Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using rock physics analysis driven feature engineering in ML-based shear slowness prediction using logs of wells from different geological setup

  • Research Article - Applied Geophysics
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shear slowness data are crucial data in rock physics analysis and seismic reservoir characterization. In petrophysical formation evaluation, the use of sonic data is limited, and hence, sonic data, especially shear sonic, are not considered as critical. In many deep-water wells to save the cost of operations, shear sonic data are not recorded. In these scenarios for rock physics analysis, it becomes necessary to predict shear sonic data from other available datasets. Conventional techniques for shear slowness predictions rely on empirical relations and rock physics modeling. However, these approaches require extensive information as input and additionally carry assumptions and multiple prerequisites. Presently with the advancement of computing power Machine learning (ML) emerges as a robust and optimized technique for predicting precise DTS in quick time and with fewer input datasets. In this study, wells located in the deep-waters of the East Coast of India and penetrated siliciclastic reservoirs of both compacted sand and soft high porosity sands were used as input to train the ML algorithm. Random Forest machine learning algorithm is best used for both classification and regression tasks, and this algorithm is used here for the data prediction. As a comparison, the convolutional LSTM method is also used for data prediction. To comply with the geological variability in the prediction and to enhance the prediction accuracy, rock physics understandings were used as a guide in feature engineering. The RF prediction shows a good match of ~ 93%, and the LSTM model prediction shows ~ 94% correlation at validation well. Both the model predicted data show good agreement with the rock physics modeling interpretations at the target well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abounaima MC, Mazouri FZE, Lamrini L, Nfissi N, Makhfi NE, Ouzarf M (2020) The Pearson correlation coefficient applied to compare multi-criteria methods: case the ranking problematic. In: 2020 1st international conference on innovative research in applied science, engineering and technology (IRASET). https://doi.org/10.1109/iraset48871.2020.9092242

  • Ahmed SA, Hussain M, Khan ZU (2022) Supervised machine learning for predicting shear sonic log (DTS) and volumes of petrophysical and elastic attributes, Kadanwari Gas Field, Pakistan. Front Earth Sci 10:919130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Ghaithi A, Prasad M (2020) Machine learning with artificial neural networks for shear log predictions in the Volve field Norwegian North Sea. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2020. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 450–454

  • Alameedy U, Alhaleem AA, Isah A, Al-Yaseri A, El-Husseiny A, Mahmoud M (2022) Predicting dynamic shear wave slowness from well logs using machine learning methods in the Mishrif Reservoir. Iraq J Appl Geophys 205:104760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anemangely M, Ramezanzadeh A, Amiri H, Hoseinpour S-A (2019) Machine learning technique for the prediction of shear wave velocity using petrophysical logs. J Petrol Sci Eng 174:306–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans Am Inst Mech Eng 146:54–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Avseth P, Mukerji T, Mavko G (2010). Quantitative seismic interpretation: applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridge university press, pp 11–13, ch 2

  • Avseth P, Mukerji T, Mavko G (2005) Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511600074

  • Azodi CB, Bolger E, McCarren A, Roantree M, de Los Campos G, Shiu SH (2019) Benchmarking parametric and machine learning models for genomic prediction of complex traits. G3 Genes Genomes Genet 9(11):3691–3702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banik R, Das P, Ray S, Biswas A (2020) Prediction of electrical energy consumption based on machine learning technique. Electr Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-020-01126-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Islam MS (2021) An efficient CNN model for automated digital handwritten digit classification. J Inf Syst Eng Bus Intell 7(1):42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon S (2015) Petrophysics: a practical guide. Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Chatterjee R, Yadav A (2020) Time lapse rock physics template and seismic quantitative analysis amid the production phase. J Appl Geophys 174:103956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Yadav A, Chatterjee R (2021a) Comprehensive rock physics, petrophysics workflow to correct sonic logs for improved seismic QI: study using wells of Krishna Godavari basin. J Appl Geophys 192:104394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Mondal S, Chatterjee R (2021b) A revised Gassmann fluid replacement model based on neutron-density logs in shaly sandstone reservoirs. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 24(04):752–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Mondal S, Chatterjee R (2022) Comprehensive workflow to quantify diagenetic cement from wireline logs of deep water east coast of India wells and rock physics modeling. J Pet Sci Eng 208:109198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Mondal S, Yadav A (2015) Rock physical diagnostic of diagenetic cement with additional input from M–N lithology Crossplot: study from wells in East coast of India. In: Conference proceedings, society of petroleum geophysicists. 11th Biennial International Conference & Exposition, Jaipur, India

  • De Cesco S, Davis JB, Brennan PE (2020) TargetDB: a target information aggregation tool and tractability predictor. PLoS ONE 15(9):e0232644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvorkin J, Nur A (1996) Elasticity of high-porosity sandstones: theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics 61(5):1363–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Géron A (2022) Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and tensor flow. O’Reilly Media, Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini Z, Gharechelou S, Mahboubi A, Moussavi-Harami R, Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi A, Zeinali M (2021) Shear wave velocity estimation utilizing statistical and multi-intelligent models from petrophysical data in a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic reservoir, SW Iran. Iran J Oil Gas Sci Technol 10(1):15–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Qiu H, Zhang H, Ben-Zion Y (2020) Using deep learning to derive shear-wave velocity models from surface-wave dispersion data. Seismol Res Lett 91(3):1738–1751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Tahmasebi P, Mao Z (2021) Deep residual U-net convolution neural networks with autoregressive strategy for fluid flow predictions in large-scale geosystems. Adv Water Resour 150:103878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy M (2015) Practical petrophysics. Elsevier, p 198

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumari P, Toshniwal D (2021) Extreme gradient boosting and deep neural network based ensemble learning approach to forecast hourly solar irradiance. J Clean Prod 279:123285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H (2017) Principles and applications of well logging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 237–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J (2009) The rock physics handbook. Cambridge University Press, pp 414–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J (2020) The rock physics handbook. Cambridge university press, pp 577–582, 603

  • Mazumder S, Tep B, Pangtey K, Mitra D (2019) Basement tectonics and shear zones in Cauvery Basin (India): implications in hydrocarbon exploration, pp 279–311

  • Mishra M, Patidar AK (2023) Post-drill geophysical characterization of two deep-water wells of Cauvery Basin, East Coast of India. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 13(1):275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal S, Yadav A, Chatterjee R (2020) Rock-physics forward modelling to predict seismic behaviour: A case study for exploration target in Mahanadi basin, East Coast of India. Geophys Prospect 68(7):2186–2194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesinos López OA, Mosqueda González BA, Montesinos López A, Crossa J (2023) Statistical machine-learning methods for genomic prediction using the SKM library. Genes 14(5):1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olayiwola T, Sanuade OA (2021) A data-driven approach to predict compressional and shear wave velocities in reservoir rocks. Petroleum 7(2):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onajite E (2021) Chapter 8: Seismic petrophysics and petrophysical well curves analysis for quantitative seismic interpretation. Applied techniques to integrated oil and gas reservoir characterization. Elsevier, pp 233–248

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov YuL (2019) Random forests. Vsp, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Porlles J, Panja P, Sorkhabi R, McLennan J (2021) Integrated porosity methods for estimation of gas-in-place in the Muerto Formation of Northwestern Peru. J Pet Sci Eng 202:108558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shandilya A, Kumar T (2013) Basement exploration in KG basin–the untouched frontier. In: 10th biennial international conference and exposition

  • Silva FGM, Beneduzi CF, Nassau GF, Rossi TB (2019) August. Using sonic log to estimate porosity and permeability in carbonates. In: 16th International congress of the brazilian geophysical society held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 19–22

  • Sundaram KM (2022) Characterizing pores and grains using logs. Developments in petroleum science, vol 76. Elsevier, pp 447–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiab D, Donaldson EC (2015) Petrophysics: theory and practice of measuring reservoir rock and fluid transport properties. Gulf professional publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Touloukian YS, Judd WR, Roy RF (1981) Physical properties of rocks and minerals. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijouyeh AG, Kadkhodaie A, Sedghi MH, Vijouyeh HG (2022) A committee machine with intelligent experts (CMIE) for estimation of fast and slow shear wave velocities utilizing petrophysical logs. Comput Geosci 165:105149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Cao J, Zhao S, Qi Q (2022) S-wave velocity inversion and prediction using a deep hybrid neural network. Sci China Earth Sci 65:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Zhou H, Huang H, Chen H, Wang L, Guo S (2020) A modified shear-wave velocity estimation method based on well-log data. J Appl Geophys 173:103932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Qu H, Chen G et al (2019) Giant discoveries of oil and gas fields in global deepwaters in the past 40 years and the prospect of exploration. J Nat Gas Geosci 4:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnggs.2019.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H (2023) Handbook of mobility data mining: volume 3: mobility data-driven applications, pp 1–228

Download references

Acknowledgements

I sincerely thank Late Prof. Rima Chatterjee without whose never-ending support and encouragement this work could never be completed. I would like to thank the Exploration Seismic Simulation laboratory, Department of Applied Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad for the technical support. Additionally, I would like to thank all of my friends who helped me in completing the work and finalizing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurabh Datta Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: NA.

Additional information

Edited by Prof. Dr. Liang Xiao (ASSOCIATE EDITOR) / Prof. Gabriela Fernández Viejo (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakraborty, S., Datta Gupta, S., Devi, V. et al. Using rock physics analysis driven feature engineering in ML-based shear slowness prediction using logs of wells from different geological setup. Acta Geophys. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01266-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01266-3

Keywords

Navigation