British Army poised to take on ‘weak’ Argentina ‘within HOURS’ of Falklands invasion

 

HUNDREDS of British troops could be deployed to the Falklands in a matter of “hours” if Argentina threatened to attack the islands, according to a former UK defence secretary.

PUBLISHED: 04:15, Sun, Apr 17, 2016 | UPDATED: 08:33, Sun, Apr 17, 2016
Academics say the country lacks the military muscle to pose a serious threat to the islandsAcademics say the country lacks the military muscle to pose a serious threat to the islands

Sir Malcolm Rifkind, who served as Defence Secretary and Foreign Secretary during the 1990s, gave an analysis of Argentina’s pitiful military prowess as he said the Falklands were better defended now than at any point since the Falklands War, which ended more than three decades ago.

He insisted islanders had little to fear from a belligerent Buenos Aires administration because Argentina’s military capability was now a “shadow of what it was in the 1980s”.

He told Express.co.uk: “The Falklands today are hugely easier to protect. Argentina from a military point of view is far weaker and at any time of increased tensions the Falklands can be reinforced in hours not in weeks by air delivery of troops and equipment and anything else that might be required.”

Analysts estimate up to 1,000 British troops could be sent to the remote South Atlantic islands within days using an “air-bridge” with Ascension Island, where the RAF has a base, which allows planes to refuel mid-way through the 20-hour flight.

Key to defending the Falklands is RAF Mount Pleasant, which was expanded during the 1980s following the conflict with Argentina.

The longer runway enabled larger jets to make the transatlantic journey, meaning more troops could be deployed at shorter notice.

The strenghened air deterrent on the islands also relieved pressure on rotating Royal Navy aircraft carriers stationed nearby in the aftermath of the 1982 conflict.

Last December’s election of Mauricio Macri heralded a thaw in relations between the UK and Argentina after years of threats and aggressive rhetoric by Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner.

But Buenos Aires has been celebrating a recent UN commission decision to expand Argentine maritime territory by a third, to include waters surrounding the Falkland Islands.

Experts believe the UK has little to fear from the current administration or Argetina’s severely diminished armed forces.

Sir Malcolm Rifkind, who served as Defence Secretary and Foreign Secretary during the 1990sSir Malcolm Rifkind served as Defence Secretary and Foreign Secretary during the 1990sRAF Mount Pleasant, which was expanded during the 1980s following the conflict with ArgentinaRAF Mount Pleasant, which was expanded during the 1980s following the conflict with Argentina

Leading academics on Argentine affairs agree the country lacks the military muscle to pose a serious threat to the islands today.

One regional expert, speaking to Express.co.uk, dismissed Argentine claims of sovereignty over the South Atlantic islands as “bluster” that would “never be followed up by any military action”.

Mark Jones, a political scientist at the US-based Baker Institute, said Argentina’s navy consisted of between 10 and 15 seaworthy ships, which were often deployed on exercise for just two weeks a year.

Port Stanley on the Falkland IslandsPort Stanley on the Falkland IslandsProtestors against British ruleLast December’s election of Mauricio Macri heralded a thaw in relations between the UK and Argentina

He recalled instances where local fishing firms had donated money to the coastguard so that they could buy fuel to go out on patrol, while the air force’s ageing fleet of Soviet-era Mirage jets were only able to fly during daylight hours and in good weather as their radar systems were now defunct.

And he said many of its land vehicles were so dilapidated that they had to be towed onto the battlefield during military drills.

Professor Klaus Dodds, a geopolitical security expert on the South Atlantic, agreed that Argentina currently posed no military threat.

But the Royal Holloway academic added there were signs that Buenos Aires planned to modernise Argentine forces.

He told Express.co.uk: “They are trying to chip away at the Falklands.

“They know the military route is out of the question, but they hope there will come a time when the British government and British public support turns and says we no longer want to spend millions of pounds keeping up our military air base.

“They are in it for the long game.”

Instead, Argentine authorities were attempting to harm trade on the islands by making “deliberate attempts to make life difficult for the Falklands in commercial terms”, threatening legal action against firms that do business with the islands.

Tourist vessels have also been harassed and attempts at developing the island’s vital fishing industry, which is largely dependant on the migratory patterns of squid and contributes as much as 60 per cent of GDP, were being hampered.

Despite instability in the Middle East, defence of the Falklands remained priority number “two or three” for the MoD, Prof Dodds added.

He said: “There are around 1,000 British personnel on the airbase at any one time and usually four Typhoon jets.

“If the men were ready to go, within a couple of days you could boost that presence with a thousand troops down there.”

Tory MP Andrew Rosindell, who has long campaigned on the importance of protecting the remote British overseas territory, told Express.co.uk: “Given recent rhetoric from Argentina, it is vital that we maintain a round-the-clock defence to ensure the protection of the Falkland Islanders.”

Original post express.co.uk

****-END-****

See related post:

Falklands ‘left with no Royal Navy protection’

US Navy buys Archerfish mine-destroying underwater drones from BAE Systems

untitled

By Henry Austin

April 16, 2016 12:46 BST

A British-made mine destroying underwater vehicle that can search and destroy the explosives at sea, has been snapped up by the US Navy. The US Department of Defense awarded a £15.5m ($22m) contract to BAE Systems to supply the Archerfish – a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) equipped with an explosive warhead to destroy sea mines.

Launched from ships, helicopters and underwater vehicles, the technology is the only mine neutralizer capable of being deployed from the air.

“It has formed a key part of the US Navy’s Airborne Mine Neutralization System (AMNS) programme since 2007,” BAE Systems said in a statement.

“This important contract demonstrates BAE Systems’ ability to deliver equipment that provides greater security and resilience to modern threats around the world,” said Product & Training Services Director Les Gregory.

The weapon is named after the Archerfish, a small creature that can shoot down insects and small animals from up to three meters away by firing jets of water from its mouth. Found in tropical countries like Australia, India and the Philippines, these fish typically live in estuaries and mangrove swamps, but they have also been found upstream in freshwater and open oceans.

Like the creature, the Archerfish ROV, which is manufactured by BAE System’s Portsmouth facility, can shoot mines from relatively long distances. Once in the water, the Archerfish enters a “hover mode” as it approaches the target, allowing it to take pictures and feed video back to the operator so they can determine the exact nature of the threat.

It can the manoeuvre itself within range of the mine and place an explosive charge, which is used to detonate the mine.

The US Navy contract includes the supply of fibre optic spools, which provide a communications link between the Archerfish and its launch platform. The US Navy mainly use MH-60S helicopters for these minesweeping missions, which are deployed from the navy’s combat ships.

Deliveries will begin in September 2017. The contract also includes further options which, if exercised by the DoD, could bring the total value to more than £39m.

@ibtimes.co.uk

****-END-****

1-lg-american-flag

U.S. Air Force plane intercepted by Russian jet in ‘unsafe’ manner

By AFP     20 mins ago in World

A US Air Force reconnaissance plane was intercepted by a Russian SU-27 jet in an “unsafe and unprofessional” manner while flying a routine route in international airspace over the Baltic Sea, the Pentagon said.

“The US aircraft was operating in international airspace and at no time crossed into Russian territory,” said Laura Seal, a Pentagon spokeswoman.

The incident comes shortly after Russian aircraft repeatedly buzzed the USS Donald Cook this past week, including an incident Tuesday in which a Russian Su-24 flew 30 feet (nine meters) above the ship in a “simulated attack profile,” according to the US military’s European Command.

Russia has denied the action was reckless or provocative.

“This unsafe and unprofessional air intercept has the potential to cause serious harm and injury to all aircrews involved,” Seal said of Thursday’s incident.

“More importantly, the unsafe and unprofessional actions of a single pilot have the potential to unnecessarily escalate tensions between countries.”

The US aircraft in question was an RC-135.

@digitaljournal.com

****-END-****

Another day another case the RC-135 is essentially a spy plane

USA if not careful might get there war soon which they will regret!

The aircraft is derived from its predecessor the C-135 Stratolifter and can execute intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) operations.

Sensors

Onboard electro-optic sensors fitted in the aircraft trace geo-located signals within the electro-magnetic spectrum and transfer the captured data to operators through secure satellite communication data link.

Performance

The RC-135 can climb at a rate of 1,490m/min. The maximum speed of the aircraft is 933km/h. The range and service ceiling are 5,550km and 15,200m respectively. The aircraft weighs around 78,743kg and its maximum take-off weight is 133,633kg. @airforce-technology.com

PHILIPPINES Unconfirmed: Islamic State Affiliated Group Claims To Have Shot Down An Army Plane

REPEAT UNCOMFIRMED

https://twitter.com/Terror_Monitor/status/721337847358160898

****-END-****

Looks like an OV-10!

KURGANETS IFV details – Video

Телеканал ЗВЕЗДА

«Курганец». Боевая амфибия № 1. Военная приемка

Google Translate

“Kurganets”. Fighting amphibious number 1. Military Acceptance

В новом выпуске мы покажем одну из самых главных и интригующих новинок российской военной техники – перспективную гусеничную платформу «Курганец». Премьерный показ этой машины впервые состоялся на параде в честь 70-летия Победы и, тем не менее, она до сих пор остаётся загадкой для широкой публики.

Google Translate

In this new release, we will show one of the most important and intriguing novelties of Russian military equipment – promising Undercarriage “Kurganets”. Premiere of this machine for the first time held a parade in honor of the 70th anniversary of the Victory and, nevertheless, it still remains a mystery to the general public. (There is no English sub)

****-END-****

See details of KURGANETS-25 IFV: HERE

S-500 Prometheus 55R6M Triumfator-M air defense missile syste

The S-500 is a new long-range anti-aircraft and anti-ballistic missile system, that is currently being developed in Russia. Development of this air defense system commenced in 2002. It is being developed by Almaz-Antey company. This system is also referred as the Prometey (Prometheus) and Triumfator-M. Prototype testing is expected to begin in 2015. The S-500 is planned to enter service at the end of this decade, possibly in 2017-2018. Russia plans to field ten battalions of S-500 missiles.

The S-500 is not an upgrade of the S-400, but a new design. It uses a lot of new technology and is superior to the S-400. It was designed to intercept ballistic missiles. It is planned to have a range of 500-600 km and hit targets at altitudes as high as 40 km. Some sources claim that this system is capable of tracking 5-20 ballistic targets and intercepting up to 5-10 ballistic targets simultaneously. It can defeat ballistic missiles travelling at 5-7 kilometers per second. It has been reported that this air defense system can also target low orbital satellites. It is planned that the S-500 will shield Moscow and the regions around it. It will replace the current A-135 anti-ballistic missile system. The S-500 missiles will be used only against the most important targets, such as intercontinental ballistic missiles, AWACS and jamming aircraft.

S-400 Triumph (SA-21 Growler): Details

Planner Announcement Date The dates of the start of serial production, receipts for armament, etc.
2010 until 2020.
02/07/2011 in 2014, the serial production of the components of the system will begin and until 2020 at least 10 S-500 divisions
April 2012 in 2014-2015. it is planned to start serial production of S-500 SAM
August-September 2013 the development will be completed in 2015, in 2017 the S-500 system can be adopted and from January 2018 the troops of the East Kazakhstan region will start receiving the S-500 systems
February 19, 2017 the prototype of the S-500 system will be ready by 2020 (Russian Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov)

Aicrovision Modelle 3D

Russian Aerospace Forces to Get State of the Art S-500 Air Defense Systems

11:10 15.04.2016 (updated 12:15 15.04.2016)

The Russian Armed Forces are reportedly planning to purchase ten S-500 battalions.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) – The Russian Aerospace Forces are expecting the appearance of new models of the S-500 air defense systems soon, Russian Aerospace Forces Vice Commander Lt.-Gen. Viktor Gumenny said Friday.

“We are expecting the first models of the S-500 air defense systems very soon,” Gumenny said on Russia’s Rossiya-24 television.

Russia’s newest S-500 Prometey system, which is expected to begin tests shortly, will be a major upgrade to the state-of-the-art S-400 complex and will, according to member of the advisory council of the Military-Industrial Commission Viktor Murakhovsky, be second to none.

Original post sputniknews.co

55K6MA and 85Zh6-2 Command Posts

The 55K6MA CP appears to be a rehosting of the baseline S-400 55K6E CP to the BAZ-69092-012 chassis, with the addition of an improved NK Orientir precision navigation system. The telescoping datalink antenna appears to cylindrical in shape. Source ausairpower.net

91N6A(M) Big Bird Acquisition and Battle Management Radar

There is insufficient detail to infer any design changes between the baseline 91N6 and the S-500 variant 91N6A(M) subtype. A BAZ-6403.01 tractor is used, also intended for future S-400 builds. The semi-trailer design has been revised and would provide better off-road handling due to the reduced surface loading of a three axle design.

96L6-TsP Acquisition Radar

The 96L6-TsP Acquisition Radar appears to be a rehosted system on the BAZ-69096 chassis. The gas turbine APU location has been changed. A telescoping datalink mast, with cylindrical antenna elements, appears to be part of this configuration. The drawing does not include the NK Orientir precision navigation system, and may be an omission.

76T6 Multimode Engagement Radar

This radar is drawn with the antenna head module of a 92N6E Grave Stone. The crew cabin is much smaller, and similar in design to that used with the 64L6E Gamma-S1E. An important design feature is the use of a telescoping datalink mast, with cylindrical antenna elements, which suggests use with widely dispersed TELs, in turn suggesting a SAM engagement capability. A reasonable inference is that this radar is a derivative of the 92N6E Grave Stone, intended to provide guidance against aerial and IRBM targets. The drawing does not include the NK Orientir precision navigation system, and may be an omission.

77T6 ABM Engagement Radar

GTRK LOTOS, Astrakhan, Russia, News YouTube

This radar is drawn with an enlarged rendering of the antenna head module of a 92N6E Grave Stone. The 10 x 10 BAZ-69096 chassis indicates the need to carry a much heavier radar than the 92N6E Grave Stone, which is consistent with the ABM radar function which requires greater power-aperture product performance compared to a SAM engagement radar. The size of the folded antenna is similar to that in the proposed  wheeled 9S19MK Imbir / High Screen ABM acquisition radar, and 9S32MK ABM engagement radar, both part of the S-300VMK system. The drawing includes the NK Orientir precision navigation system, but shows no datalink mast for dispersed TEL operation.

40V6MT Universal Mobile Mast System

The new 40V6MT replaces the legacy 40V6M/MD series. It appears to be an entirely new design with a different outrigger arrangement, and revised elevating mechanism. It is towed by a BAZ-6403.01 tractor.

77P6 Self Propelled Transporter Erector Launcher

The 77P6 is closest in appearance to the 9A82MK TEL for S-300VMK, including the use of the legacy 9A82/9A84 gantry and 9Ya238 Missile Launch Tube / Transport Container, used for the 9M82/9M82M / SA-12B/SA-23B Giant missile. Prominent differences from the 9A82MK/9A83MK are the accessory housings, which are considerably more compact, and an outrigger design common to the self-propelled S-400 9P90S TEL. The drawing shows no evidence of the CW illuminator/uplink antenna used with S-300V/VM TELARs, and does not include the NK Orientir precision navigation system, which may be an omission.

Source ausairpower.net

findpatent.ru

Missiles

77N6-N & 77N6-N1 Missiles at an Integration Rig @indiandefensenews.in

The S-500 will carry various missiles. These missiles will have various ranges and will be used against different targets. In 2009 a 40N6 long-range air defense missile was ready for testing.

40N6 Missile

screenshot-ic.pics.livejournal.com-2018.08.25-14-26-31

JSC “Concern EKR” Almaz-Antey “ 

  • The 40N6 very long range missile is capable of destroying airborne targets at ranges up to 400km (250mi). Active radar homing head. (expected in 2012) To engage targets out of sight from the ground (for homing missile can) is designed to find the target. System S -400 can hit targets at a height of 185km.

Source indiandefensenews.in

screenshot-ic.pics.livejournal.com-2018.08.25-14-27-14

JSC “Concern EKR” Almaz-Antey “

The composition of the air defense / missile defense system S-500 :

Air Defense System 55P6M
The controls of the air defense system, consisting of: 60K6
– The military command post (PBU) 55K6MA
– The radar complex (RLK) of early detection (ballistic targets) 91N6A (M) (MARS?)
– Radar complex (RLC) 96L6-1
– (optional) – advanced air defense and air defense control systems 97L6 “The Lord-TP”
– (optional) – mobile radar – all-elevated detector 96L6
– (optional) mobile tower for an antenna post 40V6MT
Missile systems, consisting of: 85Ж6-2 / 98Ж6М1
– Multifunctional radar of illumination and guidance 76T6 / 77T6
– Transport-launchers (TPU) 77P6, 55P6, 51P6M
– (optional) mobile tower for an antenna post 40V6MT
Anti-aircraft guided missiles (SAM):
– ZUR of air defense systems S-300PM1 / S-300PM2 / S-400 48N6DM
– medium-range MIR 9M96M
– long-range missiles 40H6
– long-range missile (?) 77Н6-Н and 77Н6-Н1 (?)
45Т6 (?)
Complex of technical equipment ?
Unified training complex ?

Aicrovision Modelle 3D

Some sources report, that the S-500 system can detect ballistic missile at a range of 2 000 km and warheads of ballistic missiles at a range of 1 300 km. It can defeat ballistic missiles before their warheads re-enter atmosphere.

TTX system:

55P6M
Target detection range 600-750 km / ABM up to 2000 km
Number of simultaneously tracked targets up to 500 units. (forecast, January 2017)
Targeting range – 200 km / 600 km ( historical – Mikhalev A. )
– up to 500 km ( source )
Height of target damage – aerodynamic targets up to 40-50 km
The height of defeat targets – ballistic targets up to 200 km (forecast, 2012)
Maximum target speed 7000 m / s
The deployment time of the SAM from the march 10-20 min (forecast)
Designated service life not less than 20 years

This system has brief reaction time. It has been reported that the S-500 can launch missiles within 10 minutes from travelling. Also it can be considered as a survivable system, as after launching its missiles it can briefly redeploy. In the 1980s Soviets already used this shoot, scoot and hide philosophy on the S-300V air defense system.

Echelon Middle Air Defense Line The average boundary of air defense Air Defense Long Range PRO and ultra-long interception
(option 1)
PRO and ultra-long interception
(option 2)
PRO and ultra-long interception
(option 2)
As part of the S-500 SAM possibly absent possibly absent  presumably presumably
(forecast 2012)
presumably
(forecast 2012)
presumably (forecast 2018)
The name of the SAM missile (presumably) 9M96 9M96D 48N6DM 40H6 45T6 (see the PRO system A-235 ) 77H6
Number of steps  1 1 1 2? 1 or 2 1 or 2
Length 4.75 m 5.65 m 7.5 m about 11-12 m
Case Diameter 240 mm 240 mm 519 mm
Wingspan 480 mm 480 mm 1835 mm
(1133 mm)
Weight 333 kg 420 kg 1835 kg
(1600-1900 kg)
up to 4000 kg
Vehicle weight 26 kg 26 kg 143 kg
Range of action 1-40 km 12 miles 3 – 250 km 400 km up to 600 km
Height of defeat 5 – 20,000 m 5 – 30000 m 10 – 27000 m 185 km up to 200 km
Speed ​​max. 900 m / s 1000 m / s 2500 m / s not less than 3600 m / s
Target speed max. 2780 m / s 7000 m / s ( historical – Mikhalev A. ) up to 7000 m / s

Source military-today.com/militaryrussia.ru

Images are from public domain unless otherwise stated

Main image Aicrovision Modelle 3D

Updated Nov 04, 2020

1RL257 Krasukha-4 ground-based electronic warfare system

The Krasukha-4 (Krasuha-4?) is a mobile electronic warfare (EW) system mounted onto a BAZ-6910-022 8×8 truck system. The Krasukha-4 is intended to neutralize Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) spy satellites, ground-based radars and airborne radars (AWACS) at ranges between 150 to 300 kilometers. The system is also able to cause damage to the enemy’s EW systems and communications. The Krasukha-4 system works by creating powerful jamming at the fundamental radar frequencies and other radio-emitting sources. The system is manufactured by the Bryansk Electromechanical Plant (KRET). Source deagel.com

screenshot-www.youtube.com-2018.10.03-18-04-35LEINI-TV

Sources in the Swedish government have blamed Russian intelligence for causing a major cyberattack on Sweden’s air traffic control system that lasted for at least five days in November 2015, allegedly due to Russia testing out its electronic warfare capabilities.

Between 4-9 November 2015, hundreds of domestic and international flights were grounded at multiple airports across Sweden due to its air traffic control system going offline. The attack caused the radar systems to stop working, which made the computer screens to go blank. This meant that air traffic controllers were unable to see any aircraft on their screens at all. Source ibtimes.co.uk

CqLI6hSWgAER1TU

Missilito @twitter

Наземный модуль радиоэлектронного подавления 1РЛ257Э Красуха-4 (1RL257E Krasukha-4)

1РЛ257Э Красуха-4 (1RL257E Krasukha-4)

МАКС-2015 – Комплексы ПВО, РЭБ, БПЛА и прочее (MAKS-2015 – Air defence, EW, UAV and other) | Vitaly V. Kuzmin

D7tlBNgUIAA4d5C

Sukhoi Su-57 Felon @twitter

D7tlMwZUwAAvu7r

Sukhoi Su-57 Felon @twitter

Russian_Armed_Forces_will_receive_Krasukha-4_and_Moskva-1_electronic_warfare_systems_640_001

1L266E jammer control post from 1L267 Moskva-1 system (Photo Copyright Vitaly Kuzmin)

CqLI5LZW8AE0KGy

Missilito @twitter

Russian Electronic Warfare Updates

A new and complementary jammer, the 1RL257E Krasukha-S4, is being delivered to the military this year, according to Kret. It is an X-band system designed for use against tactical airborne radars and AGS systems. Both Krasukha systems can operate independently, but are mainly intended to work as part of a multiplatform electronic attack force, with multiple, widely separated jammer locations used to increase the chances of jamming through a target’s main beam. Source w54.biz

screenshot-www.youtube.com-2018.10.03-18-01-27LEINI-TV

The Krasukha-4 is mounted on a chassis of the KAMAZ-6350 four-axle heavy truck. The limit of the work in azimuth is 360 degrees; the limit of the work in angle of site is from -1 to +85 degrees.

The electronic warfare system has the following traffic handling capacity: one radar system of a satellite vehicle and one Northrop Grumman E-8 Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (E-8 JSTARS) or eleven radar systems of tactical reconnaissance aircraft.

The radius of the zone of coverage during suppression of radar systems of tactical reconnaissance aircraft is 11-19 km, of target-acquisition and fire-control systems – 16-41 km, of satellite vehicles – 15-25 km. The deployment time is up to 20 minutes. Source southfront.org

1858009_original

Joint Air to Ground Missile (JAGM)

China’s PLAN Received about 200 Kh-59MK Anti-Ship Missiles for Su-30MK2 by end-2015

Navy_Recognition_website_online_magazine_Naval_Martitime_defense_equipment_industry_logo_125x125_001

Monday, 21 March 2016

China had received about 200 Kh-59MK (NATO reporting name: AS-13 Kingbolt) anti-ship missiles (ASM) by end-2015, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute`s (SIPRI) arms trasnfer database.

A Kh-59MK2 test round is launched from a Su-30MK Flanker G. KnAAPO picture.

The deliveries of Russian Kh-59MK missiles intended for Chinese Su-30MK2 (Flanker-G) multirole fighters started in 2008. As of end-late, China got about 200 Kh-59MKs. SIPRI emphasizes, that Chinese Armed Forces may have received both Kh-59MK and Kh-59MK2 modifications of the missile.

Kh-59MK is an anti-ship missile developed by the Tactical Missiles Corporation (Russian acronym: KTRV) for Su-30 Sukhoi fighters. It has a maximum flight range of 285 km, a maximum speeed of 0,9M, and a warhead weight of 320 kg. It is equipped with ARGS-59 active radar-homing seeker.

Kh-59MK2 air-to-surface missile is a modification of Kh-59MK intended for destruction of static targets at distances up to 285 km. It can be equipped with either penetrating (320 kg) or pellet (285 kg) warhead.

The Su-30MK2 is a variant of the Su-30 designed for dedicated use as a maritime strike aircraft, thus these aircraft ordered by China are currently being operated by the PLAN Naval Air Force.

@navyrecognition.com

****-END-****

Kh-59MK2 – Land attack variant of Kh-59MK (fire-and-forget).

The Kh-59MK airborne enhanced-range air-to-surface guided missile with the ARGS-59E active radar homing head is derived from the Kh-59ME missile with the TV/command guidance system. It is designed for engagement of a wide range of radar-contrast sea surface targets in both fair and adverse weather conditions at Sea States up to 6.

The missile makes part of weapon systems of the Su-30 type aircraft.

The ASK autometed testing system, making part of the OKA system, is modified for testing the Kh-59MK missiles during their scheduled servicing. The SNO-106MA ground support equipment is used for missiles’ maintenance in technical positions, their shipping and storage in arsenals and depots, scheduled servicing, testing, and transfer for suspension under carrier aircraft.

Chinese Su-30MK2 (Flanker-G) multirole fighters

Developer and manufacturer: “Raduga” State Machine-Building Design Bureau

 Max launch range, km:

 

 against destroyer/cruiser-type targets  285
 against boat-type targets  145
 Min launch range, km  5-25
 Missile launch envelope:
 carrier speed at launch, km/h
 (Mach number)  600-1,000 (0,5-0,9)
 carrier altitude, km  0,2-11
 Missile flight speed, km/h  900-1,050
 Missile flight altitude, m:
 en route (over sea surface)  10-15
 at terminal area  4-7
 Missile launch weight, kg  not exceeding 930
 Warhead type  penetrator
 Warhead weight, kg  320
 Missile dimensions, m:
 length  5,7
 diameter, main body
 (without engine)/nose section  0,38/0,42
 wing span  1,3

@ktrv.ruFlag_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China_svg

US Navy Ship Encounters Aggressive Russian Aircraft in Baltic Sea – with video

Story Number: NNS160413-20 Release Date: 4/13/2016 3:48:00 PM

By Headquarters, United States European Command

STUTTGART, Germany (NNS) — A United States Navy destroyer operating in international waters in the Baltic Sea experienced several close interactions by Russian aircraft on April 11 and 12.

USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) encountered multiple, aggressive flight maneuvers by Russian aircraft that were performed within close proximity of the ship.

On April 11, Donald Cook was conducting deck landing drills with an allied military helicopter when two Russian SU-24 jets made numerous close-range and low altitude passes at approximately 3 p.m. local. One of the passes, which occurred while the allied helicopter was refueling on the deck of Donald Cook, was deemed unsafe by the ship’s commanding officer. As a safety precaution, flight operations were suspended until the SU-24s departed the area.

On April 12, while Donald Cook was operating in international waters in the Baltic Sea, a Russian KA-27 Helix helicopter conducted circles at low altitude around the ship, seven in total, at approximately 5 p.m. local. The helicopter passes were also deemed unsafe and unprofessional by the ship’s commanding officer. About 40 minutes following the interaction with the Russian helicopter, two Russian SU-24 jets made numerous close-range and low altitude passes, 11 in total. The Russian aircraft flew in a simulated attack profile and failed to respond to repeated safety advisories in both English and Russian. USS Donald Cook’s commanding officer deemed several of these maneuvers as unsafe and unprofessional.

Quotes:

“April 11-12, USS Donald Cook was operating in a professional manner in international waters conducting operations and exercises with our allies in the Baltic Sea.”

“In my judgement these maneuvers in close proximity to Donald Cook are unprofessional and unsafe.”

-Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa, Adm. Mark Ferguson

Quick Facts:

We have deep concerns about the unsafe and unprofessional Russian flight maneuvers. These actions have the potential to unnecessarily escalate tensions between countries, and could result in a miscalculation or accident that could cause serious injury or death.

U.S. officials are using existing diplomatic channels to address the interactions while the incidents are also being reviewed through U.S. Navy channels.

For more news from Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe and Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet, visit www.navy.mil/local/naveur/.

@navy.mil

****-END-****

What do you expect sending a warship into there front yard while subjecting Russia to US selective sanctions!

Su-24

The Su-24 remains a powerful long-range, low-level strike attack aircraft with real all-weather precision attack capability. With its variable geometry swing wing and side-by-side cockpit, the Su-24 is inevitably compared with the US General Dynamics F-111. The aircraft was never intended or used as a strategic bomber, however, a fact obscured by such comparisons. The Su-24 is more broadly equivalent to the Anglo-German-Italian Tornado.

Entered service 1973
Crew 2 men
Dimensions and weight
Length 22.59 m
Wing span 17.64 m spread, 10.37 m swept
Height 6.19 m
Weight (empty) 22.3 t
Weight (maximum take off) 36 t
Engines and performance
Engines 2 x Perm / Sploviev AL-21F-3A turbojets
Traction (with afterburning) 2 x 109.83 kN
Maximum speed 1 320 km/h
Service ceiling 17 km
Combat radius 560 – 1 250 km
Ferry range 2 775 km
Armament
Cannon 1 x 23-mm cannon
Missiles Kh-23, Kh-25ML, Kh-29L/T, Kh-59 Ovod air-to-surface missiles; Kh-25MP, Kh-31P, Kh-29MP and Kh-58 anti-radar missiles; Kh-31A, Kh-35 anti-ship missiles, R-60 air-to-air missiles
Bombs TN-1000 and TN-1200 free-fall nuclear weapons, KAB-500Kr laser guided bombs

@military-today.com

Kamov Ka-27 Helix

Kamov Ka-27PL ‘Helix-A’
Entered service 1982
Crew 3 men
Dimensions and weight
Length 11.27 m
Main rotor diameter 15.9 m
Height 5.45 m
Weight (empty) 6.1 t
Weight (maximum take off) 12.6 t
Engines and performance
Engines 2 x Klimov TV3-117V turboshaft engines
Engine power 2 x 2 190 hp
Maximum speed 250 km/h
Cruising speed 230 km/h
Service ceiling 5 km
Range 800 km
Payload
Maximum payload 5 t
Typical load ?
Armament
Torpedoes 4 x APR-2E homing torpedoes
Bombs 4 x groups of S3V guided anti-submarine bombs in place of torpedoes

@military-today.com