skip to main content
10.1145/3555228.3555247acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Developers in focus! Developer Experience Analysis in a Collaborative Modeling Tool

Published:05 October 2022Publication History
First page image
Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Russell Beauregard, Audrey Younkin, Philip Corriveau, Rina Doherty, and Eric Salskov. 2007. Assessing the Quality of User Experience.Intel Technology Journal 11, 1 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anna E Bobkowska and Krzysztof Reszke. 2005. Usability of UML Modeling Tools.Software engineering: evolution and emerging technologies 5 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fabian Fagerholm and Jürgen Münch. 2012. Developer experience: Concept and definition. In 2012 international conference on software and system process (ICSSP). IEEE, 73–77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gliffy. 2022. Our Story Getting Gliffy With It for 15 Years. https://www.gliffy.com/about.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang, and Pekka Abrahamsson. 2017. On the unhappiness of software developers. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering. 324–333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Daniel Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang, and Pekka Abrahamsson. 2018. What happens when software developers are (un) happy. Journal of Systems and Software 140 (2018), 32–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Daniel Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, and Pekka Abrahamsson. 2013. Are happy developers more productive?. In International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement. Springer, 50–64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michaela Greiler, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Abi Noda. 2021. An Actionable Framework for Understanding and Improving Developer Experience. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marc Hassenzahl. 2018. The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product. In Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer International Publishing, 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68213-6_19Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 2003. AttrakDiff: A questionnaire to measure perceived hedonic and pragmatic quality. In Mensch & Computer, Vol. 57. 187–196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ernest R Hilgard. 1980. The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16, 2 (1980), 107–117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Susan A Jackson, Andrew J Martin, and Robert C Eklund. 2008. Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 30, 5 (2008), 561–587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kati Kuusinen. 2016. Are software developers just users of development tools? Assessing developer experience of a graphical user interface designer. In Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development. Springer, 215–233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kati Kuusinen, Helen Petrie, Fabian Fagerholm, and Tommi Mikkonen. 2016. Flow, Intrinsic Motivation, and Developer Experience in Software Engineering. In Agile Processes, in Software Engineering, and Extreme Programming, Helen Sharp and Tracy Hall (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 104–117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. James R Lewis. 2006. Usability testing. In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. Vol. 12. John Wiley, New York, 1275–1316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Audris Mockus. 2010. Organizational volatility and its effects on software defects. In Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering. 117–126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jenny Morales, Cristian Rusu, Federico Botella, and Daniela Quiñones. 2019. Programmer eXperience: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access 7(2019), 71079–71094.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Janice M Morse, Barbara J Bowers, Kathy Charmaz, Juliet Corbin, Adele E Clarke, and Phyllis Noerager Stern. 2016. Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Vol. 3. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nachiappan Nagappan, Brendan Murphy, and Victor Basili. 2008. The influence of organizational structure on software quality. In 2008 ACM/IEEE 30th International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE, 521–530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jarmo Palviainen, Terhi Kilamo, Johannes Koskinen, Janne Lautamäki, Tommi Mikkonen, and Antti Nieminen. 2015. Design framework enhancing developer experience in collaborative coding environment. In Proceedings of the 30th annual acm symposium on applied computing. 149–156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Elena Planas and Jordi Cabot. 2020. How are UML class diagrams built in practice? A usability study of two UML tools: Magicdraw and Papyrus. Computer Standards & Interfaces 67 (2020), 103363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Luis Rivero and Tayana Conte. 2017. A systematic mapping study on research contributions on UX evaluation technologies. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Richard M Ryan. 1982. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory.Journal of personality and social psychology 43, 3(1982), 450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ken Schwaber. 1997. Scrum development process. Business object design and implementation. In 10th Annual Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications Addendum to the Proceedings. ACM/SIGPLAN October. 117–134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Forrest Shull, Janice Singer, and Dag IK Sjøberg. 2007. Guide to advanced empirical software engineering. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Miguel Silva, Lígia Teixeira, Afonso Silva, Genildo Gomes, Leonardo Barreto, Bruno Gadelha, and Tayana Conte. 2022. Material Complementar - Desenvolvedores em foco! Análise da Developer Experience em uma ferramenta de modelagem colaborativa. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19795243.v5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques. (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Adam Trendowicz and Jürgen Münch. 2009. Factors influencing software development productivity–state-of-the-art and industrial experiences. Advances in computers 77(2009), 185–241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Arnold POS Vermeeren, Effie Lai-Chong Law, Virpi Roto, Marianna Obrist, Jettie Hoonhout, and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. 2010. User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Extending boundaries. 521–530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Stefan Wagner and Melanie Ruhe. 2018. A systematic review of productivity factors in software development. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06475(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Developers in focus! Developer Experience Analysis in a Collaborative Modeling Tool

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SBES '22: Proceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
            October 2022
            457 pages
            ISBN:9781450397353
            DOI:10.1145/3555228

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 October 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate147of427submissions,34%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format