Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
Advertisement

After a smooth take-off, big business and Albanese have hit turbulence

Cost-of-living pressures, plus more corporate scandals, are straining relations between companies and Canberra. From AFR Magazine’s Power issue.

James ThomsonColumnist

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

It’s not just Qantas customers and shareholders who will be left counting the cost of the airline’s descent into scandal. The disenchantment with the company across Canberra and the community is yet another hit to the corporate sector’s political and social capital, threatening to derail the business lobby’s calls for economic reform at exactly the wrong time.

Just three years on from the start of the pandemic, the Team Australia partnership between business and government has fallen apart under the pressure of a cost-of-living crisis, stalled productivity growth and Labor governments Australia-wide intent on tapping business to pay down ballooning debt piles. But it is misconduct that has put some of Australia’s biggest companies on the front page – and on the lips of politicians.

Qantas’ privileged position and its dominance of Australian aviation mean it has become a particular flashpoint for community anger. Edwina Pickles

The consumer watchdog’s case against Qantas, alleging the airline sold tickets on 8000 flights it had already cancelled, followed swiftly by the High Court’s ruling that the airline broke the law when it laid off staff in the pandemic, are the latest in a long string of scandals. That string stretches from the banking royal commission and Rio Tinto’s Juukan Gorge tragedy to the regulatory firestorms surrounding Crown Resorts and Star Entertainment, and then PwC’s outrageous tax leaks scandal.

But Qantas’ privileged position and its dominance of the Australian aviation sector mean it has become a particular flashpoint for community anger. There are few Australians who haven’t had a bad experience with Qantas in the past 12 months, or know someone who has.

The Australian Financial Review’s senior editors and journalists, meeting in mid-August, had ranked Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce as Australia’s fifth most powerful business person. The panel saw Qantas’ successful lobbying of the government to block an attempt by Qatar Airways to expand its Australian business as an example of the raw political power wielded by Joyce and the airline.

Joyce’s farewell tour seemed unstoppable: Qantas chairman Richard Goyder was defending his CEO’s strategy to return the airline to record profitability, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was happy to appear next to Joyce at an event to support the Yes vote in the Voice referendum.

Alan Joyce and Anthony Albanese at a Yes campaign event at Sydney Airport last month. Louie Douvis

How things have changed. The government is scrambling to distance itself from Qantas and defend its own credibility over the Qatar decision. The airline is unlikely to get the same hearing in Canberra again, and the government will be wary of siding with a scandal-plagued corporate sector in a hurry. Having brought forward his retirement, Joyce was dropped from our corporate power list, making space for Phil King in 10th spot.

There is some irony in all this, given there is real admiration among many business leaders for the Albanese government’s willingness to listen and work with the corporate sector. On foreign affairs, for example, efforts to reset Australia’s vexed relationship with China have been greatly appreciated, as has Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s work across the Pacific.

Advertisement

The compact with the United States that in effect recognises Australia as a favoured supplier of critical minerals has been widely lauded. On climate change, there has even been strong support for the government’s safeguard mechanism across the business sector, including among heavy carbon emitters. The corporate sector, after all, has long pushed for a carbon trading scheme.

The Coalition, by comparison, often seems at odds with big business, as Opposition Leader Peter Dutton criticises the corporate sector for being “woke”, particularly over its support for the Yes campaign.

But now business is under attack from all sides. Rising interest rates and surging inflation had already created a febrile atmosphere, but this has been heightened by the scandals at Qantas and PwC. The way the PwC episode has morphed from a relatively technical tax matter into a mainstream story underscores how sensitive the public is to any hint that big business has used its connections, size and scale to feather its own nest.

Anthony Albanese speaks at the Business Council of Australia 2023 dinner in Sydney last month. Wolter Peeters

The Senate’s cost-of-living inquiry, which Joyce appeared at just a week before his departure, looms as a new stalking horse for politicians seeking to paint businesses as the villains whose fat, post-COVID profits should be tapped to help ease the pain of taxpayers and debt-laden governments. Indeed, there was already a distinct “us against them” feel to the Queensland government’s decision to lift coal royalties last year, the NSW government’s similar move this month, and the Victorian government’s decision in May to lift payroll taxes.

The federal government’s decision not to extend the contract of Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe – a move broadly criticised inside corporate Australia – can be read through a similar lens. The huge jump in interest rates since May last year had to be someone’s fault; the Albanese government decided to make Lowe that someone.

Ironically, Qantas announced its record $2.5 billion profit late last month, in the evening after the Business Council of Australia hosted Albanese at its annual dinner. There, president Tim Reed gently pressed the lobby group’s case for productivity and tax reform, and pushed back against the government’s industrial relations changes, which are despised by most in the corporate sector.

With The Australian Financial Review Magazine’s overt power list notably devoid of business people, the duo most likely to prosecute the case for reform are Commonwealth Bank CEO Matt Comyn and BHP boss Mike Henry. The Financial Review panel struggled to separate the pair when deciding who belongs at the top of the corporate power list; Henry has been the leading business voice against Labor’s industrial relations reform and has become a proponent of gender equality.

Mike Cannon-Brookes has taken a lower profile in corporate circles this year. Flavio Brancaleone

Comyn, unlike Joyce, largely sidestepped criticism over a $10.2 billion profit and has cemented his position as a thoughtful contributor on everything from housing affordability and economic reform to climate change and generational inequality. In the ultimate view of the panel, the sheer size of CBA’s consumer-facing business lifted Comyn to the top of the business power list.

Another notable mover is Mike Cannon-Brookes, who slides from second position on last year’s business power list to ninth. The technology billionaire remains a powerful start-up investor and vocal proponent of renewable energy. But his victory in last year’s AGL Energy boardroom battle has allowed him to take a lower profile in corporate circles this year.

The AFR Magazine annual Power issue is out Friday, September 29, inside The Australian Financial Review. Follow AFR Mag on Twitter and Instagram.

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

James Thomson
James ThomsonColumnistJames Thomson is senior Chanticleer columnist based in Melbourne. He was the Companies editor and editor of BRW Magazine. Connect with James on Twitter. Email James at j.thomson@afr.com

Latest In Financial services

Fetching latest articles