Letters to the Editor
Preg. Theor. Phys. Vol. 36 (1966), No. 6
1301
total cross section of -n:--p larger than -n:+-p.
iii) The impact parameter approximation
holds:
On Pion-Nucleon Scattering at
High Energies
b~./zCZ+1)Ik
i:.+'),kr~ab
t-o
Jo
and
where k is momentum in the center-of-mass
system and t is square of four-momentum
transfer. The spin flip amplitude is written
in terms of the spin flip partial wave amplitude v(b) as
Department of Physics
Nagoya University, Nagoya
*Department of Physics
Kyusyu University, Fukuoka
September 26, 1966
On the basis of an analysis of polarization (incident pion momentum Pz=1.7~25
GeVIc in laboratory system) it was reported in a previous noten that the imagi-_
nary part of spin flip partial.wave amplitude
Im 11- (b) of -n:~
p elastic scattering is negative in the range ·of the impact parameter
b = (1-2) X 10-13cm, independently of the
incident energy.. We noted in I that this
behaviour of Imv-(b) may be closely· connected with interactions responsible for construction of baryon resonances.
In tl;le present note the analysis is extended to (1) the higher energy region Pz
= 6~
10 GeVIc where several new polarizaticm measurements 2l .have been made and to
(2) the differential cross section for the
charge, exchange process (-n:~p+°)
in
the energy region 3"""" 18 GeVIc. aJ Assumptions taken here are:
i) The -n:--p elastic amplitude f-=-o-+
onh- is dominated by spin :qon-flip term uin the forward region.
ii) The ratios a=Re.giimg and fl=Reh/
Im h are constant in ·the forward ·region for
the .11:-- p elastic and charge exchange processes respectively. The spin non-flip amplitudes for the -n:-- p elastic and charge
~s 0- =
exchange processes can be e~prsd
k(a-+i) [(da-/dt)t=o expCr-t)l(1+anJ 1121
..../7! and n•=k(ac---:i) [(da,.l dt)t=o exp(r.t)l
2 1'\ln
(l+a~)1
respectively. Here r-and
r. are parameters. The sign of Im Oc can
be determined as negative because of the
h(t) = (kl2) ~v(b)J1
(b.../ -t)bdb.
iv) The following two types are assumed
for v(b):
(I)
11 (b)
= Ab for OS:.bS:.R and 0 for
R<b,
(II)
v(b) = Ab" exp( -b 2IR 2 ),
(n=1, 3 or 5),
where A is a complex and R is a real
parameter.·
The cross section and. the polarization of
11:-- p elastic process are written by
'
and
P-(t) =2..../-;;[(l+a-fl-)l..../1+an
xim h-ICkvda~lt).
The quantity [(1+a~fl-)
oqtained from the experimenta] polarization in the forward direction
(lti<0.8(GeV/c) 2 ) is ~hown
in Fig. 1.
In Fig. 2, ..../i+;B' Imv.(b) is snown
which .is obtained from the ·spin flip part
of · the charge exchange ·cross secti~n
(da.ldt),, .. 'n;,=da.ldt-(da./dt)t=o e~p(r.t)
The value of r. has to be taken larger than
~6
( GeVI p) - 2 to satisfy the above equation.
Hatched regions in Figs. 1 and 2 come mainly
from uncertainties of the experimental data
and of r. respectively. Though the sign
respectively.
./1+a~]Imv-(b)
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article-abstract/36/6/1301/1821774 by guest on 11 June 2020
Katsuya HASEBE, Hiroyuki KANADA,
Shoichiro 0TSUKI,* Shoji SAWADA
and Masaru Y ASUNO
1302
0.05
Letters to the Editor
[(l+a_4l// l+a!] Im u.. (b)
Imv-(b) at a few GeV/c and decrease as
energy increases.
0.15
0.05
0
-0.05
-0.10
0.15
-0.15
Fig. 3. Energy dependence of Im 1J1 (b) and
ImtJa(b) at b=0.9xl0- 13 cm for case
II with n=3.
Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. Shown for tJ(b). for case II
with n=3. Similar results are obtained
for the other cases.
of Im lie (b) cannot be determined by cross
section only, we assume tentatively that it
is positive as is expected from the reason
mentioned in I.
To obtain the amplitude of definite isospin
state, i.e. Imv3(b)=Im{v-(b)+'\1"2vc(b)}
and Imvl(b)=Im{v-(b)-vc(b)/'\1"2} -for
I= 3/2 and I= 1/2 respectively, it is necessary to determine the values of «-, 8c and
8-- We take «-= -0.3 which is consistent
with experiment. Though we have no
knowledge of 8c and 8- at present, if we
restrict them by 18c I ::::::;1 and 18-1 ::::::;1, we
can obtain the values of lm /13 (b) and
lm 111 (b) rather restrictively. In case II
with n = 3 for 11 (b) the Im /13 (b) and
lm 111 (b) have maximum and minimum
values at b = 0.9 X 10-13 em respectively.
These values, which are shown in Fig. 3,
are relatively large compared with that of
In the forward direction the experimental
polarization seems to be nearly energy independent through the energy range 1.7 to 10
GeV /c. If this behaviour remains up to
20GeV/c, the value of Imv3(b) becomes
approximately zero at about 20 GeV /c.
From the above argument we expect that
1) the polarization of n+-.p elastic scattering in the forward direction is large positive
at a few GeVIc and diminish as the energy
increases and 2) the polarization of charge
exchange process is negative. The polarization measurements which test the above
results will play a significant role in understanding the interactive force between pion
and nucleon which is responsible for the
mass spectrum of nucleon isobars.n• 4 ) _More
details of our results will be reported elsewhere.
1)
2)
3)
K. Hasebe, S. Hayakawa, H. Kanada, S.
Otsuki and M. Y asuno, Prog. Theor. ·Phys.
35 (1966), 755, referred to ·as I.
In this note the same notation is as in I
used. The suffices - and c indicate 11:--p
elastic and charge exchange proces~,
respectively.
M. Borghini et al., Phys. Letters 21 (1966),
114.
P. Sonderegger et al., Phys. Letters 20
(1966), 75.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article-abstract/36/6/1301/1821774 by guest on 11 June 2020
0.10
Letters to the Editor
4)
1303
T. F. Kycia and K. F. Riley, Phys. Rev.
LetterslO (1963), 266.
S. Otsuki and S. Sawada, Prog. Theor. Phys.
36 (1966), 666.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article-abstract/36/6/1301/1821774 by guest on 11 June 2020
Note added hi proof: After this note was
completed, the authors had the opportunity to
learn the prelimimtry results of the data on the
polarization of w:•- p .and charge exchange processes reported in the ·High Energy Conference
held at Berkeley (Aug. 1966). In both processes
polarizations are positive in the forward direction. The former agrees well with ours and
the latter suggests that the case IfJcl ?:;1 has to
be treated.