24.12.2014 Views

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

Earthquake Engineering Research - HKU Libraries - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

(ICANCEER)<br />

In honor of the late Professor Liu Huixian<br />

August 15-20, 2002 Harbin and Hong Kong, China<br />

Hong Kong Volume<br />

Edited by<br />

J.M. Ko<br />

Y.L. Xu<br />

Organised by<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, Hong Kong<br />

Sponsored by<br />

Asian-Pacific Network of Centres for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (ANCER)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Institution of Engineers<br />

<strong>The</strong> Environment, Transport and Works Bureau, <strong>The</strong> Government of the HKSAR


Copyright © 2003 by the Organizing Committee of<br />

the International Conference at <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>.<br />

All statements made or opinions expressed in the<br />

Proceedings are those of the Authors. <strong>The</strong><br />

Organizing Committee will not be responsible for<br />

the statements made or for the opinions expressed in<br />

the Proceedings.<br />

All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication<br />

may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or<br />

transmitted in any form or by means, electronic,<br />

mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without the<br />

prior permission of Copyright owner.<br />

Printed by e8print.com Solutions Limited<br />

ISBN: 962-367-373-6


vw:.<br />

PREFACE<br />

Dunng a time when earthquake engineering research is in a rapid process of transformation<br />

where innovative engineering methods and new emerging technologies toward hazard<br />

reduction and improved public safety are being increasingly emphasized, a unique<br />

professional consortium called Asian-Pacific Network of Centres for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> (ANGER) has been established and sponsored a major International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (ICANCEER) in August<br />

15-20, 2002. <strong>The</strong> Conference consisted of two consecutive back-to-back meetings in Harbin<br />

and Hong Kong. <strong>The</strong> Harbin meeting was hosted by the Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics of<br />

China Seismological Bureau in August 15-17, 2002, where the program focus was on new<br />

phenomena of earthquake engineering and innovative solution approaches. Volumes 1 and 2<br />

(Harbin volume) of proceedings were a collection of the Harbin meeting papers. <strong>The</strong> Hong<br />

Kong meeting was hosted by <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> in August 19-20, 2002,<br />

in which problems of moderate seismicity and intelligent infrastructure engineering were the<br />

meeting emphases. <strong>The</strong> papers presented in the Hong Kong meeting and the panel discussion<br />

reports on two special topics were published in this volume (Hong Kong volume) of<br />

proceedings.<br />

Based on the historical records, Hong Kong is one of the typhoon regions in the world. On<br />

the other hand, Hong Kong is relatively far away from the active tectonic plate boundary and<br />

has not experienced large magnitude earthquake yet. Buildings in Hong Kong are therefore<br />

designed for strong winds but no provision for seismic resistance. However, Hong Kong is<br />

classified as an area of earthquake intensity 7 (0.15g GPA at bedrock for a return period of<br />

475 years) by China Seismological Bureau, which is of the same intensity of Shenzhen where<br />

buildings are required to design for earthquake. This of course alerts the people in Hong<br />

Kong in particular after the Kobe <strong>Earthquake</strong> in 1994 which, to a certain extent, is beyond the<br />

expectation of many earthquake-engineering experts.<br />

Since 1995, the Hong Kong Government has been taking a leading role to address this<br />

sensitive issue. In 1995, the Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong> Office of the Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Department commissioned a project to the <strong>University</strong> of Hong Kong and the Guangdong<br />

Seismological Bureau to undertake the Seismic Hazard Analysis of the Hong Kong Region.<br />

<strong>The</strong> need for seismic considerations in our building design regulations has been raised in the<br />

Legislative Council in November 1995. In response to this, the Buildings Department<br />

reckoned the need to set up a 'Working Group' to study the seismic effects on buildings in<br />

Hong Kong with the aim of identifying more specifically the need and scope of a code of<br />

practice on the subject. Recently, the Buildings Department committed a consultancy to<br />

study the Seismic Effects on Buildings in Hong Kong.<br />

Academic staff members of the universities of Hong Kong have been actively involved in<br />

earthquake engineering research in the past several years. Though there are great<br />

achievements in recent years, earthquake engineering research is relatively new in Hong Kong.<br />

More exchanges and collaboration need to be established with those regions and countries<br />

which have a much longer research history in earthquake engineering to ensure ourselves<br />

researching in the forefront.


IV<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> is very pleased to have the opportunity to organize<br />

this International Conference together with the Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics of China<br />

Seismological Bureau, which provides a forum for academics and professionals of Hong<br />

Kong to share experience and exchange views with participants from other parts of the world.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hong Kong volume of proceedings contains 2 panel reports, 6 keynote papers, and 64<br />

contributed papers covering a wide spectrum of topics: engineering seismology and<br />

geotechnical engineering, seismic risk and disaster management, smart materials and smart<br />

structures, structural analysis and design, structural control, system identification, and health<br />

monitoring and damage detection. <strong>The</strong> contributions reflect the current state-of-the-art and<br />

point to future directions of earthquake engineering research.<br />

<strong>The</strong> organization of a conference of this magnitude would not have been possible without the<br />

support and contributions of many individuals and organizations. We sincerely appreciate the<br />

support from <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Institute of Engineers and <strong>The</strong> Environment, Transport and<br />

Work Bureau of <strong>The</strong> Government of the HKSAR. We would like to thank the members of the<br />

International Advisory Committee, the International Scientific Committee, and the<br />

Conference Organising Committee. We also wish to express our gratitude to all the<br />

contributors for their careful preparation of the manuscripts. Thanks are also due to those who<br />

devoted time and effort to the organization of the Conference and publication of the<br />

Proceedings, including the secretarial staff and research students of the <strong>University</strong>.<br />

J.M. Ko<br />

Y.L. Xu


OPENING ADDRESS<br />

By Prof. Yuchen Liu<br />

Deputy Director of China Seismological Bureau<br />

Distinguished guests, friends, ladies and gentlemen,<br />

Good morning.<br />

Today we are here to continue the Hong Kong part of the conference after the Harbin part of<br />

the International Conference on Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong>, which was just successfully closed the day before yesterday. On behalf of China<br />

Seismological Bureau and in ray personal capacity, I express my sincere congratulations to<br />

the Hong Kong part of the Conference and warmly welcome all of you.<br />

As we know, earthquake disaster is one of the most serious natural disasters threatening the<br />

mankind, and the effort has been tried hard unswervingly to reduce the earthquake disaster. It<br />

is confirmed that the earthquake disaster could be effectively reduced by active participating<br />

and appropriate prevention measures in the disaster reduction.<br />

Mr. Kofe Annan, the United Nations Secretary-General, emphasized in his speech on the<br />

occasion of the closing of IDNDR in 1999, that "Prevention is not only more humane than<br />

cure; it is also much cheaper. Disaster reduction and disaster relief are complimentary, and yet<br />

quite different. Each is vital. Neither should be subsumed by the other."<br />

It is no doubt that the advancement of earthquake engineering science is playing a very<br />

important role in earthquake disaster prevention and reduction. China Seismological Bureau<br />

has been devoting itself to the efforts, paying much attention to the communities and<br />

cooperation in this field in the world, we are committed to the promotion of the science of<br />

earthquake engineering cooperation with the international scientific communities, with all of<br />

you.<br />

<strong>The</strong> conference will also contribute to the advancement of earthquake engineering science and<br />

disasters prevention and reduction in Hong Kong region, China and Asia-Pacific Region. I<br />

believe, all the participants will hold full discussion and encourage smooth flow of ideas, and<br />

offer the best for the advancement of earthquake engineering science and the mutual benefit<br />

of the human being.<br />

Finally I wish the conference a great success, and I sincerely thank my friends of the Hong<br />

Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> for their hard work that ensures successful opening.<br />

Many thanks again.


VI<br />

OPENING ADDRESS<br />

By Ir, Dr. Hon-kwan Cheng<br />

Chairman of Hong Kong Housing Authority<br />

Professor Ko, Professor Liu, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen,<br />

I am very pleased to attend the second leg of the International Conference on Advances and<br />

New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>. And I am greatly honoured to be given<br />

the opportunity to address such a distinguished audience. In this part of the Conference, we<br />

will be focusing on the specific challenges for regions of moderate seismicity, and explore<br />

how emerging technologies and new design philosophies will impact building design in these<br />

regions. I would like to take this opportunity to briefly discuss the challenges that we face in<br />

Hong Kong and the recent development of earthquake engineering here. Since our experience<br />

should be quite typical for places with moderate seismicity, I hope this would serve as a<br />

useful backdrop for our discussion over the next two days.<br />

Probably because Hong Kong has never been seriously damaged by earthquake, the structural<br />

design of buildings and other structures here do not cater for seismicity. At present, there is<br />

no such requirements in our ordinance or design codes. Up until not too long ago, most<br />

building designers here believed our risk of being struck by an earthquake is low. However,<br />

this perception has been under challenge in the past few years.<br />

Recent studies have shown that seismic intensity for the Hong Kong region with a 10%<br />

probability of exceedance in 50 years was assessed to be of intensity VII. This is consistent<br />

with the intensity given for Shenzhen located immediately north across the Hong Kong border.<br />

In addition, according to the Seismic Ground Motion Parameter Zoning Map 2001, the peak<br />

acceleration for Hong Kong Island is 0.15g while that for Kowloon and the New Territories is<br />

0.10 g. <strong>The</strong> characteristic period for the Hong Kong region is 0.35 second. <strong>The</strong>se classify<br />

Hong Kong as a region of moderate seismicity.<br />

This classification is indeed consistent with historical records. In 1991, our Government<br />

traced past earthquake data as far back as 900 years ago in places within a 350 km radius from<br />

Hong Kong and found that Hong Kong experienced at least two moderate earthquakes in<br />

1874 and 1918 respectively. On 16 September 1994, buildings on the reclamation areas of<br />

Hong Kong experienced substantial vibrations due to a strong far field earthquake. That has<br />

been the strongest earthquake felt by us since 1918.<br />

Local engineers also used to believe that given our moderate seismicity, our design provision<br />

for strong typhoon forces should be sufficient to withstand the earthquake energy. This has<br />

likewise been put in doubt. Recent studies on comparison between earthquake and wind<br />

loads in Hong Kong scenarios showed that for low rise buildings, the inter-storey shear and<br />

overturning moment from earthquake loadings are generally higher than those from wind<br />

loadings; and for medium to high-rise buildings, there is a strong possibility that the<br />

earthquake shear and moment effects will exceed those from wind at the upper storeys.<br />

I am pleased to note that attention is increasingly being paid to the issue of seismicity in Hong<br />

Kong in recent years. Through the conferences and seminars organised by the local<br />

professional bodies, we have witnessed a gradual change of minds, with more and more<br />

practitioners becoming aware of the potential risks. <strong>The</strong> local academics have also focused<br />

more research resources in studying sesimicity in the local context, providing us with crucial


Vll<br />

scientific support in our call for increased preparedness. In 1996, the Buildings Department<br />

set up a Seismic Working Group to examine the likely effect of earthquakes on buildings in<br />

Hong Kong. It is understood that this year the Department will commission a consultancy<br />

study on Seismic Effects on Buildings in Hong Kong.<br />

Several severe earthquakes that took place in China in the last 40 years occurred in areas once<br />

classified as low or moderate seismic regions. This discrepancy of zoning intensity and actual<br />

observed intensity is probably due to the uncertainty of earthquake occurrence and reliability<br />

of prediction. At the time when Hong Kong last experienced a moderate earthquake in 1918,<br />

it was still a small village. But today Hong Kong is a major financial centre and one of most<br />

densely populated cities in the world, and we simply cannot afford to ignore this risk. I<br />

believe Hong Kong should put some serious thoughts in formulating suitable seismic design<br />

guidelines and procedures, and the relevant China codes should offer a useful reference.<br />

More than ever before, we need the collaboration and cooperation of the Government, clients<br />

and our allied professions who should also need to acquaint themselves as to what<br />

earthquakes are all about.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a need to change the design philosophy of local designers. We have to think "static<br />

and dynamic" rather than "static" alone. We have to consider "plastic" in addition to "elastic".<br />

Inter-storey drift has become an important design criterion. Without a sound knowledge of<br />

seismic engineering, it would not be possible to work effectively on Mainland projects. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

are also many important issues in relation to seismic hazard, risk analysis and design practice,<br />

all waiting for our researchers to explore. In view of the moderate seismicity of Hong Kong,<br />

more public funding would be required to facilitate our local research.<br />

Cost will no doubt be a crucial feature in the public debate for the need of seismic<br />

preparedness. A recent cost-benefit analysis conducted by the China Academy of Building<br />

<strong>Research</strong> shows that the additional cost for the seismic fortification of a building in the urban<br />

area zoned at seismic intensity VI is no more than a few percent of the total structural costs.<br />

If that is the kind of money we are looking at, I think it is money well-worth spending.<br />

In closing, I would like to congratulate the Asian-Pacific Network of Centres for <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> (ANCER) for sponsoring this wonderful conference. <strong>The</strong> establishment of the<br />

Network last year represents a major step forward in fostering cooperation and collaboration<br />

in earthquake engineering research in the Asia Pacific region, and this International<br />

Conference is a very good example of the excellent contributions that we can expect from<br />

ANCER in the years to come.<br />

I would also like to thank the Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> for hosting the Hong Kong<br />

leg of the Conference. Over the years, the <strong>University</strong> has made valuable contributions to the<br />

development of seismic engineering in Hong Kong. Apart from being a leading researcher,<br />

the <strong>University</strong> has an impressive track record in organising major events to advance our<br />

knowledge in earthquake engineering. <strong>The</strong>se include the technical visits to Tangshan and<br />

Beijing in 1996 and the International Workshop on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> for Regions of<br />

Moderate Seismicity in 1998, which they jointly organized with other universities in Hong<br />

Kong and the Mid-America <strong>Earthquake</strong> Center in USA.<br />

Ladies and gentlemen, I am sure you are able to advance our knowledge through a lively<br />

discussion in this Conference. May I wish you all continued success over the next two days.<br />

Thank you.


Vlll<br />

Chairman: Lili Xie (China)<br />

Members:<br />

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE<br />

Daniel P. ABRAMS (USA)<br />

William ANDERSON (USA)<br />

Ian BUCKLE (USA)<br />

Fabio CASCIATI (Italy)<br />

Peter CHANG (USA)<br />

Sungpil CHANG (Korea)<br />

Houqun CHEN (China)<br />

Shel CHERRY (Canada)<br />

Anil CHOPRA (USA)<br />

Weimin DONG (USA)<br />

Lichu FAN (China)<br />

Toshi FUJIMORI (Japan)<br />

Yozu FUJINO (Japan)<br />

Polat GULKAN (Turkey)<br />

Minhong HE (China)<br />

George W. HOUSNER (USA)<br />

Yuxian HU (China)<br />

Hirokazu EEMURA (Japan)<br />

W. D. IWAN (USA)<br />

Paul JENNINGS (USA)<br />

James JIRSA (USA)<br />

Hiroyuki KAMEDA (Japan)<br />

Kazuhiko KAWASHIMA (Japan)<br />

Kazuhiko KASAI (Japan)<br />

Jan-ming KO (Hong Kong, China)<br />

Helmut KRAWINKLER (USA)<br />

George C. LEE (USA)<br />

OF. LEE (Hong Kong, China)<br />

Zhenpeng LLAO (China)<br />

Gao LIN (China)<br />

S. C. LIU (USA)<br />

Yuchen LIU (China)<br />

Chinhsiung LOH (Chinese Taipei)<br />

Stephen MAHIN (USA)<br />

Jack P. MOEHLE (USA)<br />

Joanne NIGG (USA)<br />

Tsnueo OKADA (Japan)<br />

Shun OTANI (Japan)<br />

Joseph PENZffiN (USA)<br />

Qiaozhai QI (China)<br />

Jiping RU (China)<br />

Haresh SHAH (USA)<br />

Liqin SHAO (China)<br />

Mete SOZEN (USA)<br />

B.F. SPENCER (USA)<br />

Eizaburo TACHIBANA (Japan)<br />

Wilson TANG (Hong Kong, China)<br />

Jun'ichi TOHMA (Japan)<br />

Kenzo TOKI (Japan)<br />

Chia-ming UANG (USA)<br />

Akira WADA (Japan)<br />

Guangyuan WANG (China)<br />

Huijuan WU (China)<br />

Hiro YAMANOUCHI (Japan)<br />

Kazuo YOSHIDA (Japan)<br />

Heping ZHAO (China)<br />

Xiyuan ZHOU (China)<br />

Shilong ZHU (China)


IX<br />

INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE<br />

Chairmen: Qiaozhai QI (China)<br />

Jan-ming KO (Hong Kong, China)<br />

Members:<br />

Sung-pil CHANG(Korea)<br />

George C. LEE (USA)<br />

S. C. LIU (USA)<br />

B.F. SPENCER (USA)<br />

LOCAL ORGANIZING COMMITTEE<br />

ICANCEER 2002 - Harbin Conference<br />

Chairman:<br />

Qiaozhai QI<br />

Vice-Chairman: Xing JIN, Jianfa HUANG<br />

Secretary general: lie GUI, Zhiqiu WANG, Ming ZHAO<br />

Members:<br />

Xun GUO, Xingmin HOU, Junqi LIN, Shutao XING, Xuelan ZHANG<br />

ICANCEER 2002 - Hong Kong Conference<br />

Chairman: Jan-ming KO<br />

Vice-Chairman: Y.L. XU<br />

Secretary general: Eddie S.S. LAM<br />

Members:<br />

Kanvtim CHAU, Yuk-lung WONG, Yi-qing NI, Hoat-Joen PAM,<br />

Chih-chen CHANG, J. Q. LI


CONTENTS<br />

Hong Kong Volume<br />

Preface<br />

Opening Address by Prof. Yuchen Liu<br />

Deputy Director of China Seismological Bureau<br />

Opening Address by Ir. Dr. Hon-kwan Cheng<br />

Chairman of Hong Kong Housing Authority<br />

International Scientific Committee<br />

International Advisory Committee<br />

Local Organizing Committee<br />

iii<br />

v<br />

vi<br />

viii<br />

viii<br />

ix<br />

Panel Reports<br />

Performance-based Design and <strong>Engineering</strong> Seismology 3<br />

G. C Lee and T. Hutchinson<br />

Structural Control and Health Monitoring 9<br />

J.N. Yang andP.C. Chang<br />

Keynote Papers<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Hazard Evaluation and Risk Mitigation in Hong Kong 17<br />

K.T. Chau, Y.L Xu, J.M. Ko, E.S.S. Lam, Y.L Wong, CM. Lee and Y.Q. Ni<br />

Parametric Estimation of Ground Motion Attenuation of Turkish <strong>Earthquake</strong>s 33<br />

P. Gulkan and E. Kalkan<br />

Development of JSSI Manual for Passive Control of Buildings 51<br />

K. Kasai<br />

A Framework for Developing Performance-based <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> 67<br />

/.P. Moehle<br />

Smart Structures Technology Opportunities and Challenges 69<br />

B.F. Spencer, Jr.<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Action Provision in GB50011 -2001 and Three Improvements 85<br />

XX. Too and S.W. Geng


XI<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Seismology and Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Digitization and Data Processing of Strong Motion <strong>Earthquake</strong> Accelerograms 99<br />

V.W.Lee<br />

Evaluation of Dynamic Soil Properties and Liquefaction Potential by Seismic 115<br />

Piezocone Tests<br />

T. Liao and P. W. Mayne<br />

Attenuation Function of Ground Motions for Guangdong Region of Southern 123<br />

China<br />

Y.L Wong, S.H. Zheng, J. Liu, Y. Kang, CM Tarn, Y,K. Leung andX.Q. Zhao<br />

Slope Stability Against <strong>Earthquake</strong> Considering Three Dimensional Effect 131<br />

/. Yoshida, T. Kaneto and M. Takao<br />

Seismic Risk and Disaster Management<br />

<strong>The</strong> Mid-America <strong>Earthquake</strong> Center <strong>Research</strong> Program Towards Development 139<br />

of Consequence-Based Seismic Risk Mitigation<br />

D. Abrams, A. Elnashai and J. Beavers<br />

Application of Early Damaged Area Estimation System Using DMSP/OLS to 149<br />

Recent Destructive <strong>Earthquake</strong>s<br />

K. Hasegawa, M. Higashida, M. Kohiyama, N. Maki, H. Hayashi, H. W. Kroehl,<br />

CD. Elvidge and V,R. Hobson<br />

CCD Camera System Application for Disaster Management 157<br />

M. Higashida, N. Maki and H. Hayashi<br />

A Simplified Method to Evaluate Liquefaction of Subsoil of Building 165<br />

LP.JingandZY.Wu<br />

A General Approach to Seismic Performance Assessment 173<br />

H. Krawinkler<br />

<strong>The</strong> Real-Time <strong>Earthquake</strong> Information System in the Northern Kyushu, Japan 181<br />

with a Small Scale Geoinformation Database for Seismic Intensity Estimation<br />

H. Narahashi<br />

Development of Virtual Emergency Response Network and Application 183<br />

S. Nishimura<br />

Strong Motion Database and Analysis Method in Mainland China 187<br />

H.Y. Yu<br />

Towards <strong>Earthquake</strong> Hazard Mitigation on Metropolis - a Platform for Risk 195<br />

Communication<br />

P. Zhu, M. Abe andJ. Kiyono


Xll<br />

Smart Materials and Smart Structures<br />

Critical Factors for Magnetorheological Fluids m Civil Structures 205<br />

J.D. Carlson<br />

Implementation of Modal Control for Seismically Excited Structures Using MR 207<br />

Dampers<br />

S.W. Cho, B.W. Kim, H.J. Jung and LW. Lee<br />

Effectiveness of Smart Base Isolation System with MR Dampers in Protecting 215<br />

Structures in Near-Fault <strong>Earthquake</strong>s<br />

S. Nagarajaiah, S. Sahasrabudhe and Y.Q. Mao<br />

Seismic Protection of A Benchmark Cable-Stayed Bridge Using A Hybrid 223<br />

Control Strategy<br />

K.S. Park, HJ. Jung, KM Choi andl.W. Lee<br />

Structural Vibration Control Using Piezoceramic Patch Actuator 231<br />

G. Song and B. Xie<br />

Rheological Behavior of MR Materials in Flow Mode 239<br />

X. Wang, F. Gordaninejad, G.H. Hitchcock, A. Fuchs, M. Xin and G. Korol<br />

Innovative Approaches for Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent 247<br />

Infrastructure Systems<br />

R.W. Wolfe, S.F. Masri andJ. Caffrey<br />

Structural Analysis and Design<br />

Drift-Based Seismic Assessment of Buildings in Hong Kong 257<br />

AM Chandler, R.K.L Su andM.N. Sheikh<br />

Understanding of the Seismic Performance of Asymmetric R/C Building 265<br />

Structures<br />

J.W. Dai, Y.L Wong andM.Z. Zhang<br />

Seismic Resistance of Very High Strength High Rise RC Buildings for Urban 273<br />

Development<br />

A.S. Elnashai andB. Laogan<br />

Performance-Based Seismic Design of Steel Moment Frames Using Target Drift 285<br />

and Yield Mechanism<br />

B.C. Goel and S.S. Lee<br />

A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm: Genetic Algorithm-Simplex 293<br />

W, Han andZ.P. Liao<br />

Seismic Simulation of Prestressed Concrete Bridges 301<br />

C.H. Jeng, Y.L Mo, andT.T.C. Hsu


Xlll<br />

Progress in the Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges in Korea, a Moderate 309<br />

Seismicity Region<br />

J.K. Kim, LH. Kim, G.H. Juhn andD.Y. Cho<br />

Seismic Behavior of Wooden House Using Distinct Element Method 317<br />

J. Kiyono and A. Furukawa<br />

<strong>The</strong> Design of Structural Concrete Regions for Seismic Actions by the Strut-and- 323<br />

Tie Method<br />

DA. Kuchma and T.N. Tjhin<br />

Seismic Response of Arch Dams Including Strain-Rate Effects 331<br />

G.Lin and S.Y.Xiao<br />

Nonlinear Static Analysis Method Based on Displacement 339<br />

W.G. TuandY.S.Zou<br />

Educational and Code Requirements for Seismic Design in Hong Kong 349<br />

G. Williams<br />

Performance-Based Design of Gravity Retaining Wall in Seismic Areas 361<br />

X. Zeng<br />

An Optimization Performance-Based <strong>Earthquake</strong>-Resistant Design 369<br />

Y.S.ZouandW.G.Tu<br />

Structural Control<br />

Adaptive Colony System for Stability Analysis of Slopes in <strong>Earthquake</strong> Zone 381<br />

C.F. Chen and X.N. Gong<br />

Dynamic Analysis of Friction-Damped Structures 389<br />

LL Chung, LY. Wu and Y.P. Wang<br />

Behavior of Seismic Protective Devices : A Computational Mechanics Approach 397<br />

G.F. Dargush, H. Cho andR. Radhakrishnan<br />

Large-scale Tests on Smart Structures and Semi-Active Control by MR Damper 405<br />

H. Fujitani, T. Azuhata, K. Morita, T. Hiwatashi, Y. Shiozaki, K. Hata,<br />

K. Sunakoda and C. Minowa<br />

Predictive Structural Vibration Control Using Soft Computing 413<br />

H. Furuta and Y. Nomura<br />

Damage Control of Hysteretic Structures by Using Instantaneous Optimal 421<br />

Control Algorithm with A Special Weighing Matrix<br />

H. Li, J.Y, Peng, Y. Suzuki andA.X. Guo<br />

An Energy Framework for Decentralized Market-Based Structural Control 429<br />

J.P. Lynch and K.H. Law


XIV<br />

Toward the Realization of Seismically Isolated Large-span Spatial Structures: 437<br />

Model Test and Simulation<br />

T. Matsui, E. Sugiyama, F. Qiao and T. Hibino<br />

Application of Semi-Active Devices in Structures Subjected to <strong>Earthquake</strong>s, 445<br />

Wind and Vibrations<br />

0. Nagel<br />

Active Control Study of Cable-Stayed Ting Kau Bridge under Stochastic 453<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Excitation<br />

7.Q. M, JM. Ko, Z.L Huang andJ.Y. Wang<br />

Hybrid FRC-Encased Steel Truss Beams for Seismic Upgrading of Reinforced 463<br />

Concrete Structures<br />

G. Parra-Montesinos, S.C. Goel andS. Savage<br />

Seismic Response of Multistory Masonry Building with Restricted Base Sliding 471<br />

M. Qamaruddin, S. Ahmad, H. Irtaza and S.M. Waseem<br />

Sliding Mode Semi-Active Base Isolation Using <strong>The</strong> Switching Hyperplane 481<br />

Designed by Disturbance-Accommodating Bilinear Control<br />

N. Santo and K. Yoshida<br />

Evaluation of Vibration Control Effect on Equipment Using Low-Stiffness and 489<br />

High-Damping Rubber<br />

S. Higuchi, K. Okuta, H. Dohi, T. Ozawa and 7. Tsujii<br />

Fractional Derivative Versus General Linear Models of Viscoelastic Dampers for 495<br />

Seismic Analysis<br />

M.P. Singh and T-S. Chang<br />

Seismic Response Control of A Benchmark Cable-Stayed Bridge 503<br />

J.N. Yang, S. Lin and F. Jabbari<br />

Evaluation of Supplemental Energy Dissipation Devices in Protecting Highway 511<br />

Bridges With Soil-Structure Interaction<br />

J. Zhang and N. Makris<br />

Seismic Reliability Analysis of Multistory Isolated Brick Buildings 519<br />

LX. Zhang, M.Z. Zhang, J.R. Jiang andJ.P. Liu<br />

System Identification, Monitoring System and Damage Detection<br />

Structural Health Monitoring for Large Structures Using Ambient Vibrations 529<br />

JM. Caicedo, E. Clayton, S.J. Dyke andM. Abe<br />

Simultaneous Estimation of Structural Parameter and <strong>Earthquake</strong> Excitation from 537<br />

Measured Structural Response<br />

J. Chen, J. Li and Y.L Xu


XV<br />

Crustal Deformation Measurement with Satellite Radar Interfermetry: A Review 545<br />

X.L Ding, Y.Q. Chen, Z.L Li, G.X. Liu andZ.W. Li<br />

Vision-Based Sensors for Monitoring Seismic Demands 547<br />

T.C. Hutchmson and F. Kuester<br />

Unscented Particle Filter for Time Domain Identification of Nonlinear Structural 555<br />

Dynamic Systems<br />

K.Y. KooandC.B. Yun<br />

Embedding Algorithms in a Wireless Structural Monitoring System 563<br />

J.P. Lynch, A, Sundararajan, K.H. Law, andA.S. Kiremidjian<br />

Multifaceted Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Studies of a Major Viaduct 571<br />

M. Saiidi, A. Itani, Q. Yang and S. Ladkany<br />

New System Identification Algorithms Combining Monte Carlo Filter and 579<br />

Genetic Algorithm<br />

T. Sato, T. Sakanoue and I. Yoshida<br />

Real-Time Structural Monitoring System 587<br />

A.M. Sereci, D. Radulescu and C. Radulescu<br />

Applying E-monitoring Information System for Highway Bridges Post- 595<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Damage Evaulations and Warnings<br />

G.C. Shiah andS.F. Perng<br />

Smart Health Monitoring System of a Prestressed Box Girder Bridge 603<br />

X. Wang and M. L. Wang<br />

Signature Recognition of Structural Damage: Data Analysis and Model-Based 611<br />

Validation for Destructive Field Tests<br />

R.R.C. Zhang, M. MacRostie and Y.L Xu<br />

Index of Contributors 1-1


PANEL REPORTS


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN AND ENGINEERING<br />

SEISMOLOGY<br />

Chairperson: G. Lee 1<br />

Recorder (editor): T. Hutchinson 2<br />

Panelists: D. Abrams 3 , J.K. Kim 4 , H. Krawinkler 5 , W.K. Pun 6 , H. Yamanouchi 7<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Panelists and interested researchers representing different areas of seisraiciry around the world<br />

discussed issues related to performance-based design (PBD). Although the merits of PBD were<br />

recognized as highly laudable, issues regarding the implementation and realization of PBD in<br />

practice were raised and the challenges ensued upon the profession highlighted. <strong>The</strong> importance<br />

of PBD in highly populated urban areas with low to moderate earthquake hazards (such as Hong<br />

Kong) and the strategies for seismic retrofit in such areas were emphasized. Summaries of the<br />

general discussions of the group are provided in the following sections.<br />

POSITIVE OUTCOMES OF PBD<br />

Models, such as that being developed by the Pacific <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> (PEER) Center,<br />

were outlined and the benefits of these and other methodologies to society discussed. <strong>The</strong><br />

objectives of the PEER performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) methodology under<br />

development are (1) to facilitate the decision making on cost-effective risk management of the<br />

built environment in areas of high seismicity, (2) to facilitate the implementation of<br />

performance-based design and evaluation by the engineering profession, and (3) to provide a<br />

foundation on which code-writing bodies can base the development of transparent performancebased<br />

provisions. Such a methodology is advantageous to the stakeholders (e.g. building owners)<br />

as they may now invest in mitigation, as they need to, for their own performance requirements.<br />

As a result, the consequences of an earthquake can be controlled for the prudent stakeholder.<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of PBD is advantageous for seismic retrofit applications as well. Performance levels<br />

within performance provisions are not mandated, thus it provides a choice for owners desiring to<br />

retrofit their structure to obtain a selected performance. As such, a building owner must know (or<br />

believe) that a retrofit to a particular level is needed. <strong>The</strong> difficulty with this concept is that,<br />

although the design life of a structure may be in excess of 50 years, the current building owner<br />

may only own the structure for 7-10 years, a window most owners may not believe an<br />

earthquake will occur within.<br />

1 Director, Multidisciplinary Center for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (MCEER), SUNY-Buffalo, NY, USA<br />

2 Assistant Professor, <strong>University</strong> of California, Irvine, CA, USA<br />

3 Director, Mid-America <strong>Earthquake</strong> (MAE) Center, <strong>University</strong> of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA<br />

4 Director, Korea <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Center (KEERC), Seoul National <strong>University</strong>, Korea<br />

5 Professor, Stanford <strong>University</strong>, Stanford, CA, USA<br />

6 Chief Geotechnical Engineer, Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Department, Government of Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong<br />

7 Chief Executive, Building <strong>Research</strong> Institute (BRJ), Tsukuba Science City, Japan.


IMPLEMENTING AND REALIZING PBD<br />

Several important issues were discussed related to the implementation and realization of PBD in<br />

practice. <strong>The</strong>se include: (i) the challenges of estimating actual performance, maintaining the<br />

required design level precision and accounting for the various sources of uncertainty, (ii)<br />

potential legal impediments, and (iii) the education and knowledge dissemination required.<br />

Estimation of Actual Performance, Design Level Precision and Uncertainty<br />

Performance is associated with the behavior of a structural system, however, not directly as<br />

calculated with present methods. As a result, issues, which may be paramount to performance,<br />

such as building occupants relating performance to human perception of vibration, or damage to<br />

nonstructural components and contents, are not incorporated in current procedures. Furthermore,<br />

the strong economic promise of performance-based design makes the consideration of<br />

nonstructural and asset (direct and indkect) losses of foremost importance in the implementation<br />

of PBD. A well-designed structure may reach other performance limit states solely due to<br />

indirect losses from downtime or other nonstructural damage and this must be incorporated in the<br />

evaluation process. <strong>The</strong>se issues largely instigated PBD, for example, the nearly $30Billion U.S.<br />

in losses from the 1994 Northridge earthquake were primarily attributed to nonstructural damage.<br />

Maintaining the level of precision in the design of structural systems that is required by<br />

performance-based design provisions is also of concern. In performance-based provisions, design<br />

will no longer be based on one limit state, but rather multiple limit states, requiring further level<br />

of detail and precision to be attainable. To compound this issue, previous and current design<br />

codes provide procedures for proportioning strength, not estimating actual behavior.<br />

Estimation of actual performance to a reasonable level of precision requires a framework<br />

accounting for (i) the intensity of the ground motion, (ii) the engineering demand imposed on the<br />

system, (iii) the corresponding damage generated, (iv) a decision variable based on knowledge of<br />

this demand and (v) realistic performance targets. Perhaps the most critical of these items are the<br />

intensity of the ground motion and the performance targets. Neither of these items is directly<br />

related to the engineers' most common tasks and arguably these may introduce the greatest<br />

amount of uncertainty in the process.<br />

This raises important questions regarding our ability (and confidence) in predicting earthquake<br />

hazard, as well as our ability to discretely characterize the structural system. Various sources of<br />

uncertainty exist in the estimation of earthquake hazard, including: (i) the occurrence of<br />

earthquakes in space and time, (ii) the earthquake magnitude, (iii) the attenuation from the source<br />

to the site, and (iv) the inherent randomness of ground motion time histories. Uncertainties in<br />

characterizing the structural system include: (i) geometric and material properties and (ii) soilfoundation-structure<br />

interaction (SFSI), and (iii) modeling uncertainties at both the component<br />

and system levels. Compounded with these are the errors and randomness of the general<br />

construction of structures. At the decision state, there are uncertainties associated with (i) the<br />

consequences of exceeding the limit state (life safety, economic losses, downtime), (ii) economic<br />

assumptions (e.g. current economic status, discount rate, (iii) the recovery rates (availability of<br />

finances, state of economy in region).


Legal Impediments<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are many important legal issues that must be addressed if PBD is to be fully realized. <strong>The</strong><br />

level of precision promised by PBD provides the consumer (the building owner) more leverage<br />

to attribute responsibility to the engineer if the promised level of performance is not realized.<br />

Protection mechanisms must be in place to shield designers and builders from excess exposure to<br />

legal issues. Similarly, owners and society must also be protected from inadequate design and<br />

construction.<br />

Education and Knowledge Dissemination<br />

Currently, there is a lack of education regarding performance-based design amongst the general<br />

public, students, educators, and engineers. Communication and dissemination over time can<br />

alleviate these gaps in knowledge, providing awareness and fostering integration of performance<br />

based provisions in practice. Perhaps the most important educational issue in PBD is the<br />

education of the stakeholder. Stakeholders must decide what level of performance is acceptable<br />

to them and the corresponding level of investment they desire. This will require simple indices<br />

for public understanding of risk (i.e. a 2% in 50 year probability of occurrence is difficult for the<br />

average stakeholder). <strong>The</strong> result is that engineering practitioners need to be educators to the<br />

stakeholders. A reasonable approach to this impediment may be to provide scenario-based<br />

information in the education of stakeholders, facilitating communication in a quantitative risk<br />

assessment form.<br />

As a whole, education of the public is a very significant issue, since practitioners desperately<br />

require their support, in the implementation of PBD. Such education may occur and exist over a<br />

short or long term. In the short term, the occurrence of major earthquakes raises public<br />

awareness, therefore facilitating interest and public education of the potential risks. Long-term<br />

education is more challenging for the profession and requires frequent awareness programs; such<br />

as regularly cited demonstration shake table videos or other media intervention.<br />

PBD IN Low TO MODERATE SEISMIC REGIONS<br />

Low to moderate seismic regions of the world may have the potential for high intensity seismic<br />

loading, with very low occurrence. This raises important questions as to the applicability of<br />

adopting performance-based design provisions in these areas, since earthquakes are a wellknown<br />

lesser hazard. Design in these regions is generally governed by other factors (e.g. wind),<br />

thus collapse prevention may control the seismic design process and immediate occupancy and<br />

life safety levels are controlled by default. <strong>The</strong> result is that design and associated construction<br />

costs in low to moderate seismic regions may be exasperated if realistic performance guidelines<br />

specific to these areas are not addressed.<br />

As a result of the historically lesser hazard earthquakes pose in low to moderate seismic regions<br />

ductile design is not routinely practiced, therefore limited ductile behavior of structural systems<br />

may be anticipated. Furthermore, ductile details are not fully developed in these regions<br />

therefore engineers will need very simple procedures to adopt these new concepts. However,<br />

simple procedures may not offer the level of precision required by performance-based design.<br />

<strong>The</strong> low occurrence of earthquake events also increases the uncertainty in earthquake hazard<br />

estimation. Although the characteristics of ground motions in areas of high seismicity may vary


greatly from those regions of the world with low to moderate seismicity, usable ground motion<br />

records are scarce, thus recordings are often borrowed from high seismic regions.<br />

PBD FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT<br />

<strong>The</strong> implicit inclusion of performance limit states is advantageous to designers trying to evaluate<br />

the benefits of retrofitting a structure. Furthermore, it assists in providing a reasonable<br />

perspective to tangible outcomes for owners. However, costs to owners will need to be evaluated<br />

in terms of the remaining life of the structure. <strong>The</strong> result is that the need to plan and conduct a<br />

seismic retrofit program in low to moderate seismic regions becomes a trade-off between the<br />

structures remaining design life and the anticipated return period of a strong enough earthquake<br />

(which is generally much longer). Communication to the general public becomes even more<br />

important in such a case where the lesser occurrence of earthquakes reduces public awareness.<br />

To convince the public, engineers must benchmark against other kinds of risk, for example,<br />

earthquake risk compared with risks due to typhoons in Hong Kong.<br />

In many regions (such as Hong Kong), seismic design procedures do not exist, thus adoption of<br />

seismic performance-based approaches and evaluation of retrofit plans must be exceedingly<br />

simple as well as justified in light of other natural hazards (e.g. typhoons). Hong Kong, for<br />

example, has adopted the approach of first developing a holistic study encompassing all risks to<br />

structures to evaluate the need for seismic retrofit. In order to convince legislators of this need, a<br />

quantitative risk assessment is pursued, whereby earthquake risk is placed in the context of other<br />

risks to structures. In Korea, for example, convincing building owners to retrofit for seismic<br />

loads has been more challenging, while retrofit programs for bridge structures are more readily<br />

accepted since bridge structures are controlled by the government and life expectancy is more<br />

carefully scrutinized. Incremental seismic retrofit programs, which have been adopted in the<br />

United States, may alleviate large sudden financial burdens. If these programs are put in the<br />

context of multi-hazard mitigation, this too may be successful in convincing the public. It should<br />

be emphasized to the stakeholder that conducting a thorough performance-based seismic design<br />

for a new building requires minimal costs, when compared with the potential costs associated<br />

with post-construction seismic retrofit.<br />

PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN VERSUS PERFORMANCE-BASED PROVISIONS<br />

Performance-based design is really nothing new and to many extents has been codified, although<br />

transparent to designers, for many years. New aspects of PBD include the details and levels of<br />

performance and the understanding of the implications of such performance. <strong>The</strong> most important<br />

outcome of PBD is the development of performance-based provisions to effectively<br />

communicate these outcomes. Performance-based provisions must carefully be balanced with<br />

minimal complexity. Transparent physical concepts must be provided that do not make the<br />

process overly complex. This is particularly important in low to moderate seismic zones where<br />

earthquake design provisions struggle for adoption. Provisions that are too cumbersome will<br />

receive little embrace by the community and not be adopted. <strong>The</strong> recent Japanese<br />

implementation of performance-based provisions is highlighted as an example of successful<br />

integration with practice.<br />

Following the 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan, a revised building standard was implemented<br />

(Building Standard Law, 1998). Revisions incorporated performance-based provisions with the


expectation of (i) expanding the freedom in design, (ii) encouraging technical development (e.g.<br />

new materials, design and construction), (iii) facilitating import of foreign goods and<br />

technologies, and (iv) activating construction activities. <strong>The</strong> basic concept of these new<br />

performance-based provisions is that any material, design method and technique should be<br />

accepted as effective if the Targeted Performance is realized in the Designed/Constructed<br />

Structure. <strong>The</strong> most challenging concept, as observed by the Japanese model code, is the<br />

evaluation of the actual performance. Performance-based provisions must provide methods<br />

simple enough for building officials to regulate, while still assuring that a specified level of<br />

performance has been attained. Building officials in Japan are heavily loaded with numerous<br />

structural permits each year. As an example, in 1996 alone in Japan over one million building<br />

applications were submitted to 1800 building officials, resulting in 604 buildings requiring<br />

regulation per building official. To resolve this contradiction, designers and engineers have to<br />

explain their design in terms of performance and take responsibility for their design as much as<br />

possible.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

In summary, the panel felt that PBD has positive benefits and clearly it will persevere, however,<br />

many challenges must be overcome before it can be fully realized. <strong>The</strong>se challenges are related<br />

to (i) the estimation of actual performance, maintaining the required design level precision and<br />

accounting for the various sources of uncertainty, (ii) the potential legal impediments, and (iii)<br />

the education and knowledge dissemination required. <strong>The</strong> importance of PBD in highly<br />

populated urban areas with low to moderate earthquake hazards (such as Hong Kong) and the<br />

strategies for seismic retrofit in such areas were emphasized. Finally, panelists agreed, we have a<br />

long road ahead of us, but international collaboration will strongly promote the broader interests<br />

and development of PBEE.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

STRUCTURAL CONTROL AND HEALTH MONITORING<br />

Chairperson: Jann N. Yang 1<br />

Recorder: Peter C. Chang 2<br />

Panelists: Hideo Fujitani 3 , Hui Li 4 , Billie F. Spencer, Jr. 5 , You-lin Xu 6 , Fuh-Gwo Yuan 7<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

At the second part of the ICANCEER conference held m Hong Kong in 2002, a panel discussion was<br />

held on structural control and health monitoring applications to earthquake engineering and its effect on<br />

civil infrastructures. <strong>The</strong> fields of structural control and health monitoring have been progressing<br />

rapidly. However, some research and technological bottlenecks have limited their growth. <strong>The</strong><br />

discussion panel looked into some of these roadblocks; identified the reasons that each research topic<br />

should be studied, and specified reasons that research in these areas would be beneficial to the<br />

engineering communities.<br />

SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION<br />

<strong>The</strong> panel responded to questions from the audience regarding issues relevant to structural control and<br />

structural health monitoring. <strong>The</strong> discussion started by focusing on the perceived bottlenecks in these<br />

areas of research. <strong>The</strong> panel and the audience suggested research topics that could resolve some of these<br />

problems. Existing technologies and their shortcomings were also discussed. Summaries of the general<br />

discussion of the panel are given in the following.<br />

Wireless Sensor Technologies<br />

It was pointed out that current wireless sensor technologies are not truly wireless. <strong>The</strong>y are typically<br />

wired from the sensor to a transponder. <strong>The</strong> wireless link consists of the communication from the<br />

transponder to the internet or data acquisition equipment. Such "wireless" setups eliminate some of the<br />

complicated wiring that is in use today, but many of the problems associated with wired network cannot<br />

be solved, including limited number of channels, expensive wiring, etc.<br />

Professor, Dept. Civil and Enviro. <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of California, Irvine, CA, USA<br />

2 Professor, Dept. Civil and Enviro. <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.<br />

3 Chief <strong>Research</strong>er, Building <strong>Research</strong> Institute (BRI), Tsukuba Science City, Japan.<br />

"Professor, Dept. Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.<br />

5 Professor, Dept. Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.<br />

6 Professor, Dept. Civil & Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, Hong Kong.<br />

7 Professor, Dept. Mechanical & Aerospace <strong>Engineering</strong>, North Carolina State <strong>University</strong>, NC, USA.


10<br />

Some applications of wireless technology exist today. <strong>The</strong>y include the Bluetooth protocol for short<br />

distance wireless data transfer, laser vibrometers, LIDAR, RFID technology, and different techniques<br />

for energy scavenging to enable wireless applications. Important issues to be resolved are the need for<br />

truly tetherless sensors. Two major problems for these sensors to be viable are the need for power supply<br />

and the reduction of the level of power consumption. Additional benefits of the tetherless sensor<br />

technology are the possibility of using large and dense arrays of sensors and the application of these<br />

sensors to existing structures. <strong>The</strong> table below outlines the critical areas of research.<br />

Critical problem<br />

Tetherless Sensors are<br />

needed<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

Wiring is expensive<br />

Wired sensors are limited<br />

to < 1000<br />

Application to existing<br />

structures<br />

Enabling technology to<br />

solve this problem<br />

Blue tooth technology<br />

Mote; smart dust<br />

RFID<br />

Laser Vibrometer<br />

Vibration power<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

Structural health<br />

monitoring<br />

ITS<br />

Ship structure monitoring<br />

B io/en vironmental<br />

monitoring<br />

Damage Identification<br />

Current damage identification methods are capable of determining structural damages in a controlled<br />

laboratory environment or computer simulation. <strong>The</strong> size of the detectable damage using many of the<br />

existing techniques is so large that the damage could often readily be detected by visual inspection. Yet<br />

the quantitative damage identification is an important component of management decisions for the<br />

maintenance and retrofit of structures. One major problem that the current methods cannot adequately<br />

deal with is the effects of environmental changes, which often create signals of the same order of<br />

magnitude as those produced by the damage. Current technology includes vibration property detection,<br />

x-ray and gamma ray techniques, ground penetrating radar, ultrasonic impedance, eddy current, laser<br />

vibrometers, etc. Two methods to deal with the environmental changes are identified; these are: (i) filter<br />

the environmental effects, and (ii) detect the novelty in signals after the environmental effects have been<br />

added. <strong>The</strong> following table outlines the critical areas of research needed:<br />

Critical problem<br />

Damage identification<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

<strong>The</strong> damage needs to be<br />

quantified<br />

No algorithm is currently<br />

available for quantifying<br />

different types of damage<br />

Provide damage<br />

assessment and<br />

maintenance decision<br />

Enabling technology to solve this<br />

problem<br />

MEMS sensors, nano-sensors, microactuators,<br />

wireless sensors, sensor<br />

network system, AE sensors, etc.<br />

Wavelets, Hilbert-Huang transform, data<br />

mining and data fusion, neural network<br />

methods, genetic algorithms, etc.<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

Autonomous SHM<br />

systems<br />

Engines, satellites,<br />

automobiles<br />

Concrete strength<br />

prediction


11<br />

Damage quantification is Ultrasonic waves, X-ray, gamma ray,<br />

difficult currently GRP, computer termography, etc.<br />

Vlaterial<br />

degradation (e.g.<br />

corrosion)<br />

Damage<br />

quantification<br />

MEMS Technology<br />

MEMS technology has reduced the size and cost of sensors for many applications. Current MEMS<br />

sensors include accelerorneters, temperature sensors, relative humidity sensors, etc. <strong>The</strong> reduction of the<br />

size and cost allow MEMS sensors to be applied densely over large areas. An added advantage of these<br />

small sensors is that they do not interfere with the function of the structure. In aerospace applications,<br />

MEMS sensors can be placed on the wing without changing the airfoil characteristics. Current MEMS<br />

sensors are wired with power provided from outside sources. Internally powered MEMS will expand the<br />

use of these small sensors to more applications.<br />

Critical problem<br />

MEMS sensors<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

Potential low cost<br />

Small size<br />

Transparency (low added<br />

weight and low profile)<br />

Enabling technology to<br />

solve this problem<br />

Maturing MEMS<br />

technology<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

Dense sensor arrays<br />

Reliability and durability<br />

of sensors<br />

Semi-Active Control<br />

<strong>The</strong> semi-active control technology is maturing to the point that it is used in production automobiles. In<br />

structural applications, it has been shown to be effective while consuming a small amount of energy. In<br />

many applications, the energy from small batteries suffices. This is particularly important because<br />

passive and active controllers have their limitations. <strong>The</strong> panel recognizes that this technology is being<br />

applied in Asia for infrastructure control. Its use in USA is limited to one application presently. <strong>The</strong><br />

discussion panel identified the durability of MR fluids used in most semi-active controllers to be an area<br />

of continuing research.<br />

Critical problem<br />

Semi-active control<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

Passive and active<br />

controllers have<br />

limitations.<br />

Enabling technology to<br />

solve this problem<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

More robust MR fluids for In application stage<br />

a wide range of systems Durability of MR fluid


12<br />

Smart Materials<br />

Smart materials, such as piezoelectric material, shape memory alloy, magnetostrive composites, etc.,<br />

have made great strides in recent years. A magneto-shape memory alloy has been produced that can be<br />

controlled magnetically to a strain of 6%. This technology can be applied to increase the presence of<br />

structural actuators. <strong>The</strong> actuators have traditionally been made from piezoelectric materials with a<br />

maximum strain often less than 1%. Non-magnetic shape memory alloys can have maximum strains of<br />

2 to 4%, which make them also viable for controllable structures.<br />

Critical problem<br />

Applications of smart<br />

materials to structural<br />

control<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

Save power and energy<br />

Multi-functionality<br />

Adaptation to random<br />

loads<br />

Enabling technology to<br />

solve this problem<br />

Piezo-electnc ceramic<br />

actuators and sensors<br />

Shape memory alloy<br />

actuators and sensors<br />

SMA<br />

MQR. dampers<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

PZT actuators<br />

Magneto-SMA actuators<br />

Integrating Structural Health Monitoring and Structural Control<br />

<strong>Research</strong>ers have shown that controlling member forces can aid in the damage detection of structures,<br />

and structural control is not currently taking advantages of the myriad of information that a dense array<br />

of low-cost sensors can provide. <strong>The</strong> panel recognizes that if the structural control system and the<br />

sensors are designed together, then it is possible for the control system to use the sensed data more<br />

effectively. With the same token, by controlling the forces in the structure, it is possible to determine<br />

damages in the structure more accurately. In this manner, the control system and the sensors are tightly<br />

coupled. <strong>Research</strong> in the coupling between these two technologies is needed.<br />

Critical problem<br />

Integrated SHM and<br />

structural control (SC)<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

SHM and SC are<br />

independently designed<br />

and implemented<br />

Current algorithms for SC<br />

do not take advantages of<br />

information that is<br />

available by SHM<br />

Current SHM systems do<br />

not use control actuation<br />

capabilities to more<br />

effectively assess the health<br />

of structures<br />

Enabling technology to<br />

solve this problem<br />

Commercially available<br />

and cost-effective control<br />

actuators (e.g., MR<br />

dampers)<br />

Dense array of low-cost<br />

sensor technology<br />

Wireless sensor technology<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

Development of new<br />

algorithms that combine<br />

sensor information and<br />

control


13<br />

Structural Control in Strong Wind and Moderate Seismic Region<br />

In the past three decades, most of the research efforts in structural control were focused on the<br />

enhancement of either the safety of buildings and structures in regions of high seismicity or the<br />

serviceability performance of buildings and structures in regions of strong winds. Less attention was<br />

paid to the integrated design of structural control systems to satisfy both the safety requirement for<br />

moderate seismic events and the serviceability requirement for strong winds. Such a task may be<br />

difficult to be accomplished using the passive control technology; however, the semi-active control<br />

technology with proper control devices and algorithms can be developed to fulfill this challenge.<br />

Critical problem<br />

Enhanced performance of<br />

building in strong wind<br />

and moderate seismic<br />

region<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

Safety and serviceability<br />

requirements for a costeffective<br />

strategy<br />

Enabling technology to<br />

solve this problem<br />

Semi-active control<br />

technology<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

Implementation of semiactive<br />

control devices and<br />

proper control algorithms.<br />

Durability and Reliability of Smart and Control Systems<br />

Reliability of active and semi-active control systems is a principal concern of building owners. <strong>Research</strong><br />

in predicting the performance of smart control systems and their reliability is needed before these<br />

technologies will see any significant use in USA. <strong>The</strong> panel points out that in most cases, semi-active<br />

controllers are used based on their passive control capabilities Gust in case the semi-active control fails<br />

to work).<br />

Critical problem<br />

Durability and reliability<br />

of smart control systems<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

[ncrease performance of<br />

structures against nature<br />

lazards.<br />

Enabling technology to<br />

solve this problem<br />

Base isolation<br />

Passive control<br />

Semi-active and hybrid<br />

systems<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

In application stage<br />

Application according to<br />

age of structure<br />

Life cycle cost and<br />

performance of control<br />

svstems<br />

EDUCATION<br />

A critical issue for the future of smart structures is to create cross-cutting educational programs to<br />

prepare the next generation of engineers to take advantage of this technology in tackling the challenges<br />

of today's rapidly evolving society. Educational programs should be developed that integrate academic


14<br />

research and education in a multi-disciplinary setting, including multi-lateral cooperation. Central to<br />

such programs are student and young researcher exchange.<br />

Critical problem<br />

Reasons this problem is<br />

important<br />

Enabling technology to<br />

solve this problem<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

Effective education in<br />

rapidly evolving<br />

technology<br />

Improved illustration,<br />

improved learning<br />

experience<br />

Instructors need to be<br />

educated.<br />

Availability of smart<br />

materials and control<br />

systems<br />

Control system design,<br />

use of this technology to<br />

improve learning


KEYNOTE PAPERS


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD EVALUATION AND RISK<br />

MITIGATION IN HONG KONG<br />

K.T. Chau, Y.L. Xu, J.M. Ko, E. S.S. Lam, Y.L. Wong, C.M. Lee and Y.Q. Ni<br />

Department of Civil and Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, Hong Kong, China<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Geographically, Hong Kong is not located in a region with frequent attacks from destructive<br />

earthquakes, and, historically, there is no provision for seismic design of building structures in Hong<br />

Kong. In recent years, the local academicians and government offices start to realize the potential risk<br />

or consequences caused by earthquakes. For example, on September 16, 2004, buildings on<br />

reclamation areas of Hong Kong experienced a strong far field earthquake of magnitude of 7.3<br />

occurred in the vicinity of Dongsha Island. Thousands of people felt the shaking and left their office<br />

buildings. This is the strongest earthquake felt in Hong Kong since 1918. Coupled with the recent<br />

earthquake disasters in Kobe, Taiwan, India and Turkey, the public begins to concern the safety of<br />

Hong Kong buildings if a major earthquake occurred in the vicinity of Hong Kong. This is not<br />

unreasonable, considering the fact that the seismicity of Tangshan area is lower than the current hazard<br />

level of Hong Kong before the hit of the great 1976 Tangshan earthquake. In Hong Kong, there are<br />

many special issues of earthquake engineering need to be addressed. In the urban areas, many high-rise<br />

buildings are close to each other and use transfer plate/beam systems to achieve maximum open space<br />

at lower levels. <strong>The</strong>se buildings are often built in a congested reclaimed land, on hilly topography, in<br />

the proximity of MTR, or on unstable slopes. Deep basements supported on bored or dnven piles for<br />

parking, shopping mall or for housing utility facilities are not uncommon in these tall buildings. This<br />

paper thus discusses the earthquake hazard evaluation and risk mitigation in Hong Kong, together with<br />

some future issues and challenges lying ahead.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Geologically, Hong Kong is located on the South China Sea Plate. <strong>The</strong> nearest active tectonic plate<br />

boundary is that of the Philippine Sea Plate and the South China Sea Plate between Taiwan and the<br />

Philippines. Although this active boundary is relatively far away from Hong Kong, historic records<br />

have indicated that Hong Kong did experience earthquake shaking of intensity up to VII in the<br />

Modified Mercalli Scale. For example, in 1874 an earthquake of magnitude 5.75 occurred at Dangan


18<br />

Island, which is about 35 km southeast of Hong Kong Observatory. This is the largest earthquake<br />

observed within 100 km of Hong Kong in the past 500 years. Another strongly felt earthquake is the<br />

1918 Shantou earthquake of magnitude 7.4 which is about 300 km away from Hong Kong. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

records agree with the "Seismic intensity zonation map of china" published in 1990 by the State<br />

Seismic Bureau of China (now the China Seismological Bureau). <strong>The</strong> newest published "Seismic<br />

ground motion parameter zonation map of China" (GB 18306-2001) predicted that a maximum ground<br />

shaking of exceeding 0.15g at rock site is expected in Hong Kong at least once in every 475 years<br />

(Wong et al., 1998a-b). This shaking will further be amplified when topographical and soil effects are<br />

considered (Wong et al., 2000; Wong et al. 1998a-b; Chau and Lo, 2001). However, when the 1874<br />

Dangan Island earthquake and the 1918 Shantou earthquake occurred. Hong Kong is still a small<br />

fishing village (see Fig. 1). However, Hong Kong is now a major financial centre and one of the most<br />

densely populated cities in the world. Any interruption to critical facilities and business operations may<br />

have serious social and economical consequences (see Fig. 1).<br />

(a)<br />

Figure 1. (a) Central in 1870s; (b) Central in 2000<br />

For instance, Newcastle city in Australia, an area of low to moderate seismic risk similar to Hong<br />

Kong, was attacked by a relatively small magnitude earthquake (M=5.6) on December 28, 1989<br />

causing about 20 billion Hong Kong dollars of damage and 13 deaths (EEFIT, 1991). In total, 50,000<br />

buildings were damaged, 300 buildings were eventually demolished, and 162 people were hospitalised.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Unexpected Catastrophe<br />

1389 Newcastle tarthtjuaJwj rnrformatHm Resources<br />

Figure 2. <strong>The</strong> unexpected Newcastle earthquake on December 28, 1989, Australia.


19<br />

On September 16, 1994, buildings on reclamation areas of Hong Kong experienced a strong far field<br />

earthquake of magnitude of 7.3 occurred in the vicinity of Dongsha Island. Thousands of people felt<br />

the shaking and left their office buildings. This is the strongest earthquake felt in Hong Kong since<br />

1918. Two separate isoseismical maps for the earthquake are shown in Fig. 3. A simulated isoseismal<br />

of the earthquake using attenuation law of South China was given in Fig. 4 for comparison; and the<br />

simulation is plotted using a GIS system developed by a collaboration between the Institute of<br />

Geophysics and the Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>. Coupled with the recent earthquake disasters<br />

in Kobe, Taiwan, India and Turkey, the public begins to concern the safety of Hong Kong buildings if<br />

a major earthquake occurred in the vicinity of Hong Kong. This has raised an increasing concern by<br />

local researchers, engineers and the general public on the possibility of being hit by a moderate to large<br />

earthquake.<br />

• /^J<br />

*/ •<br />

«—1 ***^!&&L< 4«HO*S^S.~<br />

^">^» : : 5 a^P v ""> / J« 7^"r »<br />

*^<br />

/<br />

. .<br />

TT 17 *=*•' * «flCtSL ' >• ' JtilHjtJ: \ /)>•*•*••<br />

Hong Kong ,.,ig££*-,»*. "V. •&•< • /<br />

Figure 3. Isoseismal maps for the 1994 Tongsha earthquake<br />

Figure 4. Simulation Isoseismal map of the 1994 Tongsha earthquake using a GIS system<br />

In 1996, a Working Group was setup by the Buildings Department of the Hong Kong Government to<br />

examine the likely effects of earthquakes on buildings in Hong Kong. In 1998. three universities in<br />

Hong Kong (i.e. the Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, the Hong Kong <strong>University</strong> of Science and<br />

Technology, and the <strong>University</strong> of Hong Kong) and the Mid-America <strong>Earthquake</strong> Center in USA


20<br />

jointly organized an International Workshop on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> for Regions of Moderate<br />

Seismicity. No doubt, earthquake resistant design for structures in Hong Kong is now an important<br />

issue that needs urgent attention. In the early 2002, the Buildings Department of the Hong Kong SAR<br />

government has issued a consultancy project CAO K49 on "Seismic Effects on Buildings in Hong<br />

Kong" worth about 5 millions HKS. More earthquake-related studies for Hong Kong are expected in<br />

the future.<br />

In terms of the seismic design code of China (GBJ11-89), Hong Kong is classified as an area of<br />

Seismic Intensity VII. And according to the newest Chinese seismic code (GB 18306-2001) the peak<br />

ground acceleration is expected to be 0.15g in a return period of 475 years. It seems that, Hong Kong<br />

should be regarded as an area with moderate seismic risk. According to the China Seismological<br />

Bureau, buildings to be constructed in any region with an intensity level of VI or above in 475 years<br />

should be designed in compliance with the seismic provisions of the Chinese code. Thus, it is expected<br />

that seismic provisions will eventually be required for designing buildings in Hong Kong in order to<br />

withstand seismic hazards. Inherited strength of existing structures will have to be assessed and<br />

strengthened to safeguard our building stock and infrastructures against possible seismic attack. We<br />

should emphasize that the hazard intensity level at Haicheng, Tangshan, and Yingtai before the<br />

Haicheng earthquake, Tangshan earthquake and Yingtai <strong>Earthquake</strong> is only estimated at intensity VI,<br />

which is lower than the current hazard in Hong Kong. <strong>The</strong>refore, the conception that Hong Kong is<br />

safe from large earthquake is a very misleading concept.<br />

DANGAN ISLAND—POTENTIAL SEISMIC SOURCE FOR HONG KONG<br />

As mentioned earlier, on June 23, 1874 an earthquake of magnitude 5.75 occurred at Dangan Island,<br />

which is about 35 km southeast of Hong Kong Observatory. <strong>The</strong> earthquake led to an earthquake<br />

intensity of V-VI in Hong Kong. <strong>The</strong> isoseismal trended along the ENE-WSW direction as shown in<br />

Fig. 5.<br />

Figure 5. <strong>The</strong> isoseismal of the 1874 Dangan Island earthquake together with those of the Heyuan<br />

earthquake


21<br />

Some people were injured while two houses collapsed, boulders were dislodged from slopes and some<br />

retaining walls collapsed. According to the Daily Press, the ground shaking was felt along NE to SW<br />

direction. <strong>The</strong>re were also observable ground waves, bells rang and water in the harbour was "rough and<br />

buoyant" (Lee and Workman, 1996). Thus, Dangan Island area is definitely a potential seismic source<br />

that will generate earthquakes affecting Hong Kong. A closer look of the geological setting in South<br />

China reveals that there is a large fault system in the northern South China Sea. This fracture zone is<br />

called "Binghai Fracture Zone' or "Littoral Fault Zone" (see Fig. 6). Figure 6 is modified from Lin and<br />

Xie (1996). Along this fracture zone, there had been the 1918 Shantou earthquake of magnitude 7.4<br />

which is about 300 km away from Hong Kong to the east; and there was also the 1605 Qiongshan<br />

earthquake of magnitude of 7.5 about 450km to the west of Hong Kong. <strong>The</strong>re is, however, a "largeearthquake-missing<br />

zone" in the middle around Hong Kong.<br />

Large-earthquake- \ ^ {<br />

missing -zone x j<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> with ji!<br />

^<br />

Figure 6. Large-earthquake missing-zone near Hong Kong of the Binghai Fracture Zone<br />

Figure 7, Fault system of the Binghai Fracture Zone south of Hong Kong and Dangan Island<br />

In 1982, in order to understand the basement structure characteristics of oil-bearing basins off the Pearl<br />

River Delta region, seismic profiling of the South China Sea was conducted by the Institute of<br />

Geophysics, Institutes of Acoustics and South China Sea Institute of Oceanology (Xia, 1985). A deep


22<br />

tunnel in the biggest island of the Dangan Island was used to detect the seismic waves generated from the<br />

explosive ignited from the seabed. <strong>The</strong> geological structures near Dangan Island area were obtained and<br />

are illustrated in Fig. 7 (modified from Lai and Langford, 1996).<br />

Littoral Fault Zone<br />

^- -"* -*.'; ; -X' Dangan isiS<br />

-. ,;x^>^-;- x<br />

v;-'vin-^:;C;^-<br />

' ' "0 ^ ** 40<br />

Figure 8. A cross-section cutting through Dangan Island area showing a vertical drop of the rock head<br />

of up to 3 km across the fault <strong>The</strong> vertical drop is filled with Quaternary deposit and forming a tensile<br />

rift zone<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dangan Island and Hong Kong area shows a very distinct uplift of the seabed basin through a tensile<br />

normal fault system (see Fig. 8). <strong>The</strong> geological setting of such vertical drop of the rock head level is<br />

similar to those observed in Shantou and Qiongshan, at where large earthquakes of magnitude of 7.5 has<br />

been generated. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is believed that the maximum credible earthquake magnitude at Dangan<br />

Island area may be up to 7.5. Indeed, the China Seismological Bureau did assign such a value for the<br />

Dangan Island seismic source during the probabilistic earthquake hazard analysis. Thus, Hong Kong may<br />

some days subject to near field large earthquake of magnitude up to 7.5. <strong>The</strong>refore, there is a genuine<br />

need to incorporate seismic provisions in the building regulation.<br />

SEISMIC PERJFORMANCE OF TALL BUILDINGS IN HONG KONG<br />

In Hong Kong, over 70% of the land of 1,000 square km are hilly and thus most buildings constructed in<br />

Hong Kong are high-rise in order to fully utilize the land to accommodate 7.8 millions people in such a<br />

tiny place. As shown in Fig. l(b), tall buildings are everywhere on the Hong Kong Island. Following the<br />

^allocation of the airport to Lantau Island in 1998, new buildings on Kowloon Peninsula are also<br />

expected to be high-rise. Figure 9 shows the aerial photographs for both the new and old airport.<br />

In fact, a lot of tall buildings are being built and planned in Hong Kong. For example, the "Two<br />

International Finance Center" at the Airport Railway Station at Central is near completion. It will be the


23<br />

tallest buildings in Hong Kong when it is completed in 2003. <strong>The</strong> building will be 412m tall with 88<br />

storeys. Figure 10 shows the construction phase of the building in early 2002, and the sketch of the<br />

building when it is completed. At the same time, another much taller building is now being built on<br />

Kowloon. This is the "Union Square" illustrated on Fig. 10; the building will be 480m tall with 102<br />

storeys. It is expected to complete in 2007. Both of them are much taller than the existing 374m Central<br />

Plaza and the 369m China Bank.<strong>The</strong>refore, the seismic performance of tall buildings designed according<br />

wind code is of utmost importance to Hong Kong.<br />

Figure 9. <strong>The</strong> new and old airport in Hong Kong<br />

Figure 10. <strong>The</strong> future tallest buildings in Hong Kong. <strong>The</strong> "Two International Finance Center" on<br />

Hong Kong Island and the "Union Square" on Kowloon side


Although according to the Chinese seismic code (GB50011-2001), tall buildings need to be designed by<br />

time history analysis, probably using nonlinear finite element programs. However, there is a need to<br />

estimate the seismic risk of those existing tall buildings in Hong Kong. We cannot conduct, both<br />

financially and practically, numerical analysis for all existing tall buildings. Thus, simplified but reliable<br />

method should be used to estimate the potential damages and risks of existing buildings.<br />

Shaking Table Test at IEM<br />

Since the seismic hazard in Hong Kong has traditionally been considered to be low, reinforced<br />

concrete structures in Hong Kong have been designed with no seismic provisions. This has led to the<br />

extensive use of transfer systems in the high-rise buildings in order to achieve maximum open space at<br />

the lower stories. However, the transfer systems could be vulnerable to possible moderate earthquake<br />

attack due to the formation of soft stories under the transfer. In a recent joint research study by the<br />

Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> and the Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics ("IEM"), State<br />

Seismology Bureau in Harbin, a 1:20 scale high-rise building was tested in the shaking table. In view<br />

of the uncertainty of the seismic behaviour of typical tall buildings in Hong Kong, the results of the<br />

test is very useful to investigate the vulnerability of Hong Kong buildings.<br />

Figure 11. Shaking table test for a typical tall building in Hong Kong at IEM.<br />

DAMAGE ANALYSIS FOR SOME BUILDINGS IN HONG KONG<br />

Seismic risk and damage analyses were conducted preliminary for Tsim Sha Tsui (TST) East and<br />

Wanchai as shown in Fig. 12. Over 1,400 buildings were classified into 10 building categories, and a<br />

total of 13 different buildings have been selected for vulnerability analyses.


25<br />

Figure 12. Tsim Sha Tsui East and Wanchai have been selected for seismic risk analysis<br />

Figure 13. Four buildings that have been selected for seismic risk analysis<br />

Four buildings that have been selected for seismic risk and damage analysis were shown hi Fig. 13.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y include a 42 storey public housing block with transfer system, a typical 14 storey residential<br />

block in Mei Foo Sun Chuen, a 6 storey government primary school, and a 14 storey commercial<br />

building at Tsim Sha Tsui East.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results of our vulnerability and risk analysis can be shown in GIS platform. <strong>The</strong> hazard input for<br />

our GIS system can be of probabilistic approach or of scenario earthquake approach. Figure 14 shows<br />

a scenario earthquake analysis of assuming a 7.5 earthquake occurred at Dangan Island, which is<br />

probably worst scenario that Hong Kong may face. <strong>The</strong> results are shown in Fig. 15 for both TST East<br />

and Wanchai. A darker colour indicates a higher possibility of damage.


26<br />

Seismic vulnerability of typical buildings in Hong Kong has been estimated based on the probable<br />

seismic demand and the likely building capacity. This is done through the estimation of ductility of the<br />

building. Five degree building damages can then be estimated as a function of seismic input. A<br />

number of journal papers have been resulted (Wen et al, 2000a-c); and the full details are referred to<br />

these references. A GIS system written on ArcView Avenue was developed (Wen et al., 2000d-e).<br />

Ste £* View Ihane Ijieertcr ^ndow<br />

13 53 nnmm CDEE 000<br />

Qngn |2**,4U7B. 3+7.2Z3.35|m Enter* IT 484.65B.1t. 760.434.64!m AWKL 1,1 28.9B5.+5'1.122.33 aim<br />

Figure 14. A scenario earthquake for Dangan Island with magnitude of 7.5<br />

Figure 15. <strong>The</strong> probability of exceeding none damages for scenario earthquake shown in Fig. 14.


27<br />

OTHER ONGOING WORKS<br />

Soil-pile-structure interactions<br />

Some preliminary theoretical works on the soil-pile-structure interactions (SPSI) have been done by<br />

Koo et al. (2002), and Chau and Yang (2002), by using continuum mechanics and by extending the<br />

classical work by Novak (1991). More recently, Chau et al. (2002a) performed a series of shaking<br />

table tests on a soil-pile-structure system using the MTS uniaxial shaking table at <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>. On main new finding is the observation of pounding between soil and pile<br />

when a soil-pile-structure model is subject to seismic excitations. More importantly, this pounding<br />

leads to a very large inertia force at the pile cap level, which is bigger than that at the top of the<br />

structure. Consequently, cracking in piles is induced. To illustrate this pounding between soil and pile,<br />

Chau et al. (2002a) applied the finite element method (FEM) to explain this unusual large acceleration<br />

suffered at the pile cap level. <strong>The</strong> gap element used in the FEM models can replicate the pile cap and<br />

structural responses accurately. It is, however, believed that the pounding between soil and pile<br />

investigated by Chau et al. (2002a) is reported for the first time and its implication to seismic pile<br />

damages deserves further study.<br />

Figure 16 shows the elevated view and a photograph of the 216m Hopewell Center together with the<br />

soil-pile-structure model used in our shaking table test at PolyU. <strong>The</strong> foundation of Hopewell Center<br />

is built on a sloping ground, and such differential foundation scheme is not advantageous to seismic<br />

design. A finite element model is shown in Fig. 17.<br />

Figure 16. An elevated view and a photograph of the Hopewell center and shaking table test on soilpile-structure<br />

interaction


28<br />

Figure 17. A finite element model for the soil-pile-structure interaction<br />

Pounding of Adjacent Buildings<br />

Pounding between adjacent structures or between parts of the same structure during major earthquakes<br />

has often been reported, and it has also been identified as one of the main causes for structural<br />

damages or for complete collapse of structures (Davis 1992, Chau and Wei 2001). For example,<br />

poundings between structures have been observed in Alaska <strong>Earthquake</strong> of 1964, San Fernando<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> of 1971, Mexico City <strong>Earthquake</strong> of 1985, Loma Prieta <strong>Earthquake</strong> of 1989, Kobe<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> of 1995 and Taiwan Chi-Chi <strong>Earthquake</strong> of 1999. Hong Kong is a densely populated<br />

modern city with most buildings built closely to each other and on reclaimed land. <strong>The</strong> separation<br />

distances between adjacent buildings in some cases are very small, controlled by static wind load only<br />

without considering any seismic design requirements. Recently, Chau and Wei (2001) extended the<br />

model of Davis (1992) to consider poundings as nonlinear impacts between two single-degree-offireedom<br />

(SDOF) oscillators. To validate this model, Chau et al. (2002b) performed a series of shaking<br />

table tests on poundings between two steel towers that can be considered approximately as singledegree-of-freedom<br />

oscillators (see Fig. 18). Both observations on the periodic and chaotic poundings<br />

agree quantitatively with the prediction.


29<br />

Figure 18. <strong>The</strong> pounding experiments at PolyU and the use of dampers to mitigate pounding between<br />

adjacent buildings<br />

Dampers have also been used to mitigate the potential pounding between two adjacent buildings of<br />

different dynamic characteristics, as shown in Fig. 17 (Xu et al., 1999a-b; Zhang and Xu, 1999, 2000).<br />

Both active, passive and semi-active dampers have been or will be considered.<br />

FUTURE CHALLENGE<br />

Though the research on earthquake engineering in Hong Kong has made significant progress within a<br />

short period of time, there remain, however, some important issues that have not been satisfactorily<br />

solved or have been not yet addressed. <strong>The</strong>y include the attenuation law for Hong Kong, topographical<br />

effects for amplification, micro-zonation in urban areas, mitigation techniques, design spectrum at long<br />

period, behavior of transfer system in tall building, coupling between soil-pile-structure interaction and<br />

pounding. We have the obligation to assist the Hong Kong SAR Government in the assessment of<br />

earthquake hazard, and the vulnerability and risk of our building stock and infrastructures. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />

also an urgent need to develop and implement remedial measures to strengthen or retrofit our<br />

structures, and to educate the public to understand the meaning of "moderate" seismic hazard and the<br />

extent of "risk" involved. In recent years, many new technologies have been developed worldwide<br />

including devices on vibration control, sensor technology, smart materials, global information systems<br />

and others. Bearing in mind that structures in Hong Kong are unique, application of the new<br />

technologies will need some degree of modifications. Thus, adaptation of the new technologies to<br />

improve the seismic performance of our structures is another challenge to be faced by the researchers<br />

and professionals in Hong Kong.


30<br />

RESEARCH COLLABORATION<br />

We have been active in national and international research collaboration since 1995. Academic visits<br />

have been made to Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, the Institute of Geophysics of the China<br />

Seismological Bureau, the Institute of <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> of China Academy of Building<br />

<strong>Research</strong> of Ministry of Construction of China, Tongji <strong>University</strong>, and Harbin Industrial <strong>University</strong>.<br />

More recently, the National Natural Science Foundation of China granted its first kind ever of national<br />

important project on intelligent vibration control of civil engineering structures, in which the Hong<br />

Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> is also involved.<br />

Internationally, we have linked with the <strong>University</strong> of California at Berkeley, USA, and the <strong>University</strong><br />

of Turin, <strong>University</strong> of Notre Dame, <strong>University</strong> of Illinois, Mid-America <strong>Earthquake</strong> Center, and the<br />

newly formed ANCER (Asian-Pacific Network of Centers for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>),<br />

which comprising of 7 regional earthquake research centers. Figure 19 shows a group photograph<br />

taken when we participated in the Taiwan Strait Conference on Cities Hazard Mitigation in 2000.<br />

Figure 19. Seismic group's participant in earthquake conference<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> earthquake hazard and risk problems of Hong Kong have been discussed briefly in this paper.<br />

Some new results and views were presented, especially regarding the potential hazard induced by the<br />

Dangan Island seismic source. Significant progress has been made in Hong Kong in the field of<br />

earthquake engineering in the past ten years, but there are still other research topics and urgent tasks<br />

faced by researchers and other professionals in Hong Kong. National and international collaboration is<br />

inevitable to speed up the research progress, the development of seismic design standards for building<br />

structures, and the implementation of new technologies for seismic hazard mitigation. This can be<br />

realized through exchange of data and information, jointly organized seminars and conferences,<br />

collaborative research projects, and exchange of personnel.


31<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> writers are grateful for the financial supports from the <strong>Research</strong> Grants Council of Hong Kong and<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> (under A202 and A214).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Chau K.T and Lo, J.H.Y. (2001). Soil amplification in Hong Kong under far field earthquakes. Soft Soil<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, ed. By Lee CF, Lau CK, Ng CWW, Kwong AKL, PLR Pang, Yin J-H, and Yue ZQ. <strong>The</strong><br />

Third International Conference on Soft Soil <strong>Engineering</strong> (3 rd ICSSE), Balkema, pp245-250.<br />

Chau KT and Wei XX (2001). Pounding of structures modeled as nonlinear impacts of two oscillators.<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 30, No.5, pp633-651.<br />

Chau KT, Shen CY, Guo X. (2002a) Pounding between soil and pile under earthquake excitations:<br />

Shaking table tests and FEM analyses. To be submitted to Journal Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> ASCE.<br />

Chau KT, Wei XX, Guo X, Shen CY. (2002b) Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic<br />

pounding between adjacent structures. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics,<br />

(provisionally accepted).<br />

Chau KT and Yang X (2002). Nonlinear interaction of soil-pile in horizontal vibration. To be<br />

submitted to Journal of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics ASCE<br />

Davis RO (1992). Pounding of buildings modeled by an impact oscillator. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

and Structural Dynamics 21,253-274.<br />

EEFIT (1991). <strong>The</strong> Newcastle, Australia <strong>Earthquake</strong>, Publ. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Field<br />

Investigation Team, Institution of Structural Engineers, London, UK.<br />

GB 18306-2001 (2001). Seismic ground motion parameter zonation map of China. China, 2001<br />

GB 50011-2001 (2001). Code for Seismic Design of Buildings National Standard, Beijing, China,<br />

2001.<br />

GBJ11-89 (1989). Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, National Standard, Beijing, China, 1994.<br />

Koo KK, Chau KT, Yang X, Lam, SS and Wong YL (2002). Soil-pile-structure interactions under SH<br />

waves. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, (accepted).<br />

Lai KW and Langford RL (1996). Spatial and Temporal characteristics of major faults of Hong Kong.<br />

Seismicity in Eastern Asia, Geological Society of Hong Kong Bulletin No 5, 72-84.<br />

Lee CM and Workman DR (1996). <strong>Earthquake</strong>s in the South China region and their impact on Hong<br />

Kong. Seismicity in Eastern Asia, Geological Society of Hong Kong Bulletin No. 5, 92-103.<br />

Lin J and Xie M (1996). Time and space distributions of seismicity in Southeastern coastal China.<br />

Seismicity in Eastern Asia, Geological Society of Hong Kong Bulletin No. 5,12-22.<br />

Novak M (1991). Piles under dynamic loads. State of the Art Paper. 2nd International Conference on<br />

Recent Advances in Geotechnical <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Soil Dynamics, <strong>University</strong> of<br />

Missouri-Rolla, Vol. Ill, pp250-273.<br />

Wen ZP, Hu YX and Chau KT (2002a). Site effect on vulnerability of high-rise shear-wall-buildings<br />

under near and far field earthquakes. Submitted to Soil Dynamics and <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Wen ZP, Chau KT and Hu YX (2002b). <strong>The</strong> effects of site conditions and epicentral distance on damage<br />

probability matrix of building. To be submitted to Natural Hazards.


Wen ZP, Hu YX and Chau KT (2002c). Site effect on vulnerability of 21 story buildings in Hong Kong<br />

under near and far field earthquakes. Tenth International Conference On Soil Dynamics and <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, October 7-10,2001, Philadelphia, USA, pp 225.<br />

Wen ZP, Lu HS, Chau KT and Hu, YX (2002d). A GIS system for seismic damage estimation of Hong<br />

Kong buildings". Submitted International Conference on Innovation and Sustainable development of<br />

Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> m the 21 st Century August 2002, Beijing (accepted).<br />

Wen ZP, Lu HS, Chau KT and Hu YX (2002e). A GIS system integrated with vulnerability for seismic<br />

damage and loss estimation of Hong Kong. An International Conference on Advances in Building<br />

Technology, with <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>me Advances In Building Technology, 4-6 December 2002, Hong Kong<br />

(accepted).<br />

Wong YL, Guo X, Yuan Y and Chau KT (2000). Influence of soft sandwich layer on seismic response<br />

of soil sites in Hong Kong. Journal of Natural Disasters, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp 109-116 (in Chinese).<br />

Wong YL, Zhao JX, Chau KT and Lee CM (1998). Assessment of seismicity model for Hong Kong<br />

region. <strong>The</strong> HK1E Transactions, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp50-62.<br />

Wong YL, Zhao JX, Lam SEE and Chau KT (1998). Assessing seismic response of soft soil sites in Hong<br />

Kong using microtremor records. HKIE Transactions, Vol. 5, No.3, pp70-79.<br />

Xia K (1985). <strong>The</strong> first sea bottom seismometer test in the South China Sea shallow water area. Proc. Of<br />

the Seminar on Marine geology of Hong Kong and the Pearl River Mouth. Hong Kong Geological<br />

Society, HK, pp. 29-37.<br />

Xu YL, He Q and Ko JM (1999). Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under<br />

earthquake excitation, <strong>Engineering</strong> Structures, Vol. 2, No. 21, pp 13 5-148.<br />

Xu YL, Zhan S, Ko JM and Zhang WS (1999). Experimental investigation of adjacent buildings<br />

connected by fluid dampers. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, pp609-631.<br />

Zhang WS and Xu YL (1999). Dynamic characteristics and seismic response of adjacent buildings linked<br />

by discrete dampers. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, ppl 163-1185.<br />

Zhang WS and Xu YL (2000). Vibration analysis of two buildings linked by Maxwell model-defined fluid<br />

dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 233, No. 5, pp775-796.<br />

32


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

PARAMETRIC ESTIMATION OF GROUND MOTION<br />

ATTENUATION OF TURKISH EARTHQUAKES<br />

Polat GUlkan<br />

Disaster Management <strong>Research</strong> Center and Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Middle East Technical <strong>University</strong>, 06531 Ankara, Turkey<br />

Erol Kalkan<br />

Department of Civil & Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,<br />

Troy, 12180 NY, US A<br />

Abstract: <strong>The</strong> main result of this study is the development of a consistent set of<br />

empincal attenuation expressions for predicting free-field horizontal components of peak<br />

ground acceleration (PGA) and 5 percent damped pseudo acceleration response spectra<br />

(PSA) from 47 strong ground motion records recorded in Turkey. <strong>The</strong> relationships for<br />

Turkey were derived in similar form to those previously developed by Boore et al. (1997)<br />

for shallow earthquakes in western North America. <strong>The</strong> used database was compiled for<br />

earthquakes in Turkey with moment magnitudes (M w ) 5 that occurred between 1976-<br />

1999, and consisted of horizontal peak ground acceleration and 5 percent damped<br />

response spectra of accelerograms recorded on three different site conditions classified as<br />

rock, soil and soft soil <strong>The</strong> empirical equations for predicting strong ground motion were<br />

typically fit to the strong motion data set by applying nonlinear regression analysis<br />

according to both random horizontal components and maximum horizontal components.<br />

Comparisons of the results shows that ground motion relations for earthquakes in one<br />

region cannot be simply modified for use in engineering analyses in another region. Our<br />

results, patterned after the Boore et al. expressions and dominated by the Kocaeli and<br />

Diizce events in 1999, appear to underestimate predictions based on their curves for up to<br />

about 15 km. For larger distances the reverse holds.<br />

Introduction<br />

Estimation of ground motion, either implicitly through the use of special earthquake<br />

codes or more specifically from site-specific investigations is essential for the design of<br />

engineered structures. <strong>The</strong> development of design criteria requires, as a minimum, a<br />

strong-motion attenuation relationship to estimate earthquake ground motions from<br />

specific parameters characterizing the earthquake source, geologic conditions of the site,<br />

and the length of the propagation path between the source and the site.<br />

This study describes the best estimates and uncertainties in the ground motion<br />

parameters predicted in a functional form that can be used in probabilistic hazard studies<br />

and other earthquake engineering applications. <strong>The</strong>se models and the values of the<br />

predictor parameters were developed by an extensive analysis of ground motion data and<br />

its relevant data. This effort was partly motivated by the occurrence of the 1999 (M w =<br />

7.4) Kocaeli and 1999 (M w = 7.1) Dtizce earthquakes. <strong>The</strong> Kocaeli earthquake was the<br />

largest event that occurred in Turkey within the last 50 years, and it is the first wellstudied<br />

and widely recorded large NAP (North Anatolian Fault) event.


34<br />

<strong>The</strong> data includes records from earthquakes of moment magnitude greater than about<br />

5, and site conditions characterized as soft soil, soil and rock with closest distance less<br />

than about 150 km. This presents a unique opportunity to study the indigenous<br />

attenuation characteristics of earthquake ground motions. Also, the study of the effects<br />

of local site on the attenuation of earthquake ground motions becomes possible since the<br />

recording stations are fixed and many stations have several records.<br />

Finally, this paper describes the procedure for estimating ground motion at various<br />

soil sites by presenting the tables and equations that describe attenuation functions and<br />

associated measures of uncertainty. One of the major purposes of this paper is to make<br />

comparisons between the direct use of attenuation relationships developed elsewhere for<br />

Turkey, and to illuminate the reasons for their differences.<br />

Database<br />

Database comprises 93 records from 47 horizontal components of-19 earthquakes<br />

occurred in Turkey between 1976 and 1999. Details of data library are given in Table 1,<br />

and listings of the earthquakes and the number of recordings for each of the strong<br />

motion parameters are presented in Table 2. Station names have not been translated so<br />

that independent checks may be run. Recordings from small earthquakes were limited to<br />

the closer distances than large earthquakes depending on the magnitude and the geology<br />

of the recording site to minimize the influence of regional differences in attenuation and<br />

to avoid the complex propagation effects coming from longer distances.<br />

In the data set, earthquake size is characterized by moment magnitude M w , as<br />

described by Hanks and Kanamori (1979). When original magnitudes were listed in<br />

other scales, conversion was done according to Wells and Coppersmith (1994). <strong>The</strong><br />

magnitudes are restricted to about M w^ 5.0 to emphasize those ground motions having<br />

greatest engineering interests, and to limit the analysis to the more reliably recorded<br />

events. In the regression phase, magnitudes of earthquakes were locked within +/- 0.25<br />

band intervals centered at halves or full numbers in order to eliminate the errors coming<br />

from the determination of these magnitude values. Figure 1 shows the distribution of<br />

these earthquakes in terms of magnitude, station geology (defined below) and source<br />

distance r c] , defined as the closest horizontal distance between the recording station and a<br />

point on the horizontal projection of the rupture zone on the earth's surface. However,<br />

for some of the smaller events, rupture surfaces have not been defined clearly therefore<br />

epicentral distances are used instead. We believe that use of epicentral distance does not<br />

introduce significant bias because the dimensions of the rupture area for small<br />

earthquakes are usually much smaller than the distance to the recording stations.<br />

Examination of the peak ground motion data from the small number of normal-faulting<br />

and reverse-faulting earthquakes in the data set showed that they were not significantly<br />

different from ground motion characteristics of strike-slip earthquakes. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

normal, reverse or strike-slip earthquakes were combined into a single fault category.<br />

Peak horizontal acceleration (PGA) and pseudo response spectral acceleration (PSA) are<br />

represented considering both maximum and random horizontal components. <strong>The</strong>se are<br />

explamed below.<br />

<strong>The</strong> data used in the analysis constitutes only main shocks of 19 earthquakes. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

were recorded mostly in small buildings built as meteorological stations up to three<br />

stories tall because the strong motion stations in Turkey are co-located with institutional<br />

facilities for ease of access, phone hook-up and security. This causes modified<br />

acceleration records. This is one of the unavoidable causes of uncertainties in this study,


35<br />

Table 1. Records Used in the Development of the Attenuation Equations for Peak Horizontal<br />

Acceleration and Spectral Accelerations<br />

Date<br />

dd.mm,w<br />

1908.1976<br />

05 10.1977<br />

16.121977<br />

18.07 1979<br />

0507 1983<br />

05 07 1983<br />

05 07 1983<br />

30 10 1983<br />

29.03.1984<br />

12.08.1985<br />

05.05.1986<br />

06.06.1986<br />

2004.1988<br />

13,03.1992<br />

1303.1992<br />

06.11.1992<br />

24.05.1994<br />

13.11.1994<br />

01.10.1995<br />

01.10.1995<br />

27.06.1998<br />

27.06.1998<br />

17.08.1999<br />

7,08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7,08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7,08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7.08. 1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

708.1999<br />

708.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

708 1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

708.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

7.08.1999<br />

2.11.1999<br />

2.11.1999<br />

2.11.1999<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

DENZL<br />

CERKE<br />

ZMR<br />

DURSUNBEY<br />

BGA<br />

EGA<br />

EGA<br />

HORASAN-NARMAN<br />

BALQCESR<br />

K I<br />

MALATYA<br />

SORGO (MALATYA )<br />

MURADYE<br />

ERZNCAN<br />

ERZNCAN<br />

ZMR<br />

CRT<br />

KOYCE Z<br />

DNAR<br />

DNAR<br />

ADANA-CEYHAN<br />

ADANA-CEYHAN<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

KOCAEL<br />

DOZCE<br />

DOZCE<br />

DGZCE<br />

Mw r«, (km)<br />

-_.<br />

5.4<br />

5.5<br />

5.3<br />

6.0<br />

6.1<br />

6.2<br />

6.5<br />

4.5<br />

4.9<br />

6.0<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

6.9<br />

6.9<br />

6.1<br />

5.4<br />

5.2<br />

6.4<br />

6.4<br />

6.3<br />

6.3<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

74<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7,4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7,4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

7.4<br />

74<br />

7.4<br />

7.1<br />

7.1<br />

7 1<br />

15.2<br />

46.0<br />

1.2<br />

10.3<br />

577<br />

48.7<br />

75.0<br />

25.0<br />

2.4<br />

80.8<br />

296<br />

34.7<br />

373<br />

65.0<br />

5.0<br />

41.0<br />

20.1<br />

17.4<br />

3 0<br />

46.2<br />

SO.l<br />

28.0<br />

55,0<br />

81.0<br />

n.o<br />

116.0<br />

15.0<br />

32.0<br />

49.0<br />

8.0<br />

30.0<br />

140.0<br />

3.2<br />

150.0<br />

17.0<br />

82.5<br />

116.0<br />

72.0<br />

63.0<br />

3.3<br />

63.0<br />

43.0<br />

71.0<br />

81.0<br />

20.4<br />

8.2<br />

30.9<br />

Recording Station<br />

Demzli: Mcteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Cerke Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

zmir: Meteoroloji btasyonu<br />

Dursunbey Kandilli Goziem stasyonu<br />

Edincik: Kandilli Goziem stasyonu<br />

Gooen: Meteorolojt stasyoou<br />

Tekirda Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Horasan- Meteorolqji stasyonu<br />

Bal kesir Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Ki Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Golba . Devlet Hastanesi<br />

GSIba Devlet Hastanesi<br />

Muradiye: Meteoroloji stasyouu<br />

Refahiye: Kdymakaml k Btnas<br />

Erztncao: Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Ku adas Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Foca: Gdmruk Mfldiirlu a<br />

Kdyce iz: Meteoroloji stasyoau<br />

Dinar: Meteotoloji stasyoau<br />

Qardak.-Sa Ik Oca<br />

Mersm: Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Ceyhan: PTT Mad.<br />

Bursa: Sivtl Sav. Mud.<br />

Cekraecc: Niikieer Santral Bn.<br />

DQzce: Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Ere li: Kaymakaml k Bn.<br />

Gebze. Tiibitak Marmara Ara Mer.<br />

Go'ynuk. Devtet Hastanesi<br />

stanbul: Bay ad rl k ve skaa Miid.<br />

zmit: Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

zntk: Karayollar efli i<br />

Kiitahya: Sivil Savunma MQd.<br />

Sakarya: Bay nd r! k vc skan Mud.<br />

Tekirda • Hafctmct Kona<br />

Dar ca: Arcelik Arge Bn.<br />

Ambarl : Termik Santral<br />

M. Ere hsi: Bota Gas Temuaali<br />

Ye ilfcdy: Havahman<br />

4. Levent: Yap Kredi Plaza<br />

Yar mca: Petkira Tesisten<br />

Fatifa: Fatifa TOrbesi<br />

Heybeliada; Sanatoryum<br />

Bursa: Tofa Fab.<br />

Cekmece: Nukleer Santral Bn.<br />

3olu: Bay nd rl k ve skan Mud.<br />

Duzce : Meteoroloji stasyonu<br />

Mudurnu. KavmakamI k Bmas<br />

Station<br />

Coordinates<br />

37.S140N-29.U20E<br />

40.8800N-32.9100E<br />

38.40QON- 27 1900E<br />

39 6700N- 28.5300E<br />

403600N-27.S900E<br />

40.0800N- 27 6800E<br />

40.9600N-2753QOE<br />

400400N-42 1700E<br />

39.6600N- 27.S600E<br />

39 3400N- 40 2800E<br />

377810N-376410E<br />

377810N-37.6410E<br />

39 0300N- 43.7000E<br />

39.90 ION- 38. 7690E<br />

39.7520N- 39 4870E<br />

37.36 ION- 27 2660E<br />

38.6400N-26.7700E<br />

36.9700N- 28.6940E<br />

38.0600N-30.1500E<br />

37 8250N- 29 66SOE<br />

36.8300N- 34.6500E<br />

370500N35SIOOE<br />

40.1830N-29.I310E<br />

40.9700N-28.7000E<br />

40.8500N-3U7QQE<br />

40.9800N-27.7900E<br />

40.8200N- 29.4400E<br />

40.3850N- 30.7340E<br />

41.0S80N-29.0130E<br />

40.7900N- 29.960QE<br />

4Q.437QN-296910E<br />

39.4190N-299970E<br />

40.7370N- 30 3840E<br />

40.9790N-27.5150E<br />

40.82360N-293607E<br />

40.9809N- 28.6926E<br />

40.99 19N-27.9795E<br />

40.9823N-28S199E<br />

4l.08HN-20.OtUE<br />

40 7639N-29 7620E<br />

41.0196N-23.9500E<br />

40.8688N- 29.0S75E<br />

40.2605N- 29.0680E<br />

40.9700N- 28.7000E<br />

40.7450N-31.6100E<br />

40.S500N-31.1700E<br />

40.4630N-31.1S20E<br />

Station<br />

Site Class<br />

Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Rock<br />

Rock<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Rock<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Rock<br />

Roclc<br />

Rock<br />

Sort Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Rock<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Rock<br />

Rock<br />

Rock<br />

Rock<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Rock<br />

Rock<br />

Sod<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Rock<br />

Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Rock<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Soft Soil<br />

Peak Hor. Ace. (mg)<br />

_ N-S E-W<br />

348.53<br />

36.03<br />

391.41<br />

232.29<br />

5344<br />

50.11<br />

2939<br />

15026<br />

223.89<br />

163.06<br />

11470<br />

68.54<br />

4950<br />

6721<br />

404.97<br />

83,49<br />

36.06<br />

72.79<br />

288.30<br />

65.07<br />

119.29<br />

22342<br />

54.32<br />

1 18.03<br />

314.38<br />

90.36<br />

26482<br />

13769<br />

60.67<br />

171.17<br />

91.89<br />

50.05<br />

40704<br />

12979<br />

211 37<br />

252.56<br />

98.88<br />

90.21<br />

41.08<br />

23022<br />

18939<br />

56.15<br />

100.89<br />

177.31<br />

739.56<br />

40769<br />

120.99<br />

290.36<br />

38.94<br />

125.40<br />

288.25<br />

4651<br />

4677<br />

3491<br />

173 30<br />

128.97<br />

8909<br />

7604<br />

3443<br />

51.18<br />

85.93<br />

470.92<br />

71.80<br />

4980<br />

96.51<br />

26995<br />

61.30<br />

132.12<br />

273.55<br />

45.81<br />

8961<br />

373.76<br />

101.36<br />

14 ( 45<br />

117.90<br />

42.66<br />

224.91<br />

12332<br />

59.66<br />

128.33<br />

133.68<br />

186.04<br />

87 10<br />

84.47<br />

35.52<br />

322.20<br />

161.87<br />

1 10.23<br />

100.04<br />

132.08<br />

805.38<br />

513.78<br />

58.34<br />

but there are other attributes that must be mentioned. <strong>The</strong> first is our omission of<br />

aftershock data. Most of these come from the two major 1999 events, and contain freefield<br />

data that we did not wish to cornrningle with the rest of the set. We also omitted<br />

the few records for which the peak acceleration caused by the main shock is less than<br />

about 0.04 g. Our entire, non-discriminated ensemble is shown in Figure 2.<br />

When we consider the effects of geological conditions on ground motion and<br />

response spectra, the widely accepted method of reflecting these effects is to classify the<br />

recording stations according to the shear-wave velocity profiles of their substrata.<br />

Unfortunately, the actual shear-wave velocity and detailed site description are not<br />

available for most stations in Turkey. For this reason, we estimated the site classification<br />

by analogy with infonnation in similar geologic materials. <strong>The</strong> type of geologic material<br />

underlying each recording site was obtained in a number of ways: consultation with<br />

geologists at <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Division of Ministry of Public Works and Settlement,<br />

various geologic maps, past earthquake reports and geological references prepared for


36<br />

Turkey In the hght of this information we divided soil groups for Turkey into three m<br />

ascending order for shear velocity soft soil, soil, and rock <strong>The</strong> average shear-wave<br />

velocities assigned for these groups are 200, 400 and 700m/s, respectively <strong>The</strong><br />

distribution of the records with respect to magnitude and distance plotted by type of<br />

faulting is shown in Figure 3<br />

su<br />

3<br />

S<br />

SJD<br />

5<br />

a<br />

CJ<br />

£ o<br />

o<br />

-3<br />

•5<br />

I<br />

a<br />

o<br />

8 0 -<br />

75 -<br />

70 -<br />

6 5 -<br />

60 •<br />

55 -<br />

| 55 -<br />

1<br />

80<br />

75 -<br />

o<br />

I 70 -<br />

Sea-<br />

S 60-<br />

• * • • • • • •<br />

• *<br />

* • • »<br />

'<br />

50 •<br />

•<br />

ROCK<br />

45 i 1 ~~T~<br />

1 10 100<br />

o n<br />

O U T^<br />

75 -<br />

70 -<br />

65 -<br />

60 -<br />

50 -<br />

4 fi -<br />

* » •• • •<br />

•<br />

- - •<br />

10 100<br />

*•<br />

9<br />

SOIL<br />

I 55 '<br />

I 50-<br />

45 -<br />

40<br />

10<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

SOFT SOIL<br />

1QQ<br />

Figure 1 Distribution of records in the database in terms of magnitude, distance and<br />

local geological conditions<br />

Table 2 <strong>Earthquake</strong>s Used in the Analysis


37<br />

Date<br />

8/19/1976<br />

10/5/1977<br />

12/16/1977<br />

7/18/1979<br />

7/5/1983<br />

10/30/1983<br />

3/29/1984<br />

8/12/1985<br />

5/5/1986<br />

6/6/1986<br />

4/20/1988<br />

3/13/1992<br />

11/6/1992<br />

5/24/1994<br />

11/13/1994<br />

10/1/1995<br />

6/27/1998<br />

8/17/1999<br />

11/12/1999<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

DENIZLI<br />

CERKJES<br />

IZMIR<br />

DURSUNBEY<br />

BIGA<br />

HORASAN-NARMAN<br />

BALIKESIR<br />

KIGI<br />

MALATYA<br />

SURGU(MALATYA)<br />

MURADIYE<br />

ERZINCAN<br />

IZMIR<br />

GIRIT<br />

KOYCEGIZ<br />

DINAR<br />

ADANA-CEYHAN<br />

KOCAELI<br />

DUZCE<br />

Fault Type<br />

Normal<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Normal<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Reverse<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Normal<br />

Normal<br />

Normal<br />

Normal<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

Strike-Slip<br />

M w<br />

53<br />

54<br />

55<br />

53<br />

60<br />

65<br />

45<br />

49<br />

60<br />

60<br />

50<br />

69<br />

61<br />

54<br />

52<br />

64<br />

63<br />

74<br />

71<br />

NUMBER OF RECORDINGS<br />

Soft Soil Soil Rock<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

4<br />

12<br />

6<br />

Total 40<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

16<br />

24<br />

2<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

15<br />

29<br />

ALL DATA<br />

01 -<br />

* •<br />

001<br />

10 100<br />

Figure 2 Distribution of the larger maximum horizontal acceleration of either component<br />

versus distance


38<br />

-)<br />

1<br />

*I<br />

C5<br />

IS<br />

"c<br />

0»<br />

s<br />

o<br />

o u -<br />

75 -<br />

45 -<br />

Q A<br />

75 -<br />

70 -<br />

65 -<br />

60 -<br />

55 -<br />

m * * •* •* •»•••• • i»<br />

• • • • •<br />

• • •<br />

*•<br />

«h •<br />

* ••<br />

STRIKE SLIP<br />

1 10 100<br />

_<br />

•. — ~ 9<br />

„ _ __^<br />

• » « _<br />

50 -<br />

_ _ _ +<br />

45 •<br />

.<br />

NORMAL<br />

4 0 -<br />

1 10 100<br />

P n - - - - - - - -<br />

"5 OJ)<br />

C8<br />

s s<br />

o<br />

s<br />

50 -<br />

• • •<br />

70-<br />

So 65 -<br />

1 60 -<br />

s<br />

Q 55-<br />

S<br />

3<br />

50-<br />

75-<br />

65-<br />

60-<br />

55-<br />

45-<br />

4 0 -<br />

REVERSE<br />

1 10 100<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

Figure 3. Distribution of records in the database in terms of magnitude, distance and<br />

type of faulting<br />

Attenuation Equation Development<br />

Attenuation relationships were developed by using the same general form of the<br />

equation proposed by Boore et al. (1997). <strong>The</strong> ground motion parameter estimation<br />

equation is as follows:<br />

lnY = bi + b 2 (M - 6) + b 3 (M - 6) 2 + b 5 In r + b v In (V s / V A<br />

(1)


39<br />

(2)<br />

Here Y is the ground motion parameter (peak horizontal acceleration (PGA) or<br />

pseudo spectral acceleration (PSA) in g); M is (moment) magnitude; r ci is closest<br />

horizontal distance from the station to a site of interest in km; V s is the shear wave<br />

velocity for the station in m/s; bi, 02, b 3 , bs, h, by, and V A are the parameters to be<br />

determined. Here h is a fictitious depth, and V A a fictitious velocity that are determined<br />

by regression. <strong>The</strong> coefficients in the equations for predicting ground motion were<br />

determined by using nonlinear regression analysis. Nonlinear regression is a method of<br />

finding a nonlinear model of the relationship between the dependent variable and a set of<br />

independent variables. Unlike traditional linear regression, nonlinear regression can<br />

estimate models with arbitrary relationships between independent and dependent<br />

variables. This is accomplished using iterative estimation algorithms. This exercise was<br />

performed separately on PGA and on PSA data at each oscillator period considered<br />

(total of 46 periods from 0.1 to 2.0s.).<br />

<strong>The</strong> procedure that we have used to develop the attenuation curves consists of two<br />

stages (Joyner and Boore, 1993). In the first, attenuation relationships were developed<br />

for PGA and spectral acceleration values by selecting the acceleration values in the<br />

database as maximum horizontal components of each recording station. <strong>The</strong>n, a<br />

nonlinear regression analysis was performed. In the next stage, random horizontal<br />

components were selected for the acceleration values in the database and regression<br />

analyses were applied. <strong>The</strong> results were compared for PGA, 0.3 s and 1.0 s PSA cases,<br />

and it was concluded that selection of maximum, rather than of random, horizontal<br />

components did not yield improved estimates and smaller error terms. This issue is<br />

taken up again in the section on comparisons of our results with other relations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coefficients for estimating the maximum horizontal-component pseudoacceleration<br />

response by Equation (1) are given in Table 3. <strong>The</strong> resulting parameters can<br />

be used to produce attenuation relationships that predict response spectra over the full<br />

range of magnitudes (M w 5 to 7.5) and distances (r d ) up to 150 km. <strong>The</strong> results were<br />

used to compute errors for PGA and PSA at individual periods. <strong>The</strong> standard deviation<br />

of the residuals, a, expressing the random variability of ground motions, is an important<br />

input parameter in probabilistic hazard analysis. In this study, the observed value of a<br />

lies generally within the range of 0.5 to 0.7. <strong>The</strong> calculated attenuation relationships for<br />

PGA for rock, soil and soft soil sites are shown in Figures 4 through 6.


40<br />

Table 3. Attenuation Relationships of Honzontal PGA and Response Spectral<br />

Accelerations (5% damping)<br />

ln(Y) = b1 + b2 (M - 6) +<br />

Period b1 b2<br />

PGA<br />

0.10<br />

0.11<br />

0.12<br />

0.13<br />

0.14<br />

0.15<br />

0.16<br />

0.17<br />

0.18<br />

0.19<br />

0.20<br />

0.22<br />

0.24<br />

0.26<br />

0.28<br />

0.30<br />

0.32<br />

0.34<br />

0.36<br />

0.38<br />

0.40<br />

0.42<br />

0.44<br />

0.46<br />

0.48<br />

0.50<br />

0.55<br />

0.60<br />

0.65<br />

0.70<br />

0.75<br />

0.80<br />

0.85<br />

0.90<br />

0.95<br />

1.00<br />

1.10<br />

1.20<br />

1.30<br />

1.40<br />

1.50<br />

1.60<br />

1 70<br />

1.80<br />

1.90<br />

2.00<br />

-0.682<br />

-0139<br />

0.031<br />

0.123<br />

0138<br />

0100<br />

0.090<br />

-0.128<br />

-0.107<br />

0.045<br />

0.053<br />

0.127<br />

-0.081<br />

-0.167<br />

-0.129<br />

0.140<br />

0.296<br />

0.454<br />

0.422<br />

0.554<br />

0.254<br />

0.231<br />

0.120<br />

0.035<br />

-0.077<br />

-0.154<br />

-0078<br />

-0.169<br />

-0.387<br />

-0.583<br />

-0.681<br />

-0.717<br />

-0.763<br />

-0.778<br />

-0.837<br />

-0.957<br />

-1.112<br />

-1.459<br />

-1.437<br />

-1.321<br />

-1.212<br />

-1.340<br />

-1.353<br />

-1.420<br />

-1.465<br />

-1.500<br />

-1.452<br />

0.253<br />

0.200<br />

0.235<br />

0.228<br />

0.216<br />

0.186<br />

0.210<br />

0.214<br />

0.187<br />

0.168<br />

0.180<br />

0.192<br />

0.214<br />

0.265<br />

0.345<br />

0.428<br />

0.471<br />

0.476<br />

0.471<br />

0.509<br />

0.499<br />

0.497<br />

0.518<br />

0.544<br />

0.580<br />

0.611<br />

0.638<br />

0.707<br />

0.698<br />

0.689<br />

0.698<br />

0.730<br />

0757<br />

0810<br />

0.856<br />

0.870<br />

0.904<br />

0.898<br />

0.962<br />

1.000<br />

1.000<br />

0.997<br />

0.999<br />

0.996<br />

0.995<br />

0999<br />

1 020<br />

b3 (M - 6) 2<br />

b3<br />

0036<br />

-0.003<br />

-0.007<br />

-0.031<br />

-0.007<br />

0.014<br />

-0.013<br />

0.007<br />

0.037<br />

0043<br />

0.063<br />

0065<br />

0.006<br />

-0.035<br />

-0.039<br />

-0.096<br />

-0.140<br />

-0.168<br />

-0.152<br />

-0.114<br />

-0.105<br />

-0.105<br />

-0.135<br />

-0.142<br />

-0.147<br />

-0.154<br />

-0.161<br />

-0.179<br />

-0.187<br />

-0.159<br />

-0.143<br />

-0.143<br />

-0.113<br />

-0.123<br />

-0.130<br />

-0.127<br />

-0.169<br />

-0.147<br />

-0.156<br />

-0.147<br />

-0.088<br />

-0.055<br />

-0.056<br />

-0.052<br />

-0.053<br />

-0.051<br />

-0.079<br />

+ b5inr+bVln(V s/V<br />

b5<br />

b v<br />

-0.562<br />

-0.553<br />

-0.573<br />

-0.586<br />

-0.590<br />

-0.585<br />

-0.549<br />

-0.519<br />

-0.535<br />

-0.556<br />

-0.570<br />

-0.597<br />

-0.532<br />

-0.531<br />

-0.552<br />

-0.616<br />

-0.642<br />

-0.653<br />

-0.651<br />

-0692<br />

-0.645<br />

-0.647<br />

-0.612<br />

-0.583<br />

-0.563<br />

-0.552<br />

-0.565<br />

-0.539<br />

-0.506<br />

-0.500<br />

-0.517<br />

-0.516<br />

-0.525<br />

-0.529<br />

-0.512<br />

-0.472<br />

-0.443<br />

-0.414<br />

-0.463<br />

-0.517<br />

-0.584<br />

-0.582<br />

-0.590<br />

-0.582<br />

-0.581<br />

-0.592<br />

-0.612<br />

-0.297<br />

-0.167<br />

-0.181<br />

-0.208<br />

-0.237<br />

-0.249<br />

-0.196<br />

-0.224<br />

-0.243<br />

-0.256<br />

-0.288<br />

-0.303<br />

-0.319<br />

-0.382<br />

-0.395<br />

-0369<br />

-0.346<br />

-0.290<br />

-0300<br />

-0.287<br />

-0.341<br />

-0.333<br />

-0.313<br />

-0.286<br />

-0.285<br />

-0.293<br />

-0.259<br />

-0.216<br />

-0.259<br />

-0.304<br />

-0.360<br />

-0.331<br />

-0.302<br />

-0.283<br />

-0.252<br />

-0.163<br />

-0.200<br />

-0.252<br />

-0.267<br />

-0.219<br />

-0.178<br />

-0.165<br />

-0.135<br />

-0.097<br />

-0.058<br />

-0.047<br />

-0.019<br />

A ) with r =<br />

V A<br />

1381<br />

1063<br />

1413<br />

1501<br />

1591<br />

1833<br />

1810<br />

2193<br />

2433<br />

2041<br />

2086<br />

2238<br />

2198<br />

2198<br />

2160<br />

2179<br />

2149<br />

2144<br />

2083<br />

2043<br />

2009<br />

1968<br />

1905<br />

1899<br />

1863<br />

1801<br />

1768<br />

1724<br />

1629<br />

1607<br />

1530<br />

1492<br />

1491<br />

1438<br />

1446<br />

1384<br />

1391<br />

1380<br />

1415<br />

1429<br />

1454<br />

1490<br />

1513<br />

1569<br />

1653<br />

1707<br />

1787<br />

( re! 2 + h 2 ) 1<br />

h<br />

4.480<br />

3.760<br />

3.890<br />

4.720<br />

5.460<br />

4.980<br />

2.770<br />

1.320<br />

1.670<br />

2.440<br />

2.970<br />

3.480<br />

1.980<br />

2.550<br />

3.450<br />

4.950<br />

6.110<br />

7.380<br />

8300<br />

9.180<br />

9.920<br />

9.920<br />

9.090<br />

9.250<br />

8980<br />

8.960<br />

9.060<br />

8.290<br />

8.240<br />

7.640<br />

7.760<br />

7.120<br />

6.980<br />

6.570<br />

7.250<br />

7.240<br />

6.630<br />

6.210<br />

7.170<br />

7.660<br />

9.100<br />

9.860<br />

9.940<br />

9.550<br />

9.350<br />

9.490<br />

9.780<br />

12<br />

a<br />

0.562<br />

0.621<br />

0.618<br />

0.615<br />

0.634<br />

0.635<br />

0.620<br />

0.627<br />

0.621<br />

0.599<br />

0.601<br />

0.611<br />

0.584<br />

0.569<br />

0.549<br />

0.530<br />

0.540<br />

0.555<br />

0.562<br />

0.563<br />

0.562<br />

0.604<br />

0.634<br />

0.627<br />

0.642<br />

0.653<br />

0.679<br />

0.710<br />

0.707<br />

0.736<br />

0.743<br />

0.740<br />

0.742<br />

0.758<br />

0.754<br />

0.752<br />

0.756<br />

0.792<br />

0.802<br />

0.796<br />

0.790<br />

0.788<br />

0787<br />

0.789<br />

0.827<br />

0.864<br />

0895


41<br />

1 2 3 4567810 20 3040 SO 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

Figure 4. Peak acceleration versus distance for magnitude 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5<br />

earthquakes at rock sites<br />

2 3 4 557810 20 3040 60 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

Figure 5. Peak acceleration versus distance for magnitude 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5<br />

earthquakes at soil sites


42<br />

2 3 4 5S7810 20 3040 60 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

Figure 6. Peak acceleration versus distance for magnitude 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5<br />

earthquakes at soft soil sites<br />

Comparison with Other Recent Attenuation Relationships<br />

<strong>The</strong> estimate equations developed in this study were compared to those recently<br />

developed by Boore et al. (1997), Campbell (1997), Sadigh et al. (1997), Spudich et al.<br />

(1997) and finally Ambraseys et al. (1996), <strong>The</strong> equations of Boore et al. and Ambraseys<br />

et al. divided site classes into four groups according to shear wave velocities.<br />

Campbell's equations pertain to alluvium (or firm soil), soft rock and hard rock. Sadigh<br />

et al, and Spudich et al. state that their equations are applicable for rock and soil sites.<br />

<strong>The</strong> attenuation of PGA and PSA at 0.3 and 1.0 s for M w = 7.4 for rock and soil sites<br />

are compared in Figures 7-9, respectively. <strong>The</strong> measured database points from the<br />

Kocaeli event are also marked on these curves to illustrate how well they fit the<br />

estimates. <strong>The</strong> differences in the curves are judged to be reasonable because different<br />

databases, regression models and analysis methods, different definitions for source to<br />

site distance and magnitude parameters among the relationships are contained m each<br />

model.<br />

For some parameters and especially for PGA, there are numerous published<br />

attenuation equations for use in any particular engineering application. Atkinson and<br />

Boore (1997) showed the differences between attenuation characteristics in western and<br />

eastern USA for stable intraplate and interplate regions. Nevertheless, differences among<br />

attenuation of strong motions from one region to another have not been definitely<br />

proven. Because of this reason it is preferable to use attenuation equations that are based<br />

on the records taken from the region in which the estimation equations are to be applied.<br />

Sensors comprising the national or other strong motion networks in Turkey are<br />

oriented so that their horizontal axes match the N-S and the E-W directions. Whereas<br />

Figure 2 illustrates the larger of these two components as a function of distance, it may<br />

not represent the largest horizontal acceleration that occurred before the cessation of the<br />

ground motion. <strong>The</strong> value of the absolute maximum acceleration in whichever direction<br />

can be determined by monitoring through a simple book-keeping procedure for the size


43<br />

of the resultant horizontal component, and then resolving all pairs to the direction of that<br />

largest component once it is known. At variance with the customary practice, we call<br />

this component the "random" horizontal component. In Figure 10, the difference in the<br />

predictive power of the regression equations derived from both of these definitions is<br />

illustrated for M w = 7.4, and compared against the Kocaeli measurements. We believe<br />

that both sets yield essentially the same results. With the differences between the mean<br />

or the standard deviation curves substantially less than the value of In (a) itself, an<br />

improvement in accuracy does not appear to be plausible between the definitions of<br />

maximum horizontal acceleration.<br />

1 oo<br />

ra<br />

U)<br />

Q.<br />

KOCAELI DATA (Max.Hor Comp )<br />

Max.HorComp<br />

Booreetal (1997)<br />

+/-1 Sigma<br />

001<br />

200<br />

Ambraseysetal (19S6)<br />

Spudichetat (1997)<br />

Sadighetai(1997)<br />

Campbell (1997)<br />

Closest Distance (km)


44<br />

100<br />

(Q<br />

ra<br />

a.<br />

KOCAELI DATA (Max H Comp )<br />

Max Hor Comp<br />

Booreetal (1997)<br />

+/ 1 Sigma<br />

001<br />

2 3 4567810 20 3040 60 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

Ambraseys et ai (1996)<br />

Spudich et al (1997)<br />

Sadigh et al (1997)<br />

Campbell (1997)<br />

Figure 7 Peak acceleration versus distance for magnitude 7 4 earthquake at<br />

rock and soil sites


45<br />

200<br />

006<br />

005<br />

004<br />

003<br />

002<br />

Rock, Mw = 7 4<br />

O KOCAELI DATA (Max Hor Camp )<br />

Max Hor Camp<br />

Booreetal (1997)<br />

'"•"•"•"•»• +/ 1 Sigma<br />

Sadighetal(1997)<br />

1 2 3 4567810 20 3040 60 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

200<br />

V)<br />

005 •<br />

004 •<br />

003 -<br />

Soil, Mw = 7 4<br />

O KOCAEL! DATA (Max Hor Comp )<br />

- — Max Hor Comp<br />

Booreeta! (1997)<br />

- +/ 1 Sigma<br />

Sadighatal(1997)<br />

001<br />

1 2 3 4567810 20 3040 60 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

Figure 8 Spectral acceleration at T = 0 3 s versus distance for a magnitude- 7 4 earthquake<br />

at rock and soil sites


46<br />

100<br />

080<br />

070<br />

060<br />

050<br />

040<br />

030<br />

020<br />

010<br />

008<br />

007<br />

006<br />

005<br />

004<br />

003<br />

002<br />

Rock, Wlw - 7.4<br />

O KOCAEL! DATA (Max Her Comp )<br />

• Max Hor Comp<br />

Booreetal (1997)<br />

,„....!!„..., +/„ 1 Sigma<br />

Sadighetal(l997)<br />

001<br />

1 2 3 4567810 20 3040 60 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

200<br />

100<br />

m060<br />

050<br />

040<br />

030<br />

020<br />

flj<br />

CO<br />

010 •<br />

m-<br />

006 -<br />

005<br />

004<br />

003<br />

002<br />

Soil, Mw = 7.4<br />

O<br />

KQCAELl DATA (Max Her Comp)<br />

•• Max Hor Comp<br />

Baoreetai (1997)<br />

—"—a +/-1 Sigma<br />

Sadigh et ai (1997)<br />

001<br />

1 2 3 4567810 20 3040 60 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

Figure 9 Spectral acceleration at T = 1.0 s versus distance for a magnitude-7.4 earthquake<br />

at rock and soil sites


47<br />

en<br />

o_<br />

KOCAELI DATA (Random Hor Comp)<br />

003<br />

002<br />

Random Hor Comp<br />

Booreetal (1997)<br />

Max Hor Comp<br />

•*•/-1 Sigma (Ran Hor Comp)<br />

+/-1 Sigma (Max Hor Comp }<br />

001<br />

1 2 3 4567810 20 3040 60 100 200<br />

Closest Distance (km)<br />

Figure 10 Differences caused by using the larger of the two horizontal components or the<br />

component in the direction of the largest resultant<br />

Uncertainty and Reliability<br />

Uncertainty is a condition associated with essentially all aspects of earthquake related<br />

science and engineering. <strong>The</strong> principle sources of uncertainty lie in the characterization<br />

of site geology, calculation of closest distances, determination of seismic shaking<br />

properties, and in the geotechrucal properties of earthquake motion monitoring sites. <strong>The</strong><br />

regression analysis is based on stochastic analysis method thus the obtained attenuation<br />

formula contains unavoidable errors. <strong>The</strong>se uncertainties, for the most part stemming<br />

from the lack of and/or the imperfect reliability of the specific supporting data available,<br />

affect all analytical methods and procedures applied to the derivation of all<br />

aforementioned parameters.<br />

<strong>The</strong> attenuation relationships presented in this study cannot, and do not, eliminate<br />

these uncertainties. However through the use of nonlinear regression analysis, it<br />

provides a more sophisticated and direct approach to address the uncertainties than do<br />

traditional linear analysis procedures. <strong>The</strong> results we have presented in tabular and<br />

graphical form become meaningful only in the context of the error distributions that are<br />

associated with each variable. In general, our results possess larger deviations in<br />

comparison with, e.g., Boore et al. (1997). This is plausible because of the smaller<br />

number of records from which they have been derived. In view of the limited number of<br />

records utilized in this study it may not be appropriate to expect the distributions to<br />

conform to the normal distribution. We do this only as a vehicle that permits a direct<br />

comparison to be made between our results and those of Boore et al. (1997),


48<br />

Conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> recommended attenuation relationships presented in detail in this paper through<br />

Table 3 and illustrated in Figures 4-6 are considered to be appropriate for the estimation<br />

of horizontal components of peak ground acceleration, and 5 percent damped pseudo<br />

acceleration response spectra for earthquakes with magnitude in the range M w 5 to 7.5<br />

and r c!


Atkinson G.M., Boore D.M., Some Comparisons between Recent Ground Motion<br />

Relations, Seismological <strong>Research</strong> Letters, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 24-40<br />

January/February, 1997.<br />

Boore D.M., Joyner W.B., Fumal T.E., Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response<br />

Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American <strong>Earthquake</strong>s: A<br />

Summary of Recent Work, Seismological <strong>Research</strong> Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1,<br />

pp.128-153, January/February, 1997.<br />

Campbell K.W., Empirical Near Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and<br />

Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and<br />

Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra, Seismological <strong>Research</strong> Letters,<br />

Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 154-179, January/February, 1997.<br />

Hanks T., and Kanamori H., A Moment Magnitude Scale, J.Geophys.Res., Vol. 84, No.<br />

2, pp. 348-2-350, 1979.<br />

Joyner B.W., Boore M.D., Methods for Regression Analysis of Strong-Motion Data,<br />

Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, Vol. 83, No. 2, p. 469-487, April,<br />

1993.<br />

Sadigh K., Chang C.Y., Egan J.A., Makdisi F., Youngs R.R., Attenuation Relationships<br />

for Shallow Crustal <strong>Earthquake</strong>s Based on California Strong Motion Data,<br />

Seismological <strong>Research</strong> Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 180-189, January/February,<br />

1997.<br />

Spudich P., Fletcher IB., Hellweg M., A New Predictive Relation for <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

Ground Motions in Extensional Tectonic Regimes, Seismological <strong>Research</strong><br />

Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 190-198, January/February, 1997.<br />

Wells D.L., Coppersmith K.J., New Empirical Formula among Magnitude, Rupture<br />

Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement, Bulletin of<br />

Seismological Society of America, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 974-1002, August, 1994.<br />

49


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

5 j<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF JSSI MANUAL<br />

FOR PASSIVE CONTROL OF BUILDINGS<br />

(Part 1:<br />

Background, Scope, and Design Concept)<br />

Kazuhiko KASAI<br />

Professor, Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Center,<br />

Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, JAPAN, and<br />

Chairman, Response Control Cpmrnittee,<br />

Japan Society of Seismic Isolation (JSSI)<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Japan Society of Seismic Isolation (JSSI), a key organization for promotion and codification for the<br />

base-isolation scheme in Japan, has decided to initiate a new activity regarding passive control<br />

scheme. <strong>The</strong> JSSI Response Control Committee is currently formulating the Manual for Design<br />

and Construction of Passively-Controlled Buildings. This paper, together with the companion<br />

paper (Ref. 15), describes such an effort of the committee. In particular, Part 1 addresses<br />

background and scopes of the manual as well as design methods.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Passive control scheme has established its status as a viable means to enhance seismic performance<br />

of buildings [1-14]. Social desire for adopting this scheme as well as base isolation scheme has<br />

increased "considerably after the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Up to the year 2002, the number of<br />

passively controlled buildings has increased to about three hundred in Japan. For the sake of<br />

further growth in this technology, it is necessary to promote understanding of the passive control<br />

schemes, as well as to create a uniform basis for assessment of the various stages to be followed<br />

during the design and construction process.<br />

Pursuant to this need, the Japan Society of Seismic Isolation (JSSI), a key organization for<br />

promotion and codification for the base-isolation scheme in Japan, has decided to initiate a new<br />

activity regarding passive control scheme: the JSSI Response Control Committee is currently<br />

formulating the Manual for Design and Construction of Passively-Controlled Buildings [3-14].<br />

<strong>The</strong> manual will refer to the mechanism, design, fabrication, testing, quality control, and analytical<br />

modeling of various types of passive control devices, as well as design, construction, and analysis<br />

of passively controlled buildings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> manual is being developed by researchers, designers, and more than twenty device<br />

manufacturing companies. This paper, together with a companion paper (Ref. 15) describes such<br />

an effort. In particular, this paper will address background and scope of the manual, as well as<br />

design and analysis. Details will be explained in the other papers (Ref. 16-27) that are also to be<br />

presented in the present and following sessions in this congress.


52<br />

BACKGROUND AND SCOPES<br />

In order to justify the use of passive control for producing higher seismic performance, it has<br />

become necessary to indicate the control effectiveness as well as expected performance to the<br />

building officials* owners, and/or users. In this regard, it is necessary to develop a common<br />

standard for design, construction, and quality for this technology. <strong>The</strong> JSSI manual is intended to<br />

provide such a standard.<br />

However, such development requires a great caution, since the history of implementing passive<br />

control is short. This new system has experienced neither a major earthquake nor frequent minor<br />

earthquakes, and database for actual performance is poor. In addition, it is not yet exposed to the<br />

long-term use, and durability of the device as well as frame has not been attested in the actual<br />

environment. Moreover, analysis and performance prediction are based on the extrapolation of<br />

limited experimental data that are typically created from testing of reduced-scale devices and<br />

systems under highly idealized load and boundary conditions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> JSSI manual is being developed considering the above-mentioned circumstances. It shall<br />

clarify the ranges of the device and system performance, as well as limitations of the analysis and<br />

prediction methods as precisely as possible. Furthermore, the manual will describe broadly the<br />

important matters to examine in each stage of a design, manufacture, and construction of various<br />

components of the system. In this manner, the manual is expected to promote mutual<br />

understanding and common recognition by the structure designer, manufacturer, and builder, which<br />

could result in better assurance for the stipulated performance of a building,.<br />

Note also that the manual does not intend to restrain the new idea about passive control, and it aims<br />

at offering the basis needed to enable flexible and creative thinking on application of the<br />

technology.<br />

JSSI RESPONSE CONTROL COMMITTEE<br />

JSSI established the Response Control Committee in February, 2000, for the purpose of<br />

investigating and exchanging information on various types of response control schemes such as<br />

active,"passive, and base isolation systems. Since then, this committee has been growing, and as<br />

indicated in Table 1, it currently consists of 3 subcommittees and 8 working groups of 88 members.<br />

<strong>The</strong> passive control subcommittee, device standard subcommittee, and their 8 working groups are<br />

developing the manual currently (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> task is a combined effort by the researchers,<br />

structural engineers, and device manufacturers.<br />

Table I.<br />

JSSI Response Control Committee, Subcommittees, and Working Groups<br />

Committee<br />

Response Control<br />

Subcommittee<br />

Active Control<br />

Passive Control<br />

Device Standard<br />

Working Group<br />

—<br />

Passive Device Analysis<br />

Passive System Analysis<br />

System Design Methodology<br />

Oil Damper<br />

Viscous Damper<br />

Viscoelastic Damper<br />

Steel Damper<br />

Device Design


53<br />

CONTENTS OF JSSI MANUAL<br />

Following summarizes prospective contents of the manual, and so far it is partially completed at the<br />

present stage:<br />

Chap. 1 General<br />

Definitions and Terminology, Classifications of Passive Control Systems, Performance<br />

Parameters of Control Devices, Applicability of Manual Contents.<br />

Chap. 2 Target Control Performance<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Damage and Target Performance. Performance Grades of Passive Control System.<br />

Chap. 3 Mechanism of SDQF Passive Control System<br />

Effects of Supplemental Stiffness and Viscosity, Velocity -, Deformation -, and<br />

Hybrid-Dependencies, Factors Governing Passive Control Effectiveness, Simplified Response<br />

Prediction Utilizing Response Spectra, Use of Performance Curves.<br />

Chap. 4 Design of MDOF Passive Control System<br />

Mechanism of MDOF Passive Control, Layout of Control Devices, Simplified Response<br />

Prediction, Static Equivalent Force Considering Elastic and Viscous Forces, Limit Force<br />

Design and Tri-Service Manual Methods.<br />

Chap. 5 Dynamic Time History Analysis Methods<br />

Combined Effect of Device and Supporting Member, Device Modeling Schemes, Algorithms,<br />

and Accuracy, System Modeling Schemes and Accuracy.<br />

Chap. 6 Design of Control Devices<br />

Characteristics and Applicable Range, Test and Evaluation Methods, Limit Condition and<br />

Design of Device, Limit Condition and Design of Connection Elements.<br />

Chap. 7 Specifications and Examinations of Device<br />

Device Performance Specifications, Device Performance Examinations.<br />

Chap. 8 Quality Control Scheme<br />

Manufacturing Process and Quality Control Scheme, Items Subjected to Examinations,<br />

Examinations Prior to Delivery, Installation, and Project Completion.<br />

Chap. Q Operation Scheme during Construction<br />

Operational Attentions, Protection and Curing During Operation, Checking Items for<br />

Connection Elements.<br />

Chap 10. Maintenance Scheme<br />

Basic Agreement, Durability of Device and Connection Elements, Maintenance Plans.<br />

APPLICABILITY OF MANUAL<br />

Four types of devices are considered in the manual. <strong>The</strong>y are oil dampers, viscous dampers,<br />

viscoelastic dampers, and steel dampers such as shown in Fig, 1.<br />

Viscous damper produces the hysteresis loop of combined ellipse and rectangle. <strong>The</strong> material<br />

used therein is typically silicon fluid, and its resistance against flow produces the damper force. <strong>The</strong><br />

damper possesses configurations of vertical panel, box, or cylinder.<br />

Oil damper produces the hysteresis loop of ellipse. <strong>The</strong> material used therein is oil, and its<br />

resistance against flow at orifice produces the damper force. <strong>The</strong> damper possesses the


configurations of cylinder, and it is usually provided with a relief mechanism that prevents increase<br />

in force.<br />

Viscoelastic damper produces the hysteresis loop of inclined ellipse. In some material, the<br />

hysteresis is close to bilinear especially when it is under large deformation. <strong>The</strong> material used is<br />

polymer composite of acryl, butadiene, silicon, or others, and resistance is produced from the<br />

molecular motion when subjected to loading. Typical damper has configurations of vertical panel<br />

or tube, but it could be designed for many other configurations as well.<br />

Steel damper produces bi-linear hysteresis. <strong>The</strong> material is steel, but those using lead or friction<br />

pad can exhibit similar behavior. <strong>The</strong>se materials produce elasto-plastic resistance due to yielding<br />

or slipping. Typical damper has configurations of vertical panel or tube, but it could be designed<br />

for many other configurations as well. This damper is the least expensive among the four types.<br />

; F=Cif*<br />

•<br />

Combined Ellipse mid<br />

Rectangle Hysteresis<br />

Silicon Fluid etc.<br />

Shear Resistance,<br />

Flow Resistance<br />

Plane, Box, and<br />

Tube Shapes<br />

JF-Ca<br />

Ellipse Hysteresis<br />

Oil<br />

Orifice Flow<br />

Resistance<br />

Tube Configuration<br />

F = K(W it* C (M) '• ii<br />

Inclined Ellipse<br />

Hysteresis<br />

Acryl, Butadiene etc.<br />

Shear Resistance<br />

Tube and Plane Shapes<br />

F=K*f(u)<br />

Bilinear H y $ te res is<br />

Steef, Lead,<br />

Friction Pad, etc.<br />

Yielding Resistance<br />

Slipping Resistance<br />

Tube and Plane Shapes<br />

Fig. 1 Four Types of Dampers Considered in Manual<br />

Many framing types are considered in this manual, and they are categorized into directly connected<br />

system, indirectly connected system, and special system (Fig. 2).<br />

Directly connected system is wall type, brace type, or shear link type. In such a system, both ends<br />

of the damper are directly connected to the locations whose differential displacements define the<br />

story drifts. In other words, the damper is effective in directly controlling the drifts of the frame.<br />

Indirectly connected system is stud type, bracket type, or connector type. In such a system, both<br />

ends of the damper are connected to the beams and columns that could deform locally and absorb a<br />

portion of the deformations that otherwise could be imposed to the damper. Thus, the damper is<br />

generally less effective than those of the directly connected system mentioned above. However,<br />

since the system has an advantage of offering greater freedom for architectural planning, it has been<br />

much favored currently by the structural engineers and architects in Japan.<br />

Special system considered herein is either column type or beam type. In such a system, the<br />

damper is inserted into intentionally disconnected zone of a beam or a column, and becomes a part<br />

of those members. Thus, it does not create any obstacle in the floor plan, but its control<br />

effectiveness depends on how rigid the rest of the frame is. Similarly to the indirectly connected<br />

system, the frame must be very stiff such that the deformation takes a place in the damper. Ref. 18<br />

for instance describes a real application of the column type, which turned out to be very effective in<br />

controlling both displacements and forces including uplift force of the foundation.


55<br />

Directly<br />

Connected<br />

System<br />

Wall lype Brace Type Shear Link Type<br />

Indirectly<br />

Connected<br />

System<br />

Stud Type Bracket Type Connector Type<br />

Column Type |<br />

Beam Type<br />

Special<br />

System<br />

Fig. 2<br />

Framing Types Considered in Manual<br />

BASIC DESIGN METHOD<br />

To date, design and performance prediction of passive control systems have typically been based on<br />

iteration involving extensive response time history analyses or equivalent static analyses using<br />

various types and sizes of dampers. <strong>The</strong> analysis methods are also different between the various<br />

systems; these make direct comparison of the systems difficult. Moreover, they offer limited<br />

information about the possible range of seismic performance variations and the complex<br />

interactions between the dampers, their supporting members, frame, seismic input, and response.<br />

<strong>The</strong> manual will propose a method to clarify the seismic performance of the various types by<br />

commonly expressing their response effectiveness as a continuous function of the structural and<br />

seismic input parameters. <strong>The</strong> method should promote understanding of the commonalities and<br />

differences between the various types, which have distinct energy dissipation mechanisms. It<br />

requires only simple calculations, and its prediction agrees well with the results of the extensive<br />

multi-degree-of-freedom dynamic analyses performed [1, 2]. <strong>The</strong> method can also find an<br />

optimum design solution to control both displacement and acceleration of the systems. <strong>The</strong><br />

method is briefly explained below:<br />

Fig. 3 shows an example of such a method applied to the multi-story passive system using either a<br />

viscoelastic damper or elastoplastic damper. <strong>The</strong> method considers an equivalent<br />

single-degree-of-freedom system consisting of damper and supporting member such as brace that<br />

are connected in series, as well as a frame connected in parallel with these components. <strong>The</strong><br />

parameters used to characterize the control effectiveness are: the 1st mode effective mass<br />

approximately equal to 0.8 times total mass in a case of regular building; elastic stiffness of frame,<br />

damper, and brace, and; ductility factor and loss factor that quantify the amount of energy<br />

dissipation by the elastoplastic damper and viscoelastic damper, respectively.


l<br />

56<br />

X<br />

xT / ^<br />

V^—^E-^/i / X\ -<br />

yX^ | E°0ar,oer i '<br />

3r5LCS<br />

N<br />

*£-£"• = ' !/ 1.<br />

PASSIVELY-COTROLLED BUILDING<br />

EP-SYSTEM<br />

Kf = Frame Stiffness<br />

K d = Damper Elastic Stiffness<br />

K b = Brace Stiffness<br />

2 "i<br />

Kif<br />

f<br />

^AVVv<br />

VE-SYSTEM<br />

ji d = EP Damper Ductility<br />

T| d = VTE Damper Loss Factor<br />

l<br />

Fig. 3<br />

Example Passi\e Control Systems and SDOF Representations<br />

F t j 4 ^:evss the chart created by Kasai's SDOF theory on passive control effectiveness (Refs. 1 and<br />

2T Tn.s chart can be used to'determine the desired ratio between the above-mentioned stiffness<br />

parameters as well as loss and ductility factors. For a given earthquake input, the peak displacement<br />

and base shear of the frame prior to damper installment can be predicted easily from the response<br />

spectrum. <strong>The</strong>n using the chart, for desired reduction ratios of the displacement and acceleration,<br />

one can determine the "necessary stiffness of the damper and brace relative to that of the given frame,<br />

as uel. as either ductility factor or loss factor of the damper. This chart was created by assuming<br />

that pseudo-velocity response is constant relati\e to the building period, a typical design assumption<br />

mace for a moderate to tall building in Japan. <strong>The</strong> design result for SDOF system can be equally<br />

applied to sizing of the dampers in the multistory case as well. <strong>The</strong> accuracy of the method for the<br />

system using \arious types of dampers has been examined by the System Design Methodology<br />

\\ jrking Group (Table 1). and the results are briefly explained in Ref. 16.<br />

O.Z 0.4 O.b OS<br />

DISP. REDUCTION RATIO<br />

•1 • | \ _>* U.23<br />

l«V.4-->" _, "^ i 0.5<br />

i 2 t|dKd J 'Ki ><br />

i — i- *——•—,<br />

i i —<br />

02 0.4 H6 03<br />

DISP. REDUCTION RATIO<br />

1<br />

-o— rjf-30<br />

Fig. 4 Example Design Chart for Passive Control Systems<br />

After the^ simplified procedure outlined abo\e, one can create a muiti-degree-of-freedom model, and<br />

may perform time-history analyses using a series of earthquake records in order to confirm or make<br />

modifications in design. <strong>The</strong> methods 10 create analytical model for the damper of the system are


57<br />

being developed [19-23] by the Passive Device Analysis Working Group, and Passi\e Svstem<br />

Analysis Working, Group, respectively (Table 1). Fig. 5 shows summary of the design procedures<br />

mentioned above.<br />

Given: Blclg. Config., Damper Type<br />

( Get<br />

(c<br />

\<br />

t<br />

1<br />

Frame, Stiffness, Period etc.<br />

1<br />

1<br />

T • T ^1<br />

against EQ. Levels<br />

4<br />

Get: Damper ;MZ & ^<br />

1<br />

Perform: Time History Analysis*<br />

nf Ettitlftinrr<br />

\<br />

Y<br />

\1f\fla>l<br />

Evaluate: Building Performance<br />

l<br />

.N.-J-<br />

' j OK*<br />

| Yes<br />

END 1<br />

Fig. 5<br />

Summary of Damper and System Design Procedures<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> JSSI Response Control Committee is currently formulating the Manual for Design and<br />

Construction of Passively Controlled Buildings. <strong>The</strong> manual refers to the mechanism, design,<br />

fabrication, testing, quality control, and analytical modeling of various passive control devices, as<br />

well as design, construction, and analysis of passively controlled buildings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> manual is being developed by researchers, designers, and more than twenty device<br />

manufacturing companies. This paper has explained background and scope of the manual as weH<br />

as design concept. A companion paper (Ref. 15) describes characteristics and implementations of<br />

the control devices. Other papers (Refs. 16-27) also explain some details of the manual contents.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[i] KASAI, K, FU, Y, and WATANABE, A. (1998). Passive Control Systems for Seismic ^Damage<br />

Mfas&ion, Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, American Society of Civil Engineers, 122:10, 501-512<br />

[2] FU, V., and KASAi, K. (1998). Comparative Study of Frames Using Viscoelastic and Viscous<br />

Dampers, Journal oj Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, American Society of Civ il Engineers, 122:10, 513-522<br />

Related Papers by Response Control Committee: 2001 Passive Control Symposium, Structural<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> ReseaVch Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology, JAPAN, Dec. 2001.<br />

[3] KASA1, K. and KIBAYASHI M., Principles and Current Status of Manual for Design and<br />

Construction of Passively-Controlled Buildings, 23-32 (in Japanese)<br />

[4] KIBAYASHI, M., KATO, S., KIKUCHI, M., KIMURA, Y, KOBAYASH1, T., and TSUI, Y, Summary<br />

of Guidelines for Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in USA, 33-44 (in Japanese)<br />

[5] TSUYUKI, Y, KAMEI, T., GOHUKU, Y, and IIYAMA, R, Performance and Qualir\ Control of Oil<br />

Damper, 45-58 (in Japanese)<br />

[6] KAWAGUCHI, S., SUKAGAWA, M., MASAKL N., SERA, S., iCATO, N.. VrASHIYAMA, \ ,<br />

MITSUSAKA, Y., and FURUKAWA, Y, Performance and Quality Control of Viscous Dampers,


58<br />

59-74 (in Japanese)<br />

[7] ISHIKAWA, K., OKUMA, K., OKU, T., SONE, Y, NAKAMURA, K, and MASAKI, N.,<br />

Performance and Quality Control of Viscoelastic Dampers, 75-86 (in Japanese)<br />

[8] NAKATA, Y., UEMURA, K., IIDA, T., and HIROTA, M., Performance and Quality Control of Steel<br />

Hysteretic Damper, 87-100 (in Japanese)<br />

[9] TAKAHASHI, O. and SEKiGUCHI, Y., Constitutive Rule of the Oil Damper with Maxwell Model<br />

and Source Code for the Analysis Program, 101-108 (in Japanese)<br />

[10] SEKIGUCHI, Y. and TAKAHASHI, O., Constitutive Rule of the Viscous Damping Wall and Source<br />

Code for the Analysis Program, 109-116 (in Japanese)<br />

[11] KASAI, K. and OOHARA, K., Algorithm and Computer Code to Simulate Response of Viscous<br />

Damper, 117-126 (in Japanese)<br />

[12] KASAI, K., OOKI, Y., and TOKORO, K., Algorithm and Computer Code to Simulate Response of<br />

Acrylic Viscoelastic Damper, 127-140 (in Japanese)<br />

[13] SODA, S. and KAKIMOTO, K., Mechanical Models and Algorithm for Viscoelastic Dampers,<br />

141-162 (in Japanese)<br />

[14] ONO, Y, and KANEKO H., Constitutive Rule of the Steel Damper and Source Code for the Analysis<br />

Programs, 163-170 (in Japanese)<br />

Companion Paper (Part 2):<br />

[15] KASAI, K. (2002). Development of JSSI Manual for Passive Control of Buildings (Part2: Device<br />

Standard and Implementations), Proceedings oflCANCEER 2002, Hong Kong, China, August 19-20,<br />

2002<br />

Related SEWC2002 (Structural Engineers World Congress 2002, Yokohama, Japan, October<br />

9-12, 2002) Papers by Response Control Committee:<br />

[16] TAKEUCHI, T., KASAI, K., OHARA, K., NAKAJIMA, H., and KIMURA, Y., Performance<br />

Evaluation and Design of Passively Controlled Buildings Using Equivalent Linearization<br />

[17] ICHIKAWA, Y., TAKEUCHI, T., MORIMOTO, S., and SUGIYAMA, M., Practical Design of<br />

High-Rise Structure Using Viscoelastic Dampers and Hysteretic Dampers<br />

[IS]<br />

KANADA, M., KASAI, K., and OKUMA, K., Innovative Passive Control Scheme: a Japanese<br />

12-Story Building with stepping Columns and Viscoelastic Dampers<br />

[ 19] ONO, Y., KANEKO, H., and KASAI, K., Time-History Analysis Models For Steel Dampers<br />

[20] OOKI, Y., KASAI, K., and TOKORO, K., Time-History Analysis Models For Linear And Nonlinear<br />

Viscoelastic Dampers<br />

[21] OOHARA, K., and KASAI, K., Time-History Analysis Models For Nonlinear Viscous Dampers<br />

[22] SEKIGUCHI, Y., and TAKAHASHI, 0., Time-History Analysis Models For Nonlinear Viscous<br />

Damping Wall<br />

[23] TAKAHASHI, 0. and SEKIGUCHI, Y., Time-History Analysis Models For Nonlinear Oil Dampers<br />

[24] TSUYUKI, Y., KAMEI, T., GOFUKU, Y., IIYAMA, F., and KOTAKE, Y., Performance And<br />

Quality Control Of Oil-Damper<br />

[25] FURUKAWA, Y., KAWAGUCHI, S., SUKAGAWA, M., MASAKI, N., SERA, S., KATO, N.,<br />

WASHIYAMA, Y, and MITSUSAKA, Y., Performance and Quality Control of Viscous Dampers<br />

[26] OKUMA, K., 1SHIKAWA, K., OKU, T., SONE, Y., NAKAMURA, H., and MASAKI, N.,<br />

Performance and Quality Control of Viscoelastic Dampers<br />

[27] NAKATA, Y., Performance And Quality Control Of Steel Hysteretic Damper


Proceedings of the International Conference on 59<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF JSSI MANUAL<br />

FOR PASSIVE CONTROL OF BUILDINGS<br />

(Part 2:<br />

Device Standard and Implementations)<br />

Kazuhiko KASAI<br />

Professor, Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Center,<br />

Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, JAPAN, and<br />

Chairman, Response Control Committee,<br />

Japan Society of Seismic Isolation (JSSI)<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Part 2 introduces the manual contents regarding analytical modeling, numerical algorithm, and<br />

example computer codes for load-deformation relationship of each device type. It also explains<br />

another part of the manual referring to the mechanical, chemical, and environmental characteristics<br />

as well as acceptable range and quality of each device type. Manual policies on declaration of<br />

device property, assurance of device quality, and maintenance for long-term use will be explained.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> companion paper (Part 1, see Ref.l) explained background and scopes as well as design<br />

concept of the JSSI Manual for Design and Construction of Passively Controlled Buildings. It<br />

introduced the tasks of the subcommittees and the working groups, and briefly explained the<br />

contents of the manual regarding classifications of the seismic energy dissipation devices and<br />

framing types, as well as comprehensive methods to evaluate effectiveness of the devices and the<br />

framing schemes [1].<br />

<strong>The</strong> present paper (Part 2) introduces the manual contents regarding analytical modeling, numerical<br />

algorithm, and example computer codes for load-deformation relationship of each device type,<br />

which aims at promoting reliable time-history analysis of the passive control system. <strong>The</strong> contents<br />

were developed by the researchers and the engineers of software, construction, and design<br />

companies. Part 2 also explains another portion of the manual referring to the mechanical,<br />

chemical, and environmental characteristics as well as acceptable range and quality of each device<br />

type. <strong>The</strong> contents were created through extensive collaborations among more than twenty device<br />

manufacturers and their close interactions with the structural engineers and the researchers.<br />

Finally, manual policies on declaration of device property, assurance of device quality, and<br />

maintenance for long-term use will be explained.<br />

ANALYSIS MODELS AND DISSEMINATION OF COMPUTER CODES<br />

In Japan, significant progress is being made in numerical modeling of the devices (Fig. 1) for<br />

time-history analysis of passively systems. However, the new models, in spite of enhanced


60<br />

accuracy and efficiency, have not necessanl> been implemented into the computer programs of<br />

software companies or construction companies. <strong>The</strong> manual is intended to accelerate<br />

implementations, by exhibiting model algorithms and computer codes, which should lead to more<br />

reliable and fair assessment "of the passive scheme, thereby promoting sound growth in the<br />

technology. <strong>The</strong> following briefly describes the models, and detailed information can be found<br />

from the ""papers by the Device Analysis Working Group (see Rets. 9 to 14, and 19 to 23)<br />

Oil damper produces the hysteresis loop of ellipse (Fig. 1). <strong>The</strong> material used therein is oil, and its<br />

orifice resistance against the flow produces the damper force [5,24]. <strong>The</strong> damper possesses a<br />

configuration of cylinder. It can be modeled by a linear dashpot against a small deformation rate.<br />

However, since the Japanese oil damper typically has the relief mechanism [5, 24], the viscous<br />

coefficient of the linear dashpot needs to be reset small when subjected to a large deformation rate<br />

[9,23].<br />

Viscous damper produces the hysteresis loop of combined ellipse and rectangle (Fig. 1). <strong>The</strong><br />

material used is typically silicon fluid, and its resistance against flow produces the damper force [6,<br />

25]. <strong>The</strong> damper possesses a configuration of vertical panel, box, or cylinder. Unlike the oil<br />

damper discussed above, its model uses a nonlinear dashpot whose force is a fractional power of<br />

deformation rate. For some types possessing elastic stiffness, the model considers an in-series<br />

combination of the spring and the nonlinear dashpot [11, 21]. <strong>The</strong> elastic stiffness may be a<br />

nonlinear function of the deformation [10, 22]. Sensitivity against temperature must be modeled<br />

for some types [10, 22].<br />

Viscoelastic damper could be either linear type, softening type, and stiffening type. Hysteresis<br />

loops of the three types show commonly an inclined ellipse at relatively small deformation, but they<br />

differ considerably at larger deformation (Fig. 1). <strong>The</strong> material used is polymer composite of acryl,<br />

butadiene, silicon, or others, and resistance is produced from the molecular motion caused by<br />

loading [7, 26]. <strong>The</strong> damper has a configuration of vertical panel or tube, but it could be designed<br />

for many other configurations as well. It produces two forces, one proportional to deformation<br />

and another proportional to deformation rate, and mostly it is sensitive to frequency and<br />

temperature [7, 26]. In order to simulate these, some models consist of in-series as well as parallel<br />

combinations of dashpots and springs [13], and another model directly expresses the constitutive<br />

equation of the damper using fractional time-derivatives of the force and deformation [12, 20].<br />

Steel damper produces hysteresis of approximately bi-linear characteristics (Fig, 1). It is a vertical<br />

panel utilizing shear yielding or a brace utilizing axial yielding of the steel, and can be designed for<br />

other configurations [8, 27], Analytical model can utilize the constitutive equations of steel<br />

material readily known from the past research, but the typical Japanese model assumes purely<br />

bi-linear behavior [14, 19]. <strong>The</strong> damper using lead or friction pad may be analytically treated in a<br />

similar manner. Note that the input parameters such as steel yield strength, ultimate strength, and<br />

strain-hardening modulus are the nominal values, not necessarily the actual ones. <strong>The</strong> analysis<br />

results must be cross-referenced to cumulative damage of the damper, since the damper is typically<br />

designed to yield under the small and frequent seismic loads. Special model is developed for some<br />

dampers designed to a post-buckled range.<br />

Fig. 2 shows existing combinations of the above-mentioned device types and framing types that are<br />

seen from current Japanese practice. <strong>The</strong> framing types are named as brace, wall, shear link, stud,<br />

bracket, connector, column, outrigger, and amplified types, respectively. More systems are<br />

expected to appear in the near future, as better control performance is sought. On the other hand,<br />

in the typical Japanese practice to-date, the system is converted commonly into an equivalent shear<br />

beam model for an efficient dynamic time-history analysis. Such modeling, however, has been<br />

found to cause significant error, and for some system a detailed frame model with<br />

member-to-member modeling may be inevitable. <strong>The</strong> manual will try to resolve this situation, by<br />

suggesting modeling techniques and their accuracy. Analysis methods for device and system must<br />

be carefully evaluated, especially because actual dampers are being produced precisely with a<br />

property tolerance of at most 20% relative to the target typically.


61<br />

Force is Proportional to Velocity<br />

Orifice Resistance of Oil<br />

Normally Accompanied by Relief Mechanism<br />

Force is Proportional to<br />

Fractional Power i>f Velocity<br />

ii Fluid i- km R<br />

Vlscoclastie Material Layers and Steel<br />

Shearinq Resistance, Various Shanes<br />

Axial Yklding<br />

Shear Yielding<br />

Rigid Plastic Behavior<br />

riction at Contact Siirta<br />

Fig. 1 Device Types of Considered in Manual<br />

(Friction Damper Considered for Analysis Only.)


62<br />

f<br />

•c<br />

J<br />

—<br />

c.<br />

p<br />

«3<br />

no<br />

Fig. 2 Existing Combinations of Various Device Types and Framing Types in Japan<br />

(a) Systems Using Brace Type, Wall Type, Shear Link Type, or Stud Type


63<br />

c<br />

U<br />

~c<br />

M Q<br />

c<br />

U<br />

>-„<br />

H<br />

HO<br />

Fig. 2 Existing Combinations of Various Device Types and Framing Types in Japan<br />

(b) Systems Using Bracket Type, Connector Type, Column Type, or Other Types


64<br />

VARIOUS TESTS AND DISSEMINATION OF PROPERTY DATA<br />

Each of the above device types is designed and produced differently by the manufacturers in Japan.<br />

And, the Japanese structural engineers are currently making their own search and judgment when<br />

using the products, relying on the database from each manufacturer. <strong>The</strong> manual is intended to<br />

provide broad information for assisting such an effort, as well as a uniform basis for assessment of<br />

the various products in order to enable fair judgment and better quality control. In the manual the<br />

property of each damper is described for a common ranges of the loading and environmental<br />

conditions indicated in Table 1. For the data at the conditions not included in Table 1, the special<br />

performance check should be made<br />

Table 1 Design Parameter Ranges<br />

for Passive Control Devices<br />

Furthermore, the manual specifies the<br />

benchmark for the loading and environmental<br />

conditions. <strong>The</strong> benchmark conditions are: (1)<br />

vibration frequencies of 0.3 Hz and 1 Hz,<br />

typical values for a high-rise building and a<br />

medium-rise building, respectively; (2)<br />

temerature of 20°C, a typical value in a room<br />

where dampers are, and; (3) story drift angle<br />

of 0.03 rad., a traditionally used deformation<br />

limit against the so-called level-2 earthquake<br />

considered in Japan. <strong>The</strong> benchmark data<br />

will be also used as a comparative basis, to<br />

which variations of property and performance<br />

will be described for the ranges specified in<br />

Tablel.<br />

<strong>The</strong> damper test method for the range<br />

discussed above can vary according to the<br />

damper's dynamic characteristics and<br />

dependencies on loading and environment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> test items are listed in Table 2 for each<br />

Frequency<br />

Temperature<br />

Story Drift<br />

Angle<br />

Number of<br />

Cyclic<br />

Excursions<br />

Normal Range: 0.2— 3 Hz*<br />

Normal Range: 10-30t**<br />

Major <strong>Earthquake</strong>: 1/100 rad.<br />

Rare Wind Storm • 1 /200 rad.<br />

Frequent Wind : 1/1 0,000 rad.<br />

Major <strong>Earthquake</strong>: 10 cycles<br />

Rare Wind Storm : 1 ,000 cycles<br />

Frequent Wind: 1,000,000 cycles<br />

Special design consideration will be given for<br />

frequencies under 0.2 Hz, or over 3~~10 Hz.<br />

Special design consideration will be given for low<br />

temperature -IO~--Q 0 C, or high temperature 30~<br />

40°C.<br />

device type. Especially, the loading test data considering the range in Table 1 and the items<br />

described in Table 2 should be sufficient for creating the proper analysis model of each damper.<br />

In principle, full-size dampers should be tested, which, however, may not be possible due to the<br />

limited experimental capabilities. Test methodologies for a reduced-scale damper will be carefully<br />

determined for each device type. Detailed information regarding the device properties and testing<br />

methods can be found from the papers (Refs. 5 to 8, 24 to 27) written by the Oil, Viscous,<br />

Viscoelastic, and Steel Device Working Groups that are defined by Ref. 1.<br />

POLICIES ON PROPERTY DECLARATION, QUALITY ASSURANCE, AND MAINTENANCE<br />

It is necessary to specify the performance demand for the damper as well as performance limit of<br />

the selected damper in a building plan document. <strong>The</strong> performance demand should reflect the<br />

items listed in Tables 1 and 2, and could include information such as expected maximum responses<br />

at the design load level. It is also desirable to indicate in the document and damper itself whether<br />

or not the damper is to be replaced after a major earthquake. When the damper is intended for a<br />

long-term use, careful evaluations must be made for the effects of a series of earthquakes that could<br />

be experienced by the damper. Especially when using a damper that yields and deforms<br />

permanently, expected consequence must be stated in the document and explained to the building<br />

owners.<br />

Post-earthquake investigations into a trace of proper functioning as well as possible damage of the<br />

damper must be performed as efficiently as possible, and it is desirable to provide the architectural<br />

detail that makes this task easy. However, in most cases the finish materials covering the damper


65<br />

need to be destroyed, and such possibility must be declared in the document. Furthermore, when<br />

two or more earthquakes are experienced, it becomes very important to establish a judgment basis<br />

for the investigation. <strong>The</strong> damage in the members transferring the damper force must be carefully<br />

evaluated, especially in a case of retrofitted building.<br />

<strong>The</strong> demands from the society to quality of building and its component has become more severe<br />

nowadays. As an example of the result, the Japanese law about promotion of quality of a<br />

residential building _was enacted in July 2000, and the ten-year warranty for the function of main<br />

structural member is required now. Considering this and the performance superior to general<br />

earthquake-resistant construction, the quality of the passively controlled building must be assured<br />

by taking all possible measures. Long-term warranty is highly desirable for the passive devices,<br />

but realizing it may be difficult due to the following: this new scheme has very little database for<br />

the actual performance, and the damage of the device may stem from inadequate structural design<br />

rather than defect of the device itself <strong>The</strong>se obviously make it difficult to establish any warranty<br />

agreement among the device manufacturer, structural engineer, and building owner.<br />

Table 2<br />

Items Considered for Testing of Four Device Types.<br />

I Oil Damper Viscous Damper Vkcoelastic Damper! Steel Damper<br />

I; | (Stiffness}<br />

Elastic Stiffness<br />

Elastic Stiffness<br />

Elastic Stiffness<br />

[ BiLsiC<br />

Performance ,<br />

Dumping Coefficient<br />

Fust-Relief Damping<br />

Coefficient<br />

Stroke<br />

Failure iMotie<br />

Dumping Coefficient<br />

Stiffness Change<br />

Stroke<br />

Failure Mode<br />

Damping Coefficient<br />

Softening and<br />

Stiffening<br />

(.Itimate Deformation<br />

Failure Mode<br />

Yield Strength<br />

Post- Yield Stiffness<br />

Ultimate Deformation<br />

Cumulative Plastic<br />

Deformation<br />

Failure Mode<br />

Impact Characteristics<br />

Impact Characteristics<br />

Impact Characteristics<br />

Impact Characteristics<br />

/ Various j<br />

1<br />

Dependencies<br />

1 Frequency<br />

Velocity<br />

Frequency<br />

Velocity and<br />

.Deformation<br />

Temperature<br />

Frequency<br />

Velocity and<br />

Deformation<br />

Temperature<br />

Deformation<br />

1 Low and j<br />

ji High Cycle |<br />

Number of Cycles<br />

Fatigue (Wind Loud)<br />

Number of Cycles<br />

Fatigue (Wind Load)<br />

Number of Cycles<br />

Fatigue<br />

(<strong>Earthquake</strong> Load)<br />

Fatigue (Wind Load)<br />

Number of Cycles<br />

Fatigue<br />

{<strong>Earthquake</strong> Load)<br />

Fatigue {Wind Load)<br />

Durability<br />

j<br />

Aging<br />

Aging<br />

Water Resistance<br />

Aging<br />

Moisture Resistance<br />

Aging<br />

Rust Resistance<br />

1 Fire 1<br />

1 Resistance \-<br />

Firing Point<br />

Firing Behavior<br />

Gasification<br />

Firing Point<br />

Firing Behavior<br />

Gasification<br />

Softening Point<br />

Firing Behavior<br />

Gasification<br />

Softening Point<br />

Softening Beha\ ior<br />

j Others {<br />

Connection Slackness<br />

Connection Slackness<br />

Bond Strength<br />

Weld Quality<br />

Buckling Control<br />

Maintenance may be required for some passive devices that are nearly machine products, especially<br />

when the device warranty is sought. Note that the traditional building members were not<br />

subjected to maintenance, and the periodical check and repair may be difficult to require.<br />

However, considering the normal use period of 60 to 100 years for a building, it is strongly felt<br />

reasonable to enforce maintenance management of the devices that plays a key role in building


66<br />

response.. <strong>The</strong> post-earthquake investigation explained earlier could be also considered as a part<br />

of maintenance In a case of the base-isolated building, the maintenance of the isolators and other<br />

components, including the post-earthquake investigation, are required now And, the same<br />

consideration would be necessary for the passively controlled buildings.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Passive control scheme has established its status as a viable means to enhance seismic performance<br />

of buildings. For the sake of further growth in this technology, it is necessary to promote<br />

understanding of the passive control schemes, as well as to create a uniform basis for assessment of<br />

the various stages to be followed during the design and construction process. Pursuant to this, the<br />

JSSI Response Control Committee is currently formulating the Manual for Design and Construction<br />

of Passively-Controlled Buildings. <strong>The</strong> companion paper (Part 1) and this paper (Part 2) described<br />

the effort of the committee.<br />

In particular, Part 2 introduced the manual contents regarding analytical modeling, numerical<br />

algorithm, and example computer codes for load-deformation relationship of each device type. It<br />

also explained another part of the manual referring to the mechanical, chemical, and environmental<br />

characteristics as well as acceptable range and quality of each device type. Manual policies on<br />

declaration of the device property, assurance of the device quality, and maintenance for the<br />

long-term use were also explained.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] KASAI, K (2002). Development of JSSI Manual for Passive Control of Buildings (Parti Background,<br />

Scope, and Design Concept), Proceedings oj ICANCEER 2002, Hong Kong, China, August 19-20,<br />

2002<br />

Note: Refs. [2] to [27] are listed in the above-mentioned companion paper, (i.e., Part 1 paper)


Proceedings of the International Conference on 57<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

A FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING PERFORMANCE-<br />

BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING<br />

Jack P. Moehle<br />

Pacific <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Center<br />

<strong>University</strong> of California, Berkeley<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Performance-Based <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> seeks to improve seismic risk decision-making<br />

through assessment and design methods that have a stronger scientific basis and that express<br />

options in terms that enable stakeholders to make informed decisions. A key feature is the<br />

definition of performance metrics that are relevant to decision making for seismic risk<br />

mitigation. In concept, these metrics consist of estimates of losses due to earthquakes,<br />

including direct losses (repair and restoration costs), loss in functionality (or downtime), and<br />

casualties.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first generation of performance-based earthquake engineering assessment procedures in<br />

the United States provides approximate relationships between structural response indices<br />

(interstory drifts, inelastic member deformations and member forces) and performanceoriented<br />

descriptions such as Immediate Occupancy, Life Safety and Collapse Prevention.<br />

However, the relationship between the structural indices and performance measures are very<br />

approximate, determined in part by calibration to expectations of performance intended by<br />

current building code provisions, and in part by engineering judgment of various experts.<br />

Moreover, specific expectations of the performance targets are not clearly defined.<br />

Efforts under way by researchers in Pacific <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (PEER) center<br />

aim to develop a more robust methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering -<br />

one that breaks the process into logical elements that can be studied and resolved in a rigorous<br />

and consistent manner. <strong>The</strong> process begins with definition of a ground motion Intensity<br />

Measure, which defines in a probabilistic sense the salient features of the ground motion<br />

hazard that affect structural response. <strong>The</strong> next step is to determine <strong>Engineering</strong> Demand<br />

Parameters, which describe structural response in terms of deformations, accelerations, or<br />

other response quantities calculated by simulation of the building to the input ground motions.<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Demand Parameters are next related to Damage Measures, which describe the<br />

condition of the structure and its components. Finally, given a detailed probabilistic<br />

description of damage, the process culminates with calculations of Decision Variables, which<br />

translate the damage into quantities that enter into risk management decisions. Underlying<br />

the entire methodology is a consistent framework for representing the inherent uncertainties in<br />

earthquake performance assessment.<br />

While full realization of the methodology in professional practice is still years away,<br />

important advances are being made through research in the Pacific <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Center. <strong>The</strong> discussion will describe the overall approach and some specific<br />

highlights.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY<br />

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES<br />

B.F. Spencer, Jr.<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

205 North Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> design, fabrication, and construction of smart structures is one of the ultimate challenges to engineering<br />

researchers today. In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to research and development<br />

of efficacious actuation devices for smart structures, with particular emphasis on alleviation of<br />

wind and seismic response of buildings and bridges. Because of their mechanical simplicity, low power<br />

requirements, and large force capacity, smart dampers provide one of the most promising new technologies<br />

for protection of civil infrastructure. Additionally, recent research efforts for advancing smart<br />

structures technology have centered around innovative sensors and sensor systems, as they form the<br />

essence of intelligence for a smart structure. In particular, smart sensoring systems offer a new and radical<br />

departure from the conventional approach to monitoring structures. This paper is divided into two<br />

parts. <strong>The</strong> first part focuses on the review two smart damping approaches that have been proposed and<br />

implemented in full-scale structures. <strong>The</strong> remainder of the paper then discusses recent advances in<br />

smart sensing technology, as well as the challenges and opportunities offered.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

For more than two decades, researchers have investigated the possibility of using smart structures technology<br />

to improve upon the performance of traditional approaches to reduce structural responses due to<br />

dynamic loads (Soong 1990; Spencer and Sain 1997; Housner et al 1997; Soong and Spencer 2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> first full-scale application of smart structures technology to a building was accomplished by the<br />

Kajima Corporation in 1989 (Kobori 1994). <strong>The</strong> Kyobashi Seiwa building, shown in Fig. 1, is an 11-<br />

story (33.1 m) building with a total floor area of 423 m 2 . An active mass driver (AMD) system was<br />

installed, consisting of two AMDs — the primary AMD is used for transverse motion and has a mass of<br />

4 tons, while the secondary AMD has a mass of 1 ton and is employed to reduce torsional motion. <strong>The</strong><br />

role of the active system is to reduce building vibration under strong winds and moderate earthquake<br />

excitations and consequently to increase the comfort of occupants of the building. Since that time,<br />

active/hybrid structural control has been successfully applied in approximately 40 commercial buildings<br />

and 15 bridges (during construction).


70<br />

Observation<br />

-" system<br />

Figure 1. Kyobashi Seiwa Building with AMD Installation.<br />

One of the most promising new methods for<br />

protecting civil infrastructure systems is<br />

found in smart damping (also known as<br />

semiactive control) systems. <strong>The</strong>se systems<br />

offer the reliability of passive devices, yet<br />

maintain the versatility and adaptability of<br />

fully active systems without requiring the<br />

associated large power sources. In fact,<br />

many can operate on battery power, which is<br />

critical during seismic events when the main<br />

power source to the structure may fail.<br />

According to presently accepted definitions,<br />

a smart damping device is one which cannot<br />

inject mechanical energy into the controlled<br />

structural system (i.e., including the structure<br />

and the control device), but has properties<br />

that can be controlled to optimally reduce the responses of the system. <strong>The</strong>refore, in contrast to<br />

active control devices, smart damping devices do not have the potential to destabilize (in the bounded<br />

input/bounded output sense) the structural system. Studies have shown that appropriately implemented<br />

smart damping systems perform significantly better than passive devices and have the potential to<br />

achieve, or even surpass, the performance of fully active systems, thus allowing for the possibility of<br />

effective response reduction during a wide array of dynamic loading conditions (Dyke et al. 1998;<br />

Spencer et al. 2000). Examples of such devices include variable-orifice fluid dampers, controllable friction<br />

devices, variable stiffness devices, adjustable tuned liquid dampers, and controllable fluid dampers<br />

(Spencer and Sain 1997).<br />

In addition to being adaptable, smart structures can have the possibility of using their sensors to become<br />

self-monitoring. <strong>The</strong> ability to continuously monitor the integrity of structures in real-time can provide<br />

for increased safety to the public, particularly for the aging structures in widespread use today. Detecting<br />

damage at an early stage can reduce the costs and down-time associated with repair of critical damage.<br />

Observing and/or predicting the onset of dangerous structural behavior, such as flutter in bridges,<br />

can allow for advance warning of such behavior and commencement of mitigating control or removal<br />

of the structure from service for the protection of human life. In addition to monitoring long-term degradation,<br />

assessment of structural integrity after catastrophic events, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tornados,<br />

or fires, is vital. <strong>The</strong>se assessments can be a significant expense (both in time and money), as<br />

was seen after the 1994 Northridge earthquake with the shear number of buildings that needed to have<br />

the moment-resisting connections inspected. Additionally, structures internally, but not obviously, damaged<br />

in an earthquake may be in great danger of collapse during aftershocks; structural integrity assessment<br />

can help to identify such structures to enable evacuation of building occupants and contents prior<br />

to aftershocks. Furthermore, after natural disasters, it is imperative that emergency facilities and evacuation<br />

routes, including bridges and highways, be assessed for safety. However, a significant number of<br />

sensors are required to efficaciously monitoring of civil infrastructure systems.<br />

Recent advances in sensors, wireless communication, MEMS, and information technologies have made the<br />

dream of inexpensive, powerful, ubiquitous sensing for structural health monitoring a readily achievable<br />

near-term goal. To assist in dealing with the large amount of data that is generated by such a dense<br />

array of sensors, on-board processing at the sensor level allows a portion of the computation to be done<br />

locally on the sensor's embedded microprocessor. Such an approach provides for an adaptable, smart sensor,


71<br />

with the potential for self-diagnosis and self-calibration capabilities, thus reducing that amount of information<br />

that needs to be transmitted over the network. Indeed, a National <strong>Research</strong> Council report recently<br />

noted that the use of networked systems of embedded computers and sensors throughout society could<br />

well dwarf all previous milestones in the information revolution.<br />

This paper is comprised of two parts. Part one focuses on two smart damping strategies that have<br />

already been implemented in full-scale civil engineering applications. <strong>The</strong> first, the variable orifice<br />

damper, has been or is being installed in 11 buildings in Japan. <strong>The</strong> second smart damping strategy discussed<br />

herein considers magnetorheological (MR) fluid dampers, one of the most promising of the<br />

smart devices. <strong>The</strong>se two classes of smart dampers mesh well with application demands and constraints<br />

to offer an attractive means of protecting civil infrastructure systems against severe earthquake and<br />

wind loading. <strong>The</strong> second part of the paper is directed toward the future of smart sensors. A brief review<br />

of existing systems is provided, followed by an outline of some of the challenges and opportunities<br />

offered.<br />

VARIABLE-ORIFICE DAMPERS<br />

One means of achieving a smart damping device is to<br />

use a controllable, electromechanical, variable-orifice ^--<br />

valve to alter the resistance to flow of a conventional ^»<br />

hydraulic fluid damper. Such a device, schematically L J<br />

shown in Fig. 2, typically operates on approximately<br />

50 watts of power. <strong>The</strong> concept of applying this type<br />

Flgure 2> Schematic Of variable-orifice damper<br />

of variable-damping device to control the motion of bridges experiencing seismic motion was first discussed<br />

by Feng and Shinozuka (1990), Kawashima and Unjoh (1993) and Kawashima et al. (1992).<br />

Subsequently, variable-orifice dampers have been studied by Symans et al. (1994) and Symans and<br />

Constantinou (1996) at the Multidisciplinary Center for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> in Buffalo,<br />

New York.<br />

Sack and Patten (1993) conducted experiments in which a hydraulic actuator with a controllable orifice<br />

was implemented in a single-lane model bridge to dissipate the energy induced bv vehicle traffic. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

studies were followed by a full-scale experiment conducted on a bridge on interstate highway 1-35 to<br />

demonstrate this technology (Patten 1998, Patten, et al. 1999; Kuehn et al. 1999) shown in Figs. 3-4.<br />

Figure 5 shows the effectiveness of the SAVA system. This experiment constitutes the only full-scale<br />

implementation of structural control in the USA.<br />

Conceived as a variable-stiffness device, Kobori et al (1993) and Kamagata and Kobori (1994) implemented<br />

a full-scale variable-orifice damper in a semiactive variable-stiffness system (SAVS) to investigate<br />

semiactive control at the Kajima Technical <strong>Research</strong> Institute. <strong>The</strong> overall system, shown<br />

schematically in Fig. 6, has SAVS devices installed on both sides of the structure in the longitudinal<br />

direction. <strong>The</strong> results of these analytical and experimental studies indicate that this device is effective in<br />

reducing structural responses.<br />

More recently, a smart damping system was installed in the Kajima Shizuoka Building in Shizuoka,<br />

Japan. As seen in Fig. 7, semiactive hydraulic dampers are installed inside the walls on both sides of the<br />

building to enable it to be used as a disaster relief base in post-earthquake situations (Kobori, 1998:


72<br />

Figure 3. First full-scale implementation of<br />

smart damping in the US.<br />

Figure 4. SAVA-II variable-orifice damper<br />

'y Truck /Lett Lane<br />

is Section, Heavy Truck /Right Lane<br />

r 1500<br />

1 -2000<br />

I<br />

Girder #. Eastern to Western<br />

Figure 5. Comparison of peak stresses for heavy trucks<br />

Kurata et al. 1999). Each damper contains a flow control<br />

valve, a check valve and an accumulator, and can<br />

develop a maximum damping force of 1000 kN.<br />

Figure 8 shows a sample of the response analysis<br />

results based on one of the selected control schemes<br />

and several earthquake input motions with the scaled<br />

maximum velocity of 50 cm/sec, together with a simulated<br />

Tokai wave. Both story shear forces and story<br />

drifts are seen to be greatly reduced with control activated.<br />

In the case of the shear forces, they are confined<br />

within their elastic-limit values (indicated by E-limit);<br />

without control, they would enter the plastic range.<br />

<strong>The</strong> use of the variable-orifice damper has blossomed<br />

in Japan. Figure 9 shows the construction site in the<br />

Siodome area in downtown Tokyo. <strong>The</strong>re are 4 buildings<br />

currently under construction in this area that will<br />

employ switching semi-active hydraulic dampers for<br />

Figure 6. Kajima Technical <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

with the SAVS svstem


73<br />

Semi-active Hydraulic<br />

(SHD)<br />

Control computers and<br />

Uninterruptible power supply<br />

Figure 7. Kajima Shizuoka building configured with semiactive hydraulic dampers<br />

(Story)<br />

(Story)<br />

5<br />

—•— EL50<br />

--4-TF50 !<br />

--D--HA50 I<br />

-o--Tokai<br />

v t-^ 1/200 J<br />

2000 4000 6000 8000 (kN)<br />

Maximum shear force<br />

(a) w/ control<br />

2 4 6 8 10 (cm)<br />

Maximum story drift<br />

(b) w/o control<br />

Figure 8. Maximum responses (El Centro, Taft and Hachinohe waves<br />

with 50 cm/sec, and assumed Tokai waves)<br />

structural protection. One of these structures, the Kajima K-Tower, is a 172 m tall, 38-story hotel and<br />

office complex installed with 88 semi-active dampers and 2 hybrid mass dampers (see Fig. 10). In the<br />

Roppongi area of Tokyo, the Kajima R-Building, a 54-story building with 356 variable-orifice dampers<br />

and 192 passive dampers distributed throughout, has recently been completed (see Fig. 11). Altogether,<br />

the Kajima Corporation is currently constructing or has recently finished 9 buildings in Japan that<br />

employ semi-active hydraulic dampers for structural protection. Table 1 provides a summary of these 9<br />

buildings (Kobori 2002). When these projects are completed, a total of more than 777 variable-orifice<br />

dampers will be installed in building structures in Japan.


74<br />

Figure 9. View of construction site in the Siodome area in downtown Tokyo<br />

• ...'.IttttUHMn<br />

^ 10. Siodome Kajima T( fower<br />

Figure 11. Roppongi Tower<br />

CONTROLLABLE FLUID DAMPERS<br />

Except for controllable fluid dampers, smart dampers employ some electrically controlled valves or<br />

mechanisms to achieve changes in device characteristics. Such mechanical components can be problematic<br />

in terms of reliability and maintenance. Another class of smart damping devices uses controllable<br />

fluids in a fixed-orifice damper. As shown schematically in Fig. 12, the advantage of these<br />

controllable fluid dampers is their mechanical simplicity; i.e., they contain no moving parts other than<br />

the damper's piston.<br />

Two fluids that are viable contenders for development of controllable dampers are: (i) electrorheological<br />

(ER) fluids and (ii) magnetorheological (MR) fluids. <strong>The</strong> essential characteristic of these fluids is<br />

their ability to reversibly change from a free-flowing, linear viscous fluid to a semi-solid with a control-


75<br />

Table 1 Buildings currently under construction employing semi-active hydraulic dampers<br />

Name<br />

Stones<br />

Height (m)<br />

# of Semi- active<br />

Dampers<br />

Completion Date<br />

Chuden Gifu Building<br />

Niigata B-prqject<br />

Siodome M-Building<br />

Siodome N-Building<br />

Siodome K-Tower<br />

Roppongi Tower<br />

Siodome T-Building<br />

S-Hotel<br />

H-Building<br />

11<br />

31<br />

25<br />

28<br />

38<br />

54<br />

19<br />

30<br />

23<br />

56<br />

140.5<br />

119.9<br />

136.6<br />

172<br />

241.4<br />

98.9<br />

104.9<br />

100.4<br />

42<br />

72<br />

38<br />

60<br />

88<br />

356<br />

27<br />

66<br />

28<br />

March 2001<br />

December 2002<br />

January 2003<br />

March 2003<br />

April 2003<br />

May 2003<br />

May 2003<br />

December 2004<br />

August 2004<br />

lable yield strength in milliseconds when exposed to an electric (for ER fluids) or magnetic (for MR fluids)<br />

field. In the absence of an applied field, these fluids flow freely and can be modelled as Newtonian.<br />

When the field is applied, a Bingham plastic model (Shames and Cozzarelli 1992) is often used to<br />

describe the fluid behavior.<br />

Although the discovery of both ER and MR fluids<br />

Electric or Magnetic Choke<br />

dates back to the late 1940's (Rabinow 1948; Winslow<br />

1947, 1949), for many years, research programs<br />

Controllable Fluid<br />

concentrated primarily on ER fluids. Nevertheless, X Jlpssi M<br />

some obstacles remain in the development of commercially<br />

feasible damping devices using ER fluids.<br />

\ ^ |<br />

;••»,» -w» ** * _1<br />

1<br />

For example, the best ER fluids currently available<br />

1<br />

have a yield stress of only 3.0 to 3.5 kPa and cannot Figure 12. Schematic of controllable fluid damper<br />

tolerate common impurities (e.g., water) that might<br />

be introduced during manufacturing or use. In addition, safety, availability and cost of the high voltage<br />

(e.g., -4000V) power supplies required to control the ER fluids need to be addressed.<br />

Recently developed MR fluids appear to be an attractive alternative to ER fluids for use in controllable<br />

fluid dampers (Carlson 1994; Carlson and Weiss 1994; Carlson et al. 1995a,b) (see also: http://<br />

www.rheonetic.com/). MR fluids typically consist of micron-sized, magnetically polarizable particles<br />

dispersed in a carrier medium such as mineral or silicone oil. Carlson and Weiss (1994) indicate that the<br />

achievable yield stress of an MR fluid is an order of magnitude greater than its ER counterpart and that<br />

MR fluids can operate at temperatures from -40 to 150°C with only modest variations in the yield<br />

stress. Moreover, MR fluids are not sensitive to impurities such as are commonly encountered during<br />

manufacturing and usage, and little particle/carrier fluid separation takes place in MR fluids under common<br />

flow conditions. <strong>The</strong> size, shape and performance of a given device is determined by a combination<br />

of T> and T^id) . <strong>The</strong> design equations for most controllable damper geometries indicate that<br />

minimizing the ratio V t^eid) is desirable. This ratio for MR fluids ( V 1^) = 5xicr n sec/Pa) is<br />

three orders of magnitude smaller than the corresponding ratio for today's best ER fluids. Thus, controllable<br />

devices using MR fluids have the potential of being much smaller than ER devices with similar<br />

capabilities. Further, the MR fluid can be readily controlled with a low power (e g. 9 less than 50 watts),<br />

low voltage (e.g., -12-24V), current-driven power supply ourpurting only -1-2 amps. Such power lev-


76<br />

els can be readily supplied by batteries. Table 2 provides a summary of the key physical characteristics<br />

of both MR and ER fluids.<br />

Spencer et al. (1997) and Dyke et al. (1998) (see also: http://www.nd.edu/-quake/) have conducted a<br />

number of pilot studies to assess the usefulness of MR dampers for seismic response reduction. Dyke et<br />

al. (1998) have shown through laboratory experiments that the MR damper, used in conjunction with<br />

recently proposed acceleration feedback control strategies, significantly outperforms comparable passive<br />

configurations of the damper for seismic response reduction.<br />

Table 2 Summary of the Properties of Today's MR and ER Fluids (Carlson 1994).<br />

Property<br />

Max. Yield Stress i y(fjeld)<br />

Operable Temp. Range<br />

Plastic Viscosity, r^<br />

Stability<br />

V<br />

T y(field)<br />

Power Supply (typical)<br />

Response Time<br />

Particle Sedimentation<br />

Raw Materials<br />

MR Fluids<br />

50-100kPa<br />

-50 to 150°C<br />

0.2-1. OPa-s<br />

Not affected by most impurities<br />

10- 10 -10- u s/Pa<br />

2-25V, 1-2 A<br />

milliseconds<br />

Little<br />

nontoxic & environ, safe<br />

ER Fluids<br />

2-5 kPa<br />

+ 10to90°C<br />

0.2-1. OPa-s<br />

Cannot tolerate impurities<br />

l(T 7 -l(r 8 s/Pa<br />

2000-5000 V, 1-1 OmA<br />

milliseconds<br />

Little<br />

nontoxic & environ, safe<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF FULL-SCALE MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS<br />

To prove the scalability of MR fluid technology to smart damping devices of appropriate size for civil<br />

engineering applications, a 20-ton MR fluid damper has been designed and built (Carlson and Spencer<br />

1996; Spencer et al. 1997, 1999). Figure 13a shows the schematic of the MR damper tested herein. <strong>The</strong><br />

damper uses a particularly simple geometry in which the outer cylindrical housing is part of the magnetic<br />

circuit. <strong>The</strong> effective fluid orifice is the entire annular space between the piston outside diameter<br />

Figure 13. (a) Schematic of 20-ton MR fluid damper; (b) Experimental setup


77<br />

and the inside of the damper cylinder housing. <strong>The</strong> damper has an inside diameter of 20.3 cm and a<br />

stroke of ±8 cm. <strong>The</strong> electromagnetic coils are wound in three sections on the piston, resulting in four<br />

effective valve regions as the fluid flows past the piston. <strong>The</strong> coils contain a total of about 1.5 km of<br />

wire. When wired in series, the total coil has an inductance L 0 = 6.6 H and a resistance R Q = 21.9 Q.<br />

<strong>The</strong> completed damper is approximately 1 m long and has a mass of 250 kg. <strong>The</strong> damper contains<br />

approximately 5 liters of MR fluid. <strong>The</strong> amount of fluid energized by the magnetic field at any given<br />

instant is approximately 90 cm 3 .<br />

Figure 13b shows the experimental setup at the <strong>University</strong> of Notre Dame for the large-scale 20-ton MR<br />

fluid damper. <strong>The</strong> damper was attached to a 7.5 cm thick plate that was grouted to a 2 m thick strong<br />

floor. <strong>The</strong> damper is driven by a 560 kN actuator configured with a 57 1pm servo-valve with a bandwidth<br />

of 30 Hz. A Schenck-Pegasus 5910 servo-hydraulic controller is employed in conjunction with a<br />

200 MPa, 340 1pm hydraulic pump. So that reliable tests of the dynamic performance could be obtained,<br />

particular care was taken to minimize compliance in the system.<br />

Analytical and experimental pseudo-static studies of the damper have been conducted at the Structural<br />

Dynamics and Control / <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Laboratory at the <strong>University</strong> of Notre Dame. Figure<br />

14a shows the measured force-displacement loops under a commanded 5.4 cm/sec triangular displacement<br />

at the maximum magnetic field and no magnetic field (off state) respectively. At the maximum<br />

magnetic field, the output force of the damper is 201 kN, which is within 0.5% of the design specification<br />

of 200 kN. Moreover, the on/off range of the damper is well over the design specification of 10.<br />

Fig. 14b also shows the measured force-velocity relationship and its comparison with the results of the<br />

axisymmetric model and parallel plate model (Spencer et al 1999). Both analytical models compare<br />

well with the experimental results. <strong>The</strong> dynamic response of the damper to changes in the commanded<br />

force has also been shown to be excellent (Yang et al 2000; Yang 2001).<br />

Recently, Sunakoda et al (2000) have also presented encouraging results regarding design and construction<br />

of large scale MR dampers. More information regarding MR dampers and their application to<br />

civil engineering structures can be found at: hitpj/cee muc.edu/sstl/.<br />

Max Magnetic Reid (2A)<br />

No Magnetic Field iQA)<br />

Figure 14. (a) Measured force-displacement loops at 5.4 cm/sec; (b) Comparison of measured and<br />

predicted force-velocity behavior (Spencer et aL 1999)


78<br />

FULL-SCALE IMPLEMENTATION OF MR DAMPERS<br />

In 2001, the first full-scale implementation of MR dampers for civil engineering applications was<br />

achieved. <strong>The</strong> Nihon-Kagaku-Miraikan, the Tokyo National Museum of Emerging Science and Innovation,<br />

shown in Fig. 15, has two 30-ton, MR Fluid dampers installed between the 3rd and 5th floors. <strong>The</strong><br />

dampers were built by Sanwa Tekki using MR fluid from the Lord Corporation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dongting Lake Bridge in Hunan, China constitutes the first full-scale implementation of MR dampers<br />

for bridge structures (see Fig. 16). Long steel cables, such as are used in cable-stayed bridges and<br />

other structures, are prone to vibration induced by the structure to which they are connected and by<br />

weather conditions, particularly wind combined with rain, that may cause cable galloping. <strong>The</strong><br />

extremely low damping inherent in such cables, typically on the order of a fraction of a percent, is<br />

insufficient to eliminate this vibration, causing reduced cable and connection life due to fatigue and/or<br />

breakdown of corrosion protection. Two Lord SD-1005 (www.rheonetic.com) MR dampers have been<br />

installed on each cable to mitigate cable vibration. <strong>The</strong> technical support for this engineering project<br />

was provided through a joint venture between Central South <strong>University</strong>, <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic<br />

<strong>University</strong>, and the author. Recently, a feasibility study on the applicability of MR fluid dampers for<br />

cable vibration control of the Stonecutter Bridge, which when construction is complete will be the<br />

world's longest cable-stayed bridge with a main span of 1018, has been accomplished (Chen et al. 2002,<br />

Ying et al. 2002).<br />

While tremendous strides have been made, a number of aspects of the smart damping control problem<br />

merit additional attention. One particularly important area is system integration. Structural systems are<br />

complex combinations of individual structural components. Integration of smart damping control strategies<br />

directly into the basic design of these complex systems can offer the optimal combination of performance<br />

enhancement versus construction costs and long-term effects. Because of the intrinsically<br />

nonlinear nature of smart damping control devices, development of output feedback control strategies<br />

that are practically implementable and can fully utilize the capabilities of these unique devices is<br />

another important, yet challenging, task. Once the advantages of smart damping control systems are<br />

fully recognized, a primary task is the development of prototype design standards or specifications<br />

complementary to existing standards.<br />

Figure 15. Nihon-Kagaku-Miraikan, Tokyo National Museum of Emerging Science and Innovation


79<br />

Figure 16. MR damper installation on the Dongting Lake Bridge, Hunan, China<br />

SMART SENSORS<br />

Recent research efforts for advancing smart structures technology have centered around innovative sensors<br />

and sensor systems, as they form the essence of intelligence for a smart structure. In particular,<br />

smart sensing systems have received many researchers' attention. <strong>The</strong> essential difference between the<br />

standard sensor and "smart" sensor, lies in its intelligence capabilities due to the use of an on-board microprocessor.<br />

This microprocessor is intended for digital signal processing, self-diagnostics, self-identification,<br />

and self-adaptation (decision making) functions. To date, all smart sensors have also been wireless.<br />

Some of the first efforts in developing smart sensors for application to civil engineering structures were presented<br />

by Straser and Kiremidjian (1996, 1998), Straser, et al. (1998), and Kiremidjian et al (1997). This<br />

research sought to develop a near real-time damage diagnostic and structural health monitoring system. <strong>The</strong><br />

hardware was designed to acquire and manage the data and the software to facilitate damage detection diagnosis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sensor unit consists of a microprocessor, radio modem, data storage, and batteries. To save battery<br />

life, most of the time the sensor unit is in a sleep mode, periodically checking its hardware interrupts to<br />

determine if there are external events that require attention. Building on the work of Kiremidjian et al.<br />

(1997), Lynch et a\. (2001) demonstrated a proof-of-concept wireless sensor that uses standard integrated<br />

circuit components. This unit consists of an 8-bit Atmel microcontroller with a 4 MHz CPU that can accommodate<br />

a wide range of analog sensors. <strong>The</strong> communication between the sensors is done via a direct<br />

sequence spread spectrum radio. Some units used the ADXL210 accelerometer making use of the duty cycle<br />

modulator that provides a 14 bit output with an anti-aliased digital signal. In other units, a high performance<br />

planar accelerometer is used along with a 16 bit A/D converter. <strong>The</strong> whole system can be accommodated<br />

within a seal packing unit roughly 5" by 4" by 1" in dimension. <strong>The</strong> sensor unit was validated through various<br />

controlled experiments in the laboratory. It was pointed out that pushing data acquisition and computation<br />

forward is fundamental to the smart sensing and monitoring systems, but represents a radical departure<br />

from the conventional instrumentation design and computational strategies for monitoring civil structures.<br />

Maser et al. (1997) proposed the Wireless Global Bridge Evaluation and Monitoring System (WGBEMS) to<br />

remotely monitor the condition and performance of bridges. This system used small, self-contained, battery<br />

operated transducers, each containing a sensor, a small radio transponder, and a battery. <strong>The</strong> complete system<br />

consisted of a local controller placed off the bridge and several transducers distributed throughout the<br />

bridge. <strong>The</strong> data collection at the transducer involves signal conditioning, filtering, sampling, quantization,<br />

and digital signal processing. <strong>The</strong> radio link uses a wide band in the 902 to 928 MHz range.


80<br />

Brooks (1999) emphasized the necessity of migrating some of the computational processing to the sensor<br />

board, calling them fourth-generation sensors. He indicated that this generation of sensors will be characterized<br />

by a number of attributes: bi-directional command and data communication, all digital transmission,<br />

local digital processing, preprogrammed decision algorithms, user-defined algorithms, internal self-verification/diagnosis,<br />

compensation algorithms, on-board storage, and extensible sensor object models.<br />

Mitchell et al. (1999) presented a wireless data acquisition system for health monitoring of smart structures.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y developed a micro sensor that uses an analog multiplexer to allow data from multiple sensors to be<br />

communicated over a single communication channel. <strong>The</strong> data is converted to a digital format before transmission<br />

using an 80C515CO microcontroller. A 900 MHz spread spectrum transceiver system, capable of<br />

transmitting serial data at the rate of SOKbps, is used to perform the wireless transmission. Mitchell et al.<br />

(2001) continued this work to extend the cellular communication between the central cluster and the web<br />

server, allowing web-control of the network.<br />

Liu et al. (2001) presented a wireless sensor system that includes 5 monitoring stations, each of them with a<br />

3-axis accelerometer (ADXL05). <strong>The</strong> stations use an 80C251 microprocessor with a 16 bit A/D converter.<br />

Because this network is sensing continuously, transmission of data to the base station could present collisions.<br />

To avoid this problem, a direct sequence spread spectrum radio with long pseudo noise code was used<br />

to distinguish each substation. Experimental verification was provided.<br />

While significant strides have been made toward the development of smart sensors, all of the above<br />

cited systems are proprietary in nature. Moreover, the types of measurements that can be readily made<br />

are not necessarily suitable for civil infrastructure applications. <strong>The</strong> Mote platform developed at the<br />

<strong>University</strong> of California at Berkeley (see Fig. 17) with funding from the Defense Advanced <strong>Research</strong><br />

Projects Agency (DARPA) offers, for the first time, an open hardware/software environment for broad<br />

smart sensing research. In addition to the small physical size, low cost, modest power consumption, and<br />

diversity in design and usage, one of the main advantages of using the Mote is that employing the Berkeley-Mote<br />

(http://webs.cs.berkeley.edu/) platform allows leveraging of the substantial resources that<br />

have already been invested by DARPA. Smart sensors based on the Berkeley-Mote platform should<br />

provide the impetus for the development of the next generation of structural health monitoring and control<br />

systems.<br />

Although progress in smart<br />

sensing technology has made<br />

substantial progress in recent<br />

years, a number of impediment<br />

exist to the realization<br />

of the vision of massively<br />

distributed smart sensors for N<br />

structural health monitoring<br />

and control. One of the most<br />

prominent is the lack of a<br />

computational framework on<br />

vvhich to build new structural<br />

health monitoring strategies.<br />

Relatively complex algo- Figure 17. Berkeley-Mote (Mica) Processor Board.<br />

rithms for monitoring structures<br />

and detecting both the extent and location of damage have been developed and implemented in the<br />

laboratory (Doebling and Farrar 1999). However, these algorithms assume central processing of the<br />

data; they cannot be implemented readily in the distributed computing environment employed by smart


81<br />

sensors. New algorithms must be developed that can utilize the smart sensor's on-board processor to<br />

deal with the large amount of data that will be generated by a monitoring system employing a dense<br />

array of sensors. Additionally, eliminating redundant information from neighboring sensors may be<br />

necessary. Such an approach reduces that amount of information that needs to be transmitted over the<br />

network. To date an appropriate framework on which to build structural health monitoring and control<br />

strategies does not exist. Other critical issues include errors in synchronization of on-board clocks<br />

among sensors, delays in transmission due packet collisions (20-30% of the data packets can be lost),<br />

short transmission range, inability to simultaneously transmit and acquire data, and limited memory<br />

capabilities.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

This paper provides an update of smart structures technology, including both smart dampers and smart<br />

sensors. Although in their infancy, control strategies based on smart damping devices appear to cornbine<br />

the best features of both passive and active control systems and to offer a viable means of protecting<br />

civil engineering structural systems against earthquake and wind loading. In particular, they provide<br />

the reliability and fail-safe character of passive devices, yet possess the adaptability of fully active<br />

devices. Full-scale implementations for two smart damping systems were presented. <strong>The</strong> variable orifice<br />

damper has been or is being installed in 11 buildings in Japan. Magnetorheological (MR) fluid<br />

dampers have been installed last year in a building in Japan and on a bridge in China. <strong>The</strong>se two classes<br />

of smart dampers have been shown to mesh well with application demands and constraints to offer an<br />

attractive means of protecting civil infrastructure systems against severe earthquake and wind loading.<br />

To investigate both local and global damage criteria, a dense array of sensors is anticipated to be<br />

required for large civil engineering structures. Rapid advances in sensor, wireless communication,<br />

Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), and information technologies have the potential to significantly<br />

impact structural health monitoring. <strong>The</strong> emerging technology of smart sensors, allows a portion<br />

of the computation to be done locally on the sensor's embedded microprocessor. This paper presented<br />

the basic ideas behind smart sensors, some of units developed to date, and indicated certain needs to<br />

takes advantages of smart sensors for structural health monitoring. <strong>The</strong> Berkeley-Mote smart sensors<br />

are an open hardware/software platform that will provide the impetus for the development of the next<br />

generation of structural health monitoring and control systems.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

<strong>The</strong> author gratefully acknowledges the partial support of this research by the National Science Foundation<br />

under grant CMS 99-00234 (Dr. S.C. Liu, Program Director) and the Lord Corporation. <strong>The</strong> author<br />

would also like to thank Dr. Takuji Kobori for providing the information and photographs regarding the<br />

full-scale implementation of semi-active hydraulic dampers by the Kajima Corporation and thank Dr.<br />

Y.Q. Ni for providing the photographs regarding the full-scale implementation of MR dampers on the<br />

Dongting Lake Bridge.


82<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Brooks T. (1999). Using smart accelerometers and wireless interfaces for condition monitoring. Machine<br />

Plant & Systems Monitor. May/June issue.<br />

Carlson J.D. (1994). <strong>The</strong> promise of controllable fluids. Proc. of Actuator 94 (H. Borgmann and K.<br />

Lenz, Eds.), AXON Technologic Consult GmbH, 266-270.<br />

Carlson J.D. and Weiss K.D. (1994), A growing attraction to magnetic fluids. Machine Design, August,<br />

61-64.<br />

Carlson J.D., Catanzarite D.M., and St. Clair K.A. (1995). Commercial magneto-rheological fluid devices.<br />

Proc., 5th Int. Conf on ER Fluids, MR Fluids and Assoc. Tech., Sheffield, UK.<br />

Carlson J.D., Chrzan M.J., and James P.O. (1995). Magnetorheological fluid devices, U.S. Patent<br />

#5,398,917.<br />

Carlson J.D. and Spencer Jr. B.F. (1996). Magneto-rheological fluid dampers for semi-active seismic<br />

control. Proc, 3rd Int Conf on Motion and Vib. Control, III, 35-40.<br />

Chen, Y., Ni, Y.Q., and Ko, J.M. (2002). Applicability of passive and active devices for vibration control<br />

of long-span bridge cables. <strong>Research</strong> Report, Department of Civil and Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, Hong Kong.<br />

Doebling A.W. and Farrar C.R. (1999). <strong>The</strong> state of the art in structural identification of constructed facilities.<br />

Los Alamos National Laboratory.<br />

Dyke S.J., Spencer Jr. B.F., Sain M.K., and Carlson J.D. (1998). An experimental study of MR dampers<br />

for seismic protection. Smart Mat. and Struct. 7, 693—703<br />

Feng M.Q. and Shinozuka M. (1990). Use of a variable damper for hybrid control of bridge response<br />

under earthquake. Proc., U.S. National Workshop on Struct. Control <strong>Research</strong>. USC Publication no.<br />

CE-9013.<br />

Gavin H.P., Hanson R.D., and Filisko F.E. (1996). Electrorheological dampers, part 1: analysis and design.<br />

J. Applied Mechanics, 63:9, 669-675.<br />

Hill J. (2000) A software architecture supporting networked sensors. <strong>Research</strong> Project to obtain the degree<br />

of Master of Science. <strong>University</strong> of California at Berkeley.<br />

Hill J., Szewczyk R., Woo A., Hollar S., Culler D., and Pister, K. (2000). System architecture directions<br />

for networked sensors. International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages<br />

and Operating Systems - ASPLOS, 9th International Conference Architectural Support for<br />

Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS-LX), Cambridge, MA, pp. 93-104.<br />

Hollar S. (2000). COTS dust <strong>Research</strong> project to obtain the degree of Master of Science. <strong>University</strong> of<br />

California at Berkeley.<br />

Housner G.W., Bergman L.A., Caughey T.K., Chassiakos A.G, Claus R.O., Masri S.F., Skelton R.E.,<br />

Soong T.T., Spencer B.F., and Yao J.T.P. (1997). Structural control: past, present and future," J. of<br />

Engrg Mech , ASCE, 123(9), 897-971.<br />

Kamagata S. and Kobori T. (1994). Autonomous adaptive control of active variable stiffness systems<br />

for seismic ground motion", Proc., 1 st World Conf. on Struct. Control, TA4:33-42, Pasadena, CA.<br />

Kawashima K. and Unjoh S. (1993). Variable dampers and variable stiffness for seismic control of<br />

bridges. Proc, Int. Workshop on Struct. Control, Honolulu, Hawaii, 283-297.<br />

Kawashima K., Unjoh S., and Shimizu K. (1992). Experiments on dynamics characteristics of variable<br />

damper. Proc., Japan Nat. Symp. on Struct. Resp. Control, Tokyo, Japan, 121.<br />

Kiremidjian A.S., Straser E.G, Meng T.H., Law K., and Soon, H. (1997). Structural damage monitoring<br />

for civil structures. International Workshop - Structural Health Monitoring, pp. 371-382.<br />

Kobori T. (1994). Future direction on research and development of seismic-response-controlled structure.<br />

Proc. 1st World Conf on Struct. Control, Panel: 19-31.


83<br />

Kobon T. (1998). Mission and perspective towards future structural control research. Proc, 2 nd World<br />

Conf on Struct Control, 1, 25-34, Kyoto, Japan.<br />

Kobon T. (2002). Past, present and future in seismic response control in civil engineering structures.<br />

Proc , 3rd World Conf on Struct Control, Como, Italy,<br />

Kobon T., Takahashi M, Nasu T., Niwa N., and Ogasawara, K. (1993). Seismic response controlled<br />

structure with active variable stiffness system. <strong>Earthquake</strong> Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 22, 925-941.<br />

Kuehn J., Song G, and Sun J. (1999). Experimental verification of a non-protruding intelligent stiffener<br />

for bridges (ISB). Proc , Int. Post-SMiRT Conf Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy, Dissipation<br />

and Active Control of Vibrations of Structures, Cheju, Korea, August 23-25, 1999.<br />

Kurata N., Kobori T., Takahashi M., NiwaN., and Midorikawa H. (1999). Actual seismic response controlled<br />

building with semi-active damper system. <strong>Earthquake</strong> Engrg and Struct. Dyn., 28, 1427-<br />

1447.<br />

Liu R.C., Zhou L, Chen X., and Mau S.T. (2001). Wireless sensors for structural monitoring. Strong<br />

Motion Instrumentation for Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Structures, pp. 253-266.<br />

Lynch J.P., Law K.H., Kiremidjian A.S., Kenny T.W., Carryer E., and Partridge A. (2001). <strong>The</strong> design<br />

of a wireless sensing unit for structural health monitoring." 3rd International Workshop on Structural<br />

Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, pp. 1041-1050.<br />

Maser K., Egri, R., Lichtenstein A., and Chase S. (1997). Development of a wireless global bridge evaluation<br />

and monitoring system (WGBEMS). Proceedings of the Specialty Conference on Infrastructure<br />

Condition Assessment- Art, Science, Practice, pp. 91-100.<br />

Mitchell K., Sana S., Balakrishnan VS., Rao V., and Pottinger, H.J. (1999). Micro sensors for health<br />

monitoring of smart structures. SPIE Conference on Smart Electronics and MEMS, 3673, pp. 351-<br />

358.<br />

Mitchell K., Dang N., Liu P., Rao V., and Pottinger H.J. (2001). Web-controlled wireless network sensors<br />

for structural health monitoring. Proceedings - SPIE the International Society for Optical <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

4334, pp. 234-243.<br />

Patten W.N. (1998). <strong>The</strong> 1-35 Walnut Creek bridge: an intelligent highway bridge via semi-active structural<br />

control. Proc, 2 nd World Conf on Struct. Control, 1,427^36, Kyoto, Japan.<br />

Patten W., Sun J., Li G, Kuehn J., and Song G. (1999). Field test of an intelligent stiffener for bridges at<br />

the 1-35 Walnut Creek bridge. <strong>Earthquake</strong> Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 28(2), 109-126.<br />

Rabinow J. (1948). <strong>The</strong> magnetic fluid clutch. A1EE Transactions, 67, 1308-1315.<br />

Sack R.L. and Patten W. (1993). Semiactive hydraulic structural control, Proc., Int, Workshop on Struct.<br />

Control, USC Publication No. CE-9311, 417-431, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1993.<br />

Shames I.H., and Cozzarelli F.A. (1992). Elastic and inelastic stress analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood<br />

Cliffs, New Jersey.<br />

Soong T.T. (1990). Active structural control: theory and practice, Longman Scientific and Technical,<br />

Essex, England,<br />

Soong T.T. and Spencer Jr. B.F. (2002). Supplementary energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-ofthe-practice.<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Structures, 24, 243-259.<br />

Spencer Jr. B.F., Dyke S.J., Sain M.K., and Carlson J.D. (1997). Phenomenological model ofamagnetorheological<br />

damper. J Engrg Mech., ASCE, 123:3,230-238.<br />

Spencer Jr. B.F. and Sain M.K. (1997). Controlling buildings: a new frontier in feedback. IEEE Control<br />

Sys. Mag 17:6, 19-35.<br />

Spencer Jr. B.F., Yang G, Carlson J.D., and Sain M.K. (1999). 'Smart' dampers for seismic protection<br />

of structures: a full-scale study. Proc., 2nd World Conf. Struct. Control, 1, 417-426.<br />

Spencer Jr. B.F., Johnson E.A., and Ramallo J. C. (2000). 'Smart 1 isolation for seismic control. JSME<br />

Int J. Special Issue on Frontiers of Motion and Vibration Control, C, 43(3), 704-711.


Straser E.G. and Kiremidjian A.S. (1996). A modular visual approach to damage monitoring for civil<br />

structures. Proceedings ofSPIE, Smart Structures and Materials, 2719, pp. 112-122.<br />

Straser E.G. and Kiremidjian A.S. (1998). A modular, wireless damage monitoring system for structures.<br />

<strong>The</strong> John A. Blume <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Center, Report No. 128.<br />

Straser E.G., Kiremidjian A.S., Meng T.H., and Redlefsen, L. (1998). A modular, wireless network platform<br />

for monitoring structures. Proceedings - SPIE <strong>The</strong> International Society for Optical <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

issue 3243, 1, pp. 450-456.<br />

Sunakoda K., Sodeyama H., Iwata N., Fujitani H., and Soda S. (2000). Dynamic characteristics of magneto-rheological<br />

fluid damper Proc, SPIE Smart Struct and Mat Conf, 194-203.<br />

Symans M.D., Constantmou M.C., Taylor D.P., and Garjost K.D. (1994). Semi-active fluid viscous<br />

dampers for seismic response control. Proc , 1st World Conf on Struct Control, Los Angeles, California,<br />

FA4:3-12, August, 1994.<br />

Symans M D and Constantmou M.C. (1996). Experimental study of seismic response of structures with<br />

semi-active damping control systems. Proc, Structures Congress XIV, Chicago, IL, April 15-18,<br />

1996<br />

Winslow W.M. (1947). Method and means for translating electrical impulses into mechanical force, US<br />

Patent No. 2,417,850.<br />

Winslow W.M. (1949). Induced fibration of suspensions. J ofAppL Phys , 20, 1137-1140.<br />

Yang G, Ramallo J.C., Spencer Jr. B.F., Carlson J.D., and Sain M.K. (2000). Dynamic performance of<br />

large-scale MR fluid dampers. Proc, 14th Engrg. Mech. Spec, Conf, 6 pages.<br />

Yang G (2001). Large-scale magnetorheological fluid damper for vibration mitigation, modeling, testing<br />

and control. Ph.D dissertation, <strong>University</strong> of Notre Dame, IN.<br />

Ying, Z.G, Ni, Y.Q., and Ko, J.M. (2002). Analysis and control of dynamic stability of bridge stay cables<br />

induced by parametrically excited oscillation. <strong>Research</strong> Report, Department of Civil and Structural<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, Hong Kong.<br />

84


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

EARTHQUAKE ACTION PROVISION IN GB50011-2001<br />

AND THREE IMPROVEMENTS<br />

Tao Xiaxin 1 and Geng Shuwei 3 ' 2<br />

'institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, Harbin 150080, China<br />

2 Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In the code for seismic design of buildings GB 50011-2001 of China, many new methods and<br />

techniques have been adopted, and quite large improvements achieved. For earthquake action<br />

provision, the two main improvements are summarized in this paper. (1) <strong>The</strong> long period band of the<br />

design spectrum is extended from 3 seconds to 6 seconds, while the low limit of the long period design<br />

spectrum is removed, and a slow line of amplitude decline is adopted instead; (2) Two additional<br />

intervals of a max, the maximum value of the design response spectrum, are added one for each<br />

Intensity VII and VI respectively, and T & the characteristic period, is determined based on both the<br />

seismic zoning map and the site condition, and thus, it is not necessary to take into account the<br />

"far-source" effect.<br />

Three further improvements are also suggested in this paper, as follows: a max to be adjusted<br />

according to site condition, the long period band of the design spectrum to be extended to 10 second,<br />

the declining rate of the design spectrum at long period range to be -1.0, and the ratio of design spectra<br />

between vertical and horizontal components to be taken as a function of the period, instead of a<br />

constant value of 0.65 for soil site.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> new code for seismic design of buildings GB 50011-2001 of China, was issued by the Ministry of<br />

Construction and the State General Administration for Quality Supervision and Inspection and<br />

Quarantine last year, and was put into practice at the beginning of this year. Its earthquake action


86<br />

provisions have been improved, and are summarized and discussed in detail in this paper. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />

still some new methods and suggestions that have not been included in the revision, since they had not<br />

been validated adequately at that time. As the end of a revision could be considered as also the<br />

beginning of the next, those methods and suggestions need to be considered further. Some other<br />

seismic design codes, for example, the Code for seismic design of highway engineering (JTJ004-89)<br />

and the Design code for anti seismic special structures (GB 50191-93), are ongoing or going to be<br />

revised in China. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is necessary to probe into new improvement(s) as past of an overview of<br />

the state of the art and future trends in seismic design codes.<br />

THE IMPROVEMENTS IN EARTHQUAKE ACTION PROVISION IN GB 50011-2001<br />

In the revision of the code for seismic design of buildings of China, many new methods and techniques<br />

have been adopted, and quite large improvements achieved. For earthquake action provision, there are<br />

two main improvements.<br />

Period band of design spectrum extended<br />

With the development of construction and urbanization, buildings are getting larger and higher, and the<br />

fundamental natural periods of buildings are getting much longer than the 3.0 second that is the longest<br />

period of the design response spectrum (so called seismic effect coefficient) in the former edition of<br />

code for seismic design of buildings GBJ11-89. <strong>The</strong> long period of the design response spectrum band<br />

must be extended to meet the demand of construction. Of course, this broadening should be based on<br />

the reliability of the data at long period range. Since many strong ground motion records have been<br />

observed by analog accelerographs, the data reliability firstly depends on the period band of the<br />

instruments. Some correction techniques have been adopted to broaden the instrument<br />

amplitude-frequency feature, originally from O.SHz to 25Hz. <strong>The</strong> Ormsby digital filter with low cut-off<br />

frequency 0.15Hz could broaden the frequency band to 0.15Hz, i.e. the longest period is 6.6 second.<br />

Furthermore, another correction has been made to remove the noise in the digitizing process, which<br />

consists mainly of long period components. <strong>The</strong> long cut-off period of the filter was taken as 26cm/v,<br />

where v is the running speed of the record paper in cm/'s. Since the paper speed was generally 4.8 cm/s,<br />

the longest period must be<br />

5.4 second. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

long period design spectrum<br />

band in the new edition of the<br />

code is extended from 3.0<br />

second to 6.0 second.<br />

o.<br />

<strong>The</strong> low limit of the long<br />

period design spectrum in<br />

GBJ11-89, was acceptable<br />

Figure l ^e design spectrum in code GB50011-2001


87<br />

for a period range less than 3.0 second, but it must be deleted now, because of the band broadening<br />

mentioned above. A slow declining line has been adopted instead in the new code, as shown in figure 1,<br />

and the amplitude of the design response spectrum a is described as a function of period T as<br />

follows<br />

5T<br />

s n<br />

CD<br />

where a max is the maximum value of the design response spectrum, T g is the characteristic period,<br />

7 is the descending rate of the design spectrum in period range from T g to 5 T g , and depends on the<br />

damping ratio as<br />

0.5 + 5C<br />

and<br />

77, is the descending rate of the design spectrum in period range from 5T g to 6.0 second, given<br />

as<br />

ty =0.02 + (0.05-£)/8 (3)<br />

and taking a value of 0.0, if the value is negative from the above equation.<br />

77., is the damping<br />

adjustment factor, given as<br />

(4)<br />

taking a value of 0.55, if the value calculated from the above equation is less than 0.55.<br />

Provision for<br />

a max and T g<br />

<strong>The</strong> improvement in design spectrum provision arises mainly from the revision of the China Seismic<br />

Zoning Map. A new national seismic zoning map of China, also the state standard GB 18306-2001,<br />

was issued by the State General Administration for Quality Supervision and Inspection and Quarantine<br />

at the beginning of 2001, and was put into practice in August, 2001. <strong>The</strong> zoning map consists of two<br />

sheets, one for ground acceleration, the other for the characteristic period T g . On the acceleration map,


the zones, divided by contours are in 7 intervals,


89<br />

tens or more than a hundred accelerograms recorded at each event, and mostly recorded by digital<br />

accelerographs. <strong>The</strong>se instruments possess a wide dynamic range, broad frequency band, high<br />

sampling rate and pre-event memory. <strong>The</strong> low frequency errors in the records of these instruments are<br />

mainly due to instrument noise and site background noise. <strong>The</strong> total noise level could be estimated by<br />

comparing the records with the pre-event recordings. A result based on limited data showed that the<br />

longest period of the effective frequency band could reach a dozen seconds (Xie Lili etal., 2000). By<br />

checking if the long period drift could be removed completely in the displacement time history by a<br />

double integration of the acceleration record, a high pass cut-off frequency was selected as<br />

0.067Hz~0.083Hz.<br />

In this paper, 132 free field records from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake are used for comparing<br />

systematically the Fourier spectra of the pre-event recordings (i.e. noise) with those of the strong<br />

ground motion records. In general, the Fourier spectrum amplitudes of noise show a smooth<br />

distribution hi the band of most engineering interest, while they are getting larger at periods of about<br />

10 seconds. <strong>The</strong> spectrum amplitudes of strong ground motion are generally much higher than those of<br />

the noise, but descend gradually at very short and long periods, becoming similar to those of the noise.<br />

All results from the 132 records show that the signal to noise spectral ratio is greater than 90 at period<br />

of 10.24 second. It is higher than the<br />

ratio at high frequency range of more<br />

than 30 Hz. <strong>The</strong> facts show that the<br />

digital records of strong ground motion<br />

are reliable at least up to 10 second. <strong>The</strong><br />

seismic effect coefficient at periods in Mtf<br />

the 6.0-10.0 second range could be<br />

stipulated in the seismic design code 1 icf<br />

from these records. An example of a<br />

Fourier spectra comparison of noise and<br />

strong ground motion recorded by the<br />

same accelerograph at the same position in<br />

two time periods with just tens seconds in<br />

between, is shown in figure 2.<br />

; ia 2 ia 3 ia 2 ia 1 icP io 1 10 2<br />

Lgf(mHz)<br />

Fig.2 Comparison of Fourier spectra of noise and<br />

ground motion<br />

As mentioned above, the amplitude of the design spectrum is depressed obviously by the improvement<br />

in the new code. However, it is still conservative if the band of the spectrum extends up to 10 seconds.<br />

In the seismic design codes of many earthquake countries (Euro code 8, 1993), the descending rates<br />

are given as T" 1 and T" 2 in moderate and long period ranges respectively. <strong>The</strong> reliability and safety<br />

redundancy of a design spectrum descending with T 1 at long period range are validated on the basis of<br />

760 strong ground motion records. <strong>The</strong> numbers of records in groups of magnitudes (M) and distances<br />

(R) are listed in the following table.<br />

Table 2<br />

Strong ground motion data in groups<br />

Rock site<br />

^^^--JQistance<br />

MaojiituSs^v^ R


90<br />

4


91<br />

In order to validate the conclusion above,<br />

the ground motion recorded at soft soil site<br />

in Chi-Chi earthquake are processed in the<br />

same way. <strong>The</strong> result is shown in figure 4<br />

for the whole penod band, where the black<br />

curve is the average spectrum with<br />

descending rate of T 1 , the grey ones are the<br />

spectra of the original records. It is also<br />

clear that the reliability of the average<br />

spectrum at period range longer than 6<br />

seconds is higher than that at short period<br />

range.<br />

0 5 10 15<br />

T(sec.)<br />

Fig 4 Comparison of the average spectrum with those of the<br />

original records on soft soil sites from Chi-Chi earthquake<br />

<strong>The</strong> maximum value of design spectrum adjusted from the site condition<br />

Before and during the revision of the code for the seismic design of buildings in China, an<br />

improvement had been adopted in some seismic design codes of other countries in that the maximum<br />

values of design spectra determined from the zoning maps were further adjusted from site condition.<br />

For example, in the NEHRP recommended provisions, the maximum value of the design spectrum<br />

equals the value from the zoning map for site category B (soft rock site) multiplied by a site factor.<br />

This improvement is consistent with the experience that earthquake damage on soil site is generally<br />

more serious than on rock site, and is supported by some observed data (TLDobry et al., 2000). <strong>The</strong><br />

values of the adjusting coefficients mainly depend on statistical data for acceleration 0.1 g and less on<br />

site in category B, and on a lot of numerical results from site response analyses for stronger<br />

accelerations, as shown in table 3.<br />

Site<br />

categories<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Table 3 <strong>The</strong> adjusting coefficients of various sites<br />

Acceleration from the zoning map for site category B<br />


92<br />

Site<br />

categories<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Table 4 <strong>The</strong> adjusting coefficients suggested by Li Xiaojun (2001)<br />

Acceleration from the zoning map for site category A<br />

0.05g O.lg 0.15g 0.20g 0.30g 0.40g<br />

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0<br />

1.5 1.45 1.40 1.33 1.25 1.18<br />

1.10 LOO 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6<br />

0.8 0.7 0.6 0.55 0.50 0.45<br />

<strong>The</strong> values in the above two tables commonly describe the amplifying effect of ground soil layers, and<br />

the reduction effect of soil nonlinearity when acceleration is strong enough. Meanwhile one can find<br />

there is quite a large difference between the values in the two tables, especially the trend of varying<br />

with soil from stiff to soft and from thin to thick. Should it increase or decrease <strong>The</strong> most convincing<br />

answer must come from the observed data. <strong>The</strong> maximum values of normalized response spectra of<br />

760 free field ground motion records, and the corresponding magnitudes, distances and site conditions,<br />

are summarized to work out the coefficient values in this paper.<br />

To deal with the relation between the maximum values of normalized spectra and site condition, the<br />

key point is to compare them at the same magnitude and distance. <strong>The</strong> biggest difficulty is that the data<br />

sample is not large enough, and the data distribution in magnitude and distance is not homogeneous.<br />

One can rarely find sets of data of the same magnitude (ideally the same earthquake) and exact same<br />

distance for various site conditions. <strong>The</strong> qualification has to be relaxed to those of similar magnitude<br />

and distance. <strong>The</strong> authors compare the mean maximum values in each magnitude and distance group<br />

directly rather than compare the attenuation relationships for various site categories. <strong>The</strong> ratios of<br />

mean values of maximum spectrum amplitudes for various sites to the value for rock site in every<br />

group are shown hi table 5, where the number in bracket after the ratio is the sample size (i.e. number<br />

of records. <strong>The</strong> records just on the boundaries between two neighboring groups are applied twice). <strong>The</strong><br />

term Ace. is for acceleration of maximum spectral amplitude on rock site divided by 2.5<br />

Table 5 <strong>The</strong> ratios of mean values of maximum spectral amplitudes of various sites to one of rock site<br />

Distance ikm)<br />

' -— A CC - (§)<br />

Site Categories----^^_<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Distance (km)<br />

' " — "•—--— .^Acc. (3)<br />

Site Categories'——-^<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Magnitude ^5.75<br />

0-10 10-50<br />

0.2543<br />

1.00 (9)<br />

0.1365<br />

LOO (10)<br />

139 (6)<br />

0.79 (84) 0.79 (81)<br />

Magnitude 5.75 - 6.5<br />

0-30 30-50<br />

0.199<br />

1.00 (18)<br />

1.47 (8)<br />

1.96 (8)<br />

1.35 (91)<br />

0.1271<br />

1.00 (6)<br />

1.38 (6)<br />

1.10 (4)<br />

1.25 (112)<br />

50-100<br />

0.028<br />

1.00 (4)<br />

1.23 (22)<br />

50-100<br />

0.0291<br />

1.00 (6)<br />

1.53 (4)<br />

2.21 (38)<br />

100-200<br />

0.0303<br />

1.00 (2)<br />

100-200<br />

0.0357<br />

1.00 (2)<br />

0.68 (20)


93<br />

Distance (km)<br />

""""--^Acc. (g)<br />

Magnitude "*""~-~--—_<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Magnitude 6.5 - 7.5 |g<br />

10-30 30-50<br />

0.2813<br />

1.00 (10)<br />

0.74 (2)<br />

1.16 (64)<br />

0.1355<br />

1.00 (6)<br />

1.51 (10)<br />

0.78 (2)<br />

1.18 (116)<br />

50-100<br />

0.1147<br />

1.00 (6)<br />

1.11 (12)<br />

1.78 (16)<br />

0.98 (72)<br />

100-200<br />

0.036<br />

1.00 (2)<br />

1.79 (2)<br />

1.81 (14)<br />

One can see from the table that the ratios vary with site condition. <strong>The</strong> ratio values are further<br />

summarized into four groups according to the Ace. values ^O.OSg, 0.08~0.15g, 0.15~0.25g, or^<br />

0.25g, the mean values of these four groups are listed in table 6 with the representative values O.OSg,<br />

O.lg, 0.2g and 0.3g. From that table, one can find that, in general, soil site will amplify the ratio (the<br />

maximum to 1.96 times), the rate of amplification may decreases smoothly as the soil gets softer and<br />

the thicker the soil layers. <strong>The</strong> rate of amplification decreases obviously until less than 1.0 when the<br />

Ace. is greater than 0.3g from the nonlinearity effect of soil. It is true that some values in the table vary<br />

in unstable fashion, even jumpily, because of the insufficient and inhomogeneous data sample. Putting<br />

the ratios for the soil sites together, a general trend of the ratio decreasing smoothly with the Ace. can<br />

be recognized. From the above table and some other references, the suggested values of adjustment<br />

coefficient are listed in table 7, where the values for Ace. 0.15g and 0.3g are estimated by<br />

interpolation.<br />

Table 6 <strong>The</strong> mean ratios of four Ace, groups<br />

^^^"^•^A-cc (g)<br />

Site Categories"--^^^<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

0.05<br />

LOO<br />

1.66<br />

1.59<br />

0.1<br />

1.00<br />

1.30<br />

1.41 ^<br />

1.06<br />

0.2<br />

1.00<br />

1.47<br />

1.96<br />

1.35<br />

0.3<br />

LOO<br />

0.77<br />

0.95<br />

""^^-^^Acc.Cg)<br />

Site Categon&s--^^^^<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Table 7 <strong>The</strong> suggested values of site coefficient<br />

0.05<br />

1.0<br />

1.65<br />

1.65<br />

1.60<br />

0.1<br />

1.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

0.15<br />

1.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

0.2<br />

1.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.5<br />

1.3<br />

0,25<br />

1.0<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

LI<br />

0.3<br />

1.0<br />

1.2<br />

LI<br />

1.0<br />

0.4<br />

1.0<br />

1.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

Ratio of vertical to horizontal component varying with period<br />

As the accumulation of near field records has increased, some quite large vertical components of<br />

ground motions have been reported, which are even larger than the horizontal components. To examine<br />

if it is necessary to stipulate the ratio of vertical maximum amplitude to the horizontal one in the<br />

design spectra for different distances, 1449 ratios of vertical to horizontal parrs of records were


94<br />

calculated at 91 periods from 0.04 second to 15.0 seconds. <strong>The</strong> mean value of the ratios obtained over<br />

all period ranges is 0.65, which indicates the provision of the ratio in GB 50011-2001 is relevant in<br />

general. <strong>The</strong> results from a further group rag into nine are listed in table 8. <strong>The</strong> ratio varies smoothly,<br />

and reaches a value of 0.5 in far field from a large earthquake.<br />

Table 8 <strong>The</strong> V/H spectral ratio in groups<br />

^^^^i^^de<br />

Distance^--^^ 80<br />

0.64 (429)<br />

0.66 (64)<br />

0.68 (12)<br />

0.65 (291)<br />

0.63 (402)<br />

0.63 (60)<br />

>6.75<br />

0.71 (33)<br />

0.63 (104)<br />

0.50 (52)<br />

Examining the variability of the ratio over the whole period range, one can find quite a large difference<br />

between the ratio values for different period ranges. A gross mean is shown in figure 5, and the general<br />

variation trend can be recognized as providing a peak with a value up to 1.0 over short period, which<br />

then descends rapidly to a trough with a value less than 0.5 as the period increases, and gradually<br />

increases to a value of 0.6 at a period 2.5 second and keeps that value at longer period. From a detailed<br />

grouping analysis for various magnitudes, distances and sites, the following can be concluded: the ratio<br />

on rock site varies smoothly, the peak in the short period range is obvious and may be greater than 1.0<br />

only at the near field from large earthquake; the peak ratio reaches 1.0 in short period range on soil site,<br />

and gets higher at the near field from a large earthquake.<br />

Since the peak ground acceleration relates only to the very short period component of ground motion,<br />

the conclusion above is consistent with some reports. <strong>The</strong> gross mean value of the ratio, however<br />

relates mainly to the stable value of 0.6 at long periods as well as the higher contribution over a very<br />

short period. In a seismic design code, in order to take into account the fact that the ratio of vertical to<br />

horizontal component varies with period, the authors suggest the ratio R should be expressed as a<br />

function of period Tfor soil site. A preliminary formula is as follows<br />

0.9<br />

1.0-7*<br />

0.475 + 0.057*<br />

0.6<br />

o


95<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

In this paper the improvements in earthquake action provision in the China code for seismic design of<br />

buildings GB 50011-2001 are summarized as (1) <strong>The</strong> long period band of design spectrum has been<br />

extended from 3 second to 6 second, while the low limit of the design spectrum at long period has been<br />

removed, and a slow decline line is adopted instead; (2) Two additional intervals of a ^^ are added ,<br />

one each for Intensity W and VI respectively, and T g9 the characteristic period, is determined based<br />

on both the seismic zoning map and the site condition. Thus, the "far-source" effect does not need to<br />

be taken into account once again.<br />

Three further improvements are also suggested for future consideration for inclusion into the code, as<br />

follows: Q max to be adjusted according to site condition, the long period band of the design spectrum<br />

to be extended to 10 second, and the declining rate of the design spectrum at long period range to be<br />

-1.0, the design spectra ratio of vertical and horizontal components to be taken as a function of period<br />

for soil sites, instead of a constant value of 0.65.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

National Standard of People's Republic of China (2001). Code for seismic design of buildings<br />

GB50011-2001.<br />

CALTRAKS (1999). Seismic design criteria, Version 1.1.<br />

Eurocode 8 (1993). Design provision for earthquake resistance of structures.<br />

FEMA(1997). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings.<br />

Xie Lili, Li Shabai and Qian Qukang (1981). Study on the instrument correction of accelerograms<br />

recorded by accelerograph coupled with galvanometers. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Vibration 1:1, 106-116.<br />

Xie Lili, Qian Qukang and Li Shabai (1982). <strong>The</strong> effect of digitization errors on analysis of strong<br />

ground motion records and their elimination. ACTA Seismologica Sinca 4:4,412-421.<br />

Xie Lili, Zhou Yongnian, Hu Chengxiang, Yu Haiying(1990). Characteristics of response spectra of<br />

long period earthquake ground Motion. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and <strong>Engineering</strong> Vibration 10:1,<br />

1-20.<br />

W. H. K. Lee, T. C. Shin, K. W. Kuo, K. C. Chen, and C. F. Wu(2001). CWS free-field strong motion<br />

data from the 21 September Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. BSSA 91:5, 1370-1376.<br />

Xie Lili, Zhou Yongnian et.al. (2000). Near field strong ground motion and long period component<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Report, Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechinics, 1-5.<br />

Wang Guoxin and Tao Xiaxin (2001). Extraction and study of response spectrum parameters. World<br />

Information on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> 17:2,73-78.<br />

Dobry, R., R. D. Borcherdt, C. B. Grouse, I. M. Idriss, W. B. Joyner, G R. Martin, M. S. Power, E. E.


Rinne, and R. B. Seed (2000). New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent<br />

building seismic code provisions. <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra 16:1, 41-67.<br />

C. B. Grouse and J.W. McGuire (1996). Site response studies for purpose of revising NEHRP seismic<br />

provisions. <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra 12:3,407-438.<br />

Bo Jingshan (1998). Study on site classification and design response spectra adjusting method,<br />

Post-doctor <strong>Research</strong> Report. Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics.<br />

Dou Lijun (2001). Site condition and design ground motion. <strong>The</strong>sis for Doctor Degree, Institute of<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics.<br />

Li Xiaojun and Peng Qing (2001). Calculation and analysis of earthquake ground motion parameters<br />

for different site categories. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and <strong>Engineering</strong> Vibration 21:1, 29-36.<br />

Li Xiaojun, et al. (2001). Consideration of site effects for determination of design earthquake ground<br />

motion parameters. World Information on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> 17:4, 34-41.<br />

96


ENGINEERING SEISMOLOGY AND<br />

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kane Volume<br />

DIGITIZATION AND DATA PROCESSING OF STRONG MOTION<br />

EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS<br />

V. W. Lee<br />

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2531<br />

Keywords:<br />

Digitization, Data Processing, <strong>Earthquake</strong> Accelerorams<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> modern techniques for digitization of strong-motion accelerograms and subsequent data<br />

processing were first developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s, at which time the only<br />

available digitization technology was semi-automatic hand digitization. Following the<br />

development of image processing technologies in the early 1970s, an automatic digitization and<br />

data processing system, driven by a mini-computer, was developed by Trifunac and Lee (1979).<br />

<strong>The</strong> currently used digitization technology is based on personal computers and flat bed digital<br />

scanners, which appeared respectively in the early and late 1980s. <strong>The</strong> data processing part has<br />

been continuously evolving, improving the performance of the entire system. This paper presents<br />

a review of the developments in hardware and software for digitization of strong-motion<br />

accelerograms, data processing and data dissemination. In the 1980s, digital strong motion<br />

accelerographs became commercially available and currently all new deployments are digital.<br />

However, it takes time to record a large number of strong motion accelerograms, and as of now,<br />

by far, most of the strong motion data has been recorded in analog form.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> first strong motion accelerographs were analog, and were built and installed at free-field<br />

sites and in buildings in the early 1930s. Soon after, strong motion was first recorded, on March<br />

10, 1933, during the Long Beach, California earthquake. In the 1980s, digital strong motion<br />

accelerographs became commercially available (Trifunac and Todorovska, 200la), and at present<br />

essentially all new installations are digit 1 al. Yet, so far the largest number of strong motion<br />

records has been recorded in analog form, on light sensitive paper or on film. For analysis,<br />

analog strong motion records must be digitized and processed in a form suitable for subsequent


100<br />

analyses. This paper reviews the developments in digitization, processing (Trifunac et al.,<br />

1999a,b), and dissemination of strong motion accelerograms(Lee and Trifunac, 1982).<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of response spectrum as a tool in earthquake resistant design was formulated in<br />

1932, one year before the first recording of strong ground motion (Biot 1932; 33). Before the<br />

1960s, spectra had to be computed with the aid of analog mechanical devices (e.g. torsional<br />

pendulum; Biot, 1941; 42) or electrical analog computers (Caughy et al, 1960). <strong>The</strong> modern era<br />

of digitization and processing of strong motion accelerograms started in the 1960s (Fig. 1), with<br />

the availability of digital computers and semi-automatic digitizing machines (Hudson, 1979).<br />

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the only available technology for digitization of strong motion<br />

accelerograms was a semi-automatic, hand digitization system (Hudson, 1979; Trifunac and Lee,<br />

1973). <strong>The</strong> semi-automatic digitization system was operating from 1967 to about 1975, It was<br />

slow (it took about four days to digitize, check and load data onto magnetic tapes), accurate, and<br />

its noise characteristics were analyzed and documented (Trifunac et al., 1971; 1973a,b). It was<br />

used to generate all the data published in the so-called Caltech "blue book data reports" (Hudson<br />

et al., 1969; 1971; 1972a,b), which became the "standard" source for strong motion data all over<br />

the world. <strong>The</strong> digitized data of many famous older accelerograms in the blue book reports, such<br />

as March 10, 1933 Long Beach (Heck et ah, 1936), May 18, 1940, El Centra (Trifunac and<br />

Brune, 1970), July 21, 1952, Taft (Hudson et al., 1969), and February 9, 1971, Pacoima Dam<br />

(Trifunac and Hudson, 1971), were all redigitized by Trifunac using this semi-automatic<br />

digitization system, because the previously digitized versions had inadequate sampling rate and<br />

occasionally missed or misinterpreted peaks in the strong motion part of the records.<br />

2. DIGITIZATION<br />

2.1 <strong>The</strong> Automatic Digitization System<br />

<strong>The</strong> first automatic system for digitization of strong-motion accelerograms was developed by<br />

Trifunac and Lee (1979), using the commercially available hardware for image processing<br />

(Photoscan P-1000 Optronics Photodensitometer) and a Data General NOVA-3 minicomputer. In<br />

the 1980s, it was replaced by the inexpensive high-speed personal computers (PCs) and desktop<br />

digital scanners that appeared on the market and reduced the cost of the system to several<br />

thousand dollars (Fig. 1). Our new software package "LeAuto," consisting of LeFilm, LeTrace,<br />

LeTV and LeScribe computer programs, now runs on a Pentiuum PC with 128 MB or more of<br />

RAM, running Windows98 or higher operating system, and with a fast Super VGA graphics<br />

monitor. <strong>The</strong> software has been continuously updated and improved to be compatible with the<br />

new scanners that have appeared on the market. By 2000, the cost of the hardware dropped to<br />

less than US $2,000 (Fig. 1). <strong>The</strong> current resolution of digitization is >200 points/s (assuming<br />

film speed of Icm/s), with gray levels resolved by 8, 10 or 12 bits (256, 1024 or 4098 gray levels)<br />

(Lee and Trifunac, 1990; Trifunac et al., 1999a,b).<br />

2.2 Hardware Components<br />

<strong>The</strong> elements of the new automatic digitization system are shown schematically in Fig. 2. <strong>The</strong><br />

reading of an 8.5x11 inch film positive is performed by a Hewlett-Packard desktop digital<br />

scanner ("ScanJet"), interfaced with the PC. <strong>The</strong> PC needs to have a large hard disk drive and a


101<br />

minimum of 2 MB random access memory (RAM), while most modem PCs have 64, 128, 256<br />

MB or larger RAM. In the early 1990s, the automatic digitization system ran on operating<br />

system DOS version 5.00 or higher (preferably DOS 6.2), and currently (early 2000s) on<br />

Microsoft Windows 98 or higher operating system. <strong>The</strong> PC is interfaced with a Super VGA<br />

graphics display monitor, and a LaserJet printer, while other Windows supported (e.g. DeskJets<br />

and InkJet) printers can also be used.<br />

A typical strong-motion accelerogram is usually several tens of seconds long, but may be one<br />

minute or longer, if the complete length of useful recording is considered. <strong>The</strong>n, considering a<br />

typical SMA-1 70 mm wide film record, one would have to digitize a rectangular area 70 mm<br />

(2.75 in) wide and up to say 80 s (80 cm, 31.5 in) long. ScanJets are designed to scan a<br />

rectangular area up to 8.5x11 inches or 8.5x14 inches. At present, each 11-inch long segment<br />

("page") is scanned by LeFilm and written onto consecutive disk files. Program. LeTrace then<br />

processes (reads the scanned data and identifies the traces) each "page" sequentially. Using the<br />

program LeTV, the operator can edit each "page" one by one. <strong>The</strong> program LeScribe then reads<br />

the trace segments for each "page" and assembles them. This procedure thus enables one to<br />

digitize very long records. At present, LeFilm can also scan a 12-inch wide film records used by<br />

central recording system (CR-1), with 13 or more acceleration traces.<br />

2.3 Noise Characteristics of the New System<br />

<strong>The</strong> Response and Fourier amplitude spectra of the digitization noise for the overall automatic<br />

digitization process are evaluated when the system is first assembled, and when it is upgraded.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se spectra are used to determine the frequency range in which the signal to noise ratio for a<br />

digitized accelerogram trace is greater than unity, and it represents accurately the recorded<br />

motions. In general, the amplitudes of this noise depend on the scanner resolution, but also and<br />

mostly on the thickness of the trace and on the record length. Comparing records from<br />

acceleration and displacement transducers, Trifunac and Lee (1974) found that, for the old semiautomatic<br />

digitization, the typical digitization noise, after integration, might result in<br />

displacements of up to several centimeters.<br />

While for the old semi-automatic hand digitization system (Trifunac and Lee, 1973) the<br />

horizontal resolution (number of digitized points per unit length of the record) was a major factor<br />

determining the noise characteristics of the system. For the automatic system with a flat bed<br />

scanner used today, the typical resolution is 300, 600 or 1200 points/inch (dpi). <strong>The</strong>n, for 1 cm/s<br />

film speed and 600-dpi scan, the resolution is 236 points/s implying Nyquist frequency of 118<br />

Hz-more than sufficient for most recorded accelerograms.<br />

<strong>The</strong> "noise acceleration traces" were created as follows. For several SMA-1 accelerograms, the<br />

pair of baselines was digitized and processed (scaled, instrument and baseline corrected, and<br />

band pass filtered between 0.07 and 25, Hz) considering one of them as a "zero" acceleration<br />

trace and the other one as a zero baseline, and Response and Fourier amplitude spectra were<br />

finally calculated. Figures 3a and b (Lee and Trifunac, 1990) show smoothed average spectral<br />

amplitudes for five damping values (0, 2, 5, 10 and 20 percent of critical) for 45 and 90 s long<br />

records. <strong>The</strong> overall spectrum amplitudes are similar to those for the automatic digitization<br />

system with an Optronics scanner (Trifunac and Lee, 1979).


102<br />

A comparison of spectral amplitudes of noise of various recorders with those typical of recorded<br />

strong earthquake ground motion for magnitudes 4 < M < 7 and for frequencies 0.1


103<br />

digitization scheme. <strong>The</strong> computer programs (Trifunac and Lee, 1973) were first written for the<br />

IBM 7094 and IBM 360 computers. <strong>The</strong>se programs involved the following steps:<br />

(i) Volume I Processing (scaled data; Hudson et al, 1969):<br />

<strong>The</strong> half-second timing marks are first checked for "evenness" of spacing, and then smoothed by<br />

a 1/4, 1/2, 1/4 running average filter. <strong>The</strong> ^-coordinates of each trace are next scaled to units of<br />

time in seconds. Each fixed trace (baseline) is smoothed and subtracted from the corresponding<br />

acceleration trace, with the ^-coordinates subsequently scaled to units g/10 (g = 9.81 m/s 2 ).<br />

(ii) Volume II Processing (corrected data; Hudson et al., 1971):<br />

<strong>The</strong> scaled uncorrected Volume I acceleration data is next corrected for instrument response<br />

(Trifunac, 1972) and baseline adjustment (Trifunac, 1970; 1971). <strong>The</strong> data is first low-pass<br />

filtered with an Ormsby filter having a cutoff frequency f c = 25 Hz and a roll-off termination<br />

frequency / = 27 Hz. Instrument correction is next performed using the instrument constants.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se constants are the natural frequency and ratio of critical damping of the instrument,<br />

considered as a single-degree-of-freedom system (Trifunac and Hudson, 1970; Todorovska,<br />

1998). <strong>The</strong>se are determined from calibration tests for each accelerograph transducer. <strong>The</strong> data<br />

is then baseline corrected by a high-pass Ormsby filter. <strong>The</strong> cutoff and roll-off frequencies of<br />

the filter are usually determined from the signal-to-noise ratio of each component (Trifunac and<br />

Lee, 1978). <strong>The</strong> acceleration data is then integrated twice to get velocity and displacement. To<br />

avoid long period errors resulting from uncertainties in estimating the initial values of velocity<br />

and displacement, the computed velocities and displacements are high-pass filtered at each stage<br />

of integration, using the Ormsby filter with the same cutoff and roll-off frequencies as for the<br />

corrected accelerogram (Hudson et al., 1971).<br />

(in)<br />

Volume III Processing (response spectra; Hudson et aL, 1972a):<br />

Using an approach based on an exact analytical solution of the Duhamel integral for successive<br />

linear segments of excitation, the Fourier and Response Spectra for up to 91 periods and 5<br />

damping ratios are calculated. <strong>The</strong> times of maximum response for all periods and damping<br />

ratios are also recorded (Lee and Trifunac, 1979; 1986).<br />

Following the development of the automatic digitization system (Trifunac and Lee, 1979), the<br />

above computer programs, originally developed in 1969/70 (Trifunac and Lee 1973), were<br />

modified in 1978/79 (Trifunac and Lee 1979) to run on a Data General mini computer. <strong>The</strong> new<br />

approach, which took advantage of image processing techniques, increased the speed of the<br />

overall data processing by one order of magnitude (Fig. 1).<br />

(iv) Volume IVProcessing (Fourier amplitude spectra; Hudson et al., 1972b)<br />

Using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) algorithms (Cooley and Tukey, 1965) for applications<br />

that require equally spaced data on Fourier amplitude spectra, Volume IV data were computed<br />

and presented in the series of "Blue Book Data Reports" since 1972. This data was used in<br />

numerous empirical studies of Fourier spectrum amplitudes. It offered an opportunity to<br />

routinely identify significant frequencies in the records using Fisher (1929) test of significance in<br />

harmonic analyses. At present, Volume IV data processing is not performed routinely because of


104<br />

the high speed with which FFT can be calculated with modern computers, as required for each<br />

particular application.<br />

3.2 <strong>The</strong> Current System<br />

In general, the principles and the requirements governing the routine data processing of strongmotion<br />

records have changed little, if any, since the early 1970s. However, since then, we have<br />

witnessed a remarkable progress in digital signal processing techniques, in their accuracy,<br />

efficiency, speed of execution and in the major hardware cost reduction. <strong>The</strong>se improvements<br />

have been incorporated into the routine data processing of strong-motion accelerograms (Lee and<br />

Trifunac, 1984,1990).<br />

4. HIGHER-ORDER CORRECTIONS<br />

So far in this paper, the standard data processing algorithms were described, which are suitable<br />

for routine, large scale processing of analog strong motion records. For specialized studies<br />

requiring higher accuracy further corrections may be required. In the following we describe two<br />

such corrections.<br />

4.1 Misalignment and Cross-axis Sensitivity<br />

In routine data processing of three-component acceleration records it is assumed that the three<br />

sensitive axes (longitudinal, transverse and vertical) are mutually perpendicular. Careful tilt table<br />

measurements show however that this is not so and that each sensitivity vector can be misaligned<br />

by small (few degree) angles (Todorovska 1998; Todorovska et al, 1995; 1998; Wong and<br />

Trifunac, 1977). For accelerometers, which are sensitive to static tilt, the misalignment angles<br />

can be measured by simple tilt tests followed by data processing (Todorovska et al., 1995; 1998).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se angles then can be used to perform exact corrections of cross-axis sensitivity and<br />

misalignment, resulting in corrected accelerations along three mutually orthogonal coordinate<br />

axes.<br />

Measurement of the misalignment angles and corrections for misalignment and cross-axis<br />

sensitivity have been performed for all instruments of the Los Angeles strong motion network<br />

(Todorovska et al., 1998) and for the stations of the Los Angeles Department of Water and<br />

Power (Todorovska et al., 1999) for strong motion data recorded during and following<br />

Northridge, California earthquake of 17 January, 1994.<br />

4.2 Corrections for Tilt and Angular Accelerations<br />

Let Xj, X 2 and X 3 be the mutually perpendicular coordinate axes of displacement in longitudinal<br />

(L), Transverse (T) and Vertical (V) directions, and let 0 y , 0 2 and fa represent the rotations about<br />

X l9 X 2 and X 3 directions. For small transducer deflections y t = r, a, where a { is the angle of<br />

deflection of the z-th pendulum from its equilibrium position, and r t is its corresponding lever<br />

arm, the equations of motion of the three penduli of an accelerometer (e.g. SMA-1) are<br />

(Todorovska, 1998):<br />

&i + %2 a i<br />

(2a)


105<br />

(2b)<br />

where a;, and £ are respectively the natural frequency and fraction of critical damping of the i-th<br />

transducer. <strong>The</strong> second and third terms on the right hand side of equation (2a) and (2b) represent<br />

contributions from tilting ((p, and 0 3 ) and angular acceleration (


106<br />

8. Gold, B. and C.M. Rader (1975). "Digital Processes of Signals", McGraw Hill, New York, New York.<br />

9. Gupta, I.D. Rambabu, V., Joshi, R.G., Trifunac, M.D., Todorovska, M.I and Lee, V.W. (1993), "Strong<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Ground Motion Data in EQINFOS for India": Part IA, Dept. Civil Eng. Report No. CE 93-03, Univ.<br />

of Southern Calif., Los Angeles, California.<br />

10. Hudson, D.E. (1970). "Ground motion Measurements in <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>", in <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

edited by R.L. Wiegel, Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.<br />

11. Hudson, D.E. (1976). "Strong Motion <strong>Earthquake</strong> Accelerograms-Index Volume", <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng. <strong>Research</strong><br />

Laboratory, Report EERL 76-02, Calif. Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, California.<br />

12. Hudson, D.E. (1979). "Reading and Interpreting Strong Motion Accelerograms", <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng. Res. Institute,<br />

Monograph Series, 262 Telegraph Ave., Berkeley, California.<br />

13. Hudson, D.E. (1984). "Golden Anniversary Workshop on Strong Motion Seismology March 30-31", 1983,<br />

Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. of Southern California.<br />

14. Hudson, D.E., Brady, A.G. and Trifunac, M.D. (1969). "Strong-Motion <strong>Earthquake</strong> Accelerograms, Digitized<br />

and Plotted Data", Vol. 1, <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory, Report EERL 70-20, California<br />

Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.<br />

15. Hudson, D.E., Trifunac, M.D., Brady, A.G. and Vijayaragharan, A. (1971). "Strong-Motion <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

Accelerograms, II, Corrected Accelerograms and Integrated Velocity and Displacement Curves", <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory, Report EERL 71-51, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,<br />

California.<br />

16. Hudson, D.E., Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G. (1972a). "Strong-Motion Accelerograms, III, Response Spectra",<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory, Report EERL 72-80, California Institute of Technology,<br />

Pasadena, California.<br />

17. Hudson D.E., Trifunac, M.D., Udwadia, F.E., Vijayaraghavan, A. and Brady A.G. (1972b). "Strong Motion<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Accelerograms, IV, Fourier Spectra", <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory, Report EERL<br />

71-100, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.<br />

18. Lee, V.W. (1984). "A New Fast Algorithm for the Calculation of Response of a Single-Degree-of-Freedom<br />

System to Arbitrary Load in Time", Int. J, Soil Dynamics and <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng., 3(4), pp. 191-199.<br />

19. Lee, V.W. (1990). "Efficient Algorithm for Computing Displacement, Velocity, and Acceleration Responses of<br />

an Oscillator for arbitrary Ground Motion", Int. J. Soil Dynamics and <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng., 9(6), pp. 288-300.<br />

20. Lee, V.W. and Trifunac, M.D. (1979). 'Time of Maximum Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Oscillator<br />

for <strong>Earthquake</strong> Excitation", Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Report No. 79-14, <strong>University</strong> of Southern Calif.,<br />

Los Angeles, California.<br />

21. Lee, V.W. and Trifunac, M.D. (1982). "EQUINFOS (<strong>The</strong> Strong-Motion <strong>Earthquake</strong> Data Information<br />

System)", Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Report No. 82-01, <strong>University</strong> of Southern Calif., Los Angeles,<br />

California.<br />

22. Lee, V.W and M.D. Tnfunac (1984). "Current Developments in Data Processing of Strong Motion<br />

Accelerograms", Report No. CE 84-01, Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. Southern California, Los Angeles<br />

California.<br />

23. Lee, V.W. and Trifunac, M.D. (1986). "A Note on Time of Maximum Response of Single Degree of Freedom<br />

Oscillator to <strong>Earthquake</strong> Excitation", Int. J. Soil Dynamics and <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng., 5(2), pp. 119-129.<br />

24. Lee, V.W. and Trifunac, M.D. (1987). "Strong Motion Ground Motion Data in EQUINFOS: Part I, Department<br />

of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>", Report No. 87-01, <strong>University</strong> of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.<br />

25. Lee, V.W. and Trifunac, M.D. (1989). "A Note on Filtering Strong Motion Accelerograms to Produce<br />

Response Spectra of Specified Shape and Amplitude", European <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng., Vol. Ill, No. 2, pp. 38-45.<br />

26. Lee, V.W. and Trifunac, M.D. (1990). "Automatic Digitization and Professing of Accelerograms Using PC",<br />

Dept. of Civil Eng., Rep. No. CE 90-03, Univ. Southern California, Los Angeles, California.


107<br />

27. Lee, V.W. and Y.Y. Wang (1983). "On the Instrument Correction of the RDZ-I Strong- Motion Pendulum<br />

Galvanometer in China", <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng. and Eng. Vibration, Vol. 3, Part 4. Dec.<br />

28. Lee, V.W., Trifunac, M.D. and Amini, A. (1982). "Noise in <strong>Earthquake</strong> Accelerograms", ASCE Eng Mech<br />

D/v., 108, pp. 1121-1129.<br />

29 Nenov, D., Georgiev, G., Paskaleva, I., Lee, V.W. and Trifunac, MD. (1990). "Strong <strong>Earthquake</strong> Ground<br />

Motion Data in EQINFOS: Accelerograms Recorded in Bulgaria Between 1981 and 1987", Bulg. Academy of<br />

Sciences, CLSMEE, Sofia 1990, also Rep. No. 90-02, Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. Southern California, Los<br />

Angeles, California.<br />

30. Nigam, N.C. and Jennings, P.C., (1969). "Calculation of Response Spectra from Strong-Motion <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

Records", Bull. Seism. Soc, Am., 59, pp. 909-922.<br />

31. Novikova, E.I. and M.D, Trifunac (1991). "Instrument Correction for a Coupled Transducer-Galvanometer<br />

System", Report No. CE 91-02 Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. Southern California, Los Angeles California.<br />

32. Novikova, E.I. and M.D. Trifunac (1992). "Digital Instrument Response Correction for the Force-Balance<br />

Accelerometer", <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 8(3), pp. 429-442.<br />

33. Todorovska, M.I. (1998). "Cross-axis Sensitivity of Acceierographs with Pendulum Like Transducers:<br />

Mathematical Model and the Inverse problem", <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng. and Structural Dynamics, 27(10), pp. 1031-<br />

1051.<br />

34. Todorovska, M.L, Trifunac, M.D., Novikova, E.I. and Ivanovic, S.S. (1995). "Correction for Misalignment and<br />

Cross Axis Sensitivity of Strong <strong>Earthquake</strong> Motion Recorded by SMA-I Acceierographs", Dept. of Civil Eng.<br />

Report No. 95-06, Univ. Southern California, Los Angeles, California.<br />

35. Todorovska, M.L, Trifunac, M.D., Novikova, E.I. and Ivanovic, S.S. (1998). "Advanced Acceleerograph<br />

Calibration of the Los Angeles Strong Motion Array", <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng. and Strut. Dynamics, 27(10), pp. 1053-<br />

1068.<br />

36. Trifunac, M.D., (1970). "Low frequency Digitization Errors and a New Method for Zero Baseline Correction of<br />

Strong Motion Accelerograms, <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory", Report EERL 70-07, California<br />

Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.<br />

37. Trifunac, M.D. (1971). "Zero Baseline Correction of Strong-Motion Accelerograms", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.,<br />

62, pp. 401-409.<br />

38. Trifunac, M.D. (1972). "A Note on Correction of Strong-Motion Accelerograms for Instrument Response", Bull<br />

Seism. Soc. Am., 62, pp. 401-409.<br />

39. Trifunac, M.D. (1977). "Uniformly Processed Strong <strong>Earthquake</strong> Ground Accelerations in the Western United<br />

States of America for the Period from 1933 to 1971: Pseudo Relative Velocity Spectra and Processing Noise",<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Report No. CE 77-04, <strong>University</strong> of Southern Calif., Los Angeles, California.<br />

40. Trifunac, M.D. and Brune, J.N. (1970). "Complexity of Energy Release During Imperial Valley", California,<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> of 1940, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 60, pp. 137-160.<br />

41. Trifunac, M.D. and Hudson, D.E. (1970). "Laboratory Evaluation and Instrument Corrections of Strong Motion<br />

accelerographs", <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory, Report EERL 70-04, California Institute of<br />

Technology, Pasadena, California..<br />

42. Trifunac, M.D. and Hudson, D.E. (1971). "Analysis of the Pacoima Dam Accelerogram-San Fernando,<br />

California, <strong>Earthquake</strong> of 1971", Bull Seism. Soc. Amer., 61(5), pp. 1393-1411.<br />

43. Trifunac, M.D and Lee, V.W. (1973). "Routine Computer Processing of Strong Motion Accelerograms",<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng. Res. Lab., Report EERI 73-03, Calif. Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, California.<br />

44. Tnfunac, M.D. and Lee, V.W. (1974). "A Note of the Accuracy of Computed Ground Displacements from<br />

Strong-Motion Accelerogram", Bull Seism. Soc. Amer., 64, pp. 1209-1219.<br />

45. Trifunac, M.D., and V.W. Lee (1978). "Uniformly Processed Strong <strong>Earthquake</strong> Ground Accelerations in the<br />

Western United States of America for the Period from 1933 to 1971: Corrected Acceleration, Velocity and


108<br />

Displacement Curves", Dept. of Civil Engr., Report No. CE 78-01, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles,<br />

California.<br />

46. Trifunac, M.D. and V.W. Lee (1979). "Automatic Digitization and Processing of Strong Motion<br />

Accelerograms", II and I. Dept. of Civil Eng., Report No. 79-15, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles,<br />

California.<br />

47. Trifunac, M.D. and Todorovska, ML (200la). "Evolution of Accelerographs, Data Processing, Strong Motion<br />

Arrays and Amplitude and Spatial Resolution in Recording Strong <strong>Earthquake</strong> Motion", Soil Dynamics and<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng., 21(6), pp. 537-555.<br />

48 Trifunac, M.D. and Todorovska, M.I. (200Ib). "A Note on Useabie Dynamic Range in Accelerographs<br />

Recording Translation", Soil Dynamics and <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng., 21(4), pp 275-286.<br />

49 Trifunac, M.D , Udwadia, F.E. and Brady, A.G. (1971). "High Frequency Errors and Instrument Corrections of<br />

Strong-Motion Accelerograms", <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory, Report EERL 71-05, California<br />

Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.<br />

50. Trifunac, M.D, Udwadia, FE. and Brady, A.G. (1973a). "Analysis of Errors in Digitized Strong-Motion<br />

Accelerograms", Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 63, pp. 157-187.<br />

51. Tnfunac, M.D, Udwadia, RE. and Brady, A.G. (1973b). "Recent Developments in Data Processing and<br />

Accuracy Evaluations of Strong Motion Acceleration Measurements", Proc. 5 th World Conf. <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, Rome, Italy, Vol. I, pp. 1214-1233.<br />

52 Trifunac, M.D, Todorovska, M.I. and Lee, V.W. (1999a). "<strong>The</strong> Rinaldi Strong Motion Accelerogram of the<br />

Northridge California <strong>Earthquake</strong> of 7 January, 1994", <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 14(1), pp. 225-239.<br />

53. Tnfunac, M.D., Todorovska, M.I. and Lee, V.W. (1999b). "Common Problems in Automatic Digitization of<br />

Strong Motion Accelerograms", Soil Dynamics and <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng., 18(7), pp. 519-530.<br />

54. Wong, H.L. and Trifunac, M.D. (1977). "Effects of Cross-Axis Sensitivity and Misalignment on Response of<br />

Mechanical-Optical Acceierographs", Bull Seism. Soc. Amer., 67, pp. 929-956.


109<br />

FIGURE CAPTIONS<br />

Fig. 1 Trends in capabilities and cost of accelerogram digitization and data processing<br />

systems.<br />

Fig. 2 Hardware components of the automatic digitization and data processing system.<br />

Fig. 3 Fourier spectra (dashed lines) and Response Spectra (solid lines) for damping £ 0 = 0, 0.02,<br />

0.05, 0.10 and 0.20 (top to bottom), for records 45 seconds long (a-left) and 90 seconds long (bright).<br />

Fig. 4 Comparison of different noise spectra associated with different recording instruments and<br />

different methods of digitization (modified from Trifunac and Todorovska, 200Ib).<br />

Fig. 5 Comparison of Fourier amplitude spectra of translation, X t with spectra of contribution<br />

from fyg +0/ A , analog digitization noise, digital digitization noise (PDR), and microtremor and<br />

microseism noise (redrawn from Trifunac and Todorovska, 200Ib).


I 000,000<br />

100,000<br />

Number of uniformly processed records<br />

in USC strong motion database<br />

Cost of<br />

digitization system $<br />

10,000<br />

Mechanical Spectrum Analyzer<br />

Biot (1941,1942)<br />

Scanner<br />

resolution<br />

Capacity of<br />

disk storage - Mb<br />

1,000<br />

100<br />

10<br />

Time required to compute one set<br />

of standard response spectrum<br />

curves for five damping values - mm<br />

Optronics<br />

drum scanner<br />

Typical record<br />

digitization<br />

ime - mm<br />

Mechanical<br />

analyzers<br />

Analog<br />

computers<br />

Nova (1977) 286 386 486 'Pentium<br />

Mini<br />

Personal computers<br />

computers, computer^<br />

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 Year 1990 2000<br />

Figure 1


Figure 2<br />

m


Response and Fourier Spectra of Digitization Noise<br />

"1' i ii n 1 1—i'"i" i'i M| 1 1—rnrrrrrj—<br />

PSV<br />

CO<br />

10.<br />

10*<br />

Record length ~ 45,<br />

Record length = 90 s<br />

Period - s<br />

10<br />

t I t I 1<br />

I<br />

1<br />

Period -s<br />

10<br />

Figure 3


113<br />

TT] r—i j 11iii| 1 i n inij r i i niiij 1 i i | n^<br />

10 3<br />

Extrapolated Fourier amplitude spectra of acceleration<br />

R=10 km, H= 0 krn SMA-3/SMP-1<br />

Photoscan/ pStrong *& em<br />

- noise in<br />

digitization/ \ motion digitization<br />

- Japanese noise<br />

noise<br />

10 2 PHR!<br />

~ accelerogram<br />

£ M-125 of fixed<br />

- straight linec/)<br />

10'<br />

010°<br />

J,<br />

\JL<br />

10- 1<br />

io- 2<br />

10" 3<br />

1C" 3 10' 2 10" 1 10° 10 1<br />

Frequency - Hz<br />

Figure 4


114<br />

10 3<br />

10 2 r<br />

| I lll| I | I | I liq 4 I I 1 I ill) I I I 1 I )ll|<br />

Extrapolated Fourier amplitude spectra of acceleration<br />

R=10 km, H= 0 km, s=2, s L =0<br />

Typicai digitization noise<br />

in analog records digitized<br />

manually or automatically<br />

SMA-1,50dB<br />

DR, 11 bits, 60 dB<br />

Noise in<br />

PDR-1+FBA-13<br />

10- 3 10 1 10 2<br />

Frequency - Hz<br />

Figure 5


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC SOIL PROPERTIES AND<br />

LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL BY SEISMIC PIEZOCONE TESTS<br />

T. Liao and P.W. Mayne<br />

Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil & Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

Atlanta, GA 30332-0355 USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Seismic piezocone tests (SCPTu) provide an expedient and efficient means to obtain site-specific<br />

information on the soil stratigraphy, dynamic soil properties, and ground liquefaction susceptibility,<br />

since five separate readings are obtained hi the same sounding: cone tip stress (q-r), sleeve friction (f s ),<br />

penetration porewater pressure (ut>), dissipation-time recordings (tso), and shear wave velocity (V s ). <strong>The</strong><br />

shear wave data are used to determine the small-strain stiffness that is required in ground amplification<br />

analyses (e.g., SHAKE, DESRA, DEEPSOIL). Layering and soil types are evaluated from the<br />

penetration readings to detect soils that are prone to liquefaction (i.e., sands, silty sands). <strong>The</strong><br />

liquefaction potential is assessed using two independent readings from the sounding that are<br />

normalized for the effects of effective confining stress levels (q-n and V s i). Illustrative results from<br />

seismic piezocone tests at a paleoliquefaction site in the New Madrid Seismic Zone in midwestern<br />

USA are presented.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Dynamic soil properties and liquefaction potential are among the major concerns in evaluating the level<br />

of ground shaking and disruption that might occur during earthquakes. Key dynamic soil properties<br />

include the small-strain shear modulus (Gmax), Poisson's ratio (v), damping ratio (D s ) (Woods, 1978;<br />

Campanella, 1994). Parameters related to the liquefaction potential of soils are addressed separately<br />

because of their unique destructive nature. Dynamic soil properties and liquefaction potential can be<br />

evaluated by laboratory techniques, such as strain-rate-test, resonant column, ultrasonic pulse, cyclic<br />

(triaxial, simple shear, torsional shear) test, bender-element, and shake table. Although the lab tests are<br />

versatile and can provide the desirable dynamic soil properties, undisturbed samples of sandy soils are<br />

either very expensive or impossible to obtain. Furthermore, after the soil samples are taken from the<br />

field, their in-situ state cannot be fully recovered in the lab, leading to errors hi test results. For these<br />

reasons, field testing is becoming more popular for site characterization in seismic areas and the<br />

evaluation of dynamic soil properties and liquefaction potential.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most widely used field technique is the standard penetration test (SPT), but it is not realistic for the<br />

single N-value from this test to fulfill the task to provide the many parameters needed for engineering


116<br />

analysis. Other techniques include non-intrusive surface geophysics (e.g. seismic refraction/reflection,<br />

steady-state surface wave, spectral analysis of surface wave) and borehole geophysics (e.g. cross-hole,<br />

down-hole, up-hole, supension PS logging). <strong>The</strong>se tests provide the compression wave velocity (V p )<br />

and/or shear wave velocity (V s ) that are needed to derive the dynamic moduli. Data collected by the<br />

non-intrusive surface geophysics methods are difficult to interpret without experienced users. <strong>The</strong> cost<br />

of the borehole geophysics methods is very high, because the holes are drilled, cased, and grouted, then<br />

cured for several days before the tests are performed (Figure 1).<br />

<strong>The</strong> seismic piezocone test (SCPTu) is a hybrid field method that combines the virtues of the cone<br />

penetration test (CPT) with downhole geophysics (Campanella, et al., 1986). Five separate readings are<br />

obtained in the same sounding: cone tip stress (qi), sleeve friction (f s ), penetration porewater pressure<br />

(Ub), dissipation-time recordings (tso), and shear wave velocity (V s ), providing site-specific information<br />

on the geostratigraphy, dynamic soil properties, and ground liquefaction susceptibility (Figure 2).<br />

Compared with the SPT and the geophysics methods mentioned before, the SCPTu is more costeffective,<br />

its procedure is simpler and more standardized, and its continuous record of soil properties<br />

with depth enables a better look at soil variability.<br />

bownhole Testing<br />

Horizontal Plank<br />

Seismic Piezocone<br />

Tests (SCPTu)<br />

; Shear Wave Velocity K-^2!S<br />

[ V,. = AR/A-t<br />

Figure 1. Conventional Downhole<br />

Geophysics Test Using Cased Borehole<br />

Figure 2. Soil Property Evaluation from<br />

Seismic Piezocone Test Results<br />

SEISMIC PIEZOCONE TEST<br />

<strong>The</strong> SCPTu system used by the authors includes 5-, 10-, and 15-tonne Hogentogler penetrometers, field<br />

computer, and anchored hydraulic rig. Each penetrometer consists of a 60° angled-apex cone at the<br />

front end, two load cells, a transducer, an inclinometer, and one geophone. <strong>The</strong> front load cell directly<br />

measures the force over the tip area to give the cone tip resistance, q c . A second load cell records the<br />

axial force over the cylindrical sleeve area to provide the sleeve friction, f s . A saturated porous element<br />

is used to measure the porewater pressure. <strong>The</strong> pressures m and U2 are measured either at the midface<br />

of the tip or at the cone shoulder, respectively. An inclinometer is used to monitor the vertical angle, i,<br />

as a warning signal that the rods might buckle or shear during hard pushing. <strong>The</strong> geophone is<br />

incorporated at the back end of the penetrometer to provide a direct measure of the arrival times from a<br />

downhole shear wave.


117<br />

<strong>The</strong> test is conducted by advancing an instrumented electronic probe with a hydraulic pushing system<br />

at constant rate of 20 mm/s. <strong>The</strong> penetration data are logged continuously by computer giving<br />

unparalleled details on the soil layering profiles, while downhole geophysics are taken at 1-m intervals<br />

during the successive addition of rods. <strong>The</strong> 6-tonne truck utilizes twin-screw earth anchors installed to<br />

depths of 2 m for increased reaction. With lightweight rigs, soundings of 30 m can be achieved in 3<br />

hours time. Using larger 25-tonne vehicles, penetration depths of up to 90 m are possible.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tip resistance (q c ) is a point stress related to bearing capacity and soil strength. <strong>The</strong> measured q c<br />

must be corrected for porewater pressure effects on unequal tip areas (Lunne, et. al., 1997), especially<br />

in clays and silts, and this corrected value is termed q T . <strong>The</strong> uo position element is required for this<br />

correctio. <strong>The</strong> tip resistance (q-r), sleeve friction (f s ), and porewater pressures (ui or 112) are used to<br />

characterize the subsurface layering, soil behavioral type, and strength properties. Porewater dissipation<br />

(tso) can be conducted to measure permeability (k) and coefficient of consolidation (c h ).<br />

Shear waves are generated by striking a horizontal steel plank at the ground surface. A downhole<br />

geophone is oriented parallel to the plank to detect the horizontally-polarized shear waves. From the<br />

measured wave train at each depth, a pseudo-interval shear wave velocity (V s ) is determined. <strong>The</strong><br />

velocity is the difference in travel distance between any two successive events divided by the<br />

difference in travel times (Campanella et al., 1986). <strong>The</strong> seismic data are useful for subsequent site<br />

amplification studies, as well as the evaluation of soil resistance to liquefaction susceptibility.<br />

DYNAMIC SOIL PROPERTIES<br />

During the cyclic loading by earthquakes, soils exhibit nonlinear and hysteretic stress-strain behavior.<br />

<strong>The</strong> secant shear modulus G decreases with the shear strain level j c , but with a less rapid decay than<br />

that in the condition of mono tonic loading (Figure 3). At very low strain levels (less than 10") the<br />

small-strain shear modulus (G ma x - GO) is operational and the soil behaves as an elastic medium. As the<br />

strain goes beyond 10" 5 , the soil response becomes nonlinear, and at large strains (larger than 10" 3 ), the<br />

soils experience permanent plastic deformation and eventually reach an unstable condition at peak<br />

strength. Since ground motions during earthquakes may involve both small and large strains, the whole<br />

curve of shear modulus reduction is desirable for engineering computation and analysis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> magnitude of the snear strain for plane waves can be given by the expression j c = u/V s , where u<br />

is the peak particle velocity (Stokoe, et al., 1978). It is found that the shear strain caused by shear<br />

waves generated during the SCPTu travels through the soil mass below the elastic strain level. <strong>The</strong><br />

Gmax can therefore be obtained from the following equation:<br />

Where p T is the total mass density p r = j r /g and g = 9.8m/V . Mayne (2001) compiled data of unit<br />

weight y sat and V s from saturated geomaterials (Figure 4) to define the following trend:<br />

(2)<br />

where y sat is in kN/m 3 , V s in m/s, and z in meters.


It has been found that G max applies to both the initial static monotonic loading and dynamic loading of<br />

geomaterials (Jardine, et aL, 1991). Moreover, since very small strains have not yet generated any<br />

excess porewater pressures, G max can be applied to both drained and undrained soil behavior. Once<br />

G max is known, the shear modulus reduction curve can be derived from the plastic index (PI) of the<br />

soils (Vucetic & Dobry, 1991). Given the shear modulus G, the corresponding Young's modulus E,<br />

Bulk modulus B ! , and constrained modulus M' can be derived from the Poisson's ratio v. <strong>The</strong> range of<br />

the value of Poisson's ratio v is from 0.1 to 0.2 at these strains.<br />

118<br />

0 0001 0 001<br />

Shear Strain<br />

Figure 3. Secant Shear Modulus Reduction<br />

for Monotonic & Cyclic Loading<br />

100 1000<br />

Sicar Wsve Velocity, V s (ins)<br />

Figure 4. Correlation for Unit Weight from<br />

Depth and V s (Mayne, 2001)<br />

<strong>The</strong> amplitude information of the collected shear waves can be used to analyze the material damping in<br />

terms of damping ratio (D s ) at small-strains. Stewart & Campanella (1993) suggested that the spectral<br />

ratio slope (SRS) method is the most reliable and consistent approach to obtain the damping ratio D s of<br />

a soil layer by the SCPTu, but it still requires verification on different soil types to fully validate the<br />

technique (Campanella, 1994). D s increases with the strain level, and the relationship between D s and<br />

shear strain y c has also been correlated with the PI (Vucetic & Dobry, 1991).<br />

LIQUEFACTION EVALUATION<br />

Recent earthquakes in Gujarat, India (2001), Izmit, Turkey (1999), Chi-Chi, Taiwan (1999) and Kobe,<br />

Japan (1995) have emphasized the importance of liquefaction hi geotechnical engineering because of<br />

its significant destructive nature. Liquefaction predominantly occurs in sands to silty sands that are<br />

difficult or impossible to sample. This warrants the use of field testing, especially the SCPTu, for<br />

liquefaction analysis, since the SCPTu provides not only the tip resistance qr and shear wave velocity<br />

V s , which can quantity the susceptibility to liquefaction (Robertson & Wride, 1998; Andrus & Stokoe,<br />

2000), but also obtains the sleeve friction f s and porewater pressure u 2 that are used for characterizing<br />

the soil types, layering, and geotechnical engineering parameters. Liquefaction notably occurs at depths<br />

less than 20 meters, and research found that the presence and thickness of the overlying clay cap<br />

significantly affects the liquefaction potential of underlying sand layers (Ishihara, 1985; Youd &<br />

Gams, 1995). Evaluating the liquefaction susceptibility of a certain soil layer and its potential for<br />

ground damage cannot therefore be confined to testing sandy soil samples only, but requires the<br />

characterization of its overlying capping clay layer as well


119<br />

From the collected SCPTu data, the layering and soil types can be evaluated to detect soils that are<br />

prone to liquefaction (i.e., sands, silty sands) using various soil behavioral classification charts, such as<br />

proposed by Robertson (1990). Soil layers susceptible to liquefaction are further analyzed for their<br />

liquefaction potential corresponding to certain magnitude earthquakes.<br />

In liquefaction analyses, the seismic loading expressed in terms of the cyclic stress ratio (CSR) can be<br />

given as (Seed & Idriss, 1971):<br />

(3)<br />

where a max is the peak ground acceleration (PGA), g is the acceleration of gravity, a vQ and


120<br />

PALEOLIQUEFACTION STUDIES IN MED-AMERICA<br />

<strong>The</strong> New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ) is considered to be a highly-seismic region hi the United<br />

States. During 1811 and 1812, more than 200 separate earthquake events occurred hi the region, with<br />

the three largest ones estimated to have moment magnitudes of 7.9, 7.6, and 8.0 (Johnston & Schweig,<br />

1996). Due to rapid development in the late twentieth century, the NMSZ has become a highly<br />

populated area and hosts large cities, including Memphis, Tennessee and St. Louis, Missouri. <strong>The</strong><br />

inevitable recurrence of the large seismic events would cause widespread loss of life and damage to<br />

structures, because of the ground shaking and soil liquefaction. In order to map the seismic ground<br />

hazards and dynamic soil properties in the NMSZ, series of SCPTu tests were conducted in this region.<br />

A representative SCPTu sounding performed at the Walker paleoliquefaction site near Marked Tree,<br />

Arkansas is shown in Figure 6. <strong>The</strong> small-strain shear modulus and the soil stratigraphy for this<br />

sounding are also shown. <strong>The</strong> site mainly consists of sandy soils, with a capping layer of clay between<br />

the depths of 2 to 5 meters. This site was selected for study because two large sand dikes were found on<br />

the property. Recent research hi Japan and western USA, where earthquakes occur more frequently,<br />

notes the important finding that sites that experience liquefaction will likely liquefy again during<br />

earthquake events of similar magnitude (Youd, 1988; Yasuda & Tohno, 1988). <strong>The</strong>refore, the Walker<br />

site has the potential to liquefy again during large earthquakes hi the future.<br />

Tip Resistance Sleeve Friction Pore Pressure<br />

qT(MPa) f, (kPa) u2, uB(kPa)<br />

0 20 40 0 200 400 -200 0 200 400<br />

SW Velocity Shear Modulus<br />

V,(m/s)<br />

GmM(MPa)<br />

0 200 400 0<br />

1 °0 200<br />

Figure 6. Seismic Piezocone Results at Walker Paleoliquefaction Site in Eastern Arkansas<br />

<strong>The</strong> procedure of liquefaction evaluation by SCPTu is depicted in Figure 7, indicating the use of q t , f s ,<br />

and Ub for soil delineation, V s for obtaining G ma x hi site amplification analyses (a raax ), and normalized<br />

q t i and V sl for evaluating liquefaction potential. <strong>The</strong> results of liquefaction analysis from the SCPTu<br />

sounding at the Walker paleoliquefaction site corresponding to a magnitude M w =8.0 earthquake are<br />

given in Figure 8. At a factor of safety of Fs = 1.0 for liquefaction, the critical values of tip resistance<br />

and shear wave velocity are superimposed with the measured data. This critical value, which changes<br />

with depth, is shown in the same graph as the measured value in the figure. Liquefaction is likely<br />

whenever the measured value is less than the critical value. <strong>The</strong> gaps in the critical value plots<br />

represent soil layers that are not susceptible to liquefaction due to their classification (e.g., clayey soils<br />

for which liquefaction analyses are not relevant).


121<br />

Piesocone Tests to Evaluate Seismic Ground Hazards<br />

^J-aywlyVWf<br />

vj<br />

J%UT.<br />

I** 2, y,2<br />

Uy#« s, v,s<br />

Cayw-4; \^<br />

Soil Type<br />

-Nonliquefactron<br />

Susceptible<br />

j '<br />

'"'-' '''<br />

Site-Ampiificafi<br />

(SHAKE Profile<br />

*qT^<br />

sc- Based qel<br />

Figure 7. Procedures for Liquefaction<br />

Evaluation by SCPTu<br />

Figure 8. Liquefaction Analyses for Walker<br />

Site SCPTu Sounding<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> seismic piezocone (SCPTu) provides five soil measurements in a single sounding, including: tip<br />

resistance, sleeve friction, porewater pressure, dissipation, and shear wave velocity. It is an efficient<br />

way to assess soil stratigraphy, dynamic soil properties, and liquefaction potential in seismically active<br />

areas. <strong>The</strong> shear wave velocity (V s ) is used to obtain the small-strain shear modulus (G^ that is<br />

required in site-specific ground amplification studies. Both deterministic and probabilistic approaches<br />

are available to define the degree of susceptibility to liquefaction. <strong>The</strong> soil resistance to liquefaction<br />

can be ascertained from either the normalized tip stress qri and/or the normalized shear wave velocity<br />

V s i. Such redundancy provides a higher level of confidence in the conclusions.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

Financial and technical support has been provided by the Mid-America <strong>Earthquake</strong> Center (MAE)<br />

under grant EEC-9701785 by the National Science Foundation (NSF).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Andrus, R.D. and Stokoe, K.H. (2000). Liquefaction resistance of soils based on shear wave velocity.<br />

Journal of Geotechnical &. Geoenvironmental <strong>Engineering</strong> 126:11, 1015-1026.<br />

Campanella, R.G. (1994). Field methods for dynamic geotechnical testing. Dynamic Geotechnical<br />

Testing II, (STP1213), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 3-23.<br />

Campanella, R.G., Robertson, P.K. and Gillespie, D. (1986). Seismic cone penetration tests. Use ofln-<br />

Situ Tests in Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong> (GSP 6). ASCE, Reston, VA, 116-130.<br />

Ishihara, K. (1985). Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. Proceedings, 11 th International<br />

Conference on Soil Mechanics & Foundation <strong>Engineering</strong>, Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, 321-376,


Jardine, R.J., Potts, D.M., StJohn, H.D., and Hight, D.W. (1991). Some practical applications of a<br />

nonlinear ground model. Proceedings, 10th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> (1), Firenze, 223-228.<br />

Johnston, A.C. and Schweig, E.S. (1996). <strong>The</strong> enigma of the New Madrid earthquakes of 1811 - 1812.<br />

Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 24, 339-384.<br />

Juang, C.H., Jiang, T. and Andrus, R.D. (2002). Assessing Probability-based Methods for Liquefaction<br />

Potential Evaluation. Vol. Journal of Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong> 128:7, 580-589.<br />

Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K., and Powell, JJ.M. (1997). Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical<br />

Practice. Blackie Academic, Routledge Publishers, New York, 312.<br />

Mayne (2001). Stress-strain-strength-flow parameters from enhanced in-situ tests. Proceedings, Intl.<br />

Conf. on In-Situ Measurement of Soil Properties & Case Histories, Bali, Indonesia, 27-48.<br />

Robertson, P.K. (1990). Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Canadian Geotechnical<br />

Journal 27:1, 151-158.<br />

Robertson, P.K. and Wride, C.E. (1998). Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone<br />

penetration test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 35:3, 442-459.<br />

Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M. (1971). Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential,<br />

Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division 97:9, 1249-1273.<br />

Stewart, W.P. and Campanella, R.G. (1993). Practical aspects of in situ measurements of material<br />

damping with the seismic cone penetration test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 30:2, 211-219.<br />

Stokoe, K.H., Anderson, D.G., Hoar, RJ. and Isenhower, W.M. (1978). In-situ and lab shear velocity<br />

and modulus. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Soil Dynamics, Vol. Ill, ASCE, New York, 1498-1502.<br />

Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R. (1991). Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> 117:1, 89-107.<br />

Woods, R.D. (1978). Measurement of Dynamic Soil Properties, State of the Art Report. <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> and Soil Dynamics, Vol. I, ASCE, Reston, VA, 91-178.<br />

Yasuda, S. and Tohno, I. (1988). Sites of re-liquefaction caused by the 1983 Nihonkai-Chuba<br />

earthquake. Soils and Foundations 28:2, 61-72.<br />

Youd, T.L. (1988). Recurrence of liquefaction at the same site. Proceedings of the Eighth World<br />

Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>. San Francisco, Vol. Ill: 231-238.<br />

Youd, T.L. and Gams, C.T. (1995). Liquefaction-induced ground-surface disruption. Journal of<br />

Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong>, 121:11, 805-809.<br />

Youd, T. L., et al. (2001). Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and<br />

1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of<br />

Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, 127:10, 817-833.<br />

122


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

ATTENUATION FUNCTION OF GROUND MOTIONS FOR<br />

GUANGDONG REGION OF SOUTHERN CHINA<br />

WONG Yuk Lung 1 , ZHENG Sihu 2 , LIUJie 2 , KANG Ying 3 , TAM Cheuk Ming 4 ,<br />

LEUNG Yin Kong 4 , ZHAO Xinquan 5<br />

1 Department of Civil and Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, Hong Kong<br />

2 Center for Analysis and Prediction, China Seismological Bureau, Beijing, 100036<br />

3 Seismological Bureau of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, 510070<br />

4 Hong Kong Observatory, Hong Kong<br />

5 Institute of Geological and Nuclear Science, Gracefield, Lower Hutt, New Zealand<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

We made use of the first ever set of horizontal-component digital seismic data of 44 earthquake<br />

events (M L = 2.5 to 5.1) from September 1999 to October 2000, recorded by 14 stations of the<br />

Guangdong Telemetered Network to determine the attenuation function of S-wave phases of ground<br />

motions for the Guangdong Region of southern China.<br />

It was found that the geometrical spreading function of the region could be best represented by a trilinear<br />

piecewise continuous function. At a distance less than 45 km from a seismic source, the<br />

geometrical spreading coefficient was 0.97. Between 45 and 100 km, the coefficient was nearly zero.<br />

Beyond 100 km, the coefficient was 0.5. <strong>The</strong> frequency-dependent Q was estimated to be Q =<br />

481.5f°' 31 .<br />

We then evaluated the source spectra for each of the 44 events from the records of the YHK Station of<br />

the Hong Kong Observatory's seismic monitoring network, and the proposed attenuation model. It<br />

was found that the so-obtained source spectra derived from YHK Station were comparable to those<br />

derived from the stations of Guangdong Network. Hence, the proposed attenuation function was<br />

likely to be applicable for the Hong Kong region as well.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In seismology, the analysis of attenuation characteristic of ground motions provides a better<br />

understanding on wave transmission inside the earth, and the seismic source parameters. In<br />

engineering applications, the attenuation relationships of S-wave phases of ground motions are of<br />

most interest as their amplitudes are approximately five times larger than the associated P-wave<br />

phases, causing most of the earthquake damages. <strong>The</strong>refore, a quantification of the S-wave<br />

attenuation is necessary for seismic hazard analysis of a region.<br />

Traditionally, researchers tended to study the attenuation and hazard issues for seismically active<br />

regions. After the Newcastle <strong>Earthquake</strong> in 1989 which occurred in a region of low seisrnicity and<br />

caused significant damages valued at about 700 million Australian dollars (Brunsdon, 1990),<br />

earthquake hazard analysis of a region of low seismic risk but high consequence of economic losses


124<br />

has received more attention. In recent years, as there has been a tremendous economic growth in<br />

Guangdong, a province of low to moderate seismicity, the need to proper assess the attenuation of<br />

ground motions and seismic risk of this region is apparent.<br />

It has been recognized that the attenuation of wave transmission in a region can be reliably estimated<br />

from calculations based on extensive ground motion data recorded in the region. As the quantity of<br />

useable strong ground motion data in China is small, even for high seismic regions, the attenuation<br />

characteristics have been formulated using the intensity records in China. However, there is a concern<br />

on the accuracy of such approach.<br />

In 1999,the Guangdong Digital Seismograph Network was established in the Guangdong Province of<br />

China, and recording of digital ground motion data from 14 telemetered stations of the Network<br />

commenced in August of the same year In collaboration with Guangdong Seismological Bureau, the<br />

first ever-complete set of digital ground motion data of the region was used to evaluate S-wave<br />

attenuation Results of the study, including the geometrical spreading coefficients, the anelastic<br />

attenuation and site responses of the Guangdong region, and the applicability of the proposed<br />

attenuation function for the Hong Kong region are reported in this paper.<br />

SEISMOGRAM DATA<br />

<strong>The</strong> dataset consists of 249 selected horizontal-component digital seismograms from 44 earthquake<br />

events (M L = 2.5 to 5.1) between September 1999 to October 2000, recorded by the Guangdong<br />

Telemetered Network. Figure 1 shows the locations of the stations and the events. <strong>The</strong> distances<br />

between the earthquake hypocenters and the observation stations vary from 10 km to 500 km.<br />

Figure 1. Distribution of stations and seismic events (open triangles indicate location of<br />

stations and solid circles indicate locations of seismic events)<br />

FOURIER SPECTRUM OF GROUND MOTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> observed shear wave spectral amplitude of event f at station j can be written as follows<br />

where A |0 is the source term of event i, G is geometric attenuation function, R t is hypocentral<br />

distance, 5 y Is site response, and Q is frequency-dependent Q, and j3 is shear wave velocity.<br />

(i)


125<br />

Taking logarithm on two sides, we get the following equation<br />

where c(/) is the coefficient of anelastic attenuation, which is<br />

/) (2)<br />

GEOMETRICAL SPREADING FUNCTION G(R U )<br />

For the geometncal attenuation function, early studies suggested that at near source distances, the<br />

geometric spreading coefficient was 1, and at regional distances where the dominant phase was Lg<br />

wave, the geometric spreading coefficient was 0.5. However, recent studies (Burger et. al, 1987, Ou<br />

and Herrmann, 1990) indicated that the shape of geometric attenuation function was complex even for<br />

a simple layered crustal model. Within a medium source distance, the amplitudes might increase or<br />

remain constant. In this study, we tried linear, bilinear and trilinear pieciewise continuous functions<br />

to fit the ground motion data, and found that the trilinear model (Equation 4) yielded the best results<br />

or the least residual error (as defined below). Here we just outlined the procedure for determining the<br />

geometrical spreading coefficients of the trilinear model which was based on the method proposed by<br />

Atkinson and Mereu (1992).<br />

~ b ' - Rf" - R~ bl R }


126<br />

and log A tQ (/) is the mean source amplitude for event £, which is defined:<br />

where n, is the number of stations recording the event i, n 0 is the total number of events used in the<br />

analysis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> residual Res is a function of (b { , b 2 , b-. and c), the frequency /, and sources distances (R\, R 2 ).<br />

In order to reduce the number of unknowns in the inversion process, we took b 3 equal to 0.5, judging<br />

from the previous studies on Lg waves.<br />

For a specific frequency / , the site response of all stations was initially taken to be zero, and some<br />

trial values of /, and R 2 were selected. We used Genetic Algorithm (GA) to search for the<br />

combination of attenuation parameters (6,, b 2 , c) that gave minimum residual error. <strong>The</strong> increment<br />

of the site response correction Aflog 5 ; (/)] for station; was calculated from Equation 9.<br />

(8)<br />

where m } is event numbers recorded at station;.<br />

(9)<br />

<strong>The</strong> above-mentioned process was repeated, using these new site terms. Iteration continued until no<br />

further reduction in the residual error was possible. We then changed the values of R { and R 2 , and<br />

repeated the whole process again and again till a pair of ( R { and R 2 ) yielded the least residual error,<br />

so that the best set of attenuation parameters and site response were finally obtained.<br />

Coefficients of Geometrical Spreading Function<br />

Based on the aforesaid process, we derived the best pair of R { =45km and R = 2 lOOfcm. <strong>The</strong><br />

associated geometrical attenuation coefficients b { , b 2 and site terms S y (/) for each sampling<br />

frequency were also determined. By definition, the geometric attenuation coefficients b } and b 2<br />

should be independent of frequency. However, as the inversion process was conducted for each<br />

sampling frequency, we obtained one set of (b { , &, , c ) for each sampling frequency. Figure 2 shows<br />

the values of b } and b 2 . We took the average value of each parameter, and obtained: b { = 0.97 ±0.1 1,<br />

b 2 = 0.0097 ±0.15, and b 3 = 0.5 as our final solutions.<br />

In order to study the attenuation due to the path effects only, we defined the so-called normalized<br />

amplitude LogA'//) (Equation 10), by subtracting the source term and the site term of Equation 2.<br />

Figure 3 compares the observed decay of normalized amplitude with that obtained from the proposed<br />

attenuation function for/= 8.91 Hz, as a typical example. It is evident that there is a significant<br />

flattening in the decay of spectral amplitudes in the transition zone of the source distances ranging<br />

from 45 km to 100km.


127<br />

I<br />

'++<br />

-j-<br />

4.<br />

+4•N-.<br />

k<br />

.<br />

j_<br />

.."*" +<br />

. +<br />

4<br />

~ib° 10'<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

.1 n-<br />

"16° 10'<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Figure 2. Values of b { and b-> vs frequency / (thick line indicates average value)<br />

1 10-4<br />

Q)<br />

TJ<br />

10*<br />

o<br />

2<br />

10 2 10 3<br />

Hypocentrai Distance (km)<br />

Figure 3. Observed decay of normalized amplitude (for/ = 8.91/fz).<br />

ANELASTIC ATTENUATION<br />

Figure 4 plots the coefficients of anelastic attenuation, c(f), as well as 2(/) • For the frequency<br />

below 2 Hz, the calculated Q values are quite scattered. <strong>The</strong>refore, we only regressed the results<br />

above 2 Hz, and obtained the frequency-dependent Q as Q = 481.5 • /°' 31 .


128<br />

O 10 s<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Figure 4 Coefficient of anelastic attenuation c and Q avs frequency<br />

(straight line is Q = 481.5 -/ a31 )<br />

Figure 5 compares our Q model for S waves in the Guangdong region with the Q models for S or Lg<br />

waves in other regions [Mark "1" Q = 130/ 10 for Apennines of Italy (Malagnini et al., 2000a); Mark<br />

"2" Q = 150/ 5 for West America (Chin and Aki, 1991); Mark "3" Q = 56/ 01 for Oaxaca of Mexico<br />

(Castro and Munguia, 1993); Mark "4" Q = 4QO/ 42<br />

for Central Europe (Malagnini et al., 2000b);<br />

Mark "5" Q = 670/ 33 for Eastern Canada (Atkinson and Mereu, 1992); Mark "6" Q = 508/ 48 for<br />

Indian shield region (Singh et al., 1999); and Mark "7" Q = 680/ 36 s for Eastern North America<br />

(Atkinson and Boore, 1995)]. We found that the Q model for shear waves in the Guangdong region<br />

is similar to that in Central Europe.<br />

10 2 10°<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Figure 5 Comparison of 0 models of 5 waves of different regions (P - Guangdong region, 1 •<br />

Apennines, 2 - west America, 3 - Oaxaca of Mexico, 4 - Central Europe, 5 - Eastern Canada, 6 -<br />

Indian shield region, 7 - Eastern North America)


129<br />

CORRELATION WITH GROUND MOTION DATA RECORDED BY THE HONG KONG<br />

OBSERVATORY<br />

For geological considerations, Hong Kong is part of the Guangdong region. In the derivation of the<br />

above-mentioned model and parameters, we have not used the ground motion data recorded in Hong<br />

Kong. In fact, the Hong Kong Observatory operates a network of eight stations to record-ground<br />

motions in digital format since 1997.<br />

In this section, we tried to establish the source spectra of the same 44 events from the digital signals<br />

recorded by YHK station of the Hong Kong Network, assuming that there was no site amplification<br />

effect of YHK station as it was sited on hard bedrock, and using our proposed geometric spreading<br />

function and Q function derived from the Guangdong Digital Seismograph Network data.<br />

It was found that source spectra of the selected events derived from the 14 Guangdong stations and<br />

from YHK station were comparable, and the discrepancies were well within an acceptable range.<br />

Figure 6 is an example of comparison of the source spectra of the Heyuan <strong>Earthquake</strong> (M s = 3.1,<br />

occurred on 4 November 1999) calculated from 5 Guangdong stations and the YHK station. <strong>The</strong><br />

thick line is derived form YHK station. It also confirms insignificant site amplification effect at YHK<br />

station.<br />

Figure 6 Comparison of source displacement spectra recorded at different stations for Heyuan<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> of 4 November 1999 (M s = 3.1) (thick line is from records of YHK Station after corrected<br />

for attenuation)<br />

f/Hz<br />

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS<br />

Based on the 249 Fourier spectra of 44 earthquake events recorded by the 14 stations of the<br />

Guangdong Telemetered Network, the attenuation model and source parameters were estimated using<br />

the Genetic Algorithms inversion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results can be summarized as following:<br />

* <strong>The</strong> geometrical spreading function shows three distinct sections for the Guangdong region. At<br />

a source distance less than 45 km, corresponding to geometrical spreading of the direct wave,<br />

the geometrical spreading coefficient is 0.97. At a source distance between 45 and 100 km, the


130<br />

geometrical coefficient is nearly zero. At a source distance beyond 100 km, corresponding to<br />

the Lg phase, the geometrical spreading coefficient is 0.5.<br />

<strong>The</strong> frequency-dependent Q is estimated as Q — 481.5 • /° 31 .<br />

Preliminary study of the digital seismograph data of the same 44 events recorded by Hong Kong<br />

Observatory seismic monitoring network-indicates that the proposed attenuation model is likely<br />

to be applicable for Hong Kong Region<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

<strong>The</strong> work reported in this paper is a part of the ASD Project on ground motion and response spectra<br />

for seismic design in Hong Kong funded by <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>.<br />

References<br />

Atkinson, G. M. and D. Boore (1995). New ground motion relations for eastern North America, Bull<br />

Seism. Soc. Am., 85, 17-30.<br />

Atkinson, G. M. and R. F. Mereu (1992). <strong>The</strong> shape of ground motion attenuation curves in<br />

Southeastern Canada, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 82, 2014-2031.<br />

Brunsdon, D.R. (1990). <strong>The</strong> December 28, 1989 Newcastle , Australia <strong>Earthquake</strong>. Bulletin of the<br />

New Zealand National Society for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Vol. 23, No. 2, 102-120.<br />

Burger, R., P. Somerville, J. Barker, R. Herrmann, and D. Heimberger (1987). <strong>The</strong> effect of crustal<br />

structure on strong ground motion attenuation relations in eastern North America, Bull. Seism.<br />

Soc. Am 77, 420-430.<br />

Castro, R R. and L. Munguia (1993). Attenuation of P and S waves in oaxaca, Mexico subduction<br />

zone, Phvs Earth Planet. Interiors, 76, 179-187.<br />

Chun, K., G. West, R Kokoski, and C. Samson (1987). A novel technique for measuring Lg<br />

attenuation: result from eastern Canada between 1 to 10 Hz, Bull Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 389-419.<br />

Hasegawa, H. (1983). Lg spectra of local earthquakes recorded by the Eastern Canada Telemetered<br />

Network and spectral scaling, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1041-1061.<br />

Malagnmi, L., R. B. Herrmann, and M. D. Bona (2000a). Ground-motion scaling in the Apennines<br />

(Italy), Bull Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 1062-1081.<br />

Malagnini, L., R. B. Hermann, and K. Koch (2000b). Regional ground-motion scaling in central<br />

Europe, Bull Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 1052-1061.<br />

Ou, G. and R. Herrmann (1990). A statistical model for peak ground motion from local to regional<br />

distances, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 1397-1417.<br />

Shin, T. and R. Herrmann (1987). Lg attenuation and source studies using 1982 Miramichi data, Bull.<br />

Seism. Soc. Am. 77, 384-397.<br />

Singh, S. K., M. Ordaz, R. S. Dattarayam, and H. K. Guputa (1997). A Spectral analysis of 21 May<br />

1997, Jabalpur, India, <strong>Earthquake</strong> (M W =5.S) and estimation of ground motion from future<br />

earthquakes m the Indian shield region, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 89, 1620-1630.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SLOPE STABILITY AGAINST EARTHQUAKE<br />

CONSIDERING THREE DIMENSIONAL EFFECT<br />

I. Yoshida 1 , T. Kaneto 2 and M. Takao 2<br />

Structural and Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong> Department, Tokyo Electric Power Services Co.,Ltd.,<br />

Tokyo, JAPAN<br />

2 Nuclear Power <strong>Engineering</strong> Department, Tokyo Electric Power Company<br />

Tokyo, JAPAN<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In order to discuss slope stability against seismic force considering three dimensional (referred as 3-d,<br />

hereafter) effect, an evaluation method based 3-d dynamic FEM is developed. <strong>The</strong> model for the 3-d<br />

dynamic FEM used in this study is composed of one 3-d model, four 2-d far field models and four 1-d<br />

far field models. <strong>The</strong>y are connected by viscous boundaries. In the proposed method, a sliding surface<br />

is modeled by a set of planes or an oval. <strong>The</strong> problem to search the sliding surface with minimum<br />

safety margin is formulated as optimization problem, in which objective function is safety factor, and<br />

design parameters are parameters describing the sliding surface such as center and radius of the sliding<br />

arc. <strong>The</strong> optimization problem is solved by using Genetic Algorithm, which attracts attention and is<br />

widely used as practical global optimization method in various engineering problems recently. In 3-d<br />

analysis, directions of excitation and sliding are also important, so that these directions for minimum<br />

safety factor are also searched simultaneously. Several numerical simulation results show that safety<br />

factor based on 2-d analysis tends to be conservative, though the response of 3-d model is larger than<br />

that of 2-d model partially.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

After Kobe earthquake (1995), many Japanese aseismic design codes have been revised, and<br />

design earthquake and spectra tends to become large. For the large design earthquake, we need to<br />

estimate the limit state more carefully than before. If the limit state is examined under lots of<br />

conservative assumptions, the obtained safety margin might be smaller than the level required in the<br />

new design code. Consequently a lot of budget for the strengthening is needed irrationally. One of the<br />

standpoints for more precise estimation is to consider three dimensional (referred as 3-d, hereafter)<br />

effect of the slope. For the stability analysis of slopes, there are several methods, such as limit<br />

equilibrium method and finite element method (FEM). However most of the method that have been<br />

performed so far are based on two dimensional shape of slope and sliding surface.<br />

In this paper, an evaluation method based on 3-d dynamic FEM is studied. Search of critical sliding<br />

surface can be formulated as optimization problem hi which the objective function is the safety factor<br />

of the sliding surface and design parameters are parameters which define the sliding surface. Genetic<br />

Algorithm (referred as GA here) is used for the optimization. GA is one of the most prospective


132<br />

optimizing method in many engineering problems, which is learned from the way of evolution of life,<br />

especially mechanism of genes.<br />

METHODOLOGY FOR ESTIMATION OF SAFETY FACTOR<br />

Response Analysis and Safety Factor<br />

Dynamic response of a slopes is calculated in time domain by<br />

Newmark p method which is one of direct integral methods, in this<br />

study. Viscous boundaries can be adopted for the base and the four<br />

sides of a FEM model As shown in Fig.l, the 3-d model is<br />

connected with four 2-d free field models by viscous boundaries.<br />

<strong>The</strong> each 2-d model is also connected with two 1-d free field<br />

models by viscous boundaries. <strong>The</strong> each model has also viscous<br />

boundary at the base.<br />

In conventional 2-d analysis, sliding surface is usually modeled<br />

by a set of lines or an arc. As a natural extension to 3-d analysis,<br />

a sliding surface is modeled by a set of planes or an oval <strong>The</strong><br />

modeled sliding surface is divided into many triangle panels for<br />

the numerical calculations. <strong>The</strong> vertex of the panel is<br />

determined from the intersection of side of FEM element and<br />

the sliding surface. Fig.2 shows two triangle panels, cl-c3-c4<br />

and cl-c2-c3, in an hexahedron element.<br />

Safety factor of the modeled sliding surface is obtained as<br />

the ratio of resistance force to sliding force. <strong>The</strong> resistance<br />

force working on a triangle panel is calculated by normal stress<br />

to the panel, area of the panel and material strength (cohesion<br />

and internal friction). Sliding force on the panel is also<br />

calculated by shear stress to sliding direction and the area of the<br />

panel Safety factor S/ is obtained as the ratio of total sum of<br />

each force as follows.<br />

Fig.l Free Fields and<br />

Boundary Conditions<br />

Fig.2 Triangle Panels Forming<br />

Sliding Surface<br />

where, RI : resistance on panel i^A\: area of panel f, t: time,0 p 0 2 : directions of excitation and sliding<br />

S l : sliding force on panel z, n : number of the panels, x : a vector of parameter which define a sliding<br />

surface. Minimum value with respect to these parameters is used as a safety factor of a slope or ground.<br />

Optimization by Real Coded Genetic Algorithm<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem to search the sliding surface with minimum safety margin is formulated as optimization<br />

problem, in which the objective function is safety factor, and design parameters are parameters<br />

providing the sliding surface such as center, radius of the surface, and so on. In this optimization<br />

problems, there might be many local optimum solutions. In that case, local search method such as


133<br />

1st Generation<br />

dGenerate individuals randomly !<br />

generations<br />

[ Evaluation of fitness )<br />

I Preserve the elite solutions j<br />

Selection<br />

O<br />

D<br />

parent<br />

child<br />

.0 a<br />

..-Parent-]<br />

/<br />

0<br />

•Parent .2<br />

F<br />

Parent-3<br />

\.<br />

0"<br />

gQ-^arent _2<br />

a-'<br />

%r'DD<br />

0-Sn<br />

.©"'<br />

..•Parent- !<br />

Parent-3<br />

Q<br />

/ ••.<br />

f*B\<br />

/%£ )D<br />

••' Q<br />

•'* n<br />

(£"""<br />

Parent- 1<br />

••*"'"<br />

Type-1 Type-2 Type-3<br />

Fzg. 4 Outline of Crossover in Real Coded GA<br />

..-••"" Parent-<br />

Crossover and Mutation J modified Newton methods (DFP, BFGS, etc.) can not be<br />

applicable. In this study, we adopt GA (Genetic algorithms)<br />

Optimum solution<br />

which attracts attention as practical global optimization<br />

methods.<br />

Fig.3 Flowchart of Genetic Algorithm<br />

Traditionally, binary codes have been used to represent<br />

the design variables including real number parameters, and<br />

the crossover operation is performed by the exchange of a<br />

part of the binary bit. However, some researchers are using<br />

the GA with real coded crossover operators (Tsutsui et al,1997) and reported the advantage of their<br />

methods. Among them, the unimodal normal distribution crossover (UNDX) is reported to show good<br />

performance in optimizing problems (Kita, et al, 1999).<br />

Basically, the outline of real coded GA which is shown in Fig.3 is same as that of binary coded GA,<br />

except crossover operator and mutation. <strong>The</strong>re are several models proposed for real coded crossover<br />

operator with Gaussian noise. <strong>The</strong> concepts of the crossover operator which are used in this paper are<br />

illustrated in Fig.4 (Yoshida, 2000). In the case of Type-1, the children are derived by following<br />

equation.<br />

g_ A+P 2 Pi-P* here, a * N(0,l) (2)<br />

V<br />

2 2<br />

c, p l and p 2 are vectors in design parameter space, c is a child made from parents p l and p 2 . <strong>The</strong><br />

parents are randomly selected in proportion to their fitness, which is the inverse of safety factor in this<br />

slope stability study. <strong>The</strong> children are generated in one-dimensional subspace of the parameter space in<br />

Type-1. In Type-2, n dimensional perturbation is given to Type-1 children, consequently Type-2<br />

children are generated in n dimensional space, when there are n design variables. <strong>The</strong> magnitude of the<br />

perturbation is defined based on the distance from Parent-3 to the line with Parent-1 and 2. In Type-3,<br />

the children are generated in 2-dimensional subspace made by three parents as shown in Fig.4. In all<br />

types, the generated children are in the neighbourhood of the gravity center of their parents.<br />

Perturbation v is added to each design variable as mutation. In this study, Cauchy distribution is<br />

used.<br />

NUMERICAL EXAMPLES<br />

Models and Characteristics of Dynamic Response<br />

Two types of slope model are used for the numerical calculations. FEM model of them are shown<br />

in Fig.5. <strong>The</strong> height and width of the slope are indicated in Fig.6. <strong>The</strong> number of node and element of<br />

Type-1 model is 8848 and 7557, while those of Type-2 are 11336 and 9883. <strong>The</strong> sides and base of the


134<br />

Type-2<br />

Fig.5 Three dimensional Slope Model for the Numerical Calculation<br />

Z<br />

A<br />

C 800 ..£400 . c 800 x,<br />

r* *n^ "^ *n<br />

/ V /<br />

270<br />

lower layer<br />

Fig. 6 Dimension of the Slope Model<br />

'<br />

540<br />

810<br />

unit: m<br />

-01 00 01 (m/s)<br />

Fig. 7 Response Acceleration in y-Direction<br />

(perpendicular to Excitation x-Direction)<br />

model are connected with free field by viscous boundaries. Several cases with respect to stiffness and<br />

strength properties are studied.<br />

As an example of response analysis, the response acceleration in y direction at specific time with<br />

homogeneous property model (shear velocity 340m/sec., Poisson's ratio 0.48, damping ratio 0.0) is<br />

shown in Fig.7. Since the direction of excitation is in ^-direction, the response in y-direction<br />

corresponds to the component perpendicular to the excitation, which means response due to 3-d effect.<br />

<strong>The</strong> spectral ratios to the doubled input motion in ^-direction are shown in Fig.8. <strong>The</strong> response at point<br />

A becomes large, while that of point B becomes small compared with 1-d response due to the slope<br />

configuration. <strong>The</strong> response of Type-1 is larger than that of Type-2 generally.<br />

Sliding Surface With Minimum Safety Factor<br />

<strong>The</strong> sliding surface with minimum safety factor is searched by GA, for both models Type-1 and<br />

Type-2. It is assumed that the models are divided into two layers, upper and lower layer as shown in<br />

Fig.6. <strong>The</strong> properties of both layers are summarized in Table 1. <strong>The</strong> time history and Fourier spectrum<br />

of the input motion, which is the record of Kera county earthquake at Taft, are shown in Fig.9. <strong>The</strong><br />

sliding surface is defined by crossing surface of the oval and the 3-d slopes. <strong>The</strong> parameters of the oval<br />

are shown in Fig. 10. <strong>The</strong> coordinate of center (x, v, z), radius (a, b, c), angle around z axis, of the oval<br />

are determined such that the safety factor becomes minimum by GA. <strong>The</strong> directions of sliding 9 l and<br />

excitation #, for minimum safety factor are also searched in addition to the above parameters at the<br />

same time. Population size and generation size for GA are is 150 and 40.<br />

<strong>The</strong> obtained sliding surfaces with minimum safety factor of Type-1 are shown in Fig. 11 and 12.<br />

Fig. 11 shows the critical surface when the search is performed under the limitation that the sliding


135<br />

10° 10' 1<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

10° 10 1 Fig.9 Acceleration Time History of<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

/ n^wr Motion<br />

c<br />

Fig. 8 Spectral Ratio to Doubled Input Motion<br />

Fig. 10 Parameters describing the shape<br />

of sliding Surface<br />

surface is generated only inside the model, which means size of sliding block is limited by some<br />

reasons in an actual slope. While Fig. 12 shows the critical surface when no limitation is considered.<br />

<strong>The</strong> safety factor with the limitation is 2.38 and the safety factor without the limitation is 2.20. For the<br />

comparison, 2-d analysis is also performed, and the obtained safety factor is 2.14, In the case without<br />

the limitation, the shape of sliding surface is close to the shape obtained by 2-d analysis and the<br />

directions of excitation and sliding are close to the direction of the steepest of the slope. This result<br />

suggests us that the critical state without the limitation is close to the state of two dimensional analysis.<br />

On the other hand, Fig. 11 suggests that the shape of sliding surface, directions of excitation and sliding<br />

becomes complicated, if there is some limitations with respect to the area of sliding surface.<br />

<strong>The</strong> same analysis for Type-2 model with the limitation is performed. <strong>The</strong> critical surface is shown<br />

in Fig. 13. <strong>The</strong> direction of sliding and excitation are close to the steepest direction of the slope<br />

although the limitation is considered. It can be interpreted that the response around the 3-d comer of<br />

the slope of Type-2 is smaller than that of 2-d slope so that the critical slope tends to be formed to<br />

avoid 3-d corner of the slope. <strong>The</strong> obtained safety factor for Type-2 slope is 2.60, which is larger than<br />

that of Type-1 model.<br />

Table 1 Properties of Model<br />

Upper<br />

Lower<br />

Unit Weight<br />

(kN/m 3 )<br />

17.8<br />

16.8<br />

Poisson's<br />

Ratio<br />

0.48<br />

0.45<br />

Shear<br />

Velocity<br />

(m/s)<br />

338.0<br />

499.0<br />

Cohesion<br />

(kPa)<br />

98.1<br />

1500.0<br />

Internal Friction<br />

(degree)<br />

38.6<br />

0.0<br />

Tensile Strength<br />

(kPa)<br />

0.0<br />

222.0


136<br />

plane<br />

plane<br />

sliding<br />

x-z section<br />

y-z section<br />

excitation<br />

excitation<br />

Fig. 11 Critical Sliding Surface with Limitation<br />

of the Area for Type-1 Slope Model<br />

CONCUSION<br />

sliding<br />

Fig. 12 Critical Sliding Surface without<br />

Limitation of the Area for Type-1 Slope Model<br />

In this paper, an evaluation method of safety<br />

factor of sliding surface based on 3-d dynamic<br />

FEM is studied and numerical examples are<br />

shown. Within the simulations performed in this<br />

study, the safety factors obtained by 3-d model is<br />

larger than those by 2-d model Though it is<br />

difficult to conclude that the estimation by 2-d<br />

model is always conservative, our results suggest<br />

that actual 3-d slope has more safety margin than<br />

that estimated by 2-d model in many cases.<br />

y-z section<br />

plane<br />

excitation<br />

sliding<br />

References<br />

Fig. 13 Critical Sliding Surface with Limitation<br />

of the Area for Type-2 Slope Model<br />

KITA H., ONO L and KOBAYASHI S. (1999).<br />

<strong>The</strong>oretical analysis of the unimodal normal<br />

distribution crossover for real-coded genetic algorithms (in Japanese), Transactions of the society of<br />

instrument and control engineers, vol.35-11, pp. 1333-1339<br />

TSUTSUI S. and GHOSH A., CORNE D. and FUJIMOTO Y. (1997). A real coded genetic algorithm<br />

with an explore and an exploiter populations", Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on<br />

Genetic Algorithms, pp.238-345<br />

YOSHIDA I. (2000), Comparison of Real Coded GA(Genetic Algorithm) and Binary Coded GA 7<br />

Proceedings of International Conference on Monte Carlo Simulation, pp. 81-87


SEISMIC RISK AND<br />

DISASTER MANAGEMENT


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

< on<br />

THE MID-AMERICA EARTHQUAKE CENTER RESEARCH<br />

PROGRAM TOWARDS DEVELOPMENT OF CONSEQUENCE-<br />

BASED SEISMIC RISK MITIGATION<br />

D.Abrams 1 , A.Elnashai 2 and J.Beavers 3<br />

1 MAE Center, <strong>University</strong> of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Urbana, IL, USA<br />

2 MAE Center, <strong>University</strong> of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Urbana, IL, USA<br />

3 MAE Center, <strong>University</strong> of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Urbana, EL, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A new framework for managing seismic risk, termed Consequence-Based <strong>Engineering</strong> (CBE), has been<br />

adopted and articulated by the Mid-America <strong>Earthquake</strong> (MAE) Center. This entails undertaking rapid<br />

assessment, comparing expected and acceptable consequences, re-assessing hazard, vulnerability and<br />

inventory, investigating various possible vulnerability reduction measures and decision making regarding<br />

benefit and cost of the various options. This process is not limited to structural systems, but rather to all<br />

societal endeavors, including economic and social ramifications. Moreover, the framework, or paradigm,<br />

of CBE is not limited to seismic nsk, but pertains to other forms of exposure and indeed to multiple<br />

hazard scenarios. To elaborate this framework and to provide a comprehensive set of application<br />

guidelines, the MAE Center has formulated a core research program comprising a number of fully<br />

coordinated projects aimed at covering all aspects of seismic risk mitigation measures viewed from a<br />

consequence-based perspective. <strong>The</strong> research program is described in this paper. <strong>The</strong> individual projects<br />

are described and their role towards development of CBE is discussed. <strong>The</strong> intricate process of meshing<br />

the various research projects, items of input and output and their inter-relationship is described. Finally,<br />

the anticipated outcome of the MAE research program, namely (i) a complete and state-of-the-art seismic<br />

risk mitigation environment, (ii) technical developments amenable to exploitation by industry and other<br />

stakeholders and (iii) the advanced IT visualization system through which the technical developments are<br />

projected to aid decision- and policy-makers, are presented.


140<br />

CONSEQUENCE-BASED ENGINEERING - DEFINITION AND APPLICATION<br />

Consequence-Based <strong>Engineering</strong> (CBE) is a new paradigm for seismic risk reduction across regions. It<br />

quantifies the risk to societal systems and subsystems by working with policy-makers, decision-makers<br />

and stakeholders to ultimately develop risk reduction strategies and implement mitigation actions.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, it is a framework for risk assessment in all its aspects. With a coordinated approach to<br />

engineering on the basis of anticipated consequences across regions rather than individual structures, a<br />

user of CBE can assess probable seismic hazards, synthesize likely damage across regions of specific<br />

stakeholder interests and minimize consequences of such an event through selected interventions.<br />

Because social-economic impact is considered across a population of construction, the benefits of seismic<br />

risk-reduction measures can be better assessed through this new systems approach. <strong>The</strong> paradigm provides<br />

opportunities to perform the following tasks in vulnerable communities:<br />

• assessment of risks and understanding of the most critical components of the region<br />

• provision of intervention scenarios and their cost-benefit equation<br />

• setting priorities in intervention and disaster management policies<br />

• re-assessment of system vulnerability after implementation of mitigation measures<br />

• determination of research priorities to minimize uncertainty in the above applications<br />

<strong>The</strong> new paradigm is intended for use by practicing engineers responding to the needs of their clients who<br />

have a significant vested interest in mitigating seismic risk and are thus termed "stakeholders."<br />

Stakeholders are groups or individuals making decisions to invest in a particular intervention to mitigate<br />

possible earthquake losses. Examples of stakeholders relying on the results of a CBE analysis include<br />

insurance executives, city managers, state highway officials and owners of large building stocks. Using<br />

new technologies that support CBE, practitioners will be able to demonstrate to their stakeholder clients<br />

via high-end data-mining and visualization tools, what types of consequences are likely for their<br />

respective systems and how various intervention measures, such as retrofit or relocation of system<br />

ingredients, can reduce such consequences.<br />

As developed by the MAE Center the steps of a CBE analysis are given in the flowchart of Figure 1.<br />

Initially, a rapid assessment is executed to define the relevant system, approximate the probable hazard,<br />

project what consequences are likely and delineate what types of consequences might be acceptable. Next,<br />

a four-step decision tree is used to determine if: (a) estimated consequences are acceptable, (b) acceptable<br />

consequences should be redefined, (c) modeling parameters should be refined and (d) further system<br />

interventions should be considered. If anticipated consequences exceed tolerable ones and no further<br />

refinement of acceptability is feasible, then parameters defining the hazard and built environment can be<br />

refined to reduce anticipated losses (assuming that the preliminary analysis were conservative) and/or<br />

system intervention may be prescribed to minimize anticipated losses. An interactive damage synthesis<br />

module developed with advanced data-mining and visualization tools is used to determine and view<br />

consequences for various problem definitions and mitigation scenarios. Accessing this module iteratively,<br />

consequences may be visualized for a number of different system intervention strategies with various<br />

input parameters describing the hazard or the built environment.


141<br />

1. System Definition<br />

define system of interest<br />

define hazard<br />

define characteristics<br />

Are Consequences<br />

Acceptable''<br />

Done<br />

confident that<br />

consequences will be<br />

acceptable<br />

2. Rapid Estimate of<br />

Consequences<br />

quick assessment of<br />

likely consequences<br />

Should Acceptable<br />

Consequences be<br />

Redefined''<br />

• 4. Decision Making<br />

3. Define Acceptable<br />

Consequences<br />

define stakeholder needs<br />

Rapid Assessment'<br />

Should<br />

Parameters<br />

be Refined<br />

Should System<br />

Interventions; be<br />

Considered" 7<br />

Refine Hazard Estimate<br />

further refine hazard for more<br />

pfecise loss assessment<br />

Refine Inventory Estimate<br />

further refine inventory of built<br />

environment for more precise loss<br />

Assessment<br />

10. Prescribe System<br />

Interventions to Minimize<br />

Consequences<br />

rehabilitate or demolish<br />

vulnerable structures, construct<br />

new structures, re-route network<br />

flows, re-manage land use, etc<br />

Consequence Minimization '<br />

7. Refine Fragility Relations<br />

further refine vulnerability of built<br />

environment with refined hazard<br />

and more precise response<br />

analyses<br />

8. Re-Assess Social Impact<br />

assess social and economic<br />

consequences of event in terms of<br />

refined hazard and inventory<br />

estimates and fragility relations<br />

Damage Synthesis<br />

9. Re-Visualize Consequences<br />

examine effects of system<br />

alterations on reducing<br />

consequences<br />

FIGURE 1: OPERATIONAL STEPS OF CBE APPLICATION


142<br />

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS OF CBE APPLICATION<br />

CBE may be used with existing technologies. Indeed, it is in current use, though unintentionally and<br />

perhaps in a less structured manner than that depicted in Figure 1. However, its true appeal is in the fact<br />

that its requirements set research and development priorities that, in turn, bolster its application and<br />

increases confidence in decisions based on the outcome of its application. <strong>The</strong> MAE Center Core<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Program (CRP) has been formulated to respond to the challenges of developing the next<br />

generation of risk assessment environments, based on the consequence-based engineering approach. <strong>The</strong><br />

hierarchical structure of the CRP is shown in<br />

Figure 2.<br />

Damage<br />

Synthesis<br />

CBE<br />

Framework<br />

MAE Center Core<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Program<br />

Consequence<br />

Minimization<br />

Hazard<br />

Definition<br />

FIGURE 2: MAE CENTER CORE RESEARCH PROGRAM<br />

<strong>The</strong> structure of the CRP closely follows requirements set by CBE as well as research management, interdisciplinary<br />

teaming of researchers and industrial interest in research products. It comprises three thrust<br />

areas: Hazard Definition (HD), Damage Synthesis (DS) and Consequence Minimization (CM). <strong>The</strong> CBE<br />

Framework Development (FD) is an overarching activity that guides the projects, develops further the<br />

CBE approach and manages uncertainty throughout the research programs. <strong>The</strong>refore, the CBE FD is a<br />

capstone for the three thrust areas. Each thrust area, as well as the capstone FD, comprise a number of<br />

projects that are designed to fulfill a specific requirement in the CBE paradigm development and<br />

application. Broadly, the DS thrust provides damage estimates, both rapid and refined, before an event.<br />

<strong>The</strong> CM thrust area provides measures of minimizing the damage estimated in DS as well as means of<br />

selecting from a number of possible interventions. <strong>The</strong> HD thrust provides seismic input (hazard) for all<br />

projects in all required forms.<br />

<strong>The</strong> projects under each thrust area and the capstone alongside their inter-relationship are shown in Figure<br />

3. In each thrust area there is a gateway project that acts as the outlet from the thrust area to the rest of the<br />

research program. <strong>The</strong> gateway projects of the three thrusts are: Damage Visualization Module (DS-1),<br />

Decision Support Tools (CM-1) and Synthetic <strong>Earthquake</strong> Hazard (HD-1).


143<br />

f«l-.J<br />

WJjfc >. «<br />

Relations<br />

-Ji 4 *<br />

EQ Path<br />

Modeling<br />

* " a """f'*<br />

Modeling<br />

Hazards Definition Thrust Area<br />

JT* " Defortr<br />

key [ |j systems integration [ henabling technologies \...\..~ If fundamental knowledge<br />

FIGURE 3: PROJECTS OF THE MAE CENTER PROGRAM GROUPED BY THRUST AREA<br />

MAE CENTER RESEARCH PROJECTS IN A CBE CONTEXT<br />

Hereafter, the individual projects are briefly described, and their contributions to the development of the<br />

CBE paradigm are indicated in Table 1.


144<br />

Development of Consequence-Based <strong>Engineering</strong> Framework (FD)<br />

As discussed above, three projects guide the MAE Center research program by developing and<br />

articulating the application steps and operational rule of CBE; by steering the research effort towards<br />

minimizing uncertainty and by providing insight into opportunities for and impediments to the adoption of<br />

a new paradigm in the earthquake engineering community. <strong>The</strong> projects in this area provide leadership<br />

and steering power to the remainder of MAE Center activities (not least the core research program) and<br />

complete the process of elaboration and formalization of the CBE paradigm, with relevant application<br />

rules and verification examples. <strong>The</strong> three projects are:<br />

* FD-1 Consequence-Based <strong>Engineering</strong> Framework Development: This systems-level project<br />

develops and details the CBE paradigm as a framework for earthquake risk mitigation, and indeed<br />

other forms of risk, to vulnerable regions and systems. This project builds on and formalizes the<br />

operational rules for application of CBE through interaction with the various projects included<br />

under the core and stakeholder research programs and provides real-life examples of application,<br />

from conception to acceptance, documented in publications transferable to stakeholder groups.<br />

* FD-2 Systematic Treatment of Uncertainty: Develops procedures, models and control<br />

measures for managing uncertainty throughout the steps comprising the CBE paradigm application<br />

and represented in the core and stakeholder projects.<br />

* FD-3 CBE Implementation Opportunities and Challenges: Investigates the opportunities<br />

offered by, and the hurdles facing, the adoption of the paradigm by all different sectors of industry<br />

and society at large. This study will enable the MAE Center and its partners to launch measures<br />

through outreach to overcome the identified challenges and capitalize on the opportunities offered.<br />

Core Thrust Area on Damage Synthesis (DS)<br />

<strong>The</strong> ultimate objective of this core thrust area is development of innovative methods and refinement of<br />

existing ones to assess and visualize seismic risk across regions. <strong>The</strong> thrust area is focused on project DS-<br />

1 (Damage Visualization Module) which will integrate outputs from all DS projects, as well as fuse<br />

outcomes from corresponding "driving" projects CM-1 and HD-1 of the other two thrust areas. Towards<br />

this end, the following DS research projects are currently underway:<br />

• DS-1 Damage Visualization Module: This is a gateway project that integrates results of the DS,<br />

CM and HD thrust areas from the basic ingredients of hazard and vulnerability (before and after<br />

intervention) to project risk; hence, losses across societal systems. <strong>The</strong> project combines<br />

engineering seismologists, structural and geotechnical earthquake engineers and computer<br />

scientists and may be viewed as the deliverable from the entire MAE Center research program.<br />

» DS-2 Advanced Identification Technologies: Advanced techniques of data definition, selection<br />

and collection are studied here; such as remote sensing and image processing methods, both to<br />

collect inventory and to monitor losses after earthquakes.<br />

• DS-3 Response Analysis Tools: In this project, advanced concepts and techniques of analysis<br />

are developed and tested, with the aim of providing guidance for the derivation of fragility<br />

(vulnerability) functions and to increase the accuracy of damage estimates.<br />

• DS-4 Vulnerability Functions: Develops innovative approaches to investigate the vulnerability<br />

of structural systems and to derive fragility curves, with the objective of providing the most<br />

accurate and least uncertain set of fragility functions possible.


145<br />

DS-5 Response Simulation across Regions: <strong>The</strong> response of large populations of the built<br />

environment is characterized in this project for use in the visualization tool.<br />

DS-6 Network Economic Loss: Deals with refined estimates of economic losses due to network<br />

damage, taking into account time sequencing and a flexible spatial distribution of network<br />

ingredients.<br />

DS-7a Network Vulnerability Modeling: Aims to develop models for estimating the economic<br />

and social losses due to damage to large and complex transportation networks including the effect<br />

of disruption, down- and recovery-time and impact.<br />

DS-7b Damage-Functionality Relations: Derives relationships between reduction or loss of<br />

functionality on the one hand and level of damage on the other.<br />

DS-8 Social-Economic Impact Assessment: Studies the effect of an earthquake on social and<br />

economic impact measures in a region.<br />

DS-9 Risk Assessment Modeling: Develops new risk assessment models through establishing<br />

the relative merits of existing risk assessment approaches and applications results, leading to<br />

improved risk and loss modeling procedures.<br />

Core Thrust Area on Consequence Minimization (CM)<br />

<strong>The</strong> set of projects included in the area of CM use the outcome from the DS damage assessment;<br />

investigate and compare various measures of affecting the consequences through system intervention; and<br />

employ decision making and land-use management, alongside societal impact studies to zoom on to the<br />

most cost-effective consequence minimization measure to be applied to the system. <strong>The</strong> CM process also<br />

includes consulting the risk visualization facilities in DS to assess the effect of the consequence reduction<br />

measures proposed. <strong>The</strong> following CM projects are currently underway in the MAE Center:<br />

• CM-1 Probabilistic Decision Support for Regional Risk Assessment: This gateway project<br />

develops criteria for setting priorities for intervention and mitigation, based on optimization<br />

algorithms that are applied cyclically to the system under consideration, taking into account<br />

possible changes in its characteristics.<br />

• CM-2 Acceptable Consequences: Evaluates the level of acceptable consequences from a societal<br />

system viewpoint through developing reaction profiles and refining them based on field data,<br />

leading to the development of a dynamic societal response model.<br />

• CM-3 Network Retrofit and Rerouting Strategies: Develops procedures for balancing costbenefits<br />

of retrofit and/or re-routing, to aid in decision making as to the most effective intervention<br />

approach.<br />

• CM-4 Structural Retrofit Strategies: Addresses the level and type of structural intervention for<br />

populations of structure, to achieve a specified level of consequence minimization, by relating the<br />

intervention technique to changes in structural characteristics and deriving intervention-sensitive<br />

fragility relationships.<br />

• CM-5 Multi-Hazard Application of Regional Damage Synthesis: A test bed project that<br />

confirms and calibrates the damage synthesis module using a region, whose infrastructure system<br />

and hazards can be easily defined.<br />

• CM-6 Land Use Management: Minimizes consequences through the effective re-use of urban<br />

spaces, including relocation of vulnerable and hazardous buildings, widening of transportation<br />

arteries for emergency response and similar measures.


'•<br />

146<br />

Core Thrust Area on Hazard Definition (HD)<br />

<strong>The</strong> following HD projects are currently being executed, all of which are aimed at refining hazard<br />

characterization towards more accurate applications of the CBE procedure, through improving models and<br />

methods as well as providing new calibration data<br />

• BDD-1 Synthetic <strong>Earthquake</strong> Hazard: Peak ground parameters, synthesized earthquake timehistones<br />

and consequently spectra, are investigated in this gateway project for the purposes of<br />

representing source, path and site characteristics in areas where no actual earthquake records exist<br />

• HD-2 Intraplate Source Modeling: Robust understanding of intraplate earthquake mechanisms<br />

is the purpose of this project, with emphasis on the Central United States<br />

• HDD-3 Intraplate Ground Motion Data: Monitors and uses strong-motion data and fault creepshpoftheNMSZ<br />

• HD-4 Gujarat-NMSZ Correlations: Develops the relationship between the deep intraplate<br />

earthquake of Gujarat and earthquakes on similar fault systems, with special reference to the<br />

NMSZ, making use of the aftershock data collected by the MAE Center after the damaging<br />

earthquake in India, in January of 2001<br />

• HD-5 Seismic Path Modeling: Studies the attenuation of strong-motion in various media in the<br />

horizontal and vertical directions<br />

• HD-6 Site Modeling Site representation, both in terms of sub-soil condition and topographical<br />

effects, are developed in this project using measurements of earthquake motion on different soil<br />

conditions and geological features<br />

• HD-7 Ground Deformation Modeling: Denves factors affecting liquefaction and other forms of<br />

large ground deformations that may pose a hazard to the built environment<br />

TABLE 1<br />

CONTRIBUTION OF RESEARCH PROJECTS TO CBE DEVELOPMENT<br />

MAE <strong>Research</strong> Thrust Area<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Project<br />

CBE Framework Development<br />

FD-1 CBE Framework Development<br />

FD-2 Systematic Treatment of Uncertainty<br />

FD-3 CBE Implementation Opportunities<br />

Damase Synthesis<br />

[BS-I<br />

S.DS-2<br />

-BS-3<br />

IRS-4<br />

UDS-S<br />

•n-6 -<br />

•BS-7a<br />

!D&4*<br />

iDS-8<br />

'BS-9<br />

Damage Vjsoaliza&on Module<br />

• Advanced Identifi.catiQn' Technologies<br />

Response Analysis Toofe *<br />

" YHfcerabOlty Faactjons *<br />

Response Simulation across Regions "* ;<br />

^etwoa^EcoaamK-Los^ ^%i*<br />

*<br />

Mfttwrfffc ITrclttftraTvrFtfy Mnd&Fmg T :<br />

I teia^RiBc^^ «<br />

't Scoai-Bc^BOinic Impact Assessmflfft<br />

Risk-MsessmeBtModefim^, ,<br />

Consequence Minimization<br />

CBE Paradigm Step<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

x<br />

X<br />

X<br />

j»r<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

x<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

'<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

"$,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X.<br />

* X<br />

"X<br />

X,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

1 J6<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

* X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

• X<br />

X '<br />

X ;<br />

> X \<br />

X i<br />

• X '<br />

' X <<br />

* >'


147<br />

CM 1<br />

CM 2<br />

CM 3<br />

CM-4<br />

CM-5<br />

CM-6<br />

Hazard Definition<br />

,HD-1<br />

HD-2<br />

HD-3<br />

HD-4<br />

HD-5<br />

HD-6<br />

HD-7<br />

Probabilistic Decision Support<br />

Acceptable Consequences<br />

Network Retrofit/Rerouting Strategies<br />

Structure Retrofit Strategies<br />

Multi-Hazard Application of DS<br />

Land-Use Management<br />

Synthetic <strong>Earthquake</strong> Hazard -*<br />

Intraplate Source Modeling<br />

Intraplate Ground Motion Data<br />

Gujarai-NMSZ Correlations "- »- *<br />

Seismic Path Modeling<br />

Site- Modeling<br />

Ground Deformation Modeling<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

J,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

*.<br />

X<br />

_<br />

*<br />

-<br />

—<br />

-<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

-,<br />

"*""<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X.* ~ -„<br />

X<br />

x: **<br />

"X-<br />

£-*<br />

X<br />

X<br />

-<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

AC<br />

"* j<br />

*"<br />

i~ a. "*<br />

*.<br />

-<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

_<br />

~<br />

, „<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

^X -4<br />

•"•<br />

* &<br />

*_<br />

w<br />

*<br />

-,<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

t,j><br />

w~<br />

^<br />

* «<br />

•" -<br />

«<br />

CBE AND STAKEHOLDERS<br />

<strong>The</strong> structure of the MAE research program is based on the fusion of three core research thrust areas, with<br />

four stakeholder research thrust areas representing insurers, owners of large building stocks, construction<br />

associations and transportation officials To maximize leveraging potential, core thrust area research,<br />

supported with NSF and institutional matching funds, is implicitly intended to serve research interests of<br />

not one but multiple, stakeholder groups, as denoted graphically m Figure 4 In turn, research of<br />

individual stakeholder groups extends core research towards applications pertinent to their respective<br />

goals Thus, neither core nor stakeholder research thrusts by themselves can provide the appropriate<br />

balance between systems, enabling technologies and basic knowledge However, combinations of<br />

carefully configured core research with individual stakeholder research result in balanced research<br />

agendas having the most impact on earthquake risk reduction Further details on the Stakeholder <strong>Research</strong><br />

Program of the MAE Center are given on the web site http.//mae ce umc edi*<br />

Transportation<br />

Officials<br />

Buildin<br />

Ow<br />

Construction<br />

Industry<br />

Insurance<br />

Industry<br />

FIGURE 4 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORE AND STAKEHOLDER RESEARCH PROGRAMS<br />

<strong>The</strong> strategy for engaging stakeholders in learning about and indeed influencing core research projects, is<br />

critical to the success of infusing CBE m the earthquake engineering community, since affecting losses<br />

through the application of mitigation measures can only take place through stakeholders <strong>The</strong> four<br />

stakeholder groups targeted by the MAE Center, following a thorough review of national seismic nsk


148<br />

reduction priorities, have specific requirements that influence the strategic research planning for the CRP.<br />

Transportation officials are interested in assessing and minimizing the consequences of reduction or loss<br />

of traffic flow on their networks. <strong>The</strong> Construction Industry is interested in the market share appropriated<br />

by different construction form and material. Building owners are primarily interested in the probable<br />

damage to their properties from an occupant safety and continued operation viewpoints. Finally, the<br />

insurance industry is interested in quantifying the levels of relative risk on regional and national scales to<br />

refine setting premiums and deductibles as well as spread their exposure over areas of different levels of<br />

risk. <strong>The</strong> common thread amongst the stakeholder groups is that loss assessment and visualization, before<br />

and after the application of a number of risk reduction measures, is essential for their continued operation<br />

and effective future planning. This requirement is the motivation behind the development of the DS-1<br />

visualization module, which in turn drives the technical developments within the CRP.<br />

Another group with an interest in MAE Center research is engineering practitioners who will be early<br />

adopters of the CBE paradigm. Whereas consulting firms do not generally fund research, advice of<br />

practitioners with respect to the practicality of implementing a new engineering approach is essential for<br />

its ultimate success. Consultants with experience in providing seismic risk assessments for stakeholder<br />

clients are engaged with the MAE Center in refining further the research programs, as well as in<br />

developing specific projects, such as DS-9 on risk assessment modeling.<br />

CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />

<strong>The</strong> research projects currently underway at the MAE Center have been presented, starting from the<br />

definition of the guiding paradigm of CBE and its operational steps (Figure 1), to the contents of the<br />

individual projects. <strong>The</strong> relationships (input-output) between projects were presented in Figure 3, whilst<br />

the contribution of each project to the CBE application steps is shown in Table 1. <strong>The</strong> relationship<br />

between core and stakeholder research was briefly described and diagrammatically represented in Figure 4.<br />

By virtue of the above presentation, it is emphasized that the framework of CBE provides an effective tool<br />

for setting research priorities towards global seismic risk assessment and mitigation. <strong>The</strong> MAE Center<br />

research program presented above, in a CBE context, is comprehensive and fully coordinated. <strong>The</strong><br />

ensuing research projects also provide a core of developments and application examples that are of use to<br />

a wide range of industrial projects and stakeholder interests.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

Development of the research plan described in this paper is funded primarily by the <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-<br />

9701785. <strong>The</strong> authors have benefited substantially from discussions with the MAE Center Executive<br />

Advisory Board, Stakeholder Advisory Board and others.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

APPLICATION OF EARLY DAMAGED AREA ESTIMATION<br />

SYSTEM USING DMSP/OLS TO RECENT DESTRUCTIVE<br />

EARTHQUAKES<br />

Kouichi HASEGAWA 1 , Mitsuhiro HIGASHIDA 1 , Masayuki KOHIYAMA 2 ,<br />

Norio Maki 1 , Haruo Hayashi 1 , Herbert W.KROEHL 3 ,<br />

Christopher D.ELVIDGE 3 and V. Ruth HOBSON 3<br />

1 <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster Mitigation <strong>Research</strong> Center (EDM), NIED<br />

2465-1 Mikiyama, Miki, Hyogo, Japan<br />

2 Institute of Industrial Science, <strong>University</strong> of Tokyo<br />

4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan<br />

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Geophysical Data Center<br />

E/GC 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors are developing the Early Damaged Area Estimation System (EDES), which provides the<br />

information as to the estimated impacted areas within the first 24 hours after any significant<br />

earthquake based on nighttime lights observed by the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program<br />

(DMSP) Operational Linescan System (OLS). <strong>The</strong> estimation method is based on the detection of<br />

significant reductions or loss of lights in nighttime images following the event, for it can be expected<br />

that city lights will observably decrease after a large earthquake.<br />

<strong>The</strong> EDES targets Asia-Pacific region, which doesn't have tools to estimate earthquake disaster area,<br />

to support their activities after big earthquakes by providing the useful spatial information. In addition,<br />

humanitarian relief aids by various organizations all over the world should be distributed properly and<br />

fairly to those who need such aids in the impacted area, and it is desirable for international disaster<br />

response and relief communities to identify the exact location of impacted areas as soon as possible as<br />

for their quick mobilization. <strong>The</strong> EDES will also be able to support these communities with the<br />

information. We expect this system will contribute to global disaster management activities.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

It is necessary to grasp the spatial distribution of the damaged areas in early time in a large earthquake<br />

disaster in order to allocate limited human and physical resources efficiently. Shortly after a disaster,<br />

interruptions of communication and confusions of information would interfere with precise<br />

assessment of the disaster situation, and relief actions would come to confusion. <strong>The</strong>refore, the early<br />

information of damaged area distribution is indispensable for effective disaster responses.


150<br />

In Japan, on reflection of the Hanshin-Awaji <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster 1995, national and local<br />

governments have developed damage estimation systems using GIS, which are based on social<br />

inventory database and observed seismic information. <strong>The</strong>se systems provide real-time disaster<br />

information and enable efficient disaster responses. But only a few countries in the world have such<br />

damage estimation systems as developed in Japan. International rescue and research team should be<br />

deployed properly to the impacted areas in order to make their assistance effective. In addition,<br />

humanitarian aids by various organizations should be distributed properly and fairly to those who<br />

need such aids. Thus, it is desirable for international disaster response and relief committees to<br />

identify the location of impacted areas as soon as possible as the task for their mobilization.<br />

For the purpose of supporting relief and recovery activities by the governments or other organizations,<br />

the damaged areas were estimated using nighttime images observed by the Defense Meteorological<br />

Satellite Program's Operational Linescan System (DMSP/OLS). As examples two large earthquakes,<br />

the Turkey Kocaeli <strong>Earthquake</strong> (Mw7.4) on August 17 1999 and the India Gujarat <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

(Mw7.7) on January 26 2001 were picked up.<br />

2. DAMAED AREA ESTIMATION BASED ON 2 NIGHT LIGHT IMAGES BEFORE AND<br />

AFTER EARTHQUAKE (BASIC METHOD)<br />

It can be expected that city lights will observably decrease after a large earthquake due to various<br />

reasons such as electricity failure, building collapses, evacuation to shelters or the suspension of<br />

commercial activities. <strong>The</strong>refore, the significant reduction in nighttime lights can be an indication of<br />

possible impacted areas due to earthquake disasters. <strong>The</strong> satellite images observed by the DMSP/OLS<br />

are suitable for the early identification of the damaged areas for following reasons:<br />

a) Due to the sensitive scanner, nighttime images are available.<br />

b) <strong>The</strong> nighttime images are observed twice a day by two DMSP satellites.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se mean that we could detect significant reduction in nighttime lights at any day on a daily basis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> DMSP/OLS imagery has spatial resolution of 2.7 km, and the resolution is not as high as that of<br />

the Landsat/TM or the SPOT. But the recurrent periods of the satellites with high-resolution sensors<br />

are more than two weeks and the chances to observe the image immediately after a disaster are very<br />

low. Consequently, the short recurrent period is necessary for emergency use of the observed imagery.<br />

<strong>The</strong> steps of damaged area estimation are shown in Figure 1. Each pixel in the visible-near infrared<br />

(VNIR) images has digital number (DN) ranging from 0 to 63. We calculated the differences of DNs<br />

on a pixel basis between before and after the earthquake in the sampled area. <strong>The</strong> cloud influences<br />

were checked using the thermal infrared (TIR) images and the stable light images. Base on the<br />

histogram of the differences, the areas that show the reduction in nighttime lights withp > 0.995 were<br />

determined as significant reduction due to the earthquake disaster (Figures 2). <strong>The</strong> result maps were<br />

disseminated to the world through the Web page of EDM. <strong>The</strong> series of the estimation method is<br />

automatically executed in the server machine of EDM.


151<br />

Number of Pixels<br />

(Frequency)<br />

Threshold (p>99 5%)<br />

Estimated<br />

damaged areas<br />

Normal distribution<br />

based on sample<br />

ixels<br />

Difference of digital numbers (change of brightness)<br />

Figure 1:<br />

estimation<br />

Flowchart of damaged area<br />

Figure 2:<br />

estimation<br />

Criteria of damaged area<br />

3. NEW ESTIMATION METHOD BASED ON TIME-SERIES IMAGES<br />

Some problems shown in the followings remain in the estimation results based on two images before<br />

and after earthquake.<br />

a) Cloud influence remains even if Stable Light Image is applied.<br />

b) Reflection of water area leads to mis-judgment<br />

c) Small cities are neglected due to the variance of the night light<br />

<strong>The</strong>se problems would be resolved, if pixel-based average and standard deviation of digital number<br />

were analyzed for several images before an earthquake and significant test were applied to post-event<br />

image. This procedure is called "Time-Series Images Method". It takes about 10 hours to complete<br />

analysis using more than 30 images. It is important to notice that the gain of the sensor estimated<br />

originally affects the results in the period that moon light is bright. So it is better to use images in<br />

about 10 days before and after new moon. As this method is operated manually now, automated<br />

system for this method should be built.<br />

4. APPLICATION OF BASIC METHOD TO THE TURKEY MARMARA EARTHQUAKE<br />

DISASTER<br />

We estimated the possible impacted areas of the 1999 Marmara <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster that occurred in<br />

northwest Turkey on August 17. <strong>The</strong> DMSP/OLS images in this region were provided from National<br />

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Geophysical Data Center (NOAA/NGDC). <strong>The</strong><br />

nighttime images before and after the earthquake are shown in Figures 3 and 4 respectively.<br />

Fortunately, the two images have little cloud influence considering the TIR images (Figures 5 and 6).<br />

<strong>The</strong> histogram of digital number differences between two VNIR images is shown in Figure 7.<br />

<strong>The</strong> estimated impacted areas spread widely in Yalova, Kocaeli and other provinces (Figure 8). <strong>The</strong>se<br />

estimation results showed with a high degree of correspondence with the real damages.


152<br />

Before EQ<br />

After EQ<br />

Figures 3 and 4: VNIR images before and after the earthquake in Turkey<br />

Before EQ<br />

After EQ<br />

Figures 5 and 6: TIR images before and after the earthquake in Turkey<br />

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Figure 7:<br />

Histogram of digital number differences between two images (log-scaled)


153<br />

Red: possible impacted areas Gray: saturated data<br />

Figure 8: Estimated damaged area in the Marmara <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster<br />

5. APPLICATION OF BOTH METHODS TO THE GUJARAT, INDIA EARTHQUAKE<br />

DISASTER<br />

We estimated the possible impacted areas of Gujarat, India <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster on January 26, 2001<br />

using basic and new method of EDES. <strong>The</strong> VNIR and TIR image on January 24 shown in Figure 9<br />

and 10 was selected as an image before the earthquake. Figure 11 and 12 shows VNIR and TIR<br />

images after the earthquake. <strong>The</strong>se images were used for basic method. <strong>The</strong> distribution of the<br />

average and standard deviation of digital number with each pixel for new method are shown in Figure<br />

13 and 14. <strong>The</strong> estimated damaged areas using basic method and new one are shown in Figure 15 and<br />

16. <strong>The</strong> estimated impacted areas spread in Gandhi Dham, Bhuj and Morbi. Some low reliability<br />

estimation areas caused by cloud, water or other reasons remain in basic method estimation image<br />

(Fig. 15), but there exist no such areas in new method estimation image (Fig. 16). Comparing these two<br />

estimation results, it is revealed that new method estimation is better than basic one.


154<br />

Before EQ<br />

After EQ<br />

Figures 9 and 10: VNIR images before and after the earthquake in India for basic method<br />

Before EQ<br />

After EQ<br />

Figures 11 and 12: TIR images before and after the earthquake in India for basic method<br />

Average<br />

Standard deviation<br />

Figures 13 and 14: Distribution of average and standard deviation acquired from time-series<br />

images for new method


155<br />

Low reliability<br />

-(water-reflection<br />

5 n) - - -„ - -'*>/ -- /- - <<br />

"V Epicenter (Mw7.7) / l-S<br />

A - a... .:._.„,] " '.UdaipuK-- _ -,<br />

Figure 15:<br />

• Estimated damaged areas<br />

• (P>99%)<br />

Estimated damaged areas<br />

(P>95%)<br />

" Saturated data<br />

_,<br />

|g Pre-event clouds<br />

Post-event clouds<br />

Keshod<br />

Mangn<br />

200 km Veraval<br />

Red, Yellow: possible impacted areas Gray: saturated data<br />

Estimated damaged area using Basic Method in the Gujarat <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster<br />

Estimated damaged areas<br />

• (P>99%)<br />

Estimated damaged areas<br />

(P>95%)<br />

a Saturated data<br />

Red, Yellow: possible impacted areas Gray: saturated data<br />

Figure 16: Estimated damaged area using New Method in the Gujarat <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster


156<br />

6. CONCLUSION<br />

We applied the proposed method of the early damaged area estimation system to two earthquake<br />

disasters. It is revealed that the basic method estimation is considerably accurate at least in case that<br />

the cloud influence is little, whereas the estimation by new method using time-series images is hard to<br />

suffer the several kind of influences and result in more reliable.<br />

<strong>The</strong> basic method system has been automated, but the new method one is manually operated. We're<br />

going to build automation system for new method within a couple of years.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

<strong>The</strong> DMSP-OLS images used in this study are provided by NOAA/NGDC. We wish to thank<br />

NOAA/NGDC and Dr. Haruhiro Fujita for the cooperation.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Hashitera, S., Maki, N., and Hayashi, H. (1999), "<strong>The</strong> Potential of Using Satellite Images to<br />

Determine an Index of Recovery from Natural Disaster: A Case Study of the Great Hanshin-Awaji<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster," Proceedings of the 6th Japan/United States Workshop on Urban <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

Hazard Reduction, pp. 492-495.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

157<br />

CCD CAMERA SYSTEM APPLICATION<br />

FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT<br />

Mitsuhiro HIGASHIDA 1 , Norio MAKI 1 and Haruo HAYASHI 2<br />

'<strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster Mitigation <strong>Research</strong> Center,<br />

National <strong>Research</strong> Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention<br />

Hyogo, JAPAN<br />

2 Disaster Reduction System <strong>Research</strong> Center,<br />

Disaster Prevention <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Kyoto <strong>University</strong><br />

Kyoto, JAPAN<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> goal of this study is to establish a numerical disaster process simulation model, which<br />

makes it possible to estimate when the recovery from disaster will complete, what factor<br />

accelerates physical recovery. This paper discusses about the following topics, as the first step<br />

of this study; 1) the method to get the time series of physical recovery degree from a series of<br />

observed images, 2) the relationship between the physical recovery degrees and behavior of<br />

impacted people.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Though seven years have passed, the reconstruction urban planning after the 1995 Kobe<br />

earthquake is still on the way. It does not means that the quickness is the first priority in the<br />

reconstruction urban planning. <strong>The</strong> upgrading not only in the physical level but also in the<br />

regional economy and the community activities level are goals of the reconstruction urban<br />

planning. However, seven years is very long time in our life.<br />

Present reconstruction urban planning shows only the drawing of complete image. Thinking<br />

that it takes long time to complete, not only designing the complete image but also designing<br />

the process is necessary. Urban planning should become to have the sense of time. It says that<br />

planner should explain what the area would become in each time phase of recovery or<br />

reconstruction process. To do so, the simulation on disaster process of a planned area is<br />

necessary. However, the urban reconstruction study from disaster has spotlighted to the<br />

counter-measures or reconstruction urban planning itself until now. Even the evaluation studies<br />

on these counter-measures are limited. So there does not exit the data sets to trace the disaster or<br />

disaster process, which is indispensable data to make simulation.<br />

We continue to study on "disaster process" or "recovery process" after natural disaster. <strong>The</strong><br />

knowledge on disaster process is constructed from the systematic knowledge on 1) variety of<br />

problems, 2) scale of problems, 3) chronological data on each problem and 4) the<br />

countermeasures to problems. <strong>The</strong> concept of disaster process will be shown in Fig.l. <strong>The</strong> data<br />

on how the impacted people behaved in each phase of disaster process has been collected by the


method of questionnaire sheet survey and interviews until now. (Hayashi et. al. 1997, Kimura et.<br />

al. 1999, 2000, Tanaka et. al. 2000)<br />

However, these data should be understood with the relation between physical environment<br />

change data such as physical damage, situation of shelters, dismantle of damaged buildings, a<br />

land use change and reconstruction of buildings. It is necessary to clarify the relationship<br />

between behavior of people and physical recovery to understand a holistic disaster process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> goal of this study is to establish the numerical disaster process simulation model, which<br />

makes it possible to estimate when recovery from disaster will complete and how we progress<br />

recovery in the most effective manors. And we will distinguish what factor accelerates physical<br />

recovery by more quantitative manner by analyzing the relationship between activities for<br />

recovery and physical recovery. To do so, long term continuous monitoring is necessary to<br />

record physical recovery. It is essential data in a natural science field. For example, continuous<br />

ground motion monitoring is very common method in seismology.<br />

How can we monitor physical recovery An aerial photograph is the best way to monitor<br />

physical environment changes of broad area and it is easy to convert into GIS data. However, it<br />

is difficult to collect continuous data of physical recovery using aerial photograph. <strong>The</strong><br />

continuous monitoring using CCD camera system is used for monitoring natural hazards such<br />

as volcanic eruption and flood. And we have established a continuous disaster process<br />

monitoring system using CCD camera system. This system can monitor not only the physical<br />

recovery but also many data on disaster process, such as damages, situation in shelters, and<br />

activities at the impacted area. <strong>The</strong> implementations of this system into a real disaster response<br />

will be discussed in anther paper.<br />

This paper discusses about following topics as the first step of this study; 1) the method to<br />

get the time series of physical recovery degree from a series of observed images, 2) the<br />

relationship between the physical recovery degrees and behavior of impacted.<br />

158<br />

Fig.l Disaster Process<br />

2. OUTLINE OF THE MONITORING SYSTEM<br />

2.1 Outline of the monitoring system<br />

We have started continuous monitoring on disaster process at impacted areas for a disaster<br />

such as Kobe-Japan, Chungliao-Taiwan and Miyake Island-Japan and collected the digital<br />

images of the disaster process of impacted areas twice a day using CCD camera system.<br />

Observation data of each day is now accumulated to data server in Japan through the Internet.<br />

And these data is distributed through the Internet at the following address:<br />

http://inpaku.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/jp/join/live/index.html. <strong>The</strong> outline of the system will be shown<br />

in Fig.2.


Modem or Router<br />

Dial-up<br />

ISP<br />

<strong>The</strong> Internet<br />

WWW Server(X)<br />

FTP Server<br />

159<br />

CCD Camera<br />

System<br />

Pnvate network<br />

FTP<br />

Internet Client<br />

Fig.2 Outline of the monitoring system using CCD camera<br />

2.2 Continuous monitoring at Nagata, Kobe<br />

Misuga-west of Nagata, Kobe was severely impacted by the 1995 Kobe earthquake of Jan. 17,<br />

1995 and the fire induced by this earthquake. <strong>The</strong> damage statistics in this area is as follows;<br />

major damage and burnout - 242 buildings, moderate damage - 34 buildings among 334<br />

buildings in this area. So severe damage (Major and Moderate) ratio amounts to 83%. <strong>The</strong> data<br />

of this area is distributed from two sets of CCD camera which were set on the roof of Mikura 5,<br />

where the "Machi-communication" that is community based organization working for<br />

community development for this area locates. This building was reconstructed after the disaster.<br />

<strong>The</strong> data collection was started from March 19, 2001. <strong>The</strong> location and the images of CCD<br />

camera system will be shown in Fig.3.<br />

,^P *el ,^<br />

++<br />

r^<br />

8^4SPy35<br />

v* &£l§^4E2i[<br />

."* Ml<br />

Hnli<br />

I | %&<br />

Ui .1* •^^<br />

CCD1<br />

"^^"^T Vifclil^ /T^TM<br />

""V^ %<br />

4^'*<br />

Fig.3 Monitoring at Nagata, Japan<br />

2.3 Continuous monitoring at Chungliao, Taiwan<br />

Chungliao, Taiwan was severely damaged by 9.21 Taiwan earthquake, 1999. <strong>The</strong> building<br />

damage at Chungliao is 2, 542 major damage buildings, 1,424 moderate damage buildings, and<br />

human death amount to 179 peoples. <strong>The</strong> cameras were set at Yunping village at Chungliao.<br />

<strong>The</strong> community based reconstruction program, which include creating small business and<br />

rediscovering the regional heritage such as the canal that has not used for many years as well as<br />

the reconstruction of buildings, was progressed in this village supervised by Prof. Yu of<br />

Chung-Yuan <strong>University</strong> in Taiwan. <strong>The</strong> temporary town including the village office, library,


kindergarten, library, and dwellings were established at the other area where these official<br />

buildings located before the disaster, because all these official buildings were collapsed for the<br />

earthquake. <strong>The</strong> reconstruction of original area where these facilities were located before the<br />

disaster is still on the way. Continuous monitoring on both temporary town and reconstruction<br />

area is conducted using five CCD camera sets. Observations were started from April 19, 2001.<br />

<strong>The</strong> location and the images of CCD camera systems will be shown in Fig.4.<br />

160<br />

CCD1 CCD2 CCD3 CCD4<br />

Fig. 4 Monitoring at Chungliao, Taiwan<br />

CCD5<br />

3. IMAGE PROCESSING<br />

3.1 Processing procedure<br />

<strong>The</strong>se images are useful to understand present status and sequential images are useful to<br />

understand a physical disaster process by intuition. However, amount of data is huge and the<br />

development of automated data processing method is necessary to get the numerical data on the<br />

physical recovery. And to make a comparative study, the standardized procedure is<br />

indispensable. <strong>The</strong> method to get the time series of the physical recovery from a series of<br />

observed images will be discussed in this chapter. We will define the amount of buildings as the<br />

physical recovery degree from disaster.<br />

<strong>The</strong> observed data contains the noises such as 1) moving objects such as cars, people, 2) the<br />

shadow of buildings from the viewpoint, and weather such as rain. So removing these noises is<br />

the first step for image processing. In this paper, the basic procedure to get physical recovery<br />

degree using observed data is discussed. On the other hand, moving objects means physical<br />

recovery. This is a very important element to understand recovery process.<br />

3.2 Removing the noises<br />

3.2.1 Removing moving objects<br />

<strong>The</strong> method to get averaged image of observed images was used to remove moving objects


from observed images Fig 5 shows the results getting averaged image of three images. It shows<br />

that the cars observed in the image of March 25 and people observed m the image of April 6 are<br />

removed in the averaged image.<br />

3.2.2 Removing shadows in observed Images<br />

<strong>The</strong>re exist shadows of many objects such as trees, cars, and buildings in observed images.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se have possibility recognized as the physical recovery during image processing <strong>The</strong><br />

observed images have been composed from three colors, red, blue, and green. Each color has its<br />

own charactenstics against shadows. <strong>The</strong> method to remove shadows using these characteristics<br />

was developed. <strong>The</strong> procedure of this process is as follows.<br />

a Observed images are recomposed to law data of red, blue, and green (Fig 5)<br />

b <strong>The</strong> value of each color is adjusted into the value that does not have effects from the<br />

sunlight<br />

R'=(R-G/R+G)xlOO (1)<br />

B'=(B-G/B+G)xlOO (2)<br />

R' value has characteristic that effects from shadows is weak And R' value is used for die<br />

following analysis.<br />

c Comparing two sets of adjusted image according to following formulation.<br />

AR'=|RO'-R1'| (3)<br />

AR': Comparison result, RO'* Base Averaged Image , Rl': Reference Averaged image<br />

d. <strong>The</strong> compared images (acquired from process of c) are classified into two values, black and<br />

white according to a threshold. Threshold value 5 is used in this analysis. Acquired image<br />

will be shown in Fig.6.<br />

3/25 10 00 4/6 10 00 4/20 10 00<br />

Averaged image of 3/25 4/6 and 20 Averaged image of 5/181 Sand 20<br />

Red Value Green Value Blue Value<br />

Fig.5 Removing Moving objects<br />

Fig.6 Shadows removed image<br />

3.3 Acquiring amount of physical recovery<br />

<strong>The</strong>re still exist many noises without physical recovery (ref. Fig6). <strong>The</strong>se noises are<br />

generated from the effect of sunlight against existing buildings and the edge of roads. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

noises are removed by the method of smoothing. <strong>The</strong> result is shown in Fig.7. And acquired<br />

results will convert to the GIS data. About the method for conversion will be discussed another<br />

paper.


162<br />

Fig.7 Amount of physical recovery<br />

4. DISASTER PROCESS AT MISUGA-WEST AT NAGATA, KOBE<br />

4.1 Physical Recovery Degree<br />

Fulfillment ratio to FLR or BLR designated by City Planning Act can be thought as the<br />

recovery degree or index at the impacted area. Misuga-Nishi is the dwelling area and<br />

designated FLR is not usually fulfilled. So BLR is used to describe the physical recovery<br />

degree.<br />

4.2 Physical disaster process<br />

Disaster process monitoring at Nagata starts from March 19, 2001 and monitoring period is<br />

limited. <strong>The</strong> physical disaster process from the beginning was supplemented using the field<br />

survey data conducted by "City Planning Institute of Japan (CPU) and Architectural Institute<br />

of Japan (ALT)" and "Machi-communication". Fig.8 shows the damage in this area (CPU and<br />

AU) and Fig.9 shows the situation at relief phase ("Machi-communication") and Fig. 10 show<br />

the present situation. <strong>The</strong> circled buildings are the buildings picked up from the image<br />

processing.<br />

Using the time series data of CCD camera and supplement data, the relation between time<br />

and recovery degree is acquired as Fig. 11.<br />

Ma, or damage<br />

Mods-ate damage 4$& ^ %.W*<br />

Slight Damage * , "«** 1 Temporary buildings<br />

No damage \J^~ I^J Survived buildings<br />

Burned out<br />

No data<br />

B d n BRI °<br />

^" Based on Mach ' Communications<br />

;ao<br />

Fig. 8 Damage (survey by CPU and AU) Fig.9 Relief Phase (Survey by Machi-com)


163<br />

Picked up building from<br />

image processing<br />

JBSj<br />

Reconstructed<br />

Based on Machi Communications<br />

Fig.10 Present Status (Survey by Machi-com)<br />

40.0%<br />

Dismantle pf voluntary temporary<br />

Reconstructioii<br />

20.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

500 1000<br />

(days)<br />

1500 2000 2500<br />

Fig.ll decision-making and physical recovery<br />

4.3 Decision making and physical recovery progress<br />

Table. 1 shows decision making on reconstruction urban planning at Misuga-west <strong>The</strong><br />

relation between decision-making and physical recovery will be shown in Fig.ll.<br />

5. COMMENTS<br />

This paper shows the basic procedure on disaster process monitoring and very first results on<br />

disaster process monitoring using CCD camera. <strong>The</strong>re are still many points to need to be<br />

improved on image processing. Future subjects are 1) improvement of reliability to convert<br />

observed images to observed values and 2) improvement of the analysis method of a physical<br />

recovery degree. However, the possibility to monitor physical disaster process was clarified.<br />

It is usually said that it takes at least ten years to complete recovery from the disaster.


Chronological GIS based datasets both on human behavior and physical recovery continue to be<br />

collected at Nishinomiya, eastern part of Kobe, which contains the data on damage, relief,<br />

recovery, and reconstruction. We plan to be established same dataset in Chungliao, Taiwan by<br />

the cooperation with researchers at Taiwan. Using these datasets, the numerical disaster process<br />

simulation model will be established in near future.<br />

164<br />

Date<br />

17-Jan-95<br />

jTjMariS<br />

_2C-Apr-95.<br />

1 -Mav-95<br />

J-Sepc95<br />

J3-Sepr95<br />

1 4-Jan-97<br />

Ji8rFeb-91<br />

LQHy1air97<br />

^7_-N°vr97<br />

_lL-Jarr98.<br />

Jan-99<br />

Apr-99<br />

Dec-99<br />

Mar-00<br />

^T-<br />

TABLE.l DECISION MAKING PROCESS<br />

Top,c<br />

0 1995 Kobe earthquake<br />

60 First Decision _qn reconstruction urban.pjanntng „__ _ __<br />

_ -96 Machizukun organi28tionjAjQS_established __ _ „ _ .„<br />

104 Inquiry sheet survey on reconstruction urbanjjlanning<br />

224 |nquiry_sheet survey __qn__reconstruction urban planning _____<br />

„ _235 .Urban planning madejpy Machizukun organisation were prppqsed to_Kobe city government _<br />

717 Practical plan '-was decided<br />

-J^JJSepJ^rdjdejqisionjsn „.<br />

_713^Qpmmittee_ numbers on_thejand readjustment was elected _ _ _<br />

_ »LQ30,Distnct P!anning_was established<br />

___<br />

1075 J-and .readjustment starts _ _ „.,_„<br />

1424 Construction of Mikura 5 starts<br />

1514 Construction of Public apartment in this area starts<br />

1 754 Complete Mikura 5<br />

1J344 Complete the public apartment _<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

About setting CCD camera, "Machi-Communications" at Kobe and Prof. Yu of Chung-Yuan<br />

<strong>University</strong> of Taiwan, Prof. Lian-Chen Chen of National Taiwan <strong>University</strong>, and Chungliao<br />

government office at Taiwan, were extremely helpful. I would like to show the special thanks to<br />

them.<br />

Reference<br />

Building <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Final report on damage from the 1995 Kobe earthquake, 1996, (in<br />

Japanese).<br />

Hayashi, H., Shigekawa, K, Producing Disaster Ethnography for the Development of Disaster<br />

Ethnology, Papers of the Annual Conference of the Institute of Social Safety Science, No.7,<br />

ISSS, Japan, 1997, pp.376-379, (in Japanese).<br />

Higashida, M., Maki, N., Hayashi, H., Development of Recovery Process Observation System<br />

using CCD camera after a disaster, Journal of Social Safety Science, No.3, ISSS, Japan, 2001,<br />

pp.95-100, (in Japanese).<br />

Kimura, R., Hayashi, H., Tatsuki, S., Urata, Y, Clarifying the human behavior of the disaster<br />

victims after the Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake, Journal of Social Safety Science, No.l, ISSS,<br />

Japan, 1999, pp.93-102, (in Japanese).<br />

Kimura, R., Hayashi, H., Tatsuki, S., Determinants and Timing of housing Reconstruction<br />

Decision by the Victims of he 1995 Hanshin Awaji <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster, Journal of Social<br />

Safety Science, No.2, ISSS, Japan, 2000, pp. 15-24, (in Japanese).<br />

MacM-Communication<br />

Tanaka, S., Hayashi, H., Shigekawa, K., Kameda, H., Development of Standardized Procedure<br />

for. Disaster Ethnography Interview, Case Comparison, Coding, and Disaster Process<br />

identification-, Journal of Social Safety Science, No.2, ISSS, Japan, 2000, pp.267-276, (in<br />

Japanese).


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

A SIMPLIFIED METHOD TO EVALUATE LIQUEFACTION<br />

OF SUBSOIL OF BUILDING<br />

Jing Liping and Wu Zhaoying<br />

Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics<br />

China seismological Bureau, Harbin<br />

Abstract<br />

In this paper, based on the simplified method proposed by Men et al and Martin's model of the<br />

pore water pressure, a new simplified method is presented to evaluate the pore water pressure in<br />

the subsoil of buildings during earthquake. According to the cone model theory the subsoil of<br />

buildings may be approximately divided into three zones, in which the seismic shear stress and<br />

additional dynamic stress can be evaluated with the use of Seed's simplified method and the<br />

cone model. <strong>The</strong>n the pore water pressures in these three zones may be approximately evaluated<br />

with the use of Martin's model <strong>The</strong> method could be directly applied to analyze the initial<br />

liquefaction potential of subsoil of building with pore pressure ratio.<br />

Key words subsoil of building, cone model, pore water pressure, seismic liquefaction<br />

Introduction<br />

As is well known up to the present soil liquefaction evaluation methods available have been set<br />

up largely for the free field without building, <strong>The</strong>se methods may be divided into four groups i.e.<br />

(1) Seed's simplified method, (2) seismic response analysis method including both total and<br />

effective stress approach, (3) empirical formulae, (4) probabilistic and statistical method. Since<br />

the 1964 Niigata <strong>Earthquake</strong> and Alaska <strong>Earthquake</strong> brought about an extensive damage of soil<br />

liquefaction, many investigators have devoted much attention to study seismic liquefaction<br />

problems and remarkable achievements have been gotten as shown in the methods of four groups<br />

cited above. When buildings are existed the pattern of liquefaction would be different from that<br />

in the free ground. However seismic liquefaction evaluations of subsoil of buildings have not yet<br />

been resolved in such a way that general and practicable methods with sufficient accuracy and<br />

plausibility can be established for the use of engineering design and analysis. This fact may be<br />

due to that (1) building subsoil are much more complicated to deal with in contrast with free<br />

field of ground since the existence of building makes a non-uniform stress field and a<br />

complicated wave propagation pattern due to soil-structure interaction and (2) a variety of<br />

influencing factors relevant to building such as size, shape, rigidity, base area, buried depth of<br />

foundation, dead and seismic loading, etc. have to be considered <strong>The</strong>re have been only limited<br />

results of study on the problem and model tests 1 " 4 , but these studies bring large time and<br />

manpower consumption and could not meet the needs of evaluating liquefaction of subsoil of<br />

building in engineering<br />

Men et al (1997) 5 have presented a new simplified method to evaluate seismic liquefaction of<br />

subsoil of buildings. <strong>The</strong>y have devised the method in such a way that it is simple to handle and<br />

has clear physical insight and sufficient engineering accuracy by taking advantage of Seed's


166<br />

simplified method for free ground site and of the cone model concept well developed by Meek<br />

and Wolf in dynamics for scattered field. <strong>The</strong>ir conclusion showed the reasonableness and<br />

tendency in good accord with results of small model tests and of finite element analyses.<br />

In this paper based on Men's simplified method and considering the nonlinear constitutive<br />

relationship of soil and Martin's model of pore water pressure, another method is suggested for<br />

evaluating pore water pressure of subsoil of building. <strong>The</strong> method is more suitable for evaluating<br />

seismic liquefaction potential of subsoil of buildings in engineering<br />

Men's simplified method for evaluation of seismic liquefaction of subsoil of building<br />

Men et al adopted following assumptions in their method proposed.<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> building is rigid as a whole.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> building is situated on the ground surface and represented only by a footing<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> soils may be regarded as elastic under dead and seismic loading condition.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> rocking component of building motion is neglected in evaluation of liquefaction<br />

potential because only shear stress is important to induce residual pore water pressure.<br />

5. A plane shearing body wave SH is propagated vertically upward from the source of<br />

earthquake.<br />

Based on the above assumptions and the substructure method to deal with the structure reaction<br />

to seismic input, Men's simplified method can be summed up as consisted of the following<br />

procedures.<br />

For given displacement, the wave field in subsoil can be written as following<br />

u~u f +u^ (1)<br />

where u^ is the free field ground motion and « 4 is the scattered field motion induced by<br />

building, and u is the total motion of subsoil of building. If the input motion from the<br />

earthquake source is u t = u ia f (t-z/c) then the free field motion of homogeneous elastic media<br />

will be<br />

(2)<br />

where / (t) is an input function, c s is a shear wave velocity, z is a vertical ordinate downward.<br />

For given stress, the dynamic stress in subsoil of building can be written as following<br />

where r^o^are the total dynamic shear stress and total normal stress in subsoil of building,<br />

respectively, T / ,a / are the dynamic stresses in free ground, T 4 ,cr, are the additional dynamic<br />

stresses due to existing building.<br />

In the simplified method proposed by Men et al, the dynamic stress in free ground can be


167<br />

evaluated by Seed's approximate method. <strong>The</strong> additional ground motion or the additional<br />

dynamic stress induced by the presence of building can be evaluated approximately with the<br />

cone model well developed by Meek and Wolf in dynamics in recent years.<br />

When the cone model is used, the shape of foundation should be equivalent to a fixed shape,<br />

such as a circular footing, square footing or a strip footing. According to the cone model theory.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two cones, one shear and another compression can confine the influence of structure.<br />

Because the apex height of the shear cone and the apex height of the compression cone are<br />

different, the total solution are divided into three zones as named as I, II and III, as shown in<br />

Figure 1.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are the additional vertical dynamic, static stresses and the additional dynamic shear<br />

stress in zone I. <strong>The</strong>re is only the additional dynamic shear stress in zone II. <strong>The</strong> stress<br />

distribution is same as of the free ground in zone III. <strong>The</strong> procedure of evaluating seismic<br />

liquefaction of subsoil of building using the simplified method proposed by Men et al as follows.<br />

1. According to the cone model theory, the subsoil of building are divided into the three zones as<br />

shown in Figure 1.<br />

Determine the free field dynamic shear stress by using<br />

Seed's simplified method.<br />

2. Determine the additional shear stress and normal<br />

stress of each zone by using the cone model.<br />

3. Determine the total dynamic stress.<br />

4. Use triaxial dynamic compression apparatus or<br />

dynamic simple shear test devise to obtain the soil<br />

liquefaction resistance r^for relevant point to be<br />

considered.<br />

5.Make a comparison between r d and 1 R for the every<br />

point to see if that soil point may liquefy, as do in<br />

Seed's simplified method.<br />

Figure l.the cone models<br />

<strong>The</strong> simplified method to evaluate the pore water pressure in subsoil<br />

It is well known that volume of dry sand is changed under shear, i.e. the so-called dilatancy<br />

under cyclic shear loading. For saturated sand this compression is gradually compensated by the<br />

elastic rebound deformation of sand skeleton enabling thus the residual pore water pressure to<br />

generated and the effective stress to decrease until ultimately the liquefaction occurs for certain<br />

loading level with sufficient number of cycles<br />

We neglect the inertial effect and the compressibility of pore water and sand grains here and then<br />

following Martin et al (1975) 6 we can write out the pore pressure increment as<br />

c s 2<br />

A£... =c,(y-c,£,,,) + ——— ( 5 )<br />

( 6 )<br />

where e dv is the volume compression due to cyclic shear, i\£ dv ,i\G w the are increment of


168<br />

volume and residual pore pressure within one load cycle, respectively. t r is the tangent rebound<br />

modulus of sand skeleton, y is the shear stain, c { ~~ c 4 are the test constants.<br />

Note that t r is relates to the effective confined pressure and can be expressed by an empirical<br />

formula, for example of the form (Martin et al 1975)<br />

E= (7)<br />

Where a v0 is the vertical effective normal stress at the beginning of unloading, a v is the<br />

residual normal stress after unloading, & 2 , m,n are the test constants, respectively.<br />

Using Massing' s model, the non-linear relationship of the shear stress and strain can be<br />

expressed as follows<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore<br />

T==(e7,)'"-- (8)<br />

a + by<br />

1—<br />

where a,b are test constants, respectively.<br />

Substituting formula (9) into formula (5), the pore water pressure can be approximately<br />

calculated with formula (4) in terms of r after Nth cyclic loading which the dynamic shear<br />

stress T can be calculated with the simplified method proposed by Men et al<br />

Evaluating seismic liquefaction potential of subsoil of building<br />

After obtaining pore water pressure, based on the initial liquefaction criterion, the estimation of<br />

liquefaction can be made with the pore pressure ratio. <strong>The</strong> pore pressure ratio is defined as a<br />

ratio of the pore pressure to the vertical confined stress. According to the cone model, the ratio of<br />

pore pressure in the three zones of subsoil is as follows, respectively<br />

Zone I R(Z,N)= - - - (10)<br />

zone nan<br />

where a£ is the pore water pressure after Nth cyclic shear loading.


169<br />

R(z,N)is reached to 1 or more, the initial liquefaction occurs.<br />

Typical example<br />

To show the basic ideal and principle of the method proposed in this paper, as a complete<br />

example, we give a concrete evaluation of liquefaction of subsoil under a strip footing with the<br />

width of 2b Q , which rest on the ground surface of an isotropic homogeneous semi-space.<br />

According to the cone model theory, Men et al gave the stress distribution of the each zone in<br />

subsoil, as follows<br />

Zone I r f =<br />

§<br />

°>-^7<br />

( 12 )<br />

w a mf<br />

a. =±- z+zA 2g<br />

Zone II ( 13 )<br />

Zone III<br />

If r — W*VJ<br />

( 14 )<br />

where i d , a are the total dynamic shear stress and total compression stress, respectively. r s ,<br />

is the additional dynamic shear stress due to existing building, w is the vertical static load<br />

undertaken by the footing, and A is the area of footing, zj, ZQ are tne a P ex ne ig nt of shear<br />

cone and compression cone ^respectively, p is the volume weight of soil, p, is the buoyancy<br />

volume weight of soil, a mdx is the peak acceleration of ground, g is the acceleration of gravity.<br />

Using the above formulas, the equivalent cyclic shear stress amplitude and the vertical<br />

compression stress of each point with arbitrary depth in each zone can be calculated respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, the equivalent cyclic shear strain can be determined in terms of nonlinear constitutive<br />

relationship (9). Finally, the pore water pressure produced under a definite cyclic shear loading<br />

value in different zones of subsoil can be evaluated.


170<br />

For an example, taking Possion ratio of soil /^=0.33, p = 20&V/m 3 , pj=10W/m 3 ,<br />

w = 100&V , b Q = 1m ,


171<br />

subsoil and combined with the nonlinear constitutive relationship of soils and Martin's model of pore water<br />

pressure, a simplified method is suggested for evaluating pore water pressure of subsoil of building This<br />

method is simple, practical, and convenient for the prediction of seismic hazards due to liquefaction potential<br />

of subsoil of ordinary building.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Y. Yoshiaki et al., (1977). Settlement of building on saturated sand during earthquake, Soil<br />

Foundation. 17 1.<br />

2. Huishan Liu et al.,(1984). Liquefaction behavior of saturated sand layer under footing,<br />

Aseismic Behavior of Base Soils and Industrial Construction, Seismology Press (in Chinese),.<br />

3. Finn and M. Yogendrakumar, (1987). Analysis of pore water pressure in seismic centrifuge<br />

tests, in Soil dyn. liquefaction, Elsevier, Amsterdam.<br />

4. R. Popescu and J. H. Prevost, (1993). Centrifuge validation of a numerical model for dynamic<br />

soil liquefaction, SDEE, pp. 73-90.<br />

5 Fu-Lu MEN and lie Cui, (1997). Influence of building existence on seismic liquefaction of<br />

subsoils, EESD, Vol 26, 691-699.<br />

6. Martm,G.R.et al, (1975). Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading. J.Geot. Eng.<br />

Dw.,ASCE, 101(5).


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

A GENERAL APPROACH TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE<br />

ASSESSMENT<br />

H. Krawinkler 1<br />

'Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, Stanford <strong>University</strong><br />

Stanford, CA 94305-4020, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Performance-based earthquake engineering implies design, evaluation, and construction of engineered<br />

structures whose seismic performance meets the diverse economic and safety needs of owners and<br />

society. As the First major step towards an integrated design/assessment approach, the Pacific<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (PEER) Center has focused on the development of procedures,<br />

knowledge, and tools for a comprehensive seismic performance assessment of buildings and bridges.<br />

This paper focuses on the general performance assessment methodology developed by PEER<br />

researchers for buildings. <strong>The</strong> approach is aimed at improving decision-making about seismic risk by<br />

making the choice of performance goals, and the tradeoffs they entail, apparent and transparent. In the<br />

approach, decision variables are identified whose quantification, together with an assessment of<br />

important uncertainties, will make it feasible to characterize and manage economic and societal risks<br />

above and beyond potential loss of life and injuries.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> following paragraph was written at a time when the value, practicality, and direction of<br />

performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) was a matter of much debate in professional and<br />

academic organizations (Krawinkler, 1997):<br />

"Performance-based seismic engineering is a noble concept. Its implementation, however, has a long<br />

way to go. <strong>The</strong>re are legal and professional barriers, but there are also many questions whether it will<br />

be able to deliver its promises. It appears to promise engineered structures whose performance can be<br />

quantified and conforms to the owner's desires. If rigorously held to this promise, performance-based<br />

engineering will be a losing cause. We all know that we cannot predict all important seismic demands<br />

and capacities with confidence, even in a probabilistic format. <strong>The</strong>re are, nevertheless, compelling<br />

reasons to advocate performance-based engineering as a critical area for research and implementation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of seismic engineering should be to design and build better and more economical<br />

facilities. Both terms, "better" and "more economical", are relative to the status quo. In the writer's<br />

opinion, significant improvements beyond the status quo will not be achieved without a new and<br />

idealistic target to shoot for. We need to set this target high and strive to come close to its<br />

accomplishment. We may never fully reach it, but we will make significant progress if we have a well


174<br />

defined target. Performance-based seismic engineering is the best target available, and we need to<br />

focus on it."<br />

Now, five years later, the idealistic target has moved closer to reality. We still have a long way to go,<br />

but we hope to have laid the groundwork, established a framework, and provided basic tools that make<br />

PBEE realizable and an attractive alternative to conventional analysis and design. In particular,<br />

significant progress has been made in establishing performance metrics and developing procedures for<br />

a rigorous performance assessment that combine seismological, engineering, financial (e.g., $ losses)<br />

and societal (e.g., life safety) considerations. This paper tries to summarize the approach developed by<br />

PEER researchers for this purpose.<br />

One concern needs to be expressed, and one notion needs to be dispelled, up front. <strong>The</strong> concern is that<br />

the proposed approach relies heavily on the availability of seismological, engineering, and financial<br />

data (e.g., construction costs after an earthquake). Much of the needed data is of questionable<br />

reliability at this time. This is not a drawback of the approach, but points out an urgent need for data<br />

acquisition and modeling. <strong>The</strong> notion to be dispelled is that the future will consist of complex<br />

probabilistic approaches in routine structural design. This should be an option at the discretion of the<br />

engineer or owner, but should not be necessary for routine designs. <strong>The</strong> main objectives of the<br />

development is to<br />

• Facilitate decision making on cost-effective risk management of the built environment in areas<br />

of high seismicity<br />

• Facilitate the implementation of performance-based design and evaluation by the engineering<br />

profession, and<br />

• Provide a foundation on which code writing bodies can base the development of performancebased<br />

provisions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> latter should result in relatively simple but more transparent and risk consistent provisions than are<br />

contained in present codes and standards.<br />

COMPONENTS OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT APPROACH<br />

This paper is concerned with performance assessment of buildings. <strong>The</strong> assumption is that all relevant<br />

building systems, i.e., the soil/foundation/structure system as well as the nonstructural and content<br />

systems, are given. <strong>The</strong> components of the performance assessment approach are summarized here (in<br />

part from Cornell and Krawinkler, 2000) and illustrated in Fig. 1, and are elaborated on in later<br />

sections.<br />

By definition, PBEE is based on achieving desired performance targets. <strong>The</strong> latter are of concern to<br />

society as a whole or to specific groups or individual owners. Performance targets are of the type<br />

expressed in the first column of Fig. 1. <strong>The</strong> metrics of specific interest in the PEER research are life<br />

safety, dollar losses, and downtime (or loss of function), and it is postulated that a performance target<br />

can be expressed in terms of a quantifiable entity and, for instance, its annual probability of<br />

exceedance. <strong>The</strong> quantifiable entities on which performance assessment is based, are referred to as<br />

Decision Variables, DVs. For instance, X s (y), the mean annual frequency 1 (MAP) of the loss<br />

exceeding y dollars, could be the basis for a performance target. Alternatively, a performance target<br />

could be that the expected annual loss should be less than x dollars. In the assessment methodology<br />

1 <strong>The</strong> MAP is approximately equal to the annual probability for the small values of interest here.


175<br />

the key issue is to identify and quantify, with due consideration to all important uncertainties, decision<br />

variables of primary interest to the decision makers. Examples of DVs of interest are number of<br />

casualties, $ losses, and length of downtime, see second column of Fig. 1.<br />

Perform.<br />

Targets<br />

•Collapse &<br />

Life safety<br />

P f


176<br />

(probability of being in or exceeding a specific damage state, given a value of EDP). <strong>The</strong> DMs include,<br />

for example, descriptions of necessary repairs to structural or nonstructural components. If the<br />

fragility functions for all relevant damage states of all relevant components are known, the DVs of<br />

interest can be evaluated either directly or by means of cost functions that relate the damage states to<br />

repair/replacement costs. <strong>The</strong> result of this last operation is G(DV\DM), the conditional probability<br />

that DV exceeds a specified value, given a particular value of DM.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se steps, which form the basis of performance assessment, can be expressed in the following<br />

equation for a desired realization of the DV, such as the MAP of the DV, A(D V), m accordance with the<br />

total probability theorem:<br />

This equation, which often is referred to as the framework equation for performance assessment,<br />

suggests a generic structure for coordinating, combining and assessing the many considerations<br />

implicit in performance-based seismic assessment. Inspection of Eq. (1) reveals that it "de-constructs"<br />

the assessment problem into the four basic elements of hazard analysis, demand prediction, modeling<br />

of damage states, and failure or loss estimation, by introduction of the three "intermediate variables",<br />

DM, EDP, and IM. <strong>The</strong>n it re-couples the elements via integration over all levels of the selected<br />

intermediate variables. This integration implies that in principle one must assess the conditional<br />

probabilities G(EDM\IM), G(DM\EDP) and G(DV\DM) parametrically over a suitable range of DM,<br />

EDP, and IM levels.<br />

In the form written, the assumption is that appropriate intermittent variables (DMs and EDPs) are<br />

chosen such the conditioning information need not be "carried forward" (e.g., given EDP, the DMs<br />

(and DVs) are conditionally independent of /M, otherwise IM should appear after the EDP in the first<br />

factor.) So, for example, the EDPs should be selected so that the DMs (and DVs) do not also vary with<br />

intensity, once the EDP is specified. Similarly one should chose the intensity measures (IM) so that,<br />

once it is given, the dynamic response (EDP) is not also further influenced by, say, magnitude or<br />

distance (which have already been integrated into the determination of A(7MJ). This condition can<br />

make selection of records a challenge.<br />

Equation 1 may take on various forms, depending on the purpose and the decision variable of interest.<br />

For instance, Miranda and Aslani (2002) use the following form to compute the expected annual loss<br />

for component;, £"[£,], if the damage to the component can be expressed by m damage states:<br />

] = £ J £[L y | DM = dm,] P(DM = dm, \ EDP J = edp) P(EDP J > edp \ IM = im) dv(1M \E DPd m<br />

dIM<br />

(D<br />

<strong>The</strong> expected loss for the building is then computed as the sum of the expected damages for the<br />

individual components. Clearly, expected losses do not provide a comprehensive probabilistic<br />

performance assessment, and the assumption that component losses can be computed independently<br />

and then summed over all components is a simplification, but Miranda's approach is the first<br />

comprehensive implementation of the framework equation and constitutes a significant step forward in<br />

performance assessment.


177<br />

SPECIFIC ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT<br />

Each step summarized in the previous section has many issues that need much discussion and further<br />

research. <strong>The</strong> following sections address a few of these issues and point out some of the challenges<br />

that have to be confronted in order to permit a consistent implementation of the framework equation.<br />

Because of space limitations, only a few specific issues concerned with IMs and EDPs are addressed.<br />

Intensity Measures, IM<br />

Intensity measures are quantities that describe the magnitude (M) and distance (R) dependence (other<br />

parameters such as fault mechanism also could be considered) of ground motions characteristics that<br />

significantly affect the upstream variables of the performance assessment approach. In the context of<br />

Eq. (1), this implies evaluation of the MAP of IMs through seismic hazard analysis. Of course,<br />

simplicity favors scalar measures, and in particular, measures for which hazard analysis results are<br />

available. Choosing, for example, PGA for the IM may be initially appealing, but it implies that the<br />

distribution G(EDP\IM) may have a very broad variability. This in turn means that it will require a<br />

large sample of records and nonlinear analyses to estimate G(EDP\IM) with sufficient confidence. A<br />

well selected spectral ordinate (e.g., S a at the fundamental period T ; ) is an improvement over PGA and<br />

has been the popular choice in the recent past. It is a matter of debate whether S a (Tj) is indeed the<br />

"best" choice ("best" implies a balance between simplicity and accuracy).<br />

S a (Tj") does not account for the frequency content at T y T 17 which dominates higher mode effects (T <<br />

Tj) and period elongation effects for inelastic systems (T > T t ). Again, this may lead to G(EDP\IM)<br />

distributions with a very broad variability. This is illustrated in Fig. 2, which shows normalized<br />

incremental dynamic analyses (IDAs), together with statistical values, for a 6-story frame structure<br />

subjected to 40 ground motions that are scaled so that the S a at the fundamental period (T, = 0.6 sec.) is<br />

the same. Scaling records to a common S a at T, (which is implied by using S a (T|) as the IM) results in<br />

a median spectrum that resembles a typical spectrum for ordinary ground motions, but results in large<br />

variability in spectral ordinates at periods even very close to T,, see Fig. 3.<br />

NORMALIZED MAXIMUM STORY DRIFT<br />

N-6, T,=0 6, £=0 05, Peak-oriented model 9=0.010, BH, K,,S,, LMSR-N<br />

ELASTIC STRENGTH DEMAND SPECTRA<br />

Scaled Records (T=OJ s), LMSR, § = 0.05<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Norm. Max. Story Drift Over Height, 9ull)l)


178<br />

start to dominate the hazard at long return period hazards. Several efforts are in progress to find<br />

improved IMs, ranging from the use of combinations of spectral values at modal periods (Luco and<br />

Cornell, 2001) to the use of vectors that incorporate near-fault parameters such as a an equivalent pulse<br />

period.<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Demand Parameters, EDPs<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> demand parameters are the product of response prediction, most appropriately from<br />

inelastic dynamic analysis that considers the soil-foundation-structure system resting on top of bedrock.<br />

<strong>The</strong> challenge of formulating complete system models, which should incorporate modeling<br />

uncertainties and should account for all important uncertainties inherent in geotechnical and structural<br />

material, component, and system properties, will remain a challenge for many years to come.<br />

Relevant EDPs depend on the performance target and the type of system of interest. <strong>The</strong>y include<br />

story drifts, component inelastic deformations, floor accelerations and velocities, but also cumulative<br />

damage terms such as hysteretic energy dissipation. Once identified, they can be computed from<br />

different procedures such as the by now widely employed incremental dynamic analysis (IDA)<br />

procedure. In this procedure, the soil-foundation-structure system is subjected to a ground motion<br />

whose intensity is incremented after each inelastic dynamic analysis. <strong>The</strong> result is a curve that shows<br />

the EDP plotted against the M used to control the increment of the ground motion. IDAs can be<br />

earned out for a sufficiently large number of ground motions to perform statistical evaluation of the<br />

results. This implies that for a given value of IM, the median value and a measure of dispersion (e.g.<br />

84 th percentile) of the response EDP values are evaluated, with results as shown in the right part of Fig.<br />

4. This provides the information for dG(EDP\IM) of Eq. (1).<br />

For use in Eq. (1), dG(EDP\IM) must be evaluated for the full range of 1M that contributes<br />

significantly to the final value of DV. <strong>The</strong> IDA, however, has a limited range of applicability because<br />

the ground motion frequency characteristics change with magnitude, particularly for long return period<br />

events that may be dominated by near-fault ground motions. Thus, caution must be exercised in<br />

defining the range of applicability of an IDA and the associated values of dG(EDP\IM).<br />

Presuming that the IDA curves and their statistics are valid for the full range of interest, the<br />

information shown in Fig. 4 can be used to develop a hazard curve for the EDP, using the equation<br />

*£OP 00 = P[^DP > y \ IM = x] | dX m (x) | (3)<br />

This hazard curve can be obtained from numerical integration of results of the type shown in Fig. 4, or<br />

through a formulation described in Luco and Cornell (1998), which results in the following expression<br />

for the mean annual frequency of EDP exceeding a value y:<br />

X EDP (y) = P(EDP > y} = k t ylar k exp-^£DP|(M (4)<br />

This equation holds if the IM hazard can be described by the widely used equation<br />

l ai (x) = P[lM> X ] = k e x' k (5)<br />

and the following relationship can be fit locally (around the return period of primary interest) to the<br />

median EDP - IM data:


179<br />

= a(lM) b<br />

(6)<br />

A typical result of an EDP hazard curve is shown in Figure 5.<br />

' * Incremental Dynamic Analysis<br />

AVERAGE DRIFT HAZARD CURVE-T^l.8 sec.<br />

N=9, ysfl 10, §=0 05, Peak oriented model, 6*0 060, BH. K,, Si, LMSR<br />

1 •<br />

J# ft fl1 •<br />

V<br />

\ | — Hazard Curve Obtained from Numerical Integration<br />

1 N xJ _i_ '<br />

f<br />

EDP (e.g., max. interstory dnft)<br />

Figure 4. Incremental Analyses and <strong>The</strong>ir Use in<br />

Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis<br />

A nnrvi •<br />

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 O.I<br />

Average of Maximum Story Drifts, 9<br />

Figure 5. Example of a Hazard Curve for<br />

an <strong>Engineering</strong> Demand Parameter<br />

A special problem arises when the limit state of collapse is of interest. Collapse is caused by<br />

detenoration in strength, and for this reason response prediction has to resort to the use of deteriorating<br />

systems. Models for such systems are available, see Fig 6 (Ibarra et al., 2002). <strong>The</strong> effect of<br />

detenoration on the seismic response is illustrated in Fig. 7, which shows IDA curves for a 9-story<br />

frame without and with deterioration. <strong>The</strong> implication of the IDA turning horizontal is that an<br />

infinitesimal increase in ground motion intensity causes a very large increase in the maximum story<br />

drift. This implies dynamic instability (global collapse), which cannot be evaluated by means of<br />

nondeterioratmg systems.<br />

Pinching Hysteretic Model, Hahl-Column 1,P-A=0,<br />

a=Q.10,ac,p=-024,ic=fl.5,Yit=100,Y,=50,Y«=30,YB=40,5c=2.35y<br />

MAX. STORY DUCTILITY vs. NORM. STRENGTH<br />

N=», T,=0.9, §=O.OS, K,, S,, BH, 9=0.015, Peak-Oriented Model. LP89svl<br />

s 10 is<br />

Maximum Story Ductility Over the Height, fi^,.<br />

Figure 6. Comparison Between Exp. Results and<br />

Analytical Predictions for a Deteriorating System<br />

Figure 7. IDA for a MDOF Structure Without<br />

and With Deteriorating Elements<br />

<strong>The</strong> use of deteriorating systems permits a direct evaluation of the probability of collapse in<br />

accordance with Eq. (1), without the help of an intermittent DM, Collapse statistics can be performed<br />

on the last point of the ID As, see Fig. 8, which provides statistical information in terms of a suitable<br />

intensity measure. In Fig. 8, S a (Tj) is used as the IM (j is the base shear coefficient V/W).<br />

Alternatively, collapse fragility curves of the type shown in Fig. 9 can be developed, which permits an<br />

evaluation of the probability of collapse for different deterioration properties (Ibarra et al., 2002).


180<br />

MAX STORY DUCTILITY vs NORM. STRENGTH<br />

Ns9,T>0.9,5=0 05, KI, S,, BH, 9aO 015, Peak-Oriented Model,<br />

tt,=0 05,5^5,*4, ae= 0 10. y.aS Yc»8 . rk=8 , Y.=» , A.=0, LMSR<br />

(Sj/Tl vs PROBABILITY OF COLLAPSE, 1=0.5 s<br />

Peak Oriented Model, LMSR-N, £=5%, P-A='0.1N'<br />

o,=0.05, oc^Var, 5,y6y=Var, Ys.c^=Var<br />

I «1<br />

/ — Ywjyr'SO, 5^=4, Oe.-0.30<br />

YIAM* 100, 5^=4, a^-O.lG<br />

/ __ Y.tM-Inf, 5^=6, a^-0.10<br />

10 20 30<br />

Maximum Story Ductility Over the Height, li5JB«,<br />

Figure 8. ID As for a Deteriorating System and<br />

Collapse Statistics<br />

Figure 9. Collapse Fragility Curves for Systems<br />

with Various Deterioration Properties; T = 0.5 sec.<br />

For performance targets associated with monetary losses and downtime, the need exists (at least at this<br />

time) to use DMs as intermittent variables m order to close the loop from EDPs to DVs. <strong>The</strong> paper by<br />

Miranda and Aslani (2002) discusses the use of DMs in the context of loss estimation. This paper, and<br />

many others that cannot be quoted because of space constraints, provide an overview of the status quo<br />

of the research effort on performance-based earthquake engineering carried out by the PEER Center.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> work summarized in this paper is part of a multi-year research effort on seismic performance<br />

assessment. Many individuals have contributed to this research, which is a multi-institutional and<br />

multi-disciplinary effort directed and sponsored by the Pacific <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

(PEER) Center. Funding for the Center is provided by the National Science Foundation, by various<br />

agencies of the State of California, and by industry. This support is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Cornell, A. and Krawinkler, H. (2000). Progress and Challenges in Seismic Performance Assessment.<br />

PEER News, April 2000.<br />

Ibarra, L, Medina, R., and Krawinkler, H. (2002). Collapse assessment of deteriorating SDOF<br />

systems. Proceedings of the 12 th European Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, London.<br />

Krawinkler, H. (1997). <strong>Research</strong> issues in performance based seismic engineering. Seismic Design<br />

Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Fajfar, P., and Krawinkler, H., Editors, Balkema,<br />

Rotterdam, 47-58.<br />

Krawinkler, H., Medina, R., and Alavi, B. (2003). Seismic drift and ductility demands and their<br />

dependence on ground motions. Accepted for publication in the Journal of <strong>Engineering</strong> Structures.<br />

Luco, N. and Cornell, C.A. (2002). Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and<br />

ordinary earthquake ground motions. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> & Structural Dynamics.<br />

Miranda, E. And Aslani, H. (2002). Probabilistic estimation of building response for loss estimation.<br />

Proceedings, ICANCEER 2002.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

THE REAL-TIME EARTHQUAKE INFORMATION SYSTEM<br />

IN THE NORTHERN KYUSHU, JAPAN WITH A SMALL<br />

SCALE GEOINFORMATION DATABASE FOR SEISMIC<br />

INTENSITY ESTIMATION<br />

Hidemori Narahashi<br />

Assoc. Professor<br />

Department of Architecture<br />

Kyushu Sangyo <strong>University</strong>, Japan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> system to estimate seismic intensity distribution quickly after earthquakes has been<br />

developed since 1999, regarding to a local densely populated area of 20x20 square miles in<br />

the northern Kyushu, Japan. It is called KSU Real Time <strong>Earthquake</strong> Information System. <strong>The</strong><br />

system consists of two subsystems, those are the seismic observation and data acquisition<br />

subsystem and seismic intensity estimation subsystem. In this paper the performance and<br />

goals of the system are outlined and matters to be improved are discussed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two properly oriented observation stations and the eight K-NET stations are deployed in<br />

the area to observe three components ground acceleration for twenty-four hours. Soon after<br />

two or more stations will have been triggered with an event the center collects data from the<br />

other stations via public telephone line. It takes about forty minutes to receive a data set from<br />

all of the stations. Since April 2002 additional seismic intensity data at the 108 stations of<br />

Fukuoka Prefecture are transferred very promptly via ISDN telephone line to the data<br />

acquisition subsystem.<br />

After the data acquisition subsystem receives a data set from the ten ground motion<br />

observation stations it is about fifteen minutes until the latter subsystem estimates earthquake<br />

ground motion for more than ten thousands of blocks of 250x250 square meters in the area.<br />

<strong>The</strong> topography of each block is assigned on the GIS database of this subsystem in order to<br />

estimate JMA seismic intensity based on the data from triggered observation stations.<br />

Eventually the system gives 16 times as dense seismic intensity estimation results than the<br />

DIS system of the National Land Agency, Japan.<br />

<strong>The</strong> system is characterized as an earthquake information system for the local governments of<br />

the area. <strong>The</strong> procedures for interpolating the base rock motion from not too many ground<br />

surface data, as well as the procedure for evaluating ground motion amplification effect with<br />

the surface topography, should be improved for practical use. In addition, the third subsystem<br />

should be prepared to open the simulated results for local governments and the community of<br />

<strong>The</strong> area.


Proceedings of the International Conference on \ 33<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF VIRTUAL EMERGENCY<br />

RESPONSE NETWORK AND APPLICATION<br />

Sunao Nishimura<br />

AJBS Consulting, EQE Japan Division<br />

Tokyo, Japan<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In a catastrophe earthquake, individuals, companies and organizations are required to respond to<br />

protect themselves and minimize following risks, because full public assistance is not expected due to<br />

simultaneous accidents in everywhere in impacted areas, and communication problems.<br />

Various types of emergency information management platforms and systems have been developed with<br />

enhanced information technology these days. Most of those products, however, works independently<br />

apart from practical use, and enough attention is not paid to the integration of different functions with<br />

proper assumptions on what is likely to occur and how personnel need to respond to varying situations.<br />

We have developed an integrated emergency information management program for a complex area, the<br />

Hammi Island Triton Square (HITS), in Tokyo, to protect facilities, employees, visitors and tenants'<br />

businesses. <strong>The</strong> program includes a networked information system called Virtual Emergency<br />

Response Network (VERN) and emergency response planning for optimized response organization.<br />

<strong>The</strong> system attempts to encompass wide-ranging emergency information from earthquake intensity and<br />

prompt damage assessment on/around the site, through response and recovery information<br />

indispensable for proper decision-making procedure during a disaster. This paper describes concept<br />

of the network and actual application to the HITS complex.<br />

VIRTUAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK: VERN<br />

In order to make a community more self-sufficient during an earthquake disaster by expediting the<br />

collection and processing of emergency information and providing it real-time and under various<br />

formats to emergency managers, tenants, shoppers, visitors and employees, we developed a concept of<br />

VERN which is defined as a virtual network where information gathers and responders discuss<br />

situations to initiate prompt response operations. On this network, authorized responders<br />

communicate and make decisions based on information that is placed by responders or that is<br />

estimated and recommended by the system. Figure 1 shows overall structure of information which is<br />

treated on the network, and associated response expected to be determined based on the information.


184<br />

Estimated Damage<br />

Information<br />

Decision Support<br />

Information<br />

EQ Info^<br />

Provider**<br />

Shaking Intensity<br />

Distribution<br />

(PGV PGA)<br />

Initial<br />

Response<br />

Figure 1. VERN Emergency Information Structure<br />

VERN consists of four elements to cover four different types of information management: 1)<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Monitoring System, 2) Early Post <strong>Earthquake</strong> Damage Estimation Tool, 3) Emergency<br />

Information System, and 4) Decision Tree. Functions of these components are described as follows:<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Monitoring System:<br />

Monitors earthquake occurrence information released by observing agents such as Japan<br />

Meteorological Agency (JMA), and calculates ground motion distribution. <strong>The</strong> information includes<br />

epicentral information and shaking intensity recorded at local sensors. <strong>The</strong> VERN system directly<br />

connected to JMA catch the information within 10-30 minutes and suggests initial response level<br />

associated with severity of earthquake at site.<br />

Early Post <strong>Earthquake</strong> Damage Assessment Tool: EPEDAT.<br />

Triggered by input from the <strong>Earthquake</strong> Monitoring System, initiates damage estimation calculation<br />

automatically, and place results into database. This system is known as EPEDAT which is originally<br />

developed for the state of California by EQE.<br />

Emergency Information System:<br />

All information related with status (actual damage), and emergency staffing and operations is entered<br />

through forms, and reports are generated by functions of sections of emergency organization.<br />

Emergency response staffs are able to obtain necessary information as well as to input.


185<br />

Decision Making Support Tool'<br />

Upon reception of emergency information created and stored by above system, the Decision Making<br />

Support Tool suggests appropnate response to emergency response organization. Judgment criteria<br />

are determined based on specific situations that govern following actions.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se components are then integrated on a unified platform so that consistent information traffic,<br />

which is expected to help responders to manage various situations efficiently, is generated and<br />

controlled. It is very important to retain functional interface between "information" and actual<br />

"response". Figure 2 shows general flowchart of disaster management during/after an earthquake.<br />

Efficient response activities should be based on appropnate information, and VERN is a virtual space<br />

that creates communication platform.<br />

INTERACTION<br />

Figure 2. General Response Operation Flowchart<br />

APPLICATION TO HITS RESPONSE ORGANIZTION<br />

VERN concept has been applied to a complex called Harumi Island Tnton Square (HITS). <strong>The</strong> HITS<br />

is a complex facility built under the urban redevelopment plan by Tokyo Metropolitan Government.<br />

<strong>The</strong> facility contains high-rise residential apartments, commercial shopping area, concert hall, and<br />

office buildings including 3 33-40 stones high-rise buildings. <strong>The</strong> total area of the site is<br />

approximately 84,000m 2 . It is estimated that daytime population of all business tenants is 18,000 to<br />

19,000, and a number of visitors and shoppers visit this facility. <strong>Earthquake</strong> disaster management


186<br />

program was introduced to business and commercial district in order to secure life safety and minimize<br />

impacts to building properties and businesses. Residential district is excluded in this program.<br />

1 Central Emergency Operation Center (CEOC) and 5 sub Emergency Operation Centers (EOC) are<br />

assigned to major building units, and VERN system was networked for responders to establish local<br />

communication within the HITS site (see Figure 3). CEOC is in charge of building-to-building<br />

coordination to support activities, as well as manage common spaces. All information, including<br />

earthquake shaking intensity and epicenter sent from JMA and on-site building floor response records,<br />

are stored in a server at CEOC, and shared as appropriate. Authorized responders of HITS<br />

Emergency Organization initiates response operation, update status information, and implement<br />

response activities under HITS Emergency Response Plan. Critical decisions in regard with<br />

operation priority, objectives, and staff allocation are discussed and determined utilizing the network.<br />

VERN<br />

Floor<br />

Response<br />

Office<br />

Tower Y<br />

Central<br />

Emergency<br />

Operation<br />

Center<br />

Figure 3. VERN Network Applied for HITS<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

VERN could show a clue to establish a uniform emergency response mechanism and organization to<br />

minimize complexity of information, and to maximize self-sufficiency capability. This concept can<br />

be applied to various size of disaster management community which would have existing systems to<br />

integrate on a common platform. <strong>The</strong> key to fully utilize this system is to structure operational<br />

response scenarios per types and requirement of community and facilities, and decision-making<br />

support tool, as a cornerstone, is expected to help expedite efficient activities by upgrading the level of<br />

its density and detail.


Proceedings of the International Conference on -, 07<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

STRONG MOTION DATABASE AND ANALYSIS METHOD IN<br />

MAINLAND CHINA<br />

Haiying YU<br />

(Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, China Seismological Bureau,<br />

Phone:4-86-45l-6652604,Fax:-h86-451-6664755, Email:yhy6670420@mail.china.com)<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Strong motion records in China have been analyzed and processed using routine processing<br />

methods and edited by uniform format. Strong motion database and a set of computer software<br />

used for routine processing of strong motion records have been established, and 3255<br />

accelerograms obtained during 1968-2001 have been collected in the database. Based on the<br />

analysis of low frequency errors in acceelerograms recorded by digital accelerographs, a<br />

correction method is proposed. <strong>The</strong> results show that the method can be used for data processing<br />

of accelerograms of a variety of digital strong motion accelerographs, and it is possible to<br />

acquire the reliable long-period information of strong ground motion up to about 10 seconds.<br />

Finally, <strong>The</strong> accelerograms obtained in SMART-1 array of Taiwan are processed and the<br />

features of long-period response spectra are analyzed.<br />

Keywords: strong motion database, low frequency error correction, long period response spectra<br />

1. STRONG MOTION DATABASE IN MAINLAND CHINA<br />

<strong>The</strong> first experimental strong motion observation station in Mainland China was established at<br />

the Xinfengjiang reservoir dam by IEM in 1962. Up to 2000, 283 strong motion stations or<br />

arrays with 366 accelerographs have been deployed in the main seismic areas of Mainland China.<br />

After 1966 Xingtai <strong>Earthquake</strong>, IEM deployed some mobile strong motion stations. Since then,<br />

mobile strong motion observations are executed 71 times with 335 accelerographs in Mainland<br />

China. 3255 valuable accelerograms have been accumulated in China during 1968-2001, in<br />

which, 206 accelerograms with the peak value larger than 100 gal, 59 accelerograms larger than<br />

200 gal (Figure 1); the maximum horizontal peak ground acceleration is 541.7 gal, and the


188<br />

maximum vertical peak ground acceleration is 528.2 gal <strong>The</strong> major strong motion records are<br />

listed in Table 1.<br />

TABLE 1<br />

THE MAJOR STRONG MOTION ACCELEROGRAMS IN MAINLAND CHINA<br />

No.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

(Array)Name<br />

Tangshan<br />

Tangshan<br />

Arrays<br />

Guye<br />

Zhangbei<br />

Haicheng<br />

Tonghai<br />

Lonsling<br />

Gengma<br />

Wuding<br />

Lijiang<br />

Yaoan<br />

Shidian<br />

YongSeng<br />

Wuqia<br />

Wushi<br />

Wusu<br />

Atushi<br />

Jiashi<br />

Songping<br />

ZhangYe<br />

Sunan<br />

JiayuGuan<br />

Linze<br />

Gonghe<br />

Datong<br />

Huangbizhua<br />

ng Reservoir<br />

Arrays<br />

Xinfengjiang<br />

Reservoir<br />

Arrays<br />

Guanting<br />

Reservoir<br />

Arrays<br />

Douhe<br />

Reservoir<br />

Arrays<br />

Longyangxia<br />

Reservoir<br />

Date of <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

76.7.28—76.11.15<br />

82.7—84.12<br />

95.10.6<br />

98.1.10<br />

76.2.8—76.2.28<br />

70.1.14—70.9.4<br />

76.6.5—76.6.29<br />

88.11.6—88.12.6<br />

95.10.25—95.10.27<br />

95 1.31—96.2.9<br />

00.1.15—00.1.31<br />

014.10—01.5.19<br />

01.10.27<br />

85.8.28—85.9.20<br />

87.1.24—90.10.25<br />

95.5.2—96.3.22<br />

95.5.2—96.3.22<br />

96.3.19—98.8.27<br />

76.8.16—76.9.2<br />

87.9.12<br />

88.11.22—88.12.26<br />

92.1.12<br />

87.10.25—88.12.26<br />

94.2.16—94.9.24<br />

89.10.18<br />

68.7.25—74.6.6<br />

68.10.21—78.9.2<br />

94.12.23<br />

79.8.25—80.4.16<br />

90.4.26—94.10.10<br />

Magnitude<br />

3.5—7.8<br />

2.3—5.7<br />

5.9<br />

6.4<br />

3.0—5.4<br />

2.6—5.7<br />

2.3—6.2<br />

2.6—7.6<br />

4.1—5.3<br />

7.0<br />

2.7—6.5<br />

1.5—5.9<br />

4.1—6.0<br />

3.0—6.3<br />

1.9—6.4<br />

3.3—6.9<br />

3.3—6.9<br />

3.6—6.9<br />

4.2—7.2<br />

4.5<br />

2.7—5.7<br />

5.9<br />

5.0—5.1<br />

5.2—5.6<br />

5.7<br />

2.4—5.2<br />

2.6—5.3<br />

3.8<br />

3.6—4.0<br />

1.9—6.9<br />

Numbers of<br />

Event<br />

38<br />

52<br />

1<br />

1<br />

24<br />

11<br />

11<br />

92<br />

10<br />

13<br />

9<br />

41<br />

2<br />

18<br />

23<br />

7<br />

7<br />

14<br />

9<br />

1<br />

5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

6<br />

24<br />

1<br />

3<br />

3<br />

Numbers of<br />

Accelerograms<br />

267<br />

555<br />

24<br />

3<br />

366<br />

87<br />

87<br />

406<br />

24<br />

54<br />

38<br />

132<br />

6<br />

52<br />

55<br />

24<br />

24<br />

420<br />

36<br />

3<br />

33<br />

6<br />

6<br />

8<br />

20<br />

70<br />

345<br />

10<br />

25<br />

50


189<br />

31<br />

Array<br />

Liujiaxia<br />

Reservoir<br />

Arrays<br />

Total<br />

95.7.22<br />

68.7.25—01.10.27<br />

5.8<br />

1.5—7.8<br />

1<br />

434<br />

19<br />

3255<br />

In Mainland China, Strong motion database have been established by leading of Professor Li-Li<br />

XIE from 1980' s. In the past many years, more than 3000 strong motion records of Mainland<br />

China have been collected in the database. <strong>The</strong> above strong motion records have been processed<br />

using routine methods by IEM. Strong Motion Data Processing Center (Figure 2) established in<br />

IEM takes the responsibility for the processing and publication of the strong motion data<br />

obtained by the various units of China Seismological Bureau. <strong>The</strong> computer management system<br />

for strong motion database has been established, and the service for strong motion data on<br />

Internet will soon be brought about. Besides, through data exchange, more and more external<br />

strong motion records have been collected.<br />

Figure 1: Statistics of accelerograms<br />

Figure2: Strong motion data processing center in IEM<br />

In near future, the strong motion data of Mainland China will be displayed on web site. Figure 3<br />

and 4 is strong motion database web site system and home page respectively in IEM. <strong>The</strong> home<br />

page includes: professional introduction, about us, login, other useful web site and so on, and this<br />

web site has five access methods: earthquake list, station list, accelerograms list, basic search<br />

page and advance search page. Strong motion data is downloaded using these methods. <strong>The</strong><br />

researchers of the world can easily use them.


190<br />

Figure 3: strong motion database web site system<br />

Figure 4: strong motion database web site home page<br />

Up to now, 11 volumes of Report on Strong <strong>Earthquake</strong> Motion Records and 1 volume of Report<br />

of Long-period Response Spectrum have been published by EEM. In addition, China institute of<br />

water resources and hydropower research has edited and published 1 volume of Important Data<br />

on Strong Motion and Analysis in China Hydraulic Structures, including important strong<br />

motion records that recorded at Xinfengjiang reservoir dam, Huangbizhuang reservoir dam and<br />

so on.<br />

Strong motion records of China have been used in draw up the various design codes of structures,<br />

seismic ground motion parameter zonation map, probabilistic seismic hazard analysis,<br />

earthquake safety evaluation, seismic design of structures, studies on characteristics of<br />

earthquake ground motion and attenuation lows of ground motion. For example, the<br />

accelerograms recorded at Qianan station during the Tangshan aftershock of August 31,<br />

1976(m=5.8) and the accelerograms recorded at Tianjing hospital station during the Ninghe<br />

earthquake of November 15, 1976(m=7.1) are used usually as the input seismic wave in<br />

vibrating table experiment and seismic calculation of structures. Figure 5 to 8 is typical strong<br />

motion records of Mainland China.<br />

AUG.31 1976 11:253 TANGSHAN AFTERSHOCK HEBEI M-5.8 3TAT\ONNO.fM0303101ANANL*NHE9RlDGE<br />

1NTTYPE. :<br />

'ALLY SPACED INTERVALS OF 0.01 SEC<br />

NOV.l 5.1571 21 :S3BTVI TANGSHAN AFTERSHOCK HEBEI M-6 9 • 1INHO<br />

INSTRUMENT-TYPE RDZ1 IF NO OF POINTS. 1 91 2 EQUALLY SEC<br />

SPACED INTERVALS OF 0.01<br />

EFFECTIVE FREQUENCY BAND 30 -3500 HZ<br />

TH7-m COMP. EW Amox-97 356 (cra/s/s)<br />

TSJ7-H500MP SN Amax-132.392 (ci<br />

TS27-146COMP.UO Amax=50.493(cm/5/s)<br />

TS38-21 - 4 COMP UD Amm-aHO mm- (on/s/s) onss<br />

Figure5: Accelerogram recorded at Qianan Station<br />

in Taneshan Aftershock of August 31. 1976<br />

Figure6: Accelerogram recorded at Tianjing Hospital<br />

Station in Ninghe <strong>Earthquake</strong> of November 15, 1976


191<br />

IV STATION YM<br />

kCED INTERVALS OF C<br />

•nro&incQMPsa<br />

SHOWN EARTHQUAKE 3HMAN OMAG 5 3(Msl STATION TAPING<br />

U^ -'gg'tf K***'**® "TSmSOF 001 SEC<br />

SOB-DOB CQMPV Am


192<br />

2.2 Low frequency errors correction method of accelerograms recorded by digital<br />

accelerographs<br />

After comparing the results of different methods, the correction method of low frequency errors<br />

of accelerograms recorded by digital accelerographs is proposed, as follows:<br />

1. Adjust zero baseline of original accelerogram by subtracting the average value of preevent<br />

records, and subtracting, the subtract average value of whole length of accelerogram or use<br />

in the least squares method if there is no pre-event records can be available.<br />

2. Filtering the accelerograms by Butterworth digital filter, and the cut-off frequency can be<br />

determined by Fourier spectrum analyses for seismic records and pre-event noises records. If<br />

there is no sufficient long pre-event records can be used, we can select one or several cut-off<br />

frequency according to the experiences to trial, and a suitable cut-off frequency can be<br />

determined according to if the drift of zero baseline of displacement curve is eliminated or not.<br />

3. Calculating acceleration response spectrum, velocity response spectrum and displacement<br />

response spectrum of filtered records. Integrating the velocity and displacement time histories,<br />

adjusting the zero baseline of displacement time history using least squares method in order to<br />

eliminate linear trend.<br />

2.3 Features of Long-Period Spectrum of SMART-1 Array Records<br />

2.3.1 Record and disposal of digital strong motion Accelerograph<br />

236 accelerograms recorded by SMART-1 array in 8 earthquakes with magnitudes above 6 are<br />

selected for analyzing the long period component characteristics of seismic ground motion on the<br />

same category of site in a small region. Table2 list the data of the 8 earthquake.<br />

All of the epicentral distances in Table2 are the epicentral distances of central point (COO), the<br />

maximum distance between various stations is only 4km, so the epicentral distances of each<br />

station can be considered as same in these earthquakes, except No.7 earthquake. All records are<br />

processed using the method described above.<br />

2.3.2 Response spectra characteristics of accelerograms obtained in an earthquake<br />

Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the dynamic amplification factor /3 curves of accelerograms<br />

recorded at different stations during two earthquakes (No,4 and No.8) respectively (damping<br />

ratio is 0.05). In the Figures, the symbols "o" and "*" represent average values of /3 and a<br />

standard deviation respectively. It can be seen that in short period below 4s, although /j curves<br />

are similar for most of stations, some f$ curves are very different and the standard deviations are<br />

large. For example, in case of No.4 earthquake, the corresponding periods for peak values of p<br />

curves are Is or so for most stations, and are 0.3~0.7s for other stations (Figure6). <strong>The</strong><br />

epicentral distances of all stations are almost same in the two earthquakes. So, It shows that the<br />

acceleration response spectra, in short period part are quite different even if the accalerograms<br />

are recorded at same category of sites in an earthquake. However, for the accelerograms obtained


193<br />

at different stations, the differences of p curves in long period part above 4s is small and the<br />

attenuate rate is almost same. It shows that the long period component of seismic ground motion<br />

are almost same at same category of site with same epicentral distance in an earthquake and it is<br />

almost not influenced by the small differences between the local site conditions of various<br />

stations and other random factors.<br />

TABLE 2<br />

EARTHQUAKE DATA<br />

No.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

Date of earthquake<br />

81.01.29<br />

82.12.27<br />

83.05.10<br />

83.06.24<br />

86.01.16<br />

86.05.20<br />

86.07.30<br />

86.11.14<br />

Magnitude<br />

6.9<br />

6.9<br />

6.3<br />

7.2<br />

6.5<br />

6.9<br />

6.2<br />

7.0<br />

Epicentral<br />

distance ( km )<br />

31<br />

118<br />

35<br />

116<br />

22<br />

36<br />

6<br />

79<br />

Period (Second)<br />

Figure 11: Dynamic magnification coefficient ft of the<br />

accelerograms recorded at different stations in No.4<br />

earthquake (damping ratio is 0,05)<br />

Figure 12: Dynamic magnification coefficient /3 of the<br />

accelerograms recorded at different stations in No.8<br />

earthquake (damping ratio is 0.05)<br />

2.3.3 Response spectral characteristics of accelerograms recorded at a station<br />

Figures 13 and 14 show the /3 curves of accelerograms recorded in 8 events at Station COO and<br />

1-03, respectively (damping ratio is 0.05 ), the magnitudes of these 8 earthquakes are all above 6,<br />

and the epicentral distances are very different from 6km to 118km. It can be seen that the periods<br />

corresponding to the peaks of response spectra are quite different, and the/3 values in long<br />

period part of No.8 earthquake (dashed line in Figures 13 and 14) is much larger than that of any<br />

other earthquakes.


194<br />

Panod (Second)<br />

Figure 13: Dynamic magnification coefficient /3 of Figurel4: Dynamic magnification coefficient 0 of<br />

accelerograms recorded by Station COO (damping ratio is<br />

0.05)<br />

accelerograms recorded by Station 1-03 (damping ratio is<br />

0.05)<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Li-Li Xie. (1985). <strong>The</strong> Main Features Of Data Processing Procedure For Strong Motion Records In China,<br />

Physics of the Earth And Planetary Interiors, 38, 134-143, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam-<br />

Pnnted In the Netherlands.<br />

2. Li-Li Xie, Shabai Li, Jukang Qian, (1981). Study on the Instument Correction of Accelerograms Recorded<br />

by Accelerograph Coupled with Galvenometers, Journal of <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> And <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Vibration, 1: 106-Il6(ln Chinese)<br />

3. Li-Li Xie, Yongnian Zhou, Haiying Yu, Chengxiang Hu. (1991). Report of Long-period Response<br />

Spectrum(in Chinese), Seismological Press<br />

4. Yongnian Zhou, Haiying Yu. (1999). Low Frequency Error Correction of Accelerogram Recorded by<br />

Digital Accelerograph(in Chinese), Proceedings of workshop on key science problems and design theories<br />

research of large complicate structures, Dalian <strong>University</strong> of Technology Press,2000<br />

5. Haiying Yu, Yongnian Zhou. (1992). Design of Strong Motion Database Management System (in Chinese),<br />

Procedings of National workshop on Strong Motion Observation Technology (Vol.1) > Xiamen »<br />

Seismological Press<br />

6. Haiying Yu, Yongnian Zhou. (2001). Features of Long-Period Spectrum of SMART-1 Array Records(in<br />

Chinese) , Proceedings of workshop on key science problems and design theories research of large<br />

complicate structures (2000), Shanghai Tongji <strong>University</strong> Press<br />

7. Guangyi Gao, Haiying Yu, Shanyou Li. (2001). <strong>The</strong> strong-motion observation in the mainland of<br />

China(in Chinese), World information on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Vol.17, No.4<br />

8. I wan. W. D., M. A. Moser, and C. Y. Peng. (1985) Some observations on strong-motion earthquake<br />

measurement using a digital accelerograph, BSSA, Vol. 75<br />

9. Bolt, B. A., Y. B. Tsai. K. Yen, and M. K. Hsu. (1982). <strong>Earthquake</strong> strong motions recorded by a large<br />

near-source array of digital seismographs. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10, 561-573.<br />

10. Hung-Chie Chiu. (1997) Stable baseline correction of digital strong motion data, BSSA, Vol. 87, No. 4<br />

ILRDobry, R.D.Borcherdt, C.B.Crouse, I.M.Idriss, W.BJoyner, G.R.Martin, M.S.Power, EJE.Rinne, and<br />

R.B.Seed. (2000). New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code<br />

provisions, <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, Vol.16


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

TOWARDS EARTHQUAKE HAZARD MITIGATION ON<br />

METROPOLIS - A PLATFORM FOR RISK COMMUNICATION<br />

Ping Zhu 1 , Masato Abe 2 and Junji Kiyono 3<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute of Science and Technology for Society, Japan Atomic Energy <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

18F, Atago Green Hills Mori Tower, 2-5-1 Atago, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-6218, Japan<br />

2 Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> of Tokyo<br />

7-3-1 Kongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan<br />

3 Graduate School of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Kyoto <strong>University</strong><br />

Yoshida Hon-machi, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Severe earthquakes occurred in regions with high dense population cause not only damage of<br />

structures but also social problems. Resent years, the demands are increasing for risk evaluation and<br />

communication of before, during and after earthquakes for disaster precaution, mitigation, rescue and<br />

recovery works. Upon discussing the challenges from both technology and social issues, this paper<br />

presents a sketch of a platform based on the Internet for a risk evaluation and disaster mitigation<br />

system for metropolis under severe earthquakes.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Metropolises are vulnerable under attacks of severe earthquakes. Catastrophic economic losses around<br />

the world are huge and increasing in last decade. <strong>The</strong> 1995 earthquake in Kobe, Japan (Fig. 1) and the<br />

1999 earthquake in Chi Chi, Taiwan, for instance, caused losses about $120 and $10 billion<br />

respectively (Ref. 5). <strong>The</strong> disaster causes not only damage to buildings, structures but problems in<br />

society. <strong>Earthquake</strong> engineering professionals have been facing new challenges for helping solving<br />

economic and social problems with their knowledge.<br />

Upcoming earthquakes are still threatening metropolises in Japan (Fig. 2). Resent years, the demands<br />

are increasing for risk evaluation and communication of before, during and after earthquakes for<br />

disaster precaution, mitigation, rescue and recovery works.


196<br />

Upon discussing challenges on conducting seismic risk management and disaster mitigation for<br />

metropolis, from which a project the authors undertaking, this paper depicts a perspective for solving the<br />

problems using state-of-the-art computer technologies with a framework of a distributed application<br />

platform based on the Internet and Virtual Reality (VR) technology and presents some initial<br />

implementations.<br />

1<br />

Fig. 1 Collapse of elevated bridges in 1995 Kobe earthquake<br />

Hokkaldo-Nansel-OKI<br />

M7.8 1993 "<br />

* itokkBldo-Toho-<br />

P*iJwa:U994<br />

| KushlM-Oki.MT.8,1992<br />

Kobe (Hvngo-Ken-<br />

NambU).M7.2,1395<br />

Salirtkii-Haruka-Qkl,<br />

M7.5.1994<br />

: M7.5-8.mmi<br />

:B5»i [20 Years]<br />

•98% [30 Years]<br />

TwinEqs.MB-,<br />

M3D±10<br />

Nankai-Tinankal<br />

M7.5-Jokai<br />

I 37% [30 Years))<br />

Fig. 2 Seismic action in recent years and near future in Japan


197<br />

PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong>s, as a kind of natural catastrophe, are of low frequency but high consequence It is difficult to<br />

accumulate experiences This way, conventional aseisrmc design takes engineering codes as a main<br />

target, which means a design is created entirely on criteria that can meet the codes Present code design<br />

procedures, however, cannot give convincing answers to questions such as what might be the<br />

prospective damage sustained by a structure during an upcoming earthquake or the costs and benefits of<br />

earthquake protection<br />

Though proper handling of seismic behavior of a building or a structure is essential, it is still quite a local<br />

issue on concerning nsk management for metropolis During the 1995 Kobe earthquake the traffic<br />

service system in the emergency situation experienced substantial difficulties as considerable damage<br />

happened in elevated bridges (Fig 1 2) Collapsed buildings can also block roads Fires during the<br />

earthquake may rum several areas within a city for lack of emergent rescue (Fig 3)<br />

Fig. 3 Areas damaged by fires during the Kobe earthquake<br />

All the above-mentioned issues will cause losses of lives directly or indirectly Communication with the<br />

public becomes quite important for saving lives and keeping order of the society Dunng an earthquake<br />

city infrastructures such as power supply, electronic communication etc might be out of their functions<br />

To find efficient ways for communication should be a problem<br />

On conducting seismic nsk management and disaster mitigation for metropolis as problems concerned<br />

above, current solutions are insufficient in following aspects<br />

1) For structure seismic analysis, current solutions are weak in recreating and presenting real<br />

phenomena, such as damage and collapses of structures<br />

2) <strong>Research</strong> achievements and data, such as programs developed and data of structures created or<br />

obtained from design, construction and maintenance, mainly exist as isolated islands <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

lack of integration and interaction Moreover, it is difficult to reuse the resources<br />

3) <strong>The</strong>re is lack of concern in providing and distributing information, which is useful to and can be<br />

easily accessed by estate owners, administrators and the public Furthermore, less mechanism is<br />

established to listen and gather messages from the public


198<br />

It can be seen, to undertake seismic risk management and disaster mitigation for metropolis, a complex<br />

system is needed. To meet the needs of this task, the system should be built concerning functions as<br />

following:<br />

1) Data management, to collect and to keep updating data (geographical, structural data etc.) with<br />

unified format.<br />

2) Precise simulation of physical phenomena and consequences, including ground motion,<br />

structure seismic response, fire etc. in both macro and micro levels.<br />

3) Evaluation of damage and economic losses based on simulations from scenarios.<br />

4) Presentation and communication, to show results to different audiences (such as professionals,<br />

governors, estate owners and the public) with different methods; to collect information from<br />

the public.<br />

5) Integration of the system, to bring all the above together for a living system.<br />

6) Robustness, performance of the system and ways of communication during occurrences of<br />

disasters<br />

Since it is obviously difficult to achieve all the targets in one step, a practical way is to conduct and to<br />

accumulate effects on a frame of an integrated platform.<br />

A PERSPECTIVE SOLUTION<br />

Rapid growth computer technologies within the last decade, especially the Internet provide human<br />

beings new measures to deal with engineering and social problems which were hard to solve in<br />

traditional ways. A distributed application platform based on the Internet is a reasonable solution for<br />

hosting such a complex system with versatile resources. Furthermore, the Virtual Reality (VR)<br />

technology, which becomes more mature, can play an important role on performing 3D detailed<br />

presentation for various purposes.<br />

Concerning conducting seismic risk management and disaster mitigation for metropolis, basic targets<br />

of the distributed application platform are as follow:<br />

To develop a system for risk communication<br />

To establish a collaborating platform for researchers, professionals and governors<br />

To integrate resources and applications<br />

To communicate with the public reciprocally<br />

Fig. 4 illustrates concepts of this platform. Each functional parts are liked together without considering<br />

their physical locations. General audiences have their entry point at a web server with web browsers<br />

and client-end applets and applications; while professionals can utilize resources along with the<br />

platform, such as to access databases, to invoke dense computations and to cooperate with others.


199<br />

Database<br />

s*n/ar_- ^<br />

"<br />

Application<br />

server<br />

PC c/uster for<br />

Communication with<br />

" " * other groups<br />

Fig. 4 A perspective view of the distributed platform<br />

<strong>The</strong> above picture shows still simple and basic ideas for conducting the system. To introduce the<br />

Internet into the system is not only for it can integrate resources and applications for a collaborative<br />

solution but also for it can be an effective way of reciprocal communication in a society. Traditional<br />

applications (such as a seismic analysis program) provide solutions, as shown in the upper part of Fig.<br />

5, by local computation, which means both user and machine are in a same physical location. To shift<br />

traditional applications into a web-oriented environment, generally speaking, interfaces should be<br />

separated from the main applications and the interface for output should be able to perform on the<br />

client end (Fig. 5). This makes it possible for people to access applications from the web.<br />

Local computing<br />

User<br />

-<br />

interface<br />

:><br />

Application<br />

, Browser<br />

Web<br />

' Application<br />

User<br />

VRIVIL<br />

A simple internet based application<br />

Fig. 5 A simplified application prototype<br />

In a complex system, no single application can complete the task for final solutions. Fig. 6 shows a<br />

distributed environment based on the web. For communications between applications at server's part<br />

and also between client-end applets/applications and server applications, XML (Extensible Markup<br />

Language) will play an important role. XML has been claimed the most exciting and significant thing<br />

to hit the Internet since HTML (Cover R. (2001)). XML is a metamarkup language by providing


200<br />

arbitrary structures for one to make his/her own markup language For sharing data among applications<br />

for seismic analysis a special XML, which might be called Structure XML or StructureML, can be<br />

initiated for purposes of structure analyses, damage evaluation result presentation etc<br />

Users<br />

Browser<br />

Client-end < X/WL > Sen/er -e» A PP //car on<br />

app ^ -7<br />

{Extensible<br />

Language)<br />

Browser<br />

Client end < - ^ Sen/er ^ App/, car/on<br />

app ^ -<br />

Fig 6 Distributed applications on web<br />

SIMPLE IMPLEMENTATIONS WITH VR<br />

Tremendous efforts have been made to achieve good communication between human beings and<br />

computers since the initial work of computer graphics from later 60 Virtual Reality (VR), which<br />

becomes more popular recently, is among the most important technologies (Donale H, Baker MP<br />

(1997), McCarthy M, Descartes A (1998))<br />

<strong>The</strong> term of Vutual Reality originally referred to Immersive Virtual Reality, which means that users<br />

become fully immersed in an artificial 3D world that is completed generated by computers Nowadays,<br />

the term VR is also used for applications without fully immersive <strong>The</strong> boundaries are becoming<br />

blurred<br />

A practical way to perform VR is using VRML, which stands for Virtual Reality Modeling Language<br />

(Ames A L el al (1997)) VRML is an open standard for 3D multimedia and shared virtual worlds on<br />

the Internet (ISO/TEC 14772-1 1997) (Cnspen B (2000)) It is the de facto standard tor sharing data<br />

between CAD (3D modeling) and animation programs VRML is a text based scene description<br />

language It is not a programming language but can have scripts, like JavaScript<br />

VRML can be used to present structures and to convey 3D scene from the Internet Fig 7 shows a<br />

suspension bndge authored with VRML <strong>The</strong> model bridge can be displayed interactively using a web<br />

browser with a VRML plug-in<br />

More practice of VR has been made based on a work of a general-purpose 3D dynamic analysis<br />

program for bridges <strong>The</strong> program performs seismic analysis of elevated badges based on precise 3D<br />

modeling (Zhu P et al (2002)) Fig 8 shows a three-span steel bndge analyzed by the program A new<br />

output interface of this program has been added to convert results of dynamic response of the bndge<br />

into VRML Animations of vibration can be seen through a VRML viewing tool, such as a web<br />

browser with VRML plug-in (Fig 9) Users can navigate through the scene to find more details of<br />

seismic response of the bndge, which are difficult to be acquainted by traditional 2D charts


201<br />

o<br />

Fig. 7 VRML authoring - modeling of a suspension bridge<br />

Fig. 8 Seismic analysis of a steel elevated bridge<br />

Fig. 9 Seismic response presented using VRML through Internet Explorer


202<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Upon discussing demands on conducting seismic nsk management and disaster mitigation for<br />

metropolis, this paper depicts challenges faced by earthquake engineering professionals for helping<br />

solving economic and social problems. To meet this multidisciplinary task, the paper presents a<br />

perspective of solutions with a distributed application platform based on the Internet and VR<br />

technology. As a first step towards this platform, simple implementations with VR have also been<br />

demonstrated. Good results are obtained on promoting seismic response presentations using VRML.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

Thanks are given to Ali Alaghehbandian, a master student at Dept. of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Univ. of<br />

Tokyo, for his work (Fig. 7) of VRML authoring.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1) Arnes A. L., Nadeau D. R. and Moreland J. L. (1997). VRML 2.0 Sourcebook, Second Edition, John<br />

Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.<br />

2} Cover R. (2001). <strong>The</strong> XML Cover Pages - Introducing the Extensible Markup Language (XML),<br />

http://xml.coverpages.org/xnillntro.html<br />

3) Crispen B. (2000). comp.lang.vrml FAQ, http://hiwaay.nct/~ crispen/vrml/faq.html<br />

4) Donale H., Baker MR (1997). Computer Graphics C Version (Second Edition), Prentice Hall, Inc.<br />

New York, US A.<br />

5) EERJ Endowment Fund White Paper. (2000). "Financial Management of <strong>Earthquake</strong> Risk."<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute.<br />

6)McCarthy M., Descartes A. (1998). Reality Architecture Building 3D worlds with Java and VRML,<br />

Prentice Hall Europe, Great Britain.<br />

7) Zhu P., Abe M. and Fujino Y. (2002). "Modeling Three Dimensional Non-linear Seismic<br />

Performance of Elevated Bridges with Emphasis on Pounding of Girders." <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

and Structural Dynamics (under publication).


SMART MATERIALS AND<br />

SMART STRUCTURES


Proceedings of the International Conference on 205<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

CRITICAL FACTORS FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL<br />

FLUIDS IN CIVIL STRUCTURES<br />

J. David Carlson<br />

Lord Corporation, Materials Division<br />

406 Gregson Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27511, USA<br />

E-mail: jdcarlson@lord com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Magnetorheological (MR) fluid technology has progressed to the point where it is now<br />

routinely used on a large, commercial scale to enable semi-active control devices,<br />

particularly for automotive application. Experience in developing MR fluids for successful<br />

commercial application has shown that the greatest barriers to success of MR fluid<br />

technology are not the factors originally presumed to be most important in the laboratory and<br />

early development stages. While the most common responses to the question of what makes<br />

a good MR fluid are likely to be "high yield strength" or "non-settling", other factors have<br />

actually proven to be more critical. <strong>The</strong> present paper looks at conditions found in MR fluid<br />

devices operating in real-world applications where shear rates may exceed 10 5 sec" 1 and<br />

devices are called upon to operate for very long periods of time. <strong>The</strong> problem of "in-usethickening"<br />

wherein a MR fluid subjected to long-term use progressively thickens until it<br />

eventually becomes an unworkable paste is presented. <strong>The</strong> search for a solution to this<br />

heretofore unrecognized problem delayed the successful introduction of commercial MR<br />

fluid dampers for heavy-duty trucks for several years. Today, good MR fluids are able to<br />

operate for long periods with minimum in-use-thickening and settling.


Proceedings of the International Conference on 207<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF MODAL CONTROL FOR<br />

SEISMICALLY EXCITED STRUCTURES USING MR DAMPER<br />

S. W. Cho, B. W. Kim, H. J. Jung, and I. W. Lee<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper proposes an implementation of modal control for seismically excited structures using<br />

magnetorheoiogical (MR) dampers. Modal control reshapes the motion of a structure by merely<br />

controlling a few selected vibration modes. Hence, a modal control scheme is more convenient to<br />

design the controller than other control algorithms. Although modal control has been investigated for<br />

the several decades, its potential for semi-active control, especially for the MR damper, has not been<br />

exploited. Thus, in order to study the effectiveness for MR damper system, a modal control scheme is<br />

implemented to seismically excited structures. A Kalman filter is included in a control scheme to<br />

estimate modal states from measurements by sensors. Moreover, a low-pass filter is applied to<br />

eliminate the spillover problem. <strong>The</strong> numerical results indicate that the motion of the structure is<br />

effectively suppressed by merely controlling a few lowest modes, although resulting responses varied<br />

greatly depending on the choice of measurements available and weightings.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Magnetorheoiogical (MR) dampers are one of semi-active control devices, which use MR fluids to<br />

provide controllable damping forces. A number of control algorithms have been adopted for semiactive<br />

systems including the MR damper. Jansen and Dyke (2000) discussed recently proposed semi-


208<br />

active control algorithms including the decentralized bang-bang controller (MaClamroch and Gavin<br />

1995), the controller based on Lyapunov stability theory (Brogan 1991; Leitmann 1994), the clippedoptimal<br />

controller (Sack et al. 1994; Dyke 1996), the modulated homogeneous friction controller<br />

(Inaudi 1997), and the maximum energy dissipation algorithm. <strong>The</strong>y, also, formulated these algorithms<br />

for use with MR dampers and evaluated and compared the performance of each algorithm.<br />

Modal control represents one control class, in which the motion of a structure is reshaped by merely<br />

controlling some selected vibration modes. Modal control is especially desirable for the vibration<br />

control of civil engineering structure may involve hundred or even thousand degrees of freedom, its<br />

vibration is usually dominated by the first few modes. <strong>The</strong>refore, the motion of the structure can be<br />

effectively suppressed by merely controlling these few modes. A modal control scheme, which uses<br />

modal state estimation, is deskable (Meirovitch 1990).<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose of this study is to implement modal control for seismically excited structures that use MR<br />

dampers and to compare the performance of the proposed method with that of other control algorithms<br />

previously studied. A modal control scheme with a Kalman filter and a low-pass filter is applied. A<br />

Kalman filter is included in a control scheme to estimate modal states from measurements by sensors.<br />

Three cases of the structural measurement are considered by a Kalman filter to verify the effect of each<br />

measurement; displacement, velocity, and acceleration, respectively. Moreover, a low-pass filter is<br />

applied to eliminate the spillover problem.<br />

MODAL CONTROL SCHEME FOR MR DAMPERS<br />

In this section, a modal control scheme with a Kalman filter and a low-pass filter is implemented to<br />

seismically excited structure. After the implementation of modal control scheme, numerical simulation<br />

is presented in a subsequent section for comparisons between control algorithms.<br />

Modal Control<br />

Consider a seismically excited structure controlled with m MR dampers. Assuming that the forces<br />

provided by the control devices are adequate to keep the response of the primary structure from exiting<br />

the linear region, the equations of motion can be written<br />

Mx(t} + C±(t} + Ex(t)=Jtf(t}-Mn g (1)<br />

where M, C and K are the nxn mass, damping, and stiffness matrices, respectively; :c is the n-<br />

dimensional vector of the relative displacements of the floors of the structure;/= [/;,/2,...,/ m ] r is the


209<br />

vector of measured control forces generated by m MR dampers; x g is ground acceleration; F is the<br />

column vector of ones; and A is the matrix determined by the placement of MR dampers in the<br />

structure. <strong>The</strong> displacement can be expressed as the linear combination<br />

(0=*»,r = J.2,...,n (2)<br />

where r\ r (r) is the r th modal displacement; fy r is the r th eigenvector; 0 is a eigenvector set; and 77 is a<br />

modal displacement vector. In modal control, only a limited number of lower modes are controlled.<br />

Hence, / controlled modes can be selected with I < n and the displacement may be partitioned into<br />

controlled and uncontrolled parts as jr(r) = x c (r) + X R () , where x c and X R represent the controlled<br />

and uncontrolled displacement vector, respectively. We refer to the uncontrolled modes as residual.<br />

<strong>The</strong> eigenvectors are orthogonal and can be normalized so as to satisfy the orthononnality conditions.<br />

Inserting Eq. (2) into Eq. (1), multiplying by$ r r and considering orthogonal condition between<br />

eigenvectors, we obtain<br />

(3)<br />

where C are r modal damping ratios, ® r is a natural frequency. <strong>The</strong>n, Equation (3) can be rewritten in<br />

state-space form such as<br />

w c (t) = A c w c (t) + B c f(l) + E c x s , y c (t} = C c w c (t} (4)<br />

where w c is a 2/-dimensional modal state vector by the controlled modes and<br />

' °<br />

-al -/ ''<br />

/c I s B - - I E -<br />

—<br />

Er ~<br />

~ ''<br />

(5)<br />

are the 21x21, 2Lxm matrixes and a 2/xl vector, respectively, and Ac is the diagonal matrix listing<br />

2co r £ r ; ii 2 is the diagonal matrix listing fi),..., a$\ B c '=® T A\ and E c '=


210<br />

Gaussian) methods are advocated because of their successful application in previous studies (Dyke et<br />

al. 1996). For the controller design, x g is taken to be a stationary white noise, and an infinite horizon<br />

performance index is chosen that weights the modal states by controlled modes such as<br />

J slimier f \w T cQw c + u T Ru)dt] (7)<br />

*-»- r L J ° J<br />

where R is a 2x2 identity matrix because the numerical example has two MR dampers, and Q is a<br />

2Zx2/ diagonal matrix. It should be noted that the size of Q is reduced from 2nx2n to 21x21 because the<br />

limited lower modes are controlled. <strong>The</strong>refore, it can be said that it is more convenient to design the<br />

smaller weighting matrix of modal control. For example, when the lowest one mode is controlled for<br />

calculating the modal control action, Q is a 2x2 diagonal matrix.<br />

Modal State Estimation<br />

An observer for modal state estimation should be provided, since real sensors may not estimate the fu]l<br />

modal states directly or the system may be expensive to prepare the sensors for the full states. To<br />

estimate the modal state vector H>cW from the measured output y (£), we consider a Kalman-Bucy filter<br />

as an observer(Meirovitch, 1990). Not only, in this paper, the state feedback including velocities or<br />

displacements is considered, but also the acceleration feedback is implemented for the modal state<br />

estimation using a Kalman-Buch filter. In any case, we can write a modal observer in the form<br />

$ c (t) = A c w c (t) + B c f(t) + E c x g +L[y(t)~C c w c (t}-D c f(t)] (8)<br />

where w c (t) is the estimated controlled modal state and L is the optimally chosen observer gain matrix<br />

by solving a matrix Riccati equation, which assumes that the noise intensities associated with<br />

earthquake and sensors are known. C c is changeable according to the signals which are used for the<br />

feedback and D c is generally zero except the acceleration feedback. For modal state estimation from<br />

the displacements, C c = [4> C 0 ]. For control with the velocity feedback, C c = [ 0


211<br />

To examine the effect of the control forces on the uncontrolled modes, residual modes can be written<br />

^R(^= : A R w R (t) J rB R f(t) + E R x g (12)<br />

where W R is a residual state vector by uncontrolled modes. Substituting Eq. (10) into Eq. (4) and<br />

considering Eq. (12), we obtain<br />

w c (r) = A c w c (t)-B c K c w c (t) + E c x g} w R (t)-A R w R (t)-B R K c w c (f) + E R x (13)<br />

Moreover, substituting Eqs. (10) and (11) into Eq. (8), we can write the observer equation in the form<br />

* c (t) = (Ac - B C K C )>v c (r) + LC C (w c (t) - w c (r)) + LC R W R (r) + E c x g (14)<br />

<strong>The</strong> error vector is defined such as e c (t) = w c (t) - w c (t). <strong>The</strong>n the Equations can be written in the<br />

matrix form<br />

A C -B C K C 0<br />

0<br />

~B C K C<br />

— BffK r<br />

(15)<br />

LC R A C -LC C<br />

Note that the term -B^Kc in Eq. (15) is responsible for the excitation of the residual modes by the<br />

control forces and is known as control spilloveralas. If CR is zeros, which means the sensor signal only<br />

include controlled modes, the term -B&Kc has no effect on the eigenvalues of the closed-loop system.<br />

Hence, we conclude that control spillover cannot destabilize the system, although it can cause some<br />

degradation in the system performance. Normally, however, the above system can not satisfy the<br />

separate principle because the term LC# affects eigenvalues of the controlled system by the observer.<br />

This effect is known as observation spillover and can produce instability in the residual modes.<br />

However, a small amount of damping inherent in the structure is often sufficient to overcome the<br />

observation spillover effect. At any rate, observation spillover can be eliminated if the sensor signals<br />

are prefiltered so as to screen out the contribution of the uncontrolled modes (Meirovitch, 1990)<br />

Numerical Example<br />

To evaluate the proposed modal control scheme for use with the MR damper, a numerical example is<br />

considered in which a model of a six-story building is controlled with four MR dampers (Fig. 1). This<br />

numerical example is the same with that of Jansen and Dyke (2000) and is adopted for direct<br />

comparisons between the proposed modal control scheme and other control algorithms. In simulation,<br />

the model of the structure is subjected to the NS component of the 1940 El Centro earthquake. Because


212<br />

the building system considered is a scaled model, the amplitude of the<br />

earthquake was scaled to ten percent of the full-scale earthquake. <strong>The</strong><br />

various control algorithms were evaluated using a set of evaluation<br />

criteria based on those used in the second generation linear control<br />

problem for buildings (Spencer and Sain 1997) such as<br />

FIGURE 1<br />

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM<br />

(Jansen and Dyke 2000)<br />

where x t (f) is the relative displacement of the zth floor over the entire<br />

response, x"^ denotes the uncontrolled maximum displacement. h t is the<br />

height of each floor (30cm), d t (t) is the interstory drift of the above<br />

max<br />

ground floors over the response history, d n denotes the normalized<br />

peak interstory drift in the uncontrolled response, x m (r) is the absolute<br />

accelerations of the zth floor, x is the peak uncontrolled floor<br />

acceleration, and W is the total weight of the structure (1335 N). <strong>The</strong> corresponding uncontrolled<br />

responses are as follows: x*** =1.313 cm, JT = 0.00981 cml'xT (t) = 146.95 cm/sec 2 .<br />

<strong>The</strong> resulting evaluation criteria are presented in Table 1 for the control algorithms previously studied<br />

(Jansen and Dyke, 2000). <strong>The</strong> numbers in parentheses indicate the percent reduction as compared to<br />

the best passive case. To compare the performance of the semiactive system to that of comparable<br />

passive systems, two cases are considered in which MR dampers are used in a passive mode by<br />

maintaining a constant voltage to the devices. <strong>The</strong> results of passive-off ( 0 V ) and passive-on (5V)<br />

configurations are included.<br />

FIGURE 2 VARIATIONS OF EVALUATION CRITERIA WITH WEIGHTING PARAMETERS<br />

FOR THE ACCELERATION FEEDBACK<br />

For modal control, three cases of the structural measurements are considered; displacements, velocities<br />

and accelerations. Using each structural measurement, a Kalman filter estimates the modal states. Fig.<br />

2 represents the variations of each evaluation criteria for increasing weighting parameters in a 3-<br />

dimensional plot JT is the summation of evaluation criteria, //, /2 and /. We can find the weighting<br />

for reduction of overall structural responses from the variations of JT, whereas we can find the<br />

weighting for reduction of related responses from //, J and /j, Designer can decide which to use<br />

according to control objectives. By using the controller (H2/LQG) with designed weighting matrices


213<br />

from Fig. 2, we can get the results in Table 2. Similarly, for the displacement and velocity feedback<br />

cases, Table 2 summarize the results for each minimum evaluation criteria of the designed weighting<br />

matrices.<br />

TABLE 1*<br />

NORMALIZED CONTROLLED MAXIMUM RESPONSES<br />

DUE TO THE SCAPED EL CENTRO EARTHQUAKE<br />

Control strategy<br />

Passive-off<br />

Passive-on<br />

Lyapunov controller A<br />

Lyapunov controller A<br />

Decentralized bang-bang<br />

Maximum energy dissipation<br />

Clipped-optimal A<br />

Clipped-optimal B<br />

Modified homogeneous friction<br />

Ji<br />

0.862<br />

0.506<br />

0.686(4-35)<br />

0.326(-35)<br />

0.449M1)<br />

0.548(4-8)<br />

0.631(4-24)<br />

0.405(-20)<br />

0.421 (-17)<br />

TABLE 2<br />

J2<br />

0.801<br />

0.696<br />

0.788(4-13)<br />

0.548(~21)<br />

0.791(4-13)<br />

0,620(-11)<br />

0.640(~8)<br />

0.547(-21)<br />

0.599(-20)<br />

h<br />

0.904<br />

141<br />

0 756(-16)<br />

1.39(4-53)<br />

1.00(4-11)<br />

1.06(4-17)<br />

0.636(~29)<br />

1.25(4-38)<br />

1.06(4-17)<br />

J 4<br />

0.00292<br />

0.0178<br />

0.0178<br />

0.0178<br />

0.0178<br />

0.0121<br />

0.01095<br />

0.0178<br />

00178<br />

(* Jansen and Dyke 2000)<br />

NORMALIZED CONTROLLED MAXIMUM RESPONSES OF THE VARIOUS FEEDBACK DUE<br />

Control strategy<br />

Modal control A n<br />

Modal control Aj 2<br />

Modal control A^<br />

Modal control Ar T<br />

Modal control Dn<br />

Modal control D n<br />

Modal control D^<br />

Modal control Dn*<br />

Modal control V;,<br />

Modal control V J2<br />

Modal control V n<br />

Modal control V rT<br />

TO THE SCALED EL CENTRO EARTHQUAKE<br />

Weighting parameters<br />

qmd=400, qmv=sl500<br />

qmd=l, qmv=oOO<br />

qmd=2200, qmv=100<br />

qmd=500. qmv=600<br />

^md=100, gmv=4900<br />

qmd=100, qmv=4900<br />

qmd=200, qmvs=4900<br />

qmd=3300, qmv=4700<br />

qmd-700, qmv=800<br />

qmd=l, qmv=400<br />

qmd=1300, qmv=100<br />

qmd=600, qmv=500<br />

Ji<br />

0.310(-39)<br />

0.398(-21)<br />

0.549(4-8)<br />

Q.380(-25)<br />

Q.403(-20)<br />

0.403(-20)<br />

0 702(4-39)<br />

0408(-19)<br />

0.327(-35)<br />

0383(-24)<br />

0 541(4-7)<br />

0.354f-30)<br />

J 2<br />

0529(-24)<br />

0 485(-30)<br />

0.618H1)<br />

0.488(-30)<br />

0.560


214<br />

matrix of modal control. This is one of the important benefits of the proposed modal control scheme.<br />

<strong>The</strong> numerical results show that the motion of the structure was effectively suppressed by merely<br />

controlling a few lowest modes, although resulting responses varied greatly depending on the choice of<br />

measurements available and weightings. <strong>The</strong> modal controller A and V achieved significant reductions<br />

in the responses. <strong>The</strong> modal controller Ayj, A J2 and V J3 achieve reductions (39%, 30%, 30%) in<br />

evaluation criteria Ji, Jo and */3, respectively, resulting in the lowest values of all cases considered here.<br />

<strong>The</strong> modal controller AJT and VJT fail to achieve any lowest value of evaluation criteria, but have<br />

competitive performance in all evaluation criteria. Based on these results, the proposed modal control<br />

scheme is found to be suited for use with MR dampers in a multi-input control system. Further studies<br />

are underwav to examine the influence of the number of controlled modes on the control performance.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This research was supported by the National <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory Grant(No. : 2000-N-NL-01-C-251)<br />

in Korea. <strong>The</strong> financial support is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Brogan, W.L. (1991). Modern Control <strong>The</strong>ory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.<br />

Dyke, SJL, Spencer Jr., B.F., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D. (1996). "Modeling and Control of<br />

Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction," Smart Materials and Structures, Vol.<br />

5, pp. 565-575.<br />

Inaudi, J.A. (1997). "Modulated Homogeneous Friction: A Semi-active Damping Strategy,"<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 361.<br />

Jansen, L.M. and Dyke, SJ. (2000). "Semi-active Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative<br />

Study," Journal of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, Vol. 126, No. 8, pp. 795-803.<br />

Leitmann, G. (1994). "Semiactive Control for Vibration Attenuation," J. of Intelligent Material<br />

Systems and Structures, Vol. 5 September, pp. 841-846.<br />

McClamroch, N.H. and Gavin, H.P. (1995). "Closed Loop Structural Control Using Electrorheological<br />

Dampers," Proc. oftheAmer. Ctrl. Conf. 9 Seattle, Washington, pp. 4173-77.<br />

Meirovitch, L. (1990). "Dynamics and Control of Structures," John Wiley & Sons.<br />

Sack, R.L., Kuo, C.C., Wu, H.C., Liu, L and Patten, W.N. (1994). "Seismic Motion Control via<br />

Semiactive Hydraulic Actuators." Proc. of the U.S. Fifth National Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, Chicago, Illinois, Vol. 2, pp, 311-320.<br />

Spencer Jr., B.F., Dyke, S. J., Sain, M. K., and Carlson, J. D. (1997). "Phenomenological Model off<br />

Magnetorheological damper," Journal ofEngrg. Mech., ASCE, 123(3), pp. 230-238.


Proceedings of the Intel-national Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

EFFECTIVENESS OF SMART BASE ISOLATION SYSTEM WITH<br />

MR DAMPERS IN PROTECTING STRUCTURES<br />

IN NEAR-FAULT EARTHQUAKES<br />

Satish Nagarajaiah 1 , Sanjay Sahasrabudhe 2 and Yuqing Mao 2<br />

1.Associate Professor, Civil & Env. Eng. , Rice <strong>University</strong>, Houston, TX<br />

2 Engineer, McDermott, Houston, TX, Formerly, Graduate <strong>Research</strong> Assistant, Rice <strong>University</strong><br />

Abstract<br />

This paper presents an analytical study of smart base isolated structures with vanable MR dampers,<br />

which extends the results of prior analytical and experimental studies by the authors. New analytical models<br />

of the nonlinear base isolated structures with MR dampers are developed. A Lyapunov based controller is<br />

developed and used to perform simulations. Numerical simulations and parametric studies are performed<br />

using several near-fault ground motions. <strong>The</strong> computed results are verified using shake table test results of<br />

scaled base isolated structural model with MR dampers. It is demonstrated that base isolated structures with<br />

MR dampers are more effective than base isolated structures with passive nonlinear dampers, in reducing<br />

the response in wide range of near-fault earthquakes.<br />

Introduction<br />

Base isolation systems are effective in protecting structures in strong earthquakes. Recent studies have<br />

shown that base isolated structures tend to have larger base displacements in near-fault long period earthquakes.<br />

This may lead to large isolation gap or in cases—with insufficient isolation gap—pounding against<br />

the retaining wall of the building, and damage to the superstructure. Nonlinear passive dampers have been<br />

implemented in base isolated buildings to counter some of the effects of near-fault earthquakes (Taylor et<br />

al. 2001). Although supplemental nonlinear passive dampers can limit base displacements, the isolation<br />

forces, superstructure drifts and accelerations will be higher. Several researchers have recently studied the<br />

capability of Magneto-rheological (MR) dampers and other variable dampers in effectively countering such<br />

limitations (Gavin et al. 2001, Madden et al. 2000, Nagarajaiah et al. 2000, Spencer et al. 2000, Yang et<br />

al 2002, and Yoshika et al. 2002). MR clampers, which can be used to vary the nonlinear damping in the<br />

isolation systems, can reduce base displacements in near-fault earthquakes, further than passive nonlinear<br />

dampers, while maintaining the same or lower level of isolation forces, superstructure drifts and accelerations,<br />

as compared to passive nonlinear dampers (Sahasrabudhe et al. 2000,2001). Spencer et al. (2000)<br />

and Yoshioka et al (2002) have shown the effectiveness of base isolated structures with MR dampers in<br />

both moderate/strong and in near/far-fault earthquakes by analytical and experimental studies. This paper<br />

presents an analytical study of smart base isolated structures with variable MR dampers, which extends the<br />

results of prior analytical and experimental studies by the authors (Sahasrabudhe et al. 2000, 2001). It is<br />

demonstrated that base isolated structures with MR dampers are more effective than base isolated structures<br />

with passive nonlinear clampers, in reducing the response in wide range of near-fault earthquakes.<br />

Analytical Model of Smart Base Isolated Structure with MR Dampers<br />

<strong>The</strong> equations of motion for the smart base isolated structure shown in Figure 1 are as follows<br />

M C U C + C C U C + K C U C + F c = B E u s (1)<br />

c<br />

f U \ ("


216<br />

Figure 1: Smart Base Isolated Structure with Sliding Isolation Bearings, Recentering Springs, and MR<br />

Dampers<br />

R — the matrix of earthquake influence coefficients, U = modal displacement vector relative to the base<br />

(modal transformation U =


217<br />

where gj^i = g(X fcTl , F^+^it<br />

formulation iterations are avoided.<br />

) (4)<br />

.); Hence, the method is implicit, needing iteration. In the incremental<br />

Modeling of Base Isolation Bearings and MR Dampers<br />

Sliding bearings are modeled using the following equation:<br />

fb (t) = pN. S (t) (5)<br />

where N is the normal force at the sliding bearing, the coefficient of friction /x = /max — (/^ax - / mm ) •<br />

e-aK! wj t k u b the velocity of the sliding base, / max the coefficient of sliding friction at high velocity, / m i n<br />

is the coefficient of sliding friction at essentially zero velocity of sliding, and a is the coefficient controlling<br />

the dependency of friction on velocity of sliding and z (t] is a Bouc-Wen hysteretic dimensionless quantity<br />

governed by the equation:<br />

Y-Z + T \u b \ • z \z\ n ~ l + p-u b -z n -Au b = Q (6)<br />

where Y is the yield displacement, 7, /3, n, and A are dimensionless parameters of the model that govern<br />

the hysteretic behavior, and lib is the base displacement.<br />

Magnetorheological (MR) dampers are semi-active control devices that use MR fluids to produce controllable<br />

damping. In this paper an extension to the MR damper model by Spencer et al (2000 ) is developed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Bouc-Wen model hysteretic element with spring and variable dashpot in parallel are used to model the<br />

MR damper, as shown hi Figure 2.<br />

Figure 2. MR Damper Model<br />

<strong>The</strong> governing equation of the model shown in Figure 2 is given by<br />

where k is the stiffness of the accumulator, the variable damping coefficient, c = c a -f c& with c a being<br />

constant and c b — GI • hi(v), a = a a 4- a b with a a being constant and a& » aj. • h^(v}^ with &i(v), /ia(u) and<br />

f(v) being functions of voltage, v, applied to the MR damper, f(u) accounts for the variation in the force<br />

generated by the damper under different voltages. <strong>The</strong> hysteretic variable z of Bouc-Wen Model is governed<br />

by equation (6), where Y is the yield displacement and 7 = 0.9, / = 0.1, n = 2, .4 - 1.<br />

Equations (5), (6) and (7) are solved using the unconditionally stable semi-implicit Runge-Kutta method<br />

suitable for stiff differential equations. Equations (3), (4), (5) and (6) are solved using an efficient predictorcorrector<br />

algorithm developed by the authors.


218<br />

Lyapunov Controller for the System with MR Damper<br />

For MR damper, a Lyapunov Based Controller is developed as Mows. <strong>The</strong> equation (3) can be rewritten<br />

in absolute coordinates for a rigid superstructure as follows<br />

= AX a (i) + B/(t) 4- Bu + Bk b u a = g(X a ,/, u g ) (8)<br />

i a = the absolute displacement of rigid<br />

mass m fc , / = the aonlinear force at the isolation level, u = c(t) u bl c(i) is the tune varying damping<br />

coefficient of the MR damper, u b — relative displacement of mass with respect to the ground, and u g =<br />

ground displacement. Based on a appropriate Lyapunov function V and V being negative or minimum the<br />

following switching control algorithm is derived.<br />

C (+\<br />

( t ) _ j<br />

^<br />

— \ o or<br />

where C min is the minimum damping coefficient for one volt, C max is the maximum damping coefficient<br />

for 4 volts, pi and p> are constants.<br />

Figure 1 shows a smart sliding isolated two-story building model with MR Damper, a restoring spring,<br />

and four sliding bearings, considered in this analytical study. A corresponding scaled model has been tested<br />

by authors (Sahasrabudhe et al. 2000,2001). <strong>The</strong> 1:5 scale model is 1.47m in length and the height is<br />

1.48m, with 0.74m height of each floor. <strong>The</strong> base mass is 5.54 N-s 2 /cm, and the mass of the first and second<br />

floor is 5.92 N-s 2 /cm each. <strong>The</strong> total stiffness of recentering springs connected between the base of the<br />

building and the shaking table is 720 N/cm. <strong>The</strong> condensed superstructure stiffness matrix in the fixed base<br />

condition (including joint rotations), and corresponding clamping matrix are considered. <strong>The</strong> fundamental<br />

period of the superstructure in the fixed base condition (2DOF) is 0.15 sec. <strong>The</strong> fundamental period of the<br />

model sliding base isolated structure (3DOF) is nearly 1.0 sec (2.24 sec at prototype scale). Simulations<br />

are performed at both the prototype and model scale with proper consideration being given to the scaling<br />

issues. For the superstructure (2DOF), in the fixed base condition, the damping coefficients are & = 2.56%<br />

and g> = 1.48%. Simulations are performed with MR clamper off—constant zero volts—low damping, MR<br />

damper on—constant four volts—high damping, and controlled cases where the voltage is switched between<br />

one and four volts.<br />

Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> response of the prototype smart sliding isolated rigid structure (SDOF) with an isolation period of 2<br />

sec to a cosine pulse with a period of 2 sec, representative of the Rinaldi fault normal earthquake, is shown<br />

in Figure 3. It is evident from the response in Figure 3 that in the controlled case the base displacement as<br />

well as the total shear force at the isolation level are reduced further than the passive high damping case;<br />

the switching of the MR damper dissipation force, from one volt level to the four volt level, in the controlled<br />

case is clearly evident. It is clearly evident that the smart isolation system performs better than the passive<br />

high damping case.<br />

<strong>The</strong> response of the prototype smart sliding isolated rigid structure (3DOF) with an isolation period of<br />

4 sec to Newhall fault normal earthquake, is shown in Figure 4. It is evident from the response in Figure 4<br />

that the controlled case clearly reduces the base displacement as well as the total shear force at the isolation<br />

level. In the total isolation force-base displacement loops shown in Figure 4 the difference in loops of the<br />

three cases is primarily due to changes in MR clamper forces—switching of the MR damper, between one<br />

and four volt levels, in the controlled case is clearly evident in the force-displacement loops. <strong>The</strong> ability of<br />

the smart MR damper to reduce the response further than the passive high damping case is clearly evident.<br />

Next the simulations of the smart sliding isolated model structure (SDOF) are performed for the following<br />

earthquakes: (1) El-Centro SOOE <strong>Earthquake</strong> (May 18,1940), peak acceleration: 0.34 g (100%); (2) Newhall<br />

Channel 1 90 Deg. Fault Parallel (Jan. 17, 1994), peak acceleration: 0.608 (105%)g; (3) Newhall Channel


219<br />

3 360 Deg. Fault Normal (Jan. 17, 1994), peak acceleration: 0.59 g (100%); (4) Sylmar Channel 1 90 Deg<br />

Fault Parallel (Jan. 17, 1994), peak acceleration: 0.461 g (80%); (5) Sylmar Channel 3 360 Deg. Fault<br />

Normal (Jan. 17, 1994), peak acceleration: 0,84 g (100%); (6) Kobe NS (Jan. 17, 1995), peak acceleration:<br />

0816 g (100%); (7) Kobe EW (Jan. 17, 1995), peak acceleration: 0.62 g (100%). <strong>The</strong> records are time<br />

scaled by a factor of 2.236 to satisfy similitude requirements. <strong>The</strong> peak accelerations are scaled from the<br />

original recorded values. Results are presented in Table 1 to Table 3. Table 1 shows peak values of relative<br />

base displacement and normalized peak shear force at the isolation level (total of friction force, MR damper<br />

force, and spring force normalized by total weight). Table 2 shows the peak values of first floor and second<br />

floor inter-story drifts. Table 3 shows the peak values of first floor and second floor accelerations.<br />

In Tables 1 to 3 in case of Sylmar, Newhall, and Kobe earthquakes, the relative base displacement<br />

reductions range from 5 to 40 % in the passive high damping (4 volt) case when compared to the passive<br />

low damping (0 volt) case. This occurs due to the increase in energy dissipation in high damping case, with<br />

nearly 5 to 30 % increase in the peak total force at the isolation level when compared to the low damping case.<br />

<strong>The</strong> semiactive controlled case gives an additional 5 to 15 % reduction in the base displacement response<br />

over the passive high damping (4 volt) case. <strong>The</strong> controlled case also reduces or maintains the same level<br />

of total force at the isolation level when compared to the high damping case. Hence, the controlled case<br />

reduces the base displacement further, when compared to 0 volt and 4 volt cases, with no further increase<br />

in force as compared to 4 volt case. <strong>The</strong> energy dissipation occurs more efficiently in the controlled case<br />

revealing the potential of smart damping. In most cases the interstory drifts in the controlled case are the<br />

smaller than the passive high damping case—which indicates the effectiveness of the smart isolation system,<br />

<strong>The</strong> accelerations in the controlled case remain bounded by the high and low damping cases. As evident<br />

from Table 1 in case of Sylmar 360 earthquake the peak relative base displacement, the largest amongst all<br />

earthquakes, is reduced by 42% in the passive high damping (4 volt) case when compared to the passive low<br />

damping (0 volt) case. <strong>The</strong> passive high damping (4 volt) case also reduces the total force at isolation level<br />

by 4% when compared to the passive low damping (0 volt) case. <strong>The</strong> controlled case gives additional 7%<br />

reduction in the base displacement response over the passive high damping (4 volt) case; the control case<br />

also maintains the same level of total force at the isolation level as compared to that of the passive high<br />

damping case. Thus based on the results in Tables 1, 2 and 3 it can be concluded that the controlled case<br />

reduces the base displacement further and maintains the total force at the isolation level within bounds in<br />

most earthquakes-the one exception being El Centro. In addition the controlled case maintains the interstory<br />

drifts and acceleration response of the two-story model within bounds. Thus the newly developed<br />

Lyapunov based control algorithm and the smart isolation system with MR damper is effective in reducing<br />

the base displacements, without further increases in the total force at the isolation level, interstory drifts<br />

and accelerations.<br />

Table 1 Peak Relative Base Displacement and Normalized Peak Shear Force at the Isolation Level of the<br />

Two-story Smart Sliding Isolated Structure<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Rel. Base Disp.(cm) Force at Isolation Level/W<br />

El Centro(100%)<br />

Sylmar 90 (80%)<br />

Sylmar 90(100%)<br />

Sylmar 360(105%)<br />

Newhall 90(100%)<br />

Newhall 360(100%)<br />

Kobe NS(80%)<br />

Kobe NS(100%)<br />

Kobe EW<br />

0 Volt<br />

0.938<br />

2.293<br />

3.00<br />

5.48<br />

1.815<br />

3.867<br />

2.511<br />

3.362<br />

2.578<br />

4 Volt<br />

0.85<br />

1.649<br />

2.15<br />

3.183<br />

1.614<br />

3.373<br />

2.45<br />

2.825<br />

2.24<br />

Control<br />

0.77<br />

1.484<br />

2.1<br />

3.02<br />

1.276<br />

3.294<br />

2.105<br />

2.543<br />

2.22<br />

0 Volt<br />

0.16<br />

0.224<br />

0.254<br />

0.354<br />

0.21<br />

0.293<br />

0.204<br />

0.235<br />

0.236<br />

4 Volt<br />

0.244<br />

L 0.263<br />

0.292<br />

0.343<br />

0.28<br />

0.349<br />

0.29<br />

0.312<br />

0.305<br />

Control<br />

0.243<br />

0.26<br />

0.279<br />

0.34<br />

0.261<br />

0.29<br />

0.28<br />

0.3<br />

0.278<br />

Comparison with Experimental Results<br />

Comparison of analytical and experimental results are presented in Table 4 for three earthquakes: (1)


220<br />

Sylmar 90, (2) Newhall 90, and (3) El Centro. As evident from Table 4 the comparison is satisfactory<br />

indicating'the accuracy of the analytical model. In addition it is worth noting in Table 4 that in the<br />

experimental results of Sylmar 90, Newhall 90, and El Centro the base displacement is reduced further by<br />

15 to 20 % in passive high damping case (4 volts) when compared to passive low damping (0 volts) case;<br />

this occurs due to increase in peak total force at the isolation level in the high damping case by 15 to 45<br />

% as compared to the low damping case. In the controlled case with smart damping the base displacement<br />

is further reduced by 10 to 15% while the peak total force at the isolation level is less than that of the<br />

high damping case. <strong>The</strong> controlled case reduces the base displacement, when compared to passive low and<br />

high damping cases, with no further increase in force as compared to passive high damping (4 volt) case.<br />

Also interstory drifts in the controlled case, presented in Table 4, are smaller than the passive high damping<br />

case, while the accelerations remain bounded. From Table 4 it is clearly evident that the reductions in base<br />

displacement and total isolation force in the experimental case are better than the analytical case.<br />

Table 2 Interstory Drifts of the Two-story Smart Sliding Isolated Structure<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> First Story Drift (cm) Second Story Drift (cm)<br />

El Centro<br />

Sylmar 90 (80%)<br />

Sylmar 90<br />

Sylmar 360<br />

Newhall 90<br />

Newhall 360<br />

Kobe NS(80%)<br />

Kobe NS<br />

KobeEW<br />

OVolt<br />

0.111<br />

0.109<br />

0.121<br />

0.149<br />

0.129<br />

0.137<br />

0.134<br />

0.14<br />

0.12<br />

4 Volt<br />

0.136<br />

0.144<br />

0.157<br />

0.165<br />

0.155<br />

0.179<br />

0.158<br />

0.18<br />

0.153<br />

Control<br />

0.136<br />

0.126<br />

0.156<br />

0.15<br />

0.141<br />

0.159<br />

0.151<br />

0.158<br />

0.145<br />

OVolt<br />

0.15<br />

0.143<br />

0.148<br />

0.181<br />

0.162<br />

0.153<br />

0.162<br />

0.169<br />

0.137<br />

4 Volt<br />

0.166<br />

0.181<br />

0.201<br />

0.215<br />

0.222<br />

0.227<br />

0.205<br />

0.222<br />

0.191<br />

Control<br />

0.166<br />

0.157<br />

0.2<br />

0.19<br />

0.209<br />

0.187<br />

0.187<br />

0.2<br />

0.172<br />

Table 3 Acceleration Response of the Two-story Smart Sliding Isolated Structure<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Base Ace. cm) First Fl. Ace. (g) Second Fl. Acc.(g)<br />

El Centro<br />

Sylmar 90 (80%)<br />

Sylmar 90<br />

Sylmar 360<br />

Newhall 90<br />

Newhall 360<br />

Kobe NS(80%)<br />

Kobe NS<br />

KobeEW<br />

0 V<br />

0.45<br />

0.48<br />

0.51<br />

0.55<br />

0.56<br />

0.47<br />

0.56<br />

0.633<br />

0.474<br />

4V<br />

0.76<br />

0.55<br />

0.61<br />

0.63<br />

0.75<br />

0.74<br />

0.752<br />

0.81<br />

0.64<br />

Cont.<br />

0.75<br />

0.51<br />

0.61<br />

0.6<br />

0.73<br />

0.66<br />

0.7<br />

0.736<br />

0.611<br />

0 V<br />

0.352<br />

0.333<br />

0.41<br />

0.55<br />

0.359<br />

0.46<br />

0.372<br />

0.47<br />

0.42<br />

4 V<br />

0.66<br />

0.435<br />

0.49<br />

0.564<br />

0.60<br />

0.49<br />

0.486<br />

0.524<br />

0.54<br />

Cont.<br />

0.66<br />

0.412<br />

0.489<br />

0.55<br />

0.60<br />

0.489<br />

0.485<br />

0.506<br />

0.518<br />

0 V<br />

0.497<br />

0.478<br />

0.5<br />

0.702<br />

0.551<br />

0.55<br />

0.59<br />

0.597<br />

0.494<br />

4V<br />

0.541<br />

0.576<br />

0.65<br />

0.679<br />

0.785<br />

0.79<br />

0.806<br />

0.789<br />

0.66<br />

Cont.<br />

0.54<br />

0.515<br />

0.645<br />

0.631<br />

0.774<br />

0.664<br />

0.72<br />

0.693<br />

0.6<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

Sylmar90<br />

Sylmar 90<br />

Sylmar 90<br />

Newk0190<br />

Newhall 90<br />

Newhall 90<br />

El Centro<br />

El Centro<br />

El Centro<br />

Table 4 Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Results<br />

MRD Relative Base Total Force First Story Second Story<br />

Disp. (cm.) Isol. Lvl./Wt. Drift (cm) Drift (cm)<br />

Expt. Anal. Expt. Anal. Expt. Anal Expt. Anal.<br />

0.0 V 2.179 2.293 0.212 0.224 0.113 0.109 0.127 0.143<br />

40V 1.761 1.649 0.28 0.263 0.139 0.144 0.147 0.181<br />

Control 1.409 1.484 0.26 0.26 0.128 0.126 0.141 0.157<br />

0.0 V 1.914 1.815 0.214 0.21 0.123 0.129 0.122 0.162<br />

4.0V 1.613 1.614 0.28 0.28 0.185 0.155 0.192 0.222<br />

Control 1.411 1.276 0.241 0.261 0.163 0.141 0.159 0.209<br />

0.0 V 0.969 0.938 0.166 0.16 0.098 0.111 0.142 0.15<br />

4.0V 0.928 0.847 0.246 0.244 0.131 0.136 0.159 0.166<br />

Control 0.743 0.775 0.24 0.24 0.119 0.136 0.142 0.166


221<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

Sylmar 90<br />

Sylinar 90<br />

Sylmar 90<br />

Newhall 90<br />

Newhall 90<br />

NewhaU 90<br />

El Centro<br />

El Centre<br />

El Centre<br />

MRD<br />

0.0 V<br />

40V<br />

Control<br />

0.0 V<br />

4.0V<br />

Control<br />

0.0 V<br />

4.0V<br />

Control<br />

Table 4 Continued<br />

Base Ace. (g) First Fl Acc.(g)<br />

0.38 0.296 0.384 0.478<br />

0.43 0.324 0.482 0.576<br />

0.40 0.32 0.481 0.515<br />

0.42 0.56 0.484 0.359<br />

0.565 0.75 L 0.544 0.60<br />

0.58 0.73 0762 0.60<br />

0.44 0.192 0.301 0.497<br />

0.40 0.308 0.364 0.541<br />

0.38 0.282 0.344 0.54<br />

Sec. Fl. Ace. (g)<br />

0.333 0.48<br />

0.435 0.55<br />

0.412 0.51<br />

0.359 0.551<br />

0.59 0.785<br />

0.609 0.774<br />

0.352 0.45<br />

0.66 0.76<br />

0.66 0.75<br />

Conclusions<br />

Analytical study of smart sliding isolated structure with MR dampers is presented. New detailed nonlinear<br />

analytical models for the smart sliding isolated structure and MR damper are developed and the solution<br />

procedure is presented. <strong>The</strong> analytical results are verified using shake table test results. <strong>The</strong> response to<br />

several near fault earthquakes is presented. From the presented analytical and experimental results T it is<br />

evident that the smart sliding isolation system with MR dampers is capable of reducing the base displacement<br />

response and the total isolation force further to the passive high damping case, while maintaining the<br />

interstory drifts and accelerations within bounds<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

Funding for this project provided by the National Science Foundation CAREER Grant (CMS-996290),<br />

with Dr. S. C. Liu and Dr P. Chang as program directors, is gratefully acknowledged<br />

References<br />

Gavin, H. and Aldernir, U. (2001). "Behavior and response of auto-adaptive seismic isolation," Proc. U.<br />

S. Japan Workshop in Urban <strong>Earthquake</strong> Disaster Mitigation, Seattle, WA.<br />

Maddan, G. J., Wongprasert, N., and Symans, M. D. (2000). "Adaptive seismic isolation systems for<br />

structures subjected to disparate earthquake ground motions,'" Proc. Structures Congress, ASCE, Philadelphia<br />

Ṅagarajaiah, S, Sahasrabudhe, S., and Iyer, R. (2000). "Seismic Response of Sliding Isolated Bridges with<br />

Smart Dampers Subjected to Near Source Ground Motions," Proc. Structures Congress, ASCE, Philadelphia.<br />

Sahasrabudhe, S., Nagarajaiah, S., and Hard, C. (2000). "Experimental Study of Sliding Isolated Buildings<br />

with Smart Dampers," Proc.Eng. Mech. Conf., ASCE, UT Austin.<br />

Sahasrabudhe, S., and Nagarajaiah, S. (2001)."Sliding Isolated Buildings with Smart Dampers: Shake<br />

Table Studies," Proc. Structures Congress, ASCE, Washington D. C.<br />

Spencer, B.F, Johnson, R. A., and Ramallo, J. C., (2000)."Smart isolation for seismic control," JSME<br />

Int. J. Series C-Mech. Sys. Machine Elem. And Manufacturing, 43 (7), 704-711.<br />

Taylor, D. P., and Constantinou, M. C. (2001). "Fluid Dampers for Applications of Seismic Energy<br />

Dissipation and Seismic Isolation" Taylor Devices Inc., also see http://www.taylordevices.com/.<br />

Yang, J. N., and Agrawal, A. K. (2002)."Semiactive hybrid control systems for nonlinear buildings against<br />

near-field earthquakes," Eng. Structures, 24 (3): 271-280.<br />

Yoshioka, H., Ramallo, J. C.; and B. F. Spencer Jr. (2002). "Smart Base Isolation Strategies Employing<br />

Magnetorheological Dampers," J. of Eng. Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 5.


222<br />

V<br />

•03 -W<br />

-0.3 .02<br />

Figure 3. Response of the Prototype Smart SHding Isolated Rigid Structure (SDOF) with an<br />

Isolation Period of 2 sec to a Cosine Pulse Excitation of 2 sec Period<br />

Figure 4. Response of a Prototype Smart Sliding Isolated Structure (3DOF) with an<br />

Isolation Period of 4 sec to a Newhall FN <strong>Earthquake</strong> Excitation


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SEISMIC PROTECTION OF A BENCHMARK CABLE-STAYED<br />

BRIDGE USING A HYBRID CONTROL STRATEGY<br />

K. S. Park, H. J. Jung, K. M. Choi, and I. W. Lee<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper presents a hybrid control strategy for seismic protection of a benchmark cable-stayed bridge,<br />

which is provided as a testbed structure for the development of strategies for the control of cablestayed<br />

badges. In this study, a hybrid control system is composed of a passive control system to reduce<br />

the earthquake-induced forces in the structure and an active control system to further reduce the bridge<br />

responses, especially deck displacements. Lead rubber bearings and ideal hydraulic actuators are used<br />

for the passive and active control systems. An H 2 fLQG control algorithm is adopted as an active<br />

control algorithm. Numerical simulation results show that the performance of the proposed hybrid<br />

control strategy is superior to that of the passive control strategy and slightly better than that of the<br />

active control strategy. <strong>The</strong> proposed control method is also more reliable than the fully active control<br />

method due to the passive control part. <strong>The</strong>refore, the proposed hybrid control strategy can effectively<br />

be used to seismically excited cable-stayed bridges.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Structural control systems, such as passive, active, semiactive or a combination thereof, could provide<br />

an efficient means for seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges, but the control of such type of bridge<br />

is a new, unique and challenging problem because those structures are very large and flexible.


224<br />

Under the coordination of the ASCE Committee on Structural Control, Dyke et al developed the first<br />

generation of benchmark structural control problems for seismically excited cable-stayed bridges to<br />

investigate the effectiveness of various control strategies (Dyke et al., 2000). In this study, a hybrid<br />

control strategy for the seismic protection of a cable-stayed bridge is investigated by using this ASCE<br />

first generation benchmark bridge model.<br />

BENCHMARK PROBLEM STATEMENT<br />

This benchmark problem considers the cable-stayed bridge shown in Fig. 1, which is scheduled for<br />

completion 2003 in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, USA. In this benchmark study, only the cable-stayed<br />

portion of the bridge is considered, because the Illinois approach has a negligible effect on the<br />

dynamics of the cable-stayed portion of the bridge. Based on detailed drawings of the bridge, Dyke et<br />

al developed and made available a three-dimensional linearized evaluation model that effectively<br />

represents the complex behavior of the full-scale benchmark bridge. <strong>The</strong> stiffness matrices used in this<br />

linear model are those of the structure determined through a nonlinear static analysis corresponding to<br />

the deformed state of the bridge with dead loads. Because this bridge is assumed to be attached to<br />

bedrock, the effect of the soil-structure interaction has been neglected. A one-dimensional ground<br />

acceleration is applied in the longitudinal direction for seismically excited cable-stayed bridges.<br />

142.7m 350.6m 142.7m 57Dm<br />

Bout Pier 2<br />

Q Cable Number<br />

FIGURE 1 SCHEMATIC OF THE CAPE GIRARDEAU BRIDGE (Dyke et a/., 2000)<br />

Application of static condensation to the full model of the bridge as a model reduction scheme resulted<br />

in a 419 DOF reduced-order model, designated the evaluation model. Each mode of this evaluation<br />

model has 3% of critical damping, which is consistent with assumptions made during the design of<br />

bridge. <strong>The</strong> first ten frequencies of the evaluation model for the uncontrolled system are 0.2899,<br />

0.3699, 0.4683, 0.5158, 0.5812, 0.6490, 0.6687, 0.6970, 0.7102, and 0.7203 Hz. <strong>The</strong> deck-tower<br />

connections in this model are fixed (Le., the dynamically stiff shock transmission devices are present).<br />

On the other hand, another evaluation model should be formed in which the connection between the<br />

tower and the deck are disconnected to place control devices acting longitudinally. <strong>The</strong> first ten<br />

frequencies of this second model are 0,1618, 0.2666, 0.3723, 0.4545, 0.5015, 0.5650, 0.6187, 0.6486,


225<br />

0.6965, and 0.7094 Hz, which are much lower than those of the nominal bridge model<br />

Three historical earthquake records are considered as ground excitations for numerical simulations of<br />

seismic protective systems installed in the bridge: i) 1940 El Centre NS; ii) 1985 Mexico City; and iii)<br />

1999 Turkey Gebze NS. Eighteen criteria have been defined to evaluate the capabilities of each<br />

proposed control strategy. <strong>The</strong> first six evaluation criteria are peak responses of the bridge to consider<br />

the ability of the controller. <strong>The</strong> second five evaluation criteria consider normed responses over the<br />

entire simulation time. <strong>The</strong> last seven evaluation criteria consider the requirements of each control<br />

system itself. More details can be found in Dyke et al. (2000).<br />

SEISMIC CONTROL SYSTEM USING HYBRID CONTROL STRATEGY<br />

Control Devices<br />

Passive control devices<br />

In this study, conventional base isolation devices such as lead rubber bearings (LRBs) are used. <strong>The</strong><br />

design of passive control device follows a general and recommended procedure (Ah" and Abdel-<br />

Ghaffar, 1995). In the design procedure, the design shear force level for the yielding of lead plugs is<br />

taken to be 0.1 OM, where M is the part of the deck weight carried by bearings. <strong>The</strong> asymptotic<br />

stiffness ratio of the bearings at the bent and tower are assumed to be 1.0. As the results, a total of 24<br />

LRBs are placed between the deck and pier/bent. Six LRBs are installed between the each deck and<br />

pier/bent. <strong>The</strong> properties of LRBs are shown in Table 1 and these LRBs are installed after removing<br />

the horizontal stiffness of beam element in pier 4.<br />

Nonlinear model proposed by Wen (Wen, 1989) is used to simulate the motion of nonlinear dynamics<br />

of the LRB. <strong>The</strong> restoring force of the model is composed of the linear and the nonlinear terms as<br />

(1)<br />

(2)


226<br />

where k 0 and a are the linear stiffness and its contribution to restoring force, x r and x r are relative<br />

displacement and relative velocity of nodes which LRBs are installed, respectively. And D v and 3; are<br />

the yield displacement of LRB and the variable, respectively, satisfying Eqn. 2.<br />

where A to y, f> and n are the constant that affect the hysteretic behavior. <strong>The</strong> values of A,=rc=l and<br />

CE=/3=0.5 are used to simulate the characteristic curve of the LRB in this study.<br />

TABLE 1<br />

THE PROPERTIES OF THE LRB<br />

Property<br />

Elastic stiffness, & e (N/rn)<br />

Plastic stiffness, Ap(N/m)<br />

Yield displacement of lead plugs, D v (cm)<br />

Design shear force level for the yielding of lead plugs, Q


227<br />

Two displacement sensors are positioned between the deck and pier 2 and two displacement sensors<br />

are located between the deck and pier 3. All sensor measurements are obtained in the longitudinal<br />

direction to the bridge and are assumed to be ideal, having a constant magnitude and phase (Dyke et al,<br />

2000).<br />

Control Design Model<br />

A reduced order model of the system is developed for control design, which is formed from the<br />

evaluation model and has 30 states. This model obtained by forming a balanced realization of the<br />

system and condensing out the states with relatively small controllability and observability grammians<br />

(Laub et al., 1987). <strong>The</strong> resulting state space system is represented as follows<br />

(5)<br />

(6)<br />

(7)<br />

where x^ is the design state vector , x s is the ground acceleration, u is the control command input, and<br />

z is the regulated output vector including evaluation outputs (Le,, shear force and moments in the tower,<br />

deck displacements, and cable tension forces, etc).<br />

Control Algorithm<br />

In this study, an #2/LQG control design is adopted for the active control part. For this design, x g is<br />

taken to be a stationary white noise, and an infinite horizontal cost function is chosen as<br />

(8)<br />

where R is an identity matrix of order 8, and Q is the response weighting matrix. Further, the<br />

measurement noise is assumed to be identically distributed, statistically independent Gaussian white<br />

noise process, and the ratio of autospectral density function is 25.


228<br />

In the optimal control such as LQG, obtaining the appropriate weighting parameters is very important<br />

to get well-performed controllers. In this study, the maximum response approach is used as follows: i)<br />

select the responses which could be considered as the important responses for the overall behaviors of<br />

the bridge; ii) perform the simulations in each parameter with varying the value of the parameter and<br />

determine the appropriate weighting parameters and combination; iii) perform the additional<br />

simulation in the combination of the weighting parameters selected in the previous step and finally<br />

select the appropriate values of each weighting parameters. Consequently, the following combination<br />

and values of weighting parameters are obtained through the abovementioned approach for active and<br />

hybrid control systems:<br />


229<br />

14% to 45% (under El Centre earthquake), 11% ~ 24% (under Mexico City earthquake), and 10% ~<br />

57% (under Gebze earthquake) compared to the passive control system. <strong>The</strong> structural responses with<br />

the hybrid control system under El Centro earthquake are decreased by 1% - 26% compared to the<br />

active control system. All the structural responses except the peak shear at deck level (J 2 ) are<br />

decreased by 0.3% - 35% under Mexico City earthquake. J 2 is increased by 2%. In the case of<br />

Gebze earthquake, the structural responses are decreased by 4% - 24%, whereas the normed moment<br />

at deck level (Jio) is increased by 2%. Moreover, active and hybrid control systems are satisfied the<br />

actuator requirement (Le., Max force: 1000 kN, Max Stroke: 0.2 m, Max velocity: 1 m/s) given by<br />

Dyke et al (2000).<br />

(a) El Centro earthquake (b) Mexico City earthquake (c) Gebze earthquake<br />

FIGURE 2 RESTORING FORCE OF LRB AT PIER 2<br />

TABLE 2<br />

MAXIMUM EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ALL THE THREE EARTHQUAKES<br />

Criterion<br />

J r peak base shear<br />

J 2- peak shear at deck level<br />

J 3- peak overturning mom<br />

J 4- peak mom. at deck level<br />

J 5- peak dev. of cable tension<br />

JCT peak deck displacement<br />

J 7- normed base shear<br />

Jg- normed shear at deck level<br />

Jg- normed overturning mom.<br />

JUT normed mom. at deck level<br />

IIP normed dev. of cable tension<br />

J 12- peak control force<br />

J 13- peak stroke<br />

JV peak power<br />

J 15- peak total power<br />

lie- no. of control devices<br />

Ji7- no. of sensors<br />

Jis~ no. of resources<br />

Dvke et aL<br />

0.4582<br />

1.3784<br />

0.5836<br />

1.2246<br />

0.1861<br />

3.5640<br />

0.3983<br />

1.4271<br />

0.4552<br />

1.4569<br />

2.2968e-2<br />

1.7145e-3<br />

1.9540<br />

7.3689e-3<br />

6.9492e-4<br />

24<br />

9<br />

30<br />

Passive Control<br />

0.5459<br />

1.4616<br />

0.6188<br />

1.2656<br />

0.2077<br />

3.8289<br />

0.4211<br />

1.5502<br />

0.4815<br />

1.4429<br />

2.2327e-2<br />

2.l611e-3<br />

2.0993<br />

-<br />

-<br />

24<br />

,<br />

-<br />

Active Control<br />

0.5071<br />

1.1576<br />

0.4485<br />

0.8792<br />

0.1474<br />

1.8023<br />

0.3755<br />

0.9510<br />

0.3563<br />

0.7618<br />

1.6176e-2<br />

1.9608e-3<br />

0.9886<br />

9.3311e-3<br />

8.7997e-4<br />

24<br />

9<br />

30<br />

Hybrid Control<br />

0.4854<br />

0.9360<br />

0.4471<br />

0.6719<br />

0.1462<br />

1.6629<br />

0.3723<br />

0.9169<br />

0.3336<br />

0.7799<br />

1.8215e-2<br />

LRB+HA:<br />

2.6438e-3<br />

LRB: 1.2246e-3<br />

HA: 1.9608e-3<br />

0.9118<br />

6.6678e-3<br />

8.4888e-4<br />

LRB-fHA:<br />

24-^-24<br />

9<br />

30


230<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

In this paper, a hybrid control strategy, which is composed of a passive control system to reduce the<br />

earthquake-induced forces in the structure and an active control system to further reduce the bridge<br />

responses, especially deck displacements, has been proposed by investigating the ASCE first<br />

generation benchmark control problem for seismic responses of cable-stayed badges. <strong>The</strong> proposed<br />

control design uses conventional base isolation devices such as LRBs and ideal hydraulic actuators for<br />

the passive and active control systems. <strong>The</strong> Bouc-Wen model is used to simulate the nonlinear behavior<br />

of these devices. An #2/LQG control algorithm is adopted for the active control part. <strong>The</strong> numerical<br />

results show that all the structural responses with the proposed hybrid control strategy except the peak<br />

shear at deck level under Mexico City earthquake and the normed moment at deck level under Gebze<br />

earthquake are decreased by 03% ~ 35% compared to the active control strategy. In the comparison to<br />

the passive control system, all the structural responses are decreased by 10% ~ 57% because of the<br />

additional active control devices in the hybrid control system. <strong>The</strong> hybrid control strategy is also more<br />

reliable than the active control method due to the passive control part. <strong>The</strong>refore, the proposed hybrid<br />

control strategy can effectively be used to seismically excited cable-stayed bridges.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This research was supported by the National <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory Grant(No. : 2000-N-NL-01-C-251)<br />

in Korea. <strong>The</strong> financial support is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

All H. M., and Abdel-Ghaffar A. M, (1995). Seismic passive control of cable-stayed bridges. Shock<br />

and Vibration 2:4,259-272.<br />

Dyke S. J., Turan G.., Caicedo J. M., Bergman L. A., and Hague S. (2000). Benchmark control<br />

problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. http://wusseLcive.wustl.edu/quake/<br />

Wen Y. K. (1989). Method for random vibration for inelastic structures. Journal of applied mechanics<br />

division 42:2, 39-52.<br />

Laub, A. J., Heakth, M. T., Paige, C C, and Ward, R, C. (1987). Computation of system balancing<br />

transformations and other applications of simultaneous diagonalization algorithms. IEEE Transaction<br />

on Automatic Control AC-32,17-32.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

STRUCTURAL VIBRATION CONTROL USING PIEZOCERAMIC<br />

PATCH ACTUATOR<br />

G. Song 'and B. Xie<br />

Smart Materials & Structures Laboratory<br />

Department of Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> of Akron,<br />

Akron, OH 44325-3903 USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper presents active vibration control of a 3-floor model building using piezoceramic patch<br />

actuators. Piezoceramic material possesses the property of piezoelectricity, which describes the<br />

phenomenon of generating an electric charge in a material when subjected to a mechanical stress (direct<br />

effect), and conversely, generating a mechanical strain in response to an applied electric field. This<br />

property prepares piezoceramic materials being able to function as both sensors and actuators. <strong>The</strong><br />

advantages of piezoceramic include high efficiency, no moving parts, fast response, and being compact. A<br />

commonly used piezoceramic is the Lead zirconate titanate (PZT), which has a strong piezoeffect. PZT<br />

actuation strain can be on the order of 1000 £i strain. Within the linear range, PZT actuators produce<br />

strains that are proportional to the applied electric field/voltage. <strong>The</strong>se features make them attractive for<br />

dynamic applications. PZT can be fabricated into different shapes to meet specific geometric<br />

requirements. PZT patches are often used as both sensors and actuators, which can be surface-bonded to<br />

various structures. In the research, surface-bonded PZT patches are used as both sensor and actuators.<br />

Prior to control design, experimental modal testing of the model building is performed to reveal the<br />

dominant modes and their corresponding modal shapes. This information is then used in the control<br />

design. Several controllers, positive position feedback, strain rate feedback, and sliding-mode control, are<br />

designed and implemented on the 3-floor model building. Increased vibration damping is observed in all<br />

control designs. A comparative study is conducted to reveal the advantages and disadvantages of each<br />

control design.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

Recent years have seen the emergence of the new field of structural control "smart structure" or "active<br />

structure" for application to active control of seismic-excited linear and nonlinear civil engineering<br />

structures. <strong>The</strong> term of "smart structure" or "active structure" is uses to describe a structure, which has the<br />

ability to sense and adapt to the changing operational condition according to the designed specifications.<br />

Smart structures are characterized by integrating sensors, actuators and micro-processors. Among the<br />

smart materials used in the smart structures, piezoceramics has proven to be one of the most promising<br />

ones in the active control applications. <strong>The</strong> advantages of piezoceramic include high efficiency, no<br />

<strong>The</strong> author to whom all correspondence should be addressed, Tel: (330) 972- 6715; Fax: (330) 972- 6027; Email:


232<br />

moving parts, and fast response, being compact and easy implementation. A commonly used<br />

piezoceramic is the lead zirconate titanate (PZT), which can produce a maximum actuation strain on the<br />

order of 1 000 \JL strain. Furthermore, PZT actuators produce strains that are proportional to the applied<br />

electric field/voltage within linear range, which have bandwidths beyond the frequency range of structural<br />

and acoustic control applications. <strong>The</strong>se features make them attractive for active control applications.<br />

<strong>The</strong> controller design of smart structures has been based on the linear and nonlinear control theories. In<br />

the linear controller, positive position feedback (PPF) (Goh and Caughey (1985); Fanson and Caughey<br />

(1990); Agrawal and Bang (1994); Song et al, (2000)) is applied by feeding the structural position<br />

coordinate directly to the compensator, and the product of the compensator and a scalar gain positively<br />

back to the structure. Song et al (1998) experimentally demonstrated that PPF is insensitive to a varying<br />

modal frequency. Strain Rate Feedback (SRF) control is also used for active damping of a flexible space<br />

structure (Newman (1992), Song etal (2002)).<br />

In the nonlinear control of civil engineering application, Yang et al (1997) has used the sliding mode<br />

controller for wind and seismic response control application on ten-story and forty-story steel frame<br />

building. Allen et al (2000) has used this control algorithm to control a large flexible structure,<br />

In this paper, the objective is to examine the effectiveness using smart sensors and actuators for active<br />

vibration control on a 3-floor model building. Prior to control design and implementation, the<br />

experimental modal testing of the model building is performed to obtain the natural frequency and their<br />

corresponding modal shapes. PZT will be used as both sensors and actuators in this research. <strong>The</strong>se three<br />

active vibration control methods, positive position feedback (PPF), strain rate feedback (SRF), and<br />

sliding-mode controller (SMC), are designed and implemented.<br />

2 VIBRATION SUPPRESSION METHODS<br />

For this research three vibration-suppression methods were identified viz. Positive Position Feedback<br />

(PPF), Strain Rate Feedback (SRF), and sliding mode control (SMC).<br />

2.1 Positive Position Feedback Control<br />

Positive Position Feedback (PPF) control was first proposed by Goh and Caughey (1985) as a robust<br />

control solution since it is insensitive to spillover phenomenon. It is not destabilized by the finite actuator<br />

dynamics and the stability is guaranteed by only considering the structures stiffness properties only. Later<br />

Song et al (2002) experimentally demonstrated PPF control in pultruded fiber-reinforced polymer I-beam.<br />

<strong>The</strong> PPF control is applied by feeding the structural position coordinate directly to the second order<br />

system. <strong>The</strong> position is then positively fed back to the structure. PPF offers quick damping for the<br />

controlled mode provided that the natural frequency and gain are known. <strong>The</strong> scalar equations governing<br />

the vibration of the structure in a single mode and the PPF controller are given as:<br />

Structure: £ 4- 2go> -h &r£ ~bu (1)<br />

Controller: 77 + 2q c O) c fj + 0777 = gO)^ (2)<br />

-^(fVl (3)<br />

where § , q and oo are the modal co-ordinate displacement, damping ratio, and natural frequency of the<br />

structure respectively. In the controller equation, r\, q ff , co c , g are the compensator co-ordinate<br />

displacement, damping ratio, natural frequency, and feedback gain of the controller. It can be proved<br />

(Friswell and Inman, (1997)) that the stability condition is satisfied if and only if


233<br />

g ^ w (4)<br />

Notice that the stability condition depends only on the natural frequency rather than the damping ratio of<br />

the structures. In order to achieve maximum damping effect in the PPF control, the natural frequency<br />

should be closely matched to that of the structure.<br />

2.2 Strain Rate Feedback Control<br />

Strain rate feedback control (SRF) is implemented by feeding the velocity co-ordinate to the compensator.<br />

<strong>The</strong> position co-ordinate of the compensator is then fed back with a negative gain to the structure. When a<br />

smart structure is involved using a collocated PZT actuator and sensor, this control is achieved by feeding<br />

the derivative of the voltage from the sensor, which is proportional to the strain rate, to the input of the<br />

compensator and applying the negative compensator output voltage to the actuator. <strong>The</strong> scalar equations<br />

governing the vibration of the structure in a single mode and the SRF controller are given as:<br />

-gQ} 2 7l (5)<br />

= a; t 2 f (6)<br />

<strong>The</strong> variables above are the same as those defined in the PPF control. <strong>The</strong> stability condition requires that<br />

the frequency in the second order compensator be greater than the controlled mode frequency of the<br />

structure. As compared with the PPF, SRF has a much wider active damping frequency region, which<br />

gives a designer some flexibility. Selecting a precise compensator frequency for SELF is not as critical as<br />

for PPF. As long as the compensator satisfies the stability condition, a certain amount of damping will be<br />

provided. SRF can also stabilize more than one mode given a sufficient bandwidth. A limitation of SRF is<br />

that the magnitude of the transfer function in the active damping region becomes extremely small very<br />

quickly. <strong>The</strong>refore, the amount of damping provided SRF over a certain frequency range is limited.<br />

2.3 Sliding-Mode Based Robust Controller<br />

Sliding mode controller (SMC) technique is naturally robust with respect to the uncertainty in the<br />

structural parameters and external disturbances. In principle, SMC consists of the control law that<br />

switches with infinite speed to drive the system on a specified state trajectory, called the sliding surface,<br />

and has capability to keep the state on this surface. Clearly, this controller belongs to the non-linear robust<br />

controller. Among the design issues, the most important is to design the sliding surface and reduce the<br />

chatter phenomenon. <strong>The</strong> governing equation of the structure is the same as described in equation (1). <strong>The</strong><br />

control force in the SMC framework is obtained by following the equivalent control method, which<br />

requires that the sliding surface r = £ + A£ and r = 0 , and the control force is called as the equivalent<br />

force. <strong>The</strong> parameter A is a positive constant. <strong>The</strong> control law can be expressed as<br />

u = -K D r~-pszt(ar) (7)<br />

where K D and r are positive constants. <strong>The</strong> parameter p called robust gain is maximum value of the<br />

nonlinear switching control action to account for the disturbance. And the sat function is a nonlinear<br />

saturation function imposing upper and lower bounds on a signal. <strong>The</strong> function is defined as<br />

Isgn(ar)<br />

otherwise<br />

(8)


234<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose of the robust compensator (psat(ar)) is to reduce the undesirable so-called chattering<br />

phenomenon. Continuity of the control force between the upper bound and the lower bound of sliding<br />

surface reduces chattering.<br />

3 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF ACTIVE VIBRATION SUPPRESSION<br />

3.1 Experimental Setup<br />

<strong>The</strong> control objective is to show the effectiveness of various vibration suppression strategies for a 3-floor<br />

model building by using smart sensors and actuators. <strong>The</strong> setup is shown in Figure 1. Two pairs of larger<br />

PZT patches are surface-bonded both support beams near their base ends. <strong>The</strong>se PZT patches are used as<br />

actuators to excite the building and to enable active control of the model building vibration. <strong>The</strong>re are also<br />

four smaller PZT patches surface-bonded on one the support beam of<br />

the model building. <strong>The</strong>se four PZT patches act as sensors for the<br />

feedback of the signal in the active control algorithms. <strong>The</strong> sensor<br />

signal from the bottom floor (near the actuator pair) of the model<br />

building is used for feedback control. <strong>The</strong> sampling frequency for real<br />

time control was set to Ik Hz.<br />

Fig. 1 Experimental setup<br />

In the research, various vibration control algorithm are used to control<br />

vibration of the model building. <strong>The</strong> modal parameters of the first two<br />

modes have been determined by experiment before control design and<br />

implementation. <strong>The</strong> fundamental frequency and the corresponding<br />

damping ratio were found experimentally to be 7.81Hz and 0.0081<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> second natural frequency is 24.0Hz. In each test, the<br />

system is excited by a combination of a sinusoidal signal at the first<br />

modal frequency and a white noise for the initial 5 seconds. Various<br />

control methods are then applied to control the induced vibration. <strong>The</strong><br />

uncontrolled response of model building is shown Figure 2.<br />

3.2 PPF Experimental Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> positive position feedback control was implemented using the experimental set up described in the<br />

previous section. <strong>The</strong> first mode vibration control is investigated first. Different values of gains were<br />

tested. <strong>The</strong> PPF controller-damping ratio q c was set to 0.4 and controller frequency co c was set at 49<br />

rad/sec (7.8Hz). <strong>The</strong> controller-damping ratio q c was chosen as a compromise between damping<br />

effectiveness and robustness.<br />

Figure 3 shows the corresponding PPF controlled vibrations of the model building. <strong>The</strong> PPF<br />

controlled vibrations of the model building damp out within 5 seconds after excitation. <strong>The</strong> PSD plot<br />

for 5-15 seconds is shown in Figure 4(a). A drop of 51dB as compared to the uncontrolled energy level is<br />

observed during this period of active control. <strong>The</strong> corresponding damping ratio was calculated and found<br />

to be 0.0499, as compared with the free vibration damping ratio of 0.0081. This represents an increase of<br />

516%. A number of tests were conducted with variation in the PPF gain while keeping c, c at 0.4 and co c at<br />

49 rad/sec. <strong>The</strong> results are shown in table 1, which shows that maximum damping is achieved at the gain<br />

of 15.<br />

PPF control is then extended to control several modes simultaneously. If the first two modes are under<br />

control, the modal selectivity is also achieved by tuning the compensator frequency co c on the targeted


235<br />

modes. An energy drop will be obtained in the second mode as the first mode. Figure 4(b) shows that the<br />

energy drops about 17 dB in the second mode when compared with the uncontrolled system response.<br />

with control<br />

time(s)<br />

Fig. 2 Free response of the building<br />

time(s)<br />

Fig 3 PPF controlled system response<br />

Table 1 PPF result for 1st mode<br />

Gain 1st modal dB drop Controlled damping ratio % Change in damping<br />

5<br />

10<br />

12.5<br />

15<br />

44.75<br />

50.9<br />

50.4<br />

48.8<br />

0.0313<br />

0.0467<br />

0.0499<br />

0.0519<br />

286.42<br />

476.54<br />

516.05<br />

540.74<br />

with control<br />

without control<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

(a)PPF with first mode under control (b) PPF with first two modes under control<br />

Fig. 4 PSD plot comparison for PPF control


236<br />

3.3 SRF Experimental Results<br />

In this research, the strain rate feedback control is designed to control the vibration of the fundamental<br />

mode. <strong>The</strong> SRF controller-damping ratio q c was set at 0.10, controller frequency co c was set at 62.8<br />

rad/sec (lOHz), which is greater than the targeted mode of 7.62Hz and the effectiveness of SRF controller<br />

at various gains was tested. <strong>The</strong> results are shown in table 2, with maximum energy drop achieved at gain<br />

of 0.12.<br />

SRF<br />

Gain<br />

0.12<br />

0.15<br />

0.17<br />

0.20<br />

Modal dB drop<br />

j-ij sec<br />

52.66<br />

52.80<br />

50.35<br />

49.12<br />

Table 2 SRF Results<br />

Contn)Ued damping ratio<br />

0.040<br />

0.042<br />

0.043<br />

0.045<br />

% Change in damping<br />

387.7<br />

423.4<br />

435.8<br />

451.2<br />

<strong>The</strong> excitation in the SRF experiment is the same as that in the PPF experiment. <strong>The</strong> SRF controlled<br />

system response is depicted in Figure 5. <strong>The</strong> building vibrations disappear within 5 seconds after the<br />

excitation signal is stopped. When compared to the PPF controller, the results are almost as dramatic as<br />

that of PPF. <strong>The</strong> PSD plot for 5-15 seconds is shown in Figure 6. <strong>The</strong> SRF control was accompanied with<br />

a drop of about 50 dB in the energy level of the model building in the period of active control. <strong>The</strong><br />

damping ratio achieved was 0.045. As compared with the undamped ratio of 0.008, this represents an<br />

increase of 451%.<br />

with control<br />

CD<br />

H,.<br />

"55<br />

with control<br />

— - without control<br />

>,.30<br />

O)<br />

time(s)<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Fig. 5 SRF control response of the model<br />

building<br />

Fig. 6 PSD plots of uncontrolled and SRF<br />

controlled model building for 5-15 sec<br />

3.4 SMC Experimental Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> sliding mode control algorithm is also applied to control the vibration of the 3-floor model building.<br />

Since the first mode dominants the free response, the sliding mode control will suppress the first mode<br />

vibration. Following the method discussed by Adhikari and Yamaguichi (1997)), the controller<br />

parameters are A = 0.5, p = 1, and a = 1, and thus the sliding surface is r = £ + 0.5§ =0.<br />

In the research, the excitation of the model building is the same as those in the PPF and SRF control. <strong>The</strong><br />

SMC controlled response is shown in Figure 7 and the corresponding PSD plot for 5-15 seconds is<br />

depicted in Figure 8. An energy drop of 51dB as compared with the uncontrolled energy level is observed<br />

during this period of active control. <strong>The</strong> vibration control of the first mode is comparable to that of the


237<br />

PPF controller. <strong>The</strong> second mode energy experienced a small increase rather than a decrease. This is<br />

mainly due to the switching nature of the SMC.<br />

In the controller law, the parameter p is set to be a constant of 1. <strong>The</strong> maximum control voltage is<br />

assumed to be 100V. <strong>The</strong> phase plane plot of the closed-loop system is shown in Figure 9 and the<br />

corresponding control voltage is shown in Figure 10. It can be clearly seen from the phase plane plot that<br />

the system trajectory converges to the equilibrium point. <strong>The</strong> control objective is achieved.<br />

with control<br />

with control<br />

without control<br />

time(s)<br />

Fig. 7 Sliding mode control response<br />

10 20 30 40<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Fig. 8 PSD plot of uncontrolled and SMC<br />

controlled model building for 5-15 sec<br />

"5<br />

o<br />

Phase plane plot<br />

Control voltage<br />

Displacement(V)<br />

Fig 9 Phase plane plot of the SMC<br />

time(s)<br />

Fig 10 Control voltage<br />

4. CONCLUSION<br />

<strong>The</strong> paper experimentally demonstrated the vibration suppression of a 3-floor model building using the<br />

positive position feedback (PPF), strain rate feedback (SKF), and sliding mode control (SMC). Since the<br />

same computerized excitation was used all the tests, the energy level drop in the power spectrum density<br />

plots as compared with uncontrolled case is used as one index to examine the effectiveness of the control<br />

method. <strong>The</strong> first mode is the dominant mode and is the main concern for vibradon control. Increased<br />

vibration damping is observed in all control designs. A maximum increase in damping ratio of 540% was<br />

obtained and energy level drop of 51dB was achieved in the case of PPF control. <strong>The</strong> PPF control was the


238<br />

most effective control strategy. Multi-mode PPF control targeting at the first two modes was tested and<br />

achieved energy level drop in both modes simultaneously. Compared to SRF control, the PPF controller<br />

will have most likely to become unstable due to the natural frequency change of the system. <strong>Research</strong><br />

work is currently being conducted using adaptive positive position feedback control Sliding mode control<br />

in the research achieves energy level as much as those in the PPF control <strong>The</strong> main disadvantage of the<br />

sliding mode control is the excitation of high modes and relatively large initial overshoot.<br />

5. Acknowledgements<br />

<strong>The</strong> first author would like to thank the support provided by NSF via a CAREER grant.<br />

6. REFERENCES<br />

1. Goh C J and Caughey T K (1985), On the stability problem caused by finite actuator dynamics in the<br />

collocated control of large space structure, International Journal of Control, 41:3, 787-802.<br />

2. Fanson J L and Caughey T K (1990), Positive position feedback control for large space structures, Am.<br />

Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut J., 28:4, 717-724.<br />

3. Agrawal B N and Bang H (1994), Adaptive Structure for Large Precision Antennas, 45th Congress of<br />

the International Astronautical Federation, Jerusalem, Israel,<br />

4. Song G, Schmidt S P and Agrawal B N (2000), Active vibration suppression of a flexible structure<br />

using smart material and modular control patch, Proc Institute of Mechanical Engineers, 214 Part G<br />

217-229.<br />

5. Song G, Schmidt S P and Agrawal B N (1998), Experimental Study of Vibration Suppression of<br />

Flexible Structure Using Modular Control Patch, Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference,<br />

Snowmass, Co.<br />

6. Won C C, Sulla L, Sparks D W and Belvin W K(1994), "Application of piezoelectric devices to<br />

vibration suppression", J. Guidance, Control, Dynamics, 17(6), 1333-1338.<br />

7. Song G, Qiao P, Sethi V. Active Vibration Control of a Smart Pultruded Fiber-Reinforced Polymer 1-<br />

Beam, Proceedings ofSPIE9th Smart Material & Structural Conference (San Diego, CA), 2002.<br />

8. Manning WJ et a/,(2000) "Vibration Control of a Flexible Beam with Integrated Actuators and<br />

Sensors", Smart Material and Structures, 9, 932-939.<br />

9. Yang J.N, et al (1997) Sliding Mode Control With Compensator For Wind and Seismic response<br />

Control, <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 26, 1137-1156.<br />

10. Allen M., et al (2000) "Sliding Mode Control of a Large Flexible Space Structure", Control of<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Practice, 8, 861-871.<br />

11. Sugavanam S, et al (1998) "Modeling and Control of a Lightly Dampe T-Beam Using Piezoceramic<br />

Actuators and Sensors", Smart Material and Structures, 7, 899-906.<br />

12. Preumont A (1996) "Vibration Control of Active Structures—An Introduction", Kluwer Academic<br />

Publishers.<br />

13. Dorf R.C, Bishop R.H (1998) "Modern Control Systems", Addison-Wesley.<br />

14. Adhikari R, Yamaguichi H,(1997) "Sliding Mode Control of Building with ATMD", <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 26, 400-422.<br />

15. Friswell M.I, Inman DJ. (1997) "<strong>The</strong> Relationship between Positive Position Feedback and Output<br />

Feedback Controllers", Smart Material and Structures, 8, 285-291.


Proceedings of the International Conference on 239<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF MR<br />

MATERIALS IN FLOW MODE<br />

X. Wang 1 , F. Gordaninejad 1 , G. H. Hitchcock 1 ,<br />

A. Fuchs 2 , M. Xin 2 and G. Korol 3<br />

1 Department of Mechanical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA<br />

Department of Chemical <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA<br />

3 Visteon Automotive Systems, Dearborn, MI 48126, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A flow mode type rheometer is developed to evaluate the tunable rheological properties of magnetorheological<br />

(MR) materials. <strong>The</strong> proposed method is simple, and provides measurement of the<br />

apparent viscosity and yield stress of MR materials. In addition, a theoretical shear stress-shear strain<br />

rate relationship is developed based on a non-Newtonian fluid flow analysis. <strong>The</strong> rheological<br />

properties of a commercial MR fluid and a newly developed magneto-rheological polymeric gel<br />

(MRPG) are investigated. Experimental shear stress results are presented for a shear strain rate range<br />

of 20s" 1 to 20,000s" 1 . <strong>The</strong> results for apparent viscosity, dynamic and static shear yield stress under the<br />

influence of different applied magnetic fields are reported.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Typically, the design of an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) damper consists of one or more<br />

orifices which either are located within the piston or are external by-passes. For most applications, a<br />

magneto-rheological (MR) fluid damper can have a similar orifice design characteristic to an OEM<br />

damper (Gordaninejad and Breese, 2000, Gordaninejad and Kelso, 2000). Available measurements<br />

for rheological properties of MR fluids are mainly in the shear-mode and low shear stain rates (Li,<br />

2000). <strong>The</strong> focus of this study is to determine the shear stress of a MR fluid in the flow mode for a<br />

wide range of shear strain rates. This may be important for the force estimation and the controller<br />

design of a MR fluid damper where the working fluid operates at high shear strain rates.<br />

Recently, a piston-driven slit channel rheometer has been developed to estimate the shear yield stress<br />

of MR fluids under a magnetic field by Nakano et al. (1999). <strong>The</strong> slit rheometer utilizes an applied<br />

uniform magnetic field normal to the slit channel flow direction where forced convection assists in<br />

heat dissipation at high shear strain rates. However, it is difficult to determine the velocity gradient for<br />

a non-Newtonian fluid in such a device.<br />

In general, although it is important in some MR fluid based applications, relatively little attention has<br />

been paid to the behavior of MR suspensions in pressure driven flows. In addition, conventional<br />

rotational rheometry encompasses shear strain rates only up to a few thousand I/sec, while shear strain


240<br />

rates in most MR fluid devices can reach up to 20,000s' 1 .<br />

properties of MR fluids at high shear strain rates is warranted.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, study of the rheological<br />

Base on these observations, a piston-driven flow type rheometer has been designed and built at the<br />

Composite and Intelligent Materials Laboratory of the <strong>University</strong> of Nevada, Reno, to evaluate the<br />

tunable rheological properties of MR fluids in flow mode. Three different MR fluid samples are<br />

investigated in this study. <strong>The</strong> apparent viscosity, dynamic and static shear yield stress, under the<br />

influence of applied magnetic fields, are studied.<br />

METHODS AND THEORETICAL ANALYSIS<br />

Figure 1 presents the piston-driven flow-mode rheometer system for MR fluids with a rectangular<br />

cross section. An electromagnet provides a magnetic flux normal to the slit channel flow. <strong>The</strong> coil is<br />

activated by a power supply in constant current mode. By using a Gauss meter, the magnetic flux<br />

density inside the channel is measured.<br />

Piston (connected to<br />

Instron 882 Is)<br />

:ro magnet<br />

Accumulator<br />

Figure 1. Schematic of the MR channel flow rheometer.<br />

<strong>The</strong> MR fluid is confined in the well-sealed channel cell, and is pressurized to generate a flow through<br />

the channel between the two parallel magnet poles. <strong>The</strong>re is an external groove in the test channel in<br />

order to align the electromagnetic field over the test section. <strong>The</strong> control of the hydraulic source piston<br />

velocity is achieved by connecting the piston-cylinder mechanism to an Instron 882IS servo hydraulic<br />

actuator. Two pressure transducers measure the pressure drop across the test section. <strong>The</strong> test section<br />

has dimensions of h= 1.0mm in height, w=10mm in width and L=14mm in length (Figure 2). <strong>The</strong><br />

proposed MR fluid rheometer utilizes a nitrogen gas accumulator. <strong>The</strong> accumulator functions as a<br />

sink, when the piston is positively displaced, and a source, when the piston is negatively displaced,<br />

making it possible to measure the static and dynamic shear yield stress of MR fluids.<br />

Pressure P<br />

Magnetic field B<br />

Figure 2. Geometric dimensions of the MR rheometer channel.


241<br />

In order to determine the apparent viscosity, r\ aoo = —, one has to relate the shear stress r and shear<br />

r<br />

strain rate, y, with measured pressure drop, Ap, and volumetric flow rate, Q. If minor losses are<br />

small, the value of r at the wall can be determined by pressure drop across the channel, as follows:<br />

hAp f 7<br />

r = —£- for h«w (I)<br />

2/<br />

It can be shown that for a one-dimensional, steady, non-Newtonian flow the shear strain rate can be<br />

expressed as:<br />

)=4g.<br />

h 2 wjsri<br />

where n = —. Equation (2) provides the relationship between t and y(r ) with the measured<br />

dlnO<br />

quantities Ap and 0. <strong>The</strong> term in the bracket is similar to the Rabinowitch correction used for<br />

conventional capillary viscometer (Zaman, 1998). For a Newtonian fluid n -I. For a non-<br />

Newtonian fluid, n can be determined from the experimental results of ln(r )V ) versus In(0//z 2 w).<br />

For a given flow rate, n is equal to the slope of the curve at that point. Linear regression methods can<br />

be used to obtain the best fit for \&(r w ) as a function of lu(Q/ h 2 w).<br />

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE AND DATA ANALYSIS<br />

Experiment results are presented for three MR fluid samples that are: 1) A Hydrocarbon-based MR<br />

fluid (MRF-132LD, Lord Corp., USA), 2) A polyalphaolefm (PAO)-based Magneto-rheological<br />

polymer gel (MRPG) prepared by the Polymer Science Laboratory (PSL) at the <strong>University</strong> of Nevada,<br />

Reno, and 3) A Ferro fluid-based MR fluid prepared by PSL based on information in the literature<br />

(Ginder, 1996).<br />

Magneto-rheological polymer gels are a type of MR material, which are prepared by suspending iron<br />

particles in polymeric gels. <strong>The</strong>se composite polymeric materials allows the control of viscosity,<br />

provide high shear yield stress and exhibit low particle settling behavior through different<br />

combinations of resins and crosslinkers (Wilson et al., 2002). PAO based MRPG is prepared using<br />

polyalphaolefin as the carrier fluid with polymer/carrier fluid ratios from 10:100 to 50:100. <strong>The</strong> PAO<br />

MRPG contains, 80% by weight, carbonyl iron particle with 99.5% purity. Ferrofluid-based MR fluid<br />

employs a magnetizable carrier fluid, such as a ferro fluid to obtain higher shear yield stress.<br />

All the tests were performed using INSTRON servo-hydaulic test rig Model 882IS at room<br />

temperature. Before conducting the experiments, the accumulator was pressurized to 300-900kPa<br />

(50~150psi) via a nitrogen tank. <strong>The</strong> displacement input was a double ramp profile to generate<br />

constant piston velocities; hence, constant flow rates. Each set of tests included different velocities,<br />

which covers shear strain rates from 20s" 1 to 20000s" 1 . <strong>The</strong> electromagnetic coil was energized with<br />

current for each velocity at 0 A, 0.5A, l.OA and 2.0A, corresponding to O.OmT, 120mT, 250mT and<br />

350mT magnetic flux densities (Bo), respectively. A ramp input displacement was used to keep the<br />

piston moving with a constant velocity, thus, the time variations of pressure drop across the measured<br />

channel were almost constant during each measurements.<br />

Typical results for the input and output profiles are presented in Figure 3. As can be seen in Figure 3,<br />

initially, an internal pressure about 300kPa (50psi) was applied by the accumulator. A pressure drop<br />

v ;


offset about 30kPa (6psi) across the channel test section was observed. For the first ramp, the piston<br />

pushes the MR fluid through the channel with a constant velocity with an externally applied magnetic<br />

field. As a result of the MR effect, the pressure drop (Ap=Pi-P 2 ) across the magnetically activated<br />

region increases significantly. As illustrated in Figure 3, we define this pressure drop as the dynamic<br />

pressure drop, since its value depends on the combination of the applied magnetic flux density and the<br />

input velocity of the piston. In this study, the dynamic pressure drop experimental data can establish<br />

the shear stress and shear strain rate relationship needed to obtain the apparent viscosity and dynamic<br />

yield stress of MR fluids.<br />

For the second ramp, the piston returns to its original position. Both the pressures P! and P 2 decreased<br />

while the accumulator pushes the MR fluid back. In addition, PI drops more than its initial pressure.<br />

This means that a vacuum may have been formed in the inlet chamber. <strong>The</strong> material resistance due to<br />

the MR effect may prevent the MR fluid returning back completely. A negative pressure drop is<br />

obtained at this phase. We refer to this pressure drop as the static pressure drop, as shown in Figure 3.<br />

<strong>The</strong> static pressure drop is highly dependent on the magnetic flux density and nearly is unaffected by<br />

the piston movement.<br />

When the piston is completely stopped, after returning to its initial position, the static pressure drop<br />

can be kept in equilibrium until the magnetic field is switched off. After a short period following the<br />

input electric current being turned off, the pressures PI and p2 recover to their original values, as<br />

shown in Figure 3. This would suggest that the static pressure drop is the minimum pressure that can<br />

induce MR fluid flow. <strong>The</strong>refore, using Equation (1), the static shear yield stress of MR fluids could<br />

be evaluated from the measurement data of the static pressure drop.<br />

242<br />

2000.00 0.40<br />

-500.00 -1.60<br />

I I I ~<br />

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00<br />

Time (&\<br />

Figure 3. A typical measured result of piston displacement and flow<br />

pressures across the rectangular channel.


243<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />

Figure 4 shows the measured apparent viscosity versus shear strain rate for Lord MRF-132LD fluid at<br />

various magnetic fields for the range of 20s" 1 to 20,000s" 1 . <strong>The</strong>se results are compared to those<br />

obtained by a commercial parallel-plate MR fluid rheometer (Li, 2000). As can be seen from Figure 4,<br />

the results of both studies agree well in'the range of 20 s* 1 to 200 s" 1 where the experimental data of<br />

shear strain rates for these two different rheometers overlap. In addition, the experimental results show<br />

a linear relation in the log-log scale, which implies that there is a power-law dependence (i.e.,<br />

rj app cc y~ m ) of the apparent viscosity, rj app , on the shear strain rate, /, for MR fluids. A shear thinning<br />

effect was observed as the apparent viscosity decreases with the increase of shear strain rate for all<br />

three MR fluid samples. At the "on-state" (magnetic field is activated), all exponent m values are in<br />

the range of 0.60-0.94. "m" increases with increasing the magnetic flux density. Similar phenomena<br />

were also reported for monodispers electro-rheological fluids (Halsey, et al., 1992) and monodispers<br />

MR fluids (Felt, et al., 1996). At the "off-state" (with no applied magnetic field), ferrofluid-based MR<br />

fluid behaves as a Newtonian fluid, when m is close to zero. <strong>The</strong> PAO based MRPG shows a weak<br />

shear thinning effect where its power law exponent m is much less than that of the "on-state".<br />

Typical results of the shear stress versus shear strain rate for the Lord MRF-132LD fluid are shown in<br />

Figure 5. <strong>The</strong> dynamic shear yield stress is obtained by extrapolating shear stress data to intercept the<br />

shear stress axis based on the Bingham plastic model. For an increase in magnetic flux density, a<br />

similar increase in the respective shear stress is observed.<br />

Figure 6 shows the experimental results of shear stress dependence on the magnetic flux density for<br />

three MR materials. <strong>The</strong> static shear yield stress was obtained by evaluating the experimental data of<br />

the static pressure drop employing Equation (1). Note that the dynamic shear yield stress exceeds the<br />

static case over an entire range of magnetic fields for all three samples. <strong>The</strong>se results are consistent<br />

with Kordonski et al. (1999) and Li (2000) experimental studies where they examined MR fluid in<br />

shear mode. Volkova et al (2000) analyzed the existence of the two different shear yield stresses for<br />

two types of magnetic particle suspensions in the presence of a magnetic field. <strong>The</strong>y explained that<br />

the dynamic shear yield stress (whic they referred to it as Bingham yield stress) is associated with the<br />

rupture of the aggregate which reform in the presence of the magnetostatic forces, while the static yield<br />

stress (which they referred to it as frictional yield stress) is associated with solid friction of the<br />

particles on the plates of the rheometer. <strong>The</strong>refore, there is no logical reason for the static and the<br />

dynamic yield stress to have the same value.<br />

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

A flow-mode rheometer is designed and built to evaluate the tunable rheological properties of MR<br />

materials in the presence of a magnetic field. This instrument can be used to study the apparent<br />

viscosity of MR fluids for a wide range of shear strain rates, from 20s" 1 to 20,000s" 1 . A Rabinowitch<br />

correction for the slit channel flow is developed to obtain the shear strain rate at the wall as a function<br />

of shear stress. By measuring the pressure drop as a function of flow rate, the apparent viscosity is<br />

determined. A unique design feature for the flow-mode MR fluid rheometer used in this study allows<br />

measurements of both the dynamic and static shear static yield stress of MR materials.


244<br />

1.00&05T —<br />

1.00E+04-S<br />

o. 100E^03-E<br />

w<br />

o<br />

» 1QQE+Q2-:<br />

« From U, Bmrf=370mT<br />

• Channel Rheometer, BO=350mT<br />

A From U, Bmrf=270mT<br />

X Channel Rheometer, BO=250mT<br />

• From U,Bmrf=170mT<br />

• Channel Rheometer, BO=120mT<br />

£<br />

8. 1oofr-01<br />

CL<br />

1.00E+OQ-:<br />

I OOE-01<br />

1.00E-K30 1.00E-K31 100E+02 1.00E+03 1.00E-K34 1.00E+05<br />

Shear Strain Rate (1/s)<br />

Figure 4. Log-log plot of the apparent viscosity of Lord MRF-132LD fluid<br />

versus shear strain rate for various magnetic fields.<br />

2000 4000 6000<br />

8000 10000<br />

Shear Strain Rate (1/s)<br />

Figure 5. Shear stress versus shear strain rate measurea ai rour different magnetic fields<br />

for Lord MRF-132LD. <strong>The</strong> straight lines represent the curve fit of the<br />

experimental data with using the Bingham plastic model


245<br />

100 150 200 250 300<br />

Magnetic Flux Density, (mT)<br />

350 400<br />

Figure 6. Comparisons of shear yield stress versus magnetic field for three MR<br />

materials. Hollow marks are the dynamic shear yield stress and<br />

solid marks are static shear yield stress.<br />

<strong>The</strong> performance of the device is compared to a rotational shear-mode rheometer. <strong>The</strong> results indicate<br />

that the measurements obtained by the flow-mode device are consistent with rotational shear-mode<br />

rheometer. Three different MR materials are examined under various magnetic flux densities. <strong>The</strong><br />

apparent viscosities, dynamic and static shear yield stresses are determined. All materials examined<br />

show a strong shear rnrnning effect. A power-law relationship was obtained for the apparent viscosity<br />

versus shear strain rate. <strong>The</strong> dynamic shear yield stress exceeds the static shear yield stress over the<br />

entire range of magnetic flux densities for all the three MR materials.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This study in part is supported by the U.S. Army <strong>Research</strong> Office and Visteon Corporation, USA. <strong>The</strong><br />

authors at the <strong>University</strong> of Nevada, Reno are thankful for their support.<br />

REFERENCE<br />

Ginder, J. M. (1996). Rheology Controlled by Magnetic Fields. Encyclopedia of Applied<br />

Physics, 16, 487-503.<br />

Felt, D. W. 9 Hagenbuchle M., Liu J, and Richard, J. (1996). Rheology of a magnetorheological<br />

fluid. /. Int. Mat Sys. Struct 7 :5, 589-593.<br />

Gordaninejad, F. and Breese, D. G. (2000). "Magneto-rheological fluid dampers." U.S. Patent<br />

No. 6,019,201.


246<br />

Gordaninejad, F. and Kelso S. P. (2000). Fail-safe magneto-rheological fluid dampers for offhighway,<br />

high-payload vehicles. J Int. Mat. Sys. Struct., 11:5, 395-406.<br />

Halsey, T. C, Martin, J. E. and Adolf, D. (1992).<br />

Physical Review Letters, 68 :10, 1519-1522.<br />

Rheology of Electrorheological Fluids.<br />

Kordonski, W. I. and Goiini, D. (1999). Fundamentals of magnetorheological fluid utilization<br />

m high precision finishing. J Int. Mat Sys. Struct. 10 :9, 683-689.<br />

Li, W. H. (2000). Rheology of MR Fluids and MR Damper Dynamic Response: Experimental<br />

and Modeling Approaches, Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Mechanical and Production <strong>Engineering</strong>, the<br />

Nanyang Technological <strong>University</strong>, Singapore.<br />

Nakano, M., Yamamoto, H., Jolly, M. R. (1999). Dynamic viscoelasticity of a<br />

magnetorheological fluid in oscillatory slit flow. International Journal ofMordern Physics B 13:14-<br />

16, 2068-2076.<br />

Volkova, O., Bossis, G., Guyot,M., Bashtovoi, M. and Reks, A. (2000).Magnetorheology<br />

of magnetic holes compared to magnetic particles. J. Rheology 44:1, 91-104.<br />

Wilson, M., Fuchs, A. and Gordaninejad, F (2002). Development and Characterization of<br />

Magnetorheological Polymer Gels. J. Appl. Polym. Scf,, 84:14, 2733.<br />

Zaman, A. A. (1998). Techniques in Rheological Measurements: Fundamentals and<br />

Applications, NSF <strong>Engineering</strong> Resource Center for Particle Science & Technology, <strong>University</strong> of<br />

Florida, Gainesville, Florida.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH<br />

MONITORING OF INTELLIGENT INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS<br />

Raymond W. Wolfe 1 , Sami F. Masri 2 , and John Caffrey 2<br />

Supervising Bridge Engineer, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, USA<br />

2 Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Intelligent infrastructure components (e.g., MR dampers) possessing adaptive features<br />

are being seriously considered for deployment in civil infrastructure systems in highly<br />

seismic regions throughout the world. Due to the long service life and harsh<br />

environments that such components may be subjected to, it is essential to have a<br />

reliable and efficient procedure for condition assessment of these components based<br />

on the analysis of their vibration signature.<br />

This paper presents an overview of some promising approaches based on nonlinear<br />

system identification techniques to detect slight changes in the characteristics of<br />

nonlinear dampers of the type commonly encountered in structural control<br />

applications involving large civil infrastructure systems such as bridges. By<br />

characterizing the restoring-force surface of the damper in a nonparametric form, and<br />

subsequently analyzing the higher-order statistics of the coefficients defining such<br />

surfaces, it is found that the associated probability density function of the identified<br />

coefficients furnishes a sensitive indicator of the underlying damper parameters. Both<br />

simulation results as well as experimental measurements from a prototype nonlinear<br />

viscous damper are presented to illustrate the approach and discuss its range of<br />

validity. Sensor requirements for field implementation are also discussed.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Large-scale civil infrastructure design and construction present an interesting class of<br />

problems related to the large dynamic demands from wind and seismic events.<br />

Engineers are searching for new ways to handle the large forces and displacements<br />

generated from such events. Strength design concepts are yielding to more elegant<br />

and efficient energy dissipative devices such as large-scale viscous dampers. <strong>The</strong><br />

reliance on these devices to dissipate energy stemming from wind and seismic<br />

occurrences makes them integral components to the success of the design to withstand<br />

such events. Failure of a viscous damper can portend potentially catastrophic<br />

localized or large-scale system failure, as the adjoining members are sized based on<br />

the energy absorbed by the dampers. Given the criticality of the damper elements to<br />

the success of the design strategies being implemented on these large structures, a<br />

means of evaluating their in-situ health is imperative.


248<br />

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING<br />

Scope<br />

<strong>The</strong> focus of this paper is to investigate the applicability of on-line condition<br />

assessment of structural damper components. A relatively simple approach developed<br />

by Masri and Caughy [1] allowing the identification of a broad class of dynamic<br />

models was in this effort. Complex issues typically associated with nonparametric<br />

identification methods, such as greater mathematical complexity, convergence<br />

difficulties, excessive computational effort, restrictions on the nature of the dynamic<br />

systems to be evaluated, and restrictions on the allowable system excitations are<br />

addressed through the application of regression techniques coupled with orthogonal<br />

polynomials. Results of analytical and experimental studies are presented in<br />

succeeding sections to substantiate the identification algorithm's robustness and<br />

applicability to real-time in-situ system health monitoring.<br />

2. SIMULATION STUDIES<br />

2.1. Overview of Nonlinear System Model<br />

Figure 2.1 Noise polluted damper simulation response, random excitation


249<br />

WOLFE, MASRI, CAFFREY<br />

Synthetic data was developed utilizing a nonlinear single-degree-of-freedom (sdof)<br />

Duffing oscillator. Manipulating the equation of motion yields the oscillator<br />

restoring force as<br />

f(x,x)=m[2£aK + G) 2 (x + £x 3 )] (1)<br />

Unit mass and system period were prescribed for this oscillator. <strong>The</strong> natural<br />

frequency was set at In. <strong>The</strong>se values yielded the system stiffness, damping<br />

coefficient and nonlinear term of 39.48, 1.26 and 1.23, respectively. Noise pollution<br />

was incorporated into the simulated data by adding stationary, zero-mean, 0.10<br />

standard deviation noise. Potential noise sources in real-world applications include<br />

instrumentation susceptibility, cabling interference, acquisition hardware, etc. <strong>The</strong><br />

system response to a stationary random excitation is depicted in Figure 2.1.<br />

2.2. Identification Procedure<br />

<strong>The</strong> restoring force method [1] was utilized to identify the system parameters from the<br />

system response. This method expresses the estimated restoring force in terms of<br />

two-dimensional orthogonal polynomials as<br />

where the T's are defined as Chebyshev polynomials, taking advantage of their equalerror<br />

approximation within the interval of interest. Chebyshev polynomials are<br />

defined as<br />

(3)<br />

satisfying the weighted orthogonality property<br />

0<br />

(4)<br />

<strong>The</strong> normalized displacement and velocity values are defined as<br />

-x_)/2]


250<br />

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING<br />

<strong>The</strong> normalized Chebyshev coefficients are generated as a result of fitting the<br />

computed restoring force from the prescribed data set containing the system<br />

displacement and velocity to the measureoVsimulated force response. One advantage<br />

of this method is that upon a relatively straight forward transformation of Equation 2<br />

to a Power Series expansion [3], the coefficients can be correlated to recognizable<br />

physical systems. This property allows a simple verification of the identified results<br />

against a known standard and facilitates understanding of the root cause of identified<br />

system degradation.<br />

23. Sample Results<br />

<strong>The</strong> identification algorithm presented above is easily adapted to statistical studies<br />

drawn from large ensemble data sets, enabling the establishment of identification<br />

results under system parameter uncertainty or variability.<br />

55155 11231 1684S5 22462 55262 110524 165.786 221.048<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 2.2 Chebyshev coefficient (2,1), (a) 5% stiffness degradation with 10% noise<br />

pollution, (b) 5% epsilon degradation with 10% noise pollution<br />

<strong>The</strong> robustness of the identification algorithm in detecting subtle changes to system<br />

parameters was evaluated by implementing a Monte Carlo approach. System<br />

parameters were varied from the prescribed system mean values noted above. 3000<br />

simulations were then performed with a zero-mean random excitation. After<br />

computing the mean and standard deviation statistics of these runs, plots of individual<br />

parameters highlighted excursions from prescribed values, such as in Figure 2.2.


251<br />

WOLFE, MASRI, CAFFREY<br />

Transforming the computed Chebyshev polynomial coefficients to an equivalent<br />

Power Series representation allows direct comparison of individual parameter shifts.<br />

Figure 2.3 illustrates the mean shift of the identified system stiffness parameter when<br />

the simulated stiffness and Duffing epsilon values were degraded by 5% individually.<br />

As expected, the identification algorithm discnminates the system change, noting<br />

mean values of approximately 42.4, 40.0, and 42.5 for the reference, degraded<br />

stiffness and degraded epsilon cases, respectively. <strong>The</strong>se values yield a stiffness<br />

degradation of 5.8% for the case wherein the stiffness parameter was degraded by 5%,<br />

and a 0.1% change in the identified stiffness parameter when the nonlinear Duffing<br />

term epsilon is degraded by 5%. <strong>The</strong>se results confirm the ability of the algorithm to<br />

detect and discriminate system change even under noise pollution.<br />

0.03<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

-10 15 40 65 90<br />

Figure 23 Comparison of degraded stiffness and epsilon mean shift to reference case<br />

(undegraded)


252<br />

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING<br />

3. EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES<br />

3.1. Test Description<br />

Validation of the results obtained through the above and additional simulation studies<br />

requires application to experimental data. To accomplish this, a test facility was<br />

developed to test a 10-kip nonlinear viscous damper with a 12-inch stroke and a<br />

velocity rating of 70 ips. <strong>The</strong> system was excited through an 11-kip MTS Systems<br />

actuator fitted with a 90 gpm servo valve to accommodate high velocities. Figure 3.1<br />

presents a digital image of the test set-up. <strong>The</strong> damper/actuator connection was<br />

fabricated with linear bearings to only allow motion along the axis of the damper,<br />

thereby avoiding out-of-plane bending.<br />

Figure 3.1 Digital photo of test set-up (damper is approx. 4 feet long)<br />

3.2. Sample Measurements<br />

Figure 3.2 depicts the measured system response of the damper excited by a 4-inch<br />

peak broadband signal. <strong>The</strong> highly irregular system response captured in the<br />

velocity/restoring force phase plot in the transition range reveals dead-space<br />

fluid/orifice dynamics internal to the damper.<br />

It is important to note that the damper component tested experimentally incorporates a<br />

relatively minor contribution of the stiffness parameter to the measured response. In<br />

contrast, the Duffing oscillator defined in the analytical studies included a significant<br />

stiffness to the restoring force. <strong>The</strong> simulations were conducted with a sdof<br />

descriptive model, interpreted as a model containing an elastic member and a damper


253<br />

WOLFE MASRI,CAFFREY<br />

in parallel [2] <strong>The</strong> tested damper element incorporates stiffness only in the<br />

seal/piston interface and sikcone fluid compressibility, with the fluid passing through<br />

internal orifices lending the primary system force response Hence, the test setup<br />

isolates the damper element, resulting in a damping dominated restoring force instead<br />

of the stiffness controlled force defined in the simulation efforts This difference is<br />

readily observed from a detailed review of the phase plots in Figures 2 1 and 3 2<br />

While the simulated Duffing oscillator system response is clearly heavily dependent<br />

on the stiffness term, the measured system response from the tested damper is largely<br />

influenced by the damping parameter contribution<br />

0 06<br />

displacement (inches)<br />

Figure 3*2 Measured nonlinear damper response, broadband excitation<br />

4200<br />

2800<br />

1400<br />

2800<br />

4200<br />

02 03 03 04<br />

Figure 33 Comparison of measured and identified system force


254<br />

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> application feasibility of system identification tools to condition assessment<br />

problems has been demonstrated in this paper. <strong>The</strong> restoring force algorithm based on<br />

orthogonal Chebyshev polynomials was proven successful in identifying and<br />

quantifying subtle system changes with both artificially noise-polluted simulation data<br />

and experimental data. A more in-depth treatment of the subject supporting these<br />

conclusions is detailed in [3].<br />

jdfl*<br />

:-<br />

i<br />

u r<br />

£ ,B,<br />

•1,<br />

-2 -<br />

Figure 3.4 Identified restoring force surface<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Masri, S.F., and Caughey, T.K. (1979). A Nonparametric Identification<br />

Technique for Nonlinear Dynamic Problems. ASME Journal of Applied<br />

Mechanics 46:1, 433-447.<br />

2. Wolfe, R.W., Masri, S.F., and Caffrey, J. (2002). Some. Structural Health<br />

Monitoring Approaches for Nonlinear Hydraulic Dampers. Journal of<br />

Structural Control.<br />

3. Wolfe, R.W., (2002). Analytical and experimental studies of structural health<br />

monitoring of nonlinear viscous dampers. Ph.D. Dissertation. <strong>University</strong> of<br />

Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.


STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

DRIFT-BASED SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF BUILDINGS<br />

IN HONG KONG<br />

A.M. Chandler 1 , R.K.L. Su 1 and M.N. Sheikh 1<br />

1 Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> of Hong Kong,<br />

Pokfularn Road, Hong Kong SAR, China<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Large magnitude earthquakes generated at distances exceeding 100km are typified by low frequency<br />

(long period) seismic waves, since the high frequency components have greatly diminished in amplitude<br />

as a result of energy absorption along the wave travel path. <strong>The</strong> peak ground acceleration (PGA), or<br />

response spectral accelerations (RSA), from such distant earthquakes can be very low and yet the<br />

induced motion can be highly destructive due to its high displacement (drift), and possibly high velocity,<br />

shaking characteristics. This paper introduces a methodology for predicting the response spectral<br />

displacement (RSD) using the Component Attenuation Model (CAM). Hence, the critical drift demands<br />

from long distance earthquakes affecting tall buildings in Hong Kong have been estimated. It is shown<br />

that soil (site) resonance effects play a critical role in determining the level of seismic drift demand.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Large magnitude, distant earthquakes represent the critical design events for the prevalent medium-rise<br />

and high-rise construction in Hong Kong (Lam et al, 2002). This paper firstly introduces attenuation<br />

relationships to predict the velocity and displacement (drift) demands from long distance earthquakes,<br />

based on stochastic simulations for the crustal conditions of South China. <strong>The</strong> Component Attenuation<br />

Model (CAM) procedure, so developed, is based on separating the "source", "path" and "site" effects.<br />

Such separation is intended to address the fact that attenuation of seismic waves is strongly dependent<br />

on regional properties of the earth's crust, through which seismic waves are propagated and modified.<br />

This regional crustal influence is particularly significant for seismic waves propagating over a long<br />

distance (site-source distance R> 100km). Response spectrum formats that can effectively represent<br />

such effects are shown in Fig's 1.1 a and Lib, and the parameters of interest are accordingly RSD max<br />

and RSV rtulx . Existing empirical response spectrum attenuation relationships from high seismic regions<br />

are typically based on strong motions recorded in the near-field. Thus, they cannot be relied upon to<br />

model distant earthquakes. <strong>The</strong> recorded ground shaking on different sites, and in different regions, can<br />

vary significantly even for very similar moment magnitude (M) and site-source distance, R (km). By


258<br />

separating the above three effects, such variability can be addressed in stages so that ground shaking<br />

prediction becomes easier to generalise.<br />

RSD<br />

(a)<br />

Miaximum Displacement (Drift) Demand RSD m<br />

RSD ^RSV^—^S L<br />

applies to rock spectrum for<br />

moderate-large events.<br />

suggested<br />

T=5secs<br />

Natural Period T^T 2 = TS for soil spectrum<br />

LogRSV<br />

Maximum Velocity (Kinetic Energy) Demand RSV inax<br />

ct<br />

(b)<br />

T,orT s T=5secs Velocity Demand (RSV)<br />

Log Natural Period T<br />

Fig. 1.1: Response spectra and response spectral parameters<br />

2. PATH AND SITE EFFECTS MODELLING<br />

<strong>The</strong> M-dependent source properties a(M) of the CAM model have been dealt with by Lam and<br />

Chandler (2002). <strong>The</strong> attenuation of seismic waves is significantly more regionally dependent than<br />

source properties; thus, it is inappropriate to propose a generalised relationship. Ideally, attenuation is<br />

best modelled by correlating locally recorded strong motion with distance, using a large representative<br />

database. A direct approach is often not achievable, due to the chronic lack of strong-motion data in<br />

regions of low to moderate seismicity such as South China (including Hong Kong). An alternative<br />

viable approach is to estimate the effects of individual wave modification mechanisms based on known<br />

geophysical parameters (which do not require the recording of strong motion for their determination).<br />

<strong>The</strong> combined path effects (which exclude local site modifications, dealt with below) can be expressed<br />

as the product of the following component factors: (i) geometrical attenuation factor G(R,D), (ii)<br />

anelastic attenuation, or energy absorption, factor $R,Q) 9 (iii) the mid-crustal amplification factor<br />

JmcWwee), and (iv) the upper crust modification factor y uc ; where the associated parameters are the<br />

crustal depth (D, in km), the shear wave velocity gradient of the earth's crust and the wave<br />

transmission quality factor (Q). <strong>The</strong> component factors as summarised in Lam and Chandler (2002)<br />

were derived by curve-fitting results from stochastic simulations of regional seismological parameters.<br />

Shaking from distant earthquakes can also induce very significant soil amplification effects, as a result<br />

of the robust transmission of high period energy (in the velocity and displacement-sensitive parts of the<br />

response spectrum) over long distances. <strong>The</strong> 1985 Mexico City and 1989 Loma Prieta, California<br />

earthquakes offer well-known recent examples of this phenomenon. <strong>The</strong> site response component


259<br />

factors briefly described in Table 2.1 have been based on the "frame analogy soil amplification" (FASA)<br />

model, as described by Lam et al (2001). <strong>The</strong> term V^is the shear wave velocity of the bedrock (ra/s).<br />

<strong>The</strong> basis of FASA is that the amplitude of the soil spectrum (soil RSV max ) can be obtained by scaling<br />

from RSVnuu of the corresponding rock spectrum at the natural period of the site (T s ). This modelling<br />

concept is supported by results obtained from non-linear wave analysis and by Seld observations.<br />

Demand Parameters<br />

RSD max<br />

RSV max<br />

H<br />

1.2<br />

1.2<br />

TABLE 2.1<br />

SITE FACTOR S(T S v s( > p. ox t<br />

a<br />

X<br />

4-6<br />

4-6<br />

0.65 + -i~< 10<br />

10000<br />

V<br />

0.65 + — *£—


260<br />

200 300 400<br />

SHAKE Computed RSD^ and RSV^<br />

Fig. 2.1. Comparison of FASA and SHAKE in predicting maximum response spectral velocity and<br />

displacement at the soil surface (Hong Kong sites)<br />

Eqn.(2.1) is also known as the Component Attenuation Model (CAM), initially developed by the<br />

authors in Lara et al (200Qa,b). <strong>The</strong> attenuation relationships are for predictions of the mean.<br />

Log Natural Period (log T)<br />

Fig. 2.2. Soil and rock response spectra modelled by CAM and FASA procedures


261<br />

3. GROUND SHAKING PREDICTIONS FOR HONG KONG<br />

Based on results presented in Lam et al (2002) and Chandler et al (2002b), Table 3 1 summarises the<br />

5% damped response spectrum predictions for design-level earthquakes affecting Hong Kong,<br />

comprising critical very far-field events (R=280km) <strong>The</strong> results have been based on CAM model for<br />

rock sites and FASA scaling model for soil sites<br />

TABLE 3.1<br />

RECOMMENDED PARAMETERS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR HONG KONG<br />

Return<br />

Period<br />

(years)<br />

PE<br />

750<br />

years<br />

Rock 1<br />

RSV max<br />

(mm/s)<br />

Rock 2<br />

RSD mx<br />

(mm)<br />

S-Factor<br />

for Soil<br />

RSV raax<br />

Soil 3<br />

RSV^<br />

(mm/s)<br />

S-Factor<br />

for Soil<br />

RSDan<br />

Soil 4<br />

RSDo^<br />

(mm)<br />

70<br />

500<br />

1000<br />

2500<br />

50%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

2%<br />

34<br />

70<br />

84<br />

100<br />

12<br />

25<br />

30<br />

36<br />

65<br />

57<br />

55<br />

54<br />

220<br />

400<br />

460<br />

540<br />

29<br />

26<br />

24<br />

24<br />

35<br />

64<br />

73<br />

86<br />

1 for periods T falling between CAM bedrock response spectrum comer periods TI and ^T 2 (refer Fig. 1.1)<br />

2 for periods T = 5 0 sec (Fig. 11)<br />

3 for penods T falling between TI and site period T s , TI = corner period on Soil RSV response spectrum (Fig 2 2)<br />

4 results correspond to period T = site period T s , values quoted are for T s = 1.0 sec and can be scaled in proportion to T 5><br />

provided T s < X m T 2 : X m = 1 - (M-5)/6 [Lam and Chandler (2002)]<br />

4. DRIFT PREDICTIONS FOR HONG KONG BUILDINGS<br />

In the recently established displacement-based approaches for seismic assessment of buildings, for<br />

example Priestley (1995), the overall drift demand at effective height of building (or at roof level) is<br />

compared with the corresponding drift capacity curve in order to assess the degree of damage as well<br />

as the factor of safety of the building This approach cannot however distinguish whether the drift is<br />

uniformly distributed at each storey or is concentrated at a particular storey that may be caused, for<br />

example, by the presence of a soft storey or by higher mode effects It is important to recognize that<br />

local deformation associated with high inter-storey drift would cause significant damage to the nonstructural<br />

(NS) components and high internal forces to develop in particular structural elements such as<br />

columns and coupling beams In this section, which starts with the estimation of overall lateral seismic<br />

drift demand, a prediction formula for maximum inter-storey drift demand of buildings with due<br />

consideration of higher mode effects and potential soft storey effects will be presented.<br />

<strong>The</strong> average building drift angle # a v g defined as the ratio between the roof seismic displacement and the<br />

height of building can be estimated by the equation [Chandler et al (2002b)]<br />

=165 RSD l<br />

(41)<br />

<strong>The</strong> maximum seismic inter-storey drift angle #max (due to the combined seismic vibration modes) can<br />

be related to the effective first-mode displacement RSD\ using the following generic expression:


262<br />

where H b is the building height and l max is the maximum dynamic drift factor determined by response<br />

spectrum analyses employing, for example, Fig. 2,2 and Table 3.1. Chandler et al (2002b) investigated<br />

19 RC buildings with a wide range of height, and established the following relationships for A max<br />

For rock sites: ^ = 2.72 + 0.497; < 9.5 (43)<br />

For soH sites: ^ = 2.72 + 0.67/ 5 < 9.5 (44)<br />

Both RSDi and A max depend on the building's fundamental lateral period T\. Su et al (2002) estimated<br />

the fundamental lateral period of typical dynamic computer models for buildings in Hong Kong and<br />

found the following estimation formula for fundamental lateral period of bare frame models:<br />

r 6/1 = 0.025tf, (45)<br />

<strong>The</strong> initial fundamental lateral period of real buildings (or denoted by full frames) with due<br />

consideration of non-structural components and the variation of mean and design elastic modulus of<br />

concrete was measured by ambient vibration tests [Su et al, 2002]. <strong>The</strong> following period prediction<br />

equation for full frames was suggested<br />

7^=0.013^ (4.6)<br />

Chandler et aL (2002a) further considered the reduction of initial stiffness of the NS components and<br />

the inelastic deformation of structural components under seismic dynamic deformation and proposed<br />

the following period prediction formula with consideration of period shift at large-amplitude vibration:<br />

Ti=T f<br />

(4.7)<br />

where p (=1.0) represents the ratio of lateral stiffness fromNS components and structural components,<br />

n\ (


263<br />

are assumed to be founded on a deep soil site, with seismic action having 2% PE/50 years. <strong>The</strong> interstorey<br />

drift predicted by eqn's (4.2) and (4.8) (denoted as predicted real buildings) using an iterative<br />

procedure is also displayed in Figure 4. lb for comparison. <strong>The</strong> period shift factor £ is found to vary<br />

with building height from 1.04 to 1.17 with mean value of around 1.09. <strong>The</strong> maximum demands of drift<br />

angles 0 a v g and i9 max are 0.24% and 0.45%, respectively, for real buildings of height -75m.<br />

0.5<br />

04 -<br />

0.3 -<br />

0.2 -<br />

0.1 -<br />

0<br />

A Bare frame models<br />

* Fullframemodels<br />

- -' Predicted real buildings<br />

0.8 -<br />

0.7 -<br />

0.6 -<br />

0.5 -<br />

0.4 -<br />

0.3 -<br />

0.2 -<br />

0.1 -<br />

0.-<br />

A A *<br />

A Bare frame models<br />

* — .. Fullframemodels<br />

1 1<br />

Predicted real buildings<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450<br />

Figure (a)<br />

Height^ _ _ Height^<br />

Figure (b)<br />

Fig. 4.1. Variations of drift angles against building heights of deep soil site with 2% PE/50years<br />

(a) 0 avg and (b) # max<br />

TABLE 4.1<br />

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERIOD SHIFT FACTOR Q AND 0 m<br />

O max (%)<br />

0.0<br />

0.2<br />

0.5<br />

1.0<br />

1.5<br />

€<br />

1.00<br />

1.03<br />

1.19<br />

1.64<br />

2.95<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

1. Long distance attenuation relationships for the maximum response spectral displacement (RSD max )<br />

and the maximum response spectral velocity (RSVma*) for rock and soil sites have been developed<br />

using the CAM-FAS A framework.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> input parameters to CAM and FASA can be obtained from seismological monitoring, as<br />

opposed to capturing strong motion data. Thus, reliable distant earthquake attenuation relationships<br />

that account for regional characteristics can now be obtained for low to moderate seismic regions<br />

such as South China (including Hong Kong).<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> maximum demands of drift angles # avg and 6^ of buildings founded on deep soil sites in Hong<br />

Kong with consideration of partial damage of structural and non-structural components are found<br />

to be 0.24% and 0.45%, respectively, for buildings with height of around 75m.


264<br />

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> work described in this paper has been supported by the URC (<strong>University</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Committee) of<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> of Hong Kong through Seed Funding for a Basic <strong>Research</strong> Grant (2002-2003), and also<br />

by the <strong>Research</strong> Grants Council of Hong Kong (Project No.'s <strong>HKU</strong> 7023/99E and <strong>HKU</strong> 7002/OOE),<br />

whose support is gratefully acknowledged. <strong>The</strong> research collaboration with Dr Nelson Lam of <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> of Melbourne on topics covered in this paper is also acknowledged with thanks.<br />

7. REFERENCES<br />

Chandler, A.M., Su R.K.L. and Lam, N.T.K. (2002a). Review of Displacement-Based Seismic<br />

Assessment of Building Structures, Joint Internal Report, Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> of Hong Kong and <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> of Melbourne, Australia.<br />

Chandler, A.M., Su R.K.L. and Lee, P.K.K. (2002b). Seismic Drift Assessment for Hong Kong<br />

Buildings. Proceedings of the HKIE Structural Division Annual Seminar, "Recent Developments in<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>", 1-15.<br />

Chandler, A.M., Lam, N.T.K. and Sheikh, M.N. (2002c). Response Spectrum Predictions for Potential<br />

Near-Field and Far-Field <strong>Earthquake</strong>s Affecting Hong Kong: Soil Sites. Journal of Soil Dynamics &<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> (in press).<br />

Lam, N.T.K. and Wilson, J.L. (1999). Estimation of Site Natural Period from a Borehole Record.<br />

Australian Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> SE1:3, 179-199.<br />

Lam, N.T.K., Wilson, J.L, Chandler, A.M. and Hutchinson, G.L. (2000a). Response Spectral<br />

Relationships for Rock Sites Derived from the Component Attenuation Model. Journal of <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics 29:10, 1457-1490.<br />

Lam, N.T.K, Wilson, J.L, Chandler, A.M. and Hutchinson, G.L. (2000b). Response Spectrum<br />

Modelling for Rock Sites in Low and Moderate Seismicity Regions Combining Velocity, Displacement<br />

and Acceleration Predictions. J. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics 29:10, 1491-1525.<br />

Lam, N.T.K., Wilson, J.L. and Chandler, A.M. (2001). Seismic Displacement Response Spectrum<br />

Estimated from the Frame Analogy Soil Amplification Model. J. Eng. Structures 23, 1437-1452.<br />

Lam, N.T.K., Wilson, J.L, Chandler, A.M. and Hutchinson, G.L. (2002). Response Spectrum<br />

Predictions for Potential Near-Field and Far-Field <strong>Earthquake</strong>s Affecting Hong Kong: Rock Sites.<br />

Journal of Soil Dynamics & <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> 22, 47-72.<br />

Lam, N.T.K. and Chandler, A.M. (2002). Prediction of Displacement and Velocity Demands of Long<br />

Distance <strong>Earthquake</strong>s. Proc. 12 th Euro. Conf. on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, London, 10pp. (in press).<br />

Priestley MJ.N. (1995). Displacement-based seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete<br />

buildings, Proc. 5th Pacific Conf. on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Melbourne, Australia, 225-244.<br />

Sheikh, M.N. (2001). Simplified analysis of earthquake site response with particular application to low<br />

and moderate seismicity regions. M.Phil thesis, Dept. of Civil Eng., <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> of Hong Kong.<br />

Su, R.K.L., Chandler, A.M., Lee, P.K.K., To, A.P. and Li, J.H. (2002). Dynamic testing and modelling<br />

of existing buildings in Hong Kong, Trans. ofH.K. Institution of Engineers (submitted Apr 2002).


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

UNDERSTANDING OF THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF<br />

ASYMMETRIC R/C BUILDING STRUCTURES<br />

Junwu DAI 1 Yuk-Lung WONG 2 and Minzheng ZHANG 1<br />

1 Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, China Seismological Bureau, China<br />

Department of CSE, <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, Hong Kong<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper is composed by the following investigations: 1) Using the time-history response of the base<br />

shear-torque of 3 asymmetric RC single-story-building systems under a set of earthquake simulation<br />

tests on shake table, both of the advantages and shortcomings of the base shear-torque (BST) surface<br />

(1C. De La Llera and A.K. Chopra) established on the assumption of idealized force-displacement<br />

relationship are checked. 2) Based on the experimental results and the assumption of the bi-linear<br />

force-displacement relationship, a more reasonable and effective analytical model, the state space of<br />

base shear-torque is developed for estimation of the seismic performance particularly the torsional<br />

effects of the RC asymmetric structures.<br />

KEYWORDS<br />

earthquake simulation test, torsional, asymmetric, seismic response, inelastic, shear-torque relationship<br />

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES<br />

It has been observed repeatedly in strong earthquakes that the presence of asymmetry in the plan of a<br />

structure makes it more vulnerable to seismic damages. <strong>The</strong>re are reports of extensive damages to<br />

buildings that are attributed to excessive torsional responses caused by asymmetry in earthquakes such<br />

as the 1972 Managua earthquake, the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, the 1995 Kobe earthquake and the<br />

1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. Although torsion has been recognized as a major reason for poor seismic<br />

performance of asymmetric buildings and many studies have been done on this topic, the analytical and<br />

experimental studies on the inelastic seismic response of asymmetric buildings do not have a long<br />

history. Recently, De La Llera and Chopra (1995) developed a simple model for analysis and design of<br />

asymmetric buildings based on the assumption of idealized elasto-plastic force-displacement<br />

relationship. Each story of the building is represented by a single super-element in the simplified model.<br />

In this method, the story shear and torque interaction surface (Kan and Chopra 198L Palazzo and<br />

Fraternali 1988, De La Llera and Chopra 1995) is used as an important component. <strong>The</strong> story shear and<br />

torque (SST) surface is basically the yield surface of the story due to the interaction between story shear<br />

and torque. Each point inside the surface represents a combination of story shear and torque that the<br />

story remains elastic. On the other hand, each point on the surface represent a combination of shear and<br />

torque that leads to the yielding of the story. How realistic is such a model to represent the behavior of<br />

ductile buildings in seismic regions is a subject that requires further investigation.


266<br />

<strong>The</strong> objectives of this paper presented here are: 1) to check the limitations of the story shear-torque<br />

surface based on the assumption of the idealized force-displacement relationship with experimental<br />

results of earthquake simulation tests for 3 asymmetric single-story structures and 2) to develop it to be<br />

more realistic three state spaces based on the bi-linear force-displacement relationship.<br />

SHEAR-TORQUE RELATIONSHIP<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are three reinforced concrete single-story-building structures are designed to cater for the research<br />

objectives. All experiments are carried out on a single-axial shake table installed by MTS in HK<br />

Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>. Design detailing, instrumentations and ground excitations used in experiments<br />

have been described in reference [2].<br />

& i<br />

} I<br />

iv<br />

!<br />

': D1/A1 on ground, D2DID4/A2A3A4 on roof |<br />

^03 Wl iDUD2) D4 «<br />

T* 3 T AUA^ A4<br />

X<br />

600mm<br />

'<br />

AY<br />

^ W1^ *<br />

•02 ; 1<br />

; I W3 I<br />

DI/A1 on ground, D2D3b4/A2A3A4 on roof |<br />

WD3 ADKD2) D4 9<br />

'<br />

A3<br />

IAKA2)<br />

A4<br />

X<br />

3<br />

&<br />

I W2 1<br />

:<br />

• ci t „ !„.. .<br />

"4 l^wVirn " M ^ O^^TUTI ^'<br />

i r<br />

•<br />

(D U Input (3)<br />

®~"<br />

1<br />

I W2 1<br />

MjCI | |<br />

1<br />

A<br />

•^ mnnm J L innnm<br />

£ If *"<br />

Cu U input (D<br />

Specimen 1/3 & Instrumentation<br />

Fig.l Specimen Configuration & Instrumentation<br />

Specimen2 & Instrumentation<br />

Verification of the shear-torque relationship<br />

Based on the assumption of idealized force-displacement relationship of structural members, J.C. De Le<br />

Llera and A.K. Chopra (1995) developed a useful and effective method for understanding of<br />

fundamental issues on seismic torsional phenomena of asymmetric structures. <strong>The</strong> most important<br />

component of this approach is the use of the idealized yield base shear-torque (BST) surface of the<br />

studied system. As examples, abovementioned 3 model structures studied in earthquake simulation tests<br />

are used to examine both of the validity and the shortage of the idealized yield BST surface here for<br />

understanding of the real seismic behavior of asymmetric systems correctly.<br />

According to the method of reference [3] developed, the BST surfaces of the 3 asymmetric model<br />

structures are founded respectively based on the assumption of idealized force-displacement relationship<br />

while only single-directional ground excitation is considered, shown in fig. 8 for convenience of<br />

comparison. <strong>The</strong> displacement-based approach that T. Paulay (2000) established is used in the<br />

determination of the srif&iess of structural members. From fig.2, obviously, it can be found that the BST<br />

surface of specimen2 expanded uniformly on the basis of specimenl while for that of specimenj, it is<br />

skewed and extended to the 1 st and 3 rd quadrant relatively. In fact, due to the strength of concrete used in<br />

the fabrication of specimen2 is higher than that of in specimenl, the strength of structural members in<br />

specimen2 is uniformly increased. Together with the wall wl being arranged at the outer edge of<br />

specimen! comparing with specimenl, the entire shear-torque resistant capacity is correspondingly<br />

increased in specimen2 than mat of specimenl. <strong>The</strong> result is the space covered by the BST surface of<br />

specimen2 is larger than that of specimenl. Similarly, the higher strength of concrete and the<br />

reinforcement ratio used in specimenj particularly in walls than that of in specimenl, intensified the


strength eccentricity and simultaneously increased the entire shear-torque resistant capacity of<br />

specimens. <strong>The</strong> associated consequence is that the BST surface of specimens is skewer and larger than<br />

that of specimen 1. This figure illustrates the different seismic capacity among different model structures<br />

directly. From the area covered by the BST surface of each specimen, it can roughly predict that the<br />

seismic behavior of each specimen will be changed differently in a certain way.<br />

267<br />

Fig.2 BST surfaces of 3 model structures<br />

b) Specimen2<br />

Time-history BST surface<br />

response<br />

c) Specimens<br />

Fig.3. Verification of the BST surface with time-history response of specimens<br />

in earthquake simulation tests


268<br />

<strong>The</strong> comparison between abovementioned theoretical results (solid line signifies the idealized BST<br />

surface of each specimens) and the experimental response (dotted area) in terms of the time history of the<br />

base shear-torque of each specimen is shown in fig.3a)~c). Each sub-figure dictates one case of ground<br />

excitation. For example, A0.14& E0.30g, L0.37g and N0.91g signify the time history response of base<br />

shear-torque in the case of ground excitation with intensity of artificial wave 0.14g, El Centro-NS<br />

component 0.30g, Loma Prieta record 0.37g and North Ridge record 0.91g, respectively.<br />

From fig.3 a) ~c), the following conclusions can be inferred:<br />

1) For most cases of the intensity of ground motions are not higher than about 0.47g, the time history<br />

response of the base shear-torque does not or only lightly exceed the area the BST surface encircled. But<br />

it exceeds the boundary of the BST surface greatly in cases of the intensity of ground motions higher<br />

than about 0 47g for all 3 model structures. <strong>The</strong>se facts tell the truth that the assumption of the idealized<br />

force-displacement relationship is only roughly reasonable for evaluation of the most common concrete<br />

structures in region with potential lower to moderate seismic intensity. However, for other relatively<br />

more important structures particularly those located in region with higher potential seismic intensity,<br />

more reasonable models such as bi- or tri-linear force-displacement relationship based strength/stiffness<br />

degradation/harden model should be used case to case. Correspondingly, the idealized BST surface<br />

should be developed further to be more realized bi- or tri-state spaces model to estimate the seismic<br />

performance (torsional effects) of asymmetric structures in a more general sense.<br />

2) With the increase of the intensity level of the ground excitations, the time history response of the base<br />

shear-torque tends to be developed to the longest inclined side of the BST surface. From the definition of<br />

the BST surface according to reference [3], these two longest inclined sides signify the mechanism of<br />

other lateral resistant planes (the left column even the central wall planes) are damaged when the<br />

strongest right wall plane remains linear elastic. <strong>The</strong> experimental observation proved the fact that the<br />

damage sequence of all 3 specimens are started from the left column plane to the right wall plane at last<br />

although there are obvious difference among the seismic damage type of them. <strong>The</strong>se experimental<br />

results testified that the theoretical results are reasonable. <strong>The</strong>refore, the idealized BST surface can be<br />

used to estimate the seismic damage sequence of asymmetric structures roughly.<br />

3) On the other hand, the trends of the time history of the base shear-torque lean to the longest sides of<br />

the BST surface illustrate effects of the change of the stiffness eccentricity to the seismic behavior of the<br />

model structure. That is, at the onset of the damage of the left column and central wall plane, the stronger<br />

right wall plane still remains linear elastic. Inevitably, the stiffness center shifts to the stronger right wall<br />

plane, intensified the stiffness eccentricity of the model structure. This phenomenon explains that<br />

although the stiffness eccentricity does not affect the shape of the BST surface, it really influences the<br />

developing trends of the time history response of the base shear-torque. In other words, the larger of the<br />

stiffness eccentricity is, the smaller of the possibility that the stronger members near the stiffness center<br />

are damaged will be and, the larger of the possibility that the weaker members far away from the<br />

stiffness center are damaged will be. <strong>The</strong> consequence is the larger of the possibility of the serious<br />

unbalanced damage occurring will be.<br />

4) In most experimental cases, there is no pure torsional damage observed from the responses of the base<br />

shear-torque, i.e., only in few cases of modell and mode!3, the torque resistance are exceeded lightly. In<br />

model2, such phenomena are never found. This fact illustrates, on one hand, the possibility of the<br />

occurring of the pure twist damage will be very small even for structures with larger eccentricity such as<br />

the model structures here studied. On the other hand, it shows that the location change of the central wall<br />

wl improves the entire torque resistance directly and makes the coupling response more uniform and<br />

simultaneously, it tells the fact of the effects of the structural members in the orthogonal direction is<br />

un-negligible when the seismic resistant capacity in one principal direction of the structure is studied and<br />

vice versa.


269<br />

State space of base shear-torque relationship<br />

In fact, the degradation type of bi- and tri-linear force-displacement relationship should be more suitable<br />

than the idealized elasto-plastic one for most cases of reinforced concrete building structures in seismic<br />

ductility design. This conclusion can be verified directly from the comparison of the abovementioned<br />

experimental response and the idealized BST surface shown in fig.3a)~c). <strong>The</strong>n, correspondingly, the<br />

single space surrounded by the BST surface can be developed to 2 or 3 state spaces signifying<br />

respectively the elastic, inelastic even collapsed state of the related structural system. In other words, for<br />

evaluating the seismic performance of asymmetric RC structures realistically, the ultimate BST surface<br />

in the idealized model should be developed to nonlinear space(s) of the base shear- torque responses. <strong>The</strong><br />

first space signifies the elastic response while the second space represents the inelastic characteristics<br />

when yield damage occurred in structure, and the third space means that the shear-torque response<br />

exceeds the ultimate capacity of the system. <strong>The</strong> boundary between the first and the second space<br />

describes a kind of critical state that the yielding damage initiates in system. Whilst, the boundary<br />

between the second and the third space should theoretically signify that the system begins to collapse.<br />

As example, abovementioned specimen2 (bi-directional asymmetry with 3 lateral resistant planes along<br />

the y-direction of ground excitations) here is used to show how the 3 state-spaces model for evaluation of<br />

the seismic response of the base shear-torque is established. From the experimental data for the yielding<br />

strength f y of the reinforcement used in the model system shown in table 1 respectively, the yield<br />

boundary dividing the elastic and the inelastic response spaces can be determined according to the<br />

method that De La Llera and A.K. Chopra established, i.e., its* location is completely same to that of the<br />

BST surface in the idealized model but they have quiet different meaning. Using the similar way and the<br />

ultimate strength/, shown in table 1 , the eight vertices of the collapse boundary can be easily determined<br />

based on the following formulas* 31 :<br />

5 = — | 7 6 ~ — 2 i -j — —-} i % — — ^<br />

y^ = -y\ ' y 6 = -^ > ^ = -^ > ^ = -^<br />

( 1 )<br />

where, in a more general sense, the symbol "*" signifies two kinds of critical state: the onset of yielding<br />

and reaching at the ultimate strength. If the structure system just starts to be damaged (reaches its yield<br />

strength), parameters in the above formulas have the same meanings with those of in the idealized BST<br />

surface. If the structural response reaches the maximum capacity of the system, these parameters can be<br />

determined based on the ultimate strength of structural members. As shown in fig.4, structural<br />

parameters controlling the response state space of the studied system are explained as,<br />

1). y* =VJV* Q is the normalized base shear along x-direction, while F r<br />

v<br />

0 = ^^ / vn and<br />

^/o = X- /«' are ^e yi e^m§ an d ultimate lateral resistant capacities along the x-direction of the<br />

studied system respectively, in which, f yxl and f llxl are the corresponding yield and ultimate strength of<br />

the zth lateral resistant plane, and Mis the number of the lateral resistant planes along x-direction. If the<br />

earthquake actions along the x-direction (besides slong the y-direction) should be taken into account, i.e.,<br />

j7 r =£0, the shape of the state space would be changed with the change of the value of V x . Otherwise, if<br />

only single-directional earthquake excitation is studied, i.e., F r =0, the effects of this item should be<br />

ignored.<br />

2). J/, V 0 = Y^ f m and V" Q = ^N f uyl are the lateral yield and ultimate capacity of the system along<br />

y-direction, f yyi and f liy , are the lateral yield and ultimate strength of the lateral resistant planes,<br />

respectively. N is the number of the lateral resistant planes along y-direction. <strong>The</strong> value of V^ and V^


270<br />

determine the span of the state space of base shear-toque on the shear axial V" Q - F/ 0 directly gives out<br />

the improvable space of the shear capacity of the structural system after yielding.<br />

3). V\ and V\ are the lateral yield and ultimate capacity of the resistant plane passing through the<br />

center of mass. Generally, this parameter represents the sum of the resistant capacity of all lateral planes<br />

closing to the center of mass. From fig.6, it is obvious that the increase of the value V u yc - V v yc means the<br />

increase of the possibility that the pure torsional mechanism will occur after yielding.<br />

and jZ ml \f y, respectively, define the<br />

torsional capacity of the system when pure twist yield and ultimate damage will be occurring. <strong>The</strong>se two<br />

parameters control the maximum and minimum coordinates of the two critical boundaries along the<br />

torque axial. Moreover, the improvement of the torsional capacity of the system after yielding is also<br />

controlled by the value T 0 " - T Q V .<br />

5)- TL = 5^ fy**yi ^ -Ti "XTil^^'i are contr & u ti° n of the torsional capacity provided by the<br />

orthogonal lateral planes at the level of initiating yield and collapse respectively. <strong>The</strong> possibility of the<br />

pure shear mechanism should be increased with the increase of the value 7^ - 7 1 / particularly during the<br />

stage of inelastic response<br />

Base Torque<br />

Collapse Boundary<br />

-V:<br />

Base Shear<br />

Yield Boundary<br />

Elastic Space<br />

6 y 7 y<br />

Fig.4 Structural parameters controlling the state space of base shear-torque<br />

, IV lv<br />

y* y* determine the strength eccentricity of the system at<br />

two damage levels: before yielding and at the initiating of collapse, respectively. <strong>The</strong>y signify<br />

independently the degree of the strength eccentricity on the two critical levels. Here, x v is considered to<br />

be a constant during the elastic stage while x u p is also defined as a critical value at the instant of initiating<br />

collapse although the strength eccentricity is varied from x y p to its' maximum value, and then decreased<br />

to x" p with the increase of the intensity of the ground excitations gradually during the inelastic stage.


271<br />

7)- C = Z;;i 2 (/ w *i/*,|) and V u yu ^^(f^x, /|x,|) , at two levels: before yielding and at the<br />

initiating of collapse, respectively, define the degree of the unbalanced strength distribution at the two<br />

sides of the center of mass. <strong>The</strong> variation of the value V^ ~ V^ shows the change of the possibility of the<br />

occurring of the pure shear mechanism. Corresponding with the change of the strength eccentricity, this<br />

value should represent the state of some weaker structural members being damaged on one side of the<br />

center of mass while remaining elastic on the other side of the CM. Fig.4 does not show the peak value<br />

directly<br />

From the determination of the two critical boundary of the torsional-lateral coupling system, it can be<br />

inferred that the seismic response of the base shear-torque is naturally divided into 3 regions that<br />

represent respectively the linear elastic state, nonlinear state and the destroyed collapse state. <strong>The</strong> two<br />

critical boundaries, which signify the initiating yield and collapse, can be established independently<br />

based on the yield strength and the ultimate strength of structural members. This model can be directly<br />

used to estimate both of the overall seismic capacity and the developing trends of the time history<br />

response of the system base shear-torque to strong earthquakes even without complicated nonlinear<br />

analysis.<br />

«Collapse boundary of the state space<br />

Yielding Boundary<br />

* Dotted area: Time-history responses of the base shear-torque in earthquake simulation<br />

test for specimen 2<br />

Fig.5 comparison of the theoretically established state space of the base shear-torque with experimental results<br />

Fig.5 shows the comparison of the theoretical state space of the base shear-torque with the experimental<br />

results. <strong>The</strong> time-history shear-torque response of the bi-directional asymmetric single-story RC system<br />

in 19 cases of ground excitations illustrates highly consistency with the state space established based on


the assumption of the bi-linear force-displacement relationship. Such consistency is unreachabie only by<br />

using the BST surface based on the idealized elasto-plastic assumption.<br />

272<br />

CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />

In summary, the shake table tests provided useful data references for theoretical studies on seismic<br />

torsional effects of asymmetric building structures. Through the comparison between the experimental<br />

and the theoretical results, the following conclusions can be obtained:<br />

1) Although the BST (base shear-torque) surface established on the assumption of idealized<br />

force-displacement relationship can be roughly used to estimate the seismic performance of<br />

asymmetric systems, it will bring obvious error on the prediction of the nonlinear response when the<br />

studied structure suffered strong earthquakes.<br />

2) <strong>The</strong>refore, based on the assumption of the bi-linear force-displacement relationship and the<br />

displacement-based method to determine the stiffness, the state space signifying the base<br />

shear-torque relationship is developed to describe the entire seismic capacity of the asymmetric<br />

systems. It shows high consistency with the experimental results. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is no doubt a reliable<br />

model that can be directly used to estimate not only the entire seismic capacity but also the potential<br />

seismic damage may occur in the studied systems, even without relying on any complicated<br />

numerical analysis. It can be seen, this model will be very convenient and useful in evaluation of the<br />

lateral-torsional coupling effects of asymmetric structures particularly in the preliminary stage of<br />

design, retrofitting and research.<br />

It should be noted that abovementioned conclusions are obtained on the basis of the experimental results<br />

of single story building structure. <strong>The</strong>ir reliability and universality should be checked further with real<br />

seismic records or earthquake simulation tests for multi-story and high-rise building.<br />

References<br />

1. Dai Junwu, Yuklung Wong and Minzheng Zhang, Torsion Response of Reinforced Concrete Building under Shaking<br />

Table Test. Advances In Structural Dynamics, 2000, Vol. II, pp859-865.<br />

2. Dai Junwu, <strong>Research</strong> on nonlinear seismic performance of asymmetric RC building structure^ Ph.D. thesis, Institute<br />

of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, China Seisraological Bureau, 2002,<br />

3. De la Llera, J.C., Chopra, A. K., Understanding the Inelastic Seismic Behaviour of Asymmetric Plan Buildings, J.<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> & Structural Dynamics, 1995, v.24, pp.549-572.<br />

4. De la Llera, J.C., Chopra, A. K., Inelastic Behaviour of Asymmetric Multistory Buildings, L Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

1996,v.l22,no.6,pp.597-606.<br />

5. Guo Xun, Yuk-lung Wong and Yuan Yifan, Investigation of Seismic Response of Soil site in HK, HKIE Transactions,<br />

2000, Vol. 7, No. 3.<br />

6. Kan, C.L. and Chopra, A.K., Torsional coupling and earthquake response of simple elastic and inelastic systems, J.<br />

structural Division, ASCE, 1981, v.107, pp.1569-1588.<br />

7. Minzheng Zhang, Problem study on the application of the similitude law in earthquake simulation test, <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> and <strong>Engineering</strong> Vibration, 1997.6, Vol. 17, No.2.<br />

8. Palazzo, B. and Fraternali, F., Seismic ductility demand in buildings irregular in plan: A new single story nonlinear<br />

model, Proceedings of the 9 th World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 1988, Vol.V,<br />

V-43 to V-48.<br />

9. Paulay, T., Displacement-based design approach to earthquake-induced torsion in ductile buildings, <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Structures, 1997, VoL19,No,9, pp.699-707.<br />

10. Paulay, T., Torsional mechanisms in ductile building systems, <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics,<br />

1998, Vol.27, pp.1101-1121.<br />

11. Paulay, T., Understanding torsional phenomena in ductile systems, Bulletin of the NZ Society for <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, 2000 S Vol.33, No.4, pp.403-420.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SEISMIC RESISTANCE OF VERY HIGH STRENGTH<br />

HIGH RISE RC BUILDINGS FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT<br />

A.S. Elnashai 1 and B. Laogan 2<br />

1 Mid-America <strong>Earthquake</strong> Center, Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

<strong>University</strong> of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA<br />

2 ATR J<strong>Engineering</strong>, Manila, Philippines<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

High rise buildings have increased in number and geographical spread. This in turn dictates that higher<br />

strength materials are utilized, to keep member sizes at manageable proportions. Whereas the increase<br />

in strength of high strength steel and concrete (steel above 500 MPa yield strength and concrete above<br />

70 MPa compressive strength) results in commensurate increase in member capacity, this does not<br />

necessarily follow when considering the deformational capacity of members hence structures.<br />

Moreover, the increase in cost associated with high strength materials is not necessarily offset by the<br />

reduction in quantities and construction time. Issues of ductility of high strength materials have been<br />

explored by the writer and his co-workers using testing and analysis on the material, member and<br />

structure levels for a number of years. In this paper, after a brief mention of previous studies, ten high<br />

rise frame-wall RC buildings are designed with various combinations of steel and concrete strengths<br />

and equivalence criteria (defined as criteria that render two different designs equivalent in terms of<br />

their fulfilment of a design premise). <strong>The</strong>se structures are then analyzed up to collapse when subjected<br />

to a number of earthquake ground motions. <strong>The</strong> results for the different strengths and also the different<br />

equivalence criteria are compared from a structural performance as well as from the cost of<br />

construction points of view. It is concluded that there is a limit to the use of high strength materials<br />

dictated by the ductility capacity, energy absorption potential and economics of construction. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

limits are quantitatively established for the class of structure investigated.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> need for higher buildings (due to financial centres and population expansion) naturally leads to the<br />

conclusion that high strength construction materials will be increasingly used in the future, in order<br />

that column sizes are maintained at current dimensions and more effective use is made of floor areas,<br />

especially in the lower stories of high rise structures. Two other performance criteria lend weight to the<br />

necessity of the use of high strength concrete: increased wind and traffic vibration susceptibility<br />

dictates that the modulus of elasticity of the material is as high as possible, in order to delimit small<br />

amplitude elastic displacements. Moreover, the need for rapid construction requires early age strength<br />

gain, a feature that may be offered readily by high strength concrete.


274<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several outstanding examples of high rise buildings using high strength materials around the<br />

world, both existing and under construction or consideration. In Seattle, Washington, the Pacific First<br />

Centre (44 storeys) and Two Union Square (62 storeys) buildings employ concrete with compressive<br />

strength of 115 MPa; mainly used for its high modulus of elasticity of 50,000 MPa. <strong>The</strong>se are extreme<br />

examples. More commonly used high strength concrete mixes are represented by the Two Prudential<br />

Plaza (281 m) and 311 South Wacker Drive (295 m) buildings (both in Chicago, Illinois), which use a<br />

mix with compressive strength of over 80 MPa. Outside the US, the Miglin-Beiter building (Frankfurt,<br />

Germany) has a 610 m height and concrete of 97 MPa compressive strength. In addition, the Petronas<br />

Towers (Kuala Lampur, Malaysia) (450 m) employ concrete of compressive strength of 80 MPa for<br />

the lower stories; while the BfG building (186 m), in Frankfurt, Germany, goes up to 85 MPa.<br />

Development of high yield steel for general construction lagged behind that of concrete. Only in the<br />

early 1990s was there widely available high yield steel, mainly from Japanese steel manufacturers,<br />

with yield strength above 1000 MPa being tested and used. This has had an effect on high strength<br />

materials construction economics because the decrease in column dimensions would lead to an<br />

increase in required steel area, unless high yield steel is used.<br />

REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES<br />

Whereas several research projects have been concerned with the experimental behaviour of reinforced<br />

concrete members with high strength concrete and high yield steel, very few have applied loading and<br />

boundary conditions relevant to earthquake response. Furthermore, none of the previous projects<br />

comprehensively and systematically addressed the range of concrete compressive strength,<br />

longitudinal steel yield stress, transverse steel yield stress and confining steel spacing. Though, it is<br />

noted that such early studies were most valuable in establishing trends and alerting designers to serious<br />

issues which may affect seismic safety. In Table 1, the ranges covered by tests conducted by various<br />

researchers are presented: the light shading indicates testing under axial force only (including eccentric<br />

loading); the darker shade indicates combined axial-flexural loads; and blank areas were not<br />

previously tested.<br />

TABLE 1<br />

RANGE OF TEST PARAMETERS FOR STEEL AND CONCRETE<br />

(Letters allude to references, below Table 2)<br />

f c^or f y -> (MPa)<br />

60-80<br />

80-100 _,<br />

100-120<br />

>120<br />

300-500<br />

a,c,d,f,l,m<br />

cJOr<br />

b,c,d,jq,r<br />

b,r<br />

500-700<br />

d<br />

k,p<br />

b,d,p<br />

b<br />

700-900<br />

' d<br />

k<br />

d<br />

900-1100<br />

m<br />

>1100<br />

With regard to confining steel characteristics and spacing tested, as identified from the published<br />

literature, these are indicated in Table 2.


275<br />

f c i or f v -* (MPa)<br />

60-80<br />

80-100<br />

100-120<br />

>120<br />

TABLE 2<br />

RANGE OF TEST PARAMETERS FOR CONFINING STEEL<br />

(Letters allude to references, given below)<br />

300-500<br />

c,e,f,l<br />

c,e,l,q<br />

b,c,d,e,g,j,q<br />

b,e,g,h<br />

500-700<br />

f<br />

o,p<br />

o,p<br />

h<br />

700-900<br />

d,f<br />

k,q<br />

dj,q,r<br />

r<br />

a. Ahmad and Shah (1982) b.AI-Hussainie/a/(1993)<br />

d. Nagashima etal (1992)<br />

e. Muguruma et al (1993)<br />

g. Razvi and Saatciogiu (1994) h. Razvi and Saatciogiu (1996)<br />

j Azizinammi and Kuska( 1993) LKimura etal (1996)<br />

m.Tanakae/a/(1994)<br />

n. Sugano(1996)<br />

p. Galeota and Giammatteo (1996) q. Muguruma and Watanabe (1990)<br />

900-1100<br />

a<br />

h<br />

h<br />

>1100<br />

a,d,l,m<br />

1<br />

d,n<br />

e t n<br />

c.Bjerkeli etal (1990)<br />

f. Cusson and Paultre (1993)<br />

i. Sun etal (1996)<br />

L Liet al (1994)<br />

o. Bayrak and Sheikh (1996)<br />

r. Nishiyama et al (1993)<br />

It is clear from the above, that there are considerable gaps in testing results of relevance to seismic<br />

response; which require attention prior to attempting to derive comprehensive design guidance. This is<br />

further emphasized by the observation that some of the above tests were conducted under eccentric<br />

axial load to represent combined axial-flexural testing. Notwithstanding other objectives that the<br />

researchers may have had in mind, this type of testing is considered by the authors to be not strictly<br />

relevant for seismic assessment purposes. <strong>The</strong>re are several behavioral considerations supporting the<br />

latter statement; amongst which is that levels of axial load at maximum moment are so high that the<br />

mobilized confining stresses are rather unrealistic and unrepresentative of seismic response of<br />

structures. A comprehensive testing program on beam-column members was recently completed at<br />

imperial College (Elnashai et al [1998], Goodfellow [1998] and Elnashai and Goodfellow [2002]). <strong>The</strong><br />

testing range was concrete strength of 60 MPa to 130 MPa and steel yield strength of 500 MPa to 1300<br />

MPa, with two stirrup spacing and two axial load levels under cyclic and monotonic transverse<br />

loading, leading to 92 test specimens.<br />

It was concluded (in the experimental studies above) that values of plastic hinge length and<br />

displacement ductility of reinforced concrete members, constructed from concrete up to 130 MPa and<br />

steel up to 1300 MPa, are on the whole similar and lower, respectively, than the normal material values<br />

commonly expected. However, no indication was given that ductility-based seismic design cannot<br />

make use of these materials that may be dictated on the project, by column size requirements and wind<br />

vibration control It is clear though, that specific design guidance is needed and curbs on the level of<br />

steel yield in particular should be imposed. This is confirmed by the low values of deformation-related<br />

parameters obtained for the f c 130-f y !300 pairs. Until further work is undertaken, a limit of concrete<br />

strength and steel yield for ductile seismic design may be set at f c =100 MPa, with f y =700 MPa. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

values started from the study reported above and therefore, are employed below. <strong>The</strong> study also gave<br />

values of secant stiffness at yield and ultimate for displacement-based design purposes. Finally, it is<br />

significantly concluded that the use of high strength confining hoops is not warranted, especially when<br />

employing high strength concrete. This is attributed to the low levels of dilation generally observed for<br />

high strength concrete. This is an important economic consideration in ductility-based design using<br />

high strength materials.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are very few studies on high strength materials at the structure level. <strong>The</strong> study by Kateinas<br />

(1997) (summarized in Elnashai, 1998) was one of the first detailed analytical investigations into high<br />

strength concrete buildings. It used the simplest approach possible for the analysis of a suite of


276<br />

buildings with different concrete strength and steel yield. This comprised keeping the member size<br />

constant and changing the material properties. Moreover, the higher the strength of concrete, the<br />

steeper was the third segment of the model. <strong>The</strong> above features of that study significantly affected the<br />

results obtained, hence, the conclusions drawn. By keeping the section dimensions and ratio of<br />

reinforcement constant, many of the structures ended up with response typical of 'strength design' as<br />

opposed to 'ductility design', as well as sections being over-reinforced. <strong>The</strong> consequence is to decrease<br />

the ductility of structures using high yield steel. <strong>The</strong> feature of using severely dipping descending<br />

branches for concrete lead to the structures behaving in a highly non-ductile fashion. It was noted in<br />

that study that high strength structures exhibit very low levels of ductility and behaviour factors<br />

nearing unity. In common with the current study though, the range of concrete and steel for viable<br />

seismic design was identified. <strong>The</strong>refore, the above analytical study represents the expected behaviour<br />

of high strength concrete structures if the confined concrete behaviour is still non-ductile and the steel<br />

stress ratio (ultimate-to-yield) is near unity. Higher levels of ductility would have been obtained<br />

though, if the 'over-reinforced' sections were re-designed.<br />

SCOPE OF WORK ON ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT<br />

<strong>The</strong> main objective of this paper is to summarize investigations of the seismic performance of high<br />

nse, high strength, concrete buildings designed according to existing code provisions and undertaken<br />

by the primary author and his co-researchers (Kateinas [1997], Laogan and Elnashai [1999],<br />

Goodfellow [1998] and Elnashai and Goodfellow [2002]) and to employ the conclusions of the<br />

experimental study in structural-level investigations.<br />

Ten, 24-storey structures with the same overall dimension<br />

and geometry, sized according to two equivalence criteria<br />

(Laogan and Elnashai, 1999), were analyzed elastically and<br />

designed according to the provisions of the Uniform Building<br />

Code (1994). <strong>The</strong> general layout of the frame-wall structures<br />

is shown in Figure 1. <strong>The</strong> material strength characteristics of<br />

the structures are given in Table 3. Every effort was made to<br />

have realistically designed and detailed structures. A<br />

comparative cost analysis of these structures was performed<br />

to determine their relative cost-effectiveness. Inelastic<br />

analyses were then performed using the program ADAPTIC<br />

(Izzuddin and Elnashai, 1989). Two sets of inelastic analyses<br />

were undertaken: first a static pushover analysis of the<br />

structure was performed, followed by a set of dynamic<br />

analyses using three artificial accelerograms, scaled to the<br />

design ground acceleration (PGA) and twice the design PGA.<br />

Moreover, dynamic analyses up to collapse, for purposes of FIGURE 1<br />

(R ° r q) ' ^ 24-STORY FRAME-WALL<br />

MODEL STRUCTURE


277<br />

TABLE 3<br />

SUMMARY OF STRUCTURES CONSIDERED<br />

Model<br />

N35<br />

N80<br />

N100<br />

N120<br />

N80R<br />

N100R<br />

N120R<br />

N80RS<br />

N100RS<br />

N120RS<br />

f c (MPa)<br />

35<br />

80<br />

100<br />

120<br />

80<br />

100<br />

120<br />

80<br />

100<br />

120<br />

Beams<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

600<br />

700<br />

800<br />

600<br />

700<br />

800<br />

Columns<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

600<br />

700<br />

800<br />

f y (MPa)<br />

Shear Wall<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

600<br />

700<br />

800<br />

Hoops<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

415<br />

600<br />

700<br />

800<br />

Remarks<br />

Basic Model Structure<br />

Equivalent Stiffness<br />

Equivalent Stiffness<br />

Equivalent Stiffness<br />

Reduced Stiffness<br />

Reduced Stiffness<br />

Reduced Stiffness<br />

One steel grade only<br />

One steel grade only<br />

One steel grade only<br />

In Table 3, ""equivalent stiffness" refers to an equivalence criterion whereby the stiffness of the<br />

structure is kept constant; taking into account that higher strength concrete will have higher stiffness.<br />

"Reduced stiffness" refers to a criterion whereby a limiting elastic drift value governs the equivalence<br />

of two structures (this is selected as 0.02/R W as recommended in Uniform Building Code, 1994). "One<br />

steel grade" refers to structures where all slabs, beams and columns utilize the same steel grade. <strong>The</strong><br />

schedule of reinforcement and detailed drawings of the main lateral resisting elements, of the ten<br />

model structures, is given in Laogan and Elnashai (1999).<br />

RESULTS OF COST COMPARISON<br />

<strong>The</strong> assessment included not only the material costs, but also the cost of formwork. Considerable effort<br />

was expended in collecting realistic cost estimates from more than one source, but the significance of<br />

the study is more comparative than absolute. It was concluded that the most cost-effective structure is<br />

N80R. This is attributable to it using only a minimal amount of the expensive high yield steel (used in<br />

the beams only), while at the same time taking advantage of the large axial load carrying capacity of<br />

the high strength concrete to reduce the vertical steel reinforcement. Figure 2 shows a bar chart of the<br />

cost broken down into the different components.


278<br />

160,000 -<br />

140,000<br />

_^<br />

d Concrete<br />

• Form works<br />

120,000 - -j DRebars<br />

!<br />

1<br />

1<br />

"<br />

"<br />

100,000 -<br />

s :<br />

60,000 -<br />

40,000<br />

—<br />

—<br />

-<br />

1<br />

-<br />

20,000<br />

n<br />

FIGURE 2<br />

COST OF THE DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF THE STRUCTURES<br />

As a group, the structures designed using the equivalent stiffness criterion (NSO-N120) show an<br />

increase in the cost of the concrete component as the strength of the material increases. <strong>The</strong> cost of the<br />

formwork remains relatively stable. <strong>The</strong> cost of the steel reinforcement is almost similar among the<br />

high strength concrete structures and is substantially less than that of the normal strength concrete<br />

structure. <strong>The</strong> group designed using the reduced stiffness criterion seems to be the most economical.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cost of the concrete component increases with increasing concrete strength, but is generally less<br />

than the normal strength concrete structure. <strong>The</strong> cost of formwork (as in the previous group) remains<br />

relatively the same, while the cost of the steel component shows a slight increase with increasing<br />

concrete strength. <strong>The</strong> structures using only one grade of steel appear to be the least economically<br />

viable. <strong>The</strong> relative savings over T expenditures are given in Table 4.<br />

Model<br />

% Savings<br />

N35<br />

0.00%<br />

TABLE 4<br />

PERCENTAGE SAVINGS RELATIVE TO N35<br />

N80<br />

8 08%<br />

N100<br />

5.35%<br />

N120<br />

-0.99%<br />

N80R<br />

17.70%<br />

N100R<br />

12.99%<br />

N120R<br />

6 57%<br />

N80RS N100RS<br />

11.85% 6.22%<br />

N120RS<br />

-1.14%<br />

At this cost level, it is noticeable that even the structures using only one grade of steel become<br />

economically feasible. Moreover, the use of high strength concrete can result in substantial savings.<br />

This suggests that the cost effectiveness of a high strength structure depends to a large extent on the<br />

cost component attributable to the steel reinforcement. As this item drops due to wider international<br />

use, high strength RC buildings will become more economical than has hitherto been the case.


279<br />

STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS RESULTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> yield point of the structure, defined based on an equivalent elasto-plastic system with reduced<br />

stiffness, evaluated as a secant through 75% of the maximum, is adapted for this study On the other<br />

hand, the ultimate limit state (ULS) is based on a global criterion of the attainment of 3% interstorey<br />

drift. At this level of drift, it is generally accepted that structures would have suffered major structural<br />

and non-structural damage. Further refinement of the limit states is not necessary since the primary<br />

objective is to compare the different structures. Figure 3 shows the force-displacement curve for the<br />

normal strength and the equivalent stiffness structures. It is noticeable that the initial stiffness of the<br />

structures is the same This feature is also exhibited in the reduced stiffness structure, thus validating<br />

the equivalence criteria used. This also confirms that imposing equivalent stiffness at the member level<br />

will give a structure with the same overall stiffness.<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

* 6000 -<br />

W<br />

u<br />

K<br />

4000<br />

/<br />

/<br />

/•<br />

^ -~ ~<br />

>- — 1<br />

500 1000 1500<br />

TOP DISPLACEMENT(mm)<br />

N35 1-<br />

---- NSO I<br />

Kttnn ,<br />

2000<br />

FIGURE 3<br />

FORCE-DISPLACEMENT CURVE FOR N35, N80, N100 AND N120<br />

<strong>The</strong> level of overstrength is defined herein as the ratio of the capacity of the structure, based on the<br />

static pushover analysis, to the code-defined design base shear. <strong>The</strong> calculated overstrength for the<br />

different structures is given in Table 5.<br />

TABLES<br />

STRUCTURE OVERSTRENGTH<br />

Model<br />

Overstrength<br />

N35<br />

6.29<br />

N80<br />

4.51<br />

N100<br />

4.47<br />

N120<br />

4.42<br />

N80R<br />

4.20<br />

NIOOR<br />

4.67<br />

N120R<br />

4.93<br />

N80RS<br />

4.25<br />

N100RS<br />

4.77<br />

N120RS<br />

5 10<br />

For each of the ten structures, dynamic analysis was performed with three artificial records, scaled to<br />

the design ground acceleration (PGA) and twice the design PGA, corresponding to 0.4g and 0.8g,<br />

respectively. As a measure of global response characteristics, the displacement and total base shear<br />

time-history and the interstorey drift ratio from the analyses are examined. For the purposes of<br />

discussion, NSO, N100 and N120 constitute "E" group (based on the equivalent stiffness criterion);<br />

N80R, NIOOR and N120R constitute "R" group (based on the reduced stiffness criterion); and N80RS,<br />

N100RS and N120RS constitute"RS" group (based on the reduced stiffness criterion with one steel<br />

grade only).<br />

It was observed that for buildings in the same group, subjected to the same input motion, the shape of<br />

the displacement and base shear response was similar. This suggests that structures in the same group


280<br />

responded in a fairly similar manner, confirming the effectiveness of the criteria developed for<br />

generating the structures. <strong>The</strong> maximum top displacement of the structures, within the same group,<br />

shows a slight increase as the concrete strength increases. This is consistent with the load-displacement<br />

curves generated under static loading. <strong>The</strong> higher strength concrete experiences slightly more<br />

softening beyond a certain strain, in the initial ascending branch of the curve. This is partially<br />

attributable to the cracking of the concrete cover. In all instances, the maximum top displacement of<br />

the structures in the R and RS groups are greater than those structures of the same concrete strengths in<br />

the E group.<br />

N80R N100R N120R<br />

FIGURE 4<br />

SAMPLE PLASTIC HINGE LOCATIONS<br />

(SHADED AREAS ARE PLASTIC HINGING IN THE WALL)<br />

<strong>The</strong> plastic hinges formed in the different structures show that the number of column hinges generally<br />

increases with increasing concrete strength. This is attributable to the higher strain levels in the steel,<br />

due to the increase in strength and modulus of elasticity of the concrete. Although the strong-column<br />

weak-beam provision of the code was satisfied in the design, the 120 MPa concrete structures in the R<br />

group show substantially more hinging in the columns, as shown in Figure 4. <strong>The</strong> use of high yield<br />

steel in the beams and normal grade steel in the columns of the R structures has an adverse effect in<br />

terms of increased number of column hinges. <strong>The</strong> RS group, which used high yield steel in the<br />

columns, had fewer column hinges, even at high levels of loading. On the other hand, the spread of<br />

inelasticity in the shear wall is unaffected by the change in concrete strength. <strong>The</strong> use of normal grade<br />

steel with high strength concrete does not cause undesirable consequences in the wall. For the beams,<br />

at twice the design PGA, yielding has occurred in almost all cases. This is both expected and desirable<br />

at this level of loading.<br />

To study local effects, the curvature ductility demand of a number of beams at different locations in<br />

the structure, was calculated. <strong>The</strong> maximum curvature ductility demand in the beams is shown in<br />

Table 6.


281<br />

TABLE 6<br />

MAXIMUM CURVATURE DUCTILITY DEMAND IN BEAMS<br />

Model<br />

EC8-1<br />

EC8-2<br />

EC8-3<br />

0.4g<br />

3 11<br />

373<br />

2.33<br />

E- group<br />

0.8g<br />

7 15<br />

703<br />

6.09<br />

0.4g<br />

1 68<br />

1.63<br />

165<br />

R - group<br />

0.8g<br />

399<br />

383<br />

3.05<br />

RS - group<br />

0.4g<br />

1 71<br />

1 68<br />

167<br />

0.8g<br />

3.87<br />

3.90<br />

3.12<br />

It is interesting to note that the maximum curvature ductility demand, given in Table 7, occurred in the<br />

normal strength concrete structure and the equivalent stiffness HSC structures. <strong>The</strong> ductility demand at<br />

a PGA of O.Sg is already on the high side, but is within achievable ductility capacity of well-detailed<br />

members. For the R and RS structures, the ductility demand is significantly less compared to those of<br />

E group. Since the R and RS group structures use high yield steel in the beams, the strain that defined<br />

yield is much higher compared to normal strength steel; hence, a higher yield curvature and<br />

consequently, a lower ductility demand was observed.<br />

TABLE<br />

CALCULATED COLLAPSE PGA, YIELD PGA AND RESPONSE MODIFICATION<br />

Model<br />

N35<br />

N80<br />

N100<br />

N120<br />

N80R<br />

N1GOR<br />

N120R<br />

N80RS<br />

NIOORS<br />

N120RS<br />

EC8-1<br />

0.841<br />

0.870<br />

0.868<br />

0.893<br />

0.934<br />

0.958<br />

0.984<br />

0.963<br />

0.959<br />

0.997<br />

Mg)<br />

EC8-2<br />

0.950<br />

0.982<br />

0.954<br />

0.970<br />

0.864<br />

0.911<br />

0.939<br />

0.901<br />

0.918<br />

0.958<br />

EC8-3<br />

0.902<br />

0.871<br />

0.847<br />

0.869<br />

0.980<br />

0.898<br />

0.876<br />

0.980<br />

0.869<br />

0.853<br />

EC8-1<br />

0.150<br />

0.107<br />

0.106<br />

0.105<br />

0.100<br />

0.111<br />

0.117<br />

0.101<br />

0.114<br />

0.121<br />

Me)<br />

EC8-2<br />

0.150<br />

0.107<br />

0.106<br />

0.105<br />

0.100<br />

0.111<br />

0.117<br />

0.101<br />

0.114<br />

0.121<br />

EC8-3<br />

0.150<br />

0.107<br />

0.106<br />

0.105<br />

0.100<br />

0.111<br />

0.117<br />

0.101<br />

0.114<br />

0.121<br />

EC8-1<br />

5.61<br />

8.13<br />

8.19<br />

8.50<br />

9.34<br />

8.63<br />

8.41<br />

9.53<br />

8.41<br />

8.24<br />

Rorq<br />

EC8-2<br />

6.33<br />

918<br />

900<br />

9.24<br />

8.64<br />

8.21<br />

8.03<br />

8.92<br />

8,05<br />

7.92<br />

EC8-3<br />

6.01<br />

8.14<br />

7.99<br />

8.28<br />

9.80<br />

8.09<br />

7.49<br />

9.70<br />

7.62<br />

7.05<br />

For simplicity, the response modification factor (R in US practice and q in European practice) is<br />

defined as the ratio of the ground acceleration of the earthquake that caused the attainment of the<br />

ultimate limit state, to that of the earthquake corresponding to the yield limit state. Of all the structures<br />

considered, the normal strength structure has the lowest response modification factor. This is<br />

attributable to it having a much larger level of overstrength, compared to the other structures. <strong>The</strong> extra<br />

steel reinforcement, provided for gravity loading in the normal strength concrete, has affected its<br />

energy dissipation capacity in the inelastic range. <strong>The</strong> behaviour factor for structures in the E group is<br />

almost constant. On the other hand, the behaviour factor generally decreases with increasing concrete<br />

strength for both the R and RS structures (with very few exceptions). Comparison of the calculated<br />

behaviour factors suggest that, in terms of structural ability to respond in the inelastic range, the 80<br />

MPa concrete is the most effective for the given structural configuration.


282<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

In this paper, the seismic performance and cost effectiveness of high rise high strength RC buildings<br />

were discussed. Based on the analyses performed, the following conclusions are supported by the<br />

results:<br />

• Contrary to some of the studies performed on columns subjected to pure axial load, the optimum<br />

concrete strength that will give the most economical structure is not necessarily the highest<br />

concrete strength available. <strong>The</strong> concrete strength that can reduce the cost of the steel component,<br />

while at the same time limit the cost of the concrete component, will result in the most cost<br />

effective structure.<br />

• In the light of the common practice of using high strength concrete only in the columns of the<br />

structure, it was shown that the use of high strength concrete in the beams and slabs, where they<br />

are less effective, can still furnish substantial cost savings.<br />

• Under static loading, the high strength concrete structures have stable load-displacement curves.<br />

<strong>The</strong> shape of the curve is similar to that of normal strength concrete structures. For this type of<br />

loading, inelasticity developed mostly in the beams. <strong>The</strong> columns appear to be well protected from<br />

hinging by capacity design regulations.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> level of overstrength in high strength concrete structures, calculated based on the static<br />

pushover analysis, is less than that of the normal strength structure. In the normal strength<br />

structure, the additional steel reinforcement required to resist high axial loads provide extra lateral<br />

load capacity, thus increasing overstrength.<br />

• At the global level, based on the three response parameters (top displacement, base shear and<br />

maximum interstorey drift ratio) examined, the performance of the high strength concrete<br />

structures compares favourably with that of the equivalent normal strength concrete structure.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> selection of the grade of steel to use with the high strength concrete is very important. Results<br />

from the dynamic analysis indicate that using normal grade steel for concrete strengths of up to 80<br />

MPa is adequate. Beyond 80 MPa, the use of normal grade steel with high strength concrete<br />

resulted in significantly more hinging in the columns. <strong>The</strong> use of high yield steel in beams and<br />

normal grade steel in the columns should also be avoided.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> maximum curvature ductility demand at the design and twice the design earthquake is 3.73<br />

and 7.15, respectively. <strong>The</strong>se are well within the achievable ductility capacity of seismically<br />

designed and detailed members. Moreover, the use of high yield steel with high strength concrete<br />

significantly reduced the ductility demand on the members to about 1.63 and 3.83.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> calculated behaviour factors suggest that the SOMPa concrete is the optimum concrete strength<br />

for the given structural configuration, in terms of energy dissipation capacity. In general, the higher<br />

strength concrete structures have a larger behaviour factor compared to the normal strength<br />

structure.


283<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Ahmad, S.H. and Shah, S.P. (1982). Stress-strain curves for concrete confined by spiral reinforcement.<br />

ACIJournal 79:46, 484-490.<br />

Al-Hussami, A, Regan P.E., Xue, H-Y. and Ramdane, K-E. (1993). <strong>The</strong> behaviour of high strength<br />

concrete columns under axial load. Third International Conference on Utilisation of High Strength<br />

Concrete, Lillehammer, Norway, pp. 83-90.<br />

Azizinamini, A. and Kuska, S. (1993). Flexural capacity of high strength concrete columns. Third<br />

International Conference on Utilisation of High Strength Concrete, Lillehammer, Norway, pp. 91-97.<br />

Bayrak, 0. and Sheikh, S.A. (1996). Confinement requirements for high strength concrete columns.<br />

llth World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper no. 463.<br />

Bjerkeli, L, Tomaszewicz, A. and Jensen, J.J. (1990). Deformation properties and ductility of highstrength<br />

concrete. High Strength Concrete - Second International Symposium, ACISP 121, pp. 215-<br />

238.<br />

Cusson, D. and Paultre, P. (1993). Experimental study of high strength concrete columns confined by<br />

rectangular ties. Third International Conference on Utilisation of High Strength Concrete,<br />

Lillehammer, Norway, pp. 136-145.<br />

Elnashai, A.S. (1998). <strong>Earthquake</strong> resistance of high strength reinforced concrete buildings. Seismic<br />

Design Practice into the Next Century., Booth (ed.), Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 3-14.<br />

Elnashai, A.S. and Goodfellow, R.C. (2002). Seismic Response characteristics of high strength steel<br />

and concrete members. 7 th National U.S. Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.<br />

Elnashai, A.S., Goodfellow, R.C. and Chana, P.S. (1998). Flexural ductility of high strength reinforced<br />

concrete structures. Proceedings of the Second Japan-UK Workshop on Implications of Recent<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> on Seismic Risk, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan, pp. 145-157.<br />

Galeota, D. and Giammatteo, M.M. (1996). Seismic resistance of high strength concrete columns, llth<br />

World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper no. 1390.<br />

Goodfellow, R.C. (1998). Ductility of RC members with high strength materials. PhD thesis,<br />

<strong>University</strong> of London, UK.<br />

ICBO, Uniform Building Code (1994). International Conference of Building Officials,<br />

California, USA.<br />

Whittier,'<br />

Izzuddin, B.A. and Elnashai, A.S. (1989). ADAPTIC - A program for adaptive large displacement<br />

eiasto-plastic dynamic analysis of steel and composite frames. <strong>Engineering</strong> Seismology and<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Report No. 89/7, Imperial College, London, UK.<br />

Kateinas, I. (1997). Seismic response of R/C structures made with high strength material. MSc<br />

Dissertation, Imperial College, London, UK.<br />

Kimura H., Sugano, S. and Nagashima, T. (1996) Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns<br />

using ultra-high-strength concrete under high axial load. Fourth International Symposium on<br />

Utilisation of High Strength/High Performance Concrete, Paris, France, Paper no. 184.<br />

Laogan, B.T. and Elnashai, A.S. (1999). Structural performance and economics of tall high strength<br />

RC buildings in seismic regions. <strong>The</strong> Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 8, 171-204.


284<br />

Li B, Park, R. and Tanaka, H. (1994). Strength and ductility of reinforced concrete members and<br />

frames constructed from high strength concrete. <strong>Research</strong> Report 94-5, Department of Civil<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.<br />

Muguruma, H., Nishiyama, M. and Watanabe, F. (1993). Stress-strain curve model for concrete with a<br />

wide range of compressive strength. Third International Conference on Utilisation of High Strength<br />

Concrete, Lillehammer, Norway, pp. 314-321.<br />

Muguruma, H. and Watanabe, F. (1990). Ductility improvements of high-strength concrete columns<br />

with lateral confinement. High Strength Concrete - Second International Symposium, SP-121, pp. 47-<br />

60.<br />

Nagashima, T., Sugano, S., Kimura, H. and Ichikawa, A. (1992). Monotonic axial compression test on<br />

ultra-high-strength concrete tied columns. 10th World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

Madrid, pp. 2983-2988.<br />

Nishiyama, M., Fukushima, I., Watanabe, F. and Muguruma, H. (1993). Axial loading tests on high<br />

strength concrete prisms confined with ordinary and high strength steel. Third International<br />

Conference on Utilisation of High Strength Concrete, Lillehammer, Norway, pp. 322-329.<br />

Razvi, S.R. and Saatcioglu, M. (1994). Behaviour of high-strength concrete columns confined with<br />

circular spirals', 10th European Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Vienna, Austria, pp. 1643-<br />

1648.<br />

Razvi, S.R. and Saatcioglu, M. (1996). Confinement of high-strength concrete columns for seismic<br />

applications, llth World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper no. 1855.<br />

Sugano, S. (1996). Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns which used ultra-high-strength<br />

concrete, llth World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper no. 1383.<br />

Sun, Y.P., Oba, T., Tian, F.S. and Ikeda, T. (1996). Confinement effects of transverse hoops in highstrength<br />

concrete, llth World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Paper no. 1363.<br />

Tanaka, H., Sato, Y., Park, R. and Kani, N. (1994). High-strength concrete columns with longitudinal<br />

reinforcement of mixed grades. Proceedings of AC1 International Conference on High Performance<br />

Concrete, Singapore, pp. 391-411.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF STEEL MOMENT<br />

FRAMES USING TARGET DRIFT AND YIELD MECHANISM<br />

Subhash C. Goel and Soon-Sik Lee<br />

Department of Civil and Env. <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper presents a seismic design procedure based on performance limit states using plastic<br />

mechanism method and the concept of energy balance. In this study, using the concept of seismic force<br />

reduction factor and the displacement amplification factor, the energy balance equation is modified for<br />

the design procedure. A new seismic lateral force distribution based on nonlinear dynamic analyses is<br />

also presented. This distribution is applied to the performance based plastic design procedure for steel<br />

moment frames. <strong>The</strong> results of nonlinear static and dynamic analyses of an example steel moment<br />

frame designed by using the proposed method are presented and discussed. <strong>The</strong> results show that the<br />

structure performed well under design level ground motions as intended, with story drifts within the<br />

target limit.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Many studies have shown that building structures designed by modern seismic code procedures are<br />

expected to undergo large cyclic deformations in the inelastic range when subjected severe earthquake<br />

ground motions. Nevertheless, most seismic design codes are still based on elastic methods using<br />

equivalent static lateral design forces. This procedure can result in unpredictable and poor response<br />

during severe ground motions with inelastic activity unevenly distributed among structural members.<br />

Leelataviwat (1998) developed a new performance-based plastic design procedure using the concept of<br />

energy balance applied to a preselected yield mechanism, with adequate strength and ductility. This<br />

study is an extension of the previous study by Leelataviwat (1998). It is well known that force<br />

reduction and displacement amplification factors, intended to account for damping, energy dissipation<br />

capacity as well as overstrength, have important roles in seismic design. However, since the previous<br />

proposed design method (Leelataviwat, 1998) did not consider the above factors as influenced by the<br />

structure period, the method can result in conservative design for long period structures and<br />

unconservative design for low-rise, short period structures.


For simplicity, a linear distribution of the lateral design forces has been generally used in the codes<br />

However, many studies have shown that this distribution may not be applicable in the inelastic stage<br />

and may underestimate the story shears. It can also be too conservative for the design of columns in the<br />

performance based plastic design procedure. Moreover, this distribution does not satisfactorily<br />

recognize the higher mode effects for high-rise building structures. In this study, a new distribution of<br />

the lateral forces is presented and applied to a new performance based plastic design procedure. <strong>The</strong><br />

results of nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses of an example steel moment frame designed<br />

by the new method are also presented and discussed.<br />

MODIFIED ENERGY BALANCE EQUATION<br />

286<br />

In the earlier study (Leelataviwat, 1998), the energy balance equation was written as:<br />

E = E.+E p (1)<br />

where E(= l/2MS^ is the elastic input energy, and E d and E p are the elastic and plastic components<br />

of work required to push the structure monotonically up to the target drift. Based on studies by<br />

Newmark and Hall (1982) and Uang (1994), Eqn. 5 can be modifies as:<br />

7E = (E e + E p ) (2)<br />

where 7 is a modification factor, which depends on the structural ductility factor ( ju & ) and the ductility<br />

reduction factor ( R^),<br />

Fig. 1 shows the relationship between the base shear ratio (C) and the drift ( A ), and Eqn. 2 can be<br />

written as:<br />

(3)<br />

Using the expression for drifts ( A ), Eqn. 3 can be rewritten as:<br />

where A tf and A inax from Fig. 1 are equal to R^ A v and // 4 A y , respectively. Substituting these terms in<br />

Equation 8, the energy modification factor y can be determined as:


287<br />

Figure 1 Structural Idealized Response-Application Principle of Energy Conservation<br />

(5)<br />

According to Eqn. 5, the modification factor is a function of the ductility reduction factor and the<br />

structural ductility factor Using different approaches, many investigators have attempted to estimate<br />

the ductility reduction factor (R M ) and structural ductility factor (// 4 ) (Miranda and Bertero 1994). In<br />

this study, the proposal of Newmark and Hall (1982) is used to estimate the ductility reduction factor<br />

and the structural ductility factor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> design input energy can be determined from the elastic design pseudo-acceleration spectra as<br />

given in the building codes. In this study, the design is based on the UBC (1997) design spectrum<br />

which, for elastic systems, is specified as:<br />

A = ZlCg = ag (6)<br />

where A is the design pseudo-acceleration, / is the importance factor, Z is the zone factor, C is the<br />

elastic seismic coefficient, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and a = ZIC. <strong>The</strong> energy balance<br />

. |W M.-2<br />

- Wi ** 3<br />

W\J n.= 4<br />

\y *»s<br />

Accln ; „ Velocity, **<br />

Region "*["""* Displacement Regions<br />

Period (sec)<br />

Figure 2. Ductility reduction factors<br />

proposed by Newmark and Hall (1982)<br />

Figure 3. Modification factors for<br />

energy equation versus period


equation can be re- written as:<br />

288<br />

l -rM(^ag (7)<br />

Akiyama (1985) showed that the elastic vibrational energy can be calculated by assuming that the<br />

entire structure is reduced into a single-degree-of-freedom system, i e.,<br />

where Vis the yield base shear and Wis the total seismic weight of the structure (W=Mg). Substituting<br />

Eqn. 8 into Eqn. 7 and rearranging terms gives:<br />

• "><br />

NEW LATERAL FORCE DISTRIBUTION FOR PROPOSED DESIGN PROCEDURE<br />

Inelastic dynamic analyses were conducted to determine the distribution of maximum story shears. <strong>The</strong><br />

nonlinear analysis program SNAP-2DX [Rai et al., 1996] was used to perform the analyses. <strong>The</strong> study<br />

frame was subjected to four selected earthquake records (Lee and Goel, 2000). Fig. 4 shows the<br />

example 5-bay, 9 story steel frame. <strong>The</strong> relative distributions of maximum story shears due to four<br />

selected earthquake records and the UBC static story shears are shown in Fig. 5. <strong>The</strong> ratio of the<br />

earthquake induced story shear at level / to that at the top level, n, is assumed to be of the form:<br />

where V t and V n , respectively, are the static story shears at level / and at the top level as computed<br />

from the design forces given by the UBC lateral force equations. <strong>The</strong> value of exponent b = 0.5 was<br />

derived from many analyses using different types of structures following the strong column- weak<br />

beam mechanism (Lee and Goel, 2000).<br />

Using the static story shears, V l and V n , at level i and the top story provided by UBC formulas, the<br />

factor can be written as:<br />

w,h, (i - o.or) + 0.077*2<br />

(ID


289<br />

W24N68 W24x68 W24x6S W24\6S WWvfiS<br />

\V27\84 * W27\S4 5<br />

3<br />

W27-v84 5 \V27\84 | W27\»4<br />

;<br />

W30x9


290<br />

DESIGN BASE SHEAR<br />

Equating the plastic energy term E p to the external work done by the lateral forces gives'<br />

Substituting Eqs. 9 and 14 into Eqn. 15 , and solving for V/W gives:<br />

V _-a + ^a" + 4yu 2 „„<br />

W~ 2<br />

where a is a dimensionless parameter, which depends on the stiffness of the structure, the modal<br />

properties and the intended drift level, and is given by:<br />

Plastic Design of Moment Frames<br />

<strong>The</strong> distribution of beam strength along the height should closely follow the distribution of story shears<br />

induced by ground motion. <strong>The</strong>n, the required beam strength at each level can be determined as<br />

follows:<br />

fi M )h,F. (18)<br />

where \f p b r is the reference plastic moment of beams and the only unknown variable in the above<br />

equation. <strong>The</strong> plastic moment of the first-story columns to prevent the story mechanism in the first<br />

story can be taken as:<br />

where Vis the total base shear, h/ is the height of the first story, and the factor 1.1 is the overstrength<br />

factor to account for possible overloading due to strain hardening (Leelataviwat, 1998).<br />

In order to ensure the selected strong column-weak beam plastic mechanism at the ultimate drift level,<br />

it is important that columns are designed assuming that all beam plastic hinges are fully strainhardened<br />

when the drift is at the target ultimate level <strong>The</strong> detailed procedure for design of columns<br />

can be found in the previous study (Leelataviwat, 1998).


SEISMIC EVALUATION OF THE STUDY FRAME<br />

291<br />

<strong>The</strong> example frame was designed by the proposed design procedure. Fig. 6 shows the resulting<br />

member sizes of the frame. In this study, the frame was designed by selecting an assumed 2% target<br />

drift, which is consistent with the drift limit imposed by the UBC, and all members with specified yield<br />

strength of 50 ksi. <strong>The</strong> members were designed by using AISC-LRFD specification (AISC, 1994).<br />

Design parameters for the example frame are shown in Table 1.<br />

\V33vll8 "^<br />

W3H\W<br />

~k<br />

W33\118 ^<br />

W3li


292<br />

by using the computer program SNAP-2DX (Rai et al., 1996). Strain hardening and damping values of<br />

2 % were used for all members.<br />

Fig. 7 shows the base shear versus roof displacement plot of the frame obtained from die static<br />

pushover analysis. As can be seen, the yield drift and the design base shear of the frame are very close<br />

to the values assumed in the design. Fig. 8 shows the envelopes of maximum story drifts of the frame<br />

due to the four selected ground motions. <strong>The</strong> envelopes of maximum story drifts show that the story<br />

drifts are generally within the target design limit of 2%, as expected.<br />

Conclusion<br />

A new seismic design procedure based on modified energy balance equation and plastic design concept<br />

was presented and discussed. A new modification factor for energy was derived, which depends on the<br />

structural ductility factor f ju^) and the ductility reduction factor (R M ). A new design lateral force<br />

distribution based on nonlinear inelastic dynamic analysis results was used. In this proposed design<br />

method, the story drift is specified as a design parameter and, therefore, no explicit check for ultimate<br />

drift is required.<br />

<strong>The</strong> example 9-story frame was designed by the proposed design method. Nonlinear static and<br />

dynamic analyses of the frame were conducted to verify the proposed method. <strong>The</strong> results show that<br />

the proposed method can produce structures that meet preselected performance objectives in terms of<br />

yield mechanism and target drift.<br />

References<br />

Lee, Soon-Sik and Goel, S.C., U A New Lateral Force Distribution for Seismic Design of Steel<br />

Structure," Proceedings of U.S.-Japan Workshop on Seismic Fracture Issues in Steel<br />

Structures, San Francisco, CA, February 28-March 1, 2000.<br />

Leelataviwat, S. (1998), Drift and Yield Mechanism based Seismic Design and Upgrading of<br />

Steel Moment Frames, Ph.D. <strong>The</strong>sis, Department of Civ. & Env. Engrg., <strong>University</strong> of<br />

Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.<br />

Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994), "Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong>-Resistant Design," <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1994<br />

Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1982), <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra and Design, <strong>Earthquake</strong> Engrg.<br />

Res. Inst, El Cerrito, CA.<br />

Rai, D.C., Goel, S.C., and Firmansjah, J. (1996), U SNAP-2DX: A General Purpose Computer<br />

Program for Nonlinear Structural Analysis," Report EERC 96-21, Dept. of Civ. & Env.<br />

Engrg., <strong>University</strong> of Michigan, Ann Arbor, ML<br />

Uang, C.-M. and Maarouf, A. (1994), "Deflection Amplification Factor for Seismic Design<br />

Provisions," J. Struc. Engrg., Vol. 120, No. 8,2423-2436, ASCE<br />

Uniform Building Code (UBC) (1997), Int. Conf. of Bldg. Officials, Whittier, Calif.


Proceedings of the International Conference on «««<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

A HYBRID OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM:<br />

GENETIC ALGORITHM - SIMPLEX<br />

HAN Wei 1 ' 2 and LIAO Zhenpeng 1<br />

'institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, China Seismological Bureau,<br />

Harbin, China<br />

"Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Genetic algorithm is a global optimization algorithm that attracts much attention, and has been used in<br />

many fields recent years. Although it can search widely in model space, its local searching ability is<br />

poor, especially for some complex optimization problems in earthquake engineering. In general, the<br />

local optimization algorithm is excellent in searching ability. To cope with the problem of low<br />

searching efficiency and premature of genetic algorithm, a hybrid global - local optimization<br />

algorithm, genetic algorithm-simplex, is proposed in this paper. Taking the advantages of effective<br />

searching, easy implementing and proper combining of simplex, the proposed algorithm can overcome<br />

the premature of genetic algorithm, and the calculating efficiency of genetic algorithm is also<br />

improved by using simplex to enhance the searching ability, providing new models and increasing the<br />

variety of the population. Numerical experiments were carried out by seven test functions that can<br />

rigorously examine the searching ability of algorithm in various aspects. Compared with several other<br />

global optimization algorithms, the searching ability of the proposed genetic-simplex is verified.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Genetic algorithm (GA) is a global optimization algorithm which uses simple encoding technology to<br />

express complex parameters. By genetic operation and natural selection, it can search model space<br />

intelligently. Because of its population searching mode, genetic algorithm can search many locations in<br />

the solution space synchronously. Moreover, natural selection and simple genetic operation make<br />

genetic algorithm easy to use and is not restricted by some additional conditions and information. <strong>The</strong><br />

widely used genetic algorithm is simple genetic algorithm (SGA) with elitist strategy. It employs<br />

binary encoding and roulette wheel selection, and uses just two genetic operations: crossover and


294<br />

mutation. Elitist strategy means that the best individual has been found will always be kept in the<br />

population. <strong>The</strong> simple genetic algorithm with elitist strategy is convergence^.<br />

For many multi-parameters optimization problems, some algorithms have to calculate the grad of the<br />

function. But in nonlinear optimization problems, the grad of function can not be expressed<br />

analytically, and can only be calculated approximately. This will not only increase the calculating cost<br />

but also depress the precision of the solution. Simplex is a multi-dimensions local optimization<br />

algorithm which does not calculate the grad of the objective function. It has the advantages of easy<br />

implement, good searching ability in local area and simplicity of operation on computers.<br />

Simple genetic algorithm is one of the widely used optimization algorithms. But has the disadvantage<br />

of low searching efficiency problem, especially for multi-dimension and high precision demanded<br />

problems. Many efforts have been put by researchers to speed up the convergence of the genetic<br />

algorithm. For example, Cui 3 has obtained some improvement by combing GA with simulated<br />

annealing algorithm. In order to improve the search capability, a hybrid optimization algorithm was<br />

developed in this paper which combines the genetic algorithm and the simplex. In the proposed<br />

algorithm, the convergence is guaranteed by genetic algorithm, and simplex can speed up the<br />

optimization. Further more, the validity of this hybrid algorithm was checked by seven test functions<br />

and compared with other two algorithms. <strong>The</strong> result shows that the proposed hybrid algorithm has high<br />

searching efficiency.<br />

2. GENETIC ALGORITHM - SIMPLEX<br />

Premature is the main factor that affects the speed of convergence of GA. To cope with it, genetic<br />

algorithm-simplex is presented, and the main procedure is shown in Fig 1.<br />

2.1 Objective Function and Initial Population<br />

In many actual engineering optimization problems, observed data are used to identify the parameters.<br />

For example, as the observed data are Fc(i), i=l,2,-,M, M is the number of the parameters that to be<br />

identified in the model, the objective function can be defined as:<br />

in which, F L (i) is the theoretic value. If the model space is B, its size is K, the objective of optimization<br />

is to find a special model, and its M parameters meet the condition,<br />

(2.1)<br />

$ ^ s (2.2)<br />

where s is convergence precision, is a pre-chosen, small positive number.


295<br />

Genetic algorithm starts from a group of individuals, namely population, and its size is noted as N.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n the primal parameters of model can be given by:<br />

S, = S imin + ^(Staax - Si rai n) (i=l,2,...,M) (2.3)<br />

in which, S imax and Si min are respectively the upper and lower limits of parameter S, that need to be<br />

identified. ^ is a uniform distributed random number between 0 and 1.<br />

2.2 Genetic Operation<br />

2.2.1 Selection<br />

After the initial population was obtained, the objective function of every model can be calculated by<br />

(2.1). Objective function is the direct express of the quality of the model, and is the basic standard to<br />

distinguish the individuals. <strong>The</strong>re are many methods to express the quality of individual in genetic<br />

algorithm, and the relative fitness used in the paper is<br />

(2.4)<br />

where T is a constant, £ is a random distributed variable, and £e[0,l]. If ^\|/, <


296<br />

2.3 Premature Judgment and Combined with Simplex<br />

<strong>The</strong> premature standard in this paper is that the best fitness in the population does not change m 20<br />

successive generations.<br />

I Initial Population X, . t=Q |<br />

| Objective function of every individual in X,<br />

Convergence<br />

Fitness of every individual in X,<br />

Fitness-proportionate selection of N individuals from X,<br />

I Crossover between


297<br />

genetic algorithm is N, then the demand of the hybrid algorithm is N>M+1 During the optimization<br />

process, if the GA is in the premature status, the hybrid algorithm will select M-t-1 individuals from the<br />

population as the beginning of simplex. <strong>The</strong>n the simplex begins its optimization calculation. If the<br />

simplex finds the solution satisfies (2.2), the optimization ends. Otherwise, simplex can find some<br />

better solutions generally after a number of calculations. <strong>The</strong>n the hybrid algorithm will replace M+l<br />

individuals selected randomly in the population with new better solutions found by simplex, and the<br />

genetic algorithm continues. Use GA and simplex alternately until the best solution is found. <strong>The</strong> flow<br />

chart of genetic algorithm - simplex is show in Fig. 1.<br />

3. TEST FUNCTIONS AND HYBRID ALGORITHM TEST<br />

In order to test the validity of the hybrid algorithm, seven complex test functions were selected. In the<br />

test, the objective function is defined as O =<br />

best value - function value<br />

best value<br />

. For the first four test<br />

functions, only two-dimension cases were calculated, and for other three functions, both<br />

two-dimension and multi-dimension cases were calculated.<br />

3,1 Test Function<br />

(1) Fi: Shubert function 3 (-10


298<br />

(3) F 3 : De Jone's F 5 3 (Shekel's Foxholes) function (-32


299<br />

3.2 Test and Results<br />

In the test, three algorithms were compared: hybrid algorithm, genetic-simulated annealing algorithm<br />

developed by Cui 3 (SAGA), and simple genetic algorithm with elitist strategy (SGA). <strong>The</strong> evaluation<br />

standard is the calculation number of test function by algorithms. In the test, if an algorithm can find<br />

the global optimization solution in 20 successive calculations, the algorithm is considered valid, and<br />

the average of these 20 calculations is shown in Table 3.3, If one algorithm can not find the solution<br />

using 10 times calculation number of other algorithms, it is considered "divergent". In the test, the<br />

population size is 50, the crossover probability is 0.6, the mutation probability is 0.05, and the<br />

convergence precision is shown in Table 3.2. <strong>The</strong> test results are shown in Table3. <strong>The</strong> number in the<br />

bracket is the root-mean-square deviation.<br />

TABLE 3.2 CONVERGENCE PRESISION s<br />

Test Function<br />

Num of Dim.<br />

£<br />

Test Function<br />

Num of Dim.<br />

s<br />

F, F 2<br />

2 2<br />

2.03xlO" 3<br />

F 4<br />

2<br />

F 3<br />

F 5<br />

2<br />

2 5 10 15<br />

2.71x10° 1 00x10° 5-OOxlO" 3 1.00x10° 1 00x10° 1.00x10<br />

3 1.00x10°<br />

F 6<br />

2<br />

l.OOxlO" 3 5<br />

1 OOxl O" 3 10<br />

1 OOxl O' 3 15<br />

1.00x10°<br />

F 7<br />

2<br />

5<br />

10<br />

5.00x1 Q- 2 4.00x10' 2 2.80x1 0" 2<br />

TABLE 3.3<br />

Test<br />

Function<br />

Fi<br />

F,<br />

F 3<br />

F 4<br />

F 5<br />

F &<br />

F 7<br />

TEST RESULTS<br />

Dim.<br />

M<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

2<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

2<br />

5<br />

10<br />

Hybrid Algorithm<br />

16052(9896)<br />

2816(1137)<br />

12550(10483)<br />

16851(17565)<br />

6813(4636)<br />

29129(4373)<br />

369000(141868)<br />

9975064(1823640)<br />

475(129)<br />

3854(1094)<br />

124386(52570)<br />

1625996(1537333)<br />

^_ 419(262)<br />

6344(3623)<br />

135385(86500)<br />

Calculation Number<br />

SGA<br />

14180(17313) U)<br />

2816(1137)<br />

12550(10483)<br />

-<br />

-<br />

_<br />

-<br />

-<br />

475(129)<br />

3854(1094)<br />

284960(1 61 227) {2)<br />

-<br />

419(262)<br />

6344(3623)<br />

151883(144991)<br />

SAGA<br />

1 8608(26048) 13)<br />

2816(1137)<br />

12550(10483)<br />

(4)<br />

_<br />

_<br />

-<br />

-<br />

475(129)<br />

3854(1094)<br />

287574(1 66246) 15)<br />

-<br />

419(262)<br />

6344(3623)<br />

107984(51991)<br />

Note<br />

- : Divergent<br />

(1): 10 convergence, the number is average of the other 10 converged calculations;<br />

(2): 13 divergence, the number is average of other 17 converged calculations;<br />

(3): 13 divergence, the number is average of other 7 converged calculations;<br />

(4): seldom convergent;<br />

(5): 5 divergence, the number is average of other 15 converged calculations.


300<br />

3.3 Test Conclusions<br />

From the test results, some conclusions can be obtained. First of all, for some test functions (e.g. F 2 , F 3<br />

and some cases of F 6 , Fy), three algorithms are equivalent. <strong>The</strong> reason is that genetic algorithm has<br />

strong searching ability for some optimization problems, and can find the solution directly Secondly,<br />

hybrid algorithm has the best searching ability among three algorithms. It can find solutions in all test<br />

functions. Furthermore, the hybrid algorithm has the highest searching efficiency which requires the<br />

least amount of calculations.<br />

4. CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />

Generally, an efficient global optimization algorithm should has local searching ability, and can<br />

transfer from a local optimization status to another. When genetic algorithm and simplex are combined<br />

together, simplex not only can enforce the local searching ability, but also provided new individuals for<br />

GA. <strong>The</strong> test results showed that the hybrid algorithm is an efficient optimization method.<br />

References<br />

1. PAN Zhengjun, KANG Lishan, CHEN Yuping. (1998). Evolutionary Computation, Tsmghua, China.<br />

2. HAN Wei, LIAO Zhenpeng. (1999). A Note on the Convergence of Genetic Algorithms. Journal of<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and <strong>Engineering</strong> Vibration 19:4, 13-16.<br />

3. CUI Jianwen. (1998). <strong>The</strong> Global Optimization Method for Inverting Velocity Profile with Rayleigh<br />

Surface Wave Data, Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, China<br />

4. Scrrwefel H.P. (1981), Numerical Optimization of Computer Models. John Wiley, UK.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SEISMIC SIMULATION OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE<br />

BRIDGES<br />

Chyuan-Hwan Jeng, Y.L. Mo and Thomas T.C. Hsu<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Houston<br />

Houston, Texas, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are three mam subjects m this research: finite fiber element analysis (FFEA)<br />

for reinforced concrete and prstressed concrete (RC/PC) frame structures, application of<br />

artificial neural networks (ANN) to seismic evaluation of prestressed concrete (PC)<br />

bridges, and development of finite-element (FE) software using object-onented<br />

programming (OOP), By employing force-based FFEA, nonlinear static and dynamic<br />

analyses of RC/PC frame structures were studied with investgation into the effect of the<br />

material constitutive models on the FFEA analysis and the solution algorithm of the<br />

FFEA procedures. Multiplayer perceptron networks (MLP) were applied to model the<br />

earthquake excitation - cntical structural response of PC bridges based on the database<br />

constructed from the analytical results of the FFEA. An augmented form of MLP was<br />

proposed to improve the modeling accuracy of the classical MLP.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

It is well known that reinforced concrete (RC) structures designed according to<br />

current design codes will respond inelastically to the maximum expected earthquake. <strong>The</strong><br />

capability of RC structures to resist earthquake attacks relies heavily upon the nonlinear<br />

load-carrying capacity demanded implicitly by design codes through such indices as<br />

ductility and formation of plastic hinges. <strong>The</strong> majority of the seismic energy imparted on<br />

an RC structure is dissipated by these nonlinear mechanisms, and the proposition of<br />

contemporary structural engineering that structures are allowed to be moderately<br />

damaged without collapse under severe earthquake attacks is thus assured.<br />

This paper presents the study and applications of state-of-the-art finite element (FE)<br />

analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed concrete (PC) frame structures and<br />

the investigation of the effect of material constitutive models on fee FE analysis. <strong>The</strong><br />

objective was to accomplish a complete set of finite element software for nonlinear<br />

analysis of RC/PC frame structures subjected to cyclic static load or earthquake


30;<br />

excitation. Also, the software was built following the object-oriented (OO) programming<br />

paradigm by using Or computer language.<br />

To trace and simulate the overall behavior of the structures subjected to earthquake<br />

excitation, various types of non-linear finite element analysis for reinforced concrete<br />

frame structures have been pursued and investigated over the last thirty years. Most of<br />

them can be divided into three categories: local models (microscopic or macroscopic<br />

finite element models), global models (member models), and semi-local models (fiber<br />

element models) (Miramontes et al. 1996, Meyer et al. 1991).<br />

Semi-local models stand between global models and local models (Miramontes et al.<br />

1996). A simplified kinematic hypothesis was adopted and equations of equilibrium are<br />

solved only for nodal points, like global models. By employing a cyclic constitutive<br />

relationship of the constituent materials, stress and strain were calculated at local level<br />

and consequently no hysteretic model at section or member level was needed, like local<br />

models. Fiber models exploited in this research fall into the category of semi-local<br />

models and have been investigated by many researchers (Taucer et al. 1991, Rubianobenavides<br />

1998). Despite many merits, fiber models had been considered to be too<br />

expensive for practical structural analysis. As personal computers have been getting<br />

cheaper and more computationally efficient, however, fiber models may become a<br />

rational and feasible tool for practical structural analysis. In this research, force-based<br />

finite fiber elements for RC frame structures and its applications were investigated.<br />

In addition to the precise nonlinear FE analysis of the overall structural responses,<br />

larger-scaled quick estimation of critical structural responses are convenient tools for preearthquake<br />

damage evaluation and emergent post-earthquake repair. In this research, the<br />

application of artificial neural networks (ANN") to estimate the critical structural<br />

responses was explored. <strong>The</strong> application of multiplayer perceptron (MLP) networks was<br />

studied and an augmented form of MLP was proposed to improve the modeling accuracy<br />

of classical MLP.<br />

CYCLIC STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP OF REINFORCED CONCRETE<br />

MATERIALS<br />

Reinforced concrete is actually a composite material, in which its constituent<br />

materials, reinforcing steel and concrete, are subjected to quite a different loading<br />

condition than that of the tests for the individual materials. Hence, another approach to<br />

the investigation of RC materials is to derive the average (smeared) behavior of steel and<br />

concrete of reinforced concrete directly from experiments on larger reinforced concrete<br />

specimens, such as the tests on panel element conducted at the <strong>University</strong> of Houston<br />

(Hsu 1993, Mansour et al. 2001). Such constitutive relations can be defined as reinforced<br />

concrete material models (Meyer et al. 1991).<br />

This study was aimed at analyzing RC/PC frame structures subjected to cyclic static<br />

loading or dynamic earthquake excitation. With this goal, five material models (Jeng<br />

2002) were employed for the finite element analysis to attain sufficient accuracy and to<br />

maintain computational efficiency as well. <strong>The</strong> first four models are shown in Figs. 1 to 4.


303<br />

Except the yield stress, the fifth model (SteelJ02) is the same as the fourth model<br />

(SteelJOl). In the fifth model (SteelJ02) the average yield stress proposed by Hsu (1993)<br />

was used.<br />

Fig. SConcreteJOl<br />

Fig. 4 SteelJOl<br />

rMPLEMENTATION<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposed finite element program uses the smeared crack model for the main<br />

body of a reinforced concrete element in a bridge. <strong>The</strong> smeared crack model is suitable<br />

because a concrete bridge can be conveniently divided into small elements, each<br />

behaving in an approximately uniform manner. <strong>The</strong> average stress-strain relationships of<br />

concrete and steel at the element level should capture the primary load-deformation<br />

characteristics of the whole concrete bridge.<br />

Using OpenSees (Open System for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Simulation) (Fenves et al.<br />

2001) as a framework, a program (NRCFrame) for nonlinear flexural response analysis of<br />

concrete frames has been developed at the <strong>University</strong> of Houston (UH) (Jeng 2002) that<br />

can be used to perform linear and nonlinear dynamic response analysis. This program<br />

was validated through comparisons with results from shake table tests on prestressed


304<br />

concrete frames as documented in literature (Kowalsky et al. 2000). <strong>The</strong> program was<br />

then used to evaluate the ability of concrete bridges to withstand seismic disturbance.<br />

VALIDATION<br />

<strong>The</strong> dynamic tests of a prestressed lightweight concrete bridge model specimen were<br />

conducted at the <strong>University</strong> of California - San Diego (Kowalsky et al. 2000). <strong>The</strong><br />

dimensions and configuration of the specimen are shown in Fig. 5. <strong>The</strong> columns were<br />

circular RC columns with 203 mm -diameter cross section. <strong>The</strong> girder was 381 mm x381 mm<br />

square PC girder. A total prestress force of 445 kN was applied through four 15 mm<br />

Dywidag bars. It was a shake table experiment; the specimen was subjected to a<br />

predetermined ground motion, A mass block of 11643 kg was attached to the girder.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fiber discretization of the cross sections of the fiber element model is shown in<br />

Fig. 6. Since only two-dimensional analysis is needed, concrete of the cross section is<br />

divided into layer fibers. Seven and six control sections for girder and columns are used<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> material parameters used in the analysis are as indicated in Tables 1 and<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> prestress forces were simulated with two horizontal concentrated nodal forces at<br />

the two end nodes of the girder. <strong>The</strong> prestressing tendons were modeled by the offset<br />

stress and strain with offset yielding strength due to the pretension. It was reported in<br />

(Kowalsky et al.2000) that the strength of the steel was increased by strain rate and an<br />

average yield stress enhancement of 13% was applied to their section analysis with better<br />

agreement with experiment. Thus the average yield stress enhancement of 13% of steel<br />

was also Mowed in the fiber element analysis.<br />

Table 1 Analytical material parameters of steel<br />

/,(MPa)<br />

Hardening Ratio<br />

Es(MPa)<br />

dsu<br />

Main Bar (DIORebar)<br />

514.15<br />

0.006<br />

200000<br />

0.09<br />

Tendon (offset values)<br />

419.88<br />

0.0123<br />

186000<br />

—<br />

Table 2 Analytical material parameters of concrete<br />

/'c(MPa)<br />

do<br />

/«,(MPa)<br />

dm<br />

Unconfined<br />

35.5<br />

0.004<br />

15<br />

0.02<br />

Confined<br />

36<br />

0.0048<br />

16<br />

0.023


305<br />

2794 r<br />

f"<br />

A<br />

Fig. 5 Outline of the UCSD bridge bent.<br />

As =12-010<br />

A.A<br />

B-B<br />

Fig. 6 Fiber discretization of the cross sections.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1978 Tabas earthquake was chosen as the reference ground motion. <strong>The</strong> testing<br />

procedure involved subjecting the specimen to the selected input motion at various levels<br />

of excitation. <strong>The</strong> testing runs corresponding to service state and survival state are<br />

analyzed in this study and are referred to as Case A and Case B subsequently. A<br />

comparison of the analytical and experimental displacement history for Case A in the<br />

service state is shown in Fig. 7. <strong>The</strong> comparison shows good agreement.<br />

Fig. 7 Comparison between the analytical and experimental displacement history<br />

of Case A


30€<br />

NEURAL NETWORKS<br />

Development<br />

In the case study, the UCSD PC bridge bent analyzed previously was selected as the<br />

reference structure. A nonlinear finite fiber element model of an enlarged PC bridge is<br />

composed as the target structure to be modeled, employing the nonlinear fiber frame<br />

element of the developed software. A total of 86 cases of the FE model subjected to the<br />

ground motion of the 1940 El Centro earthquake were analyzed using the developed<br />

nonlinear FE software. <strong>The</strong> analytical results were then used as the training and testing<br />

data for the ANNs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> magnitude and orientation of the horizontal ground motion (1940 El Centro<br />

earthquake) were selected as the input parameters of the ANN. <strong>The</strong> maximum biaxial<br />

bending moments of columns and girder and the maximum horizontal displacement of<br />

the girder were selected as the outputs of the ANN. Seven MLP networks with different<br />

number of hidden layers and hidden neurons were first tried. An augmented form of MLP<br />

was used to improve the modeling accuracy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> magnitude of the earthquake was represented by the scale factor for the ground<br />

acceleration record of El Centro earthquake. Scale factors ranging from 1.0 to 3.1 were<br />

used, which corresponds to a PGA level ranging from 0.32g to 0.99g. <strong>The</strong> orientation of<br />

the earthquake was represented by the inclination angle between the longitudinal axis and<br />

the incident direction of the ground acceleration, as the a angle. Considering the<br />

symmetry of the structure, a range of a angle from 0° to 90° was investigated. Thus, 86<br />

cases of fiber element analysis were conducted, the outcomes of which were summarized.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bi-axial maximum member-end moments of the piers and the girder and the<br />

maximum horizontal node displacements of all 86 cases were also summarized<br />

It was found that the bending moment at the bottom end of the piers was generally<br />

greater than that at the top end of the piers. Hence, only the bending moment at the<br />

bottom of the piers was chosen as one of the output parameters of the ANNs. Also, the<br />

maximum bending moments of the two piers were very close; thus, only one set of the<br />

maximum bi-axial bending moments M y , M z of the two piers was chosen as the<br />

representative critical bending moments of the bridge piers.<br />

Similarly, a pair of the maximum bi-axial bending moments of the girder was<br />

chosen from the maximum bending moments at the two ends of the girder; however,<br />

since the minor-axis bending moment M y of the girder was generally very small, only the<br />

major-axis bending moment M 2 was chosen to be investigated by the ANNs. <strong>The</strong><br />

maximum value of the displacements at the two nodes was selected as the representative<br />

maximum horizontal displacement of the girder. <strong>The</strong>refore, there were 4 output<br />

parameters altogether of the ANNs, that is, the maximum bending moments M y and M 2 of<br />

the piers, the maximum bending moment M z of the girder, and the maximum horizontal<br />

displacement of the girder.


307<br />

MLP Networks<br />

Seven fully-connected multiplayer perception (MLP) networks were constructed to<br />

model the critical structural response of the target PC bridge subjected to the ground<br />

motion of the 1940 El Centro earthquake of various magnitudes and orientations. To<br />

improve the predicting performance, an augmented type of MLP was used in the next<br />

section.<br />

Augmented MLP Networks<br />

To improve the modeling accuracy of the classical MLPs mentioned above, an<br />

augmented form of MLP was used. <strong>The</strong> augmented MLP was formed by adding two<br />

additional exponential input nodes to the classical MLP. <strong>The</strong> exponential input nodes<br />

were derived from the incident angle of the horizontal ground motion a.<br />

Four augmented MLPs were constructed to model the critical structural response of<br />

the target PC bridge. Each of the four augmented MLPs was trained using various values<br />

of learning rate and momentum. <strong>The</strong> outcome with best accuracy for each of the<br />

augmented MLPs was used to demonstrate the comparison between the networkcomputed<br />

values and the desired values for the training set as well as the testing set. <strong>The</strong><br />

network configuration, network training parameters, and degree of predicting accuracy of<br />

all the four Augmented MLPs are determined.<br />

It was found that the augmented MLPs generally provided considerably better<br />

modeling accuracy than the classical MLPs. In terms of minimum ensemble total mean<br />

square error, the augmented MLP (0.006886) can be considered 26% more accurate than<br />

the classical MLP (0.00929).<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> research presented in this paper basically demonstrates the feasibility of the<br />

employed methodology, the application of which can be extended to other concrete<br />

structures. <strong>The</strong> following conclusions may be drawn based on this research:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> inclusion of the Baushinger effect and reduced average strength effect in the<br />

stress-strain relationship of mild steel is the dominant factor for the improved<br />

performance of the finite fiber element analyses. <strong>The</strong> effect of concrete model on the<br />

finite element analysis is less sensitive.<br />

2. It was found that the use of the proposed offset stress-strain curve for prestressing<br />

steel in the finite element analysis generated analytical results that were reasonably close<br />

to the experimental data.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> application of artificial neural networks to quick estimation of the critical<br />

response of PC bridges is feasible. <strong>The</strong> proposed augmented multilayer perception<br />

networks were effective in enhancing the modeling accuracy.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> merits of the application of object-oriented programming to finite element<br />

analysis were acknowledged.


308<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> research reported in this paper was founded by the National Science Foundation<br />

under Grant No. CMS-9711084, USA and the Sinotech <strong>Engineering</strong> Foundation, Taiwan.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Fenves, G. L., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and et al. (2001), OpenSees User and<br />

Developer Workshop, Workshop Handout, Pacific <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Center, <strong>University</strong> of California, Berkeley, CA, August 20-23.<br />

Hsu, T. T. C. (1993), Unified <strong>The</strong>ory of Reinforced Concrete, CRC Press, Inc., Boca<br />

Raton, Flonda, pp.205-217.<br />

Mansour, M. Y., Lee, J.Y., and Hsu, T. T. C. (2001), "Cyclic Stress-Strain Curves of<br />

Concrete and Steel Bars in Membrane Elements," Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

s Vol. 127, No. 12, December, pp. 1402-1411.<br />

Jeng, C.H. (2002). Nonlinear Finite Fiber Element Analysis for Static and Dynamic<br />

Simulation of Concrete Frames: Modeling, Implementation, and Application Ph.D.<br />

Dissertation, Department of Civil & Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Houston,<br />

Houston, Texas.<br />

Kowalsky, M. I, Priestley, M. J. N., and Seible, F. (2000), "Dynamic Behavior of<br />

Lightweight Concrete Bridges," AC! Structural Journal Vol. 97, No. 4, JuL-Aug.,<br />

pp.602-618.<br />

Meyer, C, de Borst, R., Bicanic, N, Filippou, F.C., and Maekawa, K. (1991), "Chapter 6,<br />

Dynamic Loading," Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures II,<br />

Proceedings of the International Workshop, ASCE, June 2-5.<br />

Miramontes, D., Merabet, O. and Rynouard, J. M. (1996), "Beam Global Model for the<br />

Seismic Analysis of RC Frames," <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, Vol.<br />

25, pp. 671-688.<br />

Taucer, F., Spacone, E., and Filippou, F. C. (1991), A Fiber Beam-Column Element for<br />

Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures, <strong>Research</strong> Report No.<br />

UCB/EERC-91/17, <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>. <strong>Research</strong> Center, <strong>University</strong> of California,<br />

Berkeley, CA.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

3Qg<br />

PROGRESS IN THE SEISMIC DESIGN AND RETROFIT OF<br />

BRIDGES IN KOREA, A MODERATE SEISMICITY REGION<br />

Jae Kwan KIM ! , Ick Hyun KIM 2 , Gui-Hyun JUHN 3 and Dae Yeon CHO 4<br />

1 Associate Professor, Department of Civil, Urban and Geosystem <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

Seoul National <strong>University</strong>, Kwanak-ku, Seoul, 151-742, Korea<br />

E-mail: jkwankim@plaza.snu.ac.kr<br />

2 Assisstant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

<strong>University</strong> of Ulsan, Ulsan, 680-749, Korea<br />

3 <strong>Research</strong> & Development Division, Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation,<br />

Ilsan-ku, Koyang, Kyounggi-do, 411-410, Korea<br />

4 REITs and Venture Team, <strong>Research</strong> Center, Korea Highway Corporation,<br />

Seongnam, Kyounggi-do, 461-703, Korea<br />

ABSTRACT: New performance-based seismic design concept had been developed in 1997 and<br />

included in 2000 edition of Korea Highway Bridge Standards. <strong>The</strong> limited ductility design approach<br />

appropriate to Korea is under active development. In this year the manual for the seismic assessment<br />

of highway bridges was drafted and approved. <strong>The</strong> manual for retrofit will be drafted and published<br />

soon. Because it is required by law, many old bridges will be retrofitted in near future. In this seismic<br />

assessment manual a new philosophy is introduced in the determination of design earthquake for<br />

retrofit of bridges. In this paper, this new concept is introduced briefly. In addition the Korean efforts<br />

in the seismic design and retrofit of highway bridges are briefly reported.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Even though Korea is located rather far away from the active plate boundary many historic records and<br />

recent seismic activities indicate Korea belongs to a region of moderate seismicity. In spite of seismic<br />

hazard the earthquake resistant design was introduced to Korea for the first time in 1992 for highway<br />

bridges. But the energetic study and research to develop new seismic design concept has been<br />

activated since the 1995 Kobe earthquake. As a result performance-based design concept was<br />

developed in 1997 and included in 2000 edition of Korea Highway Bridge Standard partially. <strong>The</strong><br />

details of this standard are basically similar to those of the AASHTO code of USA. However the<br />

seismic response characteristics of structures in moderate seismicity regions has not been fully taken<br />

into account in the present code. It is clearly recognized that the limited ductility design will be<br />

appropriate in the moderate seismicity regions. Currently research efforts are under progress to<br />

develop the details for the implementation of limited ductility design for the highway bridges. In this<br />

paper the research progress and design details of landmark bridges is reported.


310<br />

In order to ensure the entire social safety against seismic hazard the sufficient seismic performance has<br />

to be secured for the existing structures as well as new ones. In Korea many multi-span continuous<br />

bridges had been constructed in which earthquake load was not considered adequately. <strong>The</strong>y can be<br />

very vulnerable to the earthquake ground motion especially in longitudinal direction. Hence many<br />

alternative retrofit methods are considered and/or implemented such as isolation bearings and shock<br />

transmission units. <strong>The</strong> project to develop the seismic performance assessment method has been<br />

initiated by the Ministry of Construction and Transportation of Korea (KMOCT). In this year the<br />

manual for seismic assessment of bridges was drafted and approved. It will be distributed soon. In this<br />

manual a new philosophy is introduced in the determination of design earthquake for the retrofit of<br />

bridges. In this paper, this new concept is introduced briefly. And several retrofit examples are<br />

reported.<br />

SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES IN KOREA<br />

Seismic Design Code of Bridges<br />

<strong>The</strong> history of seismic design in Korea is not as long as that of countries in high seismicity region. It<br />

has been introduced to Korea since 1986 for high-rise buildings, since 1992 for highway bridges and<br />

even earlier than that for nuclear power plants. <strong>The</strong> basic idea in these codes has been borrowed<br />

heavily from those developed for the high seismicity region. However the public did not aware the<br />

necessity of seismic design in general until Kobe earthquake yielding severe damage and huge<br />

casualties in 1995. Taking opportunity of this earthquake KMOCT decided to develop new<br />

performance based seismic design code system that can be commonly applicable to most types of<br />

facilities. As the first step, the high-level criteria of performance-based seismic design had been<br />

completed to regulate seismic design loads and seismic performance level of structures. Based on this,<br />

the low-level criteria and technical standards specific to each own type of facility have been under<br />

development. <strong>The</strong> 2002 edition of Korea Highway Bridge Standard (KHBDS) adopted this design<br />

concept.<br />

In Korea, the seismic design has been carried out in two ways. <strong>The</strong> one is relying on the ductility of<br />

column bents, and the other is adoption of various types of earthquake protection systems such as<br />

isolation systems. For the former, the identical reinforcement details to those in zone II of AASHTO<br />

code have been adopted as shown in TABLE 1. It is remarkable that the lap splice of longitudinal bars<br />

in the plastic hinge zone is implicitly allowed. Due to this lap splice detail same amount of transverse<br />

reinforcement as specified in high seismicity zone is required to attain satisfactory ductility. Unlike<br />

high seismicity zone, the limited ductile behavior is expected in the moderate seismicity regions. In<br />

Korea the sectional dimension of piers designed conventionally is as large as 3.5m diameters.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore they can have considerable amount of inherent lateral load resistant capacity. However the<br />

current codes requires relatively larger amount of transverse rebar than necessary. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is<br />

necessary to develop limited ductility design that is appropriate to the seismicity of Korea and the<br />

characteristics of columns. This design approach should take advantage of the inherent seismic<br />

capacity of conventional designed piers.


311<br />

TABLE 1.<br />

COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DETAILS BETWEEN AASHTO CODE AND KOREAN CODE<br />

Desc.<br />

Zone<br />

Seismicity<br />

(A)<br />

Lap Splice<br />

Transverse<br />

reinforceme<br />

nt<br />

I<br />

A < 0.09<br />

No<br />

consideratio<br />

n of seismic<br />

forces :<br />

Convention<br />

al design<br />

n<br />

0.09


312<br />

Examples of Seismic Design<br />

In Korea, as in other moderate seismic regions, using the strength and ductility of columns is sufficient<br />

to meet performance criteria in many types of bridge system. But earthquake protection devices such as<br />

LRB (Lead Rubber Bearing), STU (Shock Transmission Unit) and viscous damper are indispensable in<br />

multi-span continuous bridge, cable-stayed bridge and cable-suspended bridges. As an example of<br />

seismic design Seohae Bridge can be supposed, which consists of 3 different types of bridges: cablestayed<br />

bridge (990m), FCM bridge (500m), and PSM bridges (5820m). It was designed with<br />

earthquake load of only 6% of self-weight and constructed. According to the current code, the<br />

earthquake force can be as high as 35% of self-weight. So, Korea Highway Corporation decided to<br />

retrofit these bridges. Strictly speaking the methods introduced here was applied as retrofit methods.<br />

But the same methods can be implemented to new bridge system as alternative seismic design concept.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 97 spans of PSM bridges are grouped as 16 bridges: 3 to 10 continuous span bridges. If the bridges<br />

with flexible piers can withstand the earthquake force by increasing the number of fixed piers concrete<br />

block and/or restrainers was implemented as shown in Fig 1. On the other hand, this method was not<br />

applicable to the bridge with stiff piers. <strong>The</strong> viscous fluid dampers were used, which placed between<br />

the superstructure and the pier as shown in Fig. 2. In 5-span continuous cables-stayed bridge, of which<br />

center span length is 470m and side span length is 60m, large earthquake load would concentrate on<br />

the fixed pylon by the seismic analysis. So, LUD (lock-up device; it is called Shock Transmission Unit<br />

also) was adopted to distribute this force to the other pylon as shown in Fig. 3. It can provide a<br />

temporary rigid link between bridge structural members under seismic, braking, or other dynamic load,<br />

while permitting slow thermal movements. It was the first application in Korea.<br />

FIGURE 1.<br />

CONCRETE BLOCK AND RESTRINER<br />

FIGURE 2.<br />

VISCOUS DAMPER


313<br />

FIGURE 3.<br />

LOCK-UP DEVICE<br />

SEISMIC RETROFIT<br />

Progress of Seismic Retrofit in Korea<br />

When the necessity of seismic design began to get support from the public after Kobe earthquake<br />

almost all resources have been concentrated on the research related to the development of new seismic<br />

design concept. <strong>The</strong>refore the retrofit of existing structures did not receive due attention. But the<br />

seismic retrofit should be also treated as an urgent task in order to ensure uniform social safety against<br />

seismic hazard. In Korea only less than 1% of bridges are designed seismically. Fortunately it is<br />

realized by the preliminary studies that the seismic performance of existing bridges is adequate even if<br />

the ductility is not so satisfactory. But multi-span bridges were widely constructed in Korea entering<br />

1990's. This type of bridge has only one fixed bearing pier in the longitudinal direction in general.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore it is very vulnerable to the earthquake ground motion since a great earthquake load is<br />

concentrated on the single pier. <strong>The</strong> enhancement of ductility of fixed pier or the anti-seismic devices<br />

can be considered as a seismic retrofit method. Realizing the urgency for retrofit the MOCT has<br />

initiated a serious of project to develop the method for seismic assessment and seismic retrofit of<br />

existing bridges. As a result the manual for seismic assessment for existing bridges has been drafted in<br />

this year. <strong>The</strong> development of the seismic retrofit manual is on progress.<br />

Basic Concept of Seismic Assessment<br />

<strong>The</strong> manual for seismic assessment is to assist the engineers for the easy and efficient assessment and<br />

retrofit design. <strong>The</strong> check of capacity/demand ratio is adopted as the basic idea. Once the earthquake<br />

load is determined seismic performance is checked at each member/component level such as pier,<br />

bearing, abutment, foundation and so on. Considering the assessment efficiency it is performed through<br />

two- stage progress. In the first stage, the bridge considered is grouped to decide its priority by<br />

seismictiy, vulnerability and impact into 4 categories. <strong>The</strong> detailed assessment is carried out in the<br />

second stage for the bridges dropped into the critical category, the important and the observed grade. In<br />

this detailed assessment new philosophy is introduced in the determination of design earthquake for<br />

retrofit of bridges. As shown in Eq. (1) it is determined by the idea that the possibility of existing<br />

bridges to experience the seismic design earthquake equates to that of new ones. <strong>The</strong>refore the


314<br />

earthquake load can be reduced with increase of the age of bridges. As the result many exiting bridges<br />

can be exempted from seismic retrofit. But if the owner wants to extend the lifetime of bridges under<br />

consideration, the appropriate level of seismic design earthquake should be applied.<br />

(<strong>The</strong> yearly occurrence probability of earthquake for seismic retrofit x target lifetime of existing bridge)<br />

= (<strong>The</strong> yearly occurrence probability of seismic design earthquake x design lifetime) (1)<br />

In fact the above idea was introduced on the background to secure urgently the seismic performance of<br />

a lot of existing bridges with the limited economic resource. <strong>The</strong>refore it is still controversial due to the<br />

lack of validity backed up by sufficient studies. But we hope this idea can be embodied as a realistic<br />

and reasonable alternative to determine the necessity of retrofit by the further intensive studies.<br />

Examples of Seismic Retrofit<br />

<strong>The</strong> manual for the seismic retrofit bridges has not been completed yet. But many analytical and<br />

experimental studies have been performed on performance of retrofitted bridges. <strong>The</strong> dominant failure<br />

modes of existing bridges are the failure of bearings and the premature bond failure of lap spliced<br />

longitudinal bars in the fixed piers. <strong>The</strong>refore, research efforts are concentrated on the enhancement of<br />

ductility by wrapping plastic hinge zone of piers with steel plates, carbon sheet, and glass fiber sheet<br />

etc.. In parallel the implementation of the various earthquake protection devices has been studied.<br />

Based on the results of these primary studies quite a few importance bridges have been retrofitted<br />

already prior to completion of the manual. Once the manual for retrofit is completed the retrofit of<br />

existing bridges will be carried out actively.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Figure 4 and 5 present the example of seismic retrofit of existing 4-span continuous bridge. <strong>The</strong><br />

seismic assessment showed that it was very vulnerable at the bearings and the fixed pier. <strong>The</strong> bearings<br />

were protected by shear keys; steel brackets in the transverse direction and concrete blocks in the<br />

longitudinal one respectively. And the fixed pier was retrofitted by wrapping with the steel plate to<br />

enhance ductility.<br />

a) STEEL BRACKETS b) CONCRETE BLOCKS<br />

FIGURE 4.<br />

PROTECTION OF BEARINGS BY SHEAR KEY


315<br />

FIGURE 5.<br />

RETROFIT OF FIXED PIER BY STEEL PLATE<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Korea belongs to a region of moderate seismic hazard. <strong>Earthquake</strong> resistant design was introduced to in<br />

1992 for highway bridges. New performance-based design concept was developed in 1997 and<br />

included in 2000 edition of Korea Highway Bridge Standards. Based on the research results on the<br />

performance of bridges designed conventionally the limited ductility design approach appropriate to<br />

Korea environment is under active development. In addition, various anti-seismic devices are actively<br />

implemented to the multi-span continuous bridge, cable-suspended bridge and cable-stayed bridges. In<br />

this year the manual for seismic assessment of highway bridges was drafted in Korea. <strong>The</strong> manual for<br />

retrofit also will be drafted soon. <strong>The</strong> existing bridges found to have very poor ductility due to the lap<br />

spliced longitudinal bars. <strong>The</strong>refore several important bridges have been retrofitted already prior to<br />

accomplishment of manual. In near future many old bridges will be strengthened according to the<br />

manual.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Chai, Y.H., Priestley, M.J.N. and Seible, F. (1991). Seismic retrofit of circular bridge columns for<br />

enhanced flexural performance. ACI Structural Journal 88: 5, 572-584.<br />

Kim, J.K., Kim, I.H., Lim, H.W., and Lee, J.H.(2000). Seismic upgrading of existing circular RC pier<br />

with steel jacket. Proc. ofEESK Conference 4:1, 341-349(in Korean).<br />

Kim, J.K., Kim, I.H., Lim, H.W., Lee, J.H. and Lee, J.H.(2001). Cyclic loading test of bridge pier<br />

models without seismic detailing. Proc. ofEASEC-8.


Proceedings of the Intel national Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

Engineei mg <strong>Research</strong> Hong Kong Volume<br />

317<br />

SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF WOODEN HOUSE<br />

USING DISTINCT ELEMENT METHOD<br />

J Kiyono 1 and A Furukawa 1<br />

1 Graduate School of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Kyoto <strong>University</strong>, Kyoto, Japan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Collapsing process of wooden houses during an earthquake has been analyzed using the Distinct<br />

Element Method (DEM) DEM is a numerical analysis method in which the positions of the elements<br />

are calculated by solving the equations of motions step by step Not only individual but also group<br />

behavior can be simulated using this method <strong>The</strong> structure is modeled as an assembly of distinct<br />

elements and these elements are connected by virtual springs and dashpots Damage to human bodies<br />

has been considered as well <strong>The</strong> human body is modeled as a circle and put on the floor <strong>The</strong><br />

maximum impact acceleration experienced by a human body during an earthquake is calculated<br />

Damage to human bodies in the house is discussed based on the index of Chest-G and HLC<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

During the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake, many wooden houses were destroyed More than 6400<br />

people were killed during this quake, and 80% of them died due to the structural failure To reduce<br />

casualties due to earthquakes, it is very important to know the way structures collapse and how people<br />

get injured because of it <strong>The</strong> purposes of this study are firstly to simulate collapsing process of<br />

wooden houses using DEM, secondly to estimate the impact acceleration applying to the people m the<br />

house, and finally to assess the damage level of people<br />

Rigid Body<br />

(a) rectangular element<br />

(b)circular element<br />

Fig.3.1 Contact model of elements


318<br />

METHOD<br />

DEM is used in this study. <strong>The</strong> DEM is a numerical analysis method that can compute the position of<br />

each element by solving the equation of motion step by step. All elements are assumed to be rigid.<br />

Each element has a spring and dashpot in its normal and tangential direction. When it comes in contact<br />

with others (Fig.3.1), the contact force is generated by the connected springs and dashpots. By solving<br />

the equations of motions for all elements step by step, the behaviors of all elements can be traced. <strong>The</strong><br />

forces applying to the element are the external force (/,,/.) and the total sum of contact forces<br />

between elements (F x1 F z J e ). <strong>The</strong> element acceleration is obtained as follows:<br />

/m<br />

I m<br />

(3.1)<br />

(3.3)<br />

(3-2)<br />

where m is the element mass, and I 9 is the inertia moments around the center of the gravity.<br />

From the above equations, the velocity and the displacement of the next time step is calculated as:<br />

uT-A/<br />

Ar (3.4)<br />

(3.5)<br />

where Ar is the time interval of the computation.<br />

ANALYTICAL MODEL<br />

Modeling of the structure<br />

<strong>The</strong> analyzed structure model is a two-story house as shown in Fig.4.1. Both the height and the width<br />

are 10m. <strong>The</strong> structure consists of four columns, two ceiling beams and a roof. <strong>The</strong> roof and the ceiling<br />

beam are connected by three support beams. In this study, we deal with wooden houses. All elements<br />

are 10cm width. <strong>The</strong> mass and inertia moments of all elements are calculated from the density of<br />

Japanese cypress (0.34g/cm 3 ).<br />

In usual DEM, elements affect only contact force each other because joint elements are not considered.<br />

But elements of real structures are connected at joints and behave as a continuum until joints are


319<br />

broken. <strong>The</strong>refore, joint elements which connect different elements are introduced and behaviors are<br />

examined.<br />

Case A<br />

In Case A, joint elements are not considered. Only contact forces are taken into account and joints<br />

cannot resist tension forces.<br />

CaseB<br />

In Case B, joint elements are considered. So, not only contact forces but also tension forces are taken<br />

into account. During the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake, many old wooden houses were collapsed<br />

because the first floor was smashed by the strong seismic motion. In many cases, second floor<br />

remained without being broken. We can presume that the joints of the first floor were too weak to<br />

sustain the strong shock of the earthauake. <strong>The</strong>refore, we assumed that the joint strength of the first<br />

fl<br />

Table 4.1 Contact parameters<br />

o. _.._ n no<br />

Fig.4.1 Two-story structure model<br />

A*<br />

K n (N/m)<br />

K^N/m)<br />

C fl (N-sec/m)<br />

K n (Nlm)<br />

Human body<br />

0.277<br />

7.949xl0 4<br />

3.974xl0 4<br />

2.095xl0 3<br />

0.0<br />

Structured/kg)<br />

0.677<br />

3.944xl0 4<br />

3,944xl0 4<br />

1.256xl0 3<br />

1.256xl0 3<br />

Case C<br />

In Case C, joint elements are considered. If all joints were strong enough to sustain the earthquake,<br />

houses could avoid collapse and many people could survive. <strong>The</strong>refore, we assumed that the joints of<br />

the first floor are as strong as those of the second floor.<br />

Modeling of the human body<br />

<strong>The</strong> human body is modeled as a circle element. <strong>The</strong> radius r and the density p have been evaluated<br />

as 0.26m and 1.706xl0 2 (£g/m 3 ), respectively, using physical examination results. <strong>The</strong> mass and<br />

inertia moments are calculated according to these values. Four human elements are put on each floor,<br />

and the impact accelerations experienced by these people are computed. <strong>The</strong> human elements on the<br />

first floor are numbered as 1, 2, 3, and 4 from the left, and those on the second floor are numbered as<br />

5,6, 7, and 8 from the left.<br />

Spring constant and Damping<br />

Coefficient<br />

Spring constant and damping coefficient (K H ,K^C a ,C^<br />

of wooden houses are assumed to be


320<br />

proportional to the element mass and those of human bodies are obtained from a simple experiment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> values are shown in Table 4.1.<br />

Time Interval<br />

In DEM, a time interval of computation has a strong influence on the stability of results. If the time<br />

interval is too large, the result will diverge. Cundall (1974) recommends the following time interval.<br />

(4.1)<br />

From the above equation, the limitation is Ar /v><br />

1UUJ<br />

*ytn<br />

AA<br />

AAA<br />

B<br />

A<br />

AA<br />

Q 45 60 75<br />

Fig.5.1 Classification of damage levels<br />

C<br />

B<br />

Chest-G<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

TIME (sec)<br />

Fig.6.1 Input ground motion<br />

ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE TO HUMAN BODY<br />

In the field of the car engineering, the values of HIC (Head Injury Criteria) and Chest-G are often used<br />

to assess the damage to human body. We use the same criteria as HIC and Chest-G. <strong>The</strong> allowance<br />

level of chest is considered to be 60G, and HIC to be 1000. Using these values, the damage level of the<br />

people in the house can be estimated. As is shown in Fig.5.1, the damage level is classified into 6<br />

levels (AAA, AA, A, B, C, D). AAA is the safest level and D is the most dangerous level.<br />

RESULT<br />

We used the acceleration record of Kobe Marine Meteorological Agency during the 1995 Hyogo-ken<br />

Nanbu earthquake to the modeled structures (Fig.6.1). <strong>The</strong> result of each case is as follows:<br />

Case A<br />

<strong>The</strong> structure behavior in Case A is shown in Fig.6.2. <strong>The</strong> structure started tilting at 7.0 second and<br />

completely collapsed at 11.4 second. <strong>The</strong> computed values of Chest-G, HIC, and the human damage<br />

level are shown in Table 6.1 (a). In this case, joint elements are not considered. <strong>The</strong>refore the structure<br />

easily collapsed and crushed the human bodies. All people are on the worst damage level 'D' and have


321<br />

the highest probability to get seriously injured. Compared with the people on the second floor, people<br />

on the first floor were undergone severer damage because they were crushed by the second floor and<br />

the roof. Compared with the people on the right side, people on the left side got severer damage<br />

because the structure collapsed to the left side as it can be seen in FIG.6.1.<br />

CaseB<br />

<strong>The</strong> structure behavior in Case B is shown in Fig.6.3. <strong>The</strong> structure started tilling at 7.6 second and<br />

completely collapsed at 12.4 second. <strong>The</strong> computed values of Chest-G, HOC, and the human damage<br />

level are shown in Table 6.1 (b). In this case, joint elements are considered, but the joint strength of the<br />

first floor is half of the second floor. <strong>The</strong>refore, only the first floor collapsed and the second floor stood<br />

still. Because the second floor remained without collapse, the people on the second floor did not get<br />

injured and the damage levels are 'AAA 1 or 'AA'. Both Chest-G and HEC is lower than its allowance<br />

level. However, the people on the first floor get injured because they are affected by the crush of the<br />

second floor. Especially, No.3 and No.4 are on the worst damage level 'D' and are expected to get<br />

seriously injured because the structure collapsed to the right side.<br />

CaseC<br />

<strong>The</strong> structure behavior in Case C is shown in Fig6.4. Because the joints were strong enough to sustain<br />

the input ground motion, the structure swayed but did not collapsed. <strong>The</strong> computed values of Chest-G,<br />

HIC, and the human damage level are shown in Table 6.1 (c). In this case, joints have the sufficient<br />

strength. <strong>The</strong>refore, the structure did not collapse and nobody got injured. All people are on the safest<br />

level 'AAA 1 . Compared to the people on the first floor, the criteria of the people on the second floor are<br />

a little bit larger. This is because the structure was swaying during the earthquake and the second floor<br />

was swayed more than the first floor.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Collapsing process of wooden house has been simulated by DEM, and the damage to the human body<br />

also has been estimated. <strong>The</strong> collapsing pattern and the extent of the damage vary depends on the joint<br />

strength. Joint elements are introduced and the influence of the joint strength has been discussed as<br />

well. As the collapsing process of the structure is strongly affected by the spring constant and damping<br />

coefficients in DEM, it is very important to evaluate the actual restoring force and damping force of<br />

the wooden house, and to try to simulate a more realistic failure behavior of the structure using<br />

parametric studies. In this study, human body has been modeled as a circle element. We have to make a<br />

more hurnan-like model if we want to obtain detailed damage to each body part.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Cundall, P. A (1974). Rational Design of Tunnel Supports - A Computer Model for Rock Mass<br />

Behavior Using Interactive Graphics for the Input and Output of Geometrical Data. Technical Report<br />

MRD-2-74, Missouri River Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers<br />

National Organization for Automotive Safety & Victims' Aid (2001). New Car Assessment Japan


322<br />

y - -i " " \<br />

(a) 10.0 (sec) (b)10.2 (sec) (c) 10.4 (sec) (d) 10.6 (sec)<br />

(e)10.8 (sec) (f)11.0 (sec) (g) 11.2 (sec) (h) 11.4 (sec)<br />

Fig.6.2 Collapsing process in Case A<br />

/..../<br />

(a) 11.0 (sec) (b)11.2 (sec) (c) 11.4 (sec) (d) 11.6 (sec)<br />

(e)l 1.8 (sec) (f)12.0 (sec) (g) 12.2 (sec) (h) 12.4 (sec)<br />

Fig.6.3 Collapsing process in Case B<br />

(a)8.0 (sec) (b)9.0 (sec) (c) 10.0 (sec) (d) 11.0 (sec)<br />

(e)12.0 (sec) (f)13.0 (sec) (g) 14.0 (sec) (h) 15.0 (sec)<br />

TL<br />

Fig.6.4 Collapsing process in Case C


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 323<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

THE DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL CONCRETE REGIONS FOR<br />

SEISMIC ACTIONS BY THE STRUT-AND-TIE METHOD<br />

Daniel A, Kuchma 1 and Tjen N. Tjhin 1<br />

'Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,<br />

Urbana,IL61801,USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> Strut-and-Tie Method (STM) is gaining acceptance as a consistent design methodology for<br />

structural concrete regions that are subject to complex variation in strains, such as beam-column<br />

joints, squat walls, and pier caps. Provisions for designing by the STM were recently incorporated<br />

into the primary US bridge code, US building code, as well as other international codes. Although<br />

the STM provides a conceptually simple design methodology, the application of this method is<br />

usually complicated by the need to perform iterative and time-consuming calculations and graphical<br />

procedures. In addition, the current STM provisions are primarily for the design of structures<br />

subjected to non-reversed loadings and thus seismic design issues have not be properly addressed.<br />

This paper provides an overview of the STM and codes provisions for its use. It also discusses how<br />

the STM can be extended for seismic design and evaluation in the framework of performance-based<br />

seismic engineering. An STM design tool called CAST (Computer-Aided Strut-and-Tie), which is<br />

being developed to overcome the complexity of STM design process, is also presented. CAST<br />

functionality is demonstrated by the design example of a squat wall with openings.<br />

THE STRUT-AND-TIE METHOD<br />

B- and D-Regions<br />

For the purpose of selecting the appropriate<br />

design approach, it is useful to divide the<br />

structure into either B-(Beam) regions or D-<br />

( Discontinuity) regions. B-regions are<br />

where it is reasonable to assume that there is | t<br />

a linear variation of strain over the flexural Fig. 1 Example of B-Regions and D-Regions in a<br />

depth of the cross-section. D-regions are Common Structure<br />

where there is a complex, variation in strain<br />

due to abrupt changes in geometry (geometrical discontinuities) or concentrated forces (statical<br />

discontinuities). D-regions can be considered to extend a longitudinal distance equal to the largest<br />

of the depth or width of the member from the discontinuity. <strong>The</strong> distinction between B-regions and<br />

D-regions is illustrated in Fig. 1.


324<br />

Development Background<br />

Although both B- and D-regions are of similar importance, their design methodologies are not<br />

equail/well-founded. Strong rational bases have long been established for the design of B-regions,<br />

but empirical rules or common detailing practices are still currently adopted for D-regions. In B-<br />

regions, for examples, the Bernoulli beam theory is the basis for the flexural design and the truss<br />

analogy method is used for the shear design. For common types of D-regions, such as beam-column<br />

joints, "corbels, and deep beams, approaches based solely on test results have still been used. For<br />

other D-regions, there is little to no guidance found in literature.<br />

Motivated to unify the design methodology for B- and D-regions, Marti (1985) and Schlaich et al.<br />

(1987) promoted the STM. This<br />

method basically extends the use of | ^|<br />

the truss model employed in the<br />

truss analogy method.<br />

Design Methodology<br />

<strong>The</strong> STM is based on the lowerbound<br />

theory of limit analysis. In<br />

the STM, an internal trass is<br />

envisioned to carry the applied<br />

loading through the D-region to its<br />

supports or boundaries. <strong>The</strong> truss is<br />

Beam-Column Joint<br />

Coupling Beam in<br />

Coupled Shear Wai<br />

Non-Slender Wall<br />

Fig. 2 Examples of Strut-and-Tie Models<br />

termed strut-and-tie model. Like the steel truss, the strut-and-tie model consists of struts, ties, and<br />

joint (or nodes). Struts are the compression members while the ties are tension members. Nodes are<br />

the meeting points of struts and ties. Examples of strut-and-tie models for a few typical D-regions<br />

are illustrated in Fig. 2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> strut-and-tie model has to be in equilibrium externally with the applied loading and reactions<br />

and internally at each node. Reinforcing or prestressing steel is selected to serve as the ties, and the<br />

dimensions for struts and nodes are selected so that they have sufficient strength and do not violate<br />

the D-region boundary.<br />

Steps in Design by the STM<br />

<strong>The</strong> design process using STM consists mainly of five steps described below.<br />

1. Define the boundaries of the D-region and then evaluate the concentrated, distributed, and<br />

sectional forces that act on the boundaries of this region.<br />

2. Sketch a strut-and-tie model and solve for the truss member forces.<br />

3. Select the reinforcing or prestressing steel that is necessary to provide the required tie<br />

capacity and ensure that this reinforcement is properly anchored in the nodal zones (joints of<br />

the truss).<br />

4. Evaluate the dimensions of the struts and nodes such that the capacity of these components<br />

is sufficient to carry the design force values.<br />

5. Provide distributed reinforcement to increase the ductility of the D-region.


325<br />

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS<br />

Overview<br />

<strong>The</strong> STM has been incorporated in various major structural concrete codes. <strong>The</strong>se includes, among<br />

others, the Canadian Building Code (1984), CEB-FIP Model Code (1993), and AASHTO LRFD<br />

Bridge Design Specifications (1994). In 1998, a more detailed set of guidelines was published in a<br />

special report from the FIP (Federation Internationale de la Precontrainte) "Practical Design of<br />

Structural Concrete" (1998). Most recently, provisions have been developed to form Appendix A<br />

"Strut-and-Tie Models" to the ACI318-02 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete<br />

(2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> STM design provisions typically specify rules for arranging the strut-and-tie models, rules for<br />

defining the dimensions and ultimate stress limits of struts and nodes, requirements for the<br />

distribution and anchorage of ties, and requirements for crack control and ductility detailing<br />

(MacGregor 2002). However, the rules vary from one code to another because of uncertainties<br />

associated with defining the characteristics of an idealized truss within a continuum of structural<br />

concrete.<br />

ACI Appendix A<br />

As described in the previous section, the latest edition of ACI318-02 Building Code (2002) includes<br />

provisions for the STM as a design procedure for all forms of D-regions. Table 1 shows the<br />

summary of stress limits and strength reduction factors used in Appendix A. Fig. 3 illustrates the<br />

various struts defined in the code. More detailed information about ACI Appendix A as well as the<br />

comparison of the code with AASHTO LRFD (1994) is provided elsewhere (Kuchma and Tjhin,<br />

2001).<br />

Struts:<br />

/,„ = 0.85P,/,'<br />

Table 1 Stress Limits and Strength Reduction Factors<br />

Stress Limits<br />

where: P, =1.00 for prismatic struts in uncracked compression zones (Fig. 3: (d) and (f))<br />

(3^ = 0.40 for struts in tension members<br />

P, = 0.75 when struts may be bottle shaped and crack control reinforcement is included (Fig. 3: (a))<br />

P s = 0.60 when struts may be bottle shaped and crack control reinforcement is not included (Fig. 3: (b))<br />

P t = 0.60 for all other cases (Fig. 3: (c) and (e))<br />

Notes: <strong>The</strong> angle between the struts and adjoining ties has to be greater than 25°<br />

Crack control reinforcement requirement is ^p w sin7, > 0.003, where p w is the steel ratio of the i-th<br />

layer of reinforcement crossing that strut, and y, is the angle between the axis of a strut and the bars.<br />

Nodes: f cu = 0.85(3 J L<br />

where: p, = 1.00 when nodes are bounded by struts and/or bearing areas<br />

P, = 0.80 when nodes anchor only one de<br />

P 5 = 0.60 when nodes anchor more than one tie<br />


326<br />

(d)<br />

fH| (e) (c) „,, (a) _, (b)<br />

4-i<br />

-<br />

^<br />

—<br />

\Jv<br />

v<br />

^>.<br />

^~^~<br />

x <<br />

\<br />

N - \/ •^<br />

s<br />

x<br />

\<br />

Fig. 3 Types of struts in a typical D-region: (a) prismatic in uncracked field (b) prismatic in<br />

cracked field where struts are parallel to cracks (c) prismatic in cracked field where<br />

struts are not parallel to cracks (d) bottle-shaped with crack control reinforcement (e)<br />

bottle-shaped without crack control reinforcement (f) confined strut<br />

USE OF STRUT-AND-TIE MODELS IN SEISMIC DESIGN AND EVALUATION<br />

A strut-and-tie model is an idealization of the actual flow of forces in a D-region because it<br />

approximates the principal stress flow in the structure and is in equilibrium with the boundary<br />

forces. <strong>The</strong> required reinforcement in D-Regions can be calculated from the tie forces determined<br />

from a strut-and-tie model. This approach has been applied in seismic design and detailing. An<br />

example of this use is in the design of joints of cap beam and column in multiple column bridge<br />

bents (Sritharan et al. 2001).<br />

For the past decade, the performance-based design and evaluation has been an extensively explored<br />

topic in the earthquake engineering community. Conceptual guidance (e.g., Vision 2000 (1995)) as<br />

well as implementation (e.g., Priestley (2000)) of the methodology has been well documented.<br />

Additional considerations must be made when the STM is used in the framework of this<br />

performance-based methodology. A few of them are now described.<br />

Selection of Strut-and~Tie Models<br />

Strut-and-tie models are to be selected according to the selected design performance objectives.<br />

Structures are usually expected to perform elastically for performance objectives with no damage<br />

performance levels. Consequently, strut-and-tie models that follow elastic stress trajectories should<br />

be selected to avoid excessive stress redistribution. For performance objectives with damage state<br />

performance levels, it is often necessary to consider strut-and-tie models that deviate significantly<br />

from those suggested by elastic stress distributions. Due to limited ductility in structural concrete,<br />

however, the selected strut-and-tie models should be within workable limits.<br />

Multiple Load Conditions and Combinations<br />

Because the loading induced by earthquake is cyclic in nature, multiple load conditions, one for<br />

each direction as well as those from gravity loads, must be considered. <strong>The</strong> design load<br />

combinations are defined by superposition of relevant load conditions. Although superposition of<br />

strut-and-tie models associated with each load condition is allowed by the STM, strut-and-tie<br />

models should be established considering the design load combinations directly as a result of strain<br />

compatibility requirements.


327<br />

Strength Degradation<br />

<strong>The</strong> strength of struts is typically taken as a fraction of uniaxial concrete compressive strength<br />

obtained from compressive cylinder tests. This reduction in the usable concrete strength depends on<br />

many conditions; some of which were described in Fig. 3. In design considering reversed cyclic<br />

loading, two strut-and-tie models associated with each loading direction may share the same region.<br />

In addition, struts may change from struts to ties or visa-versa. This condition causes strength<br />

degradation in the struts and must be considered.<br />

Ductile Detailing<br />

Since earthquake loading is still poorly understood, capacity design concepts should be employed to<br />

ensure ductile behavior in all design performance objectives. In this regard, the capacity of the strutand-tie<br />

models should be governed by the capacity of ties. Also, the struts and nodes must still have<br />

sufficient strength under the expected strength of ties.<br />

Load-Deformation Prediction<br />

When load-deformation prediction needs to be made, basic requirements in structural mechanics<br />

must be satisfied in the strut-and-tie model for each loading step, namely equilibrium, strain<br />

compatibility relationships (kinematics), and stress-strain relationships. In addition, the geometry of<br />

the strut-and-tie model should be adjusted so that the internal energy of the system is minimum.<br />

Strain compatibility relationships should include components from struts, ties, as well as the nodes<br />

(Stojadinovic 1999). Stiffness degradation due to load reversal (Kinugasa and Nomura 2000) should<br />

also be considered.<br />

THE COMPUTER AIDED STRUT-AND-TIE (CAST) DESIGN TOOL<br />

Overview<br />

<strong>The</strong> simplicity and versatility of the STM can be hampered by the need to perform numerous<br />

calculations and geometric manipulations in order to complete a design. To overcome this<br />

encumbrance, various computer-based design tools have been developed to bring efficiency and<br />

transparency to the STM design process. A summary of the capabilities of a few computer-based<br />

STM design tools is discussed by Tjhin and Kuchma (2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors have been developing the CAST (Computer Aided Strut-and-Tie) design tool that<br />

provides a single graphical environment (Fig. 4) in which the designer can sketch the D-region,<br />

draw the strut-and-tie model, solve for truss members forces, select tie reinforcement, define the<br />

dimensions of struts and nodes, adjust all design variables, as well as create a printout that<br />

summarizes the design. This design tool enables users to make on screen adjustments of all screen<br />

variables, to investigate design possibilities, and to optimize the design. In addition, the CAST tool<br />

enables multiple load cases and combinations to be considered.<br />

CAST has been under development since Fall 1998 and runs on the Windows 32-bit family<br />

operating systems. <strong>The</strong> current version of this program is freely available from


http-//www cee.uiuc edu/kuchma/strut&tie. <strong>The</strong>re have been approximately 650 downloads made<br />

by people from outside of the <strong>University</strong> of Illinois, with feedback from users being used to make<br />

valuable changes and additions to this program.<br />

328<br />

Design Example Using CAST<br />

<strong>The</strong> three-story squat wall with openings described in the book by Paulay and Priestley (1992) is<br />

used to show how CAST can be used for seismic design. In this design, ACI code (ACI 318-02<br />

2002) is employed <strong>The</strong> design only considers the seismic effects in term of equivalent static lateral<br />

forces; the gravity load condition is not performed. Because the structure is not symmetric, two load<br />

conditions, one associated with the left lateral forces and the other associated with the right lateral<br />

forces, need to be considered.<br />

HCAST- 5«nt Watt with Openinis<br />

F8e £d* View Select £ombu* Define Assign Anal^n* £tsplaj> Qptiorw Window fcjelP<br />

(a*, a, -° ' Ji -* F — > ES


I<br />

329<br />

file £dit Vww Select Construct Define 6s»Qn Analasis Djsplay flptions Window /indow Help<br />

SI Unit -Dl^S^Jl 0_-° M<br />

: i «• u* t<br />

«;<br />

FJi<br />

> E<br />

^ El<br />

n<br />

lie<br />

General Info<br />

I ID i Bl '<br />

Function | Strut and-Tie<br />

connectivity<br />

Start STM Node [<br />

End STM Node \~<br />

8<br />

1<br />

JLJXJ<br />

- Properties ———<br />

Length | 315Q.Q mm Pfopertylype<br />

Orientation | 3SQQOQ deg Non Ptestressed flanforcement Tie J^j<br />

ReL Stiffness) 1<br />

Property Type Name<br />

TwForce j 2400 kN 3rd Flow Steel _^| 1 ShowDetaJ. |t<br />

,<br />

nTTiPKM—i ... . ,.. ,„., TrTi.r., NUTT r, ,<br />

yp u t<br />

iy(>fe Propciiic*<br />

•T"^ - • ^strength —— - -<br />

& r 300 00<br />

Pa<br />

. . .." , Number of Bar Layc s j 4 ^j<br />

"Defined Types-<br />

-• Bat Layer Oat*<br />

|<br />

IIV<br />

NODE<br />

ifffibr.<br />

rn 4fi9\<br />

ExS[RJt)S e teel ' " , Bar Oes^jnation<br />

Interior Steel dpi' | NumfagrofBars<br />

I — — — .j Nominal Diameter -111 mm<br />

813<br />

-^ Aiw-284mrrf<br />

I 300 mm<br />

Mote. Oak the 'Apply button to the tight after<br />

ng a bar layer<br />

Note. This tie type cannot be deleted ~<br />

because tt has been assigned to STM g -~~<br />

Element*<br />

summaiy<br />

. Total Steel Area | 2272.0<br />

Dos* Section<br />

Strength Reduction<br />

•**• j Q75<br />

~- » : Yield Force | " 5112<br />

kH<br />

| TensionZone Extension | 50 mm<br />

^_j'<br />

_<br />

mrrf<br />

Use Default<br />

Controd<br />

lie j iusl M«tTieV/idth | 7191<br />

mm<br />

j<br />

• » Tip- In addition to using "Layer Number updown contol above to select<br />

a bar layer you can ako do it by clicking a bar laiyer from the image<br />

! tothelertorbyc£ckmgtheimageandthenpres: wig up or down<br />

u F __i ^•Tljrl -<br />

arrowkey<br />

JU |1 rr,r| [ OK | Caned<br />

Fig. 5 Results of truss analysis, dimensioning of struts and nodes, and selection of<br />

reinforcement for ties.<br />

<strong>The</strong> truss analysis for each load condition was then conducted. Afterwards, the reinforcement for<br />

each tie was selected, and the dimensioning of the struts and nodes were performed. Fig. 5 shows<br />

the results after the design was finalized. <strong>The</strong> top left display window partially shows the member<br />

forces and stress ratios associated with the left lateral load condition. <strong>The</strong> bottom left display<br />

window partially shows the member forces and stress ratios (i.e., the member stress intensities<br />

normalized to the corresponding stress limits) associated with the right lateral load condition. Note<br />

that colorized members were used to describe the level of stress ratios. <strong>The</strong> top right window is the<br />

"Show Element Info" dialog box displaying the summary of tie B-L This dialogue box was<br />

displayed by selecting tie B-I using the right mouse button. From that dialog box, the "Show<br />

Detail" button was pressed to reveal the "Define Non-Prestressed Reinforcement Tie Types"<br />

dialogue box (bottom right window) displaying reinforcing bar detail for Tie B-L<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Provisions for the design of D-(Discontinuity) Regions in structural concrete by the Strut-and-Tie<br />

Method (STM) have recently been incorporated into several international design specifications.<br />

<strong>The</strong> next step in the evolution of these provisions is to incorporate seismic design rules that address<br />

the strength degradation of struts and nodes, ductile detailing, and how to design structures for<br />

cyclic loading combinations. To aid designers in the use of the STM, computer-based design tools<br />

are under development, including the CAST design tool (www.cee.uiuc.edu/kuchma/strut&tie).<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


<strong>The</strong> development of CAST has been supported by a grant from the <strong>University</strong> of Illinois, a<br />

fellowship from Portland Cement Association, and a CAREER award from the National Science<br />

Foundation.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (1994). AASHTO LRFD<br />

bridge specification. 1st ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials<br />

Washington, DC.<br />

American Concrete Institute Committee 318 (ACI 318) (2002). Building code requirements for<br />

structural concrete (ACI 318-02) and commentary (ACI 318R-02), American Concrete Institute,<br />

Farmington Hills, MI.<br />

Comite Euro-International du Beton (1993). CEB-FIP model code 1990, Thomas Telford Services,<br />

Ltd., London.<br />

CSA Committee A23.3 (1984). Design of concrete structures for buildings (CAN3-A23.3-M84),<br />

Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Canada.<br />

FIP Commission 3 (1998). FIP recommendation 1996, practical design of structural concrete,<br />

Federation Internationale de la Precontrainte, Lausanne, Austria.<br />

Kinugasa, H., and Nomura, S. (1996). Failure mechanism under reversed cyclic loading after<br />

flexural yielding (Paper No. 177). Proceeding of the llth World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>.<br />

Kuchma, D. A., and Tjhin, T. N. (2002). Design of discontinuity regions in structural concrete using<br />

a computer-based strut-and-tie methodology," Proceedings of the 81st TRB Annual Meeting.<br />

Marti, P. (1985). Basic tools of reinforced concrete beam design. ACI Journal, Proceedings 82:1,<br />

45-56.<br />

MacGregor, 1 G. (2002). Derivation of strut-and-tie models for the 2002 ACI code. To be<br />

published in ACI Special Publication entitled "Examples for the design of structural concrete with<br />

strut-and-tie models."<br />

Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry<br />

buildings, John Wiley & Sons, New York.<br />

Priestley, M. J. N. (2000). Performance-based seismic design (Paper No. 2831). Proceeding of the<br />

12th World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>.<br />

Schlaich, J., Schafer, K., and Jennewein, M. (1987). Toward a consistent design of structural<br />

concrete. Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute 32:3, 74-150.<br />

Sritharan, S., Priestley, M. J. N., and Seible, F. (2001). Seismic design and experimental<br />

verification of concrete multiple column bridge bents. ACI Structural Journal 98:3, 335-346.<br />

Stojadinovic, B. (1999). Strut-and-tie models for cyclic loading. Informal group discussion of Sub-<br />

Committee 445-2.<br />

Tjhin, T. N., and Kuchma, D. A. (2002). Computer-based tools for design by the strut-and-tie<br />

method: advances and challenges. To be published in Sept.-Oct. issue of ACI Structural Journal<br />

Vision 2000 (1995). Performance-based seismic engineering of buildings. Vision 2000 Committee,<br />

Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA.<br />

330


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF ARCH DAMS INCLUDING<br />

STRAIN-RATE EFFECTS<br />

Gao Lin and Shi-yun Xiao<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Dalian <strong>University</strong> of Technology,<br />

Dalian 116024, China<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Most of the experimental studies on concrete have shown that it is sensitive to the rate of loading.<br />

<strong>The</strong> material strength, stiffness and ductility are rate-dependent. When a dam is subjected to the<br />

earthquake excitation, the stress-strain relationship in different parts of the structure at different<br />

instant will be different due to different rate of strain it experiences. Based on the concept of<br />

viscoplastic consistency model, a modified three-parameter William-Warnke viscoplastic model is<br />

developed to take account of the rate-dependent behaviour of concrete. <strong>The</strong> seismic response of a<br />

27 8 m high arch dam is analyzed as an example. It is shown that the strain rate affects the<br />

displacement and stress distribution of the dam response, it plays an important role in the safety<br />

assessment of arch dams located in earthquake active area.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Many high arch dams have been built and will be built in high seismic area in China. <strong>The</strong> highest of<br />

them reaches 300 m . <strong>The</strong> safety of these structures against earthquake shocks is of great concern.<br />

During the past two or three decades, our ability to analyze mathematical models of dam structures<br />

subjected to earthquake ground motions has improved dramatically. Sophisticated computer<br />

programs have been developed and used for numerical analysis of the arch dams. Nevertheless, the<br />

current design practice in the seismic design of arch dams is still based on the linear elastic<br />

assumption. <strong>The</strong> key property which determines the capacity of arch dams to withstand earthquakes<br />

is the tensile strength of concrete. However, the design criteria for tensile stress is still a problem at<br />

issue. A widely accepted standard is not available. As a consequence of this, there has not been a<br />

corresponding improvement in the earthquake resistant design. <strong>The</strong>refore, improvement of the


332<br />

mathematical modeling of real structures has great significance.<br />

Concrete is a structural material sensitive to the rate of loading. Numerous tests have been carried<br />

out to investigate its response to rapid loading. Experimental results reveal that the material strength,<br />

stiffness and ductility (or brittleness) are rate-dependent. Hence, when a dam is subjected to the<br />

earthquake excitation, the stress-strain relationship in different parts of it at different instant will be<br />

different due to different strain rate it experiences. However, the conventional design practice<br />

accounts for rate sensitivity by means of drastic simplifying assumptions. That is, in all cases, the<br />

allowable stresses of an arch dam under earthquake load is increased by, say, 30% of the value<br />

specified for static case. Similarly, the dynamic modulus of elasticity is assigned 30% higher than<br />

its static value. <strong>The</strong> effect of dynamic behaviour of the dam and the effect of the waveform of the<br />

earthquake excitation have been disregarded. As a result, the true response of the dam may be<br />

altered to some extent. This paper aims to investigate the effect of strain-dependency on the seismic<br />

response of arch darn. In the literature several researchers (Lee et al 1998, Cervera et al 1996)<br />

studied the seismic response of a two dimensional concrete gravity dam by employing<br />

rate-dependent damage model. In the plastic-damage model of Lee et al (1998), the rate-dependent<br />

regularization is used to guarantee a unique converged solution for softening regions. No effect for<br />

rate-dependency on the stress distribution is involved. In the rate-dependent isotropic damage<br />

model, Cervera et al (1996) used a stress-strain curve that does not agree with the experimental<br />

results of majority of investigators (Bischoff et al 1991, Bazant et al 1982). In this paper,<br />

experiments on dynamic behaviour of concrete at high stain rates have been carried out and a<br />

consistency viscoplastic three-parameter William-Wamke model is developed to study the strain<br />

rate effects on the seismic response of arch dams.<br />

STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP AT HIGH STRAIN RATE<br />

Dynamic tensile and compressive tests of concrete at high strain rates have been carried out in our<br />

laboratory. <strong>The</strong> stress-strain curves obtained are shown in Fig.l and Fig.2.<br />

Strain (1Cf 8 )<br />

Fig.l Typical stress-strain response of concrete<br />

in tension<br />

Strain (t(T 6 )<br />

Fig.2 Typical stress-strain response of concrete<br />

in compression<br />

<strong>The</strong> strain rate enhancement in tension and in compression are given by


333<br />

(1)<br />

(2)<br />

Where f t and _/£ are the dynamic tensile and compressive strengths respectively; f ts and f cs are the<br />

static tensile and compressive strengths respectively; £ r and £ c are the tensile and compressive strain<br />

rates respectively;^and£ cs are the static strain rates in tension and in compression respectively<br />

(f tt = €„ = 10" 5 j' 1 ). Test results indicate that the dynamic modulus of elasticity increases with the<br />

strain rate. A slightly decrease of critical strain (strain at peak stress) in compression at high stain<br />

rates has been observed, but no visible change of critical stain in tension with the strain rate can be<br />

found. Some researchers indicated that the Poisson's ratio of concrete increases with the strain rate<br />

when subjected to tension and decreases with the strain rate when subjected to compression. In our<br />

experiments test results dispersed to some extent, it is difficult to correlate the dynamic Poisson's<br />

ratio with the stain rate.<br />

RATE-DEPENDENT CONSTITUTIVE MODEL OF CONCRETE<br />

Wang (1997) proposed a viscoplastic consistency model for analyzing metal, which can be seen as<br />

an extension of the classical elasto-plastic approach to account for rate dependency. <strong>The</strong> model can<br />

relatively, easily be implemented in place of classical rate-independent plasticity models (Winnicki<br />

et al 2001). In this model during viscoplastic flow, the actual stress state must remain on the yield<br />

surface. That is, for visvcoplastic loading, the yielding surface is expressed as<br />

/(cr y ,/r,K-) = 0 for A>0 (3)<br />

Where o;, is the component of stress tensor; K is the internal variable and A is the viscoplastic<br />

multiplier. <strong>The</strong> viscoplastic strain rate is defined as €"f - /bi y , and for the associated flow rule<br />

m tj = d//3cr y . Thus, the yield surface is rate dependent and can change its size and shape<br />

according to the value of the viscoplastic strain rate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> consistency condition is formulated as<br />

Assume that the rate of internal variable K is a linear function of viscoplastic multiplier of the form


334<br />

ft = Ag(0 tJ ), the consistency condition becomes<br />

Where<br />

m y


335<br />

JL dalt (10)<br />

Where<br />

Solution of the problem is accomplished by an implicit backward Euler integration scheme, where<br />

the Newton-Raphson iterative procedure is employed. <strong>The</strong> calculated stress-strain relationships for<br />

uniaxial compression and tension by this model are shown in Fig.3-6. <strong>The</strong> material properties used<br />

wereyc0=22.0MPa,y;0=1.45MPa, v=0.17 and E=1.9xl0 4 MPa. Comparison with experimental data is<br />

made and a fairly good agreement is achieved.<br />

-SOO 0 SCO 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500<br />

Strain (10 8 )<br />

Fig.3 Stress-strain relationship of the model for<br />

uniaxial tension<br />

Fig.4 Stress-strain relationship of the model for<br />

uniaxial compression<br />

Experimental<br />

Numerical<br />

1 strain rate: 10 s /s<br />

2 strain rate. 10 3 /s<br />

1 strain rate 10 s /s<br />

2 strain rate. 10 a /s<br />

3 strain rate 10 T /s<br />

60 SO 100 12Q 140 160<br />

Strain (lO*)<br />

5QO 100Q 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500<br />

Strain (10"*)<br />

Fig.5 Stress-strain relationship of the model for<br />

uniaxial tension with different stain rate<br />

Fig.6 Stress-strain relationship of the model for<br />

uniaxial compression with different stain rate


336<br />

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF AN ARCH DAM<br />

In order to illustrate the effect of the rate dependency on the dynamic structural response, a 278 m<br />

high arch dam in China subjected to earthquake excitation is analyzed by the proposed model. <strong>The</strong><br />

material properties for the study are as follows: for the dam body E=2.4xl0 4 MPa, v=0.17,<br />

p=2.4xl0 3 kg/m 3 , static compressive strength/ c =30MPa, and static tensile strength/=3MPa; for the<br />

foundation rock E^1.6xl0 4 MPa, v=0.25, p=2.0xl0 3 kg/m 3 . <strong>The</strong> dam and the foundation are<br />

discretized into 450 and 1040 isoparametric elements respectively. Fig.7 shows the discretized<br />

dam-foundation system. <strong>The</strong> five lowest vibration frequencies of the dam in care of full reservoir<br />

are://=0.997 Hz ,/r=1.0Q4 ^ /3=1.450 Hz ,f 4 =lA91 ^ and/5=1.542 Hz . An assumption of massless<br />

foundation is introduced to simplifying the dam-foundation interaction analysis though more<br />

rigorous interaction effects can be included. <strong>The</strong> design earthquake acceleration is 0.32 Ig.<br />

Fig.7 Geometry and mesh of arch dam.<br />

Fig. 8 Time history of <strong>Earthquake</strong> input<br />

Three-dimensional earthquake waves are used as the input. Fig.8 shows the typical artificial<br />

acceleragram that meets the requirement of (Chinese Specifications for Seismic Design of<br />

Hydraulic Structures }> .<br />

Three analyses were performed: an elastic analysis, a rate-independent plastic analysis and a rate<br />

dependent viscoplastic analysis. <strong>The</strong> maximum values of the first and the third principle stresses in<br />

the dam are shown in the Tab.l. It is seen that in all three cases, the maximum compressive stress<br />

are the same, the material remains working in the elastic range. However, for the maximum tensile<br />

stress there is marked difference between the calculated results of rate dependent model and that of<br />

rate independent model.<br />

Table.l<br />

MAXIMUM VALUES OF PRINCIPLE STRESSES<br />

Model<br />

Elastic<br />

Rate independent Plastic<br />

rate dependent Viscoplastic<br />

Compression(MPa)<br />

-12.5<br />

-12.5<br />

-12.5<br />

Tension(MPa)<br />

5.17<br />

2.87<br />

3.22


337<br />

Fig.9 Distribution of first principle stresses of an arch darn (upstream and downstream face)<br />

- rate independent plastic model<br />

'u;r<br />

Itf l' ' k ,-.-, ,' 1 V<br />

*£i£xV —-^.- .»-•<br />

,.-A'. I .,• ^j',V,'.«<br />

t .' 'i» -•' ,-;J<br />

-J'r.';-'-" J / ^, %S^-,'-Xc'./<br />

'•"•-- ••• - —'--.„"$' &/<br />


338<br />

rate-independent and rate dependent model, Fig. 12 shows that distribution of equivalent plastic<br />

strain rate calculated by the rate dependent model.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

A modified three-parameter William-Wamke consistency viscoplastic model is proposed to<br />

investigate the strain-rate effects on the seismic response of arch dams. It is shown that the rate<br />

dependent analyses alter the stress distribution over the dam body and lead to an increased<br />

maximum tensile stress. <strong>The</strong>se effects should be taken into consideration in the safety assessment of<br />

arch dams located in high seismic area.<br />

A CKNO WLEDGEMENT<br />

This research was founded by the National Science Foundation of China under grant No. 50139010 and No. 59739180.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bazant, Z.P. and Oh, B.H.(19982). Strain-rate effect in rapid triaxial loading of concrete, Journal of<br />

the <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics Division, ASCE, 108: EMS, 764-782<br />

Bischoff, P.H. and Perrry, S.H. (1991). Compressive behaviour of concrete at high strain rates,<br />

Materials and Structures, 24,425-450<br />

Cervera, M, Oliver, J. and Manzoli, 0. (1996). A rate-dependent isotropic damage model for the<br />

seismic analysis of concrete dams, <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 25, 987-1010<br />

Chinese standard (2001). Specifications for Seismic Design of Hydraulic Structures, Chinese<br />

Electric Power Press, 17<br />

Harris, D.W., Mohorovic, C.E. and Dolen, T.P. (2000). Dynamic Properties of mass concrete<br />

obtained from dam cores, ACI MaterialJournal, 97, 290-296<br />

Japan Society of Civil Engineers (1996). <strong>Earthquake</strong> Resistant Design for Civil <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Structures in Japan, 16-18<br />

Lee, J. and Fenves, GL. (1998). A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams,<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 27, 937-956<br />

Wang W. (1997). Stationary and propagative instabilities in metals - a computational point of view,<br />

phD, TU Delft, Netherlands.<br />

Winnicld, A., Pearce, C.J. and Bicanie, N. (2001). Viscoplastic Hoffman consistency model for<br />

concrete, Computers and Structures, 79,7-19<br />

Xiao Shi-yun (2002). Rate-dependent constitutive model of concrete and its application to dynamic<br />

response of arch dams, ph.D dissertation, Dalian <strong>University</strong> of Technology, China.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

NONLINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS METHOD BASED ON<br />

DISPLACEMENT<br />

Tu Wen-ge and Zou Yin-sheng<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Hunan <strong>University</strong>, Changsha, China, 410082<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In this paper, nonlinear static method based on displacement is presented. <strong>The</strong> earthquake-resistant<br />

performance of a building structure is represented as a sequence of functions of the maximum<br />

displacements that occur during strong seismic ground motions. <strong>The</strong> acceleration of ground motion<br />

being monotonously increased step by step, maximum displacements can be estimated using the<br />

concept of elastic displacement (or acceleration) spectra and be distributed using SRSS. <strong>The</strong>se spectra,<br />

together with recently proposed natural periods for frame structures being into inelastic range, are then<br />

incorporated into a nonlinear static method based on displacement. Tow examples illustrate the<br />

proposed method.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Traditional earthquake-resistant design methods emphasize that adequate strength, instead of<br />

displacement, is considered as the main design parameter. In the design procedure, the structural<br />

response of maximum base shear based on an elastic spectrum analysis is placed computation of and<br />

considered to be adequate; and then the member sizes are calculated via the distribution of this<br />

maximum base shear, based on elastic strength demand, along the height of the structure. Traditional<br />

methods do not explicitly consider the effects of ground motions' duration and the effects of hysteretic<br />

behavior of structural members, which will affect the overall force and deformation patterns on the<br />

structures. <strong>The</strong> above effects are implicitly considered by means of checking displacement limits (even<br />

extending to inelastic range) after sizing the structural members from the calculated elastic forces.<br />

In the case of large earthquakes, when yielding occurs in a structure and the structure is into inelastic<br />

range, the structural inter-storey drift increase more quickly than inter-storey shear, and structural<br />

members' deformation increase more quickly than members' force. Besides, it has been proved in


340<br />

many research works that adequate strength does not have a decisive influence on expected structural<br />

drift. Limit state can best be represented by deformation rather than by strength as damage that can be<br />

directly correlated with displacement. <strong>The</strong>refore, maximum displacements, rather than maximum<br />

stresses, represent the proper design criteria. This differs from current force-based design that is based<br />

on acceleration spectra, code performance factors that correlate poorly with damage potential, and<br />

displacement checks to ensure that structural displacement limitations are not exceeded.<br />

In this paper, nonlinear static method based on displacement is presented. <strong>The</strong> earthquake-resistant<br />

performance of building structures is represented as a sequence of functions of the maximum<br />

displacements that occur during strong seismic ground motions. <strong>The</strong> acceleration of ground motion<br />

being monotonously increased by degree, maximum displacements can be estimated using the concept<br />

of elastic displacement (or acceleration) spectra and be distributed using SRSS.<br />

NONLINEAAR STATIC PROCEDURE<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are four levels of structural analysis procedures appropriate for the evaluation of existing<br />

buildings and new design ones, as followed:<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> Linear Static Procedure (LSP), which is a basic procedure, and mainly applicable to buildings<br />

whose respond is primarily in the elastic range;<br />

(2) <strong>The</strong> Linear Dynamic Procedure (LDP), which has such characteristics as LSP;<br />

(3) <strong>The</strong> Nonlinear Static Procedure (NSP), which can evaluate buildings loaded beyond the elastic<br />

range, but does not fully reflect dynamic response of structures, specially the effects of higher<br />

mode;<br />

(4) <strong>The</strong> Nonlinear Dynamic Procedure (NDP), which is the most complete form of analysis,<br />

modeling both dynamic effects and inelastic response, but which is sensitive to modeling and<br />

ground motion assumptions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> more advanced the form of analysis provides a more accurate model of the actual performance of<br />

a building subjected to earthquake loads, but greater the time and memory space are required. So, <strong>The</strong><br />

Nonlinear Static Procedure (NSP) is a very practical analysis method, whose basic steps of are:<br />

(1) Assume the nonlinear force-displacement relationship of individual elements of structure<br />

(including yield strength, post yield stifmess and stiffness degradation, etc);<br />

(2) Calculate the target displacement of structure;<br />

(3) Select a reasonable lateral load pattern, and pushing the structure under this load pattern which is<br />

monotonously increasing step by step, when a structural member yields, then its stiffness is<br />

modified, until the roof displacement of structure is up to the target displacement or the structure<br />

collapses.<br />

At this time, the evaluation of seismic performance of structure is obtained. It is clear that the<br />

Nonlinear Static Procedure (Pushover) is a force-based analysis method which adds checking<br />

computation of displacement and deformation of structures by means of either base shearing force<br />

versus peak displacement or seismic demand spectrum versus structural capacity spectrum.


341<br />

DISPLACMENT-BASED NSF<br />

In this paper, a nonlinear static procedure based on displacement is presented. <strong>The</strong> method is a<br />

displacement-based analysis method that adds checking computation of displacement and deformation<br />

of structures. It maintains the simplicity of pushover analysis, and extends pushover analysis to<br />

investigate structural dynamic characteristic, and to account for development of displacement, and to<br />

describe ductility capacity of members set plastic hinge on.<br />

In this method, the acceleration of ground motion is monotonously increased step by step based on<br />

different seismic hazard levels. <strong>The</strong> lateral displacement, instead of base shearing force, is calculated.<br />

Moreover, the distribution of lateral displacement is selected by the mode shapes, which are<br />

considered based on structural dynamic modification considering the residual displacement of inelastic<br />

members, and post yield stiffness etc.<br />

In this method, modal analysis is adopted, because the displacement or force distribution can be<br />

expressed with the modal shapes, and the maximum displacement of each joint or floor of a structure<br />

subjected to the ground motion acceleration can also be expressed with the maximum coordinate using<br />

the displacement response spectrum. Furthermore, the higher modals are taken into consideration via<br />

the SRSS/CQC method. When the displacement is increased to some extend, the structure enters<br />

inelastic range, whose overall stif&iess is modified and whose dynamic characteristics is changed.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, the structure is anew done modal analysis in order to obtain dynamic characteristics of the<br />

structure in inelastic range.<br />

Modal Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> structural motion differential equation is expressed as<br />

(1)<br />

Where M is the mass matrixes, C is the damping matrixes, K is the stiffness matrixes, X is the<br />

displacement vector, x w is the ground acceleration history.<br />

Calculate the eigenvalues and eigenvectors (natural frequencies and modal shapes) of the structure<br />

under undamping free vibration. Assume that X satisfies<br />

where O is the shape matrixes , q is the modal coordinate.<br />

Substitute this expression for X in equation (1):<br />

X=< (2)


342<br />

= -MIx g (3)<br />

Pre-multiplied by ® r , equation (3) becomes<br />

mq + cq + kq = -£, (4)<br />

Where<br />

r=$> J MI (5)<br />

(6)<br />

(7)<br />

(8)<br />

If it is a proportional or classical damping system, according to Duhamel integration, the modal<br />

coordinates can be calculated on the basis of equation (4). <strong>The</strong>n, the displacement can be calculated on<br />

the basis of equation (2). Hence, the structural members' force and deformations can also be obtained.<br />

Maximum displacement<br />

At the initial stage of structural design, a structural engineer should consider reasonable deformations<br />

under various earthquake intensities. Nevertheless, the prediction of important characteristic of input<br />

ground motion and the basic structural parameters are uncertain. Based on displacement spectrum, the<br />

maximum value of displacement is given. Because the inelastic displacement spectrum is not presented<br />

by Code for seismic design of buildings [2001], the displacement spectrum is transform from the<br />

acceleration spectrum, as followed:<br />

Oi^ (9)<br />

So, the maximum value of thej-f/z modal coordinates can be expressed by:<br />

W=aK>f>« 0°)<br />

When the periods and modes of a structure at previous step is known, according to modal analysis,<br />

both the relative-displacement of the structural members and the inter-storey drifts can be calculated<br />

using SRSS (Square Root of the Sum of the Square). And then force corresponding to them can also be<br />

obtained.


343<br />

Define the displacement of the i-th joint X,, using SRSS of N modes:<br />

(11)<br />

where 4> g is the z-f/z joint corresponding to j-th mode shape, &>j is the natural frequency<br />

corresponding to j-th mode, £j is the damping ratio corresponding to j-th mode, YJ is the mode<br />

participant parameter corresponding loj-th mode.<br />

When the maximum of acceleration of ground motion is increased step-by-step, formation of a desired<br />

earthquake-resistant mechanism comes into effect, and various modal parameters are modified.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, the modal parameters and X,- are calculated anew. <strong>The</strong> dynamic performance of the<br />

structure in inelastic range is expressed via modal parameters and X, modified.<br />

Modify<br />

stiffness<br />

When formation of a desired earthquake-resistant mechanism comes into effect, one or some structural<br />

members enter inelastic range, whose stiffness is or are substituted post yield stiffness for. In this paper,<br />

the hysteretic model is bilinear one, no stiffness degradation. Furthermore, both residual displacement<br />

and P-Delta effect is taken into account as geometric nonlinearity. <strong>The</strong> i-th inter-storey drift, A I|9 is<br />

equal to sum both inter-storey lateral drift at yield, A y, and inter-storey lateral drift after yield, A p.<br />

ApA^ + A, (13)<br />

Determine the inter-storey yield<br />

For each structural member, its nonlinear stiffness model is a bilinear stiffness model. For each storey,<br />

its nonlinear storey shearing stiffness is also simplified to a bilinear stifmess model, that is, the<br />

nonlinear storey lateral force versus inter-storey lateral drift response of the prototype structure is<br />

represented by a bilinear approximation. <strong>The</strong> bilinear approximation has three defining characteristic:<br />

(a) <strong>The</strong> initial stiffness, Kj , (b) the maximum storey force and inter-storey drift, F u and A a ,<br />

respectively and (c) the second (post yield) stifmess, £•<br />

<strong>The</strong> initial elastic stiffness is calculated from a linear-elastic analysis where the linear stiffness of the<br />

members. <strong>The</strong> maximum load and deformation at the limit state, F u and A u , respectively, in the<br />

bilinear approximation are equal to those of the nonlinear curve. <strong>The</strong> second stiffness, £2, is calculated<br />

by equating the strain energy in the nonlinear curve to that in the bilinear approximation, where the<br />

strain energy can be calculated by means of integrating the piece-wise-linear inter-storey force-drift<br />

curve.<br />

Meanwhile, <strong>The</strong> storey lateral force, F y , and niter-storey lateral drift, A 7 , at yield are defined by the


344<br />

intersection of the two stiffaess in the bilinear approximation of the pushover response curve of each<br />

storey. <strong>The</strong> relationship between them is shown by equation (12).<br />

Limit state<br />

<strong>The</strong> yield and limit-state deformations are used to defined the limit-state displacement ductility, // A :<br />

=-~ and //


345<br />

EXAMPLE<br />

<strong>The</strong> nonlinear static analysis method based on displacement is illustrated with two examples: Ex. A is a<br />

storey shear model. Ex. B is a structure that collapses from 7 th storey to 13 th storey in Tang Shan<br />

earthquake.<br />

EX.A<br />

Its structural parameters are shown in Table 1. <strong>The</strong> structure is in region of VII. <strong>The</strong> characteristic<br />

period value is 0.30 second. <strong>The</strong> nonlinear static analysis method based on displacement is carried out<br />

with 5 steps. Data at each step are shown in Table 2. <strong>The</strong> inter-storey drift at each step is shown in Fig<br />

1, and displacement of top floor versus the acceleration of ground motion in Fig 2.<br />

^\<br />

1 st floor<br />

2 na floor<br />

3 ra floor<br />

4 m floor<br />

Mass<br />

(xlO 6^)<br />

7.8<br />

7.0<br />

6.8<br />

5.0<br />

Stiffiiess<br />

(xW*N/m)<br />

3.86314<br />

4.03524<br />

3.03524<br />

2.24514<br />

Table 1: structural parameters<br />

Post stiffness<br />

(xlQ 7 #/w)<br />

7.72628<br />

8.07048<br />

6.07048<br />

4.49028<br />

Inter-storey<br />

yield drift (m)<br />

0.0101<br />

0.0080<br />

0.0080<br />

0.0080<br />

Inter-storey<br />

limited drift (m)<br />

0.0910<br />

0.0720<br />

0.0720<br />

0.0720<br />

\^<br />

1 st step<br />

2 nd step<br />

3 rd step<br />

4 th step<br />

5 m step<br />

Floor<br />

9 nd<br />

i st<br />

3 ra<br />

4 m<br />

^nd<br />

Table 2: Frequency and damage states at each step<br />

State<br />

Yield<br />

Yield<br />

Yield<br />

Yield<br />

Utmost<br />

Acceleration of<br />

ground motion( mis 2 }<br />

1.0065<br />

1.0889<br />

1.1266<br />

1.7323<br />

1.7311<br />

1 st<br />

2.6809<br />

1.7751<br />

1.3350<br />

1.2268<br />

1.1989<br />

Frequency (rad/sec)<br />

ond<br />

3 rd<br />

6.7741 10.1263<br />

6.7537 7.9907<br />

4.4852 7.1603<br />

3.4175 5.6160<br />

3.0295 4.5286<br />

4th<br />

13.0079<br />

11.1671<br />

11.1592<br />

9.0872<br />

5.8173<br />

EX.B<br />

<strong>The</strong> height of every floor of Ex. B is 4m except 4.5m at both 11 th and 12 th floor, and 3m at 13 th floor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> height from the base of structure is 52.0m. <strong>The</strong> span between columns is 6.0m. <strong>The</strong> cross-sections<br />

of columns decrease from 600 x 800mm(at 1 st floor) to 300 x 300mm (at 13 th floor). <strong>The</strong> cross-section<br />

of beams is 300 x 700mm. <strong>The</strong> grade of concrete is C20. <strong>The</strong> structure is in region of VIIL <strong>The</strong><br />

characteristic period value is 0.40 second. <strong>The</strong> elevation of the frame structure is shown by Fig 3. <strong>The</strong><br />

Giberson model is adopted in analysis, so yields of members occur only at the ends of elements. Fig 4<br />

shows the damage formation pattern of the structure. It is clear that members* deformation limitation


346<br />

occur at 7 th storey, which is consistent with the structure's collapse from 7 th storey to 13 th storey in<br />

Tang Shan earthquake.<br />

Fig l(Left): inter-storey drift at each step<br />

Fig 2(Riglit): curve of displacement of top floor versus the acceleration of ground motion<br />

Fig 3(Left): Elevation of frame structure<br />

Fig 4(Riglit): Distribution of damage (* represent plastic hinges, a represent limited state)<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Nonlinear static analysis method based on displacement is presented in this paper. Nonlinear action of<br />

structure is divided into some segments, in which nonlinear action is equivalent to linear action. For<br />

each segment, nonlinear respond of structure is made computation with effective elastic-linear<br />

parameters. Maximum displacements are calculated using displacement/ acceleration spectra and are<br />

distributed via SRSS at each increment of acceleration of ground motioa For two examples, the<br />

method is an available tool, and can account for structural nonlinear action.


347<br />

REFERENCE<br />

Code for seismic design of buildings, (GB 50011-2001), National standard of the people republic of<br />

China, Architecture Building Press of China<br />

T. Paulay and M. J. N, Priestley (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings,<br />

John Wiley & Sons. Inc.<br />

Peter Fajfar (1996), "Simple Push-Over Analysis of Buildings Structures", 11 th World Conference on<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, CD-ROM, paper No. 1011, Mexico.<br />

Mehdl Salidl (1981). "Simple Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of R/C Structures", Journal of Structures,<br />

ASCE, Vol.107, No.ST5,pp937-953.<br />

Ekwueme, M S (1999). "Determination of displacement limits for seismic rehabilitation of concrete<br />

buildings", <strong>The</strong> Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 8:79-115.<br />

Bommer, J J and Elnashai, A S (1999). "Displacement spectra for seismic design", Journal of<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, 3(1): 1-32.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

EDUCATIONAL AND CODE REQUIREMENTS<br />

FOR SEISMIC DESIGN IN HONG KONG<br />

Gordon Williams<br />

WSP Hong Kong Ltd.,<br />

Hong Kong<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In a number of infra-plate seismic regions of the world, authorities are considering the need to<br />

introduce seismic design into their structural codes where previously there was none. One of the major<br />

challenges for educators will be to ensure that the local practising structural engineers are well<br />

prepared for the more challenging conceptual and detailed design requirements of seismic design.<br />

This paper provides the author's thoughts on the educational requirements of designers who will need<br />

to be introduced to seismic design and also ideas on the type of code needed by designers in low to<br />

moderate risk seismic regions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> complexities of earthquake design for inexperienced designers in key areas such as, risk, loads,<br />

site factors, peak ground acceleration, response spectra, structural form and reinforcement detailing are<br />

discussed and some recommendations made.<br />

In the section on response spectra, a comparison of seismic loads using the latest spectrum response<br />

values from China, USA, and Europe indicate the significant variability with both previous versions of<br />

codes and each other.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Designer's needs<br />

Structural designers are frequently required to cope with new or changing codes during their<br />

professional life. Although they are well able to understand the changes, the demands of time and<br />

economics usually mean that new codes take a long time to be accepted. Acceptance is improved when<br />

modified or new codes are logically presented, clearly explained and do not involve too many different<br />

factors or load cases to be considered for routine calculations. <strong>The</strong> requirement for clear unambiguous<br />

codes is even more necessary now than in the past since clients are increasingly demanding reduced<br />

design periods.<br />

Brief History of Seismic design in intra-plate areas<br />

Before the 1970's it was uncommon for building structures in intra-plate areas to be designed for<br />

earthquakes, however seismic design is already required in many urban areas and a number of cities


350<br />

including Hong Kong are considering introducing seismic design where previously there was none.<br />

Table 1 provides a brief summary of key dates when seismic design was officially introduced for some<br />

areas of low to moderate seismic risk.<br />

TABLE 1<br />

DATES SEISMIC DESIGN INTRODUCED<br />

Location<br />

Boston USA i<br />

Australia "<br />

Canada J<br />

China 4<br />

New York USA '<br />

Date<br />

1975<br />

1979<br />

1985<br />

1990<br />

1995<br />

Comments<br />

After 7 magnitude earthquake in Meckering 1968<br />

Seismic provisions since 1953<br />

Official code 1974 but seismic design not required for intensity less than 7<br />

Classified zone 2 on map in 1982<br />

1. Nordensen(1989) 2.Bubb(1998) 3. Heidebrecht(1998) 4.Hu(1993)<br />

It is probable that seismic design was carried out for some government buildings prior to legislation<br />

being introduced. For example the author earned out the design for a new replacement school in South<br />

Africa at Tulbach near Cape Town incorporating seismic provisions in 1972 following an earthquake<br />

estimated to be 6.3 on the Richter scale on 29 th September 1969. Similarly hi Hong Kong there are<br />

some buildings which have incorporated seismic design and details even though there is no statutory or<br />

code requirement to do so. From the above it can be seen that earthquake design in intra-plate areas is<br />

relatively recent<br />

Existing seismic knowledge in Hong Kong<br />

In HK at present there are no requirements for buildings to be designed for seismic loads. Civil<br />

engineering structures, however, including bridges and railway stations have been routinely designed<br />

for seismic forces since at least 1983, (Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Manual Chapter 4 1983). <strong>The</strong> Structures<br />

Design Manual for Highways and Railways (HKSDM) was published in 1993 (Highways Department<br />

of HK. 1993) and became more accessible to structural engineers designing buildings from May 1994<br />

when it was referenced to in PNAP 115 (Buildings Department HKSAR 1994). <strong>The</strong> nominal seismic<br />

load in the HKSDM is .05 times the mass, to which is applied as a static force with a dead load factor<br />

of 1.4 giving an equivalent to an ultimate acceleration of 0.07g. No consideration of structural form or<br />

soil conditions is required.<br />

In HK seismic design knowledge and awareness of structural engineers has increased through a<br />

number of initiatives by Government, Universities and others since tie early 1990's. This knowledge<br />

has also increased because there have been many designs carried out by HK structural engineers for<br />

developments in China where seismic design is required. In some ways this may not be an advantage<br />

since conceptually there are differences in the Chinese approach when compared to some of the<br />

seismic codes in other countries. Further Chinese design institutes frequently cany out the detailed<br />

design of a building so some of the detailed provisions are not so well known in HK. In 2002 the<br />

Buildings Department invited tenders to study the seismic effects on buildings in HK and so it is<br />

possible that a seismic code will be developed within the foreseeable future.<br />

<strong>The</strong> major seismic regions of the world such as California, Japan, China, Taiwan and New Zealand<br />

have long had seismic codes that are well established. Many of the HK local practicing structural<br />

engineers who have had their education in these countries understand seismic codes but have not


351<br />

necessarily had significant working experience using them.<br />

Structural engineers that have had seismic design experience in high seismic risk areas are likely to<br />

have less difficulty adapting to a new code in HK than those who have had no seismic experience.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y may not, however, easily adapt their knowledge of design in regions of high seismicity to a<br />

region of low/moderate seismicity during the schematic design stage of a project This is because it is<br />

not necessary or appropriate to design structures in these regions for high levels of ductility. A further<br />

complication is that whereas HK, China and Europe use separate material factors for steel and concrete<br />

the US, Australia and New Zealand adopt strength reduction factors. This makes it more difficult to<br />

compare the codes.<br />

HK has some unique types of construction, especially when considering the dominance of residential<br />

high-rise construction. Different materials, types of construction and heights will mean that experience<br />

gained in other countries may not be readily transferred to HK, Concrete frames are predominately<br />

used for commercial buildings in New Zealand and Australia but their residential buildings are mainly<br />

low rise or separate family dwellings. In the US, although there are numerous concrete buildings, steel<br />

framing is mainly used for their commercial high-rise buildings.<br />

EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS<br />

Educational Challenges for introduction of seismic codes<br />

One of the key challenges for educators in cities considering introducing seismic provisions in their<br />

codes is to ensure that the local practicing structural engineers are well prepared for the more<br />

challenging conceptual and detailed design requirements of seismic design. This is required so as to<br />

ensure that the economic, functional and aesthetic qualities of the built environment are not<br />

excessively compromised.<br />

It is at the schematic design stage that it is necessary to provide sound structural advice to the architect<br />

Inappropriate structural forms will result in additional cost or time implications to the project and<br />

could produce buildings that might experience significant structural failure during a severe seismic<br />

event.<br />

In order to determine how best to put across the key seismic design issues it is useful to consider the<br />

structural engineer's experience. Generally in HK there is a difference between the working<br />

experiences gained by structural engineers who design buildings as compared to civil engineers who<br />

design structures such as bridges, port facilities, dams, pumping facilities etc. Civil and geotechnical<br />

engineers in HK tend to be more familiar with design using more variable materials and more<br />

uncertain loads such as vehicle loads, impact, temperature, varying water tables etc. On the other hand<br />

structural engineers for buildings in HK mainly design for dead, live, wind and soil loads in<br />

accordance with rigid codes and even wind loads are still fairly basic and generally follow a simplified<br />

form of the method used in the outdated British code of practice CP3.<br />

Geotechnical engineers are more familiar with designing for consequence of failure in slope design.<br />

Post university training of structural engineers seldom require consideration of such topics. Structural<br />

engineers generally do not have to make decisions based on subjective criteria and often consider that<br />

their computer analysis and design models reflect an accuracy that hi reality may not necessarily exist<br />

This higher level of uncertainty of seismic design as compared to design without seismic<br />

considerations may adversely affect the ready comprehension of the requirements by practicing


352<br />

structural engineers. Although deflection calculations in reinforced concrete design only predict actual<br />

deflections within 25 to 30% this is usually not of concern to structural engineers since they only have<br />

the need to use simplified code methods of checking using BSS110 Part 1. In BS8110 Part 2 the more<br />

detailed methods of calculating deflection are not frequently referred to and are generally only used in<br />

automated structural computer programs.<br />

It is likely that the uncertainty, variability and perceived requirement to have a better than normal<br />

understanding of geotechnical engineering will be one of the hurdles preventing structural engineers to<br />

easily make the changes required to incorporate seismic loads into their structural design.<br />

Unfortunately there are a number of terms and different ways of presenting seismic risk that can be<br />

confusing for the non-specialist. It is important therefore when discussing the subject that all parties<br />

have a common understanding of the definitions adopted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> best way to train structural designers may be to play down the load variability and all of the<br />

geotechnical complexities and concentrate on the importance of detailing for ductility, providing well<br />

defined load paths and economical yet robust design. As Bubb (1998) said in a keynote address it<br />

should be realised that in building structures that "if there is a weakness, the earthquake will seek it out<br />

and even cause collapse and therefore loss of life. <strong>The</strong> earthquake will also find the weakness that the<br />

ignorance builds in." As found in Kobe, Taiwan, and Northridge, failures commonly occur at changes<br />

in strength or stiffness, because non structural walls affected the structural response or because the<br />

joints have not performed as well as expected. Bubb (1998) follows on by saying "It is the earthquake<br />

and the principles of mechanics that determines which are structural and which are non structural<br />

elements. Common sense and 'normal' practice would wrongly assume that the architect, the owner or<br />

the builder could determine which are non-structural elements".<br />

Seismic loads<br />

<strong>The</strong> main difference in seismic horizontal loads to wind loads is that for wind the load at right angles<br />

to the longer side is usually the critical load case. However for long narrow buildings seismic loads are<br />

dominant in the direction normal to the short side i.e. at right angles to the maximum wind load<br />

direction because the load is dependent on mass, which is the same in any direction. This means that<br />

the required relative seismic capacity of medium height and tall buildings in the long direction will<br />

need to be higher than that required for wind. However this may not control the design since concrete<br />

core buildings frequently have much greater capacity than required in the long direction because the<br />

reinforcement provided for the short direction controls the design.<br />

Static Equivalent Seismic Design Equation<br />

For concept design the lateral loads should be calculated from the static equivalent design equation<br />

Eqn. 1. but can be visualised most easily using a spectrum response curve see Fig. 4 and 5.<br />

7TC<br />

^~W (1)<br />

where V - Base shear, 2 = Zone Factor, I = Importance factor (Building use),<br />

C = Dynamic factor, R = Structural Characteristic, W = Weight of the building.<br />

Although the equation is simple it is somewhat difficult to understand in detail because the variability<br />

of the factors is greater than usually encountered by structural engineers.


353<br />

1) Zone factor / Seismology<br />

Generally structural engineers do not need much understanding of seismology other than when a time<br />

history analysis is required. Even topics such as attenuation, frequency, shear wave velocity, peak<br />

ground acceleration etc are concepts practitioners need to know little about provided they are given an<br />

easily defined structural spectrum from which they can carry out the design.<br />

<strong>The</strong> zone factor Z is the equivalent peak ground acceleration (pga) on rock for the location under<br />

consideration. In most codes the benchmark is the 10% probability that an earthquake of this size will<br />

occur in 50 years (equivalent to a return period of 475 years). <strong>The</strong> generally accepted range for the pga<br />

on rock in Hong Kong varies between O.OTg and 0.12g. This value tends towards a low level of<br />

earthquake risk rather than a medium level.<br />

Recently the Chinese map shows Kowloon and New Territories as 0.1 g and Hong Kong Island as<br />

0.15g. see Fig. 1 (Gao Mengtan 2002). A finer zoning would be more appropriate in order to reduce<br />

the difference between the two areas see Fig. 2 (Pun et al.2002). However "Drawing lines on maps, in<br />

social conduct, in religion, in law itself, has not proved one of humankind's greatest skills. Misery,<br />

expense and death are the usual outcomes," (Bill Mantle Canberra Times 15/8/98). It may be more<br />

pragmatic to adopt a single value for Hong Kong. In the authors opinion because of the many<br />

multiplying factors of this basic parameter it would be best to adopt a low value of say 0.8 for HK.<br />

Fig 1 (Gao Mengtan 2002)<br />

Illustration of seismic hazard in Hong Kong<br />

Fig 2 (Pun et al.2002)<br />

10% in 50-year pga bedrock contours<br />

2) Importance factor<br />

<strong>The</strong> Importance factor I can vary between 0.8 and 1.5. <strong>The</strong>re may be a case to use this factor to<br />

provide a higher level of protection to properties on Hong Kong Island as compared to the New<br />

Territories for economic reasons rather than to use variable pga or Z factors in HK.<br />

3) Dynamic factor<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dynamic factor C is a function of the structural period and the frequency characteristics of the<br />

earthquake. <strong>The</strong> latter are highly dependent on the soils at the site; soft sites tend to amplify longer<br />

period motions, while on rock sites most of the energy is at short periods. C is therefore a function of<br />

the soil characteristics at the site, as well as the period of the structure being considered. C varies<br />

similar to the structural response of the building discussed under the building period & structural<br />

response spectra section.


354<br />

4) Structural characteristics<br />

R is a factor to account for ductility of the structure and varies between 4 and 8.5 for high ductility<br />

buildings and as low as 1 for low ductility buildings.<br />

5; Weight of Building<br />

W is the seismic weight of the structure. Engineers use force rather than mass units and so when<br />

accelerations are used care needs to be taken with the units to ensure the results are not incorrect by a<br />

factor of g (9.81 m/sec 2 ). Codes use different percentages of live load to be included for the building<br />

weight, which leads to some confusion. Structural engineers would prefer clear guidelines as to the<br />

appropriate factor.<br />

Base Shear<br />

In Hong Kong for earthquake design when the above variability is considered the value of V could be<br />

anything between .0014W and .225 W (a factor of 160). Fortunately very few buildings would be<br />

designed for the low value since they would tend to be over 100 metres in height where the wind loads<br />

are likely to be the dominant lateral load. In the Australian / New Zealand draft seismic loading code it<br />

is recommended that all buildings should be designed for a minimum horizontal load of .01W<br />

Building period & structural response spectra<br />

It is important that structural engineers understand the importance of the building period and the<br />

spectrum response when carrying out the seismic design of building structures.<br />

One concern is the accuracy of calculating natural frequencies. A plot of fundamental frequency versus<br />

height for 163 rectangular plan buildings is shown in Fig 3 (Ellis, B.R. 1980). If the actual measured<br />

frequency is checked against the theoretically calculated frequency the spread of frequency is even less<br />

accurate (Ellis B. R. 1995).<br />

E.<br />

Fig 3. Plot of fundamental frequency V, height for 163<br />

rectangular plan buildings. ISO 4866 'Evaluation and<br />

measurement of vibration in buildings' Annex A -<br />

'Predicting natural frequencies and damping of<br />

buildings.'(Ellis 1995)<br />

7=<br />

»<br />

I<br />

T2.5-<br />

O.Z5 0.5 r 0<br />

Frequency<br />

2.0<br />

Most structures are analysed assumed the frame to be skeletal made up of beams, columns and shear<br />

walls. In measurements of real buildings so called non-structural elements can contribute significantly<br />

to the stiffness of the structure resulting in a wide scatter of results.<br />

A comparison of acceleration spectrum responses for different codes normalised to O.OSg for rock and<br />

soil is shown in Figs, 4 and 6. From fig. 3 the rule of thumb calculation for a building height of say 50


355<br />

metres is about 1 hertz yet measurements on real buildings varied between 0.5 hertz and 2 hertz. If this<br />

variability is used to determine the base shear from the acceleration spectrum response curves in fig. 6<br />

the results can vary between 0.05g and 0.3g. This order of variability in loads exceeds by far that<br />

normally encountered by structural engineers. Fig. 6 shows that there is considerable variability in the<br />

different spectrum response curves in terms of acceleration up to one second. When the displacement<br />

curves are considered in Fig. 7 it is the 3 to 6 second period range that appear to be more variable.<br />

HONG KONG SEISMIC CODE REQUIREMENTS<br />

Analysis, P-delta, time history etc.<br />

Techniques such as push over analysis and non-linear analysis help to identify hinge locations but as<br />

yet these tools rely heavily on the accuracy of the structural modeling and the correct choice of many<br />

variables. Generally the requirement in codes to use time history is not particularly well understood by<br />

practicing engineers and appears to be more of academic than practical value. A significant amount of<br />

judgment is needed and codified guidance is seldom provided to enable practitioners to apply time<br />

history analysis confidently. It may be better to avoid these complex analysis methods for routine<br />

projects in HK.<br />

P-delta, accidental eccentricities, allowable overall and inter-storey drifts and building separation<br />

required to avoid pounding of adjacent buildings will need to be clearly explained in the HK code to<br />

avoid ambiguity or incorrect application by practitioners.<br />

Detailing rules and Ductility<br />

In all the seismic codes confinement reinforcement of potential hinge points is required and one of the<br />

most significant decisions to be made during the schematic design stage is the choice of which specific<br />

detailing rules should be adopted. If options are permitted in the HK code for high, moderate or no<br />

special detailing then it is likely, for the majority of buildings, to be more economical to adopt the least<br />

stringent detailing rules. However it may be better to allow only low levels of ductility detailing for<br />

routine designs.<br />

Large quantities of reinforcement could be saved if nominal ductility reinforcement could be<br />

minimized by not requiring it at all beam column junctions. For instance is it necessary to have<br />

ductility detailing for columns where small beams frame into large columns High-rise structures may<br />

only require ductility detailing of columns for the lowest three stories or so (much like shear walls) and<br />

when the column size reduces or the reinforcement changes. Further high-rise buildings will be<br />

controlled by stiffness due to wind loads rather than by seismic considerations and so a blanket<br />

ductility-detailing requirement would be wasteful of steel reinforcement.<br />

Particular care needs to be taken for items such as transfer floors, soft stories and other locations where<br />

high ductility demand can be expected. Providing additional capacity or higher ductility levels at these<br />

locations may be more economical than increasing the design loads or ductility of the building as a<br />

whole.<br />

Redistribution of moments is allowed by codes. It is probable that where redistribution of moments has<br />

been adopted the clarity of the design will be compromised and the standard of confinement<br />

reinforcement needs to be increased due to an expected higher ductility demand. Redistribution of<br />

moments should be maintained hi codes for elements such as slabs and secondary beams in order to


356<br />

maintain economy of design but may need to be prohibited for frames designed to resist seismic loads.<br />

Ductility of heavily reinforced sections<br />

It is not unusual in Hong Kong for columns to have nearly 6% reinforcement and even to use staggered<br />

laps and couplers to comply with the maximum 10 % allowable by BS 8110. If plastic hinges are not<br />

expected it may be possible to continue to allow heavily reinforced concrete members.<br />

Avoidance of shear failure of vertical members<br />

<strong>The</strong> capacity design requirement to provide sufficient shear reinforcement at ends of beams to ensure<br />

that the longitudinal reinforcement yields before shear failure occurs is a straightforward concept for<br />

beams. It is not as straightforward for compression members or where the gravity loads determine the<br />

design of the beams. Recent experience from the 1999 Athens earthquake indicates that even<br />

seismically designed columns failed, in shear, at mid height rather than at the top or bottom of the<br />

column. This will need further consideration when defining the nominal detailing rules especially since<br />

in HK column cross sections frequently are large compared to their length..<br />

Development of HK Seismic Code<br />

<strong>The</strong> New Zealand (NZ) and Australian concrete codes closely follow the US code that uses strength<br />

reduction factors to reduce the ultimate design capacity, rather than material factors which are used in<br />

the Chinese, British and European standards. Since the US and NZ codes have been developed mainly<br />

for regions of high seismicity they may not be the most suited for development of a HK seismic code.<br />

One of the main difficulties in Hong Kong will be to extend the material design codes currently used,<br />

to allow seismic detailing. Neither the concrete code - BS 8110, nor the steel code - BS5950 has any<br />

guidance in this regard. Most countries separate the material design codes from the loading code. It<br />

will therefore, be a major decision as to what to do in Hong Kong where the material design codes<br />

have been adapted from British versions a number of years after their introduction in Britain. Even<br />

today HK uses the 1985 Version of the concrete design code even though the latest British version is<br />

1997. <strong>The</strong> British codes never had seismic design and in any case are being superseded by the Eurocodes<br />

so Hong Kong could follow the European seismic design code. However the Eurocode has<br />

tended to follow the rather complicated, yet pioneering seismic design codes developed in NZ,<br />

It is thus probable that using the Euro-code as a model to particularise for HK conditions will be the<br />

quickest way to produce a Hong Kong seismic code, however serious consideration should be given to<br />

adopting the Chinese code approach to seismic design. After all, HK is part of China and so it would<br />

be shortsighted to adopt a different system when first introducing a seismic code in HK. Whatever<br />

method is used, the main aim of the Hong Kong Seismic Code should be to keep it simple and make it<br />

easy to understand and use.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Before introducing a seismic code in HK, one of the challenges for educators will be to ensure that<br />

designers are confident in the determination of base shear and are familiar with the highly variable<br />

values derived. <strong>The</strong> key seismic code requirements for Hong Kong will be to provide clear guidance<br />

on the ductility factors and analysis methods to be adopted and that nominal detailing rules do not<br />

require high percentages of ductility reinforcement at all column beam joints.


357<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Booth E. D. A. J. Kappos & Park R. (1998) A Critical review of international practice on seismic<br />

design of reinforced concrete buildings. <strong>The</strong> Structural Engineer Vol. 76/No 11, June 1998<br />

Bubb Charles (1998) <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> in Australia - Before Mekering and after Newcastle,<br />

Australian <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Society Conference, Perth 1998 Bulletin of the New Zealand<br />

Society for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Vol. 32, No 1, March 1999<br />

Buildings Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (1994). Legislation and<br />

Publications Affecting the Building Industry PNAP 115 Practice Notes for Authorised Persons and<br />

Registered Structural Engineers<br />

Ellis, B. R. An assessment of the accuracy of predicting the fundamental natural frequencies of<br />

buildings and the implications concerning dynamic analysis of structures Proc. ICE, Pt2, Sept. 1980<br />

Ellis, B. RA feedback mechanism for improving analysis <strong>The</strong> Structural Engineer Vol. 73/No 21,<br />

November 1995<br />

Gao Mengtan New national seismic zoning map and seismic hazard in Hong Kong Region. One-day<br />

seminar on recent developments in <strong>Earthquake</strong> engineering. <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Institution of Engineers<br />

and the Institution of Structural Engineers Joint Division May 2002.<br />

Heidebrecht Arthur C. (1998) Comments on Seismic Design for Regions of Moderate Seismicity &<br />

Case History on Effect of Seismic Hazard Level on Performance of Six Storey Moment Resisting Steel<br />

Frame Structures. International Workshop on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> for Regions of Moderate<br />

Seismicity pp 51-77<br />

Hu Shipping (1993) Seismic Design of Buildings in China. <strong>Earthquake</strong> spectra Vol. 9 No 4 pp 703-737<br />

Nordensen Guy J.P. (1995). Built Value and <strong>Earthquake</strong> Risk. National Centre for <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, 167-174<br />

Pun W K. Pang P L R, Wong A C W Recent Developments on the Understanding of the Seismic<br />

Hazard of Hong Kong. One-day seminar on recent developments in <strong>Earthquake</strong> engineering. <strong>The</strong><br />

Hong Kong Institution of Engineers and the Institution of Structural Engineers Joint Division May<br />

2002.


358<br />

R<br />

C3&OC11 L8C34 USC3 •••<br />

Fig. 4 - Elastic RSAS Using Different Codes, PGA=0.08g, Rock Site<br />

2 3 4<br />

Natural Panod of Structures. (s.|<br />

Fig. 5 - Elastic RSDs Using Different Codes, PGA=0.08g, Rock Site


359<br />

d Ptatod af Structure (t\<br />

UBC37 • SurocadeS -<br />

Fig. 6 - Elastic RSAS Using Different Codes, PGA=0.08g, Soil Site<br />

Natural Penao of Structures fs)<br />

-GB-50011<br />

- IWC-SSC 3DCO<br />

Fig. 7 - Elastic RSDs Using Different Codes, PGA=0.08g, Soil Site


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN OF<br />

GRAVITY RETAINING WALL IN SEISMIC AREAS<br />

X. Zeng<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Case Western Reserve <strong>University</strong><br />

Cleveland, Ohio, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Failure of gravity retaining walls occurred many times in past earthquakes. Typical failure mechanism<br />

was either an overturn or a large lateral deformation beyond repair. Traditional design approaches based<br />

on conventional limit equilibrium-based methods would emphasize on adopting a factor of safety against<br />

such failure. <strong>The</strong> goal was to design a structure that can resist forces generated by a seismic event.<br />

However, the cost of satisfying such requirement can be very high, especially for high intensity<br />

earthquake of rare occurrence.<br />

Performance-based design is a new methodology that emerged in the 1990s. <strong>The</strong> objective of this method<br />

is to avoid the limitations of conventional seismic design method. In a performance-based design method,<br />

a gravity retaining wall would be allowed to have an acceptable level of deformation that depends on the<br />

function of the structure. <strong>The</strong> critical element in this design method is to calculate the displacement of a<br />

gravity wall under a design earthquake. This paper reviews the methods that have been developed for<br />

calculating lateral, rotational, and coupled displacement of gravity retaining walls. It also discusses the<br />

role of comprehensive numerical codes in a performance-based design when simple analytical methods<br />

cannot produce satisfactory results. An example is used to illustrate the application of a performancebased<br />

design method, which in general leads to a more economical design. However, in order to apply this<br />

approach in the field with confidence, the time history of the design earthquake needs to be known.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Many failures of gravity type of retaining walls have been reported in past earthquakes, for example,<br />

Tsuchida (1991) and Inagaki et al (1996). Most of the failures were caused by a large displacement of the<br />

structure in forms of lateral displacement, settlement, or rotation. For example, during the Kobe<br />

earthquake in 1995, caisson type quay walls at Port Island and Rokko Island had lateral displacement up<br />

to more than 5 meters, settlement up to more than 2 meters, and rotation of several degrees, Inagaki et al<br />

(1996). This kind of displacement was far above the acceptable level of damage allowed for this type of<br />

structure and was very expensive to repair.


362<br />

Traditionally, seismic resistant design of gravity retaining walls is based on a limit equilibrium-based<br />

approach, in which the dynamic forces induced by an earthquake are calculated. A factor of safety was<br />

then introduced to ensure that the retaining wall has sufficient resistance against the tendencies of sliding<br />

and rotating. However, in recent years this design philosophy went through a lot of debating and<br />

discussion because of its limitations. <strong>The</strong> main points of the discussion, as summarized by the<br />

International Navigation Association (2001), are: 1) in a typical design, deformations in ground and<br />

foundation soils and the corresponding structural deformation and stress states are key design parameters;<br />

2) conventional limit equilibrium-based methods are not well suited to evaluate these parameters; and 3)<br />

some residual deformation may be acceptable for the operation of most structures.<br />

To overcome these limitations, the concept of performance-based design was introduced (lai and Ichii,<br />

1998, Steedman, 1998). <strong>The</strong> main argument for this new design approach are: 1) if we demand that limit<br />

equilibrium not be exceeded in conventional design for the relatively high intensity ground motions<br />

associated with very rare seismic event, the construction/retrofitting cost will most likely be too high; and<br />

2) if force-balance design is based on a more frequent seismic event, then it is difficult to estimate the<br />

seismic performance of the structure when subjected to ground motions that are greater than those used in<br />

the design.<br />

Two of the most important steps in a performance-based design are to select the acceptable level of<br />

damage for the structure designed and to calculate the deformation of the structure under the design<br />

earthquake so as to check whether the deformation is acceptable. Some guidelines on how to choose the<br />

acceptable level of damage were proposed by the International Navigation Association (2001). Table 1.1<br />

is a summary of its recommendations.<br />

TABLE 1.1<br />

ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF DAMAGE IN PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN<br />

Structural<br />

Minor or no damage<br />

Controlled damage<br />

Extensive damage in near<br />

collapse<br />

Complete loss of structure<br />

Level of damage<br />

Degree I: Serviceable<br />

Degree II: Repairable<br />

Degree El: Near collapse<br />

Degree IV: Collapse<br />

Operational<br />

Little or no loss of serviceability<br />

Short-term loss of serviceability<br />

Long-term or complete loss of<br />

serviceability<br />

Complete loss of serviceability<br />

Of course, for most structures, the purposes of performance-based design is to limit the level of damage to<br />

degree I or maybe degree U in some exceptional cases. <strong>The</strong> acceptable level of damage depends on the<br />

importance and the function of the structure. Once that is determined, the next step is to choose the design<br />

earthquake. <strong>The</strong>n, the critical part of the design is to analyze the performance of the structure being<br />

designed during the chosen design earthquake. For a gravity retaining wall, the performance is measured<br />

by the displacement of the wall under the design seismic loading.


363<br />

DISPLACEMENT CALCULATION FOR GRAVITY RETAINING WALL UNDER<br />

EARTHQUAKE LOADING<br />

Sliding Displacement<br />

Traditionally, sliding displacement of a gravity retaining wall is calculated using Newmark's (1965)<br />

sliding block method. Using the concept of a yield or threshold acceleration, relative displacement<br />

between a rigid wall and the ground beneath will accumulate from the instant the ground acceleration<br />

exceeds the threshold until the block and the ground have the same velocity again. For design purpose,<br />

Franklin and Chang (1977) analyzed a number of historic earthquake records to develop "standardized"<br />

sliding displacements as a function of the ratio of threshold to peak acceleration.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sliding block approach was modified and extended by Richards and Elms (1979) for the design of<br />

gravity retaining walls. A design envelope based on Franklin and Chang's standardized displacements<br />

was proposed to estimate the displacement of gravity walls, defined by<br />

where<br />

V 2<br />

d = 0.087—(N/A)" 4 (2.1)<br />

A<br />

d - displacement of a gravity wall in inches<br />

V = peak velocity of the design earthquake in inch/sec<br />

N = threshold acceleration for sliding in in/sec 2 , and<br />

A = peak lateral ground acceleration in in/sec 2<br />

Rotational Displacement<br />

For a gravity retaining wall, the displacement can also be caused by the rotation of the wall. A rotating<br />

block method was introduced by Zeng and Steedman (2000) to calculate such displacement. Similar to<br />

sliding block method, when the threshold acceleration for rotating is exceeded, a wall will start to rotate.<br />

Rotational displacement will accumulate until the angular velocity of rotation is dropped to zero. <strong>The</strong><br />

important influential parameters on the angle of rotation are: peak acceleration, number of significant<br />

cycles, and the frequency of base motion. This approach was developed further to calculate coupled<br />

rotating and sliding displacement.<br />

Gravity Retaining Wall with Saturated Backfill<br />

Both the sliding and rotating block methods are used mainly for retaining walls with dry backfill. If the<br />

soil around the wall is saturated such as in the case of a quay wall, the calculation become too complex<br />

for these analyses to be used. Firstly, there are hydrodynamic pressures on both sides of the wall. <strong>The</strong><br />

calculation of hydrodynamic pressure on the seaside is quite straightforward for a rigid wall by using the<br />

Westergaard's (1933) theory. However, the calculation of hydrodynamic pressure on the backfill side is


364<br />

complex as it depends on the soil-water-wall interaction. Secondly, excess pore pressure will build up m<br />

saturated soil. It is difficult to estimate excess pore pressure using simple calculation and hence it is not<br />

possible to use simple design calculation to determine the threshold acceleration or the resulting<br />

displacement. <strong>The</strong>refore, small-scale model simulation or comprehensive numerical codes need to be<br />

used.<br />

Physical Modeling<br />

Since earthquakes in the field are unpredictable, it is difficult to record seismic response of gravity walls<br />

during earthquakes in the field. In most cases, what geotechnical engineers have are the pre-earthquake<br />

information and data collected during post-earthquake investigations. <strong>The</strong> most crucial information i.e.<br />

the response of the structure during earthquakes such as the amplification of vibration, excess pore<br />

pressure, and dynamic soil-structure interaction is generally not available. In order to calibrate or verify<br />

analytical procedures or numerical simulation, realistic physical data are needed.<br />

In the absence of field data recorded in earthquakes, data generated by physical model tests such as shake<br />

table tests and centrifuge tests become very valuable. In recent years, significant progress has been made<br />

in physical modeling technique in geotechnical earthquake engineering as reported in the 2001 NSF<br />

International Workshop on <strong>Earthquake</strong> Simulation in Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong> (Zeng, 2002). Shake table<br />

tests conduct at Ig have been used to study seismic response of gravity quay walls by Inagaki et al (1996)<br />

after the Kobe earthquake. While the interpretation of data from Ig shake table test is complicated by the<br />

scaling law issues, centrifuge modeling has the ability to create the same stress and strain condition as<br />

expected in the field. Since most mechanical properties of soils are stress dependent, centrifuge modeling<br />

has the advantage of satisfying most of the scaling laws. In the 1990s, a group of centrifuge tests of<br />

gravity retaining walls were conducted by Zeng (1998) for the VELACS project. <strong>The</strong> result of one model<br />

test is shown in Fig. 2.1.<br />

-•<br />

water<br />

'<br />

I<br />

!<br />

" -i*<br />

l°s L 44<br />

:,<br />

5<br />

1<br />

40 \<br />

* :~"<br />

i<br />

!<br />

i\ • :i<br />

1- 96 ^|<br />

water saturated backfill<br />

Us<br />

~ initial boundary<br />

" boundary after EQl<br />

Fig, 2.1 Cross-sectional view of a gravity wall model after earthquake test (unit:m)


365<br />

As shown in the figure, a model test can simulate the type of deformation observed in the field such as<br />

sliding, rotation, and settlement. In addition, during a centrifuge test, the transducers used (such as<br />

accelerometers, pore pressure transducers, and LVDTs) can record in detail the dynamic response of the<br />

soil and the wall, excess pore pressure generation in soil, and deformation process of the structure. Such<br />

information is very helpful in the study of mechanism of response, in validating design calculations, and<br />

in calibrating or verifying numerical analysis.<br />

Numerical Modeling<br />

For complex design situations such as a gravity wall with saturated backfill, comprehensive numerical<br />

codes need to be used. In recent years, considerable progress has been made and several effective-stressbased-fully-coupled<br />

programs have been developed. One of the challenges numerical simulation is facing<br />

is how to verify the results of a numerical simulation. In the regards, physical modeling especially<br />

centrifuge modeling has an important role to play. For example, as part of the VELACS project, the<br />

response of the gravity wall shown in Fig. 2.1 during an earthquake was simulated using a computer<br />

program SWANDYNE (Chang, 1989). <strong>The</strong> results are shown in Fig. 2.2 (Madabhushi and Zeng, 1998)<br />

Fig, 2.2 Deformed finite element mesh after earthquake (unit: m)<br />

<strong>The</strong> deformation simulated by the finite element program is similar to that recorded in the centrifuge test.<br />

Thus, the code can be considered to have the ability to analyze complicated deformation of a gravity wall<br />

with saturated backfill under earthquake loading.


366<br />

AN EXAMPLE<br />

With the ability of calculating the displacement of a gravity retaining wall developed, the concept of<br />

performance-based design can be applied straightforwardly in the field. As an example, suppose we need<br />

to design a gravity retaining wall shown in Fig. 3.1 a) with the following parameters: friction angle of<br />

backfill


367<br />

history of a design earthquake is a modified version of a previous earthquake at the same site or a record<br />

of earthquake from a place with similar geological conditions. As an earthquake in the field never repeat<br />

itself even at the same site, wise engineenng judgment is needed in choosing such an design earthquake.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> recently emerged design approach of performance-based design can be applied to seismic resistant<br />

design of gravity type retaining walls. From the discussions and the example presented in this paper, the<br />

following conclusions can be made:<br />

1) Performance-based design emphasizes on limiting deformation of the structure rather than<br />

avoiding displacement completely as in the traditional limit-equilibrium type of design<br />

approach.<br />

2) <strong>The</strong> most crucial step in the performance-based design of gravity retaining wall in seismic area<br />

is to develop reliable procedures that can calculate sliding, rotating or coupled sliding and<br />

rotating displacements. Traditional sliding block method, rotating block method, or<br />

comprehensive numerical procedures can be used. Physical modeling techniques also have an<br />

important role.<br />

3) From the example presented in the paper, it seems that a performance-based design can lead to<br />

a more economical solution. However, the accurate application of such design concept requires<br />

the complete time history of the design earthquake be known, which can be difficult to obtain<br />

and at the same time bring in some uncertainties.<br />

References<br />

Chang, A.H.C. (1989). User manual for DIANA SWANDYNE-H, Dept. of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong><br />

of Glasgow, Glasgow, U.K.<br />

Franklin, A.G. and Chang, F.K. (1977). Permanent displacements of earth embankments by Newmark<br />

sliding block analysis, Report 5, Miscellaneous Paper S-71-27, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterway<br />

Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.<br />

lai, S. and Ichii, K. (1998). Performance based design for port structures, Proceedings of UJNR 30 th Joint<br />

Meeting of United States-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, Gaithersburg, NIST (3-5), 1-13.<br />

Inagaki, H., lai, S., Sugano, T., Yamazaki, H. and Inatomi, T. (1996). Performance of caisson type quay<br />

walls at Kobe port. Soils and Foundations, January, 119-136.<br />

International Navigation Association (2001). Seismic design guidelines for port structures, A.A. Balkema<br />

Publishers, Netherlands.<br />

Madabhushi, S.P.G. and Zeng, X. (1998). Seismic response of gravity quay walls. II: numerical modeling,<br />

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, ASCE, 124:5,418-427.


368<br />

Newmark, K.M. (1965). Effect of earthquakes on dams and embankments, Geotechnique, London, U.K.<br />

15:2,139-160.<br />

Richards, Jr., R. and Elms, D.G. (1979). Seismic behavior of gravity retaining walls, Journal of<br />

Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong>, ASCE, 105:4, 449-469.<br />

Steedman, R.S. (1998). Seismic design of retaining walls, Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong>, Proceedings of<br />

Institution of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, 131, 12-22.<br />

Tsuchida, H. (1991). Disasters caused by earthquakes in costal areas and countermeasures. Proceedings of<br />

the International Conference on Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong> for Costal Development, Volume 2, 918-926,<br />

Yokohama, Japan.<br />

Westergaard, H.M. (1933), Water pressure on dams during earthquakes, Transactions of ASCE 95, 418-<br />

472.<br />

Zeng, X. (1998). Seismic response of gravity quay walls. I: centrifuge modeling, Journal of Geotechnical<br />

and Geoenvironmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, ASCE, 124:5, 406-417.<br />

Zeng, X. and Steedman, R.S. (2000). Rotating block method for seismic displacement of gravity walls,<br />

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, ASCE, 126:8, 709-717.<br />

Zeng, X, (editor) (2002). Proceedings of NSF International Workshop on <strong>Earthquake</strong> Simulation in<br />

Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong>, Dept. of Civil Engineenng, Case Western Reserve <strong>University</strong>, Cleveland,<br />

Ohio, USA, http://ecivwww.cwru.edu/civil/xxzl6/proceeding/index.htm.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

AN OPTIMIZATION PERFORMANCE-BASED<br />

EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN<br />

Zou Yin-sheng and Tu Wen-ge<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Hunan <strong>University</strong>, Changsha, China, 410082<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In this paper, an optimization procedure of design based on performance is presented. <strong>The</strong><br />

performance-based design should consider two types of target performance levels: "generality" and<br />

"individuality". <strong>The</strong> latter is put sufficiently emphases upon to satisfy clients' demands for<br />

earthquake-resistant performances of structures in large earthquake.<br />

In order to satisfy "individual" performance levels, the investigation includes steps as followed: 1)<br />

determine target performance levels based on clients 1 various and particular demands, by means of<br />

Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory, 2) develop detailed criteria for the performance-based design of specific structure<br />

types and performance levels. <strong>The</strong> framework is demonstrated with a simple example involving a<br />

six-story RC frame.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In recent years, the performance-based design of earthquake-resistant structures is emphasized and<br />

popularized. Based on the code for seismic design, the structural performance in inelastic range is paid<br />

greater attention to satisfied economic and social, and even clients' demands for structures in the large<br />

earthquake. Performance-based design results from and extends the traditional earthquake-resistant<br />

design, which inherits characteristics of traditional design and has some characteristics that the<br />

traditional design have not.<br />

To emphasize the structural performance in inelastic range is to satisfy clients* particular demands for a<br />

structure. It is important that the performance design criteria, which engineers determine, must be hi<br />

agreement with economic and social, as well as clients' demands for a structure subjected to large


370<br />

earthquake loads. In the first stage of performance-based design, it is a key step to clarify and simplify<br />

the target performance objectives from the views of protecting "human life", "properties contents" and<br />

"structure function", etc. <strong>The</strong>se demands are generally described by language, need to be transformed<br />

into target performance objectives which structural engineers are familiar with. In the transformation<br />

step, Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory is an effective and available tool.<br />

In this paper, the characteristics of performance-based design are described. Because of clients' various<br />

and particular demands, "individual" performance levels is determined by means of Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, detailed criteria for the performance-based design of specific structure types and performance<br />

levels are developed.<br />

GENERALITY AKD INDIVIDUALITY<br />

Performance-based earthquake-resistant design, which is the modern approach, makes an attempt to<br />

predict structures with desired earthquake-resistant performances that are not only in agreement with<br />

economic and social demands, but also satisfy particular ones from "building users" and "building<br />

owners". <strong>The</strong>refore, there should be two types of target performance levels, which reflect the<br />

"generality" and "individuality" of the design, respectively.<br />

"Generality" roots in the codes for earthquake-resistant design, and is described by means of a series<br />

of design parameters, empirical code formulations, limit states, and some disciplines required. Its<br />

objectives such as life safety and collapse prevention, both of which are hi agreement with the<br />

economic and social demands, are used to define the state of every structure subjected to earthquake<br />

load. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is a target performance level that every earthquake-resistant structure must be<br />

equipped with. In a word, "generality" is the compulsory performance level that every<br />

earthquake-resistant structure must satisfy.<br />

For "generality", to protect human life safety is the most important, and primary target performance<br />

objective, which promises to produce every structure with desired mere earthquake-resistant<br />

performance that is described by designating the maximum allowable damage state for an identified<br />

seismic hazard. Hence, "generality" is the minimum performance level that every earthquake-resistant<br />

structure must satisfy.<br />

"Individuality" is a unique target performance level of an actual earthquake-resistant structure, which<br />

promise a structure to satisfy some particular demands from "building users" and "building owners",<br />

except for "generality". To emphasize "individuality" in earthquake-resistant design is to consider<br />

particular demands for a structure. <strong>The</strong>refore, a performance objective may be chosen in according<br />

with damage states for several levels of seismic hazard, to assure not only "safety of human life",<br />

"prevention of structure collapse', but also "preservation of property" and "maintenance of structure<br />

function". <strong>The</strong>n, a dual or multiple-level performance objective would be adopted. It is clear that<br />

"individuality" extend target performance level based on "generality", and is enhanced performance.<br />

For an earthquake-resistant structure designed with performance-based design method, "individuality"


371<br />

reflects the structure's usefulness, and particular demands for "building users"' and "building owners";<br />

"generality" reflects universal and compulsory demands for the society. It is clear that if "generality" is<br />

not satisfied, "individuality" will be not accepted.<br />

FUZZY PERFORMANCE CRITERIA<br />

In performance-based design method, "individuality" is paid more attention to. "Individuality" results<br />

from various aspects of earthquake-resistant performances demands from "building users" and<br />

"building owners". In accordance with clients' demands, engineers must determine design<br />

earthquake-resistant performances of each particular structure, and then establish technical design<br />

criteria and the design values corresponding to each performance level, as well as required structural<br />

strength levels to satisfy the technical design targets. It is necessary to clarify and identify what level<br />

of performance is required to meet each objective in the design stage.<br />

Classify clients' demands<br />

<strong>The</strong> ground motion uncertainty can be described by seismic hazard analysis. Consequently, to assure<br />

structural target performance levels, each design criteria must be determined in according with clients'<br />

demands for performances either in small earthquake (frequent occurrence), or in intermediate<br />

earthquake, or in large earthquake (infrequent occurrence). <strong>The</strong>n, to classify clients' demands will help<br />

us to make assessment to these demands.<br />

For each identified probability of earthquake occurrence, the following aspects need to be known from<br />

"building users" and "building owners":<br />

(1) Severity of hazard to human life (safety of human life)<br />

Select one of the following levels of injury: 1) no injury, 2) slight injury, 3) injury of fracture, 4)<br />

serious injury, and 5) death; which should be the minimum performance that the structure should<br />

provide.<br />

(2) Extent of loss of property value<br />

Select one of the following levels of loss: 1) no loss, 2) small loss, 3) middle loss, 4) large loss, and 5)<br />

almost total loss can not be avoided; which is the state in which the property value in structure is<br />

deemed to be preserved.<br />

(3) Required function of structure<br />

Select one of the following levels of function: 1) keep overall function, 2) keep main function and<br />

nonstructural damage can not be avoided, 3) keep essential function and partial repair is necessary, 4)<br />

keep limited function and can be used after repair, and 5) guarantee for life safety and it is necessary to


372<br />

rebuild; which is the state in which the structure is deemed as being preserved.<br />

As for "building users", generally speaking, both the "severity for hazard to human life" and the "loss<br />

in value of property" are given more attention than the other items, in which "no injure" and "slight<br />

injure", "no loss" and "small loss" are deemed as acceptable performances.<br />

As for "building owners", both the "severity of hazard to human life" and the "loss in value of<br />

property" are emphasized, as well as the "required function of the structure", in which "keep limited<br />

function and can be used after repair" and items under it is taken of as acceptable performances, is also<br />

paid greater attention to than "building users"<br />

Structural damage levels<br />

Structural engineers are familiar with structure damage levels, which are distinctly defined in codes for<br />

earthquake-resistant design in lots of countries. <strong>The</strong> structure damage levels are defined as followed:<br />

Select one of the following levels of damage: 1) no damage 2) slight damage, 3) small scale damage, 4)<br />

middle scale damage, and 5) serious damage and no guarantee for life safety, which is the damage<br />

state.<br />

In the level of serious damage, serious damages in structural members are not able to avoided, and<br />

partial collapse is probable to occur. Consequently, the hazardous damage to human life must be<br />

avoided.<br />

As for structural engineers, clients' demands about structural performance in complex range have to be<br />

clarified and simplified into key definitions and procedures of performance-based design, according to<br />

the principles in design Code, and then detailed criteria for the performance-based design of specific<br />

structural types and performance levels need to be defined. Clarifying and simplifying clients'<br />

demands, and then identifying design criteria are carried out by means of Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory.<br />

Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

<strong>The</strong> Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory, which was first introduced by Lotfi A. Zadeh in 1965, is considered as a means<br />

for quantifying the ambiguity and including it in an understandable logic. <strong>The</strong> most innovating aspect<br />

is the fuzzy reasoning hi which both variables and the relations between them are considered as fuzzy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory can be considered as a complement to the theory of probabilities. <strong>The</strong>re are, in<br />

fact two sources of uncertainties: randomness and fuzziness. <strong>The</strong> latter describes the vagueness,<br />

imprecision or ambiguity of the information. <strong>The</strong>y are fundamentally different: a random or<br />

probabilistic phenomenon becomes certain after an event occur, whereas the ambiguity in the<br />

definition of a concept persists and is toe-insensitive, hi general, the imprecise or fuzzy information<br />

is replaced for which the membership is a binary notion (Le. yes/no or 0/1), by fuzzy sets, or for which<br />

the transition from membership to non-membership is smooth and not abrupt (i.e. sets whose elements


373<br />

have a membership degree between 0 and 1).<br />

A fuzzy set A of a universe X is characterized by a membership function ju 4 (x) which affects to<br />

each element x of Xa real number of the interval [0, I],ju 4 : X -> [0,1] It is usually represented as:<br />

A = & A (x)/x\x€X} (1)<br />

Where ju±(x) is the membership degree of* to A: the closest is this value to unity, the highest is the<br />

membership of x to A. <strong>The</strong> symbol "/" is used as a separator between the element x and its membership<br />

degree<br />

JJ. A (x) .If A is a. crisp set, this function can take only one of the two values 0 or 1 whether x<br />

belongs to A or not. <strong>The</strong> construction of the membership function of a parameter requires statistical<br />

data or the opinion of an expert who gives an estimation of the interval where the parameter can vary<br />

as well as its most likely value.<br />

<strong>The</strong> survey in both "building users" and "building owners" is carried out to know their demands. In the<br />

survey, informants are requested to answer to "hazard to human life", "loss of property value" and<br />

"required function of structure" according to various probabilities of earthquake occurrence. Its results<br />

are shown with the form of membership functions of fuzzy theory for damage level expressed by<br />

language. <strong>The</strong> derivation of the membership functions uses the number of the relevant option selected<br />

divided by the total number (ratio of each option selected). <strong>The</strong> evaluation points are evaluated as this<br />

membership value. <strong>The</strong> fuzzy set H is used to expressed severity degree of hazard to human life,<br />

whose membership function is defined as:<br />

(2)<br />

Based on the same method, the fuzzy set, L and F, about "loss of property value" and "required<br />

function of structure" can also be obtained.<br />

"Hazard to human life", "loss of property value" and "required function of structure" due to structural<br />

damage should not be independently and individually evaluated, but should be properly correlated.<br />

Hence, the damage levels corresponding to items studied about clients' demands are expressed by<br />

means of fuzzy reasoning method.<br />

In view of engineering, economic and social evaluation for earthquake resistant safety of structures,<br />

stressed degrees of three aspects about clients' demands are different. In this paper, the Cfc weight" of<br />

each aspect is used to measure its stressed degree. <strong>The</strong> sum of "weight" values is equal to 1.<br />

<strong>The</strong> studies about all information collected are carried out for using fuzzy reasoning method. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

results are input into the three fuzzy relationships, the membership functions of the structural damage,


374<br />

D, can be obtained by evaluating each aspect using the following equation.<br />

D = (3)<br />

Where w(#), w(Z), and w(F) is the "weight" of fuzzy set "H", "I", and "P, respectively.<br />

Hence, <strong>The</strong> membership functions for comprehensive structural damage can be obtained by using the<br />

fuzzy reasoning method based on the membership functions of fuzzy sets about three aspects. Based<br />

on the membership functions, result can be simplified by applying the fuzzy maximizing decision<br />

[Bellman and Zadeh, 1970]. <strong>The</strong> structural damage levels in the ground motion hazard level, whose<br />

earthquake probability of occupancy 20% in 50 years and whose mean return period is 225 years, is<br />

demonstrated with Table 1, whose result is "slight injure".<br />

Table 1: Clients' demands transformation into damage leveis (performance levels) by Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

—^—-^<br />

Hazard to human<br />

life<br />

Loss of property<br />

value<br />

Required function<br />

Damage levels<br />

Weight<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.3<br />

No injure<br />

0.634<br />

No loss<br />

0.334<br />

Keep overall<br />

function<br />

0.301<br />

No damage<br />

0.4441<br />

Fuzzy membership<br />

Slight injure<br />

Injure of<br />

fracture<br />

Serious injure<br />

0.366<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Small loss<br />

0.613<br />

Keep main<br />

function<br />

0.585<br />

Slight<br />

damage<br />

0.5058<br />

Middle loss<br />

0.053<br />

Keep<br />

essential<br />

function<br />

0.114<br />

Small scale<br />

damage<br />

0.0501<br />

Large loss<br />

0<br />

Keep limited<br />

function<br />

0<br />

Middle scale<br />

damage<br />

0<br />

Death<br />

0<br />

Almost total<br />

loss<br />

0<br />

Guarantee for<br />

life safety<br />

0<br />

Serious<br />

damage<br />

0<br />

DETAILED DESIGN<br />

Clients lay stress on the performance of a structure in large earthquake. Moreover, structural engineers<br />

the capacity of a structure in inelastic range. In order to assure structural earthquake-resistant<br />

performance, the distribution of strength through a building is more important than the absolute value<br />

of the design base shear. A frame building would perform better under seismic attack, if it could be<br />

assured weak beam / strong column mechanism, that is, plastic hinges would occur in beams rather<br />

than in columns, or if the shear strength of members exceeded the shear corresponding to flexural<br />

strength. This can be identified as structural performance levels based on multiple design criteria,<br />

where the overall performance of the building is satisfied. Nevertheless, there are some factors that<br />

have a hold on the performance, for example the uncertainties of dynamic environment, uncertainties


375<br />

of initialization of structure, modeling uncertainties and so on.<br />

Based on different performance levels according to probability model of earthquake occurrence, the<br />

position of plastic hinges and the sequence of hinge formation are determined. One or some structural<br />

members come to be inelastic to dissipate seismic energy, which should be provided with sufficient<br />

ductility and not occur to spalling damage to resist large infrequent earthquakes. In the other hand,<br />

performance-protected members and others that are inappropriate for dissipation of energy should be<br />

always maintained in elastic response range. Consequently, the action on the columns and beams after<br />

yielding should be paid enough attention to.<br />

EXMAPLE<br />

Model building<br />

Function: Teaching building<br />

Construction site: Design characteristic period of ground motion: 0.40 second.<br />

Building type: Reinforced concrete frame (See Fig 1)<br />

Number of stories: 4 and 6 stories Story height: 3.0m (all stories)<br />

Number of spans: 3 spans Length between spans: 6.0m<br />

<strong>The</strong> cross-section of columns:<br />

450 x 500mm (side column at l~3 rd floor)<br />

500 x 500mm (middle column at l~3 rd floor)<br />

500 x 550mm (side column at 4-6* floor)<br />

550x 550mm (middle column at 4~6th floor)<br />

<strong>The</strong> grade of concrete: C35<br />

<strong>The</strong> cross-section of beams:<br />

Fig 1: Structure mode!<br />

I l l<br />

Fig 2: Plastic hinges formation<br />

Ex. A: 250x 600mm,<br />

Ex. B: 300x 500mm,<br />

Ex. C: 250x600mm(side beams) and 250x500mm(middle beams)<br />

Ex. D: 250x600mm(side beams) and 250x550mm(middle beams)<br />

<strong>The</strong> grade of concrete: C25.<br />

Performance objectives: Slight damage (earthquake probability of occupancy for the 20% in 50 years)<br />

Middle scale damage (the 10% in 50 years)<br />

Performance requirement:<br />

Beam / Column moment: flexural cracks to remain small and no significant spalling should occur<br />

Beam / Column shear: shear failure dose not occur and shear cracks are minor<br />

Mechanism: weak beams / strong column mechanism<br />

Analysis method: the static nonlinear analysis procedure using secant stiffness<br />

Analysis result<br />

Ex. A, B, C, and D is calculated and analyzed, whose position of plastic hinges is shown by Figure.2.


376<br />

Ab are shown by Figure 3-6, their capacity spectra are given, respectively In Table 2, their<br />

performance points and maximum value of base shear force and top floor displacement are given It is<br />

clear that Ex D is an optimum design, comparing with Ex A, B, and C<br />

SpcctraE DispPacemenf Spectral Displacement *"<br />

Fig 3 Capacity spectrum of Ex. A<br />

"~ "* SpeciraE Displacement<br />

Fig 4 Capacity spectrum of Ex B<br />

'Speclral Displacement " "<br />

"* w ~'<br />

Fig 5 Capacity spectrum of Ex. C<br />

Fig 6 Capacity spectrum of Ex. D<br />

Table 2 Performance points of examples<br />

~~ — "—--—,<br />

(V,D)<br />

(kN m)<br />

(Sa, Sd)<br />

(Vmax, Dmax)<br />

(kN m)<br />

Ex A<br />

(2177415 0283)<br />

(0170 0218)<br />

(2668 8237, 0 3779)<br />

Ex B<br />

(1935827,0322)<br />

(0155 0245)<br />

(22502539,04061)<br />

Ex C<br />

(2073727,0301)<br />

(0164 0230)<br />

(2696 4783, 0 4423)<br />

Ex D<br />

(2131635,0293)<br />

(0 168 0224)<br />

(2872 9229,0 4522)<br />

SUMMARY<br />

In this paper, the Ghent's performance demands for an earthquake-resistant structure in earthquake by<br />

language are clarified and simplified into damage levels (i e performance levels) by Fuzzy Set <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

Based on these damage levels (or performance levels), the structural quality in large earthquake load is<br />

inspected and modiiy if it is not satisfied, which assure that both clients' demands and economic and<br />

social ones for a structure in large earthquake load is satisfied


377<br />

REFERENCE<br />

Zadeh, L A (1965), "Fuzzy Sets", Information and Control, 8, pp 338-353<br />

Bellman, R E and Zadeh, L A (1970), "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment" Management<br />

Sciences, Vol 17, No 4, B-141-B-164<br />

T Pauiay and M J N Priestley (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings,<br />

John Wiley & Sons Inc<br />

Mehdl Salidl (1981) "Simple Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of R/C Structures<br />

ASCE Vcl 107, No ST5, pp937-953<br />

Journal of Structures


STRUCTURAL CONTROL


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

ADAPTIVE COLONY SYSTEM FOR STABILITY ANALYSIS<br />

OF SLOPES IN EARTHQUAKE ZONE<br />

Chang-Fu Chen 1 ' 2 and Xiao-Nan Gong 2<br />

1 Institute of Geotechnical, <strong>The</strong> Hunan <strong>University</strong>,<br />

Changsha, China<br />

2 Institute of Geotechnical, <strong>The</strong> Zhejiang <strong>University</strong>,<br />

Hongzhou, China<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> is an important factor that induces the movements and failure of slopes. <strong>The</strong> stability of<br />

slopes in earthquake zone has received wide attention due to its practical importance. In this paper, the<br />

structure of ant colony system and the transfer probability of ants are modified to analyze the stability<br />

problem of complicated slopes. A new adaptive ant colony system (AACS) is proposed to determine<br />

critical slip surface and it is used to assess the influence of earthquake on the stability of slopes in<br />

earthquake zone. Two examples are presented to verify the proposed approach.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Movements and failure of cuts and natural slopes constitute an important geotechnical problem<br />

(Leroueil, 2001). According to Schuster(1996), the economic losses associated with slope movements<br />

reach about US$4.5 billion per year in Japan, US$2.6 billion per year in Italy, on the order of US$2<br />

billion in the United States, and US$1.5 billion in India. China is probably the country that suffers the<br />

most from fatalities due to landslides. <strong>The</strong> number of landslide-related fatalities exceeds 100 per year<br />

(Li, 1989). <strong>Earthquake</strong> is an important factor that induces movements and failure of slopes. For<br />

example, the Haiyuan landslides in 1920 in China killed 100000 (possibly 200000) people. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

the stability of slopes in earthquake zone has received wide attention due to its practical importance.<br />

Generally, limit equilibrium techniques (bishop, 1955; Morgenstern and Price, 1965; Spencer, 1967;<br />

Janbu, 1973; Sarma, 1979; Hoek, 1987) are commonly used to assess the stability of the slopes, as<br />

complex geological subsoil profiles, seepage, and external loads can be easily dealt with. <strong>The</strong> key<br />

problem in stability analysis of slopes is how to accurately determine the critical slip surface giving the<br />

minimum factor of safety F±. Many approaches have been developed to automate the search for the<br />

critical slip surface. <strong>The</strong> traditional mathematical optimization methods that have used include<br />

dynamic programming (Baker, 1980), conjugate-gradient (Arai and Togyo, 1985), random search<br />

(Siegel et al., 1981; Chen, 1992; Greco, 1996), and simplex optimization (Nguyen, 1985). <strong>The</strong> main


382<br />

shortcoming of these optimization techniques is the uncertainty as to the robustness of the algorithms<br />

to locate the global minimum factor of safety rather than the local minimum factor of safety for<br />

complicated and nonhomogeneous geological subsoil conditions (Goh, 1999). For this reason, Goh<br />

(1999) has presented a genetic-based evolution technique to search for the critical slip surface of slope.<br />

In this paper, an adaptive ant colony system is proposed to determine critical slip surface. It is used to<br />

assess the influence of earthquake on the stability of slopes in earthquake zone. Ant colony system,<br />

which is developed by imitating the colony behavior of ant colony, is mostly used to solve<br />

combination optimization problems at present. For solving the complicated slope-stability problem, its<br />

structure and the transfer probability of ant are ingeniously modified. Two examples are presented to<br />

verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.<br />

ADAPTIVE ANT COLONY SYSTEM FOR SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS<br />

Recently, ant colony system (ACS; Dorigo et al, 1996) is often applied to solve the combination<br />

optimization problems, especially the traveling salesman problem (TSP; Dorigo and Gambardella,<br />

1997). For ACS being fit for solving the problem of slope stability, the ant colony system's structure<br />

and the computation method of the transfer probability of ant must be modified. For this purpose, a<br />

slope is discrete by the separating lines and nodes shown in Figure 1 (Chen and Xie, 2002). An ant<br />

starts from the point START, and then passes the nodes on the separating line one by one up to the<br />

point END. Thus, a circulation is finished and a slip surface formed.<br />

START ,<br />

i<br />

//'<br />

V<br />

A<br />

\'<br />

\<br />

ṛ<br />

'•><br />

\<br />

-+1<br />

!w;\<br />

(r+<br />

^<br />

N&^<br />

^- exit<br />

END<br />

* A<br />

"""/I<br />

/ /r-<br />

Km<br />

M tt JLfl<br />

r<br />

Figure 1 Search technique of critical slip surface of slope<br />

It is noticed that the dotted lines in Figure 1 are only used to guide the ants to search for slip surfaces<br />

and they are not considered in the computation of the slope safety factor.<br />

Suppose that (r, /) represents the fth node on the rth separating line; (r+1, y) represents theyth node on<br />

the (rfl)th separating line; [(r, i), (r+l,y)] represents the route from (r, i) to (r+1,;) and the number of<br />

ants in ant colony is m. During the movement of ants, ant k (fc=l, 2, —, m) decides its transfer direction<br />

according<br />

to the pheromone quantity on the routes. At moment r, the probability P^r0(r+l;) (0 of ant k<br />

transferring from (r, i) to (r+1,7) can be expressed as


.0,(r+l,,)] (0 + A (3)<br />

383<br />

-l.y)] ( f ) J<br />

(1)<br />

7=1,2, •<br />

where t [(rtl)t(r + ljn (t) is the intensity of the remained pheromone on the route [(r, /), (r-f l,y)] at moment<br />

r. At initial moment, the intensity of the pheromone on each route is equal, that is r [ (r , /), (r+i,;)] (0)=C (C<br />

is a constant). 7] [(/v)((rl . lt;)] (0 is the visibility of the pheromone on the route [(r, z), (r+lj)] at moment t.<br />

Here, we have<br />

(2)<br />

•l-s)<br />

where M r+ i is the number of nodes on the separating line (r+1). a and / respectively represent the<br />

index of the relative importance level of the intensity and the visibility of pheromone on the route of<br />

the ant choosing (a>0, /3>0).<br />

With time going on, the intensity of the remained pheromone on the routes ants have passed will<br />

gradually abate. Parameter p (0


384<br />

(Janbu, 1973 )<br />

4 1 Y 1 \ C L cosa ' +^ ~ U J> cosc U tan( P ( 1<br />

4<br />

~ TX tana - 1 cos2a ,( 1 + tan( P, tana/F/) J<br />

where W, is the weight of the zth slice; a, is the angle of inclination at base of slice; /, is the length of<br />

the zth slice's base; M, is the pore water pressure; c £ ,


385<br />

<strong>The</strong> first example is come from Arai and Tagyo's paper (1985). A simple slope, shown in Fig. 2, consists<br />

of a homogeneous soil with zero pore pressure. <strong>The</strong> height and grade of slope are respectively 20m and<br />

1:1.5. <strong>The</strong> computation parameters of soil are cohesion c=41.65kPa, angle of internal friction 0=15°, unit<br />

weight Y = 18.82kN/m 3 . For the convenience of analysis, the slope is divided into 11 slices, each of which<br />

has the width 6m as illustrated in Fig.2, and the spacing of nodes on each slice is 0.5m.<br />

Figure 2 <strong>The</strong> computing results of Example 1<br />

Based on the simplified Janbu's analysis method of slope stability and the present search technique of slip<br />

surface, the location of the most dangerous slip surface is illustrated as the dash double-dot line in Fig.2,<br />

and the factor of safety is 1.268. For explaining the accuracy of the present method, the Arai and Tagyo's<br />

result obtained by the use of conjugate gradient technique is depicted as the solid line in Fig.2. <strong>The</strong> factor<br />

of safety is 1.265. <strong>The</strong> Fig.2 shows that the results obtained by the present AACS are very consistent with<br />

those given by the Arai and Tagyo's conjugate gradient search technique. This demonstrates that the<br />

AACS is effective and reliable for stability analysis of slopes.<br />

Example 2<br />

An open-pit mine is located in gobi in Xinjiang Autonomous Region. In this mine zone, the mean annual<br />

rainfall is 33.4mm, but the quantity of evaporation is as high as 3222.2mm. <strong>The</strong> difference of atmospheric<br />

temperature between the day and night reaches up to 40°C, and the most difference during all year long is<br />

about 76°C. <strong>The</strong> design height of slope at the northern part of the mine is 98m- 120m, and the inclination<br />

angle of slopes is 44°C. <strong>The</strong> open-pit slope consists of crystalline lime-rock, marble, andesite, and iron ore.<br />

<strong>The</strong> physical and mechanical parameters of rock mass, shown in table 1, are obtained by the laboratory test<br />

and in-situ investigation. <strong>The</strong> influence factor of earthquake is 0.08.<br />

TABLE 1<br />

PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PARAMETERS OF ROCK MASS<br />

Material<br />

Crystalline lime-rock<br />

Marble<br />

Unit weight,<br />

y<br />

28.0kPa<br />

28.1 kPa<br />

Internal<br />

friction,<br />

9<br />

36.6°<br />

43.8°<br />

Cohesion,<br />

c<br />

162.0 kPa<br />

213.0 kPa<br />

Influence Factor of<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong>, K c<br />

0.08<br />

0.08


386<br />

Andesite<br />

Iron ore<br />

27.4 kPa<br />

31.0 kPa<br />

39.2°<br />

46.2°<br />

187.0 kPa<br />

318.0kPa<br />

0.08<br />

0.08<br />

By the use of the proposed AACS, the five slopes in above open-pit mine are analyzed by assuming m<br />

=100, a=1.0, /J =1.0, p =0.6, p Q =Q.%, ^=200 and the computation results are shown in Table 2.<br />

TABLE2<br />

THE COMPUTATION RESULTS OF EXAMPLE 2<br />

Slope number<br />

N7<br />

Nil<br />

N15<br />

N19<br />

N23<br />

Height of<br />

slope, H<br />

120.0m<br />

118.0m<br />

115.0m<br />

117.0m<br />

116.0m<br />

Dip angle of<br />

slope, a<br />

44.0°<br />

44.0°<br />

44.0°<br />

44.0°<br />

44.0°<br />

Safety factor with<br />

no earthquake, F s<br />

1.4910<br />

1,5098<br />

1.5405<br />

1.5104<br />

1.5217<br />

Safety factor with<br />

earthquake, F^<br />

1.2846<br />

1.2932<br />

1.3143<br />

1.2979<br />

1.3122<br />

Relative<br />

deviation<br />

13.84%<br />

14.35%<br />

14.68%<br />

14.07%<br />

13.77%<br />

Table 2 shows that the safety factors of slopes in earthquake zone decrease by 13.77 to 14.68 percent as<br />

compared to the safety factors of slopes in no earthquake condition. <strong>The</strong> average decrease of safety factor<br />

is 14.14%.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> stability analysis of complicated slope is actually a nonlinear programming problem with multiple<br />

extreme values and the objective function usually is not explicit. <strong>The</strong> traditional optimization methods are<br />

difficulty to find out the most dangerous slip surface. For the ant colony algorithm being fit for evaluating<br />

the influence of earthquake on the stability of slopes in earthquake zone, the structure of basic ant colony<br />

system (ACS) is modified. A heuristic operator is introduced to determine the transfer probability of ant<br />

and an adaptive operator is presented to avoid the phenomenon of stagnation in evolution process and then<br />

a new adaptive ant colony system (AACS) is proposed.<br />

Two examples are given to verify the adaptive ant colony system. Example 1 is used to verify the accuracy<br />

of the proposed method <strong>The</strong> computation results show that this method is feasible and reliable and it can<br />

also be used to evaluate various slopes with complicated soil layers and complicated profiles. Example 2 is<br />

used to assess the influence of earthquake on the stability of slopes in earthquake zone. <strong>The</strong> results show<br />

that the average decrease of safety factor of slopes under earthquake is 14.14% in the above open-pit.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This work is partly supported by the Fund of Science and Technology from Hunan province (Grant No<br />

X99P51059).


387<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Leroueil, S. (2001). Natural slopes and cuts: movement and failure mechanisms. Geotechniqu 51:3,<br />

197-243.<br />

Schuster, R. L. (1996). Socioeconomic significance of landslides. In Landslides: Investigation and<br />

Mitigation, Special Report 247, Washington: Transportation <strong>Research</strong> Board, pp. 12-35.<br />

Li, T. (1989). Landslides: extent and economic significance in China. Proc. 28th Int. Geol Cong.:<br />

Symp. Landslides, Washington, 271-287,<br />

Bishop, A. W. (1955). <strong>The</strong> use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Geotechniqu 5:1, 7-<br />

17,<br />

Morgenstern, N. R. and Price, V. E. (1965). <strong>The</strong> analysis of stability of general slip surface.<br />

Geotechniqu 15:1, 79-93.<br />

Spencer, E. (1967). A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel interslice<br />

forces. Geotechniqu 17:1, 11-26.<br />

Janbu, N. (1973). Slope stability computations. In Embankment dam engineering. Edited by R.C.<br />

Hirschfield and J. Poulos. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 47-86.<br />

Sarma, S. K. (1979). Stability analysis of embankments and slopes. Journal of the Geotechnical<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Division, ASCE 105:12, 1511-1524.<br />

Hoek, E, (1987). General two-dimensional slope stability analysis. In Analytical and computational<br />

methods in engineering rock mechanics. Edited by E.T. brown. Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 95-128.<br />

Baker, R. (1980). Determination of the critical slip surface in slope stability computations.<br />

International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 4, 333-359.<br />

Arai K, and Tagyo K. (1985). Determination of noncircular slip surface giving the minimum factor of<br />

safety in slope stability analysis. Soils and Foundations 25:1, 43-51.<br />

Siegel, R. A., Kovacs, W. D., and Lovell, C. W. (1981). Random surface generation instability<br />

analysis. Journal of the Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong> Division, ASCE 107:7, 996-1002.<br />

Chen, Z.-Y. (1992). Random trials used in determining global minimum factors of safety of slopes.<br />

Canadian Geotechnical Journal 20, 225-233.<br />

Greco, V. R. (1996). Efficient Monte Carlo technique for locating critical slip surface. Journal of the<br />

Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong>, ASCE 122:7, 517-525.<br />

Nguyen, V. U. (1985). Determination of critical slope failure surfaces. Journal of the Geotechnical<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, ASCE 111:2, 238-250.<br />

Goh, A. T. C. (1999). Genetic algorithm search for critical slip surface in multiple-wedge stability<br />

analysis, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 36, 382-391.


388<br />

Dongo, M. et al. (1996). Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperation agents. IEEE Trans, on<br />

SMC-Part £26:1,29-41.<br />

Don go, M. and Gambardella, L. M. (1997). Ant colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the<br />

travelling salesman problem. IEEE Trans, on Evolutionary Computation 1:1, 53-56.<br />

Chen, C.-F. and Xie, X.-B. (2002). Ant colony algorithm used to search for critical slip surface of<br />

open-pit slopes. Journal ofXiangtan Mining Institute 17:1, 62-64.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF FRICTION-DAMPED STRUCTURES<br />

L. L. Chung 1 , L Y. Wu 2 , and Y. P. Wang 3<br />

1 National Center for <strong>Research</strong> on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Taiwan<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, National Taiwan <strong>University</strong>, Taiwan<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, National Chiao-Tung <strong>University</strong>, Taiwan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In this paper, the feasibility of friction damper as a passive control devices is verified through<br />

theoretical and numerical investigation. <strong>The</strong> stiffness and damping may be enhanced simultaneously<br />

by adding friction dampers to the conventional structures. Significant reduction in dynamic response<br />

can be achieved. After the friction dampers are added to the structure, friction mechanism makes the<br />

structural system highly non-linear and the motion of the friction damper may be shifted from the nonsliding<br />

mode to the sliding mode, and vise versa. No matter in the non-sliding or sliding mode, either<br />

the kinematic or kinetic condition is known. A simple and efficient numerical method is developed for<br />

the dynamic analysis of friction-damped structures. Only a single equation of motion is used to<br />

describe the dynamic system for both non-sliding and sliding modes. <strong>The</strong> stability and accuracy are<br />

guaranteed even though the time step of integration remains constant during the process of the<br />

solution.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Friction damper is one of the promising passive control devices for civil engineering structures. <strong>The</strong><br />

stiffness and damping may be enhanced simultaneously by adding friction dampers to the conventional<br />

structures. With appropriate allocation of friction dampers, vibration energy will be dissipated<br />

efficiently when the structure is subjected to environment loads. <strong>The</strong> research on slotted bolted<br />

connection for friction damper can be traced back to 1976 (Venuti 1976). <strong>The</strong> friction damper consists<br />

of two outer plates and one inner plate. Circular holes are drilled on the outer plates and slotted holes<br />

are drilled on the inner plate for the bolted connection so that relative sliding between the inner and<br />

outer plates is allowed. Energy is dissipated through friction mechanism (Pall and Marsh 1979;<br />

Fitzgerald et al 1989; Roik et al 1988). In 1982, X-shaped bracing system was used to mount the<br />

friction damper (Pall and Marsh 1982). <strong>The</strong> stiffness is induced from the tension of the bracing. At<br />

the connection of the X-shaped bracing, energy is dissipated by the friction mechanism of the link and<br />

braking pad (Filatrault and Cherry 1987; Pekau and Guimond 1991). Such kind of friction damper has<br />

been put into real application (Pall et al. 1993).


390<br />

After the friction dampers are added to the structure, friction mechanism makes the structural system<br />

hishly non-linear. When the structure is driven with external loads, the motion of the friction damper<br />

may be shifted from the non-sliding mode to the sliding mode, and vise versa. In the non-sliding<br />

mode, the relative displacement between the interfaces of the damper remains unchanged but the shear<br />

force between the interfaces is unknown. In the sliding mode, the relative displacement is unknown<br />

but the shear force is the maximum friction force. No matter in the non-sliding or sliding mode, either<br />

the kinematic or kinetic condition is known. In this paper, a simple and efficient numerical method is<br />

developed for the dynamic analysis of friction-damped structures. Only a single equation of motion is<br />

used to describe the dynamic system for both non-sliding and sliding modes. <strong>The</strong> stability and<br />

accuracy are guaranteed even though the time step of integration remains constant during the process<br />

of the solution. Finally, the effectiveness of the friction dampers is studied.<br />

MATHEMATICAL DERIVATION<br />

When a discrete-parameter structural system with n degrees of freedom is subjected to environmental<br />

loads w(r) and counteracted by a friction force w(r), its governing equation can be taken as:<br />

Mx(r) + Cx(r) + Kx(r) = bu(0 + Ew(0 (1)<br />

where x(f) is the displacement vector; M, C and K are the mass matrix, damping matrix and<br />

stiffness matrix, respectively; b is the location vector of the friction damper; E is the location matrix<br />

of the environmental loads. Represented in state-space form, the second-order differential equation (1)<br />

is changed to the first-order differential equation as:<br />

where z(r) = ., I, A =, . ,, Ur =,<br />

I x(r) -M- 1 K -M- l C f c M' l b<br />

and E c = | ,.__!„ I. Since the recorded<br />

load functions are commonly discretized and the friction force are piece-wise linear in nature, it is<br />

logical to assume linear variations of these loading functions between two consecutive sampling<br />

instants. <strong>The</strong>refore, With the sampling period &* , the solution of the state equation (2) becomes a<br />

difference equation as:<br />

z[k + 1] = Az[*] + b Q it[k] + b^u[k + 1] + E 0 w[fc] + E! w[& + 1] (3)<br />

where A = e AA


391<br />

maximum friction force and there is no change in the relative displacement between the interfaces.<br />

<strong>The</strong> non-sliding conditions are:<br />

(4a)<br />

(4b)<br />

where /j. is the faction coefficient; N is the normal force applied to the interfaces; s[k -f 1] and s[k]<br />

are the relative displacement between interfaces at the current and the next time steps. In the nonsliding<br />

phase, the shear force is unknown but the relative displacement remains unchanged. During the<br />

sliding phase, the shear force is large enough to make the damper slide and there is change in the<br />

relative displacement. <strong>The</strong> sliding conditions are:<br />

(5a)<br />

(5b)<br />

In the sliding phase, the shear force is known while the relative displacement is unknown. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

no matter the damper slides or not, either the shear force or the relative displacement between the<br />

interfaces is known. With this additional condition, the shear force at the next time step can be<br />

determined, and the response of the system can in turn be solved.<br />

First, the friction damper is assumed in the non-sliding phase, so that the relative displacement of the<br />

interfaces remains unchanged:<br />

s[k + l] = y b [k+l]-y(k + l]~y b [k]-y[k] = S[k] (6)<br />

where y b [k] is the relative displacement of the bracing system by which the friction damper is<br />

mounted; y[k] is the relative displacement between the two stories where the friction damper is<br />

located. <strong>The</strong> story drift y[k] is a linear combination of the state vector z[&] as:<br />

y[*] = Dz[*] (7)<br />

where D = [-& T 0 T J is the output row vector; T denotes the transpose of vector or matrix. <strong>The</strong> shear<br />

force of the damper and the relative displacement of the bracing system are related as:<br />

u[k] = k b y,[k] (8)<br />

where & b is the stiffness of the bracing system. After pre-multiplying the stiffness & b to equation (6),<br />

it gives:<br />

Utilizing equations (7) and (8), the estimated shear force at the next time step is expressed as:<br />

u[k + 1] = Jt b Dz[* + 1] + u[k] - * b Dz[*] (10)


392<br />

After substituting equation (3) into the above equation, it gives:<br />

u[k +1] = Jfc b D( Az[&] + b Q u[k] + b&k +1] + E 0 w[£] + Ej w[fc +1]) + w[&] - & b Dz[&] (11)<br />

After rearrangement, the shear force at the next time step can be estimated as:<br />

u[k -f 1] = Pz[k] + Qu[&] + R 0 w[fc] + R t w[£ +1] (12)<br />

where P = (l-* b Db i r l fc b D(A-I); Q = (l~£ b Db i r l (£ b Db 0 +1); R 0 =(l-*J>bO -I U>E 0 and<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are two possible cases for the estimated value of the shear force at the next time step u[k +1]:<br />

When the estimated shear force is less than the maximum friction force, the interfaces stick together<br />

and the assumption stated in equation (6) is satisfied. <strong>The</strong> shear force at the next time step is the same<br />

as the estimated one:<br />

(2) \u[k 4-1]| >it [Wi ~/tN<br />

When the estimated force is greater than the maximum friction force, the friction between the<br />

interfaces is overcome and the interfaces slide relative each other. <strong>The</strong> assumption stated in equation<br />

(6) is violated. <strong>The</strong>refore the magnitude of the shear force is the same as the maximum friction force<br />

and the direction of the shear force is the same as the estimated one:<br />

«[* +1] = «m« sgn02[* +1]) = /.iNsgn(u(k +1]) (14)<br />

where sgn(») = •/[«! is the signum function. <strong>The</strong> procedures for the dynamic analysis of the frictiondamped<br />

structure are shown in the flow chart (Figure 1).<br />

NUMERICAL VERIFICATION<br />

In order to illustrate the effectiveness of friction damper, a single-degree-of-freedom structure, with<br />

mass m = 100 ton, stiffness k = 4000 kN/m, and damping coefficient c = 40 kN/(m/sec), is investigated.<br />

Thus, the natural period and damping ratio of the structure are T = 0.993 sec and £=3.16 %,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> top of the friction damper is mounted underneath the beam while the bottom of the<br />

damper is connected to the inverted V-shaped bracing through the T-shaped beam. Under earthquake<br />

excitation, shear force between the interfaces of the friction damper is induced. If the friction is<br />

overcome with the shear force, the damper slides. During the excitation, the motion of the damper<br />

switches from the non-sliding phase to the sliding phase, and vise versa. <strong>The</strong> location vector of the<br />

damper is b = -1 and the output vector for the story drift is D = [-b 7 oj= [l o]. <strong>The</strong> ratio between


393<br />

the stiffness of the bracing and that of the structure is assigned to be two so that the stiffness of the<br />

bracing is k b = 8000 kN/m.<br />

Since the non-linear behavior of the friction damper is utilized to dissipate the structural energy<br />

induced by external excitation, both the effective stiffness and damping may be increased after<br />

implementation of friction damper. When the maximum friction force of the damper is very low, that<br />

is ("nuxM) -» 0, it is very easy for the damper to slide. It is equivalent to the case of bared frame<br />

where friction damper does not exist. When the maximum friction force is very high, that is,<br />

( w mx/ m £) —»°°, the damper does not slide. It is equivalent to the case of braced frame. If the<br />

excitation is known a priori, the maximum friction can be designed to maximize the damping of the<br />

friction-damped structure. Under El Centra earthquake which is normalized to 1 g, the optimal ratio<br />

between the maximum friction and the weight of the structure is 2. After friction damper is added to<br />

the structure, the relative displacement, relative velocity and absolute acceleration are all reduced<br />

dramatically (Figures 2 and 3). Comparing to the bared frame, the reduction in relative displacement,<br />

relative velocity and absolute acceleration of the friction-damped frame are 64.4% * 54.6% and 48.5%,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> hysteresis loop is in rectangular shape which is consistent with the assumption of<br />

Coulomb friction.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

After theoretical derivation and numerical simulation, it is verified that friction damper is an efficient<br />

device for energy dissipation. If the characteristics of the excitation are known a priori, optimal ratio<br />

of the maximum friction force to the weight of the structure can be designed in order to achieve the<br />

best damping effectiveness. In this paper, an innovative and systematic numerical procedure by which<br />

a unified motion equation can be adapted for both the non-sliding and sliding phases of the system.<br />

ACKNOWLEGEMENT<br />

This research was supported in part by the National Science Council. This support is greatly<br />

appreciated.<br />

REFERENCE<br />

Venuti, W. J. (1976). Energy absorption of high strength bolted connections, Test Report, Structural<br />

Steel Education Council, California, USA.<br />

Pall, A. S., and Marsh, C. (1979). 'Energy dissipation in panelized buildings using limited slip bolted<br />

joints', Proceedings, AICAP-CED conference, 3, Rome, Italy.<br />

Fitzgerald, T. F., Anagnos, T., Goodson, M., and Zsutti, T. (1989). 'Slotted bolted connections in<br />

aseismic design of concentrically braced connections', <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 5.<br />

Roik, K., Dorka, U., and Dechent, P. (1988). 'Vibration control of structures under earthquake loading<br />

by three stage friction grip elements', <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 16, 501-521.


394<br />

Pall, A S , and Marsh, C (1982) 'Response of friction damped braced frames', Journal of Structural<br />

Division, ASCE, 108,1313-1323<br />

Filatrault A , and Cherry, S (1987) 'Performance evaluation of faction damped braced steel frame<br />

under simulated earthquake loads', <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 3, 57-87<br />

Pekau, 0 A, and Guimond, R (1991) Controlling seismic response of eccentric structures by<br />

faction dampers', <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 20, 505-521<br />

Pall, A , Vezina, S , Proulx, P , and Pall, R (1993) 'Friction dampers for seismic control of Canadian<br />

space agency headquarters' <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 9, 547-557<br />

Assign initial value<br />

jfc = 0<br />

z[o] = 0<br />

Assume non-sliding mode<br />

Estimate u[k +1] by equation (12)<br />

Assumption is contradicted<br />

Compute z[k +1] by equation (3)<br />

Figure 1 Flow chart for numerical analysis of faction-damped structures


395<br />

splacemen<br />

(m)<br />

Bared<br />

—Braced/Damped<br />

>» .-*<br />

±! O<br />

o<br />

o


Acceleration<br />

(m/sec 2 )<br />

Velocity<br />

(m/sec)<br />

Displacement<br />

(m)


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

BEHAVIOR OF SEISMIC PROTECTIVE DEVICES: A<br />

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS APPROACH<br />

G. F Dargush, H. Cho and R Radhaknshnan<br />

Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

State <strong>University</strong> of New York at Buffalo<br />

135 Ketter Hall, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Structural control technology continues to advance rapidly on many fronts through the introduction of<br />

new devices and systems. At the same time, there is a need to continually improve our understanding<br />

Of existing protective technologies via carefully controlled physical experiments and mathematical<br />

modeling. In this paper, we present work related to computational continuum mechanics analysis of<br />

several passive devices. In particular, we consider two different metallic dampers and a solid<br />

viscoelastic damper. For each case, an overview of the constitutive modeling is provided, along with<br />

some details from the finite element analyses relating to damper behavior. Finally, we argue that such<br />

an approach is advisable in general, as we attempt to move toward the goal of developing disasterresilient<br />

communities.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

A wide variety of seismic protective systems have been developed over the past several decades and,<br />

as the concept becomes more well known, an increasing number of structures employing these systems<br />

appear each year Whether one considers base isolation systems (Skinner et al., 1993), passive energy<br />

dissipation systems (Soong and Dargush, 1997; Constantinou et al., 1998) or active/semi-active control<br />

systems (Soong, 1990), there are key elements that will to a large extent determine the performance of<br />

the entire structure during significant earthquakes In many cases, these key elements are the seismic<br />

protective devices. In this paper, we advocate a philosophy that treats seismic protective devices as<br />

critical components, necessitating a high level of reliability This, in turn, requires a rigorous program<br />

of engineering analysis, testing and design. Here we focus on aspects associated with engineering<br />

analysis, and present the application of computational continuum mechanics to study the behavior of<br />

several passive devices.<br />

First, we examine metallic dampers and develop a two-surface cyclic plasticity model to characterize<br />

their behavior. Model parameters are established to capture essential features of structural steel under<br />

constant amplitude cyclic loading <strong>The</strong> resulting model is then utilized in finite element analyses to<br />

study the behavior of an E-damper for seismic isolation systems and a triangular plate energy absorber<br />

(TPEA) for passive energy dissipation. In both cases, the numerical solutions are compared with the<br />

results of physical experiments. Additionally, several significant aspects of the response can be<br />

elucidated with a computational mechanics approach.


398<br />

As a further illustration of this approach, we consider the behavior of viscoelastic dampers.<br />

Constitutive models based upon fractional derivative (Makris and Constantinou, 1991; Makris et al.,<br />

1993) and generalized Maxwell representations have been proposed in the literature. Here we employ<br />

the latter representation to study device response. A finite element method is used to solve the<br />

associated coupled thermomechanical problem for a two-dimensional model of solid viscoelastic<br />

dampers. Again, numerical results are compared with data from physical experiments and some<br />

interesting aspects of the cyclic response are revealed.<br />

Finally, based upon the results of these case studies, arguments are given in favor of an increasingly<br />

important role for computational continuum mechanics in the development and design of seismic<br />

protective devices.<br />

METALLIC DAMPERS<br />

Constitutive Model<br />

Practical two-surface phenomenological models, based primarily on the work of Krieg (1975), have<br />

found wide application in the computational mechanics literature, and are adopted here for the cyclic<br />

analysis of metallic dampers. <strong>The</strong> specific formulation selected is a modified version of the model<br />

developed in Banerjee et al. (1987) and Chopra and Dargush (1994). <strong>The</strong> stress space behavior of the<br />

model is depicted in Fig. la, which shows two distinct, but nested, cylindrical yield surfaces. <strong>The</strong> inner<br />

or loading surface separates the elastic and inelastic response regimes. It is characterized by its center<br />

and radius represented by the back stress and inner yield strength, respectively. On the other hand, the<br />

outer or bounding surface, which completely contains the smaller inner surface, is always centered at<br />

the origin of stress space with radius equal to variable outer yield strength. Translation of the inner<br />

surface corresponds to kinematic hardening, while expansion of the outer surface produces isotropic<br />

hardening. This separation of kinematic and isotropic hardening mechanisms proves to be quite useful<br />

in representing the stabilized cyclic response of structural steel. <strong>The</strong> yield criteria, flow rules, and<br />

hardening rules are established to ensure that the state of stress always lies on or within both surfaces,<br />

that all transitions during loading are smooth, and that infinitesimal strain cycles do not cause<br />

anomalous behavior. <strong>The</strong> present model requires the determination of five inelastic material<br />

parameters, including the yield strength of the loading surface, the initial yield strength of the<br />

bounding surface and three hardening parameters. (Details of the model are recorded in Sant, 2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> model has been implemented as a user-defined material model within the general-purpose finite<br />

element program ABAQUS (1998). Three-dimensional, plane stress and uniaxial versions of the model<br />

have been developed. Both explicit and implicit integration schemes are available.<br />

This two-surface model was used to represent ASTM A36 structural steel. Material parameters were<br />

established as follows. <strong>The</strong> elastic modulus and Poisson ratio were equated with the usual handbook<br />

values, while the remaining five parameters were established from the stabilized cyclic data presented<br />

by Cofie and Krawinkler (1985). Parameter values, obtained from the Marquardt (1963) algorithm for<br />

nonlinear least squares curve fitting, are presented Dargush et al. (2002). A comparison of the stressstrain<br />

response obtained from the two-surface model and the experimental data is displayed in Fig. Ib.


399<br />

Figure 1: Two-surface Model Definition (a) Stress Space, (b) A36 Steel Cyclic Response<br />

E-shaped Metallic Damper Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> Italian company ALGA has developed a seismic isolation system consisting of lubricated sliding<br />

bearings to resist gravitational load and energy dissipating devices shaped like the capital letter "E" to<br />

dissipate horizontally transmitted destructive earthquake energy. A pair of E-shaped devices is<br />

responsible for the dissipation of energy in one direction. <strong>The</strong>refore, two pairs are used in one bearing<br />

to dissipate the horizontally transmitted energy. <strong>The</strong> central leg and external legs are hinge-connected<br />

to the top and bottom plates of the sliding bearings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two-surface model discussed in the previous section is now applied in a finite element study of the<br />

cyclic response of the E-damper. A deformed shape plot of the damper obtained with plane stress<br />

elements is shown for the maximum displaced position in Fig. 2a, while load-displacement curves<br />

from the numerical model and experimental testing (Marioni, 1991) are compared in Fig. 2b. <strong>The</strong><br />

overall agreement is quite good, particularly since the constitutive model parameters were determined<br />

independently from the damper experiments. Although some minor differences exist, relating<br />

primarily to the material stabilization processes, the detailed plastic strain distributions could be used<br />

for a preliminary assessment of durability.<br />

KT7<br />

•<br />

Marioni (1991)<br />

30 . Two Surface Model<br />

20<br />

~ 10<br />

« / r<br />

-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150<br />

Displacement (mm)<br />

Figure 2: E-Damper (a) Deformed Shape, (b) Cyclic Response


400<br />

Triangular Plate Metallic Damper Analysis<br />

Next the two-surface plasticity model is applied to study the cyclic response of metallic triangular<br />

plate dampers. For the finite element analysis, a solid element model for one-half of one plate is used.<br />

<strong>The</strong> particular triangular-shaped damper plate studied here has an overall length of 0.304m, a base<br />

width of 0.1333m and a 0.0361m thickness. This damper is designated 2B2 by Tsai et al. (1993). <strong>The</strong><br />

wide end of the plate is clamped, symmetry is enforced about the centerline and a constant amplitude<br />

displacement-controlled loading history is applied normal to the plate at the tip. <strong>The</strong> plate is subjected<br />

to five complete loading cycles at low frequency. Quasistatic response is assumed.<br />

In the finite element analysis, the amplitude of the enforced displacement at the tip of the plate is set at<br />

0.0912m. This corresponds to a nominal angle x 0 =0.30 as defined in Tsai et al. (1993) and Dargush<br />

and Soong (1995). <strong>The</strong> longitudinal plastic strains are presented in Fig. 3a at maximum displacement<br />

with the deformation shown at actual scale. Meanwhile, the damper force-displacement response,<br />

using the present two-surface model is displayed in Fig. 3b. Not only does the response stabilize, the<br />

shape is quite similar to that obtained hi experiments (Tsai et al., 1993). Furthermore, the stiffening<br />

that occurs at large strain amplitudes can be attributed to the effects of large deformation. One often<br />

must account for these effects in passive devices due to the intentional high concentration of energy<br />

dissipation. Although these trends are well predicted, the magnitude of the forces obtained from the<br />

present analysis is approximately 20% higher than those measured in the experiments. Further<br />

investigation is needed to properly account for this difference.<br />

Figure 3: Triangular Plate Damper (a) Longitudinal Plastic Strains, (b) Cyclic Response<br />

VISCOELASTIC DAMPERS<br />

Constitutive Model<br />

A number of models for viscoelastic solids and fluids have appeared in the literature. For example,<br />

Shen and Soong (1995) used a Williams four-parameter model, while Makris et al. (1993, 1995) and<br />

Kasai et al. (1993) employed a fractional derivative model. Both models have attractive features that<br />

permit material characterization over a rather broad frequency range with a limited number of<br />

parameters. Under certain circumstances, one can also establish a theoretical basis for these models<br />

from the underlying micromechamcs. However, neither of these models is particularly effective for<br />

transient nonlinear analysis, which is necessary for proper description of response under significant<br />

seismic excitation. <strong>The</strong> difficulty pertains to the fact that the time-dependent relaxation moduli<br />

associated with these models are not separable. This means that to compute the stress at any instant of


401<br />

time, one must integrate over the entire strain history beginning from time zero. Thus, stress<br />

calculations become more and more expensive as the solution progresses. On the other hand,<br />

generalized Maxwell (or Prony series) models possess a separable relaxation modulus that greatly<br />

reduces the computational burden. Additionally, the generalized Maxwell model can provide a very<br />

reasonable representation of the frequency dependent response of viscoelastic solids, and consequently<br />

is adopted in the present work. Although details cannot be provided here, Fig. 4 illustrates the<br />

behavior of the model in the frequency range of primary interest. Furthermore, we assume that the<br />

material is thermorheologically simple, leading to the definition of an intrinsic time scale that may<br />

vary throughout the damper, depending on current temperature.<br />

VE CONSTITUTIVE MODEL<br />

Generalised Maxwell Model<br />

Comple< Moduli<br />

Figure 4: Generalized Maxwell Model - Frequency Domain Response<br />

VE Damper Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> thermally sensitive generalized Maxwell constitutive model described in the previous section is<br />

readily available in the commercial finite element code ABAQUS (1998) within the context of a<br />

quasistatic coupled thermomechanical analysis. In order to incorporate dynamic effects within the<br />

damper, user-defined subroutines must be developed (Radhakrishnan, 2000). However, results<br />

reported here utilize only the quasistatic formulation.<br />

As an illustrative example, consider a constant amplitude cyclic strain-controlled analysis of a single<br />

layer VE damper. For this analysis, the width of the damper is 3.5in, while the thickness of the<br />

viscoelastic layer is 0.5in. <strong>The</strong> adjoining 0.5in thick steel plates are also included in this plane strain<br />

thermomechanical analysis. <strong>The</strong> damper is assumed to begin at rest in an unstressed state at a uniform<br />

temperature of 21.7°C. <strong>The</strong>n constant shear strain range sinusoidal cycling begins with 50%<br />

amplitude at an excitation frequency of 1 Hz for a duration of 10s.<br />

Some results are shown in Figs. 5-7. Figure 5 presents the temperature response as a function of time<br />

for points in the center of the viscoelastic layer and at the VE-steei interface. <strong>The</strong> most significant rise<br />

occurs at the center, where an increase of approximately 6°C during the ten seconds of excitation. On<br />

the other hand, very little temperature increase occurs at the interface because heat is conducted into<br />

the steel plates. <strong>The</strong> overall wavy nature of these curves is a consequence of the sinusoidal excitation.


402<br />

This trend has also been reported in experiments (Kasai et al., 1993). Meanwhile, the overall forcedisplacement<br />

response is displayed in Fig. 6. Viscous dissipation leads to the development of the<br />

increased temperatures that, in turn, cause thermal softening of the VE layer. This produces the<br />

degradation of the hysteresis loops shown in the figure. Again, this is evident in experiments and must<br />

be properly accounted for in VE damper design. Detailed contour plots of temperature and shear strain<br />

throughout the VE layer at maximum lateral displacement are provided in Fig. 7. Of particular<br />

concern are the shear strain concentrations that appear on the VE-steel interface at the free edges.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se can lead to debonding failures.<br />

Figure 5: VE Damper - Temperature Response<br />

Figure 6: VE Damper - Force-Displacement Response<br />

f .««*-««*,.. *,.•*., f<br />

Figure 7: VE Damper - Temperature and Shear Strain Distributions


403<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

In the previous sections, we have provided an overview of some computational mechanics studies of<br />

seismic protective devices. Both metallic dampers and viscoelastic dampers are considered.<br />

For the metallic dampers, a two-surface cyclic plasticity model is developed that has the capability to<br />

reproduce stabilized hysteresis loops under constant amplitude cycling, while retaining an inherent<br />

self-consistency under more general loading paths. Model parameters are established from<br />

experimental data on structural steel that is independent of the damper response tests. For both the E-<br />

damper and the triangular plate damper, the subsequent finite element analysis captures the main<br />

features of the experimental damper results, while providing additional insight into the behavior. In<br />

the case of the triangular plate damper, for example, the analysis identifies the important role of large<br />

deformation effects and potential locking. <strong>The</strong> analysis also indicates that the triangular shape may not<br />

be ideal for response under severe lateral deformations.<br />

Meanwhile, the viscoelastic dampers are modeled as a thermorheologically simple generalized<br />

Maxwell material. This provides a reasonable representation of both the frequency and temperature<br />

dependence, while retaining computational efficiency. <strong>The</strong> finite element analysis captures the overall<br />

damper behavior, including thermal softening. <strong>The</strong> continuum model also provides detailed<br />

information that could be used to better understand damper durability, particularly in terms of<br />

interfacial debonding.<br />

In ail three cases, the computational continuum mechanics approach provides additional insight into<br />

the behavior of the control device. This complements the results of physical experiments and the<br />

initial back-of-the-envelope calculations that are more routinely performed. During a significant<br />

earthquake, the performance of the entire structural system will often ultimately depend upon the<br />

reliability of these critical control devices. Consequently, we recommend detailed computational<br />

continuum mechanics evaluations of all seismic protective devices.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

Support for the work described in this paper was provided in part by the Multidisciplinary Center for<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> under a cooperative agreement from the U.S. National Science<br />

Foundation (Grant EEC-9701471). <strong>The</strong> authors gratefully acknowledge this support.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ABAQUS (1998), <strong>The</strong>ory Manual, Version 5.8, Pawtucket, RI.<br />

Banerjee, P.K., Wilson, R.B. and Raveendra, S.T. (1987), Advanced Applications of BEM to Threedimensional<br />

Problems of Monotonic and Cyclic Plasticity, Int. J. Mech. ScL s 29(9), 637-653.<br />

Chopra, M.B. and Dargush, G.F. (1994), Development of BEM for <strong>The</strong>rmoplasticity, Int. J. Solids<br />

Struct., 31, 1635-1656,<br />

Cofie, N.G. and Krawinkler, H. (1985), Uniaxial Cyclic Stress-Strain Behavior of Structural Steel, J.<br />

Engrg Mech., ASCE, 111(9), 1105-1120.


404<br />

Constantinou, M.C., Soong, T.T. and Dargush, G.F. (1998), Passive Energy Dissipation Systems for<br />

Structural Design and Retrofit, Monograph No. 1, Multidisciplinary Center for <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Buffalo, NY.<br />

Dargush, G.F., Cho, H. and Sant, R.S. (2002), Cyclic Elastoplastic Analysis of Metallic Dampers for<br />

Seismic Energy Dissipation, Seventh U.S. Nat. Conf. <strong>Earthquake</strong> Engrg., EERI, Boston, MA.<br />

Dargush, G.F. and Soong, T.T. (1995), Behavior of Metallic Plate Dampers in Seismic Passive Energy<br />

Dissipation Systems, <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 11, 545-568.<br />

Kasai, K., Munshi, J.A., Lai, M.L. and Maison, B.F. (1993), Viscoelastic Damper Hysteretic Model:<br />

<strong>The</strong>ory, Experiment and Application, Proc. ATC 17-1 on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation, and<br />

Active Control, San Francisco, CA, 2, 521-532.<br />

Krieg, R.D. (1975), A Practical Two Surface Plasticity <strong>The</strong>ory, J. Appl Mech., ASME, E42, 641-646.<br />

Makris, N. and Constantinou, M.C. (1991), Fractional-Derivative Maxwell Model for Viscous<br />

Dampers, J. Struct Engrg., ASCE, 117(9), 2708-2724.<br />

Makris, N., Constantinou, M.C. and Dargush, G.F. (1993), Analytical Model for Viscoelastic Fluid<br />

Dampers, J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 119(11), 3310-3325.<br />

Makris, N., Dargush, G.F. and Constantinou, M.C. (1995), Dynamic Analysis of Viscoelastic Fluid<br />

Dampers, J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 121(10), 1114-1121.<br />

Marioni, A. (1991), Antiseismic Bearing Devices on the Mortaiolo Viaduct, Third World Congress on<br />

Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1263-1280.<br />

Marquardt, D.W. (1963), An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters,<br />

J. Soc. Ind Appl. Math., 11(2), 431-441.<br />

Radhakrishnan, R. (2000), Coupled <strong>The</strong>rmomechanical Analysis of Viscoelastic Dampers, M.S.<br />

<strong>The</strong>sis, <strong>University</strong> at Buffalo, NY.<br />

Sant, R.S. (2002), Evolutionary Structural Optimization for Aseismic Design, Ph.D. Dissertation,<br />

<strong>University</strong> at Buffalo, NY.<br />

Shen, K.L. and Soong, T.T. (1995), Modeling of Viscoelastic Dampers for Structural Applications, J.<br />

Engrg. Mech., 121(6), 694-701.<br />

Skinner, R.I., Robinson, W.H., and McVerry, G.H. (1993), An Introduction to Seismic Isolation,<br />

Wiley, Chichester and New York.<br />

Soong, T.T. (1990), Active Structural Control: <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice, Longman London and Wilev<br />

y<br />

New York.<br />

Soong, T.T. and Dargush, G.F. (1997), Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

Wiley, London and New York.<br />

Tsai, K.C., Chen, H.W., Hong, C.P. and Su, Y.F. (1993), Design of Steel Triangular Plate Energy<br />

Absorbers for Seismic-Resistant Construction, <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 9(3), 505-528.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

LARGE-SCALE TESTS ON SMART STRUCTURES<br />

AND SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL BY MR DAMPER<br />

H. Fujitani 1 , T. Azuhata 1 , K. Morita 2 , T. Hiwatashi 3 , Y. Shiozaki 3 , K. Hata 4 , K. Sunakoda 5 ,<br />

and C. Minowa 6<br />

1 Department of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, Building <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Tsukuba, Japan<br />

2 National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management,<br />

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport,<br />

Tsukuba, Japan<br />

3 Visiting <strong>Research</strong>er, Department of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, Building <strong>Research</strong> Institute,<br />

Tsukuba, Japan<br />

4 Director, Central <strong>Research</strong> & Development Division, Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.<br />

Kobe, Japan<br />

5 Senior General Manager, <strong>Engineering</strong> Division, Sanwa TekM Corporation,<br />

Tokyo, Japan<br />

6 National <strong>Research</strong> Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention,<br />

Tsukuba, Japan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> objectives of these large-scale tests are to confirm the effectiveness of several proposed smart<br />

materials, members and structural systems. <strong>The</strong> tests were conducted on the shaking table of the test<br />

facility of the National <strong>Research</strong> Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED), Tsukuba,<br />

Japan. It has a maximum displacement of 22 cm, a maximum velocity of 75 cm/s, and a maximum<br />

weight of 500 ton. <strong>The</strong> following test series was conducted: 1) semi-active control by MR dampers<br />

(base-isolation system and seismic control system), 2) damage detection system (identification of<br />

damaged members and evaluation of new sensors), 3) rocking energy dissipation system (lift-up<br />

system).<br />

In this paper, the test methods of semi-active control by an MR damper are discussed as the main<br />

subject. An MR damper changes its damping force by changing the magnetic field acting on the MR<br />

fluid according to an electric current. Semi-active control using an MR damper stabilizes building<br />

responses in an earthquake better than the conventional passive control. <strong>The</strong> MR damper's basic<br />

characteristics have been clarified.<br />

This paper outlines the objectives of the large-scale tests, the design of the test frame for each<br />

objective and test methods of semi-active control by an MR damper.


406<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> Building <strong>Research</strong> Institute (BRI) of Japan and the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)<br />

initiated the U.S.-Japan Cooperative <strong>Research</strong> Program on Auto-adaptive Media (Smart Structural<br />

Systems) in 1998 (Otani, 2000), under the aegis of the U.S.-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects<br />

of the U.S.-Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resources. At the Joint Technical Coordinating<br />

Committee (JTCC) meeting, research items and plans were discussed in detail for three research<br />

thrusts: (1) structural systems, (2) sensing and monitoring technology, and (3) effecter technology.<br />

BRI planned a series of large-scale tests to verify some smart systems developed m this project. <strong>The</strong><br />

effectiveness of "Semi-active control by MR dampers", "Damage detection system" and "Rocbng<br />

energy dissipation system" will also be confirmed.<br />

This paper outlines the objectives of the large-scale tests, the design of the test frame for each<br />

objective, and static and dynamic characteristics of the test frame and one of the test results of semiactive<br />

control of base isolation by MR damper.<br />

OBJECTIVES OF LARGE-SCALE TESTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> basic test frame used for this large-scale test is a 3-story steel frame. It is 3m (1 span) x 4m (2m<br />

x 2 span) in plan and 6m high, weighs a total of 20 tons (including the weight of the 1st floor), and has<br />

a natural period of approximately 0.5 sec. Some devices for the response control system with semiactive<br />

MR dampers and for damage detection are installed in the middle frame in the shaking direction.<br />

Devices for the rocking energy dissipation system are installed in each column foot of the 1 st story.<br />

NIED's shaking table (Photo 1) was used. Figure 1 shows the performance of the shaking table.<br />

<strong>The</strong> shaking table has a maximum displacement of 22 cm, a maximum velocity of 75 cm/s, and a<br />

maximum weight of 500 ton.<br />

LIMIT PERFORMANCE<br />

Photo 1: Shaking Table of NIED<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Figure 1: Performance of NIED's Shaking Table<br />

<strong>The</strong> following subjects are discussed with regard to the large-scale shaking table test.


407<br />

Response Control by Magneto-Rheological (MR) Fluid<br />

Magneto-rheological (MR) dampers have been expected to control the response of civil and building<br />

structures in recent years because of their large force capacity and variable force characteristics. In<br />

general, passive control has a limitation of damping effects within a certain range of frequency and<br />

input levels. Semi-active control reduces both response displacements and accelerations. <strong>The</strong> MR<br />

damper generates a damping force, which does not depend on the piston speed (Fujitani 2000). <strong>The</strong><br />

target of this subject is to improve the safety, functionality and habitability by controlling the response<br />

displacements and accelerations by using MR dampers. For this purpose, MR dampers and a control<br />

algorithm have been developed, and their validity is discussed by an analytical study and shaking table<br />

tests.<br />

MR damper<br />

(a) Control of base isolation system<br />

Damage Detection by Sensors<br />

(b) Two types of story drift control<br />

Figure 2: Test frame for response control by MR<br />

dampers<br />

Monitoring the structural soundness of a building effectively reduces its life cycle cost. A series of<br />

experimental tests for a monitoring system has been conducted by measuring the process in which a<br />

concrete device is broken. Devices are inserted in the central structural plane in each frame layer<br />

(Figure 3). <strong>The</strong> same device is installed in each layer, and the purpose of the test is to detect damage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> input earthquake wave is El Centro 1940 NS. <strong>The</strong> table was shaken three times with maximum<br />

velocities of lOcm/sec, 30cm/sec, and 40cm/sec. White noise excitation and micro tremor<br />

measurement were carried out before and after shaking.<br />

Two identification methods were carried out: one using the data of before and after shaking, and the<br />

other using the data during shaking. For the first, we used the flexibility method, the layers stiffness<br />

method and the identification method using multiple natural frequency changes, etc. For the second,<br />

we used the ARX model and parallel processing identification method (Morita 2001).<br />

Several types of "smart sensors" (such as line-saving systems, RDIF tags, maximum value memory<br />

sensors, smart temperature sensors, and AE sensors) are examined.<br />

Rocking Energy Dissipation System<br />

Rocking systems that cause rocking vibration under appropriate control during earthquakes are now<br />

under development (Midorikawa et. al. 2002). Some researchers have pointed out that the effects of<br />

rocking vibration can reduce seismic damage to buildings subjected to strong earthquake ground


408<br />

motions. One of these systems has weak base plates at the bottom of each steel first-story column.<br />

When the weak base plates yield during a strong earthquake, rocking vibration is caused in the<br />

building, as illustrated in Figure 4.<br />

Device<br />

Transducer<br />

Crack Sensor<br />

Control PC<br />

-r<br />

E2Z3<br />

Figure 3: Central frame of span direction for damage detection and smart sensors<br />

A base plate yields<br />

Figure 4: Outline of rocking system with base plate yielding<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF TEST FRAME<br />

Figure 5 shows the Fourier spectrum of response acceleration of each story of the superstructure<br />

excited by white noise. <strong>The</strong> roofs primary predominant (1 st mode) frequency is 1.83Hz. This<br />

means that the first natural period 0.546 sec. However, the 2 nd spectrum value is smaller than the 3 rd<br />

value on the 3 floor, and me 2nd spectrum value is larger than the 3 rd value on the 2nd floor. This<br />

means that the secondary mode of vibration is being generated.


409<br />

s<br />

e a ooo<br />

j| soo<br />

y<br />

0<br />

c<br />

l83Hz<br />

,530Hz<br />

V.. Jv JL 7WHI<br />

Acceleration<br />

i 1 i<br />

Roof<br />

Frequency (Hz) 2nd Floor Frequency (Hz)<br />

I<br />

1500<br />

1 i<br />

s s.<br />

^ * 500<br />

5<br />

J<br />

u<br />

3rd Floor<br />

.1 X 1<br />

3<br />

" 80<br />

« a<br />

II 60<br />

II 40<br />

S 20<br />

5 r~*iw^^<br />

2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 3 1<br />

FreqaencvlHz) Shaking T-ible Frequency (H.)<br />

Figure 5: Founer spectra of acceleration response of test frame<br />

Table 1 shows the characteristics of test frame.<br />

TABLE 1.1 TABLE 1.2<br />

MASSES CHARACTERISTICS OF FRAME<br />

TABLE 1.3<br />

CHARACTERISTIS<br />

OF BASE ISOLATION<br />

Roof<br />

SrdFbor<br />

2nd F bor<br />

IstFbor<br />

Total<br />

467<br />

478<br />

478<br />

6 DO<br />

2023<br />

3F<br />

2F<br />

1F<br />

Stiffness(kN/cni)<br />

276<br />

284<br />

354<br />

EfestcOBpfetcementfcni )<br />

174<br />

3 DO<br />

227<br />

Stiffness(kN/cm)<br />

Frctbn Force (kN)<br />

DamphgCoeffbBntWs/cra)<br />

DamphgRatb<br />

NaturalPerbdfeec)<br />

101<br />

0692<br />

OD333<br />

OD37<br />

284<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF MR FLUID<br />

Trial product of MR fluid "#230", which was made on an experimental basis by fourth author of<br />

Bando Chemical Co. LTD., was used for the MR damper. <strong>The</strong> "#230" is an oil-based fluid and has<br />

good stability. Properties of "#230" are shown in TABLE 2.<br />

TABLE 2<br />

PROPERTIES OF MR FLUID "#230"<br />

Properties<br />

Base fluid<br />

Density<br />

Stability (%)=V(t) / V(0) *100<br />

V(t):sedimental volume after t min :V(0): original sedimental volume<br />

#230<br />

Oil<br />

3.3*10 3 kg/m 3<br />

Approximately 98%<br />

(by volume) after 2*10 4 min.


410<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF MR DAMPER<br />

<strong>The</strong> design of the bypass-flow-type MR damper, which was developed by fifth author for semi-active<br />

control of base isolation, is shown in Figure 6 and TABLE 3. It is composed of three parts: bypassflow,<br />

pressure chambers and a reservoir. <strong>The</strong> bypass flow portion has an orifice for effectively<br />

magnetizing the fluid. <strong>The</strong> uniform magnetic field is applied perpendicularly to the MR fluid flow at<br />

the annular orifice. <strong>The</strong> thermal expansion due to the temperature rise of the MR fluid is absorbed by<br />

the reservoir.<br />

Cyclic loading tests were conducted to clarify the performance of the MR damper. Figure 7 shows<br />

the force-displacement relationship. <strong>The</strong> electric current to the electromagnet was set at a constant<br />

value of OA~ 3 A in the 0.3A interval. <strong>The</strong> hysteretic loop shows rigid-plastic like characteristics<br />

caused by friction force of the MR fluid with magnetic field. <strong>The</strong> force increases almost<br />

proportionally to the increase in the electric current. Figure 8 shows the force-velocity relationship.<br />

<strong>The</strong> velocity is the maximum velocity of the piston in the case of sinusoidal loading. This figure also<br />

shows that the force increases almost proportionally to the increase in the electnc current, and the<br />

force does not depend so much on the piston velocity.<br />

Bypass Fbw<br />

.Reservoir TABLE 3<br />

DESIGN SPECIFICATION<br />

Coil<br />

Figure 6: Structure of MR damper<br />

M ax Force<br />

Stroke<br />

Cy Inder Bore<br />

Secton<br />

Orifce<br />

Length<br />

Inductance<br />

E lectrom agnet Res stance<br />

M ax.Curreni<br />

MR fliri<br />

40kN<br />

± 295m in<br />

..»,-». —-iir'-v » j~,^<br />

•"' *'* * ••'££<br />

^rrr^^ —^-^<br />

7»^^» • > -4j^ .- .^ ^" r. •'•*•«<br />

>— ^T-np /-T -w-^<br />

1 "^<br />

T<br />

OA<br />

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

(a) O.lHz, 10cm, 6.28cm/sec<br />

40<br />

^20<br />

z;<br />

A*<br />

o 0<br />

CJ<br />

O<br />

i,<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

T<br />

3.0A<br />

T<br />

OA<br />

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30<br />

Displacement


411<br />

*fU<br />

O A<br />

20<br />

7 HA I<br />

, 2 4A<br />

.'.-%-.', -21A<br />

* ..*•'. +• 1 SA<br />

• * x x V • 1 iA<br />

^e V* * x | * 1 M<br />

10<br />

0<br />

"" _^ 0 6A<br />

" H. - 0 3A<br />

s -^- — *~ a ~~~ f 7 f *^ * 0 OA<br />

0 10 20 30<br />

Velocity


412<br />

-OA -«— 03A -<br />

-09A X -Control<br />

-06A<br />

R<br />

t 3<br />

100 200 300<br />

Accelerator! fcm/s/s)<br />

(a) Absolute acceleration<br />

10 20<br />

D isplacem ent fcm )<br />

(b) Relative displacement<br />

Figure 10: Average values of response of each story of positive side and negative side<br />

(El Centra 1940 NS, Maximum velocity is 50 cm/sec)<br />

30<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

This paper has described the characteristics of a large-scale test frame. One test frame was used for<br />

four series of experimental tests to verify each developing technology, such as semi-active control for<br />

base-isolation and seismic response control, damage detection and rocking energy dissipation. This<br />

large-scale experimental test verified the validity of application of those systems to smart structures,<br />

and useful experimental results were obtained for the settlement of future research. As one of the test<br />

results, authors verified that an MR damper can reduce the response displacements while reducing the<br />

response acceleration.<br />

ACKNOWLEGEMENT<br />

This work has been carried out under the US-Japan cooperative structural research project on Smart<br />

Structure Systems (Chairperson of Japanese side: Prof. S. Otani, <strong>University</strong> of Tokyo, Chairperson of<br />

U.S. side: Prof. M. A. Sozen, Purdue <strong>University</strong>). We would like to acknowledge the hard work and<br />

contribution of all members of the project for their useful advice and suggestions.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Fujitam H., Sodeyama H., Haia K., Iv/ata N., Komatsu Y., Sunakoda K. and Soda S. (2000)<br />

Dynamic Performance Evaluation of Magneto-Rheological Damper, Proceedings of Advances in Structural Dynamics 2000,<br />

Vol.1, pp 319-326.<br />

Kamopp, D., Crosby, M. J. and Harwood, R. A. (1974). Vibration Control Using Semi-Active Force Generators, Journal of <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

for Industry, Transactions of ASME, May 1941, pp.619-626.<br />

Midonkawa M., Azuhata T., Ishihara T, Matsuba Y., Mtsushima Y. and Wada A. (2002) <strong>Earthquake</strong> response reduction of buildings by<br />

Monta<br />

rocking structural systems, Proc.of SPIE's 9th. International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Paper No. 4696-<br />

33<br />

K, Teshigawara M., Isoda H., Hamamoto T. and Mita A. (2001) Damage Detection Tests of Five-Story Steel Frame with<br />

Simulated Damages, Proc of SPIE's 6th International Symposium on NDE for Health Monitoring and Diagnostics, Paper No.<br />

4335-18<br />

Otani S., Hiraishi H. r Midonkawa M., Teshigawara M., Saito T. and Fujitani H. (2000)<br />

Development of Smart Systems for Building Structures (Invited paper), Proc.of SPIE's 7th. International Symposium on Smart<br />

Structures and Materials, Paper No. 3988-01.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

PREDICTIVE STRUCTURAL VIBRATION CONTROL<br />

USING SOFT COMPUTING<br />

H. Furuta 1 and Y. Nomura 2<br />

Department of Informatics, Kansai <strong>University</strong><br />

Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan<br />

2 Graduate School of Informatics, Kansai <strong>University</strong>,<br />

Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In recent years, there has been a tendency that structures become higher and longer due to the advance<br />

of civil engineering technology. For such large and long structures, active structural control attracts<br />

attention to reduce the amplitude of vibration and to improve their safety and serviceability. In this<br />

study, an attempt is made to develop new structural control systems that can reduce the vibration of<br />

structures by introducing such soft computing technologies as recurrent neural network and predictive<br />

fuzzy control.<br />

By introducing the recurrent neural network, it is possible to realize the learning ability and to deal<br />

with continuous outputs. It is reported that the recurrent neural network can learn various patterns in<br />

higher speed than the usual Hopfield's neural network. In the integration of the output from each cell,<br />

the feedback system is adopted, in which every cells except the input layer are mutually connected so<br />

that the output is used as an input for the next step. This implies that the recurrent neural network is<br />

suitable for the analysis of time series data and for the structural vibration control.<br />

Predictive fuzzy control is also adopted to improve the accuracy of fuzzy active control. <strong>The</strong> external<br />

force at the next step is predicted based upon the time-series data by applying the deterministic<br />

nonlinear prediction method with fuzzy reasoning using neighborhood's difference. Several<br />

numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the control systems developed here.<br />

STRUCTURAL VIBRATION CONTROL USING RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK<br />

Recurrent neural network is effective in processing of time series data (Douya, 1991) In a recurrent<br />

neural network, the output value as opposed to the input value of time t turns into the input value of<br />

time t+1. Since each input data is dealt with as having mutual relations, the recurrent neural network<br />

can learn simultaneously not only an input-and-output pattern but also the time change pattern during<br />

each input and output.<br />

In time t, the output value of unit i is expressed by Z t (t). In case that this unit i is in the input layer, the


414<br />

output value is defined as jq (t) and it is y t (t) in the case other than this unit i is in the input layer.<br />

where I, H, and 0 denote the input unit, intermediate unit, and output unit, respectively. In time t+1,<br />

yj (t+1), the output value of unit i^HUO, is expressed by Eqn. 2, where 85 (t+1) means the internal<br />

state expressed by Eqn. 3. <strong>The</strong>n, w, j is a weighting coefficient between unit i and unit j. <strong>The</strong> function<br />

f t is the monotonous increasing function that can be differentiated, and a sigmoid function is used here<br />

(Eqn. 4) (Kitagawa et aL, 1997).<br />

f^t + l)), ieHuO (2)<br />

!>.*,«+ £*W;« = 2X.Z-W (3)<br />

jel jeH(jO ys/utfuO<br />

, ' ; l - + exp(-x) -7—\<br />

As typical learning methods of the recurrent neural network, BPTT (Back Propagation Through Time)<br />

that performs error propagation in the direction of reverse time, and RTRT (Real Time Recurrent<br />

Learning) that performs error propagation in the direction of positive time, are developed. Since the<br />

purpose of this study is the real time learning, RTRT is employed here. <strong>The</strong> error between the output<br />

value from a network and teaching data in time t is calculated as Eqn. 5 and Eqn. 6.<br />

E(t)=iZ(e t (t)) 2 (5)<br />

(t)=fy k (t)-d t (t),<br />

if keo<br />

kW [0 otherwise<br />

where d k (t) is the teaching data for the input value in time t.<br />

between the output value and the teaching value.<br />

In the output unit, e k (t) is the difference<br />

In this study, the input values of the neural network are current wind velocity, displacement and<br />

velocity of structure, and the control force at the previous time step. <strong>The</strong>n, learning of recurrent<br />

neural network is performed as follows: the input values in time t 0 are the wind velocity, the<br />

1<br />

displacement and velocity of the structure. <strong>The</strong>n, the input values at the previous time step are set to<br />

be zero, because ^ is the starting time. <strong>The</strong> learning is not performed and only the output value is<br />

calculated in order to initialize the information in a neural network. In time t+1, the input data in<br />

time ^ are used as the data before 1 step and set new data with current input value. <strong>The</strong> next output<br />

values are calculated in the same way and the learning of neural network starts with the minimization<br />

of the square error between output values and teaching data. <strong>The</strong> similar process is executed in real<br />

time learning method by numerical computation. However, it is difficult for the vibration control to<br />

obtain the teaching data for the learning so that virtual teaching data are used for learning, which are<br />

obtained by solving an approximate differential equation. Fig.l shows learning process of recurrent<br />

neural network.


415<br />

Wind Velocity (t J<br />

Relative Displacement (tj<br />

Relative Velocity (t n)<br />

Wind Velocity (t n_,)<br />

Relative Displacement^)<br />

Relative Velocity (t n.,)<br />

When applying this system to the structural<br />

control, it is assumed that the external force,<br />

the velocity and displacement are measured<br />

and normalized by 5% of each maximum<br />

value.<br />

Fig. 1 Learning Process of Recurrent Neural Network<br />

Err<br />

6QOE-02<br />

500E-02<br />

4DOE-02<br />

First, 1,000 times learning is executed by<br />

using 100 wind velocity data obtained at<br />

every 0.05 second as the input data. <strong>The</strong><br />

degree of sigmoid function, learning<br />

coefficient, and the node number of<br />

intermediate layer are supposed to be 1.0,<br />

0.01, and 10, respectively. Fig. 2 shows the<br />

convergence process of the square error in<br />

learning.<br />

300E-02<br />

200E-02<br />

1OQE-02<br />

ODOE+00<br />

Fig.2<br />

200 400 600<br />

800 1000<br />

TineStep(005sec)<br />

Convergence Process of Square Error<br />

<strong>The</strong> calculated displacement and velocity are presented in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, and the maximum velocity<br />

and displacement are presented in TABLE 1 and the average velocity and displacement are presented<br />

in TABLE 2. In Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, the dotted line shows the displacement or velocity without control,<br />

and the solid line shows the results obtained by the structural control using the recurrent neural<br />

network.<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

0<br />

-002<br />

-0.04<br />

-0.06<br />

.<br />

^<br />

Jblg. 3 .Displacement alter Learning<br />

-.<br />

Fig.4 Velocity after Learning


416<br />

No control<br />

RNN<br />

No control<br />

RNN<br />

TABLE 1. MAXI1VIUM VALUES<br />

Velocity<br />

4 8143 fm/s)<br />

43197(m/s)<br />

Displacement<br />

0 6353 (m)<br />

0 6277 (m)<br />

TABLE 2. AVERAGE VALUES<br />

Velocity<br />

0 4733 (m/s)<br />

0 1215 (m/s)<br />

Displacement<br />

0 0442 (m)<br />

0 0236 (m)<br />

PREDICTIVE FUZZY CONTROL FOR STRUCTURAL VIBRATION<br />

Fuzzy Active Vibration Control<br />

In essential the fuzzy control is employed here as a basic control method m which fuzzy rules are tuned by the<br />

prediction results of wind velocity As a fuzzy control rule the following If-<strong>The</strong>n rules are used<br />

If (wind load) and (relative velocity), then (control force)<br />

where the antecedent and consequent parts are defined m terms of seven membership functions<br />

respectively Representative rules are presented m TABLE 3<br />

TABLE 3. REPRESENTATIVE RULES<br />

A<br />

NB<br />

NM<br />

NS<br />

ZR<br />

PS<br />

PM<br />

PB<br />

NB NM NS ZR PS PM PB<br />

PB<br />

PB<br />

PB<br />

PB<br />

PB<br />

PB<br />

PB<br />

PM<br />

NB<br />

NM<br />

NS<br />

PS<br />

PS<br />

PM<br />

PB<br />

NB<br />

NM<br />

NS<br />

ZR MS NM<br />

PS<br />

PM<br />

PB<br />

NB<br />

NB<br />

NB<br />

NB<br />

NB<br />

NB<br />

NB<br />

Identification of Structural Characteristics Using Neural Network<br />

Structural characteristics are identified by using a layered type neural network <strong>The</strong> identification of structural<br />

characteristics is considered as one of approximation of nonlinear functions Using the data from 5001 to 10000<br />

steps, wind load and control force are learned As output values the relative wind velocity at the next step is<br />

obtained bv implementing the neural computing with values of wind load, relative structural displacement and<br />

velocity at the previous step, control force at the previous step as input variables For learning, back-propagation<br />

method is employed<br />

Time Series Prediction by Chaos <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

If the data sampled is chaotic the behavior is regard to be governed by a deterministic rule <strong>The</strong>n, if a<br />

non-linear deterministic rule is estimated, it is able to predict the data of near future until the<br />

deterministic rule does not work due to the sensitivity to the initial state Fig 5 and Fig 6 show the<br />

attractor and the result of Lyapunov exponent analysis


417<br />

Fig. 5 4ttractor (time lag=l) Fig. 6 Result of Lyapunov Exponent Analysis<br />

When a time series shows a chaotic behavior it may follow a deterministic rule <strong>The</strong>n it is possible to<br />

predict the near future behavior of the time series with the aid of chaos theory Here it is attempted to<br />

predict the wind velocity given by a time series record using Local Fuzzy Reconstruction Method<br />

(LJFRM) (lokibe et al, 1994) and Dtermimstic Nonlinear Prediction Method using Neighborhood s<br />

Difference (NDM) (Sakawa et al 1998) Fig 7 and Fig 8 show prediction results by LFRM and<br />

NDM<br />

Application Example<br />

In the proposed system the structural characteristics are determined by the neural computing and the<br />

wind velocity at the next step is predicted by the chaos theory <strong>The</strong>n the wind load at the next step is<br />

calculated through the neural computing by using the vibration states and control force at the previous<br />

step as the input data Introducing the wind load calculated, fuzzy active control is implemented <strong>The</strong><br />

procedure can provide the control force at a step before than the usual fuzzy control This enables to<br />

realize a more flexible and effective vibration control<br />

70 80 90 00<br />

Fig. 7 Prediction Result by LFRM<br />

Fig. 8 Prediction Result by NDM<br />

Figs 9 thorough 11 present the relative displacements of the cases without control, with fuzzy control<br />

and with the proposed system, respectively Figs 12 through 14 depict the changes of relative<br />

velocity TABLE 4 shows the mean displacement and mean velocity It is seen that the proposed<br />

system can provide the best result among the three methods to reduce the vibration<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

In order to realize a more accurate and practical control for structural vibration of structures, it is


418<br />

necessary to update control rules in real time. It is, however, difficult to apply the conventional<br />

vibration control svstem for the structures with the variation of structural characteristics. In this study,<br />

Fig 8. Relative Displacement without Control<br />

Fig 11. Relative Velocity without Control<br />

1600 I BOO 2000<br />

Fig 9. Relative Displacement with Fuzzy Control Fig 12. Relative Velocity with Fuzzy Control<br />

Fig 10. Relative Displacement with Proposed System Fig 13. Relative Velocity with Proposed System<br />

TABLE 4. MEAN VALUES OF RELATIVE VELOCITY AND DISPLACEMENT<br />

No control<br />

Fuzzy<br />

Proposed<br />

Mean Velocity<br />

0.2234 (m/s)<br />

0.13021 (m/s)<br />

0.08183 (m/s)<br />

Mean Displacement<br />

0.0205 Cm)<br />

0.0143 Cm)<br />

0.0109 (m)<br />

an attempt was made to develop a vibration control system of structures with the ability of selfadjustment.<br />

By applying recurrent neural network, it is possible to update control rules automatically,<br />

because the recurrent neural network has the ability of learning time series data and correcting<br />

weighting coefficients of neural network in real time. From the numerical simulation, it was


419<br />

concluded that the real time recurrent learning can reduce the intensity of vibration. This implies that<br />

the real time system identification of the dynamic characteristics of the structure can be sufficiently<br />

done.<br />

In this paper, another attempt was made to develop a structural vibration system that can reduce the<br />

displacement and velocity of the structure with more efficiency. Introducing the prediction of wind<br />

velocity at the next step, it is possible to realize a more effective control of structural vibration. In this<br />

study, the structural characteristics are identified by using the layered-type neural network. For the<br />

learning data, the control results given by the fuzzy control are used. Although the structural model is<br />

very simple, the identification result is quite satisfactory.<br />

In the development of predicting method of wind velocity, the chaos theory was useful in short-term<br />

prediction. In the utilization of the chaos theory, it is necessary to prove the chaotic behavior of the<br />

wind velocity record. <strong>The</strong> chaotic behavior was proven by the Lyapunov exponent analysis. <strong>The</strong><br />

prediction of wind velocity could be done with more accuracy by employing appropriate parameters<br />

whose values were determined empirically. <strong>The</strong> proposed method may be promising for the structural<br />

vibration control due to earthquake excitations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors would like to acknowledge Osaka municipal office and Hitachi Zosen Corp. for providing<br />

the data of wind velocity measured at Osaka bay.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Douya, K. (1991), Learning algorithm of recurrent network, /. of Instru. And Control, Vol.30, No.4,<br />

pp.296-301. (in Japanese)<br />

Kitagawa, K., T. Honma and K. Abe (1997), Emergent learning method of recurrent neural network, J.<br />

oflnstru. and Control Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 1093-1098. (in Japanese)<br />

Takens, R (1981), Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Springer, Berlin, pp.366-381<br />

lokibe, T., M. Kanke, Y. Fujimoto and S. Suzuki. (1994), Short-term prediction on Chaotic Timeby<br />

local fuzzy reconstruction method, Proc. of Brazil-Japan Joint Symposium on Fuzzy Systems,<br />

pp. 136-139 (in Japanese)<br />

M.Sakawa, M., K.Kato and K.Ooura. (1998) A deterministic nonlinear prediction method through<br />

fuzzy reasoning using neighborhood's difference and its application to actual time series data, J.<br />

of Japan Society for Fuzzy <strong>The</strong>ory and Systems, Vol. 10, No.2, pp381-386 (in Japanese)


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

DAMAGE CONTROL OF HYSTERETIC STRUCTURES BY USING<br />

INSTANTANEOUS OPTIMAL CONTROL ALGORITHM WITH A<br />

SPECIAL WEIGHING MATRIX<br />

LI Hui 1 , PENG Jun-yi l , Suzuki Yoshiyuki 2 , GUO An-xin 1<br />

School of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin<br />

150090, China<br />

2 Disaster Prevention <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Kyoto <strong>University</strong>, Kyoto, Japan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper studied the damage reduction of hysteretic structures by using the instantaneous optimal<br />

control strategy with a special weighing matrix. <strong>The</strong> reduction performance of several control<br />

algorithms is compared through numerical studies. In addition, several cases, which include all<br />

responses could be observed, or only part of responses could be observed and other responses were<br />

estimated by the Kalman filter and the extended Kalman filter (EKF), respectively, with the structural<br />

hysteretic model prior-known are also studied and compared. <strong>The</strong> simulation results indicated that the<br />

instantaneous optimal control strategy with the proposed weighing matrix established a further<br />

reduction on the damage under the same control force to compare with that obtained by LQR and the<br />

instantaneous optimal control strategy with conventional proposed weighing matrix. Simulation results<br />

also showed that the semi-active control based on the instantaneous optimal control algorithm with the<br />

proposed weighing matrix is more trackable than that based on conventional instantaneous optimal<br />

control and LQR strategies. <strong>The</strong> estimated responses by Kalman filter based on the initial structural<br />

parameters results in large discrepancy of the responses and control forces from that based on all state<br />

observer or the extend Kalman filter, so the identification of structural hysteretic model parameters are<br />

very important for the control implement.<br />

KEY WORDS: structural control; instantaneous optimal control; semi-active control; hysteretic<br />

structure; nonlinear system; seismic response<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Since the concept of structural control was first introduced into civil structures application, a wide<br />

variety of active control strategies and hardware configurations have been developed to protect<br />

structures against wind and seismic hazards (Housner et al, 1997). <strong>The</strong> linear quadratic regulator


422<br />

(LQR/LQG), H M and the instantaneous optimal control strategies are frequently employed as active<br />

control and semi-active control strategies. However, the weighing matrices in the performance index<br />

are more difficult to choose. <strong>The</strong> stirrhess and mass matrices were ever proposed and widely used as<br />

the weighing matrix with the strain energy and kinetic energy of the controlled building being<br />

minimum in nature.<br />

However, damping matrix or stifihess matrix can be chosen as the linear quadratic objective weighing<br />

matrix for the instantaneous optimal control algorithm due to the special expression of the control<br />

force. <strong>The</strong> control force will provide a classical proportional damping to the controlled building when<br />

the mass multiplying by damping matrix (MC) is selected as the weighing of the instantaneous optimal<br />

control algorithm that results in a reasonable damping distribution for the controlled structures.<br />

Simulation results indicated that the control forces obtained from the instantaneous optimal control<br />

algorithm with the suggested weighing matrix can further reduce the drifts and absolute responses<br />

significantly than that obtained from the instantaneous optimal control algorithm with the conventional<br />

weighing matrix (MM) and LQR under the same control force. In addition, the control strategy is more<br />

suitable for semi-active variable damping control (such as variable damping damper and MR damper<br />

and ER damper) because it just acts like passive damper with adjustable parameters in nature. <strong>The</strong><br />

simulation results showed that the semi-active control based on the instantaneous optimal control<br />

algorithm with proposed weighing matrix is more trackable than that based conventional instantaneous<br />

optimal control and LQR strategies.<br />

2, INSTANTANEOUS OPTIMAL CONTROL WITH FULL STATE OBSERVER<br />

For a structure with n degrees of freedom (DOFs), the equation of motion is given by<br />

)= -MX S (f)+ DU(t) (2.1)<br />

whereMand Care the nxn mass and damping matrices, respectively, X(t),X(t),X(t) are the<br />

relative displacement, velocity and acceleration vectors, respectively, U(t) is the pxl active<br />

control force vector, D is the n x p distribution matrix that relates the effect of each control force<br />

with each DOF, X g (t) is the earthquake ground acceleration vector at each DOF, and F(x(t),X(t))<br />

is the restoring force of the structure and can be described by many hysteretic models, herein,<br />

Bouc-Wen model is employed to investigate the control strategy in this study as follows<br />

F(x(t\ X(t))= ofcc + (1 - a}kz (2.2)<br />

where k is the pre-yielding stiffiiess, a is the ratio of post-yielding stirrhess to pre-yielding<br />

stiffness, and (l-a)fc is the hysteretic part of the restoring force in which z is described by the<br />

following nonlinear differential equation<br />

~ (2.3)


423<br />

with the parameters A,fi,y and n govern the shape of the hysteresis loop. *andi are the<br />

interstory drift and velocity, respectively. <strong>The</strong> state-space representation of Eqn. 2.1 can be written in<br />

the form<br />

(2.4)<br />

where A-<br />

-M~ I F(X,X]<br />

0 X<br />

-M' I CX\'<br />

matrix, I denote the identity matrix, and -1 is a matrix with -1 as the elements.<br />

<strong>The</strong> instantaneous optimal control strategy for nonlinear structures can be obtained as follows<br />

(2.5)<br />

where A/ is the sampling time, and superscript -1 denote the inverse matrix. <strong>The</strong> control force in Eqn.<br />

2.5 will miriirnize the following objective<br />

J(t) = Z T (i)QZ(t)+ U(t} T RU(t) (2.6)<br />

where Q and R are positive-semi-definite and positive-definite weighing matrices, respectively. 0<br />

is selected as follows in general<br />

M<br />

(2.7)<br />

<strong>The</strong> weighing matrix Q in Eqn.2.7 will make the kinetic energy and strain energy of controlled<br />

structure minimum However, another type of weighing matrix Q has showed more effectively to<br />

reduce responses of linear structures subjected to earthquakes and described here<br />

(2.8)<br />

in which Q n can be arbitrary positive-semi-definite matrix. <strong>The</strong> above weighing matrix Q<br />

generated following control force (MC for short)<br />

(2.9)<br />

<strong>The</strong> weighing matrix R is frequently selected as diagonal matrix, so the control force in Eqn.2.9<br />

would supply the optimal control force with classical proportional damping matrix to the controlled<br />

building when the diagonal elements of R are equal to each other. As a result, the value of the<br />

elements in R implies the additional damping ratio to the controlled building by the control devices<br />

and can be conveniently determined according to the response reduction demand. <strong>The</strong> additional


424<br />

damping ratio provided by the control devices is described<br />

where f a and C are the additional and the original structural damping ratios, respectively, and s is<br />

the diagonal element of the weighing matrix R . <strong>The</strong> instantaneous optimal control force in Eqn. 2.9 is<br />

(2.11)<br />

<strong>The</strong> control force described in Eqn. 2.11 provides more reasonable damping distribution and is more<br />

suitable for semi-active fluid control devices considering semi-active fluid control devices acting<br />

essentially as passive dampers with adjustable parameters.<br />

<strong>The</strong> control force in Eqn. 2.1 1 can further reduce the linear responses of structures to compare with the<br />

linear optimal control force and other type of control force, however, it will be further investigated in<br />

this study that the control force in Eqn. 2.11 can establish further reduction for the nonlinear structures<br />

with hysteretic restoring force in comparison with the linear optimal control strategy and other type of<br />

control strategies. <strong>The</strong> optimal linear control force (LQR or LQG) can be obtained in Eqn. 2.12 with<br />

the positive definite symmetric matrix P determined by the matrix Riccati equation.<br />

= -R' l B T PZ(t) (2.12)<br />

For simplicity, A will be replaced with A^, and<br />

0<br />

where K is the<br />

pre-yielding stiffness matrix. And the weighing matrices Oand R in Eqn. 2.12 and Riccati equation<br />

will be determined by Eqn. 2.7 and the demanding control force, respectively. <strong>The</strong> matrix in Eqn. 2.7<br />

will also be used to determine the instantaneous optimal control force in the Eqn. 2.5 (MM for short) in<br />

order to compare the performance with that established in Eqn.2.11.<br />

3. INSTANTANEOUS OPTIMAL CONTROL WITH OBSERVER<br />

It is impossible to install sensors at all DOFs to measure all responses from the practical application<br />

view. However, it is a realistic way that few sensors are only installed at limit locations to measure<br />

responses and other unobserved responses could be estimated by some filter methods, such as the<br />

Kalman filter and the extended Kalman filter (EKF). <strong>The</strong> Kalman filter is a stochastic filter that allows<br />

the estimation of the states of a system based on a linear state space model and the EKF uses a local<br />

linearisation to extend the scope of the Kalman filter to systems described by nonlinear ordinary<br />

differential equations (Maybeck 1982).<br />

Since the Kalrnan filter is based on linear model that inherently implies the structure to be always in<br />

elastic phase, it is not suitable for the nonlinear structure control problem. Comparing with the Kalman<br />

filter, the EKF is based on nonlinear model, its time varying model parameter can track the stiffness


425<br />

change continuously. In this paper, the EKF is employed to estimate the states of the nonlinear<br />

structure in order to implement the structural control. Suppose the nonlinear dynamic equation of<br />

structure with active control devices subjected to additive plant noise w may be<br />

Z = f(z 9 U,X g ,w) (3.1)<br />

And the measurement equation with noise v given by<br />

y v ~C v Z + v (3.2)<br />

where C v is the measurement matrix and y v are the observe structural states, w and v are<br />

statistically independent zero mean Gaussian white noise with covariance O w and R v , respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong> EKF implements the state estimation through a recursion algorithm that is more suitable for online<br />

simulation. Every calculating step is composed of time update and measurement update equations. <strong>The</strong><br />

recursion algorithm is given as follows:<br />

(3-3)<br />

(t M |O (3.4)<br />

l<br />

(3.5)<br />

Z(t k \t k ) = Z(t t Kj+£(Oy-C,Z(f t Kj (3-6)<br />

P(t k \t k } = [l-K(t k )C,]P(t k \t k J (3.7)<br />

In which Z(t k \ t k ] is the state estimation at t k ,P(t k \ rj is covariance matrix of error 'mZ(t k \ t t ),<br />

K(t k ) is Kalman gain at time t t , $(t M \t t ) is state transfer matrix from t t to t M , and<br />

^fe+ilO is ^ discretirized plant noise input matrix. For the sampling time A, matrix


426<br />

by Eqn. 2.9 and Eqn. 2.12, respectively, based on the estimated states obtained by the EKF<br />

4. DAMAGE EVALUATION CRITERIA<br />

In order to compare the performance of various control strategies, some criteria should be given. <strong>The</strong><br />

damage of the hysteretic structures subjected to strong earthquake is the most critical criteria to<br />

evaluate the performance of the structures. Lots of damage evaluation criteria have been given for<br />

hysteretic structures (Cosenza et al 2000). As a whole, the peak value of the interstory drift, the energy<br />

dissipation, and the damage index are the most common criteria to indicate the destroy and collapse of<br />

structures. <strong>The</strong> Park and Ang's damage index will be employed in this study.<br />

In addition, the control force that is related with the power for active control devices will be another<br />

criteria. <strong>The</strong> ratio of the energy dissipation supplied by the control devices to that by the structural<br />

hysteretic characteristics is also a criterion to evaluate the efficiency of the control strategy.<br />

5. NUMERICAL STUDIES<br />

5.1 Full State-Feedback Controller<br />

Consider a 5-story shear building model with active control devices attached at each floor. <strong>The</strong><br />

uniform lumped mass and floor stiffness are 2000kg and 10 6 N/m so that the first period of the linear<br />

structure is 0.99s. <strong>The</strong> critical damping ratio is 0.02 for the first two modes and the Rayleigh damping<br />

matrk keep constant regardless of whether the structure is linear or nonlinear. <strong>The</strong> parameters to<br />

describe the hysteretic characteristics are assumed to be ,4 = 1,a = 0.05,^ = 0.5 and 7 = 0.5. <strong>The</strong> yield<br />

displacement is 2cm, ultimate displacement is 14cm and £ =0 15 used in Park and Ang's damage<br />

index is assumed. <strong>The</strong> control forces in Eqns. 2.12 and 2.5 with the weighing matrix in Eqn. 2.7, and in<br />

Eqn. 2,11 are used in the numerical example, and the additional damping ratio in Eqn. 2.10 is assumed<br />

to be 0.03, 0.08, 0.13 and 0.18. <strong>The</strong> matrix R in Eqn. 2.12 and 2.5 was determined according to the<br />

demand of identical control force for three control strategies. EL Centro, Kobe and Northridge ground<br />

motion records with peak values 3.417m/s 2 , 8.18m/s 2 and 8.27m/s 2 , respectively, are used as inputs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> earthquake intensity is changed by multiplying coefficient ranged from 0.05 to 3.5 for EL Centro<br />

earthquake and 0.05 to 2 for Northridge and Kobe earthquakes with increment 0.1.<br />

<strong>The</strong> interstory drifts of the building subjected to various intensity earthquakes are shown in Fig. 5.1. It<br />

was shown that the response reduction of the first story drift is the nearly same by the three control<br />

strategies, MC, MM and LQR for small and moderate intensity EL Centro, however, the further<br />

reduction for the first story drift was established by the proposed control strategy (MC) than that<br />

achieved by MM and LQR for high intensity EL Centro, Furthermore, the proposed control strategy<br />

(MC) established significant further reduction of the 1 st and 5 th story drifts than MM and LQR by using<br />

the same value of control force for both Northridge and Kobe earthquakes over all intensity range,<br />

especially more significant further reduction established over high intensity range.<br />

Fig. 5.2 show the 1 st floor damage index under Northridge earthquake. <strong>The</strong> results indicate that MC<br />

strategy decreased the damage of the structures more significantly than MM and LQR.


427<br />

Shown in Fig. 5.3 is the ratio of active devices dissipated energy to the structural dissipated energy by<br />

three control strategies under El Centro earthquakes. In this figure, the upper lines inply that the larger<br />

additive damping ratio £ a . We can observed from the figure that the larger f a can dissipate more<br />

earthquake input energy compared to the dissipated energy by structure itself, and the latter are<br />

comprised of viscous damping dissipated energy and hysteretic behavior dissipated energy. However,<br />

the trend will weaken in the situation of larger intensity earthquakes.<br />

05 10 15 20 25 30<br />

(a) the l sr mterstory drift<br />

10 15 20 25 30<br />

(b) the 5 th tnterstory drift<br />

Fig. 5.1 <strong>The</strong> interstory drifts by three control strategies under El Centro earthquake<br />

1 0-,<br />

08-<br />

06-<br />

04-<br />

02-<br />

00-<br />

intereity<br />

Fig.5.2 <strong>The</strong> 1st story damage under<br />

Northridge earthquake<br />

Fig. 5 3 <strong>The</strong> ratio of dissipated energy<br />

under El Centro earthquake<br />

5.2 <strong>The</strong> Control Force with the State Estimation by EKF<br />

Consider the same model above, however, only the fifth floor displacement is observed and other<br />

states will be estimated by EKF and the Kalman filter, respectively, to implement the active control<br />

strategy in this case.<br />

full state feedback<br />

the Kdlnan filter estimated<br />

state feedback<br />

— full state feedback<br />

O the EKF estimated<br />

state feedback<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Fig.5.4 Comparison of the 5 th relative displacement response (MC<br />

controller , £ a = 0.08, with the intensity =2,0) of three types of state feedback cases<br />

under ElCentro earthquake


428<br />

Fig.5.4 shows the comparison of the 5 th relative displacement response between the full state feedback,<br />

the EKF estimated state feedback and the Kalman filter estimated state feedback, respectively. <strong>The</strong><br />

results indicate that the Kalman filter could not track the real structural response for the higher<br />

intensity earthquake since the nonlinear behavior of the hysteretic structure. However, the responses of<br />

the structure with full state feedback controller and with estimated state controller (EKF) are similar,<br />

which indicated that EKF can accurately estimate the nonlinear structural response.<br />

Although it is difficult to on-line implement the nonlinear structural state estimation during the control<br />

process, EKF is still valuable to further study on the online estimation for nonlinear structures with<br />

respect to its precision.<br />

6, CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposed control strategy can establish further reduction of the drift and damage by using the<br />

same control force subjected to various earthquakes than LQR and instantaneous optimal control with<br />

conventional weighing matrix. In addition, the semi-active control determined by the proposed active<br />

control strategy could more exactly follow the performance tracks established by the corresponding<br />

proposed active control Finally, the active control for nonlinear structure with observation can be<br />

accurately implemented by the EKF state estimation online.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Housner, G W. et al (1997). Structural control: past, present, and future. Journal of <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Mechanics, ASCE, 123:9, 897-971.<br />

Cosenza, E. et al (2000). Damage indices and damage measures. Progress Structure <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Material 2, 50-59<br />

Cosenza, E. et al (1993), <strong>The</strong> use of damage functional in earthquake-resistant design: a comparison<br />

among different procedures. Struct Dyn. & Ear. Engng 22, 855-868<br />

Soda, S. (1996). Role of viscous damping in nonlinear vibration of buildings exposed to intense<br />

ground motion. Journal of Wind <strong>Engineering</strong> and Industrial Aerodynamics 59, 247-264<br />

Yang, J. N., Li, Z. (1991) Instantaneous optimal control for linear, nonlinear and hysteretic structures:<br />

stable controllers. NCEER-91-0026, Nat. Or. For <strong>Earthquake</strong> Engrg, Res., State <strong>University</strong> of New<br />

York, Buffalo, NY.<br />

Maybeck, P. S. (1982). Stochastic models, estimation and control. New York: Academic Press.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

42g<br />

AN ENERGY FRAMEWORK FOR DECENTRALIZED MARKET-<br />

BASED STRUCTURAL CONTROL<br />

Jerome Peter Lynch and Kincho H. Law<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, Stanford <strong>University</strong><br />

Stanford, CA, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> current state-of-practice in structural control uses the centralized Linear Quadratic Regulator<br />

(LQR) approach to determine optimal control forces. <strong>The</strong> centralized architecture of the LQR control<br />

approach does not easily scale to complex systems characterized by high sensor and actuator densities.<br />

In this paper, a decentralized control approach is proposed for application in structural control<br />

systems. Termed energy market-based control (EMBC), the control system's decision process is<br />

modeled after the laws of supply and demand that govern free-market economies. <strong>The</strong> demand<br />

function of system actuators reflect the real-time kinetic and strain energy response of the structural<br />

system while the supply function of the system power sources are influenced by the structure's<br />

external input energy- <strong>The</strong> approach is shown to yield control results comparable to those obtained<br />

from the centralized LQR solution.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept of using control systems in the structural engineering domain has been proposed for about<br />

three decades (Yao 1972). In 1989, the first building to use an active-control system for limiting<br />

structural deflections during wind and seismic loadings was constructed (Kobori et al. 1991). Over<br />

twenty buildings, primarily in Asia, have since been constructed using a variety of structural control<br />

system designs (Nishitam 1998). Early control system types are termed active because one or two<br />

large actuators apply control forces to the structure directly. WJiile success was attained using active<br />

control systems, they suffered from many technological limitations such as high costs and high power<br />

consumption demands. In response to these limitations, most recent research efforts have been<br />

centered upon the design of semi-active control systems. In semi-active control, passive energy<br />

devices are modified to possess variability in their response properties for service as indirect system<br />

actuators. Examples of semi-active control devices include stiffness control devices and variable<br />

dampers (Takahashi et al. 1998). Semi-active control devices are reliable, compact, require power on<br />

the order of tens of watts, and are cheaper to manufacture and operate (Symans and Constantinou<br />

1999).


Innovation is driving control device designs towards smaller, cheaper, and more power efficient<br />

actuators for structural control. <strong>The</strong> technological improvement gained in adopting semi-active<br />

control serves as an example of this evolutionary trend. <strong>The</strong> trend suggests that control systems of the<br />

future will potentially employ up to hundreds of actuators and sensors, resulting in a large-scale<br />

control problem defined by high actuation and sensing densities. Current state-of-practice employs a<br />

centralized controller for the calculation of control forces based upon measurements obtained from<br />

system sensors. A centralized controller is generally not adopted in large-scale control systems<br />

because control force computations increase at faster than a linear rate with increases in system<br />

dimensionality (Lunze 1992).<br />

As an alternative to the centralized controller, decentralized control techniques can be considered for<br />

adoption in large-scale control problems. Application of decentralized control solutions result in the<br />

reduction of the global system into an interrelated collection of smaller subsystems. A vanety of<br />

decentralized control approaches can be considered for adoption in a structural control system.<br />

Modifications of the centralized linear quadratic regulator (LQR) in order to produce optimal<br />

decentralized controllers for structural control have been explored (Lynch and Law 2002). From a<br />

performance standpoint, it has been shown that no penalty is incurred in choosing a decentralized<br />

control solution.<br />

Most recently, the explosion in development of MEMS sensing and actuation systems has resulted in<br />

many large-scale control problems. With the reliability of MEMS sensors and actuators lower than<br />

conventional counterparts, adaptive and flexible control methods are required with decentralized<br />

control solutions most popular. <strong>Research</strong>ers have explored using free-market concepts as one<br />

approach for controlling large-scale MEMS systems (Guenther et al. 1997). By modeling the control<br />

system as a free-market economy, where actuators are market buyers and power source are market<br />

sellers, an optimal control solution can result. Market-based control (MBC) methods have also been<br />

applied for controlling the computational load of microprocessors and for load-balancing in data<br />

networks (Clearwater 1996).<br />

Lynch and Law (2001) have proposed a market-based control (MBC) approach specific to application<br />

in a structural control system. <strong>The</strong> MBC method was derived using linear demand and supply<br />

functions for behavioral definition of market participants. Although excellent control performance<br />

was attained, the linear market functions lacked a physical rationale. <strong>The</strong> scope of this research is to<br />

revisit the MBC derivation and to develop a more rational framework by incorporating the naturally<br />

occurring measures of energy in the system. Termed energy market-based control (EMBC), the<br />

approach will be tested using the semi-active controlled Kajima-Shizuoka building as an illustrative<br />

example. <strong>The</strong> EMBC control performance will be compared to that of the centralized LQR controller.<br />

430<br />

OVERVIEW OF MARKET-BASED CONTROL<br />

<strong>The</strong> free market economies are an efficient means of allocating amongst market participants scarce<br />

resources, such as labor and goods. Free markets are decentralized in the a priori sense because the<br />

market mechanisms operate without knowledge of the global system. <strong>The</strong> historically poor<br />

performance of centralized economies underscores the efficiencies of the decentralized marketplaces.<br />

<strong>The</strong> competitive mechanisms of a free market can be extended for application to the control paradigm.<br />

First, the marketplace is defined by a scarce commodity such as control power, control forces, or<br />

control energy, just to name a few potential quantities. In the control marketplace, the role of market


uyers and sellers are assumed by system actuators and power sources respectively. <strong>The</strong> behavior of<br />

buyers is defined by individual utility functions, UB, that measure the amount of utility derived by the<br />

buyer from purchasing the market commodity. Utility is a function of the pnce per unit commodity, p,<br />

the amount of commodity purchased, CB, and response measures of the dynamic system, y. Similarly,<br />

the sellers are governed by individual profit functions, Us, that measure the amount of profit derived<br />

by the seller from selling the commodity. Profit is modeled as a function of the price per unit<br />

commodity, p, and commodity sold, C$.<br />

<strong>The</strong> goal of market buyers is to maximize their utility. In doing so, maximization of their utility<br />

functions is constrained by limiting the total purchase cost, pCs, to be less than their instantaneous<br />

wealth, W. Maximization of the market sellers' profit functions is constrained by the maximum<br />

amount of commodity they possess,<br />

431<br />

max U SI (C SI , p) subject to C sl < C MAXl<br />

maxII S2 (C S2 ,p) subject to C S2


432<br />

STRUCTURAL ENERGY DURING VIBRATIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> energy balance of a structural system dunng a seismic disturbance can easily be derived. First<br />

consider the equation of motion of an n degrees-of-freedom structural system subjected to a seismic<br />

disturbance and using controls to limit responses that would result:<br />

My 00 + Cx(t] 4- Kx(t) = Du(t) (2)<br />

<strong>The</strong> displacement response vector of the system is x(t), the control forces applied to the system by m<br />

actuators are represented by u(t), and the absolute displacement isy(t). <strong>The</strong> absolute displacement of<br />

the system, y(t), is simply the input ground displacement, x s (t), added to each term of the relative<br />

displacement vector, x(t). <strong>The</strong> mass, damping, and stiffness matrices are nxn'm dimension and are<br />

denoted by M, C, and K, respectively. It is assumed that the mass, damping and stiffness matrices are<br />

symmetric. D is the n x m location matrix for the application of control forces.<br />

Equation (2) represents the equilibrium balance of forces in the structural system at any point in time.<br />

Integrating the forces over the response path from the initial position, x 0 , to the final position, ,r/, yields<br />

the energy of the balanced system (Wong and Yang 2001).<br />

[*' y T Mdx+ J v x T Cdx + J V X T Kdx = J"' U T D T dx (3)<br />

<strong>The</strong> first term on the left-hand side of Equation (3) reflects the kinetic energy of the system while the<br />

third term represents the strain energy of the system. Both measures of energy are based upon<br />

conservative forces and are therefore path independent. <strong>The</strong>ir measure is only dependent upon the<br />

current position and initial position of the system. Assuming the system is initially at rest, the kinetic<br />

and strain energy of the system can be rewritten and Equation (3) updated.<br />

<strong>The</strong> four terms of the left-hand side of Equation (4) represent respectively, kinetic energy (KE),<br />

damping energy (DE), strain energy (SE) and control energy (CE). <strong>The</strong>se four energies balance the<br />

input energy (IE) resulting from the ground motion as shown on the right-hand side of Equation (4).<br />

DERIVATION OF ENERGY MARKET-BASED CONTROL<br />

<strong>The</strong> derivation of energy market-based control (EMBC) is centered upon a marketplace allocating the<br />

scarce commodity of control energy. <strong>The</strong> method begins with the selection of demand and supply<br />

functions that reflect measures of energy in the system. <strong>The</strong> demand and supply functions will each<br />

contain a "tuning" constant that can be used to vary their sensitivities.<br />

Derivation of Demand and Supply Functions<br />

In the energy marketplace, the scarce commodity of control energy is used to determine the magnitude<br />

of control forces applied to the structural system. <strong>The</strong> form of the demand function is selected to<br />

reflect two intentions of the market buyers. First, when the price of control energy is zero, the demand<br />

of the market buyer is equal to the input energy of its degree-of-freedom. Second, the demands of the


433<br />

Remaining Control Energy in Power Source<br />

p, price<br />

(a) Market Buyer Demand Function<br />

p, price<br />

(b) Market Seller Supply Function<br />

Figure 1 - Energy market-based control (EMBC) demand and supply functions<br />

market buyers asymptotically converge toward zero at infinite prices. To encapsulate these two<br />

characteristics, an exponential demand function for the i th market buyer, is proposed:<br />

(5)<br />

<strong>The</strong> y-axis intercept is equal to the instantaneous input energy of the ground motion at a particular<br />

degree-of-freedom multiplied by the market buyer's wealth, W t . <strong>The</strong> exponential decay of the demand<br />

function is dependent upon the kinetic and strain energy of the system as depicted in the denominator<br />

of the exponential term. As the response of the system increases due to greater kinetic and strain<br />

energy, the rate of decay decreases. <strong>The</strong> tuning constant, a, is provided to control the sensitivity of the<br />

demand function. Figure l(a) illustrates the behavior of the modeled demand function.<br />

<strong>The</strong> control system's battery sources represent the market sellers whose actions are described by<br />

supply functions. Each market seller has in its possession a certain amount of control energy. Again,<br />

two observations of the market seller's behavior are required before specifying a suitable supply<br />

function. First, if the price of power is set to zero, no market seller is willing to sell. Second, as the<br />

price grows to infinity, each market buyer would be willing to sell all of its remaining control energy<br />

denoted by L t . As a result, the following supply function is proposed:<br />

Equation (6) provides an origin intercept in addition to an asymptotic convergence to the remaining<br />

battery life at very large market prices. <strong>The</strong> constant J3 is used to provide a means of adjusting the<br />

supply function. Figure l(b) presents a graphical interpretation of the market seller supply function.<br />

Figure 2 - Determination of the competitive equilibrium price of control energy


434<br />

Equilibrium Price of Power<br />

With the demand and supply functions for all market participants established, the Pareto optimal price<br />

at each time step can be readily determined. <strong>The</strong> aggregate demand function is set equal to the<br />

aggregate supply function to determine the competitive equilibrium price of energy for a given time<br />

step. A graphical interpretation, as shown in Figure 2, is the price of control energy of the point where<br />

the global demand and supply functions intersect. It can be shown that this intersection point always<br />

exists. <strong>The</strong> solution represents a Pareto optimal price of control energy for the marketplace.<br />

<strong>The</strong> amount of control energy that is purchased by each system actuator is used to determine the<br />

applied control force. Given the instantaneous control energy purchased by an actuator, the control<br />

force u t can be determined from Equation (7).<br />

CE = M,Ax, (7)<br />

After control energy has been purchased, the energy is evenly subtracted from the system power<br />

sources. Similarly, the amount of energy purchased by an actuator times the market price per unit<br />

power determines the amount of wealth removed from each actuator's total wealth.<br />

EXAMPLE EMBC IMPLEMENTATION IN THE KAJIMA-SHIZUOKA BUILDING<br />

<strong>The</strong> Kajima-Shizuoka Building is used to illustrate the implementation of the derived EMBC control<br />

solution. <strong>The</strong> structural details of the building are presented in Figure 3 (Kurata et al. 1999). A total<br />

of ten semi-active hydraulic dampers, capable of changing their damping coefficient in real-time, are<br />

installed in the structure's weak longitudinal direction. Each SHD control device is capable of<br />

producing a maximum control force of 1,000 kN.<br />

To quantify the performance of the EMBC solution, the structure is controlled for the El Centro, Taft,<br />

and Northridge seismic disturbances. For the three earthquake records selected, peak absolute ground<br />

velocities have been normalized to a value of 50 cm/sec. <strong>The</strong> performance of the EMBC controller<br />

will be directly compared to that of a centralized LQR controller.<br />

I<br />

5F<br />

V<br />

VIVVIV<br />

1 st to 5th<br />

1st to 5th<br />

Floor<br />

Floor<br />

cj r 1 T rl1 rT r<br />

run<br />

1<br />

1F<br />

Floor Seismic Mass (kg) Story Stiffness (kN/m)<br />

1 215,200 147,000<br />

2 209,200 113,000<br />

3 207,000 99,000<br />

4 204,800 89,000<br />

5 266.100 84,000<br />

Figure 3 -<strong>The</strong> Kajima-Shizuoka Building, Shizuoka, Japan


For the implementation of the EMBC controller, the demand and supply constants, orand ft, are set to<br />

unity. It is determined that values of unity for these two constants makes the supply and demand<br />

functions sufficiently sensitive to yield excellent control results. Each floor of the structure that<br />

contains two actuators is provided with an equal amount of initial wealth.<br />

W l = 1000; W 2 = 1000; W, = 1000; W 4 = 1000; W 5 = 1000 (8)<br />

<strong>The</strong> total amount of power initially provided by the system power source is roughly calculated based<br />

upon the observation that the control system battery in the Kajima-Shizuoka Building is designed to<br />

last for 8 continuous minutes with 10 SHD devices each drawing 70 W of power. As a result, the total<br />

energy provided to the system battery sources is set to 1.25 x 10 10 J.<br />

L T =1.25 x 10 i0 J (9)<br />

An LQR controller is also implemented for the structure. <strong>The</strong> Q and R weighting matrices of the LQR<br />

controller are chosen to weigh with heavier emphasis on the absolute velocity response of the system<br />

degrees-of-freedom.<br />

Figure 4 presents the maximum absolute interstory drift of the Shizuoka Building when no control is<br />

used and when the LQR and EMBC controllers are employed. As shown, both the LQR and EMBC<br />

controllers are effective in reducing the drift response of the structure, with minimal differences<br />

between the two control performances. Only for the Northridge seismic disturbance does the LQR<br />

controller exhibit slightly superior performance when compared to the drift response of the EMBC<br />

controller at the 2 nd and 3 rd stones.<br />

(10)<br />

435<br />

E! Centra (50 cm/s) Taft (50 cm/s) Northridge (50 cm/s)<br />

"0 0.035<br />

Drift (m)<br />

0 035 0 07<br />

Drift (m)<br />

- Revised MBC Control -e- Centralized LQR Control<br />

Figure 4 - Maximum absolute interstory drift using LQR and EMBC controllers


436<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

<strong>The</strong> scope of this research focused upon extending the concepts of decentralized market-based control<br />

(MBC) using an energy framework. <strong>The</strong> decentralized EMBC controller was implemented in the<br />

Kajima-Shizuoka Building with excellent control results observed compared to the centralized LQR<br />

controller. Other market models may exist and provide more superior control performances.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This research is partially sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Grant Numbers CMS-<br />

9988909 and CMS-0121S42.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Clearwater, S. H. (1996). Market-based control: a paradigm for distributed resource allocation. World<br />

Scientific Press, Singapore.<br />

Guenther, O., Hogg, T., and Huberman, B. A. (1997). "Controls for unstable structures." SPIE Smart<br />

Structures and Materials: Mathematics and Control in Smart Structures, SPIE, v.3039, 754-763.<br />

Kobori, T., Koshika, N., Yamada, K., Dceda, Y. (1991). "Seismic response controlled structure with active mass<br />

driver system - Part 1." <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 20:2, 133-149.<br />

Kurata, N., Kobori, T., Takahashi, M., Niwa, N., Midorikawa, H. (1999). "Actual seismic response controlled<br />

building with semi-active damper system." <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 28:11, 1427-<br />

1447.<br />

Lunze, J. (1992). Feedback control of large-scale systems. Prentice Hall, New York, NY.<br />

Lynch, I. P., and Law, K. H. (2001). "Formulation of a market-based approach for structural control"<br />

Proceedings of the 19 th International Modal Analysis Conference. Society of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, Bethel,<br />

CT, 921-927.<br />

Lynch, J. P., and Law, K. H. (2002). "Decentralized Control Techniques for Large-Scale Civil Structural<br />

Systems." Proceedings of the 2Cf h International Modal Analysis Conference. Society of <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Mechanics, Bethel, CT.<br />

Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />

New York, NY.<br />

Nishitani, A. (1998). "Applications of active structural control in Japan." Progress in Structural <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

and Materials, 1:1, 301-307.<br />

Symans, M. D., and Constantinou, M. C. (1999). "Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of<br />

structures: A state-of-the-art review." <strong>Engineering</strong> Structures, 21:6, 469-487.<br />

Takahashi, M., Kobori, T., Nasu T T., Niwa, N., and Kurata, N. (1998). "Active response control of buildings for<br />

large earthquakes - seismic response control systems with variable structural characteristics." Smart Materials<br />

and Structures, 7:4, 522-529.<br />

YaoJ.T.P. (1972). "Concept of structural control." Journal of Structural Division, 98:7, 1567-1574.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

TOWARD THE REALIZATION OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED<br />

LARGE-SPAN SPATIAL STRUCTURES:<br />

MODEL TEST AND SIMULATION<br />

T. Matsui 1 , E. Sugiyama 2 , F. Qiao 3 and T. Hibino 4<br />

'Department of Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong> and Architecture,<br />

Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya <strong>University</strong>, Nagoya, Japan<br />

2 Ito Architects & Engineers Inc., Nagoya, Japan<br />

3 0gawa Tec Corporation, Tokyo, Japan<br />

Department of Architecture, School of <strong>Engineering</strong>, Nagoya <strong>University</strong>, Nagoya, Japan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Until recently few research efforts have been directed toward the application of seismic isolation<br />

system in large-span spatial structures. This is due to the light weight and relatively long natural period<br />

of this type of structure which makes it difficult to apply the commonly used isolation system<br />

composed of laminated rubber isolators and dampers for multi-story buildings. In this paper, the use of<br />

a seismic isolation system with sliding mechanism is proposed for large-span spatial structures. In<br />

order to confirm its effectiveness in reducing the seismic response, shaking table tests are performed<br />

using a small-scale arch model. <strong>The</strong> test results are utilized to validate the simulation method, which is<br />

then applied to investigate the seismic response of a 200m span latticed dome supported by the baseisolation<br />

system. It is confirmed that the proposed seismic isolation system is effective in reducing<br />

substantially the horizontal and vertical accelerations as well as member stresses due to horizontal<br />

ground motions.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Large span spatial structures such as gymnasia or auditoria are requested to have higher level of safety<br />

against earthquakes because they always accommodate many and unspecified spectators and are often<br />

used as regional refuges once the disaster occurs. In order to protect the structure from severe damages<br />

and to prevent the drop of hanging equipments or ceiling panels due to strong earthquake motions, it<br />

seems to be effective to employ a seismic isolation system. Especially, in view of the brittle nature of<br />

the failure of this type of structure and the difficulty of repair of damaged members over the large span<br />

roof, it is desirable to retain all the members within the elastic range even under extremely rare strong<br />

earthquake. This is only possible by employing the seismic isolation system. <strong>The</strong> seismic isolation is<br />

also effective to release thermal stresses, and to prevent the failures caused by unequal movement of<br />

the supporting structures which were frequently observed at Kobe <strong>Earthquake</strong> in 1995.


438<br />

<strong>The</strong> effectiveness of the seismic isolation system in multi-story buildings has been well proved and<br />

realized. However, until recently few research efforts have been directed toward the application of<br />

seismic isolation system in spatial structures.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most commonly used seismic isolation device for multi-story buildings is a combination of<br />

laminated rubber isolators to elongate the natural period apart from the dominant period of earthquakes<br />

and dampers to absorb vibration energies (AD, 2001). Kato et al (1998) attempted to apply such an<br />

isolation system in spatial structures and confirmed its effectiveness analytically in reducing seismic<br />

response of a 300m span dome. However, the dynamic properties of laminated rubber isolator is<br />

known to vary depending on many factors, such as the weight of super-structure, strain level,<br />

temperature and so on. It is generally difficult to elongate the natural period of commonly used seismic<br />

isolation devices sufficiently long to be applied to spatial structures with light weight and relatively<br />

long natural period (typically 1 second or so). In order to lengthen the natural period of the isolator<br />

without a restriction on the mass of super-structure or mechanical properties of the materials of device,<br />

Kawaguchi and Tatemichi (2000) proposed the "paddle isolator", a kind of rocking pendulum, and<br />

realized the isolator with a natural period up to 4 seconds.<br />

In the present paper, the use of a seismic isolation system with sliding mechanism is proposed for<br />

large-span spatial structures. Such an isolation system can be realized, e.g. by an elastic sliding device<br />

composed of a laminated rubber isolator with Teflon sheet attached to the bottom and placed on<br />

stainless plate, which is usually combined with commonly used laminated rubber isolators to give<br />

restoring forces after sliding. In order to confirm its effectiveness in reducing the seismic response,<br />

shaking" table tests are performed using a small-scale arch model. <strong>The</strong> test results are utilized to<br />

validate the simulation method, which is then applied to investigate the seismic response of a 200m<br />

span latticed dome supported by the base-isolation system. <strong>The</strong> effectiveness of the proposed seismic<br />

isolation system is demonstrated to reduce the dome response under strong earthquake motions.<br />

SHAKING TABLE TESTS FOR SMALL-SCALE ARCH MODEL<br />

Test Model<br />

In order to confirm the effectiveness of the<br />

proposed seismic isolation system, shaking<br />

table tests were performed using a<br />

small-scale arch model composed of<br />

polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sheet and a pair of<br />

aluminum tie rods, as shown in Fig. 2.1. <strong>The</strong><br />

arch is hinge-supported along the bottom<br />

sides on a pair of horizontal edge beams<br />

which are roller-supported on a stainless<br />

plate and connected through 4 springs to the<br />

shaking table. A twin model of non-isolated<br />

arch was also manufactured which is<br />

hinge-supported directly on the bed of the<br />

shaking table. <strong>The</strong> material and mechanical<br />

properties of the model were selected such<br />

that the fundamental natural period of the<br />

model is close to that of this type of structure.<br />

Roller:<br />

Shaking tabl*<br />

FIG. 2.1<br />

TEST MODEL


439<br />

stiffness of the springs added to give restoring<br />

forces after sliding was tuned such that the<br />

natural period of the isolation system after<br />

sliding is 3.0 seconds. Young's modulus of PVC<br />

material and the friction coefficient of the roller<br />

were evaluated by measurement. <strong>The</strong> damping<br />

ratios were evaluated by the random decrement<br />

method from the records of forced oscillation<br />

tests (Vandier, 1982). <strong>The</strong> principal dimensions<br />

and parameters of the model are listed in Table<br />

2.1.<br />

Method of Measurement<br />

Tests were performed using the bi-axial shaking<br />

table at Nagoya <strong>University</strong> which can generate<br />

horizontal and vertical motions simultaneously.<br />

<strong>The</strong> NS and UD components of El Centro 1940<br />

acceleration records which were normalized such<br />

TABLE 2.1<br />

PRINCIPAL PARAMETERS OF TEST MODEL<br />

Span<br />

Rise<br />

Radius of curvature<br />

Width<br />

Thickness<br />

Half subtended angle<br />

Total mass of arch<br />

Total mass of sub-structure<br />

Young's modulus of PVC<br />

Damping ratio<br />

non-isolated model<br />

isolated model<br />

Stiffness of a spring<br />

Friction coefficient of rollers<br />

780mm<br />

212.5 mm<br />

480.6 mm<br />

300mm<br />

I mm<br />

54.2°<br />

0.409 kg<br />

0.329 kg<br />

2.90 kN/mnf<br />

0.809 N/m<br />

0.03<br />

that the maximum horizontal acceleration is 300 gal were adopted as input horizontal and vertical<br />

ground motions, respectively. <strong>The</strong> accelerations of the shaking table were measured by means of<br />

strain-gauge type acceleration meters, and the displacement responses were measured at 7 points along<br />

the arch section and a point on the shaking table by means of an optical image tracking system.<br />

Test Results<br />

Prior to forced oscillation tests using earthquake records, sweep oscillation tests were performed to<br />

measure the natural frequencies of the non-isolated arch model, of which the results are shown in<br />

Table 2.2.<br />

Fig. 2.2 shows the measured time histories of<br />

displacement responses at the point A of the nonisolated<br />

and isolated models. <strong>The</strong>se are the<br />

displacements relative to the base-isolation system<br />

for the isolated model and to the shaking table for<br />

the non-isolated model. It is observed that large<br />

displacement responses are excited not only in the<br />

horizontal but also in the vertical directions of the<br />

non-isolated arch. This is due to the fundamental<br />

TABLE 2.2<br />

MEASURED AND PREDICTED NATURAL<br />

PERIODS OF NON-ISOLATED MODEL<br />

Mode<br />

Measured<br />

Predicted<br />

1 st mode<br />

(antisymmetric)<br />

0.632 s<br />

0.637 s<br />

2 nd mode<br />

(symmetric)<br />

0.172s<br />

0.180s<br />

(s)<br />

Horizontal disi<br />

Vertical displacanent<br />

Mon-isolated<br />

Non-isolated<br />

— Isolated<br />

FIG. 2.2<br />

MEASURED DISPLACEMENT RESPONSES<br />

AT POINT A OF ARCH


440<br />

anti-symmetnc mode excited by the horizontal ground motion. <strong>The</strong> large displacement responses of<br />

the non-isolated arch are found to be reduced drastically by introducing the base-isolation system,<br />

demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed base-isolation system. <strong>The</strong> seismic isolation system<br />

possesses only a mechanism to isolate the horizontal ground motion. In the present case the vertical<br />

displacement of the arch is governed by the contribution from the anti-symmetric mode excited by the<br />

horizontal ground motion for which the base-isolation system is effective. This is the reason why the<br />

seismic isolation system is effective in reducing the displacement responses not only in the horizontal<br />

but also in the vertical directions.<br />

In order to investigate the effectiveness of<br />

additional springs in reducing the residual<br />

displacement of the base-isolation system at the<br />

termination of the earthquake, tests were also<br />

performed for the isolated model without the<br />

springs. Fig. 2.3 shows the comparison between<br />

the displacement responses of the base-isolation<br />

system with and without the springs. It is FIG. 2.3<br />

obvious that the additional springs are very MEASURED DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE<br />

effective in reducing the residual displacements<br />

OF BASE-ISOLATION SYSTEM<br />

SIMULATION ANALYSIS FOR EXPERIMENTAL ARCH MODEL<br />

Simulation Method<br />

<strong>The</strong> earthquake response analysis is based on the sub-structure method which divides the whole system<br />

into the arch and the base isolation system. Assuming that it remains within the elastic range, the<br />

response of the arch is expressed as a superposition of free vibration modes in the absence of the base<br />

isolation system. <strong>The</strong> base isolation system is idealized as a single d. o. f. system with bi-linear<br />

hysteresis characteristics which is movable only in the horizontal direction. This makes it easy to<br />

implement the parametric analysis of the coupled arch-base isolation system and to treat the different<br />

damping mechanisms (non-proportional damping) for the arch and the base isolation system. In the<br />

simulation below the measured viscous damping ratios were adopted for the arch, while no viscous<br />

damping was assumed for the base isolation system. <strong>The</strong> reduction of the stiffness of the arch due to<br />

the axial compression introduced in the process of forming the arch by bending a flat PVC sheet was<br />

taken into account as geometric stiffness matrices. Time-domain simulation was performed by<br />

employing the linear acceleration method with a time interval of 0.01 seconds.<br />

Comparison between Model Test and Simulation<br />

Prior to earthquake response analysis the free vibration analysis was performed for the non-isolated<br />

pin-supported arch. <strong>The</strong> predicted natural periods for the lowest two modes are shown in Table 2.2<br />

together with the measured values. Satisfactory agreement is observed between the prediction and<br />

measurement. Figs. 3.1 and 3.2 show the comparison of the measured and simulated time histories of<br />

displacement responses at the point A. Agreement is seen to be satisfactory between the simulation and<br />

model tests except the large discrepancies in the peak values of vertical displacement of the nonisolated<br />

model. <strong>The</strong>se discrepancies may be attributed to the geometrically non-linear effect (biharmonic<br />

response) that is not considered in the simulation.


441<br />

-— «oaei test<br />

~^^\f^<br />

Horizontal displacement<br />

Smulatian<br />

Model test -<br />

Sinulation<br />

Model test -<br />

^<br />

10 Li 30 2i 30<br />

(s)<br />

Vertical displacement<br />

(s)<br />

Vertical displacenent<br />

FIG. 3.1<br />

MEASURED AND SIMULATED<br />

DISPLACEMENT RESPONSES AT POINT A<br />

OF NON-ISOLATED MODEL<br />

FIG. 3.2<br />

MEASURED AND SIMULATED<br />

DISPLACEMENT RESPONSES AT POINT A<br />

OF ISOLATED MODEL<br />

SIMULATION ANALYSIS FOR A 200M SPAN LATTICED DOME<br />

Analysis Model<br />

As analysis model a single-layer latticed dome of 200m span and 46.63m rise is selected, as shown in<br />

Fig. 4.1. <strong>The</strong> dome is composed of pin-jointed steel pipes and pin-supported on the base isolation<br />

devices at the bottom of a tension ring which is assumed to be so stiff that the isolation devices can be<br />

idealized as a single d. o. f. system movable only in the horizontal x-direction. In Table 4.1 are shown<br />

the principal dimensions of the dome which were so determined as to satisfy the allowable stress<br />

design criteria against the gravity loads, wind loads and temperature change of 40°C (AIJ, 1973).<br />

TABLE 4.1<br />

PRINCIPAL DIMENSIONS OF DOME<br />

FIG. 4.1<br />

ANALYSIS MODEL<br />

Span<br />

Rise<br />

Radius of curvature<br />

Half subtended angle<br />

Gravity load<br />

Total mass of dome<br />

Young's modulus of steel<br />

Poisson's ratio of steel<br />

Section of roof member<br />

Section of tension ring<br />

200m<br />

46.63 m<br />

130.54m<br />

50°<br />

1.96 kN/nr<br />

76701<br />

0.206 MN/mm 3<br />

0.3<br />

0500x20<br />

0900x50


442<br />

Base Isolation System<br />

<strong>The</strong> base isolation system<br />

considered herein is a combination<br />

of elastic sliding devices and<br />

commonly used laminated rubber<br />

isolators to give restoring forces<br />

after sliding, for which bi-linear<br />

hysteresis characteristics may<br />

reasonably be assumed In Tables<br />

42 and 4.3 are shown the principal<br />

parameters and specifications of<br />

the base isolation devices which<br />

were designed according to ALT<br />

recommendation (ALT, 2001). In<br />

order to prevent the sliding occur<br />

under ordinary wind condition the<br />

yield displacement was set larger<br />

than the maximum displacement<br />

2.24cm of the base isolation<br />

system, predicted by the spectral<br />

modal analysis under the design<br />

wind loads in the return period of<br />

100 years (Matsui et al, 2001).<br />

Free Vibration Analysis<br />

TABLE 4.2<br />

PARAMETERS OF BASE-ISOLATION SYSTEM<br />

Elastic natural period<br />

Natural period after yielding<br />

Initial horizontal stiffness<br />

Secondary horizontal stiffness<br />

Yield displacement<br />

Yield shearing force coefficient<br />

Friction coefficient<br />

Item<br />

1.0s<br />

4.0s<br />

303 kN/mm<br />

18.9kN/mm<br />

0.025 m<br />

0.10<br />

0.16<br />

TABLE 4.3<br />

SPECIFICATIONS OF BASE-ISOLATION SYSTEM<br />

Number of devices<br />

Diameter<br />

Rubber thickness<br />

Shear modulus of rubber<br />

Shape coefficient S l<br />

Shape coefficient S 2<br />

Horizontal stiffness<br />

Vertical stiffness<br />

Surface pressure<br />

Elastic sliding<br />

device<br />

40<br />

600mm<br />

5mmx5<br />

0.628 N/mm 2<br />

30.0<br />

24.0<br />

7. 10 kN/mm<br />

12.0 MN/mm<br />

4.43 N/mnr<br />

Laminated<br />

rubber isolator<br />

20<br />

600mm<br />

6 mmx22<br />

0.441 N/mm 2<br />

25.0<br />

4.6<br />

0.95 kN/mm<br />

2.06 MN/mm<br />

4.43 N/mm 2<br />

Prior to earthquake response<br />

analysis the free vibration analysis was performed for the non-isolated pin-supported dome. Symmetry<br />

with respect to the x-axis was exploited to analyze only a half of the dome. <strong>The</strong> natural periods and<br />

corresponding free vibration modes for the lowest few modes are shown in Fig. 4.2. It is noted that the<br />

natural periods with significant participation factors are closely spaced over the period range between<br />

0.58-0.25 seconds and that not only horizontal but also vertical motions are excited by the horizontal<br />

ground motion (anti-symmetric modes). In the earthquake response analysis below the lowest 64<br />

modes with significant participation factors were adopted.<br />

1st mode/0.580s<br />

(anti-symmetric)<br />

3rd mode / 0.528 s<br />

(anti-symmetric)<br />

4th mode / 0.524 s<br />

(symmetric)<br />

FIG. 4.2<br />

NATURAL PERIODS AND FREE VIBRATION MODES OF NON-ISOLATED DOME


443<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Response Analysis<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> response analysis was performed for<br />

the non-isolated and isolated domes. Both the NS<br />

and UD components of El Centro 1940<br />

acceleration records which were normalized such<br />

that the maximum horizontal velocity is 50 kine<br />

were simultaneously inputted as the horizontal<br />

and vertical ground motions, respectively. In<br />

order to investigate the residual displacement of<br />

the isolation system at the termination of the<br />

earthquake, the accelerations were reduced<br />

gradually from 30 seconds approaching zero after<br />

35 seconds. Time domain simulation was based<br />

on the linear acceleration method with a time<br />

interval of 0.01 seconds for duration time of 40<br />

seconds. <strong>The</strong> viscous damping ratio was assumed<br />

to be 1.5% for the dome and 1.0% for the base<br />

isolation system.<br />

Fig. 4.3 shows the distribution of the maximum<br />

acceleration responses along the x-axis. It is<br />

observed that the large horizontal and vertical<br />

acceleration responses of the non-isolated dome<br />

are reduced drastically by introducing the baseisolation<br />

system. This is because the antisymmetric<br />

vibration modes excited by the<br />

horizontal ground motion are reduced by<br />

introducing the seismic isolation system.<br />

Co-latitude (dec)<br />

Co-latitude (dec)<br />

Vertical acceleration<br />

* Non-isolated|<br />

ees Isolated<br />

FIG. 4.3<br />

MAXIMUM ACCELERATION RESPONSES<br />

ALONG X-AXIS TO EL CENTRO 1940<br />

Fig. 4.4 shows the distribution of the maximum<br />

axial stresses (bending stresses not included) of<br />

1 6 10* 1<br />

-U 10* - L<br />

Displaceraent (cm)<br />

FIG. 4.5<br />

HYSTERESIS LOOP FOR BASE<br />

ISOLATION SYSTEM<br />

Co-latutude<br />

lagonai neabers adjacent to x-axis<br />

FIG. 44<br />

MAXIMUM AXIAL STRESS RESPONSES<br />

TO EL CENTRO 1940


444<br />

each member along or adjacent to the x-axis to which the axial stresses due to the gravity load are<br />

added. It is again observed that the axial stresses of the members of the non-isolated dome are reduced<br />

drastically by introducing the base-isolation system.<br />

Fig. 4.5 shows the hysteresis behavior of the base isolation system. It can be understood that the<br />

present isolation system with sliding mechanism absorbs vibration energies by hysteretic damping.<br />

<strong>The</strong> maximum displacement of the base isolation device remains within 17cm (130% of the height of<br />

isolators) which may be considered allowable. <strong>The</strong> residual displacement of the base isolation device<br />

at the termination of the earthquake remains within 2.4cm due to the effect of laminated rubber<br />

isolators giving restoring forces after sliding.<br />

It can be concluded from the above results that the proposed seismic isolation system is effective in<br />

reducing the dome response under strong earthquake motions.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

A seismic isolation system with sliding mechanism was proposed for reducing the seismic response of<br />

large-span spatial structures. <strong>The</strong> proposed isolation system is a combination of elastic sliding devices<br />

with commonly used laminated rubber isolators to give restoring forces after sliding. In order to<br />

confirm its effectiveness in reducing the seismic response, shaking table tests were performed using a<br />

small-scale arch model. <strong>The</strong> test results were utilized to validate the simulation method, which was<br />

then applied to investigate the seismic response of a 200m span latticed dome supported by the baseisolation<br />

system. <strong>The</strong> effectiveness of the proposed seismic isolation system was confirmed to reduce<br />

the dome response under strong earthquake motions.<br />

References<br />

Architectural Institute of Japan (1973). Design Standard for Steel Structures, AIJ, Tokyo, Japan.<br />

Architectural Institute of Japan (2001). Recommendation for the Design of Base Isolated Buildings<br />

(2 nd Edition), AIJ, Tokyo, Japan.<br />

Kato, S., Nakazawa, S., Ueki, T., Uchikoshi, M. and Osugi, F. (1998). <strong>Earthquake</strong> response of domes<br />

implemented by hysteresis dampers for earthquake isolation. Lightweight Structures in Architecture,<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> and Construction, lASS/IEAust/LSAA International Congress, Sydney, Australia, 451-<br />

459.<br />

Kawaguchi, M. and Tatemichi, I. (2000). Seismic isolation systems and their application in space<br />

structures, Bridging Large Spans from Antiquity to the Present, IASS Symposium Istanbul Turkey,<br />

217-228. '<br />

Matsui, M., Qiao, F., Moribe, Y., Sugiyama, E. and Esaka, Y. (2001). Responses of seismically<br />

isolated large span domes to fluctuating wind loads, <strong>The</strong>ory, Design and Realization of Shell and<br />

Spatial Structures, IASS Symposium, Nagoya, Japan, TP120.<br />

Vandier, J.K. et al (1982). A mathematical basis for the random decrement vibration signature analysis<br />

technique, J. Mech, Design 104, 307-313. °


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

APPLICATION OF SEMI-ACTIVE DEVICES IN STRUCTURES<br />

SUBJECTED TO EARTHQUAKES, WIND AND VIBRATIONS<br />

Oliver Nagel<br />

Maurer Soehne GmbH & CO KG<br />

Frankfurter Ring 193<br />

D 80 807 Munich, Germany<br />

www.rnaur@r-soehne.de, nagel@mcrin.maurer-soehne.de<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

During the European community research programme SPACE, "smart" devices for mitigating the<br />

influence of vibrations on structures are developed. This paper describes the development of a<br />

magnetorheological damper and its practical application for the damping of a pedestrian bridge in<br />

Germany. Beyond that, in the project the improvement of the seismic behaviour of a steel railway<br />

bridge by replacing the existing passive hydraulic dampers by MR-dampers was investigated. Reason<br />

for this development is that the occurring earthquakes in the recent past were much stronger than the<br />

design earthquakes. Furthermore, a new kind of magnetic valve was developed which led to a<br />

considerable improvement of the dampers properties regarding the response force. Additionally,<br />

shake-tabie-tests with a 2-floor steel structure model (scale 1:5) were performed.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> SPACE Project "Semi-active and Passive Control of the dynamic behaviour of structures<br />

subjected to <strong>Earthquake</strong>s, wind and vibrations", financed by the European Union, has its main<br />

objective in developing devices to mitigate the effects of earthquakes and other disturbing vibrations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following systems are in the process of being developed in the course of this project:<br />

• A semi-active damper, based on magneto-rheological fluids, especially suited to seismic highdemand<br />

applications<br />

• An improved passive-floor isolation system, based on high damping elastomeric bearings<br />

• A hybrid system, combining both passive and semi-active devices<br />

To achieve the named objectives, it also has to be worked out (among others):<br />

• Suitable materials (e.g. stable magnetorheological fluid)<br />

• Suitable real time control algorithms and electronic hardware for different types of structures<br />

This paper concentrates on the semi-active damper and the developments in this connection.


446<br />

2 PROJECT PARTICIPANTS<br />

Concerning the semi-active damper, the following partners are involved in the project;<br />

Industrial representatives:<br />

• Maurer Soehne GmbH & Co KG as bridge equipment manufacturer<br />

• Bilfinger + Berger AG as construction company<br />

• Thales Underwater System as a designer / manufacturer of electronic and acoustic underwater<br />

equipment<br />

Universities:<br />

• KTH Polymerteknologi, largest technical university of Sweden, for the development of MR fluids<br />

and materials to be used in the manufacturing of the MR dampers.<br />

• Universita di Roma 3, for the development of mathematical control algorithms, analytical and<br />

numerical modelling of device behaviour<br />

Private research institutions:<br />

• ISMES, a contract research organisation, performs tests on MR devices<br />

• ENEA, the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment, is entrusted<br />

with the development and validation of numerical models of the devices.<br />

• ENEL, one of the world's largest utilities companies, is involved in the numerical modelling of<br />

structures and mock-ups as well as in dynamic analysis.<br />

3 MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS<br />

Energy dissipation is a very important measure to mitigate the action of earthquakes, wind and other<br />

vibrations on structures. However, passive devices are designed on the base of clearly defined<br />

parameters regarding load, velocity etc. As soon as the occurring real event deviates from the designevent,<br />

the efficiency of the installed passive devices is diminished.<br />

Semi-active devices have the capability to modify their stiffness and/or damping characteristics and<br />

adapt their response behaviour to the real event. That means for every single event, the energy<br />

dissipation can be optimised and the damper can be adapted to different excitations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> essential characteristic of controllable fluids is their ability to change within milliseconds from a<br />

free-flowing, linear viscous fluid to a semisolid with a controllable yield strength when exposed to an<br />

electric (ER fluids) or magnetic (MR fluids) field. From today's point of view, the use of<br />

magnetorheological fluids has the following advantages over electrorheological fluids:<br />

• MR fluids are not sensitive to impurities which can arise from manufacturing and usage<br />

• MR fluids can be mixed with a wide choice of additives to enhance stability, seal life etc.<br />

» MR fluids have a maximum yield stress of up to 100 kPa (ER fluids: 3-3,5 kPa)<br />

» MR fluids can operate at temperatures from - 40°C to + 150°C with only slight variations in yield<br />

stress<br />

On the other hand, the employment of MR fluids makes it necessary to overcome the following<br />

obstacles:<br />

» <strong>The</strong> generation of an evenly distributed magnetic field is more complicate than the generation of an<br />

electric field<br />

• <strong>The</strong> occurring effects of sedimentation are much stronger in case of MR-fluids than in ER-fluids.


447<br />

3.1 Activities completed<br />

3.LI New magnetic valve<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of a new kind of magnetic valve could be completed. <strong>The</strong> improvement with regard<br />

to a constant response force of the damping device -independent from the movement velocities- is<br />

shown in the following chart (Fig. 3.1). It is obvious, that the response force area of the 2 nd step device<br />

is considerably increased compared to the previous device. <strong>The</strong> maximum response force already is<br />

achieved at low movement velocities and it stays constant, i.e. independent from the movement<br />

velocity. At a movement velocity of app. 10 mm/sec, the response force of the damper could be<br />

increased from 29 kN to 700 kN by applying a current of 4,2 amperes and 22 volts. That means: with a<br />

small amount of energy (less than 100 watts) we can control a power of 7,000 watts.<br />

^ __ t ^possible response<br />

force graph<br />

velocity [mm/s]<br />

Fig 3.1: comparison of adjustable damper force - 1 st and 2 nd design step of magnetic valves<br />

<strong>The</strong> following picture (Fig. 3.2) shows the new designed piston with a special flow channel inside and<br />

different adapted materials.<br />

Fig. 3.2: Hydraulic piston with new magnetic valves


448<br />

3.1.2 Investigations at Seyhan Bridge, Turkey<br />

<strong>The</strong> Seyhan Metro Bridge is a 3-span steel structure. <strong>The</strong> total length of the railway bridge is app. 180<br />

m (50 m + 80 m + 50 m), the height of the piers is 10m. <strong>The</strong> bridge was opened in 1999 with a<br />

seismic protection system consisting of two non-linear passive hydraulic dampers in longitudinal<br />

direction at each abutment, elastomeric bearings (on the piers) and unidirectional sliding pot bearings<br />

(on the abutments, to avoid transverse relative movements between bridge deck and abutments).<br />

<strong>The</strong> dampers are characterized by a quasi-constant force level, i.e. the response force of the damper<br />

stays constant and is independent from the movement velocity of the damper.<br />

<strong>The</strong> protection system was designed according to Turkish national anti seismic rules for bridge design,<br />

considering a peak ground acceleration of 0,36 g.<br />

However, the Bolu earthquake (Turkey, 1999) showed a peak ground acceleration of 0,8 g, which is<br />

more than the double value of the considered design earthquake.<br />

<strong>The</strong> goal of the investigation was to find out, how the existing seismic protection system could be<br />

adapted to earthquakes exceeding the design earthquake.<br />

After modelling the bridge and the protection devices, non-linear step-by-step dynamic analyses were<br />

made to single out an appropriate semi-active protection system which is capable to adapt to a broad<br />

spectrum of earthquakes.<br />

end piers 1 and 4 central piers 2 and 3<br />

£ 20-<br />

actual semi- semi- semi- actual semi- semi- semipassive<br />

active 1 active 2 active 3 passive active 1 active 2 active 3<br />

Fig. 3.3: Seyhan bridge: actual passive versus different semi-active control algorithms<br />

Regarding the graph of Fig. 3.3, it becomes clear that the replacement of the passive dampers by semiactive<br />

devices (i.e. semi-active 3), the maximum deformations of both end piers and central piers can<br />

be kept below the maximum design values - even in case of earthquakes much stronger than the<br />

design earthquake.<br />

4 CURRENT APPLICATIONS<br />

4.1 Vibration control of a footbridge by means of a magnetorheological tuned mass damper<br />

Tuned mass dampers (TMD) represent a powerful tool to control dynamic vibration of footbridges<br />

caused by excitation of crossing pedestrians. For economical and esthetical reasons, these bridges<br />

often are carried out as light weight structures with low natural frequencies and low structural<br />

damping. To avoid any damage resulting from vandalism as well as to ensure a certain comfort for<br />

crossing pedestrians, damping devices have to be installed.


449<br />

A topical example for a vibration-sensitive structure is the suspension pedestrian bridge in Forchheim,<br />

a town in the south of Germany (Fig. 4.1). <strong>The</strong> bridge deck was installed in summer 2002 and<br />

investigations about the dynamic behaviour of the bridge are made at the moment (08/2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong> deck is supported by 8 cables, meeting in the top end of an inclined steel pier. All main structural<br />

members (pier and superstructure beams) are made of steel, whereas the pedestrian deck is covered<br />

with wooden planks. <strong>The</strong> total length is 117.5 m, the width of the deck is 4.25 m. <strong>The</strong> height of the<br />

inclined pier is app. 30 m.<br />

Fig. 4.1 Sketch of the footbridge Forchheim, Germany<br />

A numerical modal analysis of the bridge showed the natural frequencies in the range between 1,0 Hz<br />

and 3,5 Hz. Experimental testing at the bridge pointed out that the structure is not only sensitive to one<br />

natural frequency, but at least two of them could be excited by a group of people crossing the bridge.<br />

This is the reason why the installation of one passive device would not be sufficient.<br />

For maximum efficiency the properties of a TMD should be chosen according to the real dynamic<br />

characteristics of the bridge which are usually obtained by experimental tests. However, in case the<br />

system properties may change (e.g. variable bridge mass due to variable live loads) or several different<br />

frequencies with similar eigenforms shall be dampened, the properties of the damper shall vary. <strong>The</strong><br />

effectiveness of a passive TMD is considerably reduced in case the system properties deviate from the<br />

design properties (e.g. deviation in frequency). <strong>The</strong>refore, instead of the conventional passive device, a<br />

semi-active magnetorheological damper is installed in the TMD in order to adopt the latter to the<br />

current frequency and to increase the device's effectiveness in different load cases.<br />

4.2 Characteristics of the TMD<br />

<strong>The</strong> mechanical properties of the semi-active magnetorheological TMD will be identical to an optimal<br />

passive TMD, according to the Den Hartog criteria. <strong>The</strong> passive viscous damping device will be<br />

replaced by a magnetic field-controlled MR damper.<br />

To avoid transverse movements and rotations of the oscillating damper mass, two MR-dampers are<br />

installed in the TMD. <strong>The</strong> damping mass of the TMD can be varied by the number of steel plates,<br />

inserted into the damper (Fig 4.2). This step allows a variation of the damper frequency in order to test<br />

the efficiency of the semi-active behaviour.


450<br />

Fig. 4.2: principle drawing of a semi-active tuned mass damper<br />

<strong>The</strong> output of the MR damper will be controlled by a special algorithm which aims at minimising the<br />

bridge displacements. Based on a set of continuously measured system state variables during a<br />

dynamic excitation, the algorithm evaluates an optimal force which will be approximated by varying<br />

the strength of the magnetic field. <strong>The</strong> maximum current supply for the MR device will be only a few<br />

amperes and therefore can be realized by a small battery and a solar panel.<br />

4.2.1 Numerical analysis and results<br />

<strong>The</strong> analysis of the footbridge was carried out using a simplified structural model (2 DOF system,<br />

representing the corresponding eigenform and the TMD) and the non-linear numerical model for the<br />

simulation of the MR damper. <strong>The</strong> investigations were performed implementing a passive and a semiactive<br />

TMD. <strong>The</strong> dynamic loading induced by a pedestrian was assumed by a stationary harmonic load<br />

(4.2.1)<br />

at maximum of the corresponding eigenform. <strong>The</strong> amplitudes A, represent dynamic components of a<br />

walking, running or jumping pedestrian (G = 1,0 kN) with corresponding phase angle 0 t . For running,<br />

the sum of these amplification factors can reach about 2.5 times the static load. As it is commonly<br />

known that pedestrians synchronize their movement due to the frequency of the bridge, the angular<br />

frequency (Ob is assumed to be the one of the corresponding bridge eigenform.<br />

In a first study the dynamic response of the footbridge in terms of its displacement (at maximum of the<br />

corresponding eigenform) without TMD, with a passive TMD in the optimal configuration and with a<br />

semi-active TMD with properties of the optimal passive one was investigated.<br />

As the dynamic behaviour of the footbridge with both types of TMD (optimal passive and semi-active)<br />

are more or less coincident, it can be concluded that no improvement (but also no deterioration) is<br />

obtained by implementing a semi-active damper - in case the TMD already exposes optimal properties


451<br />

due to the Den Hartog criteria. <strong>The</strong> effectiveness of the TMD could be observed as the maximum<br />

displacements are reduced to 1mm in comparison to the undamped motion with maximum value of<br />

about 7mm.<br />

When performing a numerical modal analysis of a structure, natural frequencies higher than the real<br />

ones are obtained in general, as the masses and material stiffness are assumed on the save side (usually<br />

the mass is overestimated and the material stiffness is underestimated). <strong>The</strong>se assumptions finally<br />

result in calculated frequencies to be about 10-20% higher than the real occurring frequencies.<br />

Experimental testing on the footbridge always is recommended to optimize the TMD. Nevertheless, in<br />

order to show the influence of higher real system stiffness than the assumed one (resulting in a nonoptimal<br />

configuration of the TMD), the dynamic response of the bridge is shown in Fig. 4.3 for a<br />

running pedestrian.<br />

-no TWO<br />

~TMD with optimal tuned passive damper<br />

0004<br />

0005<br />

""TMD with subopttmal tuned passve damper<br />

-TMD with suboptimal tuned semi-active damper<br />

Fig. 4.3 Bridge response with non-optimal TMD properties (stiffness<br />

variation)<br />

It can be observed that in case of a non-optimal tuned TMD, the amplitudes are app. 35% higher than<br />

in case of optimal tuning. In case of a non-optimal tuned semi-active TMD, the maximum<br />

displacements (and accelerations) do not exceed the values of the optimal tuned passive TMD. This<br />

shows the excellent performance of a semi-active controlled TMD.<br />

Due to presence of live loads on the bridge deck, the mass of the structure may significantly vary<br />

which again results in a non-optimal configuration of the TMD. In case the total mass of the bridge is<br />

very high, only little influence on the natural frequency has to be expected, as it varies proportional to<br />

the square root of the mass. However, in case of the footbridge in Forchheim, the live loads may<br />

increase the total bridge mass by a factor of 2. Thus, the passive TMD cannot be tuned optimal for<br />

different load cases.<br />

In order to show this effect, the bridge mass of the simplified model was increased by a factor 1.6<br />

(taking into account that the corresponding eigenform only represents a part of the total mass). <strong>The</strong><br />

resulting response of the bridge is shown in Fig. 4.4 for the undamped case as well as for the cases<br />

with a passive TMD and with a semi-active TMD.


452<br />

no TMD<br />

— TMD with optimal tuned passive dampen<br />

— TMD witn suboptimai tuned passive damper<br />

— TMD wirn sudoptimal tuned semi aeuve damper<br />

Fig. 4.4: Bridge response with non-optimal TMD properties (variation of mass)<br />

Again, the passive TMD strongly is losing its effectiveness with a non-optimal configuration, resulting<br />

in an increase of the displacements and accelerations by a factor higher than 2. <strong>The</strong> non-optimal semiactive<br />

TMD performs much better than the passive one, even if it does not reach the minimum values<br />

obtained for an optimal TMD. However, this result is also due to the effect that the mass ratio between<br />

damper and bridge masses is decreasing, which in general reduces the effectiveness of any TMD.<br />

5 CONCLUSION<br />

In the course of the Projekt SPACE, the following steps were made:<br />

<strong>The</strong> effectiveness of MR dampers for upgrading or retrofitting of seismic protection systems for<br />

bridges was investigated in the course of non-linear dynamic analyses. <strong>The</strong> developed hardware (i.e.<br />

new magnetic valves) was tested in laboratory and showed its broad range of variability regarding the<br />

response force. <strong>The</strong> practical application is made these days by installing semi-active dampers in a<br />

TMD of a pedestrian bridge. <strong>The</strong> application of MR-dampers for seismic protection now requires an<br />

open-minded client with a suitable bridge project.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Medeot, R, <strong>The</strong> EC-fimdedproject "SPACE", 7 th International Seminar on seismic isolation, passive<br />

energy dissipation and active control of vibrations of structures, Assisi, Italy, October 2-5, 2001<br />

Bachmann, H. et al, Vibration problems in structures. Practical guidelines, Birkhauser Verlas<br />

Basilea, 1995<br />

ISO/DIS 10137, Bases for Desing of Structures. Serviceability of Buildings against Vibrations, Ginebra<br />

BS-54QO, Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges. Part 2 Specifications of Loads, 1978.<br />

DEN HARTOQ J. P., Mechanical Vibrations, McGraw Hill, 4 th edition, 1956<br />

SERINO, G, OCCHIUZZI, A., Semi-active MR dampers in TMD sfor vibration control of footbridges,<br />

Part 1: Numerical Modeling and Control Algorithm, Proceedings of Footbridge 2002, Paris, 2002 &


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

ACTIVE CONTROL STUDY OF CABLE-STAYED TING KAU<br />

BRIDGE UNDER STOCHASTIC EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION<br />

Y. Q. Ni 1 , J. M. Ko 1 , Z. L. Huang 2 , J. Y. Wang 1<br />

1 Department of Civil and Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>,<br />

Hung Horn, Kowloon, Hong Kong<br />

2 Department of Mechanics, Zhejiang <strong>University</strong>, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Structural control provides an efficient means for protection of cable-stayed bridges against<br />

earthquakes, wind and other hazards. Although the concept of active control of cable-stayed bridges<br />

has been proposed at the end of the seventies, studies on active seismic response control of cablesupported<br />

bridges referring to detailed bridge models have evolved only in recent years. In this paper,<br />

a stochastic optimal control strategy is developed for seismic response mitigation of cable-stayed<br />

bridges with use of active mass drivers (AMDs). <strong>The</strong> cable-stayed Ting Kau Bridge in Hong Kong is<br />

selected as a paradigm to demonstrate the seismic control efficacy of the proposed strategy. Simulation<br />

studies show that seismic response of the bridge can be significantly reduced by implementation of<br />

AMDs, and the control design can be performed with use of only a few dominant modes. It is found<br />

that installation of AMDs on top of the bridge towers and at the middle of the main spans can achieve<br />

good control effectiveness. <strong>The</strong> control effectiveness for the deck displacements and internal forces<br />

under transverse seismic excitation is better than that under longitudinal seismic excitation.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Due to high flexibility and low damping, a long-span cable-stayed bridge is vulnerable to dynamic<br />

loading such as earthquakes and typhoons. Structural control provides an efficient means for protection<br />

of cable-stayed bridges against earthquakes, wind and other hazards. Although the concept of active<br />

control of cable-stayed bridges has been proposed as early as the end of the seventies (Yang &<br />

Giannopolous 1979a,b), substantial research on this subject did not progress in the eighties. Studies of<br />

applying active control to cable-supported bridges have revived in the last decade. While active control<br />

of wind-induced flutter vibration has been extensively studied using both mechanical and aerodynamic<br />

measures, active seismic control of cable-supported bridges has essentially focused on exploring active<br />

cable tendon control and decentralized control techniques by referring to simple structural models.<br />

Studies on active seismic response control of cable-supported bridges referring to detailed bridge<br />

models have evolved only in recent years (Miyata et al 1996; Shoureshi & Bell 1996; Paulet-<br />

Crainiceanu 1998; Schemmann & Smith 1998a,b). A benchmark problem for seismic response control<br />

of the cable-stayed Cape Girardeau Bridge has been recently developed (Dyke et al 2000). A state-ofart<br />

review of active/semiactive control for cable-supported bridges is available (Ni et al 2001a).


454<br />

In this paper, a stochastic optimal control method is developed for seismic response control of cablestayed<br />

badges with use of active mass drivers (AMDs). Numerical simulation studies of applying the<br />

proposed method to the cable-stayed Ting Kau Bridge (TKB) are then carried out to demonstrate the<br />

control effectiveness and efficacy. Based on a precise three-dimensional finite element model of the<br />

bridge, a control-oriented reduced-order modal model suitable for control design is developed.<br />

Different AMD installation configurations (number and location) are designed for the bridge, and the<br />

random earthquake excitation is assumed to act in the longitudinal, transverse and 45° directions,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> stochastic optimal control strategy based on the dynamical programming principle<br />

and stochastic averaging method is devised to command the operation of AMDs. Twelve evaluation<br />

cnteria are formulated to evaluate the control effectiveness and efficiency. Structural deflection and<br />

internal force responses of the bridge without and with active AMD control are obtained and compared<br />

under different excitation conditions.<br />

PROPOSED CONTROL STRATEGY<br />

Consider an rc-degree-of-freedom structure incorporated with active mass drivers. <strong>The</strong> governing<br />

equation of motion of the integrated system can be expressed as<br />

MX + CX + KX = ~x s ME - PDU (1)<br />

in which M, C , K are mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the structure, respectively; E is the<br />

n-dimensional vector associated with external excitation; P is an nxm matrix indicating the location<br />

of control devices; D is a diagonal matrix comprising the masses of AMDs used. V denotes a vector<br />

of relative accelerations where AMDs are attached; x g is the random ground acceleration excitation,<br />

its spectrum being taken herein as the non-white Kanai-Tajimi power spectral density function with the<br />

expression<br />

where % g and & g represent the damping coefficient and predominant frequency, respectively, of the<br />

ground motion; 5 0 is a constant power spectral density.<br />

Based on the mode superposition method, displacement response of the structure can be expressed in<br />

terms of modal transformation as<br />

where & c , Q c are the dominant modal matrix and displacement vector, respectively.<br />

Equation (1) can then be transformed into the following reduced modal coordinate equations<br />

a+^^a+^G^-A^w-v, (i=i,2,...,o - (4)<br />

where / is the reduced modal order; Q l9 CD I and £ are modal displacement, frequency and damping


455<br />

ratio of the zth mode; /, -{ T cME} t is the participation factor of the z'th mode; v, = {<br />

denotes the control force corresponding to the ith mode.<br />

<strong>The</strong> seismic response control of the structure can be achieved through the corresponding energy<br />

control of structural modal vibration. By applying the stochastic averaging technique for quasiintegrable-Hamiltonian<br />

system (Zhu & Lin 1991; Zhu et al 1997), the averaged Ito stochastic<br />

differential equations with respect to modal energies can be obtained in the form of<br />

_<br />

dH t ^[m l (H)--^v ] }dt + a i (E}dW l (t) (f,;=l,2,...,/) (5)<br />

dQj<br />

in which the model energy vector H , the reduced drift vector m(H) and the diffusion matrix a(H)<br />

are represented as<br />

H,=U2+a>Q)l2<br />

m,(H) = -2^ca,H, +Lfis t «o t )<br />

(6a)<br />

(6b)<br />

and W, (r) is unit Wienner process.<br />

a;(H) = ft-S l (a),)H, (6c)<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of the study is to find out an optimal feedback control law to minimize a finite horizon<br />

performance index. Assuming the ground excitation be stationary and ergodic, the performance index<br />

of the stochastic optimal control in the finite time horizon ( r 0 , T ) is expressed in the form of<br />

J = \imlL(Q c (T\Q c (r),U(r))dr (7)<br />

7"_»oo J<br />

0<br />

where L denotes a continuous differentiable convex function.<br />

In order to minimize the average energy diffusion of the structure, the following stochastic Hamilton-<br />

Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation for optimal ergodic control is established according to the stochastic<br />

optimal dynamical programming principle (Stengel 1986)<br />

_i t 2 o H t<br />

(8)<br />

where V represents a value function with respect to H corresponding to optimal control force.<br />

<strong>The</strong> optimal control force U* is then obtained by minimizing the right hand side of Equation (8).<br />

When the convex function has the form<br />

the expression of U* can be obtained as<br />

U (9)


456<br />

<strong>The</strong> dynamical programming equation is finally obtained by substituting Equation (10) into Equation<br />

(8) and completing the averaging with respect to Q c and Q c as follows<br />

+ £ [ JH (H) 4^<br />

where A u = [0 T C PR' 2 P T , Jt ff,#A + o(||uf ) (12a)<br />

on l y=i<br />

the optimal control force is obtained as<br />

with


457<br />

<strong>The</strong> exact stationary probability density for modal energy H can be obtained from solving the reduced<br />

Fokker-Planck-Komogorov (FPK) equation associated with the averaged stochastic differential<br />

equation (14). That is<br />

p(H) = C,exp[-] A.*.<br />

J A a iLJ><br />

ft- e (,<br />

where C n is a normalization constant.<br />

H t H,]<br />

'<br />

(16)<br />

After obtaining the root mean square responses of structural deflection and internal forces, the control<br />

effectiveness is evaluated using the following performance index<br />

K = -<br />

-ov<br />

(17)<br />

where subscripts u and c denote the uncontrolled and controlled structure; s represents the structural<br />

response variables, which can be displacement, velocity, acceleration or internal force.<br />

A total of twelve evaluation criteria have been defined to assess the control effectiveness and efficacy.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y include: maximum and average displacement reduction; maximum and average base force<br />

reduction; maximum and average bending moment reduction; maximum displacement of AMDs;<br />

maximum control force of AMDs; ratio of total control force to weight of bridge; etc.<br />

CASE STUDY OF TING KAU BRIDGE<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ting Kau Bridge (TKB), as shown in Figure 1, is a three-tower cable-stayed bridge with two main<br />

spans of 448 m and 475 m respectively, and two side spans of 127 m each (Bergermann & Schlaich<br />

1996). <strong>The</strong> bridge deck has been separated into two carriageways with three monoleg towers located<br />

between. Eight longitudinal stabilizing cables with length up to 465 m have been used to strengthen<br />

the slender central tower. Due to adopting these special design configurations, the TKB is one of the<br />

most flexible cable-stayed bridges in the world.<br />

For modal and seismic response analyses, a precise three-dimensional finite element model of the TKB<br />

has been developed that contains over 15,000 degrees of freedom (DOFs). <strong>The</strong> huge number of DOFs<br />

in a full structural model for cable-stayed bridges makes it difficult to create computationally effective<br />

Fig. 1 Cable-stayed Ting Kau Bridge


458<br />

control strategy. Model reduction is necessary to achieve a reduced-order model suitable for control<br />

design purpose. Based on both modal analysis and observability/controllability evaluation, a controloriented,<br />

reduced-order model for the 1KB has been formulated (Ni et al 200Ib). <strong>The</strong> proposed<br />

modeling strategy consists of three level models. <strong>The</strong> Level I model is the three-dimensional finite<br />

element model that aims to depict spatial configuration and dynamic properties of the bridge. <strong>The</strong><br />

Level II model, which is reduced from the Level I model and contains only the so-called important<br />

modes, is a mode-space model used for response prediction, state estimation and control efficacy<br />

evaluation. <strong>The</strong> Level III model containing only limited dominant modes is used for control synthesis<br />

and analysis. <strong>The</strong> scale of the Level II and III models and the selection of important and dominant<br />

modes are dependent on specific bridge under consideration.<br />

Numerical verification of effectiveness of the proposed control method for seismic mitigation of the<br />

TKB has been conducted under different AMD configurations and various earthquake excitations. In<br />

this study, the Level III model consisting of 22 dominant modes is used for control design, while the<br />

Level //model consisting of 47 important modes is used for response prediction and control<br />

evaluation. <strong>The</strong> earthquake excitations are considered to apply to the TKB in the longitudinal, lateral<br />

TABLE 1<br />

RMS DISPLACEMENT RESPONSES AND REDUCTION OF TKB USING AMDS<br />

Uncontrolled<br />

Controlled<br />

Reduction<br />

(%)<br />

Uncontrolled<br />

Controlled<br />

Reduction<br />

(%)<br />

Ting Kau<br />

tower top<br />

&(m)<br />

0.1018<br />

0.0614<br />

39.73<br />


1<br />

459<br />

Uncontrolled<br />

Controlled<br />

Reduction<br />

(%)<br />

179.62<br />

132.89<br />

26.02<br />

920.32<br />

514.17<br />

44.13<br />

195.41<br />

133.64<br />

31.61<br />

1.95<br />

1.74<br />

11.06<br />

9.58<br />

6.27<br />

34.49<br />

1.88<br />

1.47<br />

21.50<br />

M and Q denote the moment and shear force, respectively,<br />

and 45° (horizontal) directions, respectively. In this example, the random earthquake excitation<br />

spectrum is taken as the Kanai-Tajimi power spectral density function with the parameters % g = 0.25,<br />

0) s = 5 rad/s, and S 0 = 0.01 m 2 -rad/s j . For each seismic excitation, five AMD implementation schemes<br />

are investigated. <strong>The</strong> number of the AMDs, each with mass of 8xl0 4 kg, ranges from 5 to 20. <strong>The</strong><br />

AMDs are installed on top of the three towers, at the half heights of the towers, on one or two sides of<br />

mid-span and quarter-span positions of the two main spans. Due to the limited space, only the control<br />

results of one AMD configuration under the earthquake excitation in 45° direction are reported here.<br />

<strong>The</strong> AMD implementation is designed as follows: one AMD on each tower top and mid-points of Ting<br />

Kau and Tsing Yi main spans both in lateral and longitudinal directions. As a result, a total of ten<br />

AMDs are utilized in this case. Figure 2 shows the reduction of cable tension forces after active control<br />

using the AMDs. Tables 1 and 2 list the displacement and internal force responses and the response<br />

reduction of the TKB after using the AMDs achieved with the proposed control strategy. It is observed<br />

that the seismic response of the TKB can be significantly reduced by using AMDs in conjunction with<br />

the proposed stochastic optimal control method. <strong>The</strong> reduction of displacement responses is larger than<br />

that of internal forces. Simulation studies also show that the control effectiveness for the deck<br />

displacements and internal forces under transverse seismic excitation is better than that under<br />

longitudinal seismic excitation. It is found that installation of AMDs on top of the bridge towers and at<br />

the middle of main spans can achieve relatively good control effectiveness.<br />

o<br />

as<br />

» 20<br />

DC<br />

5<br />

n<br />

:-<br />

: *<br />

: |<br />

:<br />

i 1<br />

: j<br />

r - >«•<br />

,<br />

:<br />

n : : ft<br />

' *• "<br />

' j 1 ' ' j<br />

-•-.-JV--.H<br />

'"•:i^ j'ii<br />

: i<br />

• f • - t * r v<br />

-,;<br />

l\<br />

•<br />

'<br />

-;-<br />

l<br />

•<br />

'<br />

-.-<br />

\ '<br />

-!-'<br />

! i<br />

; * f •<br />

" " i \ '<br />

li ''<br />

::;!'.L:<br />

•* •• f i •<br />

'-•';- ' '<br />

,--.--<br />

1<br />

1 *<br />

\f<br />

, , , i ,<br />

| I- /•<br />

^* 1 '• • • *<br />

j -i- -,-.-•-<br />

1*•„ |. i . •. . .<br />

, , ,<br />

f\[<br />

• ' •<br />

, * *<br />

•T ''f\<br />

•<br />

;<br />

I , . ! , , , , ! , , ,<br />

'<br />

'<br />

s i<br />

\<br />


460<br />

(AMDs) and the proposed control strategy for seismic response mitigation of the 1KB has been<br />

conducted. Simulation results show that installation of AMDs on top of the bridge towers and at the<br />

middle of main spans of the TKB can achieve good control effectiveness both in longitudinal and<br />

lateral directions. Both the displacement and internal force responses at the bridge towers and deck can<br />

be significantly reduced by using only limited dominant modes in control design, especially for the<br />

central tower. <strong>The</strong> fluctuation of cable tension forces can also be reduced remarkably by implementing<br />

the AMDs.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

<strong>The</strong> work presented in this paper was supported by a grant from <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic<br />

<strong>University</strong> through the Area of Strategic Development Programme (<strong>Research</strong> Centre for Urban Hazard<br />

Mitigation). This support is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

References<br />

Bergermann, R. and Schlaich, M. (1996). Ting Kau Bridge, Hong Kong. Structural <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

International 6, 152-154.<br />

Dyke, S.J., Turan, G., Caicedo, J.M., Bergman, L.A. and Hague, S. (2000). Benchmark control<br />

problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. <strong>Research</strong> Report, Washington <strong>University</strong> in St.<br />

Louis (http://wusceel.cive.wustl.edu/quake/), 42p.<br />

Miyata, T., Yamada, H. and Paulet-Crainiceanu, F. (1996). Active structural control for cable bridges<br />

under earthquake loads. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Motion and Vibration<br />

Control, Chiba, Japan, 2: 53-58.<br />

Ni, Y.Q., Spencer Jr., B.F. and Ko, J.M. (200la). Active/semiactive seismic response control of cablesupported<br />

bridges: current research status and key issues. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Frontiers in the<br />

New Millennium, B.F. Spencer Jr. and Y.X. Hu (eds.), Rotterdam, Netherlands, 299-304.<br />

Ni, Y.Q., Spencer Jr., B.F. and Ko, J.M. (2001b). Feasibility of active control of cable-stayed bridges:<br />

an insight into Ting Kau Bridge. Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Smart Systems for Bridges,<br />

Structures, and Highways, S.C. Liu (ed.), SPIE Vol. 4330, 387-398.<br />

Paulet-Crainiceanu, F. (1998). Seismic response control of cable-stayed bridges. Proceedings of the<br />

2nd World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, 2: 959-964.<br />

Schemmann, A.G. and Smith, H.A. (1998a). Vibration control of cable-stayed bridges-part 1:<br />

modeling issues. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics 27, 811-824.<br />

Schernrnann, A.G. and Smith, H.A. (1998b). Vibration control of cable-stayed bridges-part 2: control<br />

analyses. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics 27, 825-843.<br />

Shoureshi, R.A. and Bell, MJ. (1996). Vibration control of cable-stayed bridges: control system<br />

development and experimental results. <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics: Proceedings of the 11th Conference,<br />

Y.K. Lin and T.C. Su (eds.), ASCE, New York, 2: 902-905.<br />

Stengel, R.F. (1986). Stochastic Optimal Control, Wiley, New York.<br />

Yang, J.N. and Giannopolous, F. (1979a). Active control and stability of cable-stayed bridge. ASCE<br />

Journal of the <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics Division 105, 677-694.<br />

Yang, J.N. and Giannopolous, F. (1979b). Active control of two-cable-stayed bridge. ASCE Journal of<br />

the <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics Division 105, 795-810.


461<br />

Zhu, W.Q., Huang, Z.L. and Yang, Y.Q. (1997). Stochastic averaging of quasi-integrable-Hamiltoman<br />

systems. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 64, 975-984.<br />

Zhu, W.Q. and Lin, Y.K. (1991). Stochastic averaging of energy envelope. ASCE Journal of<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics 117, 1890-1905.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

HYBRID FRC-ENCASED STEEL TRUSS BEAMS FOR SEISMIC<br />

UPGRADING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES<br />

Gustavo Parra-Montesinos 1 , Subhash C. Goel 1 , and Steve Savage 2<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

<strong>University</strong> of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA<br />

2 Coughlin, Porter and Lundeen, Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper presents an innovative scheme using hybrid beams consisting of steel trusses encased in<br />

fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) for seismic upgrading of RC frames with inadequate beams or slabcolumn<br />

frames. <strong>The</strong> behavior of various connection details between the hybrid beams and RC columns<br />

was evaluated through testing of four beam-column subassemblies under simulated earthquake<br />

loading. In this paper, experimental results are described in terms of load vs. displacement response,<br />

cracking pattern, beam rotations and energy dissipation capacity of the subassemblies. Test results<br />

indicate that moment connections consisting of either a combination of longitudinal beam bars passing<br />

through the RC column plus external steel plates, or the use of only external steel rods behave<br />

satisfactory under large displacement reversals.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

During the last few decades, several seismic retrofit schemes have been used in old non-ductile<br />

reinforced concrete (RC) buildings that include the addition of structural walls, dampers, steel braces,<br />

wrapping or jacketing of RC members with steel or composite materials, and base isolation. With the<br />

development of innovative hybrid structural systems that combine the use of steel and RC elements,<br />

new possibilities for seismic upgrading of RC structures are also becoming available. Hybrid beams<br />

that consist of steel trusses embedded in fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) for use in buildings with slabcolumn<br />

frames or inadequate RC beams is one scheme. <strong>The</strong>se hybrid beams have been shown to<br />

exhibit excellent behavior under large displacement reversals (Khuntia and Goel 1998). In addition,<br />

hybrid FRC-encased steel truss beams are attractive from a construction viewpoint because they could<br />

be prefabricated or constructed on site with little or no shoring required. This can be done by first<br />

connecting the steel truss to the RC columns and then suspending metal or wood forms from the truss<br />

during the FRC casting process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> addition of hybrid FRC-encased steel truss beams for seismic retrofit was recently considered for<br />

the historic King County Courthouse in Seattle, Washington. <strong>The</strong> King County Courthouse is an Pishaped<br />

11-story RC building with a plan of approximately 240 by 240 feet and height of 180 feet.


464<br />

Square and octagonal columns are supported by individual piers and pyramid spread footings. <strong>The</strong><br />

floor system consists of RC beams in the north-south direction that support the joists and 4 in. thick<br />

one-way slabs in the east-west direction. <strong>The</strong> beam-column system in the north-south direction<br />

constitutes a poorly detailed moment frame and the lack of beams in the east-west direction implies a<br />

very weak and soft system in that direction. Based on FEMA-356 Life-Safety performance criteria<br />

(FEMA 2000) for a 10% in 50 year event, the lateral-force-resisting system of the building was found<br />

to be inadequate when the current renovation design was undertaken.<br />

Results from linear and non-linear 2-D and 3-D computer analyses of the structure conducted by<br />

Coughlin, Porter and Lundeen, Inc. led to the selection of fluid viscous dampers in conjunction with<br />

hybrid FRC-encased steel truss beams for strengthening the structure in the north-south direction,<br />

while Yielding Steel Braced Frames were selected for the east-west direction. For the addition of the<br />

hybrid beams, appropriate connection details needed to be developed in order to assure adequate<br />

transfer offerees between the new hybrid beams and the existing RC columns. In this paper, a testing<br />

program aimed at evaluating various details for connecting hybrid FRC-encased steel truss beams to<br />

the existing RC columns of the King County Courthouse building structure is described.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM<br />

<strong>The</strong> experimental program consisted of testing of four beam-column subassemblies under<br />

displacement reversals. Specimens 1 and 2 represented interior connections, while Specimens 3 and 4<br />

represented exterior subassemblies. Fig. I shows a sketch of the test setup used in the experimental<br />

program. <strong>The</strong> four test specimens were subjected to a displacement pattern similar to that specified in<br />

the ACI ITG/T1.1-99 document (ACI 1999) with story drifts ranging from 0.2% up to 3.5%.<br />

Additional cycles, with an amplitude of approximately 4.5% drift and 5.0% drift, were applied to<br />

Specimens 1 thru 3 and Specimen 4, respectively, after the completion of the cycles to 3.5% drift.<br />

<strong>The</strong> column and beam cross section dimensions were the same for all four specimens. <strong>The</strong> column<br />

cross section had an octagonal shape with a side length of 8.25 in. and a 20 in. square beam cross<br />

section was used for all test specimens. <strong>The</strong>se dimensions translated into an approximately 2/3 scale<br />

compared to the existing columns and the hybrid beams planned for the building. Lateral<br />

displacements were applied through a hydraulic actuator connected to the top of the column and to a<br />

strong reaction wall (Fig. 1). A small axial load was applied to the column through hydraulic jacks,<br />

amounting to an axial stress of approximately 150 psi. Three connection details were evaluated for<br />

achieving proper moment connection between the beam and column: 1) use of beam longitudinal<br />

reinforcing bars passing through and epoxy-bonded to the column, 2) use of beam longitudinal<br />

reinforcing bars combined with external steel reinforcement, 3) use of only external steel<br />

reinforcement for full moment transfer. In all cases, shear connection between the embedded steel truss<br />

and the existing column was provided to resist the full shear demand.<br />

Test Specimens<br />

Four beam-column subassemblies were designed and tested to evaluate the behavior of the three<br />

moment connections mentioned above. In the following, a brief description of beam, column and<br />

connection details used in the test specimens is given.


465<br />

Specimen 1<br />

Specimen 1 represented an interior beam-column subassembly with beams framing into the column<br />

from two opposite sides (Fig. 1). As mentioned above, a 20 in. square beam and an octagonal shape<br />

column with a side length of 8.25 in. were used in this specimen. <strong>The</strong> column was constructed prior to<br />

the beam to simulate the existing columns of the structure. <strong>The</strong> FRC beam had steel hooked fibers with<br />

a volumetric fraction of 1% and the beam reinforcement consisted of 4 #5 top and bottom longitudinal<br />

bars, #3 closed stirrups, and a steel truss embedded in FRC (Fig. 2). In this specimen moment transfer<br />

in the connection region was achieved by passing the longitudinal beam bars through holes drilled in<br />

the RC column, which were later epoxy injected. <strong>The</strong> chords of the steel truss were connected to a steel<br />

plate with slotted holes that was in turn bolted to the column (Fig. 2), and thus the truss was not<br />

expected to contribute to moment strength in the beam plastic hinge region adjacent to the column<br />

face. <strong>The</strong> truss, however, was designed to resist the shear force demand in the plastic hinge in addition<br />

to supporting the permanent steel forms during the concrete casting process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> original column design in Specimen 1 included 12 #5 longitudinal rebars representing a steel ratio<br />

of 1.1%. However, because core drilling of the column would be performed in this retrofit scheme,<br />

four bars were eliminated to account for possible cutting of longitudinal reinforcement during the<br />

drilling process. <strong>The</strong> column transverse reinforcement consisted of a #3 spiral with a 4 in. pitch. <strong>The</strong><br />

spiral reinforcement was cut at different locations in the joint region to simulate possible cutting during<br />

column core drilling. To maintain adequate concrete confinement after cutting of the column<br />

transverse reinforcement, the column was wrapped with glass fiber sheets in the connection region.<br />

Specimen 2<br />

Specimen 2 was similar to Specimen 1. Moment transfer in the connection region was achieved by<br />

passing the beam longitudinal reinforcement through holes drilled in the RC columns, as for Specimen<br />

1, in combination with external steel plates (Fig. 3). <strong>The</strong> purpose of these external plates was to control<br />

the opening of gap at the beam-column interface, as well as to increase the beam moment strength in<br />

the region adjacent to the column, forcing the plastic hinge to form away from the column face.<br />

Connection between the FRC beam and the external reinforcement was achieved through a 1.25 in.<br />

steel rod that was embedded in the beam section (Fig. 3). Standard holes were drilled in the steel plates<br />

to connect them to the beam through-bolts. To decrease the moment capacity in the relocated plastic<br />

hinge region so as to maintain a shear demand comparable to that in Specimen 1, the beam longitudinal<br />

reinforcement was reduced to 2#5 and 2#4 top and bottom rebars.<br />

Specimen 3<br />

This specimen represented an exterior beam-column subassembly and used a moment connection<br />

consisting of internal beam rebars and external steel plates, as in Specimen 2. A beam stub was used in<br />

the opposite (back) side of the column for anchorage of the beam longitudinal reinforcing bars.<br />

Because the use of hooks at the bar ends would pose construction difficulties, the beam longitudinal<br />

bars were terminated with a mechanical anchor. In Specimen 3, 2 in. through-bolts were used for<br />

transfer of forces between the FRC beam and the external reinforcement. In addition, tight holes were<br />

used in the external steel plates to avoid any slip that would lead to "pinching" in the load vs.<br />

displacement hysteretic response (Fig. 3). With regard to beam transverse reinforcement, #3 stirrups<br />

were used only adjacent to the through-bolts and reinforcement mechanical anchors. No transverse


466<br />

reinforcement was used over the remaining part of the beam and beam longitudinal reinforcement was<br />

kept the same as for Specimen 2.<br />

Specimen 4<br />

Test Specimen 4 represented an exterior subassembly similar to Specimen 3. However, no reinforcing<br />

bars were used in the hybrid beam, and thus the steel reinforcement consisted only of a steel truss<br />

embedded in the FRC beam. Moment transfer in this specimen was achieved through the use of<br />

external steel rods. <strong>The</strong> use of a moment connection through only external reinforcement eliminates<br />

the need for drilling holes in the RC column, and thus the risk of cutting longitudinal and transverse<br />

reinforcement, which required wrapping of the column. A sketch of the connection details used to<br />

transfer the forces from the steel truss to the external rods is shown in Fig. 4.<br />

Material Properties<br />

Ready-mix concrete from a local supplier was used in all four specimens. For the FRC used in the<br />

beams, 1.2 in. long hooked steel fibers with a diameter of 0.02 in. were added at a volumetric fraction<br />

of 1%. Concrete compressive strength for the columns ranged between 4100-5600 psi, while that of the<br />

FRC ranged between 3500-4100 psi. Grade 60 steel was used for all reinforcing bars in the columns<br />

and beams. A3 6 steel was used for the steel truss members and Grade B7 bolts were used for the<br />

through-rods in Specimens 2 and 3, and the external rods in Specimen 4.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> behavior of the test specimens was evaluated in terms of their load vs. displacement hysteretic<br />

response, cracking pattern, beam rotations, and energy dissipation capacity.<br />

Load vs. Displacement Behavior and Cracking Pattern<br />

<strong>The</strong> load vs. displacement response for Specimens 1, 3 and 4 is shown in Fig. 5. Specimen 1, with<br />

moment connection relying on epoxy injection of the longitudinal beam bars passing through the<br />

column, experienced significant pinching due to slippage of the longitudinal beam bars. Yielding of<br />

these bars began at 1.0% drift and for story drifts up to 1.4%, pinching in the hysteretic loops was<br />

moderate. However, at larger drift levels, the amount of pinching increased severely due to an almost<br />

total loss of bond between the longitudinal beam bars and the column concrete, which led to the<br />

opening of a large gap at the beam-column interface. Flexural cracking in the FRC beams was<br />

observed at early stages of the test. However, concentrated rotations at the beam ends due to the<br />

opening of the gap dominated beam rotations, and thus beam flexural cracks did not open significantly<br />

during the cycles performed at larger drifts. In terms of lateral strength, Specimen 1 maintained its<br />

strength up to 4.5% story drift with little loss of stiffness during repeated cycles at the same drift level<br />

Specimen 3 5 which had the moment connection with combined external steel plates and epoxy<br />

injection of the longitudinal beam bars passing through the column, exhibited a stable hysteretic<br />

response with good stiffness retention and energy dissipation capacity, as shown in Fig. 5b. In this<br />

specimen, the use of external steel plates with tight holes connected to the beam through-bolts


467<br />

increased the beam moment strength in the region adjacent to the column face, and thus lead to<br />

spreading of the beam inelastic deformations away from the column face, as shown in Fig. 5c. In<br />

addition, the external steel plates controlled the opening of the gap at the beam-column interface,<br />

reducing pinching in the load vs. displacement hysteretic loops compared to Specimen 1 <strong>The</strong> strength<br />

of Specimen 3 was governed by the beam moment strength, which was increased due to the use of<br />

steel FRC. For all drift levels, no decay in strength was measured and only little decay hi stiffness<br />

during repeated cycles at the same drift level was observed. Specimen 2, which had the same details as<br />

Specimen 3 but with standard holes in the external steel plates for connection with the beam throughbolts,<br />

exhibited a response somewhat between those of Specimens 1 and 3 due to slip of the external<br />

plates that did not control the opening of the gap at the column face as effectively as the plates with<br />

tight holes used in Specimen 3.<br />

Specimen 4 had no longitudinal beam bars, and thus the steel reinforcement was provided by the<br />

embedded steel truss. <strong>The</strong> moment connection in this specimen was achieved entirely through external<br />

steel rods as shown in Fig 4. Specimen 4 showed a load vs. displacement response characterized by<br />

full hysteretic loops (Fig. 5d). <strong>The</strong> strength of this specimen was governed by yielding of the truss<br />

chords, which occurred in the region adjacent to the embedded steel tubes connecting the steel truss<br />

with the external steel rods. In Specimen 4, tlexural cracking concentrated at this location and at large<br />

drift levels a significant opening of a single crack was observed in the FRC beam. Severe local<br />

buckling of the truss chords was observed at 5% drift, leading to a significant decay in the specimen<br />

strength.<br />

Energy Dissipation Capacity<br />

<strong>The</strong> energy dissipation capacity exhibited by the test specimens was evaluated by comparing the area<br />

of the hysteretic loop corresponding to the last cycle at a particular drift level with that of an equivalent<br />

elasto-plastic system with a stiffness corresponding to the initial stiffness of the specimen and the<br />

strength measured during the first cycle at the story drift level of interest. Fig. 6 shows the energy ratio<br />

(specimen vs. equivalent elasto-plastic system) for the four test specimens. As can be seen, Specimen 1<br />

exhibited poor energy dissipation capacity with energy ratios below 12% for displacement levels larger<br />

than 1.0% drift. On the other hand, Specimen 4, with external steel rods, exhibited energy ratios as<br />

high as 47%. Specimens 2 and 3 exhibited energy ratios of approximately 15% and between 19-25% at<br />

story drifts larger than 2%, respectively.<br />

Beam Rotations<br />

Rotations in the FRC beams were measured with linear potentiometers over a length of 22 in. from the<br />

column face (1.1 x beam depth). In Specimen 1, beam rotations primarily concentrated at the beamcolumn<br />

interface due to significant slip of the beam longitudinal reinforcing bars. In Specimen 2, due<br />

to the use of standard holes in the external steel plates, the opening of the gap at the beam column<br />

interface was not adequately controlled, and thus beam rotations consisted of both concentrated<br />

rotations at the beam end and in the beam region adjacent to the column face. However, in Specimen 3<br />

with a combination of internal beam bars and external steel plates with tight holes, significant rotations<br />

were measured in the region adjacent to the through-bolts due to relocation of the plastic hinge region<br />

and an adequate control of the opening of the gap at the beam-column interface. In this specimen,<br />

rotations in excess of 4% were measured over approximately one depth from the column face. In<br />

Specimen 4, beam rotations concentrated primarily in the beam region connected to the external steel


468<br />

rods where the damage concentrated at large drift levels. In this specimen, rotations exceeding 6%<br />

were measured at the end of the test, as shown in Fig. 7.<br />

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

Results from tests of four hybrid FRC-encased steel truss beam-RC column subassembhes are reported<br />

in this paper Three connection details were evaluated for moment transfer in the connection region. 1)<br />

use of beam longitudinal reinforcing bars passing through and epoxy-bonded to the RC column, 2) use<br />

of beam longitudinal reinforcing bars combined with external steel reinforcement, and 3) use of only<br />

external steel reinforcement for full moment transfer Experimental results indicate that connections<br />

consisting of beam longitudinal reinforcement in combination with external reinforcement, or only<br />

external steel rods, exhibit a stable response under large displacement reversals with good strength,<br />

stiffness and energy dissipation capacity <strong>The</strong> use of external reinforcement in the beam region<br />

adjacent to the RC column controlled the opening of a gap at the beam-column interface and allowed<br />

the relocation of the beam plastic hinge away from the column face.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

American Concrete Institute, ACL (1999). Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural<br />

testing. Report ACI1TG/T1 1-99<br />

FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic<br />

rehabilitation of buildings. FEiMA-356, Washington, B.C.<br />

Khuntia, M., and Goei, S. C. (1998). FRC-encased steel joist composite beams under reversed cyclic<br />

loading. ASCE Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> 124:10, 1115-1124.<br />

Fig. 1 - Test Setup


469<br />

3<br />

4@8<br />

~T / C<br />

4 #5 #3 stirrups<br />

86<br />

Beam Reinforcing Bars<br />

v Dlxl/2<br />

PL 17x7\i/4<br />

\ \ \A325 0=3/4'<br />

\ \ 14x3x3/8<br />

\ HILTIHSLM12/25<br />

k v '<br />

. Dl/2


470<br />

"<br />

5 -i 3 - 2 - 1<br />

Story Drift (%)<br />

b) Specimen 3<br />

1 Z 3 4 S<br />

Story Drift {%)<br />

c) Cracking in Specimen 3 d) Specimen 4<br />

Fig. 5-Specimen Load vs. Displacement Response and Cracking Pattern<br />

Story Dnft {%)<br />

•Q 08 -0 OS -0.04 -0.02 0 0 02 Q 04 0 06 0 08<br />

Fig. 6 - Energy Ratio<br />

Fig. 7 - Load vs. Beam Rotation Response<br />

(Specimen 4)


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 471<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MULTISTOREY MASONRY<br />

BUILDING WITH RESTRICTED BASE SLIDING<br />

M. Qamaruddin, S. Ahmad, H. Irtaza and S. M. Waseem<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Z. H. College of <strong>Engineering</strong> and Technology,<br />

Aligarh Muslim <strong>University</strong>, Aligarh 202002, India<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In the present investigation, a multistory masonry building system is considered in which a<br />

smoothened surface is created at the top of the substructure and the superstructure rests at this level<br />

and restricted sliding is permitted with fnctional resistance. <strong>The</strong> restricted sliding base system is<br />

idealized as a discrete mass mathematical model with two degree of freedom for computing its seismic<br />

response. <strong>The</strong> shear walls provide the spring action in the system. <strong>The</strong> total mass of the superstructure<br />

of the building, that is, the mass of all the stones, except the bottom half of the ground story mass, is<br />

lumped as top mass in the model and mass of the remaining bottom half portion of the ground story is<br />

lumped as bottom mass in the model. <strong>The</strong> bottom mass is assumed to rest on a plane with dry frictional<br />

damping to permit restricted sliding of the system. <strong>The</strong> seismic response of multistory masonry<br />

building with restricted sliding subjected to Koyna and El Centro earthquakes is computed employing<br />

this mathematical model treating the frictional resistance as rigid plastic. It turns out from this study<br />

that the restricted sliding base system is effective in reducing the seismic force acting on the building<br />

with low values of coefficient of friction. <strong>The</strong> seismic response of such a system is much reduced<br />

compared to the fixed base buildings with the same parameters.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

In past earthquake in India, unengineered masonry buildings were mostly damaged<br />

due to a variety of factors, such as. their short fundamental period and mostly lying in the dominant<br />

frequency range of strong earthquakes; very low tensile and moderate shear strength; some times not<br />

sufficiently high compressive strength; usually poor workmanship, etc. To improve the behavior of<br />

masonry structures under seismic forces, strengthening measures have been proposed. In spite of all<br />

these measures, masonry buildings can still be cracked during the earthquake. Such damage might be<br />

avoided if major part of the seismic energy is dissipated during earthquake One possibility to achieve<br />

this objective is by means of base isolation technique, which consists of decoupling the structures from<br />

the damaging effect of the earthquake. In the last few decades, various researchers have proposed<br />

varieties of isolation devices.<br />

In several major earthquake occurrences in developing countries like India and China, a beneficial<br />

behavior of the low-rise buildings which could slide as rigid bodies over their foundations was<br />

observed during some past severe earthquakes, viz., the Dhubri <strong>Earthquake</strong> in Assam in 1930 [2], and<br />

in Bihar-Nepal <strong>Earthquake</strong> in 1934. <strong>The</strong> damage study by Gee [2] and the observations made in China<br />

by LiLi [3], showed that those buildings in which the possibility of movement existed between the<br />

superstructure and the substructure suffered less damage than those buildings in which no such<br />

freedom of movements existed. Arya, Chandra and Qamaruddin [1], LiLi [3] and Qamaruddin [5] have


472<br />

investigated a base isolation system in which the isolation mechanism is purely sliding friction. Such<br />

system utilizes pure friction to allow some parts of a structure to slide relative to the others.<br />

A mathematical model was introduced by Qamaruddin [5] and Arya et al. [1] to compute the seismic<br />

response of masonry building with friction base isolation. A new concept has been proposed for the<br />

construction of brick building in which a clear smoothened surface is created just above the dampproof<br />

course at plinth level without any mortar, and the superstructure simply rests at this level and is<br />

free to slide except for frictional resistance. <strong>The</strong> concept of such system was further strengthened by<br />

the damage studies made by Li Li[3] after the Xintai (1966), Bohai(1969) and Tangstan (1976)<br />

earthquakes in which it was found that adobe buildings which were free to slide on their foundations<br />

(by accident) survived with little or no damage whereas others which were tied on their foundations<br />

collapsed. <strong>Research</strong>ers have made experimental and theoretical studies to incorporate such a system in<br />

masonry buildings economically to achieve a collapse free if not a damage free performance during the<br />

earthquakes. Further studies have also been made by Mostaghel et al. [4] and Qamaruddin et al. [6 and<br />

7] with encouraging results.<br />

2. MATHEMATICAL IDEALIZATION<br />

2.1 Mathematical Model<br />

A two-degree spring mass model shown in Fig. 2.1 represents the concept of multistory building with<br />

restricted base sliding. A layer of suitable material of known coefficient of friction is laid between the<br />

contact surfaces of the bond beam of the superstructure and plinth band of the substructure. <strong>The</strong> spring<br />

action in the system is assumed to be provided by the shear walls. Internal damping is represented by a<br />

dashpot that is parallel with the spring. <strong>The</strong> total mass of the superstructure of a multistory building,<br />

i.e., the mass of all the stories, except the bottom half of the ground story is lumped at the top of the<br />

system and the mass of the remaining bottom half portion of the ground story is lumped at the level of<br />

the band beam. <strong>The</strong> lower mass is assumed to rest on a plane with dry frictional damping to permit<br />

sliding of the system. Restricted base sliding can occur at the contact surface without overturning or<br />

tilting. <strong>The</strong> building is subjected to only one horizontal component of ground shaking at a time, the<br />

effect of vertical ground motion is not considered here. <strong>The</strong> stopper is considered as rigid.<br />

2.2 Equations of Motions<br />

Phase I: Initially, bottom mass moves with the base so long as sliding force does not overcome the<br />

frictional resistance. So the building behaves as a single degree of freedom system and therefore<br />

equation of motion is:<br />

M t x t +C s (Z t -Z b )+K s (Z t -Z b ) = 0 (2.1)<br />

orZ t -r2o)^(Z t -Z b )4-03 2 (Z t -Z b ) =-y(t) (2.2)<br />

where, C s = coefficient of the viscous damper; K s = spring constant; M t = top mass; X{, Z{ =<br />

absolute and relative acceleration of the top mass; y(t) = ground acceleration at time t; Z b, Z t =<br />

lateral relative displacement of masses M b and M b respectively; M b - bottom mass; Z b , Zt =<br />

relative velocity of masses M b and M t, respectively; co = natural frequency and £ = fraction of critical<br />

damping.


473<br />

Phase 2: <strong>The</strong> sliding of the bottom mass begins when the sliding force overcomes the frictional<br />

resistance at the plinth level. <strong>The</strong> force to cause sliding S t, is given by<br />

S f = C s (Z t -Z b ) + K s (Z t -Z b )-M b X b (2.3)<br />

Sliding of bottom mass occurs if | Sf | > JJL Mjg (2.4)<br />

where, g = acceleration due to gravity; MT=Mb + M t and}x = friction coefficient. In this phase, the<br />

building acts as two degree of freedom system shown by the following simplified equations of motion:<br />

F =-y(t) (2.5)<br />

Z, +2 2 (Z, -Z h ) = -X') (2.6)<br />

where, F = |ig(l + 0)Sin(Z5); Z b = relative acceleration of bottom mass; Sin(Z b ) =+1 if (Z b )<br />

is positive; Sin(Z b ) = -1 it (Zj-,) is negative and 0 = —— = mass ratio<br />

M b<br />

Phase 3: If the stopper is positioned in such a way that the peak displacement of the system is more,<br />

then the system will strike the stopper at any time. <strong>The</strong>refore, the motion of the system will be reversed<br />

if the frictional resistance at the plinth level is overcome by the sliding force (S'f ) at the time of strike.<br />

This force is given by:<br />

n<br />

M t<br />

X b /p (2.7)<br />

where, p=l/(2+0). <strong>The</strong> sliding of the bottom mass occurs backward if | S'f | > ^ M T g and the<br />

equations of motion are given as follows:<br />

Z b -2co^ep(Z t -Z b ) - (B 2 9|3(Z t -Z b ) + Fp = -y(t) (2.8)<br />

Z t +2o^(Z t -Z b ) + 03 2 (Z t -Z b ) = -y(t) (2.9)<br />

Phase 4: At any time during the motion of the system if | Sf | or | S'f j < JJL Mxg, then the sliding of<br />

the bottom mass is stopped but the top mass continues to vibrate. <strong>The</strong>refore, the system will behave as<br />

single degree of freedom and its equation of motion is same as given in phase 1.<br />

2.3 Solution of Equations of Motion<br />

<strong>The</strong> equations of motion for the different phases are solved by Runga-Kutta fourth order method for<br />

obtaining the complete seismic response. A computer program has been developed to compute the<br />

time-wise earthquake response of multistory masonry building with restricted sliding base system.<br />

3. PARAMETRIC STUDY<br />

<strong>The</strong> parameters that are mainly considered in the study include the time period, mass ratio, dry<br />

coefficient of friction and viscous damping for estimating realistic forces and displacements of<br />

multistory building with restricted sliding type system. <strong>The</strong> response has been computed for two<br />

actually recorded severe earthquakes viz., Koyna <strong>Earthquake</strong> (India) of December II, 1967<br />

(longitudinal component) and El Centra <strong>Earthquake</strong> (USA) of May 18, 1940 (N-S component). <strong>The</strong>


474<br />

quantities of interest are: (1) absolute acceleration which determines the forces acting on the shear<br />

walls; (2) the maximum relative displacement of the superstructure (in case of free sliding); and (3) the<br />

residual relative displacement which will indicate the position of the superstructure at the end of the<br />

ground motion. <strong>The</strong> following range of values of different parameters has been estimated, that would<br />

cover a wide variety of multistory masonry buildings:<br />

TABLE 3.1<br />

DATA FOR COMPUTING SEISMIC RESPONSE<br />

Time Period<br />

(TP) sec.<br />

0.40<br />

0.50<br />

0.60<br />

0.70<br />

0.80<br />

Mass Ratio<br />

(9)<br />

6 to 8<br />

8 to 10<br />

10 to 12<br />

12 to 14<br />

14 to 16<br />

Damping<br />

Coefficient<br />

(f)<br />

0.05 to 0.15<br />

0.05 to 0.15<br />

0.05 to 0.15<br />

0.05 to 0.15<br />

0.05 to 0.15<br />

Coefficient<br />

of friction<br />

(M.)<br />

0.10 to 0.25<br />

0.10 to 0.25<br />

0.10 to 0.25<br />

0.10 to 0.25<br />

0,10 to 0.25<br />

Restricted<br />

Sliding base<br />

range (A) mm<br />

2 to 130<br />

3 to 140<br />

2 to 150<br />

9 to 145<br />

2 to 165<br />

It is assumed that a coefficient of friction less than 0.10 in sliding will be difficult to obtain in actual<br />

building construction, and for a value greater than 0.25, no sliding motion may occur in most real<br />

earthquakes and the system may act just like a fixed-base structure. For four-story building, top three<br />

and half portion of the total mass of the building is assumed to be lumped as the top mass in the<br />

mathematical model. In the same way, as the story of the building increases, the mass ratio increases.<br />

In estimating the mass ratio, it is assumed that mass in each story is same.<br />

4. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> influence of various parameters on maximum response of the free sliding (without stopper),<br />

restricted base sliding (with stopper) and fixed base multistory masonry buildings subjected to Koyna<br />

and El Centra shocks is presented in the present investigation through representative Figures 4.1 to 4.6.<br />

A comparison of the absolute acceleration response in the restricted base sliding has been made with<br />

that of the free sliding and fixed base buildings. <strong>The</strong> results of this study are discussed in the following<br />

paragraphs.<br />

Figs. 4.3 to 4.6 shows the typical acceleration response of the masonry buildings subjected to Koyna<br />

and El Centra earthquakes for different parameters. In these figures, the upper dashed line shows the<br />

maximum acceleration response in the fixed base structure, whereas the bottom dashed lines show the<br />

maximum acceleration developed in the building with free sliding base system during the seismic<br />

ground motion at different mass ratios. <strong>The</strong> firm lines show the maximum acceleration response<br />

computed in the buildings with the restricted base sliding system during the earthquakes at different<br />

mass ratios.<br />

4.1 Influence of Viscous Damping<br />

<strong>The</strong> representative acceleration response curves show that at a particular mass ratio, time period and<br />

coefficient of friction in the case of restricted base sliding buildings, an increase in viscous damping<br />

(from 5% to 15%) decreases the acceleration response (Figs. 4.1 and 4.2). This is perhaps because of<br />

increasing energy dissipation in the internal friction of the system as the damping coefficient increases.<br />

In view of this well-established trend, the acceleration response for other cases has not been studied.


475<br />

4.2 Effect of Coefficient of Friction<br />

It is seen from Figs. 4.3 to 4.6 that for a particular time period and coefficient of critical damping, as<br />

the coefficient of friction increases, the peak displacement decreases in the case of building with free<br />

sliding base. This is logical, since the resistance against sliding of the system decreases as the<br />

coefficient of friction between the sliding surface decreases and the buildup of a large inertia force in<br />

the superstructure becomes restricted. Thus, the spectral acceleration of such a system decreases.<br />

Similar trend is generally true in the buildings with restricted base sliding system. <strong>The</strong> slight departure<br />

in this trend observed in few cases is due to the fact that positions of stopper are different in different<br />

building parametric cases.<br />

4.3 Time Period Effect<br />

It is observed from Figs. 4.3 to 4.6 that for both the El Centre and Koyna shocks, the acceleration of<br />

the restricted base sliding buildings -decreases in general as the time period increases for a particular<br />

viscous damping coefficient and coefficient of friction. For same building systems, the acceleration<br />

values are more when they are subjected to Koyna shock than that in the case of El Centre shock. But,<br />

the acceleration response of the free sliding system is independent of its time period for different<br />

values of coefficient of friction.<br />

4.4 Influence of Stopper's Position<br />

It is seen from Figs. 4.3 to 4.6 that if the stopper is placed close to the building (before its sliding), then<br />

its acceleration approaches to the corresponding values as obtained in the case of fixed base. But, if the<br />

stopper is placed at a distance approximately equal to the peak displacement of the free sliding system,<br />

far away from the building, then its acceleration is very near to that of the corresponding values of the<br />

free sliding system. This trend is observed in all the building systems subjected to both the earthquakes<br />

(Koyna and El Centro).<br />

Table 3.1 shows the position of the stopper for different time periods of the system ranging from 0.4 to<br />

0.8 seconds subjected to Koyna and El Centro shocks. <strong>The</strong>se are the most feasible ranges of stopper<br />

positions for different mass ratios. This study shows that if the stopper is placed anywhere in this<br />

range, then the absolute acceleration of the top mass of the system is much less than the corresponding<br />

fixed base system. <strong>The</strong> occupants of the multistory buildings will have psychological comfort by<br />

providing stopper in the sliding base system.<br />

4.5 Effect of Mass Ratio<br />

From Figs, 4.3 to 4.6, it may be observed that as the mass ratio increases, generally, the acceleration<br />

response decreases in all the cases of parametric combinations for a particular time period and<br />

damping coefficient in the case of free sliding base. But, generally, no definite pattern of acceleration<br />

response variation has been observed in the case of buildings with restricted base sliding with varying<br />

values of the mass ratio.<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> following conclusions are drawn from the seismic response study of multistory masonry building<br />

with restricted base sliding system:


F b 1 MrtTHEMAHCAL MODEL FDR MULT I<br />

Mrt ^Dt P BUILDING WITH RL-TRILTED BAGE<br />

<strong>The</strong> restricted sliding base svstem is effective in reducing the effective seismic force acting on the<br />

multistory masonry building with low value of coefficient of friction <strong>The</strong> restricted sliding base<br />

system will provide psychological comfort to the occupants of the multistory buildings<br />

6 REFERENCES<br />

(1) Arva, A S , Chandra B and Qamaruddin, M (1981) A new concept for resistance of masonry<br />

buildings in severe earthquake shocks, Journal of the Institution of Engineers (I), 61 PtC16, 302 - 308<br />

(2) Gee E R (1934) Dhubn earthquake-1930, Memories of geological survey of India, LXV, 1 - lOo<br />

(3) Li Li (1984) Base isolation measures for a seismic in China, Eight World Conference on<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> San Francisco California, IV,791 -798<br />

(4) Vlostaghel N , Hejazi, M and Tanbakuchi, J (1983) Response of sliding structures to harmonic<br />

motion Journal of <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 11, 355 - 366<br />

(5) Qarnaruddm, M (1978) Development of brick building systems for improved earthquake<br />

performance', Ph D <strong>The</strong>sis <strong>University</strong> ofRoorkee Roorkee<br />

(6) Qamaruddm, M Arva, A S and Chandra, B (1986) Seismic response of brick buildings with<br />

sliding substructure, Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> ASCE, 122 3, 558 - 572<br />

(7) Qamaruddm M, Rasheeduzzafur, Arya, A S and Chandra, B (1986) Seismic response of<br />

masonry buildings with sliding substructure, Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> ASCE 122 9 2001 -<br />

2011


477<br />

-ZETA=Q 05<br />

-ZETA=010<br />

-ZETA=015<br />

03<br />

II<br />

015 4<br />

70 80 90 100 110<br />

POSITION OF STOPPER (mm)<br />

FIG 4 1 VARIATION OF ABSOLUTE ACCELERATION WITH<br />

DIFFERENT POSITION OF STOPPER FOR ELCENTRO SHOCK<br />

(TP=040MR=7p=01)<br />

03<br />

028<br />

CO<br />

2 026<br />

O P 024<br />

!u 022<br />

02<br />

-ZETA=0 05<br />

-ZETA=01Q<br />

-ZETA-015<br />

a 016<br />

S 014<br />

03<br />


478<br />

1<br />

c095<br />

^09-<br />

§085<br />

j= 03<br />

go 75<br />

3 ° 7 1<br />

goes<br />

o as<br />


479<br />

031<br />

en 03<br />

0029<br />

P<br />

|Q 28<br />

~*—MR=6(WS) 1<br />

-»—MR=7(WS)<br />

-*—MR=8(WS)<br />

FIXED BASE<br />

MR=6(WOS)<br />

MR=7(WOS)<br />

MR=8(WOS)<br />

3027-<br />

2o26<br />

I-<br />

^025<br />

u)<br />

SO 24<br />

023<br />

7 8 9<br />

POSmON OF STOPPER (mm)<br />

FIG 4.5. VARIATION OF ABSOLUTE ACCELERATION WITH DIFFERENT<br />

POSITIONS OF STOPPER FOR EL CENTRO SHOCK<br />

01<br />

Z<br />

9


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> °<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SLIDING MODE SEMI-ACTIVE BASE ISOLATION USING THE<br />

SWITCHING HYPERPLANE DESIGNED BY DISTURBANCE-<br />

ACCOMMODATING BILINEAR CONTROL<br />

Norihiro SANTO, Kazuo YOSHIDA<br />

l Keio <strong>University</strong>, Deparment of System Design <strong>Engineering</strong>, 3-14-1,<br />

Hiyoshi, Kouhoku-kn, Yokohama, Japan<br />

2 Keio <strong>University</strong>, Deparment of System Design <strong>Engineering</strong>, 3-14-1,<br />

Hiyoshi, Kouhoku-ku, Yokohama, Japan<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In vibration isolation control problem, the semi-active control methods in which coefficient of viscous<br />

damping is varied effectively have been proposed and expected to realize a high performance. However, the<br />

semi-active system is classified into a bilinear system which belongs to a nonlinear system. In this study, the<br />

switching hyperplane of sliding mode control is designed by the disturbance-accommodating bilinear optimal<br />

control theory, and it is applied to a semi-active base isolation problem. <strong>The</strong> proposed method adopts the<br />

damping force in criteria function, and the controller takes into account the disturbance dynamics by difining an<br />

augemented bilinear system. This study deals with a ten-degree-of-freedom structural model with base isolation.<br />

And the computer simulation is carried out by taking account of the delay of switching the coefficient of<br />

dampers. As a result, the usefulness of the present method was demonstrated.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Recently the technologies on active or semi-active vibration control methods have widely spread and some<br />

of them have been put into pracice.tn the field of building structure, a semi-active vibration control of high-rise<br />

building was put into practice 1979 for the first time, and then an active vibration control of pencil building was<br />

realized in 1989 for the first time. <strong>The</strong>se vibration control systems belong to a type of dynamic vibration<br />

absorber which is installed at the top ofbuilding. <strong>The</strong> number of buildings with active vibration absorber<br />

exceeded 20. Since the Kobe earthquake occurred in 1995, passive base isolation systems with lead damper,<br />

high damping rubber and so on have been used as a damping element. <strong>The</strong>se passive dampers are designed<br />

for the large seismic wave. <strong>The</strong>refore, the base isolation system is not necessarily effective resonance transmissibility,<br />

while it raises the transmissibility in the higher frequency range.<br />

Semi-active control method which is a method to control the parameters of control device such as spring


482<br />

stiffness or coefficient of viscous damping, has recently drawn more attention [Kamopp, D., 1995, Dyke, S.<br />

J., Spencer, Jr., B. R, 1997, Yoshida. S. and Yoshida. K., 1997, Fujio. T. and Yoshida. K., 1999] than the<br />

active control methodology which needs much power. Semi-active control is characteristic of less power then<br />

active control and higher performance than passive control. Especially, variable dampers have already been<br />

put into practice in the field of automobile, and a skyhook damper is approximately realized by using variable<br />

damper. Since the suppression of actuator power is an important issue for active structural control, in this<br />

stud\, a new semi-active control method for vibration base isolation is presented by a sliding mode using the<br />

switching hyperplane designed by disturbance-accommodating bilinear control.<br />

One of the authors proposed an bilinear potimal control with feedforward link for a semi-active dynamic<br />

vibration absorber and then applied it to a base isolation problem [Fujio. T. and Yoshida. K., 1999]. This<br />

study presents a sliding mode controller using the switching hyperplane designed by disturbance-accommodating<br />

bilinear control. In order to investigate the performance and the effectiveness of the proposed method<br />

by numerical calculation and computer simulation, it is applied to a model of an actual structure with 10 degree-of-freedom.<br />

CONTROLLER DSEIGN<br />

Fundamental Model for Controller Design<br />

hi this study, a ten-storied structural model with semi-active base isolator subjected to seismic excitation is<br />

treated as a control object A variable damper is installed between the base and the first story of structure. As a<br />

result of the eigenvalueanalysis, first natural frequency of system is 0.25Hz and damping ratio is 2%, respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n this control object is represented by the following bilinear equation.<br />

V" ;r Y" •' • A TC TC V • • • T I<br />

l A 0 A 10 "hj<br />

"S L A 10<br />

where .r is state variable vector and z is disturbance vector, u denotes the vector of the control input, that is, the<br />

damping coefficient of damper given by the semi-active control.<br />

Controller with Feedforwrad Link<br />

In this stud}, it is assumed that there is a disturbance with flat spectral density at the controlled frequency<br />

range in order to adapt to various earthquakes. Accordingly, by restricting the frequency range of disturbance,<br />

we assume that the characteristic of power sepectal density is the same as white noise within the restricted<br />

frequency range. <strong>The</strong>n, we assume that the disturbance is such a colored noise that has the transfer function of the<br />

characteristic of a low pass filter as shown in Fig. 1, whose transfer function is give by


483<br />

li£l = 2<br />

W(s) r+-2O<br />

(2)<br />

In this case, the state equation of the disturbance is written by<br />

(3)<br />

where<br />

o i o<br />

o o i<br />

0 -co. 1 -If<br />

> A* =<br />

(4)<br />

Utilizing Eqs.( 1) and (3), we have the following augmented state equation<br />

B = #, (5)<br />

Switching Hyperplane Designed by Disturbance-Accommodating Bilinear Control<br />

In this chapter, by appling the bilinear optimal control theory to the agumented system, we derive the<br />

switching hyperplane. Generally, such semi-active control as parameter control is classified into a bilinear<br />

system which belongs to non-linear systems. It is considered that that design restriction in semi-active damper<br />

is a damping power rather than a damping coefficient. From this viewpoint, the maximum damping power of<br />

damper design is the designed parameter. In this study, term of the damping power is introduced to the<br />

criterion function.<br />

We consider the following control strategy to minimize the criterion<br />

+« T (0^TW^(0^(0«(0]*'<br />

(6)<br />

where Q and R are weighting functions. And the optimal control input U Q which satisfies the following equation<br />

is synthesized<br />

J r (w°) = minJ r (n) (7)<br />

<strong>The</strong>n the dynamic programming method is applied to obtain the optimal control input u°. This problem is


484<br />

solved for the Hamilton Jacobi-Bellman equation of the optimality condition, and the switching hyperplane is<br />

expressed by the following equation.<br />

S = F = X m lty'B T usm P (8)<br />

where P in (8 ) denotes the positive semi definite matrix which satisfies the following equations.<br />

(9)<br />

Sliding Mode Controller Design by Disturbance-Accommodating<br />

Here, we obtain the continuous sliding mode controller based on the switching hyperplane by disturbanceaccommodating<br />

bilinear control. <strong>The</strong> block diagram of the proposed control system is shown in Fig. 2. <strong>The</strong><br />

control law consits of the feedback link and the feedforward link.<br />

This control object is represented by the following bilinear equation.<br />

We assume an sliding mode is defined in n-dimensional state space as follows :<br />

(10)<br />


485<br />

where 8 t (i = 1 , 2 , . .. , n] denote the sliding margins. <strong>The</strong>se controllers will have the state move from an<br />

arbitrary initial state to the sliding mode and then move along the user-specified sliding mode to origin.<br />

And the control input at boundary layer is assumed as follows equation.<br />

u c - -Kx = -(A^ + & 2 jc 2 + .. . + k n x n ) (13)<br />

+,!-/; xinf a, -£,) £ f >o<br />

<strong>The</strong> boundary layer is a hypothetical band centred on the sliding mode cr = 0 , <strong>The</strong> width of the boundary layer,<br />

A represents the tolerance or allowable deviation from the ideal sliding motion due to parameter uncertainty and<br />

desturbances. <strong>The</strong> contol input where the boundary layer equivalence is considered can be reprezented by<br />

where (f> represents parameter uncertainty and other disturabances. w is the classical sliding mode given by<br />

disturbance-accommodating.<br />

In the above treatment, the semi-active force is supposed to be realized by variable dampers. Actually, the<br />

damping coefficients should be positive, and remain within a certain range for practical use. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

damping coefficients of semi-active dampers are limited by the inequality. By supposing that the control force<br />

generated by the semi-active dampers under the above constraint is as close as possible to the control force of<br />

active control, the damping coefficient of semi-active damper is expressed as follows:<br />

C =<br />

NUMERICAL CALCULATION<br />

In order to investigate the feasibility and the effectiveness of the semi-active control using variable dampers<br />

which is designed by the method proposed in this study, the numerical calculation was carried out.<br />

And the control characteristics of the proposed semi-active base isolation control are examined in both time<br />

and frequency domains. Since the semi-active control is essentially nonlinear, the vibration transmissibilityunder<br />

semi-active control is obtained as a ratio in frequency range of the spectral densities of input and output. And a<br />

white noise is used as an input.<br />

For the semi-active contol based upon the disturbance accommodating sliding mode using the bilinear optimal<br />

switching hyperplane, an observer used VSS observer was, since the measured physical values are sup-


486<br />

posed to be the accelerations of the base and the top floor of the structure and the relative displacement between<br />

the base and the first story of the structure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> specification of the 10 degree-of -feedom structure model shown in Fig. 3 are shown in Table. 1. <strong>The</strong> no<br />

isolation case means the case that its first damping ratio is 5%. <strong>The</strong>n the passive case 1 measns no control, and<br />

the passive case 2 means the case where its first damping ratio is much higher than the passive 1, the passive case<br />

3 measns on isolation with lead rubber bearing, the skyhook case means that skyhook control method is adopted<br />

as a semi-active control <strong>The</strong> disturbance-accommodating sliding mode control (DA-SMC) case and skyhook<br />

cace deal with the case of installing variable viscous damper between the base and the first story. <strong>The</strong> frequency<br />

range is assumed to be less than 7 Hz.<br />

Numerical calculation was carried out for the case that the absolute velocity is adopted as an objective<br />

function as follows:<br />

O lx , 1 0 0]<br />

(16)<br />

And in order to consider the dynamics of oil damper, Maxwell model is introduced in the numerical calculation.<br />

Figs. 4-8 and Table.2 show the time history of the top floor acceleration and the first floor dispacement<br />

under El Centro earthquake,and so on. From these figures the effectiveness of the DA-SMC was demonstrated.<br />

And it was seen that the DA-SMC can reduce the maximum response of acceleraion at the top floor more than<br />

the passive control and also reduces the residual vibration which appears in no-control.<br />

Figure 9 shows the numerical results of the vibration transrnissibility for respective controllers. In the case of<br />

the skyhook control the performance at the frequency range is affected, while DA-SMC is effective at the whole<br />

frequency range.<br />

Table, 1 Parameters of the sturucture<br />

Fig. 3 10-DOF structure model possessing an semiactive<br />

base isolator<br />

Layer<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

1<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Mass [t]<br />

4981.40<br />

3438.20<br />

2490.60<br />

1826.40<br />

2033.10<br />

2050.00<br />

2036.90<br />

2037.10<br />

2066.40<br />

2499.90<br />

Spring constant<br />

ft/cm]<br />

68.20<br />

2320.00<br />

2820.00<br />

2020.00<br />

1840.00<br />

1850.00<br />

1600.00<br />

1410.00<br />

1180.00<br />

1020.00<br />

Coefficient of<br />

viscous damping<br />

[t s/cm]<br />

0.90<br />

12.94<br />

1971<br />

13.34<br />

11.15<br />

11.05<br />

10.55<br />

10.15<br />

8.48<br />

8.71


487<br />

| 05,<br />

I<br />

20 25 30<br />

(a) Passive 3 (LRJB)<br />

Time fsl<br />

(bj Skyhook<br />

(c) DA SMC<br />

Fig. 4 Acceleration of the 10th floor for the El Centro earthquake<br />

04|<br />

-, 031-<br />

— Passive 2 (NRB+POD) j<br />

°-03<br />

-04J<br />

0 S 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Traefs]<br />

S°<br />

S oi<br />

J


488<br />

vlaxacccleiation [my<br />

O O O O —_.-._.<br />

No Isolaion<br />

Passive 1 (NRB)<br />

Passive 2 (NRB+POD)<br />

Skyhook<br />

DA-SMC<br />

Passive 1 Passive 2 Passive 3 Skyhook DA-SMC<br />

(NRB) (NRB+-POD) (LRB)<br />

Fig. 8 <strong>The</strong> max acceleration comparison of 10th<br />

foor for the El Centre eathquakes<br />

Fig. 9 Vibration transmissibihty<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

In this study, the disturbance-accommodating sliding mode controller of variable damper was presented and<br />

it was applied to the building structure with base isolation. As a result, the conclusions were obtained as<br />

follows.<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> semi-active damper has higher control performance on the vibration transmissibility than the passive<br />

control and skyhook control at a wide frequency range.<br />

(2) For El Centra earthquake as well as the other earthquakes, the present method reduces residual vibration<br />

which appears in the uncontrolled case and also reduces the maximum response of the first story of the structure<br />

in comparison with the passive control whose first mode damping ratio is the same as the semi-active<br />

control<br />

From to these result, the capability of D A-SMC for semi-active vibration isolation system is demonstrated<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Yoshida. S. and Yoshida. K.( 1997). Semi-Active Vibration Isolation Control Using Feedforward Information of<br />

Disturbance. Proc ofASm Design Eng. and Tec. Conf. (CD-ROM), Paper No. DETC97/VIP-3820.<br />

Dyke, S. J., Spencer, Jr., B. F. (1997). A Comparion of Semi-Active Control Strategies for the MR Damper.<br />

Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference, Intelligent Information Systems.<br />

Singh, M. P., Matheu, E. E.(1997). Active and Semi-Active Control of Structures Under Seismic<br />

Excitation. <strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng Sturuct Dyn.26, 193-213.<br />

Karaopp, D, (1997). Active and Semi-Active Vibration Isolation. Trans, of the ASMS, Special Anniversary<br />

Deign Issue, 117,177-185.<br />

Yoshida. K. and Fujio. T.(1999). Semi-Active Base Isolation for a Building Structure, Proceedings of ASME<br />

Design <strong>Engineering</strong> Technical Conference(CD-ROM), Paper No. DETC99/MOVIC-8427.<br />

Kang, S. and Yoshida, K. (1993). Vibration Isolation Control with Feedforward Link using ETCntrol <strong>The</strong>ory.<br />

Proceedings of 'the JSME International conference on Advanced Mechatoronics, 645-649.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

EVALUATION OF VIBRATION CONTROL EFFECT<br />

ON EQUIPMENT USING LOW-STIFFNESS AND<br />

HIGH-DAiMPING RUBBER<br />

1<br />

HIGUCHI Shoko ', OKUTA Kenji 2 , DOHI Hiroshi '<br />

OZAWA Teruhiko ! and TSUJII Yasuhito 3<br />

<strong>Research</strong> and Development Headquarters, NTT Facilities, Inc.,<br />

NTT Building Technology Institute,<br />

Architectural Management Headquarters, NTT Facilities Inc.,<br />

Tokyo, JAPAN<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> vibration control device of low-stiffness and high-damping laminated rubber has been<br />

developed for the anti-seismic measurement for the information equipment. This vibration<br />

control device can reduce the effect of seismic acceleration against the equipment by installing<br />

between the bottom of the equipment and the floor. Thus, the equipment can be prevented from<br />

falling or being damaged by the seismic motion. This paper evaluates this vibration control<br />

effect on the equipment by using the laminated rubber against seismic motion based on the<br />

shaking table test's results.<br />

Center of gravity<br />

\ steel plate tf=25VV<br />

Fig. I.<br />

OVERVIEW OF THE TESTING MODEL<br />

Side view


490<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In recent years, the large earthquakes have frequently occurred near the urban area and brought<br />

about enormous damage to not only building structures but also lifeline system. Especially the<br />

damage to information equipment has great impact on city functions with the advance of<br />

information society. <strong>The</strong>refore it is important to take effective measures to keep the safety of<br />

the equipment against the earthquakes.<br />

In the previous paper *\ the excellent vibration control effect on the equipment by the device of<br />

high-stiffness and high-damping rubber had been shown where the equipment was installed on<br />

the upper floor of information buildings. In this study, the vibration control device of<br />

low-stiffness and high-damping rubber has been considered through the shaking table tests<br />

using the artificial wave made from the lower floor response of buildings against earthquakes<br />

with seismic intensity scale MM8.<br />

VIBRATION CONTROL DEVICE<br />

<strong>The</strong> vibration control device is consisted of pieces of low-stiffness and high-damping laminated<br />

rubber sized to match the equipment and is attached to the bottom of the equipment. This<br />

rubber was designed to reduce the acceleration response at the time of an earthquake by<br />

absorbing the vibration energy.<br />

<strong>The</strong> characteristics of the equipment and level of the earthquake motion used in this shaking<br />

table test are shown in Table 1. <strong>The</strong> characteristics of each low-stiffness and high-damping<br />

rubber are shown in Table 2. Two kinds of rubber with different damping ratio were used as A<br />

and B. <strong>The</strong>ir dynamic characteristics are described in Fig. 2. <strong>The</strong> equivalent stiffness is almost<br />

the same for type A and B. <strong>The</strong> equivalent damping factor of type A is larger than type B. <strong>The</strong><br />

vibration control device, the equipment system, and the raised-floor were set up on the<br />

three-dimensional shaking table as in Fig. 1.<br />

TABLE. 1.<br />

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EQUIPMENT AND TEST CASE<br />

Test Case<br />

Equipment size(mm)<br />

Equipment own weight (kg)<br />

Dummy weight (kg)<br />

Equipment Total weight (kg)<br />

Type of rubber<br />

X direction<br />

Natural Period (sec)<br />

Y direction<br />

Horizontal (m/sec 2 )<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> motion level<br />

Vertical (m/sec 2 )<br />

CaseN Case A CaseB<br />

_<br />

0.23<br />

0.16<br />

700X900X2000<br />

190.5<br />

228.5<br />

419.0<br />

Type A<br />

0,24<br />

0.17<br />

4-6-8<br />

2-3-4<br />

TypeB<br />

0.25<br />

0.17


491<br />

SHAKING TABLE TEST<br />

Seismic Wave<br />

<strong>The</strong> seismograph data has been recorded by seismograph observatory for constant. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

seismic records on the building floor obtained through the observations are dealt. Based on<br />

these records, the seismic waves were made artificially to have duration of 40 seconds and to<br />

have a floor acceleration response spectrum of medium-rise and low-rise buildings. <strong>The</strong> phase<br />

characteristic of the wave is provided by random value.<br />

<strong>The</strong> seismic waves are applied simultaneously in two horizontal directions and the vertical<br />

direction. As an example, the seismic wave-form applied in the shaking table test is shown in<br />

Fig. 3, and the floor acceleration response spectra for the horizontal wave and the vertical wave<br />

are shown in Fig. 4 (in the case of the floor acceleration of 6 m/s 2 ).<br />

-120-80-40 0 40 80 120<br />

Shear Strain (%)<br />

-120-80-40 0 40 80 120<br />

Shear Strain (%)<br />

Fig. 2.<br />

RESTORING FORCE CHARACTERISTIC RELATIONSHIP OF HIGH-DAMPING<br />

RUBBER (HORIZONTAL)<br />

TABLE. 2.<br />

CHARACTERISTIC OF LOW-STIFFNESS AND HIGH-DAMPING RUBBER<br />

Type of Rubber<br />

Type A<br />

Type B<br />

Size<br />

Equivalent Damping factor (%)<br />

Equivalent shear stiffness (N/cm)<br />

Diameter (mm)<br />

Height (mm)<br />

Shear strain=20%<br />

Shear strain=40%<br />

Shear strain=70%<br />

Shear strain=20%<br />

Shear strain=40%<br />

Shear strain=70%<br />

18<br />

24<br />

26<br />

1021<br />

590<br />

429<br />

74<br />

42<br />

8<br />

17<br />

21<br />

1000<br />

620<br />

452


492<br />

Since earthquake motion has been amplified in the buildings structure when it affects the<br />

equipment, the earthquake motion put in the equipment is estimated as the maximum<br />

acceleration level; 4 m/s 2 (AT04), 6 m/s 2 (AT06), and 8 m/s 2 (AT08) horizontally and vertical<br />

acceleration is half level of horizontal one. When the estimation is 8 m/s 2 horizontally and 4<br />

m/s 2 vertically, seismic intensity scale is MM8. Using this artificial earthquake motion as the<br />

one affecting the equipment, the authors made an investigation thorough testing in the<br />

following chapters.<br />

Shaking Table Test<br />

A shaking table test has been conducted using a three-dimensional shaking table with an actual<br />

equipment system set up on it together with the raised floor, in order to evaluate earthquake<br />

response characteristics of the equipment and vibration control effect achieved by the<br />

low-stiffness and high-damping rubber. Dummy weights were placed evenly on eight shelves of<br />

the equipment. In case A and B, the rubber type A and B are used. In case N, no rubber is used.<br />

20<br />

(1) Horizontal (2) Vertical<br />

Fig. 3<br />

ACCELERATION WAVE OF ARTIFICIAL EARTHQUAKE MOTION (10m/sec 2 )<br />

S 15 Period (sec)<br />

0.1 1<br />

Period (sec)<br />

Fig. 4<br />

ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRA OF ARTIFICIAL EARTHQUAKE MOTION<br />

(6m/sec 2 : AT06)


493<br />

TEST RESULTS<br />

Response Acceleration<br />

Fig. 5 shows acceleration response magnification at different points in the equipment, top,<br />

middle and bottom. <strong>The</strong> figure shows that installing vibration control device reduced response<br />

acceleration at the top of the equipment 13% in the X direction and 15% in the Y direction at<br />

AT04, and 21% in the X direction and 29% in the Y direction at AT06. At AT08, 36% reduction<br />

in response acceleration was found in the Y direction, but no vibration control effect was<br />

Top<br />

o-.. AT04-N '<br />

A- - - AT06-N<br />

o--- AT08-N<br />

AT04-A<br />

AT06-A<br />

AT08-A<br />

AT04-B<br />

AT06-B<br />

AT08-B<br />

1 2 3 4<br />

Maximum Acceleration Response<br />

Magnification(X dir)<br />

1 2 3 4<br />

Maximum Acceleration Response<br />

Magnification(Y-dir)<br />

Fig. 5.<br />

MAXIMUM ACCELERATION RESPONSE MAGNIFICATION<br />

FOR EACH PART OF THE EQUIPMENT<br />

, 4 6<br />

Input Acceleration (m/sec 2 )<br />

Fig. 6.<br />

SHEAR STRAIN LOW-STIFFNESS AND HIGH-DAMPING RUBBER


494<br />

confirmed in the X direction. Because the equipment had a small width in the X direction,<br />

rocking occurred more outstanding in the X direction than in the Y direction.<br />

<strong>The</strong> acceleration response magnification at the center of gravity was about 2.5 in case N, and<br />

about 2.0 in case A and case B. <strong>The</strong> acceleration response spectra in Fig. 4 indicate that the<br />

damping factor was about 5% in case N, and about 7% in case A and case B.<br />

Characteristic Difference In Two Types Low-Stiffness<br />

and High-Damping Rubber<br />

Fig. 6 shows shear strain of the low-stiffness and high-damping rubber at every level of seismic<br />

test. Shear strain increased as greater ground motion was applied in case A and B. Shear strain<br />

of type B was greater than type A. <strong>The</strong> shaking table test found no significant difference in<br />

vibration control effect of type A and type B.<br />

Physical Damage To <strong>The</strong> Equipment<br />

Physical damage to the equipment is discussed below. In case N, the welding, the major<br />

structural elements of the equipment, suffered damage, like cracking, at AT08. As a result, the<br />

acceleration response magnification at the top of the equipment at AT08 was lower than at<br />

AT06 (see Fig. 5). In case A and case B, neither permanent deformation of major structural<br />

elements nor cracking in the welding occurred at AT08. Thus, vibration control effect was<br />

confirmed.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> application of vibration control device that reduces horizontal seismic force, which affects<br />

the equipment, has been developed. Inserting low-stiffness and high-damping rubber between<br />

the bottom of the equipment and the floor could attain the reduction of the seismic force<br />

considered the lower floor response of buildings against earthquakes. Through the shaking<br />

table test, the following conclusions were obtained.<br />

(1) Installing low-stiffness and high-damping rubber between the bottom of the equipment and<br />

the floor could reduce response acceleration of seismic motion 4 m/s 2 and 6 m/s 2 by 13%<br />

to 29%. Damage to the equipment could be prevented against seismic motion 8 m/s 2 .<br />

(2) Vibration control will become more effective even at higher levels of input seismic motions<br />

by considering the way to reduce the rocking of the equipment.<br />

Reference<br />

INABA, T., DOHI, H., OKUTA, K., and SATO, T. (1998). Vibration Control of Equipment Using High<br />

Damping Rubber. Second World Conference on Structural Control, ABSTRACTS, JUNE, 28-JULY1, 170.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 495<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE VERSUS GENERAL LINEAR<br />

MODELS OF VISCOELASTIC DAMPERS FOR<br />

SEISMIC ANALYSIS<br />

M. P. Singh 1 and T-S. Chang 2<br />

Department of <strong>Engineering</strong> Science and Mechanics<br />

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State <strong>University</strong><br />

Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

For the design of structures installed with viscoelastic dampers it is important to work with analytical<br />

models that realistically capture the constitutive properties of the material and are easy to use<br />

analytically. A simple model with a spring and a dashpot in parallel is often used but it does not<br />

include the frequency dependence of the loss and storage moduli of the material. To include this<br />

dependence, the use of fractional derivative models has been suggested. However, these models are<br />

quite complicated to analyze. Herein, therefore, the use of a generalized linear model using a series of<br />

linear derivatives is explored. Such a model is capable of capturing the frequency dependency of the<br />

damper properties, and is also analytically convenient to work with. <strong>The</strong> paper presents a comparison<br />

of the numerical results obtained for a structure installed with viscoelastic dampers modeled by<br />

fractional derivative and by generalized linear models. Based on this study the use of the generalized<br />

linear models for the viscoelastic dampers is advocated.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

For response control of structural systems subjected to earthquake induced motions, the passive and<br />

active vibration control schemes have been considered, with passive schemes being used more<br />

commonly in practice. <strong>The</strong> passive schemes mainly consist of three different approaches: base<br />

isolation, tuned mass dampers, and energy dissipation approaches. Base isolation filters out the energy<br />

approaching the structure usually through a soft base isolation element. In earthquake engineering, this<br />

approach is more suitable for structures with higher frequencies such as low to medium height<br />

structures. <strong>The</strong> tuned mass dampers reduce the response by shifting of energy from the main structure<br />

to the tuned mass damper, and not by energy dissipation; they have received mixed support about their<br />

usefulness in seismic design applications. <strong>The</strong> energy dissipation systems on the other hand dissipate<br />

the energy in some discrete elements, called dampers, installed in the structure so that less is available<br />

to deform and damage the main structure. <strong>The</strong> classical viscous dampers, viscoelastic dampers,<br />

1 Preston Wade Professor<br />

2 Graduate Student


496<br />

yielding metallic dampers, and friction dampers are among the common energy dissipation systems<br />

that have been used in seismic design applications. This study is focused on some analytical issues<br />

primarily pertaining to the viscoelastic dampers.<br />

MODELS OF VISCOELASTIC DAMPERS<br />

For structural designs with an energy dissipation device, it is important to have the correct forcedeformation<br />

model of the device to represent the actual behavior of the material used in the device.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model should also be convenient for use in dynamic analysis to predict dynamic response as<br />

accurately as possible to examine different design alternatives. <strong>The</strong> viscoelastic dampers use a<br />

polymeric material that dissipates energy by shear deformations applied cyclically. <strong>The</strong>se dampers<br />

contribute both to the damping and stiffness of a structure. To represent the load-deformation<br />

characteristics of these dampers, models with increasing degree of complexity have been used. One of<br />

the simplest models used is a classical Kelvin model with frequency-independent damping and<br />

stiffness elements arranged in parallel. <strong>The</strong> analysis of structures with such dampers is quite<br />

straightforward. However, this simple model does not capture the frequency dependence of the<br />

damping and stiffness characteristics of the material that are observed in the experiments. To capture<br />

the frequency dependence, the complex modulus relating the strain with stress has been used; it<br />

describes the relationship accurately for a purely harmonic motion. <strong>The</strong> real part of the complex<br />

modulus (called the storage modulus) represents the stiffness property of the material. <strong>The</strong> imaginary<br />

part (called as the loss modulus), on the other hand, is associated with the energy dissipation and thus<br />

damping. <strong>The</strong> linear structures installed with these dampers can be analyzed using the discrete Fourier<br />

transforms in frequency domain. For the response spectrum analysis of a structure installed with these<br />

dampers, the modal strain energy approach (linger and Kerwin, 1962) can be used (Soong and<br />

Dargush, 1997) to incorporate the frequency dependency of the parameters approximately.<br />

Equation Section 3<br />

Another model used to incorporate the frequency dependence is the fractional derivative model. It is a<br />

generalization of the classical Kelvin model but with a fractional derivative. It is defined by the<br />

following differential equation:<br />

f=ku + cD a (u}, 0


497<br />

<strong>The</strong> equation of motion of a structure installed with dampers modeled by fractional derivatives and<br />

excited by earthquake induced ground motion x g (r) will also have fractional derivative terms:<br />

M{3c} + CW + CD ff (W)+K f U} = -M{r}^(r) (3.4)<br />

where M and C, respectively, are the mass and inherent damping matrix of the structure; [x] is<br />

relative displacement vector; K, is the total stiffness matrix including the effect of the damper, and C<br />

is the damping matrix due to the contribution of the damper. <strong>The</strong> solution of these equations for an<br />

arbitrarily defined input such as earthquake acceleration time history (that are defined at discrete time<br />

points) is a complicated task. Only a few analyses with earthquake induced ground motions have been<br />

reported in the literature, and they have been primarily limited to the response calculation of single<br />

degree of freedom systems. Makris and Constantinou (1991) used the Fourier transform methods to<br />

obtain the numerical results. Koh and Kelly (1990) used the LI algorithm to solve the problem of a<br />

single degree of freedom base-isolated system in which the damping characteristics of the base<br />

isolation element was represented by a fractional derivative model. L-l signifies the use of the<br />

Luoiville-Riemann definition for the fractional derivative. <strong>The</strong> Gl algorithms using the Grundwald<br />

representation have also been used. <strong>The</strong>se algorithms can be extended for direct integration of the<br />

equations of motion of the multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) structures installed with fractional<br />

derivative modeled dampers. In these schemes, the regular derivatives in the equations of motion are<br />

represented either by some finite difference schemes or by Newmark-/ approach. <strong>The</strong> development<br />

of these numerical integration schemes for MDOF systems can be found in Chang (2002).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se equations can also be solved by a special eigenvector expansion approach, herein called as the<br />

modal approach similar to that used for linear systems with regular derivatives, if the exponent of the<br />

fractional derivative can be expressed as a rational number, that is a = l/m, i


498<br />

where the coefficients a m and b n with the derivatives in the model are chosen such that the model<br />

captures the frequency dependent properties of the material accurately. For this, the storage and loss<br />

moduli corresponding for this model are compared with the experimentally obtained moduli. <strong>The</strong><br />

coefficients are adjusted to obtain a good fit over the range of frequencies of interest. <strong>The</strong> complex<br />

modulus for this model, which defines the storage and loss moduli, can be expressed as:<br />

(1- a,<br />

(3-6)<br />

Figure 3.1 Mechanical representation of a linear model with 7 parameters<br />

It can be shown that the system shown in Fig. 3.1 is equivalent to the model of Eqn. 3.5. <strong>The</strong><br />

coefficients in Eqn. 3.5 can now be expressed in terms of the spring and damper coefficients in Fig.<br />

3.1. In this study, a third-order model has been used to obtain numerical results. For such a model,<br />

there are seven coefficients, which can be written in terms of the spring coefficients ^...£4 and<br />

damper coefficients c 2 , c 3 , and c 4 as follows:<br />

)+ c ; (*,-'+tf+k- 1 )+c 4 (k- 1 +£+*,-«)]<br />

;)+(^'+A 3 - 1 )(c I +c;)+(fc,- 1 +^')( C 3 +c 4 )l<br />

(3.7)<br />

"L<br />

4A ;<br />


499<br />

numerical approach. However, one can also formulate a more convenient self-adjoint system of state<br />

equations with the help of the physical model shown in Fig. 3.1. To describe the dynamic deformation<br />

of each damper completely, we introduce auxiliary displacement coordinates at the interface of each<br />

damping element as shown in Fig. 3.1. In terms of these auxiliary displacement coordinates and the<br />

displacement coordinates that define the motion of each structural degree of freedom, one can develop<br />

the kinetic energy function, potential energy function, and dissipation function. Using the Lagrange<br />

equations, the equations of motion can then be explicitly obtained. Using appropriate auxiliary<br />

equations, and after some re-arrangements of terms, these equations can be written in the self-adjoint<br />

state form. For a shear building with viscoelastic dampers installed in each story, these state equations<br />

can be written as follows:<br />

(4.1)<br />

where the state matrices are defined as:<br />

C<br />

0<br />

0<br />

-c 4<br />

M<br />

0<br />

C 2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 -(<br />

C+C<br />

0<br />

Ml<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 J<br />

,B =<br />

~~K<br />

Kfc<br />

0<br />

K 4<br />

_ 0<br />

K b<br />

-K,-K<br />

K 2<br />

0<br />

0<br />

K 2 0 0<br />

K 4 Ol<br />

ic 3 o<br />

-K 3 -K 4 0<br />

0 Mj<br />

(4.2)<br />

withC = C + C 4 , K=K + K 4 +K fl , C, ^<br />

and 0 elsewhere, and the state vector is defined as {y} = {{*},fa},{z 2 },{zi},{x}] . It is noted that the<br />

state matrices are symmetric, and the system is self-adjoint. It is also noted that, for the third order<br />

model used here, the state vector is of size 5N. Usually a third order model would have enough<br />

parameters to change to obtain a close match with the experimentally obtained moduli.<br />

<strong>The</strong> system of equations, Eqn. 4.1 can be uncoupled using the eigen properties of the system. A modal<br />

analysis approach can be formulated, with all the advantages associated with such an approach. For<br />

example, one can develop a response spectrum approach to calculate the maximum displacement, story<br />

shear, floor acceleration, etc. for seismic design inputs defined in terms of response spectra. <strong>The</strong><br />

details of this formulation are provided by Chang (2002).<br />

Equation Section 5<br />

NUMERICAL RESULTS<br />

In this section we present the numerical results of seismic analysis of a structure installed with<br />

viscoelastic dampers. To show that the higher order linear model of Eqn. 3.5 is as good as the<br />

fractional derivative model, we compare the numerical results obtained by the two formulations.<br />

A 4-story shear building with story masses of m^ ~ m^ = 40 Mg, m^ = m 4 = 36 Mg, and story stiffness<br />

coefficients of K : =18 MN/m , K 2 = £ 3 =12MN/m, K 4 = 10MN/m, was chosen to obtain the<br />

numerical results. To introduce inherent energy dissipation in the system, a damping matrix providing


500<br />

modal damping ratio of 2% in each mode was assumed. <strong>The</strong> undamped frequencies of the system are:<br />

1.07Hz, 2.89Hz, 4.39Hz, and 5.29Hz. <strong>The</strong> viscoelastic dampers were installed in the diagonal bracing<br />

of each story at 45° angles. <strong>The</strong> dimensions of the viscoelastic material used in the dampers were:<br />

area, A = 200 cm 2 , and material thickness, h = 3 cm.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model parameters for the fractional derivative model were chosen as: a = 3/5, G 0 = O.SxlO 5<br />

N/m 2 , GI - 7.2 x 10 5 sec* N/m 2 . For these parameters, the storage and loss moduli are defined by:<br />

G'(£y)=o.8-K7.2cos— )


501<br />

simpler and computationally very efficient compared to the solution of the uncoupled equations in the<br />

fractional derivative model case.<br />

Table 5.1 Comparison of maximum response<br />

Response<br />

Floor 1<br />

Floor 2<br />

Floor3<br />

Floor 4<br />

Relative displacement (m)<br />

No<br />

damper<br />

0.0315<br />

0.0804<br />

0.1242<br />

0.1598<br />

Fractional<br />

derivative<br />

0.0161<br />

0.0338<br />

0.0467<br />

0.0543<br />

Linear<br />

7-para<br />

0.0162<br />

0.0341<br />

0.0472<br />

0.0550<br />

Absolute acceleration (m/s~)<br />

No<br />

damper<br />

6.48<br />

6.10<br />

6.48<br />

10.0<br />

Fractional<br />

derivative<br />

3.28<br />

2.92<br />

3.40<br />

4.14<br />

Linear<br />

7-para<br />

3.26<br />

2.94<br />

3.50<br />

4.32<br />

No<br />

damper<br />

566<br />

590<br />

527<br />

359<br />

Story shear (kN)<br />

Fractional<br />

derivative<br />

290<br />

218<br />

160<br />

79.7<br />

Linear<br />

7-para<br />

291<br />

220<br />

164<br />

82.3<br />

<strong>The</strong> time histories calculated by the two approaches for displacement and acceleration responses were<br />

very similar, but not exactly the same. A more meaningful comparison is obtained when the maximum<br />

response quantities are compared. In Table 5.1 we compare the maximum values of the floor<br />

displacements, story shears, and floor accelerations calculated by the two approaches. It is noted that<br />

the response values calculated by different approaches are close to each other. Also shown are the<br />

values for the undamped case. <strong>The</strong> response reducing effect of the dampers is clearly evident. In<br />

Figures 5.2(a) and 5.2(b) we show the floor response spectra of the floors 2 and 4, again obtained by<br />

the two approaches. <strong>The</strong> difference between the floor response spectra calculated by the two<br />

approaches is minimal at higher frequencies. At lower frequencies, these is some difference, primarily<br />

because of the differences in the match of the frequency dependent moduli, Fig. 5.1. However, this can<br />

be improved. This verifies that the linear higher derivative model can provide an as accurate<br />

description of viscoelastic dampers as the fractional derivative model.<br />

70<br />

(a) Floor 2 (b) Floor 4<br />

0.2 1 10 100 0.2 1 10<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Figure 5.2 Floor spectra of pseudo acceleration at floor 2 and 4<br />

100


502<br />

CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />

<strong>The</strong> paper reviews the analytical models that have been proposed to model the frequency dependent<br />

behavior of the viscoelastic materials used in dampers. Among these different models, the fractional<br />

derivative model is considered to capture the frequency dependent characteristics quite well. However,<br />

the analytical complexities of this model are quite significant, and solution of the equations of motion<br />

of structures installed with these dampers can be quite tedious. <strong>The</strong>refore, the use of a generalized<br />

Kelvin-Maxwell model with higher order derivatives is proposed. This model can capture the<br />

frequency dependencies of the material properties as well as the fractional derivative model. However,<br />

this model is analytically much simpler to work and numerically more efficient than the fractional<br />

derivative model. <strong>The</strong> use of this model facilitates the development of a response spectrum method of<br />

analysis, commonly used in earthquake engineering with linear systems. <strong>The</strong> optimal damper<br />

placement studies that are necessary for achieving performance-based design of buildings with these<br />

dampers can also be greatly simplified.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation through Grant No. CMS-99S7469.<br />

This support is gratefully acknowledged. <strong>The</strong> opinions, findings, and conclusions of this work are<br />

those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bagley, R. L. and Torvik, P. J. (1985). Fractional Calculus in the Transient Analysis of<br />

Viscoelastically Damped Structures. AIM Journal 23:6, 918-925.<br />

Chang, T-S. (2002). Seismic Response of Structures with Added Viscoelastic Dampers. Ph. D.<br />

Dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA<br />

Chang, T-S. and Singh, M. P. (2002). Seismic Response of Structures with Fractional Derivative-<br />

Based Viscoelastic Dampers. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Proc, CD-ROM, 7 th U.S.<br />

National Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Boston, M.A., July 21-25.<br />

Makris, N. and Constantinou, M. C. (1991). Fractional-Derivative Maxwell Model for Viscous<br />

Dampers. ASCE Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> 117:9, 2708-2724.<br />

Koh, C. G. and Kelly, J. M. (1990). Application of Fractional Derivatives to Seismic Analysis of Base-<br />

Isolated Models, <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics. 19, 229-241.<br />

Soong, T. T. and Dargush, G. F. (1997). Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong>, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.<br />

Suarez. L. and Shokooh, A. (1997). An Eigenvector Expansion Method for the Solution of Motion<br />

Containing Fractional Derivatives. Journal of Applied Mechanics 64:3, 629-635.<br />

Unger, E. E. and Kerwin, E. M. (1962). Loss Factor of Viscoelastic Systems in Terms of Energy<br />

Concepts. Journal of American Acoustic Society 34, 954-957.


Proceedings of the International Conference on 503<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SEISMIC RESPONSE CONTROL OF A BENCHMARK<br />

CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE<br />

J. N. Yang 1 , S. Lin 1 and F. Jabbari 2<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Control systems have been shown to be quite effective in reducing the seismic response of buildings and<br />

bridges. In this paper, two HZ based control strategies with energy-bounded or peak-bounded excitations<br />

are proposed and their applications to the seismic response control of a benchmark cable-stayed bridge<br />

are presented. For design loads specified by a class of "energy-bounded" or peak-bounded excitations,<br />

both controllers are derived by minimizing the upper bound of the HI performance. <strong>The</strong> design syntheses<br />

of these control strategies are developed and formulated within the framework of linear matrix<br />

inequalities (LMIs), so that the LMI toolbox in MALAB can be used effectively and conveniently. <strong>The</strong><br />

performance of these two control strategies is demonstrated using a seismically excited benchmark<br />

cable-stayed bridge. Simulation results indicate that: (i) the performance of the proposed control<br />

strategies is excellent in comparison with that of the LQG sample controller, and (ii) the seismic<br />

response of the cable-stayed bridge can be reduced significantly through the application of the control<br />

technology.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

It has been shown that various control systems can be used effectively to reduce the response of civil<br />

engineering structures subject to strong winds, earthquakes and other service loads [e.g., Housner et al<br />

(1997), Spencer and Sain (1997), Yang et ai (2QOOb,c; 2002a,b)]. Benchmark problems for control of<br />

buildings and bridges have been established recently [ e.g., Spencer et al (1998), Ohtori et al (2000),<br />

Yang et al (2000a), Dyke et al (2000) ]. <strong>The</strong> response control of long-span cable-stayed bridges has<br />

attracted considerable attention [e.g., Yang et al (1979a,b), Warnitchai et at (1993), Achkire & Preumont<br />

(1996), Johnson et al (2002) ]. In particular, the connection between the bridge deck and towers affects<br />

the seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. Under seismic excitations, a strong connection will reduce<br />

the displacement response of the deck and increase the shear force and bending moment at the base of<br />

the towers. A weaker connection can be used as a compromise between the deck displacement and forces<br />

at the base of the tower to restrict the deck motion during small earthquakes. During strong earthquakes,<br />

the weaker connection will be damaged to allow a large deck motion thus preventing damages to the<br />

tower. Another approach is to dissipate the vibration energy of the bridge using active, passive,


504<br />

semi-active and hybrid control systems. An extensive review of various control systems, including their<br />

advantages and limitations, can be found in [ He et al (2002) ]. Based on the latter approach, a<br />

benchmark problem for the seismic response control of a cable-stayed bridge has been established<br />

recently [ Dyke et al (2000) ].<br />

For the benchmark cable-stayed bridge, control systems, such as actuators, semi-active dampers,<br />

passive viscous dampers, etc , can be installed between the deck and the towers or piers to reduce the<br />

seismic response. A sample LQG control strategy has been used when actuators are installed in the<br />

bridge [ Dyke et al (2000) ]. In this paper, we present two H2 based control strategies for applications to<br />

the benchmark cable-stayed bridge and their performances in reducing the seismic response of the<br />

bridge are evaluated and compared with that of the LQG controller.<br />

PROBLEM STATEMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> equation of motion of an n-DOF structure equipped with control systems and subject to earthquake<br />

or wind excitations can be written as<br />

Mi(t) + Ci(t) + Kx(t) = Hu(t) + t|w(t) (1)<br />

in which x(t) is the displacement vector with the ith element xj being the displacement of the ith DOF<br />

relative to the ground; M, C and K are mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the structure; H is the<br />

location matrix of controllers; r\ is the influence coefficient matrix of the excitations; and u(t) and w(t)<br />

are the vectors of control forces and disturbances, respectively. For a structure subject to earthquake<br />

excitations, r\ is a (nxl) matrix and w(t)=x g (t) is a scalar denoting the earthquake ground<br />

acceleration.<br />

In the state space, Eq.(l) can be expressed as<br />

Z(t) = AZ(t) + Bu(t) + Ew(t) (2)<br />

in which Z(t) = {x T (t) , i (t)} T is a 2n state vector, A is a system matrix, B and E are appropriate<br />

matrices, and the superscript T denotes the transpose of a vector or matrix. In general, a ni -dimensional<br />

controlled output vector z\, a ^-dimensional constraint output vector zi, and a m-dimensional measured<br />

output vector y can be expressed, respectively, by<br />

Zl(t) = C 2l Z(t)-hD zl u(t)-hE zl w(t)<br />

(t) (3)<br />

where v is a measurement noise vector. Let z^t) be the ith element of the vector Z2(t), where all<br />

elements of za(t) denote the constraint variables (i.e., physical constraints). Since we are interested in<br />

limiting or penalizing the peak values of these variables individually and since each of Z2,i(t) is a scalar,<br />

the peak values of these physical quantities are the LQO norms, i.e.,<br />

1 2 2,i W I oo = sup i Z2 >» (t) I '<br />

for [ = ls 2) •"' n 2 ( 4 )<br />

For a given structure in Eq.(2), our goal is to find a controller u(t) such that: (i) the closed-loop system<br />

is asymptotically stable, (ii) the Hi performance index J*2 is minimized, i.e.,<br />

•7*2 = Kw(»|| 2 = [ ~ C trace [T^OJo) T ZlW (jco)] do> ] 1/2 (5)<br />

and (iii) the constraints for the peak values of all components of 22(1) are satisfied, i.e.,<br />

|Ki(t)L^YiSi> i = l,2,...,n 2 , Vw(t)eW (6)<br />

In Eqs.(5>(6), T ZlW (s) is the transfer matrix from w(t) to zi(t), the superscript H is the conjugate and


505<br />

transpose of a matrix or vector, e, (i - 1, 2, ..., n 2 ) are specified design allowable values representing the<br />

constraints, such as peak control forces, peak strokes, peak drifts, etc., and YJ are design variables<br />

( weighting factors ) to be adjusted in order to obtain an admissible and good performance controller.<br />

Further, W can be either a class of "energy-bounded" excitations (design loads), i.e.,<br />

or a class of peak-bounded excitations, i.e.,<br />

w(t)€W = {w(t)|jw(t)| 2


506<br />

Iiz2i(t)l


507<br />

be adjusted and Eqs.(17)-(19) should be used. In this connection, the function "MINCX" in the LMI<br />

toolbox of MATLAB can be used conveniently to design both KfcB-EB and HaB-PB controllers.<br />

APPLICATION TO BENCHMARK CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE<br />

A benchmark model for a cable-stayed bridge has been established [Dyke et al (2002)] in order to<br />

investigate the effectiveness of control systems during an episode of earthquake. <strong>The</strong> benchmark<br />

cable-stayed bridge is the Missouri 74-fllinois 146 bridge spanning the Mississippi River near Girardau,<br />

Missouri, and a schematic drawing of the bridge is shown in Fig.l. A control system has been suggested<br />

and a sample LQG controller has been worked out in the benchmark paper to serve as a reference for the<br />

comparison of control performances with that of the other control strategies. In this control system,<br />

actuators are installed between the deck and two towers (a total of 4 locations) as well as between the<br />

deck at both ends and the pier and abutment, respectively. A total of 24 hydraulic actuators are installed<br />

symmetrically with respect to the centerline of the bridge at a total of 8 locations as shown by the dotted<br />

areas in Fig.2. <strong>The</strong> number of actuators installed at each location is indicated in parentheses next to the<br />

dotted area. All actuators are identical and each has a capacity of lOOOkN. Three earthquakes records<br />

have been considered as the input excitations in the longitudinal direction of the bridge, i.e., El Centro<br />

NS, Gebze NS and Mexico earthquakes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> performance indices are defined by Jj to Jig, where Jj = maxi. base shear of tower; ^2 = maxi.<br />

deck shear; Js = maxi. base moment of tower; 14 = maxi. deck moment; Js = maxi. cable force deviation;<br />

Jg = maxi. deck displacement; Jy = norm base shear of tower; Jg - norm deck shear; 19 = norm base<br />

moment of tower; JIQ = norm deck moment; Jn= norm cable force deviation; Ji2~ maxi. control force;<br />

Jn = maxi. actuator stroke; Ji4= maxi. actuator power; ]\s= total actuator power; Jig = number of<br />

actuators; Jn = number of sensors; and Jig = control resources. <strong>The</strong> norm Ml of a response quantity is<br />

-468' -1150' -468' 1870'<br />

I<br />

I<br />

Bent 1 Pier 2<br />

to<br />

I<br />

I<br />

Pier 3 Pier 4<br />

Fig. 1: Drawing of the Cape Girardeau Bridge [Drawing Courtesy of Dyke et al (2002)].<br />

/Protective Devices<br />

Ill ( 2 )<br />

S:S ( 4 )^— Number of Ac;tuators N ted (4) w mN V^l^:<br />

Illinois> Approach " ^<br />

Bentl Pier 2 Pier 3<br />

Fig. 2: Locations of Protective Devices in the Cable-Stayed Bridge.


508<br />

defined as 114 - [ J* [•] 2 dt /t ] l ' 2 , where T is sufficiently large to allow the response of the structure<br />

to attenuate, and [•] is the quantity whose norm is to be calculated. Note that Ji to Ju are bridge<br />

response quantities normalized by the corresponding uncontrolled responses, and J^ to J^are the<br />

required actuator capacities normalized by different quantities. Hence, the control performance is better<br />

if the value of indices J t (i =1,2,...,18) is smaller.<br />

Evaluation criteria Ji to Jis for each control strategies are shown in Table 1, in which the result<br />

denote the maximum value due to 3 earthquakes, i.e., El Centra, Gebze, and Mexico. Columns (2) and (6)<br />

of Table 1 show the results for the LQG sample controller considered in [Dyke et al (2002)], except that<br />

all the diagonal elements of the weighting matrix R are reduced from 1.0 to 0.62, so that the maximum<br />

actuator control force is increased to 996kN (see Table 1) to improve the control performance.<br />

For both H 2 B-EB and H 2 B-PB controllers, we use the same state-reduced order system and the<br />

Kalman-Bucy filter as that used hi the LQG sample controller. Our control output vector z^t) is<br />

selected as, zTz^z^z, where z T Qz was used in the objective function of the LQG sample<br />

controller. <strong>The</strong> constraint output vector z 2 (t) in Eq. (3) is equal to u(t), i.e., z 2 (t) = u(t) = [MI, u 2 ,...,<br />

ug] T where u l is the control force from one actuator at the ith location and it has a peak force<br />

limitation of 1000 kN. Hence, only the constraints on the actuator peak forces are considered in the<br />

constraint output vector z 2 (t), i.e., B l =1000 kN for i = 1, 2, ..., 8. Finally, measured output vector y(t)<br />

in Eq.(3) is identical to that used in the LQG controller, i.e., four accelerometers are installed on the top<br />

of the tower legs and one accelerometer on the deck at the mid-span, whereas two displacement sensors<br />

are located between the deck and pier 2 and other two displacement sensors are located between the deck<br />

and pier 3. Based on three earthquake records, the maximum total "energy" is computed as p 2 = 3.37<br />

m/sec 3/2 (El Centro earthquake), whereas the maximum peak ground acceleration (PGA) is p00= 3.42<br />

m/sec 2 (El Centro earthquake). With the input parameter 8j, P 2 and p^ above, the design parameters<br />

for the H 2 B-EB controller are y j = y = 4.76 for i = 1,2,..., 8, whereas that for the H 2 B-PB controller are<br />

y> =y = 68.95 for i = 1,2,..., 8 and cc=0.01.<br />

<strong>The</strong> resulting performance indices for these two controllers are presented in Table 1. A comparison<br />

of the results in Table 1 indicates that the performances of the proposed new controllers are superior to<br />

that of the LQG sample controller. Peak values of control forces for all controllers in Uj (i= 1,2,..., 8)<br />

Table 1: Evaluation Criteria and Peak Control Forces For LQG, H 2 B-EB and H 2 B-PB Controllers<br />

Criteria<br />

(1)<br />

Ji<br />

:-><br />

J3<br />

J 4<br />

h<br />

J6<br />

J<br />

J 8<br />

J 9<br />

Force<br />

ui<br />

U2<br />

U 3<br />

U4<br />

LQG<br />

(2)<br />

0456<br />

1.340<br />

0.547<br />

1.073<br />

0.174<br />

3.043<br />

0.396<br />

1.348<br />

0.436<br />

LQG<br />

471<br />

471<br />

914<br />

914<br />

H 2 B-EB<br />

(3)<br />

0.454<br />

1.225<br />

0.494<br />

0.964<br />

0.162<br />

2.406<br />

0.394<br />

1.192<br />

0.398<br />

H 2 B-PB<br />

(4)<br />

0.453<br />

1.218<br />

0.493<br />

0.956<br />

0.161<br />

2.374<br />

0.394<br />

1.183<br />

0.397<br />

Criteria<br />

(5)<br />

JIG<br />

Jn(xlO- z )<br />

Ji2(xlO' J )<br />

Jl3<br />

Ji 4 (xi


509<br />

are presented in the lower part of Table 1. Peak control forces are maximum under the Gebze earthquake<br />

for the LQG controller, whereas these quantities are maximum under the El Centro earthquake for both<br />

H 2 B-EB and H 2 B-PB controllers as shown Table 1. It is observed that the peak control forces of all<br />

actuators for the proposed controllers are quite close to the upper limit 1 OQOkN. <strong>The</strong> main reason for the<br />

superior performance of our proposed controllers is that they are capable of pushing the control<br />

resources (i.e., peak control forces) of all actuators at all locations to the limit This is a significant<br />

advantage of the proposed new control strategies over other control methods. It is further observed from<br />

Table 1 that most of the response quantities of the bridge have been reduced significantly through the<br />

installation of control devices.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Two H- based control strategies with "energy-bounded" or peak-bounded excitations have been<br />

proposed and their applications to the seismic response control of a benchmark cable-stayed bridge have<br />

been presented. For design loads specified by a class of "energy-bounded" or peak-bounded excitations,<br />

both controllers are derived by minimizing the upper bound of the HI performance. <strong>The</strong> design syntheses<br />

of these control strategies are developed and formulated within the framework of linear matrix<br />

inequalities (LMIs), so that the LMI toolbox in MALAB can be used effectively and conveniently. <strong>The</strong><br />

performance of these two control strategies in reducing the seismic response of structures has been<br />

demonstrated using a benchmark cable-stayed bridge. Simulation results indicate that: (i) the<br />

performance of the proposed control strategies is excellent in comparison with the LQG sample<br />

controller, and (ii) the seismic response of cable-stayed bridges can be reduced significantly through the<br />

application of control technology. Although actuators are considered in this paper as a possible control<br />

device, it has been shown that passive and semi-active control systems, including passive viscous<br />

dampers, MR dampers, resetting semi-active stiffness dampers and semi-active friction dampers, can be<br />

used to effectively reduce the seismic response of the cable-stayed bridge [ e.g., Moon et al (2002),<br />

Agrawal et al (2002) ].<br />

References<br />

Achkire, Y. and Preumont, A. (1996), "Active Tendon Control of a Cable-Stayed Bridges", J. of<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 25: 6, 585-597.<br />

Agrawal, A.K., Yang, IN., and He, W.L. (2002), "Performance Evaluation of Some Semi-Active<br />

Control Systems For A Benchmark Cable-Stayed Bridge", Proc 3 rd World Conference on Structural<br />

Control, Como, Italy.<br />

Dyke, S.J., Bergman,, L.A., Turan, G. and Caicedo, J.M. (2000), "Benchmark Control Problem For<br />

Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridge", Proc. 3 rd International workshop on Structural Control,<br />

Paris, France, Website: http://wusceelcive.wustl.edu/quake/.<br />

E.A. Johnson, G.A. Baker, B.F. Spencer, Jr., and Y. Fujino (2002), "Semiactive Damping of Stay<br />

Cables," Journal of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, ASCE, in press. Web version online at http://rcf.usc.edu/<br />

~j ohnsone/papers/smartdamping_tautcablej em.html.<br />

Housner, G.W., Bergman, LA., Caughey, T.K., Chassiakos, A.G. and others (1997), "Structural<br />

Control: Past, Present, and Future", J. ofEngrg Mechanics, ASCE, 123:9, 897-971.<br />

He, WJL, Agrawal, A.K., and Yang, J.N. (2002), "A Novel Semi-Active Friction Controller for Linear<br />

Structures Against <strong>Earthquake</strong>s", to appear in ASCE Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>.<br />

Moon, S.J., Bergman, LA, and Voulgaris, P.G« (2002), "Sliding Mode Control of a Cable-Stayed<br />

Bridge Subject to Seismic Excitation", Proc. 3 r World Conf on Structural Control, Como, Italy.<br />

Ohtori, Y., Christenson, R.E., Spencer, B.F. and Dyke, SJ. (2000), " Benchmark Control Problems for<br />

Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings", World Wide Website: http://www.nd.edu/<br />

~quake/bench.html, to appear in the Special Issue of ASCE J. Engrg Mechanics, 2003.


Spencer, B.F., Jr. and Sain, M.K. (1997), "Controlling Buildings: A New Frontier in Feedback", IEEE<br />

Control Systems, 17:6,19-35.<br />

Spencer, Jr., B.F., Dyke, S.J., and Deoskar, H.S. (1998), "Benchmark Problems in Structural<br />

Control-Part 1: Active Mass Driver System, and Part 2: Active Tendon System." J. <strong>Earthquake</strong> Engrg.<br />

and Structural Dynamics, 27:11,1127-1147.<br />

Warnitchai, P., Fujino, Y., Pacheco, B.M. and Agret, R. (1993), "An Experimental Study on Active<br />

Tendon Control of Cable-Stayed Bridges", J. of <strong>Earthquake</strong> Engrg. & Structural Dynamics, 22:2,<br />

93-111.<br />

Yang, IN., and Giannopoulos, F. (1979a), "Active Control and Stability of Cable-Stayed Bridge",<br />

ASCEJ. <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, 105, 677-694,<br />

Yang, J.N., and Giannopouios, F. (1979b), "Active Control of Two-Cable-Stayed Bridge", ASCE J.<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, 105,795-810.<br />

Yang, J.N., Agrawal, A.K., Samali, B. and Wu, J.C. (2000a), "A Benchmark Problem For Response<br />

Control of Wind-Excited Tail Buildings", Proceedings of!4th <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics Conference,<br />

ASCE, May 21-24, Austin, Texas, CD-ROM, 8 pages, Website: http://www-ce.engr.<br />

ccny .cuny .edu/people/factdty/agrawal/benckmark.html, to appear in Special Issue of ASCE J. Engrg.<br />

Mechanics, 2003.<br />

Yang, J. N., and Agrawal, A. K., (2000b), "Protective Systems For High-Technology Facilities Against<br />

Microvibration and <strong>Earthquake</strong>", International Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> & Mechanics, 10:6,<br />

561-575.<br />

Yang, J. N., Kim, J.H., and Agrawal, A.K., (2000c), "A Resetting Semi-Active Stiffness Damper for<br />

Seismic Response Control",/, of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, ASCE, 126:12, 1427-1433.<br />

Yang, J.N., and Agrawal, A.K., (2002a), "Semi-Active Hybrid Control systems For Nonlinear Buildings<br />

Against Near-Field <strong>Earthquake</strong>s", InternationalJournal of <strong>Engineering</strong> Structures, 24, 271-280.<br />

Yang, IN., Lin, S. 9 Kim, J.H., and Agrawal, A.K. (2002b), "Optimal Design of passive Energy<br />

Dissipation Systems Based on H* and H^ Performances", Journal of <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and<br />

Structural Dynamics, 31:4, 921-936.<br />

510


Proceedings of the International Conference on c-11<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

EVALUATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL ENERGY DISSIPATION<br />

DEVICES IN PROTECTING HIGHWAY BRIDGES WITH<br />

SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION<br />

Jian Zhang and Nicos Makris<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of California, Berkeley<br />

Berkeley, CA 94710, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper presents the response analysis of a freeway overcrossing equipped with isolation bearings and<br />

fluid dampers in order to evaluate the efficiency of supplemental energy dissipation devices to suppress<br />

the seismic response of highway bridges. Recognizing that the soil-structure interaction affects<br />

appreciably the earthquake response of highway overcrossings, the study employs an elementary stick<br />

model enhanced with frequency-independent springs and dashpots that approximate the dynamic<br />

stiffnesses of approach embankments and pile groups. <strong>The</strong> nonlinear behavior of columns as well as<br />

hysteretic behavior of seismic protection devices (elastomeric bearings and viscous fluid dampers) are<br />

included in the study. <strong>The</strong> emphasis is placed to understand the effect of supplemental damping in<br />

association with the ability of the structure to dissipate energy through soil-structure interaction. It is<br />

concluded that the fluid dampers are effective in controlling displacement demands, however the<br />

flexibility of the approaching embankments is responsible for partially reducing their efficiency.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> damage in most highway overcrossing is the result of excessive seismic displacements and<br />

large force demands that have been substantially under-estimated during past design. A direct<br />

consequence of the under-estimated seismic displacements, which were the combined result of poor<br />

representation of the kinematic characteristics of the ground, low lateral forces, and overestimated<br />

stiffnesses, was that the seating length at the deck supports was unrealistically short and the lateral<br />

separation between adjacent structures were typically inadequate, resulting in loss of support or pounding<br />

(Maragakis and Jennings 1987). <strong>The</strong>se geometrical inconsistencies resulted in spectacular failures that<br />

have been witnessed during the recent 1989 Loma Prieta and the 1994 Northridge earthquakes in<br />

California and the 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan.<br />

In view of these failures many research programs were launched after the 1971 San Fernando earthquake<br />

to study the seismic resistance of highway bridges. Improvements have been achieved in both design and<br />

analysis of bridge structures with the help of strong motion records. Extensive retrofit programs have<br />

been implemented in California, which include jacketing of columns and the use of composite materials<br />

(FHWA 1995). While retrofit programs are underway there is ongoing need for better understanding the<br />

behavior of each substructure elements of the bridge and to what extend its individual behavior affects the<br />

overall response of the bridge structure. In particular, the increasing need for safer bridges in association


512<br />

with the rapid success of seismic protection devices in buildings has accelerated the implementation of<br />

large-capacity damping devices in bridges (Delis et al. 1996; Smyth et al. 2000; Papanikalas 2002). <strong>The</strong><br />

presence of the isolation system and other protective devices is expected to alter appreciably the response<br />

of bridge and therefore the role of its substructure elements in association with the role of soil-structure<br />

interaction needs to be reexamined for this class of "flexible" structures.<br />

<strong>The</strong> promises of modern seismic protection technologies about their ability to operate under strong<br />

shaking has directed most of the attention on the performance of bearings and dampers under large<br />

displacements and large velocities. <strong>The</strong> interaction of these devices with the remaining bridge structure is<br />

an issue that has been either incorporated in the response analysis indirectly via the finite element analysis<br />

of the entire bridge with large computer codes or has been neglected; partly because the transmitting<br />

forces are usually relatively small and the reaction structures are usually relatively stiff.<br />

Ebstorreric Bearing<br />

Figure 1. Elastomeric bearing and fluid damper layout of 91/5 Overcrossing (left); and photograph of<br />

four dampers installed at east abutment (right).<br />

In this paper the efficiency of modern seismic protection technologies is examined by analyzing the<br />

seismic response of a newly constructed highway overcrossing in southern California, which is the first<br />

seismic isolated overcrossing in the United States equipped with fluid dampers. <strong>The</strong> 91/5 overcrossing of<br />

interest is a continuous two-span, cast-in-place prestressed concrete box-girder bridge. It is supported at<br />

each end-abutments on four elastomeric pads while it is attached with four fluid dampers. Figure 1 shows<br />

the layout of elastomeric bearings and fluid dampers (left) and a view of four fluid dampers installed at<br />

the east abutment. <strong>The</strong> deck is supported near the center bent by a prestressed reinforced concrete<br />

outrigger which rests on two pile groups, each consisting of 49 driven concrete friction piles. Figure 2<br />

shows an idealization of seismic isolated overcrossing together with its approach embankments and pile<br />

foundations. <strong>The</strong> interesting characteristic of this structure is that its transverse and longitudinal modal<br />

periods lie in the range between 0.4sec and O.Ssec, that is a period range for which supplemental damping<br />

on a single-degree-of-freedom structure has beneficial effect. Furthermore, the bridge is approached from<br />

each side by earth embankments that have a tendency to amplify the free-field motion and increase the<br />

role of soil-structure interaction. Accordingly the assessment of the efficiency of the seismic protection<br />

devices is conducted by accounting in our analysis the effect of soil-structure interaction at the end<br />

abutments/approach embankments and at the foundations of the center columns. In principle lengthening<br />

the period of a structure with mechanical isolation reduces accelerations and increases displacements.


Nevertheless, a more flexible configuration offers to the deck additional mobility that may result to<br />

undesirable response.<br />

513<br />

Pile Foundation<br />

Approach<br />

E mbanlcmeni<br />

and Pile<br />

Foundation at<br />

Abutment<br />

Approach<br />

JSmbaiikment<br />

and Pile<br />

Foundation at<br />

Abutment<br />

Figure 2. Schematic of an idealized model of the 91/5 Overcrossing<br />

MACROSCOPIC CONSTITUTIVE LAWS OF SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> bridge is decomposed into its main substructure components including approach embankments, pile<br />

foundations, center bent and seismic protection system that consists of isolation bearings and fluid<br />

dampers. Simple macroscopic constitutive laws that capture satisfactorily the restoring and energy<br />

dissipation mechanisms of these substructural elements within the deformation levels of interest are<br />

adopted.<br />

Recognizing that soil-structure interaction affects appreciably the earthquake response of conventional<br />

highway overcrossings, a recent study by Zhang and Makris (2001, 2002a,b) developed a simple<br />

procedure to compute the kinematic response functions and dynamic stiffnesses of approach<br />

embankments that has been validated against recorded data from two well-instrumented bridges with<br />

integral abutments, the Meloland Road and the Painter Street overcrossings. That study also indicated<br />

that & although the dynamic stiffnesses of approach embankments and pile foundations are in general<br />

frequency dependent quantities, their low frequency values do not fluctuate appreciably with frequency<br />

and one can replace them with frequency independent springs and dashpots.<br />

For the center bent, the columns are expected to behave inelastically. <strong>The</strong>refore, their behavior ^ is<br />

represented by the nonlinear moment-curvature curve, that was computed with the geometry and material<br />

properties of columns.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mechanical behavior of seismic protection systems is nonlinear since isolation bearings yield or slide,<br />

while fluid dampers deliver forces that depend on a fractional power of the piston velocity. One can use a<br />

bi-directional bilinear model to characterize their behavior. Under shear deformation the elastomeric pads<br />

deform nearly elastically (K eff * 5MN/m) until they develop a lateral force F = pJV, where p, = 0.3 is<br />

the friction coefficient of the pad-deck interface and N is the normal force on the pad. In this study the<br />

force at which sliding initiates is F« 0.3MN and the yield displacement is u y = F/K sff * 0.06m. Each<br />

fluid damper implemented is designed to produce 250kips at a piston velocity of 42in/s. <strong>The</strong>ir behavior is<br />

nonlinear and the force output is proportional to a fractional power of the velocity,<br />

P(/) = C a |w(Ol a sgn[M(0], wk ere fractional power, CL Q IJ taken to be 0.35 in this application.<br />

Accordingly, the damping constant, C a is 1.09MN- (s/m) ' .


Figure 3 summarizes the static push-over curves that result from the constitutive models adopted in this<br />

study. Each push-over curve extends to the range of deformation that the corresponding element<br />

experiences during the strong (Case 1) and moderately strong (Case 2) earthquake loading. All<br />

substructure elements except the isolation bearings exhibit a nearly elastic behavior. This observation is in<br />

agreement with observations from the studies on highway overcrossings, such as the Meloland Road and<br />

the Painter Street Overcrossings that have been shaken by strong earthquakes (Werner et al. 1987,<br />

McCallen and Romstad 1994, Goel and Chopra 1997). Even the center bent that shares a large fraction of<br />

the horizontal inertial loading behaves nearly elastic. This finding is in agreement with recent design<br />

practice adopted by Caltrans.<br />

514<br />

Below East Abutment (.r or y)<br />

ilar for West Abutment)<br />

0.06 0.08 0.1<br />

Displacement (m)<br />

Figure 3. Summary of force-displacement (push-over) curves of various substructure elements of<br />

interest m this study. Each curve extends to the range of deformation that the corresponding element<br />

experiences. Case 1: strong earthquake shaking; Case 2: moderately strong earthquake.<br />

SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS<br />

Figure 4 presents a stick model idealization of the 91/5 Overcrossing. <strong>The</strong> bridge superstructure is<br />

modeled by beam elements with a massless rigid link at each end that preserves the skewed geometry of<br />

the bridge deck and serves as the connecting elements between bridge deck and the abutment. <strong>The</strong><br />

elastomeric bearings are replaced by the bilinear models that will produce the same hysteretic loop as a<br />

sliding bearing. <strong>The</strong> fluid dampers are replaced by nonlinear dashpot elements and are arranged in a way<br />

exact as the layout during the construction. <strong>The</strong> elastomeric bearings serve as the connecting element<br />

between deck and abutment while the abutment is supported by "springs" and "dashpots" that will replace<br />

the presence of embankment and pile foundation under the abutment footing. <strong>The</strong> detailed information on<br />

the values of these spring and dashpot constants can be found in the thesis by Zhang (2002).<br />

Because of the proximity of the bridge to active faults, eleven strong ground motions that have been<br />

recorded in California relatively close to the fault of major earthquakes are selected for the simulation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bridge is subjected to the recorded free-field accelerations at the center bent and the amplified<br />

accelerations at end abutments along the transverse and longitudinal directions simultaneously. In general<br />

the fault-normal component is applied to the transverse direction while the fault-parallel component is<br />

applied to the longitudinal direction.


515<br />

Embankment, Beanngs<br />

& Fluid Dampers<br />

Embankment, Bearings<br />

& Fluid Dampers<br />

Pile Foundation<br />

(Equivalent Beam & Dashpot<br />

Stick Model<br />

Figure 4. Numerical model of 91/5 Overcrossing<br />

In this paper, the dynamic response of three configurations of the 91/5 Overcrossing are compared: (a) the<br />

as built configuration where the deck is supported at both ends by elastomeric pads and is equipped with<br />

fluid dampers (Pads+Dampers); (b) same configuration as (a) but without fluid dampers (Pads only); (c)<br />

the bridge-deck is rigidly connected to integral abutments (Integral Abutments).<br />

Figure 5 summarizes the peak total accelerations and relative displacements of Point A (east end of deck)<br />

for various earthquakes. <strong>The</strong> results are sorted according to the peak ground acceleration of the faultnormal<br />

component of each earthquake record. <strong>The</strong> thin lines are the results for all three cases when soilstructure<br />

interaction is neglected while the think lines are the results when soil-structure interaction is<br />

included in the analysis. Along the longitudinal direction, the bridge with sitting abutment is more<br />

flexible than that with integral abutments, so accelerations are smaller and displacements are larger.<br />

Damping reduces both displacements and accelerations of the flexible configuration. However, along the<br />

transverse direction, the case of bridge with integral abutment not only yields smaller accelerations but<br />

also smaller relative displacements. This can be explained by looking at the transverse mode of the two<br />

configurations. <strong>The</strong> transverse mode of the case of integral abutment is primarily a flexural mode,<br />

whereas in the case of sitting abutment the transverse mode is primarily a translational mode where the<br />

entire deck translates sideways without flexing appreciably. This results to larger displacements at the<br />

deck ends and also larger accelerations. Supplemental damping reduces both displacements and<br />

accelerations but the response of the bridge with sitting abutments appears to under-perform the response<br />

of the bridge with integral abutments. Figure 5 also indicates that the soil-structure interaction increases<br />

both accelerations and displacements. Similarly, Figure 6 plots the peak total accelerations and relative<br />

displacements of Point B (middle of the deck). <strong>The</strong> trend of accelerations and displacements along the<br />

longitudinal directions resemble the trend that one observes at Point A. Along the transverse direction the<br />

results for accelerations and displacements of three configurations are mixed because the mid-span moves<br />

sideways approximately the same amount regardless of whether the transverse movement is the result of a<br />

primarily flexural mode or of a primarily translational mode. Again the bridge response is considerably<br />

underestimated when the effect of soil-structure interaction is neglected.<br />

Figure 7 plots the peak forces behind the end abutments. Clearly, the isolated configuration reduces the<br />

longitudinal forces but not the transverse forces. Interestingly, the presence of fluid dampers yields<br />

transverse forces that are higher than the forces when the bridge has integral abutments. Figure 8 plots the<br />

peak shear forces at the base of columns. Along the transverse direction the isolated bridge transmits<br />

approximately the same forces to the column base that the bridge with integral abutments transmits.<br />

Along the longitudinal direction, the differences are dramatic since in some earthquakes the column base<br />

shears of the isolated bridge are more than two times the column base shears of the bridge with integral<br />

abutments.


CONCLUSIONS<br />

516<br />

This paper presents a case study on the seismic response of the 91/5 Overcrossing that is equipped with<br />

isolation bearings and fluid dampers at its end-abutments. <strong>The</strong> study adopts the substructure method and a<br />

reduced-order stick model. <strong>The</strong> simple macroscopic constitutive laws of the main substructure elements<br />

are proposed. <strong>The</strong> study reveals that lengthening of the period of an overcrossing by introducing isolation<br />

bearings reduces the longitudinal accelerations of the deck but increases the translational accelerations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> supplemental damping is beneficial but in many cases the configuration with integral abutment is<br />

shown to yield the most favorable response. Soil-structure interaction is responsible for increasing<br />

displacements while having mixed effect on accelerations. <strong>The</strong> response of the isolated bridge is<br />

significantly underestimated when soil-structure interaction is neglected.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Delis, E.A., Malla, R.B., Madani, M, and Thompson, K.J. (1996), "Energy dissipation devices in<br />

bridges using hydraulic dampers", Proc. Structures Congress XIV, Vol. 2, 1188-1196, Chicago, IL.<br />

FHWA (1995), "Seismic retrofitting manual for highway bridges", Publication No. FHWA-RD-94-052,<br />

McLeon, VA.<br />

Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1997), "Evaluation of bridge abutment capacity and stiffness during<br />

earthquakes", <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 13(1): 1-23.<br />

Maragakis, E.A. and Jennings, RC. (1987), "Analytical models for the rigid body motions of skew<br />

bridges", <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics., 15(8):923-44.<br />

McCallen, D.B., and Romstad, K.M. (1994), "Analysis of a skewed short-span, box-girder overpass",<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, 10(4):729-55.<br />

Papanikolas, RK. (2002), "Deck superstructure and cable stays of the Rio-Antirion bridge", Proc. 4th<br />

National Conference on Steel Structures, Patros, Greece.<br />

Symth, A.W., Masri, A.F., Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M., and Nigbor, R.N. (2000), "Development of a nonlinear<br />

multi-input/multi-output model for the Vincent Thomas Bridge under earthquake excitations", Proc.<br />

12th World Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Paper No. 2211, Upper Hurt, New Zealand.<br />

Werner, S.D., Beck, J.L. and Levine, M.B. (1987), "Seismic response evaluation of Meloland Road<br />

Overpass using 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake records", <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural<br />

Dynamics, 15:249-74.<br />

Zhang, J. and Makris, N. (2001), "Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings including soilstructure<br />

interaction", Report No. PEER-01/02, <strong>University</strong> of California, Berkeley, CA.<br />

Zhang, J. and Makris, N. (2002a), "Kinematic response functions and dynamic stiffnesses of bridge<br />

embankments", <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 31, in press.<br />

Zhang, J. and Makris, N. (2002b), "Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings including soilstructure<br />

interaction", <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and Structural Dynamics, 31, in press.<br />

Zhang, J. (2002), "Seismic response analysis and protection of highway overcrossings including soilstructure<br />

interaction", Ph. D Dissertation, <strong>University</strong> of California, Berkeley, CA.


517<br />

Longitudinal<br />

-o- Integral Abutment (SSI)<br />

-o- W Pads (SSI)<br />

•*•• W Pads & Dampers (SSI)<br />

-e— Integral Abutment (No SSI)<br />

-a- w Pads (No SSI)<br />

•*• W. Pads & Dampers (No SSI)<br />

Peak Ground Acceleration (FN)<br />

Peak Ground Acceleration (FN)<br />

Figure 5. Peak total accelerations (top) and peak relative displacements (bottom) near east end of deck (Point A) due to<br />

various earthquake motions ordered with increasing peak ground acceleration of the fault-normal component<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

f<br />

Transverse<br />

Integral Abutment (SSI)<br />

W Pads (SSI)<br />

W. Pads &. Dampers (SSI)<br />

Integral Abutment (No SSI)<br />

W Pads (No SSI)<br />

W Pads & Dampers (No SSI)<br />

f<br />

'


518<br />

1<br />

OS<br />

h<br />

: 0 6<br />

5<br />

5 04<br />

Transverse<br />

Integral Abutment (SSI)<br />

W Pads (SSI)<br />

• W Pads & Dampers (SSI)<br />

Integral Abutment (No SSI)<br />

W Pads (No SSI)<br />

W Pads & Dampers (No SSI)<br />

Longitudinal<br />

02<br />

0<br />

Figure<br />

Peak Ground Acceleration (FN)<br />

Peak Ground Acceleration (FN)<br />

7. Peak forces behind end abutments due to vanous earthquake motions ordered with increasing<br />

peak ground acceleration of the fault-normal component<br />

0.8<br />

:<br />

h<br />

: 0.6<br />

J04<br />

" 0.2<br />

!><br />

: 0 6<br />

08<br />

0 &f3a!,,i l l i f I a i I t * s<br />

1 I 11 H I i I 1<br />

Longitudinal<br />

o Integral Abutment (SSI)<br />

-Or- W Pads (SSI)<br />

*r W Pads & Dampers (SSI)<br />

-e- Integral Abutment (No SSI)<br />

-a- w Pads (No SSI)<br />

W Pads & Dampers (No SSI)<br />

Peak Ground Acceleration (FN)<br />

peak Ground Acceleration (FN)<br />

Figure 8. Peak forces at base of center columns due to vanous earthquake motions ordered with<br />

increasing peak ground acceleration of the fault-normal component


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 51 9<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SEISMIC RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF<br />

MULTISTORY ISOLATED BRICK BUILDINGS<br />

Lingxin ZHANG Minzheng ZHANG Jinren JIANG and Jiepmg LIU<br />

Institute of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, China Seismological Bureau, Harbin, China 150080<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper analyzes the seismic reliability of four multistory isolated brick buildings with different<br />

story numbers and design intensities by Latin Hypercube Sampling technique and nonlinear seismic<br />

time history response analysis. And the results of the isolated buildings and the corresponding<br />

buildings without isolation are compared. On the basis of the comparative results, the specific<br />

suggestions for the seismic design of the isolated brick buildings are proposed.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

With the development of structural isolation technique, people have recognized that using the isolation<br />

technique can mitigate effectively damage to the buildings subjected to earthquake. Butlt is not clear<br />

what the seismic safety of the isolated buildings can be increased, compared with the corresponding<br />

buildings without isolation. This paper studies the safety of the isolated buildings by taking four<br />

multistory brick buildings with laminated rubber bearings as examples and analyzing their seismic<br />

reliabilities. <strong>The</strong> seismic reliability is analyzed by Latin Hypercube Sampling technique and nonlinear<br />

seismic time history response analysis. In the analysis, the uncertainties of earthquake load and<br />

structural parameters are considered.<br />

2 FOUR MULTISTORY BRICK BUILDINGS WITH LAMINATED RUBBER BEARINGS<br />

In order to evaluate the seismic reliability of multistory isolated brick buildings, a set of representative structures<br />

needs to be established according to Latin Hypercube Sampling technique. For this reason, we regard multistory<br />

isolated dwelling brick buildings as examples, and take the maximum story number of the brick buildings for various<br />

intensities according to Chinese " L Code for seismic design of buildings" (GBJ11-89). Thus, four multistory dwelling<br />

brick buildings with laminated rubber bearings are chosen, which are an eight-story building for intensity VI, a<br />

seven-story building for intensity W, a six-story building for intensity Vffl, and a four-story building for intensity DC,<br />

respectively. Taking use of the typical common design parametric values of multistory dwelling bnck buildings, four<br />

representative multistory dwelling brick buildings, as shown in table 1, are established by Latin Hypercube Sampling<br />

technique. <strong>The</strong> seismic design of multistory dwelling brick buildings is conducted according to Chinese "Code for<br />

seismic design of buildings"(GBJll-89). <strong>The</strong> thickness of the inner wall is 24cm, but 37crn for the first and second<br />

floors of four-story building designed for intensity IX. <strong>The</strong> grade of mortar is usually M2.5, but it can be increased to<br />

M5.0 and M10.0 according to the requirement of seismic design. <strong>The</strong> transversal wall is taken as the<br />

load-bearing wall in the four buildings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> thickness of laminated rubber bearing is 50mm.<br />

Sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 59978047


520<br />

TABLE 1<br />

REPRESENTATIVE MULTISTORY DWELLING BRICK BUILDINGS<br />

Design parameters<br />

Story<br />

Story height (m)<br />

Top story height (m)<br />

Bay (m)<br />

Building width (m)<br />

Building length (m)<br />

Outer wall thickness (cm)<br />

Load of roof (N/m 2 )<br />

Load of floor (~N"/m 2 )<br />

1<br />

4<br />

2.7<br />

2.8<br />

3.3<br />

10.3<br />

32.2<br />

37<br />

3310<br />

3790<br />

2<br />

6<br />

2.7<br />

2.7<br />

3.9<br />

11.2<br />

34.6<br />

37<br />

3310<br />

3790<br />

Buildings<br />

3<br />

7<br />

2.8<br />

2.8<br />

3.6<br />

10.3<br />

34.6<br />

37<br />

3310<br />

3790<br />

4<br />

8<br />

2.8<br />

2.8<br />

3.6<br />

10.3<br />

34.6<br />

37<br />

3310<br />

3790<br />

3 NONLINEAR SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS<br />

<strong>The</strong> brick building model is a shear stick model. <strong>The</strong> hysteretic model used is a tnlinear model, which<br />

is given through referring to a large number references [5], as shown in Fig.l. <strong>The</strong> details of the<br />

formulas of stiffness and strength in this model are given in Ref. [5]. This model includes a negative<br />

stiffness branch. In order to avoid the probable unstable phenomenon in the iteration method and<br />

probable non-definite abnormal matrix in the variable stiffness matrix method during dealing with the<br />

negative stiffness, we use the method of nonlinear dynamic response analysis based on pattern of<br />

self-equilibrating stresses [5, 6] to analyze the response of multistory brick buildings.<br />

Figure!: Hysteretic model of brick wall<br />

Figure 2: Elasto-plastic hysteretic model<br />

<strong>The</strong> hysteretic model used in laminated rubber bearing is an elasto-plastic hysteretic model, as shown<br />

in Fig.2.<br />

<strong>The</strong> earthquake ground motion input used in this analysis is the artificial ground motion [7]. <strong>The</strong><br />

earthquake acceleration time history is expressed as:<br />

a(t) = \|/(t)a,(t) (1)<br />

where, a s (t) is a stationary Gaussian process with zero mean value. ¥(t) is an envelope function


521<br />

describing nonstationary process.<br />

<strong>The</strong> acceleration time history a(t) is normalized using its maximum amplitude a max . <strong>The</strong> normalized<br />

nonstationary acceleration time history is as fellows:<br />

V(t)a s (t)<br />

(2)<br />

So, the nonstationary acceleration time history is:<br />

where, A p is a given peak ground acceleration.<br />

= A p a m (t) (3)<br />

4 UNCERTAINTIES OF EARTHQUAKE LOAD AND STRUCTURAL MODEL<br />

<strong>The</strong> parameters of structural model considered in this analysis are the viscous damping ratio and the<br />

hysteretic model parameters. <strong>The</strong> viscous damping ratio of brick structures can be expressed as [2]:<br />

where, A is the sum of horizontal cross sectional area of transversal walls for each floor. F is the area<br />

of structure for each floor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> hysteretic model is characterized by five parameters: the initial stiffness KO, the hardening<br />

stiffness KI, the softening stiffness KI, the crack strength Q c , and the ultimate strength Q u . <strong>The</strong>se<br />

parameters can be determined by the experimental data. In this analysis, KQS KI and Q c are treated as<br />

independent random variables. In terms of KI and a stain hardening ratio otj, KI can be expressed as K<br />

= -aiKi. <strong>The</strong> relationship between Q u and Q c is more or less fixed, and its variability is very small. So<br />

it is omitted. <strong>The</strong>re is not pinching effect in inelastic reloading stiffness of the hysteretic model. <strong>The</strong><br />

degree of inelastic unloading stiffness has some effect on energy-dissipation under cyclic loadings, but<br />

it hasn't effect on the maximum deformation of structures. So it is reasonable to assume the unloading<br />

stiffness K o as deterministic.<br />

<strong>The</strong> coefficients of variation of KO, a, Q c and ^ for the brick walls with and without constructional<br />

columns are listed in table 2, respectively [2].<br />

TABLE 2<br />

PARAMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES OF STRUCTURAL MODEL<br />

(4)<br />

Coefficient of variation<br />

of model parameters<br />

&<br />

Pa,<br />

Po.<br />

P<<br />

Brick wall without<br />

constructional columns<br />

0.30<br />

0.33<br />

0.30<br />

0.30<br />

Brick wall with<br />

constructional columns<br />

0.30<br />

0.42<br />

0.20<br />

0.30<br />

<strong>The</strong> artificial wave is obtained by transforming the mean response spectrum into the power spectrum.<br />

So the parameters of earthquake model include the mean response spectrum, the duration of<br />

earthquake ground motion and the damping ratio. We take the standard response spectrum in Chinese<br />

"Code for seismic design of buildings"(GBJll-89) as the mean response spectrum. <strong>The</strong> former is


522<br />

obtained by simply averaging a large amount of strong earthquake acceleration response spectra and<br />

making smooth. <strong>The</strong> coefficient of variation of the normalized mean response spectrum changes with<br />

period. But for general site and the range of period of multistory dwelling brick buildings, according to<br />

Ref. [8], it can be taken as PR = 0.26. <strong>The</strong> duration of strong motion is taken as the 1/2 peak<br />

acceleration duration i. By calculating 24 strong earthquake records longer than 2.75s from Ref. [8],<br />

we obtain that its mean value is 8.25s, and its coefficient of variation (3 T = 0.678. <strong>The</strong> standard response<br />

spectrum in the code is the one with the damping ratio of 0.05. When the structural damping ratio isn't<br />

0.05, the response spectrum is revised by the damping revising coefficient formula (12) specified in<br />

Chinese "Design code for antiseismic of special structures" (GB50191-93).<br />

In this paper, we don't consider the parametric uncertainties of laminated rubber bearings.<br />

5 THE EARTHQUAKE LOAD-STRUCTURE SYSTEM<br />

<strong>The</strong> Latin Hypercube Sampling technique is utilized to establish the earthquake load -structure system<br />

used in nonlinear time history analysis. In the analysis, four parameters describing the structural model<br />

and four parameters describing the earthquake model are considered. <strong>The</strong> uncertainties for each<br />

parameter are expressed in terms of three representative values, i.e., mean, mean minus and plus one<br />

standard deviation. So, for the ensemble of structural model, from the combinations of three<br />

representative values of the four parameters, a total of 81 structural models can be established. For the<br />

ensemble of earthquake time histories, from the combinations of three representative values of<br />

response spectrum and damping ratio, nine response spectra are obtained. For each response spectrum,<br />

three stationary time histories are generated. Thus, 27 stationary time histories are produced. It is noted<br />

that 27 different sets of random phase angles are used to generate these time histories. And then three<br />

envelope functions represented by strong motion duration are applied to each stationary time history to<br />

generate three normalized nonstationary time histories. Three strong motion durations are taken as its<br />

mean, mean minus and plus 0.8 times standard deviation [2]. Thus, a total of 81 normalized earthquake<br />

acceleration time histories are generated. Finally, using the Latin Hypercube Sampling technique, these<br />

earthquake time histories are matched to the structural models so that 81 samples of the earthquake<br />

load-structure system are constructed for seismic response analysis.<br />

6 STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS<br />

6.1 Limit States and Structural Capacity<br />

In this study, the limit state of structure is defined in terms of structural ductility factor, and five limit<br />

states representing initial crack damage, slight damage, moderate damage, severe damage and collapse<br />

of structure are considered. For each limit state, a corresponding capacity in terms of the ductility<br />

factor can be established. <strong>The</strong> ductility factor of the brick wall is defined as the ratio of the maximum<br />

TABLE 3<br />

DUCTILITY FACTOR CAPACITY<br />

Limit states<br />

Initial crack damage<br />

Severe damage<br />

Collapse<br />

Brick wall without<br />

constructional column<br />

PR °R<br />

1.0 0.3<br />

1.6 0.3<br />

2.6 0.3<br />

Brick wall with<br />

constructional column<br />

PR °R<br />

1.0 0.3<br />

2.6 0.3<br />

4.8 0.3


523<br />

deformation to the crack deformation. <strong>The</strong> structural capacity can be usually modeled by a lognormal distribution.<br />

According to Ref. [2], on the basis of the crack feature of wall in each hysteretic skeleton curve stage and compared<br />

with the true earthquake damage degree of buildings, the median jI R and logarithmic standard deviation C R can be<br />

obtained, as shown in table 3. <strong>The</strong> collapse capacities of brick wall with and without constructional columns are taken<br />

as 90% and 85% ultimate strength, respectively. <strong>The</strong> capacity for the severe damage is related to the ultimate strength.<br />

<strong>The</strong> capacity for the initial crack damage is related to the crack strength. <strong>The</strong> capacities for the slight damage and the<br />

moderate damage are taken as the values at 1/5 and 3/5 points between the capacities for the initial crack damage and<br />

the severe damage, respectively. <strong>The</strong> median and logarithmic standard deviation of story capacity of the brick<br />

buildings are obtained by composing the mean and standard deviation of the brick walls with and without<br />

constructional columns according to their cross section ratio.<br />

6.2 Probabilistic Response of Structures<br />

For each earthquake load-structure system, the nonlinear seismic response analysis is carried out. <strong>The</strong><br />

i-th story ductility ratio is:<br />

IT<br />

*-^ (5)<br />

where, U max ,i is the maximum absolute inter-story deformation of the i-th story; U c ,i is the crack<br />

deformation of the i-th story.<br />

<strong>The</strong> statistical analysis is utilized to determine mean, standard deviation and distribution function of<br />

sample. <strong>The</strong> maximum structural response can be modeled by a lognormal distribution [2].<br />

6.3 Vulnerability Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> structural vulnerability with respect to a particular limit state is defined as the conditional<br />

probability that structural response E exceeds the structural capacity R. <strong>The</strong> i-th story limit state<br />

probability of the buildings can be written as:<br />

P fi =P n (R,


524<br />

levels of peak ground acceleration.<br />

7 SEISMIC RELIABILITY ANALYSIS<br />

<strong>The</strong> structural seismic reliability analysis is usually to determine the limit state probability PF with<br />

respect to a particular limit state during the structural service life. It can be expressed as:<br />

<strong>The</strong> structural reliability index with respect to a particular limit state is.<br />

1=6<br />

where, k, is the occurrence rate of earthquake with intensity I, during the structural service life. For a<br />

given earthquake risk curve FI (I,), it can be written as:<br />

P t (Ii) is the conditional limit state probability with respect to a particular limit state for a given<br />

intensity I,, i.e., the structural vulnerability with respect to a particular limit state given above.<br />

<strong>The</strong> peak ground accelerations with respect to various intensities are taken as 0.05g> 0.10g^ 0.20gN<br />

0.40g and O.SOg for intensity VI, VI, VI, IX, and X, respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong> analytical multistory dwelling brick buildings are assumed to be located in Tianjing, Beijing and<br />

Xichang. <strong>The</strong>ir basic intensities are VI, VI, and K, respectively, and their earthquake risk curves may<br />

refer to Ref. [10].<br />

Table4 lists the seismic reliability indexes of four multistory brick buildings with and without isolation<br />

located in region of intensity VI (Tianjing), VIII (Beijing) and EX (Xichang) for various limit states<br />

and their ratios. From this table, we can see that the ratios of the seismic reliability indexes of the brick<br />

buildings with and without isolation for various limit states are more and more large from low intensity<br />

region to high intensity region. This illustrates that the isolated brick buildings built in higher intensity<br />

region have better seismic performance than in lower intensity region. <strong>The</strong> seismic reliability indexes<br />

of a six-story brick building without isolation designed for intensity VI in region of intensity VI and<br />

a seven-story brick building without isolation designed for intensity VI in region of intensity VI for<br />

various limit states are slightly smaller than the seismic reliability indexes of the corresponding<br />

isolated brick buildings designed for intensity VI in region of intensity K and designed for intensity<br />

W in region of intensity VI, respectively. Thus, compared with the brick buildings without isolation,<br />

the isolated brick buildings can be designed with 1 intensity lower than the basic intensity, and the<br />

story number of the isolated brick building can be broken through the limit of the code, such as a<br />

six-story isolated brick building may be designed in region of intensity DC and a seven-story isolated<br />

brick building in region of intensity VI. As seen in Table 1, the plane and elevation of the seven-story<br />

brick building designed for intensity VU are the same as those of the eight-story brick building<br />

designed for intensity VI. <strong>The</strong> seismic reliability indexes of the seven-story brick building without<br />

isolation designed for intensity VI in region of intensity VI for various limit states are far smaller<br />

than those of the eight-story isolated brick building designed for intensity VI in region of intensity Vfl.<br />

Thus, compared with the brick buildings without isolation, it is no problem that the isolated brick<br />

buildings can be designed with 1 intensity lower than the basic intensity and increasing 1 story, and it<br />

can assure that the isolated brick buildings designed in this way have higher seismic safety.


525<br />

TABLE 4<br />

SEISMIC RJELIABILITY INDEXES<br />

Story<br />

number<br />

Design<br />

intensity<br />

4<br />

IX<br />

6<br />

V1I1<br />

7<br />

vn<br />

8<br />

VI<br />

Site<br />

intensity<br />

vn<br />

vm<br />

K<br />

Vfl<br />

WI<br />

IX<br />

VD<br />

WI<br />

IX<br />

vn<br />

VII<br />

IX<br />

Isolation<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(l)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(D<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(l)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(D<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(l)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(l)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(l)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(l)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2V(1)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(l)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(l)<br />

Without (1)<br />

With (2)<br />

(2)/(D<br />

Initial crack<br />

damage<br />

3.858<br />

4.702<br />

1.22<br />

3.105<br />

3.955<br />

1.27<br />

2.391<br />

3.380<br />

1.41<br />

3.073<br />

4.090<br />

1.33<br />

2.280<br />

3.361<br />

1.47<br />

1.373<br />

2.700<br />

1.97<br />

2.747<br />

3.979<br />

1.45<br />

1.933<br />

3.242<br />

1.68<br />

0.931<br />

2.559<br />

2.75<br />

2.586<br />

3.693<br />

1.43<br />

1.755<br />

2.935<br />

1.67<br />

0.687<br />

2.181<br />

3.17<br />

Slight<br />

damage<br />

4160<br />

4.823<br />

1.16<br />

3.390<br />

4.084<br />

1.20<br />

2.725<br />

3.527<br />

1.29<br />

3.345<br />

4.349<br />

1.30<br />

2.550<br />

3.595<br />

1.41<br />

1.700<br />

2.968<br />

1.75<br />

3.016<br />

4.234<br />

1.40<br />

2.200<br />

3.468<br />

1.58<br />

1.248<br />

2.819<br />

2.26<br />

2.757<br />

3.819<br />

1.39<br />

1.932<br />

3,067<br />

1.59<br />

0.912<br />

2.345<br />

2.57<br />

Limit state of structure<br />

Moderate<br />

damage<br />

4,458<br />

4.983<br />

1.12<br />

3.664<br />

4.267<br />

1.16<br />

3.043<br />

3.734<br />

1.23<br />

3.664<br />

4.594<br />

1.25<br />

2.881<br />

3.821<br />

1.33<br />

2.108<br />

3.229<br />

1.53<br />

3.290<br />

4.465<br />

1.36<br />

2.463<br />

3.673<br />

1.49<br />

1.566<br />

3.051<br />

1.95<br />

2.996<br />

4.006<br />

1.34<br />

2.178<br />

3.274<br />

1.50<br />

1.226<br />

2.594<br />

2.12<br />

Severe<br />

damage<br />

4.612<br />

5.0<br />

1.08<br />

3.836<br />

4.401<br />

1.15<br />

3.241<br />

3.885<br />

1.20<br />

3.884<br />

4.723<br />

1.22<br />

3.110<br />

3.967<br />

1.28<br />

2.390<br />

3.393<br />

1.42<br />

3.430<br />

4.575<br />

1.33<br />

I 2.611<br />

3.789<br />

1.45<br />

1.757<br />

3.187<br />

1.81<br />

3.160<br />

4.152<br />

1.31<br />

2.346<br />

3.433<br />

1.46<br />

1.431<br />

2.782<br />

1.94<br />

Collapse<br />

4.999<br />

5.0<br />

LOO<br />

4.286<br />

4.718<br />

1.10<br />

3755<br />

4.236<br />

1.13<br />

4.364<br />

5.0<br />

1.15<br />

3.584<br />

L 4.311<br />

1.20<br />

2.952<br />

3.783<br />

1.28<br />

3.763<br />

4.813<br />

1.28<br />

3.012<br />

4.069<br />

1.35<br />

2.260<br />

3.509<br />

1.55<br />

3.534<br />

4.534<br />

1.28<br />

2.749<br />

3.839<br />

1.40<br />

1.945<br />

3.255<br />

1.67


526<br />

8 CONCLUSIONS<br />

This paper gives the seismic reliability indexes of four multistory dwelling brick buildings with and<br />

without laminated rubber bearings in given regions of intensity YE, VI and IX by Latin Hypercube<br />

Sampling technique and nonlinear seismic time history response analysis. Through the comparison of<br />

the seismic reliability indexes of the brick buildings with and without isolation, three results are<br />

obtained as follows:<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> isolated brick buildings built in higher intensity region have better seismic performance than in<br />

lower intensity region.<br />

(2) Compared with the brick buildings without isolation, the isolated brick buildings can be designed<br />

with 1 intensity lower than the basic intensity, and the story number of the isolated brick building<br />

can be broken through the limit of the code, such as a six-story isolated brick building may be<br />

designed in region of intensity IX and a seven-story isolated brick building in region of intensity<br />

VHI.<br />

(3) Compared with the brick buildings without isolation, it is no problem that the isolated brick<br />

buildings can be designed with 1 intensity lower than the basic intensity and increasing 1 story,<br />

and it can assure that the isolated brick buildings designed in this way have higher seismic safety.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results provide basis for the design of multistory isolated brick buildings. This method can also<br />

be used in the seismic reliability analysis of other isolated building structures.<br />

References<br />

[1] Hwang, H.M. and Jing- Wen Jaw (1990). Probabilistic Damage Analysis of Structures. J Struct<br />

Engrg 116:7.<br />

[2] ZHANG Ling-xin, JIANG Jin-ren and LIU Jie-ping(2002). Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of<br />

Multistory Dwelling Brick Buildings. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and <strong>Engineering</strong> Vibration 22:1,<br />

49-55. (in Chinese).<br />

[3] ZHANG Lingxin and JIANG Jinren (1997). Latin Hypercube Sampling and Its Application to<br />

Structural Reliability Analysis. World Information on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> 13:4, 1-6. (in<br />

Chinese).<br />

[4] National Standard of the People's Republic of China: Code for seismic design of buildings<br />

(GBJ11-89), Architectural Industry Press of China, (in Chinese).<br />

[5] ZHANG Lingxin and JIANG Jinren (1998). Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis of Multistory<br />

Brick Buildings. Proceedings oftheSth National Conference on <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, Beijing,<br />

418-423. (in Chinese).<br />

[6] ZHANG Lingxin and JIANG Jinren (1997). Method of Elasto-plastic Dynamic Response Analysis<br />

Based on Pattern of Self-equilibrating Stresses. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Vibration 17:4, 9-17. (in Chinese).<br />

[7] JIANG Jinren and HONG Feng (1984). Conversion Between Power Spectrum and Response<br />

Spectrum and Artificial <strong>Earthquake</strong>s. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and <strong>Engineering</strong> Vibration 4:3, 1-11.<br />

(in Chinese).<br />

[8] JIANG Jinren, LU Qinnian and SUN Jingjiang (1995). Statistical Characteristics of Strong Ground<br />

Motion Specified by Response Spectrum and Power Spectral Density Function. <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> in China 9:4, 387-402. Allerton Press, INC. /NEW YORK.<br />

[9] National Standard of the People's Republic of China: Design code for antiseismic of special<br />

structures (GB50191—93), Project Press of China, (in Chinese).<br />

[10] TAO Xiaxin etc. (2000). <strong>Engineering</strong> Design <strong>Earthquake</strong> Level and Seismic Motion Parameter.<br />

Personal communication.


SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION, MONITORING<br />

SYSTEM AND DAMAGE DETECTION


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

r<br />

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING FOR LARGE<br />

STRUCTURES USING AMBIENT VIBRATIONS<br />

Juan M Caicedo 1 , Enk Clayton 1 *, Shirley J Dyke 1 and Masato Abe 2<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Washington <strong>University</strong> in St. Louis<br />

St. Louis, Missouri, USA<br />

2 Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of Tokyo,<br />

Tokyo, JAPAN<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

With the advent of more sophisticated computing software and hardware, the practicality<br />

of effectively implementing ambient vibration based global structural health monitoring<br />

algorithms has been greatly enhanced. <strong>The</strong>se improvements have facilitated the implementation<br />

of systems to measure the dynamic behavior of large structures such as sky<br />

scrapers and long span bridges. <strong>The</strong>se flexible structures have features that introduce additional<br />

challenges to the field of structural health monitoring. This paper examines the effectiveness<br />

of the Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) combined with the Eigensystem<br />

Realization Algorithm (ERA) to identify modal parameters in such structures. Simulated<br />

data from a mathematical model of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge is used. Ambient<br />

vibrations, modeled as stationary broadband inputs, are used for exciting the model.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Virtually every facet of our daily activities depends on the reliability of our civil infrastructure.<br />

Long span bridges and tall buildings are costly to construct and can be critical to<br />

the smooth operation of our nations' infrastructure. <strong>The</strong> loss or unnecessary closure of key<br />

structures in the transportation network has severe consequences on regional or national<br />

economies. <strong>The</strong>re is a clear need to continuously maintain the function of these structures<br />

well into the future.<br />

Presently, simple yet time consuming and labor intensive methods such as visual inspection<br />

and hammer echo are utilized in the field to monitor the health of structures such as<br />

highway overpasses and tunnel linings. <strong>The</strong>re are limitations concerning the implementation<br />

of the these approaches, the most prominent being: the safety of those inspecting the<br />

structures; the difficulty of inspecting large or inaccessible parts of structures; and, the inefficiency<br />

of such time consuming approaches. As a result of the shortcomings found in<br />

these methods, mathematically based global structural health monitoring (SHM) tech-<br />

* Currently an undergraduate civil engineering student, Univ. of Tennessee, KnoxviIIe, Tennessee USA.


530<br />

niques for monitoring the health of structures have been borrowed from the aerospace industry<br />

to be refined and applied to civil infrastructure. <strong>The</strong>se techniques facilitate the<br />

monitoring of structural health in an automated mode, reducing the uncertainty in the integrity<br />

of the structure and providing valuable information to decision makers after a major<br />

event.<br />

One important issue in SHM is obtaining appropriate structural response data. For best results,<br />

one would typically excite the structure with an actuator or shaker, and measure the<br />

responses. However, for many structures, using forced vibration to induce response for<br />

SHM or system identification purposes may be infeasible or forbidden (due to concerns of<br />

the owners or danger that the structure may already be damaged). However, ambient excitation<br />

(e.g., microtremor, wind, traffic, etc.) can often provide sufficient response for system<br />

identification to be performed. Further, ambient input excitation is often unmeasured<br />

(or actually immeasurable) and methods that require knowledge of the input must be selected.<br />

Additional challenges arise from the nature of large, flexible structures. <strong>The</strong> characteristics<br />

of these structures include: they are continuous structures that are not wellrepresented<br />

with lumped masses; lateral and torsional motions can be highly coupled; using<br />

a limited number of sensors is feasible; and, they have closely-spaced modes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> focus of this paper is to examine the capabilities of the Natural Excitation Technique<br />

(NExT) combined with the Eigensystem Realization (ERA) algorithm to extract modal<br />

parameters from a structure with closely spaced modes. A numerical model of the Bill<br />

Emerson Memorial Bridge, developed for the benchmark problem on the control of cablestayed<br />

bridges, is used to perform simulations and obtain response records. For this initial<br />

study, the bridge is excited using a stationary broadband force as a rough simulation of<br />

ambient vibrations. Three sensor configurations are considered to investigate the dependence<br />

of the methodology on the sensor configurations.<br />

DESCRIPTION OF THE BRIDGE AND FINITE ELEMENT MODEL<br />

<strong>The</strong> cable-stayed bridge used for this benchmark study is the Bill Emerson Memorial<br />

Bridge spanning the Mississippi River (on Missouri 74—Illinois 146) near Cape Girardeau,<br />

Missouri, designed by the HNTB Corporation (Hague, 1997). <strong>The</strong> bridge is currently under<br />

construction and is to be completed in 2003. Instrumentation is being installed in the<br />

Emerson bridge and surrounding soil during the construction process to evaluate structural<br />

behavior and seismic risk (Qelebi, 1998).<br />

As shown in Fig. 1, the bridge is composed of two towers, 128 cables, and 12 additional<br />

piers in the approach bridge from the Illinois side. It has a total length of 1205.8 m (3956<br />

ft). <strong>The</strong> main span is 350.6 m (1150 ft) in length, the side spans are 142.7 m (468 ft) in<br />

length, and the approach on the Illinois side is 570 m (1870 ft). A cross section of the<br />

deck. <strong>The</strong> bridge has four lanes plus two narrower bicycle lanes, for a total width of 29.3<br />

m (96 ft). <strong>The</strong> deck is composed of steel beams and prestressed concrete slabs. <strong>The</strong> 128<br />

cables are made of high-strength, low-relaxation steel (ASTM A882 grade 270). <strong>The</strong> H-<br />

shaped towers have a height of 102.4 m (336 ft) at pier 2 and 108.5 m (356 ft) at pier 3.<br />

Each tower supports a total 64 cables. <strong>The</strong> cross section of each tower varies five times<br />

over the height of the tower. <strong>The</strong> approach bridge from the Illinois side is supported by 11<br />

piers and bent 15, <strong>The</strong> deck consists of a rigid steel diaphragm with a slab of concrete at<br />

the top. Sixteen 6.67 MN (1,500 kip) shock transmission devices are employed in the connection<br />

between the tower and the deck. <strong>The</strong>se devices are installed longitudinally to allow<br />

for expansion of the deck due to temperature changes. Under dynamic loads these<br />

devices are extremely stiff and behave as rigid links. Further details are provided in the paper<br />

describing the benchmark control problem statement Dyke et al, (2002),


531<br />

350.6m 142.7m<br />

.0130') i (468') ,.<br />

Bent !<br />

Pier i<br />

0 Cable Number<br />

Figure 1. Drawing of the Emerson Bridge.<br />

Based on the drawings of the Emerson bridge, a three-dimensional finite element model of<br />

the bridge was developed in MATLAB® (1997). A linear evaluation model is used in this<br />

benchmark study. However, the stiffness matrices used in this linear model are those of the<br />

structure determined through a nonlinear static analysis corresponding to the deformed<br />

state of the bridge with dead loads (Wilson and Gravelle, 1991; Dyke et al, 2002). Additionally,<br />

the bridge is assumed to be attached to bedrock, and the effects of soil-structure<br />

interaction are neglected.<br />

<strong>The</strong> finite element<br />

model employs beam<br />

elements, cable elements<br />

and rigid links.<br />

<strong>The</strong> nonlinear static<br />

analysis is performed<br />

in ABAQUS® (1998),<br />

and the element mass<br />

and stiffness matrices<br />

are output to MAT-<br />

LAB® for assembly.<br />

Subsequently, the constraints<br />

are applied, Bent<br />

and a reduction is performed<br />

to reduce the<br />

Figure 2: Finite Element Model.<br />

size of the model to<br />

something more manageable. <strong>The</strong> finite element model, shown in Fig. 2, has a total of 579<br />

nodes, 420 rigid links, 162 beam elements, 134 nodal masses and 128 cable elements. <strong>The</strong><br />

towers are modeled using 50 nodes, 43 beam elements and 74 rigid links. Constraints are<br />

applied to restrict the deck from moving in the lateral direction at piers 2, 3 and 4. Boundary<br />

conditions restrict the motion at pier 1 to allow only longitudinal displacement (X) and<br />

rotations about the Y and Z axes. <strong>The</strong> cables are modeled with truss elements. In the finite<br />

element model the nominal tension is assigned to each cable.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model resulting from the finite element formulation has a large number of degrees-offreedom<br />

and high frequency dynamics. Thus, some assumptions are made regarding the<br />

behavior of the bridge to make the model more manageable for dynamic simulation while<br />

retaining the fundamental behavior of the bridge. Static condensation is performed by first<br />

partitioning the mass and stiffness matrices corresponding to the structure DOF into active<br />

and dependent DOF (Fig. 2). Application of this reduction scheme to the full model of the<br />

bridge resulted in a 419 DOF reduced order model. <strong>The</strong> first 100 natural frequencies of the<br />

reduced model (up to 3.5 Hz) were compared and are in good agreement with those of the<br />

909 DOF structure. <strong>The</strong> damping in the system is defined based on the assumption of<br />

modal damping. <strong>The</strong> damping matrix was developed by assigning 3% of critical damping<br />

to each mode. This value was selected to be consistent with assumptions made during the


532<br />

design of the bridge. A more detailed description of the finite element model of the bridge<br />

can be found in Dyke et al, (2002).<br />

PROBLEM FORMULATION<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of this research is to investigate the capabilities of the NExT/ERA technique<br />

for identification of the modal parameters of this structure (Caicedo et al., 2002). Herein,<br />

the excitation is assumed to be ambient, and is considered to be unknown for the identification<br />

procedure. Ambient inputs are simulated by applying uncorrelated, stationary<br />

broadband random forces at all nodes of the structure. <strong>The</strong> modal parameters are determined<br />

through acquisition of free response data from ambient responses and then identification<br />

of modal parameters. <strong>The</strong> methodology is described in the following sections.<br />

Acquiring Free Response Data<br />

Here it is assumed that the excitation to the system consists of ambient vibrations, which<br />

are not measurable. James et al. (1993) showed that the matrix of cross-correlation functions<br />

between the responses of the system and a response selected to be the reference response<br />

are a solution to the homogenous equation of motion. We refer to this step as<br />

application of NExT. Consider the equation of motion for a N degree of freedom classically<br />

damped linear system<br />

Mjc(f) + Cjc(/) + Kx(0 = f(r)<br />

where x is the N x 1 vector of displacements, M , C , and K are the N x N mass, damping,<br />

and stiffness matrices, respectively, and f(t) is the vector offerees acting on the system.<br />

Assuming the excitation and responses are each stationary random processes, Eq. (1)<br />

is written<br />

MX(t) + CX(r) -r KX(r) = F(t) (2)<br />

where X(t) is a displacement stochastic vector process and F(t) is the stochastic excitation<br />

vector process. Assuming that the structural parameter matrices are deterministic,<br />

postmultiplying Eq. (2) by a reference scalar response process X t (s) , and taking the expected<br />

value of each side yields<br />

, s) + CR^t, s) + KJR^f, s) = R FX (t, s) (3)<br />

where R(-) denotes a vector of correlation functions. Assuming that X, X and X are<br />

weakly stationary processes, and the excitation is uncorrelated with the responses, Eq. (3)<br />

can be written as (Bendat and Pierson, 2000)<br />

(I)<br />

+ Ktf^Cc) = 0 (4)<br />

Thus, the vector of displacement process correlation functions, R^r(t) , satisfies the homogeneous<br />

differential equation of motion.<br />

To implement this method, one of the available responses is selected as the reference signal,<br />

jc r (r) , the cross spectral density functions between the reference signal and each of the<br />

response signals are obtained, and an inverse fast Fourier transform is performed to determine<br />

the cross correlation functions. <strong>The</strong> reference channel should be selected such that<br />

all of the modes are observed in the responses at that location. If the reference channel lo-


533<br />

cation corresponds to a node of one of the modes, that mode will not be observed. This<br />

method allows the cross spectral density (CSD) functions to be averaged over a number of<br />

samples to increase the accuracy in the CSDs. Windowing should be used to minimize the<br />

effects of leakage.<br />

Identification of Modal Parameters<br />

Once the time domain free response data is obtained, there are numerous techniques available<br />

for identifying the modal parameters Here the ERA (Juang and Pappa, 1985) is<br />

adopted because it is quite effective for identification of lightly damped structures and is<br />

applicable to multi-input/multi-output systems. In the ERA, the Hankel matrix is formed<br />

y(k)<br />

(5)<br />

where y(k) is the response vector at the £th time step. <strong>The</strong> parameters s and r correspond<br />

to the number of columns and rows (of response vectors) in the matrix. This matrix is<br />

evaluated for H(0) and a singular value decomposition is performed,<br />

H(0) = PDQ 7 (6)<br />

Relatively small singular values along the diagonal of D correspond to computational<br />

modes and the associated rows and columns are eliminated to form the condensed D^v,<br />

P jV , and Q N matrices. <strong>The</strong> state matrix for the resulting discrete time system and the associated<br />

matrix in the output equation are found using is found using<br />

_! _1 _!<br />

A = D^ 2P/H(l)QtfDtf 2 C - K T P N D N<br />

2<br />

where E r = [I 0. .0]. Because this is a discrete time system, it is then transformed to<br />

the corresponding continuous time system. <strong>The</strong> natural frequencies are found by determining<br />

the eigenvalues of the continuous time matrix A, and C is used to transform the computed<br />

eigenvectors of the state matrix corresponding to the non-physical states in the<br />

identified model, to the values of the mode shapes at the floors of the structure. <strong>The</strong> ERA<br />

method was implemented in MATLAB (1997).<br />

NUMERICAL RESULTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> approach described in the previous section was implemented to identify the modal parameters<br />

of the structure from simulated acceleration records. Uncorrelated stationary<br />

broadband forces were used as the excitation in the lateral, longitudinal and transverse directions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> excitations were applied along the deck of the bridge. Thirty minute acceleration<br />

record with a sampling rate of 12.5 Hz was used for the identification procedure.<br />

Three different sensor configurations were considered to study the capabilities of the<br />

methods when the number of sensors is varied. Figure 3 shows the identification models<br />

used and the location of the sensors on the bridge for each case. Three sensors in each tower<br />

measure accelerations in the transverse and longitudinal directions. All deck sensors<br />

measure acceleration in the transverse and vertical directions. Case 1 uses a total of 128<br />

(7)


534<br />

* Reference Channel<br />

128 Sensors<br />

Case 1<br />

72 Sensors 40 Sensors<br />

Case 2 Case 3<br />

Figure 3. Sensor Locations.<br />

sensors, case 2 uses 72 sensors and Case 3 uses 40 sensors.<br />

Cross correlation functions were calculated as the inverse Fourier transform of the cross<br />

spectral density function, and treated as free response data. For these calculations the reference<br />

channel shown in Fig. 3 was selected. Frames of 512 points with 50% overlapping<br />

were used to determine cross spectral density functions. A representative cross spectral<br />

density and cross correlation function are shown in Fig. 4. Note that this structure may<br />

have many closed spaced modes at very low frequencies, as is typical of large flexible<br />

structures'such as cable stayed or suspension bridges.<br />

-190<br />

£-2001<br />

3-210<br />

W<br />

•S -220<br />

5<br />

.r: -230<br />

If -240<br />

*3<br />

< -250<br />

A<br />

i<br />

• /<br />

; 'S 'i „<br />

CD 1<br />

5<br />

H<br />

I- 1 -2<br />

! ' '<br />

Mn'«V ' " ^" * " "" —- vw<br />

ill<br />

• 25 °0 2 4 6 ~ M Q 5 . 10 15 2<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Time (s)<br />

Figure 4. Representative Cross Spectral Density and Cross Correlation Functions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ERA was used to identify the modal parameters<br />

from the cross correlation functions.<br />

Figure 5 shows a typical singular values plot<br />

obtained with the ERA. In most structures a<br />

sharp drop in the values will occur, indicating<br />

a finite number of singular values appropriate<br />

for effective modeling of the structure (Juang<br />

and Pappa, 1985: Caicedo et al, 2001). In this<br />

case, this sharp drop is not present due to the<br />

closely spaced modes. Here, the correct natural<br />

frequencies and mode shapes are selected<br />

by examining the identified damping ratio.<br />

Only modes with damping ratios between 2.5<br />

and 3.5% are accepted.<br />

a-"<br />

•I-<br />

Singular Value No.<br />

Figure 5. Singular Values.<br />

Table 1 provides the identified natural frequencies and the error in the frequency with respect<br />

to the corresponding analytical value. Negative values indicates that the identified<br />

natural frequency was higher than the analytical value. Vertical responses are analyzed independently<br />

of transverse responses for this initial study, and thus torsional modes are not


535<br />

listed separately. Vertical modes are expected to have lower natural frequencies than transverse<br />

modes because the deck is stiffer in the transverse direction. As a result more vertical<br />

natural frequencies were identified.<br />

Note that when the number of sensors is decreased, the error in the identified natural frequencies<br />

increased, and the number of natural frequencies identified decreases. For the<br />

first two cases, ten vertical natural modes were identified, and for the third this number<br />

was reduced to 8. Also note that the first mode in Cases 2 and 3 corresponds to the third<br />

mode in Case 1, indicating that the two lower modes are not identified with the reduced<br />

sensor configuration. In the transverse direction five modes were obtained for the first<br />

case, and only three modes were found for the other two cases. Two pairs of identified and<br />

analytical (actual) mode shapes were compared to each other to demonstrate the accuracy<br />

of the results. Figure 6 shows a comparison between the identified and analytical mode<br />

shapes. Good agreement was found.<br />

Casel<br />

CO, (Hz) Error, (%)<br />

1.062<br />

1.258<br />

1.454<br />

1.632<br />

2.191<br />

2.559<br />

2.788<br />

3.380<br />

3.770<br />

4.156<br />

U.66y<br />

1.825<br />

2.636<br />

2.897<br />

3.725<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Table 1: IDENTIFIED NATURAL FREQUENCIES.<br />

U.4SU<br />

-0.894<br />

-0.197<br />

0.684<br />

-0.317<br />

0.478<br />

0.397<br />

0.782<br />

1.245<br />

1.558<br />

-U.M.5<br />

-1.012<br />

0.302<br />

-0.733<br />

2.014<br />

Case 2<br />

0),(Hz) Error, (%)<br />

1 453<br />

1 638<br />

1.901<br />

2.190<br />

2.788<br />

3.380<br />

4.154<br />

4.565<br />

5.616<br />

5.866<br />

Vertical modes<br />

-u.iiy<br />

0.318<br />

L_ " L515<br />

-0.272<br />

0.420<br />

0.803<br />

1.606<br />

3.718<br />

-1.085<br />

2.009<br />

Iransverse Modes<br />

U.668<br />

1.824<br />

2.870<br />

—-<br />

-U.4&U<br />

-0.925<br />

0.187<br />

—<br />

-<br />

Case 3<br />

CO, (Hz) Error, (%)<br />

1.43U<br />

1.637<br />

2.191<br />

2.780<br />

3.383<br />

3.784<br />

4.143<br />

4.461<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1. 823<br />

2.856<br />

3.728<br />

—<br />

—<br />

U 116<br />

0.380<br />

-0.333<br />

0.681<br />

0.714<br />

0.865<br />

1.870<br />

5.896<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-u.y/3<br />

0.691<br />

1.941<br />

-<br />

-<br />

<strong>The</strong> NExT/ERA technique shows promise as a means for detenruning modal parameters<br />

to be used for structural health monitoring of large, flexible structures with closely spaced<br />

modes and low natural frequencies. This technique will permit monitoring large scale<br />

structures where ambient excitations (unknown input) are present as an excitation. This<br />

g « Identified<br />

B<br />

. °<br />

Analytical .-*-*<br />

° * * * * e I » o<br />

« towers .<br />

Mode 76 - Vertical (2.184 Hz)<br />

Mode 7 - Horizontal (0.665 Hz)<br />

Figure 6. Identified vs. Analytical Modes.


536<br />

approach was applied to simulated data from a numerical model of the Emerson bridge<br />

under ambient excitation that is modeled as a stationary broadband force. <strong>The</strong> technique<br />

was successfully used to identify modal parameters of the structure for the different sensor<br />

configurations. <strong>The</strong> results indicated that fewer sensors resulted in the identification of<br />

fewer modes.<br />

Future investigations will consider a broader class of ambient vibrations, and use the modal<br />

parameters to identify structural parameters for damage detection. More information<br />

can be found at: http://wusceeLcive.wustl.edii/.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

This research is funded in part by the National Science Foundation (CAREER Grant No.<br />

CMS 9733272). <strong>The</strong> second author also acknowledges support from the <strong>Research</strong> Experiences<br />

for Undergraduates in Japan in Advanced Technology (NSF Grant No. INT<br />

0202630).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ABAQUS (1998). Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc. Pawtucket, RI.<br />

Beck, J.L., May, B.S., and Polidori, D.C. (1994). "Determination of Modal Parameters<br />

from Ambient Vibration Data for Structural Health Monitoring," Proceedings<br />

of the First World Conference on Structural Control, Pasadena, CA, June.<br />

Beck, J.L., Vanik, M.W., Polidori, D.C., and May, B.S. (1998). "Structural Health<br />

Monitoring Using Ambient Vibrations," Proc. Struc. Engrs World Cong., Til8-3,<br />

San Francisco.<br />

Caicedo, J.M., Dyke, S.J., Moon, S.J., Bergman, L.A., Turan, G., and Hague, S.<br />

(2003). "Phase II Benchmark Control Problem for Seismic Response of Cable-<br />

Stayed Bridges," J. of Struc. Control, Wiley (submitted).<br />

Caicedo, J.M., Marulanda, J., Thomson, P., and Dyke S.J., (2001) Monitoring of<br />

Bridges to Detect Changes in Structural Health, Proc. of the 2001 American Control<br />

Conf, Arlington, Virginia, June 25-27.<br />

(Jelebi, M., (1998), Final Proposal for Seismic Instrumentation of the Cable-Stayed<br />

Girardeau (MO) Bridge, U.S. Geological Survey.<br />

Dyke, S.J., Caicedo, J.M., Turan, G., Bergman, L.A., and Hague, S. (2002). "Phase<br />

I Benchmark Control Problem for Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridges," J.<br />

of Struc. Engrg, ASCE, (in press).<br />

Farrar, C.R. and James, G.H. Ill (1997). "System Identification from Ambient Vibration<br />

Measurements on a Bridge," Journal of Sound and Vibration, 205:1, 1-18.<br />

Hague, S. (1997). "Composite Design for Long Span Bridges." Proc. of the XV<br />

ASCE Structures Congress, Portland, Oregon.<br />

James, G.H. Came, T.G, and Lauffer, J.R (1993). "<strong>The</strong> Natural Excitation Technique<br />

for Modal Parameter Extraction from Operating Wind Turbines," SAND92-<br />

1666, UC-261, Sandia National Laboratories.<br />

Juang, J.N. and Pappa, R.S. (1985). "An Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for<br />

Modal Parameter Identification and Model Reduction." J. Quid Control and Dvn<br />

8, pp. 620-627. ''<br />

MATLAB (1997). <strong>The</strong> Math Works, Inc. Natick, Massachusetts.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF STRUCTURAL PARAMETER<br />

AND EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION FROM MEASURED<br />

STRUCTURAL RESPONSE<br />

J.Chen 1 - 2 , J.Li 2 and Y. L. Xu 1<br />

'Department of Civil and Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong><br />

Hung Horn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China<br />

Department of Building <strong>Engineering</strong>, College of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, Tongji <strong>University</strong><br />

Shanghai 200092, China<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper presents an element level system identification method in the time domain to<br />

simultaneously estimate structural parameters and earthquake-induced ground motion from measured<br />

structural responses only. <strong>The</strong> method, named the dynamic compound inverse method, combines the<br />

least-squares technique and the statistical average method together, leading to a proper iterative<br />

procedure for a better solution of the problem. <strong>The</strong> earthquake-induced ground motion is first<br />

conjectured using the measured structural responses and the assumed initial values of the structural<br />

parameters to be identified. <strong>The</strong> conjectured ground motion is then forced to comply with the<br />

dynamics of the given structure using the statistical average method. <strong>The</strong> modified ground motion is<br />

further used to provide a new estimation of the structural parameters using the least-squares technique.<br />

Repeating the iterative procedure until a preset convergence criterion is reached then provides the<br />

simultaneous estimation of structural parameters and earthquake excitation. Numerical example using<br />

a shear building is carried out to demonstrate the feasibility of the dynamic compound inverse method.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results show that the method can estimate the structural parameters and the ground motion<br />

satisfactorily for the cases that the structural responses are not polluted or slightly contaminated by<br />

noise.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> frequency-domain modal approach is commonly used to identify natural frequencies, modal<br />

damping ratios, and mode shapes of a structure from measured structural responses without requiring<br />

the information on external excitation but assuming the external excitation to be a white noise random<br />

process. Though the natural frequencies and mode shapes are representative of the stiffness of a<br />

structure to some extent, it may not be possible to use the identified natural frequencies and mode<br />

shapes to quantify even a severe level of structural damage because they are not sensitive to the<br />

damage of individual structural members. Furthermore, earthquake-induced ground motion cannot be


538<br />

assumed as a white noise random process and most of existing buildings have no sensors to measure<br />

the ground motion directly underneath the building. <strong>The</strong>refore, the direct identification of structural<br />

parameters at the element level in the time domain attracts more and more attention from researchers<br />

and engineers.<br />

As far as identification of a structure under seismic excitation is concerned, several techniques have<br />

already been proposed to estimate the structural parameters and input excitation from the measured<br />

response alone. Toki (1989) and Hoshiya (1995) solved this problem by assuming that the coda of the<br />

measured response time history represented the free vibration response of the structural system and<br />

estimated the structural parameters using the extended Kalman filter technique from this part of the<br />

measurements. <strong>The</strong> input ground motion was then estimated using the obtained parameters. However,<br />

it is difficult to decide the exact starting time of the free response part without knowing time history of<br />

the ground motion. Moreover, the performance of Kalman filter is sensitive to the initial condition<br />

selected. Wang and Haldar (1994) proposed another approach to simultaneously identify the input<br />

excitation and structural parameters in the element level. In their method, the input was initially<br />

assumed to be zero at the first four sampling time points, structural parameters were estimated at this<br />

four points using the least-squares technique. <strong>The</strong>n, the input information on all the sampling time<br />

instants was computed using the estimated parameters and measured responses. Afterward, structural<br />

parameters could be identified again using the estimated input excitation and measured responses of<br />

the full length. <strong>The</strong> iteration procedure was stopped when the identified input excitation at the first<br />

four points converged to a predetermined tolerance level. Later on, by combining with the extended<br />

Kalman Filter, this approach was expanded (Wang and Haldar, 1997) for the case that the response<br />

measurements of a structure were available at only limited locations. More recently, Cho (2000)<br />

improved this approach into a more generalized style and ameliorated the convergence of least-squares<br />

method by using multiple model QR decomposition algorithm.<br />

In this paper, the element-level time-domain approach suggested by Wang and Haldar (1994) is<br />

improved for simultaneous identification of earthquake excitation and structural parameters from<br />

measured structural responses using a combination of the least-squares-technique and the statistical<br />

average method. Numerical examples using shear type buildings are carried out to demonstrate the<br />

feasibility of the improved method, named the dynamic compound inverse method.<br />

DYNAMIC COMPOUND INVERSE METHOD<br />

Basic Equations<br />

<strong>The</strong> response of a N-story shear building subjected to a base acceleration X g (t) is governed by the<br />

following equation<br />

MX(t) + CX(t) -f KX(t) = -MX g (2.1)<br />

where M is the diagonal mass matrix of the building with all the elements provided. C and K, each<br />

of order N by N, are the damping and stiffness matrices that consist of structural parameters k,, c,<br />

(i=l,N) to be identified X(t), X(t) and X are the relative displacement, velocity and acceleration<br />

response vectors of the building with respect to the ground. Eq.(l) can be rearranged into the following<br />

form for identification.


539<br />

in which<br />

H = [H(t l ), H(t 2 ), -.., H(t L )] T (2.3)<br />

0 = [c 13 c 2 , -.., C N , k p k 2 , .... k N f (2.4)<br />

P = [P(t l ), P(t 2 ), »., P(t L )f (2.5)<br />

where H is the response matrix of velocity and displacement of the building. H is a rectangular<br />

matrix of order (L x N) x J, where L is the number of sampling points in the measured structural<br />

response time history and J is the number of unknown parameters. For the present case, J =2*N.<br />

Vector 9 contains all the unknown parameters and P is a vector related to the ground acceleration<br />

and building inertia forces.<br />

At any sample time instant t,, one has<br />

H(t,) =<br />

"*,<br />

0<br />

X 1 -x 2 0<br />

x 2 — x, x, — x 3<br />

0<br />

0<br />

x, x,-x, 0 0<br />

0 x,-x t x 2 -x 3 0<br />

(2.6)<br />

0<br />

0 0<br />

x n -x<br />

0 0 0 x n »x Q<br />

P(t 1 ) = [-m l x 1 (t l )-m l x g (t t ), -m.jXjtt.J-mjX^t,), •••, -m N x N (t l )-m N x g (t l )] r (2J)<br />

<strong>The</strong> responses of the structure are supposed to be measured in terms of displacement, velocity and<br />

acceleration. If the ground acceleration X g (t) is available, parameter estimation is trivial using, for<br />

instance, the least-squares technique (Hsia, 1977) as<br />

0 = [H T H] 1 H T P (2>8)<br />

However, the problem here is the ground acceleration is unknown and it is expected to simultaneously<br />

estimate with the structural parameters. In this connection, a dynamic compound inverse method is<br />

suggested below.<br />

Dynamic Compound Inverse Method<br />

<strong>The</strong> dynamic compound inverse method is actually an iterative identification procedure that consists of<br />

the least-squares technique for parameter identification and the statistical average method for forcing<br />

the identified input excitation to comply with the dynamic equilibrium of the concerned building. <strong>The</strong><br />

implementation of the dynamic compound inverse method can be divided into the following steps.<br />

Stepl: Since both the structural parameters 0 and the ground motion X g (t) are unknown, initial<br />

values for the structural parameters have to be assumed, for instance, let 9 Q = [l, 1, •••, l] T . It will<br />

be demonstrated later that the performance of the suggested method is not sensitive to this initial<br />

assumption. <strong>The</strong> symbol ' A ' stands for the estimated value and the subscript 4 0* of 0 stands for the<br />

number of iteration times.<br />

Step2i From Eqn.2.2, the vector P can be estimated using # 0 and the measured structural responses,<br />

resulting in P = H0 0 . <strong>The</strong>n, comparing with Eqn.2.7, one may have


540<br />

where r denotes the r th story.<br />

t,), P(t 2 ), .-, P(t L )] r (2.9)<br />

P(t,) = [P,(t,), P,(t,),..., P N (t,)f ( 2 - 10 )<br />

p r (t,) = -m r x r (t,)-m r k< rt (t,) r = l,...,N (2.11)<br />

Step3: From Eqn.2.11, at any sample time instant t,, the ground acceleration x g (t,) can be estimated<br />

from p r (t,) for each story as<br />

^r) (t l ) = x r (t 1 )-p r (t,)/m r r = l,.",N, i = l,-,L (2.12)<br />

According to the structural dynamics, all the N ground acceleration Xg r) (t,) obtained from Eqn.2.12<br />

should be the same at the time t, no matter which story it is estimated from. However, they may not be<br />

the same because of the difference between the assumed initial values and the actual values of the<br />

structural parameters. <strong>The</strong>refore, a statistical average process is introduced to compute the average of<br />

x g r) (t,) to force the N ground accelerations to be the same.<br />

*.(t,) = Z*(O i = V",L (2.13)<br />

r«l<br />

Step4: Now, reconstruct the vector P in Eq. (2,7) using the averaged value x g (t,)and the measured<br />

structural responses, leading to<br />

p r (t I ) = -m r x r (t I )-m r I g (t 1 ) r = l,-,N (2.14)<br />

where the symbol '-'denotes the modified value.<br />

PW-faW, P 2 (U -, P N (t,)F (2-15)<br />

p^lSco, f(t a ), »., p(tjf (2.16)<br />

StepS: Eqns. 2.14 to 2.16 are different from Eqns. 2.9 to 2.10 in that after Step 4 the estimated ground<br />

acceleration time histories at each story are forced to be identical in Eqns. 2.14 to 2.16. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

improved estimation of the unknown structural parameters can be obtained by<br />

^ = [H T H]" I H T P (2.1)<br />

Step6: Replace # 0 by 0 { , and repeat Step 2 to 6 until the following convergence criteria are satisfied.<br />

max (2-18)<br />

( 2 - 19 )<br />

where the subscript tier stands for the current iterative step, / means the /th element of vector 0; s e<br />

and Eg are the predetermined index for the structural parameter and the input vector, respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are generally a small number of the magnitude between 10" 4 to 10" 6 . Clearly, the first criterion is<br />

imposed on the estimated structural parameter while the second criterion is imposed on the estimated<br />

ground motion. Once the iterations converge, the vector 0 obtained in Step 5 gives the final


541<br />

identification results of structural parameters while the averaged value x (t) obtained in stepS gives<br />

the time history of the ground motion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> key point of this improved method is the statistical average process in Steps 3 and 4, which<br />

actually provides a measure to convert the dynamics of structure under earthquake excitation into a<br />

mathematical condition that ensures the convergency of the iterative procedure. Moreover, the<br />

statistical average process is independent from the parameter identification algonthm chosen. In this<br />

connection, for special cases different parameter identification methods can be adopted instead of the<br />

least-squares method.<br />

NUMERICAL EXAMPLES<br />

<strong>The</strong> applicability of the dynamic compound inverse method is<br />

demonstrated in this section through a numerical example of a 3-<br />

story shear building (see Fig.3.1) under earthquake excitation (see<br />

Fig. 3.5) for both noise-free and noise contamination cases. <strong>The</strong><br />

properties of the building, as used by Yang and Agrawal (2000 j for<br />

a high tech building, are mi=350,25,m 2 =262.29 and m 3 =175.13/0rc;<br />

ci=4369, C2-291.3 and c 3 =145.6&Vs/m; ki=4728400, k 2 =315230<br />

and k3-157610AW/m. <strong>The</strong> three natural frequencies of the building<br />

"'<br />

are computed as 3.447, 7.372 and 19.155 Hz, with the<br />

corresponding modal damping ratios are 1%, 2.14% and 5.56%,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> peak acceleration of the input ground motion is<br />

120cm/s 2 . <strong>The</strong> sampling time interval of the ground motion is<br />

" s<br />

0.02s and the time duration is 80s, resulting in a total of sampling Fig3.1 3-story shear building<br />

points N=4000. <strong>The</strong> dynamic responses of the building are<br />

computed by the Wilson-0 algorithm and are then taken as the measured responses in the following to<br />

identify both the structural parameters and the ground motion. <strong>The</strong> computed (measured) relative<br />

displacement, velocity and acceleration responses of the top floor are depicted in Fig. 3.2(a) to (c),<br />

respectively.<br />

Time (sec)<br />

Time (sec)<br />

(a) Displacement (b) Velocity (c) Acceleration<br />

Fig.3.2. Computed dynamic responses of the top floor of the building<br />

Noise-free Case<br />

<strong>The</strong> measured dynamic responses without noise contamination are first used to identify the structural<br />

parameters and the* input acceleration ground motion with the dynamic compound inverse method. <strong>The</strong><br />

identification results are summarized in TableS.l, in which the conditions in Cases 1 to 4 are all the


542<br />

same except for the initial values for the structural parameters selected in order to examine the<br />

sensitivity of the method to these assumed values. <strong>The</strong> initial values of the structural parameters for<br />

Cases 1 to 4 are given in TableS.l in bracket together with the identified results. Cases A to D in Table<br />

3.1 are the cases using the different number of sampling points L but with the same initial value. For<br />

all the cases, the convergence indices are set as 10~ 6 . For Casel, the convergence curve, which is<br />

defined as the variation of the identified value normalized by the actual value with the iterative time, is<br />

depicted in Fig.3.3 and Fig.3.4 for building damping and stiffness parameters, respectively.<br />

It is seen from Table 3.1 that the stiffness parameters identified by the dynamic compound inverse<br />

method are almost the same as the true values for all the cases including Case D where the sample<br />

points of only 200 are used. For the damping parameters, the maximum relative estimation error is less<br />

than 0.1%. It can be also seen that even for very poor initial values selected as in Case 4, the true<br />

structural parameters can be still identified. Thus, one may conclude that the accuracy of the identified<br />

method is not sensitive to initial values of the structural parameters selected. From the convergence<br />

curves shown in Fig.3.3 and Fig.3.4, it is clearly demonstrated that with the increase of iteration times<br />

the estimated parameters converge rapidly to the true values. Moreover, the input ground motion<br />

identified is found to be nearly the same as the real input acceleration.<br />

Case<br />

L<br />

Cl<br />

Ci<br />

C3<br />

ki<br />

k 2<br />

k*<br />

TABLE3.1<br />

IDENTIFICATION RESULTS FROM NOISE-FREE BUILDING RESPONSES<br />

2<br />

3 4 A B C<br />

4000 4000 4000 2000 1000 500<br />

4370.9(1000) 4370.9(-1) 4370.9(-0.32) 4370.9 4370.9 4369.7<br />

291.37(1000) 291.37(-1) 291.37(1000) 291.37 291.37 291.35<br />

145.60(1000) 145.59(-1) 145.58(1.2) 145.59 145.59 145.48<br />

4728337(1000) 4728370(1) 4728308(0.03) 4728306 4728306 4728482<br />

315210(1000) 315208(1) 315208(-1234) 315208 315208 315216<br />

157581(1000) 157581(1) 157581(23232) 157581 157581 157584<br />

1<br />

4000<br />

4370.9(1)<br />

291.36(1)<br />

145.59(1)<br />

4728307(1)<br />

315208(1)<br />

157581(1)<br />

L: Number of sampling points used<br />

D<br />

200<br />

4369.5<br />

291.39<br />

145.57<br />

4728495<br />

315219<br />

157586<br />

\<br />

-.r<br />

c,<br />

t<br />

80 100 120 140<br />

Iteration times<br />

Fig.3.3 Convergence curve for damping<br />

coefficients<br />

Q 20 40 60 80 100 120 140<br />

Iteration times<br />

Fig.3.4 Convergence curve for stiffness<br />

coefficients<br />

Noise-polluted Cases<br />

To assess the capacity of the dynamic compound inverse method against measurement noise in the<br />

responses, the numerically generated zero-mean Gaussian white noise is added to the measured<br />

responses in two ways. In the first way, which is denoted as NCI (noise easel), the identical noise<br />

process is added to the displacement, velocity and acceleration responses of the same floor with the<br />

noise level controlled by the root-mean-square ratio between the noise process and the response time-


543<br />

history to be polluted. In the second way named as NC2, different noise processes are added to the<br />

dynamic responses of the same floor. As a result, the three different noise processes are simulated and<br />

used in NC1 while the nine different noise processes are simulated and used in NC2. Moreover, three<br />

noise levels of 1%, 3% and 5% are considered in NCI whereas NC2 considers three noise levels of 1%,<br />

2%, and 3%. <strong>The</strong> identification results are listed in Table 3 2 and Table 3.3 for NCI and NC2,<br />

respectively.<br />

TABLE3.2<br />

IDENTIFICATION RESULTS FROM NOISE-POLLUTED BUILDING RESPONSES (NCI)<br />

Noise Level<br />

1%<br />

Estimated Error<br />

3%<br />

Estimated Error<br />

5%<br />

Estimated Error<br />

Cj<br />

C2<br />

C3<br />

ki<br />

k 2<br />

k 3<br />

PGA<br />

4409.6<br />

294.73<br />

147.52<br />

4727325<br />

315159<br />

157559<br />

1.2097<br />

0.93%<br />

1.18%<br />

1.32%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.02%<br />

0.03%<br />

0.8%<br />

4510.6<br />

302.29<br />

151.58<br />

4726698<br />

315047<br />

157483<br />

1.229<br />

3.24%<br />

3.78%<br />

4.11%<br />

0.04%<br />

0.06%<br />

0.08%<br />

2.41%<br />

4642.6<br />

310.97<br />

155.92<br />

4727935<br />

314917<br />

157365<br />

1.248<br />

6.26%<br />

6.75%<br />

7.09%<br />

0.01%<br />

0.10%<br />

0.16%<br />

4%<br />

PGA(m/s~): Peak ground acceleration identified<br />

TABLE3.3<br />

IDENTIFICATION RESULTS FROM NOISE-POLLUTED BUILDING RESPONSES (NC2)<br />

XT . T , 1% 2% 3%<br />

iNUIbC l_,CVCi<br />

C]<br />

C2<br />

C3<br />

k,<br />

k 2<br />

k 3<br />

PGA<br />

Estimated<br />

4276.9<br />

283.66<br />

144.21<br />

4673818<br />

312894<br />

156761<br />

1.1952<br />

Error<br />

2.11%<br />

2.62%<br />

0.96%<br />

1.15%<br />

0.74%<br />

0.54%<br />

0.4%<br />

Estimated<br />

4325.7<br />

274.55<br />

140.69<br />

4569663<br />

307930<br />

155069<br />

1.1796<br />

PGA(m/T): Peak ground acceleration identified<br />

Error<br />

0.99%<br />

5.75%<br />

3.37%<br />

3.36%<br />

2.32%<br />

1.61%<br />

1.7%<br />

Estimated<br />

4514.2<br />

264.94<br />

135.52<br />

4488512<br />

302899<br />

151148<br />

1.15<br />

Error<br />

3.32%<br />

9.05%<br />

6.93%<br />

5.07%<br />

3.91%<br />

4.09%<br />

4.16%<br />

From Table3.2, one may see that the dynamic compound inverse method can accurately identify the<br />

stiffness coefficients even though the noise contamination in the responses reaches a 5% level. For the<br />

damping coefficients and the peak acceleration of ground motion, the capacity of the method against<br />

noise contamination seems to be relatively weak. <strong>The</strong> maximum identification errors of damping<br />

coefficient are 1.32%, 4.11% and 7.09% for noise level of 1%, 3% and 5%, respectively. <strong>The</strong><br />

identified time history of input ground motion is shown in Fig. 3.6 for a noise level of 5% in NCI. It is<br />

seen that the identified one is quite close to the true one, with the maximum error of the peak<br />

acceleration of 4%. For NC2 where different noise processes are added to different types of structural<br />

responses at the same floor, the identification errors increase moderately for damping coefficients and<br />

input peak acceleration but considerably for stiffness coefficients when compared with NCI. <strong>The</strong><br />

maximum identification errors in damping coefficients are 2.62%, 5.75% and 9.05% for noise level of<br />

1%, 2% and 3%, respectively. <strong>The</strong> maximum identification errors in stiffness coefficients are 1.15%,<br />

3.36% and 5.07% for noise level of 1%, 2% and 3%, respectively. <strong>The</strong> estimated ground acceleration<br />

motion for a 3% noise level in NC2 is plotted in Fig.3.7. <strong>The</strong> peak acceleration of the estimated ground<br />

motion is found to be lower than the true peak acceleration by 4.2%.


544<br />

Time (sec)<br />

Time (sec)<br />

Time (sec)<br />

Fie.3.5 Input ground acceleration Fig.3.6. Estimated ground motion Fig.3.7 Estimated ground motion<br />

motion for 5% noise level in NC1 for 3% noise level in NC2<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> dynamic compound inverse method has been introduced in this paper for simultaneously<br />

identifying the structural parameters and the ground motion using the measured structural .responses<br />

only. Numerical examples using a three-story shear building showed that the method could accurately<br />

identify the structural parameters and the ground motion simultaneously when the dynamic responses<br />

were noise free. For the dynamic responses at the same building floor polluted by the same noise<br />

process, the compound inverse method could still accurately identity the building stiffness coefficients<br />

but the damping coefficients and the peak acceleration of the ground motion were estimated with some<br />

acceptable errors. If the dynamic responses at the same building floor polluted by different noise<br />

processes, the maximum identification errors increase moderately for damping coefficients and input<br />

peak acceleration but considerably for stiffness coefficients when compared with the case with the<br />

same noise process concerned. <strong>The</strong> extension and the further application of the method are under way.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> writers are grateful for the financial support from Tongji <strong>University</strong> through a PhD studentship to<br />

the first writer and <strong>The</strong> Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> through Young Professor Scheme to the<br />

third writer.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Cho H. N. and Paik S. W (2000), Time domain system identification technique with unknown input<br />

and limited observation, Proceedings of 8 th ASCE specially conference on Probabilistic Mechanics<br />

and Structural Reliability, PMC2000-190<br />

dough R.W. and Penzien J. (1993), " Dynamics of Structures", 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc.<br />

Hoshiya M. and Sutoh A. (1995), Identification of input and parameters of a MDOF system,<br />

Proceedings ofEASEC-5, Gold Coast, Australia, 1309-1314<br />

Hsia T. C. (1977), System identification: least-squares methods, Lexington, Mass<br />

Toki K., Sato T. and Kiyono J. (1989), Identification of structural parameters and input ground motion<br />

from response time histories, Structural Eng./<strong>Earthquake</strong> Eng, 6:2, 413-421<br />

Wang D. and Haldar A. (1994), Element-level system identification with unknown input, J. of<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, ASCE, 120:1, 159-175<br />

Wang D. and Haldar A. (1997), System idetification with limited observation and without input, J of<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, ASCE, 123:5, 504-511<br />

Yang J. N. and Agrawal A. K. (2000), Protective system for high-technology facilities against<br />

microvibration and earthquake, J. of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> and Mechanics, 10:6, 561-575


Proceedings of the International Conference on 545<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

CRUSTAL DEFORMATION MEASUREMENT WITH<br />

SATELLITE RADAR INTEFEROMETRY: A REVIEW<br />

XL Ding, YQ Chen, ZL Li, GX Liu and ZW Li<br />

Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics<br />

Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong><br />

Hong Kong<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Satellite radar interferometry uses synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images acquired with<br />

satellite-borne radars to accurately reveal tiny ground deformations or changes. Due to the<br />

unprecedented high resolution, accuracy and ground area coverage of the technology, it has<br />

fast become one of the most important technologies for the measurement of earthquake<br />

related crustal deformations. Results from such measurement can potentially provide<br />

information on stress changes in the crust that are crucial to understand the development of<br />

earthquakes.<br />

This paper briefly examines the capacity and limitations of the technology, its applications in<br />

earthquake related research, and its potential future development.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

VISION-BASED SENSORS<br />

FOR MONITORING SEISMIC DEMANDS<br />

Tara C. Hutchinson 1 and Falko Kuester<br />

'Department of Civil & Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Department of Electrical and Computer <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> of California, Irvine USA 92697<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A vision-based approach is evaluated for its applicability as a new sensing technology for measuring<br />

earthquake induced motions. Traditional motion sensors used in laboratory and field experiments must<br />

be physically attached to the structure and require cumbersome cabling, configurations and substantial<br />

time for set-up. Moreover, for reduced scale experiments, sensors generally add substantial mass or<br />

change the response characteristics of the system. <strong>The</strong> approach evaluated in this paper is<br />

advantageous since it requires very limited physical attachment to the structure of interest, is highspeed,<br />

high-resolution and does not introduce additional mass or otherwise modify the properties of the<br />

structure. In this exploratory phase, four digital high-speed, high-resolution cameras outfitted with redlight<br />

emitters are used to track reflective (nearly) mass less spherical elements discretely mounted on a<br />

scale 5-story steel frame structure. <strong>The</strong> structure is mounted on the <strong>University</strong> of California, Irvine's<br />

bi-axial shake table and subjected to different earthquake motions. <strong>The</strong> structure is also instrumented<br />

with a total of eleven conventional (wired) transducers (LVDTs and accelerometers) providing a<br />

unique comparison with the vision-based approach. Results from this exploratory study show that the<br />

non-intrusive vision-based approach is extremely promising in terms of its ability to capture inter-story<br />

drift, floor level velocities and accelerations, provided proper post-processing of the data occurs.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Alternative methods of tracking seismic motions are desirable, particularly in the laboratory setting<br />

where scale models are often used to study earthquake response. Many fields, besides earthquake<br />

engineering, require precise high-speed motion tracking and thus new technologies are rapidly<br />

becoming available. Biomechanics, human gait analysis, robotics, virtual reality (VR), gaming and<br />

even entertainment have successfully employed a variety of new motion tracking techniques. Typically<br />

these applications require accurate six degree-of-freedom tracking, expressed by position (x, y, z) and<br />

orientation (yaw, pitch, roll). In earthquake engineering, generally the three positional degrees-offreedom<br />

are the most important motions to track and often only one of these dominates depending<br />

upon the problem. However, high spatial and temporal resolution (high sampling rates), large working<br />

volumes, limited instrumentation time and low-cost are also required. Depending on the particular


548<br />

environment constraints and the configuration of the system to be tracked, the required accuracy can<br />

range anywhere between millimeters to fractions thereof. Perhaps the most difficult problem faced in<br />

earthquake engineering experimental research is the cumbersome physical attachment and associated<br />

lengthy set-up times of most conventional motion sensors. For reduced scale experiments, these<br />

sensors generally add substantial mass or stiffness and therefore change the response characteristics of<br />

the system.<br />

In this paper, different motion tracking technologies are reviewed and a vision-based approach is<br />

selected and evaluated for its applicability as a new sensing technology for measuring earthquake<br />

induced motions. <strong>The</strong> approach is advantageous since very limited physical attachment to the structure<br />

of interest is needed, is high-speed, high-resolution and does not introduce additional mass or<br />

otherwise modify the properties of the structure. An exploratory study is conducted using four digital,<br />

high-speed, high-resolution cameras outfitted with red-light emitters to track reflective (nearly) mass<br />

less spherical elements discretely mounted on a scale 5-story steel frame structure. <strong>The</strong> structure is<br />

mounted on the <strong>University</strong> of California, Irvine's (UCIs) bi-axial shake table and subjected to different<br />

earthquake motions. <strong>The</strong> primarily uni-axial dominated motion of the frame provides a simplified<br />

reference expenment with reduced degrees of movement for evaluating this approach. <strong>The</strong> structure is<br />

also instrumented with a total of eleven conventional (wired) transducers [linear variable displacement<br />

transducers (LVDTs) and accelerometers]. A review of motion tracking technologies and specifically<br />

vision-based technologies is provided, followed by a description and select results from the exploratory<br />

studv conducted.<br />

TYPES OF MOTION TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Specific types of motion tracking technologies include: (1) mechanical, (2) magnetic, (3) acoustic, (4)<br />

optical, (5) and hybrid solutions combining two or more of the previously mentioned techniques to<br />

achieve higher accuracy or sampling rates. Mechanical tracking techniques such as linear displacement<br />

transducers and linked boom structures (in VR) provide excellent results for linear and rotational<br />

movement measurements at the cost of limited working volumes, degrees-of-freedom, added mass and<br />

friction. <strong>The</strong>y also generally require physical attachment or point-wise anchorage to elements of<br />

interest. Electro-magnetic techniques are less constraining and are based on generation of a magnetic<br />

field by an emitter and collection by a receiver. Used prevalently in VR, the transmitter system is<br />

generally statically mounted while the receivers can be freely moving within the field. While these<br />

systems can operate at nearly 150Hz sampling rates at a static accuracy of less than two millimeters<br />

and 0.5 degrees under ideal conditions, they are sensitive to metal components and other magnetic<br />

fields located in the workspace. This noise introduced by the environment can greatly distort the<br />

electromagnetic reference signal making it difficult to use in earthquake testing facilities. While these<br />

systems remove the mechanical constraint mentioned earlier and reduce sensor mass at the same time,<br />

currently a wired connection is still required. Acoustic or ultrasound techniques use time of flight<br />

information to triangulate the position of the target object, which is instrumented with active sensors.<br />

Generally, multiple emitters are mounted in a known pattern on the target and broadcast a signal in<br />

sequential order. <strong>The</strong> time of flight from the target to receivers mounted throughout the environment is<br />

then used to triangulate its position. Potential problems include ambient ultrasonic noise produced by a<br />

variety of electronic devices and slow update rates.<br />

Optical tracking techniques come in different forms and are often termed vision-based systems. Early<br />

and very extensive usage of optical tracking technologies can be traced to robotics and subsequently to<br />

the medical field for biornechanics and human motion studies with a strong focus on gait analysis [e.g.


549<br />

Cappazzo (1984), Heyn et al (1996), Kidder et al (1996), Sampath et al. (1998) and Hansen et al.<br />

(2002)]. <strong>The</strong> ability to carefully analyze and<br />

characterize a patient's manner and rate of<br />

movement (gait) has greatly aided in the<br />

development of treatment options for the physically<br />

handicapped. Requirements of very precise<br />

measurements, extended workspaces and limited<br />

physical constraints are similar to those faced in<br />

many civil engineering applications. An example of<br />

a human motion study (applied to dance) conducted<br />

using an optical (light)-based approach is shown in<br />

Figure 1.<br />

Vision-Based Systems<br />

Vision-based systems may be classified into either<br />

image- or light-based. Image-based systems in the<br />

context of motion tracking rely on feature detection<br />

between frames of a color texture map. In parallel<br />

with feature detection, image processing and<br />

reconstruction must be conducted, a challenging task<br />

for resolving the tracking to the level of resolution<br />

required for seismic motions.<br />

FIGURE 1. Example of human motion study<br />

(dance) using light-based approach (courtesy of<br />

Motion Analysis).<br />

Early forms of light-based tracking were based on emitter/receiver systems using arrays of light<br />

emitting diodes (LEDs) mounted statically at specific locations in a test space and a CCD camera<br />

(charge-coupled device) responsible for recording the created reference pattern. Given the exact<br />

spacing and position of the LEDs, the relative position of the CCD can then be triangulated. More<br />

recent techniques have removed the need for emitter/receiver pairs by directly analyzing image (video)<br />

data. <strong>The</strong> most popular approach currently uses reflective markers to identify points of interest within<br />

the environment that should be tracked, significantly reducing the required processing time. In this<br />

case, a range of wavelengths of light are filtered out, thus decreasing the required amount of<br />

information to be collection, allowing higher speeds and resolution to be captured. <strong>The</strong> CCD cameras<br />

are then used to measure the light intensity at each pixel. A strobe constructed of a cluster of highintensity<br />

LEDs is used on a per camera basis to illuminate the scene with red light. This strobe can<br />

easily illuminate reflective markers at distance between 2-25 meters.<br />

During the data acquisition stage only raw data (images showing the marker position) is acquired on a<br />

per camera basis. Each marker is represented by multiple pixels in the final image. Before the spatial<br />

position can be calculated, the marker "blobs" have to be approximated (by ellipses or circles) and<br />

their respective centroids determined. <strong>The</strong> position of the corresponding points can then be matched<br />

between image pairs obtained from two cameras and triangulated to obtain their 3D position. <strong>The</strong><br />

corresponding markers between two images can be found based on the epipolar constraint, which<br />

states that a point in the first image must lie on the epipolar line in the second. (This reduces the<br />

matching problem from an area to a line segment). Given the projection of a marker into one image<br />

plane at p l and into another image plane at p 2 , the epipolar constraint is expressed by:<br />

•F- Pl =0 (1)


550<br />

where F is the fundamental matrix (Faugeras 1993). <strong>The</strong> 3D position of the markers can then be<br />

computed from the acquired marker sets using the intrinsic and extrinsic parameters of the camera<br />

system (e.g. position, focal length). Positional information (x,y,z) on a per marker basis and orientation<br />

(yaw, pitch, roll) is available through groups of markers aligned along two different axes.<br />

EXPLORATORY STUDY<br />

An exploratory study was conducted to investigate the applicability of a vision-system for capturing<br />

the response of a specimen mounted on UCIs bi-axial shake table. In this case, a scale 5-story steel<br />

moment frame structure with a dual damping system (Villaverde et al. 2002) subjected to uni-axial<br />

seismic motions provides a simple structure for evaluation of this new technology. <strong>The</strong> frame structure<br />

is 2.44 m in height and mounted with a roof isolation system. Figure 2(a) shows an elevation of the<br />

specimen mounted on the shake table with strategically placed spherical tracker elements (which show<br />

up as bright reflections in the photograph). <strong>The</strong> tracker elements (markers) are 12.5 mm diameter<br />

Styrofoam spheres wrapped in reflective tape. Compared with the mass of the specimen and the<br />

conventional transducers, the mass of the tracker elements is negligible. Four high-resolution<br />

(1280x1024 pixel) CCD cameras (Vicon, Oxford Metrics, Oxford, England) with maximum capture<br />

rates of 250 Hz were mounted on tripods and strategically placed facing the frame structure. <strong>The</strong><br />

cameras were rigidly mounted with light emitting strobes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model building is instrumented with a total of six LVDT displacement transducers, one attached at<br />

each fluid viscous damper (brace element) and one at the roof damping system. Five accelerometers<br />

were installed at the individual floor levels. In total, 21 spherical tracker elements were mounted at<br />

floor levels and at several locations on the base of the shake table for reference, as shown in Figure<br />

2(a). <strong>The</strong> use of the mass less spherical trackers allows multiple measurements for comparison and<br />

potential averaging. Figure 2(b) shows a detailed photograph of the roof level including selected<br />

placement between the roof and isolation system of the trackers. It took approximately 30 minutes to<br />

array the trackers in strategic positions on the frame.<br />

It is important to note that the LVDTs at the damper level provide an additional resistance to the<br />

damper element and overall system response, which is large relative to the scale of the model<br />

specimen. Although it may not be evident from the photograph, a roof isolation system is being studied<br />

in this work (Villaverde et al. 2002), thus the desired results are a comparison between two systems<br />

(with and without roof isolation), where each includes engaging the damping at the braces. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

for these particular experiments, the additional resistance due to placement of the LVDT in-line with<br />

the brace is not important.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cameras were evenly spaced (at approximately 2 meters on center) along the line of action of<br />

lateral input seismic motion. <strong>The</strong>y are aligned such that at least three of the cameras can observe any of<br />

the desired points at any given time. <strong>The</strong> closest camera was approximately 5.5 m, and the farthest<br />

camera was 6.0 m from the center of the specimen.<br />

Since positional information is computed by triangulation of the image data obtained by each camera,<br />

careful calibration is required. Calibration should ideally occur prior to running the tests but can be<br />

reapplied to the acquired raw data should a better calibration be required at a later time. Two phases of<br />

calibration were conducted: (1) static calibration and (2) dynamic calibration. Static calibration is<br />

achieved by placing a rigid L-frame within the static viewing volume. Markers are mounted on


551<br />

precisely defined distances on the rigid L-frame. Dynamic calibration is achieved by sweeping a wand<br />

with a marker mounted at each end through the desired viewing volume. For this exploratory study, the<br />

system was statically calibrated to be within 1 mm positional resolution and dynamically calibrated<br />

such that each of the camera's were within 0.5 mm precision of each other.<br />

Once the system is calibrated, the entire environment can be instrumented with an arbitrary number of<br />

passive markers. However, careful consideration must be given to the density of marker placement as<br />

related to the resolution of the camera system. If makers are placed too close to each other it will be<br />

difficult to distinguish them in the obtained image. In addition, if markers are placed behind an element<br />

in the scene, they will be occluded during motion capture. This can be challenging since elements<br />

within the scene move thus similar to conventional transducers, the magnitude and direction of<br />

movement must be anticipated.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS<br />

Two earthquake motions were used and multiple runs were conducted (with and without the roof<br />

isolation system) to evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of the motion tracking system. In total,<br />

seven shake table simulations were conducted. <strong>The</strong> first input motion was a modified version of the<br />

SCT acceleration record from the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. <strong>The</strong> second motion was a modified<br />

form of the Takatori acceleration record from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Each of these motions were<br />

tuned to the fundamental frequency of the model building (f = 2.375 Hz) (Villaverde et al. 2002) and<br />

applied as a base excitation to the structure.<br />

Figure 3 shows a comparison of inter-story drift ratios at the roof level of the model structure,<br />

measured using the vision-based approach and the LVDTs. In this case, the difference in maximum


552<br />

drift ratio was determined as Ymax =<br />

0.3% and 0.2%, for the structure with<br />

and without the roof isolation system,<br />

respectively. This corresponds to a<br />

difference in maximum drift of 1.3<br />

and 0.8 mm, respectively. Table 1<br />

summarizes the difference in<br />

maximum inter-story drifts obtained<br />

from each of the measurement<br />

technologies for each of the<br />

conditions considered by Villaverde et<br />

al. (2002). <strong>The</strong> largest difference<br />

between the vision-based system and<br />

the LVDTs was 2.8 mm. However,<br />

the average difference between<br />

maximum measured inter-story drifts<br />

was fairly reasonable at 1.4 mm and<br />

the standard deviation from these data<br />

was 0.8 mm. It is interesting to note<br />

that in all cases the vision-based<br />

system measurements were larger<br />

than that of the LVDTs. <strong>The</strong> visionbased<br />

measurements may have<br />

compounding errors, since inter-story<br />

drift is determined as the difference<br />

from several different markers,<br />

whereas the LVDTs were designed to<br />

directly measure inter-story drift. It<br />

should be noted that positional data<br />

obtained at the floor level was taken<br />

as the average from two spherical<br />

trackers mounted at each floor level<br />

[one mounted to the North, one<br />

mounted to the South, as shown in<br />

Figure 2(b)].<br />

Acceleration and velocity time<br />

histories at the floor levels were also<br />

evaluated. Signal processing and<br />

numerical differentiation of the<br />

positional data was required for<br />

calculating acceleration and velocity<br />

time histories from the vision-based<br />

(positional) measurements. Two<br />

aspects of high frequency noise were<br />

observed in the vision-system<br />

positional data, requiring frequency<br />

domain filtering: (1) that imposed<br />

artificially from the reaction floor in<br />

Conventional LVDTs<br />

- Vision-based Measurem<br />

10<br />

Time (seconds)<br />

W<br />

Time (seconds)<br />

(A) ~<br />

FIGURE 3. Comparison of vision-based tracking system and<br />

conventional LVDT measurements for a 5-story steel frame<br />

model subjected to the Mexico City input motion: (a) with<br />

roof isolation system and (b) without roof isolation system.<br />

TABLE 1. Summary of difference in maximum measured interstory<br />

drift using the vision-based system and LVDTs.<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Motion and<br />

Structure Condition<br />

Mexico City - toith roof isolation<br />

Mexico City - without roof<br />

isolation<br />

Takatori - without roof isolation<br />

Takatori - with roof isolation<br />

Floor<br />

Level<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Difference in<br />

Max. Drift (mm)<br />

1.3<br />

0.8<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

1.4<br />

0.8<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

1.3<br />

2.2<br />

0.0<br />

1.0<br />

1.8<br />

0.5<br />

2.3<br />

1.5<br />

2.7<br />

2.6<br />

1.7<br />

2.8


553<br />

the laboratory and (2) that imposed during numerical differentiation due to time stepping.<br />

High frequencies introduced during testing occurred because the cameras were mounted on the<br />

reaction floor surround the shake table and the shake table itself induces some motion into the<br />

surrounding floor during earthquake simulation. <strong>The</strong> magnitude of this noise was consistently observed<br />

to be small and outside of the frequencies of interest (> 50 Hz), thus it could easily be filtered in the<br />

frequency domain using a 4 th Order low-pass Butterworth filter.<br />

Double numerical differentiation also creates noise in acceleration traces. In this case, a 10 th Order<br />

low-pass Butterworth filter was applied after numerical differentiation to remove introduced high<br />

frequency noise. Low pass filters of comparable details were also applied to the conventional<br />

accelerometer measurements.<br />

Figure 4 shows a comparison of<br />

acceleration and velocity time<br />

Iristories (absolute) measured from<br />

the 5 th floor (roof level) of the<br />

structure during the Mexico City<br />

event with the roof isolation system<br />

engaged. Accelerations are<br />

compared between the double<br />

differentiated vision-system<br />

positional data and the conventional<br />

accelerometers. Velocities are<br />

compared between the single<br />

differentiated vision system data<br />

and integrated accelerometer<br />

measurements. <strong>The</strong>se comparisons<br />

are very promising, with differences<br />

in maximum acceleration of 0.06g<br />

and differences in maximum<br />

velocity of 6 cm/second observed.<br />

Analysis of other floor levels and<br />

the different experiments showed<br />

that this was the largest difference<br />

between the two systems. However,<br />

_^<br />

o<br />

to<br />

Time (seconds)<br />

FIGURE 4. Comparison of velocity (a) and acceleration (b) time<br />

histories (absolute) at the roof level - Mexico City input motion<br />

with the roof isolation system engaged.<br />

it should be noted that selection of cut-off frequencies during the data processing was an important step<br />

in the evaluation of each case due to the different frequencies induced by the earthquake motions.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

A vision-based motion tracking system was evaluated for its accuracy in monitoring the seismic<br />

demands induced in a 5-story scale moment resisting frame structure. Reasonable comparison between<br />

time-varying positional responses was observed when comparing the vision system with conventional<br />

LVDT measurements. Although the system was calibrated statically to within a 1 mm displacement,<br />

the average difference in maximum displacements was observed as 1.4 mm. Signal processing and<br />

numerical differentiation of the positional data was required for 'calculating acceleration and velocity<br />

time histories from the vision-based (positional) measurements. Two aspects of high frequency noise


554<br />

were observed in the vision-system positional data requiring frequency domain filtering: (1) that<br />

imposed artificially from the reaction floor in the laboratory and (2) that imposed during numerical<br />

differentiation due to time stepping. Using low-pass filtering techniques, reasonable acceleration and<br />

velocity time histories were generated. <strong>The</strong> largest difference in maximum accelerations and velocities<br />

observed was fairly reasonable at 0.06g's and 6 cm/second, respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong> initial comparison of measurements obtained from the vision-based system and conventional<br />

sensors in this study provides promising results for the use of such systems in future experimental<br />

earthquake research. Further study is required to evaluate the applicability of these types of systems for<br />

capturing seismic motions in 3-dimensions, including the potential effects of occlusions during the<br />

time-variant capture process.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> experimental data from the study of Dr. Roberto Villaverde are greatly appreciated. <strong>The</strong> assistance<br />

of Mr. Charlie Hamilton and Mr. Bob Kajanzy of the Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> Test Hall (SETH) at UC<br />

Irvine is greatly appreciated.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Cappozzo, A. (1984). "Gait analysis methodology." Human Movement Science. Vol. 3: 27-50.<br />

Faugeras, 0. (1993). Three Dimensional Computer Vision: a Geometric Viewpoint. MIT Press.<br />

Hansen, A.H., Childress, D.S., and Meier, M.R. (2002). "A simple method for determination of gait<br />

events." Journal ofBiomechanics. Vol 35: 135-138.<br />

Heyn, A., Mayagoitia, R.E., Nene, A.V., Veltink, P.H. (1996). "<strong>The</strong> kinematics of the swing phase<br />

obtained from accelerometer and gyroscope measurements." In the Proceedings of the 18 th Annual<br />

International Conference of the IEEE <strong>Engineering</strong> in Medicine and Biology Society. Amsterdam, pp.<br />

463-464.<br />

Kidder, S.M., Abuzzahab, F.S., Hams, G.F. (1996). "A system for the analysis of foot and ankle<br />

kinematics during gait." IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation <strong>Engineering</strong>. Vol. 4(1): 25-32.<br />

Motion Analysis (2002). http-//www.motionanalysis.cnrn.<br />

Sampath, G., Abu-Faraj, Z.O., Smith, PA. and Harris, G.F. (1998). "Design and development of an<br />

active marker based system for analysis of 3-D pediatric foot and ankle motion." In the Proceedings of<br />

the 2V h Annual International Conference of the IEEE <strong>Engineering</strong> in Medicine and Bioloey Society<br />

Vol 20(5): 2415-2417.<br />

Vicon (2002). http://www.vicon.com.<br />

Villaverde, R., Aguirre, M. and Hamilton, C. (2002). "Roof isolation system implemented with steel<br />

oval elements: exploratory study." Proceedings of the 3 rd World Conference on Structural Control,<br />

Como, Italy. April 7-12.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

555<br />

UNSCENTED PARTICLE FILTER FOR TIME DOMAIN<br />

IDENTIFICATION OF NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC<br />

SYSTEMS<br />

K.Y. Koo and C.B. Yun<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>,<br />

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejoen, Korea<br />

ABSTRACTS<br />

In this study, a recently developed unscented particle filter (UPF) technique is studied for<br />

identification of nonlinear structural dynamic systems. It is well-known that there is no general<br />

solution for parameter identification of nonlinear structural system. As an alternative in the sense<br />

of linear approximation solution, the Extended Kalman filter (EKF) has been frequently employed<br />

for identification of time-varying structural parameters. However, the EKF has several drawbacks<br />

such as biased estimations and erroneous estimations especially for highly nonlinear dynamic<br />

systems due to its crude linearization scheme. To overcome the weakness of the EKF, the UPF was<br />

recently developed. <strong>The</strong> UPF is a novel method for nonlinear, non-Gaussian, and on-line<br />

estimation. <strong>The</strong> algorithm is a particle filter that uses an unscented Kalman filter (UKF) to generate<br />

the importance proposal distribution.<br />

Numerical simulation studies have been carried out on SDOF and MDOF systems. <strong>The</strong> results on<br />

the linear and nonlinear SDOF systems show that the UPF gives more accurate and robust estimates<br />

under the existence of the system and measurement errors with rough initial guesses for the states<br />

and the error covariance matrices. <strong>The</strong> results on a five-story building structure subjected to<br />

nonlinear behavior at the bottoms of the columns show that the UPF has good estimation capability.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results from a series of numerical simulations indicate that the UPF is superior to the EKF for<br />

the system identification of nonlinear dynamic systems especially for highly nonlinear systems.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Detection of structural change or damage is one of the most important and challenging issues in<br />

the structural health monitoring system. Statistical inference approaches are more appropriate in<br />

the detection of the structural change due to the complex nature of civil infrastructures and<br />

noise-polluted measurements. Especially Bayesian approach in statistical inference has useful<br />

structure in on-line estimation and has been applied to various fields, i.e., physics, control system<br />

and signal processing.


556<br />

<strong>The</strong> most well-known Bayesian solution is the Kalman filter which is complete and tractable<br />

Bayesian solution for linear dynamic system by making linear and Gaussian assumptions to<br />

simplify the optimal recursive Bayesian estimation Unfortunately, the problem of estimating<br />

the structural change often has nonlinear dynamics so the extended Kalman filter (EKF) was<br />

applied that is approximation solution for nonlinear dynamic system in a sense of piecewise<br />

linear approximation and has been reported on its successful applications in numerous state<br />

estimation problem But assumptions on extended Kalman filter may be violated in highly<br />

nonlinear systems.<br />

Particle filtering techniques are general approach in estimations of nonlinear dynamic system<br />

without assumptions on the form of the probability densities in question, that is, they employ<br />

full nonlinear and non-Gaussian estimation Recently the unscented particle filter has been<br />

developed by Wan and Merwe[5] that utilizes the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) to augment<br />

and improve the standard particle filter, specifically through generation of the importance<br />

proposal distribution In this study, the performance of the unscented particle filter was<br />

evaluated being a more general filtering technique for detection of structural change in civil<br />

infra-structures in comparison with the extended Kalman filter<br />

2. UNSCENTED PARTICLE FILTER<br />

Bayesian approach<br />

Given measurements of inputs u k and structural response y k , the goal is to estimate the<br />

parameters of the structural dynamic system. <strong>The</strong> optimal estimate in a sense of minimum<br />

mean-squared error (MMSE) is given by the conditional mean as follows<br />

1 = E[^|Y OA ] (2.1)<br />

where Y Q k is the sequence of observations up to time k. Evaluation of this expectation<br />

requires information of the a postenor density p(X k | Y OA ). <strong>The</strong> problems of determine<br />

posteriori density given a priori density p(X k | YQ^) is referred as the Bayesian approach<br />

and can be evaluated recursively according to the following relations<br />

where<br />

, x<br />

(22)<br />

P(Xt I YO*.!) = p(X k | X^i)p(X k^l | Xu^X**-! (2.3)<br />

and the normalizing constant p(Y k \ Y 0 A-l ) is given by<br />

P0t i Y 0 *..!) = J p(X k | Y 0 k _j) p(Y k | X k ) dX k (2 4)<br />

This recursion specifies the current state density as a function of the previous density and the<br />

most recent measurement data. <strong>The</strong> state-space model comes into play by specifying the state<br />

transition probability p(X k \ x^) and measurement probability or likelihood p(Y k I X k )<br />

Unfortunately, the multidimensional integration indicated by Eqn (2 2) Make a closed-form<br />

solution intractable for most systems. <strong>The</strong> only general approach is to apply Monte Carlo<br />

sampling techniques that essentially convert integrals to finite sums, which converge to the true<br />

&<br />

solution in the limit.


557<br />

Unscented particle filter<br />

<strong>The</strong> choice of the importance proposal distribution q(X h \X Qk ,Y Qk ) is most important and<br />

critical design issue for filter performance <strong>The</strong> optimal importance proposal distribution which<br />

minimizes the variance on the importance weights is given by<br />

q(X k \ X 0k^Y Qk ) = p(X k I X Q^Y ok ) (2.5)<br />

That is, the true conditional state density given the previous state hasty and all observations<br />

Sampling form this distribution is impractical for arbitrary densities Consequently, the<br />

transition prior is the most popular choice of importance proposal distribution<br />

g(X k 1 X Q ,_!,r 0k ) = p(X k I XM) (2.6)<br />

<strong>The</strong> effectiveness of this approximation depends on how close the importance proposal<br />

distribution is to the true posterior distribution. If there is not sufficient overlap, only a few<br />

particles will have significant importance weights when their likelihood is evaluated<br />

An improvement in the choice of importance proposal distribution over the simple transition<br />

prior, which also address the problem of sample depletion, can be accomplished by moving the<br />

particles toward the regions of high likelihood, based on the most recent observations y k f An<br />

effective approach to accomplish this, is to use an EKF generated Gaussian approximation to<br />

the optimal importance proposal, that is,<br />

q(X k \X, k . l J, K }^q N (X k \Y^} (27)<br />

which is accomplished by using a separate EKF to generate and propagate a Gaussian<br />

importance proposal distribution for each particle,<br />

Ar(^l*W) = Al«i«), ^ = l^.. : N (28)<br />

That is, at time k one uses the EKF equations, with the new data, to compute the mean and<br />

covariance of the importance distribution for each particle from the previous time step k-1.<br />

Next, we redraw the rth particle (at time k) from this new updated distribution While still<br />

making a Gaussian assumption, the approach provides a better approximation to the optimal<br />

conditional importance proposal distribution and has been shown to improve performance on a<br />

number of applications.<br />

Prior<br />

Likelihood<br />

Fig. 2 1 Unscented Particle Filter Moving importance proposal distribution<br />

to regions of high likelihood using the most current observation<br />

By replacing the EKF with the UKF, we can more accurately propagate the mean and<br />

covariance of the Gaussian approximation to the state distribution. Distributions generated by<br />

the UKF will have a grater support overlap with the true posterior distribution than the overlap


558<br />

achieved by the EKF estimates In addition, scaling parameters used for sigma-point selection<br />

can be optimized to capture certain characteristic of the prior distribution if known, e g the<br />

algorithm can be modified to work with distributions that have heavier tail than Gaussian<br />

distributions such as Cauchy or Student-t distributions <strong>The</strong> new filter that results from using a<br />

UKF for importance proposal distribution generation within a particle filter framework is<br />

called the unscentedparticle filter (UPF)<br />

3. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS<br />

Identification of nonlinear SDOF system: the EKF and the UKF<br />

In this numerical simulation, performance of the UKF and the EKF was evaluated on<br />

single-degree-of-freedom Bouc-Wen's hysteretic model as following<br />

u<br />

(3 1)<br />

(32)<br />

f (3 3)<br />

where u(t) is displacement, ® n is natural frequency, £ is damping ratio, $ is<br />

Bouc-Wen's nonlinear displacement related to nonlinear restoring force, u is ground<br />

acceleration and / & y are shape-control parameters to be identified X is^state vector<br />

used in the filtering techniques<br />

Estimation performance was compared for 13 by 13 cases of initial guesses of £(0 | 0) and<br />

(0 | 0) and estimation error (RMSE in percentile) was shown in Fig. 3 1 Performance<br />

between the EKF and the UKF is strongly distinct <strong>The</strong> EKF diverges almost region of<br />

simulation but the UKF shows robust estimation capability about the initial guesses of £(0 | 0)<br />

and P(0|0)<br />

%(0\0"> ieU '<br />

a) <strong>The</strong> extended Kalman filter b) <strong>The</strong> unscented Kalman filter<br />

Fig. 3 1 Root mean square error (RJVISE) of estimation


559<br />

Application to 5-story building structure using unscented Kalman filter<br />

Numerical simulations are carried out to show the capability of parameter identification using<br />

unscented Kalman filter Identification performed for the five-degree-of-freedom<br />

shear-building model with Bouc-Wen's hysteretic nonlinear spring at the bottom of columns<br />

using the artificial responses data with 1% noise in RMS level In this example, the parameters<br />

to be identified are c t , k,, A and 7(1=!,2,3,4,5) <strong>The</strong> exact values of system parameters and<br />

estimated results are shown in Table 2 and estimation histories for linear and nonlinear<br />

parameters are shown in Fig 3 3<br />

'i I i H Bouc-Wen's<br />

VJ },. - Hysteretic<br />

Spring<br />

Fig 3 2 Five story building structure model<br />

TABLE 2.1<br />

THE EXACT VALUES FOR SIMULATIONS AND IDENTIFIED VALUES<br />

Story<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Story<br />

1<br />

c true<br />

02<br />

02<br />

02 -<br />

02<br />

02<br />

A<br />

01<br />

C<br />

& guess<br />

01<br />

01<br />

01<br />

0.1<br />

01<br />

P<br />

Pguess<br />

00<br />

^identified<br />

0.20011<br />

01982<br />

020131<br />

020015<br />

0 19839<br />

/^identified<br />

0 099911<br />

Kfrue<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

Jirue<br />

02<br />

K<br />

Kguess<br />

20<br />

30<br />

20<br />

30<br />

20<br />

7<br />

"Jguess<br />

00<br />

^identified<br />

99949<br />

10004<br />

99957<br />

10005<br />

99959<br />

^identified<br />

02002


560<br />

0 2 4 5 3 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 8 8 10 12 14 16 IB 20<br />

_J I. t.- -J 1 L_<br />

10 12 14 16 18 2D Q 2 4 B 8 10 12 14<br />

16 18 20<br />

6, 1 , , , , . 1<br />

0*2<br />

10 1'=<br />

0<br />

Q 2 4 5 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Q 2 4 B 8 10 12 14<br />

6, , , , , , , ,_<br />

4 i<br />

Li-<br />

0 2 4 5 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Q 2 4 B 3 10 12 14<br />

2, , 1 r- 1 1 1 i—<br />

-J ' i '<br />

4 5 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 S 8 10 12 14<br />

Time {sec}<br />

Time {sec}<br />

18 20<br />

Q 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1S 18 20<br />

Time {sec}<br />

Fig. 3.3 Estimation histories of system parameters<br />

(—: true values of system parameters)


561<br />

Identification of nonlinear SDOF system<br />

<strong>The</strong> performances of the UPF and the EKF are evaluated on nonlinear identification problem<br />

with Bouc-Wen's hysteretic spring mode mentioned in previous section (see Eqn. (3.2)). Fig.<br />

3.4 compares the estimates generated from a single run of EKF and UPF. <strong>The</strong> extend Kalman<br />

filter shows divergence phenomena whereas unscented particle filter (UPF) shows good<br />

estimation capability.<br />

8<br />

£'<br />

— 4<br />

F 7<br />

io<br />

J2<br />

"2 - 2<br />

1 ft<br />

-8<br />

-10<br />

fl<br />

D.erge ^ ji<br />

y/JV , i ! I ! !<br />

•«' y» i / i i<br />

i<br />

— observed response<br />

— UPFestmaton<br />

— EKF estimation<br />

I l\<br />

i f i<br />

f "hi<br />

'• ¥\ / \ / ^<br />

\ i y v -<br />

r I i I i<br />

V II li ' * :<br />

V j<br />

Time (sec)<br />

i i \ 'i j.<br />

i I la A /\<br />

15 "j 1 5 — EKF estmaton<br />

f ',<br />

^5<br />

1 5<br />

nllnearpar<br />

a<br />

z<br />

tn o<br />

^\ — 'Exact values<br />

S<br />

,|<br />

f^<br />

i<br />

;<br />

-10<br />

^<br />

Diverge<br />

1<br />

-IS<br />

05 1 IS 2 IS 3 3.5 4 45 5<br />

Time (sec)<br />

-<br />

Diverge<br />

— Exact values<br />

— UPF esUmaHon<br />

— EKF estmaton<br />

Time (sec)<br />

a) states and parameter estimation b) probability density functions estimated<br />

by unscented particle filter<br />

Fig. 3.4 Estimations by the extended Kalman filter and unscented particle filter


562<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

In this study, the recently developed unscented particle filter as an alternative to Extended<br />

Kalman filter has been applied to the identification of nonlinear structural dynamic systems.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results from a series of numerical simulation studies are summarized below<br />

1 Statistical inference for nonlinear dynamic system can be carried out by more generic<br />

approach using particle filter than linear approximated schemes such as the extended<br />

Kalman filter.<br />

2 Unscented particle filter may show better performance than generic particle filters by<br />

using importance proposal distribution estimated from the UKF.<br />

3 For real world applications of statistical filtering technique, the accurate mathematical<br />

model on system dynamics including damage phenomena is demanded.<br />

References<br />

1. Haykin, S (2001). Kalman filtering and Neural Networks, Wieley interscience<br />

2. Juiler, SJ. and Uhlmann, IK., (1994) A new approach for the nonlinear transform of<br />

means and covariance in linear filters, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,<br />

3. Koo, K.Y, (2001) Time Domain Identification of Nonlinear Structural Dynamic<br />

Systems using Unscented Kalman filter, M.S. <strong>The</strong>sis, KAIST<br />

4 Maruyama, 0, Yun, C.B., Hoshiya, M. and Shinozuka, M., (1989). Program EXKAL2<br />

for identification of Structural Dynamic Systems, Technical Report NCEER, New<br />

York<br />

5. Rudolph, M., Doucet, A., Freitas, N. and Wan, E. (2000) <strong>The</strong> unscented particle fitler,<br />

Technical report Cambridge <strong>University</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> Department<br />

6. Shinozuka, M., Yun, C.B., and Imai, H., (1982). Identification of linear structural<br />

dynamic systems, Journal of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics Division, ASCE, 108:6,<br />

1371-1390<br />

7. Sorenson, H.W., (1985). Kalman filtering: <strong>The</strong>ory and Application IEEE process<br />

New York<br />

8. Yuri, C.B. and Shinozuka, M., (1980) Identification of Nonlinear Structural Dynamic<br />

Systems", Journal of Structural Mechanics, 8:2, 187-203<br />

9. Yun, OB., Lee. HJ. and Lee, C.G (1997) Sequential Prediction-Error Method for<br />

Structural Identification, Journal of <strong>Engineering</strong> Mechanics, 115-122


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 563<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

EMBEDDING ALGORITHMS IN A WIRELESS STRUCTURAL<br />

MONITORING SYSTEM<br />

Jerome Peter Lynch 1 , Arvmd Sundararajan 2 , Kincho H. Law 1 , and Anne S. Kiremidjian 1<br />

Department of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, Stanford <strong>University</strong><br />

Stanford, CA, USA<br />

Department of Electrical <strong>Engineering</strong>, Stanford <strong>University</strong><br />

Stanford, CA, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A complex wireless sensing unit is designed for application in structural monitoring systems.<br />

Fabricated from advanced embedded system technologies, the prototype unit employs a spreadspectrum<br />

wireless modem for peer-to-peer communication between sensing units and a complex 32-bit<br />

computational core for local data interrogation. Utilizing the computational capabilities of the sensing<br />

unit design, a collection of structural health monitoring software applications can be implemented for<br />

execution by the units. Fast Fourier transforms and methods for fitting auto-regressive time-series<br />

models are employed as illustrative algorithms embedded in the wireless sensing unit. <strong>The</strong> research<br />

goal is a wireless sensing network supporting the collaborative processing of real-time measurement<br />

data for the identification of potential damage in a structural system.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> field of structural engineering has historically derived tremendous benefit from the installation of<br />

structural monitoring systems. Data generated by structural monitoring systems provide insight to the<br />

performance of a structure over its operational life and during large external disturbances such as<br />

earthquakes. <strong>The</strong> current state-of-technology is characterized by centralized systems that employ<br />

sensors (such as accelerometers) wired to a centralized data acquisition system. <strong>The</strong> use of wires as<br />

the sole medium for data transfer from system sensors to data servers cause systems to have high<br />

installation and maintenance costs. As a result, the adoption of the technology is defined as sluggish.<br />

With installation and maintenance costs high for tethered systems, Straser (1998) proposed employing<br />

wireless communication technology to serve as a cost effective and reliable alternative for current<br />

cabled structural monitoring systems.<br />

<strong>The</strong> past decade has witnessed the explosive growth of wireless communications along with major<br />

advancements of integrated circuit and embedded system technologies. For wireless communication<br />

and embedded system technologies, the cost of hardware components continues to decrease while their<br />

functional capabilities broaden. As a result, a wireless sensing unit is designed and constructed from<br />

off-the-shelf hardware components to serve as the fundamental building block of wireless modular<br />

monitoring systems (WiMMS). Key features of the unit include wireless communications, high


564<br />

Figure 1 - Prototype wireless sensing unit<br />

resolution 16-bit digital conversion of interfaced sensors, and a powerful computational core that can<br />

perform various data interrogation techniques in near real-time (Lynch et al. 2002). <strong>The</strong><br />

computational core's architecture is designed using two processors. <strong>The</strong> first is a low-power 8-bit<br />

Atmel microcontroller included for data acquisition functions such as reading measurements from<br />

interfaced sensors. <strong>The</strong> second, a 32-bit Motorola PowerPC microcontroller that supports hardware<br />

floating point calculations, is included in the design to perform the data interrogation tasks. <strong>The</strong> unit is<br />

compact at 20 in. 3 and the current total component cost is less than $500. A picture of the prototype<br />

wireless sensing unit is shown in Figure 1.<br />

With a flexible and capable hardware design, the wireless sensing units are to be implemented with the<br />

computational tasks required by a structural health monitoring system. Structural health monitoring<br />

algorithms can be embedded in the wireless sensing unit to assess changes in the system, and if<br />

appropriate, infer potential structural damage from time-history measurement data. To validate the<br />

sensing unit's role as a computational agent for structural health monitoring applications, two<br />

algorithms are embedded to locally process measurement data. <strong>The</strong> first is the fast Fourier transform<br />

that will be used to derive the frequency response function from time-history data; the frequency<br />

response function serves as the basis for many frequency-domain damage detection approaches. <strong>The</strong><br />

second algorithm, representing the first step in a novel time-domain damage detection method, is the<br />

fitting of an auto-regressive time series model to time-history data. <strong>The</strong> functionality of both<br />

computational methods is to be illustrated on response measurements obtained from a laboratory test<br />

structure excited by a shaking table.<br />

OVERVIEW OF STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING ALGORITHMS<br />

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is defined as the computational paradigm used to quantify a<br />

structure's health and well-being over its operational life. Application of SHM concepts to a diverse<br />

set of structures, ranging from aircrafts to traditional civil structures, has tremendous benefit in<br />

assessing safety and remaining operational life. While still in its infancy, researchers hi the SHM field<br />

have produced a variety of algorithms for the identification of damage in structures. To date, methods<br />

developed for damage detection can be classified as frequency-domain or time-domain approaches.<br />

<strong>The</strong> earliest damage detection methods correlated damage to changes hi structural stiffness. <strong>The</strong><br />

methods use finite element models and linear modal parameters, such as natural frequencies and mode<br />

shapes, to identify the existence of damage and in some cases, even damage location and severity<br />

(Doebling et al 1996). Modal properties, like natural frequencies of a structure's modes, are observed


in the healthy structure. If major changes are observed in modal properties over a structure's<br />

operational life, the changes could be attributed to damage. <strong>The</strong> extraction of modal parameters from<br />

frequency response functions derived from vibration-based test data follows closely the developments<br />

in traditional modal testing (Ewms 1984). Classified as frequency-domain approaches, these methods<br />

had success in identifying large levels of damage in a structure but suffered from an inability to<br />

positively identify the onset of damage (Sohn and Farrar 2001). With respect to civil structures,<br />

environmental and operational variability can also cause changes in natural frequencies and mode<br />

shapes, rendering frequency-domain approaches difficult to apply except in cases of extreme damage<br />

(Sohn et al. 1999).<br />

In response to the difficulties associated with applying frequency-domain techniques to civil<br />

structures, new approaches to damage detection are being explored. In particular, approaches based<br />

upon the statistical pattern recognition paradigm appear promising (Sohn et al. 2001). This timedomain<br />

approach entails the use of statistical signal processing techniques applied on time-history<br />

measurement data to infer the existence of damage in the structural system. <strong>The</strong> approach extensively<br />

uses linear predictive time-series models. Assuming the structural response to be stationary, an autoregressive<br />

(AR) time-series model can be fit to time-history measurement data:<br />

565<br />

^=I>,V ( +^ (1)<br />

1=1<br />

<strong>The</strong> response of the structure at time t—kAt t denoted by x^ is a function of p previous observations of<br />

the response of the system, plus, a residual error term, rf. Weights on the previous observations of x k . t<br />

are denoted by the coefficient, &,. <strong>The</strong> residual error of the AR model is a damage sensitive parameter,<br />

but it is also influenced by the operational variability of the structure. To separate changes in the<br />

residual error resulting from damage and operational variability, an auto-regressive with exogenous<br />

input (ARX) time-series model is used to model the relationship between the AR model residual error,<br />

r/, and the measured response, Xk'.<br />

i=l y=0<br />

- + * (2)<br />

<strong>The</strong> residual error of the ARX model, e**, is the damage sensitive feature used to identify the existence<br />

of damage regardless of the structure's operational state. To implement the statistical pattern<br />

recognition approach, a structure is observed in its undamaged state under a variety of environmental<br />

and operational states to populate a database pairing AR(p) models of dimension p and ARX(a,b)<br />

models of dimension a and b.<br />

After measuring the response of a structure, denoted by 3;*, in an unknown state (damaged or<br />

undamaged), an AR(p) model is fit. <strong>The</strong> coefficients of the fitted AR model are compared to the<br />

database of AR-ARX model pairs previously calculated for the undamaged structure. A match is<br />

made by minimizing the difference (in a Euclidean sense) between the coefficients of the AR model<br />

calculated and an AR model from the database. If no structural damage is experienced and the<br />

operational conditions of the two models are close to one another, the selected AR database model<br />

should closely approximate the measured response. If damage has been sustained by the structure,<br />

even the closest AR model of the database will not approximate the measured structural response well.<br />

With an AR-ARX model pair selected from the database, the measured response, y/c, and residual<br />

error, r k y , of the fitted AR model are substituted in the ARX model of Equation (2) to determine the<br />

residual error, £/. If the structure is in a state of damage, the statistics of the ARX model residual, £/,


566<br />

will vary from that of the ARX model, e£, corresponding to the undamaged structure. <strong>The</strong> damage<br />

can then be identified when the ratio of the standard deviation of the model residuals exceeds a<br />

threshold value established from good engineering judgment:<br />

(3)<br />

Application of the linear prediction time-series model has been illustrated for a variety of structures<br />

from fast patrol boats to lumped mass models (Sohn and Farrar 2001, Sohn et al. 2001).<br />

EMBEDDED SOFTWARE DESIGN<br />

To illustrate the units' utility in an automated structural health monitoring system, two computational<br />

algorithms are selected and encoded for embedment in the prototype wireless sensing units. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

algorithm is the fast Founer transform (FFT) used to derive the frequency response function (FRF)<br />

from time-history data collected by the units. <strong>The</strong> second computational algorithm to be embedded is<br />

an auto-regressive (AR; time series fitting algorithm.<br />

Fast Fourier Transform<br />

<strong>The</strong> FRF of a structural system can be calculated directly from measurement data by using the<br />

computationally efficient fast Founer transform (FFT). <strong>The</strong> discretely measured response of a system<br />

in the time domain, h k , is converted to the response in the frequency domain, H n , by means of a<br />

discrete Fourier transform:<br />

H^ZV 1^ (4)<br />

JL*0<br />

where A T represents the total number of time-history samples. If the discrete Fourier transform of<br />

Equation (4) is directly calculated by the wireless sensing unit, the calculation is an 0(N 2 ) process.<br />

Utilization of the discrete fast Fourier transform reduces this calculation to an 0(Nlog2N) process.<br />

Although various forms of the fast Fourier transform are available for use, our implementation of the<br />

algorithm for embedment in the sensing unit's core follows closely the Cooley-Tukey method (Press et<br />

al. 1992). <strong>The</strong> approach reorders the initial time-history data and performs a series of two-point<br />

Founer transforms on adjacent data points.<br />

Auto-Regressive Time Series Modeling<br />

<strong>The</strong> wireless sensing units can individually perform most of the computations associated with the<br />

statistical pattern recognition algorithms. <strong>The</strong> role of the unit is well defined with the responsibility of<br />

recording the structural response, normalizing the response, and fitting AR models to the<br />

measurements. After the AR model is fit, the model's coefficients would be wirelessly communicated<br />

to a centralized data server housing a database populated by AR-ARX model pairs. Once a model<br />

match is made, the coefficients of the ARX model are transmitted to the wireless sensing unit where<br />

the standard deviation of the ARX model is calculated. <strong>The</strong> ratio of standard deviations of ARX<br />

model errors shown in Equation (3) is calculated and compared to a previously established threshold.


Software is written for the wireless sensing unit to determine the coefficients of an AR(p) model based<br />

on a segment of the recorded data. Multiplying both sides of Equation (1) by the current measurement<br />

sample, z/., and taking the expected value of both sides, the autocorrelation function of the autoregressive<br />

process is derived:<br />

567<br />

' cc v ' / i i T z> \ v "/ /c\<br />

t=i<br />

PJ<br />

where cp^(k) are the discrete terms of the autocorrelation function of Xk. <strong>The</strong> autocorrelation function<br />

obeys the initial difference equation of the AR process. This yields a means of determining the<br />

coefficients of the AR process based on calculations of the autocorrelation of the measurement data.<br />

Resulting are the Yule-Walker equations (Gelb 1974):<br />

>-2) fc<br />

(6)<br />

Coefficients of the auto-regressive process are very sensitive to the way the autocorrelation of the<br />

process is determined. As a result, Burg's method has been proposed by Press et al. (1992) for<br />

determining the coefficients of the auto-regressive model directly from the measurement data. <strong>The</strong><br />

method is recursive with its order increasing during each recursive call by estimating a new coefficient<br />

b t and re-estimating the previously calculated coefficients so as to minimize the residual error of the<br />

process.<br />

SOFTWARE VALIDATION<br />

To validate the performance of the wireless sensing unit in a structural health monitoring setting,<br />

validation tests upon a laboratory test structure are devised. A five-story shear frame structure, made<br />

from aluminum, is employed as shown in Figure 2. <strong>The</strong> lateral stiffness of each floor originates from<br />

the four vertical aluminum columns roughly 0.5 inches by 0.25 inches in cross sectional area. Each<br />

floor weighs 16 pounds. From log-decrement calculations of free vibration tests, the damping of the<br />

structure is approximated to be 0.5% of critical damping. <strong>The</strong> wireless sensing unit is securely<br />

fastened to the fourth story while the Analog Devices ADXL210 MEMS-based accelerometer is<br />

mounted upon the fifth story. <strong>The</strong> entire structure is fastened to the top of a one-directional lateral<br />

shaking table driven horizontally by an 11 kip actuator. Various excitations are applied at the base of<br />

the structure to dynamically excite the system.<br />

Determination of the Frequency Response Function<br />

A swept-frequency sine, also known as a chirping excitation, is applied to the base of the structure in<br />

order to excite the lower modes of response of the system. <strong>The</strong> chirping excitation has constant<br />

displacement amplitude of 0.075 inches with a linearly varying frequency of 0.25 to 3 Hz over 60<br />

seconds. During the excitation, the acceleration response of the fifth story is monitored. <strong>The</strong><br />

measurement data is sampled at 30 Hz, well above the primary modes of response of the system<br />

analytically determined to be 2.96, 8.71, 13.70, 17.47, and 20.04 Hz.


568<br />

A<br />

11 25"<br />

11 25"<br />

1<br />

T<br />

1<br />

11 25*<br />

!<br />

5 _L<br />

11 25"<br />

-L s<br />

_, _ f<br />

•^<br />

T<br />

Figure 2 - Five-story lumped-mass shear structure mounted upon a shaking table<br />

ADXL210 Measured Absolute Acceleration Response<br />

10 30<br />

Time (seconds)<br />

Figure 3 - Absolute acceleration response at the fifth story from a sweep input excitation<br />

Figure 3 presents the absolute acceleration response of the shear structure to the input motion<br />

generated b"v the shaking table <strong>The</strong> absolute acceleration response measured using the accelerometer<br />

is in ver> good agreement with the theoretical response determined analytically<br />

<strong>The</strong> frequency response function of the recorded tune-history is locallv calculated from an embedded<br />

FFT algorithm <strong>The</strong> FFT is performed on 1024 consecutive tune points of the response between 10<br />

and 44 seconds <strong>The</strong> first three modes of response of the structure can be visually identified from the<br />

calculated response functions as shown in Figure 4 <strong>The</strong> modes are determined to be 2 87, 8 59, and<br />

13 54 Hz <strong>The</strong> frequencies of the calculated modes are within 3% of those calculated from the<br />

theoretical model<br />

Auto-Regressive Time Series Model Fitting<br />

<strong>The</strong> test structure is excited b> a white noise excitation (zero mean and 0 05 inch standard deviation)<br />

and the accelerometer on the fifth story measures the acceleration response as shown in Figure 5


569<br />

ADXL210 Frequency Response Function (30Hz)<br />

5 10<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

15<br />

Figure 4 - Frequency response function denved from the structural acceleration response<br />

ADXL210 Measured Absolute Acceleration Response to White Noise Input<br />

30<br />

Time (sec)<br />

Figure 5 - Absolute acceleration response of fifth-story to a white noise input excitation<br />

<strong>The</strong> time history acceleration response of the structure as measured in this manner is relatively<br />

stationary with zero mean and a standard deviation of approximately 1 1 g <strong>The</strong>refore, the record is<br />

suitable to fitting an auto-regressive time series model<br />

After recording the acceleration response of the test structure, an auto regressive model of 10<br />

coefficients is tit to the measurement data of Figure 5 After logging the coefficients an identical<br />

analysis is performed using Burg s auto-regressive function provided by MATLAB to compare the<br />

accuracy of the coefficients determined by the wireless sensing unit <strong>The</strong> coefficients determined by<br />

the wireless sensing unit and MATLAB, as presented in Table 1 are identical<br />

Table 1 - Coefficients of a fitted auto regressive model to stationary structural response<br />

bi<br />

1><br />

b 3<br />

5 4<br />

b s<br />

be<br />

b 7<br />

b s<br />

b 9<br />

bio<br />

PowerPC<br />

166M)<br />

13009<br />

047D2<br />

01171<br />

06756<br />

15212<br />

12646<br />

0^989<br />

01498<br />

00891<br />

AR 10<br />

MATLAB<br />

16650<br />

13009<br />

04752<br />

0 1171<br />

06756<br />

15212<br />

12646<br />

05989<br />

01498<br />

00891


570<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

<strong>The</strong> realization of an automated structural health monitoring system has taken one step forward with<br />

the development of a wireless sensing unit constructed with advanced embedded system technologies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> result is a hardware design that is optimized for tasks specific to structural health monitoring<br />

applications. In particular, an advanced computational core is provided that is capable of locally<br />

processing measurement data to assess the state and possibly identify damage in a structure. A fast<br />

Founer transform algorithm and an auto-regressive time series algorithm have been embedded in the<br />

unit to illustrate the unit's computational capabilities. Both applications have been successfully<br />

applied to time-history measurement data taken from a five degree-of-freedom laboratory structure<br />

excited bv a shaking table.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

This research is partially sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Grant Numbers CMS-<br />

9988909 and CMS-0121842. <strong>The</strong> fruitful suggestions provided by Dr. Chuck Farrar and Dr. Hoon<br />

Sohn of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, have been invaluable to the progress of our research.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B., and Shevitz, D.W. (1996). Damage identification and health<br />

monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature<br />

review. Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.<br />

Ewins D. J. (1984). Modal testing: theory and practice. <strong>Research</strong> Studies Press, Letchworth, England.<br />

Gelb, A. (1974). Applied optimal estimation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.<br />

Lynch, J. P., Law, K.H., Kiremidjian, A.S., Kenny, T.W., and Carryer, E. (2002). A wireless modular<br />

monitoring system for civil structures. Proceedings of2& h International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC),<br />

Los Angeles, CA, February 4-7.<br />

Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A,, Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C: the art<br />

of scientific computing. Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, Cambridge, England.<br />

Sohn, H., Dzwonczyk, M., Straser, E.G., Kkemidjian, A.S., Law, K.H., and Meng, T, (1999). Experimental<br />

study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> and<br />

Structural Dynamics, 28:9, 879-897.<br />

Sohn, H., and Farrar, C.R. (2001). "Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals." Smart<br />

Materials and Structures, Institute of Physics, 10:4, 446-451.<br />

Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Hunter, N., and Worden, K. (2001). Applying the LANL statistical pattern<br />

recognition paradigm for structural health monitoring to data from a surface-effect fast patrol boat.<br />

Report LA-13761-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.<br />

Straser, E.G. {1998). A modular, wireless damage monitoring system for structures. Ph.D. <strong>The</strong>sis, Department<br />

of Civil and Environmental <strong>Engineering</strong>, Stanford <strong>University</strong>, Stanford, CA.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

MULTIFACETED SEISMIC EVALUATION AND RETROFIT<br />

STUDIES OF A MAJOR VIADUCT<br />

M. Saiidi 1 , A. Itani 1 , Q. Yang 2 , and S. Ladkany 3<br />

'Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Department, <strong>University</strong> of Nevada,<br />

Reno, USA<br />

2 Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Department, Northern Jiaotong <strong>University</strong>,<br />

Beijing, China<br />

3 Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Department, <strong>University</strong> of Nevada,<br />

Las Vegas, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A major viaduct in downtown Las Vegas is slated for seismic retrofit. <strong>The</strong> structure has 22 spans and<br />

110 columns of various shapes. <strong>The</strong> performance and seismic vulnerability of the bridge and its<br />

adjacent rarnps are being evaluated. <strong>The</strong> focus of this article is on the effect of incoherent ground<br />

motion on the viaduct and an explanation of a pilot study on the use of superelastic shape memory<br />

alloy (SMA) to upgrade the seismic performance of the bridge elements. It is shown that combination<br />

geometric incoherency, wave passage, and site characteristics effects can increase the base shears<br />

considerably. <strong>The</strong> improvement in the capacity and ductility of concrete cubes confined by SMA rods<br />

has pointed out the potential of this new material for application in seismic retrofit.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Several new concepts and issues have emerged in the past few years in seismic evaluation and retrofit<br />

of structures. <strong>The</strong> underlying principle in utilizing new concepts is to ensure a reliable, economical,<br />

and intelligent design that makes optimal use of innovative materials and information technology tools.<br />

Some of the new tools, while may be well developed in the arena of their origin require further<br />

research and development before they can be adopted in civil engineering projects. It may be hard to<br />

justify the development work for specific projects of relatively small magnitude. However, the<br />

potential benefit of such research can be significant for large projects and hence undertaking the socalled<br />

"high risk" studies may be warranted.<br />

In planning the seismic retrofit of major bridges, it is inevitable that the solution will involve both<br />

conventional and non-conventional strategies. This article presents some of the results of an on-going<br />

study to develop retrofit plans for a major freeway viaduct in Las Vegas, Nevada. Several aspects of


572<br />

the structural response and retrofit methods are being studied. <strong>The</strong> article will present a summary of<br />

the study of a selected number of the critical issues.<br />

DESCRIPTION OF THE VIADUCT<br />

<strong>The</strong> viaduct consists of two main 22-span continuous structures for the westbound and eastbound<br />

traffic on Interstate 95 in North Las Vegas (Fig. 1). In addition a 7-span on ramp and two off ramp<br />

badges, one with two spans and the other with three spans are connected to the viaduct. <strong>The</strong><br />

superstructure is cast-in-place muiticell box girder in all the structures and has seven in-span hinges in<br />

the main structure. <strong>The</strong> main bridges are supported on multi-column piers with two to four diamond<br />

shape columns and the ramp bridges are supported on irregular octagonal single-column piers some<br />

with a pedestal. Figures 2 and 3 show the cross section of the columns. Single columns are detailed<br />

vuth a one-way hinge at connection to the footing and columns of the multi-column bents are detailed<br />

with two-way hinges at the base.<br />

<strong>The</strong> viaduct was constructed in 1969 and was widened in 1984 by adding one row of columns and a<br />

new box cell on the north side with little seismic load and detailing consideration. <strong>The</strong> columns are<br />

supported on spread footings. Based on the soil blow counts at the site of the bridge, approximately<br />

the west third of the bridge is on a relatively soft soil while the rest of the structure is on medium firm<br />

soil.<br />

Seismic codes place Las Vegas in areas of moderate seismicity category. To determine how critical a<br />

bridge is with respect to the need to upgrade its seismic performance, however, the average daily<br />

traffic (ADT) is also factored in. As a result the Nevada Department of Transportation has identified<br />

the viaduct as the most critical bridge in Nevada with respect to priority for seismic retrofit because of<br />

its high ADT in addition to having seismic deficiencies. Seismological studies of the Las Vegas area<br />

have pointed out the possibility of strong ground motion due to soil amplification despite the fact that<br />

the area is categorized as having only a moderate probability of experiencing high seismic forces (Su<br />

etal. 1998).<br />

CRITICAL ISSUES<br />

<strong>The</strong> original structure and the subsequent expansion were not designed to resist significant seismic<br />

forces. As a result there are many deficiencies in the bridge with respect to seismic detailing. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

include inadequate lateral steel in the columns (Fig. 2 and 3), short anchorage length for longitudinal<br />

bars, insufficient shear steel in the beams, very low amount of bottom steel in the beams at<br />

connections to columns, a lack of top mat of steel in footings, short seat widths at hinges, and a lack of<br />

shear steel at beam column connections. Considering the length of the viaduct and variation in soil<br />

properties, there is also uncertainty about the performance of the bridge under incoherent ground<br />

motions at different supports.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study to address these deficiencies include (1) a three dimensional detailed nonlinear modeling of<br />

the viaduct subjected to earthquakes to determine the performance level under different loading<br />

scenarios, (2) a reduced linear modeling of the bridge to study the effect of incoherent ground motions,<br />

(3) shake table studies of the as-built and retrofitted models of single-column bents, (4) shake table


573<br />

studies of the as-built and retrofitted models of multi-column bents, and (5) an exploratory study of<br />

the application of innovative materials for retrofit. Due to space limitation only a summary of the<br />

research in Tasks 2 and 5 is presented in this article.<br />

INCOHERENT GROUND MOTION EFFECTS<br />

Although commonly assumed to be uniform, ground motion at different supports of a structure may<br />

vary from one support to the next. Variation in support excitation may be due to three causes: (1)<br />

geometric incoherency, (2) wave-passage, and (3) local site geotechnical characteristics. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

effect is due to randomness of the earthquake motion even at a given site with practically the same<br />

distance from the earthquake source. <strong>The</strong> second effect is caused by delay in the motion from one<br />

support to the next as the earthquake wave passes through the site. Finally the third source of<br />

variation is that, for the same bedrock motion, soils of different properties and depth transfer the<br />

motion to the surface differently. <strong>The</strong> first two factors can be particularly important for relatively long<br />

structures, whereas the third factor can be important even for short structures with supports located on<br />

soils layers that are different from one another.<br />

<strong>The</strong> total length of the bridge is 552.7 m. Furthermore soil investigation of the site prior to<br />

construction have shown that the soil type over the western third of the bridge may be categorized as<br />

soft, while the soil for the rest of the bridge is in the category of medium firm. Considering the length<br />

and the variation in the soil type it was decided to include all three sources of deficiencies in the study.<br />

No site-specific seismic studies and detailed soil investigations have been conducted for the viaduct.<br />

As a result it was felt that the study of the incoherency effects would have to be approximate. A<br />

reduced linear model of the viaduct was used to determine the trends in the response relative to the<br />

response for uniform ground motions. <strong>The</strong> structure was treated as a planar system subjected to inplane<br />

ground motion loading in the longitudinal direction of the bridge. Details of the study are<br />

presented by Yang et al. 2002.<br />

Figure 4 shows the elevation of the reduced model of the viaduct. To develop the reduced model,<br />

each segment of the structure between adjacent hinges was modeled by a single mass supported on a<br />

column that had the same lateral stiffness as that of the bridge segment. Bridge hinges were modeled<br />

as pin connections. <strong>The</strong> coherency function was adopted from a previous study that was based on<br />

random processes principles developed by Yang and Chen (2000). Eight acceleration records were<br />

generated at bedrock with slightly different peaks in a range of 0,38 to 0.41g. <strong>The</strong>se motions were<br />

used to determine the displacement and acceleration histories at the ground level of the soil column<br />

under each support of the reduced model. To study the effect of wave passage, a wave velocity of 600<br />

m/sec. was used for the entire viaduct even though the soil varied from the west to the east. This was<br />

done because blow counts of the western and eastern parts, although placed the soils in different<br />

categories, were not drastically different.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect of different combinations of incoherency parameters were studied by focusing on the<br />

"column" base shears in the reduced model. An artificial acceleration record generated for a<br />

magnitude 7.4 at 40 km distance from the epicenter was used. To establish a benchmark, the model<br />

was analyzed for two uniform ground motions obtained by combining the bedrock motion near the<br />

middle of the viaduct one with amplification due to soft soil and the other with amplification with<br />

medium firm soil. <strong>The</strong> average of the two responses was used as the representative response for<br />

uniform ground motion.


574<br />

<strong>The</strong> ratios of base shear at different column base nodes for the non-uniform and uniform motions are<br />

shown in Fig. 5. In case 3 only the effect of site characteristics was included. Cases 4 and 5 included<br />

the wave passage effect in addition to the local site effect, one for waves traveling from east to west<br />

and the other traveling in the opposite direction. In case 6 the combination of local site effect and<br />

geometric mcoherency was included. Finally cases 7 and 8 accounted for all three parameters, for<br />

waves traveling from east to west and west to east, respectively. A ratio exceeding one on the vertical<br />

axis indicates an increase in force due to incoherent ground motion. It can be seen in Fig. 5 that cases<br />

3,4 and 5 were not generally critical. However, for cases 6 to 8 the base shear ratios exceeded 1 in<br />

man}* piers. <strong>The</strong> maximum ratio occurred in Pier 7 with ratios being 1.59, 1.72, and 1.84 for case 6, 7,<br />

and 8, respectively. It was concluded that the inclusion of all three mcoherency effects can be the<br />

most critical combination and even eliminating the wave passage effect (case 6) led to force ratios that<br />

exceeded one in one-half of the piers.<br />

STUDY OF SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS<br />

Superelastic shape memory alloys (SMAs) have found their applications in medical equipment,<br />

aerospace, and dentistry. <strong>The</strong>ir ability to deform well into the yielded state and recover their entire<br />

deformation upon unloading makes them potentially attractive for earthquake resistant design. <strong>The</strong><br />

application of SMA rods for bridge seismic restrainers has been explored by DesRoches (2001). As<br />

part of the study of the retrofit alternative for the Las Vegas Downtown Viaducts, the performance of<br />

SMA rods made from Nickel and Titanium (NiTi) used in combination with concrete is being<br />

investigated. Basic characteristics of SMAs in providing concrete confinement and in acting as<br />

longitudinal reinforcement are determined in concrete cubes and beams subjected to cyclic loads.<br />

Figure 6 shows a flag-shape stress strain relationship that is characteristic response of superelastic<br />

SMA materials. A series of 150x150x150 mm concrete cubes have been cast with central pipes in two<br />

directions for the passage of SMA rods. Figure 7 shows the compression load setup for one of the<br />

cubes. <strong>The</strong> SMA rods are anchored by nuts and stiff steel bearing plates to confine the concrete. <strong>The</strong><br />

rods in the setup shown are of 13 mm diameter with a nominal upper yield plateau of 420 MPa and a<br />

lower yield plateau of 140 MPa.<br />

Only a limited number of cubes have been tested thus far. Figure 8 shows a sample result for cyclic<br />

loading of a cube confined with two 13-mm SMA rods. <strong>The</strong> unconfmed cube strength was 35.9 MPa.<br />

It can be seen that confinement increased the compressive strength to 52.2 MPa, an increase of 45<br />

percent. Using Mander's confined concrete model and the measured confinement stress, the estimated<br />

compresshe strength would be 55.6 MPa. <strong>The</strong> ultimate strain capacity of the confined concrete was<br />

near 0.029, which is approximately 10 times the nominal failure strain of unconfmed concrete. More<br />

tests are being conducted to compare the permanent damage experienced by SMA-rod confined cubes<br />

and cubes confined by steel rods and to develop confinement models as necessary.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Several aspects of the behavior and retrofit of a major viaduct are being studied. <strong>The</strong> results of the<br />

study of the incoherent ground motion effects suggest that internal forces can be significantly higher


575<br />

than those based on uniform ground motion when all three parameters, namely, geometric incoherency,<br />

soil characteristics under different supports, and the wave passage effects are included. <strong>The</strong> increase<br />

in the force even for earthquakes with peak acceleration of approximately 0.4g exceeded 80 percent.<br />

<strong>The</strong> exploratory study of superelastic shape memory alloys as a possible means to improve<br />

confinement of the substandard bridge elements has led to promising results. Both the compressive<br />

strength and ductility of concrete considerably increased as a result of the confinement.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

<strong>The</strong> study reported in this article is funded by the US Federal Highway Administration and the<br />

Nevada Department of Transportation. Several graduate students have been working on different<br />

aspects of the project and they are thanked for their dedication. <strong>The</strong> students are: Chadi Ayoub, Dong<br />

Gang, Nathan Johnson, Suresh Kandasamy, and Hasan Mohammad.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Su, F., J. Anderson, S. Ni, and Y. Zeng, (1998) "Effect of Site Amplification and Basin Response on<br />

Strong Motion in Las Vegas, Nevada," <strong>Earthquake</strong> Spectra, V. 14, N. 2, pp. 357-376.<br />

Yang, Q., M. Saiidi, H. Wang, and A. Itani, (2002) "Influence of Ground Motion Incoherency on<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> Response of Multi-Support Structures," Civil <strong>Engineering</strong> Department, <strong>University</strong> of<br />

Nevada, Reno, Report No. CCEER 02-2.<br />

Yang Q., and Y. Chen, (2000) "A Practical Coherency Model for Spatially Varying Ground Motions"<br />

Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> and Mechanics, 9(2), pp. 141-152.<br />

DesRoches, R., (2001) "Application of Shape Memory Alloys in Seismic Rehabilitation of Bridges,"<br />

NCHRP-IDEA 29, Annual Progress Report, Transportation <strong>Research</strong> Board, Washington, DC.<br />

Elevation View<br />

Fig. 1 Plan and elevation views of the viaduct


576<br />

SECTION A-A<br />

COLUMN DETAIL AT<br />

TOP OF PEDESTAL<br />

Fig. 2 Typical column cross section in single-column piers (1 in. =25.4 mm)<br />

Fig. 3 Typical column cross section in multi-column piers (1 in.= 25.4 mm)


577<br />

1-*<br />

67.06m ^^ 7757m ^ ^ 73.15m ^ 73.15m 71.17m7401m<br />

«•—•" •— —" ^" •"• *• -« *• • *•• » «• I*-<br />

1^1 A, V M2 b M 3 A. M4i A. MS ±, MA A. M L. Mgj<br />

C<br />

9<br />

» ~ •<br />

10 11 12<br />

•<br />

"13 1"4<br />

9<br />

715<br />

~<br />

IB<br />

m<br />

IT<br />

~ •<br />

18 79 20<br />

*<br />

21<br />

-<br />

22<br />

m<br />

23<br />

il Pj H 2 |Pj H 2 iP 2 H 3 P 3 H 3 Pj HsjPj H 3^j H 4 !F<br />

1<br />

L —<br />

2 ' 3 . " 4 5 1 6. 7. 8i<br />

i<br />

Soft soil (Type<br />

1 . «<br />

M<br />

j<br />

I I 3<br />

1<br />

C<br />

- 1 J - 1 - ' 'i ' •<br />

1 • 1 " ! • ! . * "' j .<br />

"] . - a. 1 • - ' 1 1 '<br />

Medium soil (Type ) ^ -<br />

'; j J - . " i •"<br />

: I I J "I *!<br />

i - .M - " ;<br />

j i • .<br />

^-c^^-. i . * •' i r - a ,. j^^, __<br />

Bed rock<br />

J<br />

.<br />

Fig. 4 Reduced model of the viaduct<br />

F/F t<br />

5<br />

• Case3 • Case4 ^ CaseS<br />

T Case6 * Case + CaseS<br />

0.8 -<br />

2.0-<br />

1.6-<br />

1.2-<br />

0.4-<br />

+<br />

¥<br />

+<br />

• 1 A<br />

t . . . . ,<br />

* . A<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Node number<br />

Fig. 5 Effect of incoherent ground motion on base shears


578<br />

Stress<br />

Strain<br />

Fig. 6 Superelastic behavior of SMA rods<br />

Fig. 7 Cubes confined by SMA rods<br />

0.01 0.015 0.02<br />

Vertical Strain<br />

Fig. 8 Venical stress strain relationship for SMA confined cube


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 579<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

NEW SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHHMS COMBINING<br />

MONTE CALRO FILTER AND GENETIC ALGORITHM<br />

T. Sato ', Sakanoue 2 and I. Yoshida 3<br />

1


580<br />

Genetic Algorithm(GA) and the MCF by Higuchi[3], we developed an algorithm implementing an GA<br />

operation into the MCF to speed up convergence of the MCF to identify the non-stationary structural<br />

parameters.<br />

STATISTICAL FILTER THEORIES<br />

State Space Model<br />

<strong>The</strong> general form of state space model, with non-linear and non-Gaussian characteristics, can be<br />

described by the following state transfer equation and observation equation.<br />

X* = F(*/i-l>Wj (1)<br />

in which \ ;J is the state vector, w, 7 the system noise, z /7 the observation vector, H the observation<br />

matnx, v the observation noise vector.<br />

Kalman Filter(KF)<br />

<strong>The</strong> KF is easily derived if the state transfer and observation equation are linear, and noises are<br />

Gaussian. <strong>The</strong> linear state transfer and observation equation are described as follows:<br />

in which<br />

„_, is the state transfer matrix, r n _, the state transfer matnx for system noise.<br />

<strong>The</strong> KF algorithm is defined by the following steps:<br />

1. Define an initial value of the state vector x 0 and its covanance matrix P 0 as well as the<br />

co variance matrix of the observation noise R,, .<br />

2. Calculate the pre-estimation value of the state vector x /7 and its covanance matrix M ;J from<br />

*„= „-!*„-! +r n _,w, 7 _ 1 (5)<br />

M fl =„_,„_,


581<br />

K /7 = P n H n R- 1 = MX(H, 7 MX+R, 7 )~' (8)<br />

5. Calculate the most likely-hood(or post-) estimation value of the state vector x by<br />

** =x lf +K ll (z /f -H fl xJ " (9)<br />

6. Return to 2. after renewal of the time step.<br />

Monte Carlo Filter(MCF)<br />

<strong>The</strong> MCF can be applied even if the state space model is non-linear and non-Gaussian. In the MCF, the<br />

probabilistic nature of the state vector is described by many realizations instead of first and second<br />

moments as defined in the KF. However, in the MCF, the observation noise vector v is assumed to be<br />

uniquely determined by a function G differentiate with respect to the observation vector z n as<br />

follows:<br />

\ n =//"'(z /7 ,xJ = G(z /7 ,x /7 ) (10)<br />

<strong>The</strong> MCF is an algorithm to identify the conditional distribution function p(\ n |Z,,)of the state<br />

variable x n when observation values Z = {r, •• = n }up to the present time n are given. <strong>The</strong>n, we define<br />

P(\ n |Z,,_,) as the predictor distribution and p(\ n \ Z /7 ) as the filter distribution. In this paper, each<br />

probability density function of each distnbution is approximated by finite realizations composed of<br />

m particles as follows:<br />

<strong>The</strong> MCF algorithm is defined by the following steps.<br />

1. Generate a initial set (j = l~m) of random number f^ obeying an arbitrary probability<br />

density function p Q (f 0 )<br />

2. Repeat the following steps until the end of time steps.<br />

(a) Generate a set of random number w|/' obeying probability density function q(w n )<br />

(b) Compute a state transfer of particles by<br />

(c) Compute the likelihood value of each particle by<br />

a ( n j] = r(G(z /7 ,b J/')) —— (14)<br />

n<br />

(d) Generate f ( n ]) by resampling of b (/) (A)<br />

fu) = b a» with probability -^— (15)<br />

(e) Return to (a) Yor (n


582<br />

IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHM<br />

State Transfer and Observation Equations<br />

For simplicity we formulate the system transfer and observation equations for a single degree of<br />

freedom system. <strong>The</strong> equation of motion for a structural system is<br />

in which, m is the mass, h the damping ratio,<br />

y 4- 2hcoy + co 2 y = -X g (16)<br />

co the natural circular frequency , and y is the<br />

relative displacement to the ground. X^ is the ground acceleration. And the state vector is chosen as<br />

follows:<br />

x= [y y h co} T (17)<br />

<strong>The</strong> state transfer equation is expressed by a nonlinear equation as follows:<br />

in which, g is a vector composed of four components<br />

gCx^Xf+W, (18)<br />

g={-2h(ay-(D 2 y-X 9 y 0 0) r (19)<br />

When the relative velocity and displacement are observed, the observation equation is defined as<br />

follows:<br />

n f f n (2Q)<br />

in which, H is given by<br />

H<br />

o<br />

O i o o<br />

(21)<br />

Identification Algorithm Using Hybrid Filter<br />

In Hybrid Filter, the state vector in the MCF is divided into two parts , in which one represents the<br />

responses of the structural system, \ a and the other represents the structural dynamic parameters,<br />

\p as follows:<br />

**={^v} r (22)<br />

Xp = [h,a)\ T (23)<br />

<strong>The</strong> distribution of x a is assumed to be Gaussian and identified by the KF algorithm. <strong>The</strong><br />

distrubution of \ fl is expressed by many particles and identified by the MCF algorithm.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hybrid filter algorithm is defined by the following steps:<br />

1 . Define an initial value of the state vector x ff 0 and its covariance matrix P 0 .


583<br />

2. Generate an initial set of random number \ ( f = [h ( Q'\a ( Q n \ obeying probability density function<br />

3. Repeat the following steps until the end of time steps.<br />

(a) Generate a set of random number wj/ 1 obeying probability density function<br />

(b) Compute the pre-estimation value of state vector \ p by<br />

(c) Calculate the pre-estimation value of the state vector x a by<br />

(24)<br />

=<br />

(25)<br />

y<br />

(d) Lineanzmg Eq.(25) to apply the KF algorithm. <strong>The</strong> state transfer matrix<br />

~ Jl-2A B ( -"S' J) A/ -co ( f~\<br />

*•-{ A, , i<br />


584<br />

the simulated structural response. <strong>The</strong> observed data of all nodes are used for the identification. In this<br />

case, we asuume Gaussian distrubution for the dynamic parameters whose mean is true value and<br />

standard deviation is 0.01. It is because that the aim of this example is to detect damages of structures.<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of particles is 5000.<br />

Figure 1. <strong>The</strong> sketch of the non-stationary structural system<br />

<strong>The</strong> identified time histories of the damping ratio and natural circular frequency at node 1 are shown in<br />

Fig.2. In these algonthm, probability density functions of dynamic parameters are identified as a set of<br />

particles. We therefore expressed the identified results as the time series-histogram of particles. Fig.2<br />

shows that the identified value of the natural circular frequency converge to the true value for both<br />

cases using MCF and Hybnd filter. But that of the damping ratio tend to converge to the true value<br />

only for the case using Hybrid filter.<br />

Time step<br />

Time step<br />

0005<br />

0015<br />

damping ratio<br />

002 0025 0.03<br />

(a) normal MCF<br />

natural circular frequency<br />

Time step<br />

Time step<br />

001<br />

0.015<br />

damping ratio<br />

002<br />

0.025 Q,03-<br />

(b) Hybrid Filter<br />

2 4<br />

natural circular frequency<br />

Figure 2. Comparison of the time histories of the identified dynamic<br />

parameters at node 1 by normal MCF and that by Hybrid Filter


585<br />

A FILTER COMBINIG GA AND MCF<br />

GA-MCF<br />

A study to investigate the relationships between the Genetic Algorithm and the Monte Cairo Filter has been<br />

conducted. Both the MCF and the GA is the algorithm to reconstruct a set of realizations representing the state<br />

variables from an initial set of random numbers.<br />

In the MCF, the particles representing the state vector are always generated obeying the conditional probability<br />

density function that is influenced by past-information of the structural response. <strong>The</strong> MCF has, therefore, a<br />

function to decrease the influence of past observation noises. On the contrary, it can not perform high tracking<br />

ability for an abrupt change of dynamic characteristics of structural systems.<br />

We developed an algorithm introducing the mutation procedure of Genetic Algorithm into the MCF to speed up<br />

convergence for identifying non-stationary structural parameters and called GA-MCF. <strong>The</strong> proposed method is<br />

defined by the following steps:<br />

1. Generate a initial set (j=l^/77)of the state vector f^1<br />

function p Q (\)<br />

obeying an arbitrary probability density<br />

2. Repeat the following steps until the end of time steps.<br />

(a) Generate a set of random number wj/ 1 obeying probability density function q(w,,)<br />

(b) Compute prediction partcles using the state transfer eaution<br />

bJ/UFff^X/') (32)<br />

(c) Compute the likelihood value of each particles by<br />

m (^, , 11 K ^ 5G<br />

(33)<br />

(d) Choose k particles from a set of particles obtained by Eq.(32) and construct a new set of the<br />

prediction particles B = (b! 7 ' J --b^} in which each particles has a large likelihood value.<br />

(e) Generate new filter particles by mutating the filter particles which generate a set of the<br />

prediction particles B and compute again prediction particles B' using Eq.(32)<br />

(f) Comparing the likelihood value of each component of B' with that of B When the<br />

likelihood value of a component in B' is larger than that of a component in B, the particle<br />

in B is replaced by the particle in B'.<br />

(g) Generate f,| ;)<br />

by the resampling of b (y)<br />

(h) Return to (a) until the end of observation data.<br />

Numerical examples<br />

To demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed GA-MCF filter to identify the non-stationary structural<br />

parameters. We simulate a set of observed structural responses of which dynamic parameters varies at ten<br />

seconds(1000 steps) after the earthquake motion input to the structure. <strong>The</strong> number of particles is 5000.In


586<br />

GA-MCF, the number of particles set used for mutation is 100 Fig 3 shows comparison of the time histories of<br />

the identified circular frequency of the first layer obtained by the normal MCF and that by GA-MCF <strong>The</strong><br />

identified result obtained by the GA-MCF has higher tracking ability for the non-stationary change of structural<br />

parameters than that by normal MCF Fig 4 shows the number of particles that are replaced by new particles<br />

generated in step (e) of GA-MCF algorithm This means that mutations in GA work well to track abrupt change<br />

of structural parameters <strong>The</strong> number of renewal particles is large especially when the structural system becomes<br />

non-stationarv<br />

2 4 s<br />

natural circular frequency<br />

{a) normal MCF<br />

^ GA-MCF<br />

Figure 3 Companson of the time histories of the identified natural circular<br />

frequency at node 1 by normal MCF and that by GA-MCF<br />

Figure 4 <strong>The</strong> number of the renewal particles m GA-MCF<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

We developed two new system identification algorithms, one is a hybrid algorithm combining the Kalman Filter<br />

and the Monte Carlo Filter <strong>The</strong> other is an algorithm taking into account the Genetic Algorithm to speed up<br />

convergence of the Monte Carlo Filter to identify non-stationary structural systems<br />

REFERENCE<br />

[ 1 ] Kitagawa, Genshiro {1996) Monte Carlo filter and smoother for non-Gaussian nonlinear state space models Journal of<br />

Computational and Graphical Statistics Vol 5, No I 1 -25<br />

[2] Yoshida, Ikumasa (2001) Damage Detection Using Monte Carlo Filter Based on Non-Gaussian Noises 8 th<br />

International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability June<br />

[3] Higuchu Tomoyuki. (1997) Monte Carlo filter using the Genetic algorithm operators Journal of Statistical<br />

Computation and Simula!ion, Vol 59, No 1 1-23


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 587<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

REAL-TIME STRUCTURAL MONITORING SYSTEM<br />

A. M. Sereci 1 , D. Radulescu 1 and C. Radulescu 1<br />

^igitexx Data Systems, Inc.<br />

Pasadena, California<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper presents the state-of-the-art technology already implemented in real-time structural<br />

monitoring and initial damage assessment approach. <strong>The</strong> short history of earthquake data recording is<br />

intended to provide a general view of the main possibilities of different recorders in time. <strong>The</strong> core of<br />

the paper focuses on how today's modern systems can provide the tools to do much more than simple<br />

event recording. <strong>The</strong> real examples are provided using already installed systems to show that today's<br />

technical advances combined with powerful data acquisition, analysis and broadcasting software is a<br />

perfect match for real-time structural monitoring studies. Today, affordable fast communication (DSL,<br />

Tl, T3), well established protocols (TCP/IP, UDP, FTP) combined with COTS (Commercially Of <strong>The</strong><br />

Shelf) data acquisition hardware, and powerful software packages make this domain accessible.<br />

1. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong>s were studied for a long time. Due to their complexity, three major sciences emerged.<br />

Seismology, the science that studies the characteristics of the earthquake as natural phenomena;<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> Seismology, the science that studies the wave characteristics at a given site; and<br />

<strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong>, the science that studies the response of a structure during an earthquake.<br />

Different recording equipment has been developed for each of these sciences to provide accurate data<br />

required as an input for different analysis methods. Sometime, an instrument has been developed to<br />

cover more than one science. <strong>The</strong> time proved that this approach had a cost/benefit flaw for at least<br />

one science. Also, the location of the instrument requires site selection parameters, which are different<br />

from one science to another. For example, a seismological station requires a quiet site, direct contact<br />

with the bedrock or as close as possible, grid type distribution, high resolution etc. <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

Seismology requires grid type installation in high-populated areas combined with geological survey to<br />

describe the near surface stratification, local amplification phenomena, propagation, attenuation and<br />

frequency content at a given site. Finally, the <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> science requires structural


588<br />

instrumentation to monitor and determine the structural response during an earthquake and also to<br />

determine the damage level based on advanced data analysis. This application requires especially:<br />

High number of channel count<br />

Different type of sensors (accelerometers, pressure, temperature, relative displacement, etc)<br />

Relatively high dynamic range (min. 96dB)<br />

Compact system hardware<br />

Redundancy<br />

Easy configurable real-time data analysis<br />

Full-remote control<br />

Powerful data broadcasting<br />

Real-time design limits exceedance analysis<br />

A short historical evolution of the instrumentation dedicated to structural monitoring is presented<br />

below (see Table 1.1)<br />

TABLE 1.1<br />

EVOLUTION OF STRUCTURAL RESPONSE MONITORING EQUIPMENT<br />

Type<br />

Analog<br />

Analog<br />

Analog<br />

Analog<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Digital<br />

Recording<br />

Media<br />

Photographic Film<br />

Photographic Film<br />

FMTape<br />

FMTape<br />

Memory<br />

Memory<br />

Memory<br />

Memory<br />

Sundisk<br />

Sundisk<br />

Sundisk<br />

Sundisk<br />

PC-Based<br />

PC-based<br />

Number of<br />

Channels<br />

3<br />

13<br />

3<br />

12<br />

3<br />

18<br />

24<br />

3<br />

3<br />

24<br />

3, 6, or 12<br />

18<br />

32, 64, or 128<br />

32, or 64<br />

Dynamic range<br />

fdBl<br />

-60<br />

-60<br />


589<br />

This paper focuses on the last two systems presented in Table 1.1. <strong>The</strong>se systems are considered stateof-the-art<br />

and here are some of their specific characteristics that make them distinguish from the<br />

others.<br />

2. DIGITAL SYSTEMS FOR STRUCTURAL MONITORING<br />

Today, the structural monitoring can be achieved using only digital systems. <strong>The</strong>se systems have<br />

some specific technical characteristics that must cover the needs of such monitoring/analysis. Next we<br />

will analyze those characteristics that are important for this application.<br />

2.1 Resolution<br />

<strong>The</strong> resolution of the AID converter is an important parameter for digital systems. With respect to this<br />

parameter the question is:<br />

Is 16-bit (120dB<br />

In this case, the peak voltage generated by the sensor for the above theoretical acceleration is:<br />

a=1256uV


590<br />

If we compare this peak value with the LSB for the 16-bit A/D with gain 100 and full-scale +/-0.1V<br />

we can reach the conclusion that there is enough resolution for this type of measurements.<br />

Figure 2.1.1 shows the time series and the corresponding FFT for a signal generated by a Force<br />

Balance type accelerometer with a dynamic range >120dB and a full-scale of +/-lg, recorded with 16-<br />

bit resolution, gain 100, full-scale 4-/-0.1V. <strong>The</strong> sensor was located in Pasadena, on a quiet street, at<br />

the ground level, and oriented horizontal.<br />

Figure 2.1.2 shows a detail of the time series to underline the resolution of the signal<br />

In both figures time series traces from top down are:<br />

Ground acceleration in um/s"<br />

Integrated Velocity in um/s<br />

Reference velocity in um/s provided by a seismometer with T n = 3 sec and S= lOOV/m/s.<br />

2OOO OOOOOO -"<br />

TOOO OOOOOO -j<br />

O OOOOOO<br />

-1OOO OOOOOQ<br />

sooooo<br />

OOOOOO<br />

sooooo<br />

OOOOOO<br />

sooooo<br />

OOOOOO<br />

Time series Acceleration Velocity Reference Velocity<br />

V'<br />

Mtyb^^<br />

I J I I<br />

V^v^^^<br />

3 OOOOOOJ<br />

FFTforRef VotandVtf<br />

SOO OOOOOO -<br />

3T5 OOOOOO -<br />

FFT for Acceleration<br />

•A OOOOOO -j<br />

3 OOOOOO 4<br />

a oooooo<br />

2 SO OOOOOO -<br />

125000000-<br />

0000000-,"<br />

oo rs iso aas soo yr 3<br />

0 OOOOOO _pxjv "w«<br />

OO TS TSO ZSO 35 O<br />

Noise signal recorded at ground level<br />

Figure 2.1.1 City noise recorded at ground level


591<br />

Time series Acceleration, Velocity, Reference Velocity<br />

2OOO OOOOOO -<br />

1000 OOOOOO -<br />

o oooooo -<br />

-1OOO OOOOOO -<br />

ooo<br />

25<br />

12<br />

O OOOQOO •<br />

-12 SOOOOO -<br />

25 OOOOOO<br />

OOOOOO<br />

SOOOOO -<br />

•4 OOOOOO -<br />

FFTfbrRef VdandVel<br />

SOO OOOOOO -<br />

FFT for Acceleration<br />

2 OOOQOO _<br />

1 000000-<br />

0 OOOOOO -<br />

4 OOOOOO -<br />

3 OOOOOO -<br />

2 OOOOOO -<br />

1 OOOOOO -<br />

O OOOOOO-<br />

375 OOOOOO-<br />

25O OOOOOO-<br />

12S OOOOOO -<br />

O OOOOOO-<br />

Noise signal recorded at ground level<br />

Figure 2. 1, 2 Detailed time series to underline the resolution of the signal.<br />

<strong>The</strong> conclusion of this test is that a 16-bit A/D resolution with gain 1 00 and full-scale set to +/-0.1V is<br />

suitable for ambient vibration measurements. If the gain is set to 2, which correspond to +/-5V fullscale,<br />

then the system is suitable for strong motion type measurements. <strong>The</strong> difference between this<br />

settings and the use of a 2 1 -bit or greater resolution A/D is the overall dynamic range. In other words,<br />

the 16-bit system requires different settings for different type of measurements while the 21 -bit or<br />

greater system covers both applications with one setting. Of course the difference in price is<br />

significant and can become a cost/benefit factor.<br />

2.2 Number of Channels<br />

Detailed structural monitoring requires a high number of channels. <strong>The</strong> last two systems (See Table<br />

1.1) have standard 64 channels and optional 128


592<br />

2.3 Sampling rate<br />

Structural monitoring requires a relatively high sampling rate. A minimum of 100 sps (samples per<br />

second) per channel is required. Again, the last two systems (See Table 1.1) provide up to 500 sps per<br />

channel<br />

2.4 Data broadcasting<br />

For real-time monitoring, the data needs to be broadcasted to multiple remote stations. Each station<br />

should have software capable of recording, analyzing, and comparing data with different userspecified<br />

design limits and take different actions based on exceedance criteria.<br />

3. ENGINEERING NEEDS<br />

From engineers point of view the structural monitoring has different aspects. This is because different<br />

specialties are interested in:<br />

• Overall structural response<br />

• Structural elements behavior<br />

• Structural elements fatigue (long term monitoring combined with statistical analysis)<br />

• Soil-structure interaction<br />

This information is provided by different type of sensors. <strong>The</strong> system must be able to accept signals<br />

from all sensors, group them on categories, distribute remotely the signals to each user based on the<br />

field of interest, and provide the specific analysis tools for each user. All these functions are to be<br />

handled by the Central recording system (called server) and distributed in real-time to remote stations<br />

(called clients).<br />

Again, the last two systems (See Table 1.1) cover all these requirements.<br />

4. TURN-KEY SYSTEM<br />

Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. developed two systems (one with 16-bit and the second with 24-bit<br />

resolution) capable of performing ail functions described above. <strong>The</strong> system has been developed to<br />

use COTS components. Digitexx developed the software package following the concept presented in<br />

Figure 4.1.


593<br />

Server<br />

Data<br />

Acquisition<br />

t<br />

Sensors<br />

Client Client Client<br />

System Controlled Full<br />

Status Access Access<br />

Figure 4.1 System concept<br />

<strong>The</strong> left side in this figure shows the 'server'. <strong>The</strong> server consists of the hardware (Data acquisition<br />

and sensors) and the server software. This package is responsible for acquiring data, recording events<br />

based on trigger threshold exceedance, and distribute the data to multiple users 'clients' in -real-time<br />

over the internet using TCP/IP protocol and publish subscribe mechanism.<br />

Once you have the right to connect to the system, you will activate the 'client software'. This software<br />

package is highly customized to meet end-user requirements. It can perform real-time data analysis,<br />

data recording using event-driven triggers, on demand, and user-defined scheduled recording.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se two pictures show a<br />

building in San Francisco (left)<br />

instrumented with Digitexx<br />

Real Time Monitoring System<br />

Model RTMS-2001RM (right).<br />

<strong>The</strong> system has 31 channels<br />

connected to uniaxial<br />

accelerometers distributed at<br />

different floors. <strong>The</strong> server has<br />

a DSL connection to the<br />

Internet.


594<br />

Any remote station that has the subscribe permission can connect to the server using the client software.<br />

This software is highly customized and it can perform intensive real-time data analysis. Below is an<br />

example of client software.<br />

e<br />

Picture 4.1 Client software screen shot<br />

This client software computes in real-time acceleration, velocity, and displacement. It also computes the<br />

response spectrum for a user-selected channel. Functions as on-demand and scheduled data recording can<br />

be seen on the same picture.<br />

5. FINAL REMARKS<br />

<strong>The</strong> characteristics which make the systems/concept presented in this paper state-of-the-art solution are:<br />

• High number of channel count<br />

• Reliable data acquisition and real-time data broadcasting<br />

• Simultaneous real-time connection of multiple clients<br />

• Real-time intensive data analysis focused on initial and cumulative damage assessment<br />

• Long term structural health monitoring<br />

• Exports data directly to standard commercial analysis software packages<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors acknowledge the scientific input received from Prof. W.D. Iwan (Caltech), Prof. C. E.<br />

Ventura (UBC), Prof. M. D. Trifunac (USC), and Dr. M. Celebi (USGS).


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 595<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

APPLYING E-MONITORING INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR<br />

HIGHWAY BRIDGES POST-EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE<br />

EVALUATIONS AND WARNINGS<br />

Guan-Chyun Shiah 1 , Sheng-Fuh Perng 2<br />

'Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, National Kaoshiung <strong>University</strong> of Applied Science<br />

Department of Civil <strong>Engineering</strong>, National Kaoshiung <strong>University</strong> of Applied Science<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

An e-Monitonng information system is Remote Monitoring using Wire-less technology on the Internet<br />

in which it utilizes the modern technology such as global positioning system (GPS), geographical<br />

information system (CIS), wireless communication technology (WCT), and mobile displaying system<br />

(MDS). This integrated system requires Pre-earthquake installations on the expansion joints, bridge<br />

piers, and bridge footings. When certain scale earthquake motion are detected by strong-motion<br />

instruments, using wireless or internet transmitting network to send out the signal to transportation<br />

controlling system for feasible signal control actions. During the earthquake loads period, the bridge<br />

structural crack monitoring system should according to its preset crack signal warning thresholds to<br />

decide on emitting warning signals to bridge authorities or disaster rescue teams in the nearby.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of a remote earthquake supervisory control system for highway bridges is to let highway<br />

transportation authority staff can immediately obtain the bridges' post-earthquake damage information<br />

and handle a remote system in a easier way. A remote E-monitoring control system, in general, consists<br />

of supervisory units and a central control unit. Traditional systems use private network to guarantee the<br />

quality and performance for the communication among all units i it always results in too many cables<br />

and great costs. ( Ref. 1 ) Also, the maintenance quality of the whole system affect the performance and<br />

the reliability of the system. To overcome the above drawbacks, an e-Monitoring earthquake information<br />

system in which combined GPS, GIS, WCT and MDS is proposed in this study. <strong>The</strong> proposed e-<br />

monitoring system consists of a central control unit, a supervisory controller with a gateway to internet<br />

or PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Networks). <strong>The</strong> central control unit issues controlling message to


596<br />

or receives environmental information from the supervisory controller gateway by internet, wireless or<br />

PSTN. <strong>The</strong> supervisory controller gateway gathers post-earthquake bridge damage information on<br />

which came from the supervisory controller unit through blue-tooth communication module, optical<br />

fibers or cables, and sends them to the central control units. <strong>The</strong> systematic framework of the proposed<br />

e-monitoring system for bridge post-earthquake evaluations and warnings is shown in Fig. 2.<br />

Bridge Damage Lessons Learned From 921 Ji-Ji <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

It is helpful to gather the historical bridges post-earthquake damage information for constructing a<br />

remote earthquake supervisory control system for future highway bridges post-earthquake damage<br />

evaluations and warnings. <strong>The</strong>re are several bridges serious damages were reported after the Ji-Ji<br />

earthquake that took place in Taiwan on Sep. 21, 1999. After conducting field investigations on about<br />

990 bridges in Taichung, Changhua, Yunlin and Nantou counties since the 921 earthquake, the research<br />

team found that nearly 200 bridges had sustained damage. "At least 25 bridges have been classified as<br />

'extensively damaged' and nearly 70 percent of them were built prior to 1987, when older regulations<br />

governing earthquake-resistant construction was in force. Bridges within 10km of the Chelungpu fault<br />

were more vulnerable than elsewhere during 921 earthquake. Severe ground motion accompanied by a<br />

sudden slip of the fault on Sept. 21 led to a number of different types of damage, including bridge<br />

collapses, abutment tilt, pier breaks and crossbeam displacement. Scientists said that since it is hard for<br />

engineers to avoid building bridges right over fault lines, which are scattered over across the country,<br />

and that a better way to prevent disasters would be to build stronger bridges meeting stricter regulations.<br />

Conclusions drawn from scientists and engineers suggest reclassifying the existing four earthquakeresistant<br />

construction categories into two stricter categories.<br />

In 2000, the construction regulations were revised, the highest earthquake-resistant coefficients would<br />

be higher than the past threshold - which is 0.33G horizontal ground acceleration. Areas near the<br />

Chelungpu fault certainly would be included in a new "Category 1," which would stand for the highest of<br />

the two new proposed categories. Investigators found that different bridge designs resulted in different<br />

kinds of damage, and therefore adopting innovative ways to build bridges should be considered in the<br />

future. In the past, engineers tended to widen existing bridges without strengthening supporting piers<br />

first, and me method resulted in disasters during 921 quake. <strong>The</strong> reason for the collapse of bridges built<br />

by the Highway Bureau during the quake is because it adopted the simply supported beam system of<br />

construction. This type of design is vulnerable during quakes. If engineers were to adopt a better system,<br />

the continuous-beam system would be best for future bridge construction projects.


597<br />

<strong>The</strong> Necessity of Highway Bridge Instrumented With <strong>Earthquake</strong> Early Warning And Monitoring<br />

System<br />

Early detection of highway bridges' earthquake damage or degradation prior to local failure can prevent<br />

"runaway" catastrophic failure of the bridge system. In the event of an earthquake, the rapid detection of<br />

catastrophic failure of a strategic bridge can allow early and effective response by highway officials in<br />

rerouting traffic and avoiding an otherwise difficult situation. <strong>The</strong> large physical sizes of the bridges<br />

necessitate an extensive array of different<br />

sensors and appropriate technologies for data<br />

acquisition/reduction for rational health monitoring applications. <strong>The</strong> bridge earthquake damage<br />

monitoring systems should also be designed for a long life under severe environmental conditions. <strong>The</strong><br />

system should be able to automatically detect, locate and assess structural damage anywhere within the<br />

bridge system, and to communicate the status (alerting) to responsible authorities. At its simplest<br />

application, the threshold exceed anywhere in the bridge is monitored and an alarm is provided if pre-set<br />

threshold levels have been exceeded. This alarm may be used to automatically divert the traffic if it<br />

indicates damage due to earthquake, explosion or impact.<br />

THE PROPOSED AUTOMATED EARTHQUAKE E-MONITORING SYSTEM IN TAIWAN<br />

Taiwan Central Weather Bureau (CWB) can now routinely obtain earthquake information in one minute<br />

after the occurrence of an earthquake using this new algorithm. In order to take full advantage of this<br />

capability, four automatic information broadcast media, namely, E-mail, World Wide Web, FTP server<br />

and pager system, have been configured to receive and transmit automatically the earthquake<br />

information from the CWB seismic monitoring system.(Ref 1). See Fig. 2. This new automatic<br />

earthquake information Warning and Monitoring system will enable the CWB to disseminate<br />

information about felt earthquakes even more quickly and widely than its current practice through fax<br />

and paper reports.<br />

Lessons Learned from Early <strong>Earthquake</strong> Warning And Health Monitoring Systems<br />

In all types of bridge health monitoring system, the early earthquake warning and monitoring system has<br />

a basic framework consisting of (1) a broad spectrum of monitoring techniques, (2) a mechanism for<br />

collating and evaluating this disparate data, (3) a routine for converting the relevant data into a<br />

prediction or a forecast of an impending hazard, and (4) a system for issuing the relevant warning to<br />

those at risk.


598<br />

Comparisons of Proposed E-Monitoring System with <strong>The</strong> Other Bridge Monitoring Tech<br />

Currently, there are various bridge health monitoring systems named "Traditional<br />

Wired & Client Server Type (TWCS ) , Metal Time Domain Reflectometry (MTDR ) , Optical Time<br />

Domain Reflectometry (OTDR) , and Bluetooth Supervisory Wired type.(Ref 2) Each of the above<br />

mentioned bridge monitoring system has its limitations and drawbacks which can be summarized as the<br />

followmgs:<br />

Twcs<br />

• Many wires are need for various sensors, simple client-server type connections.<br />

* Costly installation and maintenance.<br />

Mtdr<br />

Signal decay increased with the sensors' distance.<br />

Vulnerable for corrosion. And, Electro-Magnetic interference<br />

Otdr<br />

* Costly installation and maintenance. Also, Poor mechanics behavior<br />

• Signal loss hardly count. And, Not yet reach practical application stage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposed E-monitoring system for highway bridge expansion joint have the following Merit<br />

features for Many Taiwan existing simple supported bridges<br />

•Expansion joint movements<br />

•Measured Concrete and Ambient Temperatures, increasing the accuracy of data<br />

•Battery power system<br />

•Preset time interval measurements and transfers the data daily using Wire-less technology from any<br />

remote site to monitoring station<br />

•Simple to install and starts data logger within 1 hour. Fast installation response<br />

•Developed for Tropical Climate in which meet the industrial standards.


599<br />

Communication<br />

Information Manioulating<br />

• Satellite / \ • Decision<br />

• Wireless / <strong>Earthquake</strong> \ • GIS<br />

• Wired / Induced \ * Cnsis Management<br />

/ Bridge V Public Relation<br />

( Damage )<br />

Affilate facilities<br />

\<br />

\<br />

Response<br />

Ppntor<br />

/<br />

Image Proceg^ing<br />

• UPS \<br />

• LCD display<br />

• Automatic Power \<br />

/ Image Transmitting<br />

Supply<br />

• Net-Meeting<br />

• Seismic Isolator<br />

FIG 1 AN INTEGRATED EARTHQUAKE INDUCED BRIDGE DAMAGE RESPONSE SYSTEM


600<br />

LCD display <strong>Earthquake</strong> Warning<br />

load<br />

Bndgpspctor<br />

I "~* - " - /- L<br />

- Ti F '<br />

^oad<br />

lu -r^<br />

Rich s Scale 3U J-<br />

a<br />

Acceierometer<br />

y<br />

-—- .—, Electrolytic<br />

Vibrating Wire Sensors Tilt sensor<br />

tL<br />

v Data loggen with<br />

0 *- W reless Modem<br />

^ 0120-400 m<br />

i y ,<br />

trasm tt nq Distance<br />

> " Server<br />

Crack: sensor<br />

Inclir ometer<br />

Supervisory Modem<br />

i /) gateway<br />

Smart Me^nitonng W i r e l e s s ^<br />

RTQ<br />

communication S m s Alarm<br />

Tech GPRSM essa ge for<br />

(fatjre)<br />

Aijthoring<br />

*-*-^. — ^<br />

/ 1<br />

Y GSM(current] (<br />

^., ṙ.. -<br />

j^ ^<<br />

^SPRS<br />

Bridge Health<br />

Monitoring System<br />

WWW<br />

PDA<br />

Central Weathe<br />

Bareau(CWB)<br />

r<br />

Internet<br />

\<br />

Early <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

Warning System for —<br />

Bridge Damage<br />

Microwave<br />

Internet<br />

5Ar.eiv«r<br />

r,._<br />

•**==<br />

J server<br />

f W reless<br />

t microwave<br />

^<br />

Taiwan strong<br />

Radio<br />

Monon Net<br />

0<br />

_L Serial Communication<br />

I3H —<br />

Wireless<br />

Modem<br />

L qjmca^ion 3 axis<br />

sensors seismic Accelerator


601<br />

TABLE 1<br />

THE COMPARISONS OF VARIOUS BRIDGE MONITORING SYSTEMS<br />

Technology<br />

Types<br />

Traditional<br />

Wired &<br />

Client Server<br />

type<br />

MTDR<br />

OTDR<br />

Blue-tooth<br />

Supervisory<br />

Wired sys<br />

E-momtonng<br />

With SMS<br />

alarm<br />

Economic Maintenance Reliability<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2<br />

2<br />

Data<br />

Completeness<br />

Remark Weighting scores from 1-5 represents the best to the worst<br />

3<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

Accuracy Easy Total Rank<br />

Installed<br />

3<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

2<br />

1<br />

19<br />

18<br />

20<br />

13<br />

10<br />

4<br />

3<br />

5<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Reference<br />

1 Yih-Mm Wu 1 Tzay Chyn Shin 2 Yi-Ben Tsar 3 Kai-Wen Kuo 4 On the establishment of anautomatic earthquake<br />

information broadcast system in Taiwan<br />

2 Yea Chy Chang Kao-Shing Hwang el <strong>The</strong> Implementation of Bluetooth Technology on Supervisory Control<br />

and Data Acquisition System MS <strong>The</strong>sis National Chung Cheng <strong>University</strong> June 2001<br />

3 Dowding, C H andFC Huang 1994 Early Detection of Rock Movement with Time Domain<br />

RQflectQmetty, Journal of Geotechnical <strong>Engineering</strong>, ASCE, v 120, No 8, pp 1413-1427<br />

4 James C I Dooge, Lessons learned from early warning systems What do they have in common<br />

5 Peter L FuhrDryrerR Huston (1993) Stress Monitoring of Concrete Using Embedded optical Fiber Sensors<br />

Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> Vol 119 No 7 pp 22622269


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong> 603<br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

SMART HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM<br />

OF A PRESTRESSED BOX GIRDER BRIDGE<br />

Xuan Wang,<br />

Ming L. Wang<br />

Dept. of Civil and Material <strong>Engineering</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor St<br />

Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

With increasing technology, many non-destructive testing methods have been developed for the health<br />

assessment of bridges. <strong>The</strong>se methods range from the simplest ones that cover regular inspections and<br />

visual controlling to highly sophisticated methods that require expensive equipment and highly skilled<br />

personnel. This paper presents experiences gained from the health assessment of a pre-stressed boxgirder<br />

bridge. Dynamic and static methods, including two load tests, were used in evaluating the<br />

bridge's health. From these experiences, a new Smart Health Monitoring System was developed and<br />

applied in the real-time health monitoring of the Box-girder Bridge. Because this new system can preprocess<br />

all the raw data from each sensor, it improves largely the efficiency of data analysis. Also, it's<br />

able to supply the real-time health status of the bridge and all the statistical data on-line.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> rating of damage severity should be based on how much the damage influences safety of the<br />

structure. Besides defects that directly threaten structural safety, there are damages that do not hinder<br />

proper performance of the bridge under normal traffic conditions but they decrease its safety margin,<br />

which means that the structure does not have required reliability. In such cases, possible overloading<br />

like traffic congestion may lead to the collapse. <strong>The</strong>re are also some damages associated with<br />

durability that accelerate the deterioration processes in structural materials and finally may cause<br />

serious failure. An example is cracking in prestressed concrete structures exposed to severe weather<br />

conditions that may lead to the corrosion of prestressing reinforcement, reduction of steel area and<br />

finally rupture, e.g. sudden collapse of Bickton Meadows footbridge in Hampshire, UK in 1967 caused<br />

by corrosion of prestressing tendons. Traditional monitoring method is to measure the responses of a<br />

bridge periodly. It can't find and respond to any emergency happened on the bridge. And the raw data<br />

collected from various kinds of sensors is too much to be analyzed easily. Hence, engineers need a<br />

kind of new smart health monitoring system that can show the real-time health status of bridges. Also,<br />

the new system can preprocess all the raw data and calculate daily, weekly, monthly or annual<br />

statistical data.


604<br />

<strong>The</strong> Smart Monitoring System (SMS) was developed by the Bridge <strong>Research</strong> Center at the <strong>University</strong><br />

of Illinois for IDOT under the title Development and Installation of a Permanent Health Monitoring<br />

Station for the South-Bound Kishwaukee Bridge. This paper describes the following aspects of the<br />

monitoring system that were developed as a part of this project: capabilities, sensors and locations, and<br />

analysis. <strong>The</strong> analysis of data obtained from the installed system reveals the health condition of the<br />

bridge between December 2001 to March 2002. <strong>The</strong> system consists of a rack-mount UNIX-based PC<br />

(top rack) which controls a multi-function data acquisition card and modem. Signal conditioning<br />

modules and anti-aliasing filters are contained in a separate enclosure (lower rack). <strong>The</strong> diagram of<br />

SMS was shown in Figure 1.<br />

Bridge Computer Station<br />

Software Functions<br />

1 Process<br />

J Diagnostic<br />

Algorithms<br />

Hardware Functions<br />

, Acquisition<br />

•decimated data stream<br />

updated hourly<br />

•inferred bridge status<br />

updated daily<br />

UIC Computer Station<br />

Hardware Functions<br />

Software Functions<br />

temperature<br />

iocal strains<br />

crack displacements<br />

acceleration (freq.)<br />

video snapshots<br />

IDOT<br />

Computer<br />

Station<br />

• system status<br />

• video frames<br />

• daily monitoring status<br />

• low-bandwidth data<br />

available in spreadsheet<br />

format<br />

Wired<br />

Ethernet<br />

Standard<br />

Windows<br />

PC<br />

Fig. 1 Schematic Diagram of Smart Monitoring System<br />

<strong>The</strong> objectives of Smart Monitoring System (SMS) are to monitor and evaluate the structural health<br />

status for Kishwaukee River Bridge, and to provide information for facilitating the inspection and<br />

maintenance activities. <strong>The</strong> SMS can collect and preprocess the raw data of structural responses such<br />

as strain, crack opening displacement and acceleration, in order to:<br />

1) Characterize the temperature influence on strain, crack opening displacement, and acceleration.<br />

2) Characterize the traffic-related inputs and responses.<br />

3) Establish the global frequencies of the structure.<br />

4) Provide the information on presence and extent of crack growth and state of shear reinforcement in<br />

the web.<br />

5) Provide the global information useful for FEM model updating (important for damage sensitivity).<br />

6) Locate regions that require more in-depth scrutiny through diagnostic tests and determine<br />

additional locations that require continuous monitoring.<br />

7) Provide information that will aid the owner and maintenance authority to make rational decisions<br />

when assigning the maintenance and repair budget.<br />

2 DESCRIPTION OF THE BRIDGE AND SENSOR LOCATIONS


605<br />

Kishwaukee River Bridge consists of two independent structures: the southbound bridge and<br />

northbound bridge. <strong>The</strong>se two bridges were made by post-tensioning of single-cell precast segments.<br />

<strong>The</strong> deck of the bridge has five spans. <strong>The</strong> overall length of the deck is 334 m (1096 ft). <strong>The</strong> deck was<br />

built by the balanced cantilever method. Each cantilever consisted of seventeen segments 2150 mm<br />

(7'- 3 / 5 ") long and one pier segment 1067 mm (3'-6") long. Cast-in-place closures have a length of 984<br />

mm (3'-2 3 / 4 "). Figure 2 shows the longitudinal layout of the Kishwaukee Southbound Bridge with four<br />

piers. <strong>The</strong>re are four kinds of sensors installed in the Kishwaukee Bridge, as shown in Figure 3:<br />

1) Electrical Resistance Strain Gages; 2) LVDT sensors (Linear Vibration Displacement Transducer);<br />

3) <strong>The</strong>rmocouples; 4) Accelerometers.<br />

76.2 76.2 76.2 51.82<br />

"1<br />

orth<br />

mtme<br />

nt<br />

n<br />

1-1<br />

Pier SB4<br />

Pier SB3<br />

n<br />

Pier SB2 Jl Soutl<br />

abutn<br />

Pier SB 1<br />

Fig.2 Longitudinal layout of the Kishwaukee Bridge (Units: foot)<br />

North Pier 4<br />

Abutment<br />

'<br />

Pier 3<br />

SMS<br />

Workstation<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Strain gage<br />

•»-<br />

• LVDT 03 gage -<br />

..;...:<br />

J<br />

i«tn<br />

0 Accelerometer<br />

Pier 2<br />

• <strong>The</strong>rmocouple<br />

,<br />

Fieri<br />

Fig. 3 Sensor Location in Kishwaukee Southbound Bridge (Plain view from top)<br />

u South<br />

Abutment<br />

3 DATA ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL MONITORING SYSTEM<br />

Figure 4 shows the flow chart of data analysis of Structural Monitoring System (SMS). As presented in<br />

the chart, the raw data will be divided into four parts according to the fixed channels: 1) Strain; 2)<br />

Crack opening displacement; 3) Acceleration; 4) Temperature. For every part, the real-time data can be


606<br />

shown on-line by the software DACview of SMS. SMS can store the data from the four kinds of<br />

sensors for one year. And based on the real-time data, the preprocessing program installed in the<br />

workstation of the bridge can separate the strain and displacement data into two parts as either the<br />

traffic effect or the temperature effect. <strong>The</strong> acceleration and temperature data also will be preprocessed<br />

for the purpose of efficiency. Moreover, SMS can automatically analyze and calculate the daily,<br />

weekly, monthly and annual statistical data.<br />

i<br />

j<br />

Bending Stttfness<br />

Max/Mm strains<br />

Strain |<br />

FEM Updating<br />

Number ot trucks<br />

Real-time Display<br />

/*<br />

Young s Modulus of concrete Truck Speed<br />

Data stored tor tracking (one vear)<br />

Compare to preset values<br />

Truck Weight<br />

Data pre processed for efficiency<br />

Warning for abrupt change<br />

v earlv monthly weekiv and daily summary Traffic Effect<br />

Temperature Effect<br />

Max/Mm strains<br />

Strain/degree change( "C )<br />

Real time Display<br />

Stress in Shear Reinforcement<br />

Data stored for tracking (one year)<br />

Max/Mm crack opening displacement<br />

Shear Stiffness<br />

Number of trucks<br />

Data pre processed tor efficiency<br />

Compare to preset values<br />

Yearly monthly, weekly and daily summary<br />

Truck Weight<br />

Acceleration<br />

Real-time Display<br />

Data stored r or tracking (one year)<br />

Traffic Effect<br />

Temperature Effect<br />

Warning for abrupt change<br />

Max/Mm crack opening displacement<br />

Displacement/degree change<br />

Data pre processed tor efficiency<br />

Max/Mm G level<br />

Yearly monthly weekly and daily summary<br />

Frequency Analysis (the first 5 frequencies)<br />

'—i*j Temperature j<br />

Compare to preset frequency at prescribed temperature<br />

Red-time Display<br />

Warning tor unusual change of acceleration (Traffic lam or accident)<br />

Data stored for tracking (one year)<br />

Data pre processed for efficiency<br />

Yearly monthly weekly and daily summary<br />

Max/Mm temperature<br />

Inside/outside difference<br />

Outside/concrete difference<br />

Warning tor unusual change of temperature<br />

Fig. 4 Flow Chart of Smart Monitoring System<br />

3.1 Strain Data Analysis<br />

Due to the traffic and temperature effect, strain data were preprocessed and separated into two parts, as<br />

shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Based on the relationship between strain and truck weight, we found<br />

that a strain record over 4 microstrain represents a truck passing through the location of the strain gage.<br />

In order to verify the threshold of strain, the actual number of trucks and the time when the trucks<br />

passed the bridge were recorded on March 30, 2002 from 2:00 pm to 3.00 pm. Figure 7 shows the<br />

comparison between these two records of truck numbers. In addition, it can be observed that the onthe-spot<br />

record matches the result from the strain analysis. Since strain gages are located on SB2-N16<br />

and SB2-S16 and the distance between these two locations is known to be 225.6 ft, the speeds of<br />

trucks can be obtained by calculating the time difference between two strain peaks at these two<br />

locations. Figure 8 presented the record of truck speed in March 2002. As observed in the figure, one<br />

truck's speed is 51.3 m/h. According to the load test in 2000, the maximum positive strain in the web<br />

of the segment SB2-S16 of Kishwaukee Bridge, under two three-axles trucks each weighing 96,000<br />

Ibs, turned out to be 24 microstrain. And the maximum was 16.92 at the same location. Tablet shows<br />

the comparison of monthly maximum strain and curvature with the result of Load Test. As shown in


607<br />

the table, the monthly maximum values are close to the result of Load Test But none of them exceeds<br />

the value of Load Test.<br />

Maximum Strain is 43 7 microstram<br />

Minimum Strain is - 40 8 microstram<br />

""Maximum SfrairTis 24 microstrairTforlhelbad test'<br />

<strong>The</strong> temperature difference is 18 °C in this month<br />

"ZJ^r"<br />

2 3 4 5 6 7 8\ 9 10 11 12 13. 14 15 16 17/18 T-EL.20 21/22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29<br />

JIhe-Cban.ge-of stcain-iS-5 min<br />

temperature change of 1 °C<br />

Time (day)<br />

Fig. 5 Monthly Record of Strain on the East Web of SB2-S16<br />

due to Temperature Effect (March, 2002)<br />

Maximum positive strain was 20 4 mtcrostram during the month<br />

<strong>The</strong> positive strain of over 18 microstram was recorded 20 times<br />

Maximum positive strain was 24 microstram for the load test<br />

Fig. 6 Monthly Record of Maximum Positive Strain on the East Web of<br />

SB2-S16 due to Traffic Loads (recorded every 5 minutes in March, 2002)


608<br />

One truck count is based on the recorded strain value<br />

of over 4 microstram<br />

Q Actual Counting<br />

Record - 80 trucks<br />

D Monitoring System<br />

Record - 82 trucks<br />

Time (minutes)<br />

Fig. 7 Comparison of Number of Trucks based on Actual & Monitoring Records<br />

StratnofSB2-S16<br />

Maximum 102<br />

Minimum-15 2<br />

Strain on SB2-N16<br />

Maximum 162<br />

Minimum -20 9<br />

(Beginning Time Mar 4, 2002 10 40 00 pm)<br />

]<br />

Distance 225 6 ft, Time 3 s, Truck Speed 51 3 m/h<br />

Time (second)<br />

Fig. 8 Time Record of a Truck Passing SB2-N16 & SB2-S16 on Mar 4<br />

Dec<br />

Jan<br />

Feb<br />

Mar<br />

Table 1 Comparison of MontMy Max. Strain and Curvature with Load Test Result<br />

Maximum Strain Maximum Strain Maximum Curvature Maximum Curvature<br />

Monthly<br />

In Load Test Monthly in Load Test<br />

(microstrain) (microstrain)<br />

20.5<br />

24.0<br />

14.39<br />

16.92<br />

18.3<br />

24.0<br />

12.84<br />

16.92<br />

19.6<br />

24.0<br />

13.75<br />

16.92<br />

20.4<br />

24.0<br />

14.32<br />

16.92


609<br />

3.2 L VDTData Analysis<br />

LVDT sensor installed on the web of segment SB2-N4 can measure crack opening displacement.<br />

Based on the record, we can analyze if the growth of shear crack on the web has been controlled.<br />

Traffic loads and temperature change both have a significant effect on the change of crack opening<br />

displacement. Hence, the original LVDT data was separated into two parts. According to the load test<br />

hi 2000, the maximum crack opening displacement on the web of SB2-S16 was 0.0020 inch. Table 2<br />

shows the comparison between monthly maximum values and the load test result on the web of<br />

Segment SB2-S16.<br />

Dec<br />

Jan<br />

Feb<br />

Mar<br />

Table 2 Comparison of Monthly Max. Crack Opening Displacement with Load Test<br />

Maximum Change of Maximum Change of Crack<br />

Crack Width Monthly Width due to Load Test<br />

(inch)<br />

(inch)<br />

0.0021<br />

0.0020<br />

0.0022<br />

0.0020<br />

0.0023<br />

0.0020<br />

0.0022<br />

0.0020<br />

Maximum Truck<br />

Weight in Load Test<br />

(LBS)<br />

96000 ( x2 )<br />

96000 ( x2 ) i<br />

96000 ( x2 )<br />

96000 ( x2 )<br />

<strong>The</strong> above data shows that since December 2001, the monthly maximum values of crack opening<br />

displacement on the web of SB2-N4 have been over the change of crack width measured in the static<br />

load test of 2000. It seems that the shear cracks on the webs are still the main problem for the health of<br />

this bridge. <strong>The</strong> vibration caused by high-speed heavy trucks has an effect on the growth of crack<br />

width.<br />

3.3 Acceleration Data Analysis<br />

Based on the record, it's clear that the vertical acceleration is the largest and the longitudinal<br />

acceleration is the smallest. This is due to the fact that heavy trucks excite the bridge mainly in the<br />

vertical direction. Because the longitudinal motion excited by the traffic load was too small, the signal<br />

corresponding to this direction was very difficult to capture. <strong>The</strong> comparison of vertical natural<br />

frequencies from 1986 to 2002 was shown in Table 3. Higher frequencies were measured in the winter<br />

while the lowest were measured in May. <strong>The</strong> modal frequencies of this bridge didn't seem to change a<br />

lot over these years. Those measurements are consistent with the effect of reduced temperature on the<br />

modulus of elasticity of concrete.<br />

Table 3 Comparison of vertical natural frequencies<br />

Frequency<br />

'Measured by CTL<br />

*'Measured by UIC<br />

Smart Monitoring System<br />

FEM result<br />

l.mode<br />

1.61-1.65<br />

1.60-1.65<br />

1.62<br />

1.650<br />

2.mode<br />

2.06-2.08<br />

2.05-2.10<br />

2.07<br />

2.132<br />

3 .mode<br />

2.64-2.66<br />

2.65-2.70<br />

2.68<br />

2.767<br />

4.mode<br />

2.95<br />

2.94<br />

3.010<br />

1} Measurements made by Construction Technology Laboratory in 1986<br />

* } Measurements made by Bridge <strong>Research</strong> Center of UIC in 2000<br />

5. mode<br />

3.90-3.98<br />

3.95-4.00<br />

3.93<br />

4.032<br />

5 CONCLUSIONS


610<br />

1) According to the SMS records due to traffic effects, the maximum values of positive strain on the<br />

webs of SB2-N16 and SB2-S16 are close to the maximum strain (24 microstrain) in the load test of<br />

2000. Moreover, the monthly maximum crack opening displacements have exceeded the maximum<br />

value (0.002 in) measured in the load test since December 2001. Although the flexural stiffness of the<br />

bridge is still unchanged, some measures should be taken to control the growth of shear cracks on the<br />

web within a reasonable limit. It is recommended to impose a restriction to the speed and weight of<br />

trucks going across the bridge. An automated camera system could be added in our Structural<br />

Monitoring System to photograph any vehicle surpassing the threshold of speed or weight that would<br />

cause harm to the bridge.<br />

2} ) Temperature change has a significant effect on the change of strain and crack opening<br />

displacement. Based on the records of Structural Monitoring System, the maximum change of strain<br />

due to temperature effect is from - 40.8 to 43.7. <strong>The</strong> corresponding temperature change is 18 °C. So<br />

the average change of strain is about 5 microstrain with the temperature change of 1 °C. Similarly, the<br />

change of crack opening displacement is about 0.0005 in for every temperature change of 1°C.<br />

3) <strong>The</strong> dynamic properties are almost the same as the results measured in 2000. <strong>The</strong> modal frequencies<br />

of this bridge seem to have stayed relatively constant over these years.<br />

4) <strong>The</strong> advanced monitoring system can automatically pick up and analyze the data and transfer the<br />

processed data from the bridge through a specified telephone line. It can count the number of trucks,<br />

calculate their speed and record the exact time upon which they pass the sensor location. It's quite<br />

useful for monitoring the traffic on the bridge in real time. Using this system as a basis, the next step<br />

will be to build a new traffic warning system. By embedding a decision-making system in the sensory<br />

system, this new system will be able to automatically react to the strain or acceleration signal<br />

exceeding the predefined threshold. For example, in the case of a heavy traffic jam or any severe<br />

accident happening on the bridge, it can send an on-line warning to the Department of Transportation<br />

immediately.<br />

References<br />

1. D. J. Ewins, (1985) Modal Testing: <strong>The</strong>ory and Practice, John Wiley, New York.<br />

2. R. Shepherd and A. W. Charleson, (1971) "Experimental Determination of the dynamic Properties<br />

of a Bridge Substructure", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 61,1529-1548.<br />

3. R. Kohoutek, (1993) "Tests on Bridge over Talbragar River at Dubbo", Proceedings of the 11 th<br />

International Modal Analysis Conference, Kissimmee, FL., 1168-1174.<br />

4. P. K. Lee, D. Ho and H. W. Chung, (1987) "Static and Dynamic Tests of concrete Bridge", ASCE<br />

Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, 113, 61-73.<br />

5. C.R. Farrar, W. E. Baker and T .M. Bell, (June 1994) "Dynamic Characterization and Damage<br />

Detection in the 1-40 Bridge over Rio Grande", <strong>Research</strong> report Los Alamos National Laboratory,<br />

LA-12767-MS.<br />

6. Wang, M. L, F. Xu, and George M. Lloyd, (July 2000) Results and Implications of the Damage<br />

Index Method Applied to a Multi-Span Continuous Segmental Prestressed Concrete Bridge,<br />

International Journal of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong> and Mechanics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 37-52.<br />

7. Wang M. L., and D. Satpathi, (Sept. 1997) Damage Detection of a Model Bridge Using Modal<br />

Testing, Structural Health Monitoring—Current Status and Perspective, Technomic Publishing Co.<br />

Edited by F. K. Chang, pp. 589-602.<br />

8. Wang, MX., F. Xu and G. Lloyd, (Aug. 2000) Health Assessment of a Post-tensioned Concrete<br />

Bridge, In proceedings of ASCE's 2000 Structure Congress, Philadelphia, PA.


Proceedings of the International Conference on<br />

Advances and New Challenges in <strong>Earthquake</strong><br />

<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, Hong Kong Volume<br />

*''<br />

SIGNATURE RECOGNITION OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE: DATA<br />

ANALYSIS AND MODEL-BASED VALIDATION FOR<br />

DESTRUCTIVE FIELD TESTS<br />

Ray Ruichong Zhang 1 , Matt MacRostie*, and Y.L. Xu 2<br />

1 Division of <strong>Engineering</strong>, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA<br />

2 Department of Structural <strong>Engineering</strong>, Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong>, Hong Kong<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This study uses the Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT), a method for nonlinear, nonstationary data<br />

processing, to analyze recordings of destructive vibration tests of substructures in Trinity River Relief<br />

(TRR) Bridge in Texas in its intact, minor- and severe-damage stages. It shows that the HHT method<br />

can identify the natural frequencies of the structure from the mixed frequency content in a recording<br />

that also contains the time-dependent excitation and noise frequencies, and then to quantify the<br />

downshift of frequencies for damaged structure relative to frequencies in the non-damaged structure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above assertion is also validated by an ANSYS model-based analysis.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> most common damage of bridge piers and abutments is caused by scour from floods, which cannot<br />

be visualized nor calculated by normal hydraulic and geotechnical analysis procedures. Using<br />

vibration measurements might aid in the detection of the damage. Without appropriate data analysis<br />

methods, however, it will not identify minor damage. For example, conventional (e.g., Fourier-based)<br />

data processing/analysis techniques may yield distorted, indirect, or incomplete information about<br />

vibration motion that is inherently nonstationary and also likely the result of a nonlinear dynamic<br />

process. This will mislead the consequent use of the data for damage signature recognition.<br />

Because of its ability to faithfully characterize nonlinear (time-varying amplitude and frequency) and<br />

nonstationary data, the HHT (Huang et al. 1998) can provide an alternative tool for data analysis and<br />

subsequent applications to damage-signature recognition. <strong>The</strong> HHT method builds on Empirical Mode<br />

Decomposition (EMD) and Hilbert Spectral Analysis (HSA). Based on the local characteristic time<br />

scale of any complicated time series, the EMD decomposes the data set into a finite, often small<br />

number of intrinsic mode functions (IMF) that admit a well-behaved Hilbert transform. <strong>The</strong> HSA of<br />

each IMF then defines instantaneous or time-dependent frequencies of the data that have physical<br />

meaning, unlike the HSA of the original data (Huang et al., 1998). <strong>The</strong> EMD, HSA, or their<br />

combination referred to as the HHT typically helps recover useful information from the data sets under


investigation and subsequently improve understanding of the underlying physical process. In this<br />

study, we use the HHT to characterize the structural damage from the recordings and model-based<br />

simulated data of controlled field vibration tests of two substructures in Trinity River Relief (TRR)<br />

Bridge in Texas in its intact, minor- and severe-damage stages.<br />

612<br />

HHT ANALYSIS OF DESTRUCTIVE VIBRATION TESTING DATA<br />

<strong>The</strong> bndge for the case study is the Trinity River Relief (TRR) Bridge, located on old US Hwy 90 on<br />

the west side of Liberty, Texas. <strong>The</strong> three stages of the bent shown in Fig. 1 is in order:<br />

(1) Intact stage: the column with sensor 15 was not broken and soil around the pile had the same<br />

height as the soil around the pile with sensor 13.<br />

(2) Minor-damage stage: the pile with sensor 15 was not broken, but soil around the pile was<br />

excavated, which was simulated for flood-induced minor scour with partial loss of load capacity.<br />

(3) Severe-damage stage: the pile with sensor 15 was broken with the steel bars left only and soil<br />

around the pile was excavated, which could be regarded as equivalent damage of the column due to<br />

earthquake-induced liquefaction or severe scour with complete loss of load capacity.<br />

Figs. 2a and 2b show respectively the time histories of vertical excitation force and its corresponding<br />

vertical vibration response at sensor 15 with the structure in intact stage. Both time histories are<br />

highly nonstationary, with the frequency sweeping almost linearly from 4 Hz at 0.3 s to 72 Hz at 5.7 s,<br />

referred to as chirp frequency for later use. <strong>The</strong>refore, their Fourier spectra are unable to provide<br />

faithful time-dependent frequency content of the data.<br />

Fig. 3 a shows that the excitation contains a dominant energy with the chirp frequency increasing with<br />

time from 4 Hz at 0.3 s to 72 Hz at 5.7 s. <strong>The</strong> excitation also has energy at other frequencies such as<br />

high frequencies ranging from 20 to 50 Hz between 0.4 and l.ls shown in Fig. 3a, which can be<br />

visually verified from the excitation time history shown in Fig. 2a.<br />

It is known that the frequency content of the vibration response should contain primarily both the<br />

driving frequencies and the natural frequencies of the structure. This is confirmed by Fig. 3b.<br />

Specifically, Fig. 3b shows the energy with a primary frequency content linearly increasing with time,<br />

which is the signature of excitation with the chirp frequency. By comparing with Fig. 3 a, the signature<br />

of excitation in Fig. 3b can also be found at frequency band of 20-30 Hz between 0.4-0.8 s and of 0-30<br />

Hz between 4.7-5.7 s, among others. In addition to the above excitation-inherited energy, Fig. 3b also<br />

illustrates energy concentration in the frequency range of 10-20 Hz (others in 20-75 Hz) between 1-2 s.<br />

This is not inherent from the excitation in Fig. 3 a but rather the energy contributed from the structural<br />

vibration modes at a couple of lower (higher) natural frequencies, or the signature of the structure.<br />

This, together with the subsequent interpretation, will be verified later by a model-based analysis. <strong>The</strong><br />

aforementioned vibration with 10-20 Hz at 1-2 s is likely excited by the force with a low-frequency<br />

band in 4-15 Hz at 0.4-1 s (see Figs. 2a and 3a,b). As time goes on (say 2-3 s), the vibration at the<br />

low-frequency band dies down quickly due to damping, or is too small to be shown in the figure in<br />

comparison with strong excitation-inherited energy. Since the first mode of vertical vibration motion<br />

should be dominant in the low-frequency band, the above observation and assertion suggests that the<br />

fundamental natural frequency can be found from the Hilbert amplitude spectrum by identifying the<br />

corresponding dominant structural energy, particularly around 1-2 s.<br />

Fig. 4a enlarges the Hilbert amplitude spectrum in Fig. 3b. Except the excitation energy at chirp<br />

frequency and at high-frequency band of 15-30 Hz between 0.5-0.7 s, all the other energy<br />

concentration shown in Fig. 4a is attributed primarily by the structure itself. We now focus on the


structural response energy with frequency up to 15 Hz during 1-2 s. <strong>The</strong> structural response energy<br />

below roughly 12 Hz (light lines or dots) is much less than that above 12 Hz (dark lines or dots). <strong>The</strong><br />

response energy is generated likely by the force with the chirp frequency during 0.4-1 s and with the<br />

frequency band in 5-15 Hz at around 1+ s in Fig. 3a. If the fundamental natural frequency falls in the<br />

driving frequency range of 5-15 Hz, the response energy at the fundamental natural frequency should<br />

be much stronger than that at frequency lower, but not necessarily stronger than that at frequency<br />

higher since there exist second and higher natural frequencies and mixed frequencies between driving<br />

and natural frequencies. Fig. 4a suggests that the fundamental natural frequency is around 12 Hz.<br />

Fig. 4b shows the Hilbert amplitude spectrum of vibration response at sensor 15 with the bent in<br />

minor-damage stage. Besides the energy inherited from the excitation force such as at chirpy<br />

frequency, the response energy during 1-2 s has lowered its dominant frequency to 5 Hz at about 1.4 s.<br />

<strong>The</strong> observed 5 Hz in the minor-damage stage could be related to the mixed natural frequencies of the<br />

bent and pile, since the vibration at sensor 15 should reflect the dynamic characteristics of both the<br />

whole bent and the local member. <strong>The</strong> bent with excavated soil, i.e., the bent in the minor-damage<br />

stage, reduces the stiffness of the pile and thus the fundamental natural frequencies of the bent and<br />

pile. This is the signature of local damage in the recordings, which is not sensitively picked up by the<br />

Fourier data analysis.<br />

Such an explanation can be further strengthened from Fig. 4c, which shows the Hilbert amplitude<br />

spectrum of vibration response at sensor 15 with the bent in severe-damage stage. As seen in the<br />

figure, the dominant frequency corresponding to the structural energy has decreased to 3 Hz at 1.7 s.<br />

As a comparison for damage-signature recognition from recordings that are collected at sensor 15 close<br />

to the damage location, Figs. 5a-c show the Hilbert amplitude spectra of vibration data at sensor 13<br />

away from the damage location for the bent in intact, minor- and severe-damage stages respectively.<br />

Fig. 5 a shows that the dominant frequency to structural vibration energy is around 13 Hz at 2 s, slightly<br />

higher than 12 Hz identified from Fig. 4a, which could be caused by noise and various uncertainties<br />

introduced when recorded at sensors 13 and 15. Figs. 5b and 5c show the dominant structural<br />

vibration energy with lowest frequency of 10 Hz at 2 and 2.2 s respectively. Since sensor 13 is<br />

removed from the damage location, the vibration characteristics at sensor 13 will retain primarily the<br />

dynamic features of whole bent, which likely do not change significantly due to the local damage at the<br />

column with sensor 15. Accordingly, it is understood for the small change observed in the identified<br />

frequency associated with the dominant structural vibration energy for the bent in three-different stages<br />

in Figs. 5a-c.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above analysis suggests that signature of structural vibration in terms of natural frequencies of the<br />

whole bent and/or local members can be well distinguished from the driving frequency content by the<br />

HHT analysis of recordings, which is sensitive to the local damage if the recordings are collected near<br />

the damage location.<br />

613<br />

MODEL-BASED VALIDATION<br />

To verify the observation and assertion in the last chapter and thus to improve our understanding of the<br />

HHT-based damage characterization, we performed the HHT analysis of simulated vibration data with<br />

ANSYS-based two-dimensional (2D) finite-element-method (FEM) models for the bent 12 hi its intact<br />

and severe-damage stages. Fig. 6 shows the ANSYS-based 2D FEM model for the bent 12 in intact<br />

stage, which was built on design specifications and pertinent information by Sanayei and Santini


614<br />

(1998). In this study, we also extended the 2D model from the bent in the intact stage to that hi the<br />

severe-damage stage by releasing boundary restriction at the ground end of pile 15 in Fig. 6.<br />

Table 1 shows the first ten undamped natural frequencies of the bent in its intact and severe-damage<br />

stages, in which the first to the third natural frequencies in vertical directions and their reduction<br />

percentage in its severe damage are also indicated. To simulate the damping effects, Rayleigh<br />

damping was used in modeling, i.e., [C] = a 0 [M] + a : [K] where M, C and K are the matrices of mass,<br />

damping and stiffness, 0 0 and a } are the constant coefficients. We used the same force in Fig. 2a to<br />

excite the 2D model hi Fig. 6 and obtained vibration response at nodes 53 and 37 in Fig. 6 that<br />

correspond to the same locations in sensors 15 and 13 in Fig. 1, respectively.<br />

Fig. 7a shows the Hilbert amplitude spectrum of the response at node 37 of the bent in intact stage with<br />

no damping, i.e., a 0 = a } = d = 0. <strong>The</strong> response energy focuses at frequency band with its center<br />

primarily around 12.0, 19.7, and 69.2 Hz that are respectively the fust three natural frequencies in<br />

vertical direction in Table 1. This can be further clarified in marginal amplitude spectrum in Fig. 7b.<br />

Without damping, the bent is fully excited at the natural frequencies. <strong>The</strong>refore, the vibration energy<br />

at natural frequencies is typically higher than the excitation-inherited energy at chirp frequency.<br />

Consequently, the energy inherited from the excitation at chirp frequency is not clearly shown in Fig.<br />

7a, except the strong portion with frequency band from 40-70 Hz at 3.5-5 s. With the damping, the<br />

relath e intensity of the energy from the structure and excitation should be changed, which can be seen<br />

from the Hilbert amplitude spectra in Figs. 7c,d with a Q = a : = d =0.00198 and 0.05305, respectively.<br />

Comparing Fig. 7c with Figs. 3a and noticing the fundamental natural frequency of the bent being<br />

11.98 Hz, we can conclude that the excitation-inherited energy in Fig. 7c is associated with chirp<br />

frequency and other frequencies such as high-frequency band in 10-30 Hz during 0.3-0.8 s, and that the<br />

vibration energy is associated with frequency band around 10-13 Hz during 1-1.6 s. <strong>The</strong> damped<br />

fundamental natural frequency in vertical direction is identified in Fig. 7c around 11.5 Hz, smaller than<br />

the undamped one with 11.98 Hz in Table 1 which is consistent with the vibration theories. Due to the<br />

large damping used and strong excitation at chirp frequency, the vibration energy at natural<br />

frequencies are greatly suppressed and the excitation energy is inherited, in comparison with the<br />

undamping case (see Figs. 7a,c). This phenomenon can be further clarified by Fig. 7d with a large<br />

damping. Fig. 7d shows that the vibration energy at 10 Hz primarily at 1.4 s. Since the damping here<br />

is extremely high, the damped fundamental natural frequency is greatly downshifted from undamped<br />

one at 11.98 Hz to the current one at 10 Hz. It should be noted here that it is with the damping<br />

d=0,05305 that the ANSYS model in Fig. 6 generated time history responses that are similar to those<br />

in recordings such as Fig. 2b. This implies that real damping of bent 12 in the vertical direction is very<br />

high.<br />

Depicted in Figs. 8a,b are respectively the Hilbert amplitude spectra of the response at nodes 37 and<br />

53 of the bent in severe-damage stage with a Q =a l =d =003979. Fig. 8b shows the vibration energy<br />

concentrates at 7 Hz from 0.5 to 1.2 s, i.e., the fundamental natural frequency of severe-damage bent<br />

in Table 1. In contrast, the dominant vibration energy in Fig. 8a is at around 12 Hz between 0.6-1 Hz<br />

and minor at 7 Hz at 1+ s. <strong>The</strong> difference of dominant response energy at frequency 7 Hz in Figs. 8a,b,<br />

i.e., damage-signature from recordings, helps identify qualitatively the damage column and severity.


615<br />

Table 1: Fundamental natural frequencies of Bent 12 in intact and severe-damage stages, modeled by<br />

ANSYS software in terms of design specifications<br />

Natural frequencies in Hz (comments)<br />

1st<br />

2nd (1st vertical natural frequency)<br />

3rd<br />

4th (2nd vertical natural frequency)<br />

5th<br />

6th (3rd vertical natural frequency)<br />

7th<br />

8th<br />

9th<br />

10th<br />

Intact<br />

3 99<br />

11 98<br />

14 84<br />

19 68<br />

44 01<br />

69 22<br />

93 88<br />

104 45<br />

106 37<br />

108 49<br />

Severe damage (decrease w r t intact)<br />

3 29<br />

6 95 (41 98%)<br />

12 47<br />

18 08 (8 13%)<br />

39 19<br />

52 50 (24 15%)<br />

72 50<br />

L_ 95 00<br />

105 82<br />

108 17<br />

Figure 1 (left): Vibration tests of Bent 12 in the Trinity Relief River Bridge under excitations at the<br />

middle of the deck.<br />

Figure 2 (right): Bent 12 in intact stage, (a, top) Forcing function and (b, bottom) Recorded<br />

vibration at sensor 15.<br />

Figure 3a (left): Hilbert amplitude spectra of forcing function for vibration at sensor 15 of Bent 12 in<br />

intact stage.<br />

Figure 3b (right): Hilbert amplitude spectra of vibration at sensor 15 of Bent 12 in intact stage.


616<br />

Htibert Spectrum or Sensor 15 Intacs<br />

Hilbert Spectrum of Vibration at Sensor 13 Intact<br />

Hilbwt Spectrum tor Sensor 15 No Pile<br />

T7I<br />

1 15<br />

Timtistc)<br />

Figure 4 (left): Hilbert amplitude spectra of vibration at sensor 15 of Bent 12 in (a, top) intact stage,<br />

(b, middle) minor-damage stage and (c, bottom) severe-damage stage.<br />

Figure 5 (right): Hilbert amplitude spectra of vibration at sensor 13 of Bent 12 in (a, top) intact stage,<br />

(b, middle) minor-damage stage and (c, bottom) severe-damage stage.


617<br />

JUSTS rs s."<br />

WUUR. 4 20O2<br />

IS 44.36<br />

E-BT<br />

Power Si:ia.ptia.as<br />

Trj_ixa.cy Bra-d-cye 20/ Bent: 12, Center<br />

Figure tf: ANSYS models for Bent 12 in the Trinity Relief River Bridge m intact stage, in which piles<br />

15 and 13 are respectively corresponding to the columns with sensors 15 and 13 in Fig. Ib, and nodes<br />

53 and 37 to the locations of sensors 15 and 13 in Fig. Ib.<br />

0 5 10 15 2D 35 30 :<br />

Frequmcy Hz) a** (0 00075)s<br />

Tim. I8«0<br />

a«»»|O.OOOTS)»<br />

Figure 7: For vibration at node 37 of Bent 12 in intact stage, (a, upper left) Hilbert amplitude<br />

spectrum with d=0, (b, upper right) marginal amplitude spectrum, (c, lower left) Hilbert amplitude<br />

spectrum with d=0.00198, and (d, lower right) Hilbert amplitude spectrum with d=O.Q5305.


618<br />

m ipcdfum-(Bent "2Mode S7brohen-ace0=00399t<br />

Hubert SOectasn- (Bert 13 Node S& broken-ace d* 003379)<br />

Figure 8: Hilbert amplitude spectra of vibration at (a, left) node 37 and (b, right) node 53 of Bent 12<br />

in severe-damage stage with d= 0.003979.<br />

CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />

This study presents the use of HHT to characterize damage of recordings and model-based simulated<br />

data of bridge structures in their intact, minor- and severe-damage stages. It reveals that the HHTbased<br />

characterization is able to identify the local dynamic properties from a limited number of<br />

recordings. In addition, comparison of the HHT analysis of two recordings from damaged and health<br />

structural elements in one condition stage of the structure can tell the signature difference of local<br />

structural members. This eliminates the need of a priori data required in traditional damage diagnosis,<br />

and thus significantly improves the efficiency in data collection. It should be emphasized here that the<br />

above observations are, at this point, qualitative and suggestive, not quantitative and conclusive.<br />

Validation requires further examination of other recordings and model-based simulation.<br />

AKNOWLEGMENTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors 'would like to express their appreciation for the financial supports provided by the<br />

National Science Foundation with Grant No. 0085272 and by the Federal Highway Administration<br />

DTFH61-96-00030. <strong>The</strong> financial supports are also acknowledged from the strategic research<br />

program in the Hong Kong Polytechnic <strong>University</strong> (HKPU) and US-PRC <strong>Research</strong>er Exchange<br />

Program administered by Multidisciplinary Center for <strong>Earthquake</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, which makes<br />

it possible for the first author to conduct the study in HKPU during the summer of 2001. Thanks are<br />

also extended to Larry Olson who provided the destructive testing data.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Huang, N.E., S. Zheng, S.R. Long, M.C. Wu, H,H. Shin, Q. Zheng, N-C. Yen, C.C. Tung, and M.H.<br />

Liu (1998a). "<strong>The</strong> Empirical Mode Decomposition And Hilbert Spectrum For Nonlinear<br />

And Nonstationary Time Series Analysis." Proc. Roy. SocLond., A 454 903-995.<br />

Sanayei, M. and E.M. Santini (1998) "Dynamic bridge substructure evaluation and monitoring<br />

system," Report of subcontract to Tufts <strong>University</strong> from FEW A Grant to Olson <strong>Engineering</strong>.


1-1<br />

INDEX OF CONTRIBUTORS<br />

Volumes III<br />

Abe,M. 195,529<br />

Abrams, D. 139<br />

Ahmad, S. 471<br />

Azuhata,T. 405<br />

Beavers,! 139<br />

Caffrey,J. 247<br />

Caicedo, J.M. 529<br />

Carlson, ID. 205<br />

Chandler, A.M. 257<br />

Chang, P.C. 9<br />

Chang, T-S. 495<br />

Chau,K.T. 17<br />

Chen,CR 381<br />

Chen,J. 537<br />

Chen,Y.Q. 545<br />

Cho, D.Y. 309<br />

Cho,H. 397<br />

Cho, S.W. 207<br />

Choi,K.M. 223<br />

Chung, L.L. 389<br />

Clayton, E. 529<br />

Dai, J.W. 265<br />

Dargush, G.R 397<br />

Ding,X.L. 545<br />

Dohi,H. 489<br />

Dyke, SJ. 529<br />

Elnashai, A.S. 139,273<br />

Elvidge,C.D. 149<br />

Fuchs, A. 239<br />

Fujitani,H. 405<br />

Furukawa,A. 317<br />

Furata,H. 413<br />

Geng,S.W. 85<br />

Goel,S.C. 285,463<br />

Gong,X.N. 381<br />

Gordaninejad, F. 239<br />

Gulkan,P. 33<br />

Guo, A.X. 421<br />

Han,W. 293<br />

Hasegawa,K. 149<br />

Hata, K. 405<br />

Hayashi, H. 149, 157<br />

Hibino, T. 437<br />

Higashida, M. 149,157<br />

Higuchi, S. 489<br />

Hitchcock, G.H. 239<br />

Hiwatashi,T. 405<br />

Hobson,V.R. 149<br />

Hsu, T.T.C. 301<br />

Huang, Z.L. 453<br />

Hutchinson, T.C. 3,547<br />

Irtaza, H. 471<br />

Itam,A. 571<br />

Jabbari,F. 503<br />

Jeng, C.H. 301<br />

Jiang, J.R. 519<br />

Jing,L.P. 165<br />

Juhn, G.H. 309<br />

Jung, H J. 207,223<br />

Kalkan,E. 33<br />

Kaneto, T. 131<br />

Kang,Y. 123<br />

Kasai, K. 51<br />

Kim, B.W. 207<br />

Kim,I.H. 309<br />

Kim, J.K. 309<br />

Kirernidjian, A.S. 563<br />

Kiyono,J. 195,317<br />

Ko,J.M. 17,453<br />

Kohiyama,M. 149<br />

Koo, K.Y. 555<br />

Korol, G. 239<br />

Krawinkler, H. 173<br />

Kroehl,H.W. 149<br />

Kuchma, D.A. 323<br />

Kuester,F. 547<br />

Ladkany,S. 571<br />

Lam,E.S.S. 17<br />

Laogan,B» 273<br />

Law, K.H. 429,563<br />

Lee, CM. 17<br />

Lee,G.C. 3<br />

Lee, I.W. 207, 223<br />

Lee,S.S. 285<br />

Lee, V.W. 99<br />

Leung, Y.K. 123<br />

Li, H. 421<br />

Li,J. 537<br />

Li,Z.L. 545<br />

Li,Z.W. 545<br />

Liao,T. 115<br />

Liao, Z.P. 293<br />

Lin,G. 331<br />

Lin, S. 503<br />

Liu, G.X. 545<br />

Liu,J. 123<br />

Liu,J.P. 519<br />

Lynch, J.P. 429,563<br />

MacRosite,M. 611<br />

Maki, N. 149, 157<br />

Makris,N. 511<br />

Mao, Y.Q. 215<br />

Masri, S.F. 247<br />

Matsui, T. 437<br />

Mayne,P.W. 115<br />

Minowa, C. 405<br />

Mo, Y.L. 301<br />

Moehle,J.P. 67<br />

Morita, K. 405<br />

Nagarajaiah, S. 215<br />

Nagel, O. 445<br />

Narahashi,H. 181<br />

Ni,Y.Q. 17,453<br />

Nishimura, S. 183<br />

Nomura, Y. 413<br />

Okuta, K. 489<br />

Ozawa, T. 489<br />

Park, K.S. 223<br />

Parra-Montesinos, G. 463<br />

Peng,J.Y. 421<br />

Perng, S.F. 595<br />

Qamaruddin, M. 471


SEP r:]<br />

1-2<br />

Qiao, F. 437<br />

Radhaknshnan, R. 397<br />

Radulescu, C. 587<br />

Radulescu,D. 587<br />

Sahasrabudhe, S. 215<br />

Saiidi,M. 571<br />

Sakanoue,T. 579<br />

Santo, N. 481<br />

Sato,T. 579<br />

Savage, S. 463<br />

Sereci,A.M. 587<br />

Sheikh, M.N. 257<br />

Shiah,G.C. 595<br />

Shiozaki, Y. 405<br />

Singh, M.P. 495<br />

Song,G. 231<br />

Spencer, Jr. B F. 69<br />

SU.R.K.L. 257<br />

Sugiyama, E. 437<br />

Sunakoda, K. 405<br />

Sundararajan, A. 563<br />

Suzuki, Y. 421<br />

Takao,M. 131<br />

Tarn, CM. 123<br />

Tao,X.X. 85<br />

Tjhin,T.N. 323<br />

Tsujii, Y. 489<br />

Tu, W.G. 339, 369<br />

Wang, J.Y. 453<br />

Wang, M.L. 603<br />

Wang,X. 239<br />

Wang,X. 603<br />

Wang, Y.P. 389<br />

Waseem, S.M. 471<br />

Williams, G. 349<br />

Wolfe, R.W. 247<br />

Wong, Y.L. 17,123, 265<br />

Wu,L.Y. 389<br />

Wu,Z.Y. 165<br />

Xiao,S.Y. 331<br />

Xie,B. 231<br />

Xin, M. 239<br />

Xu,Y.L. 17,537,611<br />

Yang,J.N. 9,503<br />

Yang, Q. 571<br />

Yoshida,!. 131,579<br />

Yoshida, K. 481<br />

YU.H.Y. 187<br />

Yun, C.B. 555<br />

Zeng,X. 361<br />

Zhang,! 511<br />

Zhang, L.X. 519<br />

Zhang, M.Z. 265,519<br />

Zhang, R.R.C. 611<br />

Zhao,X.Q. 123<br />

Zheng, S.H. 123<br />

Zhu,P. 195<br />

Zou,Y.S. 339,369


Ths OOO F X ^s dje foe return 01 ^ene^/ai on t p^e date<br />

showi un'ess previously recalled ^ nes may be<br />

PCI s red To iate re.um.<br />

DATE DUE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!