Quality Assessment of Friction Stir Welded Joints – Using the Fundamental Anti-Symmetric Lamb Wave Mode

Article Preview

Abstract:

Having a robust non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technique for friction stir welded (FSWed) joints is of interest to the processing community. Such a technique has to be sensitive to the different types and shapes of internal weld defects and has to be applicable for both similar and dissimilar material FSW joints. Investigated was the ability of ultrasonic guided waves to detect and assess the quality of FSW joints. The fundamental anti-symmetric (A0) mode was selected to detect the flaws in FSW joints. Guided waves were excited (using PZT wafers) and received (using a laser Doppler vibrometer, LDV). Implemented was the frequency-wavenumber filtering technique to separate forward propagating wave from any back propagating reflected wave due to the welded joint. Identified was the reflection of the A0 mode caused by the presence of the interface and/or defects within the joint. The findings indicate little sensitivity to the presence of material interface suggesting this technique to have a promising potential among guided-wave-based techniques in the qualitative and quantitative assessment of FSW joints.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2429-2434

Citation:

Online since:

December 2018

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Thomas, W., et al., Friction stir welding. International patent application no. PCT/GB92102203 and Great Britain patent application, 9125978.8 (1991).

Google Scholar

[2] Mishra, R. S., Ma, Z. J., Friction stir welding and processing, Materials Science and Engineering, R 50 (2005) 1-78.

Google Scholar

[3] Podržaj, P., Jerman, B., and Klobčar, D., Welding defects at friction stir welding. Metalurgija, 54(2) (2015) 387-389.

Google Scholar

[4] Ranjan, R., et al., Classification and identification of surface defects in friction stir welding: An image processing approach. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 22(2016) 237-253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.009

Google Scholar

[5] Senyurek, V.Y., Detection of cuts and impact damage at the aircraft wing slat by using Lamb wave method. Measurement, 67(2015) 10-23.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.007

Google Scholar

[6] Mariani, S., et al., Noncontact ultrasonic guided wave inspection of rails. Structural Health Monitoring, 12(5-6) (2013) 539–548.

DOI: 10.1177/1475921713498533

Google Scholar

[7] Abilasha Ramadhas, T. K., et al., Imaging of Defects in Hexcan Welds Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves and Phased Array Techniques, Proceedings of the National Seminar & Exhibition on Non-Destructive Evaluation NDE 2009, December 10-12, 2009, India.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Liu, G. Xu, X. Gu, G. Zhou, Ultrasonic test of resistance spot welds based on wavelet package analysis, Ultrasonics 56 (2015) 557–565.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.10.013

Google Scholar

[9] J. Santos, M. Santos, Lamb waves technique applied to the characterization of defects in friction stir welding of aluminum plates: comparison with Xray and ultrasonic C-scan, J. Testing Evaluation 38 (2010) 1–6.

DOI: 10.1520/jte102397

Google Scholar

[10] M. Tabatabaeipour, J. Hettler, S. Delrue, K. Van Den Abeele, Non-destructive ultrasonic examination of root defects in friction stir welded butt-joints, NDT & E Int. 80 (2016) 23–34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.02.007

Google Scholar

[11] J Tarraf, et al., Application of Ultrasonic Waves Towards the Inspection of Similar and Dissimilar Friction Stir Welded Joints, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 255(2018) 570-583.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.006

Google Scholar

[12] Fakih, R., Detection and assessment of flaws in friction stir welded joints using ultrasonic guided waves: experimental and finite element analysis, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 101, (2018) 516-53.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.003

Google Scholar

[13] M. S. Harb and F.-G. Yuan, Damage imaging using non-contact air-coupled transducer/laser Doppler vibrometer system,, Structural Health Monitoring, 15(2) (2016) 193-203.

DOI: 10.1177/1475921716636336

Google Scholar