ML13227A320

Energ 

NUCLEAR INTELLIGENCE WEEKLY 

Incorporating Uranium Intelligence Weekly 

Copyright © 2011 EIG. Unauthorited access or electronic forwarding, even for internal use, is prohibited. Vol. V. No. IS. April 11.2011 

UPR $58.33/lb U308 

f $68.71 N7.30 

$M2 $59.88 $58.62 ss&33 

$60 

$484 $49,80 

317 3M14 Y/21 3w28 4/4 4/11 

NIVV Assessment 

Market Points 

The uranium spot price weakened again last 

week, but at least one researcher is betting it 

will firm up and hit $80/lb U308 by September. 

Several market participants at a conference in 

Chicago last week worried Fukushima could 

hit supply harder than demand, leaving miners 

unable to develop new assets, even as countries 

including China and India build more reactors. 

While a few financial players have been unloading 

uranium as fast as they can in the wake of the 

Fukushima disaster, some traditional market 

participants have seen weakened prices as a 

buying opportunity. 

IWEEKLY ROUNDUP 

Fukushima - A PR Problem 

Soon to Fade From Public Attention? 

" Conferees in Chicago were glued to television sets last week when another 

earthquake struck Japan. But inside the conference halls they agreed that 

while the Fukushima disaster is a blow, it is mainly a PR problem that will 

fade relatively quickly (p3). 

• One month after an earthquake and tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi 

plant, Japan's government said it was expanding the evacuation zone 

around the crippled facility beyond the current 20 kilometer (12 mile) 

radius. The new zone will encompass five communities beyond that limit 

following new data about accumulated radiation levels. Top government 

spokesman Yukio Edano said the new evacuations would take place over 

the coming month, from areas including litate village, which lies 40 km 

from the power station, and part of the city of Kawamata. "This is not an 

emergency measure that people have to evacuate immediately," he told a 

news conference, but added that there were concerns about long-term 

health risks. Meanwhile, Tepco President Masataka Shimizu was refused 

for the second time a meeting with the governor of Fukushima, Yuhei Sato, 

while visiting the capital of the hard-struck prefecture Monday, a Tepco 

spokesman said, according to Bloomberg. The governor also declined a 

meeting with Shimizu Mar. 22. And yesterday protesters marched in Tokyo 

as public anger over the utility's response to the crisis grows. 

" US Nuclear Regulatory Commission warnings late last month about 

"mounting stress" on the containments of the four stricken Fukushima reactors 

proved prescient when a second high-intensity quake struck last week. 

With an estimated 50,000 tons of water pumped, sprayed and dropped into 

the reactors, concerns about structural integrity mounted (p4). 

Contents 

Fukushima as PR Problem 

Two Further Quakes in Japan 

Tepco's Sea Dumping 

Mandatory Global Safety Rules? 

Eastern Europe Undeterred 

Kazakhstan Puts Brakes On 

Extracts Husab Outlook 

Brief Roundup 

Uranium Market Update Table 

3 

4 

5 

7 

8 

9 

II 

12 

13 

" South Korea, Russia and possibly China issued complaints about Tepco's 

intentional release of more than 11,000 tons of radioactive waste-water into 

the Pacific (pS). 

" Despite a host of international conventions and organizations set up in the 

wake of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, most experts agree there is need 

for a credible international nuclear safety regime. But how to tackle that 

issue is another matter (p7). 

" Eastern Europe's reactor projects could be shelved temporarily, and a few 

could be permanently laid to rest - but that's not the way officials in the 

region are talking (p8). 

" A shift in thinking in Astana over Kazakhstan's natural resources may lead 

to the regulation of uranium production as a key "strategic resource" to be 

conserved for future generations, sources tell NIW (p9). 

" Extract Resources says its Husab uranium project will average production of 

some 15 million lbs U308 per year, while costing some $1.66 billion (pl 1). 0 

CE 712 of 1220

MARKET 

UPP Price Continues to Dnft Downward 

The Uranium Price Panel reported a spot price of $58.33 per 

pound U308 for Friday, down slightly from the $58.62/lb 

U308 it returned a week earlier. Since its sharp drop and 

rebound in the wake of Fukushima, the price has been drifting 

slowly downward. 

Still, Australian independent researcher and fund manager 

Fat Prophets is predicting the spot price will hit $80/lb U308 by 

September. "Our view is that the full impact to global uranium 

demand won't be known until Japan's nuclear crisis draws to a 

close. However, we believe that on balance the events in Japan 

are not going to force a meaningful change in the world's 

march toward greater reliance on nuclear energy," said 

Managing Director Greg Smith. 

Fat Prophets actually has a fairly good track record with the uranium 

market: In September, when the spot price was still stuck in 

the mid-$40s, the Australian firm predicted a price of $60/lb U308 

by Christmas and $ 100/lb U308 by September 2011. The UPP price 

going into the Christmas holiday was $60.91/lb U308. Fat Prophets 

has scaled back that $100 prediction since Fukushima, but may still 

prove correct with its revised prediction. 

"We would expect the various countries with significant 

nuclear development plans, including the US and China, to conduct 

a plant design review based on the Japanese experience," 

Smith said in his note. 'This would temporarily stall development 

plans, but not significantly change the longer-term growth of 

nuclear energy4 The current sell-off across the uranium sector will 

prove to be a wholesale buying opportunity if this is the case." 

Indeed, several traditional market participants - including utility 

buyers - at the conference in Chicago mocked financial players for 

thinking short-term and dumping uranium after Fukushima. That 

may have been a reference to Deutsche Bank's 100,000 lb U308 

sales in recent weeks, of which NIW has learned of at least two. 

Some market participants with longer planning horizons 

have been doing what they can to buy at relatively low, post- 

Fukushima prices. A trader said some utilities were frustrated 

when they tried to buy at discount prices the week after the 

earthquake and tsunami hit Fukushima and found supply was 

so thin they couldn't get any substantial quantities. 

However, it seems not all utilities have been tempted. After 

all, many of them foresaw the price run-up in late 2010 that took 

the UPP price above $72/lb U308 and bought what they needed 

earlier that year while the price was still in the $40s. Now, 

despite the post-Fukushima drop, the price is still far above that 

level. "We're not interested in anything at this kind of price," a 

utility buyer said. "We built up inventories last year." 

Long Term 

At the World Nuclear Fuel Cycle Conference in Chicago 

last week, one of the major themes was that Fukushima might 

hit supply harder than demand. It's the financial players, after 

all, who have been spooked the most by events in Japan, while 

traditional nuclear and uranium-market players, who take a 

longer view, have been less shaken. That could mean government-backed 

newbuild programs will continue, while privately 

financed uranium projects stall because they can't get skittish 

investors on board, contributing to a supply gap down the road. 

A producer tells NIW he met with a couple of US utilities at 

the, conference who were moving up their long-term procurement 

plans. "I'm not sure whether it was because of concerns about 

future supply," or simply bargain-hunting, the producer said. 

While most market participants expect Germany to ditch the 

nuclear plant life-extension plan Chancellor Angela Merkel pushed 

through last year, at least two RFPs from German nuclear utilities 

for long-term supply are apparently still on the market. Apparently, 

they're not yet convinced that the life-extension deal is dead. 

Also at the Chicago conference, an Areva executive said he'd 

been seeing declining inventories at his company's Comhurex 

conversion plant in France. "We've seen a shift from large inventories 

to production-challenging inventories" of about one year's 

operational supply, Vice President for Front-End Marketing George 

Capus said last week. The relatively low level of inventory makes 

it difficult for Comhurex to blend uranium from different sources 

to produce top-quality UF6, he said. 4 

Sam Tranum, Washington and Phil Chaffee, London 

straasum@energyintel.com; pchaffee@energyintel.com 

I URNU PRC PANE 

For the week ended April 8a 2011 

Wed Spot M urW Prime 

- Apr.-- Mar. Feb. Jan. 

Chane II 4 28 21 14 7 28 22 14 7 31 24 17 

Price ($Sb U308) -0.29 58.33 58.62 59.88 49.80 6730 66671 67.38 67.70 71241 7248 69.54 6&18 66)00 

Total Assessments -1.00 13.00 14.00 11.00 15.00 14.00 15.00 15.00 14.00 16.00 14.00 18.00 15.00 16.00 

%within I StDev 20.88 92.31 71.43 81.82 53.33 92.86 86.67 93.33 85.71 87.50 92.86 83.33 86.67 75.00 

Low ($/Ib U308) 0.00 58.00 58.00 56.00 49.00 66.00 64.50 66.00 65.00 71.50 72.00 68.00 66.00 65.00 

High ($11b U308) -1.00 59.00 60.00 62.00 51.00 68.00 68.00 68.00 70.00 74.00 73,00 72.00 70.00 67.50 

Variability* 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.20 0.05 0.17 0.21 0.20 0.29 0.00 0.75 0.89 0.50 

The Uranium Price Panel (UPP) represents the average price assessment reported by active spot market participants for a transaction of 100.000 lbs of U308 by book transfer on 

the date given. In the UPP. participants are assigned a market position of seller, buyer or intermediate. Each week Energy Intelligence eliminates assessments that are statistical outliers, 

and double-checks the market position of intermediates. It then uses random elmination to maintain an equal number of buyer and seller assessments in the final average. -Variability" 

represents the absolute range of conceivable final averages resulting from this random elimination. "High" and "Low" assessments represent the extremes of the non-eliminated market 

assessments. For a detailed explanation of the price panel methodology, see www.enefgyintel.com. 

Page 2 NIW April 11./2011 www.energyintel.com 

CE 713 of 1220

j FUKUSHIMA 

Nuclear's Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill? 

When nuclear insiders gathered in a hotel in Chicago last week 

for the annual World Nuclear Fuel Cycle conference, presentations 

and hallway conversations predictably returned again and 

again to events in Japan and how they will affect the industry. 

The consensus: Fukushima is a major blow, and it will hurt, 

but it is mostly a public relations problem that will fade relatively 

quickly because of the public's short attention span and 

the practical realities of trying to power the world economy. 

Remember, a year ago a blowout and fire occurred at the 

Deepwater Horizon platform and oil started gushing into the 

Gulf of Mexico. The mass media covered the disaster breathlessly, 

the public howled with outrage and the politicians called 

for reform. There were predictions that the oil industry would 

be changed for ever, and the futures of BP in particular, and 

deepwater drilling in general, were called into question. 

Environmental activists argued deepwater drilling was inherently 

too risky, and that the practice should no longer be allowed. 

But, after three months, the well was plugged, the news 

cycle turned and the public lost interest. Environmental and 

anti-oil groups soldiered on, calling for reforms, but they were 

relatively small and poorly funded and when fighting the 

efforts of a multi-trillion dollar industry essential to the world 

economy they lost ground quickly. The narrative shifted to 

focus on isolated technological failures and human errors as 

the cause of the crisis, rather than inherent risks of deepwater 

drilling, and rising oil prices spurred calls for more supply. 

Today, BP is still around and while there have been some 

safety evaluations and new regulations in the US and beyond, 

deepwater drilling continues - even in the Gulf of Mexico. 

There is little coverage of the lingering, largely invisible health 

and environmental effects of the spill and the cleanup. Those 

stories are not sexy: they're complicated and they don't lend 

themselves to the kinds of compelling images that drive television 

news, which spurs public outcry, which prompts politicians 

to act. 

It may be that nuclear is different because radiation scares 

the public in a way that oil spills do not. But it is possible that 

Fukushima will go the way of the BP spill. Already, the news 

cycle has turned and images of ruined, smoldering reactors at 

Fukushima Daiichi are becoming rarer on television screens. 

"Thanks to Gaddafi and Charlie Sheen and Elizabeth Taylor 

for their efforts to keep Fukushima out of the news," joked Jim 

Malone, who has been around the industry for years, and is 

now serving as Chief Nuclear Fuel Development Officer for 

Lightbridge Corp. 

In Japan, the story has now shifted away from the earthquake, 

the tsunami and the exploding reactors, to the slow slog 

toward cooling the reactors, plugging their leaks and - more 

and more - the health and environmental impacts of radiation 

coming from the Fukushima Daiichi reactors. Invisible and 

complicated, radiation is a story that does not play well on 

television, just like the lingering health and environmental hazards 

of the dispersant Corexit in the Gulf of Mexico. The same 

goes for the technical details of what failed in the Fukushima 

units and why. Although a few dozen young protesters - some 

with faux hazmat suits and tubas - gathered outside this last 

week's conference in Chicago, they'll have probably lost interest 

a year from now. 

'The World Needs Our Industr/' 

Although nuclear has the disadvantage of being scarier to 

the general public than oil, it has the advantage of having positioned 

itself on the right side of the global movement to combat 

global climate change by reducing carbon emissions, industry 

officials were keen to point out. "The challenges faced by 

our industry have been compounded by Fukushima, but the 

world needs our industry to combat global warming," said Ken 

Peterson, Exelon's Vice President for Nuclear Fuels, at the 

Chicago conference organized by the Nuclear Energy Institute 

(NEI) and the World Nuclear Association (WNA). 

Still, Fukushima is a major public relations disaster, and the 

industry is working hard to combat it. The explanation has so 

far focused in large part on the the inherent challenges that 

unforeseeable natural disasters pose to nuclear plants. But that 

is something the industry and its legions of lobbyists - who 

are better funded than their anti-nuclear counterparts and have 

more staying power than the briefly outraged public - cannot 

credibly claim the industry will overcome. So look for the 

blame to be shifted to Tepco's mistakes and the shortcomings 

of older-generation technology, problems the industry can 

promise to address through tougher regulations, more advanced 

technology and improved "safety culture." 

None of this is to say that the industry is dismissing the 

severity of the crisis at Fukushima. Many of the Chicago conference 

attendees had friends or colleagues in Japan - or were 

actually from Japan. Most presentations began with heartfelt 

words of condolence and support for Japan. And when the 7.4- 

magnitude aftershock struck northeast Japan Thursday, conference 

attendees crowded around a TV set tuned to live coverage 

from Japan's NHK network, concern clear on their faces. 

And, even before any definitive postmortem account of the 

Fukushima crisis has been released, lessons are already being 

learned. Tepco's travails should remind the nuclear industry 

that the unexpected is by definition impossible to predict, 

German Garcia-Calderon, of Spain's Enusa, suggested to conference 

attendees. The nuclear industry, like every other, cannot 

plan for and protect against every possible problem. 

Fukushima can remind it of this, and remind it also to be less 

"arrogant," and act "with more humility," he said. 

The Business Side 

Although post-Fukushima reports of the nuclear industry's 

death may have been greatly exaggerated, events in Japan will 

certainly hurt nuclear. The earthquake, tsunami and ensuing 

crisis at Daiichi knocked out about 4% of the world's nuclear 

reactors, in Japan and Germany. It has also apparently slowed 

several newbuild programs, including, critically, China's. Ux 

Consulting's Jonathan Hinze said at the Chicago conference 

that, from February to March, his company's forecast for global 

newbuild by 2020 dropped about 5%. 

China, which is planning about 50% of all newbuilds 

expected to come on line by 2020, will likely scale back its 

i www.ener-gyintel.com NIW April 11,2011 Page 3 

CE 714 of 1220

nuclear goals for the coming decade, Hinze said. While Ux had 

expected to see a goal of about 90 gigawatts of nuclear capacity 

in Beijing's 12th Five-Year Plan, it is now predicting 70-80 

GW in China by 2020. This reduction in the expected growth 

of global nuclear capacity will, of course, translate into less 

business for converters, enrichers and miners. 

Still, even with this reduced level of newbuild, the world 

will need more uranium between now and 2020 than it is on 

track to produce, said George Capus, Areva's front-end vice 

president of marketing. This may be a problem, since 

Fukushima's "effects on supply may exceed those on demand," 

he said, arguing that skittish bankers and investors may shy 

away from nuclear-related projects, hurting privately funded 

mining ventures more than the major government-backed newbuild 

programs in China, India, Russia and South Korea. 

Although Fukushima is bad news for almost everyone, it 

could be good news for two industry segments: spent-fuel cask 

manufacturers and advanced reactor vendors. The problems at 

Fukushima's spent-fuel pools have prompted calls to move fuel 

out of pools and into dry casks (NIW Apr.4,p7). And Areva, 

Westinghouse, Rosatom and GE-Hitachi clearly hope 

Fukushima's exposure of the shortcomings of older reactor 

designs may prompt utilities and/or governments to move 

faster to replace aging reactors with newer designs that include 

more advanced safety features. 

This may well happen in China, where most new reactors 

were, before Fukushima, slated to be less-advanced Chinese 

CPR-I000s. Fukushima may spur Beijing to put build more 

Gen III+ designs and fewer CPR-I000s, Hinze suggested. 

Westinghouse could be the winner if that were to happen, as 

China seems to favor its APi000 design at least for the 

moment (NIW Jan.21,p3). D' 

Sam Tranum, Chicago 

stranumgenergyintel.com 

JAPAN 

The Situation One Month Lzter 

In an eerily prescient report, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission warned about what it called "mounting stress" 

being placed on the containments of the four stricken Fukushima 

Daiichi nuclear power plants because of an estimated 50,000 

tons of water that have been pumped, sprayed and dropped into 

the reactors over the past four weeks. 

The stresses placed on the containment could make them 

more vulnerable to the shaking of a severe aftershock,. The 

report was published Mar. 26 and reported in the New York 

Times on Apr. 7. That very evening a magnitude 7.1 (some 

accounts say 7.4) earthquake struck about 40 miles east 

of Sendai, opposite the devastated area of northeastern 

Japan. Another big aftershock hit the region Monday 

afternoon (Apr. 11), measuring 6.6 on the Richter scale - its 

epicenter about 30 kilometers from the edge of Fukushima 

prefecture. It cut outside power to pumps at the Daiichi 

plant, but power was restored in about 40 minutes. There 

were no other damage reports as NIW went to press, but 

each of the "aftershocks" are major earthquakes in their own 

right - more severe than the one that shut down the 7-unit 

Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant in July 2007. 

Aftershocks, many of them strong enough to be felt in 

Tokyo, have been an almost daily occurrence since the 9.0 

earthquake on Mar. II which precipitated the crisis. But last 

week's was by far the most severe and the first post-3/11 earthquake 

to generate a tsunami warning. The feared tidal wave 

did not materialize, and the warning was lifted about an a hour 

and a half after the quake struck. Work at the Fukushima site 

halted temporarily as the workers took shelter, but resumed 

after the tsunami warning was lifted. 

Last week's earthquake impacted all of the nuclear plants 

and other facilities along the northeastern coast. The shaking 

cut outside electric power to the Rokkasho spent fuel pool and 

the Higashidori reactor in Aomori prefecture, requiring a 

switch to emergency diesel generators. However, two of three 

generators at Higashidori were out of service for maintenance 

at the time. A third generator did come into operation and supplied 

power to cooling pumps until outside electricity was 

restored, but then it started leaking diesel fuel. External power 

was restored to Higashidori Friday; Rokkasho was still on 

diesel generators. 

At the Onagawa plant, three of the four outside power lines 

were temporarily lost, but a fourth provided enough for the core 

cooling. However, the plant lost pumps to cool spent fuel pools, 

which were out of power from 20 minutes to an hour and a 

half, depending on the unit, until power was restored to them. It 

was subsequently discovered that one of Onagawa's two backup 

diesel generators had been out of commission since Apr. I. 

Tohoku Electric Power said that the quake caused some water 

(3.8 liters) to slosh out of the spent fuel pool and that it damaged 

a blowout panel that helps to control turbine pressure. 

Tepco reported no ill effects at Fukishima, which is about 

75 miles from the epicenter, apart from a 40' Celsius rise in 

core temperature of one of the reactors, believed to be Unit I, 

although there was no information on the possible causes. 

On Saturday, Apr. 9, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety 

Agency (Nisa) issued a directive to all power stations that they 

must have two backup diesel generators ready even during 

refueling or periods when the cores are in cold shutdown. 

Previously it had required just one backup generator under 

such circumstances. All of the affected nuclear plants, aside 

from the four Fukushima reactors, are in cold shutdown. 

Nisa and NRC - 

Differing Assessments? 

Nisa Deputy Director Hideko Nishiyama was asked about 

the NRC report at a regular press conference Thurrrsday 

evening. He replied that officials from the NRC are in Japan 

now and that he is "working closely with the NRC every day. 

We are sharing almost all information." 

Although he acknowledged that it was true that the containment 

vessels have had a "very rare experience," he said he did not 

see any change in the situation, even with a severe aftershock. But 

those words were spoken only a couple hours before the 7.1 magnitude 

earthquake struck, again raising questions about the structural 

integrity of the containments and pressure vessels. 

Page 4 NIW April 11,2011 www.energyintel.com 

CE 715 of 1220

The NRC report had also raised concern that the hydrogen 

buildup in the impacted plants might lead to another hydrogen 

explosion in a weakened containment. Whether or not the NRC 

concern sparked action, Tepco authorities began injecting 6,000 

cubic meters of nitrogen into Unit I. Nitrogen is meant to displace 

oxygen, rendering the hydrogen harmless. The process 

could take up to a week and may be used at Units 2 and 3. 

Three and possibly four of the Fukushima reactors experienced 

hydrogen explosions that tore up the upper portion of 

the reactor buildings in the days immediately after the Mar. I I 

earthquake, but there has not been much public discussion 

about the dangers of hydrogen buildup since then, and it is 

again a topic of concern. 

One reason may be that the Unit I core is estimated to have suffered 

the most damage since the crisis began. As of Mar. 15, Tepco 

had estimated that 70% of the unit's fuel rods were damaged. The 

figure for Unit 2 is 30% and that for Unit 3 is 25%. There was no 

fuel in the Unit 4 core when the earthquake occurred. 

No further official estimates of core damage have been disclosed 

since then, although the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum 

(JAIF) says it understands that about half of the fuel rods in 

Unit I are feared exposed - using the present tense - leading 

to the renewed fears of a potential hydrogen explosion. 

It is still an open question as yet whether a hydrogen explosion 

took place at Unit 2. On Mar. 15, a loud explosion was 

heard near the reactor, but the reactor building was only slightly 

damaged, as one can tell by looking at aerial photos of the 

four plants. However, it is possible that the suppression pool 

was damaged. 

At Unit 2 the main concern is the integrity of the pressure 

vessel, with the JAIF reporting "damage and leakage suspected" 

since Mar. 28. At Units 3 and 4 the main concern remains 

the spent fuel pool integrity. 

Yoichi Kikuchi, a Japanese nuclear engineer who helped 

design the containment vessel at one of the Fukushima 

Daiichi reactors, told the New York Times that a fuel leak at 

Unit 2 was possible. The pressure vessel's integrity was particularly 

vulnerable, he said, because of openings at the bottom 

where control rods are inserted. In a fuel melt situation, 

metal welding around those openings would give way, allowing 

the fuel to drop into the drywell. Reacting with water in 

the suppression chamber, the fuel would set off a vapor 

explosion and a huge release of radiation into the air, he told 

the newspaper. 

Tepco finally had some good news to report last week when 

it declared that it had stopped the leaking of radioactive water 

from a cable pit linked to Unit 2, which had been spilling highly 

contaminated water into the ocean. Tepco had injected 6,000 

liters of chemical including something called "water glass" 

into the pit to stop the leak. 

Despite this success, plant workers are still far from achieving 

their. goal of removing the contaminated stagnant water 

found at the bottom of the turbine buildings and other places at 

the site. Much time and effort has gone into pumping water 

back and forth to find places where it can be stored safely. 

Sea Dumping 

Meanwhile, Tepco completed the dumping of about 11,500 

tons of low-level contaminated water directly into the sea this 

weekend. The objective of the exercise is to remove the lesser 

radioactive water to make room to store the more highly radioactive, 

but it has drawn criticism from Pacific coast countries such 

as South Korea, Russia and possibly China. Nishiyama said that 

the dumping was "urgent and inevitable." 

Meanwhile, the government is studying the possibility of 

borrowing back a radioactive waste disposal barge, called 

Suzuran, which the Japanese gave to Russia in 2001 over concern 

about Russia's dumping of low-level waste from decommissioned 

nuclear submarines into the Sea of Japan. It is currently 

moored near Vladivostok. 

The stagnant pools with high radiation readings have slowed 

efforts to connect the plant's cooling systems to an outside 

power source because of the dangers of working in radiation 

zones. For the moment, that issue may be moot as the recent 

earthquake seems to have knocked out AC power over a wide 

area, at least for the time being. And of course, the integrity of 

the cooling systems themselves remains an unknown. 0 

Todd Crowell, Tokyo 

IDumping Radwaste 

At Sea 

The release of more than 11,000 tons of radioactive wastewater 

into the Pacific created an international stir last week, 

with complaints from South Korea, Russia and possibly China 

as well as protests from environmental groups and compensation 

demands from local fisherman. While it may have violated 

international treaties on at least two counts, so far there 

appears to be no move by any country to pursue legal claims 

against Japan. 

South Korea's embassy in Tokyo delivered its message of 

concern to the Japanese government on Monday, asking what 

Japan was doing to stem the effect of radiation in neighboring 

waters, according to the Yonhap news agency. Yonhap also 

reported that China expressed concern to Japan over the 

release, but it cited South Korean foreign ministry officials. 

Separately a Chinese embassy official in Washington told NIW 

in an email Apr. 8, "As I know, so far China has not made any 

formal complaint to Japan regarding the radioactive water discharge 

issue." 

Russia put out a statement Apr. 8 requesting Japan to stop 

the dumping and said it hoped Japan would disclose full information 

about the situation at the crippled Fukushima nuclear 

power plant, according to RIA Novosti. "We hope that our 

Japanese partners will provide all interested parties with complete 

information about the radiation situation in the area 

around the Fukushima nuclear power plant, and will take measures 

to prevent further discharge of radioactive water into the 

ocean," the government statement said. 

The statement added that Russia appreciates the fact that the 

dumping was a "forced measure, designed to prevent a more 

www.energyintel.com NIW April 11,2011 Page 5 

CE 716 of 1220

serious threat," and that it hopes this will not harm human 

health or the environment. Russia is continuously monitoring 

radiation levels near its shores and so far they are within the 

norm, it added. 

South Korea meanwhile decided to look into setting up 

guidelines by which it could determine how harmful the release 

was. "For now, we have no clear standards to determine how 

much is how bad for us," Yonhap quoted an official as saying. 

Japanese Apologies 

Hidehiko Nishiyama, of Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety 

Agency (Nisa), apologized for failing to inform neighboring 

countries in advance of the release and agreed with South Korea 

and China to push for an agreement during a planned summit 

meeting in Tokyo next month to tighten cooperation against 

nuclear-safety breaches in the wake of radiation leaks from the 

Fukushima Daiichi plant one month ago, according to Yonhap. 

Russia, meanwhile, may be sending back a radioactive waste 

disposal barge, called Suzuran, which the Japanese gave to it in 

2001 to deal with low-level waste from decommissioned nuclear 

submarines dumped into the Sea of Japan (see p4). 

While the releases apparently do not violate the London 

Convention on sea dumping of waste (ratified by Japan in 

1980), because they were from a land-based source, international 

nuclear legal expert and chair of the nuclear security 

working group of the International Nuclear Law Association 

Carlton Stoiber said that "dumping could arguably be inconsistent 

with the object and purpose of the anti-dumping conventions, 

although not - perhaps - strictly in violation." 

However, he said that the dumping could violate both the 

Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, and 

"customary international law" under the Vienna Convention on 

the Law of Treaties. The early notification convention requires 

notification in the event of transboundary radioactive releases 

after a nuclear accident, while "customary international law" 

forbids the use of a nation's territory "to injure the territory of 

others," according to Stoiber. 

Whether any action will be taken or not remains to be seen. 

Friends of the Earth called on the Obama administration to 

intervene to stop the release. "Dumping this nuclear waste 

directly into the Pacific is dangerous and unacceptable," said 

Damon Moglen, FOE's director of the climate and energy project. 

"It's incredible that while an international treaty forbids 

the dumping of even a barrel of this nuclear waste from a ship, 

Japan intends to send thousands of tons of that waste into the 

ocean. This dumping poses a direct threat to humans and the 

environment, and fisheries and industries depending on a clean 

Pacific could be devastated." 

"Given that ocean currents will likely bring some of this 

radioactive contamination onto our shores, and given that contaminated 

seafood could find its way into the US market, we 

demand to know what the US government is doing to stop this 

dumping and to force Tepco to retain this nuclear waste at the 

company's expense," Moglen said. 

Tepco began releasing the low-level radioactive water into 

the ocean on Apr. 4, saying it was necessary to make room for 

more highly contaminated water in other areas of the plant. In 

a statement posted on its website, Tepco said that under Article 

64 of its Nuclear Reactor Regulation Law, it was discharging 

"to the sea approximately ten thousand tons of the accumulated 

low level radioactive water and a total of fifteen hundred tons 

of the low level radioactive subsurface water stored in the sub 

drain pits of Unit 5 and 6 as soon as we get ready." 

The first discharge, from the Central Radioactive Waste 

Disposal Facility, began at 7:03 p.m. on Apr. 4, with water 

released to the south of the water discharge canal; discharges 

from the sub-drain pits began at 9 p.m. the same day via the 

water discharge canal of Units 5 and 6. The operation was 

completed Apr. 9, with a total amount discharged from the pits 

put at "approximately 1,323 tons," Tepco said. (The exact total 

amount released was not disclosed). 

Tepco spokesman Takeo Iwamoto said there are about 

60,000 tons of contaminated water in basements and trenches 

outside Units 1, 2 and 3, Bloomberg reported. Half of that will 

be pumped to the waste-treatment facility, whose contents were 

emptied into the Pacific, and the rest to tanks and floating storage 

vessels, he said. Even before the intentional release, 

radioactive water had been seeping into the Pacific as a result 

of damage to the plant. 

While the International Atomic Energy Agency said the risk to 

people from the deliberate discharge was low, other experts said 

that the buildup of radioactive products in fish can grow as marine 

predators eat lower forms of sea life - particularly with radioactive 

products like cesium, which has a half-life of 30 years. 

Long-Term Monitoring of the Pacific 

Meanwhile, France's Institute for Radiological Protection 

and Nuclear Safety has called for long-term monitoring of the 

Pacific off northeastern Japan. Its own analysis of the impact 

of high-level radioactive leakage from Unit 2, based on publicly 

available data, showed that as of Monday, water contaminated 

with radioactive substances had spread to areas near the 

coasts of Fukushima and Miyagi prefectures. It also showed 

that airborne radioactive substances had mixed with seawater. 

Its study forecast that the Japan Current could spread the 

contaminated water throughout the Pacific in three months, 

with some radioactive substances diluted by seawater, but others 

highly likely to settle on the seabed. It added that cesium- 

134 can remain in the sea for several years and cesium-137 for 

about 30 years. The lab warned that fish and seaweed in Pacific 

coastal areas of Japan could be contaminated by the substances. 

In a meeting with Tepco Chairman Tsunehisa Katsumata on 

Wednesday in Tokyo, the head of the national federation of 

fisheries cooperatives, Ikuhiro Hattori, demanded compensation 

for damage to fish stocks. Hattori complained that Tepco 

failed to consult fisherman before its decision to release the 

water. After the meeting he expressed anger at Tepco and a 

desire to see all of Japan's reactors shut down. Later in the day, 

Hattori handed Senior Vice Minister of Economy, Trade and 

Industry Tadahiro Matsushita a letter of protest expressing fury 

over the government's handling of the matter, demanding compensation 

from the government and Tepco for all losses suffered 

by fishermen due to a fishing ban and rumors. Both 


CE 717 of 1220

Katsumata and Matsushita apologized and the minister pledged 

efforts to prevent the contamination from spreading further. 

Most local fishery cooperatives in Ibaraki Prefecture are 

suspending all fishing activities, after small fish caught in 

waters off its coast were found to contain radioactive cesium 

above the legal limit. , 

Stephanie Cooke, Washington 

SAFETY 

Calls for Reforming International 

Approach to Nuclear Regulation 

scooke@energyintel.com 

Ahead of Monday's one-month anniversary of the Fukushima 

* disaster, leading lights in diplomatic, legal and nuclear safety 

circles, past and present, focused attention last week on what 

most agreed was the gaping absence of a credible international 

nuclear safety regime. Despite the plethora of international 

conventions and organizations set up in the wake of Three 

Mile Island and Chernobyl, what exists in the way of a 

regime has proved inadequate to the task of responding 

quickly, effectively and comprehensively in Japan, they 

almost uniformly agreed. 

f 

A focal point of criticism was the International Atomic 

Energy Agency (IAEA) itself, as well as two key international 

conventions - one on early notification and the other on assistance 

in the event of a nuclear accident, both signed in 1986 in 

Chernobyl's aftermath, and a third on nuclear safety, signed in 

1994. In the age of 24/7 news cycles, some asked why the IAEA 

has relied almost exclusively on the Japanese government for 

information related to the Fukushima tragedy. Beyond such 

specifics, though, loomed larger and seemingly intractable questions: 

Should there be mandatory international safety requirements, 

and, if so, how would they be harmonized and enforced? 

"Major technology advances in information technology in 

the past quarter century have largely rendered the notification 

procedures in the convention [on early notification] formalistic 

and largely unnecessary," said Carlton Stoiber, an international 

and nuclear law expert, during a Thursday afternoon panel discussion 

on Fukushima hosted by the Center for Strategic & 

International Studies (CSIS) in Washington. With that said, 

Stoiber questioned the agency's response: "Although the IAEA 

incident and emergency center was activated immediately upon 

news of the event, it is unclear whether the convention procedures 

were followed," said Stoiber. 

Criticism of the agency was widespread. Former IAEA 

Deputy Directer General Olli Heinonen, now a senior fellow at 

Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 

said "it took more than a week before the first IAEA team 

showed up in Tokyo and then a few more days" before agency 

officials appeared at the Daiichi plant in Fukushima. "The 

IAEA should use not just information from governments, but 

other sources and its own expertise" to assess accidents, and it 

"should provide expertise to member states." 

He called for two international expert missions - one to 

"make the first assessment of the accident reviewing the 

actions of the operator and the authorities" and the other to 

"provide support on handling the current situation." But he 

also said the IAEA needed to review "its own preparedness 

with the help of member states to handle safety, security and 

safeguards emergencies." 

Their remarks were echoed separately by T. P. Sreenivasan, 

a former governor for India at the IAEA, who wrote in an Apr. 

4 article on the Rediff news portal that it wasn't just Japan that 

was in a crisis situation over what "the agency still euphemistically 

calls a 'nuclear accident,"' but the agency itself. "Safety, 

one of the main pillars of the agency, is badly shaken and its 

credibility as a crisis management body in the event of a 

nuclear accident has been called into question." 

Screenivasan, writing from Vienna, said that IAEA Director 

General Yukio Amano's statement that the agency is not mandated 

to either intervene or to prevent accidents or to force 

itself into emergency situations has "exposed the chinks in its 

[armor]. The impression on the ground in Vienna is that the 

agency has failed to play its role in a nuclear emergency, for 

which it was supposed to be prepared." 

Safety and Credibility 

Meanwhile, a group of mostly former nuclear safety officials 

from several countries released a letter calling for a 

stronger international safety regime. "The safety of nuclear 

power goes beyond national boundaries," said the Apr. 4 letter 

co-signed by luminaries including Anil Kakodkar, who headed 

India's Atomic Energy Commission and Department of Atomic 

Energy for a decade; Harold Denton, President Jimmy Carter's 

representative during the Three Mile Island incident; Roger 

Mattson, who was a leading US Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission official involved in the Three Mile Island 

response; Nikolai Steinberg, the former chief engineer at 

Chernobyl; Pierre Tanguy, the former inspector general of 

nuclear safety at EDF; and Jukka Laaksonen, the current head 

of Finnish nuclear regulator Stuk. 

Just as Three Mile Island prompted the industry to design passive 

features into new reactors and to improve plant-operator 

interface, and Chernobyl prompted modernization of the Soviet 

nuclear fleet as well as the formation of the World Association of 

Nuclear Operators (Wano), the letter-signers believe Fukushima 

offers another key opportunity to advance nuclear safety. 

"A critical question should be what measures would be most 

effective in further promoting a high level of nuclear safety 

worldwide. Would it be to create new international frameworks, 

for example in the shape of an international regulatory 

agency entrusted with issuing binding international safety standards 

and performing compulsory inspections, or would it be 

to further develop and strengthen existing frameworks, emphasizing 

national responsibilities in combination with rigorous 

international peer reviews?" 

Heinonen questioned whether the IAEA should be given 

more responsibility or whether there should be a new "world 

nuclear inspectorate" to regulate nuclear safety. Sreenivasan 

said the agency "should be given the authority, resources and 

technical capability to intervene expeditiously in case of a 

nuclear emergency." However, he said the agency "was given 

www.energgyintel.com NIW April 11,2011 Page 7 

CE 718 of 1220

only the responsibility of taking radiation measurements and 

the identification of Japan's needs for a future environmental 

monitoring program. The agency neither sought nor.was it 

asked to do any firefighting at Fukushima." 

Safety Vs Safeguards 

Sreenivasan blamed the agency's shortcomings in part on an 

imbalance in priorities, with nuclear proliferation at the forefront. 

"The IAEA's founding fathers were acutely aware of the 

safety dimension of nuclear activities and had given considerable 

attention to safety, together with safeguards and nuclear 

applications. But over the years, the call for 'balance' among 

the activities of the IAEA became taboo as the agency began to 

stress safeguards to the detriment of its other activities." 

This became more acute after 9/11, he said, "because of the 

new concerns about nuclear security." But he added: "The need 

for the hour is to make the IAEA a 'nuclear safety watchdog,' 

a role which may be more important, in many ways, than being 

a nonproliferation watchdog. It should be given the authority, 

resources and technical capability to intervene expeditiously as 

and when necessary." 

Stoiber is doubtful governments will move dramatically 

toward a mandatory international nuclear safety regime. "1 

detect no appetite or big appetite" for this, he said, adding that 

"we're stuck with incrementalism." 

In that vein, it's perhaps worth noting that the proposal by 

safety regulators is only a step or two past that advanced last 

year by the World Nuclear Association's (WNA) Cooperation in 

Reactor Design Evaluation and Licensing (Cordel) working 

group (NIW Apr. 19' 1O,p7). Cordel's proposal, which was 

accompanied by a letter from the heads of leading industry 

groups, advocated regulatory harmonization, up to and including 

the issuance of an "international design certification" by a designated 

international organization or a team of national regulators. 

Technical experts have pointed out that while harmonization 

is an appealing idea, actually achieving it might prove impossible 

because of the difficulty in reconciling different technical 

standards. However, uniformity of objectives might be a differenm 

matter. So, while it might not be possible to harmonize 

reactor designs, other objectives called for by the safety 

experts could in theory be agreed to, including requirements 

that. "backup cooling systems are able to operate for a long 

enough time following a complete loss of onsite and offsite 

power," and that new plants are sited "away from areas of 

extreme natural and manmade hazards." The letter also called 

for coordinated oversight of current operating plants. 

The IAEA's nuclear safety convention review Apr. 4-14 in 

Vienna (held every three years) is seen as a useful precursor to 

laying the groundwork for meetings specifically aimed at dealing 

with the international response to Fukushima. The G20 is holding 

a meeting of nuclear regulators in May in Paris; the IAEA has 

convened a ministerial-level conference on nuclear safety in 

Vienna from Jun. 20-24. That's the meeting at which Heinonen, 

among others, sees the best hope for initiating a process of substantive 

changes to the existing international safety regime. 0, 

Stephanie Cooke, Washington and Phil Chaffee, London 

scooke@energyintel.com; pchaffee@energyintel.com 

Eastern Europe Mostly 

I NEWBUILD Undeterred Despite Hurdles 

Reaction among Eastern Europe's nuclear power centers to the 

Fukushima catastrophe has been unequivocal, with most officials 

dismissing comparisons of the safety of their own nuclear 

programs to that of Japan and reiterating that there is no viable 

alternative to nuclear energy if the region is to reduce greenhouse 

emissions. Nevertheless, many projects could be shelved 

temporarily, and a few could be permanently laid to rest as 

potential investors shun additional risks and costs in the new, 

post-Fukushima environment. 

Despite intimate experience with a civilian nuclear disaster, 

Eastern Europe has been reserved in its reaction to Japan's 

tragedy. Indeed, Germany's politically inspired decision to shut 

down seven reactors - forcing it to import 50 gigawatt hours 

daily - stunned its neighbors, and was best summed up by 

Czech Prime Minister Petr Necas: "The government would have 

to be a bunch of fools to take such a step." He called Chancellor 

Angela Merkel's decision "a cheap stunt," while a spokesman 

for CEZ, a state-controlled utility that operates the Czech 

Republic's six reactors, said Merkel's calls for stress tests 

throughout the EU was "a political phrase with no meaning." 

Excluding Russia, there are plans to build some 25 reactors 

throughout Eastern Europe, including eight in Turkey. Of the II 

countries (including Russia) intending to construct new facilities, 

not one has openly expressed a change of heart as the world 

watches Fukushima smolder - and despite public opinion. For 

instance, in Lithuania, which wants to erect a new unit to replace 

the RBMK facility shutdown in 2009, a poll released on Apr. 4 

shows that 88% of the population is against a new NPP - up 

from 44% in January. In Bulgaria, support for a new facility has 

fallen from 75% to 51% as a result of Fukushima. 

East European leaders want energy that is "clean," cheap and 

independent, and right now they say that means embracing the 

atom. "There is no other option for Turkey," said Hasan Ozertem, 

an analyst at the International Strategic Research Organization in 

Ankara. "Turkey is an emerging country, and we're talking about 

[building] two nuclear power plants, and the government's stance 

is that there are more than 400 nuclear reactors around the world, 

so if nuclear power continues operating [worldwide], we will 

proceed with our own building plans.. We are decisive about it." 

Nor does Russia, which plans to complete 24 reactors by 

2020 and several others in the region, including as many as 

four in Turkey, intend any strategic rethink about nuclear energy. 

"We'll need more time in order to understand how this 

accident will shape safety requirements of both reactors and 

sites designated for nuclear power plants," said Anton 

Khlopkov, director of the Center for Energy and Security 

Studies in Moscow. "I think that primarily the present situation 

will affect the latter - that is, requirements for sites ... Russia 

might pause building units both at home and abroad in places 

where construction hasn't begun and wait for IAEA conclusions 

and recommendations for site and safety requirements." 

Still, those projects located is seismic zones - namely 

Turkey, Armenia and Bulgaria - are of particular concern, and 


CE 719 of 1220

here the outlook is ambiguous. Khlopkov said the VVER-1000 

facility planned for Armenia will require additional studies in 

light of anticipated IAEA recommendations post-Fukushima. 

To be sure, the current VVER-440 unit withstood the 1988 

earthquake without damage, but Armenia is likely to confront 

difficulties financing the newbuild as it had hoped to attract a 

strategic investor for the project. 

Could Turkey Benefit From Japan? 

As regards Turkey, experts say the seismic zone there is not 

as potent as Japan's. "Turkish facilities are being built on sites 

at a lower risk of earthquakes and the reactors are designed 

according to expected earthquake strengths in a given region," 

Bilge Yildiz, assistant professor of nuclear technology at MIT, 

told the Hurriyet Daily News. "Japan very often has earthquakes 

higher than the Turkish 6.2 rating, so nuclear plants 

should sustain such forces without any problems." 

Ironically, Turkey could benefit from Japan's woes as the 

two sides continue to hold talks on a four-reactor project in 

Sinop. "Everyone is aware that Japan's credibility in terms 

of nuclear technology has suffered, and in Turkey this is a 

matter of concern," said Ozertem, who was in Japan when 

the tsunami struck. "However, this will be forgotten in the 

medium term ... and I believe the government will proceed 

with the Japanese option next year [after the June elections]. 

Turkey will for sure demand more safety measures, and second 

Turkey has a strong hand to bargain right now with 

Japan, which will be more compromising in order to restore 

its credibility." 

Overall, however, investor wariness is likely to put a few 

projects on deep freeze - if not in the coffin. Case in point: 

Lithuania, where the mood is increasingly despondent after 

Kepco pulled out of a tender late last year and now that Russia 

is plowing forward with newbuilds right across the border in 

the Kaliningrad exclave and in northern Belarus. "Lithuania's 

goal to build its own power plant has become even more distant 

after events in Japan," said former President Valdas 

Adamkus in a recent speech. 

Bulgaria may be in the same boat as it struggles to find foreign 

investors to take 50% of the planned twin 1,000 MW reactor 

project in Belene to be built by Russia's Atomstroyexport. 

On Apr. 5 Sofia and Moscow agreed on a three-month freeze 

while plant safety is more closely studied. However, given the 

government's seemingly contradictory conditions for the project 

- that it keep 50% ownership but without financing from the 

state budget - its viability has fallen into doubt. Germany's 

RWE exited the project in 2009. 

Finally, one victim of the Fukushima disaster could be 

floating nuclear power plants - a Russia-driven innovation 

that Moscow had been hoping to export later this decade 

after launching two such reactors in the Arctic. "I hope that 

Rosatom will renege on the idea of exporting floating NPPs 

- at least at this stage of their development," said 

Khlopkov. "Yes, they're very attractive, but right now the 

technology doesn't answer current safety requirements ... 

Rosatom should stop advertising them as a commercial project 

that can be exported." 0' 

Gary Peach, Riga 

I URANIUM Kazatomprom Prepares for an IPO 

While Kazatomprom continues to increase its uranium production, 

the level is beginning to plateau, and there are signs that it 

could reach political or commercial limits sooner than previously 

thought. The Ministry of Industry and New Technologies 

(Mint) has drafted legislation that would "regulate uranium output," 

an official told Bloomberg last week, at least partially in 

response to the Japanese crisis. But Kazakh sources indicate that 

even prior to the Fukushima incident there was a movement 

afoot in Astana to regulate uranium production as a key "strategic 

resource" that must be conserved for future generations. 

"We are ready to implement any government order, whether 

it will be a restriction of output or an increase," Kazatomprom 

President Vladimir Shkolnik told Bloomberg in an interview 

last week. Right now Kazatomprom production targets remain 

unaffected: 19,588 tons of uranium in 2011, 20,000 tU in 2012, 

followed by an indefinitely maintained plateau that could 

potentially be increased up to 25,000 tU or even higher. 

The days of massive double-digit percentage increases, however, 

appear to be a thing of the past. Whereas 2010 production 

of 17,803 tU was up 27% from the 2009 figure of 14,020 tU, an 

increase to 19,588 tU this year would be a mere 10% jump. And 

depending on the legislation being drafted in Astana, increased 

Kazakh production could altogether become a thing of the past. 

A Different Kind of Expansion 

This could help explain why Kazatomprom's recent activities 

appear to be focused more on diversification of activities 

rather than, as it was in now-jailed former head Moukhtar 

Dzhakishev's day, a near single-minded focus on boosting 

national production. 

While Shkolnik is to a certain extent merely playing the 

hand he was dealt, he is also preparing the company to go public 

within the next two years. The "People's IPO is an opportunity 

for every Kazakh citizen to become a shareholder and 

benefit directly from large national companies known as 

'national leaders' - the state-owned company-giants," wrote 

Kazakh Prime Minister Karim Massimov in a blog post two 

weeks ago. Massimov said that the uranium company - one 

of many subsidiaries of the government's Samruk Kazyna 

holding company - will be taken public in 2012 or 2013. 

Perhaps to prepare for this, the company has made a concerted 

push on the non-nuclear front, signing agreements over the 

past year with Russian, French and Japanese companies on 

prospecting for and producing rare earth metals - a sector that 

has surged in importance since China (the largest producer) 

began a de facto ban on rare earth metals export to Japan in 

September. On the nuclear side of the equation, of course, is the 

company's concerted effort to expand into the nuclear fuel cycle. 

On this front it is increasingly evident that the company is Willing 

to play hardball. Planners in Almaty and Astana have been 

eager for the company to move into conversion, particularly via a 

joint venture with Cameco. Last year the companies arrived at an 

initial understanding that they could work with Toshiba and its 

subsidiary Westinghouse (also partially owned by Kazatomprom) 

wwwenergyntel.com NIW April 11,2011 Page 9 

CE 720 of 1220

to increase UF6 production at the Springfields UK facility, which 

Westinghouse operates under a long-term lease from Britain's 

Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NIW Feb.7,p3). 

But that understanding has yet to be formalized, and Cameco 

is paying the price. According to the initial 2007 Memorandum 

of Understanding (MOU) between the two companies that proposed 

a conversion tie-up, they would also work toward doubling 

targeted production at Inkai, their joint uranium production 

site (and the largest in Kazakhstan), from 2,000 tU/year to 

4,000 tU/year (10.4 million lbs U308, of which 5.7 million lbs 

would go to Cameco). "We are currently in discussions with 

Kazatomprom about these initiatives," Cameco said in its annual 

information form last week, continuing that it expects "our 

ability to double annual production at lnkai will be closely tied 

to the success of the uranium conversion project." 

While it is widely understood that doubling Inkai's 2,000 

tons uranium per year capacity is contingent on progress on the 

conversion front, it could be that even attaining 2,000 tU/year 

in production is at stake as well. The Inkai joint venture has 

yet to receive final approval from Mint to produce at an annual 

rate of 1,500 tU (even though it produced 1,667 tU last year), 

let alone 2,000 tU. "There is no certainty," Cameco noted last 

week, that "Inkai will receive these permits or approvals or 

that it will be able to ramp up production this year." 

Kazatomprom is able to play hardball with Cameco simply 

because it doesn't need Inkai to achieve its modest production 

increase goals - these can come from its Appak or Semizbay-U 

joint ventures with Japanese and Chinese partners, respectively, or 

from expanding production at Central Mynkuduk, the operation 

that Kazatomprom took ownership of after the fall of Dzhakishev. 

Interestingly, Kazatomprom revealed to NIW that similarly it has 

not taken ownership of the Stepnogorsk Mining and Chemical 

Complex, which had the same nebulous ownership as Central 

Mynkuduk and also owns and operates the northern Shantobe 

underground mine - the only uranium production in the country 

with no Kazatomprom ownership stake (NMW Jun. 1 '09,p 4 ). 

Diversified Sales 

At this point Kazatomprom's revenue, of course, comes nearly 

entirely from uranium sales, and Shkolnik told Bloomberg that 

Kazatomprom was in talks on further and larger supply contracts 

with India. Kazatomprom's existing contract with the Nuclear Power 

Corporation of India, Ltd. (NPCIL) apparently dates from the two 

companies' January 2009 MOU (NIW Jan.26'09,p6). The contract 

accompanying that MOU calls for the supply of 1,781 tU (4.6 million 

lbs U308) spread over six years in annual quantities ranging 

from 254 tU to 339 tU; the first began last year (NIW Aug.30,p3). 

Shkolnik also told Bloomberg that Kazatomprom is looking 

to increase its sales to the US to the level of its sales to Europe, 

which he termed Kazatomprom's biggest market. It is hard to 

see how this is the case; in an email last month Kazatomprom 

told NIW that its top five customers in 2009 - China National 

Nuclear Corp. (CNNC), China Guangdong Nuclear (CGN), 

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP), Nukem and Itochu - 

were similarly at the top of the list in 2009. 

In its 2010 prospectus, Kazatomprom warned that it "is dependent 

on a small number of customers" and that "this customer 

concentration may increase" (NIW Jun. l,p6). But interestingly, 

this appears not to have happened. Whereas in 2009 these top five 

customers made up 86% of the company's sales, this decreased to 

79.8% in 2010. But, with the Chinese nuclear expansion, 

Kazatomprom wrote in that prospectus, it "expects that its customers 

will increasingly be located in China." This was certainly 

born out in 2010: "China's share of JSC Kazatomprom and its 

Kazakhstan's 2010 Uranium Production 

Company Created Ownership 

Akbastau 2006 KAP (50%). Uranium Onet (50%) 

Appak 

Baiken-U 

Betpak Dala 

Inkai LLP 

Karatau 

Katco 

Kyzylkum 

Mining Company 

2005 KAP (65%). Sumitomo (25%). 

Kansai Electric (10%) 

2006 KAP (5%), Energy Asia* (95%) 

2004 KAP (30%). Uranium One (70%) 

1996 KAP (40%), Cameco (60%) 

2005 YAP (50%), Uranium One (50%) 

1996 KAP (49%). Areva (5 1%) 

2005 KAP (30%). Uranium One (30%), 

Energy Asia* (40%) 

2004 lAP (100%) 

Semizbay-U LLP 2006 KAP (5 1%), CGNPG (49%) 

Stepnogorsk Mining & 

Chemical Complex 

Zarechnoye 

2005 New Power Systems (100%) 

2001 KAP (49.67%), Uranium Onet 

(49.67%). Kara-Balta (0.66%) 

line 

Budenovskoye, site I 

Budenovskoye, sites 3 & 4 

Western Mynkuduk 

Northern Kharasan (site 2) 

Akdala 

Inkai, site 4 (South Inkai) 

Inkai 

Budenovskoye, site 2 

Yuzhny (Moinkum) 

Tortkuduk (Moinkum) 

Northern Kharasan (site I) 

Uvanas 

East Mynkuduk 

Kanzhugan 

Southern Moinkum 

N. & S. Karamarun 

Irkol 

Semizbay 

Central Mynkuduk 

Shantobe (underground) 

Zarechnoye 

Southern Zarechnoye 

Capadtyt 

U/y 

1.000 

2000 

1,000 

2,000 

1.000 

Z000 

4.000 

1,000 

1.000 

2,000 

2000 

300 

1.000 

400 

50 

1.000 

750 

500 

1.000 

600 

1.000 

1,000 

Start-Up 

Date 

2008 

2009 

2008 

2008 

2002 

2007 

2006 

2006 

2005 

NA 

2008 

1977 

1983 

1982 

2005 

1983 

2007 

2008 

2008 

NA 

2006 

2013 

-- Production (t - 

2010 2009 2008 2007 

714 390.4 NA - 

47 - - 

NA 304.6 51.1 - 

262 

1.009 

1,700 

1.667 

1,710 

3.354 

73.1 

1,033.2 

830.7 

916.0 

1,415.0 

3,145.0 

NA 

1.029.5 

435.1 

215.0 

661.9 

1,367.4 

1.003.8 

21.8 

256.0 

470.3 

1,049.6 

257 104.7 12.0 - 

-3.400 3.361.8 3,449.0 322.0 

980.0 

418.0 

508.0 

1,050.0 

NA 510.6 76.0 50.0 

NA 

NA 

-355 

783 

1,451.5 1,046.2 

490.8 167.0 

NA 

NA 

105.2 

Notes: fAs of Dec. 27, 2010; previously stake owned directly by Atomredmetzoloto (Armz). 'Energy Asia is a Japanese consortium with the following breakdown: Marubeni (32.5%), 

Tepco (30%). Toshiba (22.5%). Chubu (10%), Tohoku (5%). 

Source: Kazatcmprom (KAP). Company Filings NEA-IAEA Uont'um 2007: Resources. Production and Demand" ("Red Book"), UDW esdmaces 

Page 10 NIW April H, 2011 www.energyintel.com 

CE 721 of 1220

subsidiaries sales amounted to 39.7%, which is a 5.4% increase 

compared to 2009," Kazatomprom told NIW. 

This is almost definitive proof that Kazatomprom and its 

subsidiaries are not the only companies exporting Kazakh-origin 

uranium to China. Last month, NIW examined Chinese 

import data that revealed some 8,165 tU, or 21 million lbs 

U308e, of Kazakh-origin imports of uranium concentrates 

(NIW Mar. 14,p8). Even if a portion of these imports were older 

Kazakh-origin materials that had been subsequently processed 

or even enriched in Russia, the amount of imports to China is 

still over 45% of total 2010 uranium production in Kazakhstan. 

And Kazatomprom said earlier this year that its 2010 sales were 

some 9,000 tU - "excluding subsidiaries and joint ventures." 

The obvious candidate among other Kazakh producers for 

export to China is Areva, which recorded landmark production 

of 3,354 tU last year from its Katco joint venture with 

Kazatomprom. The Katco operation, boasted Areva in its 2010 

Reference Document, "is now the largest in situ recovery producer 

in the world and [their] leading production site." On the 

back of Areva's 90s-era agreement with Kazatomprom, there 

are no impediments to exporting the French behemoth's 

Kazakh production anywhere it wants, and from all appearances 

it wants to export much of it to China. 

There is much less marketing flexibility for Russian-owned 

Uranium One, which with 2,849 tU of attributable 2010 production 

is the second-largest equity uranium producer in Kazakhstan, 

after Kazatomprom. Although Uranium One has, through its ties 

with and acquisition by Rosatom's Atomredmetzoloto (Armz), 

over the past several years obtained equity interest in three additional 

Kazakh production sites - if the company owned in 2010 

stakes in all the projects it now owns after the Armz acquisition, it 

would have had equity production-of 3,615 tU last year - at least 

in the short term it has little extra material to actually market. 

Indeed, for 2011 at least, Uranium One has no ability to market 

the material of the three projects it took equity interest in over the 

past 18 months. The 2011 production from Akbastau (761 tU in 

2010) and Karatau (1,710 tU in 2010) is already contracted to be 

sold to Kazatomprom at market-related pricing at time of delivery, 

while the 2011 production from Zarechnoye (783 tU in 2010) will 

be sold to- parent company Armz at a 6% discount to spot. 

It is unclear how long these contractual commitments will last, 

just as it is unclear how Uranium One's new director of marketing, 

Scott Melbye (who previously headed Cameco's sales) will spend 

his time. Of Uranium One's long-established Kazakh production 

sites, Akdala has long since plateaued, although there is significant 

room for growth at its Kharasan and South Inkai projects. '0' 

Phil Chaffee, London 

pchaffeeenergyintel.com 

Extrt Announces DFS 

The Husab uranium project would average production of some 

15 million pounds U308 per year, while costing some $1.66 

billion, Australia's Extract Resources reported last week as it 

announced the results of its Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS). 

This includes $1.48 billion in direct capital costs plus another 

$149 million with pre-strip and preproduction operating costs. 

It is unclear where exactly this money will come from, 

although there are multiplecontenders: Rio Tinto, which owns 

14% of the company, Japan's Itochu, with a 10.3% stake, or 

China Guangdong Nuclear (CGN) subsidiary CGNPC Uranium 

Resources Co. (CGNPC-URC). CGNPC-URC has an offer out 

to buy Extract's largest owner Kalahari Minerals, which has a 

42.79% stake in the Australian junior (NIW Jul. 12,p3). 

It is not clear whether CGN will stick by the initial terms of 

its £756 million ($1.2 billion) offer for Kalahari, which came 

less than a week before Japan's earthquake and tsunami set off 

the nuclear crisis in Fukushima. Even if CGN sticks by its tentative 

offer, finding outside debt financing for Husab could 

prove difficult. 

"It would be unrealistic to say there will be no effect [of 

Fukushima] on financing," Extract Chief Executive Officer 

Jonathan Leslie said in a conference call last week. "For all uranium 

projects, it's going to be more difficult than it was before." 

But it could be easier for Extract than for many other 

possible projects, as Husab is widely viewed as one of the 

most attractive unexploited uranium deposits. With some 

367 million lbs U308, the Namibian deposit is solidly in the 

top 10 uranium deposits in the world by contained metal, 

above both Australia's Jabiluka and Canada's Cigar Lake 

(NIW Aug.16,p4). 

The current DFS only involves exploiting the indicated 

resources of Zones I and 2 of the Husab property (70% of the 

current resource) and Extract is busily working to expand the 

resource even further, with another resource update expected 

during the June quarter. "In the longer term, we're very confident 

of finding additional resources," said Leslie. 

The DFS envisions total operating costs of $32/lb U308, 

including $13.9/lb for mining, $13.4/lb for processing and $2/lb 

for royalties. But the DFS is restricted to modeling an independent 

Husab development and depending on the final ownership 

structure of Extract, there could be considerable synergies with 

Rio Tinto's Rossing operation, directly north of Husab - 

which used to be called Rossing South (NIW Feb.22,p9). 

With that said, there are already some synergies in the 

Husab DFS with other Namibian uranium projects. The DFS 

envisions permanent water supply coming from a NamWater 

desalination plant at Mile 6, just north of Swakopmund, from 

which a pipeline would bring water to both Husab as well as 

Paladin Energy's Langer Heinrich mine, southeast of Husab. 

This plant has been approved in principle by the Namibian 

cabinet, but Extract has yet to see final details. As a backup, 

Extract is also considering an offtake from Wlotzkasbaken, the 

desalination plant to be built for Areva's Trekkopje project. 

Extract hopes to have the mining permit for Husab 

approved by June; if this comes through and if the company 

is able to secure financing for the project, it is targeting the 

first quarter of 2014 for "hot commissioning." Extract last 

week also received a two year extension on its exclusive 

prospecting license for Husab, which had been set to expire 

at the end of the month. , 

Phil Chaff;ee London 

pchaffeetenergyintel.com 

www.energyintel.com NIW April 11,2011 Page II 

CE 722 of 1220

'IBR]EFS 

CHINA. 

China probably will not be able to produce all the conversion and 

enrichment it will need over the next decade, Ux Consulting Vice 

President for International Operations Jonathan Hinze told the World 

Nuclear Fuel Cycle conference in Chicago last week. The country's 

focus on reactor construction has left its fuel-cycle facilities underdeveloped, 

he said. China's U308 needs were covered through 2017, leaving 

a cumulative supply gap of only 20 million lbs U308 from then until 

2020, according to Hinze. But its UF6 needs are covered only through 

2010, with a cumulative supply gap for 2011-20 of over 28 million KgU, 

he said. And its SWU requirements were covered only through 2009, 

with a cumulative supply gap of 20 million SWU from 2010-20. That's 

in spite of the continued operation of the Heping gaseous diffusion plant. 

Rosatom's construction of 1.5 million SWU capacity in China, and the 

planned ramp-up of China's domestic centrifuge-enrichment program. 

GERMANY 

Siemens may back away from nuclear power entirely as it attempts to 

brand itself as green. according to the Financial Times, which cited 

unidentified sources last week close to Siemens claiming the company 

is looking for a way out of its joint venture with Rosatom. Just last 

month it received E1.62 billion ($2.34 billion) from Areva for Siemen's 

34% stake in Areva NP, following two years of arbitration over its decision 

to withdraw from the German-French joint venture announced Jan. 

27, 2009. Its subsequent deal with Rosatom has been on hold as an 

arbitration court decides whether the deal violates a non-compete clause 

in Siemens' original contract with Areva. A decision is expected from 

the International Chamber of Commerce by this summer, according to 

Areva's 2010 Reference Document. One additional wrinkle could come 

from the European Commission, which is examining the non-compete 

clause (N1W Jun.7,p4). It's not entirely clear which way Siemens wants 

the legal questions resolved; a ruling against the Rosatom deal could be 

a convenient excuse to shed its involvement in nuclear power. 

GERMANY 

The Association of Energy and Water Industries (BDEW). a group that 

includes Germany's four nuclear utilities, announced last week that it 

would like to see a "swift and complete" end to nuclear power by 

2020-23. That would essentially mark a return to the 2002 phase-out 

plan, which foresaw Germany's 17 reactors being shut down after 

about 32 years of operation, with the last one closed in 2022. BDEW 

had been a supporter of extending the life of the nuclear fleet before 

Fukushima. "Now our association has changed its position," BDEW 

spokesman Jan Ulland told NIW. The four nuclear utilities "were 

against this decision," he said. The post-Fukushima closure of seven of 

Germany's 17 nuclear plants has prompted the country to import more 

electricity from other countries, including France, which produces 

most of its electricity through nuclear generation, and an increase in 

gas and coal generation at home, Ulland said. In the short- and medium-term, 

the nuclear phase-out would mean a further increase in coal 

and gas generation, he said. In the long-term, it would mean getting 

80%-100% of Germany's electricity from renewables by 2050, he said. 

INDIA 

An official at Uranium Corporation of India, Limited (UCIL) said last 

week the state-run firm may shut down one of its two uranium-processing 

plants after workers attacked a manager and his deputy there, according to 

the Times of India. Sagar Besra, the leader of a workers' union who had 

been suspended from the mill for reasons unclear, reportedly led a mob that 

stopped other workers from entering the mill and then assaulted the managers. 

Residents of the nearby area may have been disposed to follow 

Besra because the company has been trying to move them and their homes 

off the 300 acres it bought and wants to mine, according to the Press Trust 

of India "It is not an isolated incident It is now a recurring problem at 

Turamdih and if things continue in the same way we will be forced to close 

down" the plant, said UCIL Chairman and Managing Director Ramendra 

Gupta, according to the Times of India. The 3,000 t/d Turamdih mill has 

had other troubles as well: It was shut down for a time last month because 

of a lack of water (NIW Mar.7,p9). If it closes down permanently that will 

leave India with only the 2,500 t/d Jaduguda mill operating - until the 

new 3,000 t/d Tummalapalle mill comes on line (NIW Aug.30,p3). 

IRAN 

Russia's Atomstroyexport began reloading fuel assemblies into the 

Bushehr core last week, two months after it was forced to unload them 

due to "damages of a cool-down pump" (NIW Feb. 14,p I). The reloading 

began after Atomstroyexport "completed a visual inspection and 

flushing of the reactor internals and main circulation circuit," the 

Rosatom subsidiary said in a statement on Friday. It explained that the 

pump failure was due to design features from Bushehr's initial 1970s 

German equipment that is now integrated into the plant. While there 

have been reports of other safety issues at the plant on the Mideast 

Gulf, Iran proceeds apace with its commissioning. On Saturday night, 

Iran's ambassador to Vienna. Ali Asghar Soltanieh. said on Iranian television 

that the Bushehr plant "has the highest level of safety compared 

to the world's other nuclear facilities," according to the Tehran Times. 

UNITED STATES 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has rejected EDF subsidiary 

Unistar Nuclear Energy's plan to make it eligible to own a US nuclear plant, 

after EDF's former partner in the Calvert Cliffs Unit 3 project, Constellation 

Energy, backed away, forcing EDF to buy it out and take complete ownership 

of Unistar. At the end of January, UniStar submitted a "negation plan" 

to the NRC that would require Unistar to have its chief nuclear officer, 

chairman and two independent board members all be US citizens (NIW 

Feb.14,pl l). But this plan "does not negate the foreign ownership, control or 

domination issues," wrote David Matthews, the director of the NRC's 

department of new reactor licensing, in an Apr. 6 letter to Unistar. While 

other regulatory processes will continue, Calvert Cliffs 3 will not receive a 

construction and operation license (COL) until this issue is addressed, said 

Matthews. EDF has already said it would seek a US utility partner for the 

project, but events in Japan have made that process more difficulL 

UNITED STATES 

Moody's believes that the Fukushima crisis has created a material credit 

negative for nuclear plant owners and operators, the ratings agency said 

last week. The major risk is "political intervention" causing "unpredictable 

unintended consequences with contagion effects that can last 

for year," said the report written by a group of analysts headed by 

Senior Vice President Jim Hempstead. "Political intervention is influenced 

by society's willingness to accept nuclear risks. We believe the 

sentiment is turning more negative." Indeed, the analysts list a variety 

of challenges to the industry: emboldened opponents, a "material wildcard" 

with the US presidential election cycle commencing, increased 

governmental intervention in nuclear generation and more regulatory 

scrutiny. All of these reactions, says Moody's. "will combine to invariably 

lead to higher costs for generators and higher electricity costs for 

consumers. "While Moody's maintains its view that nuclear accidents 

are 'remote probability events,' it is re-evaluating whether our views 

adequately capture their high severity nature." ', 

Page 12 NIW April 11.2011 www.energyintel.com 

CE 723 of 1220

SE G IN ELIEC URNU MA KE UPDAT 

For the week ended April 8. 2011 (All figures as of Friday close unless otherwise indicated.) 

UPP vs. Solactive Global Uranium Index* 

tnrpviou•e 52 weeks• 

(db U308) .--- 

80 T------ SGU 

70 

60 

50 

40~ 

UPP vs. Dow Jones Industrial Average* 

andex) 

(lb U308) (previous 52 weeks) W (000) 

160 80 

20 

140 

Is 

16 

120 

14 

12 

80 

10 

30 

Apr.10 

Jun10 Sep. 10 Nov;10 Jan.'l I Apr.'l I 

60 

Apr.'10 Jun: 10 Sep.' 10 Nov.'10 Jan: I I Apr.' I 

8 

'Solactive Global Uranium Total Return Index. created by Structured Solutions 

AG tracks the price movements in shares of companies active in the uranium 

mining industry. Calculated as a total return index and published in USD. its composition 

is ordinarily adjusted twice a year. 

*Roughly two-thirds of the Dow jones Industrial Average's 30 component companies 

are manufacturers of industrial and consumer goods. The others represent 

industries ranging from financial services to entertainment. 

80 

70 

60 

50 

UPP vs. PowerShares DB Commodity Index* 

U308) (previous 52 weeks) 

301 . 18 

Apr.'10 Jun'10 Sep!'10 Nov:10 Jan: 11 Apr.l I 

*The PowerSsares DB Corrynodity Index Tracking Fund ;s designed to provide 

investors with a broadly dniersfied exposure to the returns on the commodities 

markets. It is based on the Deutsche Bank Liquid Conmmrodity Index, which is 

composed of futures contracts on 14 of the most heavily traded and important 

physical commodities 

I 

48 

42 

36 

30 

24 

UPP vs.WNA Nuclear Stock Index* 

(previous 52 weeks) M" (000) 

1,4 

3.2 

3D0 

WNAl 2.8 

2.6 

24 

2.2 

20 

4. 1.8 

1.6 

30 

. . . . .. . . . .. 1.4 

Apr.'l 0 Jun'10 Sep.'10 Nov; 10 Jan.'l I Apr.'l I 

*Maintained by the World Nuclear Association. the World Nuclear Association 

Nuclear Energy Index includes companies engaged in primary building nuclear 

power facilities. design and service reactors, operate nuclear reactors, supply nuclear 

components. technology. and fuel. 

Uranium ($/Ib U308) 

Low -17.00 

High -5.30 

Conversion ($ilgU) 

Low -1.00 

High -1.00 

Enrichment ($/SWU) 

Low 

High 

- ~2011 

M . Fdx Jais 

Monthly Spot Market Prices 

2010 

Dec. Nov'. Oct Sep. Aug. J 

+50.00 +67.00 +61.50 +59.50 +54.00 46.00 45.00 44.00 41.50 

+67.00 +7250 +69.50 +61.50 +60.50 50.50 47.00 46.25 43.00 

:+11.00 +12.00 +11.00 +11.00 +11.00 11.00 

+1200 +13.00 +12.50 +12-50 +13.00 13.00 

9.00 10.00 

13.00 12.50 

+154.00 +154.00 +154.00 +153.00 +153.00 153.00 153.00 153.00 153.00 

+155.00 +155.00 +155.00 +155.00 +155.00 154.00 154.00 155.00 155.00 

NIW monthly UF& SWU and U308 prices rely on the general consensus of direct market participants and is informed by actual market transactions. This section was previously 

known as the Nukem Weeldy Report and the Nukem Price Bulletin. The methodology for NI/s weekly UPP price is different - more information about the methodology behind 

that price is available on page two. 

6.00 

11.00 

-wAIRtmAjt R aja W. Sidaw VIcE CHAiRMAN: Marcel van Poecke. PIEsoENT: Thomas Wallin. EDrrTOR Stephanie Cooke. ASSISTANT EDITOR: Philip ChafLee. WASHINGTON Correspondent 

Sam Tranum REPORTErr James Batty, Jay Edern Bil Munray. Lauren CONeill. Alex Schindelar, Nell Sharusskina. Yen-Ling Song. Clara Tart MAIN OmaC 5 East 37t Street NY, NY 10016 USA. 

Tel: 1-212-532-1112 Fax: I-212-532-483& E.mail: niv,@energyntetcom. Website www.energyintekcom. BU.aEAUS DubaV. 971-4-3642607. Houston: 1-713-222-9700. London: +44 (0)20- 

7518-2200. Moscow. 7-495-721-1611/2. Singapore: 65-6538-0363. Washington: 1.202-662-0700. OTHER PUBUCATIONs: Erey C(sas, Ere& ke- &*ft Go r Re 

Inww 1 *ltFuel Inelpmcs M adeigerc Nas-i Gas Week We lassplas bm~d atee We*dy Oily D4 0 Makes IneigerJ~ca Iedsnteigence We"adi, Wcd Gms Wpmi~r Copyrisgt 0 2011 

by Energy Intelligence Group, inc. ("EIG) ISSN 1940-574X Nuclear Intelligence Weekly is a tradenark of EIG All rights reserved Access. distribution and reproduction are subject to the terms 

and conditions of the subscription agreement and/or license with EI Access. distribution, reproduction or electronic forwarding not speofcally deft ned and authorized in a valid subsctiption agreement 

or license with EIG is willful copyrght infringement. Additional copies of indvidual articles may be obtained using the pay-per-artlde feature offered at www.energyinteLcorn. 


CE 724 of 1220

Wert, Leonard 

From: (b)(6) on behalf of Thomas Saporito [thomas@saprodani-associates.com] 

Sent: 

Monday, April 11, 2011 9:44 PM 

Subject: > 

Japan's nuclear crisis may be raised to the highest level of 

severity, matching Chernobyl's rating, as increasing radiation 

prompts the government to wriden the evacuation zone and as 

aftershocks rocked the country. 

Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency lifted the rating 

level to 7, and will announce the decision at a news conference 

today, national broadcaster NI-K reported on its website. The 

accident at Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s -tation is currently rated 

5 on the global scale, the same as the 1979 partial reactor 

meltdown at Three Mile Island in PennsvIvania. 

Read more ..... 

Thomas Saporito, Senior Consulting Associate 

Email: thomnas@saprodani-associates.corn 

Web: http://Saprodani-Associates.coin 

Post Office Box 8413, Jupiter, Florida 33468 

Phone: (561) 972-8363 Fax: (561) 247-6404 

Saprodani-Associates - Advocate/GreenPeace USA 

CE 725 of 1220

Scheduling Call Summary for April 11, 2011 

Agenda/Action Items: 

1) CSO provided a reminder that the Bi-Annual ISSO Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, 

April 14, 2011, from 8:30 am to 12:30 pm in the TWFN auditorium. 

2) NSIR discussed modified Ops Center staffing and action item tracking for event response 

related to the Japanese earthquake: 

* The Ops Center began reduced staffing on Monday, April 11. Six people will be 

dedicated to event response. The Ops Center will continue to be staffed around the 

clock. A revised watchbill was sent out over the weekend reflecting the reduced staffing. 

* Because of the reduced staffing, some of the tasks that were being completed by the 

Ops Center will be moved to the line organizations. 

* NSIR is looking at establishing a "red ticket' process to track Ops Center actions. Ops 

Center actions would be coordinated with each office through designated office points of 

contact (e.g., TAC, due dates/times, level of concurrence, etc.). 

* "Red tickets" will be used for quick turnaround items. Longer turnaround tasks will be 

handled through other processes (e.g., green tickets). 

" NSIR is evaluating staffing in the Ops Center for the next month or so. 

" The team in Japan will continue to have approximately 11 individuals and they will now 

be staying for 3 week shifts. 

3) CFO discussed budget status: 

* The agency is continuing to operate under a continuing resolution until April 15. 

* Additional funding needs should go through the office CFO points of contact. 

CFO expects the full appropriation to be signed by the end of the week and received 

from OMB in mid-May. 

* CFO does not know yet if the appropriation includes cuts for the NRC, but should by the 

end of this week. 

4) OPA discussed that the re-designed Web site will be rolled out on Friday and announced 

publicly on Monday. 

5) SBCR is working on finalizing the annual diversity action plans to ensure they have an EEO 

focus. SBCR will be contacting some of the offices about refinements they'll be making to 

their plans to address that. 

6) OEDO asked that for questions related to ticketed items, staff work through the office or 

EDO mailroom rather than contacting SECY directly. 

7) OEDO discussed that Mike Weber would be sending out information related to the April 25 

KM Steering Committee meeting. Staff involved in the meeting should use the material to 

prepare. 

CE 726 of 1220

Woodruff, Gena 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Turtil, Richard 

Tuesday, April 12, 2011 9:14 AM 

Woodruff, Gena; Trojanowski, Robert; Tifft, Doug; McNamara, Nancy; Barker, Allan; Logaras, 

Harral; Maier, Bill; Janda, Donna; Lynch, James; Erickson, Randy; McLean, Linda; Howell, 

Linda 

Virgilio, Rosetta; Mroz (Sahm), Sara; Ryan, Michelle; Piccone, Josephine 

FW: Distribution of Situation Reports Generated by NRC 

Nancy, Doug, Bob, Gena, Allan, Harral, Bill, Donna, Jim, Randy, Linda, and Linda: 

Please see below as my proposal to Marty and FSME Management. (I apologize for referring to RSLOs only 

in the e-mail and not including RSAOs and others). The Situation Reports (SitReps) are now generated just 

once per day, at 12:00, as opposed to 0430 and 1800. I believe that Sarah's distribution will have you 

receiving these reports. But note: they are NOT for distribution to the States; however, you can speak to the 

states using this information. 

Please let me know of any conflicts or questions you may have with this approach. Thank you. 

Rich 

Richard Turtil, Chief 

Intergovernmental Liaison Branch 

Office of Federal and State M4aterials and Environmental Mianagenment Progranas 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnmi.sion 

301-415-2308 

800-368-5642 

From: Turtil, Richard 

Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 9:06 AM 

To: Virgilio, Martin; Moore, Scott; Piccone, Josephine; Lewis, Robert 

Cc: Wiggins, Jim; Dyer, Jim; Evans, Michele; Weber, Michael; Virgilio, Rosetta; Mroz (Sahm), Sara 

Subject: Distribution of Situation Reports Generated by NRC 

Marty, Scott, Josie, and Rob: 

As my staff in the State Liaison Operations Center and I recall, our first week in the Ops Center, we were given 

the OK to share status update reports with the RSLOs a few days into the event and only for their info. One of 

my staff recall marking the email transmittal to RSLOs as "OUO - FOR INFORMATION ONLY - NOT FOR 

DISSEMINATION." The RSLOs could use the reports as talking points, but were not to forward/disseminate to 

the States. (We subsequently received push back from the RSLOs for information they could provide the 

States.) 

Sara Mroz (NSIR/Ops Center) recalls that when she transmitted the status update reports, Bill Maier and Linda 

Howe, RIV were on distribution to receive the OUO reports from the very beginning of the event because NRC 

was monitoring Diablo and SONGS. Sara stated the remaining RSLOs were placed on distribution within the 

first week, following FEMA's request that the RAC chairs be added to distribution. At that time, the OUO 

reports were marked to further designate as only being shared within the Federal family. 

1 

CE 727 of 1220

The latest language recommended by Roy Zimmerman adds language indicating the report be shared beyond 

NRC only upon NRC approval. However, it was not made clear as to who in NRC approves the information 

sharing: Chairman, EDO, ET, individual RSLOs? Marty believes that: "they should not be handed or forwarded 

to the State reps and the public." 

DILR/ILB ACTION: 

Going forward, we will provide guidance to the RSLOs that such reports are NOTto be distributed to 

State representatives, but that information in the reports could be shared verbally as useful. We will 

also seek to determine if this approach satisfies the current need for information, both of the RSLOs 

and the States. 

Please let me know if you have questions and/or comments. Thank you. 

Rich 


Intergovernmental Liaison Branch 

Office of Federal and State 4Taterials and En,ii-ou,,,ental M.•anagement Programis 

U.S. Nuclear Regalatory Commission 

301-415-2308 

800-368-5642 

2 

CE 728 of 1220

Seymour, Deborah 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Dean Murphy [dmurphy@eyeforenergy.com] 

Tuesday, April 12, 2011 11:01 AM 


NRC Grants Exelon a Power Uprate for Limerick Reactors 

Hi Deborah 

I read a few articles this week that may be of interest to you - I thought I'd fire them across... 

* NRC Grants Exelon a Power Uprate for Limerick Reactors 

" Uprates Post-Fukushima: Pumping up nuclear's volume 

* EPA Cooling System Rule Could Force Plant Retrofits 

All of the articles can be found online at http://www.nuclearenerpyinsider.com/nuclear-power-uprateconference/news.shtml 

PS: The Super Early Bird Discount for this year's Nuclear Power Uprate Conference will expire next Friday 

(April 22) - you can download the brochure at http://www.nuclearenergvinsider.com/nuclear-power-uprateconference/download-brochure.shtml 

to access all of the conference details 

Best Regards 

Dean Murphy 

Senior Industry Analyst 

Nuclear Energy Insider 

Tel: +44 (0) 207 375 7204 

US TOLL FREE: 1800 814 3459 ext 7204 

Address: 7-9 Fashion St, London, El 6PX, UK 

Email: dmurphy~d'eyeforenergv.com 

Website: http://analysis.nuclearenergvinsider.com/ 

To unsubscribe from future mailings, simply click here 

CE 729 of 1220

Wert, Leonard 

From: El =(b)(6) [on behalf of Thomas Saporito [thomas@saprodani-associates.com] 

Sent: 

'-Tuesday, April 12, 20"11 12:07 PM 

Subject: > 

He stressed that unlike at Chernobyl, where the reactor itself 

exploded and fire fanned the release of radioactive material, the 

containments at the tour troubled reactors at Fukushima remained 

intact overall. 

But at a separate news conference, an official from the plant's 

operator, Tokyo Electric and Power, said. "The radiation leak has 

not stopped completely and our concern is that it could eventually 

exceed Chemobyl." 

"This is an admission by the Japanese government that the 

amount of radiation released into the environment has reached a 

new order of magnitude." said Tetsuo Iguchi, a professor in 

quantum engineering at Nagoya University. 

"The fact that we have now confirmed the world's second-ever 

level 7 accident will have huge consequences for the global 

nuclear Industry. It shows that current safety standards are 

woefully inadequate." 

Read more... 

Thomas Saporilo. Senior Cosuhl.ing Assciiute 

Email: thomas @saprodani-associates.com 

Wet: http://Saprodani-Associates.com 

Post Office Box 8413. Jupiter, Eklouida 33468 

Phone: (561) 972-8363 Fax: (561) 247-6404 

Saprodani-Associaes - AdwocaCiGrcenPeace USA 

CE 730 of 1220

Travick, Vanette 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Bentz, Julie A.f 

(b)(6) 

Tuesday. Aoril12, 2011 2:46 PM 

(b)(6) 

Cc: 

Subject: 

'EOCEnvironmentalUnit@epamail.epa.gov' 

FW: LLRW Disposition 

C 

Friends, 

Here are some reasonable suggestions from NRC to DoD's question on LLRW. Many thanks to both EPA and 

raising our understanding and in particular clarifying the regulatory pieces of this issue. 

NRC in 

Thanksl 

JulieBentzj 

1 

CE 731 of 1220

From: Hoc, PMT12 [mailto:PMT12.Hoc@nrc.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 2:25 PM 

To: Bentz, Julie A. 

Cc: OSTO0 HOC; Hoc, PMT12 

Subject: RE: LLRW Disposition 

Hi Julie. 

Here is the NRC response to the questions embedded in the string of emails. Please let us know if 

we can clarify or if you want to discuss more. 

2 

CE 732 of 1220

(b)(5) 

From: Bentz, Julie A. [mailto 

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:08 PM 

To: 

(b)(6) 

(b)(6) 

(b)(6) 

3 

CE 733 of 1220

(b)(6) 

Subject: LLRW Disposition 

Dan, 

Thanks for helping us understand where the issues are on this problem. 

(b)(5) 

(b)(5) 

Can I get an answer from NRC and EPA to these questions by COB tomorrow? EPA Ops Center and 

NRC Ops Center are on this email to forward this request to the correct plavers. If EPA or 

NRCA 

(b)(5) 

(b)(5) 

Thanks! 

Julie Bentz 

S (b)(6) 

Original ----- Message ----- 

From: Schultheisz.Daniel~epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Schultheisz.Daniel~epamail.epa.gov] On 

Behalf Of EOCEnvironmentalUnit@epamail.epa.gov 

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:57 AM 

To: 

Subject: Fw: Draft read-out 1600 Telecon 04/07/11 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposition 

I hope this helps. 

Hopefully this will become more clear as the situation evolves.. 

Dan Schultheisz 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Radiation and Indoor Air 

4 

CE 734 of 1220

Radiation Protection Division 

(202) 343-9349 

Forwarded -- by Epahq Eoc/DC/USEPA/US on 04/08/2011 02:07 PM 

From: "Steele,_Jeffrey M CIV SEA 08 NR" 

I 

(b)(6) 

To: %0- 

Date: 04/08/2011 12:53 PM 

Subject: RE: Draft read-out 1600 Telecon 04/07/11 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposition 

Dr. 

Idar, 

Given that much of the call was spent describing 

ground in Japan, I think a short summary of that 

summary. Here is a proposed paragraph. 

the current radiological status on the 

status would be useful in the telecon 

(b)(5) 

5 

CE 735 of 1220

(b)(5) 

Jeff Steele 

Naval Reactors 

202-781-6192 


From: Idar, Deanne J CIV OSD POLICY [mailtol 

(b)(6) 

Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:55 PM 

To: 

Subject: Draft read-out 1600 Telecon 04/07/11 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposition 

UN6;CA R49HD POR-Oi-ii.LIAL -- "US101Y 

ALCON: 

6 

CE 736 of 1220

The draft read-out from today's 1600 Telecon on the Low Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) 

Disposition is attached (and copied below) for your review. I welcome feedback from the 

participants on any missing 

due-outs or key points. 

Thanks again to all that were able to participate in our discussion. 

Best, 

Deanne 

> 

Low Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) Disposition IA (Sub-set) Telecon: 

1600-1700 Thursday, 6 April 2011 

Participants: 

1. NNSA/DOE: EM HQ Office of Disposal Operations Office, General Counsel, NE 

2. EPA 

3. NRC 

4. NSS 

5. DoD: DoD LLRW Disposition Advisory Committee Chair, Naval Reactors, OSD(P)/CWMD 

Facilitator: Dr. Deanne J. Idar, OSD Policy/Global Strategic Affairs/CWMD/ CBRN Defense 

Due outs: 

1. DOE: Verify if DOE AMS assets have had any radioactive levels above clearance criteria; 

follow-up w Julie Bentz, NSS 

2. NRC: provide DOS POCs information to OSD(P)/CWMD who will distribute to DoD LLRW 

Disposition Advisory Committee Chair 

3. NSS: facilitate connection to DOS contacts for OSD(P)/CWMD 

Agenda 

1. Roll Call 

2. Review of 4 questions posed by DoD LLRW Disposition Advisory Committee 

a. 

b. 

(b)(5) 

c. 

d. 

3. Wrap up 

Meeting Summary: 

The objective of today's telecon was to assist the DoD in developing the 

appropriate guidance to address any regulatory requirements for the 

appropriate disposition of LLWR generated by DoD operations in support 

of Operation Tomodachi OCONUS and CONUS. The 4 questions identified 

above were reviewed. Key points follow: 

(b)(5) 

7 1t 

CE 737 of 1220

(b)(5) 

See background NRC regulations information provided by Ms. Janice Owens, NRC, regarding 


general license for import, and definitions as follows. 

§ 110.27 General license for import. 

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a general license is issued 

to any person to import byproduct, source, or special nuclear material if the U.S. consignee 

is authorized to receive and possess the material under a general or specific NRC or 

Agreement State license issued by the Commission or a State with which the Commission has 

entered into an agreement under Section 274b. of the 

Atomic Energy Act. 

(b) The general license in paragraph (a) of this section does not authorize the import of 

more than 100 kilograms per shipment of source and/or special nuclear material in the form of 

irradiated fuel. 

(c) Paragraph (a) of this section does not authorize the import under a general license of 

radioactive waste. 

(d) A person importing formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material (as defined 

in § 73.2 of this chapter) under this general license shall provide the notifications 

required by § 73.27 and § 73.72 of this chapter. 

(e) A general license is issued to any person to import the major components of a utilization 

facility as defined in § 110.2 for end- use at a utilization facility licensed by the 

Commission. 

(f) Importers of radioactive material listed in Appendix P to this part must provide the 

notifications required by § 110.50. 

[51 FR 47208, Dec. 31, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 38336, Aug. 13, 1991; 58 FR 13003, Mar. 9, 

1993; 60 FR 37564, July 21, 1995; 61 FR 35602, July 8, 1996; 65 FR 70291, Nov. 22, 2000; 68 

FR 31589, May 28, 2003; 70 FR 

37991, July 1, 2005; 75 FR 44089, Jul. 28, 2010] 

§ 110.2 Definitions. 

Radioactive waste, for the purposes of this part, means any material that contains or is 

contaminated with source, byproduct,.or special nuclear material that by its possession would 

require a specific radioactive material license in accordance with this Chapter and is 

imported or exported for the purposes of disposal in a land disposal facility as defined in 

10 CFR part 61, a disposal area as defined in Appendix A to 10 CFR part 40, or an equivalent 

facility; or recycling, waste treatment or other waste management process that generates 

radioactive material for disposal in a land disposal facility as defined in 10 CFR part 61, a 

disposal area as defined in Appendix A to 10 CFR part 40, or an equivalent facility. 

Radioactive waste does not include radioactive material that is- 

8 

CE 738 of 1220

(1) Of U.S. origin and contained in a sealed source, or device containing a sealed source, 

that is being returned to a manufacturer, distributor or other entity which is authorized to 

receive and possess the sealed source or the device containing a sealed source; 

(2) A contaminant on any non-radioactive material (including service tools and protective 

clothing) used in a nuclear facility (an NRC- or Agreement State-licensed facility (or 

equivalent facility) or activity authorized to possess or use radioactive material), if the 

material is being shipped solely for recovery and beneficial reuse of the non-radioactive 

material in a nuclear facility and not for waste 

management purposes or disposal; 

(3) Exempted from regulation by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or equivalent Agreement 

State regulations; 

(4) Generated or used in a U.S. Government waste research and development testing program 

under international arrangements; 

(5) Being returned by or for the U.S. Government or military to a facility that is authorized 

to possess the material; or 

(6) Imported solely for the purposes of recycling and not for waste management or disposal 

where there is a market for the recycled material and evidence of a contract or business 

agreement can be produced upon request by the NRC. 

Note: The definition of radioactive waste in this part does not include spent or irradiated 

fuel. 

Deanne J. Idar, Ph.D. 

Senior Science Advisor 

OSD(P)-GSA/CWMD/ CBRN Defense Policy 

Office: Rm 5C746 Pentagon 

Phone: 703-571-2327 

Blackberry: 

(b)(6) 

CE 739 of 1220

Vias, Steven 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Karen Brackett/ 

Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:12 PM 

Vias, Steven 

Data Cover Up Continues 

(b)(6) 

~1 

,I 

"Based on government estimates, the equivalent of 500,000 terabecquerels of radiation from iodine-131 has been 

released into the atmosphere since the crisis began, well above the several tens of thousandsof terabecquerels needed 

to reach level 7. A terabecquerel equals a trillion becquerels, a measure of radiation emissions. The Chernobyl incident 

released 5.2 million terabecquerels into the air. 

Quoted from 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/as iapan earthquake: ylt=AsTse0cTS2QQnoi5Hq8JMV2sONUE: ylu=X3oDMTNqNGQwbm 

RrBGFzc2VOA2FwLzlwMTEwN DEVL2FzX2phcGFuX2VhcnRocXVha2UEY2NvZG UDbW9zdH BvcHVsYXI EY3BvcwMxBH 

BvcwMzBH BOA2hvbWVfY29rZORzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3NOb3J5BH NsawNmdWxsbmJzcHN0b31- 

The data that is concerning and greatly misleading about this report is that they are comparing the total release of iodine 

131 from Fukushima to the total isotope release of Chernobyl. That would be like two fruit trucks carrying twelve different 

types of fruits each crashing... and then saying the Fukushima truck only spilled 600,000 oranges... while the Chernobyl 

truck spilled 5.2 million oranges, apples, lemons, limes, apricots, grapefruits, grapes, tangerines, etc. etc... therefore the 

Chernobyl wreck was far worse... when in fact the Fukushima truck also spilled those others fruits too but would not 

account for their releases. It's a cover up. It's really a criminal cover up to make such a claim. 

Karen Sherry Brackett 

19 

CE 740 of 1220

Davenport, Patricia 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Mills, Daniel 

Tuesday, April 12, 2011 6:24 PM 

Nosek, Andrew 

RE: Good info. 

http:/lwww.iaif.or.iplenqlish/ 

From: Nosek, Andrew 


To: Mills, Daniel; Wagner, Brian 

Subject: FW: Good info. 

This is the Powerpoint presentation that I was not able to forward from home... 

AJ Nosek 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Division of Systems Analysis 

(301)251-7476 

From: Gibson, Kathy 

Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:03 PM 

To: RES_DSA 

Subject: Fw: Good info. 

Gives a good description of the accident progression on all of the Fukushima units. 

From: Uhle, Jennifer 

To: Johnson, Michael; Sheron, Brian; Gibson, Kathy 

Sent: Sun Mar 27 02:37:04 2011 


From: OST01 HOC 

Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:49 PM 

To: Miller, Chris; Uhle, Jennifer; Virgilio, Martin 

Cc: FOIA Response.hoc Resource 


Gives a good description of the accident progression on all of the units. 

Steve Campbell 

EST Coordinator 

From: Jervey, Richard 

Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:15 PM 

To: OST01 HOC; RST02 Hoc 


CE 741 of 1220

Regards, 

R. A. Jervey 

RES/DE/RGDB 

CS2AO7 

301/251-7404 

2 

CE 742 of 1220

Wert, Leonard 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Wert, Leonard 

Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:09 AM 

Croteau, Rick; Jones, William 

Hopper, George 

FW: Simulator demonstration of SBO and SAMG 

FYI 

From: Lew, David 


To: Howell, Art 

Cc: Satorius, Mark; McCree, Victor; Wert, Leonard 

Subject: RE: Simulator demonstration of SBO and SAMG 

Art, 

I received a call this afternoon from Marty who had feedback from NEI who asserted that someone from the 

NRC requested Ginna perform simulations of SBO and demonstrate the ability to execute SAMGs. I was not 

aware of any requests that we had made, so our TI-183 manager (Larry Doerflein) pulsed our inspection staff. 

Dave 

From: Howell, Art 


To: Lew, David 

Subject: Fw: Simulator demonstration of SBO and SAMG 

Dave, 

Any more background on this one? 

From: Virgilio, Martin 

To: Lew, David 

Cc: Dean, Bill; Cianci, Sandra; McCree, Victor; Satorius, Mark; Howell, Art; Helton, Shana; Bush-Goddard, Stephanie; 

Andersen, James 

Sent: Tue Apr 12 17:53:17 2011 

Subject: Re: Simulator demonstration of SBO and SAMG 

Thanks Dave 

From: Lew, David 

To: Virgilio, Martin 

Cc: Dean, Bill; Cianci, Sandra 

Sent: Tue Apr 12 17:49:46 2011 

Subject: Simulator demonstration of SBO and SAMG 

Marty, 

We still need to get you a complete answer; however, we have gathered the below information: 

1. NMP1 invited the resident inspector to observe and did perform these simulations earlier this week; 

however, this was not requested by the inspectors. 

1 

CE 743 of 1220

2. Ginna is planning to run these simulations and have invited the residents, but we still need to confirm that 

this was not requested by the inspectors. 

3. We are still checking with Fitzpatrick and Calvert Cliffs 

4. The inspectors at all other Region I sites have not requested simulator runs, and have no knowledge that 

runs are being conducted. 

Next steps: 

1. Continue follow-up with Fitzpatrick, Calvert Cliffs and Ginna inspectors. 

2. If Constellation is the only licensee conducting these simulations, we will reach out and ask the impetus for 

this initiative. 

3. We have, and will continue, to emphasize our expectations with inspectors regarding scope of TI-1 83 

which does not include simulator runs. 

Dave 

David C. Lew 

Deputy Regional Administrator 

NRC Region I 

610-337-5340 

2 

CE 744 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

McCree, Victor 


Lanksbury, Roger 

Re: F,., OFFICIAL USE ON. Y - 0700 EDT (March 17, 2011) USNRC Earthquake/Tsunami 

SitRep - FOR OFFICIAL USE ,NI Y 

Got it, thanks Roger. 

This email is being sent from an NRC Blackberry device. 

From: Lanksbury, Roger 

To: McCree, Victor 

Sent: Wed Apr 13 06:56:29 2011 

Subject: RE: FOR OFFICIAL USE-ONLY - 0700 EDT (March 17, 2011) USNRC Earthquake/Tsunami SitRep - FOR 

OFCL EO 

My new passport just arrived and I am still willing to help in any way I can. 

Senior Project Manager 

Division of Construction Projects 

Construction Projects Branch 2 

Region II 

630-829-9631 

630-515-1259 (fax) 


Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 11:35 AM 


Subject: RE: FOR OFFIIAL USE NLY - 0700 EDT (March 17, 2011) USNRC Earthquake/Tsunami SitRep - FOR 

OFFICIAL USE ONLY 

I just sent it in to get a renewed one. 

Roger Za""svr 




Region II 

630-829-9631 

630-515-1259 (fax) 

From: McCree, Victor 


To: Lanksbury, Roger 

Cc: Blarney, Alan 

Subject: RE: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONWY - 0700 EDT (March 17, 2011) USNRC Earthquake/Tsunami SitRep - FOR 

CE 745 of 1220

Ok, thanks Roger. Do you have a current passport? 

Vic 




Cc: Blarney, Alan 

Subject: RE: FOR-OFFIC+AL US17-0'JY - 0700 EDT (March 17, 2011) USNRC Earthquake/Tsunami SitRep - FGR 

OFFIGLAL UwE ONL 

Vic, I heard you mention today on the CCI briefing on Japan that you have a list of individuals that had volunteered to 

help. I had not seen anything on how or who to volunteer to but was interested in being a volunteer. I would like to 

volunteer to help in any way that I can, including going to Japan. I have extensive BWR experience, including 

construction and testing, having been a BWR operator license examiner, a BWR SRI, and a qualified emergency response 

manager and reactor safety manager in Rill. If the NRC can use my help in responding to the event in Japan I stand by to 

do whatever is needed. 




Region II 

630-829-9631 

630-515-1259 (fax) 



To: R2MAIL; R2_RESIDENT SITES 

Subject: FOkROFFICrAL uSE ONLY - 0700 EDT (March 17, 2011) USNRC Earthquake/Tsunami SitRep - FLR-OFREIL 

USEONIY- 

FOR-OFHCIAL USE ONLY 

Attached, for your information, is the 0700, March 17, 2011, NRC situation report regarding the impacts of the 

earthquake/tsunami event. For your convenience, I (yellow) highlighted several of the noteworthy status 

items. As a reminder, this information is considered FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY and is not to be distributed 

outside the agency. 

Vic 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLV 

2 

CE 746 of 1220

I, 

it 

Wert, Leonard 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

CD 

Cobey, Eugene 


Wert, Leonard; Gody, Tony 

Re: DRAFT TI Comments 

Len, 

I am on my way to headquarters as I write this... 

Gene 

This email is being sent from an NRC mobile device. 

From: Wert, Leonard 

To: Gody, Tony 

Cc: Cobey, Eugene 

Sent: Wed Apr 13 07:10:38 2011 

Subject: DRAFT TI Comments 

Tony, 

I'm not sure that the draft is that far off, but some major questions I had: 

(b)(5) 

Just my input... Len 

I 

CE 747 of 1220

Coovert, Nicole 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

NEI SmartBrief [nei@smartbrief.com] 



April 13, 2011 - NEI exec touts safety performance of existing U.S. reactors 

Reading this on a mobile device? Try our optimized mobile version here: http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/cRwqCanVomBZbaaXCicPaeCicNKFiE 

APRIL 13, 2011 

I SIGN UP I FORWARD I ARCHIVE I RSS FEED I ADVERTISE ý 

News about the nuclear technologies Industry 

Search past news 

I News Roundup I 

Sporsored by: 

NEI exec touts safety performance of existing U.S. reactors 

Industry experts are defending the safety of existing U.S. nuclear plants in the aftermath of the 

crisis in Japan. "The next generation will be a safer generation of plants, but I want to 

emphasize this generation of plants has an extremely high performance rating over the last 30 

years or so," said Stewart Minahan, executive director of operations for the Nuclear Energy 

Institute. He noted several safety enhancements, including tougher containment buildings, 

diesel generators and additional cooling systems. Fort Worth Star-Telegram (Texas)/McClatchy 

Newspapers (4/12) Shire: ' A I LATEf-tOr i 

TEPCO readies payment plans for people affected by Fukushima 

Tokyo Electric Power is readying compensation options for people affected by the Fukushima 

Dalichi nuclear crisis. "My biggest responsibility is to resolve the situation at the Fukushima 

Daiichi plant, fully support people who have been evacuated and make sure we provide 

electricity by overcoming the supply shortage as soon as possible," said TEPCO President 

Masataka Shimizu. Reuters (4/13) Share: OWrJ E-IL I ReLATM iýOASI 

Jaczko unsurprised by Japan's move to boost nuclear severity 

Japan's decision to increase the severity of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear crisis from level 5 to 7 

on the International Nuclear Event Scale was "not surprising," said Gregory Jaczko, chairman of 

the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. "It's been clear that this is a very serious incident and I 

think people have been responding appropriately," he added. Reuters (4/12) Sfrire: id 'I 

Experts: Japan could use fewer, more productive reactors 

Japan could manage with fewer reactors if it focused on improving the efficiency of existing 

ones, nuclear experts say. It wouldn't have needed multi-reactor facilities such as the 

Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex, which was severely damaged by a major earthquake and 

tsunami March 11. "They have to add more nuclear units than they would need" if the facilities 

were more efficient, said Andrew Kadak, a former professor of nuclear engineering at the 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Wall Street Journal (4/13) S LOrM: L-•ll A 

SFIropAT 

STORMS gol 

Sarcophagus an option to stabilize Japan crisis, experts say 

1 

CE 748 of 1220

Constructing protective encasements could be the best way to stabilize the damaged Fukushima 

Daiichi nuclear plant, Russian experts said. "I don't think the construction of protective reactor 

shells can be avoided, but the question is, what they will be like?" said Leonid Bolshakov, 

director of Russia's Nuclear Energy Safety Institute. RIA Novosti (Russia) (4/12) Share! U]IR 

I- [---s LEfff 

SCE asks for $64M to conduct seismic studies at Calif. plant 

Southern California Edison is requesting $64 million from the California Public Utilities 

Commission to carry out seismic reviews of its San Onofre nuclear plant. The amount makes up 

less than 1% of its total rate charges, the utility said. Reuters (4/12) Share, C lr Eat L 

I RELATED STORIES ] 

SCE&G says S.C. plant is protected from catastrophes 

A nuclear crisis like that in Japan is unlikely to occur at SCE&G's facility in Jenkinsville, S.C., 

because it is far from major seismic zones, said Stephen Byrne, SCE&G's chief operating officer 

and head of power generation and transmission. SCE&G invited the media to tour the facility to 

allay "fear of the unknown," Byrne said. "We have nothing to hide." The State (Columbia. S.C.) 

(4/13) Share.- RlAnI ELATED ST--E- I 

Enterprise Asset Management: Running Smarter Buildings 

By using IBM Maximo solutions, facilities have been able to move from 

a preventative maintenance system to a predictive maintenance 

. .... system, enabling true efficiencies throughout the organization. In this 

video from IBM. learn how to run your building smarter and in turn, 

create innovation for your organization and end consumers. 

I~~~ Mangemnt Ledrhp 

Companies continue to provide perks for CEOs 

Perks remain key to attracting and retaining top CEOs, with companies continuing to offer 

packages that include corporate jets, legal advice, vehicles and personal trainers, according to a 

USA TODAY analysis of 2011 corporate proxy statements. "It's not like directors haven't thought 

about getting rid of perks. They're still a sticking point for a lot of executives. They feel it's part 

of their compensation package. And it's a stature thing," said Andrew Goldstein of Towers 

Watson. USA TODAY (4/11) 5tih-areQ I -MAIL 11 RELATEO S'o~tES I 

Why great leaders need green thumbs 

Great leaders and master gardeners have more in common than you might think, writes Kevin 

Eikenberry. Practicality and planning are essential for nurturing both plants and people, 

Eikenberry argues, but so too are a wildly optimistic streak and an ability to take full advantage 

of bumper crops when they come your way. "Recognize that as a leader you are in the growing 

business: you are growing people towards their potential," he writes. KevinEikenberry.com 

(4/11) She: JIlY-l ý R-ELATEDST-OREsl I 

Business Gold Rewards Card® from American Express OPEN has 

unlimited Membership Rewards® points potential: 

" Get 25,000 bonus points when you spend $50,000 or more per year 

" Save 3%-10% automatically on business expenses from FedEx, 

Hertz®, OfficeMax®, and more with OPEN Savings® 

* No annual Card membership fee the first year - a $125 savings 

Apply Now. 

2 

CE 749 of 1220

I Fetue Cotnt' 

Im 

Forum- 

3 Steps To Better Manacement For Any Business Tim Berry 

6 Things To Consider When Hiring An SEO Firm Susan Roth 

8 Ways To Cut Business Travel Costs Mike Michalowicz &MVIJ 

10 Personality Traits That Kill Entrepreneurship Alana Horowitz MAI 

5 Easy Ways To Green Your Business Katie Morell E-'," I 

a Sponso:red by: rrC 

GE, Hitachi file decommissioning plan for Fukushima Daiichi reactors 

General Electric and Hitachi have filed a proposal to decommission the Fukushima Daiichi 

nuclear plant amid ongoing stabilization efforts there. The plan was filed April 8 and includes 

Bechtel and Exelon, said Yuichi Izumisawa, a spokesman for Hitachi. Groups led by Toshiba and 

Areva have submitted similar plans. Bloomberg (4/12) • 'lri 

Nuclear power veterans eye tougher safety rules for reactors 

Sixteen former and current nuclear industry officials are seeking heightened safety at reactors 

in an effort to prevent another large-scale disaster. Safety standards for existing and new 

nuclear facilities must be studied in the aftermath of the Fukushima Dafichi crisis in Japan, they 

said in a letter to International Atomic Energy Agency Director-General Yukiya Amano, and all 

steps taken to guarantee that such structures can handle disasters. Platts (4/12) ' M r. 

Master social media by learning from the best 

The fully online Social Media Success summit will help you master 

social media marketing with extensive case studies and how-to 

sessions from actual social media experts and book authors. Register 

tndav fnr 5COln nff dinrnunt! 

This SmartBrief was created for Nicole.Coovert@nrc.gov 

M 

Subscriber Tools 

Advertise 

Account Executive: 

3 

CE 750 of 1220

71"1" twill U 1" MD ffftlftm-ý` I I E-MAK THIS gOM10' Diana Angel (202) 470-1146 

Update account information I Change e-mail address I Unsubscribe I 

Print friendly. format I Web version I Search past news I Archive I 

Privacy policy 

Download Media Kit 

Follow NEI: Litl" 

YUM 

Publish your Press Release 

Recent NEI SmartBrief Issues: 

Tuesday, April 12. 2011 

Monday, April 11, 2011 

Friday. Aoril 08, 2011 

Thursday. Anril 07. 2011 

Wednesday, April 06, 2011 

Lead Editor: Bryan McBournie 

Mailing Address: 

SmartBrief. Inc.A, 1100 H ST NW, Suite 1000, 

Washington, DC 20005 

© 1999-2011 SmartBrief, Inc.® Legal Information 

4 

CE 751 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Gard, Lee A (INPO) [GardLA@INPO.org] 


Blarney, Alan; Wittick, Brian; Casto, Chuck; Collins, Elmo; Gauntt, Randall 0; 

michael.call@nrc.gov; Hay, Michael; Miller, Marie; richard.kondo@crbard.com; Bernhard, 

Rudolph; Salay, Michael 

FW: April 13 briefing notes, excel spreadsheet and radiation survey map 

Ryan speaking notes 6 pm briefing April 13.doc; TEPCO Summary Rev.83 Final April 

13(1 ).xls; 20110412 0930 Facility Area Survey Data [1].pdf 

Here are the latest notes and information. 

DISCLAIMER: 

This e-mail arnd any of its attachments may contain proprietary INPO or WANO information that iG privileged, confidential, or protected by copyright befonging to 

INPO or WANO. This e-mail is intendect solely for the use of the individual or unlity for whichi it is intended. Ift you are nof thL intended recipient of this e-rnaif, any 

disseminafion, distribution, copying. or action taken in refation to the contents of and atlachmeans to this e-mail is contrary to the rights of fNPO or VVANO and is 

prohibited. It you are nof the Intended recipient of this a-malt, please not ily the sender immediately by return e-mail and penmanently delete thie original and any 

copy or prinfoul of this e-miail and any attachments. 

Thank you. 

CE 752 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Importance: 


Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:02 PM 

McNamara, Nancy; Tifft, Doug; Trojanowski, Robert; Woodruff, Gena; Barker, Allan; Logaras, 

Harral; Maier, Bill 

Virgilio, Rosetta 

Distribution of Situation Reports Generated by NRC 

High 

RSLOs: 

(b)(5) 

Note: the Sitreps are now being developed and distributed just once a day, at 12:00 noon. 

I look forward to your prompt responses as Scott wishes to contact the Regions soon. Thanks. 

Rich 

CE 753 of 1220

Vanette 

Travick, 


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

LIA07 Hoc 


LIA07 Hoc; Liaison Japan 

Pleas l- Status Update - 1200 EDT, April 13, 2011 

USNRC Earthquake-Tsunami Update.041311.1200EDT.docx 

Attached is the latest Status Update. 

Please let me know if you have any changes for the next issue (1200 EDT, April 14). 

Sara 

CE 754 of 1220

FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI 

Status as of 6pm (JST) April 13, 2011- TC Briefing. (All times JST) 

The priorities remain as follows: 

" Ensuring fresh water injection and cooling capabilities to the reactors 

and spent fuel pools. Goal is to reduce and maintain temperature in 

the reactors and spent fuel pools below 100 degrees centigrade. 

* Draining water from the turbine buildings and trenches to reduce the 

radiation levels so that work can continue. 

" Containing the spread of radioactive materials. 

Highlights for today include the following: 

* Trails of white vapor are intermittently being seen coming out of the 

units 2 and 3 reactor buildings. Vapor is seen less frequently from 

Units 1 and 4. 

* N2 purging of Unit 1 continues. Drywell pressure has been steady or 

slightly decreasing over the past 72 hours. 

0 Transfer of radioactive water from the Unit 2 trench started last night. 

A decrease in trench and Unit 2 turbine building water level was noted. 

The transfer was suspended at 11:00 today to conduct planned checks 

and will start again tonight. 

a 

195 tons of water was added to the Unit 4 Spent fuel pool early this 

morning. During sampling of the Unit 4 SFP reported yesterday, water 

level was confirmed to be 2 meters above the top of fuel. 

* 35 tons of water was sprayed into the Unit 3 SFP on 4/12. It was 

confirmed to be full by a camera on the elephant. 

0 Addition of water to the Unit 2 SFP is planned for today. 

* The Fukushima prefectural government began on Tuesday a program 

to measure radiation levels at more than 2700 locations across the 

region. 

* Small amounts of strontium have been detected in soil and plants 

outside of the 30-kilometer zone. Samples were taken during the 

period March 16 - 19. 

* The unmanned helicopter flights were cancelled today because of wind 

conditions. 

Unit Status 

* In Unit 1, non-borated fresh water injection into the main feedwater line 

continues at 6 cubic meters/hr. Comments on parameters: 

CE 755 of 1220

- Reactor pressure indicator A increased slightly to .432 MPa g, (61 

psig). Indicator B continues to increase and is considered to 

unreliable. 

- Feedwater nozzle temperature continues to decrease and is 

reading 206 C (403 F). Because of recent fluctuations this 

parameter is suspect. 

- Reactor vessel lower temperature has remained steady at 119 C 

(246 F) 

- Drywell and torus pressure remains relatively steady at .190 MPa 

abs (27.6 psia) and .165 MPa abs (23 psia) respectively. 

- Dose rates in the Torus continue to decrease slightly to 10.4 

Sv/hr (1,040 Rem/hr.) 

" In Unit 2, injection of non-borated fresh water using the low pressure 

coolant injection continues at 7 cubic meters/hr, (= to the goal and 

equivalent to the decay heat rate 14 days after shutdown.) Comments 

on parameters: 

- Unit 2 reactor pressures remain fairly stable. 

- Feedwater nozzle temperature has continued to increase and is 

up 4.3 C to 170.1 C (338 F) 

- Reactor vessel lower temperature is believed unreliable. 

- Drywell pressure is stable at .095 MPa abs (13.8 psi) 

- Dose rates in the U2 Drywell and Torus continue to decrease. 

The drywell dose rates are at 27.9 Sv/hr or (2,790 Rem/hr) and 

the dose rate in the Torus has decreased to .656 Sv/hr or (65.6 

Rem/hr.) 

" In Unit 3, injection of non-borated fresh water using the low pressure 

coolant injection line continues at 7 cubic meters/hr (= to the goal and 

equivalent to the decay heat rate 14 days after shutdown.). Comments 

on parameters: 

- Unit 3 pressures are stable. 

- Feedwater nozzle temperature is fluctuating day-to-day and has 

decreased to 96 C (205 F). As previously noted, this indicator is 

questionable. 

- Reactor vessel lower temperature has continued to increase 

slightly and is at 119.3 C (247 F) 

- Drywell pressure is increasing slightly and is at .105 MPa abs 

(15.3 psi). Torus pressure decreased slightly to .169 MPa abs 

(24.5 psi). 

- Dose rates in the U3 Drywell and Torus continue to decrease. 

The drywell is at 17.4 Sv/hr (1,740 Rem/hr) and the dose rate in 

the Torus is .671 Sv/hr or (67.1 Rem/hr.) 

* Preparations are continuing to transfer water from the Unit 3 condenser 

hotwell to the CST. 

Dose Rates 

2 

CE 756 of 1220

Overall site dose rates are decreasing. For example: 

> The last reading reported at the main gate was 76 pSv /hr or 

(7.6 millirem/hour). 

> The side of the administration building facing the units is at 573 

pSv/hr or 57 mrem/hr. 

> The dose rate at the west gate is reported to be 40 pSv /hr or (4 

millirem/hour). 

> We will send the latest site survey map with our briefing notes. 

3 

CE 757 of 1220


From: Idar, Deanne J CIV OSD POLICYI (b)(6) 

Sent: 


To: 

'EOCEnvironmental Unit@epamail.epa.gov'; Bentz, J4Jie A.; Lane, Aikoiean CIV OSD. 

POLICY;, (b)(6) JMcCaughey, Bill; (b)(6) Lj 

Curry, M1hael R; David Bowman; Farrand, David E SEA04 04N; Wilber, Deb; 

DemingRM@state.gov; Douglas.Tonkay@em.doe.gov; McGinnis, Edward; 

Eoc.Epahq@epamail.epa.gov; gornjm@state.gov; Munning, Gregory A Capt Code 07, 07; 

Komp, Greg R Mr CIV USA HQDA ASO; HOO.Hoc; Janet.beninido, gov; Owens, Janice; 

Tilden, Jay; Steele, Jeffrey M CIV SEA 08 NR-I (b)(6) j Szymanski, John; 

Connery, Joyce; Gross, Laura, CIV, OSD-POLNCY; LIA02 Hoc; LIA03 Hoc; LIA08 Hoc; 

Aponte, Manuel COL OSD POLICY; Roupas, Mark, CIV, OSD-POLICY; Bahar, Michael; 

NITOPS; Terrell, Patrick COL (USA) OSD POLICY; Phillip J Finck; PMT03 Hoc; Hoc, PMT12; 

Smith-Kevern, Rebecca; Love, Richard A CIV OSD POLICY; RMTPACTSUDMP@ofda.gov; 

RMTPACTSUELNRC; RMTPACTSU_HHS; RMTPACTSU_MLO; RMTPACTSUSRO; 

Regan, Sean P.; Malone, Stephen C CTR JCS J3; Delazaro LtCol Steven J; Zerr, Thomas J.; 

Mustin, Tracy; #RESILIENCE; Bowling, Curtis, Mr, OSD-ATL; Gross, Laura, CIV, OSD- 

POLICY; Love, Richard A CIV OSD POLICY; Terrell, Patrick COL (USA) OSD POLICY 

Subject: 

RE: LLRW Disposition 

/ 

Hi All: 

Please accept my heartfelt thanks for your great IA assistance on applicable regulations and 

requirements regarding LLRW disposition. 

We have been notified that an initial discussion has been scheduled with the MOFA tomorrow 

(14 April), and I've requested specific POC information regarding those who are 

participating in the meeting there. 

Please allow me to also note, per Mr. Dan Schultheisz e-mail, that we have had the DoD 

Environmental Executive (Army) in the loop with respect to our LLRW questions. There is a set 

of guidance, Japanese Environmental Governing Standards (3EGS), that provide environmental 

compliance criteria; however, radioactive materials are not included. 

Thanks! 

Deanne 

01 





Phone: 703-571-2327 ., 

Blackberry: 

(b)(6) 


From: Schultheisz.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Schultheisz.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov] On 


Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:32 AM 


Cc:F 

(b)(6) 

(b)(6) 

1 

CE 758 of 1220

(b)(6) 

Subject: RE: 

LLRW Disposition 

Julie: 

(b)(5) 

I hope the maintaining of separate threads isn't 

too confusing. 


From: "Bentz, Julie A." (b)(6) 

To: F (b)(6) 

(b)(6) 

2 

CE 759 of 1220

(b)(6) 

Date: 

Subject: 

04/11/2011 06:28 PM 

RE: LLRW Disposition 

Dan, 

Thanks for bringing better clarity onto thisb(issue! 

(b)(5) 

J f,3 

CE 760 of 1220

(b)(5) 

NRC, 

are you up on the net for this discussion? 

Thanks! 

Julie Bentz 

t. (b )(6 ) 

----- Original Message----- 

From: Schultheisz.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Schultheisz.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov] On 


Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:51 PM 


Cc: Lane, Aikojean CIV OSD POLICY; (b)(6) McCaughey, Bill; 

(b)(6) Curry, MTchael R; (b)(6) TDavid Bowman; Farrand, 

TDavid E SEA04 04N; Idar, Deanne J CIV OSD POLICY; Wilber, Deb; DemingRM@state.gov; 

Douglas.Tonkay~em.doe.gov; McGinnis, Edward; EOC EnvironmentalUnit@epamail.epa.gov; 

Eoc.Epahq@epamail.epa.gov; gornjmf@state.gov; Munning, Gregory A Capt Code 07, 07; Komp, Greg 

R Mr CIV USA HQDA ASO; 'hoo.hoc@nrc.gov'; anet.benini(dot.gov; Owens, Janice; Tilden, Jay; 

Steele, Jeffrey M CIV SEA 08 NR; - (b)(6) J Szymanski, John; Connery, Joyce; 

Gross, Laura, CIV, OSD-POLICY; LIA02 Hoc; LIA03 Hoc; Aprnte, Manuel COL OSD POLICY; Roupas, 

Mark, CIV, OSD-POLICY; Bahar, Michael; NITOPS; Terrell, Patrick COL (USA) OSD POLICY; Phillip 

3 Finck; PMT03 Hoc; Hoc, PMT12; Smith-Kevern, Rebecca; Love, Richard A CIV OSD POLICY; 

RMTPACTSUDMP@ofda.gov; RMTPACTSUELNRC; RMTPACTSU_HHS; RMTPACTSUMLO; RMTPACTSUSRO; Regan, 

Sean P.; Malone, Stephen C CTR JCS J3; Delazaro LtCol Steven J; Zerr, Thomas J.; Mustin, 

Tracy; #RESILIENCE 

Subject: Re: LLRW Disposition 

Julie: 

4 

CE 761 of 1220

(b)(5) 


F rom: 

To: 

I-. 

"Bentz, Julie A." (b)(6) 

11 

EOC Environmental Unit@EPA, "'hoo.hoc~nrc.gov" 

, "Bahar, Michael" 

, Epahq Eoc/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

"Hoc, PMT12" 

Cc: 

(b)(6) 

5 

CE 762 of 1220

(b)(6) 

I 

Date: 

04/11/2011 12:08 PM 

Subject: LLRW Disposition 

Dan, 

Thanks for helping us understand where the issues are on this problem. 

(b)(5) 

_Can I get an answer from NRC and EPA to these questions by COB tomorrow? 

(b)(5) 

Thanks! 

Julie Bentz 

S 

(b)(6) 

Original - Message ----- 

From: Schultheisz.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Schultheisz.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov] On 


Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:57 AM 

To: 

Subject: Fw: Draft read-out 1600 Telecon 04/07/11 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposition 

6 

CE 763 of 1220

I hope this helps. 

Hopefully this will become more clear as the situation evolves. 


U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Radiation and Indoor Air 

Radiation Protection Division 

(202) 343-9349 

Forwarded -- by Epahq Eoc/DC/USEPA/US on 04/08/2011 02:07 PM 

From: "Steele, Jeffrey M CIV SEA 08 NR" 

(b)(6) 

To: 

Date: 04/08/2011 12:53 PM 

Subject: RE: Draft read-out 1600 Telecon 04/07/11 Low Level 

Radioactive Waste Disposition 

Dr. 

Idar, 

7 

CE 764 of 1220

Given that much of the call was spent describing the current radiological status on the 

ground in Japan, I think a short summary of that status would be useful in the telecon 

summary. Here is a proposed paragraph. 

(b)(5) 

CE 765 of 1220

(b)(5) 

9 

CE 766 of 1220

Jeff Steele 

Naval Reactors 

202-781-6192 


From: Idar, Deanne I CIV OSD POLICY [mailtol 

(b)(6) 


To: 

Subject: Draft read-out 1600 Telecon 04/07/11 Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposition 

UNCLASSIFIED/I 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 

ALCON: 

The draft read-out from today's 1680 Telecon on the Low Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) 

Disposition is attached (and copied below) for 

your review. I welcome feedback from the participants on any missing 

due-outs or key points. 

Thanks again to all that were able to participate in our discussion. 

Best, 

Deanne 

> 

Low Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) 

Disposition IA (Sub-set) Telecon: 

1600-1700 Thursday, 6 April 2011 

Participants: 

10 

CE 767 of 1220

1. NNSA/DOE: EM HQ Office of Disposal Operations Office, General 

Counsel, NE 

2. EPA 

3. NRC 

4. NSS 

5. DoD: DoD LLRW Disposition Advisory Committee Chair, Naval 

Reactors, OSD(P)/CWMD 

Facilitator: Dr. Deanne 3. Idar, OSD Policy/Global Strategic Affairs/CWMD/ CBRN Defense 

Due outs: 

1. DOE: Verify if DOE AMS assets have had any radioactive levels above clearance criteria; 

follow-up w Julie Bentz, NSS 

2. NRC: provide DOS POCs information to OSD(P)/CWMD who will distribute to DoD LLRW 

Disposition Advisory Committee Chair 

3. NSS: facilitate connection to DOS contacts for OSD(P)/CWMD 

Agenda 

1. Roll Call 

2. Review of 4 questions posed by DoD LLRW Disposition Advisory Committee 

(b)(5) 

3. Wrap up 

Meeting Summary: 

The objective of today's telecon was to assist the DoD in developing the 

appropriate guidance to address any regulatory requirements for the 

11 

CE 768 of 1220

appropriate disposition of LLWR generated by DoD operations in support 

of Operation Tomodachi OCONUS and CONUS. The 4 questions identified 

above were reviewed. 

Key points follow: 

(b)(5) 


general license for import, and definitions as follows. 

12 

CE 769 of 1220

§ 110.27 General license for import. 

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a general license is issued 

to any person to import byproduct, source, or special nuclear material if the U.S. consignee 

is authorized to receive and possess the material under a general or specific NRC or 

Agreement State license issued by the Commission or a State with which the Commission has 

entered into an agreement under Section 274b. of the 

Atomic Energy Act. 

(b) The general license in paragraph (a) of this section does not authorize the import of 

more than 100 kilograms per shipment of source and/or special nuclear material in the form of 

irradiated fuel. 

(c) Paragraph (a) of this section does not authorize the import under a general license of 

radioactive waste. 

(d) A person importing formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material (as defined 

in § 73.2 of this chapter) under this general license shall provide the notifications 

required by § 73.27 and § 73.72 of this chapter. 

(e) A general license is issued to any person to import the major components of a utilization 

facility as defined in § 110.2 for end- use at a utilization facility licensed by the 

Commission. 

(f) Importers of radioactive material listed in Appendix P to this part must provide the 

notifications required by § 110.50. 

[51 FR 47208, Dec. 31, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 38336, Aug. 13, 1991; 

58 FR 13003, Mar. 9, 1993; 60 FR 37564, July 21, 1995; 61 FR 35602, July 8, 1996; 65 FR 

70291, Nov. 22, 2000; 68 FR 31589, May 28, 2003; 70 FR 

37991, July 1, 2005; 75 FR 44089, Jul. 28, 2010] 

§ 110.2 Definitions. 

Radioactive waste, for the purposes of this part, means any material that contains or is 

contaminated with source, byproduct, or special nuclear material that by its possession would 

require a specific radioactive material license in accordance with this Chapter and is 

imported or exported for the purposes of disposal in a land disposal facility as defined in 

10 CFR part 61, a disposal area as defined in Appendix A to 10 CFR part 40, or an equivalent 

facility; or recycling, waste treatment or other waste management process that generates 

radioactive material for disposal in a land disposal facility as defined in 10 CFR part 61, a 

disposal area as defined in Appendix A to 10 CFR part 40, or an equivalent facility. 

Radioactive waste does not include radioactive material that is- 

13 

CE 770 of 1220

(1) Of U.S. origin and contained in a sealed source, or device containing a sealed source, 

that is being returned to a manufacturer, distributor or other entity which is authorized to 

receive and possess the sealed source or the device containing a sealed source; 

(2) A contaminant on any non-radioactive material (including service tools and protective 

clothing) used in a nuclear facility (an NRC- or Agreement State-licensed facility (or 

equivalent facility) or activity authorized to possess or use radioactive material), if the 

material is being shipped solely for recovery and beneficial reuse of the non-radioactive 

material in a nuclear facility and not for waste 

management purposes or disposal; 

(3) Exempted from regulation by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or equivalent Agreement 

State regulations; 

(4) Generated or used in a U.S. Government waste research and development testing program 

under international arrangements; 

(5) Being returned by or for the U.S. Government or military to a facility that is authorized 

to possess the material; or 

(6) Imported solely for the purposes of recycling and not for waste management or disposal 

where there is a market for the recycled material and evidence of a contract or business 

agreement can be produced upon request by the NRC. 

Note: The definition of radioactive waste in this part does not include spent or irradiated 

fuel. 




Office: Rm5C746 Pentagon 

Phone: 703-571-2327 

Blackberry: 

(b)(6) 

14 

CE 771 of 1220

Wert, Leonard 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Importance: 

Jones, William 


Hopper, George 

Croteau, Rick; Wert, Leonard 

Request: Fred Brown for NEI next week Ti-1 83 status 

High 

George, we will need a status of the Ti 183 implementation in RII (rough estimate) and a short discussion of what has 

* been identified. The other regions have received a similar request. Fred will be meeting with NEI later next week. He 

will need this Early Monday. A one to two page discussion will suffice. Len received this request during the DRA call 

today. 

William B. Jones 

Deputy Director, Division Reactor Projects, Region II 

(404) 997-4501 

(b)(6) 

JI 

CE 772 of 1220

Wert, Leonard 

From: 

Wert, Leonard 

Sent: 


To: 

R2SRMANAGERS 

Subject: FW: NRR Comm Team SitRep - 4/13 

Attachments: 

Action: post Expanded Q&As (ML1 1103A063) to NRC public website 

From: Leeds, Eric 

Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:06 PM 

To: Dean, Bill; Lew, David; McCree, Victor; Wert, Leonard; Satorius, Mark; Pederson, Cynthia; Howell, Art; Kennedy, Kriss 

Cc: Johnson, Michael; Wiggins, Jim 

Subject: FYI: NRR Comm Team SitRep - 4/13 

Eric J. Leeds, Director 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 


301-415-1270 

From: Nelson, Robert 


To: Leeds, Eric; Grobe, Jack; Boger, Bruce; Burnell, Scott; LIA06 Hoc; Roberts, Darrell; Kennedy, Kriss; Lara, Julio; 

Croteau, Rick; Steger (Tucci), Christine; Landau, Mindy; Rihm, Roger; Bahadur, Sher; Blount, Tom; Brown, Frederick; 

Cheok, Michael; Evans, Michele; Ferrell, Kimberly; Galloway, Melanie; Glitter, Joseph; Giwines, Mary; Hiland, Patrick; 

Holian, Brian; Howe, Allen; Lee, Samson; Lubinski, John; McGinty, Tim; Ruland, William; Skeen, David; Thomas, Brian; 

Westreich, Barry 

Cc: West, Steven; Shear, Gary; Burkhardt, Janet; Hayden, Elizabeth; Broaddus, Doug; Campbell, Stephen; Carlson, 

Robert; Chernoff, Harold; Kulesa, Gloria; Markley, Michael; Pascarelli, Robert; Salgado, Nancy; Simms, Sophonia; Wall, 

Scott; Guzman, Richard; Lyon, Fred; Meighan, Sean; Nguyen, Quynh; Oesterle, Eric; Polickoski, James; Tam, Peter; 

Thomas, Eric; Wertz, Trent 

Subject: FYI: NRR Comm Team SitRep - 4/13 

1. Assisted OEDO in responding to 12 Qs from Senator Cantwell. 

2. Preparing NRR assigned responses for Post Hearing Questions from the March 31, 2011 Hearing on 

2012 Budget Request for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Development of Energy's Nuclear 

Energy Programs (G20110251) due 4/20 

3. Continued to work with OPA to make the Q&A database public. The agency's firewall prevents public 

access to the SharePoint site. See attached e-mail for status. 

4. The following presentation was used by Eric Leeds in briefing to the Center for Best Practices, Nat'l 

Governors Assoc and the Commissioner, New York City, Dept of Environmental Protection. It's a high 

level summary of the Fukushima accident, the NRC's response, and NRC planned actions. 

http:H/portal.nrc.qov/edo/nrr/Presentations/Forms/AIIItems.aspx 

It's title is "Presentation to NGA (Energy Panel) April 2011" 

5. Our Comm Team will be operating with significantly reduced staffing next week because of spring 

break and ore-planned family vacations. Both Mike Markley and Eric Oesterle will be out. Please 

forward requests for support to Lauren Gibson. In addition, a member of our team, Sean Meighan, is 

leaving for Japan tomorrow to provide HP support to Chuck Casto's team for three weeks. 

6. Coordinated a visit to Cooper Nuclear Station by NNSA & LLNL. 

CE 773 of 1220

7. The agency has received two new FOIA requests, similar to the previous AP & MSNBC requests, one 

of these for expedited processing. 

8. Responded to the FOIA request for exemptions issued since 1/1/08. 

Robert A. Nelson 

NRR External Communications Coordinator, Japan Event 

Deputy Director 

Division of Operating Reactor Licensing 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 

I 

US.NRC 

* i E-mail: r-obert.nelsonOnrc.qov .3, Office: (301) 415-1453 1 3 Cell: (b)(6) Fax: (301) 415-21021 

2 

CE 774 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Importance: 



Piccone, Josephine; Jackson, Deborah; LIA06 Hoc; LIA08 Hoc; Maier, Bill; McNamara, 

Nancy; Tifft, Doug; Trojanowski, Robert; Woodruff, Gena; Barker, Allan; Logaras, Harral; 

Cool, Donald; Jones, Cynthia; Ryan, Michelle; Virgilio, Rosetta; Milligan, Patricia; Wright, Lisa 

(Gibney); Lynch, James; Browder, Rachel; Erickson, Randy; Orendi, Monica; Janda, Donna; 

Cuadrado, Leira; Arribas-Colon, Maria; Easson, Stuart; McGrady-Finneran, Patricia; Flanders, 

Scott; Moore, Scott; Lewis, Robert; Reis, Terrence 

FW: Japan Response State Coordination Call CANCELLED for 14 April 

High 

Note: no CDC/HHS call tomorrow night. We shall officially inform all SLO, CRCPD stakeholders via our list 

servers tomorrow morning. 

Rich 


Intergoventmental Liaison Branch 

Office of Federal and State Mlaterials and Environmental Alanagement Programs 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conminission 

301-415-2308 

800-368-5642 

From: CDC IMS State Coordination Task Force [mailto:eocstatecoordccdc.gov] 


To: Boedigheimer, Steven F. (CDC/OPHPR/DSLR); Rogers, Barbara A. (CDC/OD/OADP) ..... 

Subject: Japan Response State Coordination Call CANCELLED for 14 April 

There will NOT be a CDC-facilitated State Conference call tomorrow, Thursday, April 14. We anticipate that there may be 

a final call next week, but that remains unscheduled at this time. 

Your participation in the calls to date has been important and highly valued. Thank you for your assistance in keeping 

our state health officials informed. We look forward to talking with you again in the near future. 

Mark A. Davis 

On Detail to OPHPR/DSLR 

State Coordination Desk 

2011 Japan Response 

404.553.7511 

CE 775 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Wittick, Brian 


LIA08 Hoc 

Liaison Japan 

FW: INFORMATION ONLY: Heads up on discussions on LLRW 

RE. LLRW Disposition; FW: LLRW Disposition; RE: LLRW Disposition; LLRW Disposition (2) 

Thanks for the information Lisa. If in doubt, or you want to reach a broader audience on the team, please send 

to the "liaison Japan" group. 

Thanks 

Brian 

From: LIA08 Hoc 


To: Blarney, Alan; Wittick, Brian 

Subject: INFORMATION ONLY: Heads up on discussions on LLRW 

Hi Guys! I wasn't sure exactly who might want to know this so I am sending this to the two guys that I know are in 

Country! 

Just a HEADS UP for the Site Team on a series of Emails that the NRC has been working with Julie Benz (Director for 

Nuclear Defense Policy 

National Security Staff in the White House on Low Level Rad Waste Issues. 

Our PMT provided answers back (found in the second attachment FW: LLRW Disposition) and there were a host of other 

agencies that weighed in also. 

In the spirit of keeping the Japan Team in the loop, I am sending this email "package" of the emails sent on the issues of 

which regulations /who's jurisdiction might apply to any waste that might come out of the Japan event. It appears as 

though there was a meeting with MOFA on April 14 'h according to the emailbelow from Dr. Idar of OSD- 

Again, the email strings attached are simply for your awareness. 

Thanks 

Lisa 

Lisa Gibney Wright 

Liaison Team Coordinator 

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

email: liaO8.hoc@nrc.gov 

Desk Ph: 301-816-5185 

From Dr. Idar: 

Hi All: 

Please accept my heartfelt thanks for your great IA assistance on applicable 

requirements regarding LLRW disposition. 

1 

regulations and 

CE 776 of 1220

We have been notified that an initial discussion has been scheduled with the MOFA tomorrow 

(14 April), and I've requested specific POC information regarding those who are 

participating in the meeting there. 

Please allow me to also note, per Mr. Dan Schultheisz e-mail, that we have had the DoD 

Environmental Executive (Army) in the loop with respect to our LLRW questions. There is a set 

of guidance, Japanese Environmental Governing Standards (JEGS), that provide environmental 

compliance criteria; however, radioactive materials are not included. 

Thanks! 

Deanne 





Phone: 703-571-2327 

Blackberry: 

(b)(6) 

CE 777 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

RST01 Hoc 


Blamey, Alan 

Mitman Jeffrey: Bernhard. Rudolph: ET01 Hoc 

FW:I 

(b)(5) 

(b)(5) 

Alan, 

Attached is a summary of the correspondence from Steve Fetter and Per Peterson. I tried to 

summarize what I thought were Mr. Fetter's questions. Please provide us any information that 

can help clarify Mr. Fetter's concerns. 

Antonios Zoulis 

RST Severe Accident Analyst 

From: RST09 Hoc 


To: RST01 Hoc 

Subject:I 

(b)(5) 

1 

CE 778 of 1220

(b)(5) 

News Reference: 

The Tokyo Electric Power Company, or TEPCO, says the water temperature in the spent fuel 

storage pool at the No. 4 reactor in the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant has risen to about 90 

degrees Celsius.... TEPCO took the temperature on Tuesday using an extending arm on a 

special vehicle... To cool the fuel, TEPCO sprayed 195 tons of water for 6 hours on Wednesday 

morning... The company thinks the pool's water level was about 5 meters lower than normal, but 

2 meters above the fuel rods... TEPCO believes the water level is likely to rise by about one 

meter after the water spraying on Wednesday... TEPCO says high levels of radiation at 84 

millisieverts per hour were detected above the water surface, where radiation is rarely detected. 

Comments from Steven Fetter - Office of Science and Technology Policy 

(b)(6) 

1 

C:\Documents and Settings\vcw\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 

Files\Content.Outlook\OPNRPT5C 

(b)(5) 

(b)(5) Idoc 

CE 779 of 1220

(b)(5) 

2 


Files\Content.Outlook\OPNRPT5C1 

(b)(5) 

(b)(5) 

I 

CE 780 of 1220

ii 

Figure 1 

... . ...~."-"''"T - 

.... 

-4 t L 

2 M 

" 

3 


Files\Content.Outlook\OPNRPT5C] 

(b)(5) Idoc 

(b)(5) 

CE 781 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Blarney, Alan 

Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:25 AM 

'Steve.garchow@nc.gov'; Mitman, Jeffrey; Moore, Carl 

Bernhard, Rudolph; Salay, Michael 

FW: 1F Plant DATA (4/14/2011) 

2304140600_'ýi >1 /-z5/ -w .pdf; f -ýAT - 0414_0800.pdf 

FYI... 


From: W11 N rmailto:horikawa.takeshi(atepco.co.jp] 


To: Blamey, Alan 

Subject: IF Plant DATA (4/14/2011) 

Dear Mr. 

Blamey, 

Please find attached plant status of Fukushima Daiichi NPS. 

We 

appreciate your support. 

Best regards, 

Takehi Horikawa 

TEPCO 

CE 782 of 1220

4 f14R 6:00 IR 

15ý+U/V-3;4-9 

X21 :tSWIRW 

5 lu 2u 3u 4u 5u 6u 

ll)kJ*R #1616m'/h 117m3/h 41l 7m/h POPP P•tq itp 

(4/3 17.30) CO( 19:00) _ tm 4/317: 2) ttt ,..K4 

401A:-1600mm (A'1400 m I•A): -1750inmi • -6m2 .r 

- MIIB:-1600m US: -1500mm INIB: -2250mm X-'42 &10mm 22(4mm 

(__4___ _W_14 0.0 

OA23MPa g (A) -0.016MPa g (A) X 3 -O.017MPag (A) X3 0,0• O.O03MPa g O.OIOMPa g 

.O940MPa g (8) X 3 --OO2OMPa g (D) X 3 -O.083MPag (C) U3 2 (414 600R (4.,14 CiC0,' 

(4/14 000 Zi) 

' 

(4'14 

" -• 

000 •i) 

.. . .. " 

t4M000 

.. ........ 

•)E) 

. - ... 33.5r, a) 

24 i) 1iC - 

_) (4114_00_ _)_) __6) _ 

- -. T,__1047, ..... : q,0,41Ct -k., .3-- 

(4/140046') ) 3(4.114000 ftI 

(4114 0.00 MEB) 

)D/W 0.19OMPaabs DiW O.)95MPa abs D/W O.lOY7MPaabs 

D/W-S/CEn sic 0.165MPaabs SiC X-1 S/C 0.168OMPaabs X-2 

(414 00 iRE) I (4/'i4 0:00 IE) (41t4 000 MFE) 

'D/W .1 D/W 2.77XiO'Svlh D/W 167X10'Svih 

CAMS iS/c 1.01 XlOSv/h S/C 6,45XlO"Sv/h S/C 6.47XlO'Sv/h X 2 

(4114000RE1.) -(4,140000i M) (4-14000••Ef)_ 

D/W&tMEE7 O.384MPa g(ODA8MN abW O,384MN g1.485MPa abs O,384Mt ~O485Mh abs 

D/WBIARfED 0.427MPa g (0.528MPa abd 0.427MPa g (0.528MPa aW 0.427MPa p(0528MPa ab) 

•l•7-J I• 

" 72. '•1 (0/14 6W0 W I (4) 272t 

W 40400ME) 

1 

FPC I 11 -- ' 4500mm 6450mm 48 40 0X 

KI h (4114 0:00 ME) (4/14 0:00flif) .M1E(414 . _,.2 .. 

14 GQ W 

NIN (PI020) YWO{1UP (P/04) HUM________ 

0117-)v 5u:SHC E-F 6u:SHC40- 

29C (413 ) (4/13 19:04'-) (4/13 1G16"-ý 

(4113 8_00) 

VIA E(MPa ,= 91-1lMPanh -+ U"l:E X 0.1013 M) 

M.4[H(MPa abi) = Y-AiE(mllag) + WAfO.O i3NflE 

QIF M (914855) 

iFM•INU(963250) 

CE 783 of 1220

9AX-PtAM, 2ý AIOAAA5ý-9 

IPV 

iFI lF2 1F3 Z F 

-I6(EWO4l0 -15MR(/1400D) -1750 (41140) 

-to L4/1400) ____ -225'i401 I Mwj 

M~23 (A14 6.00) -0-016 (4/140)-0,01 7 (4/40100) 

O140(4/14 000) -6020 (4114 00) 4083 (041I00) 

;Fm 

IF2 

IN3 

IFI IP2 In IF 

0.65 (4114 0,M) 065 (4 (40% 

D/W. S/C 

D/Wg4(MPoeb4) 

S/CaH plb) 

-~sc~vh 4/40 0.1W (411000 M.) 

11a65 (4/1(40W) *1(4/14DM 00 0 W ,1010 4M(0) 

- 54.9 (4/14 00.M) 83A (4/14 40(1 ) 00M 

CE 784 of 1220

IFI i - 

5000[ 

4/3 17:30A9 

4 ft(90) (MM) 

09 

4000~ 

6 MI/h 

*5+OJ (MPa) 

D/WE J (MPa abs) 

08 

mo00I 

x S/CiIT 

(MPa ebs) 

0,7 

2000 

0.6 

r 

1000~ 

0.5 w 

E 

0 U 

I I I 1 9 a I 

0A~ 

-1000 

0.3 

-2000 

-3000 

.9 4 # 4 4 0 4 4 

iA A l A A A i A 

A A A t 4 

xxx x x x x x x x 

0.2 

10.1 

-4000 

IM~ It* IIm 2Ot ? in no~ w o m o I% U Im 1010 "a 0i 0 im too low im R* 1W UW m. 1 1w 

4/12 4/13 bme 4/14 

CE 785 of 1220

I1F2 

5 % ' 

5000 

0.7 

4000 

4/7 1900 L) 

.7 m/h 

s *U(I4A(mm) 

I FTORJ(MPa) 

4D/Wff)J(MPa abs) 

0.6 

3000 

0.5 

2000 

04 

Er"- 

E 

1000~ 

0.3 

E 

0 

0.2 

-1000 

A 

A 4 1 

i 0.1 

, # #* 

-2000 

m I' I I I I I I 

0 

-3000 

-0.1 

-4000 

IM 1 'SW 10 W W5 IM W0 W 40 W 0 100 IlM 1W40 IM 

4/12 4/13 bme 

1M XOD 21 00 M0 QD IN 0 100 lW12M 0 5 00lW S 

4/14 

-0.2 

CE 786 of 1220

I1F3 

6000 

0.8 

5000 

4000 

4/3 17:3W)~k 

7 m 3 /h 

(UltPI) 

# *9(00VA(mm) 

1*9-TfEjJC(MPa) 

SD,/#E)3(MPa abs) 

SS/C~i)(MPa abs) 

0.7 

0.6 

3000 

0.5 

2000 

0.4 

E 

E 

1000 

0n 

0.3 

0 

0.2 

-1000 

4 

4 

44 4 A 

0.1 

-2000 

9I 

9 

9 9 9 

0 

-3000 

II 

U 

* I I 

-0,1 

-4000 

No__ am OW__ tmI.n tw imn mO 

-0.2 

4/12 

4/13 

bme 

4/14 

CE 787 of 1220

1F5 

MisE 

IF6 

A seIi 

2011/4/1312.00 40.2 362 380 225 

2011/4/1313,% 434 351 342 2310 

2011/413 1400 46.1 34A 31A. 23,5 

2011/4/13 15S00 49.0 331 293 240 

2011/4/13 18.0 51.4 33.3 219 240 

2011/4/13 1701 54.5 3B.. 25 245 

2011/4/13 1100 57.1 32.4 28.3 25.0 

2011t4/13 100 5$92 32.0 260 255 

2011/4/132000 48. 32.0 258 28.0 

2011/4u1321,00 48.1 322 25M4 N0 

2011/4/13 220 432 32 , 251 2 

2011/4/13 2300 414 328 241 2710 

2011/4/140:00 396 331 24V 275 

2011/4/141.00 38.2 336 246 2.0, 

2011/4i14 2%00 386J 339 24.4 21.5 

2011/4/1430I 351 342 2403 290 

2011/4/14 40 35.0 " 34, 24.2 290 

2011/4/14 500 342 - ._ ,b24A 295 

2011/4/14600 33.5 35.3 241 29,5 

U 

100.0 

80.0 

60,0 a U 

a 40 

ft*j, 0F144 

*oo a,: ,a a, 

I F5 FUl 

I 1F5 SFP"' 

1F6 * 

RF SFPUJ 

20,0 

, . 11 

0.0 

4/1212:00 4/130:00 4/13 12'00 4/140:00 4/14 12:00 4/150:00 4/1512:00 

CE 788 of 1220

1 F-1 RPVNO i.AAJ "(4/14 0:00) 

425 

400 3/23 2.33 

40 MWASO)"UIM 

O.S.(4o•0t•ltfj 

375 ::: 

350 

325 4 

300 

275 ! 

250 

225 '. 40 

200 

175 

i VESSEL frange 

OP.31730 

Vesel franie 

0P.30240 

-HVH-12A 

0R31000 

Bellow Air 

s feWater nozJo N4B-ervi 

OP.27750 

*vessel core 

OP12160 

aSRV 203-4A 

OP 16524 

VOWse bottom head 

OP.15500 

o return air duct HVH-12A 

OP.12200 

0 return v ductHIN+-I2C 

OP.12200 

150 

125 

100 

75 

-- S/ C~-jl4Z 

50 

25 

0 

312324 )/B26 Y21Pl?21 VV3/0 31U1 Ct 2 4144 4 V 41641 4i1 4,1 t'10 V14'124 1?4 4I 414154' Is 

CE 789 of 1220

4,•J 4,14600) 

425 -,J-•W 

400 X 

375 3-4tM, 

N40 lgV 

3250-4A1 

300 

275 

WWI: 

15sR0fl 

P 225 

175 1 

200 

150 (7( ,._ 

sm- 

125 ..... 

100 

75Il 

50 

25 318I-C LRA 

0 i P+ PLR( 

I-IK 

3/28 3/29 3/30 311 4/1 4/2 4,3 4/4 4/5 41, 417 44 419 4/10 4/114/12 4/13 4114 4C15 

PLM8! 

CE 790 of 1220

30D 

280 

260 

240 

220 

1F-2 RPVM1 A J'M(4/14 0:00) 

U 

j* M XX NAB AI 

IRV-2-7 1A 

0P.17400 

OP.12900 

till 

180 

.u IS 

Allz 

1192034xi& 

OP.10lSO 

14D 

a 

120 

9 9) 

80 

am 

ry 

i - 

-. , s/0cl-l$• 

.,v 

40 

20 

0 

3!/25 3/243/27"3/21a23/~303/3 4/14/24/ 4/4 V/5 4/8 4,7 4/1 414/14/114 4124114/144,151 

I) 

U#lflp#i:,e 

CE 791 of 1220

3O0 

1F-3 RPVJ(414 0:00) 

--s- RPV 1974 Oll 

275 

250 * 

A. RPV 1)5j 

225 

200 " 

a 

I 

I 

a RPV 4W114AS 

OP1601 

OP,162V 

0p3 6298 

150 

125 , 

04WHIMIfh9A44THH1-I4A 

OP 10700 

100 

, ESS•CI 

RPV l*I~* N4D 

75 

* AL~t#&7iGI~TE-2-Il3G 

50 

* tIIM# 2-ISA V-~41il TE~2-4O5A 

25 

0 

3/22 3/24 3/26 3/283/30 4/1 4/3 4/5 4/7 4/9 4/11 4V134/15 4/17 

0:00 ON0 0W000.00 0: 00 0:00 . 06 000 000 0000 0:00 000 0:00 

CE 792 of 1220

1 F1~3~,~5i-~ 

*t(fP)A *Iflg()8 If~f3A PF~)EM D/WEt] Is/offt CASCM S/CUl 1 

(,m) (nmm) (MP) (VP) (MP, •s (MP,,s)( /W /l (1c) 

4/11 00 -1650 -1650 0,413 0.873 0,195 0,165 X 1 11.2 58.4 Xl: PIA 

4/112:00 0.195 0,165 X 1 11.2 

4/11,4.00 0.195 0u165 .X1 11.2 __lII-__ 

X._l"_t*1 

4/116:0 -1650 -1650 0.410 0.873 0.195 0.165 .-1 11.1 58.1 .•,1: m 

4/11800 0.195 0.165 X' 111 UP 

4/11 10:00 0.195 0.165 X 1 11.1 X1:ff TA 

4/11 10:40 0.195 01,65 X 1 111 X 1: . . 

4/11 11:30 0.195 0.165 X*1 11.1 .... XI.. TA 

4/11 1200 -1600 -1650 0.416 0.873 0.195 0.165 X.!1 11.1 57,8 ,*1: T a 

4/11 14:30 0.195 0.165 X 1 11,0 ''P A 

4/11162_00 0,195 0.165 X1 11.0 *1:9 

4/11 130 -1600 -1600 0.416 0,895 0.195 0.165 X 1 10.4 58.1 -X1I: Tl 

4/11200 0.195 0.165 X 1 10.6 X,_ : 

4/11 22.00 0.195 0.165 -1 10.8 ,_ 

4/11 2340 0.195 0.165 XI T; 

4/120,00 -1600 -1500 0.416 0,898 0.195 0,165 XI 10.8 57,5 X•I: :; 

4/12 4% 0.190 0,165 X. 1 10.8 -__ 1:.. , 

_ : 

4/126:0 -1650 -1650 0,416 0,908 0,190 0.165 X.- 1 10.8 57.1 1:l 

4/128:0 ..... ..... 0.190 0,165 Xt1 10.7 X-1:11 . 

4/12 1 W 0.190 0.165 X1 10.7X-1:1IT 

4/12 13:0 -1600 -1600 0,400 0.900 0.190 0.165 X1 9.5 56.8 1-I: 1TA 

4/12 140 0.190 0,165 xI 10.0 X_1:91__ 

4/12 150 -160 -1600 0,418 0.918 0.190 0,165 -X1 10.2 56.5 ,•1: FA 

4/121.70 0.190o 0.165 X,1 10.3 Xl. 1: TF 

4/12 18:0 -10 -1600 0.420 0.920 0190 0.165 X 1 10.4 56.3 •-1:|p. 

4/12 21:00M 0.190 0.165 X1 10.4 _T ,I:_ 

4/12230 -1650 -1650 0.423 0.925 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.4 56.1 X1| 

4/13330 o0.19 0.165 X ,1 10.4 

4/136:00 -1650 -1650 0.423 0.928 0.190 0.165 X 1 10,4 55.7 Xi: a 

4/139.9 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.4 XI: a_ _ 

4/13 12:00 -1600 -1650 W0.42 0.933 0.190 0,165 X 1 10.3 55.5 1I: |:TA_, 

4/1315,W00_ 0,190 0.165 X,1 10.3 Xl •_T_,, a 

4/13 1800 -1600 -1650 0.425 0.938 0,190 0,165 X 1 10.2 55.1 X 1: • _ _ _ 

4/13 21',0 0.190 0,.165 X 1 10.2 _ l:_ __Tl 

4/140:001 -16 -1600 0.4231 0.940 0.190 0,165 X 1 10.1 54,9 •::ff "T. 

X 

CE 793 of 1220

IF215:60VW-9 

, CAMS CM 

R lot ( )IA*11(5 

( ej•EA INO D D/W.EI) $/CEJ , M MS WAR sM 

(mm) (mm) (MPa) A') (W ab.) (pa ab ) WIN ,h (S•Th ) 

4/902 -1500 -2100 -0.018 -0.020 0.095 OS 29.4 0.751 90.3 0.10 

4/9300 -1500 -2050 o018 -0-023 0,095 o DS 29.4 0,750 89 0.07 

4/9 f0 -1500 -2050 -0.018 -0023 0o095 DS 29.3 0.748 89.3 0.07 

4/9 w -1500 -2100 -0.018 -0023, 0.095 DS 29.3 0P74 89 .08 

4/9 1M -1500 -2100 -0.020 -0.025 0.095 OS 29,2 0.743 88.5 0.08 

4/9 162 -1500 -2100 -018 -0025 0.090 DS 291 0.342 88.0 0.08 

4/9 11W -1500 -21001 -0.018 -,027 0.095 OS 29.1 0.741 87.1 0.07 

4/9200 -15W0 -2100 -0.018 -0,025 0.095 DS 291 0.741 87,5 0.07 

4/922: -150 -210 -0,020 -0.025 0.095 DS 29,0 0.740 87.2 0.07 

_M_(__,_s 

4/10 D0 -1500 -2100 -0.020 -0,025 0.090 X*1 29.0 0,739 86.9 0.08 O 1: 

4/1020, -1500 -2100 -0.020 -0.025 0.090 *1 29.0 0.739 "8,7 0,08 X:tP 

4/10,40 -1500 -2050. -0.020 -0.025 0,090 A 1 29.0 0.738 86 U08 1: 

4/1060 -1450 -20501 -. o20 -0,025 0.095 01 29.01 0737 86.2 0.12 1 

4/10,8% -1450 -20501 -0.18 -0.025 0,095 1 2.91 01,351 86.0 0..091 

4/10100 -1450 -2050 -0.020 -0.025 0.095 1 2&.9 0.734 858 0.09 XI: 

4/10o1220 -1500 -2100 -.020 -0.025 0.0i5 1 28.5 0,732 85.51 07 ýI: ..... 

41014,00 -1500 -2100 -0.023 -0.025 0,095 l 21.6 0731 85.3 M1: 00,0 , 

4/1016:0 -1500 -2100 -0.023 -0.025 0.095 A1 287 0730 85.1 0.09 X i 

4/101 0 -1500 -2050. -0023 -0025 0.095 1 ' 28.7. 0728 84.9 0.11 X1 TA 

4/10200 -1500 -2050 -0,023 -0.025 0.090 -X1 28.1 0.727 84.8 0.11 M: 

4/10220 -1500 -20 -0.0 -0.025 0.090 ,A L 28.6 0.726. 846 0,10 01 . 

4/11000 -1500 -2050 -0.020 -0.025 0.090 .*1 28.6 0,725 84. 0.10 : I 

4/112: -1500 -2050 -0.025 -0.027 0,090 .X1 28I 6 0,241 842 0,10 I: 

4/11 40 -1500 ,-0 0 -. 0.2 0.0590 *1 28.5 0,722 84.1 0.12 1: 

4/11 0 -1500 -2050 -0.025 -0029 0.090 *1 21.5 0,721 83,9 0.1 ! 1: I .. 

4/111201 -1500 -2050 -0 -023 0.095 1 124 0,717 83.5 0.12 1: 

4/11 IM -1500 -2100 -0.20 -0.023 0.0 X1 2801 0.692 1.,5 0.09 1 T 

4/12,00 -1500 -2050 -0.023 -.025 0.090 V1 28.1 0.685 81.4 0.08 1 I 

4/120 -1500 -2100 -003 .025 0.00 1 28.10.681 814.60.09 *I 

4/12 3:00 -1500 -2100 -0.027 -0.027 0.085 X i1 27.4 0.U72 82,9 0.08 1 IT 

4/12 10 -1500 -205 -0.020 -0.025 02095 *X1 27.7 0.172 82. 0.0, 1 I 

4/121 "00 -1500 -X0 -0.018 -0.020 0.095 01 27.8 0.6O7 87.0 ON0 I:f 

4/12 23 -1500 -20 -0.1023 -025 0.095 01 27. 013 85.1 0 09 f I 

4/138HO -1500 -2100 -0018 -0023 0.095 *1 27, 0.656 83.9 020 1O : TA 

4/1312: -1500 -2050 -0.016 40.020 0.095 V1 27.9, 0.653 83.3 0.0 

4/131 -1500 -2050 -0.016 -0.018 ,1 0.095 

27 0.648 82.8 0.08 1 

4/140.00 -150 -2050 -.016 -0,0201 0.095 1 27.1 0645 , 2.4 0.08 1 ....... 

CE 794 of 1220

am •(ll)e •t(=)A •E~ [:F jA +++• • CE AMS C, MS CAMS CAMSs/ ill 

*5WMA *#($#)a POEMC ?jPEA "EhfJ S/Cffj M 0 DiWH "%A 1cWA 4#1A 

(ii) (iMn) (MIA) (A) (VA aa (1% to) N)OW D/ ( S t iU) Sv'l (X ) (Ar/11) 

415 -1'0 -250 -0078 0.05 0,101 (.11.73 20,4 155 1ON 0180 1 0W .1.. 

4/50.30 -IN - -0fi l o x Ol o il i 205 15,5 _."44 0, $1, 0.111 

4/5&10 -1 -M -0,0701 o 0,1018 0 IM 212 15,4 W ,780 511 Dli 

4/5 40 t•I - -.0071 0,010 01078 0,114 211 154 o08 0`,10 511 0al 

4/510D20 -18 -2250 -4008 0`05 0107! 01733 201 15.3 0833 0.714 51 Oil_ 1 

4/5 17.10 -1 -25 0 .1 00i1 0,1011 017) 20.3 152 DR23 07 51.0 Oall_______ 

4,5M -10 -2250 -0.077 007 1 o0.1069 0 •121 203 lu 1 W 0.18 511 0,12 

4/60 -I -2250 -0017 OD 0100 0`1733 ,8__ 101 OlS5 0758 514 0,12 

4/6 -I -22 00_ A7 0 .10007 0&1731111 14 oil7 1750 51. 0o12 

41/6•1 -• lw - j 0_o 0 10M 6 0.1 11 .o5 14.81 510 0J2! 

4/6 l1• -low -2200 *0.W1 0,N04 a0106 0.1731 19,51 147 0 a732 0131 lall _ _t 

4/70.00 -1800 -2 -0.079 0102 01071 M0112 10.5 141 0(17P 0729 50,1 0.12 

4/7600 -1850 -2250 -0.019 0.021 0,1015 01121 116 14(5 0.771 0122 50.4 ... _t_. 

4/712 -l100 -2 -50 01 0010 ,0m 0al7201 19, 144 0.71 0.714 50.2 0.10 

4/7IM -950 -2250 -0.01 0 0a1062 0.1127 18.2 143 0,59 0.0 50a1 Oil 

4/711:1 -2000 -2 "0.06 0an 0.1062 0.1727 191 14,3 0757 •1•04 500 011 

4,18 1101 - .5 _0.111 J= WOO 0.1125 IUO__ 14.2 0140 1 09 

4/E1WD -2 -2250 -0.M 0.105R 0,1724 180 141 0143 0 41.7 012 

",.4t -2010 -2 -001 +'0 0.1057 0172V2 1801 141 017430.61 491 012 

4/60 -15 -2250 -001 -0104 0.1 0211 I, 14.0 0,738 0.44 415 0,14 

t I ,t11) -1100 -22M -0061 0O10 0,1054 01720 18 1401 0a733 0.61 49.3 0.10 

4/4002 -1850 -2300 41085 -0.0i 01054 %_7 0.11 1 - 13,1 0128 0.15 4. 0.13 

4 15 -16 -2250 -0,081 -002 0,1057 0,1712 115 18 0.723 06.1 4 i8 a0 

4122 -17D -M -40801 -40. 01 0 N I_ 12 1im 14 1_ 131 a117 0.08 1 a0. 

4/11 -U1~ _1 ____- -. W 18 0111 01084 0il __1715 __ 1161 (1713 (0561 48.8 11019_________ 

4/10001 -10 -2250 -0.081 -0.001 0300 01717 I 13,41 0.10 44 0.1 

4/1001 -10 -2250 -0.077 I0 0.W ,1717 1 , 0103 0. 48.31_M.0162_ _3 

4/11)101 -1100 _ 22_- '0,00 -0001 0,1 D4 0,11131 IOD_ 114 0.O W 1 _4& 0 _______ 

4/1010 -1 - 250 -m -0,03! 01D50 0,1708 1 17,6 4 0.4 0N913 4719 0708 

41101 -101 0 -W 1 -0015 0,1031 (,17 1 i7s I2 05 am638 4711 0to 

4/111 0( - -0 

-all -0011 0.1043 0a18 17.1 13.2 , 0.032 471 0.75 

41-1 -10 -220 -'0 -0.1017 a 43 01 O8 1 17.5 1 oIMl 0. 4 471 OM 

4/12 -I1 -2250 -0.07 -0015 0,105 0. 1 175 4 13,11 M 0.0 471 0.060 

4/t2 10 -1150 _2W -001 -0.01 0.15 0.521 17A 110 1! 0.1l7 410 01701 

4/1212M0 -1815 -25 -0,063 1 - 0,1 0 01 17 I i2_ 1 0 113 461 CM_ 1 

_ 

4/12 •01 -o-w AM -0 0-al 1 01048 0,1 172 _ 12. 1 OW 0,.11 , 0.011_ 

1 -1850 -2-250 -0,0831 JIM I0 0a1i J11 12 0.606 461 01,_O 

4/12101 -IN -- 25 -001 8 0.081 1ims 65m 17.1 111I 0.801 0-0 -je 0.0 

0/3610 -10 -2250 -0.010 -0019 0105 a 1M im 1 12 (1970 Q A05 

4/137 -l -M M 1 -0.011 0.1084 0l 17 71 121 on 10340.w 

4/1312:1 -1750 _ - -M 1 -0023 0.1038 0.1|77 181 121 U0S0 8 af 0a 

4/131I! -170 -22 10065 -0.021 010 0.1v 7ly l.. 12,1 m 4t -0 ' 

4/14 0% -1750 - 0 -=I.00171 . Vil als Ill 1" 007 M .... 0 ___AM 

CE 795 of 1220

8 

7 

4 

•3 

a 

A a aAJo a a a a 

a a a * a MO a A 

a 

a a a 

8000 

*'•• 7000 

1 1000 

00 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4,13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4,15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12:00 18-00 000 6:00 12.00 18:00 0:00 8:00 12-00 18:00 0:00 6:00 1200 18:00 0:00 

160 

140 

120 

LO. 100 

80 

60 

40 

20 40 @1e 0 I 416 0 16 0 e. 4k# oe€e 

0~~ 4- 

6000 

5000 E 

4000 

3000 * 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4V13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12:00 1:00 0:00 6-00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12-00 18.00 0:00 

300 

250 

*p D/Wffb3[pgejs 

a S/CEE 1 Cabs] 

3' 30 

2! 50 

•A 

AD/W)Aa 

- 200 2 00 

4zx 

S/CZIR2 

150 

50 

00 

100 a1 s aaaaaaan .s g nI 

0 

50 5) 

2000 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4114 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12.00 18:00 0.00 6:00 12.00 18.00 0:00 6:00 12-00 18-00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 

7000 

6000 

5000 

0stc*Ift 

4000 

*3000 

(22000 

1000 .***.. $*$ * 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4,,13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6.00 12:00 18.M0 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0-00 &D0 12:00 18&-00 0:00 

CE 796 of 1220

a 

7 

4 

•3 

2 

2 F -- 2 

8000 

7000 

6000 

* ff 5000 E 

= • 4000 E 

0 0,,, # ** 04 * # 0 * * # 0 0 e •*4 "* # • 0 * *0 ** 

0 0 0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12 00 18:00 0200 600 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 1800 0:00 

160 

140 

120 

?. 100 

3000* 

2000 

1000 

*80 

40 

20 * 

300 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12'00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18.00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18.00 0-00 

* D/Wff b[gae] 

250 9 S!/CE )aLbs] 2] 50 

n£ 

•~~ DiW'::R 

200 x sicz, 2' 

"R 

50 5 

r• 100° aman mmr a mussa as a a U m ma am as a n a 11 

00 

p 

0, 

50 05 

At A hAt A~ AAAA AftA AAA*AAA AAAAA tAt 

3100 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12-00 18-00 0:00 6800 12:00 18:00 0200 6-00 12:00 18:00 0-00 6:00 12-00 18.00 0.00 

6000 

500 

]0 •SiC•Zf 

0 

400 

0 

! 300 

0 

200 

0 

t00 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6.00 12:00 18:00 0200 6:00 12-00 18:00 0200 6200 12:00 18:00 0:00 6&00 12:00 18.00 0:00 

CE 797 of 1220

2 F-3-1 

7 

6 

%5 

ý14 

I3 

2 

1 1000 

0 0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4!12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 1200 1800 000 6:00 12.00 18:00 0M00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0.M0 6-00 12:00 18:00 0:00 

160 

140 

120 

8000 

7000 

6000 

50O 

4000 ti 

3000 

2000 

E 

q 80 

* 60 

40 20 . • . .. * • • . • • • • • , 40 * 0 * 0 0*** 

20 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6.00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12.00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 28:00 0.00 

300 

250 

S200 

150 

* D/WEEIf~sJte] 

* S/CfI(sb* 

* D/W21 

*C S/C2.m 

300 

250 

200~ 

150 o 

50 

50 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4.13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 1200 18:00 0.00 601) 12:00 28.00 0M00 6'00 12-00 18:,0 0:00 6:00 12:00 18.00 0:00 

6000 

5000 

4000 

3000 

*1 200000 ,44• 0 0 0 0404 00 0 *4000000 0 0 

c 2000 

0 s/c,-kn 

-1000 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6500 12:00 18.00 0:00 6:00 12:00 28:00 0.-00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:.O 

CE 798 of 1220

2 F - 4 # 

6 

7000 

6000 

04 

W3 

2 

O$* *0"0*¢€ 0 * 0 *• 0 00"s,# *$ 0 0 * * * 0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6.,00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:-00 12-00 18-00 000 6:00 12.00 1800 0:00 6:00 12.00 18:00 0:00 

160 

140 

120 V* t 

100 

80 

60 

40 

20 

0 4 40 0 "4, 0 4, 0 0 4, * * * 0 4, *04 4, * * 4, # 0 * * 0 * 

5000 E 

4000 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

W00 6:00 12.00 1800 0-00 6:00 12.00 18:.00 0:00 6.:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 

300 

250 

200 

W150 

~100 t 

50 IA lk 

g 

i 

aga 

"a *A 

ofR n 

fA i t 1aA 

o sa a u 

h" A * i I h0%#1INlA 

0 DiWE~b~gage] 

* S/CEE13 [abe] 

* D/WIIXt 

* S/caft 

300 

250 

20 0 

150 

100 

50 

a- 

A 

s 

0 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6800 12.00 1800 0:00 6:00 12'00 18:00 0:00 

6000 

3000 

2000 

1000 

5000 

~4000 

2000 4 0 61 , 4 00A k4 6004 p4 

300 

SC, 

c. 2000 

0 

-1000 

4/12 4/12 4/12 4/12 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 

0:00 6:00 12,00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18&00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 

CE 799 of 1220

2F-1- 

O.Al 5n(TAF)b%, W MAK = 12J*% -l4200[mm] 

rol• [MPa [mm] 12ýk±T~[C1 D/WI±) D/V-" 1 S/CFi)t S/C7{A S/C/a~ 

MY Im,,,J• 

(Mag m•m] , 'MlZk/ l [kPa(gage)] [°C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [°C] 

(gage)] 4i±_____ ____ 

2011/4/130:00 0.05 5150 25.4 3 30.3 105 965 24 

2011/4/13 2.00 0.05 5150 25.4 3 30.0 105 966 24 

2011/4/13 4:00 0.05 5150 25.4 3 30.2 105 964 24 

2011/4/13 6:00 0.05 5150 25.4 3 30.2 105 965 24 

2011/4/13800 005 5150 25.3 3 30.3 105 965 24 

2011/4/13 9:00 0.05 5150 25.3 4 30.2 105 965 24 

2011/4/13 10:00 0.05 5150 25.3 4 30.1 105 963 24 

2011/4/13 12:00 0.05 5150 25.2 4 30.2 105 964 24 

2011/4/13 14:00 0.05 5150 25.2 4 29.9 105 963 24 

2011/4/13 16:00 0.05 5150 25.3 4 30.0 105 963 24 

2011/4/13 1:00 0.05 5150 25.2 4 29.9 105 965 24 

2011/4/13 20:00 0.05 5150 25.3 3 30.0 105 966 24 

2011/4/1322:00 0,05 5100 25.3 3 30.0 105 964 24 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.05 5100 25.3 3 30.0 105 965 24 

2011/4/14 2:00 0.05 5100 25.3 3 30.0 105 966 24 

2011/4/144:00 0.05 5100 253 2 30.0 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 6:00 0.05 5100 25.3 2 30.0 104 967 24 

2011/4/14 8.00 

2011/4/14 10:00 

2011/4/14 12:00 

2011/4/14 14'00_ _ 

2011/4/14 16:00 

2011/4/14 18:00 

2011/4/14 20:00 

2011/4/14 22:00 

2011/4/15 02100 

CE 800 of 1220

2F-2- ,X&TAI(TAF)fi' O) J A(1 ql +4200[mm] 

goc[ ] D/WAJi) D/W"I S/CJi)t S/C R} S/Cj 

I• ra'•EMPa [mm] 'm° 

(gage)] -gig "b " lft, [kPa(gage)] [C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [°Cl 

2011/4/13 0:00 0.04 6150 25.0 3.6 31,8 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 2:00 0.04 6150 25.0 3.7 31.9 105 1200 24 

2011/4/134:00 0.03 6150 25.0 3.8 31.8 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 6:00 0,04 6150 25.0 3.8 31.9 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 8:00 0,04 6150 25.0 3.9 31.8 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 9:00 0.03 6150 24.9 4.0 31.7 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 10:00 0.04 6150 24,9 4.0 31.7 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 12:00 0.04 6150 24.9 4.2 31.7 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 14:00 0.04 6150 24.9 4.3 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 16:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.2 31.5 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 18:00 0.03 6150 24.9 4.1 31.7 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 20:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.0 31.5 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 2200 0.04 6150 24.9 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/140:00 0.03 6150 24.8 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 2:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.0 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 4:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.0 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 6:00 0,03 6150 24.8 3,9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 8:00 

2011/4/14 10:00 

2011/4/14 12:00 

2011/4/14 14:00 

201 1/4/14 16:00 

2011/4/14 18:00 

2011/4/14 20:00 

2011/4/14 22:00 

2011/4/15 0:00 

CE 801 of 1220

2F- 3Y F)'ft'O)A{4+42OD[mm] ,TA 

ýF± •?j*• ft [oC] D/WV±)t D/W- S/CJI) S/Cf{l S/C;3 

r[ol [MPa [mm] mImI 

(gage)] Tyf/JýiA')b [kPa(gage)] [0C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] ['C] 

2011/4/130:00 0.00 3600 33.4 10 35.1 110 2100 26 

2011/4/132:00 0.00 3600 33.3 10 35.0 110 2100 26 

2011/4/134:00 0.00 3600 33.2 10 35.0 111 2100 26 

2011/4/136:00 0,00 3600 33.1 10 35.0 111 2100 26 

2011/4/138:00 0.00 3600 33.1 10 35.0 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 9:00 0.00 3600 33.0 10 35.0 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 10:00 0.00 3599 33.0 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 1200 0.00 3600 33.0 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 1400 0.00 3597 33.1 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 16:00 0.00 3599 33.2 10 34.9 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 18:00 0,00 3600 33.2 10 34.7 ill 2100 26 

2011/4/13 20:00 0.00 3600 33.2 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 22:00 0.00 3600 33.2 10 34.6 111 2100 26 

2011/4/140:00 0.00 3600 33.2 10 34.7 111 2100 26 

2011/4/142:00 0.00 3599 33.1 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/144:00 0.00 3599 331 10 34.7 111 2100 26 

2011/4/146:00 0.00 3599 33.1 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4'N14 8:00 

2011/4/14 10:00 

2011/4/14 12:00 

2011/4/14 14:00 

2011/4/14 16:00 

2011/4/14 18:00 

2011/4/14 20:00 

2011/4/14 22:00 

2011/4/15 0:001 

CE 802 of 1220

2F-4'- .O •j(TAF)h5\b'O qi='* di+4200[mmi 

•E '•2(• ,t.aMU[c] D/WF)] D/Wilf S/Cf±- SiCUJ,[. S/Clmlf 

SMPa [mm] /A') [kPa(gage)] [°C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [°C] 

(gage)] T7t'fb" 

2011/4/13 0:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.4 109 2100 30 

2011/4/132:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.4 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 4:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.6 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 6:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.9 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 8:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.2 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 9:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.4 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 10-00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.4 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 12:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.5 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 14:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.9 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 16:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 18:00 0,07 4589 29.2 8 35.0 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 20:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 35.0 108 2100 30 

2011/4/13 22:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 2:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 4:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.7 109 2100 30 

2011/4/146:00 0.07 

201 1/4/14 8:00 

4589 29.1 8 34.6 108 2100 30 

2011/4/14 10:00 

2011/4/14 12:00 

2011/4/14 14:00 

2011/4/14 16:00 

2011/4/14 18:00 

2011/4/14 20:00 

2011/4/14 22:00 

2011/4/15 0:00 

CE 803 of 1220

[~]] 

V • 8:00, 20:00 311, AM11 -WHOM. 9:00/21:00 00AI fl 

t a 15:00 (411119, Mglif{t) 

§A- I1 47py fM& (4 A 14H 8: oo ) 

• -•2 my 3 4-lay 

(4/14 -T ] [4/14 TV] [4/14-f ] 

0 L..., ,i , • 60 ••..................................,••'.. * V i L i :.. k L. -- , ...... 6 i..... V '..... i............ . ""•!. .............. 

•.•i t .• A.t 

....................................................... 

•,A 4/3 17:30"- 6m/h 3 -C,ýA 4/7 19:00"- 7mi/h i•j, 4/3 17:32-- 7VA/h -&A 

(4/11 17:17"-18:04JNij L (4/1117:171--18:041M .I: (4/11 17:17tA 18:041CH .1ý 

, 9 Fi) 1 041.) J 9 Rf±) 

[4/14 •][4/14 •][4/14 f ] [4/14 f ] 

1 / I •, J, 

t ;6:) I Is,: 'o 

t . 

[U!] [U!] [UI] [U1] 

SFP ti. 4/13 13:15"-14:55 FPC i,((* 4/12 16:26-17:16 '/r 1 ,m,.6 4/12 13:04 •>i/ j, 

i 60t) b ( 35t) 4/13 0:30--6:57 '/? 2 * (M,"( 

195t) 

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

4500mm (4I/i 6:00) 630l' (1,, 1,i 6;00) 5, A 4850m (Oill 6:05) 

[4/14 TV• [4/14 f 2] [4/14 f 2] [4/14 f 2] 

[UI] [UI] [UI] [UI] 

4/12 19:35-4/13 11:00 L 

T/B 4/13 15:02-17:04 [•A •0i4 

B1i:,1 18:1}-1:32 5 f 70- 

[T/B ;*k] [TiB *2] RA/1 ;t] 

[T/B *t] 

OPN5100(m(l/1I 7:00) (4/13 OP+3O5Omm (0/i1 7:00) (4/13 OPM2900m(l/1-4 7:00) (4/13 - 

11: 00 199 •ttot W, I1: 00 1 9' lLtt LU) 11:00 199 

•1Ut L,) 

4-4 : 9 t oP4900m•) () : *IM ANIOPN30Omm) (V ': i OP+300Mm) 

*0 l2O• 1cm(t:, -j, [1',cni-('i_ 1;,011) 

7:[,•0 , 

ýO®ft [ 1 •'40 Ah ] /7:3~Nt., (4/9 4: 10"- A ,N 4 •-:°) 4/11 11:19 M 1,7 2to 

R:¥P 1TANM IS 7 I•'•7"O7, N|IF ( F• 

.IL;Vfl) V1I110311 1•.$f, [tI- 2011_0.l4• (IF 4Mf,) i T'•-. - 1 04140800.doc 

CE 804 of 1220

A 


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Awan, Riaz X (Sofia - DOE) [AwanRX@state.gov] 

Thursday, April 14,2011 1:55 AM 

Ou, Andrew H; Dudley, Katherine F; Sim, Hyon B; Toko, Kenichiro (Ken) 

Cherry, Ronald C; Blarney, Alan; Bernhard, Rudolph; Forsberg, Aaron P; Cipullo, Timothy L 

RE: 4-14 SITREP INPUT 

Andrew - my apologies, I am still trying to find my way around. Thanks for the information and now I fully know the 

coordinates. 

Riaz 

From: Ou, Andrew H 


To: Awan, Riaz X (Sofia - DOE); Dudley, Katherine F; Sim, Hyon B; Toko, Kenichiro (Ken) 

Cc: Cherry, Ronald C; 'Alan.Blamey@nrc.gov'; 'Rudolph.Bernhard@nrc.gov'; Forsberg, Aaron P; Cipullo, Timothy L 

Subject: RE: 4-14 SITREP INPUT 

Thank you, Riaz. Each day there is a different drafter and today is my colleague Hyon. Tomorrow will be our colleague 

Ken, and starting next week the duty shifts back to the Economic Section (Aaron Forsberg and Tim Cipullo). 

Andrew 

This email is UNCLASSIFIED. 

From: Awan, Riaz X (Sofia - DOE) 


To: Ou, Andrew H; Dudley, Katherine F 

Cc: Cherry, Ronald C; 'Alan.Blamey@nrc.gov'; 'Rudolph.Bernhard@nrc.gov' 

Subject: 4-14 SITREP INPUT 

Andrew, please see below input for today's SITREP. April 13 meetings were cleared by NRC. 

Thanks. 

Riaz Awan 

DOE Sofia Office [On TDY] 

DOE Provides Ground Robotic System and Associated Training: At the request 

of Government of Japan, DOE has provided Talon Robot with radiation 

hardened camera systems. Along with the system, copies of the manuals and 

videos were also provided. TEPCO plans to initially use the system at the 

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Site for outside radiation mapping and then 

possibly deploy it inside the buildings for characterization and/or 

remediation. Four experts from the DOE's Idaho National Laboratory started 

training the TEPCO operators on April 14 at the National Institute of 

Advanced Industrial Science and Technology in the city of Tsukuba. The 

two-day training is focused on equipment operation, functions, 

CE 805 of 1220

capabilities, trouble shooting, and other areas and may be extended 

depending on TEPCO needs. 

April 13 Meeting with NISA and TEPCO: In a daily scheduled meeting on April 

13, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) discussed status of the 

actions related to stabilizing the Fukushima Daiichi reactors with the 

Nuclear Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) and Tokyo Electric Power Company 

(TEPCO). Representatives from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Pacific 

Northwest National Laboratory, and the Institute of Nuclear Power 

Operations (INPO)/U.S. Industry Consortium also attended the meeting. 

Injection of nitrogen at a stable flow rate of 28 cubic meters per 

hour continues into the Unit 1 dry well. The parameters for Fukushima 

reactors continue to remain relatively static and there are no 

fluctuations and/or changes. TEPCO continues to inject water at the 

rate of 6, 7 and 7 cubic meters per hour for Units 1, 2 and 3 

respectively. For spent fuel pools (SFP), 35 tons of water was 

injected into the unit 3 SFP on April 12 and TEPCO plans to pump 

water into the Unit 2 SFP until the level is above the top of the 

active fuel. 

" On April 12, cameras and other remotely operated systems were 

deployed to collect samples and images of the water level from the 

Unit 4 SFP. The noted water level was 5 meters below normal level (8- 

9 feet above the top of active fuel). TEPCO has injected enough water 

to raise the level by one meter in the pool. The results of samples 

data will be discussed with the U.S. side on April 14. TEPCO also 

advised the radiation measurement at the SFP surface was 84 mili 

sievert per hour and the pool water temperate was relatively high at 

90 degrees Celsius. Samples were taken by submerging a container for 

three minutes in the SFP at a depth of one meter. 

* NRC noted uncertain conditions of the Unit-4 SFP and encouraged TEPCO 

to review the images taken on April 12 to determine configuration of 

the fuel. NRC also recommended evaluating additional pictures and 

images of the fuel if the current ones cannot provide enough details 

to perform an assessment. 

• As of 7:35 PM April 12, TEPCO had pumped the quantities of 

radioactive water from the Unit 2 that lowered the trench level by 4 

- 5 centimeter. This operation was stopped on April 13 at 11:00 AM to 

measure radiation. 

" NISA discussed in detail the most critical 5 priorities that NRC has 

proposed for accident mitigation and stabilization. 

- Accident analysis - First meeting of the working level technical 

experts between Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization and DOE's 

Sandia National Laboratories would take place on April 13. 

2 

CE 806 of 1220

- Accident mitigation strategy - As a result of productive technical 

discussions between INPO and TEPCO on April 12 via telephone 

conference, both parties agreed to hold these calls on a daily 

basis. At this time, the main objective is to determine how to 

flood the Primary Containment Vessel (PCV) after completing the 

nitrogen injection. Regarding the water level in the Unit 1 PCV, 

there are differences between the U.S. and Japanese sides primarily 

due to the leak rate assumptions. TEPCO would like to have further 

discussions with INPO regarding the leak rate assumptions based on 

the recent data for Unit 1 dry well pressure when the nitrogen 

injection into the Unit 1 dry well was interrupted for about six 

hours on April 11 as a result of the aftershock. The injection was 

reestablished at 11:30 PM on April 11. The bottom line conclusion 

reached was - what should be the water level and how it should be 

achieved. 

Plant stability document - NISA suggested to hold engineering level 

technical discussions to which NRC agreed. NISA has also identified 

its staff member who will be responsible for the review and the 

Government is currently determining how the document should be 

reviewed and handled. 

- Protective measures - NRC has completed its review of specific 

areas and has provided this information to NISA for consideration 

late on April 13. 

- Radioactive water management - TEPCO claimed that it is receiving 

substantial information from the U.S. industry including Areva of 

France. Development of new technologies is not a timely solution 

and challenge is how best to deploy the existing systems to manage 

this top priority issue at the Fukushima site. TEPCO is currently 

reviewing several proposals and would shortly narrow down to few 

companies. (Comment: TEPCO has only mentioned Areva. Post is not 

aware that any other major U.S. nuclear firm has submitted proposal 

to TEPCO. End Comment) 

* NISA advised the U.S. participants that Prime Minister Kan and 

Special Advisor Hosono are concerned about the structural integrity 

of the Fukushima reactors in light of the strong aftershocks over the 

past one week. TEPCO has confirmed Fukushima reactors structural 

integrity, NISA has endorsed TEPCO's methodology, and there has been 

no impact on the structures. However, Japanese citizens remain 

concerned especially additional aftershocks are expected and 

therefore NISA and TEPCO need to work together. NRC would provide an 

analysis by the end of the day April 13. 

* On March 30, NISA issued directive to all nuclear power plants in 

Japan to implement additional measures for power and cooling systems 

regarding a tsunami event. These measures include: 1) Develop plans 

for all power supplies and cooling capabilities; 2) Additional 

3 

CE 807 of 1220

measures considered for equipment; and 3) 

spent fuel. 

Cooling capability for 

April 13 Meeting with NISA and JNES: DOE's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) 

severe accident analysis experts and NRC held technical discussions with 

staff of NISA and JNES on April 13. The NISA/JNES assessment of the 

Fukushima Unit 1 reactor current status generally agrees with the one 

performed by SNL based on review of plant information and a preliminary 

MELCOR analysis. The NISA/JNES staff noted that their assessment of the 

water level in the Unit 1 drywell is higher than what is estimated by 

TEPCO. SNL experts presented results of the MELCOR analyses for the three 

Fukushima reactors noting some important insights and uncertainties due to 

lack of information. NISA/JNES provided a time line of events for the 

reactors and additional staff level technical discussions would be held on 

April 15. The status of Units 3 and 4 SFPs also discussed in some detail. 

NISA/JNES analysis of the boil off time for the Unit 4 SFP filled to 

normal levels generally agrees with calculations performed by SNL. The 

current water level in Unit 4 is 7 meters above the bottom of the SFP and 

the Unit 3 SFP level is currently unknown and the skimmer is also not 

available to provide any indication. The decay heat level in the Unit 3 

SFP is one tenth that of the Unit 4 and only contains one third the volume 

of fuel. However, thermal imagery of the Unit 3 SFP indicates a consistent 

hot spot raising concern about the water level. 

4 

CE 808 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Hay, Michael 


LIA08 Hoc; Liaison Japan; Carpenter, Cynthia; RST01 Hoc; Hoc, PMT12; OST01 HOC; 

'hochevarar@inpo.org'; 'Alice.caponiti@hq.doe.gov'; Blarney, Alan; Blount, Tom; Boger, 

Bruce; Casto, Chuck; Christensen, Harold; 'Craig.gaddis@js.pentagon.mil'; DORLCAL 

Resource; Dorman, Dan; DprNrrCal Resource; Emche, Danielle; ET05 Hoc; ET07 Hoc; FOIA 

Response.hoc Resource; Giitter, Joseph; 'glenn.southern@navy.mil' 

Re: Charter 

If anyone has the NRC Charter and can send it to me electronically for the report I would appreciate it. 

Thanks 

Mike Hay 

Blackberry message 

From: LIA08 Hoc 

To: Liaison Japan; Carpenter, Cynthia; RST01 Hoc; Hoc, PMT12; OST01 HOC; Al Hochevar ; 

Alice Caponiti ; Blarney, Alan; Blount, Tom; Boger, Bruce; Casto, Chuck; Christensen, 

Harold; Craig Gaddis ; DORLCAL Resource; Dorman, Dan; DprNrrCal Resource; Emche, 

Danielle; ET05 Hoc; ET07 Hoc; FOIA Response.hoc Resource; Giitter, Joseph; Glenn Southern 

; HOO Hoc; INPO ; INPO ; INPO 

; INPO ; INPO ; INPO ; INPO 

; INPO ; LIA01 Hoc; LIA06 Hoc; LIA08 Hoc; LIA11 Hoc; 

McDermott, Brian; McGinty, Tim; Miller, Chris; Monninger, John; Morris, Scott; NRC Liaison at USAID 

; OST02 HOC; PACOM Watch Officer ; Pentagon Japan 

Crisis Team J-4 Desk ; Peter Lyons ; Hoc, PMT12; 

Rick Nielsen ; Robert Gambone ; Robert Mercer 

; Ross-Lee, MaryJane; RST01 Hoc; RST01B Hoc; Sal Golub ; Sal 

Golub ; Steve Aoki ; Tom Vavoso 

; Virgilio, Martin; Weber, Michael; Wiggins, Jim; William Webster ; 

Zimmerman, Roy 

Sent: Tue Apr 12 21:09:34 2011 

Subject: daily updates to the US-Japan Nuclear-Related Assistance Tracker 

Attached is the updated Tracker based on the 20:00 EDT, April 12, 2011 consortium Call. 

Joe Rivers 

LT Coordinator 

CE 809 of 1220

Travick, Vainette 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 



Blarney, Alan; Wittick, Brian; Moore, Carl; Casto, Chuck; Collins, Elmo; Gauntt, Randall 0; 

Mitman, Jeffrey; michael.call@nrc.gov; Hay, Michael; Miller, Marie; 

richard.kondo@crbard.com; Bernhard, Rudolph; Salay, Michael; Garchow, Steve; Steve 

Reynolds 

FW: Unit 4 Spent Fuel Pool Isotopic Analysis 

Unit 4 SFP isotopic.JPG; SFP Anaiysis.pdf 

See attached SFP isotopic analysis data taken from U4 pool, based on water sample obtained, handed out at 11 am 

meeting today. 

At status meeting today, TEPCO analysis personnel discussed these results. 

They have concluded that fuel in Unit 4 pool did not experience fuel damage from a drop of pool inventory and uncovery 

of assemblies. 

They estimate that 1/3 of the U4 pool contains seawater. 

Lee Gard 

INPO 

cellI (b)(6) 

gardla@inpo.org 

Restricted Distribution: Copyright @ 2011 by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. Not for sale or for commercial 

use. Reproduction of this report without the prior written consent of INPO is expressly prohibited. Unauthorized 

reproduction is a violation of applicable law. The persons and organizations that are furnished copies of this report should 

not deliver or transfer this report to any third party, or make this report or its contents public, without the prior agreement 

of INPO. All other rights reserved. 

.DISCLAIMER: 

This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain prcprietoary INPO or WANe information that is privileged. confidential, of pro•tected by copyright belonging to 

fNPO or WANe. This e-mnail is intenided solely for the use of the individual or entity for which it is intended. If you ame not the intended rocipient of this e-mail, any 

diss, eminalion, distribution, copying, or aclion taken in realion to the contents of and attachmenfs to this e-mail is contrary fo lhe rights of lNPO or WANe and is 

prohibited. It you are not the intended recipient of this e-oail. please notify Ihn sender Immediately by return e-mail and pxennanently delete the original and any 

copy or printout of this e-mail and any attachments. 

Thank you. 

CE 810 of 1220

~I-JLSA*- 

4'M IF #4 

201 1404,912El 12"30:5004'J' 

14*ýQW-• .71AIJ :201 l-04, 12E3 12830:5004'J, 

,Al ~A M:, t]tf• V 0 20114g04MM~3] 12*443-•37tJ' 

*i - *ip4JI/• 

•=i j : 50.00 cm3 

100.00 % 

49.• 

:r~k 79"-5O0ml 

1Ff #4 RffliR*V-XL 

j I :'1~ BGGe02201104130637 

IVI;,--, • EneGe021104130616 

" -- :EFFGe2MAR150OmL,20060119 

[OM D t*ffl 

AITI1D 

S.4 9 N- 

At -'5-: No.2 

ROS024999201104121230 

TEPCO 

TEE . 

ooo0084 

14543ý37 !JU 

§120P10-l'(Tb) : 2000.00 (,) 

2108.03 ClJ') 

AiM : 2011-&O4,qJ138906037ýý AJl.$'M1 : 20O1U(,04 1) 

r•IEH 19 20111F-04,e113QE60624ýý 

i 

I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

-- 10 

11 Ni- 65 

12 Cu- 64 

13 Zn- 65 

14 Zn- 69m 

15 As- 76 

16 Br- 84 

17 Rb- 88 

18 Rb- 89 

19 Sr- 91 

-, 20 Sr- 92 

Noj. ( Bq/cm3 ) ( Bq/cm3 ) (keV) 

21 Y - 91 

22 Zr- 95. 

23 Nb- 95 

24 Mo- 99 

25 Tc- 99m 

26 To-101 

27 Tc-104 

28 Ru-103 

29 RuT105 

30 Aa-1 10m 

31 

--,a32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

--- 37 

38 

-• 39 

40 

N - 13 

F - 18 

Na- 24 

Cl- 38 

Cr- 51 

Mn- 54 

Mn- 56 

Fe- 59 

Co- 58 

Co- 60 

Sb-124 

I -131 

I -132 

I -133 

I -134 

1-135 

Cs-134 

Cs-i 36 

Cs-137 

Cs-I 38 

41 Ba-139 

42 Ba-140 

43 Ba-,141 

44 Ba-142 

45 La-140 

46 Ce-141 

47 Ce-144 

48 Pr-144 

49 Hf-181 

50 W -187 

ND 4. 534E-01 511.01 

ND 1.895E+03 511.01 

NO 7.881E-01 1368.59 

ND 1.486E+11 1642.20 

ND 2. 520E+00 320.08 

1.586E+01 2. 035E-01 834.83 

ND 1.486E+02 846.75 

1. 463E+00 3. 357E-01 1099.22 

5. 784E-01 2. 276E-01 810. 76 

1.691E+01 1.106E-01 1332.47 

ND 

ND 

4. 593E-01 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

7.645E+01 

ND 

ND 

4. 154E-01 

ND 

ND 

NO •RD 

ND 

ND 

3. 530E+02 

ND 

ND 

2. 158E+02 

NO 

NDO 

ND 

ND 

8. 753E+01 

4. 033E+00 

9. 327E+01 

ND 

ND 

2. 873E+00 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

1. 886E+02 

3. 492E+00 

3. 529E-01. 

1. 316E+00 

1. 405E+00 

3. 257E+13 

2. 926E+00 

5. 685E-01 

6. 374E+00 

4. 346E+01 

4. 749E+01 

8. 446E-01 

2. 016E-01 

2. 015E+00 

4. 885E+00 

9. 676E-o1 

7. 199E-01 

4. 713E-01 

2. 191E+01 

3. 177E-01 

1. 279E+00 

4. 138E-01 

4. 192E+02 

7. 859E-01 

3. 943E+07 

4. 971E+00 

3. 364E-01 

3. 212E-01 

3. 400E-01 

2.181E+13 

4. 262E+05 

1. 254E+00 

1. 530E+00 

3. 547E+00 

9. 865E-01 

5. 383E-01 

2. 372E+00 

2. 447E+01 

6. 234E-O1 

2. 314E+00 

m 

1481.77 

511.01 

1115.52 

438.63 

559.10 

881.59 

898.02 

1031.94 

749.78 

1383.94 

1208.00 

724.18 

765.79 

739.40 

140.51 

306.83 

357.99 

497.08 

724.21 

657.75 

602.72 

364.48 

667.69 

529.89 

847.03 

1260.46 

604.66 

818.50 

661.64 

462.69 

165.85 

537.27 

190.22 

255.12 

487.03 

145.44 

133.54 

696.49 

133.04 

479.51 

(count) 

101.22± 142.8 

101.2:- 142.8 

77.6± 47.4 

14.4± 9.2 

-301.1:- 147.6 

13838. 8± 123.9 

-150. 6-± 55.0 

569.66± 38. 1 

501.9 ± 44.3 

9716. 3± 100.0 

-3. 0 ± 

101.22± 

161. 5± 

-62. 9± 

147. 8- 

49. 0± 

39. 6±- 

-15. 1t 

-5..1 ±4 

75.7± 

-8.4± 

0.0-± 

380. I ± 

-18.44± 

76.8_t 

31.55± 

-231. I1 

-574. 9± 

3495. 2±t 

690. 4± 

9.9 

142.8 

33.3 

174.7 

118.8 

43. 9 

49.8 

43. 8 

79.6 

16.1 

28.9 

98. 8 

58. 8 

61.2 

220.0 

250.0 

193.0 

170.2 

69.9 

106.6 

740. 7± 463.0 

261831.2± 527.3 

-275.1± 80. 8 

39. 8± 123. 4 

-31.1±- 49.6 

1.6± 21.7 

90041.33± 313.9 

3381.2±: 70.7 

83006. 3± 297.2 

-252. 0± 147.3 

222. 0± 380.3 

787. 0-± 85. 1 

377.1 i 337.0 

45. 4± 194.8 

514.1±4. 96.9 

-575. 6±t 222.1 

59. 2± 216.4 

93.66± 64.0 

59.2± 216.4 

-152. 7± 129.4 

(%) (%) 

200.00 2. 675E+00 1. 274E+00 

194.00 1.085E+04 1. 274E+00 

100.00 3.107E+00 5.693E-01 

31.00 7. 475E1+11 4. 882E-01 

10.20. 1. 026E+00 1. 797E+00 

100.00 1. 002E+00 8. 743E-01 

98.87 7. 313E+02 8. 647E-01 

56.50 1. 016E+00 7. OOOE-01 

99.44 1. OIOE+O0 8. 813E-01 

100.00 1.OOOE+00 5. 747E-01 

25.70 

37.00 

50.75 

94.90 

41.00 

41.60 

11.60 

64.10 

23.00 

90: 10 

0.30 

43.10 

99.82 

12.60 

89.00 

88.00 

89.00 

86.40 

46.70 

94.40 

97.90 

81.00 

98.70, 

87.00 

96.00 

29.10 

97.56 

99. 70 

85.00 

27.00 

7. 670E+02 

3. 812E+00 

1. 003E+00 

3. 370E+00 

1. 909E+00 

8. 426E+13 

1. 835E+00 

1. 976E+00 

5. 722E+00 

5. 310E+02 

1. 012E+00 

1. 011E+00 

1. 020E+00 

1. 294E+00 

1. 696E+01 

2. 091E+00 

1.814E+00 

1. 018E+00 

4. 607E+01 

1. 003E+00 

1. 012E+00 

1.092E+00 

1. 708E+03 

2. 265E+00 

2- 121E+08 

1. 310E+01 

1. 001E+00 

1. 056E+00 

1. OO0E+00 

1. 799E+13 

22.40 2. 276E+05 

23. 60 1. 057E+00 

46.30 1. 810E+00 

:20. 00 2. 545E+00 

43.00 1. 526E+00 

48.40 1. 022E+00 

11.10 1. 002E+00 

1.47 1. 864E+00 

43.00 1. 017E+00 

26.00 2. 037E+00 

5. 519E-01 

1. 274E+00 

6. 949E-01 

1. 428E+00 

1. 190E+00 

8.377E-01 

8. 256E-01 

7. 395E-01 

9. 507E-01 

5. 836E-01 

6. 517E-01 

9. 767E-01 

9. 353E-01 

9. 611 E-01 

2. 591E+00 

1. 853E+00 

1. 657E+00 

1. 301E+00 

9. 766E-01 

1. 052E+00 

1. 124E+00 

1. 636E+00 

1. 040E+00 

1. 240E+00 

8. 645E-01 

6. 297E-01 

1. 055E+00 

8. 880E-01 

1. 047E+00 

1. 372E+00 

2.729E+00 

1. 227E+00 

2.591E+00 

2. 112E+00 

1. 321E+00 

2. 646E+00 

2.486E+00 

1. 007E+00 

2. 478E+00 

1.336E+00 

w S. 

N 

N 

S 

N 

w 

s 

NS 

NW 

S 

NS 

ANS 

S 

N 

S 

W 

N 

I 

- -- - - --.- -. I% *ý, -- t- eA.1 .. Fq-]*Imbnm 

QF%04 999f i Alýo 1/1

,/, •S 

Vji7< 

~~~jj: 

4 ~G)~I*~ 

Vlft Wt 23 0112 

3ý* -T* .23 4.9 13 13 

VLA' g P. 910k. (eL 

t ~7- ýA 134 2iJ~~ . . 

~131 [i8 .13] 220 

I 

09~ (Ba/cm) 

'IAAAý 

't il ' A.134 

3, 1 X10 

LuJp F 

___________________ 

S131 -1.3 

X10 7 

3. 0X 106 0.13 

~~ 50-~60mSv/hE 

/ *'d NO *ON' 

OREM V1,10 CE1802 &a22o


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

RST08 Hoc 


Bernhard, Rudolph 

Task item to answer 

Rudy, 

Below is the task item we have which was brought up on the 0300 call. I liked you comment about the questionable 

environment and where and how they get their readings and information. Could you draft up a response to help us 

out? Just send it back to the RST and reference task #4691. Don't send it to the email address on the request, we will 

take care of that. I will assign it to the site team for now to develop the response. The due date is today sometime so if 

you can get to it soon that would be great. 

Thanks for the help, 

Tim Kolb 

Requested the status of the guages in units 1,2,3, and SFPs regarding water level, pressure, etc. How reliable is 

it and how are you getting the data? 

Evidently, the he is being asked the question, because someone from the NRC made a statement something to 

the affect that the guages were blown and therefore readings were unreliable. Please respond via e-mail to 

(b)(6) 

CE 813 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

nei-hisanori@meti.go.jp 


Blarney, Alan 

Moore, Carl; Mitman, Jeffrey; Salay, Michael; Call, Michel; Bernhard, Rudolph; Garchow, 

Steve; oshima-toshiyuki@meti.go.jp; bannai-toshihiro@meti.go.jp; koyamamasaomi@meti.go.jp 

Re: Meeting Confirmation for Friday April 15, 2011 Hisanori Nei 

Dear Mr..Blamey 

I 

confirm the time and venue as you mentioned. 

See you tomorrow. 

Regards, 

Hisanori Nei 

----------- > 

----------- > 

------------------------------------ I 

I"Blamey, Alan" 

I 

-------------------------------- 

I 

I -------- > 

I • : I 

I -------- > 

------------------------------------ I 

I"'nei-hisanori@meti.go.jp.' 

I - 

--------------------------------------- I 

I ---------- > 

I cc: I 

I-------- > 

------------------------------------ I 

I"Bernhard, Rudolph" , 

"Call, Michel" , "Mitman, I 

"Salay, Michael" , 

IJeffrey" , "Moore, Carl" , "Mitman, Jeffrey" 

, "Garchow, Steve" I 

I 

I 

--------------------------------------- I 

-814----120> 

I R -1: I 

I 

I ---- - -> 

CE 814 of 1220

12011/04/14 19:34 

-- 

-- - -- - - > 

! I-> 

I 

IMeeting Confirmation for Friday April 15, 2011 

---------------------------------------- I 

Dear Nei-san, I have confirmed the 1400 meeting on protective measures. 

Based on our discussion we are planning on the following meetings on Friday April 15, 2011. 

1100 NISA / TEPCO / NRC as planned ? at TEPCO 

1400 Protective Measures meeting 

1600 Spent Fuel Removal Meeting 

1730 Accident analysis / Stability (as time permits) 

Venue: 

1042 meeting room in the annex building of METI 

1-3-1 Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan 

2 

CE 815 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 



Casto, Chuck 

RE: socializing interim assessment executive summary 

Ok. Also, I received your earlier email regarding your May 1 6 tý return to CONUS ( May 2 3 'd return to Region 

II). I assume this return date is one of mutual consent; if not, please fill me in on the decision-making.... 

From my vantage point, everyone on this end appreciates the value you are adding to the ongoing effort in 

Japan. They also recognize how well you are representing the NRC and your country. Congrats and well 

done! 

I look forward to seeing you in May and hearing details of your exploits! 

Vic 

From: Casto, Chuck 

Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:59 AM 


Subject: Re: socializing interim assessement executive summary 

Fixed 


To: Casto, Chuck 

Sent: Thu Apr 14 05:28:16 2011 

Subject: Re: socializing interim assessement executive summary 

Thanks Chuck - Ill socialize and get back to you. BTW, I see that you sent this to James "Dwyer" vs "Dyer". Was that a 

typo. 

Vic 


From: Casto, Chuck 

To: Wiggins, Jim; Dwyer, James; McCree, Victor; Zimmerman, Roy; Carpenter, Cynthia 

Cc: Virgilio, Martin; Collins, Elmo 

Sent: Wed Apr 13 23:21:51 2011 

Subject: socializing interim assessement executive summary 

Folks, 

I've attached the draft executive summary from our "interim comprehensive assessment." This global 

document is created to provide a documented basis for the assessments that we've completed and to serve as 

a launch pad for future site activities. It's a basis document for some of our most significant insights. 

I send it to you merely to get your early input and to socialize the content. I selected a few of you that have 

been intimately involved in the response. It may not be a literary masterpiece, we're just trying to capture our 

most salient points. Many if not all of the attachments were previously provided to the Japanese. 

Thanks for "socializing".... 

CE 816 of 1220

casto 

2 

CE 817 of 1220

Official Use Only - Sensitive Internal Information 

DRAFT PREDECISONAL 

UNITED STATES 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS 

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 

April XX, 2011 

SUBJECT: INTERIM SAFETY ASSESSMENT - FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI EVENT 

(b)(5) 

Official Use Only- Sensitive Internal Information 


CE 818 of 1220



(b)(5) 



2 

CE 819 of 1220



(b)(5) 



3 

CE 820 of 1220



(b)(5) 



4 

CE 821 of 1220



(b)(5) 



5 

CE 822 of 1220



(b)(5) 



6 

CE 823 of 1220



(b)(5) 



7 

CE 824 of 1220



(b)(5) 



8 

CE 825 of 1220





9 

CE 826 of 1220



ATTACHMENTS 

(b)(5) 



10 

CE 827 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Casto, Chuck 



Fw: NRC team in Japan 

Original ----- Message- 

From: Apostolakis, George 

To: Casto, Chuck 

Sent: Wed Apr 13 16:18:53 2011 

Subject: FW: NRC team in Japan 

Chuck: 

Good to see that your team's work is recognized. Congratulations. 

GA 

Gw 

Commissioner George Apostolakis 


One White Flint North, MS 016 G4 

11555 Rockville Pike 

Rockville, MD 20852 

(301) 415-1810 


From: Apostolakis, George 

Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:36 PM 

To: 'Lyons, Peter'; Jaczko, Gregory; Magwood, William; Ostendorff, William; Svinicki, 

Kristine 

Subject: RE: NRC team in Japan 

Pete: 

I am very glad to hear this. 

Thanks for confirming what I always thought to be true. 

George 

Commissioner George Apostolakis 


One White Flint North, MS 016 G4 

11555 Rockville Pike 

Rockville, MD 20852 

(301) 415-1810 


From: Lyons, Peter rmailto:Peter.LyonsONuclear.Energy.gov1 

Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 12:07 PM 

To: Jaczko, Gregory; Magwood, William; Ostendorff, William; Apostolakis, George; Svinicki, 

Kristine 

Subject: NRC team in Japan 

1 

CE 828 of 1220

Commissioners 

I returned from Japan on Friday. I had several opportunities to work with and observe the 

interactions of your NRC team with Japanese government and industry leaders. 

Many compliments on the superb work your team is doing. Chuck Casto, supported by the rest 

of your team, has clearly gained the trust of the Ambassador, key GOJ leaders, and Japanese 

industry. They are providing invaluable advice on the complex situation in Japan. 

Pete Lyons 

2 

CE 829 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

McGrady-Finneran, Patricia 


Erickson, Randy; Maier, Bill; Barker, Allan; Logaras, Harral; McNamara, Nancy; Tifft, Doug; 

Trojanowski, Robert; Woodruff, Gena; Browder, Rachel; Janda, Donna; Orendi, Monica; 

Lynch, James 

Jackson, Deborah; Turtil, Richard; Piccone, Josephine 

FW: Japan Response State Coordination Call CANCELLED for April 14, 2011 

imageO01 gif 

FYI. 

,-VU.S.NRC 

Pat ricia MVec~rady-IFberan 

Program Manager, USNRC 

Division of Intergovernmental Liaison and Rulemaking (DILR) 

Intergovernmental Liaison Branch (ILB) 

Patricia.McGrady-Finneran@nrc.gov 

Phone: (301) 415-2326 

Fax: (301) 415-3502 

From: Patricia McGrady-Finneran rma ito: Patricia. McGrady-Finneran(nrc.covl 


To: McGrady-Finneran, Patricia 

Subject: Japan Response State Coordination Call CANCELLED for April 14, 2011 

Subject: Japan Response State Coordination Call CANCELLED for 14 April 

There will NOT be a CDC-facilitated State Conference call this evening, 

Thursday, April 14. We anticipate that there may be a final call next week, 

but that remains unscheduled at this time. Participation in the calls to 

date has been important and highly valued. CDC and the federal partners 

thank you for your assistance and input. 

Ii 

JI 

CE 830 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Marksberry, Don 


RST01 Hoc; Tinkler, Charles; Schaperow, Jason; Esmaili, Hossein; Helton, Donald; Salay, 

Michael; Thorp, John; Garmon, David 

Lee, Richard; Demoss, Gary; Coyne, Kevin; Stutzke, Martin; Salley, MarkHenry; Siu, Nathan; 

Joy L Rempe; Correia, Richard; Coe, Doug 

Subject: Plant Status Chronologies of Units 1, 2, and 3 

Attachments: 

RES (4-14-2011) Fukushima Daiichi Chronology, Units 1,2,3.xlsx 

Here is this morning's edition of the plant status chronology and data tables for Units 1, 2, and 3. It does not include 

radiological information. 

Please note that the info sources are official press releases from TEPCO and NISA. No other sources or speculations 

were included. 

NOTES: 

4/14/11 The TEPCO reference column for Unit 2 was inadvertently shifted a line or two. I believe this has been 

corrected. 1ý ý, 

4/14/11 We are considering stopping the updates of the parameter spreadsheets, since other more current sources a.4-ei 

becoming readily available. More to come.... 

4/14/11 INL-DOE has started a timeline-for all 6 units at Fukushima Daiichi. We will assess whether our efforts can be 

combined with INL's to avoid duplication and conflicts within the Federal community. More to come.... 

4/13/11 Earlier event descriptions were revised to match the press release text a little closer. Also, select Article 15 

reports and emergency declarations (from TEPCO to NISA) were added for those that may imply change in unit status. 

Don 

Don Marksberry 

Division of Risk Analysis 

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research 


21 Church Street 

Rockville, Maryland 20850-4207 

Phone: 301-251-7593 

E-mail: Don.Marksberry@nrc.gov 

USPS & Express Mail Address: 

Mail Stop: C-4C07M 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

CE 831 of 1220

-. 

Plant Parameters: Unit 3 1 _ 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) I. __ 

Sourcei NISA Press Releases UnM 3/141 3/151 31161 3/17. 3/171 3/181 3/181 3/18 1 3/19 3 19 3/19: 3/201 3/20 3/20 

19:301 11:42] 12:401 3:201 11:10 2: 351 21:05 6:101 4:30 11:001 16:00 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source SalVFresh _ - _ I 

via Feed Water Line L/rin _ _"_" "_'_ ' ..... __ 

via Fire Extinguishing Line L/min _ _ _ . i 

via Fire Extinguishing Line m3r•h _ 

RPV Level __ _ _ _ . ... _ ... _ _ I [ 

_ 

Fuel Range A mm .19001 1900 -1900 -1950' *1950 -2000: -23O0_ *-900 - 1950 - 185 - -1950 

1 60 

Fuel Range B mm -23001 -2300 .23001 -2300l .2300 .2300i .23001 -230001 -23001 -2300 -23001 .2300 ' 2350 -2000 

See NISA Press Release dated 4/11/2011 

ChIb MPaj U4 0-M 4._44 4609 I_4 

4; 

G het-A" M0 k M 03' .415 

_ __ __ _ 

7_ ... '4 08 1 4.0 9 4 

4.,30 4 -42 1 

09 iMA- Q5, Pul OQ I Q-M 41 1 

i 

4.4 941 4.4 046 0X=X.9 0ý 7 

A 4. 4 ~41 X4 .1 4.Q41~6 

Drywell Pressure MPaabs 0.3351 0.415 i 0.230 0.2001 0.190 0.1551 0.155i 0.160 0.1851 0.160 0.210M 0.340 0.310 0.290 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa abs 0.500i ,-,,, •,,., ,,•, , iNote2 Note3 Noote4 

RPV Temperature _ Note 1: Both readings are noted in the press releases as coming from channel A____ I Note 2:'Down scale 100' 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp C I Note 3: 400 overscale" 

RPV Bottom Head Temp C ]I INote ' 4:'800down scale' 

Containment Atm Monitoring System - i 

Drywell Sv/h . 1 

Suppression Chamber SvOh _ __', L 

___ 

_ 

t 

. ... _. .. 

i _ 

Notes: _ _ _ _ r 

NISA News releases started reported gage 

F 

pressure, then converled readings to absolute 

pressure. NISA separate parameter tables report 

gage pressure. Conversion In this table in BLUE. 

Standard atmospheric pressure 101.325 kPa 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa= 

0.161325 Mpa _ __ . 

CE 832 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit3 [ .i[ 

Revision 4/1412011 (as of 10:00 am, EDT) - I _ 

Source: NISA Press Releases iUnit 3/21 3/211 3/21 3/22 3/221 3/231 3/231 3/24 3/24 / 324 3/25 1 3/2 251 3/25 

4:00j12:15= 14:551 5:30 10:35 4:001 9:101 2:401 10:20 18:00 6:10 16:10 18:02 20:05 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source Salt/Fresh "-Salt Salt !Salt I Fresh Fresh 

via Feed Water Line L/min i , . ., 

via Fire Extinguishing Line Umin i _ = I Note8 INote8 Note 8 1 2401 240 

via Fire Extinguishing Line m31h _ . . ' iNote 7 

RPV Level 

• 

Fuel Range A jmm -16350ý .61!0 -1550 -1575 -1575 -1900 - 180 j 0 -19001 -1850 -t19001 -1900 1 

Fuel Range B Imm -1950 -20001 -2025 -2350 -2350 -2300, -2300 .23001 -23001 -2300 -2300 -2300 1 

_ _ __,. -180_ 

See NISA Press Release dated 4/11/201 1 ....... 

wag ___ P41 441 4-M I G." 

F4 

ug 0.... G-__ "1 Q__1 I 4_ 

____ M~4jL6_ ý444 4 4R 4 14 

-0 

G4- A~ A-a MR"o 4~o3 

_A_ 

o~I~a 

14.34Q 1 

1 1 1 

GhWrek Max 9,40 008 001 001 P 991! P9_ _4I041P X 

_ 

1t 

4w"_ _ __ _ __ _ Imp "4_1 0_48_ ___ 

___ 4.9 99! __ 1 ___ = 1 

Drywei/Pressure IMPa abs 0.1601 0.120 0.110 0.100 0.100j 0.100 0.100,,1 .107 0.10710.10740.1075 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa abs X.o. 6,l,."! ' W'" :X"j: , 10.199 0.200 0.1937 0.1895 1 

up 

RPV Temperature Note 5,6 jNole6 Note 6 Noto 6 Note 6 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp IC 50.7j 14.11 65,6 42.8 -33.41 1 

RPVBottom Head Temp JC 185.4 185.5 155.7 111.6 111.0 o 

Containment Atm Monitoring System ,F 

Drywell Svih .... 57.91 55.91 53.3 51.0 38.8 

Suppression Chamber Sv/h .1.661 1.62L 1.45 1.5 1.31 

Note 5: lime of temperatures 2:20 - 

Notes: 

[Note 6: Feedwater nozzle temperature reading under survey 


Note 7:2,0to250 I/hr 

pressure, then converted readings to absolute 

Note 8: 'measurement instrument malfunction' 


gage pressure. Conversion in this table in BLUE, 

Standard atmospheric pressure = 101.325 kPa 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure = 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa = 

0.161325 Mpa 

I 

CE 833 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 3 - 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) - 1 

_ _ii i 

_ _ _ I 

2 

_ 

i 1 

Source: NISA Press Releases IUnit 31261 3/261 3/261 3/261 3/268 3/271 3/271 3/271 3 /2813/28 328. / 3/291 3/291 3X9 

5:051 7:001 10:001 11:151 18:001 4:451 10:101 14:001 5:301 10:30 20:32: 4:45 12:00' 14:39 

"a s FreshI I Fresh; J Fresh iFres 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source Salt(Fresh ,.__ F 

F _ Freshf rs 

via Feed Water Line 1L/min 2 - I { 200 [ 11 

via Fire Extinguishing Line jLlmin 230 2201 1 2101 1 116 

via Fire Extinguishing Line m3/h R / 

_ _ _ 

RPV Level I I ! "_____ 

Fuel Range A Imm .- . 1850800 .1850ý .18501 i-90j -19001 .18501 'j90o -o10 

Fuel Range B Imm -2300j _ -2300 .2300230u] -230 I"'N _ -2300 -22501 2301 -2250 

R_______,,o_...._o, ____ ]!...... 

I___ I ____ ____ ______ 

See NISA Press Release dated 4/11/2011 -_-_ f 1 ' ___- I 

_ 

_.. _ __.0_4 _ 

#141 II 

_ _ 4 

W _ I4, 

GhaR~~ol-G MPag A 1O 5 

wM - O i 

" 091 OI 3141 F41 - 

Drywell Pressure MPa abs 0.10691 10.1066 0.10681 i 0.1073100.1076 0.10831 76 01085 010751 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPaabs 0.1848! 10.1839 0.18361 0.1804 0.18061 0.17941 0.17921 ____ 0.17921 0.1796 

__________________ 

________I1- 

,,,,---T 7. 137 -1.7 13•,613 381 . _• s s. - 

RPV Temperature I ,, ' _,,6 Nole6 'Nou. i 6- tJ,, le 611 - _Nole6. 6 

!, r.. 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp IC 26 -1 37.61 61. 62.21 

RPVBottom Head Temp C 102.5 106.11 100.41 106.8 121.6 123.01 1 -O 120.9 121.1 - 

Containment Atm Monitoring System Sv__.. I - , " 

Drywell Sv/h 36.6 36.1 36.1 34.21 33.7 31.5 1 29.21 28.61 

Suppression Chamber ISvh 1.41 1.4 1.4 1.34:. 1.31 " 1.24 , l18j116 

Notes: _ . 

NISA News releases stared reported gage 1 

pressure, then convened readings to absolute 

pressure. NISA separate parameter tables repoi 

gage pressure. Conversion in this table in BLUE.I 

- ___ _ 

Standard atmospheric pressure = 101.325 kPa= 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure = 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa 

0.161325 Mpa J . - 

CE 834 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit3 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 am EDT) - -. t T l _ 

I . I 

I _ 

Source: NISA Press Releases unit Y301 3(30 3(31 31 31 441 1 4 4/2 -2'1 41 3_ 4 4131 413 4_41 414 

_oureNSA _ress _eeases Unit 3:501 13:301 4:401 9:40 5:45j 11:451 1:30. 12:10 2:30i 10:30, 12:181 17:32 3:301 9:30 

_____Fresh 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source ISaIVFresh _ - I I 

IFresh 

via Feed Water Line _ m--iinL __-- - _ " __ 7 

via Fire Extinguishing Line - L'min .n _ _ 

1 1 

via Fire Extinguishing Line m3/h 81 l 

__ _ _ !___ L -___ ,___I -,___,so 

V T 

RPVLevel - - __ _, 1 

Fuel RangeA Mmm -1850 .1851.19,. -10 -1o18190Q .I____155o -iS,0 J [10 -o'8T00 

Fuel Range B mm -2250 -2250 1-22501 

-22501 -2250 .2250 -5 1 [2250 1 -2250 

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ I _ _-_ I - . - ,_, __j I _ ____ 

££\! Presw~'e (e 'ee '0,.. ••40.!. 

iU•,• i o.,o.I.8 o . o .,o0.01o 0 i o • _'4_ 

-- o.oo.' 

GhaR~eb8 impal .4["1l44 . U4_ I _ 4 

See NISA Press Release dated 4/11/2011 .. .. 

IMP" 4.4Q 4.M I 4WL4.092 4049! 4088-40W'1 4W51-W 4 .084081 1 4.09,1. 

_._ 

RPVI'______ 

041 

N' ,- I......[08 

..... 94431 ji_7 

DrywellPressure MPaabs 0.1071 0.106410.1073 0.1066 0.10711 0.1068 0,1055 0.1050 0.10611 0.1062' , 0.1073 0.1069 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa abs 0.17801 0.17751-0.1764 0.1755 0.17551 0.1757 0.1748! 0.1748 0.1748 0.17501 1 0.1754 0.1757 

RPV Temperature I 'ole s•,6 6 ot Not, 0166 Note6 SNotetINote 6 Note _ __ io Note 6 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp C 7,53 76.71 88.5j 89.6 92,61 90,2 90.8 92.3190 910. 6j 89.8 900 

RPVBottom HeadTemp C 116 115.4i 114.21 114.4 116.31I 117.8 119.41 117.8 115.9 114.3_ 114.1 113.7 

___ iJ 

! 1 V ___ 

Containment Atm Monitoring System - - 2 24.1I__ 

I_ 

Drywell ISv/lh 27.6 26.8 25.71 25.4 24.5 24.21 24.0 23.2 22.2121.71 I 121.51 21.1 

Suppression Chamber Svfh 1.11 1.09 5 1.041 1.001 0.981 0.9551 0.935 0,911 0.8971 0.871 0.864 

_ _ - .... 

I I I _ _ _ _ _ 

Notes: I 11 T 




gage pressure. Conversion in this table in BLUE 

Standard atmospheric pressure 101.325 kPa = 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa = 

[0.161325 Mpa 

CE 835 of 1220

z Plant Parameters: Unit 3 [ . ' 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) , -. j_ { - - 

Source: NISA Press Releases !Unit 4/5 4/51 4/61 4/61 4/71 4/7 4 4/8 4/9 01 41101 

_ 5:40 10A:20:001 12:301 6:001 12:00 1:30 12:00 0:00 12:25{ 6:00_ 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source jSal__Fresh__ ' 

via Feed Water Line Il~in ___ 

via Fire Extinguishing Line l.min I t 

via Fire Extinguishing Line m3/h it 

Level___ -_V I ! I I i 

I Fuel Range A imm -185110.1850 -1850 .185-2000 -800 

-8501 950 7t - 

Fuel Range B ýmm 501 -22501.22,01 

20 

022 5 0 .22501 -2 -250 

1 

225 -0 

- .2250 -2250 

RRVPrssar~s .Mote) iII 


_ _-_ 0.441.4 4 41 _ * 02 4 001 

4491 40 4000 

h 

.An .. M1 _ - l 

lM Am , __ M, "4. H4 M_ MI UQ "4 

_ 

[= I w 

0 4 

o0 

Drywell Pressure IMPa abs 0.1078i 0.1071 0.10691 0.1069f 0.1075 0.1059 0.1061 0.105210.1054 0.1055 0.1061 I I 

Suppression Chamber Pressure fMPa abs 0.1733 0.1733 0.17331 0.1731 0.1729 0.1720 0.1726 0.1722 0.17271 0.1722 0.1717 1 1. 

RPV Temperature _ ,tote Nolao 6 Note 6 !te 1, Note Nmot • lNeleo NotE 6 (toie S Nole INt6 N 

I 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp IC 84.7 84.7 ,44 78.8 83.4 88.31 88.2 88.8 99.2 96.61 91.7 ..... 

{_ 

RPV Bottom Head Temp IC 113.7 114.1 114.1 115.0 115.8 112.31 110.81 110.7 107.5 

} 

109.21 110.8 

Containment Atm Monitoring System I J 18.6 18.. 

Drywell Sv/h 21.0 20.6 20.9 19,5 19.61 19.31 19.0 18.8 18.61 18.4 181 

Suppression Chamber ýSv/h 0.839 0.833 0.815 0.799 0.7771 0.768 0.748 0.738Nte9 0.717 0.7031 r 1_ 

i 

"• Note 9: 0.028'Under investigation of the change of the siti 

Notes: _ . _ 1-- 

NISA News releases started reported gage - 



gage pressure. Conversion in this table in BLUE. 

Standard atmospheric pressure = 101,325 kPa 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure = 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa= 

0,161325 Mpa _ 

CE 836 of 1220- -

Plant Parameters: Unit 3 ' i 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 am, EDT) 

Source: NISA Press Releases Unit _ 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source TsawFresh - 

via Feed Water Line m -rain' ...... 

via Fire Extinguishing Line . L.min [. 

via Fire Extinguishing Line 

m3th 

___" __________ -_ .... 

L I 

RPV Level [ 

Fuel Range A mm I 

Fuel Range gmm B. . . 

ARV preoo,,, (88o n,,ot- 

See NISA Press Release dated 4111/2011 1 

Ch--g 

I_ 

IMP+* gb IP r L 0101 

C R- A e .R Mpa al; _ _ 

Cha - 0 4101 O o44I o44O &4.1 

Drywell Pressure 

MPa abs 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa abs - 

RPV Temperature 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp C _ 

RPV Bottom Head Temp C 

Containment Atm Monitoring System - 

Drywell 

SO__ 

Suppression Chamber 

SvOh 

Notes: 





_ 

_ation' 

_ 

Standard atmospherc pressure = 101.325 kPa= 

0.101325 Mpa 


0.161325 Mpa _ 

CE 837 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit1 ... I iI 

_ 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) 1 _ 

Source: NISA Press Releases Unit 3/141 3/15 3/161 3/17 3/17_18 3/18 3/181 3/19 3/191 3/19 3/20{ 3/201 3/20 

t 

S19:301 11:42 12:25 3:101 11:301 2:50 7:55 21:10 3:30 11:001 16:50 5:00 11:001 15:00 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source Salt/Fresh _ _ 

via Feed Water Line 

L./min 

'm3/h __ _ .. 


U-min 

_ __ _ __ m3___ .__. 

__ 

__ _ _ . 

_ _ __'_ 

b . _ 

_ . 

. 

RPV Level _____ - '1700 

Fuel Range A Imm -1 1750..1800 1800 1700 -7001 17501 .17501 -1800__70 .17501. -1750 .1700 

Fuel Range B mm *-,: .17001 -1750 -1750 -18001' 01 _ -_800 - 17501 -1700 -1750 .17501 .1750 -1750 

___ ___ __ ___ _ _,_ I__ 

_ 

I__ 

__ 


G*A" 

__-- _94;1 IM___ W P7_ 

0-1491 P41 "64. 

iMPai 2 0 40.1-71.4 

-.. 

I.......1 

F91 

_ 

_ ___l 

____________1 __1 } 

•1 0.44 044"145 0-. 4 I 0,U 04 04. 

_ _ 4_4 

6 046. 0 

4 58 

_ _ _ _ _ _ 4g 0-I .ý O5 0C44 O-W G2I 0"46 O- Q25 & M.6 0.& PP2 

Drywell Pressure MPa abs , 0.315.r,• i • ,,! rt'.. ,,.ii 0.180 0.180 0.170 0.180 0.180 0.170 0.170 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPaabs n..,,, O n,, , iyl ,,V. I, , 0.160 0.165 0.170 0.170 0.170 0.160 0.160 

_-, 


Feedwater Nozzle Temp c 

RPV Bottom Head Temp Ic I 

Containment Atm Monitoring System 

Dqrwell 

Sv/h 

Suppression Chamber Sv/n I 

Notes: 

1. NISA News releases started reported gage 



gage pressure. Conversion in this table In BLUE. 

Standard atmospheric pressure = 101,325 kPa - 

0.101325 Mpa 


0.161325 Mpa 

CE 838 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 1 T I 1 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) _ ........... /213/2413/241 

Source: NISA Press Releases jUnit 3/211 321[3/21 31221 3/22 3/221 3/23 3/231 3/24 3 3/241 3/241 3/25 

,_ 5:001 8:001 14:25 6:001 11:20 15:301 4:001 12:001 1:00 2:35 11:00 17:00 21:45, 6:00 

tSalt I I Salt I 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source ISalFresh _ _ _ I 

via Feed Water Line L/min i___ I 1601 1 1131 

1m,3/h __ __ __ _______ ___ ___ ____ 

via Fire Extinguishing Line Lrmin , T I - - _ 

_______________________jm3/h ___ _____ T__I 

_______ '} 

H I " 

f] ___ 

_ _ 

1 ________ 

RPV Level t. - - ,7 - 

Fuel Range A Imm -1750 -17501 -1750175 . 0T . 180 0 750 .17501 .1700 1.V700 16501 *-1700 

Fuel Range B ..... 

.17501 -1750 -17501 .170 0 -1650" -1650 

7mm -1800 -17501 -1750 .1700! .17501 

. . 1 

See NISA Press ,r.(.t.!i Release dated 4111/2011 

. __P_ 

_ 

IGMP" MA P% P 4-22-70 0,.0.6•4W8 _ OAK _P9 049 

Cha4e9 imp" 015 0161 444 447 4 2 o41 0 44~ 90 

0387- GW 0441 O-W! IO 4. 

9.4 OX I 0,491 038 Q[ W- o.02a 1 

o5I 

haeBJAAA h 4ý 4.259 04.,24 - UJ~ 9 904719 

144 4.40j "9 _ 4.4K 

1 1 Mo9 

Drywell Pressure IMPa abs 0.160 0.1601 0.160 0.160 0.175 0.1751 0.260 0.3201 0.3851 0.400 0.3551 0.310 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa abs 0.160 0.1601 0.155 0.1551 0.155 0.160 0.2400.300 0.370 0.395 0.355! 0.305 

______________ __ .1 ...... o" O___ 175.3 217.9i 

RPV Temperature ) __ - 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp c _ _ _ _ 243.0 j 175.3 217.9 204.5 

RPV Bottom Head Temp C - - -. 229.0 182.8 172.4 157.5 

Containment Atm Monitoring System {__ 

__ 

Drywell Sv/h 43.9 43.540.9 40.0 

Suppression Chamber Sv/h I j "27.9 26.3 25.8 _ 25.1 

Notes: 





T 

Standard atmospheric pressure = 101,325 kPa 

0.101325 Mpa 


0.161325 Mpa - 

CE 839 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 1 I ' i I1 ' ] 

I t T __] 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a~m. EDT) 

I 

I _ L5 

Source: NISA Press Releases 'Unit 3/25 3/251 3/25 3/26j 3/261 3/26 3/27 3/27 3/27 3/281 3/28 3/28 3/291 3/29 

.. 10:001 15:37 16:301 5:001 9:301 1 3 :00 5:00 9:00 14:00 3:00 12:301 20:00 4:00 8:32 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source lSaltIFresh lFresh I Fresh I Fresh jFresh 

via Feed Water Line L/min 120 _ 

_L__ rn3_ _I _ 

__ 

1131 - 141 133 

via Fire Extinguishing Line lLimin '__ i l t - 

RPV Level . _, _ _ _ . _ I __ 

_ 

_, __ 

Fuel Range A mm .1650 .165 . 5 . •10" -1650 1165 1700 -1700 -1600 

I _ _ _ I 

Fuel Range B 1mm .1650 -16001• 60.- -0o1 i 60, - 1600'0.... -1650 -16501 I -1600 

.(. ,____.............. __,_____-: .. __ __ _ _ 

__ _ __ _ -- _____ 

1 .C 

See NISA Press Release dated 4111/2011 . .... _ I " _ 

047 

Gham"k Mpaj -53 o 0' xi Q.4 61 

GhaPAMIeA-1 A _ _~b 9A2 0-4T 

0-172 0A 0-44 "A704 9 

Drywell Pressure [MPa abs 0.295 1 0.2751 0.2701 0.270 0.2751 0.270 0.270 0.2701 0.270 0.2851 

Suppression Chamber Pressure I MPa abs 0.2901 0.2751 0.2701 0.2701 0.2751 0.2701 0.270 0.2701 0.285! 

I___ I --- I.- __ 

___ 

RPV Temperature I 1 1 2 . 2 I - 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp IC 197.8 196. 9 209.41 195.3 212.3 212.81 224.8 27 3.8 2331 

RPV Bottom Head Temp 1C 153.6 148.5 144.3[ 146.31 146,9] 141.71 143.4 139,2 1 139.41 

1___- 

1 - ...._ I __ I 

___ -I 

Containment Atm Monitoring System 37,1 5. ___ I I 

Drywell [Sv/h 38.9 37.1 35.3 35.i 35.4] 34 34.6 [ 33.8 1_36.01 

Suppression Chamber 1Sv/h 24.9 24.51 23.8 23.6 1 22,5 22.211 21.3 _ 1 20.o0 

Notes: 



pressure, NISA separate parameter tables report 

gage pressure. Conversion in this table in BLUE, 

_______ 

___ ___ ___ 1 

. i ..... .i 

Standard atmospheric pressure 101.325 kPa= 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa 

0.161325 Mpa 

CE 840 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 1 1 __...... 

__ . 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m, EDT)I ___ _ __ 

Source: NISA Press Releases 3/291 31291 3/3013T31 3/311 4/1 4/11 4/11 4/21 4/21 4/2 4131 4/3 

__9:401_13:001_4:00_ 13:00 4:001 12:001 6:00 10:00 16:18' 4:001 12:001 20:27 3:00 9:00 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source Salt/Fresh _ ____Fresh i ____Fresh 

via Feed Water Line L.min 117i 1 100 

via Fire Extinguishing Line lI.min { I ,_._ -- - 

1m3/h ___mg___ _h- I- _____ 

___ __ __ __ __ 

___I I 

RPV LevelI F I 

!J __ 

f 

Fuel Range A Imm 1,1 1 0650 

-16 0001 .600 -1600 -1650' 1650100 

1 .16m01650i -16501 -1650 

Fuel Range B mm .16501 -1600 -16001 .16001 -1650 .650 1 -d600. -1650FI -1600 .16501 1 650 .1 650 

_____ 

.... I I 

L.... 

RRV Presw'.re (_ _ _ _ _ _ 

See NISA Press Release dated 4/11/2011 "8_07 1 ____ _____ 

_W. 

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ I ___ __ _5].i5 

CGeV8 191241 09.4 O 91 9 49.4404 41 4I 050 oA45i 4491 o~ 0 14 

075 0 547O-W 

V - I 

Drywell Pressure !MPa abs 0,275 0.265 0.2351 0.230 0.2101_0.2101 0.1701 0.165 00180j0.155_ 

0.155 0.155 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa abs 0.275 0.2651 0.2351 0.230 0.210 0,205 0170 0,165 0,160 0,1551 0.16 0.155 

RPVlTemperature____ -__j{J 

___J__ 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp C 299.4 281.2 270.1 251.21 246.1 255.21 248.61 261.5 259.41 256.7 252.8 

RPVBottomHeadTemp C 135.8 133.9 130.2 128 126.1 119.7j 118.51 1 118117.6 1 117.21 116.7 


7 41 7 41 2 ,_3_43__ 

Drywell Sv/h '33.8 33.2, 37.7 41.71 41.2 44 . 3 43 1 45.51 45.11- 31.8 44.6 

Suppression Chamber Sv/h 1 19.7 19.1 18.21 18.2 17.2 17.4[ 17.2 16.51 16.0 15.3 14.9 

Notes: 




gage pressure. Conversion In this table in BLUE, 

__- 

Standard atmosphedc pressure = 101.325 kPa= 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa = 

0. 161325 Mpa 

CE 841 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit1 i ] _ 

L 

_ i 

_ . _ 

1 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) _ 

Source: NISA Press Releases Unit 4/3 13j 4/41 4/41 4/5 4/6 4/6 4/71 4 j7 4818 4/8 4/91 4/91 4/10 

1 12:021 17:30 0:00 11:00 6:00 0:00 12:00 6:001 12:00 0:001 12:00 0:00 12:00, 6:00 

RPV Injection ......... Water Source Sal/Fresh Fresh IFresh . i 

via Feed Water Line L/min - _ 

rn3/h 6.51 6 J i _ 1_ .... _ 

via Fire Extinguishing Line jUmin ' I __| 

__________________Im3• ........1......1__ _______ Ii ___ ____ 

r I 

___________________________ _____ 1 ___ I ____ 

RPV Level I - _ 

____ 

_________ I 

________ 

Fuel Range A Imm -5c. 

1-i 65LI -1700-1 .1650 -1650 5 .SOj -16"0 -1650 -16501 1501 -1550 

Fuel Range B 1mm .. ;65O.1650 -16501 -16501 -1650 -1650[ -16501 -1650 -1650 -16501 -16501 -1650 

_______I 

________________ I 

____ _______ 

PAV Press,-w •e !('no"t J 

See NISA Press Release dated 4/11/2011 - [ 

- 

-] I . I _._.. 

I _ 

MP" 

- j I 4.Qj up 4ýw ' Pal ! 

_ A_ _ _ _ _ 0405 "0g ~4.49 945 4.44 1* 9441 0-49 Q4,4 "91O O4441 ý 

Drywell Pressure IMPa abs l 0155 0.1501 0.150 0.1501 00 0.551 . 1 0.1801 0.1851 0.190 0.1901 0.195 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPaabs __ 0.155 0.1501 0.150 0.1501 0.150 0.155 0.150 0.1501 0.155 0.1551 0.1601 0.165 

II I- __ 

I RPV Temperature ___ 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp JC - 1243.11 242.81 233.5 221.6 214.0 216.3 223.8 260.7 246.6 240.5 23521 227.7 

RPVBottom Head Temp Ic j 113.4 115.31 114.8 114.8 115.0 116.2T 116.9 118.61 119.4 119.7 120.11 120.6 

I__ 

Containment Atm Monitoting System 

DyWell -vo 38.3 38.71 31.5 31.1 31.0 30.81 31.7 100 68.3 Note I o1 Noo 1 

Suppression Chamber Sv/ 1 13.4 12.21 10.21 8.791 8.01 12.91 12.9k 12.7 12.2 122 11.9 11.6 

___ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ___ __...... .. 

I 

- .. 

Notes: - _ _ _ I Note 1: 'Measuring instrumei 

1. NISA News releases started reported gage - 

pressure, ten converted readings to absolute 

i 


gage pressure. Conrversi6n in this table in BLUE 

Standard atmospheric pressure = 101.325 kPa = 

0.101325 Mpa 


0.161325 Mpa 

CE 842 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 1 ,1 {i__ ' n _ 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) _ . 

Source: NISA Press Releases jUnit-] I _ 

_ 

. _ J 

I 

__ __ I _ _ _ _ __ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

RPV Injeclion .............. Water Source Sall/Fresh _ _ _ 

via Feed Water Line Llmin ___' 

m3th - __ __ 

via Fire Extinguishing Line Umin ! I__ , _.... 

m3•h _ _ F 

RPV Level _ '_ _ I 

Fuel Range A Imm . [ _ 

Fuel Range B 1mm I _ 

_ 

_ 

i 

_ 

See NISA Press Release dated 4111/2011 -..... _ i 

, ye,, Pressure M1 ab s 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa absi_ _ 

RPV Temperature__ _ _ 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp C_ ___ I _ 

RPV Bottom Head Temp CI _ _ _ 

RVTmeauei •-. ._ 

_ _ _ _ 


Drywell Isvh _. 

Iii 

I I I 

! 

Suppression Chamber 

PSvuh a I I *Il 

Notes: t malfunction' ,! ii 

1. NISA News releases started reported gage - 

pressure, then convented readings to absolute 

pressure, NISA separate parameter tables report 

gage pressure. Conversion In this table in BLUE L- 


0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure= 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa= 

0.161325 Mpa 

CE 843 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 2 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 am, EDT) 

[/T4 

Source: NISA Press Releases Unit 3 /14 3151 3/165 3/181 3/181 3/181 3/191 3/ 1 191320 3/201 3/20 

19:301 11:421 12:251 3:101 11:301 2:501 7:551 21:101 3:30 11:00 16:30 5:00 11:001 15:00 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source Salt/Fresh [_ 

via Feed Water Line Lrmin ..... _ 

via Fire Extinguishing Line L/rain I 

______________ 3/h I __1 1 . __ __- I__ 

RPV Level 

Fuel Range A mm ,`.w:, 1 -1400 .1400 -l4r0{ *__{-14-01 -1400C.400 -1400 -14001 .1300 -1300 -14001 -1400 

Fuel Range B Imm - ~ lovx Ki~ N 

miw~ ll~ ~ i ~ ~ We JJe LNLO• 

1~ ____VaW 


chanmeb [mpa "WL 04,4 q 446 4029 4041 4044- 4Q 05 4009 40 09 4044 4W4 4.046 

____ _,__ _i .__ 4441_ 4 0 1402 4 44 4M2 42 4.0 4W32 4M 

Drywell Pressure MPa abs 0.3951 0.155 0.0401 0,075 0.1151 0.1301 0,130 0.140 0.13510.135 0.135' 0.1301 0.125 0.125 

Suppression Chamber Pressure [MPa abs :;d . . . c- ,.' . '.(-& •,,v,-' . . e,* e, . .zie 

RPV Temperature Note 1: No instrument channel specified - 

Feedwater Nozzle Teemp C Note 2: 'Due to loss of battery power i 

RPV Bottom Head Temp C -, 

Containment Atm Monitorng System - 

Drywell SvI I 

Suppression Chamber Svi- 

Notes: - 

NISA News releases stared reported gage 



gage pressure, Conversion in this table in BLUE. 

Standard atmospheric pressure = 101.325 kPa I - - 

0.101325 Mpa 


0.161325 MPa 

I 

CE 844 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 2 i ] i 

.. 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 am. EDT) _ _ 1.i 

Source: NISA Press Releases lUnit 3/211 3/211 3/211 3/221 3/221 3/22] 3/231 3/231 3/241 3/241 3/241 3/24 31251' 3125 

S3:001 8:00 14:251 6:001 11:201 15:30 4:201 9:00 1:001 9:001 17:001 21:45 1:071 6:00 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source ISaltFresh - Salt 1Salt Salt Salt 

via Feed Water Line IL/min_ _ _ 

via Fire Extinguishing Une .Lmin i 340 

m3/h - i 11! 12 12 Note3 'Note4 

RPV Level 

__ 

Fuel Range A imm -1350 - i0 -13010 -1350k -13001 .1300 -13007 -200i.150 -1200iI -clO 

Fuel Range B imm F,) ~ 

14___ 1,016q ,dV11 1.a :J PIG' 11S I 


Q,,ha,,t4- 114.4 4.4404=1 - 40.= o.Q 1 I4ON 4.Q I 40391 o4. o 40.= 

Gha1e" IUMa 402040204038 4. 4W 432 409 4.091 40 38 4 03Q 14.402 

GhannekA lM~ab 0G8 04 .04 G-M 8 G-Ml G -W 472 G-M 0.910 4741 4A 99_0 

G~ah eF A- IM..A "41~z QU3 G083 O-M 6i Joi I 0.403 M. [ 

DrywellPressure MPaabs 0.120 0.120i 0.120 0.110 0 .110 .11010110I 0.110 0.1051 0.110 0.110 0.120 

• , 

Suppression Chamber Pressure IMPaabs ,•;. - , ; -,z. . ,._._ , ],:,:,* 

h:,.___,_ 


Feedwater Nozzle Temp IC _ 12 100 1001 105 

RPV Bottom Head Temp }C 1 1091 1051 105 1 105 


Drpell Sv/h 1 49.3 48.41 47.41 1 45.9 

Suppression Chamber Sv/h 1.49 1.41 1.361 1.54 

Notes: I jNote 3: '10 m3ihr neighbor 





Note 4: Row readir 

Standard atmospheric pressure = 101.325 kPa = I - 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure =0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPaI 

0.161325 MPa ___ - -] ___ 

CE 845 of 1220


I) 

Revision 411412011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) _ __ __ __, , 

Source: NISA Press Releases 

1Unit 32j3/25 51 3/261 3/261 3/26 3/261 3/261 3/271 3/271 3/28i 3/28t 3/28i 3/29: 3/29 

o10:00o 14: .00• t0:10i10:40 13:600 17:22L 5:001 9:00o 0:12. 4:001 12:301 4:004 10:00 

RPV injection ............. Water 



RPV Level 

Fuel Range A 

Fuel Range B 

Sour' ce iSal/Fresh Fresh 1 Fresh Fresh I 

_ L/min _ / = Note6 I 

... 

in 3101 2701 _ _ 1171 

I A 

!mM j * o~I~ *v~oi 1;2001 15 Q 

mm 

Ir 

[__ 

f 

ii12~ 

I __ 

# f + , : , ( 


Gha~-A-M~aj 

Channel A 

GhaR~B 

Drywetl Pressure 

Suppression Chamber Pressure 

+ - ______ ~ 

4020 4.04 -094 4414) 

14.4I 4.44 4.Q0124= 440ý 40Q2 

lM~a~ I 

) 

40201 4~O 40~l 40W 40271 40~l 4020 

IIIRA AhR 

iMPa abs 

!MPa abs 

043. ýw 

j 

0~87 l ~1 I 

illM 4.4 44 434 

I ~ o~6ol ~o~l ~07~ 

0.120; 0,120. 0.1201 0.1151 0o.01 1 0.1101 0o.10_ 1 0.1101 0.10 o.Ioo 0.100 o 

F =~ 

. i 


i I( 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp . TCf5 1071107, 109 I 107! 107j 1123.91 123.6 (130.3! 

153.7. 

RPV Bottom Head Temp 1051 104 100 1 1001 991 .96.61 111.2 1 81.5! 77.7; 

S i 

Containment Atm Monitoring System i iNote 5 

Drywell Sv/h 45.61 45.21 43.81 43.411 43.2i 41.9 41.61 t 40.51 40.4 

Suppression Chainber }Svt1.54; .54i 1.511 i 1.491 1.48 11.431 1.41 1 1.371 1.371 

. .... _______________ _____ __. .... _ .....__ .... , _.- F ,- ... ______ 

__________ 

Notes: - '_ Note5:09:30jNote 6:270to 280 I/hr 

NISA News releases started reported gage from 'temporary measuring instrument' - 


I 


i 

gage pressure. Conversion in this table in BLUE. I 

Standard atmospheric pressure 101,325 kPa= 1 I ____-...___ 

0.101325 Mpa I 

Absolute pressure = 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa = l I 

1.161325 MPa I ___,__________,____i 

CE 846 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 2 _ _ _ _ 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) __ _, _, _ 

Source: NISA Press Releases Unit 3/29 3/30 3/30 3/30 3/301 3/311 3/311 4/11 4/1 4/21 4/2i 4/2 4/31 4/3 

13.009 400"1014 13:001 14:00! 4:001 12:001 6:001 10:001 4:00'12:00 20:43 3:00 9:00 

__ ______ ..... 

20:43 3:00 9:0 

i Fresh 

via Feed Water Line L/min T _ I 

via Fire Extinguishing Line L/min 133_ [I 1 150 1_1_1 1331 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source Salt/Fresh I Fresh Fresh - F 

______________----..-- 

''___________ ____________ _______m3/h __j__ __ 1____I 

" ....... 

RPV Level 

_ • 500 

Fuel Range A mm -1500 -15001 -!5001 1500 .i500 -1500 1500 

.1550- 1500 -1500 

Fuel Range B mm , 1- 


IMPaj 4091 4.026 _I 4=1 _ 1 4W 404 4W 4.W1 4041 4091 1 ~40 404 

l~a 1941~ 40215402 1 _= 4.20 4 04M 02440 4440071_1 40Ml 4.04 

___ _P a~ 046 -1" _ _s ui4N 1W494 8.3G- 

_z 

__ __ __ RV __ __ __ 

"4 __ _ __ _ I.6 

___ 

. 0M M & IN4 ,4 M 

Drywell Pressure IMPaabs 0.100 0.1001 1 0.100 0.110 0.110 01110 0.110,1014 0.1101 10.1051 0.105 

Suppression Chamber Pressure IMPaabs d_,_.__ J ,________,____ , ,, .::• ,,,,:', I I ,_,_.- 


Feedwater Nozzle Temp C 160.51 170.7 174.3 181.21 172.41 163.61 161.0 155.01 152.9 153.4 150.5 

RPV Bottom Head Temp IC 143.6 87.71 _._-__l __. ,,.i- I f Of,, I..._F 7 1__.. : 

Containment Atm Monitoring System I 3 

Drywell Svih 40.51 40 31 38.7 37.9 37.2 37.0 36.11 35.7 35.0 34.3 

Suppression Chamber Sv 1.331 1.28 1 1.26 1.1 1.16 1.11 1.09 0.981 0.966 0.947 0,9351 

Notes: -Note 7: 'Measuring instrument malfunction' 




gage pressure. Conversion In this table in BLUE 


0.101325 Mpa 


0.161325 MPa 

i 

CE 847 of 1220

Plant Parameters: Unit 2 ___ 1 

I _ 

_ 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) i j 

Source: NISA Press Releases jUnit 4/31 4/4 4/41 4/5 4/6! 4/61 4/71 4/71 4/71 4/81 4/81 4/91 4I9 4/10 

12:121 0:00, 11:00[ 6:00 0:00o 12:001 6:00 12:00 19:00] 3:00) 12:001 0:00] 12:001 6:00 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source ISalt/Fresh Fresh _ I 

Fresh 

via Feed Water Line lJmin i I 

via Fire Extinguishing Line IJmin _ T 

I 

__ m3/h SI_ 

RPV Level 11500 

Fuel Range A mmmm -1500 -1500[ 

1 1500 ) -15001 .1500 -15001 .-1500 -1500) .15001 .1500} .14gi 

Fuelflange B jmm .I_ ____I 

See NISA Press Release dated 4/11/2011 4 

GhA" MP- _ 404 • 41 .1 -0414"- -444 I4I 44 4O 

111AAsG j 00 ~ 7 O _9I 

Glw M"4410 4 404I 444 4029 __.0 4.024104= 4.02$40264$ 

CAeF Gl,0,R I .... 

0440-M "4104&L 

Drywell Pressure MPa abs - 0,105 0.100 0.100 0.100 0,100 1 0.1001 0.1001 0.100 0.095 0.095 0095 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa abs .,,_ ,,-_ ,., _ _,_ :. ILA . . -: . 1 ,:• ;.,: . 


_ 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp jC 140.3 139.0 141.7 140.9 142.5 144.21 143.6 143.0 141.2 141.6 144.51 149.4 

RPV Bottom Head Temp IC 1" 7 uy ' N I O tý -Y___ [1 7 NL' Htý' 143!017 7 

Containment Atm Monitoring System - 

Drywell jSv/h 33.4 32.81 32.1 31.5' 31.1 30.6 30.51 30.0 29.4 29.4 29.2) 29.0 

Suppression Chamber SvOh 0.911 0.879 0.867 0.839' 0.825 0.801 0.7941 0772 0.765 0.751 0.7 

Notes: 




gage pressure. Conversion in this table in BLUE. 

Standard atmospheric pressure =101.325 kPa 

0.101325 Mpa 

Absolute pressure = 0.101325 MPa + 0.06 MPa = 

0.161325 MPa _ 

CE 848 of 1220


Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) I , , _ 

Source: NISA Press Releases Unit _ _ _ 

T' 

RPV Injection .............. Water Source 


SaIlFresh 

L/rnin 

via Fire Extinguishing Line IL/min I 

_____________ ~m31h _ _ _ _ _ 

RPV Level 

_ 

Fuel Range A mm T 

Fuel Range B 

rmm 


Gha*eX 

IMP". 

Drywell Pressure MPa abs _ 

Suppression Chamber Pressure MPa abs i 


_ 

Feedwater Nozzle Temp 

RPV Bottom Head Temp [c 

IC 

Containment Atm Monitoring System _ __ 

Drywell [Sv/h _ _ 

Suppression Chamber jSv/h _ 

Notes' 





_ 


0.101325 Mpa 


0.161325 MPa 

- a....... 

CE 849 of 1220

Fukushima Dai-ichi Unit 3 - Reactor and Spent Fuel Pool Status -Unofficial Chronology 

Revision 4/14/2011 (as of 10:00 a.m. EDT) 

Notes: 1) Sources are limited to official press releases (PRs) from NISA and TEPCO. Events were selected relating to the status of the reactor and spent fuel pool in Units 1,2, 

and 3. Not all Article 15 reports and emergency declarations 9from TEPCO to NISA) were noted, except those that may imply change in unit status. 

2) All TEPCO press releases (PRs) to date have been reviewed; only recent NISA PRs reviewed. (All available sources other than NISA and TEPCO are largely based on TEPCO 

PRs.) 

3) Time are approximate and may differ slightly between sources. 

4) Event descriptions were standardized where possible; however, original statement were used for uncertain interpretations. 

5) NISA PRs are noted by PR number; TEPCO PRs are noted by date and later by PR number and date. 

6) Approx Time column time in gray means report time and not specific event time. 

7) Event descriptions in gray are related to spent fuel pool; those in green relate operations relating to turbine building water transfers. 

8) Japan (site) date and time are noted. 

Unit Date Approx Event Description NISAref. TEPCO 

3 3/11 

Time 

ref, 

14:46lEarthquake at Sanriku-Oki, Epicenter: Off-Coast of Sanriku (Noah Latitude: 38; East Longitude: #11 

142.9), 10km deep, M8.8) 

G 3/11 Massive tsunami hits site (about 14-15 meters above mean sea level; 4 to 5 meters inundation depth). See #10(4/9) 

Note 1. 

3 3111 15:41 ". emergency diesel generators shutdown due to malfunction resulting in the complete loss of alternating #t(3/ ) 

current for all three units." 

3/12 0:00 Reactor "is cooled by the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) system. Currently, we do not believe there is #3(3/12) 

I 

any reactor coolant leakage inside the reactor containment vessel." 

3 3/12 11:001Continue to inject water by RCIC 12-Mar 

3 3/12 13:00 Continue to inject water by RCIC. 12-Mar 

3 3/12 15:00 Continue to inject water by RCIC. 12-Mar 

0 3/12 17:00 Aricle 15 repo: 'Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) .81 

3 3/12 19:00 Continue to inject water by RClC. ..... 12_Mar 

3 3/12 20:00 Continue inject water by High Pressure Core Injection (HPCI) System.. 

/ :f..._,______ "; , • ••l, ' "' ,.,•, .,: 

#29(3/12) 

3 3/13 2:00 Continue to inject water by HPCI 

3 3/13 5:10 HPCI has been automatically shut down, Re-activation of RCIC was attempted but failed. Unable to confirm #3(3/13) 

the level of water injection to the reactor 

3 3/13 5:38 Article 15 report: 'Total loss of coolant injection function" #81 

3 3/13 8:41 "Started to vent" (NISA); "...operated the vent valve to reduce the pressure of the reactor containment vessels #84 #8(3/13) 

(partial release of air containing radioactive materials) and completed the procedure at 8:41AM, 

Mar 13 (successfully completed at 09:20AM, Mar 13)...." (TEPCO) 

3 3/13 9:00 Steps to lowering the pressure of reactor containment vessel has been taken, Spraying in order to lower 13-Mar 

pressure level within the reactor containment vessel has been cancelled. 

0 3/13 9:01fAricle 15 repot: "Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) #81 

CE 850 of 1220

Unit' Date Approx Event Description NISAref. TEPCO 

I Time I I ref. 

_81 

3 3/13 9:08 Pressure suppression and fresh water injection was started 

.1 3/13 9:25 Started injecting water containing boric acid by fire pump 13-Mar 

3- 3/1311:55 Fresh water started to be injected to RPV via the Fire Extinguish Une. #51 

:J 3/13 12:00 Safety relief valve has been opened manually, lowering the pressure level of the reactor, which was '3-Mar 

__ immediately followed by injection of sea water and boric acid 

313/13 13:12ISeawater started to be injected to RPV via the Fire Extinguish Line. #51 

013/13 14:36IAricle 15 report: "Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) #81 

3/13 15:00 "Taking account of the situation that the water level within the pressure vessel did not rise for a long time and #10(3/13) 

,the radiaton dose is increasing, we cannot exclude the possibility that the same situation occurred at Unit 1 

ion Mar 12 will occur. We are considering the countermeasure to prevent that." 

3 3/14 1:10 Seawater injection for Units l and 3 was interrupted due to the lack of seawater in pit _ #51 

313/14 3:20 Seawater injection to RPV for Unit3 was restarted [#51 

01 3/14 4:40jAicle 15 repor: 'Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) #81 

3 3/141 5:201"Started to vent" (NISA); No specific press release by TEPCO of this venting #51 ??? 

0 3/14 5:38IAricle 15 report: "Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) ___1_ 

: 3/14 6:50 While water injection to the reactor was under operation, the pressure in the reactor containment vessel 08(3116) 

increased to 530 kPa. 

-____ 

3 3/14 752[ricle 15 repor: "Unusual rise of the pressure in Primary Containment Vessel (PCV)" #81 

.3 3/14 9:05 Pressure in the reactor containment vessel decreased to 450 kPa #8(3/16) 

3 3/14 11:01 "... an explosive sound followed by white smoke occurred at the reactor building of the Unit 3. It was believed #51 01(3/14) 

to be a hydrogen explosion, According to the parameter, it is estimated that the reactor containment vessel 

remains intact." 

0 3/14 22:351Article 15 report: "Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) #81 

0 1 3/15 0:00 NISA decided the acceptance of experts dispatched from the U.S. NRC #81 

0 3/15 7:24 Aticle 15 report: 'Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary' (site-wide) #81 

0 3/15 8:54 Article 15 report: 'Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) #81 

0 3/15 16:30Aricle 15 report: 'Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) j #81 

0 3/15 23:46 Article 15 report: "Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) #81, } 

3 3/16 8:34 White smoke like steam generated #51 

3 3/16 10:45 Because of the possibility that PCV of Unit 3 was damaged, the workers evacuated from the main control #51 

room of Units 3 and 4 (common room) - 

3 3/16 11:30 Operators returned to the control room and restarted the operation of water injection #51 . 

3 3/17 6:15 Pressure in Suppression Chamber has temporarily increased. Venting not required at this time. 3/1 

3 3/17 6:15 Continue injecting seawater into RPV 

3 3/17 9:481Seawater was discharged by the helicopters #51 #2(3o) 

3 3/17 9:52 Seawater was discharged by the helicopters #51 

3! 3/171 9:58 Seawater was discharged by the helicopters #51 

CE 851 of 1220

Unit Date 1 Approx Event Description NISA ref. TEPCO 

rnime 

ref. 

3 3/171 10:01 Seawater was discharged by the helicopters [#51 

3 13/171 19:05 Started water spray from the ground for 8 minutes (riot police water cannons) #51 #2(3/20) 

3 3/17 19:131 Stopped water spray from ine ground (riot police) [#51 #2(3M2o) 

3 3/17 19:351Stated water spray from the ground using fire engine #1(Self Defense Forces) #51 

3 3/17 19:45 Started water spray from the ground using fire engine Q2 (Self Defense Forces) #51 

3 j3/17 19:531Starfed water spray from the ground using fire engine Q3 (Self Defense Forces) #51 1 

3 3/17 20:00 Started water spray from the ground using fire engine #4(Self Defense Forces) #51 

3 3/17 20:07 Started water spray from the ground using fire engine #5(Self Defense Forces) #51 

3 3/17 20:09 Stopped water spray rom the ground using 5 fire engines #51 #1(3/2.) 

3 3/18 14:001Started water spray from the ground using 6 fire engines (6 tons of water spray per engine) #51 #2(3/25) 

3 3/18 14:381Stopped water spray from the ground using 6 tire engines (6 tons of water spray per engine) #51 #2(3/20) 

3 I M81 14:00.Started water spray from the ground using U.S. fire engine provided by tile US #51 #1(3/19) 

3 13/181 14:45 Stopped water spray from the ground using U.S. fire engine provided by the US #[ 1 #1(3/19) 

T 3/181 15:55 Article 62-3 report: Leakage of the radioactive materials inside of the reactor buildings to non-controlled area #81 

of radiation (Units 1, 2, 3, 4) 

3/18 23:30 Started water spray from the ground using TFD fire engine (NOTE. Unable to confirm from TEPCO PR) #51 

3119 0:451Started water spray from the ground using TFD fire engie ) 

3 3/19 1:10 Stopped water spray from the ground using TFD flire engine ' #1(3/1) 

0Q 3/19 8:58iricle 15 repor: 'Unusual increase of radiation dose at the site boundary" (site-wide) #1 

3 3/19 14:10oSlatted water spray from the ground using TFD fire engine #1(3/20) 

: 3/20 3:40 Stopped water spray from the ground using TFD fire engine #1(3/20) 

31 3/19 9:001 Working on receiving external power supply to Units 3 and 4 #3(3/19) 

3/19 12500{Continue injecting seawater into RPV 1 #5(3/19) 

3 3/20 9:00lContinue injecting seawater into RPV 

3 3/20 11:00 PCV pressure increased to 320 kPa, then decreased to 120 kPa at 12:15 on 3/21 

] 2(2) 

I f I 

3 3/20 11:00 On-site survey for leading electric cable (From 11:00 till 16:00) #51' 

3" 3/20 21:30 Slart water spray over the Spent Fuel Pool by TFD #51 #1(3/21) 

3 3/21 3:58 Stopped water spray over the Spent Fuel Pool by TFD #51 #1(3/21) 

3 L32! 9:00 Continue injecing seawater into RPV #1(3/21) 

3 3/21 12:15 Pressure in PCV 120 kPa #51 

3 3/21 15:55 "light gray smoke' from the "floor roof' of Unit 3 building. Parameters of reactor pressure vessel and reactor #51 #5(3/21) 

containment vessel of Unit 3, and monitored environmental data around the Nuclear Power Station remains at 

the same level. However, employees working around Unit 3 evacuated to a safe location. It is observed the 

smoke has been decreasing. 

3 3/21 17:55 Smoke was confirmed to be died down #51 j#8(m3) 

3 3/221 7:11 Grayish smoke changed to be whitsh and seems to be ceasing 

#51 #4(3/22) 

CE 852 of 1220

Unit Date Approx Event Description NISAref. TEPCO 

, Time ...... ref. 

ý3 3/22 9:00 Continue injecting seawater into RPV #2(3/22) 

3 3/22 15:10 Starled Water spray (Around 180t) by TFD #51 #03/22) 

3 3/221 15:591Stopped Water spray (Around 180t) by TFD '"#51' #1o(3R22) 

3 3/22 22:43 Lighting was recovered in the Central Operation Room #51 #3(3123) 

3 3/231 11:03 Stared Injection of 35t of seawater to the Spent Fuel Pool via the Fuel Pool Cooling Line #51 #7(3/23) 

3 3/23 13:20 Stopped Injection of 35t of seawater to tlhe Spent Fuel Pool via the Fuel Pool Cooling Line #5 #7(3/23) 

3 3/23 14:00oContinue injecting seawater into RPV #12(3/23) 

3 3/23 16:20 'Light black smoke belching" from the reactor building, Parameters reactor, reactor containment vessel, and #51 #7(3/23) 

monitored figures around the site's immediate surroundings remained stable without significant change, 

Workers in the main control room of Unit 3 and around Unit 3 evacuated to a safe location. 

3 3/23 23:30At around 23:30 March 23rd and around 4:50 March 24th, it was reported that the smoke seemed to cease. #51 #1(34) 

3 3/24! 5:35.Started Injection of 120t of seawater to the Spent Fuel Pool via the Fuel Pool Cooling Line #57 #1(3/24) 

3 3/24: 14:30 3 workers from other companies who was in charge of cable laying work in the 1st floor and the underground 1 #5(3/24) 

_ _ _floor of turbine building were exposed to the radiation dose of more than 170 mSv _ 

3 3/241 16:050Stopped Injection of 120t of seawater ic the Spent Fuel Pool via the Fuel Pool Cooling Line #57 #12(3/24) 

3 3/251 13:28 Start water spray over the Spent Fuel Pool by TFD #52 #1(3/26) 

3 3/251 16:00 Stopped water spray over ihe Spent Fuel Pool by TFD #52 #1(N26) 

3 3/25 12:30lContinue injecting seawater into RPV #51 

3. 3/25 18:02 Started injectng fresh water into RPV #52 #1•3/26), 

3 3/26 8:00 White smoke was confirmed to generate continuously #57 

3 3/27 12:34 Started injection of seawater by concrete pump truck 02(3/30) 

3 T#7I 14:36 Completed injection of seawater by concrete pump truck (1001) #2(Mo) 

3 13/27 8:00 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues #57 

31 3/27! 15:30 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues #57 

3 3/28i 6:30 White smoke was confirmed to generate continuously #59 


3 3/28. 17:40 STARTED water transfer from a CST to a suppression pool water surge-tank to enable water transfer from a #64 015(3/30) 

condenser to the CST, in order to prepare to transfer the stagnant water on the basement floor of the turbine 

building to the Condenser. 

_ 

3 3/28 20:30 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues; however, transferred from fire fighting pump to a temporary motor #61 #100(28) 

___ driven pump _ 


3 3/29 14:17 Started injection of fresh water by concrete pump truck (5011h) (switched from seawater to freshwater) #61 #_(__o) 


3 3/29 18:18 Completed injection of fresh water (100t) by concrete pump truck #2(3_3) 

S3/30 6:30 White smoke was confirmed to generate continuously #6 

CE 853 of 1220

Unit Date Approx Event Description NISA ref. TEPCO 

'rTime 

ref. 

* 3/30 15:00 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues #63 

0 3/31 15:421A barge of the US armed forces carrying fresh water for cooling reactors, etc. arrived #_6 _ 

3 3/31 16:301 Spent Fuel Pool: STARTED waler spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (105t) #70 #13(3/31) 

3 3/31 19:33 Spent Fuel Pool: COMPLETED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (105t)) #70 #13(3(31) 

3 3/31 6:30jWhite smoke was confirmed to generate continuously I6 4 _ 

3 3/311 8:30 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues 

3 3/31 8:40 COMPLETED water transfer from a CST to a suppression pool water surge-tank to enable water transfer from #66 

a condenser to the CST, in order to prepare to transfer the stagnant water on the basement floor of the 

turbine building to the Condenser. 

._... 

3 4/1 9:301Injection of fresh water to RPV continues 

_66 

3 4/11 15:30 1njection of fresh water to RPV continues #67 

if 4/1? 15:561STARTED operations to transfer of fresh water from the barge to the Filtrate Tank 167 

4/2- 9:52 STARTED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (75t0h) #70 #5(4/2) 

3 12:54 Spent Fuel Pool: COMPLETED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (5hh) #70 #5(4/2) 

3 4/2 12:30ISome lights in the turbine building were turned on __ #4(4/3) 


: 4/3 8:00 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues #70 

3 4/3 10:03 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues by temporary motor driven pump, but switched to fire fighting pump #71 #4(4/3) 

for about 2 hours (until 12:16) in order to connect offsite power to a motor driven pump (editor's note: not clear 

if the same MDP) 

3 4/31 12:18 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues by a motor driven pump powered from offsite power #71 ##4(4/3) 


3 4/4 15:03] Spent Fuel Pool: STARTED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (50h0) #7(4/4) 



3 4/4 19:19 Spent Fuel Pool: COMPLETED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (701) #2(4/5) 




3 4/5 16:00 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues _75 




3f 417 6:30 White smoke was confirmed to generate continuously #78 

3 4/7 6:53 Spent Fuel Pool: STARTED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (5011h) #78 #1(4/7) 

3 4/7 8:30injection of fresh water to RPV continues #78 

'3 4/7 8:53?Spent Fuel Pool: COMPLETED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (701) #79 #1(4/7) 

CE 854 of 1220

1B 

Unit! Date ApproxEent Description NISA ref. TEPCO 


3 4/7 23:32 7.1-magnitude aftershock (originally reported as 7.4) in the offshore of Miyagi Prefecture; epicenter about 70 

mi NE of the Fukushima Daiiichi site; 66 km deep (no reports of additional damage to the units) 

- #9(4/8) 

ref.1 

4/8 6:30 White smoke was confirmed to generate continuously #80 



31 4/81 17:06 Spent Fuel Pool: STARTED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (50t/h) #82 #10(4/8) 

3 4/8 20:00 Spent Fuel Pool: COMPLETED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (75t) #82 #1(4/9) 


3 j 4/9 8:00 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues [.82 

3 i '4/9 15:30 Injection of fresh water to RPV continues #83 

4/10 6:30 White smoke was confirmed to generate continuously #84 

3 4/10 8:00.Injection of fresh water to RPV continues #84 

3 4/10 17:15 Spent Fuel Pool: STARTED water spray by tie concrete pumping vehicle (XXt/h) #1(4/11) 

3 4/10 19:15 Spent Fuel Pool: COMPLETED w~aer spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (XXt) #1(4111) 

0 4/11 17:16 7.1 magnitude earthquake centered in the Fukushima-Hama-dori: #3(4/12) 

- Water injection to the reactor of the units 1-3 was suspended due to the shutdown of the offsite power; 

resumed 6:04 pm after restoration of off-site power. 

- Nitrogen gas injection to the reactor containment vessel in unit 1 was suspended and resumed at 11:34 pm. 

- No abnormalities were detected in the parameter of each of the units. 

- The water level of units 1-3's pit did not change significantly. 

3 4/11 18:04 Injection of fresh water to RPV was restored following loss of offsite power. #3(4/12) 

0 4/12 14:07 6.8 magnitude earthquake centered in the Fukushima-Hama-dori: #13(4/12) 

-No shutdown of the off-site power of the units 1-6 

- No abnormalities in water injection to the reactor of the units 1-3 

-No abnormalities in Nitrogen gas injection to the reactor containment vessel of unit 1. 

-No abnormalities were detected in the parameter of each of the units. 

-No abnormalities in the data taken from the monitoring before as well as after the earthquake. 

-Workers outdoor evacuated in the key earthquake-proof building. 

3 4/12 16:26 Spent Fuel Pool: STARTED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (XXtb) #11(4/12) 

3 =4/12 17:16 Spent Fuel Pool: COMPLETED water spray by the concrete pumping vehicle (XXt) #11(4/12) 

0 4/12 18:38 A fire broke out at the distribution switchboard containing batteries located in the sampling equipment #3(4/12) 

switchbox situated close to the south water discharge channel for Units 1-4. The self defense fire fighting 

team began extinguishing this fire soon after it broke out. 

__ 

i_ 

CE 855 of 1220

Unit Date Approx ]Event Description ISAref. TEPCO 

_im 

ref. 

Notes 

__ 

1 Investigation results indicate that the inundation height at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station was approximately base (sea) level O.P. + 14 to 15 meters with an 

inundation depth at approximately 4 to 5 meters across the ocean-side of main building area where reactor buildings and turbine buildings are located. Base level of 

Onahama Port (O.P.) construction is 0.727 meters below Tokyo Bay mean sea height. Inundation depth is the height of the water discoloration from the ground level or base 

iof the buildings. 

CE 856 of 1220

Hartland, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Calle, Joselito 



Re: response to Japanese earthquake 

Please get on the horn with Paducah and Honeywell. We need their inputs by the end of April to prepare for the LPRs. 

Sent via Blackberry 


From: Hartland, David 

To: Calle, Joselito 

Sent: Thu Apr 14 10:30:41 2011 

Subject: RE: response to Japanese earthquake 

Only ACP 

From: Calle, Joselito 


To: Hartland, David 

Subject: RE: response to Japanese earthquake 

David, 

We received the LES write-up. What about the other sites? 

Thanks, 

Joe 


Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 3:13 PM 

To: Fogel, Douglas K; Sensue, Terry; Wyatt Padgett (LES); borenmc3usec.com; Greeno, Michael; Martin Jr., Thomas A. 

Cc: Calle, Joselito 

Subject: response to Japanese earthquake 

As I'm sure you are aware, the NRC is reviewing what impact a major earthquake would have on the facilities 

we regulate, including fuel facilities. Up to this point, we have reviewed your licensing documents to determine 

what your design basis accidents are and what safety features you have available to mitigate such accidents. 

Thanks to those who have provided information in support of this effort. 

We now are looking for some additional information if it exists. In the event that your site encounter an 

accident (e.g., earthquake, flood, tornado etc) that is beyond what was analyzed, please describe what 

mitigating actions you have available to cope with such a disaster. These may be described in EPIPs for 

disaster response that I recall seeing at some of the sites. Please respond by early next week. 

CE 857 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

NEI SmartBrief [nei@ smartbrief.com] 



April 14, 2011 - Fanning: Japan crisis won't deter Ga. nuclear-expansion project 

Reading this on a mobile device? Try our optimized mobile version here: http3:lr.smartbdef.com/respccRzACanVqmBZbpAPCicPaeCicNUVhv 

Need Better Results from Inside Sales? 

Find out how to generate and win. more 

business through a specialized sales process 

IC 

APRIL 14, 2011 SIýUP ] FORWARD t ARCHIVE I RSS FEED I ADVERTISE 

News about the nuclear technologies industry Search past news ý : 

News Roundup 

Fanning: Japan crisis won't deter Ga. nuclear-expansion project 

Southern Co. will proceed with plans to build two AP1000 reactors at the Plant Vogtle in Georgia 

despite the ongoing crisis in Japan, said Thomas Fanning, chairman, president and CEO of 

Southern. The proposed reactors would be constructed at a "seismically stable site" about 130 

miles from shore, making them safe from a tsunami, Fanning said. He also touted the reactors' 

emergency cooling systems, which would rely on gravitýand not electricity. CNBC/The 

Associated Press (4/13) Sha1reO-I [ ,, I Ll 1Rý-E-A_6TORt-- 

Official emphasizes need for backup plan to stabilize damaged reactor 

An alternative plan may be needed to stabilize one of Fukushima Daiichi's reactors because of 

sluggish progress in extracting contaminated water that is stifling repairs to cooling pumps, 

officials say. "It may be difficult to completely remove the contaminated water and so allow 

work to proceed. We may need to think of other options," said Hidehiko Nishiyama, deputy 

director-general of Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. Reuters (4/14) str:' E 

4.MAIL lI ILAM STORMSI 

TEPCO president defends response to nuclear crisis 

Tokyo Electric Power President Masataka Shimizu defended how his company's has reacted to 

the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. "The steps we have taken so far were the 

best that we could do," he said. TEPCO's top executives and board members have agreed to 

take pay reductions, Shimizu said, and the company is in talks with the government on 

payment plans for people affected by the crisis. Bloomberg (4/13) S-0:011 211 

AIREATED aToniffs-I 

U.S. official notes developments at Fukushima Daiichi plant 

The conditions are "improving every day" at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant despite the 

I 

CE 858 of 1220

Japanese government's decision to raise the nuclear-severity level there, said U.S. Navy Adm. 

Robert Willard, the Pacific Command commander. The risks are "manageable across Japan," and 

U.S. forces will remain for "weeks and perhaps months" to help stabilization efforts, he added. 

Bloomberg (4/12) -Z'itwe: 0 13r ,= i _I.A,.f.! I LK f -i•!f-i l 

NRG CEO says prospects for STP expansion have decreased 

The prospects of NRG Energy developing new reactors at the South Texas Project nuclear plant 

"have dropped substantially" since the Fukushima Daiichl nuclear crisis started, said David 

Crane, president and CEO of NRG. The disaster prompted NRG to reduce the project's budget 

and lay off more workers. The expansion would be "an uphill battle" even with federal loan 

backing and a construction license, he added. Reuters (4/13) ,3hire:[] 

E-M"iL 

I RE OSVOR'ESI 

The Plum Card® 

RETURN PROTECTION 

If a store or vendor won't return an eligible item you purchased with 

your Card, we'll refund your purchase price up to $300 per item 

(excluding shipping and handling), up to $1,000 per account each 

year. 

Plum Card® from American Express OPEN. Anniv Now. 

I Policy Watch -1 Sponsored b )DATAMONITOR 

Sen. Boxer: U.S. must respond differently to crisis like Japan's 

Industry officials and regulators should increase efforts to ensure the safety of the country's 

reactors in the aftermath of the crisis in Japan, California lawmakers said. "We have just got to 

respond in a much different way," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. "We are not humble enough 

in the face of what Mother Nature can do." The Tribune (San Luis Obispo, Calif.) (4/13) Share: L11 

Ii • E-ML I ELAM G6•tORES I 

Conn. lawmakers dispute tax plan for power producers 

Connecticut state lawmakers and business representatives criticized a tax proposal for 

electricity generators that they say could force Dominion to close down its Millstone nuclear 

plant. The plan, which would require power producers to fund alternative energy and provide 

ratepayer relief, is being criticized by being "punitive and anti-business." "We believe the tax is 

onerous and disparate in its impact," said David Christian CEO of Dominion Generation. 

CNBC/The Associated Press (4/13), Reuters (4/13) 5eM 

STORIES1 

)DATAMONITOR 

The latest ExxonMobil Sustainability Case Study provides an indepth 

analysis of Exxon's current sustainability efforts and the impact 

this has on the rest of its upstream/downstream businesses. Learn 

more here. 

Sponsored bV: - 

Ledrhp-. 

I 6 maaemn & 

4 leadership lessons from Snake Plissken 

.Snake Plissken, the character played by Kurt Russell in cult 1981 action flick "Escape from New 

York," might seem an unlikely leadership model, but there's plenty they can learn from the 

hard-bitten hero. Mike Figliuolo advises emulating Snake's relentless focus, self-belief and 

willingness to take calculated risks. "Know what you're capable of and take an occasional risk. 

You might surprise yourself with what you're able to do," Figliuolo writes. ThoughtLeaders bloq 

2 

CE 859 of 1220

4 ways to develop future leaders in the workforce 

Thinking your boss just isn't up to par? He probably hasn't had any more guidance for his role 

than you have. About 58% of managers haven't received any additional training for their 

positions, according to a recent study by CareerBuilder. Business coach Tanveer Naseer offers 

tips for refining leadership potential, such as defining "leadership as a service role, not as a job 

perk." TanveerNaseer.com (4/11) 5 :.re: Ei I -P .A- - 

-l-r- - 

IBM Maximo Asset Management helps healthcare providers track, 

monitor and manage the increasing variety of assets on which clinical 

outcomes and patient care depend. It provides a fully integrated 

software technology platform, allowing a clear view of information on 

all assets. Learn how your facility can better respond to changing 

market requirements in this free IBM white paper. 

II Fetrd otn Forurnv 

OPEN Book (Special Edition): A Practical Guide to Driving Value OPEN Book 

I 

The Hidden Secret To Successful Innovation Mike Michalowicz 

8 Easy Ways To Make Your Customers Love You Judith Aquino ! 

5 Great Ouestions To Ask Your Social Media Consultant Rohit Bhargava 

Don't Hire Without A Background Check Barbara Weltman _ 

_ 

I international 'I 

China, South Korea to strengthen nuclear safety ties 

China and South Korea have agreed to bolster their collaboration on nuclear safety. Chinese 

Prime Minister Wen Jiabao and South Korean counterpart Kim Hwang-sik are holding talks in 

Beijing, where they say they will "strategic partnership" ties. Yonhap News Agency (South 

Korea)(4/13) $5h:•rc: MlIrJ A AM•"Zr 2 • R 'L 

I smartQuote 

Ths..... 

Wher al thnk lk, oone thinks very .much, - 

~ . ~

['ý- ý00 [ ir-imovii-i 6 Account Executive: 

Uoda~te account information I Change e-mail address I Unsubscribe I 

Print friendly format I Web version I Search past news I Archive I 


Diana Angel (202) 470-1146 


Follow NEI: !t•,kf" 

Y¥111M 


Recent NEI SmartBrlef Issues: 

Wednesday. April 13. 2011 

Tuesday. April 12. 2011 

Monday. Aoril 11. 2011 

Friday, April 08, 2011 

Thursday, April 07, 2011 

Lead Editor: Bryan McBouJrnle 

Mailing Address:. 

SmartBrief. Inc,, 1100 H ST NW, Suite 1000, 



4 

CE 861 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Netzsch Thermal Analysis [ngb-news@netzsch.del 

Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:31 PM 


2nd Call for Paper - HI TEMP 2011 Conference 

If this newsletter is not displayed correctly by your ernail client, please use following 

link: hnp//ma 2che ie.de/ imail4/hml mail. so id=31835&email=dasC(' nrc gov&mailref=5ObqOOOeOOOOOzzf 

HI TEMP 2011 

CON FERENCE 

HI TEMP 2011 conference - 2nd Call for Paper No. I April 1 2011 

HI TEMP 2011 conference - 2 nd Call for Paper 

Dear Deborah Seymour, 

Date 

September 20 to 

September 22, 2011 

Location 

Millennium Hotel 

Boston, MA 

Seminar host 

NETZSCH 

Instruments 

North America LLC 

Special Event: 

Conference dinner: 

night at the MIT 

museum 

Take the chance to participate actively in HI TEMP 2011. 

The conference is intended to foster discussions and debate regarding the most 

recent understanding of "high temperature" and the state of the art in 

experimental studies of high temperature materials, processes, and diagnostics 

for scientific and technological applications. 

Abstract Submission - deadline extended to May 1 5 t" 

Oral Presentations / Poster Contributions 

All active participants of the HI Temp 2011 meeting are encouraged to 

submit abstracts of oral or poster contributions related to the given 

conference topics to be presented during the meeting. 

New: Session on LOCA 

Lost Of Cooling Accident in the nuclear industry 

- How to submit your abstract? 

Please click here! 

The conference will cover the following topics: 

" Materials for energy applications 

" Materials for aerospace applications 

" Melts, glass and amourphous materials 

1 

CE 862 of 1220

" Thermal and structural properties measurement in ceramics and thin films 

, Processing-property relations in dielectric and piezoelectric ceramics 

" Thermoelectric materials 

" Ultra-high temperature ceramic (UHTC) multilayer coatings 

" Construction materials 

The confirmed list of invited speakers is as follows: 

" Prof. Denis Brosnan I CLEMSON UNIVERSITY 

" Prof. David Clarke I HARVARD UNIVERSITY 

" Dr. Sylvia Johnson I NASA 

" Dr. Rory Kennedy I IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORIES 

" Prof. Alexandra Navrotsky I UNIVERSITY OF DAVIS 

" Prof. George Rossetti I UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT 

" Dr. Ian Saratovsky I NALCO 

" Dr. Laura Smilowitz I LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LAB 

" Prof. Terry Tritt I CLEMSON UNIVERSITY 

" Dr. Jurgen Blumm I NETZSCH 

LAST MINUTE : March 11th, 2011 the largest earthquake and tsunami ever 

recorded in Japan badly impacted the nuclear power plant at Fukushima Daiichi 

and a series of events has led to significant damage to the reactors and 

releases of radioactive material. This accident bring back to the light the need to 

simulate LOCA (Lost Of Cooling Accident) in particularly with respect to 

materials resistance. Thermal analysis plays a key role in this field. The 

conference will address this topics, and invitation are open for contribution. 

Visit the conference website 

- Download the conference flyer 

4 Register now! 

Do not hesitate to contact Ms Fumi Akimaru in case of further questions! 

(Tel.: +1 781 272 5353 1 Mail: hitemp2l11@netzsch.com) 

Best regards, 

Your HI TEMP -Team 

If you would like to unsubscribe this newsletter, please use the following link:Unsubscribe newsletter 

N [T'/.Sc_ )-(h~i'tch'u i i n; 

L X•i~l~ \l• rI_ li ~~lt .tiii~alk•4 2. 951 •f Sc'lh 

I rad, Anitsecridl I )Cr( I I R 11 N - 

VA f-l a ) nde•Cr . tzr. hni, 27)L r D.I ,lIr 81118654l I 

Manag~ing IDiieciou. IDr. homn Dmi~, cuir. Dr. Jijnir 131unin. 

2 

CE 863 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Greeno, Michael [Michael.Greeno@ Honeywell.com] 



RE: response to Japanese earthquake 

Dave, 

Thanks for re-sending; I went back and checked and I had forwarded this to Bob Stokes and Barry Stephenson, who 

handle our Emergency Response. Bob has been away in Utah this week visiting Energy Solutions as a follow up to our 

waste shipment issues; I will follow up with him when he returns Monday. 

Mike 

From: Hartland, David fmailto: David.Hartlandc(ýnrc.qov] 


To: Greeno, Michael; borenma)usec.com 


Subject: FW: response to Japanese earthquake 

Just checking the status of your response to this request. We would like to have this information prior to the 

LPR public meetings. 


Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 3:13 PM 

To: 'Fogel, Douglas K'; Sensue, Terry; Wyatt Padgett (LES); borenmousec.com; 'Greeno, Michael'; 'Martin Jr., Thomas 

A.' 


Subject: response to Japanese earthquake 

As I'm sure you are aware, the NRC is reviewing what impact a major earthquake would have on the facilities 

we regulate, including fuel facilities. Up to this point, we have reviewed your licensing documents to determine 

what your design basis accidents are and what safety features you have available to mitigate such accidents. 

Thanks to those who have provided information in support of this effort. 

We now are looking for some additional information if it exists. In the event that your site encounter an 

accident (e.g., earthquake, flood, tornado etc) that is beyond what was analyzed, please describe what 

mitigating actions you have available to cope with such a disaster. These may be described in EPIPs for 

disaster response that I recall seeing at some of the sites. Please respond by early next week. 

1 

CE 864 of 1220

Harmon, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Heisserer, Jamie 


Harmon, David 

FW: Seismic discussion 

1) Can an earthquake and tsunami as large as happened in Japan also happen here? 

This earthquake occurred on a "subduction zone", which is the type of tectonic region that produces earthquakes of 

the largest magnitude. A subduction zone is a tectonic plate boundary where one tectonic plate is pushed under 

another plate. Subduction zone earthquakes are also required to produce the kind of massive tsunami seen in Japan. 

In the continental US, the only subduction zone is the Cascadia subduction zone which lies off the coast of northern 

California, Oregon and Washington. So, a continental earthquake and tsunami as large as in Japan could only happen 

there. The only nuclear plant near the Cascadia subduction zone is the Columbia Generating Station. This plant is 

located a large distance from the coast (approximately 225 miles) and the subduction zone (approximately 300 

miles), so the ground motions estimated at the plant are far lower than those seen at the Fukushima plants. This 

distance also precludes the possibility of a tsunami affecting the plant. Outside of the Cascadia subduction zone, 

earthquakes are not expected to exceed a magnitude of approximatly 8. Magnitude is measured on a log scale and so 

a magnitude 9 earthquake is approximately 32 times larger than a magnitude 8 earthquake. 

From: Heisserer, Jamie 


To: Harmon, David 

Subject: Seismic discussion 

Hey Dave, 

As a follow-up to yesterday's conversation, this is what I was referring to - http://www.nrc.Qov/iapan/fag-can-ithappen-here.odf 

12. Are nuclear power plants along the coasts vulnerable to tsunami? 

Large tsunami such as the one that hit Japan typically are caused by "subduction" faults, where one tectonic 

plate slides under another. There is only one such fault near the U.S. coastline - off the northern part of the 

West Coast, from northern California up past Oregon and Washington. There are no coastal nuclear power 

plants in this region. The closest plant, in central California, is the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. It is well 

protected against tsunami. 

Along the Gulf Coast and the Atlantic Coast, storm surge from hurricanes generally poses a greater threatto nuclear 

power plants than tsunami. The plants in these regions are well protected against hurricane storm surge. 

Jamie M. Heisserer 

Construction Inspector 

Region II - Division of Construction Inspection 


(404) 997-4451 (ph) 

(404) 997-4902 (fax) 

CE 865 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

LIA08 Hoc 


Liaison Japan 

Emche, Danielle; Stahl, Eric; Boger, Bruce 

FW: CONSORTIUM CALL AT 2000 EDT TODAY 

Good day, folks... 

It is my understanding that a consortium call was not conducted yesterday and may occur at a reduced frequency, 

perhaps because the Japan Government Action Items and Material Requests List is relatively static at this point. Can 

you please confirm that the Consortium call is still on for today at 2000 EDT and let me know what the frequency of calls 

will be thereafter. 

I have not been on shift since Sunday morning. At that time, the protocol was for the site team to maintain the Japan 

Government Action Items and Material Requests List and forward it to the EOC Liaison Team to distribute among the 

call participants. I have a note from yesterday indicating that the team in Japan is not only maintaining the list but also 

distributing it. Just wantto make sure that is the current arrangement. Can you please confirm? 

Also, since last weekend, there was a planned transition to DOE as lead toward the end of this week. Since it is now 

Friday, April 15, in Japan, can you please confirm that DOE is now prepared to assume that lead role for conducting the 

call. 

Thanks, 

Rani Franovich 

LT Coordinator 

CE 866 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

RST01 Hoc 


Mitman, Jeffrey; Bernhard, Rudolph 

FW: Important Fukushima Information 

FYI 

Original - Message ----- 

From: Boger, Bruce 


To: RST0l Hoc; Hoc, PMT12 

Cc: Johnson, Michael; Zimmerman, Roy 

Subject: FW: Important Fukushima Information 

FYI. Interesting situation. Please share with the Japan Team. Thanks. 

Message ----- 

From: OST01 HOC 


To: Boger, Bruce 

Cc: FOIA Response.hoc Resource 



From: Dyer, Jim 


To: OST01 HOC; RST01 Hoc; Hoc, PMT12 

Cc: Weber, Michael; Zimmerman, Roy; Virgilio, Martin 



From: Fetter, Steve [mailtol (b)(6) t-4 AU)I 


To: Kelly, John E (NE); Binkley, Steve; Dyer, Jim; Trautman, Stephen 3 SES CIV NAVSEA 08 NR 


FYI 


From: Crowley, Kevin [mailto:KCrowley@nas.edu] 


To: Fetter, Steve; Holdren, John P. 

Cc: Cicerone, Ralph J.; Crowley, Kevin 

Subject: Important Fukushima Information 

John and Steve: 

Mark Thiemens (UC San Diego; mthiemens@ucsd.edu) has detected excess sulfur-35 (in S02 and 

S04) that he believes was produced by the Cl-35 (n,p) reaction at Fukushima after seawater 

cooling was initiated.. This suggests that there was a source of neutrons (perhaps from a 

I 

CE 867 of 1220

criticality event) at Fukushima after the reactors were shut down. You can read the short e- 

mail thread below for additional details. 

I am passing this information along in case it is useful for USG efforts to help reconstruct 

the accident. Also, Mark is looking for funds to analyze additional samples that are being 

collected by Japanese colleagues. Such measurements could provide information about the 

timing and duration of S-35 production events at Fukushima, neutron fluences responsible for 

production, and transmission of S-35 through the environment. Time is of the essence given 

the 87-day half life for this isotope. 

Ralph Cicerone asked me to let you know that he gives Mark the highest grades for the quality 

of his measurements. 

Regards, 

Kevin 

Kevin D. Crowley, Ph.D. 

Director 

Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board 

The National Academies 

500 Fifth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20001 USA 

+1-202-334-3066 (voice) 

+1-202-334-3077 (fax) 

kcrowley@nas.edu 


From: Thiemens, Mark [mailto:mthiemens@ucsd.edu] 


To: Crowley, Kevin 

Cc: Cicerone, Ralph J. 

Subject: RE: Fukushima 

Dear Dr. Crowley; 

Thank you for the note. Yes, we have detected the excess 35 in both S02 and S04 at exactly 

the time we expected based upon trajectories. It corresponded to when the salt water was 

added, and it was a peak that came and went away corresponded exactly to when they switched 

over to fresh water. You are right, it is the CI-35 (n,p) reaction. It is strikingly clear 

and well above the background that we measure routinely, we have measured through the winter 

at south pole where the 35S and other cosmogenics are max and this is far in excess. It looks 

to be a perfect and clean signal, far more than I expected, and a prefect peak in both gas 

and solid, we also can get some idea of what actually happened in the chemistry and perhaps 

the neutronization. 

The Japanese have a consortium of radioactivity measurement people and they asked me to 

participate and they will provide aerosols, rain etc for us to measure. I would like to but 

it is far in excess of funds I have to do it. I have been making inquiries at NSF for a RAPID 

grant but so far have not had success in that quest. They are the only people in the Federal 

Government I have spoken to and why. 

Please feel free to pass this along; it is my sense that I should make these measurements as 

sulfur is the only radioactivity at the right half life to simultaneously measure as a gas 

and solid. It can tell us not only about the neutron strength, it also says a lot about the 

transmission through the environment and time scale in a major biogeochemical cycle. At a 

half life of 87 days though, I need to move it along 

2 

CE 868 of 1220

any advice or input is most appreciated. 

Mark 

Mark H. Thiemens 

Dean, Division of Physical Sciences 

Distinguished Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry and 

Chancellors Associates Chair 

University of California San Diego 

La Jolla,California 

92093-0356 

From: Crowley, Kevin [KCrowley@nas.edu] 


To: Thiemens, Mark 

Cc: Cicerone, Ralph J.; Crowley, Kevin 

Subject: Fukushima 

Dr. Thiemens: 

I am the director of the Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board at the National Academies. Ralph 

Cicerone told me that you have detected higher-than-normal concentrations of atmospheric S-35 

that you believe might have been produced in the Fukushima reactors (presumably through the 

Cl-35 (n,p) S-35 reaction) when seawater was used for cooling. If your hunch is correct it 

provides important information about the status of the reactor fuel at Fukushima. All of the 

reactors had been shut down for several days before seawater was introduced for cooling. 

Consequently, there should not have been a substantial source of neutrons to produce S-35. 

However, there was a media report that a high neutron flux had been detected at the site, 

presumably from a criticality event in one of the reactors or spent fuel pools. That report 

was later dismissed for lack of corroborating evidence. Your data might be useful for proving 

that such an event did in fact occur and for estimating its timing and duration. 

Have you mentioned your discovery to anyone in the federal government? If not, I would like 

to pass your information and name along to OSTP. 

Thanks, 

Kevin Crowley 

Kevin D. Crowley, Ph.D. 

Director 

Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board 

The National Academies 

500 Fifth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20001 USA 

+1-202-334-3066 (voice) 

+1-202-334-3077 (fax) 

kcrowley@nas.edu 

Please advise. 

CE 869 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 



Croteau, Rick 

RE: Conference Call on Japanese Earthquake - Focus on SBO 

K got it, thanks. 

From: Croteau, Rick 



Subject: Re: Conference Call on Japanese Earthquake - Focus on SBO 

They will stay away from discussion and comparison with Japan. Focus on SBO history, capabilities, and our actions past 

and present. George Wilson will do the heavy lifting. Very capable. Will touch on B5B, but very little since it is a public 

meeting. Will mention only SBO as Vogtle event. Wayne Shmidt mentioned limitations regarding multi unit events and 

b5b. Marty acknowledged. 



To: Croteau, Rick 

Sent: Thu Apr 14 17:08:28 2011 

Subject: Conference Call on Japanese Earthquake - Focus on SBO 

Any noteworthy insights from the subject call? 

Vic 

CE 870 of 1220

Wert, Leonard 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Wert, Leonard 



Re: Early Insights on TI-183 

Vic, 

They have been populating the Sharepoint site, last time I looked we had 4 issues there. Also, DRP has action to get a 

summary of our TI 183 to date up to Fred Brown on monday am. BTW, I got positive fdbk from residents regarding R2 

efforts to prep them and provide guidance. Len 



To: Croteau, Rick; Jones, William 

Cc: Wert, Leonard 

Sent: Thu Apr 14 17:36:02 2011 

Subject: Early Insights on TI-183 

Rick/Bill, 

On Tuesday, 4/19, ! plan to meet with the other RAs...and the subject matter is a topic that will be discussed. 

Although I don't want anyone to expend a lot of effort on this..., if you have any noteworthy preliminary 

insights from the inspections we've done to date, please let me know. 

Thanks, Vic 

CE 871 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Blarney, Alan 


RST01 Hoc; Garchow, Steve; Mitman, Jeffrey; Moore, Carl; Bernhard, Rudolph; Salay, 

Michael 

FW: 1 F Plant DATA (4/15/2011) 

230415_0600_7°i 5 F,', i - --2.pdf; Z TK0415_0800FIX.pdf 


From: 4 *,- rmailto:busuiima.kouiif@tepco.co.lp] 


To: Blamey, Alan 

Subject: IF Plant DATA (4/15/2011) 

Dear Mr. 

Blamey, 

Please find attached plant status of Fukushima Daiichi NPS. 

We appreciate your support. 

Best regards, 

Koji Busujima 

TEPCO 

I 

CE 872 of 1220

4 A 5 B 6:00 Rf 

amj 

15y /FNAA5S-9 

151u 1 2u I45u6u 

I COAOU AkP. ADWU13,A"A OII 

.X13 :VRONHL 

oil . 6m~ih "I l7rn 3 ih 14,l 7m3,ih 90 PLLý 

(43 17:30) j4,719:00) Ca6tH (4/3 17:32) R ______ 

ON~5m '2 1AI:-1311, 

~1~B: -Y~0rnm I '~OIUB::-2250nm m 7!rn 21~ 

(~'(I'll~ (415ODD M) 14jQ~f (4/ 15 600 (4.15 6:0 

.042"MPa g (A) --0,018MPa g ',A) X 3 1 -0.019MPag (A)-X3 0,OO3MPa g O.0lOMPaI 

0.~F 951MPa g (B) X 3 ~-0.02,Vag (0) X-3 -O.O85MPag (C) -H X- 2 (4/15&00 (415 6 ýJ 

) 0~ 1Y'i3 M___ i 1 M) Rff) 

___ (4;_ _______ R~I 

X *2 (400 (4115 600 

________ ~~~( j1 (4RE)1~f 

0,______0_ 

[D/W 0I 18MPa abs 0'JW OO09OMPa abs 0/W 0.10'3MPaabs 

'Si OiEMPaabs S /C *ý-1 S/C 0.1664MPaabs X2 

DIW X. I0DW 2.71 X 1OSv'h 01W 1.65Xl0 1 Svih 

CAMS S/C n l2X1CPSv/h S/C 6?,9X10-'Sv,,h SIC C624X10 1 Sv/h -X2 

I. Jam 4Qý gi64&-lO4S5Pa abs) O384MPa g (O485MPa abs 0.384MPa g(0485Ma aWs 

DA 

AW I ý 

0fi .427MPa g (0.528tv.P abs) O.427MPa f, (0.528MPa abs O.427MPa g (Q528MPa abs 

*.1X1(4lK!15 600 (4;15600 

V.415 0 W ME)1 15 0m *10E)X 1 (4.15000 X2 

RUIV (P/C2C) HII (PIC40) 49431V _____ 

______A- 

______________________________________________________________(4/14_____20_ 

(4172)(4/14 1957'-) (4/ 14 1919-~) 

10JOR &!Ympanbs) Y-;If(,NlPag) EVINNOW MWITAN0.1013W 

Y-A(mpag) 

MiN 9148&) 

lCtM96257) 

CE 873 of 1220

4WITh4ft. Z 344011AW-9 

WI1F2 I F 

-150 A15 ,M)-I4Q0 (4/l 00)1 -11NO (4/IS A0) 

DI-1550 4/ý1500M) - -2 (4,_15_0,V 

N 0428 (4,15 3M 0 M 1500 -0019 t4/10 

ct0ýWsP 0953 ) 15300' ~j~ 2 150.00) -005(ý4/150OA) 

IN L F IFI IF2 IW3 

M*5:M t _0 ýiio.D;(Swli) 41 (4115 30) 211 W4/IS0HO) IM5(0516000) 

UUCP 010 31*1 .. 

S/C(Sv/h 512 (4/15300O 063 (4/150.9) 0.63 (4/15 UW0 

*1 f 

j0,1664(41150:M) 

- 

IFI IF2 INS 

0,185(4/1530 am) (f5~I0~034100 

rsc~ W 0.165 (4MI300" *1(41150:00) 

IcT C 54.1 (4/1500M) $IpA- 

B 13 W/15 :0) 45,4(4i 1500 

rAn L_ 

CE 874 of 1220

1FI 

5000 

4/3 RN:3A'9 

4000 6 mi/h 

BlM 

3000 

.**§(IN) (mm) 

*5+FE (MPa) 

, DARi) (MPa abs) 

x S/CEEJ (MPa abs) 

0,9 

0.8 

0.7 

2000 0,6 

~1000~ 

0.45 

* 0 

I I I I I I I 

o.4• 

-1000~ 

-2000 

# # # 4 # 

A 

~ 

A 

)$ x 

0.3 

0.2 

0.1 

-4000 0 

120 140C% 1%wUQ0 ?D no im l wm too 10 lim aIII Im "t Ma am tx Ox m too izmts IN 

AiI'O AId time AI119,*~ 

'=If/ I•,/ 

"lq IV 

'mm to *m " ON 

CE 875 of 1220

1F2 

5000 

4/7 19:00Ak 

*k *(10)A(mm) 

4000 7 m'!h 

iD/WE (MP's abs) 

30O0 

2000 

1000 

E 

0 

-1000 - 4 

0.7 

0.6 

0,5 

0.4 

0.3 • a. 

0.2 L 

0.1 

-2000 , 

I I I I a I 

0 

-30001 

-0.1 

JIM14 IIto Ji 4" no JIM to t m tolm 1* 14111 10 It 400 tog 100 1 its 14 liol j.ig asUs 

4/13 4/14 time 4/15 

-0.2 

CE 876 of 1220

6000 

1F3 

0.8 

5000 

4000 

4/3 17133~9 

lmih 

ft *i(V4A(mm) 

0.7 

RV W+E~CMPa) 

i D/WEEj(MPa abs) 

0.6 

SS/Off (mpa abs) 

3000 

0.5 

2000 

0.4 

E 

1000 

0.3 

0.2 

-1000 

A 

0.1 

-2000 

* * 9 9 9 

0 

I I I I 3 

-0.1 

-400 

4/13 

MN ?M 42 

WN PM 

4/14 

M% tool MNU 

time 

ZN 10 4012 t I 0 

4/15 

to 140 Itw tIN- 

-0.2 

CE 877 of 1220

IF5 

IFO 

F1 I F SFPII Ijj SFP1 

2011 ý414 1200 40,3 364 239 3,20 

2011 4i14 1300 432 355 239 320 

2011414,1400 460 34.7 239 32.5 

2011414 1500 489 341 240 330 

20114141400 513 338 241 330 

20!4114 1 00, 538 33.2 240 335 

2011'414 1800 53 327 238 340 

2011,1k41490 586 323 279 340 

21 +;414 20,0049 32.3 292 340 

2011/4114 2100 45.0 328 31,1 31.0 

20114,14 2200 431 329 33.1 300 

2011,44 I2300 41.3 334 353 295 

2011/4/15 000 3,99 331 39 290 

2011-/4151o 38 340 38.2 285 

20114,15 200 312 344 399 271 

20114.15 3,00 3*1 347 413 270 

20114•1540 353 351 432 280 

20111415 50D 348 354 451 250 

2011 415..00 339 358 411 245 

(3 

100.0 

80.0 

40.03 

5 3 

U I 

U 

U 

I 

S 

U, 

I 3 

a 

04`99144 

s IF5 ftsI 

o I1F5 SFPUA 

IFO 0*21 

I1F6 SFPS~t 

20.0 

0.0 

4/1312:00 4/140:00 4/1412:00 4/150:00 4/15 12:00 4/160:00 4/16 12.00 

CE 878 of 1220

1 F-i RPVNJ I i.U,/2 (4/15 3:00) 

p 

425 

400 11 23 

~12j 

300 

O.S. (400tChEMt 

275 ' 

250 

225to 

125 

i VESSELifrnng 

OP.31730 

Vessel fronle 

HVH-12A Bellows kw 

OP.310D0 

* oodater nozzle N4B-ond 

OP127750 

# visw wme 

OP.22160 

a SRV 203-4A 

OP.16524 

xc vessel bottom head 

0P.15500 

i return air duct HVH-1 2A 

OP. 12200 

0 returnair duct HV+12C 

OP 1220 

& CADS 5j:4± 

4 DZII 

100 

75 

50 

25 

0 

3331,4 1 25vaIi 211 2313'2131 ~3 31 4"14 k423 4, 4VS4/ 414 4,' 411 I4 10V' 11V 24/113 414/44154V 114117I 

CE 879 of 1220

1F-1 ,,)l •. (0•158E 3:00) 

425 

N4B(II*) 

375 it/ 

f 

400 - , 

350 23AVLIU I: -4G()U) 

325 t __________ 

4Ce 

32 ....... ' ..... • • 

250 • n 

225 %.. . . . . . . . . ..... ..=.7 

6 7 

175 St## 

125 

, M 331 $-I ( 

150 So#%-I 

* PURA) 

0 +...... 

3,18 34293/30 31114/1 41;241/ 4/4 4/5 4/6 417 4/tl 4/ 4/t10 4/1114/12 4/13 4/14 4/15 4/16 4/17 -J 

CE 880 of 1220

1F-2 RPV {•.•E, (4/15 0:00) 

300 

280 

7.q 

260 

* S 

# 

240 

220 

200 

180 

I.F 

i 

I2 

#. * ee 

IWO * 

Ile 

so 

4 

0 

v W _ al 

40 

20 

1121 3O~ ~ 4I4l4 t')V~ 414 01 4JO V1 'S 41$10 Cl41 $ 1340 14 413 i'II 41 

CE 881 of 1220

1F-3 RPVA (4/15 0:00) 

30 - ,- R 

3/22 22:36 

A , ;4|I 

275 a 

250 

I 

a RPV NiVh'/ 

J+ O P=14770 

OP31863 

225 ~ta RPV M~la*A NQ8 

200 o * (E -i DOU TE-2-11D 

OP.lIUM 

31 41 4L72-4/F / 4TE-2-113F 

175 

OP,16238 

150 +~ P47 

+ D/WNVHILJtI AITE-16-I )4A 

125c 8 o 

(ESS-I S 

100 ~RPV l*I*A NOD 

*5 AM# 2-71G 39 TE-2-1 13G 

* IMUM# 2-HA V-WIN TE-2-405A 

312 1'412 3/28 313 4/1 0/ 4/5 4/7 4/9 4/11 4/13 41150/7 

M0 M~ 0% H0 000 M0 0:00 000 000 H00 000 0.9 0:00 0:00 

CE 882 of 1220

1 F115>hýMV5ý-9 

/t((%N A ft (2)8 A-.,KaJ]A FW-TI D/WRJ S/Can CAMS CAMS SiCal 

RO (mm) (mm) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa abs) (MPa ab) Sv/h (Sv C ICh) (__ 

4/11 12D0 -1600 -1650 0,416 0.873 0.195 0.165 X1 11.1 57.8 X l T A 

4/li 14:30 0.195 0.165 X 1 11.0 X1: ;IT, a 

4/11 16:00 0.195 0.165 X 1 11.0 1 X.IM,;A 

4/11 18:30 -1600 -1600 0.416 0.895 0.195 0.165 X 1 10.4 58.1 X1 I If , ,I 

4/11 20.o00 0.195 0,165 X 1 10.6 __ ,_ ,:VT 

4/11 22:00 0.195 0.165 ,X1 10.8 ___ I:_ ItT1 

4/11 23:40 0.195 0.165 X., I9l T; a. 

4/120-00 -1600 -1500 0.416 0.898 0.195 0.165 X,1 10.8 57.5 1:f I T-A 

4/124:00 ..... 0.190 0.165 X1 10.8 ,_ l 4 P A• 

4/126:00 -1650 -1650 0.416 0.908 0.190 0.165 X1 10.8 57.1 I-:t.TA 

4/12,8:00 0.190 0,165 X 1 10.7 X1 *IT , 

4/12 10.00 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.7 ,•l__ .1ItITA 

4/12 13:00 -1600 -1600 0.400 0.900 0.190 0.165 X 1 9.5 56.8 ',.i :fi;T 

4/1214%00 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.0 X. I :ItsTa 

4/12 15:00 -1600 -1600 0.418 0,918 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.2 56,5 .*1: , .... 

4/12 17:00 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.3 '_i_,;Fw1 .T.. 

4/12 18:00 -1600 -1600 0.420 0.920 0.190 0.165 *X1 10.4 56.3 -XI!POTA 

4/12 21:00 0.190 0,165 X 1 10.4 x I :,f'T 

4/12 23:00 -1650 -1650 0.423 0.925 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.4 56.1 ,I,:PItTA 

4/13 3:301 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.41 1 :tI;J 

4/13 6:00 -1650 -1650 0.423 0,928 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.4 55.7 .XI:P§I FA 

4/13 9:00 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.4 X.1 ;fItTA 

4/13 12:00 -1600 -1650 0.420 0.933 0,190 0.165 X 1 10.3 55.5 X 1 : M , A 

4/13 15:00 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.3 ,.I:rfs;F, 

4/13 18:00 -1600 -1650 0.425 0.938 0.190 0.165 X*1 10.2 55.1 ,X1 I:kI 

4/13,21%00 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.2 ,-X1 I•AI ] 

4/14 000 -1600 -1600 0.423 0.940 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.1 54.9 ,X-1 fl;A 

4/14300 IN 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.1 ,1I :ifIFa 

4/14 6:00 -1600 -1600, 0.420 0.940 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.0 54.6 ,1I:filTa 

4/14 9,00 0,190 0.165 X 1 10.0 _ , 19 ITA 

4/14 12.00 -1600 -1600 0.423 0,948 0.190 0.165 X1 9,96 54.4 *X I:J TA 

4/14 15;00 o090 0.165 X 1 9.92 Xi,,1:9 T 

4/14 18:00 -1600 -1600 0.425 0,940 0.190 0.170 X*1 9.87 54.3 XII V T•A 

4/1421:00 '" r' 0.190 0,170 1)X1 9.82 •l:__ ,:1[IlU 

4/15 0.00 -1550 -1550 0.428 0,953 0.190 0.170 X*1 9.77 54.1 -X, I', 1 t:I A 

4/15300 I,, 0.428 0.953 0,185 0.165 X11 9.72 'I :fo;FAI 

CE 883 of 1220

I F2J:.4fi 15 - 

WIW4 A 

RO 

*0 (2$DB JR+-ffA POEMa)J D/V h S. M t CAMS /V CAMS S/!C S/CH o 

lt 

(mm) (mm) (MPe) (MPa) (MPa abs) (MPa abs) (Sv/h) (Sv/h) (C) (mSv/h) 

4/100.00 -1500 -2100 -0.020 -0.025 0.090 ->1 29,0 0,739 86.9 0.08 'X. I T; 

4110 2:00 -1500 -2100 -0.020 -0.025 0.090 X1 29.0 0.739 86.7 0.08 X I T A 

4/10 4:00 -1500 -2050 -0.020 -0.025 0090 X 1 29.0 0.738 86.5 0.08 :1tM fTA 

4.10 6:00 -1450 -2050 -0.020 -0.025 0.095 X 1 29.0 0,737 86.2 0.12 XI:.i' ,. 

4/108:00 -1450 -2050 -0.018 -0,025 0.095 X,1 28.9 0.735 86.0 0.09 X,1: PIT A 

4/10 0:0. -1450 -2050 -0,020 -0.025 0.095 X'1 28.9 0.734 85.8 0.09 'X1:hlT5 g 

4/1012.0 -1500 -2100 -0.020 -0.025 0.095 X'1 28,5 0.732 85.5 0.07 Xi1: tJTA 

4/1014.00 -1500 -2100 -0.023 -0,025 0.095 X 1 28,6 0,731 85.3 0.10 Ul:.IMT 

4/10 1620 -1500 -2100 -0.023 -0,025 0.095 X 1 28.1 0.730 85.1 0.09 XI:MIT a 

4/10 18:00 -1500 -2050 -0.023 -0.025 0.095 X1 28.710.728 84.9 0.11 'X-1:9T a 

4/1020:00 -1500 -2050 -0,023 -0.025 0.090 X-1 28.6 0.727 84.8 0.11 X'I:K§Ta 

4/1022:00 -1500 -2050 -0,023 -0.025 0.090 X 1 28.6 0.726 84.6 0.10 lO TA 

4'li .IR -1500 -2050 -0.020 -0,025 0,090 X 1 28.6 0.125 84,4 0.10 •XIt:s;I J 

4/I 2.9 -1500 -2050 -0a025 -0,027 0.090 X•1 28.6 0.124 84.2 0.10 'Xl: f,§T 

4/114:00 -1500 -2050 -0,020 -0,025 0.090 X 1 28.5 0.722 84.1 0.12 X-I:I' : 

4/116:00 -1500 -2050 -0.025 -0.029 0.090 .-1 28.5 0.721 83.9 0.11 -X-',: I I Jf 

4.' 1112:0 -1500 -2050 -0.020 -0,023 0.095 X 1 28.4 0.717 83,5 0.12 XI A 

4/1! 18:30 -1500 -2100 -0.020 -0.023 0.095 -Xi 28.0 0.692 81.5 0.09 jj-:PO 

4/120:00 -1500 -2050 -0.023 -0,025 0.090 -X, 28.1 0.685 81.4 0.08 .-I:f;lT. 

4/12 6:00 -1500 -2100 -0.023 -0.025 0.090 X.1 28.1 0.681 84.6 0.09 'X:Ii9jT' 

4/12 13:00 -1500 -2100 -0.027 -0,027 0.085 X,1, 21.4 0.672 829 0.08 -.1:fi: jTA 

4/1215:00 -1500 -2050 -0.020 -0.025 0,095 X 1 27.7 0.672 82.8 0.07 Xl19,t Tp j 

.4/1218:00 -1500 -2050 -0.018 -0.020 0.095 X 1 27.8 0,670 87.0 0.08 ,•lf•V:T A 

4/1223100 -1500 -2050 -0.023 -0.025 0.095 X,1 27.9 0.663 85.1 0.09 X:.1 ,I. 

4/136:00 -1500 -2100 -0.018 10,023 0.095 Xl1 21.9 0.656 83.9 0.08 ,X: ;f;T 

4/1312:00 -1500 -2050 -0.016 -0.020 0.095 'X1, 27,9 0.653 83.3 0.10 .Xl:'§PJF 

4/1318:00 -1500 -2050 -0.016 -0.018 0.095 •1 27.8 0.648 82.8 0.08 ,I:•tt •, 

4/140O0 -1500 -2050 -0.016 -0.020 0.095 "1 2717 0.645 82.4 

4/14 6:00 -1500 -2050 -0.016 -0.021 0.095 - 1 27.6 0.641 82.3 

0.08 X:IflF, 

0.08 ,9l:-r4II: 

4/14 120 -1500 -2050 -0.016 -0.021 0.090 ,1 27.4 0.637 82.0 0,09 X,1: ,T,•, 

4/14 1800 -1500 -2050 -0.018 -0.020 0.090 '61 27.3 0.633 81.7 0.09 *'jI:f TA 

4/150900 -1450 -2050 -0.018 0.023 0.090 .1 27.1 0.629 81.3 0.09 !,•t:• TA 

Iti 

CE 884 of 1220

1 F3~5..+MiEA5'-~ 

*{0(01)A *9190) [I-TEtjC WiEN DA3 SIrUj CAMS CAMS CAMS CAMS S;iAX 0U11 

G R (mm) ImP,) (MP4) tMPa abs) (MPa abs) 0S/l) 0(/AB) SIVCA) S'C(B) 'C) (S/h) 

(m)(Svih) 

(SY/h) (Sa/ib (Sv/h) 

46 0.00 -1850 -2250 -0.077 0009 0.1069 0.1733 20.9 15.1 0.815 0,158 51.4 0.12 

4/6 8:30 -IBM -2200 -0,071 0.007 0.107, 0.1731 198 14.9 0807 0,150 512 0.12 

4/61230 , -1800 -2200 -0081 0.005 0.1089 0.1731 19.5 14.8 0.799 0.743 51.0 0.12 

4/6 18.00 -1800 -2200 -''•,' 0004 0.10 0.1731 19,5 14,J 0.792 0.737 50.8 0.11 

4/17000 -1800 -2250 -0.079 0.002 0.1071 0.1729 19,5 148 0.784 0.729 50.6 0.12 

4/76.00 -I0 -2250 -0019 -0002 0.1075 0.1729 198,6 14.5 0,771 0.722 50A4 0.11 

4/7 1200 -1900 -2250 -0081 0.000 0,1059 0.1720 19,3 14.4 0.768 0.714 502 0.10 

4(7 18.00 -1950 -2250 -0.079 0.000 0.1062 01727 19.21 14.3 0.759 0.706 50,1 0.11 

4/7 1930 -20O -2250 -0081 0000 0.1062 0.1727 19.2 14.3 0.757 0.704 500 0.11 

4/8 130 -200 -2250 -0.081 -0.002 0.1081 011725H 19,0 14.2 0.748 0.694 49.8 0.11 

4/8600 -2000 -2250 -0.079 00OD 0.1059 01724 18.9 14.1 0.743 0.689 49.7 0.12 

4/86-.40 -20 , -2250 -0081 -0002 0,1051 0.1722 189 14.1 0.743 0.689 49,6 0.12 

4/8 1200 -1850 -2250 -0,079 -0004 0.1052 011722 1898 14.0 0.738 0.684 495 0.14 

4/8 800 -1700 -2200 -0.081 0.008 01047 0.1720 18,7 540 0.133 0.680 49,3 0.10 

4/00.00 -1850 -2300 -0,085 -0002 01054 0.1727 18.6 13.9 0728 0.675 49.1 0,13 

419615, -18w -2250 -0.081 -0002 0.1057 0.1726 185 13.8 0.723 0.671 48.9 0,10 

41912251 -1700 -2250 -0081 -0004 0.1055 0.1722 18.4 13.7 0.717 0666 488 0.09 

4/9 1825 -1900 -2250 -0079 -0011 01054 0.1715 18,3 136 0.713 0.661 48.6 0.09 

4/10000 -1900 -2250 -0,081 -0.011 0,1055 0,1717 18.2 13.6 0708 0.656 48.4 0.09 

4110600 -l6w -2250 -0.017 -0009 0.1061 0.1717 18.1 13.5 0,703 0.652 48.3 0.09 

4/10 1200 -1900 -2250 -0079 -0.00 0.1054 0.1713 18.0 13.4 059 0648 48.1 0.09 

4/10 18 -1900 -2250 -0.0.3 -0013 0,1052 0.1708 '_19 13.4 0.694 0.043 47.9 0.08 

4,/11000 -1900 -2250 -0.083 -0,017 0,1050 0,1703 O17, 13,3 069 0.640 47,8 0.08 

4/l 600. -1900 -2250 -0.081 -0,015 0.1031 0,1698 17,8 132 0.685 0,636 47.6 008 

4/11l 12.00 -1900 -2250 -0.083 -0.017 0a1043 0.1699 17,7 132 0.681 0.632 47.5 0.075 

4/1 1830 -1850 -2250 -0.093 -0,011 0.1043 01698 17,5 13.1 0680 0.624 47.2 0.085 

4/12000 -1850 -2250 -0.079 -0.015 0 1045 0.1698 17,5. 13,1 0675 0,820 47.1 0.080 

4u12 600 -10 -2250 -0.079 40.019 0.1052 0.1692 17.4 13.0 0.871 0.617 47.0 0.075 

4/12120. -1850 -2250 -0.0183 -0.0171 0.1048 0,1689 17.3 12.9 0,668 0.613 488 0.08. 

4012 15'10 -I8 -2250 -09085 -0.010 0;1048 01689 172 12.9 0.863 0.611 4,88 0.09 

4112 18.00 -1850 -2250 -0083 -0019 0.1050 0.1689 17,2 12.9 0.62 0,609 48.7 0.08 

4/12 22,10 -1850 -2250 -0.088 -0018 0.1055 0.1685 17,1 12.9 0.661 0.807 46.6 0.01 

4113600 -1850 -2250 -0.079 -0.019 0.1056 0,1680 17.0 12.8 0.657 0.603 46.5 0.085 

413 7,00 -1850 -225 -0079 -0.019 01054 0.1680 171.0 12.8 0,658 0.803 46.4 0.080 

411312J10 -1750 -220 -0.083 -0.023 0.1038 0.1677 16.9 12.7 0.653 0,60O 48.3 0.080 

4113 1800 -1750 -2250 -0085 -0.021 0.1036 0.1877 16.8 12.7 0.658 0.597 461 0.08 

4/14 0.00 -1750 -2250 -0,083 -0.017 0.1047 0.1880 16.7 12,6 0.647 0a95 460 0,08 

4/14 605 -(80 -2250 -0083 -0.017 0.1045 0-1613 16.7 12.0 0.643 0,.92 45.8 008 

414 12.00 -1800 -2250 -0.085 -0.017 0.104 . 051671 16,6 125 0.60 0.089 45.1 0.08 

4/14 18.00 -1800 -2250 0.085 -0.017 0,1041 0.1670 16,5 12.5 0.637 0,588 45,6 0,08 

4/150.•08 -I800 -2250 -0,085 -0.019 0,1043 0.164 1R16 124 0.634 0.584 45.4. 008 

CE 885 of 1220

2F- 1 4 

8 

7 

6 

3 

2 

8000 

ffEE 7000 

1 1000 

0 0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/t3 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0M0 6.00 12M0 18:00 0:00 6,00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12,00 1:00 0:0 

160 

140 

120 

6000 

5000 E 

4000 

3000 

2000 

80 

* 60 

40 

2 0 *, , . 0 ,. 0 0 0 0 0 

4 0 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0M00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18-00 0.00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12.00 18:00 0:00 

300 .DJWjEE, . , 3 00 

250 U S/CEt •abs) 2. 

200 2S/C 

•150 15 

iso 5 

50 5C 

500 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/1 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6:00 1200 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18 00 00 600 12:00 18:00 0:00 60 12:00 18:00 0:00 

7000 

6000 

T 5000 

E 

4000 

3000 

2000 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/1 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6-00 12.00 18-00 0.00 600 12:00 18-00 0:00 6:00 12:0 1800 0:0 6.:00 T2.00 1-00 0:00 

CE 886 of 1220

2F-2- 

8 

7 

05 3 a 

4 

8000 

7000 

6000 

• •: 5000 E 

u *f 4000 

04*444*-0 ** **** * *** *** * 0 ** 0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/t5 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0-00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18-00 0:00 6:00 12-00 18:00 0.00 

160 

140 

120 * 

sio 

3000 

2000 

1000 

40 

20 ~ ~ 4 * * 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6:00 12-00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12D00 18-00 0,00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12-00 18:00 0:00 

300 

250 

,.• 

6200 

* D/WEEj(gap) 

* S/CffE3[abaJ 

* D/WZIK 

x S/C2m 

300 

250 

200 

'IS 

50 

50 ftth*M*Ah*Ahtth*Athhh**tt*AAAt 

0 4 4. •, .4.44444,•• •• 41,• 41,41,•@OOO4,e, 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12200 18-00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 

6000 

100 

50 

E 

5oC20 

20 

40C 

30C20 

20C 

20 

IOc 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/10 4/17 

0:00 6:00 12200 18:00 0:00 6:00 12.00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12.00 1800 000 

CE 887 of 1220

2=F -- 

8 

7 

6 

5 

2 

1 1000 

0 0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6.00 12:00 18-00 0:00 6-00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18.00 0.0 6.00 12.00 18:00 0,00 

160 

140 

120 * 1 

tioo 

!80 

* 60 

40 

20 

8000 

7000 

6000 

5000 E 

0 

4/13 4/13 4113 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6:00 12-00 18:00 0-0)0 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6-00 12-00 18:00 0.00 

4000 

3000 

2000 

300 

250 

200 

•,5O 

* D/WEt Egage] 

* S/CEEA[Lbs) 

* D/W9I[ 

x S/Gait 

300 

250 

200 

150 

100 

0I 

0 tA AA t At Alt AAA A t A t tt t A tA AAt t 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6:00 12.00 18.00 0:00 6:00 12.00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12M00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18,0 0:00 

6000 

A At 

50 

5000 

4000 

SiC* a 

3000 

200() 

1000 

0 

-1000 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6.00 12:00 18:00 0-00 6:00 12:00 18.00 0,00 6:00 12:00 18600 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 000 

CE 888 of 1220

2 F - 4 -'T 

7 

6 

7000 

6000 

5 

0L.4 

Wd3 

2 

0 4*4* "0 * *44444* 444*4 *** 4#*4** 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12.00 18:00 0.00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 

160 

140 

120 

1 00 

80 

60 

40 

20 

# 00 0#**4 ** 44 0*4 0 * 00 44 *0 * 0* 0* 

5000 

E 

4000o 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4,15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 8:00 12.00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12.00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18O 0:00 

3000* 

2000 

3000 

300 

250 

0. 

6 200 

350 

* D/WEE1b [gale 

* S/CEE13[ubsJ 

* /W1 

* S/OiI1 

300 

250 

200 

150o 

'IS 

50 

hok h- * A*hhh** a..ll aNN maaa Ah aa hit 1% 

0 04 "*00#4 0#00*00*4 .0004 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

000 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:0 6-00 1200 1800 0:.00 6.00 12:00 18.00 0:00 6.00 12-00 18:00 0%0 

6000 

100~ 

so 

E 

0 

5000 

4000 

3000 

2000 0 0 -- 

0 sic*• 

-1000 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0-00 6:00 12.00 18-00 0:00 6:00 2:00 18600 0:00 6:00 1200 18:00 0:00 6:00 12-00 18-00 0-00 

CE 889 of 1220

2F- 1 -, TAF)h'*,M d+42OO[mm] 

•J*•2K , MoC] DAWR, DiWIS' ý S/Cflt S/O•d S/C.8J 

[MPa [mm] 

(gage)] MIA'I• I [kPa(gage)] [ 0 C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [°C] 

2011/4/13 12:00 0.05 5150 25.2 4 30,2 105 964 24 

2011/4/13 14:00 0.05 5150 25.2 4 29.9 105 963 24 

2011/4/1316:00 0.05 5150 25.3 4 30.0 105 963 24 

2011/4/13 18:00 0.05 5150 25.2 4 29.9 105 965 24 

2011/4/13 20:00 0.05 5150 25.3 3 30.0 105 966 24 

2011/4/13 22:00 0.05 5100 25.3 3 30.0 105 964 24 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.05 5100 25.3 3 30.0 105 965 24 

2011/4/14 2.0 0.05 5100 25.3 3 30.0 105 966 24 

2011/4/14 4:00 0.05 5100 25.3 2 30.0 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 6:00 0.05 5100 25.3 2 30.0 104 967 24 

2011/4/14 8:00 0.05 5100 25.3 2 29.9 104 967 24 

2011/4/14 10.00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 967 24 

2011/4/14 12:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 14:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 . 966 24 

2011/4/14 16:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 18:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 20:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 22.00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.8 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 0:00 0.05 5100 25.1 2 29.7 104 964 24 

2011/41152:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.7 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 4:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.7 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 6:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.7 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 8:001 

2011/4/15 10:00 i1i_ • • 

__i 

2011 /4/1512:00 

CE 890 of 1220

2F-201 X, (TAF)ih%;0*qK=ý* d+4200[mm] 

ýE ftdl 0 IM"IIJ c] D/WVEf D/W'N f S/C )jh S/C*d, S/C/Z•il 

B•IJ EMPa [mm] 

r(gage)] [M [*/.JiA' [kPa(gage)] [C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [ 0 C] 

2011/4/13 12:00 0.04 6150 24.9 4.2 31.7 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 14:00 0.04 6150 24.9 4.3 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 16:00 0.03 6150 24.8 .4.2 31.5 105 1200 24 

2011/4/1318:00 003 6150 24.9 4.1 31.7 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 20:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.0 31.5 105 1200 24 

2011/4/13 22:00 0.04 6150 24.9 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.03 6150 24.8 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 2:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.0 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/144:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.0 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 6:00 0.03 6150 24.8 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 8:00 0.03 6150 24.8 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 10:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.0 31.4 105 12001 24 

2011/4/14 1200 004 6150 24.8 4.1 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 14:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.2 31.3 105 12001 24 

2011/4/14 16:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.2 31.3 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 18:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.1 31.3 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 20:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 22:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 0:00 0.03 6150 24.7 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 2:00 0.03 6150 24.7 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 4:00 0.04 6150 24.7 4.1 31.1 105 1200 24 

2 011/4/156:00 0.03 6150 24.7 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 8:00 

2011/4/15 10:00 

2011/4/15 12:00 

CE 891 of 1220

2F-3`1 TAF)'O +4200[mm] 

'[MPa [mm] ftJi[ 0 C] D/WJI) D/W1f S/OCi) S/o,* S/Clii 

(gage)] 1[YMA 00 'hI' [kPa(gage)] [°C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [°C1 

2011/4/1312:00 0.00 3600 33.0 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 14:00 0.00 3597 33.1 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 16:00 0.00 3599 33.2 10 34.9 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 1800 ... 0.00 3600 33.2 10 34.7 

2100 26 

2011/4/13 20:00 0.00 3600 33.2 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/13 200 0.00 3600 33.2 10 34.6 111 2100 26 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.00 3600 33.2 10 34.7 111 2100 26 

2011/4/14 2:00 0.00 3599 33.1 10 34.8 1il 2100 26 

2011/4/14 4:00 0.00 3599 33.1 10 34.7 111 2100 26 

2011/4/14 6:00 0.00 3599 33.1 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/14.8:00 0.00 3599 3.3.0 10 34.6 ill 2100 26 

2011/4/14 10:00 0.00 3599 32.9 10 34.6 Ill 2100 26 

2011/4/14 12:00 0.00 3599 32.9 10 34.6 111 2100 26 

2011/4/14 14:00 0.00 3599 33.0 10 34.5 Ill 2100 26 

2011/4/14 16:00 0.00 3599 33.0 10 34.6 Ill 2100 26 

2011/4/14 1:00 0.00 3599 33.3 10 34.6 111 2100 26 

2011/4/14 20:00 0.00 3599 33.3 10 34.6 111 2100 26 

2011/4/14 22:00 0.00 3599 33.3 10 34.6 111 2100 26 

2011/4/150 :00 0.00 3599 33.2 10 34.7 111 2100 26 

2011/4/15 2:00 0.00 3600 33.1 10 34.5 111 2100 26 

2011/4/15 200 0.00 3600 33.0 10 34.5 111 2100 26 

2011/4/15 6:00 0.00 3600 33.0 10 34.5 110 2100 26 

2011/4/15 8:00 

2011/4/15 10:00 

201 1/4/15 12:00 

CE 892 of 1220

2F-4M 4 +4200[mm] 

_ r__ _ [MPa [mm] 

(gae)] T7't4" 

7 I)L 1 ,A n [kPa(gage)] 

-. [PC] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [°C] 

2011/4/13 12:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.5 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 14:00 0,07 4589 29.2 8 34.9 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 16:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 18:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 35.0 109 2100 30 

2011/4/13 20:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 35.0 108 2100 30 

2011/14/13 22:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14-2:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 4:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.7 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 6:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.6 108 2100 30 

.2011/4/14 8:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.6 108 2100 30 

2011/4/14 10:00 0.07 4589 29.1 .8 34.6 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 12:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 14:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 16:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.2 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 18:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 33.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/'14.20:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 22A00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.4 108 2100 30 

2011/4/15 0:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.4 109 2100 30 

2011/4/15_2:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.1 108 2100 30 

2011/4/15 4:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.1 109 - 2100 30 

2011/4/15 6:00 0.07 4589 29.0 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011 /4/15 8:00 

2011/4115 10:00 

2011 /4/15 12:00 

CE 893 of 1220

V •R 8:00, 18:00 (41110 MINEt 

ai 15: 00 421411, NNW.i f) 

10' 4IB•RI, 9:00/19:00 IRl.) 

(Eft,~ t: m, 

,,A-M-H u.t# /- e " .4k 

~- 14 -tkR(4 A 15 H 8:00 T) 

[4/15 f• [4/ 7][41-5 -T f] 

•,÷ ll i...... 't ..................... [• l ]................................. ... A li] ............................................................................. 

______T% 

3 

4 10i 

_ 2_______ 

(4 

• 4/3 17:30- 6m 3 /h • 4/7 19:00"- 7m-/h TaAý 4/3 17:32- 7m 3 /h •a 

(4/111l7:17 -18:04 • l*I-: (4/11 17:17ý-18:04$, _t: (4/11 17:17 L-18:04 t • 

M15 f ] [4/15 f V [4/15 f 1] [4115 ] /f 

SP • L 60t) 4/13 13:15,,-14:55 FPC f ,*(P 4/14 b•n, (25t) 15:56b-16:32 VIi _1 4/12 4/13 0:30--6:57/ 13:04 M M'Y f¢I:t 

2,-2-yg•(, 

l95t) 

" •'i '~........... ; f ; i iX i].......... ."ii #i ; i;• i................... P jif 

.................... 

4500m (0/ •, 6:0O) 53 0 (mm(-10i", 1,.i1`)) T' A:) lf (, 

[4/15-f ] [4/15 ft [1- 

-4/15 fl [1 4/15-f V 

, 4/12 19:35-,4/13 11:00, 

T/B 4/13 15:02"-17:04 ALrj t/W ,1 

4/13 18:10 - 18:32 ý''7• 

"Dt 'UMi .............................. .M Ut7•i ................................ M W'i ' 

............................. .M WIf tf .............................. 

OP+5100im(!/15 7:O0) (4/14 OP+3050mm (1.15 7:00) (4/14 OP+2900m(.h15 NO:t) (4/14 I)lP,2.L I(1 7:'S 00) ql' i1:01 

I1:00 19 '• J)tL, 11:00 19 g'Vf4t,) 11:00 ) V W. .19 

V : 0P+1900mn) (R : W EAtDI OP+300n) (4 : O M* II OP+300m) 

,,- i('b 120cm(4/15 7:00) *O D1cm(4115 7:00) I - 117cm(..15 7-i0j) - 

(4/14 11:00 19 •kta U) (4/14 11:00Jt Icm±-!) 1(4/14 11:00 1 9-F 

(1~2"-4 Wi-9~Y RWHIM 

ýo :1[I 

r'M 2 VA, 4/7 1:31'- Njt,• qj (4/94:10"- • ,'!fr- l"z), 4/11 11:19 'J'M1, 2 •'To .II 10:05 N i , 

[ ýt ,7':I,'•Rd] 4/11 MU CMEt fo 4/13 3, 4 -• -, 2-o4/14 12:20 1,2•--•!-,• 1--4-R 10*ýMUPMIM-C`o , 

[T-Hawk ii'• I' (15K"'9) 4/14 10:17'-12:25 • ,, 4/15 8:00"-14:00 •9." N' _o 

[N ). 4/14 12:00'-,13:30 ,V -iLO-(1600m01) 4/15 , -, _ 

WFs.honien20044-f -D iI6 y I -/ 1 2 i-¥ •' .•i) I 1P (1' l I;,k4if~ ) 031 

-? ,15,04 $ _0900 ±t 

*ffZ-R0415-0800FLX.doc 

CE 894 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 


Friday, April 15, 2011 3:03 AM 

Casto, Chuck 

slide 

Presentation Flow.pptx 

flow 

I 

CE 895 of 1220

Choke Point: everything relies on 

one pump to supply water (2) 

I-

4- 

0m 

OD (0 

0 

0 

Two independent trains, but common cause failure limits 

reliability (3)

7- 

m 

4 

Two diverse independent trains, with 

diverse pump type, and diverse water 

supply (4)


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 



Blarney, Alan; Wittick, Brian; Moore, Carl; Casto, Chuck; Collins, Elmo; Gauntt, Randall 0; 



Reynolds 

Scan of Drywell Level in Unit 1 April 15 

Scan0043.pdf 

This is the document that TEPCO reported on today, with some translations added. Indications picked up that give them 

some confidence of estimated drywell level in Unit 1. Graph shows projected DW levels if current injection rate of 6 

m3/hr is maintained and leakage rate is constant. Projects reaching TAF on April 28 for U1. 

Lee Gard 

INPQ 

cell (b)(6) 

gardla@inpo.org 

Restricted Distribution: Copyright © 2011 by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. Not for sale or for commercial 

use. Reproduction of this report without the prior written consent of INPO is expressly prohibited. Unauthorized 

reproduction is a violation of applicable law. The persons and organizations that are furnished copies of this report should 

not deliver or transfer this report to any third party, or make this report or its contents public, without the prior agreement 

of INPO. All other rights reserved. 

.DISCLAIMER: 

This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain proprietary INPO or WANO information that is privileged, confidenlial. or protected by copyright belonging to 

INPO or WANO. This e-mail is intended solely lor the use of the individual oi entity for which it is Intended. If you are not the intended recipient 0o this e-mail, any 

dissemination, distribution. copying, or aclion taken in relation to the contents of and altachrilnts to this e-mail is contrary to the rights of INPO or WANO and is 

prohibited. I you are not the intended recipient of this e-mall, please notify the sender rnmed~ately by return e-narl and penranertly delete mne original and any 

copy or printout of this e-mail and •ny attachments. 

Thank you. 

CE 899 of 1220

ip-4 Dw"O'wtiYU4 &aý 

1FL-1 DWA* 

UPIT I- %lWa 

Mi 5ýý 

mm M, iAbll 

W' 'JAW- PAL440f 

ism~ 3 @Tp oft2. 

L5 

V. g~e/aj 

.E....... 5EL PCv'+'F 3i( ) 

....EL27150 DN*9(.LR)LS(O) 

27150 7373 IDALi(IMLS 2457.7 

2M 7233 0 ITAF NO 

2MI 7179 JPIXX w 

ism 705 2yu 

175C $700 GAW 22W 

16150 6570 11"m 21RO 

15150 M 213" 

147M w 1101A - 

144N 624 SLOWXA4 w 

12200 237 D #31 11047 - 

029 5113 ý/ ýAQA I 

M70 Fil T S/M em 

2780 im S/C 7 

2w 1750 sic 

-470 0 4119" 1 5w 

*ELM39 

TAFC@) 

~SLC4~L~P 

.... EL16150 WIPS-(O* 

EL,14486 SLCIA54'#(T) 

9. 

4 

A 0 

0 

- 

"Rik:9 

~t~/MJ.4~ 4~ U .~M4l~1 4!4 d/ll 4/1 

l~9 ~4O4 i/U 

1~j$ 6/Ce ~ 

'~ 

A1~J0~S 

CE 900 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

NEI SmartBrief [nei@smartbrief.com] 



April 15, 2011 - TEPCO to move emergency generators to higher ground 

Reading this on a mobile device? Try our optimized mobile version here: http'//r.smartbdef.com/resp/oSaOCanVqmBZbGrDCicPFaeCicNuCvN 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Ii SIGN UPJ I F[ORWAR I ARIV i Il -l FED p I .E I 

III tAt 

News about the nuclear technologies industry 

Search past news p 

I News Roundup I 

Sponsored by: 

TEPCO to move emergency generators to higher ground 

Tokyo Electric Power will transfer emergency diesel generators to an area 66 feet above sea 

level to avoid tsunamis that may result from aftershocks. The backup generators will be linked 

to the Fukushima Daiichi plant's cooling systems on or around Tuesday, TEPCO said. Bloomberg 

Businessweek (4/14) "h9are: Llr..&E4A•LI ELArEDLToRIsI 

Encasing Fukushima Daiichi reactors would be a challenge, exec says 

Burying the Fukushima Daiichi reactors in concrete would be more difficult than doing so at 

Chernobyl, said Gerald Karch, a managing director at Putzmeister, which has operated at both 

locations. "In Chernobyl, where a single reactor was encased, 11 trucks were in action for a 

number of months. In Fukushima we're talking about four reactors," he said. Concrete encasing 

would be the best choice after the facility cools, he added. Reuters (4/14) Shac ~l!-CWL 

TEPCO to start compensating families affected by nuclear crisis 

Each family that was forced to leave home because of radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi 

nuclear plant will receive $12,000, according to Tokyo Electric Power, the facility's operator. 

"We have decided to pay provisional compensation to provide a little help for the [affected) 

people," said TEPCO President Masataka Shimizu. TEPCO will start paying about $600 million in 

compensation on April 28. ABC News/The Associated Press (4/15) 5h1],,; UM ri -- F0A 

IEATE0 STOF"" 

I 

TVA mulls improvements at its reactors 

The Tennessee Valley Authority is considering spending millions to improve the safety of its six 

reactors. In a fact sheet, TVA said it might install more backup diesel generators and transfer 

used nuclear fuel to "dry casks." Three of TVA's six reactors have designs similar to that of the 

1 

CE 901 of 1220

Fukushima Daiichi units. The New York Times (tiered subscription model) (4/14) ShNar: LIM 

IC.-I.IL I IRELAT ED ST0RES1 

Entergy moves to store Pilgrim plant's used fuel in dry containers 

Officials at Entergy's Pilgrim nuclear plant in Massachusetts have decided to store the facility's 

used fuel in dry containers. The move coincides with experts' views that keeping the material 

outside the facility is a better than storing it in pools. The Boston Globe (free registration) 

(4/14) Share: fL2-I IA E.M pE-A ros.J 

New Mexico eyes expansion of used-fuel-storage plant 

New Mexico community officials intend to expand the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in Carlsbad, 

N.M., to handle used nuclear fuel from U.S. reactors. The biggest concern from the Japanese 

nuclear crisis is the "overpacking of the spent-fuel pools," said John Heaton, a former New 

Mexico state representative. Pending studies, the facility could store high-level commercial 

nuclear waste in addition to defense-generated material, he said. Reuters (4/14) S1re:L.l 

IEIL] I RE'LATED STORIE 

Earthquake could mean more dry storage of fuel in U.S., experts say 

Dry storage casks withstood Japan's March 11 earthquake without incident, which could lead to 

more dry storage in the U.S., experts say. "What will likely happen very quickly is that the 

[Nuclear Regulatory Commission] and utilities will arrive at a consensus that moving fuel to dry 

storage needs to be accelerated to get as much spent fuel out of the pools as fast as possible," 

said nuclear engineer Ron Ballinger of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. MIT 

Technology Review online (4/14) Share; j-[i21-MAII 1. rEOrO S] 

Enterprise Asset Management: Running Smarter Buildings 

By using IBM Maximo solutions, facilities have been able to move from 

S-- .1.-- a preventative maintenance system to a predictive maintenance 

- -' system, enabling true efficiencies throughout the organization. In this 

---- video from IBM, learn how to run your building smarter and in turn, 

create innovation for your organization and end consumers. 

I Policy Watch I 

Rep. Shimkus: U.S. needs Yucca Mountain to expand nuclear energy 

The U.S. needs a permanent nuclear waste repository, instead of storing used fuel 

across the country at various sites, writes Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill. He criticizes the 

Obama administration for halting a study on Yucca Mountain, which had been 

OPINION supported by presidents of both parties before him. "I cannot see, though I would 

like to, a larger increase in nuclear power until we establish a design standard for 

new plants -- and deal with the long-term storage of nuclear waste," he writes. Politico 

(Washington, D.C.) (4/15) [R-ELT •-J 

Seismic studies are needed at Calif. nuclear plants, lawmakers say 

California lawmakers seek to determine why the Nuclear Regulatory Commission won't postpone 

license-renewal procedures for the state's two nuclear plants until seismic reviews are finished. 

"The seismic safety of our plants cannot be an afterthought," said state Sen. Alex Padilla. 

Continued studies are needed to ensure the safety of the Diablo Canyon and San Onofre nuclear 

facilities, Padilla added. San Jose MercuW News (Calif.)/The Associated Press (free registration) 

(4/.14) AI ,tr:~f~E LTfSTO~Eld 

2 

CE 902 of 1220

ý_ft 

Business Gold Rewards Card® 

Use points to do more for your business: 

* Offset business travel expenses 

* Purchase office supplies and equipment with gift cards 

" Recognize employees and thank clients - Find the perfect gift with 

thousands of options to choose from 

Business Gold Rewards Card® from American Express OPEN. 

ADDIV Now. 

I~.. mngmn&Lae shp _ 

6 ways to turn your employees into top performers 

You shouldn't assume your employees are lazy just because they don't seem motivated, writes 

David Maxfleld. Sometimes they just aren't in the right team or workspace, can't envision their 

future or need small rewards to keep them going. Ensure that your employees perform at their 

peak by investing in their professional development, encouraging them to find mentors or 

adding incentives for reaching short-term goals, Maxfield writes. SmartBrief/SmartBlog on 

Leadership (4/14) Shre - " 

Have you given your employees feedback today? 

Feedback and recognition are essential to a well-run workplace, writes Steve Crabtree. He 

analyzes results from a global study that says employees need to know, at minimum, what is 

expected of them at work, but few are getting regular, individualized feedback or recognition. 

Gallup Management Journal (free content) (4/13) Share;l IMM %!t(L I PELATED STOI.IMES 

I. Fetrd otn -1 Forum.- 

Tip Sheet: Debunking Dining Etiquette !I 

How To Protect Yourself From Counterfeiters IIN 

Mappinq Your Place On The Mobile Web 1 MAIL 

The 1 Audit Red Flaa To Watch Out For 

How To Be Selfless By Being Self-Centered 1t-MC 

3 

CE 903 of 1220

Subscriber Tools 

5IGN UP 

ý STWO FEECOACK 

I 

I' F-mams BMW, I 

Update account information I Chanae e-mail address I Unsubscribe I 

Print friendly format I Web version I Search oast news I Archive I 


Advertise 

Account Executive: 

Diana Angel (202) 470-1146 


Follow NEI: twitOr YVuM 


Recent NEI SmartBrief Issues: 

Lead Editor. Bryan McBournie 

Thursday, A2ril 14. 2011 

Wednesday, Apri 13. 2011 

Tuesday. April 12. 2011 

Monday. April 11. 2011 

Friday. April 08. 2011 

Mailing Address: 

SmartBrief. Inc.. 1100 H ST NW, Suite 1000, 



4 

CE 904 of 1220

Vias, Steven 

From: Karen Brackett, (b)(6) ] 

Sent: 

Friday, April 15,L211 5:45 PM 

To: 

Vias, Steven 

Subject: 

Dirty Legacy? or Clean One? 

http:/Irt.com/news/nagasaki-nuclear-bomb-hiroshimal 

httpo//rt.com/news/uk-iraq-depleted-uranium/ 

http://rt.com/news/irag-depleted-uranium-cancer/ 

http://rt.com/news/birth-deformities-irag/ 

http://rt.com/news/nato-bombinqs-aftermath-takes-toll-on-serbia/ 

http://rt.com/news/radiation-iapan-water-fukushima/ 

There's a dirty little secret about America that the rest of the world seems to know... but we Americans 

have been denied the knowledge of. The question today is do we want to leave a dirty legacy for our children 

and for the world's children.... or do we want to do the right thing... and leave a clean one. 

The most remarkable thing about each new day... is that it is a new day. It a new opportunity to do a reality check 

of sorts... to sum up what we have accomplished.., and determine where we need to make changes. 

Today we have soldiers in foreign countries being exposed to decades of nuclear contamination on a daily basis. 

These are young men and women of child baring age. They will return home to start or continue families not realizing 

the effect their service to their country will be extracting upon them. It is our responsibilities as citizens and leaders 

of this country to protect our servicemen and servicewomen... and provide for them when we have failed to do so. 

I know we use these shells because I have held one in my bare hands in training. It was unimaginable to me as 

I held it even.., that one had ever actually been used. I was under the innocent assumption that these were our 

worst worst worst case war scenario back ups which were exclusively held for last stand efforts to save the USA. 

Truth is... we and they would have been better off if we had just dropped an actual nuclear bomb on them. 

What really caught my throat listening to these reports... even though I voted for him.., was all the rhetoric of scare on 

national news stations of high alerts on terror for the dangers of dirty bomb attacks on our country by terrorists.., when in 

fact... it was us... it was America... that was using dirty bombs. How will we ever stop terrorism if we continue to terrorize? 

There will be generation upon generation of young people growing up while plotting their revenge upon us for using 

nuclear 

material in warheads. Not to mention our own children will grow up not wanting to look us in the eye for it. 

There is only one hope for any of this... and that is to perfect decommissioning.., and we have a world of it to do. So, 

we need to get started. Personally, I do not believe that nuclear bombs were dropped as a power trip or as a science 

experiment on Japan. I believe they were dropped as a statement to show the world what we could have done all along. 

It was appropriate and the day may come when it will need to be done again. We did not have to send thousands of our 

soldiers to their deaths fighting the Japanese... but we did it for the humanity of it. We did not have to drop incinerator 

bombs and burn all of the villages of Japan in defense when we could have nuclear-ly destroyed them forever.., but we 

did it as bizarre as it sounds for the humanity of it. A lesser evil is always a lesser evil.., though it never makes it right. 

We have to have nuclear bombs and weaponry for that terrible possibility of a catastrophic sized asteroid... and we need 

nuclear medicine and nuclear energy... but we do not need nuclear warheads on the battlefield of humanity. I don't mind 

knowing they exist in case of some science fiction attack on earth... which is highly unlikely but still good to know we have 

them just in case... but that is all they are needed for. 

Today, we need to come up with products like knew battery technologies where we can basically produce usable products 

while we are decommissioning. Using leaching plates is good... but it is a very straight forward approach... instead of 

plates.. .for instance we could use filaments in the numbers of thousands or millions and leach onto them and then turn 

20 

CE 905 of 1220

around and use those same filaments for lighting or heating elements or new chip technologies. It's a market that does 

not even exist yet... but a market we can create and turn these polluted towns into valuable mining towns. We can teach 

consumers the importance of taking used products to recycle centers. 

If we don't want to be continually at war.... then we have got to help these countries medically... and in every way we 

can... because here's the truth... a nuclear warhead is like mustard gas... it is a crime against humanity to use them. I 

wish I could say it's OK... that like with mustard gas we just did not know.., but we knew this time.. at some level.., and 

some how it has happened anyway.. and we need to find out why? We need to know who decided it and why they chose 

the consequence of it... and then we have to own it. We did this as a country and now we have to make it right as a 

country. One thing is for certain the odds of terrorism ever going away... are not likely.., unless we do this right. 

And for heaven's sake when it comes to anything nuclear.., those decisions need to pass a medical review board 

first before anything is ever used... putting mechanical-engineers in control of a nuclear plant is like having a plumber work 

in a French pastry shop... there's no logic to it... and it makes no sense what so ever. Don't get me wrong you got to have 

them... just like 

the French Chef needs the engineer that plumbs his sink or built his oven.., one won't work without the other... but that's 

just it one doesn't work without the other... and right now we are way short of chefs in my opinion. 

I have the up most respect for military generals and their skills on the battlefield are what keep us free and safe... It's not 

fair for 

them to have news stations around the world pointing their fingers at our military for doing something with these warheads 

that 

they were not trained to know how to do... or even to really know what they were doing. It's terrible that we have 

contaminated these countries the way we have... It's criminal really. Who ever developed these warheads... should have 

told them what they would do.. .besides putting holes in tanks. If you are the soldier firing one of these... just touching 

them with your bare hands is bad enough... but the warhead passes through the barrel... it is releasing even more 

radiation.... not to mention what follows after that to town and the children and our troops doing patrols.... or even 

consumers here in America who purchase might purchase something from Ebay and never know it was contaminated. I 

nearly ordered a crocheted bikini once from a gid off Esay which is a site much like Ebay for crafts and on which I used to 

sell my soap... and now looking back I am so glad I did not... but what if I had? I would have been wearing nuclear 

materials on my most valuable assets! 

We are going to have to be honest about these problems and really go after fixing them. Denial is not an option anymore. 


21 

CE 906 of 1220


From: 


Sent: 

Friday, April 15, 2011 6:34 PM 

To: 


Subject: Re: FO - 1200 EDT (April 15, 2011) USNRC Earthquake/Tsunami 

SitRep - FOR O-FFICIAL-, UE.N. 

Alan and Rudy on bus to airport. Be back in ATL about 3pm Saturday. See you Monday. Casto-san in his element. 


To: R2MAIL; R2_RESIDENT SITES 

Sent: Fri Apr 15 16:55:57 2011 

Subject: i-Ouk uT-USEOLY - 1200 EDT (April 15, 2011) USNRC Earthquake/Tsunami SitRep - I-0171FICIAL USE 

FlnR OFFCIAL USE ON',LY 

Attached, for your information, NRC situation report regarding the impacts of the earthquake/tsunami 

event dated 1200, April 15, 2011. This document is considered FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY and is 

not to be distributed outside the agency. 

Vic 

Frvr OFFICIAL USE- i LY 

CE 907 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Virgilio, Rosetta 


Barker, Allan; Maier, Bill; Tifft, Doug; Woodruff, Gena; Logaras, Harral; McNamara, Nancy; 

Trojanowski, Robert 

Turtil, Richard; Ryan, Michelle 

SLIDES 

Senate committee staff briefing april 11 2011 .pptx 

Attached FYI and use are slides Trish Milligan, NSIR used to brief the Senate Environment and Public Works 

Committee staff on April 11. Trish also addressed two "what if" Qs: 

Q: Would we need a 50 mi EPZ if all the workers walked away? 

A: Basic answer was additional responders are called in immediately to assist and this is a practiced response. 

Q: What would happen to NYC drinking water reservoirs (near IP) if there was a release? 

A: Trish described the ongoing monitoring of the water supplies under EPA and actions that would be taken, 

similar to the bottled water for children in Japan, if needed. Also stressed that the typical limits used by EPA 

for safe drinking water are based on a 70 year exposure. 

Links to references are noted below: 

Telephone survey document 

http://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/doc-collections/nurecs/contract/cr6953/vol2/ 

Evacuation document 

htt)://www.nrc.qov/readinq-rm/doc-collections/nureas/contract/cr6864/ 

Post Katrina evacuation document 

http://www.nrc.-ov/readina-rm/doc-collections/nureqs/contract/cr6981/ 

NRC's Japan Page 

httip://www.nrc.qov/iapan/iagan-info. html 

CE 908 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 



Blarney, Alan; Wittick, Brian; Moore, Carl; Casto, Chuck; Collins, Elmo; Gauntt, Randall 0: 



Reynolds 

16 April Plant Paramneter Update 

April 16 Plant Pararneters.pdf 

not translated today 

.DISCLAIM ER: 

This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain proprietary INPO or WAND Information that is pilvifoged, confidential, o! protected by copyright belonging to 

INPO or WANO. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individuat or entity for which nits intended. It you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any 

dissemination. distribiation. copying~. or action takeni in rctcttion to the contents ot and attachments to this e-mail is contrary to the rights of INPO or 'NANO And is 

prohibited. 11 yoiu are riot the intenided recipient of this o-rrail. please riotfy the sender immediately by return e-mnail arid permianently deletle the original anid any 

copy or printout of this e-mail and awy attachnnc-trts. 

Thantk you. 

CE 909 of 1220

4 fl15 20'00 R 

15ýAIA5ý-9 

X.1 : HTR; 

.X':5:9 3 % 

5l1u 2u 3u 4u 5u j 6u] 

0,~ Ftil 6m'/ 'I hmi WE 7h9/h 9±LtcP 

ý(4/3 17~30) W il (415~ IYU-) ORPH 4 _____- 

IWtA -1 rfit mm 011 1~m M4A:I0rm 

I~~~k u1B ig5Lm ON9B: -2250mm X,2 11 1'm 1,~n 

(4/1 i~~) 4/15 19CUV~) (/5l~~ (4/15 2.0 00 (4/15.',-, 

___(4/15 ___________ (4/15_ WE ME) 

U,42MPa g (A) -0.OlSMPag (A) U~ 0,C302:MPag (A) X'3 0.03MA 8 0.010MPa s 

0~~) 096CMPag (B S ' -oo2Vag (D),X.3 -*QUl O1Svlh 

9.40)XIv/h S/C 6 l6X10 Sv/ 

D/W !ýixIO'Svih 

SIC tl Z.X10S/ 

__________ (4/15 1&1X~ff) (4/15 18 iYo )Wf)_______________ 

0,Wtfl 0.384%~ gIO,485Ma aW 

0,384WN gl.4&5Ma aW~ 0.384MNg g0.485MWa aW~ 

D/WIAMIJ 0,427MPa s (0528M~a sIW OA427MPa g 10,528MPe abs) 0.427MPa g (0.528vPa abe 

FPCAH-H)-9~J 4500mm 4qý lymI- 

VI (4I15iX)ff.01) (4115 1 0U E) )1 (4/152 

U t'HIMP (P/CC NUIt (PA4 ______ ______ 

103t 

$ 1fE-F 5uI 6u 

iE 4 -;N o g)~ =i(~ fO1PAW nbRW - *I $4! ~03Ma 

C-(PUNAAh = Y-ý.EIE(Mps) 4 !~Uol:M )1 

41ft (9 14&95) 

VIWW2507) 

CE 910 of 1220

441-PhAtMI. 2.34*0tV5$-9 

*OM 1850 (4'119 

0,428 (4/15 ISO) 401(115190 

______3 (4/1 __ O 4/51 -1 

IF3 

151&%_______ 

-180D (4/15 1800 

-2250 (4/151L100)0 

4021Z (4!I5 3%00 

IF2 

+IM 

IFI 

[ F2 

I IF2 1 IF3 I 

18,0 28.8(4/Its 105) 3 (4/15 lOW) 

IFS 

I 

11t0) I UZ(41,51800] 063 (4/IS 81,50)1 

D/W, S/C 

___________ 

InI IF2 

D'Wi (Npubs) 0 BO OOO(/IS M(,1 SE 

W3 4415 

SIC 4mPlas) 0.170 (0/5 19: ), 0 (4/15 10%C 

SC53.9(411518,0) 3(/5I 

1800,~ LiijI7E'- 

SiO85h 940154/15 

CE 911 of 1220

M 15ýWW-ý 

5000 

4/3 1RNAO~ 

#.*1(29) (mm) 

0.9 

4000 

6 m 3 /h 

A D/WE t (MPa abs) 

0.8 

3000 

x S/Cff)t (MPa abs) 

0.7 

2000 

0.6 

E-- 

E 1000 0 

0.5 

I I I I I II I 

II 

II 

0.4 H 

-1000 

0.3 

-2000 

i 

£ 

A Axk A A ,A Ak A A A A A A A A A 

0.2 

-3000 

0.1 

-4000 

0 

IM loo U 110 &M till 00 2* 400 W tM " IM 140 U ft " 2M 600 IX 42 #1 to tM 119 W* 140010 )M 1100 OOD 

4/13 4/14 time 4/15 

CE 912 of 1220

1F2 5F Y- 

5000 

0.7 

4000 

4/7 19WAL 

(flitl) 

* d, (OW) A(mm) 

PR 2(MPa) t 

A D/W11 1 7(MPa abs) 

0.6 

3000 

0.5 

2000 

0.4 

E 

1000 

r4/15 12.0O0 

0.3 "' 

E.J 

6.7 m3/h 

7m3/h 

0 

1(Upis) 

0.2 I 

-1000 h A A A 

A 

A 

0.1 

-2000 

* I I I I I I a I I 

0 

-3000 

-0.1 

-4000 

IM 

NO IMN lfo UO M N 40 il U1N t Io tIM IMN N l" " N 00 M 40C I W 10t N IM U IM t14N U MM illON 

4/13 4/14 time 4/15 

-0.2 

CE 913 of 1220

1 F3 lj/ý j - 

6000 

0.8 

5000 

4000 

4/3 IM32L) 

PFmJ~l 

7 m 3 A) 

#*9 *(2) A(mm) 

v 5P-OjC(Pa) 

A D/tff (MPa abs) 

xS/OCR(MPa abs) 

0.7 

0.6 

3000 

0.5 

2000 

0.4 

E 

1000 

0.3 

0 

0.2 

A 

-1000 

X 

£ 

A A A 

A 

A 

A 

0.1 

-2000 

4 

0 

-3000 

I I I I I v I I I I 

-0.1 

-4000 

ItOM4 

4/13 

*Il to~ IN =± 00 20 1* HDto IHo 1M3140 14 110 W3 2M3 MC 200 43 10 M3 

time 

4/14 

4/15 

-0.2 

CE 914 of 1220

1 F-i RPVM t I-,ER,(4/15 18:00) 

425 

375 

350 

400 "- 3/23 Z33 

400(40ffft 

325 A 

275 :' 

225 , ai 

, , 

P200•5'" • u ,.__ 

175 

150 / 

125 

a VESSEL franp 

OP 1730 

Vessel frahqe 

HVH-12ABellowsAir 

OP.3 1000 

* feedwater nozzle N4B-end 

OP.27750 

* vessel core 

OP.22160 

m SRV 203-4A 

OP.16524 

x vessel bottom head 

OP.15500 

# return ar duct HVH-12A 

OP.12200 

a return sir duct HVH-12C 

OP.12200 

, CRO -ý,,Y,. 

* CROi v)';:4TM• 

100 

75 

50 

25 

0 

,V233/243/25Y2I3/27l3/I 

20/•2 i 4!1VIV /3 4 11,14144/7414;A 4/104111 V 124'13t144,15 l114t'17 

CE 915 of 1220

iFI H ~ ~ $#~J. (4P 150 18:00) 

425 

400 

WN4)I 

375 ALV-thIZ~r. 0091 fiA2LT *% 

b'Rit:~t~f 

N4C(NO) 

350 '11 LtRl 

325 

300 f ADWl, 

275 

P 225.... . 

1250 

7 

7 

SR#fl 

_INSRAPX 

17 203ýLS c 

SR#fl 

150 20-3DI 

125 A * PLRAD 

75 I*PL 

50 PLO 

25 +: 

V 8 3 D 4111 4/3 4/5 4/ 4/9 4/11 4/13 4/1~5 4/17 I i 

CE 916 of 1220

1F-2 RPVoO A,•, 'x(4/15 18:00) 

280 

O* M I*X1 N4 

260 

aedl. 

I 

IRV-2-71A 

OPA 1400 

240 

220 

I2-86A 

DP.1 2900 

teal 

180 

160 

140 

-if- -- - - 

, %. * E~I~Vii~f~ 

MYJVW54'11)L 

9-5 HVH-16A 

OP.10750 

12D 

4**. 

*~ *'p 

4 

80 

~ * 

* -n--- 

.-• S rCl-,,lt,•!]' 

40 

III 

20 I~fPAI~ 

15~Ii(~I~I 

U) 

II 

115 I'm 13 in "~ vv~ IT vi Q4k)U 4A t 04 " £9 t 4111411 412 N 414 4:114.114 P 

CE 917 of 1220

300 

31Z2 2136 

1F-3 RPVJ•.{ ,• (4!1518:00) 

275 

-*RPV 0ý5hTýi 

250 1 

I 

0 

OP.32556 

225 it 

I 

OP.31863 

WV 16*142~ N48 

OP26601 

200 ' I, , 

'4 

175 

U 

I 

I 

ALft# 2-11F 31 TE-2-130 

OP.16298 

150 

125 

U, 

RPv TSA5'Il 

OP.14770 

+ D/'l HVHMM9V A92 TE-16-i 14A 

OP. 10100 

Stu 

(ESS-1 I) 

100 

WY Mfl'& NO1 

75 

A LMt 2-71G 11 TE-2-113G 

50 

H IMI 2-BGA I)-#V3 

TE-2-405A 

1) V. 

3/22 324 3.26 312B 3/30 41 4/3 4/5 4/7 4/9 4/11 4/13 4/15 4/17 

0:00 H 0O 0.00 HOtO 0.00 000 0:00 000 0:00 O000 0 .0 0:00 R 

CE 918 of 1220

IFS 

IF& F 

2011/4/14120 403 364 239 320 

2011/4/1413,o 432 355 23.9 320 

2011/4/14140o 480 34.7 23.9 325 

2011/4/14150 49,9 341 240 310 

2011/4/1416.00 51,3 3•36 241 330 

2011/4/4 17:00 538 33.2 24.0 315 

2011/4/14 1800 562 31 238 340 

2011/4/14 1M00 581 323 27.9 340 

2011/4/1420:0 489J 32 292 34.0 

2011/4/14 210 458 32X6 31? 310 

2011/4/14 22.004311 32.9 33 3.04 

2011/4/14 23:0 413 33.4 3 2M5 

2011/4/15 ox 39 33.7 31.7 2.0 

2r 1.14/15 M 311 34J 3 28.5 

2011/4/1520 311 34.4 35.9 277 

2011/4/15 A 38. 34.7 41.3 27.0 

2011/4/15 4:00 351.3 3. 4 28.0 

2011/4/15 50 34. 34 45.1 25.0 

2011,A/15 6:00 339 358 47,1 24.5 

2011/4/15 710 33U4 3m.1 471 24.0 

2011/4i/5V 0 32.9 38.8 50.5s 23.5 

2011/4/15 102 32.4 37J 524 23.0 

2011/4/15 10:00 33.5 37.2 45.6 23.0 

2011/4/15 11•0 3M.1 37.1 39N. 23o 

2011/4/15 120 39,0 3711 38,7 24.0 

2011/4/1513.10 42.3 36. 33.0 24.5 

2011/4/15 14:0 4531 352 304 250 

2011R,•15 lO 41 34.0 212 255 

M11/41518.0 51.2 34,1 2.J 280 

2011/4/15 17:0 52.9 337 28.1 218 

2011/4/15 N8O0 55.8 33.2 25.9 2J 

2011/4/1518,00 583 3217 25.7 2685 

2011/4/15 W 10 49. 1 32.5 254 27.0 

C. 

100.0 

80.0 

OU.U 

40.0 a 

20.0 

I I4 

p 

I 

fts"ll, SFP!14# 

S 

U 

I 

S 

* 

* 

m 1 F5 f*it 

o 1 F5 SFPSA 

I1F60*11 

.1F6 SFPZI 

3 

I 

3 

U 

II 

I 

I 

0.0 

4/1312:00 4/14 0:00 4/14 12:00 4/15 0:00 4/15 12:00 4/16 0:00 4/16 120 

CE 919 of 1220

1 F115>ý J/ 51~-) 

*U(IOA *1(aPI)8 IFffhA PE Mfi D/WffJ S/Cf~h CAM CA SVon 

(,w) (m) (UP.) (UPO) (UP. lbs) (Wmal aba /W SC 0/ ') 

4/1 18:30 -1800 -1600 0.416 0,895 0.195 01,65 ,1 10.4 58.1 XI: T 

4/1120-.00 _ 0.195 0.165 '.1 10.6 x1:+t1 

4/11 22-00 ___________ 0.1951 0.185 *X.1 10.8 VISTA 

4/11 23:40 _____ 0.195 0.165 - ~ xl_ :gfjll 

4112. 0 -1600 -1500 0.416 0.898 0.195 0.165 ,-1 10.8 57.5 X1: I.tIFl 

4/12 401 0.190 0.165 *X1 10,8 x•l4_t't , 

4/12 6: -1650 -1650 0.416 0.908 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.81 57.1 -X:I lT;;A 

4/12 810 , 0.190 0.165 X,1 10.7 1 

4/121000 0,190 0,165 X(1 10.7 1 : t 

4/12 13:00 -1600 -1600 0,400 0,900 0,190 ,0,165 *1 915 56.8 -X1 ITI A 

4/12 14:00 0.190 0.185 v1 10.0 E 56,58 VA TIA 

4/12 15:00 -1600 -1600 0,418 0.918 0.190 0,165 A1 10.2 56.5 -XI: f tJ- 

4/12 1700 0.190 0.165 X,1 10.3 VIST A 

4/1218:00 -1600 -1600 0.420 0.920 0,1901 0.165 X1 10.4 56.3 -X:I-I ,T 

4/12 21:00 0,190 0.165 X1 10.4 X._1:91FT 

4/12 23..00 -1650 -1650 0.423 0.925 0,190 0,165 X 1 10.4 56.1 XI: ;F 

4/13 3:30 ....... 0.190 0,165 X1 10A R PT_1 

4/136:00 -1650 -1650 0.423 0.928 0.190 0.165 X1 10.4 55.7 Xl: ;FA 

4/13901 ..... 0.190 0.165 ,-1 10.4 xi i 

4/13 IM -1600 -1650 0,420 0.933 0.196 0.165 V1 10.3 55.5 -X:'1JjJ 

4/1315.0 %_____ 0.190, 0.165 xi1 10.3 I.I 

4/13 1800 -1600 -1650 0.425 0,938 0.190 0.165 X 1 10.2 55.1 Xl'hT A 

4/13 212... ..... 0,190 0a165 .1 10.2 -X1k T 

4/14000 -1600 -1600 0.423 0.940 WO190 0.165 *•1 10.1 54,9 X1:I |•,Jl 

4/1432 0,190 0.165 ,E1 10.1 x l P A 

4/146-.00 -1600 -1600 0.420 0.940 0.190 0.165 t1 10.0 54.6 ý l _ _ _ 

4/149:00 0.190 0.165 •1 10.0 IT _ ___ 

4/1412:00 -1600 -1600 0.423 0.948 0.190 0.165 X 1 9.9M 54.4 l:! _ _ _ 

4/14 150 o.190 0.165 .l 9.92 x1:ftv_ _ _ 

4/1418.00 -1600 -1600 0.425 0.940 0.190 0.170 X 1 9.87 54,3 •;1:40 

4/1421.0 0.190 0.170 X1 9.82 __I:ItIT_ 

4/150:00 -1550 -1550 0,428 0,953 0.190 0.170 X 1 9.77 54,1 l 

4/153:00 0.428 0.953 0,185 0.165 -X 1 9.72 •1: ; 

4/15600 -1550 -1600 0430 0,965 0.190 0.170 01 9.68 54.0 'i. , ;Fj 

4/1512:00 -1650 -1650 0,430 0.965 0.190 0.170 X1 9.58 54.0 ,:1 a 

4/16, 1800 -1650 -, 50 0.428 0,963 0,190 0170 X 1 9,49 5319 1:•it 

CE 920 of 1220

I F2 

75 Mji, "' .7;J- 5, 

(mm~) (mm) INN) NWe) (MPua. ab MPa abs) (I~ C) m A) 

4/10400 -150 - -0.020 -00 0.0902 OM X 29.0 0738 86,5 0.08 1. F 

4/106.00 -1450 -2050 .020 -0.025 0.095 oo .1 29, 0 037 861 0.12 X-4 5T 

4/10 82 -1450 -2050 -0.018 -0025 0.095 XL.1 28,9 0,735 86.j 0 0109 1:A T 

4/101 -1450 - -05 020 -0.025 0.095 X,1 2 0.734 85.8 0.08 X 1: a 

4/10 1:00 -1 -2100 -0.20 -0.025 0095 1 28.50.732 855 0o07 X Ih , 

4110 140 -1500 -2100 -1.023 -0.025 0.095 2X 1 286. 0,731 85.3 010I : a 

4/101600 -150 -2100 1-023 -0025 0.095 *1 28.o10.730 85.1 0.09 XIA 

410 18M -1500 -20 -023 -0V025 0.095 X 1 28.1 0.728 84.9 0l o.1 : 

4/102A. -1500 -2050 --0023 0.025 0.090 ý1 28.6 0.727 84,8 0.11 X 1: 

4102 -1500 -2050. -0,023 -0.025 0.090t _ 1 286 0.127 R, 0.10 X HI . .. 

4/11000 -1500 -2050 -0.020 -0.025 0.090, X1 286 0.7251 84.4 0.10 I : 

4/11 2:0 -1500 -20501 -0025 A0.027 0.090 1 28,6 0.24 84.2 0.10 1:, 

4/1100 -15 -20501 -020 .025 0.90... 1 285 0,72? 8. 0.12 "XITITA 

4/1il10 -1 -205 -01025 -0,02 0.090 '1 2M8. 0,721 83.9 0,11 |XIA a 

4/1l12:0 -1500 -2050 -. 020 -023 0.095 *1 28.4 0.717 835 0,12 X I a 

4/I ,18:30 -1500 -210. -0020 0023 0,095 .- 1 28.0 0,.92 81 5 OM. I: 1F A 

4/120:00 -1500 -2050 -0.0231 40025 0.090. X 1 28.10.6851 81.4 0.08 X, I: PF 

4/126% -150 -2100 -0.023 -0.025 0.090 #1 28.1 ox 0.681 84.6 0.09 I: 

/12 13:00 -15 -2100. -0027 -0,027 0,085 ~ 1 274 0.672 82.9 0.08 X1 I 

4/12 15,T -15 -20501 -04020 -0025 0.095 _L1 27.10.872 82.8 0.07 X 1: 

0/21&00 -1500 -20501 40018 -020 0.095 1 27,8 0,670 87.0 0,08 X I ITa 

4/1221%0 -150 -2050 -0.023 -0.025 0.9 1L 27.90.663 85, 0.09' .I 

4/13 62 -1500 -2100 -0.018 -0.023 0.095 X-1 2T.90.65 M J 2 1.8X :P T 

4/1312.00 -1500 -2050 -0.016 -i.02 0.095 X1 2.,9 0.653 83.3 0.10 i1I:F 

4/13 1800 -1500 -2050 -0.016 -0.018 0, 95 X. 27.8 O. 82. 0.08 , 1 fj ; JA 

4/140:00 -1500 -200 -0.016-0.02 0,09 -X 27.71 0,6451 82.4 0,08 X I PI T 

4/146.0 -1500 -20501 -0,016 -0.021 0.095 X 1 27.60.641 82.3 008 Xl IftA 

4/14 1% -1500 -20501 -0.018 -0,021 0.090 X.1 27 .4 0.637 82.0 0.09 1:I F 

4/14 1800 -1500 -20 -.0018 -0.020 0.090 1 _a _H033 8171 0,09 X 1:h A 

4/1150:0 -1450 -2050 -0018 -0,023_ 0.090 __t 27.10,62a 81.3 0.09 X1 AT 

4/158.00 -1450 -2050 -0.018 -0.025 0,090 1 27.0 0,624 81.0 0,09 1,:9 T 

4/15 12%00 -1500 -2100 1018 -0023 0.090 * 1 269 0.820 80.6 0.10 X,1: P 

4/15 18:00, -1500 -2050, -0,018 -0.023 0.090 X 1 26.8 0.16 80.3a 0.10 X8 t1: MIA 

CE 921 of 1220

IF 

ý7f;7 $-I 

UAI(EA MlR104 ij+0EC AMPJA D/WEý ,C Eý 

CAM I 

AMS 1 AM0S 

.3 Ai 

(m)(m! 

'me j a W M# b) (S/1) I (SO~) I SVA) fswli) _______ 

4,66o, -1800 -2 -00 0007 0.1071 0.1731 _ 9.8 14,9 801 0.,50 512 .12 

4/61i2.30 -1800 -22D0 JA 01 01005 0.1069 01731 19,5 148lA 0180 0,143 51.0 0,12 

4/6 IN -Igo -22D0 -0.081 00o4 0100 I .1131 19.5 14.1 03, 2 0..31 50o. 0,11 

47 H0 -180 -2250 -0.079 0,002 0,1071 01129 1915 14.6 0184 012n 50.6 0ý 12 

4/ 600 -1850 - 4-0.019 I002 0,1075 01129 1916 ,14.5 0.177 0.122 4 0.11 

4/7__ 1 ,_ -9 -22 0,000 01050 0`1120 19. 144 0.76 0,714 50.2.1 0,12 0 

4/11 -1950 -..... -007.9 000 0`1002 01727 19. , _ 14.3 0. 9 0•0.• 5DI ail 

404,30 -2000 -22501 0.081 0 010. 2 01721 19.2 14,3 0757 ..... 4__3 

___50 

4/8 130 -no -2250 -0,0D1 -0.002 01061 0.172 1110 1412 0.714 0.694 48.0 0,11 

4/8100 -1 -2250 -0.01 0.109 0.1124 119 14.1 0713 06489 49.1 0.12 

4/8 60 -200 ___ 5- -01 -,04002 0.101 0,1122 119 14.1 014 0,689 49,6 0.12 _ _____ 

4/912:00 -1050 -2250 -0.019 -0004 01052 o22 0. 48 1 .0 0.738 0684 49.5 014 

4/1018, -1100 -2200 -001 0.001 0.1047 01720 10.1 14,0 07 000 493 0.10.. 

4/90• . -1950 -230 0 -000 0a154 0172 17,U 13.9 0.2 0,651 49.1 0,13 

4/90.15 -1050 -2250 -011 -0,00.02 0,1051 0,1712 185 13.3 0123 0671 4B9 0.10 

4112125 -1100 -2250 .. 0• 1 -0.004 01069 0.1122 _1.4 13.1 0.111 0.66 47. O0 

4/U125 -19 -2250 -0.079 -0,011 0DO 0115 19.3 13,1 0`113 0,861 48,6 0.0 

4/10i.00 -190 -2250 -0 .001-011 0.1055 0.117 10,2 13.6 . 0.560 . 1 84 0,09 

4/100.00 -190 -2250 4077011 009 U0.11 0171117 _ 19.1 13.5 0103 0.652 _41.3 __000_________ 

4/1041 -1900 -.. -0.9 -0109 0,1054 0113 18,0 13,4 0.699 014 4811 0.0 

4i/o108 00 -19N -22501 -0.03 -0,013 0.1052 0110og _ 119,9 13.4 0.694 0843 _ 41.9 _0.08 _______ 

41YI1 O -1900 -2250 -001 -0.011 0.10 10.1103 _ 11.9 131 0,N 0540 __41.J _ 0.08 _______ 

4/110.0 -1900 -2250 -0,081 -0.015 0.1031 01069a 

_ 11.8 13,2 0105 0.636 4111 000 

4/11 1% -1900 -2250 -0083 -0017 0.1043 0199 11.1 13. 2 0.691 0632 41, 5 

__183_1m_ 25 0.8 00~17 0.1043 01698 17.5 11 W 0 . 64 47.2 O ________ 

()/12000 -1850 -2250 -0.079 -0015 01045 0.1 ion 11.5 131 0.115 0.020 41.1 0.00 

4/1200 -1850 -2250 -0.079 -0.019 01052 01692 11.4 13,0 0.11 I1 47.0 0075 

4/12 120 -1850_____- -0.083 -0017 0.10D48 0.1689 17.31 12.9 0,8 0613 46,8 0.08 _ ______ 

4/12 1510 -1050 -2250 ,0" -0.019 0,1 0189 112 12m 0.653 .... 0,611 468 009 

V/1218% -160 -25 -0-8 ,0.019 01 0 mg89 111. 12.9 0.062 06 461 0.08 

4012 2210 -1150 -2250 -0.06 -0.018 0.10 016 17.1 129 0.01 0.601 466 001 

4/,130.00 -1150 -2250, -0.09 -0.019 0.1055 0,1610 110 12.8 0.5 0.503 465 0.085 _ _ _ _ 

4/13 70, -1850 -22501 -0791 -0.019 0.105 0.1680 110 128 0.656 0603 41.4 0060 _ _____ 

4/13 11-10 -1750 -22001 -0.083 -0.023 0.1800 0.1611 10.9 1231 0,53 600 40.3 001 w _ _ _ _ 

41,131800 -1150 -225 -0085 -0.021 0.103 0.1811 . j 8 127 .0650 R591 401 0.08 

4/140700 -t150 -25 -0.083 -0.017 0.1047 01880 11.1 12.60 647 0.59 40 ,j 0.0 

4/140,0 -180 -20 *5 U8 -0.011 0.10 0.1513 16], 1 1 0,143 0592 4518 0.00 _______ 

4/141200 -1100 -2250 -0085 -0011 010D400.1111 15.0 121 o 0.880 45. 7 00 

4/1418-001 -1800 -2250 -0.08 -0.011 0.101 0.1610 115 1.5 0.437 0,58 45.8 U.8 _ _ _ _ _ 

4/15W0 -law -2250 -01085 -0.019 0. 143 0.156 15.5 12.4 OV 0.5B 45 0.08 _ _ _ _ 

4/15000 -1800 -2250 -0.083 -0.023 0.1043 0.1561 16.4 _ 12.4 0.61 0,581 453 0.08_____ ___ 

4/151200 00 0 220 0.8 -. 21 0,1040 01951 1. 14 0.628 0,579 45.2 0.08 _ _____ 

4115100 180 0 w -2250 -00AN06 003 15 63 1. 06025 0.510 41.0 0.08 

CE 922 of 1220

2 F - 1~1:5 

8000 

i5EE 7000 

6000 

7 

•4 

23 

50 E 

4000 ~ 

1 1000 

2000 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4114 4/14 4/15 4/t5 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4116 4/16 4/17 

D-0 6-00 12,00 I18.0 O:0 6:00 1200 1800 0-00 6:00 120 1000 0M 0 600 1200 18:00 0:00 

160 

140 

1•00 

*60 

40 

0 

4113 4/13 4.1I3 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0-00 8:00 12-00 18:00 000 6800 12:00 18-00 000 6M 1210 1800 000 600 1200 1800 0:.00 

300 

250 

CL 

200 

150 

* D/WEE~i[saga 

* S/C~jff abs] 

* a~ i 

*S/Camt 

300 

250 

20D 

,50 

150o 

100~ 

50 

50 

}AAA*IAAhAA~hAAA*AAAAAkhkA*Afl•A•* 

0o0 46aaaaee0, 0 *!*ab aaaa.*Oq*# &**a"*.* *a 0 

4A3 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4114 4.15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

000 60 12.00 18:00 00 600 1200 18!00 :00 6-00 12:00 1800 0:00 6:00 1200 1800 0.00 

7000 

6000 

0a/* 

4000 

500 

1, o000 

300aaa*a aaoaoaaaaaaa a 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0!00 6.00 12-00 1800D M0 6-00 12M0 1100 000 6:00 1200 1100 0:00 6:00 12:00 18010 M:0 

CE 923 of 1220

2F--2 

8 

7 

6 4,3a~m3.3nan933n339m3B33*3mmmfluma 

8000 

7000 

6000 

E 

•3 

2 

0 0 0 0 0 0"4 * 0 * * * * 0 * 0 * 0 0 4 * 0 * * * * 0 * *4p * * 0 0 0 

4.13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4V16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

000 6:00 12-00 18M 0:00 6-0 12100 18:00 0-00 6:00 12-00 18-.00 0:0 600 12.80 100 0 :00 

160 

140 

3000 

20DO 

1000 

120 

80 

*60 

40 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 600 12:00 18:00 0:00 6-00 12,00 18.00 0:00 6:00 12-00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12-00 18.00 0:00 

300 

250 

~2m 

150 

0 

b'•100 IIa U3 Sil 333 3I **n ***m n ***a **m * UI a 3It 30 4 

*0'wEIts.w[] 300 

SiCE Eolbs] 250 

* D/Wiln' t 

* S/Callg 200 I 

xS'Coo 

150 pf 

100 

a 

50 50 

0 0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4V14 4/14 4/15 4V15 4/15 4/15 4/10 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:0 6-00 12-00 18.00 0:00 600 12-00 18:00 0:00 6.00 12:00 18:00 000 600 12-00 18:00 0:00 

6000 

5000 

4000 

* S/C*lkt 

S3000 

2000 

100,0*0" 00 0000009 W 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4'6 4/16 4/17 

0:00 6,00 12100 18-00 000 6.00 12:00 18$,0 o0: 60o 1200 180 M 000 M 60 12:00 18.00 0:00 

CE 924 of 1220

2 F--3 

8000 

7*ffiE 

7o00 

1 6000 

S500 

E 

4 4~000 t 

S3 34000 

2 2000 

1 1000 

0 

413 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4V15 4/15 4VI5 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

00W0 600 12-00 18-"00 0-00 6:00 1200 1800 0:0 6:00 12.00 18:00 000 6:00 12.00 18:00 0.00 

1t0 

140 

120 

10 

40 

20 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/V1 415 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0M0 6.00 12-00 18:00 0.00 6.00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12-00 18: 0:00 .00 12,200 18:00 0:00 

300 *3D/Wa[Cos 3 

250 wS/CERJ[&abm, 250 

0. & D!W2311 

.:s200 xc 200 

15O 150 

00 0 

50 50 

000 0 

4 /134/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 V15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 0.:O 120 10MOO :00 8:00 12-0 18:00 1O0 800 12200 18-00 0:00 600 1200 18.00 0:0 0 

6000 

400D0* 

300 

0S/C*Ift 

0 

-1000 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/I5 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/18 4/18 4/18 4/16 4/17 

0:00 80D 12.00 18:00 0:00D 6:00 12.00 180)0 0:0 8.00 1200 1800 0:00 M0 12O0 180 0:00 

CE 925 of 1220

2 F-4-7`3 

7000 

VSE 6000 

:5 

2 

5m00 E 

4000~ 

3000 

2000 

1000 

*** #*** * 0* 4*****-- * ** '* & * 4k* #A 0 

4'13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/I5 4/15 4/1 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

000 600 1200 18:00 0 6-00 12.00 18:0 0:00 600 1200 18,00 0,00 6:00 12.00 1800 00.0 

180 

140 

1204 

I00 

*00 

40 

20 

4* 4* 4* * 4 4+ 4* 4* # 0 0 4 4* 4# 4* 4 4* 4* 4. 4 4 4* 4, 4* * 

0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4114 4/14 4/14 4t15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

M00 6-00 12:00 18:00 0:00 61)0 12.0 18:00 0:00 6& 12,00 MO0 0.00 6t00 *00 18:00 0:00 

3w0 

250 

* D/WE=J) w) 

300 

* SICff-ijab0 250 

•200 

6 

I3Soo 

50 50 

~A * AAhkot h* 04*10A A i* A #AAAtok *AAt%$AAAhh 

0#00t0 " # #*444 

00**0**060* 4440 # 0e#e44* 00#04 *4 0 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4114 4/ 14 4/14 4/15 4/ 15 4/ý15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/17 

0:00 &00 12,00 18,00 0:OD 6:00 12M0 ISO M0 600 1200 18:00 0:0 6&0 IM:0 1600 000 

150 

100o 

0 

6000 

4000 

* S/C*tk 

0 

lo 

-1000 

4/13 4/13 4/13 4/13 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/14 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/15 4/16 4/16 4/16 4/10 4/17 

000 6 12:00 8:00 0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00 6:00 12m00 18:00 :00 6e00 12:00 18:"0 0:00 

CE 926 of 1220

2F-1 N 'P,•Pi • J(TAFM)XJ' G) Q = 

;M,= + 4200[mm] 

0 ral [M;a mQ* x[oC] D/wV±Jt D/W"l S/Cf;t S/C* ,• S/Ca 

,M(ame)] 4 "0 ft / i'bBl [kPa(gage)] [ 0 C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [ 0 C] 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.05 5100 25.3 3 30.0 105 965 24 

2011/4/14 2:00 0.05 5100 25.3 3 30.0 105 966 24 

2011/4/14 4.0 0.05 5100 25.3 2 30.0 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 6H0 0.05 5100 25.3 2 30.0 104 967 24 

2011/4/14 8:00 0.05 51.00 25.3 2 29.9 104 967 24 

2011/4/14 10:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 967 24 

2011/4/14 12:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/1414:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 18:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 18:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 20:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.9 104 966 24 

2011/4/14 22:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.8 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 :00 0.05 5100 25.1 2 29.7 104 964 24 

2011/4/15 2:00 0.05 51.0 25.2 2 29.7 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 4:00 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.7 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 6:0 0.05 5100 25.2 2 29.7 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 800 0.05 5100 25.1 2 29.7 104 966 24 

2011/4/15 9:00 0.05 5100 25.1 2 29.7 104 966 24 

2011/4/15 1 0a 0.05 5100 25.1 2 29.6 104 964 24 

2011/4/15 12:00 0.05 5100 25.1 3 29.5 104 965 24 

2011/4115 14:00 0.05 5100 25.1 3 29.7 104 964 24 

.2011/4/15 1600 0.05 5100 25.1 3 29.6 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 18:00 0.05 5100 25.1 3 29,6 104 965 24 

2011/4/15 20:00 1 1 1 

2011/4/15 220H_ 

201/4/16 0:00 

CE 927 of 1220

2F-2§1 -X-9M,-TAFFh'*47 dl+4200[mm] 

ý F1 

t I f[ 0c]I D/WJ~i D/WIMM S/CJ±t SO q,1 

SiO2,1 

(gre [MPa [mm] 

(gage)] 

MMA 

4±0:, 

'Ml, ; [kPa(gage)] [ 0 C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [FC] 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.03 6150 24.8 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 2:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.0 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 4:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.0 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 6:00 0.03 6150 24.8 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/148:00 0.03 6150 24.8 3.9 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 10:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.0 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 12:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.1 31.4 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 14:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.2 31.3 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 16:00 0.04 6150 24.8 4.2 31.3 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 18:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.1 31.3 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 20:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/14 22:00 0.03 6150 24.8 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15000 0.03 6150 24.7 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 2:00 0.03 6150 24.7 4.0 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 4:00 0.04 6150 24.7 4.1 31.! 105 1200 24 

2011/4/156:00 0.03 6150 24.7 4.0 31.A 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 8:00 0.03 6150 24.7 4.1 31.1. 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 9:00 0.04 6150 24.7 4.1 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 10:00 0.04 6150 24.7 4.2 31.2 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 12:00 .04-1.04 6150 24.7 4.4 31.1 105 _ 1200 24 

2011/4/15 14:00 0.04 6100 24.7 4.6 30.8 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 1600 0.04 6100 24.6 4.6 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 18:00 0.04 6100 24.6 4.6 31.1 105 1200 24 

2011/4/15 20:001 1__ 

2011/4/15 22210 _ 

2011/4/160:001 1 1 

CE 928 of 1220

iý•' 

2F- I _______TAF)b+43 

dlKf4+42OO[mm_ 

fMia [mm * ft M [C] D/WEt; D/W MBI] S/CF)t SO/C ,$ /01i111 1 

[ M(MPa [mm] b I k , i [kPa(gage)] [ 0 C] [kPa(abs)] [mm] [ 0 C] 

(gage)] 7,9,t4 

2011/4/14-010 0.00 3600 33.2 10 34.7 111 2100 26 

2011/4/142:00 0.00 3599 33.1 10 34.8 11i 2100 26 

2011/4/144:00 0.00 3599 33.1 10 34.7 111 2100 26 

2011/4/146:00 0.00 3599 33.1 10 34.8 111 2100 26 

2011/4/148:00 0.00 3599 33.0 10 34.6 IIl 2100 26 

2011/4/1410:00 0.00 3599 32.9 10 34.6 ill 2100 26 

2011/4/14 12:00 0.00 3599 32.9 10 34.6 ill 2100 26 

2011/4/1414:00 0.00 3599 33.0 10 34.5,,,, 111 2100 26 

2011/4/1416:00 0.00 3599 33.0 10 34,6 ill 2100 26 

2011/4/14 18:00 0.00 3599 33.3 10 34.6 11i 2100 26 

2011/4/14 20:00 0.00 3599 33.3 10 34.6 ill 2100 26 

2011/4/14 22:00 0.00 3599 33.3 10 34.6 111 2100 26 

2011/4/15 H00 0.00 3599 33.2 10 34.7 111 2100 26 

2011/4/15 200 0.00 3600 33.1 10 34.5 111 2100 26 

2011/4/154:00 0.00 3600 33.0 10 34.5 11. .1121.00 26 

2011/4/15 6:00 0.00 3600 33.0 10 34.5 110 2100 26 

2011/4/158:00 0.00 3600 32.9 10 34.6 Ill 2100 26 

2011/4/159:00 0.00 3600 V2.9 10 34.5 I11. 21001 26 

2011/4/15 10:00 0.00 3600 32.9 10 34.5 111 2100 26 

2011/4/15 12:00 0.00 3600 32.8 10 34.4 110 2100 26 

2011/4/15 14:00 0.00 3600 32.9 11 34.5 110 2100 26 

2011/4/15 16:00 0.00 3600 33.0 11 34.5 110 2100 26 

2011/4/15 18:00 0.00 3600 33.6 11 34.5 110 2100 26 

2011/4/15 20:00. 

20111/4/15 22:001 

2011/4/160.01 

CE 929 of 1220

2F-4§ X 

0~~ ~ re Ip [MIfi-1[°c] D/WE±)t DWiift S'C) c±ts/cMK 

Mae 

- TA F)h'*'0)4q Om=ft _+4200[ram] 

s/c,"I 

) ?m],••, -I''I, •A) 

[kPa(gage)] [°C] [kPa(abs)] (mm] [°C] 

2011/4/14 0:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 200 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 4:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.7 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 6:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.6 108 2100 30 

2011/4/14 8:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.6 108 2100 30 

2011/4/14 10:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.6 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 12:00 0.07 4589 29,1 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 14:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 1600 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.2 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 18:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 33.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14 20:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/14_22:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.4 108 2100 30 

2011/4/15 0:00 0.07 4589 29.2 8 34.4 109 2100 30 

2011/4/152H00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.1 108 2100 30 

2011/4/154:00 0.07 4589 29,1 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/156:00 0.07 4589 29.0 8 34.1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/1580 0.07 4589 29.1 8 33.8 109 2100 30 

2011/4/15 900 0,07 4589 29.1 8 33.7 109 2100 30 

2011/4/15 10:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 33.9 109 2100 30 

2011/4/15 1200 0.07 4589 29.0 8 34.3 109 2100 30 

2011/4/15 14:00 0.07 459 29.0 8 34.1 1 109 2100 30 

2011/4/15 16:0 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.0 109 2100 30 

2011/4/15 18:00 0.07 4589 29.1 8 34.0 109 2100 30 

2011/4/15 20:00_ 

2011/4/15 22.00 

2011/4/160:001 

CE 930 of 1220

Vias, Steven 

From: Karen Bracketi (b)(6) 

Sent: 

Saturday, April-T6, 2011 12:48 PM 

To: 

Vias, Steven 

Subject: 

Massive Storm Warning 

Last night, we may have just dodged a bullet here in East Tennessee and consequently for the entire nation 

... and with global warming there's no guarantee how long this will last. People assume the buildings 

are six feet thick with two feet of lead insulation... Let me put it this way... I live in a home built 

in 1836... and it is far far safer to weather last night's storm in. 

The reason thickness stopped being used is because it was proven that it does not stop gamma. 

It only stops alpha and beta... which plastic will stop even. We need to move all nuclear facilities 

underground... 600 feet or more and perhaps old mines would help. Basically, what this will do 

is shield gamma but even more importantly it will move the sites below the water table for the most 

part in most areas. One of the best designs I can think of engineering would also have a man made lake 

on top. Also, we need to stop building these along the coast or within two hundreds of any town. Besides 

a man made lake... sand dunes even might be looked at as new potential sites. 

I have a uncle who owns a company in Florida and all he does all day long is review housing blueprints 

to make certain they meet Florida State hurricane specs.... Tennessee does not have these specs for 

hurricanes of course.. but we also don't have them for tornadoes either. 

The oldest building on site from the fifties... is so contaminated the paint has been left to chip off the walls 

on the interior because there is real concern to disturb it. This building is still being used also. It has massive 

windows. If a tornado went through there this building along with the tent building... and several warehouses would be 

gone in seconds... and I seriously doubt the other buildings would keep their roofs on. In addition, if you had 

large flying debris such as any of the trucks on site... walls would easily knocked down. Plus, the gas tanks 

have no protection at all. Not to mention this storm was so massive and is still going towards the Capitol today. 

If it had swung north into East Tennessee... a large portion of the East Coast would be more contaminated than 

Fukushima. I have toured all of the buildings on site... and there is not one in my opinion that will withstand what 

is coming in terms of the global warming effect over the next decade... We need to move these underground... 

and really we need to move as much of our national power grid off of these towers and either underground or into 

some new form of ground level pipeline system... like oil.. only built to sustain trees falling on them and large objects 

like trucks hitting them. Winter temperatures in time will become worse and worse. I am so scared to tell people what I 

suspect of the global warning full impact... but the truth is our species may not survive it... unless we get smart and 

make the most of the next ten years. I am one of the greatest environmentalists there is... and yet I know nuclear 

energy is our only hope. Can you imagine a tornado riping the turbines off a field of wind mills? I know they are or should 

be 

built to sustain certain winds capacity... but our winds will get worse... and a large knock from debris will take it's toll as 

well 

on a wind mill. Plus, in the end they may actually end up adding to the wind. Solar panels on roof tops are too vulnerable 

as 

well. Plus, they reflect too much in current designs. 

Do you know what it is like trying to go to sleep at night... knowing a storm the size of the one last night... 

might swing north and pass over Erwin? Plus... imagine if it had hit Knoxville... there's a field there where out in the open 

five thousand tanks the size of large freezers... sit filled with hexaflouride. Mix that into the wind of the storm 

last night... and the west coast would have been left to just sit and wonder what happened to us all... because we 

would not have lived through the night to warn them. 

I am afraid this is not the year to balance any budget... It's not even a year to worry about who wins an election. What we 

do or don't do this year... will determine the fate of this nation. We need a Presidential mandate to move the hexaflouride 

tanks into Yucca Mountain... and we need new reactors and fuel facilities that are buried deep. 


22 

CE 931 of 1220

I need a vacation! Who would have imagined making some homemade soap to help my Dad's hands heal... would lead 

to 

having to know all of this! Honestly, I don't know how you do your job everyday. I pray for your strength and safety. 

Sorry for venting.., but jeepers... I don't want to watch the news anymore. I know what my Uncle Orville meant when I 

asked him about how the Haiti orphanage was going... He said he was afraid to go and afraid not to go. I can really relate 

to that. 

23 

CE 932 of 1220

Vias, Steven 

L 

From: Karen Brackettf (b)(6) 

Sent: 

Saturday, April "16, 2011 4:11 PM 

To: 

Vias, Steven 

Subject: 

Tinkerbell Magic 

Here's a thought... move the river and the highway along with a portion of CSX railroad to the back side of a small 

mountain near the plant. Then build a tunnel around the portion of the interstate that is left... along with a massive but 

empty water storage pool for slurry leaching. This portion of the interstate would then be only for NFS use. Build a 

mountain over NFS and 

hide it completely with trees and wildlife. 

I have to give Disney really the credit for this design. Having completed a college cooperative program there, it is 

interesting to 

realize when you are in the park in Florida that you are actually walking around on the second floor of a building and 

below you is a massive tunnel system. 

Not only will this protect the plant from tornadoes but it would also protect the plant from jet crashes and be good 

camouflage as well. In addition, George Pacific owns about twenty thousand acres of timber in the area... might be good 

for the nation to invest in purchasing this land for future development. That would be a safe location for reprocessing the 

gas tanks stored in Knoxville. Right now if I remember right.., they only have a fifteen hundred acre perimeter., which 

worked fine when they had one rupture a few years ago from corrosion... but is too close if something massive like a 

storm challenged the integrity of the open field. 

Logistic wise... the site the plant is on is still perferable due to weather patterns... So, it's just better to protect it than to 

build a new one some where else. Plus, I am certain the current employees would appreciate the enclosed garage... 

however, you might have to build a fake business on top so they could still have fresh air during lunch and breaks. Do a 

lot of news about a giant decommissioning project and it should fairly well protect it then from terrorist threat. 


24 

CE 933 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Virgilio, Martin 

Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:12 PM 

Leeds, Eric 

Boger, Bruce; Nelson, Robert; Oesterle, Eric; Weber, Michael; Muessle, Mary; Landau, Mindy; 

Andersen, James; Markley, Michael 

NRR's Q&A data base 

Eric 

My thanks to NRR for the sharepoint site with the Q&A data base. I would not have survived the 

Congressional hearing had it not been for my review of that information. I believe it should be required reading 

for anyone who is going to be participating in a public interaction on the events in Japan. 

That said, could you please have the staff review and consider expanding the Q&As in the following areas: 

(b)(5) 

CE 934 of 1220


From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Mitman, Jeffrey 

Sunday, April 17, 2011 4:29 AM 

Liaison Japan 

Website for tracking radiation levels and earthquake frequency 

The below link may be of interest. 

Jeff 

http://fleep.com/earthquake/ 

CE 935 of 1220

Graphing Earthquake, Radiation and Water Data in Japan Pagye I of 27 

Graphing Earthquake, Radiation and Water Data in 

Japan 

About 

Graphing Earthquake, Radiation and Water Data in Japan is made from various data sources which are quoted below 

and underneath each image. I made these as quite a few people are getting confused with all the numbers floating 

around and to show in an easily viewable format the levels that are being stated. 

Last Update 

2011.04.19 08:30 JST 

Radiation Levels for Fukushima Area Graphs. 

Information 

The Radiation Graphs are made from data from monitoring posts setup by the Prefectural Offices, TEPCO and 

NISA. I am focusing on these as they are only in Japanese and provide a different view on the MEXT Radiation Data 

that everyone else is graphing. Please note that the graphs do have different scales depending on the data. All 

Radiation readings are converted to paSv/h for consistency. 

Thanks & Notice 

Thank you to all the people on Twitter who have also been providing valuable and accurate information about the 

events since the Earthquake, Friday 11 th March 2011. 

To everyone who is following the Earthquake, Radiation and Water Graphs, please note that I will usually no longer 

updating these files after 2011.04.09 00:00 JST. I want to thank everyone for the support and to the people who have 

viewed the graph page in the past 4 weeks more than 100,000+ times. I hope this has helped everyone to make sense 

of all the numbers floating around easier to understand. It's now up to the Government / Prefectural Offices to make 

these graphs to help people understand more clearly. 

Many thanks to @gakuraniman @lrick @Mutantfroginc @tokyoreporter @martyn williams and @daniel earcia r 

for all their excellent updates, coverage, help with the graphs and understanding of radiation levels. Also thanks to 

all the other graphers and visualizers who made the graphs from the MEXT and SPEEDI data sets. 

CSV Files and original Apple Numbers files I have been working with have been uploaded for anyone to use. 

Phillip Mills 

http://fleep.com 

http://twitter.com/#!/fleepcom 

http://fleep.com/earthquake/ CE 936 of 1220 05/20/2011

Graphing Earthquake, Radiation and Water Data in Japan Page 2 of 27 

lEarthqIIakes 

:BO -O'J*=M$E - Earthqnuakos in Japan 2011.O3.11 1j 

7.0 .. 

*" . 4', • .. 

604 'ý 4' 4 4' ' 

4' 4', 

4' 4414$ 

4' 4' wLI] 

' 4 

S.0 I 4' 4'14' 4;. 4 

0 4' 

U 7_"w"4. . 4. 

-W.. 

. . 

,,,o 

= . o . 

4W 

4.0 *00, "1... '2, , 

. ........... ,. 4. .4 '',. 

E :h * *k s*1.11 :1 

* 

- 4', 

44*4' , 0k -' 

f't k 4' 4w 4'0 

*~~1. 41W *1 

~_ 

4 ' 

4. 

4 ', 

.... 

4,4' 

t' 4' 4'4 

4'ý 

' w 0 *,4. 4' o 40 

%14.01 4 ' 40' 

0 

Eurth'quako / Aftorahcak caimtn smrace 20,11 A36.1 I 14z46 1185 

Onto takawk ftom #tpfinLpntqsk 

http://fleep.com/earthquake/ 05/20/2011

http://fleep.conVearthquake/ CE 938 of 1220 05/20/2011 

http://fleep.com/earthquake/ CE 938 of 1220 05/20/2011 


ISO 

JthXO) k r - 2 +j - Number of Earthquakes by Location [Magnitude 2+1 2011.03.11 14 

100 

V, 

so 

"*Iii"' 

IiiiitiIn, 

Data taken fro http:/ltenLjp/earthqmoke

Graphing Earthquake, Radiation and Water Data in Japan 

'Radiation Levels for Tokyo, Chiba, Saitama, Ibaraki 

Page 4 of 27 

]IR•lOOMIRINIAR - Tokyo Radiation Levels 

2011.03.15 00 

0.60 PSV/h 

0.46 pS%^ 

0.36 PiSW% 

0.w giSwh 

(LI psv/h 

0.06 gaS^l 

0.00 PSwih 

u~a~±~w~ 

*- r g~g~~j -Tokyo Metropoilltan lmatl~te of P~bfc Health [Sh~f*Uk 

Previous Averaep Upper MWd Lower Raclation Levl 

Dafta frm httpJ/vwvWaky-o-ken~go~phmantobig/hdx~hMxtr 

Converw ed from zyl to Psvih 


CE 939 of 1220 05/20/2011


+ XMM•)kNll - Chiba Prefecture Radiation Levels 

Page 5 of 27 

2011.03.14 OC 

0.50 pISV/h 

0.46 PSV/h 

0.40 p8v/h 

0.35 jSv/h 

0.30 paSv/h 

O.m0 plsol 

0.06 a•Svh 

0.00 pelw^ 

oam ps/h 

I 

I 

..... - Chiba Prefeee Envinmental Research Centre 

--- Previous Average Upper arnd Lower Radiation Level 

Data Ilrom htpl/www~pef~cI*JgA&UbNtsM lwhoahse/Ids-eoku*Ut.Ufr 

http://fleep.conVearthquake/ CE 940 of 1220 05/20/2011


WOil 

SEIRIO) l 

- Saitama Prefecture Radiation Levels 

2011.03.15 01: 

1.S0 jjSV/h 

1.20 pJsvi 

0.00 IAv4'h 

OJSO iawvh 

0.30 Ihswi 

0.00 M8Sib 

Pevmm Avers Upper en Lowe Raftmtlon LevW 

Data fom httph/ww"Aarfaatama&gjp/pegiouaemyuMI 



5AIMOVER 

- Ibaraki Prefecture Radiation Levels 

2011.03.14 20 

15.0 IlSw/b 

IOM0 jISv/h 

5".00 wvh 

9 N a 9 9 9 

------------------ 

- Z,00 - Kfta Ibanaid - MF - TakahagI 

;k-717 - Daigo Mac 

.. ... Previous Average Radiation Leel (Daigo Machi) 

Data from httpI//wwwvpre.i•barald4p/1mportanW) 1031 leqI 


CE 942 of 1220 0'/20/2011 

http://fleep.comlearthquake/ CE 942 of 1220 05/20/2011


Radiation Levels for Tochigi, Gunma, Yamagata, Miyagi, Iwate 

Page 8 of 27 

*IMOD ImM - Tochigi Prefecture Radiation Levels 2011.03.15 00 

2m0 PSv/h 

IM0 paSIh 

IM0 

gaSw/h 

GM PS1W/h 

"ý ý f, 

OM0 119w/h 

-IW- Uusnmmtya - 153$ - Nwu 81 B,-Nkko - 

-XO$- I 

- 11110 - Oyame - USqJ!N - Nakagawa Machi MM -Samo 

Data from htWlvww~wepr.tochig1J.p/ldrkyu/houdoenumnItm 



I515(DMEIlI 

- Gunma Prefecture Radiation Levels 

2011.03.15 00 

i.00 pSv/h 

0.80 jSvfh 

0.60 P9V,/h 

&40 1z9wh 

0.2D &lSw/h 

0.00 pi~wh 

004M$t3*IJ - Masbastil Kamoki1 Mach 

.-...Previous Aveage Radmlice Level 

Data trai http:Avww.pref~pxwuna.IpA)S/s.O020.htmi 



WElM019411i 1 - Yamagata Prefecture Radiation Levels 

2011.03.15 00 

1.O PaSVih 

am8 

lJSv/h 

0.44 pvS•h 

0.20 P9&h 

LOOW P9v/b 

.M6 .......... -- -%~ - 

j N"NO6.0-i NNOMMOOMMOMM 

------------------------------------------------- ------------------ . . ........ 

* * t- *.o 

- UWm - Yamagato - "fV - Yonezwa 

I.-.---- 

Data from hftV/%vww 

Previom 15 Year Average Upper and Lower Radiation Level 

pfyanMafta~p/ou/IAiko*kuuhi/O9OOOM/kuutdc 

xW 

xmantosyaep&f 



SAMCZ)Bj"*SE - Miyagi Prefecture Radiation Levels 

2011.03.14 17: 

2.00 PSV/h 

is 1.s ibv 

1.00 IZSVjt 

M.o IVsw'j 

0.00 pgwb 

0 0 Ci i i 

- - Yamamoto Town Hall -- J;HSW - Tohoku Ectric Power S 

Prevoms Average Upper and Lower Radiation Level (Heakh Envbirnen Center) 

Data from htp-Jwwwpef*lyag•/gmat wePsul420315htm 

Pleas note that data Is only ewed four times a day for dhese armes and data has been tame shifted to whol 


CE 946 of 1220 05/20/2011


The following graph for Iwate is no longer being updated. 

Page 12 of 27 

I - Iwate Pretecture Radiation Levels 2011.03.13 12 

1.00 pSv/h 

0.80 ;i Sv,"h 

GMpSv/h 

0.60 pSv/h 

0.2D p~/ 

0.00 Pi5wv/ 

a8 g 8 

44i Ai INi Ai INi 

S*OKV*6HRtv U- Iwft. imfctmr Envlmnmnta Heali RAsenrch Centre 

-Previous Averinge Radiation Level 

Date from httpd/wupmfJwat.jp/-hpOWSOli/hoaufmI 

Coneited **m nGyih to isvih 

http://fleep.coffi/earthquake/ CE 947 of 1220 05/20/2011


Radiation Levels for Fukushima Area 

Page 13 of 27 

alkMoN]RMl - Fukushima Prefecture Radiation Levels 2011.03.15 00 

50.00 VSv/h 

40.00 pSth 

30.00 IaS&d 

20.00 p1Svf 

10.00 PSv~h 

0" 00V/ 

* 0 ~. 

-- W4S5$REIJ 

WU*fl - Mlnaml Souma HaramaChl Ku 

•- • - Iukl Mura Town Hall 

-- : , , - Ia~~ Chuo Dal inem! Prinary School 

-- , l- Tamura City FunabOd Community Center 

X- fl#J - Katsursomura Town Hall 

- IJMfU40111 - Fukushkma Airport 

- ~b?Wl3*M - Iwald Kawaemae B 

- JIIFlfl - Kawauchi Town Hall 

Defta hornm htlux//ww4)Irft*UlwahLmJp/ 

Pteaso note that some data Is hm bee tirm shiftd to wholo hours (Emamnple 16.05 Is now 16:00). 



E53RC)NVI 

- Fukushima Prefecture Radiation Levels 

2011.03.11 18 

30.00 JSv/h 

26.00 P$vth 

20.00 liSv/h 

1&00 psvdh 

ICAOO 

SAO isV/ 

am Pew . t. 

- UR~t~E~IUURUU -Fulushima Health Offiee 

wL~tft**x~l- Kaftyame Town Hall Enst 

- *tf - Aizuwakratsut Town Hall 

MWIMITf - Mwnmv Soumva Town Hall 

Date tron httpd/www~xW.fUkUslmaJPr/i 

- 5W4P'Mrr* - Kotudym 

U~b ýAAMrr*- 

iWald To 



10.00 pSv/b 

•i5t~lOl~ 

E - Fukushima Prefecture Area Radiation Levels 

21 

8.00 PSv/h 

9.00 P9v/h 

4.00 pzSvh 

2.00 )j9vh 

OA0 OPiWh 

2 L I T 1 1 1 1 F1 F11 1211 

- r r- r r- r --- - - - - - -- 

- -•- r- 

- - North FukuAhlima -- ftqf - Ceral FswshhMa MAWI••" - South Fukshkma - 

- I** -SoumtAlzu Aea - MMUWý - SosoArea - VLb'Si-takIlCfty 

Data frm hWANWWPV(Arjp/y 

Pleme note that dam is averged ftm several ases for each loation and meewd only once or twice. 

7 ] fL7 fIl 7 7L 

Fukushima North 

Fukushima Central 

Fukushima South 

fukushima area northOl.onn fukushima area centralO1.ona 

fukushima area north02,png fulushima area central02,png ruKusnima area soutuol.png 

nE-l] 

Aizu Area 

Sou]hL & tiz ArtE 

South Aizu & Soso Area 

Iwaki City 

fukushima area aizuO1. lni fuktishima, area southaiziisoso~nng ft'kiishima area iwaki nrn 

fukushima area-aizuO2.png 


CE 950 of 1220 05/20/2011


Radiation Levels for Fukushima Dai Ichi & Dai Ni Nuclear Plant 

Page 16 of 27 

xAXMTJ 

l• bft M r-jjr Mj - Fukushima Dal Ichi Nuclear Plant [Portable] 2011.03.24 09: 

4000.0 pjv/, 

3200.0 pSv/h 

2400.0 MSv/h 

1600.0 pgw1/ 

MU0.o p~w/h 

0.0 pjwih 

8 

..- L 

Y,' 

r - - Y- - - -. - 

- lU*Mfl - Main Buling - MM ~-main gmt 

Det from htp/www.topco-oo4ptmanumotorbig/bkdex-j and httP//wwwsnlAmLgojpI 102llllnfc 

pleom noe that some cdat is OCAd from a POF flMe. There Is no asawwn tW the numbem we 100% accmue Daft bofto 

http://fleep.con/earthquake/ CE 951 of 1220 05/20/2011


500.0 pSvlh 

-- - Fukushima Dal Ichi Nuclear Plant 

2011.04. 

400.0 t)Svth 

3=00 p~v/h •.... .... ... 

100. PSWVi 

I 

m", m0"m 

U. Iisv/ 

B ~BB8 r 

-Monitorlm Post I 

-monitoftn Post 5 

- Mbonftft Post 2 

- Monkit Post 6 

Monit Post 3 

Monitoring Post 7 

- Monito"n 

Data from httpdiAww 

epcoco~jp/nuhtnu. ,Irku L.b .'-J.htm I 

http://fleep.con/earthquake/ 

CE 952 of 1220 05/20/2011


100.0 pSv/h 

- Fukushima Dai Ni Nuclear Plant 

2011.03.18 00: 

80.0 PSv/h 

60.0 pwy/h 

200ok•d 

ýýI 

I 

I 

40.0 p~y/h 

I 

R 9 9 R Rm R Rm R Ra m Re n N 8 

n 

- MWoioi Post 1 - Monltoring Post 2 Mondtoring Post 3 - Monltoring Post 4 - Monltolng Post er 

Dat from htW•/wwwfneMlbo2w=0110311 hfoJdml 

Please note that this data is OCR'd tom a PDF file. Them Is no asswmce Iha the numbes am 100% accurate. Data befoe 2 



The following graphs for Fukushima Dai Ichi & Dai Ni Nuclear Plant no longer being 

updated. 

2,000 pSv/h 

r ?iMj - Fukushima Dal Ichi Nuclear Plant West Gate 2011.0&15 11 

2,SO0 pzS'vh 

2A00 1ASv 

1.S0 PSv^h 

1 MA' EFl-h 

SI00sw 

0 pfwtIMl 

Det. ftro: http/www.Uxco.co.jp/ 

Please note that all data is not available for the West Gote. 



SM -S-TJfX-• fi r I-•EMj - Fukushima Dal Ichi Nuclear Plant Main Gate 

Page 20 of 27 

2011.03.14 00. 

12,000 pS9,./h 

10.000 IJSv/h 

SAW0 gj&v/I 

aim0 IISvIb 

I 

4,00 IISvIh 

2.000 IBw~h 

L 

I 

0 V Sv/h 

I 

Defta trm http/i•w1 w5 -Apcomcjp/ 

Pgmw ntow data Is m"Iasg betw~an fnrom 2011.03.16 15:50 - 2M1.03.2i 16:00 for the Main Gato 



-I r $$Mz tj - Fukushima Dai Ichi Nuclear Plant North Building 2011.03.17 00: 

6.000 pSv/h 

5.000 xSv/h 

II 

4COO P9I%9~ 

I 

9000 Pa5Ih 

2A00 

PSv/h 

1,00 p~vih 

Op~v ~ z z.~-,l l 3 1 S E E S 

Daft from: Wtt//wwwtepeo.co.jpl 

http://fleep.con/earthquake/ 

CE 956 of 1220 05/20/2011


.Iodine 131 Levels for Water Purifying Plants 

Page 22 of 27 

a IS 1 3 1 tIN * - Iodine 131 Tokyo Water Purifying Plants 2( 

300 Bq/Kg 9 - a a a - a a a a - a a - - w m - a a m a 

a a a a a a a a m a 

a 

300 Bq~g Govr 

2W 

Sq/K, 

i SO Bmq/tKo 

i0o BqvK 

Go•vrm 

SO Bq/Kg 

i 

0 Sq/K9 

U *7Kanamachi U 3Asaka 

Deta from http:/Iwww.waterworksjrabv.tokyo4p/pressih22/indox.htmi 

Om 

http-//fleep.coni/earthquake/ CE 957 of 1220 05/20/2011


a1IS 1 3 1 +M -**l - Iodine 131 Chiba Prefecture Water Purifying Plants 21 

250 BqJK9 

200 Bq/Ko 

I 

ISO Dqd'K 

IN 

I 

* -~i atae 

- 

.ina * * * * 

100 Bq/Kg ;iovemnn 

so OBQI 

0 Bq(X9 

I 

q 

UI 

IU 

q 

- r 

R rq 

q 

q 

i 

SO OK- Chba Noglkuno Village 111.1. - Kuftyamna *1 VW (U*MM - Kash 

OB# MENU - KashiWa West Bank Ult - Hokusu ULi-Fukumasu 

Data from http://www~pwV.chNb.Jgjeiosou ih5oAo/j tIl 



a J 1 3 1 JWiENO, - Iodine 131 Saitama Prefecture Water Purifying Plants 21 

3W00 Sq•=Kg w - - m - " m - w m - m a m m- mm 

a - - - - 

300 Bq#K9 Govemi 

250 BqVKg 

200 Sq/Kg 

150 "q/Kg 

100 a 

Bq/a 

100 Bqft Goern 

10 IQ 10 

Ci C 

U ~Okubo E ]- t Souwa 01 MR- Gyoda U mi H3- Shkmjsato U 

Data from http~J~wwwwfpu~atamajgjplpoge~housyamoi-.okwckca~htmI 

http://fleep.conmearthquake/ 

CE 959 of 1220 05/20/2011


- 10 1 31 Mm*W * - Iodine 131 Tochigi Prefecture Water Purifying Fants 2, 

300 SqKg m - - - m - - -m m m - mm - m 

a - 

30M Sq/g dovemr 

250 Bq/WK 

200 Bq/Kg 

so BqWKg 

lfv ---- ss s s s ss sr aa -- a 

o 

SOql(' 

0O~qtg 

U ~S~ 

-Matsudeshinden 

vawt TTomf Imp1wvvwWxepro~tcfla"J4jpfzflvu~nOumsefrnmni 

http://fleep.corm/earthquake/ CE 960 of 1220 05/20/2011


3 '~m 1 3 1 *iAIYP*f& - Iodine 131 Fukushima Prefecture Water Purfication Plant 

Page 26 of 27 

2 

1,000 Sq/Kg 

800 Sq/Kg 

6oo Sq/Kg 

* a a 

300 Bq/K9 GaOven 

ininmmmi 28 - 

4 

* 

a -~ U in U 

Hqr 

a 

I 

101K- Unohara U XT -Takishita 

m 

100 BQtKg Gowtnr 

I u 

W Hanazuka 

Data from hUp://www.preftukushknajp/1fldex.htm 

Data Sources 

Radiation 

Location Sour ce Data 

Tokyo http;• /I 113.35.73,180/monitoring/index.htmI 

Chiba http:, t/www.prefchiba.lg.ip/taiki/h23touhoku/houshasen/indextei.htmld 

Prefecture soku 

Saitama 

Prefecture 

'/www.pref.saitama.lg. ip_/page/housyasenryou.html 

http: 4 

Ibaraki 

//www.pref.ibaraki~jp~iniprtant/201 1031 leýL/ 

Prefecture http:• 

CSV Apple Numbers 

tokyo.csv tokyo.numbers 

chiba.csv chiba.numbers 

saitama.csv saitama.numbers 

ibaraki.csv ibaraki.numbers 

Location Source 13~ata 

CSV 

Apple Numbers 



TTochigi http://www.pref.tochi-i.1g.ip/kitkyu/houshasen.htnil tochi, i.csv tochiinunbers 

Prefecture / o 

Gunma http://www.pref.ttinma.ip/05/eO9OOO20.html -Unnma.csv gUnmra.nunibers 

Prefecture pp_____ _______ 

Yamagata ehttp://www.pref.yamagata.jp/otlkenkofukushli/090OI/houshasen.htIl 

Prefecture vamnagata.csv . .. vamanata.numnbers 

. 

1w 

Prefecture 

ate 

http://www.pref.iwate.ip/-~pO31501 /hou.html iwate.csv iwate.numbers 

Miyagi c http://www.pref.mnivagi.p 

Prefecture. . 

iventai/Press/PressH2303 

... 

15.html mivaIzi.csv miyaoi.numbers 

Location Source Data CSV Apple Numbers 

fukushima0 i.csv fukuishima0 I .numbers 

Fukushima Prefecture http://www.pref.fukushima.jp/j/ fukushima02.csv fukushima02.numbers 

fukushimaO03.csv fukushimaO3.numbers 

Fukushima Nuclear Plant 


Fukushimna Dai Ichi http://www.tepco.co.ip/nuih/onitorini/index- daiichi ha'd.csv daiichi hand.numbers 

[Tepco] jhtnml daiichi -post.numbers 

FukushiS a Dai Ni htip://www.nisa.meti.go.ip/20110311 info.html daini post.csv daini post.nunbers 

[NISA] 

Earthquakes 


Tenki JP http://tenki.iplearthtuake earthquakes.csv earthquakes. numbers 

These graphs are free to be used anywhere you like. 

Please Note: The data may belong to the respective Companies, Prefectural Offices, NISA or TEPCO. I cannot 

vouch for the accuracy of the data. 

http://fleep.con/earthquake/ CE 962 of 1220 05/20/2011

ML13227A320

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?