24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

54 th Annual Meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

" Rethinking the Roles <strong>of</strong> Business, Government and<br />

NGOs in the Global Economy "<br />

Washington, DC, USA<br />

June 30-July 3, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Editors<br />

Susan Feinberg, Program Chair<br />

Tunga Kiyak, <strong>AIB</strong> Managing Director<br />

(c) <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business


<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

54 th Annual Meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

"Rethinking the Roles <strong>of</strong> Business, Government and NGOs in the Global Economy"<br />

Washington, DC, USA<br />

June 30-July 3, <strong>2012</strong><br />

ISSN: 2078-0435<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

For more information, please contact:<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Executive Secretariat<br />

G. Tomas M. Hult, Executive Director, or<br />

Tunga Kiyak, Managing Director<br />

Eppley Center<br />

465 N. Shaw Ln Rm 7<br />

Michigan State University<br />

East Lansing, MI 48824, USA<br />

Phone: +1 (517) 432-1452 • Fax: +1 (517) 432-1009<br />

E-mail: aib@aib.msu.edu • Web: http://aib.msu.edu/


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Program Acknowledgements ..................... 3<br />

Program Overview .................................... 4<br />

Meeting Sponsors ..................................... 6<br />

Abstracts ................................................. 7<br />

Saturday Abstracts ................................ 9<br />

Sunday Abstracts ................................ 10<br />

Monday Abstracts .............................. 101<br />

Tuesday Abstracts ............................. 187<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> Program Contributors .............. 265<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 1


(This page is intentionally blank)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 2


<strong>2012</strong> PROGRAM ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

PROGRAM CHAIR<br />

Susan Feinberg - Temple University<br />

PROGRAM ASSISTANTS<br />

Catherine Magelssen, Rutgers University<br />

Bruno Barreto de Góes, Temple University<br />

TRACK CHAIRS<br />

Paul Vaaler, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Preet Aulakh, York University<br />

Saeed Samiee, University <strong>of</strong> Tulsa<br />

Dave Thomas, Simon Fraser University<br />

Bennet Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland<br />

Nigel Driffield, Aston University<br />

Jaeyong Song, Seoul National University<br />

Patricia McDougall, Indiana University<br />

Charles Dhanaraj, Indiana University<br />

Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

Anu Phene, George Washington University<br />

David Berg, Hamline University<br />

Laszlo Tihanyi, Texas A&M University<br />

Harry Bowen, Queens University <strong>of</strong> Charlotte<br />

DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM CHAIR<br />

Sumit Kundu, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

JUNIOR FACULTY CONSORTIUM CHAIR<br />

John Mezias, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

<strong>AIB</strong>/JIBS PAPER DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP<br />

Petra Christmann, Rutgers University<br />

John Cantwell, Rutgers University<br />

Pallavi Shukla, Rutgers University<br />

PLACEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR<br />

Hadi Alhorr, Saint Louis University<br />

FARMER DISSERTATION AWARD SELECTION COMMITTEE<br />

Mike Peng, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas (Chair)<br />

Anupama Phene, George Washington University<br />

Hyun-Jung Lee, London School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Kevin Zhou, University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

TEMPLE/<strong>AIB</strong> BEST PAPER SELECTION COMMITTEE<br />

Timothy M. Devinney, University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sydney (Chair)<br />

Esra Gencturk, Ozyegin University<br />

Ulf Andersson, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Kazuhiro Asakawa, Keio University<br />

LOCAL HOST COMMITTEE<br />

George Washington University<br />

Fernando Robles<br />

Alexis Gaul<br />

Meredith Buesching<br />

Liesl Riddle<br />

Nevena Yakova<br />

Reid Click<br />

HAYNES PRIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE<br />

Sid Gray - University <strong>of</strong> Sydney (Chair)<br />

K. Galen Kroeck - Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Rudolf Sinkovics - University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Jane Lu - National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

LOCAL HOST COMMITTEE<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Maryland<br />

Kislaya Prasad<br />

Lemma Senbet<br />

Sunil Mithas<br />

Terrill Drake<br />

Danielle Couick<br />

Dakia Adams<br />

Christopher Olson<br />

Karen Watts<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 3


<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Program Overview<br />

Washington, DC, USA - June 30-July 3, <strong>2012</strong><br />

AJBS Annual <strong>Conference</strong> 9:00-17:30<br />

Friday, June 29<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Board Meeting 9:00-17:00<br />

8.30-8.45 8.30-8.45<br />

8.45-9.00 8.45-9.00<br />

9.00-9.15 9.00-9.15<br />

9.15-9.30 9.15-9.30<br />

9.30-9.45 9.30-9.45<br />

9.45-10.00 9.45-10.00<br />

10.00-10.15 10.00-10.15<br />

10.15-10.30 10.15-10.30<br />

<strong>AIB</strong>/Sheth Doctoral Student Consortium 8:30-16:00<br />

Saturday, June 30<br />

10.30-10.45 10.30-10.45<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Junior Faculty Consortium 8:30-16:00<br />

<strong>AIB</strong>/JIBS Paper Development Workshop 9:00-15:00<br />

10.45-11.00 10.45-11.00<br />

11.00-11.15 11.00-11.15<br />

11.15-11.30 11.15-11.30<br />

11.30-11.45 11.30-11.45<br />

11.45-12.00 11.45-12.00<br />

12.00-12.15 12.00-12.15<br />

12.15-12.30 12.15-12.30<br />

12.30-12.45 12.30-12.45<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Chapter<br />

Chairs Luncheon<br />

12:30-14:00<br />

12.45-13.00 12.45-13.00<br />

13.00-13.15 13.00-13.15<br />

13.15-13.30 13.15-13.30<br />

13.30-13.45 13.30-13.45<br />

13.45-14.00 13.45-14.00<br />

14.00-14.15 14.00-14.15<br />

14.15-14.30 14.15-14.30<br />

14.30-14.45 14.30-14.45<br />

14.45-15.00 14.45-15.00<br />

15.00-15.15 15.00-15.15<br />

15.15-15.30 15.15-15.30<br />

15.30-15.45 15.30-15.45<br />

15.45-16.00 15.45-16.00<br />

16.00-16.15 16.00-16.15<br />

16.15-16.30 16.15-16.30<br />

16.30-16.45 16.30-16.45<br />

16.45-17.00 16.45-17.00<br />

17.00-17.15 17.00-17.15<br />

17.15-17.30 17.15-17.30<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Fellows'<br />

17.30-17.45 17.30-17.45<br />

Opening Plenary<br />

17.45-18.00 16:30-19:00<br />

17.45-18.00<br />

18.00-18.15 18.00-18.15<br />

18.15-18.30 18.15-18.30<br />

18.30-18.45 18.30-18.45<br />

18.45-19.00 18.45-19.00<br />

19.00-19.30 19.00-19.30<br />

19.30-20:00 <strong>AIB</strong> Presidential Reception 19.30-20:00<br />

20.00-20.30 19:00-21:00<br />

20.00-20.30<br />

20.30-21:00 20.30-21:00<br />

AJBS Annual <strong>Conference</strong> 9:30-16:00<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Board Meeting 9:00-12:30<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 4


Sunday, July 1<br />

1.1<br />

DC Deans Panel<br />

and Concurrent Sessions<br />

9:00-10:15<br />

COFFEE BREAK 10:35-11:15<br />

1.2<br />

Fellows Plenary<br />

in Memory <strong>of</strong> John Stopford<br />

10:45-12:00<br />

LIGHT LUNCH<br />

12:00-13:00<br />

JIBS<br />

Editorial<br />

Board<br />

Meeting<br />

1.3<br />

Eminent Scholar Award<br />

and Concurrent Sessions<br />

13:00-14:15<br />

BREAK 14:15-14:30<br />

1.4<br />

Concurrent Sessions<br />

14:30-15:45<br />

COFFEE BREAK 15:45-16:15<br />

1.5<br />

Farmer Dissertation Award<br />

and Concurrent Sessions<br />

16:15-17:30<br />

W<strong>AIB</strong> Reception<br />

17:30-18:30<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Program Overview<br />

Washington, DC, USA - June 30-July 3, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Monday, July 2<br />

8.30-8.45 8.30-8.45<br />

8.45-9.00 8.45-9.00<br />

9.00-9.15 9.00-9.15<br />

9.15-9.30 2.1<br />

9.15-9.30<br />

9.30-9.45 Concurrent Sessions 9.30-9.45<br />

9.45-10.00<br />

9:00-10:15<br />

9.45-10.00<br />

10.00-10.15 10.00-10.15<br />

10.15-10.30 10.15-10.30<br />

COFFEE BREAK 10:35-11:15<br />

10.30-10.45 10.30-10.45<br />

10.45-11.00 10.45-11.00<br />

11.00-11.15 2.2<br />

11.00-11.15<br />

11.15-11.30 Concurrent Sessions 11.15-11.30<br />

11.30-11.45<br />

10:45-12:00<br />

11.30-11.45<br />

11.45-12.00 11.45-12.00<br />

12.00-12.15 12.00-12.15<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Fellows<br />

12.15-12.30 LIGHT LUNCH<br />

12.15-12.30<br />

Business<br />

12.30-12.45 12:00-13:00<br />

Meeting 12.30-12.45<br />

12.45-13.00 12.45-13.00<br />

13.00-13.15 13.00-13.15<br />

13.15-13.30 2.3<br />

13.15-13.30<br />

13.30-13.45 Concurrent Sessions 13.30-13.45<br />

13.45-14.00<br />

13:00-14:15<br />

13.45-14.00<br />

14.00-14.15 14.00-14.15<br />

14.15-14.30 BREAK 14:15-14:30 14.15-14.30<br />

14.30-14.45 14.30-14.45<br />

14.45-15.00 2.4<br />

14.45-15.00<br />

15.00-15.15 Concurrent Sessions 15.00-15.15<br />

15.15-15.30<br />

14:30-15:45<br />

15.15-15.30<br />

15.30-15.45 15.30-15.45<br />

15.45-16.00 15.45-16.00<br />

COFFEE BREAK 15:45-16:15<br />

16.00-16.15 16.00-16.15<br />

16.15-16.30 16.15-16.30<br />

16.30-16.45 2.5<br />

16.30-16.45<br />

Ambassadors Plenary<br />

16.45-17.00 16.45-17.00<br />

on Good Governance<br />

17.00-17.15 16:15-17:30<br />

17.00-17.15<br />

17.15-17.30 17.15-17.30<br />

17.30-17.45 17.30-17.45<br />

17.45-18.00 17.45-18.00<br />

18.00-18.15 18.00-18.15<br />

18.15-18.30 18.15-18.30<br />

18.30-18.45 18.30-18.45<br />

18.45-19.00 18.45-19.00<br />

19.00-19.30<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Gala Dinner<br />

19.00-19.30<br />

19.30-20:00 National Building Museum 19.30-20:00<br />

20.00-20.30 19:00-21:00<br />

20.00-20.30<br />

20.30-21:00 20.30-21:00<br />

Tuesday, July 3<br />

3.1<br />

Concurrent Sessions<br />

9:00-10:15<br />

COFFEE BREAK 10:35-11:15<br />

3.2<br />

JIBS Decade Award<br />

and Concurrent Sessions<br />

10:45-12:00<br />

LIGHT LUNCH<br />

12:00-13:00<br />

1.3<br />

Concurrent Sessions<br />

13:00-14:15<br />

BREAK 14:15-14:30<br />

1.4<br />

Concurrent Sessions<br />

14:30-15:45<br />

COFFEE BREAK 15:45-16:15<br />

3.5<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Awards Ceremony<br />

and Business Meeting<br />

16:15-17:30<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Closing Reception<br />

17:30-18:30<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 5


<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> CONFERENCE SPONSORS<br />

John Cook School <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Boeing Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

SLU <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

S A I N T L O U I S U N I V E R S I T Y<br />

• •<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 6


ABSTRACTS<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 7


(This page is intentionally blank)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 8


ABSTRACTS FOR SATURDAY, JUNE 30, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Session: 0.5.P - Plenary<br />

Opening Plenary: Recognizing IB Leaders<br />

Presented On: June 25, 2011 - 16:30-19:00<br />

SATURDAY<br />

Welcome Remarks<br />

Keynote speech: "NGO-Business Partnerships in <strong>International</strong> Development"<br />

Ray Offenheiser, Oxfam America<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> President's Award Winner for Contributions to <strong>International</strong> Development<br />

Keynote speech: "The Contributions <strong>of</strong> Redhat to Business and Society"<br />

Jim Whitehurst, Redhat<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Fellows' <strong>International</strong> Executive <strong>of</strong> the Year Award Winner<br />

Presentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>AIB</strong> Fellows' Awards:<br />

Eminent Scholar Award: Ikujioro Nonaka<br />

Educator <strong>of</strong> the Year Award: Jorge Talavera<br />

Keynote Speech: "Rethinking the Roles <strong>of</strong> Business, Government and NGOs in the Global<br />

Economy"<br />

Theodore Moran, Georgetown University<br />

(For more information, please contact: Susan Feinberg, Temple University, USA: <strong>2012</strong>dc@aib.msu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 9


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.1.P - Special Session<br />

ABSTRACTS FOR SUNDAY, JULY 1, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Washington DC Deans Panel: Widening the Tent: Incorporating Non-pr<strong>of</strong>it and<br />

Government Actors in Global Business Education<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Robert Grosse, George Mason University<br />

Panelists:<br />

G. "Anand" Anandalingam, Robert H. Smith School <strong>of</strong> Business, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland<br />

Michael J. Ginzberg, Kogod School <strong>of</strong> Business, American University<br />

Doug Guthrie, George Washington University School <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Jorge Haddock, George Mason University School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

(For more information, please contact: Susan Feinberg, Temple University, USA: <strong>2012</strong>dc@aib.msu.edu)<br />

Session: 1.1.1 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Current Topics in Comparative Corporate Governance<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Ruth Aguilera, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Co-Chair: Ilir Haxhi, University <strong>of</strong> Amsterdam<br />

Panelists:<br />

Ruth Aguilera, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Christina Ahmadjian, Hitotsubashi University<br />

Rafel Crespi-Cladera, Universitat de les Illes Balears<br />

Thomas Clarke, University <strong>of</strong> Technology Sydney<br />

Ajai Gaur, Rutgers University<br />

William Q. Judge, Old Dominion University<br />

Our panel seeks to discuss current topics in comparative corporate governance research in different advanced<br />

industrialized and emerging markets, and draws on several theories such as institutional and agency theory<br />

broadly speaking. We will pay special attention to examining the drivers <strong>of</strong> existing corporate governance<br />

structures, what triggers change <strong>of</strong> corporate governance practices, and the diffusion <strong>of</strong> these practices over<br />

time. The panel will touch on topics that address questions such as to what extent are European and Anglo-<br />

American governance systems parallel or colliding universes (Clarke); what explains the stickiness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Japanese corporate governance system (Ahmadjian); how are the process <strong>of</strong> economic liberalization,<br />

privatization and globalization affecting governance mechanisms in emerging markets like India (Gaur); to what<br />

extent the demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> a Dutch business elite network propel the diffusion and adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

shareholder-oriented best practices in the context <strong>of</strong> the Netherlands (Haxhi and van Ees); or even what is the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> corporate governance in family firms, and what are the drivers <strong>of</strong> the control by families along<br />

generations that make these organizations potentially more competitive (Crespí-Cladera). (For more<br />

information, please contact: Ilir Haxhi, University <strong>of</strong> Amsterdam, Netherlands: i.haxhi@uva.nl)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 10


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.1.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Innovation and Strategy in the Global Automotive Industry<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Florian Täube, EBS Business School<br />

Co-Chair: Anja Schulze, swiss Center for Automotive Research (swiss CAR)<br />

Discussant: Ronaldo Parente, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Anja Schulze, swiss Center for Automotive Research (swiss CAR)<br />

John Paul MacDuffie, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Michael Eisenbeis, Scuderi Group<br />

Oliver Kallenborn, Daimler<br />

Gerald McDermott, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

Tom Murray, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency<br />

This Panel is designed to facilitate interaction among <strong>AIB</strong> members interested in the global(ization <strong>of</strong>)<br />

automotive industry as well as a dialogue with practitioners and policy makers. Thus, it brings together experts<br />

on different established and emerging automotive markets with representatives from an innovative engine<br />

technology firm and the U.S. EPA exemplifying new forms <strong>of</strong> collaboration. In particular we will trigger<br />

discussions about how organizations and institutions hailing from different geographies and sectors are<br />

becoming increasingly connected and interdependent. The internationalization <strong>of</strong> the automotive industry over<br />

the last three decades or so has commonly been associated with the rise <strong>of</strong> Japan and, more recently China and<br />

India. The panel is divided in two parts: firstly, an academic part to familiarize the audience with automotive<br />

industries in Eastern and Southern geographies and analyzing those different settings; secondly, the<br />

practitioners' voices, both from industry and policy makers. The goal <strong>of</strong> the panel is to stimulate new, potentially<br />

interdisciplinary and international collaborative research projects, much along the lines <strong>of</strong> new forms <strong>of</strong><br />

collaboration witnessed in the industry facilitated by international research networks such as IMVP. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Florian Täube, EBS Business School, Germany: florian.taeube@ebs.edu)<br />

Session: 1.1.3 – Panel<br />

Track: 14 - Methods in IB Research<br />

Approaches to the Modelling <strong>of</strong> MNE Location Choices<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Roger Strange, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />

Panelists:<br />

Roger Strange, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />

Norifumi Kawai, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />

Antonio Majocchi, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia<br />

Davide Castellani, University <strong>of</strong> Perugia<br />

Antonello Zanfei, University <strong>of</strong> Urbino<br />

Graham Cookson, King's College London<br />

Jenifer Piesse, Kings College London and University <strong>of</strong> Bournemouth<br />

Fredéric Blanc-Brude, EDHEC Risk Institute<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 11


SUNDAY<br />

MNE location choice is a key issue in the IB research agenda, including location within broad geographic regions<br />

(e.g. the EU) and location at the sub-national level (e.g. within the US or China). The determinants <strong>of</strong> this<br />

choice are <strong>of</strong> particular importance to local policy-makers who wish to attract inward FDI, and who represent<br />

geographical entities that are in competition with other neighbouring alternative locations with different<br />

attributes. There is an extensive empirical literature on MNE location within a wide range <strong>of</strong> geographical<br />

settings, but these studies use a variety <strong>of</strong> methodological approaches. One <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> this panel is to<br />

emphasise some <strong>of</strong> the advantages/disadvantages <strong>of</strong> these different methodological approaches, and to<br />

highlight some recent advances in the modelling <strong>of</strong> spatial relationships (For more information, please contact:<br />

Roger Strange, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex, United Kingdom: r.n.strange@sussex.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 1.1.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

Exploring the Institutional Boundaries <strong>of</strong> Emerging Markets<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Jean-Claude Cosset, HEC Montreal<br />

Corruption and MNCs' Ownership Strategy: Evidence from China<br />

Shu Yu, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

In this paper, we examine the following important issues in international business. How the corruption level in<br />

the host provinces in China would influence the ownership strategies <strong>of</strong> multinational companies (MNCs) in<br />

foreign market entries How is the relationship between corruption and choices <strong>of</strong> ownership strategy affected<br />

by the MNCs' home country development status We are trying to introduce corruption as an important factor<br />

influencing the ownership strategies <strong>of</strong> MNCs. Following the key tenets <strong>of</strong> institutional theory, we argue that<br />

firms will form a joint venture with a local firm in the host province where the corruption is more prevalent. We<br />

further propose that foreign firms which come from the less developed countries are more likely to choose joint<br />

venture as their ownership strategy when they face high level <strong>of</strong> corruption. Based on the empirical analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

MNCs in China, our hypotheses are supported. (For more information, please contact: Shu Yu, National<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore: yushu@nus.edu.sg)<br />

Doing It under the Table: Hidden Sales in India's Manufacturing Sector<br />

Matthew Grady Smith, Rutgers Business School<br />

In developing economies, many firms choose to hide their activities outside <strong>of</strong> the formal sector <strong>of</strong> the<br />

economy, beyond the reach <strong>of</strong> government <strong>of</strong>ficials. For instance, recent survey studies by the World Bank<br />

suggest that it is quite common for larger, formal firms to participate in the informal sector by hiding some<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> their sales transactions "<strong>of</strong>f the books." In this study, I examine the factors influencing firms'<br />

decisions to hide sales. Drawing on international business and strategy theory, I focus particular attention on<br />

how hidden sales are influenced by the institutional context, including the regulatory and tax environment, as<br />

well as bureaucratic corruption. In addition, I examine how hidden sales are influenced by firm size and<br />

macroeconomic conditions. To test these relationships, I introduce a novel model to estimate the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

hidden sales using readily available firm financial data. I apply this model to a large sample <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

manufacturing firms over the period from 1996 to 2004. For robustness, I benchmark my estimates against the<br />

World Bank Enterprise Survey dataset for India, which includes data on managers' self-reported hidden sales.<br />

Comparison with the survey results provides broad support for the model. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Matthew Grady Smith, Rutgers Business School, USA: matthewgradysmith@gmail.com)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 12


SUNDAY<br />

Competing Formally in an Increasingly Formal World: Foreign Market Entry Motivation and Competition from<br />

Informal Players<br />

Margaret Spring Schomaker, Université Laval<br />

Anna Lamin, Northeastern University<br />

IB theory argues that MNEs respond to institutional hazards in host countries by adjusting their entry strategies<br />

and subsidiary operational integration so as to "immunize" the firm against the threat <strong>of</strong> expropriation <strong>of</strong> its<br />

assets in the host environment. However, IB theory is silent on how domestic firms may also adopt their<br />

operational strategies to deal with institutional hazards within their home country. Locating parts <strong>of</strong> the value<br />

chain with the informal economy <strong>of</strong>fers local players a means <strong>of</strong> adapting to their competitive environment in<br />

ways that make them very different from foreign entrants. This paper investigates how a strong informal<br />

economy shapes competition and therefore presents significant competitive challenges for multinational<br />

enterprises, beyond the threat <strong>of</strong> expropriation traditionally examined in IB literature. Building on an analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the advantages held by informal and semi-formal players, we show that the risks and solutions for an MNE<br />

actually differ depending upon what the firm is seeking from the foreign market. We then <strong>of</strong>fer propositions<br />

contrasting the effects <strong>of</strong> a strong informal economy on MNEs in the cases <strong>of</strong> product-market seeking, servicemarket<br />

seeking, natural resource seeking, and labor seeking entries. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Margaret Spring Schomaker, Université Laval, Canada: margaret.schomaker@mng.ulaval.ca)<br />

The Provisioning <strong>of</strong> Collective Goods by MNEs in Emerging Markets<br />

Jean Boddewyn, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

How will investors in emerging markets obtain at production sites the water, electricity, roads, security, training<br />

and health care for their employees, and safeguards against various institutional hazards The provisioning <strong>of</strong><br />

these "collective goods" differs from that <strong>of</strong> the private goods which attracted investors there in the first place,<br />

and its study in the light <strong>of</strong> internalization theory and transaction-cost economics requires: (1) reconsidering the<br />

alliance mode when it involves the collaboration <strong>of</strong> economic and nonmarket partners, and (2) identifying a<br />

distinct type <strong>of</strong> governance mode so far overlooked – namely, the inducement <strong>of</strong> the not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it partners<br />

whose support is crucial. Therefore, (1) there are four governance modes – market contracting, alliance (in a<br />

modified form), internalization and inducement (a novel mode) – available for the provisioning <strong>of</strong> collective<br />

goods by and/or for MNEs in emerging markets; (2) the choice among these four governance mode is affected<br />

by both the type <strong>of</strong> ordering system prevailing in emerging markets and the transactional characteristics<br />

pertaining to the provisioning <strong>of</strong> collective goods, and (3) this choice is best represented by a matrix than by<br />

the traditional "continuum" between the price system and hierarchy. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Jean Boddewyn, Baruch College, CUNY, USA: jean.boddewyn@baruch.cuny.edu)<br />

Session: 1.1.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />

Catch-up and Firm Performance in <strong>International</strong>ization<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Xavier Martin, Tilburg University<br />

Who is Seeking Strategic Assets for Competitive Catch-Up Broadening the Awareness-Motivation-Capability<br />

Framework<br />

Lin Cui, Australian National University<br />

Klaus Meyer, China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School<br />

Helen Hu, University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 13


SUNDAY<br />

Which firms in emerging economies lead the catch-up with world leaders The first step is to develop the intent<br />

to acquire strategic assets that help closing the gap to the leader. To analyze which companies are most likely<br />

to take this critical first step, we broaden the awareness-motivation-capability (AMC) framework <strong>of</strong> competitive<br />

dynamics by distinguishing catch-up competition from immediate competition. We test the framework for firms<br />

in a competitive catch-up position, a sample <strong>of</strong> 154 Chinese firms, and find that firms are more likely to develop<br />

strategic intent to seek strategic assets abroad the more they are aware <strong>of</strong> foreign competition, motivated by<br />

their governance structure, and have relevant financial and managerial capabilities. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Lin Cui, Australian National University, Australia: lin.cui@anu.edu.au)<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> Learning Targets and Technological Catch-up <strong>of</strong> Asian Laggards<br />

Yuzhe Miao, Kyung Hee University<br />

Jaeyong Song, Seoul National University<br />

This paper investigates how the learning mechanism <strong>of</strong> technological laggards influences their successes in<br />

technological catch-up by highlighting the importance <strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> learning targets. We identify "successful<br />

peers" as a vital reference group, and examine how learning from successful peers -- peer laggards who (1)<br />

share similar traits with laggards and (2) have already achieved a certain degree <strong>of</strong> success in technological<br />

catch-up -- helps laggards catch up. We find that laggards that consider successful peers as one <strong>of</strong> their<br />

reference groups are more likely to succeed in catch-up, however the benefit <strong>of</strong> learning from successful peers<br />

diminishes if laggards rely too much on successful peers for seeking knowledge. Our analysis also suggests that<br />

learning from technologically proximal successful peers could increase the possibility <strong>of</strong> catch-up success. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Yuzhe Miao, Kyung Hee University, Korea, South: yzmiao@gmail.com)<br />

The Tortoise and the Hare: Catching up at Sub-industry Groups<br />

Jie Xiong, EMLYON Business School<br />

Philippe Monin, EMLYON Business School<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this study is to elucidate the process <strong>of</strong> catching up in an industry exported to a host country<br />

by foreign entrants. Drawing on a longitudinal historical analysis <strong>of</strong> a new-born industry in an emerging<br />

economy, we examine catching up at the sub-industry group level. We identify three catching up patterns:<br />

intra-group <strong>of</strong> domestic firms, intra-group <strong>of</strong> foreign firms and inter-group dynamics. We develop a-five-stage<br />

model illustrating the industry evolution with catching up as the underling logic. Our analysis adds to catching<br />

up literature by providing a new level <strong>of</strong> analysis: sub-industry group. It also extends the research <strong>of</strong> catching<br />

up with theoretical insights from a low technology industry and opens up new possibilities for the research<br />

domain. (For more information, please contact: Jie Xiong, EMLYON Business School, France: jie@em-lyon.com)<br />

The <strong>International</strong>ization Process Model as a Perspective on Emerging Economy MNEs: The Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Catch-<br />

Up Learning<br />

Klaus Meyer, China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School<br />

Ornjira Thaijongrak, University <strong>of</strong> Bath<br />

The rapid emergence <strong>of</strong> multinational enterprises (MNEs) from emerging economies calls for a re-assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

established theories <strong>of</strong> the MNE. In this perspective paper, we assess the usefulness <strong>of</strong> the internationalization<br />

process model (IPM), also known as Uppsala model, to explain the recent strategies <strong>of</strong> emerging economy<br />

MNEs. We argue that popular stages models derived from the IP model are not helpful, but the underlying<br />

process <strong>of</strong> experiential learning driving steps <strong>of</strong> increased commitment is an important element in explaining the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> these MNEs over time. We illustrate our arguments with six case studies <strong>of</strong> cross-border<br />

acquisitions by Thai MNEs, and their antecedents. On this basis, we discuss how the IPM can inform future<br />

research on emerging economy MNEs. Specifically, the IPM suggests focusing on the internal and external<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 14


SUNDAY<br />

factors that induce firms to accelerate their cycle <strong>of</strong> international learning and commitment, in particular the<br />

roles <strong>of</strong> networks, acquisitions, big step commitments, managerial biases and the home country institutional<br />

environment. (For more information, please contact: Klaus Meyer, China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School,<br />

China: kmeyer@ceibs.edu)<br />

Session: 1.1.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

Performance in SMEs and Born Globals<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Gary Knight, Florida State University<br />

A Contingency-Based Perspective on <strong>International</strong> SMEs Performance<br />

Bernhard Swoboda, University <strong>of</strong> Trier<br />

Edith Olejnik, Trier University<br />

Madeleine Boos, Trier University<br />

Dirk Morschett, University <strong>of</strong> Fribourg<br />

Small and medium-sized enterprises face unique performance challenges in the context <strong>of</strong> their<br />

internationalization process. Adopting a contingency view, this study posits that SMEs' international performance<br />

depends on their ability to fit the organizational elements planning processes, international structural integration<br />

and international orientation to their internationalization strategy. Assuming that performance driver vary with<br />

the internationalization strategy, we conduct multiple group analysis with a sample <strong>of</strong> 639 manufacturing SMEs<br />

comparing configurations <strong>of</strong> traditional, born global and born-again global internationalization strategies.<br />

Findings suggest that high-performing SMEs adapt organizational elements to their internationalization strategy<br />

chosen. Since performance drivers vary across configurations, decisions on organizational elements cannot be<br />

made independently from SMEs' internationalization strategy. (For more information, please contact: Bernhard<br />

Swoboda, University <strong>of</strong> Trier, Germany: b.swoboda@uni-trier.de)<br />

Understanding the Drivers <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Performance for Born Global Firms: An Integrated Perspective<br />

Stephan Gerschewski, Hankuk University <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies<br />

Elizabeth L. Rose, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Val Lindsay, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington<br />

Grounded in the resource-based view <strong>of</strong> the firm (RBV) and the network perspective on internationalisation and<br />

drawing on the exporting, international entrepreneurship, network, and strategic management literatures, we<br />

develop a model <strong>of</strong> early performance <strong>of</strong> born globals and test it on a sample <strong>of</strong> 310 firms from Australia and<br />

New Zealand. A mixed methods approach, combining exploratory interviews and a web-based survey, is<br />

employed. The study adopts a comparative perspective with non-born global firms, to enhance the robustness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the findings for born globals. Our results suggest that international entrepreneurial orientation, focus on<br />

product/service quality and competitor orientation serve as key drivers <strong>of</strong> early international performance for<br />

born globals. In addition, customer engagement skills, and positioning as a "global company" rather than an<br />

"exporter", help to explain variations in performance. The study contributes to the literature by developing and<br />

testing an integrated performance model for born global firms, and by undertaking a comparative approach<br />

between born globals with firms that adopt a more traditional approach to internationalisation. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Stephan Gerschewski, Hankuk University <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies, Korea, South:<br />

stephange@hufs.ac.kr)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 15


SUNDAY<br />

Moderate Regional Diversification for Superior Performance<br />

Elena Beleska-Spasova, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> clear empirical consensus about the nature <strong>of</strong> the relationship between the firm's level <strong>of</strong> geographic<br />

diversification (GD) and its performance (P) impedes the resolution <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the key strategic questions in<br />

international business: What is the appropriate level <strong>of</strong> geographic diversification This paper contributes to<br />

this ongoing debate by exploring the hitherto empirically under-researched role <strong>of</strong> regional strategic orientation<br />

on the performance outcomes <strong>of</strong> international firms. It does so, by proposing and testing hypotheses that focus<br />

on a key research question: does the level <strong>of</strong> intra- and inter-regional diversification impact firms' performance<br />

The proposed hypotheses that intra-regional diversification strategy outperforms the inter-regional<br />

diversification strategy were tested on an original set <strong>of</strong> 356 British exporting SMEs. The novel contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

this study is the identification <strong>of</strong> the bi-regional strategy as the optimal threshold in the GD/P relationship. The<br />

findings implicate the bi-regional diversification as an optimal internationalization strategy for superior<br />

performance. That is, a firm that has the bulk <strong>of</strong> their international sales balanced across two regions (a home<br />

and a host region) tends to outperform both firms with intra(single)-regional orientation and globally diversified<br />

firms. (For more information, please contact: Elena Beleska-Spasova, University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom:<br />

e.beleska-spasova@henley.reading.ac.uk)<br />

Liabilities <strong>of</strong> Foreignness and <strong>International</strong> Growth: Examination <strong>of</strong> IP-based and Product-based Strategies<br />

Johan Bruneel, Imperial College<br />

Theoni-Eirini Symeonidou, Imperial College<br />

Erkko Autio, Imperial College<br />

We investigate the effect <strong>of</strong> liabilities <strong>of</strong> foreignness on internationalization, using IPR-based and product-based<br />

commercialization strategies <strong>of</strong> US start-ups as our empirical lens. We model the propensity to internationalize<br />

and international intensity as a function <strong>of</strong> liabilities <strong>of</strong> foreignness, operationalized as the start-up's foreign<br />

market entry mode. We use the longitudinal panel provided by the Kauffman Firm Survey, which tracks nearly 5<br />

000 start-ups in their first six years <strong>of</strong> operation. We find that the liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness is significantly greater<br />

for product-based than for IP-based commer¬cialization strategies. Start-ups licensing-out IPRs are more likely<br />

to internationalize and exhibit a high internationalization intensity. We find that different commercialization<br />

strategies imply different liabilities <strong>of</strong> foreignness in the context <strong>of</strong> internationalization, leading us to distinguish<br />

between two types <strong>of</strong> liabilities <strong>of</strong> foreignness: LoF as an operator and LoF as a source. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Johan Bruneel, Imperial College, United Kingdom: j.bruneel@imperial.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 1.1.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Corporate Citizenship and Environmental Practices<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Carolyn P. Egri, Simon Fraser University<br />

Antecedents and Performance Outcomes <strong>of</strong> Eco-Friendly Marketing Strategies in Global Hotel Chains: A<br />

Resource-based Perspective<br />

Constantinos N. Leonidou, Leeds University<br />

Leonidas C. Leonidou, University <strong>of</strong> Cyprus<br />

Thomas A. Fotiadis, University <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

Bilge Aykol, Dokuz Eylul University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 16


SUNDAY<br />

Notwithstanding the increasing public concern on environmental issues, extant empirical research has long<br />

ignored the influence <strong>of</strong> the natural environment in marketing strategy, especially within the international<br />

business domain and the services sector. By focusing on the resource-based view <strong>of</strong> the firm, we develop and<br />

test a model <strong>of</strong> the resources and capabilities as drivers <strong>of</strong> eco-friendly marketing strategies in the global hotel<br />

industry, as well as their performance consequences. Using a sample <strong>of</strong> 102 global hotel chains, the study<br />

revealed that financial (as opposed to physical and scale) resources are instrumental in the development <strong>of</strong> an<br />

eco-friendly marketing strategy. A positive effect was also confirmed between organizational learning, shared<br />

vision, and cross-functional coordination capabilities and eco-friendly marketing strategy. The latter was found<br />

to have a positive impact on the hotel chain's competitive advantage, which subsequently favourably influences<br />

both market and financial performance. (For more information, please contact: Constantinos N. Leonidou, Leeds<br />

University, United Kingdom: c.leonidou@leeds.ac.uk)<br />

Participation <strong>of</strong> Global Companies in Local Environmental Initiatives: The Case <strong>of</strong> MNC-NGO Collaboration in<br />

Saving the Baltic Sea<br />

Tiina Anna-Maria Ritvala, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Asta Salmi, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Per Andersson, Stockholm School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

This paper aims at understanding the relationship dynamics between actors in cross-sector collaboration to<br />

solve complex environmental issues. In particular, we look at the relationship dynamics and activities between<br />

one multinational company (MNC) and one non-governmental organization (NGO) and at the network effects <strong>of</strong><br />

this interaction. Cooperation context is formed by the efforts to improve the environmental state <strong>of</strong> the Baltic<br />

Sea. Our key aim is to analyze how the MNC's participation in the multi-stakeholder network reflects in its<br />

external and internal networks. Our empirical case illustrates the early network dynamics evident in the crosssector<br />

collaboration. It shows that an initiative by the NGO to participate in environmental work was actively<br />

adopted within the MNC and led to network changes both internally and externally. Changes concerned both<br />

activation <strong>of</strong> potential, existing links and establishment <strong>of</strong> new links with new actors, such as authorities and<br />

research institutes. Our analysis illustrates the embeddedness <strong>of</strong> MNC networks, where local actions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subsidiary overlap with and become strengthened by actions in the regional and global networks (the<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> the head-quarters). (For more information, please contact: Tiina Anna-Maria Ritvala, Aalto<br />

University School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland: tiina.ritvala@aalto.fi)<br />

Multinational Corporations and Citizenship Behavior: The Effects <strong>of</strong> Strategic Choices and National Institutions<br />

KyungMi Lee, Hankuk Univesity <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies<br />

TaeYoung Yoo, Hankuk Univesity <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies<br />

This paper examines the effects <strong>of</strong> strategic choices and institutional environments <strong>of</strong> multinational corporations<br />

(MNCs) on their citizenship behavior in the host country. Our analysis <strong>of</strong> 199 MNCs in South Korea shows that<br />

strategic choices, such as ownership concentration and the motivation <strong>of</strong> internationalization, are closely related<br />

to the MNCs' general corporate citizenship behavior (CCB), while their institutional environments are not.<br />

Interestingly, however, MNCs' specific CCB such as corporate environmental activities is facilitated by their<br />

home countries' institutional conditions, even though they operate in the relatively lower level <strong>of</strong> institutional<br />

environments <strong>of</strong> the host country. Our finding suggests that MNCs' CCB in the host country is influenced by the<br />

extent to which they rely on the resources in the host country and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> institutions they face<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> host and home countries. (For more information, please contact: KyungMi Lee, Hankuk Univesity<br />

<strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies, Korea, South: lennalee77@gmail.com)<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Responsiveness toward Customers and Competitors on ESR Programs: The Moderating Roles <strong>of</strong><br />

Institutional Pressures<br />

Badri Munir Sukoco, Airlangga University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 17


SUNDAY<br />

Using market orientation perspective, this study addresses research questions as to the effects <strong>of</strong> customerand<br />

competitor orientations on the organization <strong>of</strong> environmental social responsibility (ESR) programs. This<br />

study also examines under what conditions that these orientations engender greater or lesser uptake on ESR<br />

programs. The results from a large-scale, cross-industry study show that being responsive toward customers<br />

and competitors leads organizations to adopt ESR programs. Results also indicate that governmental pressures<br />

serve as a moderator on these relationships. (For more information, please contact: Badri Munir Sukoco,<br />

Airlangga University, Indonesia: badri@feb.unair.ac.id)<br />

Session: 1.1.8 - Competitive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Growing Pains: Organizational Challenges within the MNE Subsidiary Networks<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Birgitte Grogaard, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary<br />

Capability or Conflict: Manager and Employee Diversities in Foreign Subsidiaries<br />

Chang Hoon Oh, Simon Fraser University<br />

Hea-Jung Hyun, Kyung-Hee University<br />

This study explores how the diversity in management teams and employee groups in foreign subsidiaries can<br />

affect subsidiary performance. By analyzing firm-level data on 770 South Korean subsidiaries across 45<br />

countries in the period between 2005 and 2007, we found that subsidiary employee group diversity was<br />

positively associated with subsidiary performance, while no significant effect <strong>of</strong> management team diversity<br />

existed, suggesting that the benefits <strong>of</strong> high diversity are higher for simple computational tasks conducted by<br />

employee groups rather than monitoring, coordinative and innovative tasks conducted by management teams.<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> the subsidiary management team and employee group diversities on subsidiary performance,<br />

however, may depend on the host country's institutional and cultural boundary conditions. These findings have<br />

practical implications for multinational staffing strategies in order to ensure high performance in subsidiary and<br />

host country policies used to attract high quality foreign direct investments. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Chang Hoon Oh, Simon Fraser University, Canada: coh@brocku.ca)<br />

Subsidiaries and Functional Activities in Multinational Corporations: Diversity, Interdependence and Evolution<br />

Paz Estrella Tolentino, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Odile E. M. Janne, University <strong>of</strong> London-Birkbeck<br />

Pi-Chi Chen, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Despite a substantial literature on the role, importance and management <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries and functions for the<br />

multinational corporation (MNC), there is still insufficient understanding <strong>of</strong> the links between the strategic needs<br />

<strong>of</strong> the firm and its organisational form. The paper addresses two key debates in the literature. The first<br />

concerns the continuing relevance, nature and evolution <strong>of</strong> the foreign subsidiary in relation to the more recent<br />

conceptualisation <strong>of</strong> the MNC's organisation as a differentiated network <strong>of</strong> activities. The second concerns the<br />

controversy on whether MNCs are moving (and converging) towards a ‘new' complex organisational model. In<br />

our empirical research on American IT companies in Taiwan, we determine that a systemic approach to the<br />

integration-responsiveness (IR) framework is useful to investigate the links between subsidiary-level functional<br />

activities and subsidiaries' strategic roles, and how these interact and co-evolve over time to embody increased<br />

strategic and organizational complexity and challenges for modern MNCs. We establish that subsidiaries evolve<br />

towards more complexity in ways that are specific to their initial strategic position and functional level<br />

characteristics. Conversely, the evolution <strong>of</strong> functional units discriminates among strategy types <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries.<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 18


SUNDAY<br />

(For more information, please contact: Paz Estrella Tolentino, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom:<br />

p.tolentino@bbk.ac.uk)<br />

Congruence between Subsidiary Strategic Role and Relational Characteristics on Knowledge Development:<br />

Evidence from the UK KIBS Sector<br />

Zhaleh Najafi Tavani, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Ghasem Zaefarian, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Peter Naude , University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Stephan Henneberg, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Axèle Giroud, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Grounded in configuration theory and the network view <strong>of</strong> the firm, this research seeks to understand how the<br />

congruence <strong>of</strong> subsidiary's strategic role and subsidiary-parent relational characteristics relate to knowledge<br />

development. Our configuration analysis, utilizing pr<strong>of</strong>ile deviation for each subsidiary strategic role, used a<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> 184 foreign subsidiaries operating in knowledge intensive business services in the U.K. The results<br />

provide support for equifinality <strong>of</strong> alternative subsidiary strategic roles and indicate that the subsidiary's internal<br />

ability to develop knowledge is greater when the underlying relational characteristics match those <strong>of</strong> ideal types<br />

for a given subsidiary strategic role. (For more information, please contact: Zhaleh Najafi Tavani, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Leeds, United Kingdom: z.najafitavani@leeds.ac.uk)<br />

The Interplay <strong>of</strong> Networking Activities and Internal Knowledge Actions for Subsidiary Influence within MNCs<br />

Zhaleh Najafi Tavani, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Axèle Giroud, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Ulf Andersson, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Building on resource dependency theory; this research investigates the joint impacts <strong>of</strong> subsidiary knowledge<br />

based actions (Reverse Knowledge Transfer (RKT) and knowledge development) and networking activities<br />

(internal and external embeddedness) on its strategic influence in the multinational corporation. The proposed<br />

model was tested with data on 184 foreign owned subsidiaries in the United Kingdom. The results indicate that<br />

the possession <strong>of</strong> strategic resources (knowledge or embedded relations) is not adequate for a subsidiary to<br />

increase its influence unless it is accompanied with RKT. (For more information, please contact: Zhaleh Najafi<br />

Tavani, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom: z.najafitavani@leeds.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 1.1.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Knowledge at Home and Abroad: Who Knows What<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Denise Dunlap, Northeastern University<br />

How Do Cosmopolitan and Local Employees Influence Innovativeness <strong>of</strong> Foreign and Domestic Firms<br />

Annique Un, Northeastern University<br />

Fernando Muñoz-Bullón, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid<br />

Maria Sánchez-Bueno, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid<br />

We analyze the effects <strong>of</strong> skills <strong>of</strong> employees on innovation <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> foreign multinational enterprises<br />

(MNEs) and domestic firms competing in the same country. In contrast to previous studies that argue that<br />

subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> foreign MNEs suffer from a disadvantage or liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness in comparison to domestic<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 19


SUNDAY<br />

firms, we argue for an advantage <strong>of</strong> foreignness. We propose that skills <strong>of</strong> employees <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

MNEs have a larger positive effect on innovation than skills <strong>of</strong> employees in domestic firms. The reason is that<br />

being part <strong>of</strong> the foreign MNE, subsidiaries manage employees to be more cosmopolitan whereas domestic<br />

firms tend to manage employees to be more local. Although initially managed this way to facilitate better<br />

integration with the MNE, the more cosmopolitan employees <strong>of</strong> the subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> foreign MNEs are better at<br />

searching for and integrating diverse knowledge to generate innovations than employees <strong>of</strong> domestic firms.<br />

Word count: 149 Key words: cosmopolitan, local, innovation, advantage <strong>of</strong> foreignness, multinational<br />

companies (For more information, please contact: Annique Un, Northeastern University, USA: a.un@neu.edu)<br />

Foreign vs. Domestic: What Determines the Origin <strong>of</strong> Chinese Firms' Inward Technology Licensing<br />

Ying Li, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Denmark<br />

Yuandi Wang, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Denmark<br />

The increasing prominence <strong>of</strong> cross-border technology sourcing urges us to ask a question: what factors and<br />

conditions may influence firms' decisions <strong>of</strong> sourcing technology domestically or internationally Research on<br />

this topic is scattered in the literature but a comprehensive understanding <strong>of</strong> these factors and conditions on<br />

this issue is still lacking. The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper thus is to establish a comprehensive framework that integrates<br />

factors affecting a firm's propensity to make technology sourcing decisions regarding foreign or domestic origins<br />

<strong>of</strong> technologies. We identify four distinct categories <strong>of</strong> factors that are relevant in this respect: (1) technology<br />

supplier's characteristics; (2) technology seeker's characteristics; (3) features <strong>of</strong> technology itself; and (4)<br />

external contextual factors. We test our hypotheses based on Chinese firms' inward technology licensing. We<br />

found well-established incumbent firms that are export-, and high-tech-oriented with strong absorptive capacity<br />

are more likely to in-license foreign technology rather than domestic ones if the in-sourced technology is<br />

mature, the technology suppliers have strong desorptive capacity, and the external knowledge environment is<br />

innovative. (For more information, please contact: Ying Li, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Denmark, Denmark:<br />

ying@business.dtu.dk)<br />

Knowledge Sourcing and Knowledge Accumulation through General Purpose Technologies in Foreign<br />

Subsidiaries<br />

Ranfeng Qiu, California State University San Bernardino<br />

By studying the innovative activities <strong>of</strong> the U.S subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> large non-U.S firms from 1969-1995 based on<br />

patent counts and patent citations, this research suggests that internationalization <strong>of</strong> innovations <strong>of</strong><br />

Multinational Corporations (MNCs) is closely linked to the development <strong>of</strong> General Purpose Technologies in<br />

foreign subsidiaries. GPTs make feasible the combination and recombination <strong>of</strong> technology from different<br />

domains on an international scale. Innovations in GPT fields help MNCs re-allocate competence-creating<br />

activities to at least some foreign subsidiaries which become the new "centers <strong>of</strong> excellence" to these firms.<br />

This internationalization allows MNCs to maximize the opportunities to develop new growth alternatives. Our<br />

study suggests that the development <strong>of</strong> technologies in GPT fields as peripheral technologies in a subsidiary is<br />

positively associated with the degree <strong>of</strong> technological diversification and the innovative capacity <strong>of</strong> that<br />

subsidiary, as well as the degree <strong>of</strong> geographical dispersion <strong>of</strong> MNC group innovative activities in the host<br />

country. Moreover, local specializations in non-primary GPT fields help increase the sectoral diversification <strong>of</strong> the<br />

innovation cluster in which the subsidiary is sited. (For more information, please contact: Ranfeng Qiu,<br />

California State University San Bernardino, USA: rqiu@csusb.edu)<br />

Expansion <strong>of</strong> Vertical Integration as a Knowledge Accessing Strategy in the Face <strong>of</strong> Unfavorable Network<br />

Embeddedness and Absorptive Capacity<br />

Florian Zock, University <strong>of</strong> Mannheim<br />

Suleika Bort, University <strong>of</strong> Mannheim<br />

Andreas Al-Laham, University <strong>of</strong> Mannheim<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 20


SUNDAY<br />

This paper examines the consequences <strong>of</strong> a firm's multi-level network embeddedness – its embeddedness in the<br />

ego-network, regional network, and whole global network – for its vertical integration strategy. In particular, we<br />

study how network partner configurations at these three levels <strong>of</strong> analysis influence a firm's tendency to expand<br />

its degree and breadth <strong>of</strong> vertical integration. In addition, we analyze moderating effect <strong>of</strong> absorptive capacity.<br />

Based on the knowledge-based view, we view the expansion <strong>of</strong> vertical integration as a firm's purposeful<br />

strategy to access knowledge in the light <strong>of</strong> unfavorable network partner configurations and absorptive capacity.<br />

We test this conceptual framework on a longitudinal event history data base <strong>of</strong> the entire German biotech<br />

population between 1996 and 2009. We fill a significant gap in the literature, as prior vertical integration<br />

research has largely neglected the global network perspective. Our results shed new light on the relevance <strong>of</strong><br />

network linkages and absorptive capacity for the vertical value chain configuration <strong>of</strong> knowledge-intensive firms.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Florian Zock, University <strong>of</strong> Mannheim, Germany: fzock@mail.unimannheim.de)<br />

Session: 1.1.10 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Intellectual Property Rights and <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: April Michele Knill, Florida State University<br />

The Response <strong>of</strong> Inventors to IPR Reform<br />

Theodore A. Khoury, Portland State University<br />

Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Northeastern University<br />

Luis Alfonso Dau, Northeastern University<br />

We analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> intellectual property rights (IPR) reform on patenting in emerging economies. Building<br />

on the institutional view <strong>of</strong> the firm, we argue that IPR reform has a positive impact on both domestic and<br />

foreign patent applications because it increases the transparency, credibility, consistency, and ease <strong>of</strong> patenting<br />

for both types <strong>of</strong> inventors. However, we propose that a democratic political system reinforces the effect <strong>of</strong> IPR<br />

reform on foreign but not domestic patent applications, whereas a strong legal system heightens the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

IPR reform on domestic but not foreign patent applications. The analyses <strong>of</strong> a panel <strong>of</strong> 501 patent applications<br />

in 18 countries from 1967-2009 provide support for these arguments. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Luis Alfonso Dau, Northeastern University, USA: l.dau@neu.edu)<br />

Measuring the Institutional System <strong>of</strong> Patent Protection and Enforcement: A New Index <strong>of</strong> 46 countries<br />

Nikolaos P. Papageorgiadis, Bradford University School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Adam R. Cross, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

In this study we report an index that measures the strength <strong>of</strong> the Institutional System <strong>of</strong> Patent Rights<br />

Protection and Enforcement (ISP) for 46 developing and developed countries and for the years 1998-2007. The<br />

index is constructed following a new conceptual framework that is informed by institutional and transaction cost<br />

theory and includes measures for both the de jure (book law-related) and de facto (enforcement-related)<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the ISP. The new scores <strong>of</strong> national patent protection and enforcement strength are likely to be<br />

<strong>of</strong> use in quantitative investigation <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> macroeconomic phenomena and in various disciplinary<br />

settings. (For more information, please contact: Nikolaos P. Papageorgiadis, Bradford University School <strong>of</strong><br />

Management, United Kingdom: n.papageorgiadis1@bradford.ac.uk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 21


SUNDAY<br />

MNE Knowledge Diffusion and Intellectual Property Rights<br />

Roger Smeets, Amsterdam Business School<br />

We study the extent to which a country's strength <strong>of</strong> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection moderates<br />

knowledge diffusion from multinationals (MNEs). Following the opposing views in the IPR debate, we propose a<br />

negative effect <strong>of</strong> IPR strength on horizontal knowledge diffusion, and a positive effect on vertical knowledge<br />

diffusion. Using a firm-level dataset <strong>of</strong> large, publicly traded firms in 21 developed countries, we find partial<br />

support for these expectations. Strong IPR indeed reduces horizontal knowledge diffusion, while it stimulates<br />

backward (to suppliers) knowledge diffusion. Somewhat unexpectedly however, we also find that forward (to<br />

customers) knowledge diffusion decreases with IPR strength. (For more information, please contact: Roger<br />

Smeets, Amsterdam Business School, Netherlands: r.smeets@uva.nl)<br />

Session: 1.1.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

Building Theory Through Case Study Research<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Ben Kedia, University <strong>of</strong> Memphis<br />

Phases <strong>of</strong> Foreign Growth and Triggering Factors in the <strong>International</strong>isation <strong>of</strong> Small Knowledge Intensive Firms<br />

(SKIFs)<br />

Antonella Zucchella, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia<br />

Diala Kabbara, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia<br />

Small knowledge intensive firms (SKIFs) have demonstrated an early and fast internationalisation process, if<br />

compared to other firms. They may be thus considered a paradigmatic case for a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dynamics over time <strong>of</strong> the internationalisation process in emerging industries (Bell, 1995; Bell, McNaughton,<br />

Young and Crick, 2004). Their internationalisation process is deeply embedded in their business model and in<br />

their growth path (Onetti et al., Zucchella, Kabbara, 2011). In order to attain a deeper understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

internationalisation process <strong>of</strong> SKIFs, its phases and its triggering factors, we analyse and interpret international<br />

growth by studying three different SKIFs belonging to different industries inside the knowledge intensive and<br />

science-based sector: s<strong>of</strong>tware, laser and biotechnology. In framing our research project we build on different<br />

process based models that have studied the internationalisation process <strong>of</strong> international new ventures (Jones<br />

and Coviello, 2005; Johanson and Vahlne, 2009; Zucchella and Scabini, 2007; Gabrielsson et al., 2008).<br />

Findings show that the SKIFs growth and internationalisation are deeply intertwined and they may be analysed<br />

through a distinct series <strong>of</strong> phases, characterised by common triggering factors. The latter are mostly related to<br />

the firm capacity to access relevant networks and to develop strategic partnerships. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Antonella Zucchella, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy: antonella.zucchella@unipv.it)<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> a High Level <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Commitment on SMEs<br />

Igor Kalinic, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen<br />

Cipriano Forza, University <strong>of</strong> Padova<br />

A growing number <strong>of</strong> Small-Medium Enterprises (SMEs) face the international environment not only for market<br />

purposes but also for sourcing and producing at a lower cost. Due to their size, a high level <strong>of</strong> international<br />

commitment can have huge impacts on SMEs' structure and strategy. By analyzing five cases, we explore the<br />

organizational change that occurs within headquarters. It emerges that establishing a production unit abroad<br />

implies a continuous and radical change for the manufacturing SMEs, but provides them with organizational<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 22


SUNDAY<br />

capabilities that raise their global competitiveness. (For more information, please contact: Igor Kalinic,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Groningen, Netherlands: i.kalinic@rug.nl)<br />

Export Behavior <strong>of</strong> Brazilian Companies in the Ornamental Rock Sector: A Multiple Case Study Involving<br />

Organizational, Managerial and Environmental Factors<br />

Ilan Avrichir, ESPM/SP<br />

Gabriel Vouga Chueke, ESPM/SP<br />

The goal <strong>of</strong> this paper is to investigate the influence <strong>of</strong> environmental, organizational and management <strong>of</strong><br />

marketing strategies/export <strong>of</strong> companies in the ornamental stone sector in Brazil. We conducted a multiple<br />

case study with three mining companies, in different stages <strong>of</strong> internationalization, from Cachoeiro de<br />

Itapemirim region, the main hub <strong>of</strong> extraction and processing <strong>of</strong> granite <strong>of</strong> Espirito Santo state. We identified<br />

the factors that influence marketing/export strategies <strong>of</strong> the companies in this study. We analyzed the<br />

individual cases to achieve the intra-and inter-cases analysis. For that, we used the dimensions suggested by<br />

the literature review. After that, we compared the findings with other studies. We found that, when compared<br />

to international studies, there are similarities and differences in the analysis <strong>of</strong> marketing/export strategies<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> Brazilians firms, belonging to the primary sector. Therefore, we recommend that more studies<br />

be conducted in emerging countries, in search for possible generalizations. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Ilan Avrichir, ESPM/SP, Brazil: iavrichir@espm.br)<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Emerging Economies SMEs: Entrepreneurial DNA Inception<br />

Rene Diaz-Pichardo, IPN-CIIDIR Unidad Oaxaca<br />

Juan Arriaga-Muzquiz, Egade Business School<br />

Elisa Cobas-Flores, Egade Business School<br />

The internationalization process <strong>of</strong> SMEs in emerging economies has been recently studied. Despite the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> internationalization <strong>of</strong> emerging economies SMEs for economic growth, its underlying factors are<br />

poorly understood. Although traditional models could be appropriate for Multi-National Corporations, they fail to<br />

explain the process <strong>of</strong> internationalization <strong>of</strong> emerging economy SMEs. The two major perspectives in research<br />

on SME internationalization are a sequential process, and a born global venture. However, these approaches do<br />

not explain an alternative way in the internationalization <strong>of</strong> emerging economies SMEs named as the<br />

entrepreneurial DNA inception that prepares SMEs to go abroad regardless <strong>of</strong> their origin or longevity. We use<br />

the experience <strong>of</strong> the EGADE's Business Accelerator through six case studies <strong>of</strong> Mexican SMEs in the aim to<br />

explore the process <strong>of</strong> internationalization. We conclude that business schools can contribute to this inception<br />

by creating a platform through which SMEs from emerging economies can reduce attitudinal barriers, create a<br />

vision <strong>of</strong> a sustainable operation in international markets, and receive entrepreneurial education and coaching in<br />

order to achieve competitiveness and international sustainable growth. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Rene Diaz-Pichardo, IPN-CIIDIR Unidad Oaxaca, Mexico: renediazp@hotmail.com)<br />

Early Rapidly <strong>International</strong>ising Small Firms: A Case for Continuous <strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurial Opportunity<br />

Development<br />

Shingairai Grace Masango, Sheffield Hallam University<br />

Svetla Trifonova Marinova, Aalborg University<br />

The potential for pronounced contributions within Early Rapidly <strong>International</strong>ising Small Firms (ERISFs) lie within<br />

the current efforts being made to delineate the domain <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship as an independent field <strong>of</strong> enquiry<br />

by recognising the role <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial opportunities. The paper contributes towards the debate surrounding<br />

the key concepts which should be adopted from entrepreneurship and developed within <strong>International</strong><br />

Entrepreneurship. Within the paper <strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurial Opportunity Development (IEOpD) is<br />

conceptualised as the key concept defining the internationalisation <strong>of</strong> Early Rapidly <strong>International</strong>ising Small<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 23


SUNDAY<br />

Firms (ERISFs). The paper initially tracks the evolution <strong>of</strong> the key concepts which have been imported from<br />

the field <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship and applied within <strong>International</strong> Business (IB). The paper then defines<br />

<strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurial Opportunity and <strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurial Opportunity Development (IEOpD).<br />

<strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurial Opportunity Development (IEOpD) is then modelled as a process which is directly<br />

linked to four main factors. The first three factors; the founder's prior experiences, the firm's network ties and<br />

the domestic market context act as the enablers, which make IEOpD possible. The firm's cross border formation<br />

activities are conceptualised as an outcome <strong>of</strong> IEOpD. The relationship between each IEOpD and each <strong>of</strong> these<br />

four factors is illustrated using four examples <strong>of</strong> early rapidly internationalising South African firms operating<br />

within the s<strong>of</strong>tware and biotechnology sector. The paper concludes by positioning IEOpD as the key construct<br />

defining the internationalisation <strong>of</strong> the Early Rapidly <strong>International</strong>ising Small Firm (ERISF). (For more<br />

information, please contact: Shingairai Grace Masango, Sheffield Hallam University, United Kingdom:<br />

s.masango@shu.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 1.1.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 8 - Developing Country MNCs<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Developing Economy Firms: Processes and Capabilities<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Masaaki Kotabe , Temple University<br />

Dynamic Capability - Building in Emerging Market Firms (EMF): The Effects <strong>of</strong> Firm-Level Antecedents, Physical<br />

and Institutional Infrastructure on Lean Capabilities<br />

Omar Malik,<br />

Crystal Jiang, Bryant University<br />

In this study we develop and test a model <strong>of</strong> Emerging Market Firms' (EMF) dynamic capability-building.<br />

Drawing on the dynamic capabilities view and institutional theory, we argue that firm-level, infrastructural, and<br />

institutional antecedents matter to EMFs' lean capability-building efforts. We tested hypotheses derived from our<br />

framework on a sample <strong>of</strong> 1,702 firms from Brazil, China, and India. Results show that human capital<br />

development and process management capabilities, at the firm-level, are associated with lean capabilitybuilding.<br />

At the country-level, physical and communication infrastructure significantly influenced EMFs' lean<br />

capability building efforts. At the institutional level, regulatory institutions had a negative effect on EMF lean<br />

capability building; however cognitive institutions positively influence firms' lean capabilities. In terms <strong>of</strong><br />

normative institutions, uncertainty avoidance was positively associated with EMFs' lean capability-building, while<br />

the interaction between power distance and human capital development had a negative impact on lean<br />

capabilities. Although, we find mixed support for our hypotheses, our results strongly suggest that<br />

infrastructural and institutional factors influence EMFs' dynamic capability-building after controlling for firm<br />

characteristics. (For more information, please contact: Crystal Jiang, Bryant University, USA:<br />

cjiang1@bryant.edu)<br />

Rags to Riches: Experiences <strong>of</strong> Emerging Market Firms<br />

Tanvi Kothari, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Oshkosh<br />

Masaaki Kotabe , Temple University<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the emerging phenomena <strong>of</strong> global competition is the increasing number <strong>of</strong> business innovations<br />

originating from emerging economies and spreading to developed nations. A predominant set <strong>of</strong> players,<br />

perhaps initiators <strong>of</strong> such innovations are the Emerging Market Firms (EMFs) who have survived in the rough<br />

institutional environments in their home turfs and are now participating in the global marketplace. The<br />

prominence <strong>of</strong> multinational firms from emerging markets has challenged our assumptions about the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 24


SUNDAY<br />

global competition and corresponding strategy. We use an inductive-approach to conduct historical-analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

companies that originate from key emerging markets viz India and China. We examine how EMFs devise<br />

strategies to circumvent the institutional voids in their home markets and develop routines and key capabilities<br />

that lead to their competitive advantage when they transition to developed nations. Methodologically, the paper<br />

illustrates the usefulness <strong>of</strong> semantic network-analysis tools used to conduct a content analysis. We introduce a<br />

new concept - EMFs' ability to ‘Lick the Dirt' suggesting that the disadvantages previously suffered from their<br />

home markets can become an advantage when EMFs venture overseas, especially to the developed nations.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Tanvi Kothari, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Oshkosh, USA:<br />

kothari.t@gmail.com)<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Brazilian Franchising Networks: Degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>ization and Current Status<br />

Livia Lopes Barakat, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

Sherban Leonardo Cretoiu, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

Mayara Ximenes Dalbem, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

Over the past decade, Brazilian companies have not only increased foreign direct investment but also the<br />

participation in international markets via franchising agreements due to the expansion opportunities <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

globally, especially for those already adopting the strategy in the domestic market. An empirical study was<br />

conducted with 15 Brazilian franchise networks regarding foreign agreements in the last three years. By<br />

understanding the nature <strong>of</strong> their global activities we attempt to develop a measure <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

internationalization. Furthermore, we present a panorama <strong>of</strong> their internationalization in terms <strong>of</strong> current status,<br />

geographic dispersion and challenges faced when establishing foreign agreements. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Livia Lopes Barakat, Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil: liviabarakat@fdc.org.br)<br />

EMs' Subsidiaries Competences as a Result <strong>of</strong> the Interplay between Culture and Global Mindedness<br />

Germano Glufke Reis, FGV/EAESP<br />

Maria Tereza Fleury, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Afonso Carlos Correa Fleury, University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

This paper looks at companies from an emerging economy with a strongly rooted local culture (and its<br />

associated "managerial heritage") and asks what are the impacts <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> a global mindedness. At<br />

one side, there are traits such as uthoritarianism, tendencies towards hierarchisation and over-control on<br />

subsidiaries; at the other, there is the emergence <strong>of</strong> global orientation, global knowledge, and global skills.<br />

Through a survey with major Brazilian Multinationals' (BrMNs) and a multilevel approach, this research<br />

investigates the influences <strong>of</strong> culture factors and global mindedness on the development <strong>of</strong> competences in<br />

their subsidiaries. The results suggest that the level <strong>of</strong> global mindedness <strong>of</strong> the firm is positively related to<br />

subsidiaries' competences development; culture factors, in turn, are negatively related to competences<br />

development. The development <strong>of</strong> some specific competences also had statistically significant results:<br />

organization, planning, marketing and sales, financial management, HR management, supply chain<br />

management, and customer relationships management competences. As the capacity <strong>of</strong> developing<br />

competences abroad may have an important role for BrMNs'international competitiveness, potential tensions<br />

regarding the interplay between culture and global mindedness are an issue that should be managed. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Germano Glufke Reis, FGV/EAESP, Brazil: germanoglufkereis@yahoo.com.br)<br />

Institutional Change, Strategic Orientation and Dynamic Capabilities: A Multilevel Perspective on Chinese<br />

Outward FDI<br />

Ming Hua Li, Copenhagen Business School<br />

The phenomenon <strong>of</strong> systematic institutional change in many developing countries can produce enduring<br />

transformations in the strategic orientation and organization <strong>of</strong> domestic firms. Such changes may impact the<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 25


SUNDAY<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> their dynamic capabilities and adaptive learning which can translate into visible differences in their<br />

internationalization strategies and pathways. Using China as an illustrative example <strong>of</strong> a transitioning economy<br />

experiencing upsurges in outward FDI, this study develops a theoretical framework to explain how institutional<br />

transformation at various levels <strong>of</strong> government led to different configurations <strong>of</strong> firm resources and dynamic<br />

capabilities for central and local Chinese SOEs. Specifically, propositions from this framework explore how such<br />

unique variations in firm-level attributes may lead to differences in outward foreign investment behavior.<br />

Combining insights from several research streams including the resource-based view, institutional and<br />

organizational theory frameworks, as well as the dynamic capabilities perspective, we suggest that institutional<br />

change in China serves a formative role in the development <strong>of</strong> firm strategic orientation and dynamic<br />

capabilities leading to different internationalization patterns for central and local SOEs. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Ming Hua Li, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: mhl.int@cbs.dk)<br />

Session: 1.1.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Perspectives on National Context<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Fabian Jintae Froese, Korea University<br />

The Historical Baggage <strong>of</strong> Managers' and Coworkers' Homelands: The Preference <strong>of</strong> Other Nationals<br />

Kyle D. Coble, Saint Louis University<br />

Seung H. Kim, Saint Louis University<br />

Given recent literature, the need to examine the effects <strong>of</strong> history in international business outcomes is a<br />

pressing concern, and one that has been largely overlooked. This paper attempts to address a small part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

concern, specifically on the individual level within IHRM, with an initial look at individuals' preferences for<br />

managers and coworkers based solely on that individual's home country history. An American sample was<br />

tested on perceptions <strong>of</strong> Chinese, Egyptian, German, Japanese and Mexican historical interactions with the USA,<br />

and on willingness to have a national from that country be a manager or coworker. Interactions were based on<br />

amity, animosity and perceived general knowledge, and results supported the hypotheses for amity and<br />

animosity, and gave mixed support to the influence <strong>of</strong> perceived general knowledge. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Kyle D. Coble, Saint Louis University, USA: kcoble@slu.edu)<br />

Dynamics in the Indian Entrepreneurship Scene in Australia<br />

Meena Chavan, Macquarie University<br />

This resource based inter-generational study explores the propensity <strong>of</strong> Indian immigrants towards<br />

entrepreneurship in Australia. A qualitative approach is adopted through a structured observation/field survey<br />

methodology and results are reported through a multi-case study analysis <strong>of</strong> a sample from 152 entrepreneurs<br />

belonging to the first second and third generation <strong>of</strong> Indian immigrants who have been engaged in a survey<br />

and extensive face to face interviews. This study appraises the value <strong>of</strong> the shifting degree <strong>of</strong> accessible social<br />

capital and the emergent significance <strong>of</strong> human capital, as critical factors impacting immigrant Indians decision<br />

to be self-employed over generations. The paper explores the responses to the question: What factors most<br />

influenced your decision to be self employment The following hypothesis will be tested: H1 There is a positive<br />

and significant relationship between the entrepreneurial choice and the social capital enjoyed by members <strong>of</strong> a<br />

common Indian immigrant group in Sydney. H2 Choice to become an entrepreneur has been negatively<br />

correlated with human capital. The research outcomes identify the predominant shift <strong>of</strong> recent Indian<br />

businesses towards human capital oriented business over generations and the increasing degree <strong>of</strong> ethnic social<br />

capital benefits prevailing over generations. (For more information, please contact: Meena Chavan, Macquarie<br />

University, Australia: meena.chavan@mq.edu.au)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 26


SUNDAY<br />

Managers' Career Management and Career Advanced in China—The Moderating Effect <strong>of</strong> Mentoring<br />

Meng-Hsiu Lee, National Sun Yat-Sen University<br />

Ming-Chu Yu, National University <strong>of</strong> Tainan<br />

In this constantly changing socioeconomic environment, the notion <strong>of</strong> the "new career'' emphasizes the act <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals to take charge <strong>of</strong> their own careers, and the crossover <strong>of</strong> occupational, departmental, and<br />

organizational boundaries during career progression. Simultaneously, organizational career management, such<br />

as expatriation, rotation and succession planning, is essential and serves as a prerequisite for a successful<br />

career. Moreover, hi-tech competitive companies have deployed critical <strong>of</strong>fices in China, for instance, Micros<strong>of</strong>t<br />

and IBM build R&D center in China, which provides good opportunities for middle-level managers' career<br />

advancement. The planning <strong>of</strong> individual career development is important for middle-level managers' career<br />

advancement in the future and hi-tech firms execute mentoring system for expert pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to guide and<br />

direct junior pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. This research examines the relationship between career management and career<br />

advancement opportunity using the perspective <strong>of</strong> integrating mentorship <strong>of</strong> middle-level managers in China.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Meng-Hsiu Lee, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan:<br />

st873217@yahoo.com.tw)<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> High Performance Work Systems by Local Subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> Developed Country and Turkish MNEs and<br />

Indigenous Firms in Turkey<br />

Mehmet Demirbag, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield<br />

Ekrem Tatoglu, Bahcesehir University<br />

Adrian Wilkinson, Griffith University<br />

High performance work systems (HPWS) are seen as important in helping strengthen competitive strategies <strong>of</strong><br />

multinational enterprises from developed countries (DC MNEs). Commensurate with global competitive<br />

pressures and internationalization strategies, emerging country MNEs (EC MNEs) and indigenous firms are also<br />

increasingly adopting HPWS. HPWS are not seen simply as performance enhancing systems, but also as<br />

facilitators <strong>of</strong> internationalization. MNE represents an important test bed for the HPWS and their applicability in<br />

different national contexts. In this paper, we contribute to the extant literature by focusing on HPWS adoption<br />

level within domestic subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> DC MNEs and EC MNEs along with stand alone indigenous firms in a single<br />

country setting by keeping the host country environment as constant for all three types <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Mehmet Demirbag, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, United Kingdom:<br />

m.demirbag@sheffield.ac.uk)<br />

The National Culture <strong>of</strong> Firm Ownership and Work Related Values in the Honduran Maquila Industry<br />

Robert Dean Morrison, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American<br />

Juan Angel Chavarria, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American<br />

Claudia Patricia Dole, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American<br />

This paper reports the preliminary findings on the relationship between the nationality <strong>of</strong> factory ownership,<br />

Chinese, Honduran, South Korean, US and Canadian, and the level <strong>of</strong> job satisfaction and organizational<br />

commitment in assembly for export factories, known as maquilas, in the San Pedro Sula metropolitan area <strong>of</strong><br />

Honduras. Based on H<strong>of</strong>stede's cultural dimensions, Honduran culture is closer to that <strong>of</strong> China and South Korea<br />

than it is to that <strong>of</strong> the US and Canada. This study finds that significant differences do exist and these<br />

differences are the opposite <strong>of</strong> what the extant literature on cultural differences in the workplace might suggest;<br />

workers in US and Canadian factories reported higher levels <strong>of</strong> job satisfaction and organizational commitment.<br />

The levels reported by employees in Chinese and South Korean factories were similar and lower than those<br />

reported by employees in Honduran and North American factories. (For more information, please contact: Juan<br />

Angel Chavarria, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American, USA: jachavarria@utpa.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 27


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.1.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Collaboration in MNE Networks<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Jeremy Clegg, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Coordination at the Edge <strong>of</strong> the Empire: The Delegation <strong>of</strong> Headquarters Functions through Regional<br />

Management Mandates<br />

Eva Andrea Alfoldi, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Jeremy Clegg, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Sara McGaughey, University <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde<br />

In this paper, we conceptualise the role <strong>of</strong> headquarters as a set <strong>of</strong> functions distributed across the<br />

multinational enterprise. Specifically, we investigate the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> delegating headquarters functions to<br />

local subsidiaries in the form <strong>of</strong> regional management mandates (RMMs), a new concept not addressed in prior<br />

research. Our work contributes to the literature by constructing a comprehensive typology <strong>of</strong> headquarters<br />

functions performed at various levels <strong>of</strong> the multinational enterprise and by developing propositions about the<br />

benefits and costs <strong>of</strong> using regional management mandates, drawing on different theoretical perspectives and<br />

an empirical case study. Our findings indicate that the use <strong>of</strong> regional management mandates <strong>of</strong>fers several<br />

benefits for the MNE: a balance between integration and responsiveness at levels below the efficient scale for<br />

dedicated regional headquarters; the exploitation <strong>of</strong> local operational expertise and embeddedness on a<br />

regional level; and relieving headquarters <strong>of</strong> the burden <strong>of</strong> monitoring remote peripheral agents. At the same<br />

time, we also uncover risks and dangers associated with the use <strong>of</strong> regional management mandates. Our study<br />

develops a strong foundation for future research on the roles and functions <strong>of</strong> headquarters, and provides a<br />

novel perspective on how headquarters functions are enacted at the regional level. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Eva Andrea Alfoldi, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom: eva.alfoldi@mbs.ac.uk)<br />

Understanding Tacit Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Corporations: A Study in Chinese Business Cultural<br />

Context<br />

Juana Du, Poly-technic Institute <strong>of</strong> New York University<br />

This research discusses how national business culture influence tacit knowledge transfer in multinational<br />

corporations in Chinese cultural context. In particular, how Chinese cultural values are related to different<br />

resources and different ways <strong>of</strong> learning are discussed. It proves that the two cultural value dimensions—<br />

uncertainty avoidance and power distance—have significant effects on tacit knowledge transfer in different<br />

ways. Both low uncertainty avoidance and low power distance increase the ease and amount <strong>of</strong> communication,<br />

and facilitate tacit knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. The data approve that role in organizations,<br />

as an am important resource <strong>of</strong> external tacit knowledge learning, functions as the channel <strong>of</strong> external tacit<br />

knowledge transfer and flow storage. It is also found that internal learning and external learning are mutually<br />

dependent in multinational corporations. However, in the Chinese cultural context, internal source plays a more<br />

important role than external source, and internal learning <strong>of</strong> tacit knowledge takes place more easily than<br />

external learning. (For more information, please contact: Juana Du, Poly-technic Institute <strong>of</strong> New York<br />

University, USA: xunniedu@gmail.com)<br />

A Marriage Metaphor Model for Sociocultural Integration in <strong>International</strong> Mergers and Acquisitions: A Critical<br />

Review and Integration <strong>of</strong> the Literature<br />

Daniel Rottig, Florida Gulf Coast University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 28


SUNDAY<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to develop a marriage metaphor model for the sociocultural integration in<br />

international mergers and acquisitions (M&As) based on a critical review and integration <strong>of</strong> the literature on the<br />

topic. M&As are <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as "marriages" between organizations. Building on this metaphor, the<br />

forwarded model suggests that the sociocultural integration process consists <strong>of</strong> three interrelated phases: the<br />

dating, mating, and creating periods. Extant research focuses primarily on the pre-M&A contingency and post-<br />

M&A process periods, which correspond to the dating and creating phases, respectively, and treats these<br />

research streams in relative isolation. This paper attempts to integrate these streams <strong>of</strong> research in the contexts<br />

<strong>of</strong> both organizational and national cultures, and further sets out to shed light onto the third, under-researched<br />

closing period, which corresponds with the mating phase in the forwarded model. In so doing, this paper<br />

aspires to conceptualize a more encompassing and inclusive model in order to gain a better understanding<br />

about the sociocultural integration process in M&As. Practical and scholarly implications <strong>of</strong> this perspective are<br />

discussed. (For more information, please contact: Daniel Rottig, Florida Gulf Coast University, USA:<br />

drottig@fgcu.edu)<br />

Clusters and Regional Management Structures <strong>of</strong> French Multinational Companies in Asia<br />

Johannes Schaaper, Bordeaux Management School<br />

Bruno Amann, University <strong>of</strong> Toulouse III<br />

Jacques Jaussaud, University <strong>of</strong> Pau<br />

Recent literature suggests that multinational companies (MNCs) pursue regional rather than global strategies.<br />

Regionalisation <strong>of</strong> MNCs has key implications for regional structures and organization. This contribution<br />

investigates the regional management centres that French MNCs set up in Asia, considering two research<br />

questions. First, do French MNCs divide Asia into clusters Second, what kind <strong>of</strong> regional management<br />

structures French MNCs set up in Asia to fit their regional strategies This study develops five hypotheses from<br />

prior literature and then tests them through interviews with 77 expatriated managers <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> 47<br />

French MNCs located in 10 Asian countries. One-third <strong>of</strong> the sample clusters the Asia-Pacific region into<br />

homogeneous sub-regions, where they locate regional management centres with important functions and roles.<br />

This regional strategy depends on the size <strong>of</strong> the MNC and its sales in Asia; production localisation does not<br />

influence regional strategies. Smaller MNCs, even if most <strong>of</strong> their sales occur in Asia, still centralise regional<br />

decisions and control procedures at headquarters. (For more information, please contact: Johannes Schaaper,<br />

Bordeaux Management School, France: jan.schaaper@bem.edu)<br />

A Multilevel Investigation <strong>of</strong> Promoting Performance in Cross-National R&D Teams<br />

Chung-Jen Wang, National Cheng Kung University<br />

Chin Pin Li, National Cheng Kung University<br />

Integrating leader-member exchange theory (LMX) and creativity research, we theorized about and<br />

demonstrated, through 2 multilevel field studies, the pivotal role <strong>of</strong> creativity in translating organizational unit<br />

support for LMX, team efficacy, and intrinsic motivation into job performance. Using structural equation<br />

modeling (SEM) and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses, we plan to collect cross-national samples<br />

based on 3-level data from members in different R&D teams within separate work units in the United States and<br />

Taiwan. First, this research will study the support (high LMX) from a higher organizational level (unit or branch),<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> team-efficacy from a lower organizational level (team), and individual intrinsic motivation through<br />

the mediating role <strong>of</strong> individual creativity to job performance. Second, individual creativity mediated the<br />

interactive moderation effects <strong>of</strong> unit support (high LMX), team-efficacy and team member creativity on<br />

individual performance. Finally, we will discuss the research schedule and anticipated results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transnational research. (For more information, please contact: Chung-Jen Wang, National Cheng Kung<br />

University, Taiwan: wchungzen@gmail.com)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 29


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.1.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Corporate Social Responsibility in <strong>International</strong> Business I<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Jiawen Yang, George Washington University<br />

Perceptions <strong>of</strong> Corporate Social Responsibility and the role <strong>of</strong> Psychic Distance<br />

Carri R. Tolmie, Saint Louis University<br />

Extending our understanding <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> perceived psychic distance, this study contributes to the literature<br />

on corporate social responsibility from an international perspective. Building <strong>of</strong>f cultural identity theory, we<br />

conjecture that the greater the psychic distance between countries, the greater the disparity between<br />

individual's perceptions <strong>of</strong> corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility. The paper<br />

concludes by <strong>of</strong>fering a proposal for data collection, inherent limitations <strong>of</strong> the study as well as ideas for future<br />

research. (For more information, please contact: Carri R. Tolmie, Saint Louis University, USA: creisdor@slu.edu)<br />

Adherence to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Impact <strong>of</strong> Social Dominance Orientation and Vertical<br />

Collectivism<br />

Daniel E. Martin, California State University, East Bay<br />

While the impact <strong>of</strong> collectivism has been established in a wide range <strong>of</strong> business related outcomes, its impact<br />

on adherence to corporate social responsibility (CSR) has not been adequately studied at individual levels. Over<br />

the past decade, two dimensions <strong>of</strong> collectivism have been established with horizontal collectivism suggesting<br />

perceived equity across human groups, while vertical suggests a potential preference for maintaining in-group<br />

hegemony. Related to vertical collectivism, Social Dominance Orientation is anticipated to impact adherence to<br />

CSR as it has been shown to impact preference for socially redistributive policies. Business students are primed<br />

by coursework in economic and social inequality as outcomes <strong>of</strong> their efforts. While inequalities are part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

competitive nature <strong>of</strong> business school, CSR aims to address and integrate ethical responsibility in corporate<br />

behavior. 211 business students participated in a survey which supported the overall negative impact <strong>of</strong> vertical<br />

collectivism and social dominance on adherence to CSR. (For more information, please contact: Daniel E.<br />

Martin, California State University, East Bay, USA: dmartin@alineagroup.com)<br />

Is Corporate Social Responsibility a Strategic Choice A Case Study <strong>of</strong> Korean and Japanese Electronic MNEs in<br />

Indonesia<br />

Young-Ryeol Park, Yonsei University<br />

Sangcheol Song, Bryant University<br />

Youjin Baik, Yonsei University<br />

This study examines how multinational enterprises (MNEs) conduct their social responsibility (CSR) activities in<br />

developing countries. For a theoretical tool, we adopted Porter and Kramer's CSR framework which includes two<br />

generic types <strong>of</strong> CSR: responsive vs. strategic CSR. From an in-depth case study <strong>of</strong> two Korean and two<br />

Japanese electronic MNEs, we find that other country MNEs actively engage in strategic CSR more than<br />

responsive CSR to enhance their performance, while they do not attempt to mitigate harm from value chain. We<br />

also find that those MNEs involve in CSR activities for addressing environmental and educational issues in<br />

Indonesia. Theoretical and practical implications <strong>of</strong> this case study are also discussed. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Young-Ryeol Park, Yonsei University, Korea, South: yrpark@yonsei.ac.kr)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 30


SUNDAY<br />

Do Socially Responsible Activities Help Firms Achieve Their Financial Goals Evidence from China<br />

Jie Zhang, China HuaRong Asset Management Corporation; Peking University<br />

Chang Song, Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China<br />

Jiawen Yang, George Washington University<br />

Xiyou Liu, Audit Research Institute <strong>of</strong> China's National Audit Office<br />

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a dramatically expanding area <strong>of</strong> activity for managers and academics.<br />

This study explores the question <strong>of</strong> whether socially responsible activities can help firms achieve their financial<br />

goals. The evolution <strong>of</strong> CSR in China <strong>of</strong>fers a unique setting for studying the issues. Our results suggest that<br />

firm social responsibility performance (CSP) is relevant to corporate financial performance. Specifically, we<br />

found a significant, positive main effect <strong>of</strong> firm CSP on financial performance, which indicate that firms may<br />

actually benefit from socially responsible actions and a high level <strong>of</strong> CSR can lead to superior financial<br />

performance. Further, our evidence indicates that the relationship between corporate social performance and<br />

financial performance will be stronger in non-state owned firms, but little evidence in the state owned firms.<br />

The link between CSP and financial performance is robust to various specifications. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Jie Zhang, China HuaRong Asset Management Corporation; Peking University, China:<br />

jacqueline35@sina.com)<br />

An Integrative Model <strong>of</strong> Corporate Social Responsibility in Multinational Enterprises<br />

Leighton Robert Wilks, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary<br />

Julie Rowney, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary<br />

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) within multinational enterprises (MNEs) is now emerging as an important<br />

area <strong>of</strong> research. This paper reviews the current lenses through CSR in MNEs has been studied (stakeholder<br />

theory, institutional theory, the strategic implementation <strong>of</strong> CSR, and international management literature), and<br />

then proposes an integrative model <strong>of</strong> CSR using Rugman, Verbeke, and Yuan's (2010) reconceptualization <strong>of</strong><br />

Bartlett & Ghoshal's (1986) classification <strong>of</strong> national subsidiary roles. The descriptive, normative, and<br />

prescriptive implications <strong>of</strong> this model are discussed with regard to both academics and practitioners. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Leighton Robert Wilks, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada: lrwilks@ucalgary.ca)<br />

A Comparison <strong>of</strong> Ethical Decision-Making Between Chinese and American Managers: An Analysis Through the<br />

Lens <strong>of</strong> Linear/Nonlinear Thinking Style<br />

Yongsun Paik, Loyola Marymount University<br />

Kevin. S. Groves, Pepperdine University<br />

Charles M. Vance, Loyola Marymount University<br />

This paper presents an empirical study comparing thinking style and ethical decision-making patterns <strong>of</strong> 200<br />

American and 204 Chinese managers. Contrary to our expectations, Chinese managers demonstrated a<br />

significantly greater linear thinking style compared to American managers, while the latter showed a<br />

significantly greater nonlinear thinking style. As hypothesized, Chinese and American managers with a balanced<br />

thinking style pr<strong>of</strong>ile demonstrated greater ethical intent across a series <strong>of</strong> ethics vignettes compared to<br />

managers with predominantly linear or nonlinear thinking style pr<strong>of</strong>iles. Also as predicted, Chinese managers<br />

were more likely to adopt a utilitarian rationale for explaining their ethical intent across the vignettes compared<br />

to their American counterparts. We conclude with a discussion <strong>of</strong> the theoretical as well as important practical<br />

implications for this comparative study <strong>of</strong> American and Chinese managerial thinking style and ethical decisionmaking.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Yongsun Paik, Loyola Marymount University, USA:<br />

yspaik@lmu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 31


SUNDAY<br />

Addressing the "What", "Why", "How" and "Who": Using an <strong>International</strong> Business Lens to Examine Corporate<br />

Social Responsibility - A Review <strong>of</strong> the Literature<br />

Sashi C. Sekhar, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Milwaukee<br />

This literature review addresses current debates in the general CSR literature by considering select international<br />

business studies that addresses CSR-related topics (IB/CSR). I highlight studies that embody four themes and<br />

discuss how they contribute to advancing general CSR debates. Themes include: definition and interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

CSR (what); antecedents and motivations for CSR (why); CSR strategies and outcomes (how); and implications<br />

<strong>of</strong> leadership for CSR (who). The study addresses gaps in the IB and CSR literature streams. Then, a summary<br />

along with methodological issues and suggestions for future research that promotes knowledge-building at the<br />

intersection <strong>of</strong> these relevant areas are <strong>of</strong>fered. (For more information, please contact: Sashi C. Sekhar,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA: scsekhar@uwm.edu)<br />

Stakeholder Participation in Corporate Governance<br />

Dorothee Feils, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

Manzur Rahman, University <strong>of</strong> San Diego<br />

Florin Sabac, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

Two main approaches to corporate governance are the shareholder model and the stakeholder model <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance. In this paper, we link these models to formal and informal institutions. We develop a<br />

model <strong>of</strong> corporate governance that includes elements from both the shareholder and stakeholder model in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> formal and informal institutions. We then discuss the corporate governance practices in the United<br />

States and Germany in light <strong>of</strong> our model. (For more information, please contact: Dorothee Feils, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Alberta, Canada: dfeils@ualberta.ca)<br />

Session: 1.2.P - Plenary<br />

In Memory <strong>of</strong> John Stopford: His Intellectual Contributions to the Field <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

Business (<strong>AIB</strong> Fellows Plenary)<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Alan M. Rugman, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Panelists:<br />

Louis T. Wells, Harvard Business School<br />

Donald R. Lessard, MIT Sloan School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

D. Eleanor Westney, York University<br />

Tarun Khanna, Harvard Business School<br />

Julian Birkinshaw, London Business School<br />

Jose de la Torre, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

(For more information, please contact: Alan M. Rugman, University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom:<br />

a.rugman@henley.reading.ac.uk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 32


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.3.P - Special Session<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Fellows Eminent Scholar Award Session: Honouring Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Ikujioro Nonaka<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Alan M. Rugman, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Significance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>AIB</strong> Fellows Eminent Scholar Award: Outsider Intellectual Influences on the Field <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Alan M. Rugman, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Ikujiro Nonaka<br />

Johny Johansson, Georgetown University<br />

What We can Learn from Japanese Business Practices: Past, Present and Future<br />

Ikujiro Nonaka, Hitotsubashi University<br />

What We can Learn from Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Ikujiro Nonaka: Past, Present and Future<br />

D. Eleanor Westney, York University<br />

(For more information, please contact: Alain Verbeke, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada:<br />

alain.verbeke@haskayne.ucalgary.ca)<br />

Session: 1.3.1 - Special Session<br />

UNCTAD WIR Panel I: Towards an <strong>International</strong> Policy Framework for Sustainable<br />

Development (IPFSD)<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: James Zhan, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD<br />

Discussant: Peter Buckley, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Panelists:<br />

James Zhan, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD<br />

Hafiz Mirza, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD<br />

Theodore Moran, Georgetown University<br />

Gabriele Suder, SKEMA Business School and ANUCES Fellow<br />

Rajneesh Narula, Reading University<br />

Raj Aggarwal, University <strong>of</strong> Akron<br />

Pavida Pananond, Thammasat Business School<br />

Mobilizing investment and ensuring its positive contribution to sustainable development are important objectives<br />

for most countries. As a part <strong>of</strong> the World Investment Report <strong>2012</strong>, to assist governments in this task, UNCTAD<br />

has developed a comprehensive set <strong>of</strong> policy guidelines entitled an Investment Policy Framework for<br />

Sustainable Development (IPFSD). It brings together UNCTAD’s many years <strong>of</strong> experience in designing balanced<br />

investment policies that are part and parcel <strong>of</strong> countries’ broader development strategies. The IPFSD consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> (1) a set <strong>of</strong> Core Principles for investment policymaking, (2) guidelines for national investment policies, and<br />

(3) options for designing international investment agreements (IIAs). It is a living document. With this in mind,<br />

the IPFSD will be discussed in this panel, first, to introduce the concept and content <strong>of</strong> the framework;<br />

secondly, to assess how it can be used as a basis for effective policymaking, especially in a period when both<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 33


SUNDAY<br />

national and international policies are being reviewed by many countries; and, finally, to take on board views<br />

and ideas from the <strong>AIB</strong> as part <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> evolving, elaborating and improving the IPFSD. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Hafiz Mirza, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD, Switzerland:<br />

Hafiz.Mirza@unctad.org)<br />

Session: 1.3.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Complex Cross-Cultural Interaction: Building, Studying, and Learning from Relationships<br />

among Multiple Stakeholders<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Mary Margaret Maloney, University <strong>of</strong> St. Thomas<br />

Co-Chair: Mary Elizabeth Zellmer-Bruhn, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Panelists:<br />

Mary Margaret Maloney, University <strong>of</strong> St. Thomas<br />

Mary Elizabeth Zellmer-Bruhn, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Laura Grosso, Kids Connection Haiti<br />

Chris Peot, District <strong>of</strong> Columbia Water and Sewer Authority<br />

Dana McDaniel, California State University, Long Beach<br />

Mikael Søndergaard, University <strong>of</strong> Aarhus<br />

Davina Vora, SUNY New Paltz<br />

Inspired by the <strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> conference theme this interactive panel is designed to enhance our understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

the relationships between people from business, government, and NGOs. In this panel we examine the micro<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> inter-organizational relationships, as a reminder that business-government-NGO interactions<br />

ultimately take place between people and groups <strong>of</strong> people. We propose an innovative panel session designed<br />

to elicit lively interaction among panelists and <strong>AIB</strong> members, aiming to provoke thinking across disciplinary and<br />

institutional divides. We frame our inquiry and session using the "engaged scholarship perspective" (Van de Ven<br />

2007) which proposes that solving complex problems requires researchers to communicate with and be<br />

informed by multiple stakeholders. To this end, our panel includes representatives from international business<br />

scholarship, and NGOs, public organizations. The panel will involve an interactive discussion including roundtable<br />

breakouts aimed at discovering important research problems about cross-boundary interpersonal<br />

relationships as well as novel theoretical perspectives and research designs to investigate these problems. In<br />

addition, we will build on the relationships developed in this session by connecting interested <strong>AIB</strong> members<br />

through social media, to share outcomes and encourage an ongoing dialogue among stakeholder groups. [194<br />

Words] (For more information, please contact: Mary Margaret Maloney, University <strong>of</strong> St. Thomas, USA:<br />

mmmaloney@stthomas.edu)<br />

Session: 1.3.3 - Panel<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

Doing Business in Latin America<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Luiz Ricardo Kabbach de Castro, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona<br />

Co-Chair: Ruth Aguilera, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Discussant: Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Northeastern University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 34


SUNDAY<br />

Panelists:<br />

Luiz Ricardo Kabbach de Castro, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona<br />

Ruth Aguilera, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Rafel Crespi-Cladera, Universitat de les Illes Balears<br />

William Newburry, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Susan Perkins, Northwestern University<br />

Armando Borda, Universidad ESAN/ Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Our panel seeks to discuss different topics on the Latin American business landscape. We start the panel by<br />

looking at Latin American research in the context <strong>of</strong> the international business literature. As Cuervo-Cazurra<br />

states, "<strong>International</strong> business research on Latin American firms is limited but growing," and although the<br />

literature is progressing rapidly, there are still areas that need further research. As such, we will pay special<br />

attention on firms' internal governance structures and how it may affect firm performance in countries where<br />

formal institutions are weak, and corporate elites play an important role on defining the "rules <strong>of</strong> the game."<br />

The panel will cover topics such as the nature <strong>of</strong> the corporate ownership structure in the seven largest Latin<br />

American economies aiming to understand by which means large shareholders take control <strong>of</strong> publicly listed<br />

firms (Kabbach-Castro, Aguilera, & Crespí-Cladera); how the ownership structure affect corporate governance<br />

institutional changes in Brazil (Perkins & Zajac); what are the structure, role and evolution <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

networks in Argentina and Chile (Salvaj & Lluch); and finally, how business groups diversification and<br />

internationalization affects firm performance (Borda & Newburry). (For more information, please contact: Luiz<br />

Ricardo Kabbach de Castro, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain: luisricardo.kabbach@uab.es)<br />

Session: 1.3.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

Governance Mechanisms in Emerging Economies<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Ilir Haxhi, University <strong>of</strong> Amsterdam<br />

The Effect <strong>of</strong> Ownership Mode Commitment and Cultural Distance on the Extent <strong>of</strong> Parent Firms' Strategic<br />

Control over Subsidiaries<br />

Markus K. Hödl, WU Vienna<br />

Jonas F. Puck, WU Vienna<br />

Igor Filatotchev, WU Vienna<br />

Hans-Georg Wolff, University <strong>of</strong> Erlangen-Nuremburg<br />

Previous studies <strong>of</strong>ten associated a specific type <strong>of</strong> ownership mode with the extent <strong>of</strong> strategic control a parent<br />

firm may have over a foreign subsidiary, suggesting that parent firms should have higher control over whollyowned<br />

subsidiaries (WoS) than international joint ventures (IJVs). Building on multiple agency theory, we argue<br />

that high ownership mode commitment has a negative effect on the extent <strong>of</strong> control over the foreign<br />

subsidiary. In addition, we argue that cultural distance between the parent firm and the subsidiary moderates<br />

this relationship. We test our hypothesis against data from a sample <strong>of</strong> 156 foreign subsidiaries in the People's<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> China (PRC) and find strong support for our argument. Our findings show that in WoS parent firms<br />

reduce their extent <strong>of</strong> strategic control, while in IJVs parent firms increase their extent <strong>of</strong> strategic control.<br />

Moreover, we find that extent <strong>of</strong> control over WoS (IJVs) declines (increases) when cultural distance increases.<br />

Our results have significant theoretical implications for international business (IB) research as they challenge<br />

existing views with regard to the relationship between ownership mode and control as well as the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

cultural distance on the choice <strong>of</strong> ownership mode. (For more information, please contact: Markus K. Hödl, WU<br />

Vienna, Austria: markus.hoedl@wu.ac.at)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 35


SUNDAY<br />

Antecedents <strong>of</strong> Wholly Owned Foreign Subsidiary Formal Contracting Practices in an Emerging Market<br />

Environment: An Interactive Perspective<br />

George O. White III, Old Dominion University<br />

Thomas Weber, Old Dominion University<br />

Junhou Zhang, Old Dominion University<br />

This study provides new insights concerning how home country and firm-level factors influence wholly owned<br />

foreign subsidiary (WOFS) formal contracting practices in an emerging market environment. Our analysis <strong>of</strong> 175<br />

WOFSs operating in the Philippines suggest that parent home country uncertainty avoidance is positively related<br />

to WOFS utilization <strong>of</strong> formal contracts in governing interorganizational relationships. Our results also reveal<br />

that perceived judicial arbitrariness and, more importantly, the simultaneous presence <strong>of</strong> perceived judicial<br />

arbitrariness and resource protection diminishes the positive relationship between parent home country<br />

uncertainty avoidance and formal contract utilization. Implications and future research directions are discussed.<br />

(For more information, please contact: George O. White III, Old Dominion University, USA: gowhite@odu.edu)<br />

The Institutional and Board Governance Characteristics <strong>of</strong> African IPO Firms with Long Term Foreign Partners<br />

Bruce Allen Hearn, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />

The attraction <strong>of</strong> blue-chip listings in emerging stock markets is a major policy initiative common across much <strong>of</strong><br />

the developing world. However in many cases local blue-chip firms are the result <strong>of</strong> foreign Multinational<br />

Enterprise (MNE) firms engaging with local indigenous partners to form an international joint venture (IJV).<br />

Using a unique hand-collected sample <strong>of</strong> 96 IPO firms from across Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) developing region<br />

which is characterised by considerable variation in state-level institutional quality I find evidence that minority<br />

outsider investors attracted to brand name IPO firms with early-stage long term foreign partners are more at<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> expropriation. In particular a combination <strong>of</strong> ineffective governance measures such as independent<br />

directors and committees that lack support in the SSA institutional environment, alongside dominance <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

insider groups and weak informational environments, inhibiting revelation <strong>of</strong> potential expropriating behaviour<br />

by insiders infers this class <strong>of</strong> listing carries risks for investors. (For more information, please contact: Bruce<br />

Allen Hearn, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex, United Kingdom: b.a.hearn@sussex.ac.uk)<br />

The Interaction Effects among the Three Pillars <strong>of</strong> Institutions on Cross-Border Ownership Strategies - Evidence<br />

from Emerging Economies<br />

Mirko H. Benischke, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland<br />

Siah H. Ang, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland<br />

Jonathan P. Doh, Villanova University<br />

This paper <strong>of</strong>fers an alternative explanation <strong>of</strong> multinational corporations' cross-border governance strategies by<br />

examining the effect <strong>of</strong> the interrelationship among the three pillars <strong>of</strong> institutions on the adoption <strong>of</strong> crossborder<br />

alliances and acquisitions. Drawing on neoinstitutional theory, we argue that the adoption <strong>of</strong> crossborder<br />

governance strategies is explained by the interaction between the cognitive perception <strong>of</strong> the taken-forgranted<br />

character <strong>of</strong> organizational practices in the host country and the normative and regulatory distance<br />

between home and host countries. Employing a sample <strong>of</strong> 960 cross-border alliances and acquisitions<br />

conducted by emerging economy firms between 1995 and 2008, we find that the mimetic adoption <strong>of</strong> crossborder<br />

governance strategies is contingent upon the regulatory distance between home and host countries. Our<br />

empirical results support our theoretical predictions, which emphasize the interaction effects among the three<br />

pillars <strong>of</strong> institutions on multinational behavior. (For more information, please contact: Mirko H. Benischke,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, New Zealand: m.benischke@auckland.ac.nz)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 36


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.3.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

FDI, MNEs and Emerging Economy Institutions<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Hemant Merchant, USF – St. Pete<br />

Do Institutional Fields for Outward Foreign Direct Investment from Emerging Markets Matter A Case for<br />

Theoretical Extension<br />

Svetla Trifonova Marinova, Aalborg University<br />

John Child, University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham<br />

Marin Marinov, University <strong>of</strong> Gloucestershire<br />

This paper examines institutional formation and institutional entrepreneurship relating to outward foreign direct<br />

investment (OFDI) in China and Russia since the beginning <strong>of</strong> their market-oriented economic reforms. It<br />

focuses on the stages <strong>of</strong> OFDI institutional development during these periods <strong>of</strong> major system change, with<br />

particular reference to both the processes and outcomes involved. In each country, the state and its agencies<br />

were the principal institutional entrepreneurs in developing the OFDI system. Consequently, the development <strong>of</strong><br />

OFDI institutions depended heavily on the extent to which state policy was consistent in supporting their<br />

regulative, normative and cognitive pillars. The paper concludes by advancing theoretical propositions and an<br />

analytical framework which posits various consequences <strong>of</strong> political and economic continuity for OFDI<br />

institutional development, moderated by the level <strong>of</strong> institutional entrepreneurship coming from governmental<br />

and business sources. (For more information, please contact: Svetla Trifonova Marinova, Aalborg University,<br />

Denmark: svetla@business.aau.dk)<br />

How Do Sub-National Institutional Constraints Impact Foreign Firm Performance<br />

Xiaoying Li, Brunel University<br />

Laixiang Sun, SOAS, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

This paper examines the impact <strong>of</strong> sub-national institutions on the performance <strong>of</strong> foreign firms in China.<br />

Building on institutional theory, we envisage that the negative effect <strong>of</strong> sub-national institutional constraints is<br />

moderated by firm size and age, entry mode, and market orientation. Our hypotheses are tested on a largefirm-level<br />

dataset <strong>of</strong> about 29,000 foreign firms in 120 cities in China within the period <strong>of</strong> 1998-2005. We find<br />

that firm size and age both have a diminishing positive impact on foreign firm performance; moreover, there is<br />

a U-shaped relationship between firm age and foreign firm performance in cities with higher level institutional<br />

constraints. We also find that joint ventures help mitigate the negative impact <strong>of</strong> sub-national institutional<br />

constraints on foreign firm performance when the level <strong>of</strong> institutional constraints is higher. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Xiaoying Li, Brunel University, United Kingdom: xiaoying.li@brunel.ac.uk)<br />

Multiple Roles <strong>of</strong> Multinational Corporations, Local Institutions and Indigenous Technological Efforts in an<br />

Emerging Economy<br />

Zhenzhen Xie, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

Getting engaged in competitive international markets motivates exporting firms to enhance their technological<br />

capabilities and invest in research and development (R&D). However, R&D investment is one <strong>of</strong> several ways to<br />

enhance technological capabilities. When there are other sources <strong>of</strong> knowledge available, exporters' tendency to<br />

invest in R&D may be weakened. In the paper, three other sources <strong>of</strong> knowledge are identified: 1) multinational<br />

corporations (MNC) as customers, 2) MNCs as parents, and 3) FDI in a local industry. An analysis on 5,595<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 37


SUNDAY<br />

automobile parts and components manufacturers in China during 2005-2007 supports the above argument. In<br />

order to compete in overseas markets, Chinese automobile parts and components manufacturers' tendency to<br />

invest in R&D initially increased as their export intensity is relatively low. When the export intensity exceeds a<br />

threshold, exporters acquire more advanced knowledge from their foreign customers, reducing their tendency<br />

to invest in R&D. When the exporters have foreign parents or the FDI intensity in the local industry is high, their<br />

tendency to invest in R&D stimulated by export is further reduced. Better intellectual property protection helps<br />

increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong> in-house R&D stimulated by export. (For more information, please contact: Zhenzhen<br />

Xie, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC: xiezz@ust.hk)<br />

Sectoral Heterogeneity, Inward FDI, and Location Decisions in Sub-national Regions <strong>of</strong> a Host Country<br />

In Hyeock Lee, Western Kentucky University<br />

Shige Makino, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Eunsuk Hong, SOAS, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Built on the differences between service and manufacturing sectors, this study examines the general proposition<br />

that service and manufacturing MNEs have different motives for conducting FDI, and that these differences<br />

influence their final locations in the sub-national regions <strong>of</strong> a host country. Using a full population <strong>of</strong> inward FDI<br />

projects conducted by manufacturing and service MNEs across 234 sub-national regions in Korea between 2000<br />

and 2004, this study finds evidence to support the proposition. In addition, it shows non-linear industry and<br />

home country effects between the manufacturing and service MNEs' location decisions and certain locationspecific<br />

advantages in the sub-national regions. (For more information, please contact: Eunsuk Hong, SOAS,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom: e.hong@soas.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 1.3.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Search Processes and Decision Making in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Andreas Schotter, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

Subsidiary 'Non-Localized Search' and MNC Performance: The Role <strong>of</strong> Subsidiary Intra-Firm Knowledge Outflows<br />

Feng Zhang, St. Mary's University<br />

Guohua Jiang, Temple University<br />

John Cantwell, Rutgers University<br />

While previous literature focused on firm-level new product introduction rate that is brought by firm-level nonlocalized<br />

search, this measure may not be able to generate in-depth insights <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> non-localized<br />

search on multinational corporations (MNCs) because <strong>of</strong> their geographically dispersed organizational structure.<br />

We argue that for large MNCs the pattern <strong>of</strong> intra-firm knowledge flows would <strong>of</strong>fer further insights into the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> geographically dispersed non-localized search on the MNC as a whole. By differentiating intra-firm<br />

knowledge outflows from a subsidiary to the headquarters (namely vertical outflows) and those to peer<br />

subsidiaries (namely horizontal outflows), we are able to show one <strong>of</strong> the mechanisms, through which the MNC<br />

with its spatial organizational structure could enjoy the benefits <strong>of</strong> non-localized search at a subsidiary-level.<br />

This study bridges organizational learning literature and MNC literature, and the findings have implications on<br />

knowledge management strategies <strong>of</strong> the MNC. (For more information, please contact: Feng Zhang, St. Mary's<br />

University, USA: fzhang@stmarytx.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 38


SUNDAY<br />

Understanding Location and Decision Making: A Context and Cognitions Perspective<br />

James Nebus, Suffolk University<br />

Kah Hin Chai, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

We develop a context based theory <strong>of</strong> location from a cognitive perspective. Context encompasses multiple<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> location, and decouples location from a particular level <strong>of</strong> analysis. We argue that current IB<br />

models <strong>of</strong> location and decision making suffer from the lack <strong>of</strong> a decision maker. When interacting with<br />

context, human decision makers introduce both positive and negative effects. Their biases in perception and<br />

cognitive limitations impede assessing context, which is ambiguous and uncertain. Instead <strong>of</strong> distance, our<br />

theory's antecedents are employees' context awareness and understanding. We explain five types <strong>of</strong> MNE<br />

context traps, unforeseen pitfalls due to context misjudgements. (For more information, please contact: James<br />

Nebus, Suffolk University, USA: jnebus@suffolk.edu)<br />

Diversity and Founder Power in Global Start-Up Teams: Implications for Strategic Consensus<br />

Patricio Raul Mori, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Drawing on Attribution Theory, this paper argues that conditions at founding affect strategic consensus, and its<br />

evolution in Global Start ups. High Founder Power and Low Functional Diversity are hypothesized to produce a<br />

high level <strong>of</strong> Strategic consensus in Global Start up founding teams. Time is hypothesized to moderate the<br />

relationship between Functional Diversity and Strategic Consensus and also the relationship between Founder<br />

Power and Strategic Consensus as follows: for initial stages in the business cycle (Low amount <strong>of</strong> time from the<br />

Global Startup Initiation), the relationship between the Functional Diversity and Strategic Consensus <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Global Start Up Team is negative; however, for later stages in the business cycle (High amount <strong>of</strong> time from<br />

the Global Startup Initiation) the relationship between the Functional Diversity and Strategic Consensus in the<br />

Global Start up Team is positive. This moderation can give insights about contradictory findings on metaanalytic<br />

studies regarding a U and inverted U shape relationship between functional diversity and performance.<br />

Relative Experience and Relative Educational level <strong>of</strong> the most Powerful Founder in the Team are proposed as<br />

moderators <strong>of</strong> the relationship between Founder Power and Consensus. A model for Strategic Consensus in<br />

Global Start ups is proposed. (For more information, please contact: Patricio Raul Mori, Florida <strong>International</strong><br />

University, USA: pmori001@fiu.edu)<br />

Firm Search for External Knowledge: How Institutions Matter for Innovation Performance<br />

Wolfgang S<strong>of</strong>ka, Tilburg University<br />

Christoph Grimpe, Copenhagen Business School<br />

The innovation performance <strong>of</strong> modern firms is increasingly determined by their ability to search and absorb<br />

external knowledge. However, after a certain threshold firms "oversearch" their environment and innovation<br />

performance declines. In this paper, we argue that prior literature has largely ignored the institutional context<br />

that provides or denies access to external knowledge at the country level. Combining institutional and<br />

knowledge search theory, we suggest that the market orientation <strong>of</strong> the institutional environment and the<br />

magnitude <strong>of</strong> institutional change influence when firms begin to experience the negative performance effects <strong>of</strong><br />

oversearch. Based on a comprehensive sample <strong>of</strong> almost 8,000 firms from ten European countries, we find that<br />

institutions matter considerably for firms' search activity. Higher market orientation <strong>of</strong> institutions increases the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> firms' search for external knowledge while higher magnitudes <strong>of</strong> institutional change decrease<br />

it. Our results provide important insights for management on how to adapt search strategies to the institutional<br />

context. (For more information, please contact: Wolfgang S<strong>of</strong>ka, Tilburg University, Netherlands:<br />

w.e.j.s<strong>of</strong>ka@uvt.nl)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 39


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.3.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Corporate Social Responsibility and <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Rafael Lucea, George Washington University<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> CSR Practices in Global Production Networks: An Embeddedness Perspective<br />

Valentina Marano, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Tatiana Kostova, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

We examine the diffusion <strong>of</strong> CSR practices within a firm's global production networks (GPNs). We do so by<br />

explaining a firm's decision to engage in CSR through the lenses <strong>of</strong> its GPN-related complex embeddedness,<br />

which reflects the patterns <strong>of</strong> focal firm's inter- and intra-firm ties, and the multiple institutional pressures the<br />

firm is exposed to through these ties. In the proposed conceptualization, a GPN spans multiple countries, and<br />

entails different types <strong>of</strong> economic ties between the focal firm and its business partners. These economic ties<br />

are interpreted both as channels through which resources and information can be accessed, and networks <strong>of</strong><br />

meanings, in which focal firms are socialized into certain institutional arrangements, including CSR-related<br />

matters. We hypothesize that, as focal firms become increasingly involved in these networks, they develop<br />

understandings and views about appropriate courses <strong>of</strong> action concerning CSR. Based on longitudinal data on<br />

861 U.S. corporations, our study finds support for our general model. Results indicate that firms' decisions to<br />

engage in CSR are influenced by the patterns <strong>of</strong> inter- and intra-firm ties within their GPNs, as well as by the<br />

multiple institutional pressures concerning CSR that they are exposed to through these ties. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Valentina Marano, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA:<br />

valentina.marano@gmail.com)<br />

Behind the Variation <strong>of</strong> Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in Emerging Economies<br />

Weichieh Su, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

Mike Peng, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

Weiqiang Tan, Hong Kong Baptist University<br />

Yan-Leung Cheung , Hong Kong Baptist University<br />

Why do firms respond to corporate social responsibility (CSR) differently across emerging economies Drawing<br />

from the institution-based view and signaling theory, we propose that the variation <strong>of</strong> CSR practices in emerging<br />

economies can be explained by national culture and market reaction. Specifically, due to the deficiency <strong>of</strong><br />

formal regulations on CSR, firms resort to societal norms to make decisions regarding social issues.<br />

Furthermore, because the availability <strong>of</strong> information varies in different capital markets, CSR may send different<br />

strengths <strong>of</strong> signal to investors and result in different degrees <strong>of</strong> market reactions. Based on a sample <strong>of</strong> firms<br />

from ten Asian emerging economies, we find that national culture is associated with CSR practices. We also find<br />

that the positive relationship between CSR practices and firm performance is stronger in less developed capital<br />

markets than in more developed capital markets. (For more information, please contact: Weichieh Su, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA: weichieh.su@gmail.com)<br />

Corporate Social Responsibility, Smoking Bans and Market Seeking FDI in the Tobacco Industry<br />

Nigel Driffield, Aston University<br />

Crotty Jo, Salford University<br />

Chris Jones, Aston University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 40


SUNDAY<br />

It is acknowledge that attempts by tobacco companies to legitimise its activity through CSR have largely failed.<br />

Stakeholders are not persuaded that tobacco is anything other than a ‘sinful' industry. Thus in this paper, we<br />

set aside whether tobacco firms are either ‘good or bad' and instead examine institutional influences on tobacco<br />

firms and the link between country level tobacco policy and firm level CSR. We do so by examining the<br />

relationship between smoking bans and the propensity <strong>of</strong> tobacco firms to engage in FDI. Using a firm level<br />

database <strong>of</strong> all tobacco firms, we employ the combined lenses <strong>of</strong> CSR and institution theory to show that<br />

smoking bans at home are an important institutional intervention, as they appear to reduce the propensity <strong>of</strong><br />

FDI in developing countries. We subsequently examine the importance <strong>of</strong> a country not having any form <strong>of</strong> ban<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the attractiveness <strong>of</strong> that country for FDI by tobacco firms. In addition to linking poor sales to the<br />

desire <strong>of</strong> these firms to engage in FDI, We also show that a developing country is 50% more likely to attract<br />

tobacco FDI if it does not have a smoking ban. We also show that smoking bans at home are effective as<br />

institutional interventions in the industry, making FDI by firms to developing countries less likely. We finally<br />

suggest however that higher proportions <strong>of</strong> the global tobacco industry will be dominated by firms from<br />

countries without a smoking ban. (For more information, please contact: Nigel Driffield, Aston University, United<br />

Kingdom: n.l.driffield@aston.ac.uk)<br />

Stakeholder Capital and Performance in Tough Times<br />

Sinziana Dorobantu, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Witold Henisz, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Lite Nartey, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Corporate operations, and in particular the operations <strong>of</strong> foreign companies, are increasingly contested and<br />

occasionally disrupted by opposition from political and social actors. We argue that stakeholder capital, which<br />

we define as the level <strong>of</strong> mutual recognition, understanding and trust established by the firm with its<br />

stakeholders, mitigates the adverse financial impact <strong>of</strong> these negative stakeholder events. Stakeholder capital<br />

preserves a firm's social license to operate during times when the firm's actions and operations are being<br />

challenged. The mechanism is two-fold: first, firms with higher levels <strong>of</strong> stakeholder capital are more likely to<br />

get the benefit <strong>of</strong> the doubt when they become the target <strong>of</strong> criticism, lowering the risk that stakeholders will<br />

rally against them; second, these firms are also more likely to see some <strong>of</strong> their stakeholders rise to defend<br />

their activities, thus increasing the likelihood that the companies will maintain their social license. In this way,<br />

investments in stakeholder capital can, like insurance, generate benefits or pay<strong>of</strong>fs during adverse events. Using<br />

an event study, we evaluate the stock market impact <strong>of</strong> adverse events affecting 19 gold mining firms between<br />

2000 and 2008 and show that firms with higher levels <strong>of</strong> stakeholder capital fare better financially during tough<br />

times. (For more information, please contact: Sinziana Dorobantu, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA:<br />

sdor@wharton.upenn.edu)<br />

Session: 1.3.8 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Adapting to Local Contexts<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Markus David Taussig, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

Inexperienced Firms and Foreign Operation Success<br />

Ricardo Gabriel Flores, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

Victoria Jordan-Jones, ASB/University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

Despite high failure rates, many firms still daringly fight against the daunting odds by establishing foreign<br />

operations. Theory such as the Uppsala School, the OLI paradigm, and the Entrepreneurship stream seemingly<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 41


SUNDAY<br />

agree on the pivotal role <strong>of</strong> internal resources and capabilities in explaining internationalization success.<br />

Nonetheless, little is known about whether firms not possessing these robust internal resources and/or<br />

capabilities can be successful when establishing foreign operations, or how they might accomplish this<br />

significant challenge. This study addressed this issue by using a qualitative case study to explore how Ta Ann, a<br />

Malaysian based firm without any international experience, was able to successfully establish and expand its<br />

operations in Tasmania, Australia. Against the backdrop <strong>of</strong> theory and research focused on the role internal<br />

resources in enabling successful internationalization, our emergent findings suggest that resources and<br />

capabilities mobilized by <strong>of</strong>ten-overlooked local organizations (government organizations entrusted with the<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> industrial and economic development) played a critical role in Ta Ann's success in Tasmania.<br />

Implications for internationalization frameworks, MNCs' practitioners, and host government organizations linked<br />

to international investment in their jurisdiction are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Ricardo<br />

Gabriel Flores, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia: r.flores@unsw.edu.au)<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Customer Interaction Uncertainty and Knowledge Deployment on the <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong><br />

Service Firms<br />

Christopher R. Meyer, Fairleigh Dickinson University<br />

Bruce C. Skaggs, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts<br />

Sudhir Nair, University <strong>of</strong> Victoria<br />

David G. Cohen, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts<br />

Uncertainty and its impact on production processes have proven to be a useful lens through which to examine<br />

how firms expand internationally. This paper utilizes this approach to suggest propositions for how service<br />

firms determine foreign entry modes based on the uncertainty that they face due to interactions with<br />

customers. In our model such uncertainty is countered by the deployment <strong>of</strong> knowledge in two primary forms:<br />

in processes/procedures or within workers themselves. We suggest that this deployment <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

subsequently impacts the choice <strong>of</strong> international entry mode that firms select. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Christopher R. Meyer, Fairleigh Dickinson University, USA: chrisrmeyer@mac.com)<br />

The Relative Benefit <strong>of</strong> Local Knowlesge Gathering and Information Deployment Efforts in Foreign versus<br />

Domestic Firms<br />

Joerg Zimmermann, European Comission, JRC - IPTS<br />

This study investigates the differential benefits <strong>of</strong> local information gathering and deployment efforts for foreign<br />

and domestic firms. I argue that foreigners must simultaneously handle the implications <strong>of</strong> their assets and<br />

liabilities compared to domestic counterparts. Firms that are able to internationalize have an additional<br />

deployment benefit within host markets, whereas the initial lack <strong>of</strong> embeddedness places foreigners at a relative<br />

disadvantage with regard to local information gathering activities. Early attempts by foreigners to reduce their<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> embeddedness through information gathering, however, generate an additional deployment benefit for<br />

these firms. I test the analytical framework using a broad set <strong>of</strong> foreign and domestic manufacturing firms<br />

competing in Spain. The framework contributes to the internationalization strategy literature by taking a finegrained<br />

view <strong>of</strong> specific actions intended to cope with the organizational implications <strong>of</strong> foreigners' liabilities and<br />

assets simultaneously, and related changes over time. This perspective also adds new insight to the market<br />

adaptation literature by demonstrating that a changing market environment not only implies that firms'<br />

adaptation abilities are important for firm success in a new market environment but also makes important the<br />

relative competitiveness <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> its adaptation activities. (For more information, please contact: Joerg<br />

Zimmermann, European Comission, JRC - IPTS, Spain: jzi@gmx.de)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 42


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.3.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 2 - Marketing and Supply Chain<br />

Manufacturer Responsiveness, Market Orientation, and Supply Chain Issues<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Panagiotis Ganotakis, Leeds University<br />

Responsiveness across Markets: Evidence from Automobile Recalls<br />

Kashef A. Majid, George Washington University<br />

A primary portion <strong>of</strong> a firm's marketing orientation is its responsiveness which entails absorbing feedback from<br />

consumers and transferring it back throughout the organization in order to enhance the operations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization. Using product recalls within the auto industry <strong>of</strong> the United States and the United Kingdom we<br />

examine the affect <strong>of</strong>: institutional, product level, and firm level factors on a firm's responsiveness. Our<br />

findings indicate that the institutional environment, specifically the strength <strong>of</strong> regulations, can impact a firm's<br />

level <strong>of</strong> responsiveness. Further, we also find evidence that specific product designs and the scope <strong>of</strong> the firm's<br />

operations in a given market can have a significant influence on the responsiveness <strong>of</strong> the firm. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Kashef A. Majid, George Washington University, USA: kashef@gwmail.gwu.edu)<br />

Market Orientation and Export Performance<br />

Xinming He, Newcastle University<br />

Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University<br />

Igor Filatotchev, WU Vienna<br />

Market orientation has been shown to provide a valuable resource-based advantage in domestic markets, yet it<br />

is less clear how firms can benefit from this capability as they expand abroad. We develop and test theory to<br />

suggest that although MO capabilities can lead to improved export performance, the export channel a firm uses<br />

and the institutional distance between home and export market can affect the benefits derived. Using a sample<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chinese exporters we find that firms with stronger MO capabilities can improve export performance by using<br />

hierarchical export channels and by exporting to more institutionally distant markets where MO capabilities<br />

provide greater value. Thus this paper makes several important contributions to the literature by providing a<br />

better understanding <strong>of</strong> how firms can successfully deploy MO capabilities when exporting. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University, USA:<br />

keith_brouthers@ncsu.edu)<br />

<strong>International</strong> Specialization: A Bridge between Polar Views <strong>of</strong> Operating Flexibility and Location-Specific<br />

Commitment<br />

Ingo Kleindienst, WHU<br />

Christian Geisler Asmussen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Thomas Hutzschenreuter, WHU<br />

Torben Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Whether and how international diversification and cross-border arbitrage affects firm performance remains one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the major unresolved research questions in the strategy and international business literatures. We propose<br />

that knowing how much a firm has internationally diversified tells us very little about performance implications,<br />

if we do not know, and do not ask, how the firm has diversified. Therefore, building on the two broad<br />

arguments <strong>of</strong> operating flexibility and location-specific commitment, we develop a theoretical framework that<br />

focuses on the extent to which a firm's international arbitrage strategy is characterized by specialization versus<br />

replication and argue that these different strategies may have differential impact on pr<strong>of</strong>itability and risk<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 43


SUNDAY<br />

reduction. Developing a sophisticated measure <strong>of</strong> international specialization and using a unique panel data set<br />

<strong>of</strong> 92 German MNEs to test our hypotheses, we provide a novel perspective on the relationship between<br />

international arbitrage and firm performance. (For more information, please contact: Thomas Hutzschenreuter,<br />

WHU, Germany: th@whu.edu)<br />

Session: 1.3.10 - Competitive<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

Bringing <strong>International</strong> Business to Life in the Classroom<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Martyn Lawrence, Emerald Group Publishing<br />

Nestle Revisited: A Case Analysis<br />

Patricia Ann Britton, St. Mary's University<br />

Zaida L. Martinez, St. Mary's University<br />

This is a case study (the Case) that compares and contrasts the business principles <strong>of</strong> corporate social<br />

responsibility (CSR), sustainable development (SD), base <strong>of</strong> the pyramid (BOP) and conscious capitalism (CC) to<br />

assist a multinational infant formula manufacturer like Nestlé in evaluating whether and how to provide infant<br />

formula to very poor customers in HIV/AIDS ravaged South Africa. South Africa leads the world in HIV/Aids<br />

infections. Mother-to-child transmission through breastfeeding is a primary infection pathway. World Health<br />

Organization (WHO) Guidelines recognize that switching to infant formula protects the infant from infection<br />

through feeding. An infant <strong>of</strong> a poor woman who is not infected with HIV/AIDS also bears substantial risk <strong>of</strong><br />

illness and even death if the infant's mother does not breastfeed and fails to properly sustain bottle feeding.<br />

The risk <strong>of</strong> feeding failure is high due to poverty, lack <strong>of</strong> education, scarcity <strong>of</strong> water and power shortages. The<br />

Case recounts the Nestlé infant formula boycott <strong>of</strong> the 1970's. It then utilizes three hypothetical customers to<br />

demonstrate the competing ethical issues that face an infant formula manufacturer in South Africa. Students<br />

consider the impact <strong>of</strong> various scenarios on each <strong>of</strong> the hypothetical customers. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Patricia Ann Britton, St. Mary's University, USA: pbritton1@stmarytx.edu)<br />

Supplementing, Updating, and Renewing the Relevance <strong>of</strong> IB Cases<br />

James M. Hagen, Hamline University<br />

The presentation demonstrates approaches to get the most out <strong>of</strong> the case study experience for <strong>International</strong><br />

Business courses. With rapid changes in the international business environment, current material is important,<br />

and we examine ways to bring currency and relevance even to cases that are several years old. We draw on<br />

several actual published case examples, including "Majestica Hotel in Shanghai" and "Ben & Jerry's - Japan." In<br />

addition cases that are not specifically international can be used as a foundation on which international<br />

considerations can be layered. The session includes discussion and idea sharing, and it provides ideas and<br />

perspectives that can be used immediately to enhance international business teaching at the Undergraduate,<br />

MBA, and Executive Education levels. (For more information, please contact: James M. Hagen, Hamline<br />

University, USA: jhagen05@hamline.edu)<br />

Role-Playing in an <strong>International</strong> Business Game<br />

Precha Thavikulwat, Towson University<br />

A computer-assisted, Internet accessible, massively multiplayer game wherein players assume multiple<br />

simultaneous roles in the context <strong>of</strong> a global economy is sketched. The game addresses general management<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 44


SUNDAY<br />

and core international-business topics genotypically, without mathematical models, by re-creating the topics in<br />

the context <strong>of</strong> the game. Attendees at the conference are encouraged to bring an Internet-accessible Windows<br />

computer to experience playing the game. Steps demonstrating how the game is played are described,<br />

accompanied by selected screen shots. Benefits to students, instructors, administrators, and researchers are<br />

discussed. Research conducted with games <strong>of</strong> this kind should contribute to advancing international-business as<br />

a discipline in its own right. (For more information, please contact: Precha Thavikulwat, Towson University,<br />

USA: pthavikulwat@towson.edu)<br />

Using Economic Indicators to Explore National Business Climates: An Experiential Exercise<br />

Josh Bendickson, Louisiana State University<br />

Eric W. Liguori, California State University, Fresno<br />

Here we present an experiential exercise for use in any Introductory <strong>International</strong> Business course. As part <strong>of</strong><br />

their 2011 Open Data initiative, World Bank has publically made available a plethora <strong>of</strong> economic and financial<br />

indicators from around the globe. The data catalog includes over 7,000 indicators spanning over 200 countries.<br />

Using this newly available data, student teams are tasked with analyzing various macro- and micro-economic<br />

indicators for two countries. To present the information gathered, students then employ Google Site technology<br />

to create an interactive presentation <strong>of</strong> the data. The Google Sites format challenges students to think about<br />

creative ways to use technology, and provides a challenging yet reasonable medium by which the country level<br />

data can be presented. The World Bank data challenges students to identify what factors are most relevant, and<br />

familiarizes them with what is arguably the leading source <strong>of</strong> global economic indicator data. Ultimately, this<br />

exercise is useful in explaining varying global environments, country differences, cross-border trade and<br />

investment, global competition, and data interpretation. (For more information, please contact: Josh<br />

Bendickson, Louisiana State University, USA: jbendi2@lsu.edu)<br />

Session: 1.3.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Institutional Development on FDI in Emerging Markets<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Gladys Torres Baumgarten, Ramapo College <strong>of</strong> NJ<br />

State Capitalism and Clusters: The Case <strong>of</strong> Brazilian Shipbuilding<br />

Frank Latta DuBois, American University<br />

Marcos Andre Primo, Federal University <strong>of</strong> Pernambuco<br />

The success <strong>of</strong> the BRIC countries in weathering the economic downturn <strong>of</strong> the 2007 – 2010 period has<br />

generated attention on initiatives that governments take to enhance the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> strategic industries<br />

and to encourage the development <strong>of</strong> supporting enterprises. State capitalism is an economic model that relies<br />

on the role <strong>of</strong> a strong central government to support chosen firms and industries with subsidies, tax benefits<br />

and other advantages to which non-favored firms or industries do not have access (Bremmer 2010). From an<br />

economic development perspective state capitalism is <strong>of</strong>ten used to redirect economic activity to<br />

underdeveloped regions (Wickham 2009, Chobanyan and Leigh 2006, Porter 2008). Using Porter's diamond<br />

factor model we analyze the development <strong>of</strong> an economic cluster focused around the shipbuilding industry in<br />

northeastern Brazil. We pr<strong>of</strong>ile the investments and incentives that the government has made in this region<br />

with particular attention to the mechanisms and policy directives designed to support local involvement in<br />

cluster activity. We conclude with comments with regard to the applicability <strong>of</strong> this model to economic<br />

development activity in other country contexts. (For more information, please contact: Frank Latta DuBois,<br />

American University, USA: jetfrank@yahoo.com)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 45


SUNDAY<br />

Firm Strategy in a Polarized Latin American Region<br />

Fernando Robles, George Washington University<br />

The recent financial crisis has exposed an increasingly polarized global economic order: stagnation in advanced<br />

developed economies and growth and rising affluence in emerging countries. Global polarization is shaping the<br />

regional order, in particular in Latin America. A group <strong>of</strong> economies, led by Brazil is experiencing sustainable<br />

economic growth and strong domestic markets. A second group, led by Mexico, is stagnating economically and<br />

facing the challenges <strong>of</strong> violence and social instability unleashed by criminal organizations. The most remarkable<br />

feature <strong>of</strong> the polarization in Latin America is its rapid development – within the last five to seven years.<br />

Polarization creates structural economic and market differences in the two regional hubs. This paper explores<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> regional polarization on macroeconomic performance, foreign direct investment, and global<br />

competitiveness <strong>of</strong> countries in the two hubs and speculates on how firm strategies may adjust to these<br />

different contexts. (For more information, please contact: Fernando Robles, George Washington University,<br />

USA: roblesf@gwu.edu)<br />

Interdependent Behavior in Foreign Direct Investment: Japanese Auto-Parts Manufactures' Entry into China<br />

Hideyuki Takenouchi, Sophia University<br />

Ichiro Takahashi, Jissen Women's University<br />

Yasuhiro Saito, Tokyo <strong>International</strong> University<br />

This paper examines the interdependent market entry decisions <strong>of</strong> Japanese auto-parts manufacturers in China.<br />

Based on neo-institutional theory, we hypothesize that mimetic behavior within the industry may take place. In<br />

addition, we set three moderator variables, experience effects, transaction group effects, and trading company<br />

effects. We used the multiple directories from 1987 to 2005 to create a panel data. Our analysis shows that<br />

Japanese auto-parts manufactures make an investment in China, influencing by competitors in the industry.<br />

More importantly, our findings suggest that Japanese auto-parts firms use both internal experience and external<br />

relations to deal with uncertainty in China market. (For more information, please contact: Hideyuki Takenouchi,<br />

Sophia University, Japan: takeno-h@sophia.ac.jp)<br />

The Strategic Location <strong>of</strong> Regional Headquarters for Multinationals in Africa<br />

John Manuel Luiz, University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town<br />

Busi Radebe, Wits Business School<br />

The study investigates the criteria used by multinational companies to identify the locations <strong>of</strong> their African<br />

regional headquarters (RHQs) and the importance that multinational companies assign to the respective<br />

regional <strong>of</strong>fices. We find that multinationals do assign value to their RHQs but are always aiming to strike a<br />

balance between local responsiveness and global integration. The power <strong>of</strong> standardization and the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> relevant controls have allowed multinational companies to operate as a coherent unit in the different markets<br />

where they operate. The dominant criteria used by MNEs to choose their locations for RHQs in Africa are linked<br />

to the advantages <strong>of</strong> agglomeration and the accompanying economies <strong>of</strong> scale, and a sound institutional<br />

framework which provides a predictable business climate. Distance has become less important. (For more<br />

information, please contact: John Manuel Luiz, University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, South Africa: john.luiz@gsb.uct.ac.za)<br />

Examining the Effects <strong>of</strong> Political Ties and Level <strong>of</strong> Economic Development on the MNC's Trade Activities: The<br />

Case <strong>of</strong> Transcontinental Countries<br />

Alexey V. Semenov, Saint Louis University<br />

Hadi Alhorr, Saint Louis University<br />

This research examines directions <strong>of</strong> exports for firms located in transcontinental countries and explains what<br />

moderates these directions. Potential contributions <strong>of</strong> this paper is to extend Rugman's work on regionalization<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 46


SUNDAY<br />

<strong>of</strong> MNEs by adding two moderators that affect directions <strong>of</strong> exports for firms located in transcontinental<br />

countries. (For more information, please contact: Alexey V. Semenov, Saint Louis University, USA:<br />

asemenov@slu.edu)<br />

Determinants for Political Risk Insurance <strong>of</strong> Direct Investments in Emerging Markets<br />

Omar Penna Moreira Filho, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Richard Saito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

This paper analyzes the main determinants for investors to enter into political risk insurance (PRI) for its direct<br />

investments as well as the rationale for exiting PRI by not renewing its policies. This paper contributes to the<br />

existing PRI literature by investigating how major drivers for PRI, such as, political risks, economic risks,<br />

sponsor capacity, instrument used to invest, investment horizon) determine PRI schemes by using a non-linear<br />

binary response variable model. A unique database <strong>of</strong> the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)<br />

from 1990 to 2010 containing information on 693 investments including its coverage for: convertibility risk<br />

insurance, expropriation risk insurance, war and civil disturbance risks. However, we find that 47% do not<br />

remain active until the original contracted tenor. In addition, financial institutions as guarantee holders use<br />

more debt proportionally more than equity as an investment instrument, and are largely insured within the EU.<br />

On the other hand, BRICs investors tend to mainly cover its investments in infrastructure. Empirical findings<br />

include that an increase in breach <strong>of</strong> contract and civil unrest risks is fully correlated with the renewal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

insurance policies as well as the increased risk perception <strong>of</strong> the host country. The policies seem to have a bring<br />

a unique combination <strong>of</strong> coverage: for instance, breach <strong>of</strong> contract and transfer risk are directly influenced by<br />

the breach <strong>of</strong> contract risk. Another preferred combination includes transfer risk and breach <strong>of</strong> contract are by<br />

civil unrest risks. (For more information, please contact: Omar Penna Moreira Filho, Fundação Getúlio Vargas,<br />

Brazil: opmf@terra.com.br)<br />

Wal-mart's Dream <strong>of</strong> Conquering 'Cape to Cairo' Hits Snag in South Africa<br />

Gladys Torres Baumgarten, Ramapo College <strong>of</strong> NJ<br />

Reaction to FDI announcements – either by government <strong>of</strong>ficials or the public – may set the tone for the<br />

ultimate success (or failure) <strong>of</strong> a new market entry. This paper looks at the institutional environment in a<br />

developing market and investigates the polarizing voices that may arise when one <strong>of</strong> the world's largest<br />

[retailing] MNEs (U.S.-based, Wal-mart) announces its intent to enter a developing market (South Africa). The<br />

paper draws implications for [retailing] MNEs intent on entering developing markets and also identifies policy<br />

implications for developing host countries when facing pressures to protect domestic interests, while striving to<br />

attract FDI. (For more information, please contact: Gladys Torres Baumgarten, Ramapo College <strong>of</strong> NJ, USA:<br />

torresbaumgarten@gmail.com)<br />

Session: 1.3.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

Financial Liberalization<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Amir Shoham, Temple<br />

Sovereign Credit Default Swaps and Emerging Equity Markets<br />

Mitchell Ratner, Rider University<br />

Chih-Chieh Chiu, Rider University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 47


SUNDAY<br />

Sovereign credit default swaps (CDS) provide financial insurance in the event <strong>of</strong> a default in government bonds.<br />

This paper examines the relationship between CDS spreads and equity returns in seven emerging markets<br />

including Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, and Turkey. Using dynamic conditional correlation<br />

(DCC), the findings indicate that the correlation structure in all markets is non-constant, negative, and<br />

demonstrates strong evidence <strong>of</strong> a contemporaneous relationship. Causality tests provide some evidence that<br />

CDS spreads lead stock returns in a limited number <strong>of</strong> countries, and stocks lead CDS spreads in only Chile. As<br />

a secondary contribution, this study identifies several global factors that significantly interact with the DCC<br />

estimates, including U.S. stocks, stock volatility, and the U.S. dollar. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Mitchell Ratner, Rider University, USA: ratner@rider.edu)<br />

Liquidity and Performance <strong>of</strong> Initial Public Offers<br />

Venkata Vijay Kumar Pasupuleti, IIM Indore<br />

Vijay Kumar Gupta, IIM Indore<br />

Study identifies the liquidity in secondary markets as the important characteristic <strong>of</strong> the Initial Public Offer (IPO)<br />

stocks influencing the performance in post listing period. The data <strong>of</strong> 246 IPOs floated in the Indian equity<br />

markets are considered for the analysis. With the help <strong>of</strong> ordinary least square regression tests, it's found that<br />

the liquidity explains 16-19 percent variance in short term and 11-17 percent variance in the long term<br />

performance. The liquidity has significant and consistent impact upon the short and long term performance <strong>of</strong><br />

IPO stocks. Study recommends the consideration <strong>of</strong> liquidity variable for portfolio formation. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Venkata Vijay Kumar Pasupuleti, IIM Indore, India: f07venkatav@iimidr.ac.in)<br />

Volatility Transmission from Mature to Middle East and North African Stock Markets<br />

Akash Dania, Alcorn State University<br />

John E. Spillan, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Pembroke<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this paper is to model the dynamics <strong>of</strong> volatility transmission from mature global stock markets<br />

<strong>of</strong> France, Germany, UK and the US to MENA (Middle East and North African) markets <strong>of</strong> Bahrain, Egypt,<br />

Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates. GARCH, TGARCH<br />

models <strong>of</strong> returns are estimated to determine evidence <strong>of</strong> volatility spillover from global mature markets to<br />

emerging or less mature markets <strong>of</strong> MENA region. We find evidence <strong>of</strong> different level <strong>of</strong> volatility spillover and<br />

leverage effect. This varying response to global stock market shocks reveals that MENA stock markets are not<br />

fully integrated with global economy. (For more information, please contact: Akash Dania, Alcorn State<br />

University, USA: adania@alcorn.edu)<br />

A Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Implications <strong>of</strong> the Islamic Religion on Corporate Capital Structures <strong>of</strong> Firms in<br />

Emerging Countries<br />

Joshua Shackman, Trident University<br />

Theresa Gunn, Alfred University<br />

In this study we examine the impact <strong>of</strong> the Muslim religion on firm capital structure. We compare financing<br />

patterns in Muslim versus non-Muslim countries using <strong>of</strong> 658 firms in 16 countries covering a period <strong>of</strong> seven<br />

years. We find no significant difference between Muslim and non-Muslim countries in terms <strong>of</strong> total debt ratios,<br />

which is contrary to theoretical predictions made in this study. However, we do find a significant difference in<br />

the choice <strong>of</strong> short-term versus long-term debt, with firms in Muslim countries showing a strong preference for<br />

short-term debt which is consistent with theoretical predictions. (For more information, please contact: Joshua<br />

Shackman, Trident University, USA: jshackman@tuiu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 48


SUNDAY<br />

Shariah Governance in Islamic Financial Institutions: A Multi-Country Analysis<br />

Hussain G. Rammal, University <strong>of</strong> South Australia<br />

Lee D. Parker, University <strong>of</strong> South Australia<br />

Since its <strong>of</strong>ficial launch in the 1970's, Islamic financing has grown at a rapid rate. Today Islamic banks are<br />

operating in nearly all Muslim countries and many non-Muslim countries like India, Singapore, Thailand, United<br />

Kingdom and United States. Unlike conventional financing, Islamic financing prohibits the use <strong>of</strong> interest in<br />

commercial transactions. To ensure compliance <strong>of</strong> the religious requirements, Islamic financial institutions are<br />

required to utilise the services <strong>of</strong> Shariah (Islamic law) scholars. There has been limited research undertaken in<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> Shariah supervision in Islamic financing and this study makes a contribution by analysing the<br />

Shariah governance model followed by the Islamic financial institutions operating in Pakistan, and comparing it<br />

to other national models used in Bahrain, Indonesia, Iran and Malaysia. Using the New Institutional theory<br />

frame, the study reveals that there is a lack <strong>of</strong> consistency in the application <strong>of</strong> the governance model and the<br />

pre-existing structures that exist in each country has an impact on how the national models have evolved. The<br />

findings also show that there is evidence for mimetic and normative isomorphism in the sector which may lead<br />

to greater consistencies in Shariah application and governance in Islamic financial institutions across the<br />

countries in the future (For more information, please contact: Hussain G. Rammal, University <strong>of</strong> South Australia,<br />

Australia: hussain.rammal@unisa.edu.au)<br />

Session: 1.3.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

How to Enhance Innovation Performance<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: John W Clarry, Rutgers University<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Global New Product Development Practice on Innovation Learning and Project Performance<br />

Jeen-Su Lim, University <strong>of</strong> Toledo<br />

John H. Heinrichs, Wayne State University<br />

With increased global competition and globalized market, firms are required to commit to not only product<br />

development but also globalization <strong>of</strong> innovation efforts to gain a competitive advantage in the turbulent<br />

competitive environment. This study develops and tests a conceptual model that captures the relationships<br />

among two global product development practices (globalized new product development team and global<br />

product design focus), two types <strong>of</strong> learning (individual learning and collective learning), and project<br />

performance. Managerial and theoretical implications are discussed. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Jeen-Su Lim, University <strong>of</strong> Toledo, USA: jlim@utnet.utoledo.edu)<br />

How Does Innovation Impact Firm Performance Direct v. Mediated Effects <strong>of</strong> Patent Scale and Scope<br />

Sonya H. Wen, Tamkang University<br />

Jennifer H. Chen, Nanhua University<br />

How does technological innovation impact the financial performance <strong>of</strong> technology-intensive firms From the<br />

knowledge-based view, we hypothesized and tested a firm performance model determined by patent scale and<br />

scope. For illustrating whether or not performance effects exist and how patent impacts performance, we<br />

analyzed the test-results on multiple subsamples <strong>of</strong> 106 Fabless firms in Taiwan, during 1995 and 2007. The t-<br />

test results on mean-differences <strong>of</strong> multiple performance indicators support our hypothesis that active<br />

innovators in terms <strong>of</strong> patent scale and patenting frequency perform better than passive innovators. Using the<br />

panel data <strong>of</strong> the full versus patenting subsamples, we further compared the lagging direct and mediated<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 49


SUNDAY<br />

effects among scale and scope attributes <strong>of</strong> patent portfolio. The results show that patent scale generates<br />

stronger direct effects than patent scope; contrastingly patent scope requires mediators to impact performance,<br />

but rarely demonstrates any effect in the patenting-sample. In addition, our findings on stronger performance<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> the full-sample than the patenting-sample imply that patenting may not sustain performance impacts<br />

among active innovators. Such a contingent view <strong>of</strong> innovation strategy may contribute to specify the applicable<br />

conditions for a firm to enhance its competitive advantage via strategic fitness between multiple patenting<br />

strategies and performance targets. (For more information, please contact: Sonya H. Wen, Tamkang University,<br />

Taiwan: sonya.wen@gmail.com)<br />

Breeding the Competition How Innovation Performance Varies across Partnerships between Foreign and Local<br />

Firms in China<br />

Simon C. Collinson, Reading University<br />

Kamel Mellahi, University <strong>of</strong> Warwick<br />

Cherif Guermat, University <strong>of</strong> the West <strong>of</strong> England<br />

Our central premise in this paper is that the level <strong>of</strong> knowledge transfer and resulting innovation performance in<br />

partnerships between MNCs and foreign subsidiaries are pr<strong>of</strong>oundly linked to the type <strong>of</strong> the partnership. We<br />

compare changes in innovation outputs from competitive and cooperative partnerships established by foreign<br />

multinational firms in China. Our strongest finding is that output innovation, measured by both the quality and<br />

reliability <strong>of</strong> products and the range <strong>of</strong> products and services produced by the partnership, is positively and<br />

significantly related to competitive partnerships. Some kinds <strong>of</strong> process innovation are also improved by<br />

competitive partnerships. Cooperative partnerships by way <strong>of</strong> contrast are negatively associated with both<br />

product and process innovation. Moreover, we find a strong link between long-term partnerships and superior<br />

performance in process innovation outputs. This suggests that particular kinds <strong>of</strong> resource relatedness and<br />

"combinational potential" underlie particular kinds <strong>of</strong> innovative outputs in international partnerships. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Simon C. Collinson, Reading University, United Kingdom:<br />

s.collinson@reading.ac.uk)<br />

How Does a Child Teach Herself and Her Parent Subsidiary Technology Acquisition from Multiple Sources and<br />

MNC Performance<br />

Akie Iriyama, State University <strong>of</strong> New York at Buffalo<br />

Sean Tsuhsiang Hsu, University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh<br />

This study seeks to address two related gaps in the literature on the subsidiary's role in the development <strong>of</strong><br />

MNC technological competence. First, whereas previous studies suggest subsidiary technology acquisitions from<br />

different sources influence subsidiary technology performance, few empirical efforts are made to test this in an<br />

integrated empirical framework. Second, there are no studies to examine whether a subsidiary's technology<br />

acquisitions from multiple sources contribute to the technology performance <strong>of</strong> its home country headquarters.<br />

Using the unique survey data compiled by Taiwan's government, we construct a panel dataset <strong>of</strong> 1,971<br />

Taiwanese MNCs during the period between 2003 and 2006, and we examine the impact <strong>of</strong> nine technology<br />

acquisition sources <strong>of</strong> MNC subsidiaries on technology performance <strong>of</strong> the subsidiaries and their headquarters.<br />

We reveal that Taiwanese MNC subsidiaries mainly rely on three out <strong>of</strong> the nine technology sources, i.e. (1)<br />

headquarters, (2) its own local R&D activity, and (3) inter-firm collaboration. Regressions suggest that all <strong>of</strong> the<br />

three channels have a positive impact on subsidiary technology performance. We also find that the effects are<br />

contingent on subsidiary governance structure and experience in the host country. Finally, we find that<br />

subsidiary technology acquisition from its local R&D activity contributes to its headquarters technology<br />

performance. Overall, the results suggest that subsidiary technology acquisitions contribute to MNC technology<br />

performance for limited types <strong>of</strong> sources and under limited conditions. The study complements the literature <strong>of</strong><br />

MNC competence creation by showing comprehensive evidence <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries in technology<br />

acquisitions. It also has an implication for managers that they should consider the important role <strong>of</strong> local R&D<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 50


SUNDAY<br />

activity for MNC competence creation. (For more information, please contact: Sean Tsuhsiang Hsu, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Pittsburgh, USA: thsu@katz.pitt.edu)<br />

R&D Offshoring and Complexity: Performance Implications in Clinical Trials<br />

Metin Onal Vural, IE Business School<br />

I analyze the effects <strong>of</strong> R&D <strong>of</strong>fshoring using a dataset from clinical trials. Such project work is characterized by<br />

varying levels <strong>of</strong> complexity and requires supervision and management <strong>of</strong> the process by coordinating<br />

organizations. I analyze several dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshoring <strong>of</strong> clinical trial projects and I look at the extent to<br />

which complexity plays a role in managing relationships with partners and overseeing distributed tasks related<br />

to clinical trial processes. I find that internationalization, collocation and proportion <strong>of</strong> dispersion <strong>of</strong> project sites<br />

are all significant factors affecting the successful completion <strong>of</strong> clinical trials. Using a unique dataset that<br />

comprises 227 clinical trials including 4569 clinical trial sites between the years <strong>of</strong> 1981 and 2009, I examine the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshoring, complexity, dispersion, and collocation on the performance <strong>of</strong> project work. Despite<br />

economic benefits <strong>of</strong>fshoring seems to be detrimental to project performance in this area and complex trials<br />

perform worse. I discuss the implications <strong>of</strong> my findings for theories <strong>of</strong> innovation, knowledge management and<br />

project work in international settings. (For more information, please contact: Metin Onal Vural, IE Business<br />

School, Spain: onalv@yahoo.com)<br />

Session: 1.3.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />

Managing <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Daniel Rottig, Florida Gulf Coast University<br />

Toward a Social Capital-Based View <strong>of</strong> Economic Transactions in the Context <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures<br />

Daniel Rottig, Florida Gulf Coast University<br />

This paper sets out to explore a social-capital based perspective <strong>of</strong> economic transactions in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

international joint ventures in order to gain a better understanding about the processes inherent in this<br />

organizational form. Transaction cost-based perspectives <strong>of</strong> international joint ventures (IJVs) suggest that IJVs,<br />

as a hybrid form <strong>of</strong> governing economic transactions, inhere a certain extent <strong>of</strong> uncertainty and threat <strong>of</strong><br />

opportunism, and put forth such processes as dominant control by one parent organization, commitment <strong>of</strong> and<br />

cooperation between the parent organizations to effectively manage this type <strong>of</strong> interorganizational cooperation.<br />

However, economic-based perspectives do not explain how the aforementioned processes may be developed. A<br />

conceptual framework is advanced which emphasizes the need to include a social capital-based perspective into<br />

such economic-based considerations in order to explain the antecedents <strong>of</strong> these processes. Furthermore, social<br />

capital is conceptualized to moderate the positive relationship between cultural distance and conflict between<br />

parents <strong>of</strong> IJVs and, therefore, to reduce the likelihood <strong>of</strong> the latter. In so doing, this paper aspires to provide a<br />

clearer and more realistic account <strong>of</strong> the economic exchange relations within international joint ventures. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Daniel Rottig, Florida Gulf Coast University, USA: drottig@fgcu.edu)<br />

The Dissolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures: A Legitimacy Perspective<br />

Chong He, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Gongming Qian, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 51


SUNDAY<br />

In this paper, we study international joint venture (IJV) dissolution from a legitimacy perspective. We propose<br />

that there is a tension between external and internal institutional pressures: the external institutional pressure<br />

encourages MNCs to take an IJV form while the internal institutional pressure forces MNCs to use a whollyowned<br />

subsidiary (WOS) as a means to do business in local markets. Changes in this tension will influence<br />

MNCs' ownership choice regarding their foreign subsidiaries. The external legitimacy <strong>of</strong> the MNC, which<br />

influences the value <strong>of</strong> the IJV form, impacts IJV dissolution. The internal legitimacy <strong>of</strong> the subsidiary implies<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> the subsidiary on the MNC's decisions. We argue that the attitudes <strong>of</strong> MNCs and IJVs toward<br />

ownership change will be different, and in hence the IJVs' on MNCs' decisions will be important for IJV<br />

dissolution. We also discuss the moderating effects <strong>of</strong> dependence conditions <strong>of</strong> MNCs and IJVs. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Chong He, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC:<br />

hechong@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk)<br />

The Link between Cultural Distance and Survival <strong>of</strong> IJVs - The Moderating Impact <strong>of</strong> Relative Equity Control<br />

from the Perspectives <strong>of</strong> Transaction Cost Theory and the Resource-based View<br />

Michael Hunoldt, Friedrich Schiller University <strong>of</strong> Jena<br />

Focusing on the influence <strong>of</strong> national cultural differences on IJV performance and the inconsistency <strong>of</strong> prior<br />

findings in this field <strong>of</strong> research this study <strong>of</strong>fers a novel approach by focusing on the effects <strong>of</strong> differences in<br />

each cultural dimension <strong>of</strong> the Globe-study on IJV survival separately. Additionally, this study investigates the<br />

cultural distance-survival link in the interplay <strong>of</strong> TCE and RBV arguments to combine oppositional theoretical<br />

assumptions and reinterpret conflicting findings. The results <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> 456 IJVs in Europe reveal that<br />

different Globe-dimensions affect IJV survival oppositely. Finally, the results support that equity control<br />

inequality decreases both negative and positive effects <strong>of</strong> cultural distance on IJV survival. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Michael Hunoldt, Friedrich Schiller University <strong>of</strong> Jena, Germany:<br />

michael.hunoldt@uni-jena.de)<br />

The Influence <strong>of</strong> MNC Type on Public-Private Joint Ventures and the Performance Implications <strong>of</strong> the Partner's<br />

Political Embeddedness<br />

Bradley R. Skousen, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Firms engage in political behavior to align government policy and processes with the firm's strategic objectives.<br />

Joint ventures with state-owned enterprises, a form <strong>of</strong> political behavior, are a common instrument used by<br />

Multinational Corporations (MNCs) to achieve such objectives. A review <strong>of</strong> the literature indicates that publicprivate<br />

joint ventures and the political embeddedness <strong>of</strong> the partner firm's managers with government <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

are understudied. This paper seeks to increase current understanding by developing the theoretical framework<br />

to predict and explain which MNC type (i.e., international, multi-domestic, global, or transnational) is more likely<br />

to enter into public-private joint ventures and the performance implications <strong>of</strong> such ventures based on the<br />

partner firm's political embeddedness. (For more information, please contact: Bradley R. Skousen, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA: bradleyskousen@gmail.com)<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> Ownership, Importance, and Alternativeness <strong>of</strong> Resources on Practice Standardization<br />

Jun Xia, West Virginia University<br />

Marshall Shibing Jiang, Brock University<br />

Sali Li, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Milwaukee<br />

Preet Aulakh, York University<br />

Departing from existing literature that examines product or service standardization focusing on relative<br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> multinational corporations (MNCs) in the global market, we explore the power characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

alliance partners to understand their practice standardization. Drawing on resource dependence theory, we<br />

argue that MNC ownership and the resource importance <strong>of</strong> the MNC to the local firm in their formed alliances<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 52


SUNDAY<br />

both drive MNCs practice standardization. In contrast, a local firm with established relationships with other<br />

MNCs in the home country is able to maintain their autonomy and accordingly the focal MNC partner may adapt<br />

their practices. The data collected from 257 Fortune 500 U.S. companies supported our predictions. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Marshall Shibing Jiang, Brock University, Canada: mjiang@brocku.ca)<br />

Session: 1.3.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

<strong>International</strong> Business in Developing Countries<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: John Raymond Dilyard, St. Francis College<br />

Social Entrepreneurship in BOP Countries<br />

Vladislav Maksimov, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

Yadong Luo, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

Stephanie Lu Wang, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

We extend the emerging BOP perspective by examining how firms in BOP countries contribute to social wealth<br />

despite the multitude <strong>of</strong> institutional hardship conditions they face. First, we argue that a firm's awareness <strong>of</strong><br />

social problems that can be solved by forming entrepreneurial ventures helps the recognition <strong>of</strong> social<br />

entrepreneurial opportunities. We suggest that a firm's domestic market orientation and foreign ownership<br />

foster such awareness. Second, we assert that the possession <strong>of</strong> capabilities that help firms mitigate the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> institutional hardship conditions improves the exploitation <strong>of</strong> identified opportunities. We suggest<br />

that young firm age and large firm size indicate different aspects <strong>of</strong> such capabilities. Third, we posit that a<br />

firm's social entrepreneurial awareness and hardship survival capabilities are mutually reinforcing in the pursuit<br />

<strong>of</strong> social outcomes. In a sample <strong>of</strong> 1577 firms in 11 BOP countries from Africa and Asia, we find support for<br />

these propositions. We draw important theoretical implications at the end. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Vladislav Maksimov, University <strong>of</strong> Miami, USA: vmaksimov@bus.miami.edu)<br />

Exploitation and Empowerment at the Base <strong>of</strong> the Pyramid<br />

Denis G. Arnold, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, Charlotte<br />

Andrew Valentin, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, Charlotte<br />

We begin this article by clarifying the scope <strong>of</strong> the Base <strong>of</strong> the Pyramid (BoP) and the poorest segments <strong>of</strong><br />

consumers within the BoP: those living in extreme and moderate poverty as defined by the World Bank. Next,<br />

we utilize research in development economics and consumer behavior to characterize the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

extreme and moderately poor. We go on to defend an account <strong>of</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> benefits that should be conceived<br />

when targeting those living on less than US$2.00 per day grounded in the capabilities approached developed by<br />

Amartya Sen and recently adopted by the United Nations Development Programme. We then link this approach<br />

to an account <strong>of</strong> the human rights obligations <strong>of</strong> MNCs, an approach explicitly endorsed by many MNCs<br />

operating at the base <strong>of</strong> the pyramid. Some scholars have argued that the poor may be wrongly exploited by<br />

MNCs targeting the BoP, but it is not clear from their analyses in what way <strong>of</strong>fering a product or service to<br />

consumers is objectionable from a theoretical perspective. We provide a theoretical account <strong>of</strong> exploitation tied<br />

to human rights that explains why <strong>of</strong>fering some products or services to the MEP may be properly regarded as<br />

wrongfully exploitative. We defend a model <strong>of</strong> serving the MEP grounded in the empowerment <strong>of</strong> the poor. We<br />

conclude by <strong>of</strong>fering theoretical and practical insights regarding the alleviation <strong>of</strong> poverty via business ventures<br />

that target the MEP and sketch a decision model for assessing the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> BoP activities. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Denis G. Arnold, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, Charlotte, USA:<br />

denisarnold@uncc.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 53


SUNDAY<br />

Critiquing the BOP Meta-Narrative: Inquiry, Engagement and Intervention<br />

Suparna Chatterjee, Xavier University<br />

In this paper, I argue that the Bottom <strong>of</strong> the Pyramid (BOP) thesis is fast approaching the status <strong>of</strong> a metanarrative<br />

(a grand synthesizing framework) by providing business practitioners and academe with a template for<br />

future research on poverty alleviation through market development. This paper does not advocate rejection <strong>of</strong><br />

the idea <strong>of</strong> private sector involvement in poverty alleviation rather it calls for a reevaluation <strong>of</strong> the underlying<br />

concepts and themes that have been used to substantiate the BOP thesis. Subjecting the BOP meta-narrative<br />

to both conceptual and theoretical scrutiny will make it more sensitive to its own dislocations and breaks, and<br />

thereby opening it up to creative transformations. (For more information, please contact: Suparna Chatterjee,<br />

Xavier University, USA: chatterjees@xavier.edu)<br />

Exploring Technology Diffusion in Base <strong>of</strong> Pyramid markets - Evidence from Solar Home Systems<br />

Florian Täube, EBS Business School<br />

Christian Friebe, EBS Business School/ Sustainable Business Institute<br />

Paschen Flotow, Sustainable Business Institute<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the key challenges energy access in emerging markets and developing countries is how to reach<br />

households and communities at the Base <strong>of</strong> the Pyramid (BoP) that will most probably not benefit from a grid<br />

connection in the medium and long term or that are connected to the grid, but suffer from regular blackouts.<br />

While policy makers and development agencies try to approach this issue with various programs some private<br />

sector organizations manage to deliver electricity on a market basis either as commercial or as social business.<br />

These organizations are successful as they <strong>of</strong>fer unique combinations <strong>of</strong> products and services such as<br />

maintenance and finance. By analyzing the case <strong>of</strong> Solar Home Systems, this study is one <strong>of</strong> the first attempts<br />

to quantify four different Product Service Systems (PSS). More specifically, we investigated the preferences <strong>of</strong><br />

decision-makers in this sector across several countries. We found Cash, Credit, Leasing and Fee for Service to<br />

be suitable under certain conditions. However, all PSS share that one year <strong>of</strong> maintenance or even more, as<br />

well as customer support in financing their new asset, are key to success. Moreover, it seems as if private<br />

sector companies are in principle able to deliver Solar Home Systems to households with an income <strong>of</strong> USD<br />

1000 per year or more. (For more information, please contact: Florian Täube, EBS Business School, Germany:<br />

florian.taeube@ebs.edu)<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Institutional Forces and Availability <strong>of</strong> Slack on Corporate Environmental Behaviour: Evidence from a<br />

Developing Country<br />

Farida Saleem, FUIEMS, Foundation University<br />

C. Gopinath, Suffolk University<br />

In this study we evaluated the corporate environmental activities within the framework <strong>of</strong> institutional forces,<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> slack and taking a developing country as the field <strong>of</strong> study. This paper integrates the institutional<br />

approach and slack resource theory to develop a model and then tests this model in a developing country<br />

context. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey from managers operating in a variety <strong>of</strong> industries<br />

in Pakistan. Stepwise hierarchical linear regression was used for analysis. The results validate previous findings<br />

from both developed and developing countries. (For more information, please contact: Farida Saleem, FUIEMS,<br />

Foundation University, Pakistan: farida-saleem@hotmail.com)<br />

Inclusive Economic Ecologies for Poverty Alleviation: Developing Inclusive Business Within Inclusive Markets<br />

Raed Elaydi, Roosevelt University<br />

Charles Harrison, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Cláudio Boechat, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 54


SUNDAY<br />

The following discussion promotes an Inclusive Economic Ecology perspective for poverty alleviation. The<br />

symbiotic relationship between inclusive markets and inclusive businesses is the center for the Inclusive<br />

Economic Ecology perspective. This view employs public policy and firm level poverty alleviation strategies to<br />

create an ecosystem that supports poverty mitigation and economic growth. The promotion and support <strong>of</strong><br />

inclusive markets in the Base <strong>of</strong> the Pyramid is a significant public policy agenda, although dependent on<br />

working with businesses that engage in inclusive practices. Public policy cannot independently create economic<br />

activity, however, it facilitates contexts (e.g., by supplying the legal frameworks that lend stability, fairness, and<br />

transparency to enterprise) that support inclusive business initiatives incorporating local producers and<br />

providers into their value chains. (For more information, please contact: Raed Elaydi, Roosevelt University, USA:<br />

relaydi@roosevelt.edu)<br />

Session: 1.4.P - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Showcase Panel on Managing the Shifting Public-Private Boundary in an Institutionally<br />

Heterogeneous World<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

Panelists:<br />

Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

Anita McGahan, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto<br />

Christos Pitelis, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Paul Vaaler, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Andrew Spicer, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Sandro Cabral, Universidade Federal da Bahia<br />

Since the dawn <strong>of</strong> the capitalist era, beliefs and policies about the appropriate roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> public<br />

and private sector actors have fluctuated significantly. The laissez-faire ideals prominent before the Great<br />

Depression <strong>of</strong> the 1930s subsequently gave way to Keynesianism and other forms <strong>of</strong> interventionist economic<br />

policy. By the late 1970s, the pendulum had swung back in the other direction as influential actors promoted<br />

neoliberal ideals—policymaking principles celebrating market mechanisms as a response to the perceived<br />

failings <strong>of</strong> the state-centered model—that fostered the adoption <strong>of</strong> market-oriented policy reforms in numerous<br />

countries around the world. Another shift now appears afoot. Advocates <strong>of</strong> both public and private sector<br />

solutions to the most pressing strategic issues <strong>of</strong> our time recognize the inevitable interplay between public and<br />

private organizations in creating, allocating, and stewarding resources. In some instances, public and private<br />

sector actors have adopted roles and responsibilities that depart from existing norms. More generally, the global<br />

financial crisis has instigated intense public debate about a range <strong>of</strong> issues—financial regulation, executive<br />

compensation, government assistance to the banking sector—that revolve around the appropriate roles and<br />

responsibilities <strong>of</strong> public and private sector actors. In the this panel discussion, prominent scholars from the<br />

fields <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business and Strategic Management will consider the implications <strong>of</strong> the shifting<br />

public/private boundary for business strategy and public policy. What opportunities do public and private sector<br />

actors perceive or create in the face <strong>of</strong> such major institutional change What sorts <strong>of</strong> challenges do they<br />

overcome, and how More generally, what are the relative abilities—and disabilities—<strong>of</strong> public and private<br />

sector organizations in generating, deploying, and stewarding different types <strong>of</strong> productive resources (For<br />

more information, please contact: Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park, USA:<br />

bzelner@rhsmith.umd.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 55


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.4.1 - Special Session<br />

Entrepreneurship and Policy: Insights from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM)<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Donna Kelley, GEM USA Team Leader; Babson College<br />

Discussant: Jose Ernesto Amoros, GEM Chile Team Leader; Universidad del Desarollo<br />

Introduction to Developing Economies<br />

Silvia Torres Carbonell, GEM Argentina Team Leader; IAE Business School<br />

Latin America Region<br />

Leonardo Veiga, GEM Uruguay Team Leader; Universidad de Montevideo<br />

BRICS Countries<br />

Mike Herrington, GEM South Africa Team Leader; University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town<br />

Eastern Europe Region<br />

Slavica Singer, GEM Croatia Team Leader; J.J. Strossmayer University<br />

Next 11 Countries<br />

Roland Xavier, GEM Malaysia Team Leader; Universiti Tun Abdul Razak<br />

With the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, academics have the ability to examine this policy/entrepreneurship<br />

relationship across multiple economies. In 2011, its 13th year, GEM surveyed 54 economies around the world,<br />

including 24 at the middle stage <strong>of</strong> development. This session will explore the frequency and nature <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurship in four developing regions: Latin America, Africa, Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia. GEM<br />

team leaders from these regions will participate in a panel discussion about the nature <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship in<br />

these regions and some key areas for research and entrepreneurship and the conditions that may impact this<br />

activity in the developing world.<br />

The session will open with an introduction to entrepreneurship in the developing economies and why these<br />

regions are unique as a basis for entrepreneurship research. This will be followed by a brief presentation by<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the panelists on the environment for entrepreneurship in their regions and implications for policy and<br />

academic research. The discussant will make some key observations about research using GEM data and<br />

opportunities for future research studies in developing economies. The audience will then be asked to join the<br />

discussion. (For more information, please contact: Donna Kelley, GEM USA Team Leader; Babson College, USA:<br />

dkelley@babson.edu)<br />

Session: 1.4.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Diversity, East and West: A Pr<strong>of</strong>it and Non-Pr<strong>of</strong>it Perspective <strong>of</strong> Women in <strong>International</strong><br />

Business<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Gabriele Suder, SKEMA Business School and ANUCES Fellow<br />

Co-Chair: Janet Y. Murray, University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 56


SUNDAY<br />

Diversity, East and West: A pr<strong>of</strong>it and non-pr<strong>of</strong>it perspective <strong>of</strong> women in international business<br />

Diane Poirier, American Red Cross<br />

Yuko Kimura, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.<br />

Carol Pino, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.<br />

Christine Grosse, Thunderbird<br />

This panel will address the management <strong>of</strong> diversity and gender in pr<strong>of</strong>it and non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organizations. It will be<br />

based on a cross-cultural perspective, comparing East and West, with testimonies <strong>of</strong> U.S. and Japanese<br />

executives. (For more information, please contact: Janet Y. Murray, University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis, USA:<br />

murrayjan@umsl.edu)<br />

Session: 1.4.3 - Panel<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Services Firms: Issues and Opportunities<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Elizabeth L. Rose, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Services Firms: Issues and Opportunities<br />

Elizabeth L. Rose, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Hussain G. Rammal, University <strong>of</strong> South Australia<br />

Pervez N. Ghauri, King's College London<br />

Hemant Merchant, USF – St. Pete<br />

Viveca Sasi, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

D. Eleanor Westney, York University<br />

Although increasingly critical to global business, the internationalization <strong>of</strong> services remains under-researched,<br />

with academic work in the field <strong>of</strong> international business lagging behind practice. While the existing literature on<br />

internationalization on the service sector has tended to focus on entry modes, this panel session aims to further<br />

the discussion by addressing a range <strong>of</strong> issues influencing the ability <strong>of</strong> service-sector firms to access foreign<br />

markets and to manage across borders, in a variety <strong>of</strong> institutional environments and contexts. We define<br />

services broadly, to include the full spectrum: from pure services (e.g., consulting), which are highly intangible,<br />

to hard services, which share attributes with manufacturing processes, to services that are associated with<br />

products (e.g., after-sales service) and are provided by manufacturing-sector firms. This session will be highly<br />

interactive, and will emphasize the exchange <strong>of</strong> ideas among members <strong>of</strong> the panel and the audience. The freeflowing<br />

discussion will address issues including (but not limited to): internationalization <strong>of</strong> culturally-embedded<br />

services; replication <strong>of</strong> service quality in international markets; overlap between services and products; mutual<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> service pr<strong>of</strong>essionals' qualifications; challenges faced by small firms; services internationalization<br />

in emerging markets, and moving down the income pyramid; and challenges associated with undertaking<br />

research in this area. (For more information, please contact: Elizabeth L. Rose, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, Finland: elizabeth.rose@aalto.fi)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 57


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.4.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 8 - Developing Country MNCs<br />

Theorizing Multinationals from Developing Economies<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Alan M. Rugman, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

The Genesis <strong>of</strong> Developing Country Based Multinationals<br />

Peter Buckley, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Niron Hashai, The Hebrew University<br />

This paper utilises the global system view model to evaluate the conditions under which the emergence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

new global system led by developing country based multinationals (DMNCs) would occur. More specifically, we<br />

examine how the effects <strong>of</strong>: a) upgraded technological capabilities <strong>of</strong> DMNCs; and b) increase in the domestic<br />

market size <strong>of</strong> developing countries, affect the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> developing country based firms versus<br />

advanced country based ones. The model shows that, even without possessing a competitive advantage in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> technology or brands DMNCs from rapidly technology advancing or large enough countries, are likely<br />

to dominate the predicted global system. Advanced country based multinationals (AMNCs) are only likely to<br />

outcompete DMNCs in highly technologically intensive and highly differentiated product markets. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Niron Hashai, The Hebrew University, Israel: nironh@huji.ac.il)<br />

No New Theory Needed to Study MNEs from Emerging Economies<br />

Alain Verbeke, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary<br />

Liena L. Kano, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary<br />

The recent surge <strong>of</strong> emerging economy multinational enterprises (EMNEs) has prompted a debate on whether<br />

existing international business (IB) theory, i.e., internalization theory, can accommodate this phenomenon, or<br />

whether new theory is required to study EMNEs. Advocates for a new theory cite three alleged shortcomings <strong>of</strong><br />

internalization theory. First is its MNE-centric nature and related inability to account for institutional differences<br />

between emerging and developed economies. Second is the EMNEs' lack <strong>of</strong> firm-specific advantages (FSAs),<br />

which makes it inappropriate to study these companies through a conceptual lens that assumes strong FSAs.<br />

Third is the EMNEs' unique set <strong>of</strong> motivations for internationalization. Our view is that these flawed contentions<br />

stem from an incomplete understanding <strong>of</strong> internalization theory. We demonstrate that EMNEs indeed possess<br />

FSAs, and that contemporary internalization theory is sufficient to address the complexity <strong>of</strong> EMNEs, including<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> institutional specificities and the unique nature <strong>of</strong> EMNEs' FSAs and FDI motivations. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Alain Verbeke, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada: alain.verbeke@haskayne.ucalgary.ca)<br />

Do We Need Different Frameworks to Explain Infant MNEs from Developing Countries<br />

Rajneesh Narula, Reading University<br />

Applying extant IB theory, I argue that initial firm internationalisation is shaped by the interaction between its O<br />

assets and the L assets <strong>of</strong> its home location. I also contrast the modus operandi <strong>of</strong> developing country (DC)<br />

infant MNEs with those from advanced economies. The O assets <strong>of</strong> DC MNEs are largely constrained by home<br />

country influences. Advanced economy MNEs have a larger set <strong>of</strong> L assets to draw from, because <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

factors. Strategy and host countries play a greater role once past the infant stage. I evaluate how globalization<br />

influences the propensity <strong>of</strong> firms to internationalise. Successful firms will increasingly explore<br />

internationalisation, but there is also no reason to believe that this is likely to happen disproportionately from<br />

the developing countries. (For more information, please contact: Rajneesh Narula, Reading University, United<br />

Kingdom: r.narula@henley.reading.ac.uk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 58


SUNDAY<br />

Emerging Market Multinationals and the Theory <strong>of</strong> the Multinational Enterprise<br />

Jean-Francois Hennart, Tilburg University; Queens University; Singapore Management University<br />

Can the OLI model explain the pattern <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investments by emerging market multinationals<br />

(EMMs) I argue that the OLI model suffers from one basic flaw ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it assumes that all country-specific<br />

advantages (CSAs) are properties <strong>of</strong> a country and freely available to all firms operating there. But some CSAs<br />

have owners, usually local firms, and these owners can derive significant gains from the monopoly control <strong>of</strong><br />

these resources, which they can then use to bargain for or to purchase the firm-specific advantages (FSAs) they<br />

lack, and compete with FSA-rich MNEs in their own market, and then internationally. I present a model that<br />

shows when local CSA owners are likely to capture most <strong>of</strong> the gains <strong>of</strong> putting together FSA-CSA bundles on<br />

emerging country markets, and how this has led to foreign direct investments by EMMs. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Jean-Francois Hennart, Tilburg University; Queens University; Singapore Management<br />

University, Netherlands: j.f.hennart@uvt.nl)<br />

Session: 1.4.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

M&A and <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Wenjie Chen, George Washington University<br />

Getting by with a Little Help from My Friends: Does Political Affinity Lead to Lower M&A Premiums<br />

Olivier Bertrand, SKEMA Business School<br />

Marie-Ann Betschinger, Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Alexander M. Settles, National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

The role that foreign policy plays in cross-border merger and acquisition (M&A) activities is an understudied<br />

issue. Building on the fields <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business and <strong>International</strong> Relations, we argue that political affinity<br />

between nation-states produces a positive environment for cross-border deals since political affinity may lead to<br />

cooperation between governments, easing the transactions <strong>of</strong> firms from each country. We further theorize that<br />

the bid premium effect can be accounted for in the top-down actions <strong>of</strong> these government executives in setting<br />

the business environment or bottom-up actions from stakeholders in order to block or facilitate the acquisition.<br />

Using a dataset <strong>of</strong> 925 cross-border deals for the period <strong>of</strong> 1990-2008, we find that political affinity between<br />

home (acquirer) and host (target) country leads to lower bid premiums. We also confirm that the relationship<br />

between political affinity and bid premiums is moderated by the level <strong>of</strong> democratic governance in the host<br />

country. Moreover, effects are heterogeneous across firms: the size <strong>of</strong> the acquiring firm and the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

target firm attenuate the effect <strong>of</strong> political affinity on the acquisition premium. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Alexander M. Settles, National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Russia:<br />

asettles@hse.ru)<br />

Value Creation through Cross-Border Acquisitions by BRIC-Based Firms: An Institution-Based View<br />

Yinuo Tang, University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh<br />

Emerging markets are increasingly important in worldwide economy and by 2020, BRIC countries will contribute<br />

49% <strong>of</strong> global economic growth. One effective international strategy for emerging markets to engage global<br />

expansion is through cross-border acquisitions. However, whether cross-border acquisitions could create value<br />

for acquirers remains unclear. This study uses a sample <strong>of</strong> 1002 cross-border acquisition deals in the time frame<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 59


SUNDAY<br />

2001-2011 and examines whether cross-border acquisitions will create value for acquiring firms' shareholders<br />

and also examines the impact <strong>of</strong> institutional distance between acquiring firms' home countries and target firms'<br />

countries on such values. I find that acquiring targets from more advanced economies will create greater values<br />

for acquiring firms' shareholders. Instead <strong>of</strong> using resource-based view and industry-based view, this study<br />

employs an institution-based view to explain the mechanisms. Also, limitations and future research directions<br />

are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Yinuo Tang, University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, USA:<br />

tangyn04@gmail.com)<br />

Do Institutional Factors Still affect M&A Markets in Integrated Regions <strong>of</strong> the World<br />

Caterina Moschieri, IE Business School / Universidade Católica Portuguesa<br />

Roberto Ragozzino, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

Jose Manuel Campa, IESE<br />

This paper raises the question <strong>of</strong> whether regional integration has increased the volume and improved the<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the market for cross-border mergers and acquisitions. More precisely, using the European Union as<br />

the backdrop for our investigation, we examine whether the effects <strong>of</strong> country-level barriers to cross-border<br />

M&A have weakened as integration has developed, thereby creating a more fluid market for corporate<br />

resources. Overall, the results do not show convincing support for this idea, revealing that despite on-going<br />

integration efforts in the region, M&A activity still suffers from country-specific challenges. A number <strong>of</strong><br />

implications <strong>of</strong> these findings are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Caterina Moschieri, IE<br />

Business School / Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Spain: caterina.moschieri@ie.edu)<br />

Cross-Border Mergers and Domestic Wages: Integrating 'Postitive Spillover Effects' and 'Negative Bargaining<br />

Effects'<br />

Joseph Clougherty, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and CEPR-London<br />

Klaus Gugler, Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business<br />

Lars Sørgard, Norwegian School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Two literature camps exist concerning cross-border merger activity's impact on domestic wages: one focusing<br />

on positive-spillover-effects; the other focusing on negative-bargaining-effects. Motivated by scarce theoretical<br />

scholarship spanning these literatures, we nest both mechanisms in a single conceptual framework, and predict<br />

that ‘spillover' (‘bargaining') effects are more dominant under low (high) unionization rates and with inward<br />

(outward) cross-border merger activity. Employing comprehensive US industrial sector panel-data (1986-2001)<br />

on wages, unionization and mergers, we find support for our propositions as cross-border merger activity<br />

generates wage decreases when unionization rates are high and when cross-border merger activity is outward.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Joseph Clougherty, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and CEPR-<br />

London, USA: jaclough@illinois.edu)<br />

Session: 1.4.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization Processes<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Peter W. Liesch, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Overcoming Liabilities to Accelerate the Speed <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Rollout <strong>of</strong> New Product Areas<br />

Thomas Hutzschenreuter, WHU<br />

Martin Hammes, WHU<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 60


SUNDAY<br />

An MNE that diversifies by entering a new product area usually first invests in one start country and<br />

subsequently selects target countries in which to carry out an international rollout. We study 788 new product<br />

area international rollouts by 90 German MNEs and find that rollout speed is positively affected by how closely<br />

related the new product area is to the product areas in the firm's overall, start country, and target country<br />

portfolios. We also find that geographic proximity between start and target country, as well as more already<br />

established firm activities in the target country help increase rollout speed. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Thomas Hutzschenreuter, WHU, Germany: th@whu.edu)<br />

Foreign Entry Timing and Survival: The S-curve Hypothesis<br />

Jing'an Tang, Sacred Heart University<br />

While competitive dynamics literatures suggest firms to enter a foreign market as pioneers to gain first mover<br />

advantages, agglomeration-based location studies, on the other hand, recommend them to enter a market<br />

where a critical mass <strong>of</strong> their peers is already located, that is, to be late movers in order to benefit from the<br />

agglomeration economies. Density dependence theory, however, advises being neither early nor late entrants,<br />

but being entrants in-between for survival advantages. To resolve this apparent paradox, we draw upon<br />

multiple theories to build a foreign entry and survival model to integrate these three entry positions. We argue<br />

that multiple forces interact with one another during the foreign entry process, resulting in an S-shaped<br />

curvilinear relationship between entry order and subsidiary survival. An empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> nearly<br />

4,000 Japanese FDI entries in over 40 countries from 1985 to 2003 supports our model. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Jing'an Tang, Sacred Heart University, USA: tangj3@sacredheart.edu)<br />

Foreign Direct Investment: Domestic Alliance Experience as an Antecedent to <strong>International</strong> Expansion<br />

Linda Rademaker, Tilburg University<br />

Xavier Martin, Tilburg University<br />

This paper examines how collaboration with MNEs may induce knowledge spillovers that can be used as the<br />

foundation on which local firms can build their attempts to expand internationally. Using a sample <strong>of</strong> FDI in- and<br />

outflows into China and the United States in the period 1978-2010 we analyze the likelihood <strong>of</strong> international<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> Chinese firms. We find a positive effect <strong>of</strong> joint venture experience on the propensity <strong>of</strong> Chinese<br />

firms to conduct FDI in the United States, with strong country effects. In addition, we find that domestic alliance<br />

experience influences the entry mode chosen upon internationalization. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Linda Rademaker, Tilburg University, Netherlands: c.h.a.rademaker@uvt.nl)<br />

Development and Validation <strong>of</strong> a Vertical and Horizontal <strong>International</strong>ization Metric<br />

Edmund R. Thompson, University <strong>of</strong> Bath<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> valid and reliable measures <strong>of</strong> firm-level vertical and horizontal internationalization is impeding the<br />

development and testing <strong>of</strong> hypothesized relationships between these two different dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

internationalization and a range <strong>of</strong> important MNE characteristics, actions, and effects. Through a series <strong>of</strong><br />

qualitative and quantitative studies using data collected from a total <strong>of</strong> 3,146 senior MNE executives, this paper<br />

develops and validates a scale to measure both vertical and horizontal internationalization. Subscales for each<br />

type <strong>of</strong> internationalization prove to be unidimensional, reliable, temporally stable, and to have predictive, crosscultural,<br />

cross-sectoral, and discriminant validity. (For more information, please contact: Edmund R. Thompson,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bath, United Kingdom: e.r.thompson@bath.ac.uk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 61


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.4.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />

Trust and Information Asymmetry in <strong>International</strong> Alliances<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Ilya Cuypers, Singapore Management University<br />

Information Asymmetry and Partner Selection in <strong>International</strong> Alliances<br />

Amol M. Joshi, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa<br />

Nandini Lahiri, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill<br />

We extend prior research on intra-firm language barriers by investigating inter-firm language barriers in crossborder<br />

alliances. Integrating concepts from sociolinguistics and information economics, we posit that language<br />

barriers between potential partners exacerbate information asymmetries, while market signals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

commercial value <strong>of</strong> a partner's knowledge counteract these asymmetries. To test these ideas, we quantify<br />

language barriers using a distance measure <strong>of</strong> linguistic differences and we analyze data on semiconductor<br />

alliances during 1988-2001. Controlling for cultural, geographical, and technological distances, our empirical<br />

results suggest that firms overcome large language distances by relying on market signals <strong>of</strong> a prospective<br />

partner's level <strong>of</strong> disclosure, stock <strong>of</strong> knowledge, and degree <strong>of</strong> specialization. Stronger signals significantly<br />

dampen the negative impact <strong>of</strong> language distance on the chances <strong>of</strong> forming an alliance. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Amol M. Joshi, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa, USA: amol@hawaii.edu)<br />

Home Country Effects on Trust in <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures<br />

Gokhan Ertug, Singapore Management University<br />

Ilya Cuypers, Singapore Management University<br />

Niels Noorderhaven, Tilburg University<br />

Ben Bensaou, INSEAD<br />

Trust is an important factor in interfirm relations. Interorganizational trust in cross-border relationships is likely<br />

to be influenced by both home and host country factors. Using data on 165 international IJVs, we show that the<br />

trust expressed in the other IJV parent company is influenced by the general propensity to trust in the focal<br />

firm's home country. Moreover, trustors also differentiate between the home countries <strong>of</strong> the partner parent<br />

firm. This second effect is mitigated by experience between the partners. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Gokhan Ertug, Singapore Management University, Singapore: gokhanertug@smu.edu.sg)<br />

Coping with Low Trustworthiness in <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures: The Moderating Effect <strong>of</strong> Performance<br />

Satisfaction<br />

Linda Hy Hsieh, University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham<br />

Suzana Braga Rodrigues, Erasmus University<br />

This paper contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate on the links between trust, performance satisfaction and<br />

governance. It draws upon the multi-method analysis <strong>of</strong> a survey <strong>of</strong> 71 international joint ventures (IJVs) and 4<br />

case studies <strong>of</strong> IJVs in Taiwan. The survey results show that the relationship between trust and ex post<br />

governance is moderated by performance satisfaction. The case studies corroborate and enrich the survey<br />

findings by illustrating that the trust-governance nexus is more complex than previous research has indicated.<br />

Low trustworthiness may not necessarily lead to the extensive application <strong>of</strong> ex post governance. The cases<br />

suggest that the decision to revise governance, through the intensification <strong>of</strong> existing controls or the devising <strong>of</strong><br />

new ones, is primarily taken under conditions <strong>of</strong> performance dissatisfaction. When low trust is combined with<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 62


SUNDAY<br />

performance dissatisfaction, more radical measures <strong>of</strong> control become likely, such as revision <strong>of</strong> the contract or<br />

even the termination <strong>of</strong> the venture. (For more information, please contact: Linda Hy Hsieh, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Birmingham, United Kingdom: h.hsieh@bham.ac.uk)<br />

Knowledge, Trust and Pixie Dust: Understanding the Complexities <strong>of</strong> Trust in IJVs<br />

Mikelle A. Calhoun, Georgia Southern University<br />

Akhadian S. Harnowo, Georgia Southern University<br />

A critical commodity in international joint ventures ("IJV") is knowledge. IJV success <strong>of</strong>ten hinges on internal<br />

knowledge transfer. However, trust is required for the freest flow <strong>of</strong> information and trust is more difficult<br />

across cultures. The first contribution <strong>of</strong> this paper concerns the problem <strong>of</strong> trust and knowledge balance in<br />

IJVs. Sometimes partners bring to the venture knowledge with a similar level <strong>of</strong> value – both high or both<br />

low. The knowledge value contributed is balanced. In other IJVs, one partner contributes knowledge with higher<br />

value than the other. This imbalance creates higher risk for the former and the latter has a greater need to be<br />

trusted to gain access to the knowledge. Trust becomes the commodity that facilitates full and complete<br />

internal transfer <strong>of</strong> knowledge. The second contribution <strong>of</strong> this paper concerns liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness ("LOF")<br />

that attaches to the partner who needs to build trust. That partner does not have complete knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

other partner's market and culture, which hinders trust-building efforts. Analysis explains how LOF complicates<br />

the IJV trust problem and reveals LOF is a problem that does not always or only attach to the foreign firm in the<br />

IJV. (For more information, please contact: Mikelle A. Calhoun, Georgia Southern University, USA:<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>.calhoun@gmail.com)<br />

Session: 1.4.8 - Competitive<br />

Track: 8 - Developing Country MNCs<br />

Institutions, Institutional Change and <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Developing Economy Firms<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Aya Chacar, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Business Groups, <strong>International</strong>ization and Institutional Change: Evidence from India<br />

Vikas Kumar, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Tamara Stucchi, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Sumit K. Kundu, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Business group affiliation is an important determinant <strong>of</strong> firm economic performance in the context <strong>of</strong> emerging<br />

economies. However, relationship between business group affiliation and internationalization <strong>of</strong> firms remains<br />

unclear. In the context <strong>of</strong> internationalizing emerging economy firms, many <strong>of</strong> which are affiliates <strong>of</strong> larger<br />

business groups, the question <strong>of</strong> whether such an affiliation serves as a boon or bane in firm internationalization<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> critical importance. We argue that institutional changes play an important role in shaping the<br />

relationship between business group affiliation and the degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization. Our results, based on<br />

empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> Indian firm data, indicate a negative relationship between business group affiliation and<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization during the initial period <strong>of</strong> major institutional change. In the latter period with<br />

greater institutional stability, the negative relationship fades away. Our findings imply that advantages <strong>of</strong><br />

business group affiliation are location bound and do not easily confer to international operations. Also, business<br />

group firms are slower than unaffiliated firms to adapt to a new institutional environment in times <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

institutional changes. (For more information, please contact: Vikas Kumar, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia:<br />

vikas.kumar@sydney.edu.au)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 63


SUNDAY<br />

Breaking Out <strong>of</strong> the Cage How Institutional-based Critical Resources Drive Emerging-Economy Firms to<br />

Expand into Advanced Economies or Prevent them from Doing So<br />

Kiattichai Kalasin, Mahidol University<br />

Pierre Dussauge, HEC Paris<br />

This study investigates the impact <strong>of</strong> critical resources on the international expansion <strong>of</strong> emerging market firms<br />

into advanced economies. We argue that institution-based critical resources prevent emerging-market firms (EM<br />

firms) from expanding into advanced economies. Institution-based critical resources are resources that firms<br />

develop to respond to a country's institutional environment. Firms frequently develop this type <strong>of</strong> resource to fill<br />

institutional voids in a country. The differences in the environmental conditions, institutional frameworks, and<br />

rules <strong>of</strong> the game between emerging markets and advanced economies make it more difficult for EM firms to<br />

transfer their institution-based critical resources to advanced economies, and in turn, encourage firms to<br />

improve their current paths and remain in their domestic markets or expand into other developing countries,<br />

where the institutional environments are similar to those <strong>of</strong> their home markets. To test our hypothesis, we<br />

examined 847 firms from sixteen emerging markets over a six-year period. We found strong support that<br />

institution-based critical resources <strong>of</strong> EM firms negatively correlate to the international expansion into advanced<br />

economies. (For more information, please contact: Kiattichai Kalasin, Mahidol University, Thailand:<br />

cmkiattichai@mahidol.ac.th)<br />

Sub-National Institutional Heterogeneity and Outward FDI: From an Emerging Market to Developed Markets<br />

Victor Zitian Chen, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina; Columbia University<br />

Jing Li, Simon Fraser University<br />

Daniel M. Shapiro, Simon Fraser University<br />

We investigate how sub-national institutional heterogeneity contributes to the rising investments <strong>of</strong> emerging<br />

market firms in developed markets. We argue that sub-national institutional heterogeneity in the home country<br />

may lead firms from different regions <strong>of</strong> the same country to adopt different international strategies.<br />

Theoretically, we propose a tw<strong>of</strong>old positive effect <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> market-supporting institutions a local<br />

firm's outward FDI into developed markets: one is direct; the other is through the mediation <strong>of</strong> firm-specific<br />

advantages. Our findings using a survey <strong>of</strong> 553 Chinese firms from 68 cities support the theory outlined.<br />

Contributions, implications and possible extensions are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Victor<br />

Zitian Chen, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina; Columbia University, USA: emgp.editor@gmail.com)<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Home Country Political Resources for Brazilian Multinational Companies<br />

Karina Regina Vieira Bazuchi, Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP<br />

Suelen Zacharias, Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP<br />

Rodrigo Bandeira-de-Mello, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Laurent Broering, Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP<br />

Maria Fernanda Arreola, Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP<br />

This paper aims to analyze the interaction between home country governments and Developing Country<br />

Multinational Companies (DCMCs). Draw on evidences from Brazilian political environment and Brazilian<br />

multinationals we investigate the mechanisms governments use to influence the internationalization process<br />

<strong>of</strong> domestic companies and firm's political strategic responses to shape the home country political institutional<br />

environment in which they operate. FDI outflows from developing countries need to be understood considering<br />

contextual factors such as high levels <strong>of</strong> government involvement (Wright, Filatotchev, Hoskisson & Peng,<br />

2005). Our main findings support this idea and indicate that home country government uses a series <strong>of</strong> formal<br />

and informal mechanisms in order to drive the international expansion <strong>of</strong> DCMCs in both entry and consolidation<br />

phase. Moreover, DCMCs political behavior in home country political environment is an important strategy to<br />

develop political resources and obtain above average returns from governmental benefits. (For more<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 64


SUNDAY<br />

information, please contact: Karina Regina Vieira Bazuchi, Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP, Brazil:<br />

kari_bazuchi@yahoo.com.br)<br />

Session: 1.4.9 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

MNE Response to Organized Crime, War and Violent Conflict<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Jennifer Oetzel, American University<br />

MNE Response to Organized Crime, War and Violent Conflict<br />

Jennifer Oetzel, American University<br />

Nathan Ashby, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at El Paso<br />

Li Dai, Loyola Marymount University<br />

Tim Fort, George Washington University<br />

Chang Hoon Oh, Simon Fraser University<br />

Miguel Ramos, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at El Paso<br />

Michelle Westermann-Behaylo, American University<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this panel is to examine firm response to political conflict, war and organized crime across a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> countries and institutional contexts. The papers presented will address issues such as: (1) how<br />

variations in violence and regional governance across a country are related to inward foreign investment, (2)<br />

when and whether multinational enterprises will exit a host country in anticipation <strong>of</strong> war, (3) how violent<br />

conflict affects multinational firms' new foreign direct investments into a country and when and under what<br />

conditions firms might expand their investment despite the presence <strong>of</strong> conflict, and finally, (4) how firms learn<br />

whether and how to respond to violent conflict and whether to work with nontraditional partners when doing<br />

so. A key focus <strong>of</strong> the panel will be to discuss what response options are available to firms and how firms can<br />

learn from their experiences with complex risks. (For more information, please contact: Jennifer Oetzel,<br />

American University, USA: oetzelj@american.edu)<br />

Session: 1.4.10 - Panel<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

<strong>International</strong>izing the Undergraduate Business Curriculum by Strengthening your<br />

<strong>International</strong> Business Programs<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Nicholas Athanassiou, Northeastern University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Nicholas Athanassiou, Northeastern University<br />

Allan Bird, Northeastern University<br />

Kiyohiko Ito, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa<br />

Fernando Robles, George Washington University<br />

Jerman Rose, Washington State University<br />

The panel will focus on different aspects <strong>of</strong> the international business curriculum and how these have had an<br />

impact on the broader undergraduate curriculum. First, presenters from four universities with long-established<br />

undergraduate international business programs will discuss how these influenced their entire undergraduate<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 65


SUNDAY<br />

business program. Specifically, the participants will hear how one university developed a special curriculum for<br />

the Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Science in <strong>International</strong> Business program and how this has induced the internationalization <strong>of</strong><br />

the core courses <strong>of</strong> the mainline undergraduate business degree. Another university will discuss why and how<br />

its entire undergraduate business program evolved to focus on international business. The third university's<br />

presentation focuses on how the international business component <strong>of</strong> its concentration is delivered entirely<br />

overseas in one semester. Finally, the fourth presentation discusses how college led study abroad programs<br />

initiated with the international business concentration subsequently were redesigned to become integral to the<br />

Global Learning Requirement that every business student must complete prior to graduation. The concluding<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the panel discussion will focus on the broader topic <strong>of</strong> different paths to a solid undergraduate<br />

international business program for a specific IB degree/concentration and beyond. Participants will receive<br />

detailed descriptions <strong>of</strong> each panel module. (For more information, please contact: Nicholas Athanassiou,<br />

Northeastern University, USA: n.athanassiou@neu.edu)<br />

Session: 1.4.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

Emerging Domains for <strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurship Scholars<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Tanvi Kothari, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Oshkosh<br />

Exploring and Conceptualizing the <strong>International</strong>ization Pathway <strong>of</strong> For-Pr<strong>of</strong>it Social Entrepreneurs<br />

Igor Kalinic, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen<br />

Maximiliaan Johannes Pater, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen<br />

Although there is an emerging interest for social entrepreneurs, limited attention has been devoted to their<br />

approach to internationalization. The present study aims at exploring and conceptualizing the<br />

internationalization pathway <strong>of</strong> for-pr<strong>of</strong>it social entrepreneurs. By qualitatively analyzing three for-pr<strong>of</strong>it social<br />

enterprises, it emerges that traditional models <strong>of</strong> gradual and rapid internationalization have less explanatory<br />

power for for-pr<strong>of</strong>it social enterprises. By combining literature on social entrepreneurship and<br />

internationalization pathways, we argue that social entrepreneurs have a distinct pathway and their ‘social'<br />

nature influences how this pathway takes form. The formulated propositions serve as a base to further examine<br />

and empirically investigate the phenomenon. (For more information, please contact: Igor Kalinic, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Groningen, Netherlands: i.kalinic@rug.nl)<br />

Born to Learn - Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation <strong>of</strong> 'Born Transnationals'<br />

Joerg Freiling, University <strong>of</strong> Bremen<br />

Mareike Schmidt, University <strong>of</strong> Bremen<br />

The globalization process stimulates more and more start-ups entering international markets at their earliest<br />

convenience. Supported by modern IT and logistics systems, this option is available for many ventures that<br />

become more and more independent from their country-<strong>of</strong>-origin. For transnational companies, as heterarchical<br />

networks without typical internal hub structures and a high degree <strong>of</strong> responsiveness, this holds particularly<br />

true. This is the reason why this paper focuses the ‘born transnational' type <strong>of</strong> international entrepreneurship.<br />

The question arises how international ventures achieve international competitiveness. This paper argues that<br />

the pace and the alignment <strong>of</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> external and internal learning are <strong>of</strong> utmost importance. Knowledge<br />

generation, absorption, integration, and company-wide transfer play a pivotal role in this regard. Ins<strong>of</strong>ar, the<br />

research question <strong>of</strong> the paper is: What are the factors that accelerate organizational learning <strong>of</strong> ‘born<br />

transnationals' Based on competence-based theory and a particular model <strong>of</strong> organizational learning, the paper<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 66


SUNDAY<br />

presents research propositions on the learning process <strong>of</strong> ‘born transnationals'. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Joerg Freiling, University <strong>of</strong> Bremen, Germany: freiling@uni-bremen.de)<br />

The Influence <strong>of</strong> Institutions in Founder-CEO Retention: IPO Firms in a Developing Country Context<br />

Bruce Allen Hearn, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />

Jenifer Piesse, Kings College London and University <strong>of</strong> Bournemouth<br />

While there are considerable advantages for firms in the early stages <strong>of</strong> their lifecycles in having their<br />

entrepreneurial founders in leading CEO position these change during the initial primary <strong>of</strong>fering (IPO) process<br />

and attraction <strong>of</strong> new minority outsider investors. As such the new firm-level corporate governance<br />

mechanisms as well as larger state-level institutional characteristics exert considerable influence in governance,<br />

incentive alignment and reduction <strong>of</strong> agency between entrepreneurial founder CEO and new outsider<br />

shareholders. Using a unique hand-collected sample <strong>of</strong> 97 IPO firms from across 18 Sub Saharan African (SSA)<br />

stock markets we find evidence that IPO firms are more likely to have founders as CEO with boards<br />

characterised by fewer foreign directors, fewer nonexecutives and greater proportions <strong>of</strong> these being<br />

independent and less ownership by nonexecutives. Additionally lower government effectiveness and weaker<br />

rule <strong>of</strong> law are associated with founding entrepreneur being retained as CEO while the opposite is true <strong>of</strong><br />

informational environment quality, including corruption control and unrestricted media (For more information,<br />

please contact: Bruce Allen Hearn, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex, United Kingdom: b.a.hearn@sussex.ac.uk)<br />

Engaging Diasporas as <strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurs in Developing Countries: In Search <strong>of</strong> Determinants<br />

Jean Marie Nkongolo, University <strong>of</strong> Regina<br />

Elie Virgile Chrysostome, State University <strong>of</strong> New York - Plattsburgh<br />

Diaspora phenomenon is increasingly recognized by practitioners and scholars as an important factor <strong>of</strong><br />

development in developing economies. Diaspora members send remittances, constitute an important source <strong>of</strong><br />

foreign direct investments and improve managerial capabilities in these economies. Although the literature is<br />

glutted with examples <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> diaspora on fostering entrepreneurship and reducing poverty, a<br />

theoretical foundation and framework are needed to explain these impacts. This study explores the theoretical<br />

foundation <strong>of</strong> the diaspora's benefits in the context <strong>of</strong> international business and entrepreneurship. A framework<br />

identifying the determinants <strong>of</strong> the diaspora's benefits in the country <strong>of</strong> origin is developed. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Elie Virgile Chrysostome, State University <strong>of</strong> New York - Plattsburgh, USA:<br />

elie.chrysostome@plattsburgh.edu)<br />

Emerging Economies New Ventures <strong>International</strong>ization Strategy: Firm's Readiness VS Founder's Willingness<br />

Watcharaphong Leartsurawat, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

This study proposes a synergetic conceptual framework on the internationalization strategy <strong>of</strong> emerging<br />

economies new ventures based on the integration <strong>of</strong> strategy tripod and the person-environment fit concepts.<br />

The proposed integrative framework suggests that emerging economy new ventures decisions on their<br />

internationalization strategy are influenced from both their firm's internationalization capabilities and their<br />

founder's psychological international suitability. Bringing into play psychological work preferences, resourcebased<br />

view, knowledge-based view, industry-based view, institutional theory and emerging economies setting,<br />

this study contributes to the international business field in two ways. First, it contributes to the literature a new<br />

venture from developing countries internationalization strategy research. Second, the proposed integrative<br />

framework explains how founder's psychological work preferences influence emerging economies new ventures'<br />

internationalization strategy, in addition to firm specific resources, industry based competitions, and institutional<br />

environments. (For more information, please contact: Watcharaphong Leartsurawat, Florida <strong>International</strong><br />

University, USA: wlear001@fiu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 67


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.4.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Conceptual Innovations and Reflections<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Stephan Manning, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston<br />

Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Differentiation in <strong>International</strong> Business Research: A Relational Cluster Perspective<br />

Stephan Manning, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston<br />

Werner Kunz, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston<br />

This study develops a relational cluster perspective on the evolution and differentiation <strong>of</strong> the international<br />

business research field. We show how over time distinct clusters <strong>of</strong> IB research have emerged and positioned<br />

themselves vis-à-vis each other thereby constituting and expanding the scope <strong>of</strong> IB as a research field along<br />

multiple dimensions. Based on a co-citation analysis <strong>of</strong> articles published in the Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Studies (JIBS) from 1978 to 2011, we identify 19 distinct clusters <strong>of</strong> research which constitute the scope <strong>of</strong> IB<br />

research today. We find that the clusters are positioned within a space that is constituted by three dimensions:<br />

(1) issues <strong>of</strong> going abroad vs. operating across countries; (2) governance vs. location issues, (3) strategic<br />

decision-making vs. operational challenges and capabilities. Over time, IB research has shifted and expanded<br />

from a focus on governance and strategic decision-making to incorporate location and operational issues. Our<br />

findings have important implications for the IB research agenda and for a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the evolution<br />

and differentiation <strong>of</strong> research fields and the role research clusters and their relational positioning play in this<br />

process. (For more information, please contact: Stephan Manning, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston, USA:<br />

stephan.manning@umb.edu)<br />

Looking for the Nature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>International</strong>ization Performance Relationship: A Neuronal Network Approach<br />

Hannah Noriko Richta, University <strong>of</strong> Mainz<br />

Jan Gutenberger, EBS Business School<br />

Michael-Jörg Oesterle, University <strong>of</strong> Stuttgart<br />

Over the last four decades the impact <strong>of</strong> firms' internationalization on their performance has remained one <strong>of</strong><br />

the key questions in international business research. Although extensive research has been conducted to<br />

understand this relationship, the results have been inconclusive. One reason for this is that there are several<br />

theoretical arguments for positive as well as negative relationships. Various shapes <strong>of</strong> the internationalizationperformance<br />

(IP) relationship seem reasonable depending on the arguments a researcher chooses and the<br />

weight a researcher assigns to each argument. Against this background, this paper does not investigate the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the IP relationship by theorizing and model building but by using a relatively new artificial neuronal<br />

networks (ANN) approach. The application <strong>of</strong> ANN seems promising since this method needs neither a<br />

specification <strong>of</strong> a causal nor the assumption <strong>of</strong> a linear relationship. The analysis is based on a large dataset<br />

comprising data <strong>of</strong> 102 German manufacturing firms. We reach good levels <strong>of</strong> generalization for the ANN and<br />

the visualization <strong>of</strong> the functions computed by these ANN reveals the existence <strong>of</strong> a systematic IP relationship.<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> firms' internationalization, however, is rather small and the operationalization affects the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> IP relationship tremendously. (For more information, please contact: Hannah Noriko Richta, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Mainz, Germany: hannahrichta@web.de)<br />

Spatial Relativism: Toward a Fine-Grained Approach for Capturing the Effect <strong>of</strong> Space (and time) in<br />

Multinationality and Performance Research<br />

Keith Kelley, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 68


SUNDAY<br />

The authors explore the largely marginalized role <strong>of</strong> distance or ‘space' in multinationality and performance<br />

research from a liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness perspective. Treating space as though it is liability forming, the authors<br />

employ frequently contentious research issues in domain <strong>of</strong> multinationality and performance such as: 1) how<br />

multinationality is measured, 2) what moderating variables are considered, and 3) what performance metric is<br />

appropriate, as a framework to help illustrate the relativistic nature <strong>of</strong> space. It is argued that regions, and<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> regionalization, may be considered using multiple dimensions <strong>of</strong> space and that this is simply<br />

another method for capturing multinationality. Thus, the authors contend that the choice <strong>of</strong> dimensions along<br />

which the ‘spatial proximity' defining regions is measured, affects the relationship between multinationality and<br />

performance. Furthermore, this relationship is also contingent upon other moderating variables that include:<br />

when (time) a spatial dimension is measured, the nature <strong>of</strong> the firm's business (industry), the firm's resources<br />

(e.g. human capital), and the measure performance considered (ROS, CSR), inter alia. Consequently, scholars<br />

should adopt a more fine-grained approach when considering which dimensions <strong>of</strong> space to employ, relative to<br />

the study at hand, to be both theoretically and practically relevant. (For more information, please contact: Keith<br />

Kelley, Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA: kkelley@fiu.edu)<br />

Is Opportunism Really Redundant in the Theory <strong>of</strong> the Multinational Enterprise<br />

Alex Eapen, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Rekha Krishnan, Simon Fraser University<br />

Proponents <strong>of</strong> transaction cost theory (TCT) argue that MNEs exist due to failure <strong>of</strong> markets, a main stimulus <strong>of</strong><br />

which is opportunism. On the contrary, proponents <strong>of</strong> the knowledge based view (KBV) argue that the<br />

opportunism assumption is redundant; the existence <strong>of</strong> the MNE can be explained without recourse to<br />

opportunism. This debate still persists (e.g., Fransson, Hakanson, & Liesch, 2011), but a key feature is that<br />

despite competing causal mechanisms, predictions <strong>of</strong> TCT and KBV are identical. We see this lack <strong>of</strong> predictive<br />

uniqueness as the main bottleneck in resolving the question <strong>of</strong> whether opportunism matters. We contribute to<br />

this debate in two main ways: (1) conceptually, we exploit the contingency logics inherent in KBV and TCT to<br />

build distinctive predictions from both theories, and (2) we empirically test the competing logics <strong>of</strong> both<br />

theories, bringing empirical evidence to bear on the debate which has this far been on conceptual turf alone.<br />

Our results suggest that opportunism matters. (For more information, please contact: Alex Eapen, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Sydney, Australia: alex.eapen@sydney.edu.au)<br />

A Review and Reconceptualization <strong>of</strong> Uncertainty in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Hannah Xia Han, University College Dublin<br />

Dorota Piaskowska, University College Dublin<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> exogenous and endogenous uncertainty on international activities <strong>of</strong> firms is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

commonly studied topics in international business. Building on theories such as transaction cost economics, real<br />

options, organizational learning, and institutional theory, prior research provided a range <strong>of</strong> theoretical<br />

arguments and empirical findings regarding how uncertainty impacts internationalization patterns and<br />

outcomes. Yet, inconsistencies persist both at the conceptual level and in empirical findings. In this paper, we<br />

review past research and propose that uncertainty may be usefully understood by highlighting its perceptual<br />

and cognitive aspects. We attempt to <strong>of</strong>fer a definition <strong>of</strong> uncertainty by drawing insights from past<br />

conceptualizations and clarify some <strong>of</strong> the conceptual issues identified in prior research. We conclude with an<br />

agenda for future research. (For more information, please contact: Hannah Xia Han, University College Dublin,<br />

Ireland: xia.han@ucdconnect.ie)<br />

An Alternative Approach to Measuring <strong>International</strong>ization<br />

Sandra Seno Alday, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 69


SUNDAY<br />

Building on scholarly assessments <strong>of</strong> extant measures <strong>of</strong> firm internationalization, this paper proposes an<br />

alternative measure grounded in transaction cost and internalization theories <strong>of</strong> international business. The<br />

proposed <strong>International</strong>ization Coefficient (IC) is designed to address the major issues <strong>of</strong> the most common<br />

measures, and suggested as a more robust operationalization <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> internationalization in theory.<br />

Implications on empirical international business research and potential contributions to theory testing and<br />

development are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Sandra Seno Alday, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney,<br />

Australia: sandra.seno-alday@sydney.edu.au)<br />

The Location and Co-Evolutionary Dynamics <strong>of</strong> Multi-National Enterprise in the Global Knowledge Economy<br />

Brian Hilton, Nottingham University Business School<br />

It is argues that the life cycle <strong>of</strong> technological cluster location is effected by the needs <strong>of</strong> design and<br />

governance in the value chain <strong>of</strong> Buckley's "Global Factory" This is sometimes not within Multi-National<br />

(Corporate) Enterprises (MNEs) but within networks <strong>of</strong> Multi-National Enterprise (MNE). <strong>International</strong> location is<br />

within the ambit <strong>of</strong> co-evolving institutions not just global ownership structures. This managerial fragmentation<br />

in the MNE value suggests that IB needs a frame <strong>of</strong> reference going beyond trade and FDI encompassing the<br />

location <strong>of</strong> knowledge creation in design cluster and supply chain value governance permitting those owning<br />

marketing (brand) equity to situate where they can best realise their equity. We argue that these two high<br />

value adding activities seem to locate in what North describes as Open Access Order (developed) societies that<br />

facilitates this, the new economic geographer's "North" and not in Local Access Orders (underdeveloped )<br />

societies, the "South", which do not. The theory developed is tested against the experience <strong>of</strong> the textile and<br />

garment industry where it is clear location occurs over periods far longer than the long run <strong>of</strong> capital flow but<br />

the even longer runs when technology and even the institutions <strong>of</strong> governance move. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Brian Hilton, Nottingham University Business School, China: brian.hilton@nottingham.edu.cn)<br />

Session: 1.4.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Innovation in Emerging Economies<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Sheila M. Puffer, Northeastern University<br />

A Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> Innovation Outsourcing to China and India: The Location <strong>of</strong> Clinical Trials<br />

Klaus Nielsen, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Tariq Malik, Dongbei University <strong>of</strong> Finance & Economics<br />

This study explores the reasons why foreign pharmaceutical firms prefer China rather than India as their<br />

location for innovation activities. We use clinical trials as the innovation activity and empirically compare the two<br />

locations with evidence for 2010 and 2011. Based on 1185 observations in two countries, we find that China is<br />

obviously the preferred choice and is increasingly becoming so. Large firms in particular tend to prefer China.<br />

European firms have relatively a higher preference for China as the location for clinical trials compared to<br />

American companies. Relatively small firms prefer India. The clinical trials in India are at earlier stages<br />

compared to the trials located in China which are typically at later stages. It appears that firms in China have<br />

entered earlier than those who locate in India for clinical trials. The paper discusses some possible explanations<br />

and suggests some implications. (For more information, please contact: Klaus Nielsen, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong><br />

London, United Kingdom: k.nielsen@bbk.ac.uk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 70


SUNDAY<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Emerging Market Firms' <strong>International</strong> Engagement on Product and Process Innovation<br />

Deepak Somaya, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Sandra Corredor , University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Bongsun Kim, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Emerging market firms are taking on an increasingly important role in the global economy, both through their<br />

internationalization and contributions to global innovation. However, our understanding about how emerging<br />

market firms' internationalization and innovative performance are related is quite limited. In this paper, we<br />

employ a unique survey <strong>of</strong> firms from ten emerging markets to study the relationship between the "international<br />

engagement" <strong>of</strong> these firms – measured through their exports, imports, competition with foreign firms, foreign<br />

joint ventures, and hiring <strong>of</strong> CEOs with international experience – and their product and process innovation<br />

performance. Our findings are broadly consistent with the idea that experiential and vicarious learning enables<br />

emerging market firms to access different types <strong>of</strong> knowledge through different types <strong>of</strong> international<br />

engagement, leading in turn to different types <strong>of</strong> innovative outcomes. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Deepak Somaya, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA: dsomaya@illinois.edu)<br />

Emerging Innovation in Emerging Economies: Can Institutional Reforms Help Russia Break Through Its<br />

Historical Barriers<br />

Daniel J. McCarthy, Northeastern University<br />

Sheila M. Puffer, Northeastern University<br />

Loren R. Graham, Harvard University<br />

Daniel M. Satinsky, Russia Innovation Collaborative<br />

The Russian government has embarked upon a national innovation policy and has committed billions <strong>of</strong> dollars<br />

to that effort with the goal <strong>of</strong> developing a knowledge-based economy to enhance participation in the global<br />

arena. Despite many promising initiatives and an abundant supply <strong>of</strong> scientific talent, it is an open question<br />

whether Russia can develop the formal and informal institutions to support sustainable innovation. Historically,<br />

Russia has generally not succeeded with innovation beyond the idea and sometimes product development<br />

stages, with failures attributable to a lack <strong>of</strong> institutions necessary to commercialize the <strong>of</strong>ten breakthrough<br />

technologies and products. This article examines historical examples <strong>of</strong> Russia's attempts at innovation, followed<br />

by a report <strong>of</strong> current innovation initiatives. Both the historical and current initiatives are then analyzed using<br />

institutional theory. The inadequacy <strong>of</strong> formal and informal institutional support has created historical barriers in<br />

Russia, some <strong>of</strong> which are being addressed to develop an innovation ecosystem encompassing a more<br />

supportive institutional infrastructure. The participation <strong>of</strong> international partners increases the chances <strong>of</strong><br />

successful results. The article concludes with implications for shaping national innovation policies in Russia, and<br />

for the roles <strong>of</strong> US firms and universities, as well as other international organizations involved in Russia's<br />

innovation activities. (For more information, please contact: Sheila M. Puffer, Northeastern University, USA:<br />

s.puffer@neu.edu)<br />

Frugal Innovation: What is new<br />

Kazuhiro Asakawa, Keio University<br />

Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Northeastern University<br />

Frugal innovation, innovation that addresses constraints in the environment in which the firm operates, has the<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> improving the poor's lives, creating additional firm, and generating a new international business<br />

research agenda. We propose that, despite recent rhetoric, the concept <strong>of</strong> frugal innovation is not new, but<br />

what is new is the process by which frugal innovations are created in developing countries. In contrast to lavish<br />

innovation in which new technology drives innovation and a new market is created, in frugal innovation the<br />

constraint is the problem that is solved by applying existing technologies in different ways. Additionally, we<br />

provide depth to the concept <strong>of</strong> frugal innovation by introducing three types <strong>of</strong> frugal innovation (input,<br />

throughput and output) and explaining differences in their creation processes. We discuss these ideas by<br />

comparing frugal innovation in Japan after the Second World War with developing countries nowadays. (For<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 71


SUNDAY<br />

more information, please contact: Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Northeastern University, USA:<br />

a.cuervocazurra@neu.edu)<br />

The <strong>International</strong> Dimension <strong>of</strong> Science Parks in East Asia: The Cases <strong>of</strong> Tsukuba Science City, Hsinchu<br />

Science-Based Industrial Park and Daedeok Innopolis<br />

Soo Hee Lee, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Hee Sun Kim, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Jin-Sup Jung, Chungbuk National University<br />

This paper examines the idiosyncratic features <strong>of</strong> science-based industrial clusters in East Asia. Japan's Tsukuba<br />

Science City, Korea's Daedok Innopolis and Taiwan's Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park (HSIP) are statedriven<br />

high-tech clusters which act as intermediaries for industry-university cooperation in their national and<br />

regional innovation system. However, there are distinctive characteristics and patterns <strong>of</strong> innovation that<br />

differentiate them. Firstly, Tsukuba Science City and Daedok Innopolis focus on basic and applied scientific<br />

research while the HSIP concentrates more on the development <strong>of</strong> industrial technology. Secondly, the<br />

Taiwanese government has invested heavily in infrastructure to attract foreign MNCs to establish manufacturing<br />

and R&D facilities in the HSIP. Thirdly, Taiwan's HSIP based on SME networks facilitates a closer linkage with<br />

outsiders in product innovation because <strong>of</strong> their lack <strong>of</strong> internal R&D resources. By contrast, in-house R&D by<br />

large firms and public research institutes has contributed more to the development <strong>of</strong> Tsukuba Science City and<br />

Daedok Innopolis in Japan and Korea, respectively. While these science and industrial parks are significant<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> knowledge and innovation for the national economy, their sustained growth depends on the ability to<br />

attract knowledge-intensive R&D investments from MNCs and to connect to their global value chain. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Soo Hee Lee, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom: s.lee@bbk.ac.uk)<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Institutions and Multinational Firms on Innovation Capability in Emerging Markets: A Case <strong>of</strong><br />

Russia<br />

Natalya Smith, University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool<br />

Ekaterina Thomas, Staffordshire University<br />

This paper examines the impact that institutions (i.e. corruption and legislative risk) and the allocation <strong>of</strong><br />

multinational firms (MNEs) have on innovation output in a sample <strong>of</strong> Russian regions for the period 1997-2009.<br />

For this purpose, we regress the regional number <strong>of</strong> patents filed on two institutional indices and the number <strong>of</strong><br />

MNEs, after controlling for a standard set <strong>of</strong> traditional economic determinants <strong>of</strong> innovation. Our results show<br />

that both institutions and foreign investment are significant determinants <strong>of</strong> innovation in Russian regions.<br />

Interestingly, we also observe a positive impact <strong>of</strong> corruption on innovation output through MNEs and a<br />

negative impact – through exporting. (For more information, please contact: Natalya Smith, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Liverpool, United Kingdom: natalya.smith@liv.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 1.4.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Organization and Leadership in Multinational Enterprises<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Romie Frederick Littrell, Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Effective Global Leaders: Beyond Mindsets and Skill Sets<br />

Mary Boyden Teagarden, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

Andreas Schotter, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 72


SUNDAY<br />

MNCs face a global leader supply paradox—many in global leadership roles fall short when contributing to the<br />

organization's performance, while the need for quality global leaders has never been greater. We develop a<br />

synthesized model <strong>of</strong> global leader effectiveness based on the synthesis <strong>of</strong> global mindset and boundary<br />

spanner studies that independently identified elements <strong>of</strong> global leadership linked to global organizational<br />

effectiveness. This synthesis provides a comprehensive grounded model <strong>of</strong> global leader characteristics that<br />

underpin effectiveness. Such empirically based integration has yet to be accomplished. The overarching goal <strong>of</strong><br />

this synthesis is to inform both scholars and practitioners. (For more information, please contact: Mary Boyden<br />

Teagarden, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management, USA: mary.teagarden@thunderbird.edu)<br />

How Headquarters and Hierarchy Influence Intra-Organizational Networks in MNCs<br />

William G. Egelh<strong>of</strong>f, Fordham University<br />

Joachim Wolf, University <strong>of</strong> Kiel<br />

Existing literature has failed to adequately distinguish the coordination capabilities <strong>of</strong> intra- and interorganizational<br />

networks. It frequently assumes they are similar and has suggested that one can view MNCs as<br />

inter-organizational networks. The present paper uses an information-processing perspective to define and<br />

distinguish the coordination capabilities <strong>of</strong> intra- and inter-organizational networks in MNCs. It assumes intraorganizational<br />

networks are embedded in a common hierarchical context, while inter-organizational networks<br />

are not. The paper argues that the presence <strong>of</strong> a HQ and hierarchical context significantly enhances the<br />

information-processing capacities <strong>of</strong> intra-organizational networks. Thus, in addition to directly providing<br />

hierarchical information processing to an MNC, HQ and a hierarchical context also contribute to the coordinating<br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong> its intra-organizational networks. (For more information, please contact: William G. Egelh<strong>of</strong>f,<br />

Fordham University, USA: egelh<strong>of</strong>f@fordham.edu)<br />

Marketing Management in MNC Subsidiaries: An Archetypal Analysis<br />

David F. Midgley, INSEAD<br />

Sunil Venaik, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

The relative degree <strong>of</strong> control and standardization in the ways multinational corporations operate across the<br />

globe has been a central question in international business research since the inception <strong>of</strong> the discipline.<br />

Normatively, is it better to control from the center or should local subsidiaries be allowed to go their own way<br />

Or is it more appropriate to globally standardize certain elements <strong>of</strong> operations but allow local adaptation on<br />

others Moreover, due to the dynamism and diversity <strong>of</strong> the business environments in which MNCs operate,<br />

they constantly seek better strategies and decision-making structures to balance the evolving global and local<br />

pressures on their subsidiaries. Consequently there is considerable heterogeneity in the strategies and<br />

structures employed by individual corporations as they adapt to the specific circumstances in which they find<br />

themselves. And paradoxically, although the literature examines in depth the moderating influence <strong>of</strong> various<br />

pressures on strategy and structure, it does not describe the underlying empirical heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> these<br />

strategies and structures in any detail. In this paper, we use a relatively new statistical method—archetypal<br />

analysis—and detailed measures <strong>of</strong> the marketing mix to describe the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> subsidiary marketing<br />

strategies and decision-making structures. Our preliminary results show this heterogeneity to be more complex<br />

than recognized by the literature. (For more information, please contact: Sunil Venaik, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Queensland, Australia: s.venaik@business.uq.edu.au)<br />

MNC Headquarters as Activity Systems: The Consequences <strong>of</strong> Differentiating and Relocating MNC Headquarters<br />

Phillip C. Nell, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Marcus Møller Larsen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 73


SUNDAY<br />

Recent literature has questioned why multinational corporations (MNC) relocate their headquarters activities<br />

overseas. In this paper, we investigate the consequences <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon. To do this, we conceptualize the<br />

MNC headquarters activities as an interdependent system, and develop a set <strong>of</strong> propositions that links<br />

headquarters unbundling and relocation to complexity and rising coordination costs. Moreover, we argue that<br />

the coordination costs are <strong>of</strong>ten neglected in the headquarters reconfiguration process. In sum, we provide a<br />

novel perspective on modern MNC headquarters configurations, derive consequences for MNC research, and<br />

develop a model that aims at explaining the stability <strong>of</strong> such systems. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Phillip C. Nell, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: pcn.smg@cbs.dk)<br />

Psychic Distance, Control Mechanism and Subsidiary Performance: An Empirical Study <strong>of</strong> Austrian MNCs<br />

Manfred Fuchs, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />

Beatrix Jöbstl, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />

Mariella Koestner, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />

This study analyses antecedents that influence the performance <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries in psychically close and<br />

psychically distant countries. It focuses on the impact <strong>of</strong> control mechanisms between Headquarters and<br />

subsidiaries and how these control mechanisms are determined by psychic distance "effects". The study is<br />

based on the analyses <strong>of</strong> 28 Austrian MNEs and empirically tests HQ-subsidiary relations in 45 subsidiaries,<br />

differentiated in close and distant subsidiary locations. The major objective is to show how psychic distance and<br />

control mechanisms affect subsidiary performance. Our results show that a high level <strong>of</strong> psychic distance,<br />

indicating low familiarity with a host country, is positively associated with performance. Additionally, the<br />

mediating effect <strong>of</strong> control mechanisms provides evidence that subsidiaries located in psychically close host<br />

countries are controlled and integrated more intensively which in turn leads to lower subsidiary performance.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Manfred Fuchs, University <strong>of</strong> Graz, Austria: manfred.fuchs@uni-graz.at)<br />

Understanding the Construct <strong>of</strong> Administrative Heritage<br />

Birton Cowden, Saint Louis University<br />

Administrative Heritage has previously been described as a constraint on existing businesses in making strategic<br />

decisions based on their existing configuration <strong>of</strong> physical assets and the management culture. This article<br />

provides additional items to aid in the understanding <strong>of</strong> the construct <strong>of</strong> administrative heritage and why<br />

existing firms make the decisions that they do. Furthermore, this article introduces the concept <strong>of</strong> administrative<br />

fit to help describe why some firms are constrained by their administrative heritage, while others are not. The<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> this conceptual paper is to lay a foundation for several future studies. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Birton Cowden, Saint Louis University, USA: bcowden@slu.edu)<br />

What are the Consequences <strong>of</strong> Perceived Parent Company Arrogance<br />

Jakob Lauring, Aarhus University<br />

Poul Houman Andersen, Aarhus University<br />

Marianne Storgaard, Kolding School <strong>of</strong> Design<br />

Hanne Kragh, Aarhus University<br />

Parent companies have a specific status due to size, home market position, and resources that grant them<br />

superiority over their subsidiaries. This superiority is sometimes expressed in situations that subsidiary<br />

employees interpret as arrogance. Such perceptions <strong>of</strong> parent company attitudes and behaviors could have a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> negative consequences for the general functioning <strong>of</strong> MNCs. In this article we argue that perceived<br />

parent company arrogance is an understudied but important subject in MNC management. We illustrate this by<br />

use <strong>of</strong> four qualitative studies. Our findings show that actions that lead to the labeling <strong>of</strong> parent company<br />

representatives as arrogant may be categorized as ignoring, by-passing, and educating. By use <strong>of</strong> social<br />

categorization theory and studies on group dynamics we argue that perceived arrogance could have highly<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 74


SUNDAY<br />

negative effects on parent-subsidiary relations as well as on MNC work outcomes. Results are discussed in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> theoretical and practical implications as well as suggestions for further research. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Jakob Lauring, Aarhus University, Denmark: jala@asb.dk)<br />

Session: 1.4.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

The Implications <strong>of</strong> Institutional Differences in Emerging Economies<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Mahmood Zaidi, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

A Conceptual Investigation <strong>of</strong> the Effects <strong>of</strong> Culture on Economic Freedom in Emerging Markets<br />

Chuck Bryant, Cleveland State University<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this research is to propose an investigation <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> culture on the relationship between<br />

economic freedom and economic growth in emerging markets. To eliminate any bias introduced by the<br />

relatively higher freedom index scores and/or relatively higher GDP per capita growth rates, our study focuses<br />

exclusively on emerging nations. The preponderance <strong>of</strong> literature on economic health indicates that economic<br />

freedom is a critical factor to a growing economy – especially in emerging markets where economic shocks can<br />

be particularly impactful. (Mauro, 1995). Additionally, much empirical research on macro level cultural studies,<br />

uses H<strong>of</strong>stedes' cultural index as an indicator <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> culture. This present work will rely on H<strong>of</strong>stede's<br />

cultural index and data from the Heritage Foundations' Index <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom, to investigate the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

a culture on the relationship between economic freedom and per capita GDP growth rates. We posit that culture<br />

has a moderating effect on this relationship. (For more information, please contact: Chuck Bryant, Cleveland<br />

State University, USA: c.e.bryant@csuohio.edu)<br />

Equity Culture and Transition Economies: Empirical Evaluation<br />

Zita Stone, University <strong>of</strong> Kent<br />

Fragkiskos Filippaios, University <strong>of</strong> Kent<br />

Carmen Raluca Stoian, University <strong>of</strong> Kent<br />

Equity culture is underdeveloped in Central and Eastern Europe. The question <strong>of</strong> the viability <strong>of</strong> equity financing<br />

development as an alternative to the traditional debt financing in the CEEs is the main focus <strong>of</strong> this study. We<br />

develop a theory-bridging conceptual framework through which we attempt to demonstrate what factors<br />

contribute to its formation. We maintain that firms seeking equity finance are the main drivers for equity culture<br />

development in a country. This demand is affected by the size <strong>of</strong> transaction costs these firms incur in the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> searching for, establishing and co-ordinating contractual relationships with equity providers. We<br />

establish that the size <strong>of</strong> transaction costs is determined by a set <strong>of</strong> conditions stemming from internal<br />

(managerial) and external (macro-economic and institutional) environments impacting the firm. Our findings<br />

suggest that CEECs can be clustered in three groups in terms <strong>of</strong> their potential for equity culture development.<br />

Firstly, CEECs belonging to the group <strong>of</strong> Leaders (Czech republic, Estonia, Slovakia) have the macro-economic<br />

and institutional conditions necessary for the development <strong>of</strong> an equity culture in place and that it is the equityoriented<br />

financial institutions and the managerial capabilities which require further attention so that equity<br />

culture can be fully developed. By contrast, countries from the Potentials group (Hungary, Latvia, Poland,<br />

Slovenia) have the macroeconomic performance required for the development <strong>of</strong> an advanced equity-based<br />

financial system, however the conditions stemming from the institutional (including both quality as well as<br />

adequacy <strong>of</strong> equity-oriented financial intermediaries) and the managerial environment need improving. The<br />

results for the group <strong>of</strong> Laggards (Bulgaria, Lithuania, Romania) indicate that in order for an equity culture to be<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 75


SUNDAY<br />

able to develop, a complex set <strong>of</strong> macro-economic, institutional and managerial conditions requires attention.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Zita Stone, University <strong>of</strong> Kent, United Kingdom: z.stone@kent.ac.uk)<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization and Entrepreneurship: Empirical Evidence on the Regional Formation <strong>of</strong> New Ventures in<br />

China<br />

Julie Elston, Oregon State University<br />

Extensive market reforms targeted at increasing both internationalization and entrepreneurial activity over the<br />

last three decades in China have resulted in dynamic but uneven growth across regions. This study examines<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> location on the empirical link between internationalization and firm formation across China.<br />

Results indicate that location significantly impacts firm formation, with rural China outpacing highly<br />

internationalized Shenzhen and Hong Kong regions in entrepreneurial activity. Empirical results suggest that<br />

higher degrees <strong>of</strong> regional internationalization are significant in predicting lower levels <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial<br />

activity. From a policy perspective this suggests that reforms have been effective in stimulating entrepreneurial<br />

activity in the mainland China region which not only has a high rate <strong>of</strong> necessity-based entrepreneurship but an<br />

opportunity-based entrepreneurship rate more than double Hong Kong's. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Julie Elston, Oregon State University, USA: julie.elston@osucascades.edu)<br />

Rising Labour Disputes in China: Decoding <strong>of</strong> and Adapting to China's More Deamdning Labour Relations<br />

Audrey Heung Heung Tsui, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

Roy Ee Jin Goh, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

China witnessed in the past few years mounting outbreaks <strong>of</strong> labour disputes, strikes, protests and suicides,<br />

especially in the nation's coastal provinces that host many labour-intensive manufacturing investments. This<br />

involves, in particular, tens <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> migrant workers from inland China. Most export-oriented<br />

manufacturers, both local and foreign investments from Hong Kong and Taiwan, faced severe cash flow<br />

problem due to factory order cancellations in the global financial crisis. Many drastically retrench or closed<br />

shops as a consequence. In the bigger context, China's new aspirations <strong>of</strong> economic restructuring and<br />

industrial upgrading , and its determination to raise minimum wage, to strengthen union support, and to<br />

encourage arbitration and collective bargaining in settling disputes--all imply a tighter enforcement <strong>of</strong> laws to<br />

protect labour rights. The paper presents some guidelines for companies to read the signals <strong>of</strong> change and<br />

some action recommendations to address labour disputes by actively engaging relevant stakeholders.<br />

Harmonious labour relations will be one key driver for success for investors aspiring to have a long-term<br />

presence in the China market. (For more information, please contact: Audrey Heung Heung Tsui, National<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore: bizathh@nus.edu.sg)<br />

Cross-National Gender Differences in Micr<strong>of</strong>inance: Impact <strong>of</strong> Societal Trust and Other Characteristics<br />

Raj Aggarwal, University <strong>of</strong> Akron<br />

John W. Goodell, University <strong>of</strong> Akron<br />

Lauren Selleck, University <strong>of</strong> Akron<br />

In this paper we investigate the reasons why there is international variation in the extent to which women<br />

borrowers predominate with micr<strong>of</strong>inance institutions. Using a measure <strong>of</strong> social trust from the World Values<br />

Survey we find a negative association <strong>of</strong> the percent <strong>of</strong> women borrowers with social trust suggesting that a<br />

preference for women borrowers reflects compensation for a lack <strong>of</strong> social trust. Consistent with the social<br />

mission <strong>of</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>inance institutions, we find a positive association <strong>of</strong> the percent <strong>of</strong> female borrowers with the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> "outreach" <strong>of</strong> the micr<strong>of</strong>inance institution, especially as this positive association is even stronger for<br />

nonpr<strong>of</strong>it micr<strong>of</strong>inance institutions and those that target the lower end <strong>of</strong> the social economic spectrum. We<br />

also find a negative association between the percent <strong>of</strong> female borrowers with the average loan size, and with<br />

the micr<strong>of</strong>inance institution being from Latin America. These results should be <strong>of</strong> great interest to policy makers<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 76


SUNDAY<br />

and scholars interested in the design <strong>of</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>inance institutions. (For more information, please contact: John<br />

W. Goodell, University <strong>of</strong> Akron, USA: johngoo@uakron.edu)<br />

Local versus Multinational Companies: Inconsistent CSR Perception by Consumers in Emerging Markets<br />

Omer Farooq, Euromed Management-Marseille<br />

Where previous studies have examined the effects <strong>of</strong> perceived CSR on consumer related attitudes and<br />

behaviors, this study enhances our understanding <strong>of</strong> how consumers develop their perceptions from incomplete,<br />

asymmetrical and ambiguous information <strong>of</strong> CSR and explores the inconsistency in the development <strong>of</strong> CSR<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> consumers between multinational companies (MNCs) and local companies (LCs). The study also<br />

identifies the ways and means that assist the companies (especially MNCs) to optimize the benefits <strong>of</strong> their CSR<br />

investments in emerging markets. Furthermore, the study also reveals the differential effects <strong>of</strong> different CSR<br />

actions on consumers' perceptions <strong>of</strong> CSR. The hierarchical data obtained from 54 local and multinational<br />

companies and 473 consumers in south Asia reveals interesting findings that have many implications for<br />

research and practice. It was found that CSR actions related to community development are most effective in<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> consumer perception <strong>of</strong> CSR. The results also show that MNCs are at disadvantage in<br />

stimulating the perception <strong>of</strong> CSR in comparison <strong>of</strong> their local counter parts. However, MNCs can diffuse this<br />

disadvantage by an effective marketing strategy. (For more information, please contact: Omer Farooq, Euromed<br />

Management-Marseille, France: muhammadomer.farooq@euromed-management.com)<br />

Bonding and Bridging Social Capital and SME Growth in Emerging Markets<br />

Natalya Totskaya, Concordia University<br />

This study examines the role played by bonding and bridging social capital in the choice <strong>of</strong> SME growth<br />

strategies in the context <strong>of</strong> emerging markets. A model specifying the effects <strong>of</strong> bonding and bridging relational<br />

capital on SME growth is developed based on analysis <strong>of</strong> extant literature. Human capital and institutional<br />

environment are identified as moderators <strong>of</strong> relationship between the structure <strong>of</strong> SME social capital and SME<br />

growth patterns. This study contributes to current literature by extending the knowledge <strong>of</strong> SME growth in<br />

specific context <strong>of</strong> emerging markets. By testing the effects <strong>of</strong> relational ties on the choice <strong>of</strong> growth strategies<br />

this study clarifies the role <strong>of</strong> intangible resources in SME development. In addition, it provides support for<br />

existing studies on importance <strong>of</strong> human and environmental factors for the process <strong>of</strong> firm growth. The<br />

implications <strong>of</strong> this study include practical recommendations for SMEs on building and using their social capital<br />

to assist development. (For more information, please contact: Natalya Totskaya, Concordia University, Canada:<br />

n_totska@jmsb.concordia.ca)<br />

Session: 1.5.P - Special Session<br />

Farmer Dissertation Award Presentations<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Mike Peng, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

External Threats and MNE Strategy: The Role <strong>of</strong> Exposure, Resources and Coping Mechanisms (Ph.D. Awarded<br />

by Texas A&M University)<br />

Li Dai, Loyola Marymount University<br />

No abstract available. (For more information, please contact: Li Dai, Loyola Marymount University, USA:<br />

li.dai@lmu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 77


SUNDAY<br />

The <strong>International</strong> Expansion <strong>of</strong> Emerging-Economy Firms: The Influence <strong>of</strong> Path-Breaking Change and Its<br />

Antecedents (Ph.D. Awarded by HEC-Paris)<br />

Kiattichai Kalasin, Mahidol University<br />

No abstract available. (For more information, please contact: Kiattichai Kalasin, Mahidol University, Thailand:<br />

cmkiattichai@mahidol.ac.th)<br />

A Follower in Need is A Follower Indeed: Exploring the Joint Effects <strong>of</strong> TMT Support, Contextual Shocks, and<br />

Individual Regulatory Focus on Foreign CEO Self-efficacy and New Venture Performance(Ph.D. Awarded by<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Washington)<br />

Dong Liu, Georgia Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

No abstract available. (For more information, please contact: Dong Liu, Georgia Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, USA:<br />

dong.liu@mgt.gatech.edu)<br />

An Institution-Based View <strong>of</strong> Ownership (Ph.D. Awarded by Erasmus University)<br />

Marc van Essen, Utrecht University<br />

No abstract available. (For more information, please contact: Marc van Essen, Utrecht University, Netherlands:<br />

m.vanessen@uu.nl)<br />

Session: 1.5.1 - Panel<br />

Track: 12 - Value Creation and Work<br />

MNCs, Institutional Change, Shortage <strong>of</strong> Science and Engineering Talent in the Emerging<br />

Ecology <strong>of</strong> Global Innovation: China Vs India<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Arie Y. Lewin, Duke University<br />

Co-Chair: Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

Simon C. Collinson, Reading University<br />

Silvia Massini, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Xing Zhong, Duke University<br />

Jonathan P. Doh, Villanova University<br />

The dynamics driving the globalization <strong>of</strong> innovation has been evolving over the past two decades and in recent<br />

years the share <strong>of</strong> higher value adding activities involving science and engineering work performed outside <strong>of</strong><br />

the advanced economies have begun to accelerate. The dynamic growth <strong>of</strong> global sourcing <strong>of</strong> innovation is<br />

indicative <strong>of</strong> the evolving ecology <strong>of</strong> global innovation that is expected to usher significant changes in firms,<br />

industries as well as careers <strong>of</strong> S&E talent, which are yet little understood. For example, Diaspora talent<br />

networks evokes a new way to examine organization <strong>of</strong> work, given the active role it has played ranging from<br />

stimulating entrepreneurship to facilitate global circulation <strong>of</strong> talent. This symposium is intended to advance<br />

discourse on a number <strong>of</strong> dimensions which are shaping the dynamic processes, including the role <strong>of</strong> MNCs with<br />

the challenges they face in transforming their organizations into globally distributed innovation networks, the<br />

institutional contexts in China and India that are affecting their domestic science and engineering based<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 78


SUNDAY<br />

entrepreneurship, as well as the increasing role <strong>of</strong> Diaspora talent networks in global innovation and circulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> talent as a way <strong>of</strong> moderating the anticipated worldwide shortage <strong>of</strong> S&E talent. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Arie Y. Lewin, Duke University, USA: ayl3@duke.edu)<br />

Session: 1.5.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Government Role in Promoting <strong>International</strong> Business: Maintaining Good Business-<br />

Government Relationships<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Joan Mileski, Texas A&M University at Galveston<br />

Co-Chair: Susan Forquer Gupta, Monmouth University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Joan Mileski, Texas A&M University at Galveston<br />

Susan Forquer Gupta, Monmouth University<br />

Michael R. Czinkota, Georgetown University<br />

Benny Holland, Jr., <strong>International</strong> Longshoremen's Association<br />

Tara Leiter, Attorney, Blank Rome LLP<br />

K. Denise Rucker Krepp, Maritime Administration<br />

Matthew T. McGuire, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce<br />

Margareta S. Schettler, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> State<br />

This panel will address the mechanics <strong>of</strong> good relationships between government agencies and business entities<br />

and their advocates. The importance <strong>of</strong> good relationships to the success <strong>of</strong> international business is well<br />

documented. The key elements to these relationships are how the parties interact, the expectations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

parties and the continuity <strong>of</strong> these interactions and expectations. Understanding the view from each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

parties can help implement good strategies for maintaining these relationships. The panelist will bring their<br />

unique perspectives from government, business, labor and academics to analyze what makes for good<br />

interaction and long-term beneficial relationships. They will bring their experiences and expertise to the<br />

roundtable format for a discussion <strong>of</strong> what they have learned and the keys to a successful relationship. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Joan Mileski, Texas A&M University at Galveston, USA: mileskij@tamug.edu)<br />

Session: 1.5.3 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Great Illusion Once More <strong>International</strong> Economic Governance and Corporate Non-<br />

Market Strategies <strong>of</strong> the 21st Century<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Toshiya Ozaki, Rikkyo University<br />

Co-Chair: Steven McGuire, Aberystwyth University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 79


SUNDAY<br />

Panelists:<br />

Toshiya Ozaki, Rikkyo University<br />

Tazeeb Rajwani, Cranfield University<br />

Thomas Lawton, EMLYON Business School<br />

Chengang Wang, Bradford University<br />

Fernando Fastoso, Bradford University<br />

George O. White III, Old Dominion University<br />

Adrian Kay, Australian National University<br />

Robert Ackrill, Nottingham Trent University<br />

Johan Lindeque, Amsterdam Business School<br />

Stephen Kobrin, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

This panel explores both the current state <strong>of</strong> corporate political activity in sustaining, upgrading and utilizing <strong>of</strong><br />

international market institutions, and the theoretical frameworks that account for such non-market strategy.<br />

The business community, especially <strong>of</strong> the US but also <strong>of</strong> major developed economies, played an important role<br />

in helping policy makers to design and develop the postwar international economic system. This liberalized<br />

international system, in turn, has led to internal adaptations in the political economy <strong>of</strong> emerging markets.<br />

These market institutions, however, increasingly show strains. How are firms <strong>of</strong> the early 21st century<br />

anticipating the growing challenges <strong>of</strong> growing void in international economic governance Who are main<br />

corporate players, what are their interests, and what kinds <strong>of</strong> strategies are they pursuing In what ways, do<br />

the current institutions influence the behavior <strong>of</strong> MNEs and, in turn, how do these firms engage with<br />

governments in shaping the institutional environment <strong>of</strong> the early 21st century And what theoretical<br />

frameworks best analyze non-market strategy that account for their responses to institutional challenges The<br />

panel should provide a one stop shop to cover these timely and critical questions surrounding the sustainability<br />

<strong>of</strong> international business in the 21st century. (For more information, please contact: Toshiya Ozaki, Rikkyo<br />

University, Japan: ozakit@rikkyo.ac.jp)<br />

Session: 1.5.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 12 - Value Creation and Work<br />

Reconfiguring the Value Chain: Offshoring<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Anna Dubiel, WHU<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Location Choice and Governance Model on the Offshoring Performance<br />

Lucia Piscitello, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Stefano Elia, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Davide Luzzini, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Federico Caniato, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Stefano Ronchi, Politecnico di Milano<br />

The present paper deals with the performance implications <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fshoring <strong>of</strong> service activities. Offshoring is<br />

intended as delocalization <strong>of</strong> business services in foreign countries that may occur either through a whollyowned<br />

company (Captive Offshoring) or by outsourcing the service activity (Offshore Outsourcing). We<br />

investigate the relationship between distinctive location specific characteristics <strong>of</strong> the host countries (cost <strong>of</strong><br />

labor, resource availability, cultural proximity, and the presence <strong>of</strong> local interests) and performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fshoring firm. We extend the literature by investigating both the direct effect <strong>of</strong> the governance model and its<br />

moderating role <strong>of</strong> the locations specific characteristics on performance. Our results show that the direct effect<br />

arises only when considering operational performance, while the moderating effect is more specific <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 80


SUNDAY<br />

performance. (For more information, please contact: Lucia Piscitello, Politecnico di Milano, Italy:<br />

lucia.piscitello@polimi.it)<br />

Whether or Not to Prepare for Offshoring: A Simulation Study<br />

Marcus Møller Larsen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Christian Geisler Asmussen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Torben Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

A consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshoring is increased coordination costs. To counter this, firms can strive to identify a cost<br />

reducing organizational configuration either ex ante or ex post to the <strong>of</strong>fshoring implementation. In this paper,<br />

we investigate the performance implications <strong>of</strong> these contrasting strategies through a computational model <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fshoring. We find that a proactive approach to <strong>of</strong>fshoring is largely beneficial if the impact <strong>of</strong> geographic<br />

distance and coordination costs relative to production costs is sufficiently high, but that this changes more<br />

towards the reactive approach if this diminishes. Thus, we explicate important contingencies in the paradox that<br />

firms face when balancing between strategic rationales such as lower production costs in foreign locations and<br />

the changing costs <strong>of</strong> coordination when implementing such strategic rationales. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Marcus Møller Larsen, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: mml.smg@cbs.dk)<br />

Does the Global Fragmentation <strong>of</strong> R&D Activities Pay Back The Home Region Perspective<br />

Grazia D. Santangelo, University <strong>of</strong> Catania<br />

Lorena M. D'Agostino, University <strong>of</strong> Catania<br />

R&D <strong>of</strong>fshoring has increasingly involved emerging countries as host locations and promoted a greater<br />

fragmentation <strong>of</strong> R&D activities across borders. As a result, a subtle international division <strong>of</strong> labor in knowledge<br />

production has yielded a fine-slicing <strong>of</strong> R&D activities with the highest value-added activities located in the most<br />

advanced countries and the lowest value-added activities in emerging countries. However, no study, to our<br />

knowledge, has investigated whether finely sliced foreign R&D activities complement each other in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

greater knowledge production at home. Drawing on a rich dataset, we estimate a regional knowledge<br />

production function and apply a direct complementarity test. Our results suggest that the global fragmentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> R&D activities produces synergic effects on the knowledge production <strong>of</strong> the home investing OECD regions<br />

when R&D activities are optimally rather than randomly located. (For more information, please contact: Grazia<br />

D. Santangelo, University <strong>of</strong> Catania, Italy: grsanta@unict.it)<br />

Spatial Linkages and Offshoring Location Choice<br />

Ari Van Assche, HEC Montreal<br />

Alyson C. Ma, University <strong>of</strong> San Diego<br />

We argue that a firm's <strong>of</strong>fshoring location choice not only depends on a location's production costs, but also on<br />

its spatial linkages with other parts <strong>of</strong> the global value chain. A location that is closer to upstream suppliers and<br />

downstream markets should attract more <strong>of</strong>fshoring activities. To validate this conjecture, we use detailed<br />

processing trade data for 29 Chinese provinces. We find that three types <strong>of</strong> spatial linkages affect a province's<br />

attractiveness as an <strong>of</strong>fshoring location: a province's distance to its closest seaport, the proximity <strong>of</strong> this seaport<br />

to international suppliers, and the proximity <strong>of</strong> this seaport to international markets. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Ari Van Assche, HEC Montreal, Canada: ari.van-assche@hec.ca)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 81


SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.5.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

New Perspectives on MNE Strategy and Performance<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Elizabeth L. Rose, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

The Circular Relationship between Geographical and Product Diversification in Spanish MNEs<br />

Diana Benito-Osorio, Rey Juan Carlos University<br />

Alfredo Jimenez, University <strong>of</strong> Burgos<br />

Nowadays, the number <strong>of</strong> multinational enterprises that are pursuing product diversification strategies is<br />

increasing. Drawing on the Resource Based View <strong>of</strong> the Firm, the aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to advance one step<br />

further, by investigating these strategies through the analysis <strong>of</strong> a circular relationship between product and<br />

geographical diversification. The results, obtained from a sample <strong>of</strong> the most relevant Spanish multinational<br />

firms, suggest that their adaptation to a wide range <strong>of</strong> different countries hinders the necessary coordination <strong>of</strong><br />

activities that related product diversification requires and vice-versa. On the contrary, unrelated diversification<br />

strategies can provide financial synergies, experience and flexibility, which help the process <strong>of</strong><br />

internationalization. Simultaneously, a higher geographical diversification allows each division to behave as an<br />

independent unit and to develop more efficient internal control systems and resource allocation. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Alfredo Jimenez, University <strong>of</strong> Burgos, Spain: ajimenez@ubu.es)<br />

Diverse Strategies <strong>of</strong> Resource Commitment Development among Service Firms during <strong>International</strong>ization: A<br />

Dynamic Capabilities Perspective<br />

Abhishek Shukla, Charles Darwin University<br />

This study addresses the lack <strong>of</strong> research on the development <strong>of</strong> resource commitment after the initial entry in<br />

a new international market. Two aspects from the dynamic capabilities view, namely building and<br />

reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> resource commitment by service firms in a host market were investigated. Service firms were<br />

classified based on their asset intensity and were split into knowledge intensive services and capital intensive<br />

services. It is proposed that these two types <strong>of</strong> services exhibit different patterns in the pace <strong>of</strong> resource<br />

commitment build up and also in the type <strong>of</strong> reconfiguration adopted. A quantitative longitudinal research<br />

design is used to empirically test these two aspects <strong>of</strong> dynamic capabilities. Results indicate that knowledge<br />

intensive services build their resource commitment at almost twice the pace <strong>of</strong> capital intensive services. Also,<br />

knowledge intensive services reconfigure their resource commitment in small increments which is in contrast to<br />

the radical changes preferred by capital intensive services. (For more information, please contact: Abhishek<br />

Shukla, Charles Darwin University, Australia: abhishek.shukla@cdu.edu.au)<br />

Host Country Location, Subsidiary-Level Firm-Specific Advantages, and Subsidiary Performance in South East<br />

Asia<br />

Quyen T.K Nguyen, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Alan M. Rugman, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

We examine the relationship <strong>of</strong> host country specific advantages (CSAs) in terms <strong>of</strong> market attractiveness,<br />

subsidiary-level firm specific advantages (FSAs), subsidiary sales strategy and asset exploitation FDI motives as<br />

they affect subsidiary performance. From a sample <strong>of</strong> 101 British MNE subsidiaries in six S.E Asian countries<br />

over five-year period (2003-2007), our analysis reveals three significant findings. First, host country market<br />

attractiveness and subsidiary-level FSAs can be operationalized as multi-item constructs. Second, host country<br />

market attractiveness, export sales by a subsidiary, asset exploitation FDI motives, general management<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 82


SUNDAY<br />

capability, marketing capability and invested capital have a statistically significant positive impact on sales<br />

growth, pr<strong>of</strong>it growth, market share growth, and performance <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries. Third, we find that asset<br />

exploitation FDI is the dominant FDI motives <strong>of</strong> British MNEs in South East Asia (97%) whereas strategic asset<br />

seeking accounts for only 3%. These subsidiaries generate on average 95% <strong>of</strong> total sales from the Asia Pacific<br />

region and 91% <strong>of</strong> total sales from external customers. These findings have important implications for<br />

subsidiary strategy and managerial practice. (For more information, please contact: Quyen T.K Nguyen,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom: t.k.q.nguyen@pgr.reading.ac.uk)<br />

Innovations as Drivers <strong>of</strong> Headquarters' Attention Allocation and the Orchestration <strong>of</strong> Transfer Projects<br />

Henrik Dellestrand, Uppsala University<br />

This paper analyzes headquarters' attention allocation within multinational enterprises in terms <strong>of</strong> involvement<br />

in subsidiary innovation transfer projects. It argues that the innovation attributes <strong>of</strong> complexity, codifiability,<br />

and perceived importance influence headquarters' decision to involve itself in innovation transfer projects. This<br />

extends the attention-based and knowledge-based views by emphasizing headquarters' role in innovation<br />

transfers in a model tested on a sample <strong>of</strong> 169 innovation transfer projects. The results indicate that gaining<br />

headquarters' involvement and attention during transfers is contingent on the innovations being complex and<br />

the subsidiary classifying the innovations as important. By involving itself in transfer projects, headquarters<br />

actively orchestrates innovations with specific attributes within the multinational enterprise and thereby also<br />

allocates its attention to selected innovation transfer projects within the organization. This study contributes to<br />

the understanding <strong>of</strong> when headquarters considers specific transfer projects interesting, thus attracting its<br />

strategic support. This explains attention allocation determinants and precursors to innovation orchestration in<br />

networked organizations. (For more information, please contact: Henrik Dellestrand, Uppsala University,<br />

Sweden: henrik.dellestrand@fek.uu.se)<br />

Session: 1.5.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Societal Level Culture: When and How it Matters<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Paul Brewer, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

The Hard or the S<strong>of</strong>t: The Ethics <strong>of</strong> Getting Ahead at Work across Asia<br />

Charlotte M. Karam , American University <strong>of</strong> Beirut<br />

David A. Ralston, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Carolyn P. Egri, Simon Fraser University<br />

Arif Butt, Lahore University <strong>of</strong> Management Sciences<br />

Narasimhan Srinivasan, University <strong>of</strong> Connecticut<br />

Ping Ping Fu, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Chay-Hoon Lee, Keppel Offshore & Marine<br />

Yong-lin Moon, Seoul National University<br />

Yongjuan Li, Chinese <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />

Mahfooz Ansari, University <strong>of</strong> Lethbridge<br />

Min-Hsun Kuo, National Central University<br />

Hung Vu Thanh, National Economics University<br />

Andre Pekerti, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Philip Hallinger, Hong Kong Institute <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

Yongqing Fang, University <strong>of</strong> Canberra<br />

Ho-Beng Chia, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 83


SUNDAY<br />

We explored macro-level factors that shape perceptions <strong>of</strong> the ethicality <strong>of</strong> favors in Asian workplaces using the<br />

subordinate influence ethics (SIE) measure. We expanded the crossvergence model to examine the cross-level<br />

relationship between socio-cultural (i.e., traditional/secular; survival/self-expression; in-group favoritism) and<br />

business ideology influences (i.e., human development level and control <strong>of</strong> corruption) on perceptions <strong>of</strong> favorseeking<br />

at work. We collected data on the ethical perceptions <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 4,325 managers and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in<br />

a diverse set <strong>of</strong> 11 Asian societies: China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, South<br />

Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Our investigation focused on both the ‘s<strong>of</strong>ter' (image management) and<br />

‘harder' (self-serving) sides <strong>of</strong> subordinate influence attempts to seek favors, as well as the degree <strong>of</strong> ethical<br />

differentiation across these societies. Key results based on hierarchical linear modeling suggest that both the<br />

World Value Survey's socio-cultural values as well as in-group favoritism contribute to our understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

influence behaviors in Asia. Likewise, level <strong>of</strong> human development and control <strong>of</strong> corruption also appear to be<br />

promising predictors <strong>of</strong> influence ethics. (For more information, please contact: Charlotte M. Karam, American<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Beirut, Lebanon: ck16@aub.edu.lb)<br />

Are Values at the Societal-Level Acceptable as Cross-Cultural Predictors in Today's Global Economy<br />

David A. Ralston, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Carolyn P. Egri, Simon Fraser University<br />

Olivier Furrer, University <strong>of</strong> Nijmegen<br />

Min-Hsun Kuo, National Central University<br />

Yongjuan Li, Chinese <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />

Florian von Wangenheim, Technische Universitaet Muenchen<br />

Marina Dabic, University <strong>of</strong> Zagreb<br />

Irina Naoumova, University <strong>of</strong> Hartford<br />

María Teresa de la Garza Carranza, Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya<br />

Ping Ping Fu, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Vojko V. Potocan, University <strong>of</strong> Maribor<br />

Andre Pekerti, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Tomasz Lenartowicz, Florida Atlantic University<br />

Narasimhan Srinivasan, University <strong>of</strong> Connecticut<br />

Tania Casado, University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

Ana Maria Rossi, Clinica De Stress E Bi<strong>of</strong>eedback<br />

Erna Szabo, Johannes Kepler University<br />

Arif Butt, Lahore University <strong>of</strong> Management Sciences<br />

Ian Palmer, Royal Melbourne Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Prem Ramburuth, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

David M. Brock, Ben-Gurion University<br />

Jane Terpstra-Tong, Monash University<br />

Ilya Girson, University <strong>of</strong> Westminster<br />

Emmanuelle Reynaud, IAE d'Aix-en-Provence<br />

Malika Richards, Pennsylvania State University<br />

Philip Hallinger, Hong Kong Institute <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

Francisco B. Castro, CEMPRE-Universidade do Porto<br />

Jaime Ruiz Gutiérrez, Universidad de los Andes<br />

Laurie Milton, Universidad de los Andes and University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

Mahfooz Ansari, University <strong>of</strong> Lethbridge<br />

Arunas Starkus, CIBER-Vilnius<br />

Audra Mockaitis, Mockaitis<br />

Tevfik Dalgic, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

Fidel León-Darder, University <strong>of</strong> Valencia<br />

Hung Vu Thanh, National Economics University<br />

Yong-lin Moon, Seoul National University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 84


SUNDAY<br />

Mario Molteni, Catholic University <strong>of</strong> Milan<br />

Yongqing Fang, University <strong>of</strong> Canberra<br />

Jose Pla-Barber, University <strong>of</strong> Valencia<br />

Ruth Alas, Estonia Business School<br />

Isabelle Maignan, VU University Amsterdam<br />

Jorge C. Jesuino, Instituto Superior de Ciencias do Trabalho e da Empresa<br />

Chay-Hoon Lee, Keppel Offshore & Marine<br />

Ho-Beng Chia, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

Joel Nicholson, San Francisco State University<br />

Wade Danis, University <strong>of</strong> Victoria<br />

Mark Weber, Argosy University-Twin Cities<br />

Is the societal-level <strong>of</strong> analysis sufficient today to understand the values <strong>of</strong> those in the global workforce; or, do<br />

we need to apply individual-level analyses to accurately identify the predictive power <strong>of</strong> values across country<br />

workforces Using hierarchical linear modeling across a 46-society sample, we test the predictive power for both<br />

the societal- and individual-level dimensions <strong>of</strong> collectivism and individualism values to predict ethical behavior.<br />

Our values-behaviors analysis indicates that values at the individual-level make a more significant contribution<br />

to explaining variance in ethical behaviors than do values at the societal level. Implicitly, our findings likewise<br />

question the soundness <strong>of</strong> using societal-level values measures. Implications for international business research<br />

are discussed. (For more information, please contact: David A. Ralston, Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA:<br />

ralstond@fiu.edu)<br />

Clustering National Cultures: A Fallacy, or Not, or Not Always<br />

Romie Frederick Littrell, Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

"I invoke the first law <strong>of</strong> geography: everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related<br />

than distant things." --Waldo Tobler (1970) Clusters derived from various theoretical models <strong>of</strong> culture and<br />

leadership dimensions are compared. I find that theories with models <strong>of</strong> clusters <strong>of</strong> national cultural dimensions<br />

proposed by H<strong>of</strong>stede et al. (2010), the GLOBE project (House et al., 2004), Minkov (2007, 2011), Schwartz<br />

(figure provided from personal communication), and the World Values Survey (from the WVS website) are<br />

indicative but not definitive. In most analyses I find clusters that can be defined as Anglo, Germanic, Nordic,<br />

and Latin (<strong>of</strong>ten without France and French-speaking Switzerland), and frequent appearances <strong>of</strong> Eastern<br />

Europe. Many clusters appear in some but not all models. I conclude that (1) theory-defining studies are subject<br />

to systematic error from lack <strong>of</strong> sample invariance; and (2) the theoretical models are incomplete in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

defining a sufficient set <strong>of</strong> dimensions to identify differences between nations and culture areas within nations.<br />

The implications for practice in international human resource management, marketing, general management,<br />

and expatriate selection and training are that national and area cultures are different, and the most successful<br />

approach to dealing with the differences is to treat each nation or culture area as unique, and design business<br />

approaches to consider particular source and destination cultures as unique pairs and plan and implement on<br />

that basis. (For more information, please contact: Romie Frederick Littrell, Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />

New Zealand: romie.littrell@aut.ac.nz)<br />

Session: 1.5.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

Corporate Governance<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Ruth Aguilera, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 85


SUNDAY<br />

Informality, Expropriation, and Corporate Governance<br />

Matthew Grady Smith, Rutgers Business School<br />

Poor investor protection and a large informal economy are both endemic characteristics <strong>of</strong> less developed<br />

countries. In this study, I explore the links between corporate governance and participation in the informal<br />

economy. In particular, I argue that hidden (or under-reported) sales income can be viewed simultaneously as<br />

expropriation <strong>of</strong> shareholders and as participation in the informal economy. Building on the prior corporate<br />

governance literature, I hypothesize that the decision to hide sales is related to two dimensions <strong>of</strong> ownership<br />

structure: ownership concentration and affiliation with a business group. I also hypothesize that firms that<br />

choose to cross-list on foreign exchanges will engage in less expropriation. Using panel data on publicly listed<br />

Indian manufacturing firms, along with survey data, I find evidence that ownership concentration, business<br />

group affiliation and cross-listing are all significantly related to the decision to hide sales. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Matthew Grady Smith, Rutgers Business School, USA: matthewgradysmith@gmail.com)<br />

Firm Size, Institutional Quality and the Impact <strong>of</strong> Securities Regulation<br />

April Michele Knill, Florida State University<br />

Douglas Cumming, York University<br />

Nela Thomas Richardson, Bloomberg<br />

We argue in this paper that it is appropriate to analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> regulation at the firm level due to<br />

disparate effects <strong>of</strong> regulation across firm size and institutional quality. In support <strong>of</strong> this logic, we find<br />

incongruent effects <strong>of</strong> regulation across both dimensions using a newly assembled dataset <strong>of</strong> 41,508 firms<br />

across 46 countries spanning the years 1996-2007. In G10 countries where institutional environments are<br />

relatively strong, we find that public enforcement facilitates small firm security issuance while private<br />

enforcement benefits large firms more than small firms. In Non-G10 countries where institutional environments<br />

are relatively weak and information asymmetries between firms and investors are more pronounced, the<br />

marginal benefit <strong>of</strong> both public and private enforcement requirements are more pronounced for opaque smaller<br />

firms. Stronger public enforcement gives rise to larger firms raising capital internationally both among G10 and<br />

Non-G10 countries. (For more information, please contact: April Michele Knill, Florida State University, USA:<br />

aknill@cob.fsu.edu)<br />

Evolving Property Rights and Shifting Organizational Forms: Evidence from Joint-Venture Buyouts following<br />

China's WTO Accession<br />

Fariha Kamal, Center for Economic Studies, US Census Bureau<br />

Mary E. Lovely, Syracuse University<br />

China's WTO accession reduced incentives for joint ventures while reducing constraints on wholly owned foreign<br />

subsidiaries and concurrently creating a more liberal investment environment for indigenous investors. Using<br />

newly created enterprise-level panel data on equity joint ventures and changes in registration type following<br />

China's WTO accession, we find evidence consistent with the property rights theory. More highly productive<br />

firms with higher value added and lower domestic sales shares are more likely to become wholly foreign owned,<br />

while less productive firms focused on the Chinese market are more likely to become wholly domestic owned<br />

rather than remain joint ventures. (For more information, please contact: Fariha Kamal, Center for Economic<br />

Studies, US Census Bureau, USA: fariha.kamal@census.gov)<br />

The Disintegration <strong>of</strong> the German Directors' Network - An Empirical Discussion <strong>of</strong> the Impact <strong>of</strong> Domestic and<br />

<strong>International</strong> Informal Institutions on the Convergence <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance Systems<br />

Dominik Boehler, Karlsruhe Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Jana Oehmichen, Georg-August University Göttingen<br />

Marc Steffen Rapp, Philipps-University Marburg<br />

Michael Wolff, Georg-August University Göttingen<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 86


SUNDAY<br />

The development and transformation <strong>of</strong> corporate governance systems is a matter <strong>of</strong> country-specific<br />

institutions. Though studies already show the influence <strong>of</strong> national formal institutions such as regulations or<br />

informal national effects such as culture, there are no investigations <strong>of</strong> the interaction <strong>of</strong> domestic and<br />

international institutional forces on the shape <strong>of</strong> national corporate governance patterns. By applying the<br />

concepts <strong>of</strong> coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism processes to the context <strong>of</strong> convergence <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance systems, our study provides evidence for the existence <strong>of</strong> an area <strong>of</strong> tension between the<br />

domestic and international informal institutional forces. Using the German strong directors' network as an<br />

example for a national institutional corporate governance norm, we can show that the level <strong>of</strong> the directors'<br />

embeddedness increases under domestic and decreases under foreign pressure. Our investigation is based on a<br />

unique dataset covering 41,698 supervisory board member positions <strong>of</strong> German firms from 1999 to 2007. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Jana Oehmichen, Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany:<br />

jana.oehmichen@wiwi.uni-goettingen.de)<br />

Session: 1.5.8 - Competitive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Global Human Resource Management<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Mary Margaret Maloney, University <strong>of</strong> St. Thomas<br />

Strategic <strong>International</strong> HRM: The Case <strong>of</strong> Chinese Multinationals in Australia<br />

Di Fan, Victoria University<br />

Mike Mingqiong Zhang , La Trobe University<br />

Cherrie Jiuhua Zhu, Monash University<br />

Strategic international human resource management (SIHRM) is crucial for effective leveraging <strong>of</strong> human<br />

resources in organisations so as to achieve the desired business strategies. There is a rich collection <strong>of</strong> studies<br />

on Western multinational enterprises (MNEs) in China, but few studies that explore the SIHRM <strong>of</strong> Chinese MNEs<br />

operating overseas. This study utilizes cross-level, in-depth interviews to analyse SIHRM <strong>of</strong> three large Chinese<br />

multinationals. The paper contributes to literature by addressing two contextual SIHRM issues, namely the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the SIHRM <strong>of</strong> Chinese multinationals and the extent to which their SIHRM orientation facilitates their<br />

investment and operation overseas. The findings indicate that organisational transformation is the starting point<br />

for latecomers matching their international human resource management strategies. Their SIHRM approaches,<br />

such as forming learning organisations, reliance on host country nationals, reconciling both home and host<br />

country effect and promoting ‘best practices' facilitate their international operations. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Di Fan, Victoria University, Australia: di.fan@vu.edu.au)<br />

Headquarter HRM Practices and Global Staffing in Japanese MNCs<br />

Shiho Nakamura, University <strong>of</strong> Ritsumeikan<br />

Andrew Staples, Doshisha Business School<br />

Kozo Harimaya, University <strong>of</strong> Ritsumeikan<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to clarify the impact <strong>of</strong> the human resource management policies <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

headquarters on the utilization <strong>of</strong> three types <strong>of</strong> international managers – namely, parent-country nationals<br />

(PCNs), host-country nationals (HCNs) and third-country nationals (TCNs), and on foreign sales performance.<br />

This paper drew particularly on case studies <strong>of</strong> four Japanese electronic and electrical industry companies<br />

conducted in 2003, 2006, and 2009. Unlike the three other case companies, Company G reduced the number <strong>of</strong><br />

Japanese expatriates, while increasing host-country national presidents and third-country national employees.<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 87


SUNDAY<br />

Of the human resource management methods adopted by corporate headquarters, we found that providing<br />

training and development to international managers is having an impact on changing how these human<br />

resources are utilized. We also found that the greater human resource management policies and practices led to<br />

high performance. (For more information, please contact: Shiho Nakamura, University <strong>of</strong> Ritsumeikan, Japan:<br />

snakamu@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp)<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> MNC Headquarters in Reverse Diffusion <strong>of</strong> HRM Practices<br />

Michal Lemanski, WU Wien / UE Wroclaw<br />

What is the role <strong>of</strong> the MNC headquarters in the process <strong>of</strong> reverse diffusion <strong>of</strong> HRM practices A fast growing<br />

body <strong>of</strong> research provided valuable insights on diffusion <strong>of</strong> organizational practices from the corporate<br />

periphery, but to a lesser extent covered roles that organizational actors play in the process <strong>of</strong> such diffusion.<br />

Analyzing 117 instances <strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> human resource management practices that originated in emerging<br />

market subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> 45 MNCs we identified seven headquarters' roles that enhance or hinder diffusion but<br />

have not been identified in previous studies. We report on what is presumable the first large-scale study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

role played by the headquarters in the process <strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> practices from foreign subsidiaries, and discuss<br />

the implications <strong>of</strong> the results for research and practice. (For more information, please contact: Michal<br />

Lemanski, WU Wien / UE Wroclaw, Poland: leman@poczta.onet.pl)<br />

Cultural Distance and the <strong>International</strong> Migration <strong>of</strong> Top Managers: Evidence from European Boards<br />

Padma Rao Sahib, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen<br />

Kees van Veen , University <strong>of</strong> Groningen<br />

This paper investigates the role <strong>of</strong> various distance measures in explaining the presence <strong>of</strong> top managers <strong>of</strong><br />

different nationalities on European boards. Based on data on 5500 board members from 15 countries in the<br />

period 2005-2007 we find that the greater the cultural distance between the country <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> a top manager<br />

and the country in which the company is headquartered, the lower the percentage <strong>of</strong> top managers <strong>of</strong> that<br />

nationality in the board. We conclude that the labor market for European top managers remains un-even and<br />

seem to develop in a fragmented way. Managers <strong>of</strong> different countries have different opportunities and this<br />

depends on characteristics <strong>of</strong> the home and host county. (For more information, please contact: Padma Rao<br />

Sahib, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen, Netherlands: p.rao.sahib@rug.nl)<br />

Session: 1.5.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Business and Society - Rethinking the Boundaries<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Paul Vaaler, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

<strong>International</strong> Standards Certification Matters More for Firms in Institutionally Weak Countries<br />

Leo Sleuwaegen, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and University <strong>of</strong> Leuven<br />

Micheline Goedhuys, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School<br />

This paper builds on a rapidly developing literature showing the importance <strong>of</strong> quality certificates, in particular<br />

ISO standards, for the efficient development <strong>of</strong> firms. The novelty <strong>of</strong> this paper is that it uses firm level data<br />

from 59 developing countries and systematically tests whether the propensity to obtain certification and its<br />

effect on firm performance is differently affected in countries where markets are missing or institutions are<br />

weak, in supporting the efficient use and allocation <strong>of</strong> inputs and outputs. We find evidence that certification is<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 88


SUNDAY<br />

more likely among high quality firms endowed with skill and capital intensity. Controlling for this, there is<br />

evidence that firms in institutionally weak countries are more likely to use a certificate. The same holds for<br />

foreign firms and firms with larger geographical markets, underscoring the strategic role <strong>of</strong> certificates as a<br />

signalling device. Certification in turn appears beneficial for the productivity and sales growth <strong>of</strong> firms,<br />

especially in institutionally less developed countries. (For more information, please contact: Leo Sleuwaegen,<br />

Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and University <strong>of</strong> Leuven, Belgium:<br />

leo.sleuwaegen@econ.kuleuven.be)<br />

Heterogeneous Effect <strong>of</strong> Ethnic Networks on <strong>International</strong> Trade <strong>of</strong> Thailand: The Role <strong>of</strong> Family Ties and Ethnic<br />

Diversity<br />

Jing-Lin Duanmu, University <strong>of</strong> Surrey<br />

Yilmaz Guney, University <strong>of</strong> Hull<br />

Ethnic networks have been found to have a pro-trade effect in previous research. However, the heterogeneous<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> different ethnicities is under-studied. Drawing on the literature on social structure, this paper attempts<br />

to untangle the heterogeneous effect <strong>of</strong> ethnic networks on international trade using trade data <strong>of</strong> Thailand. We<br />

found that ethnic networks have a positive impact overall on trade, confirming the results <strong>of</strong> previous studies.<br />

However, the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the positive effect varies across different ethnicities along two dimensions. First, the<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> family ties in the culture <strong>of</strong> origin accelerates the pro-trade effect <strong>of</strong> its ethnic networks, suggesting<br />

ethnicities with stronger family ties have a cultural preference for trading within their own ethnic community. In<br />

comparison, ethnic diversity weakens the positive effect <strong>of</strong> ethnic networks on trade, suggesting an<br />

informational value <strong>of</strong> diverse ethnic structure in promoting trade between different ethnicities. Our study<br />

contributes new evidence <strong>of</strong> the enduring influence <strong>of</strong> social and cultural attributes on economic activities. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Jing-Lin Duanmu, University <strong>of</strong> Surrey, United Kingdom:<br />

j.duanmu@surrey.ac.uk)<br />

Transnational Diaspora Entrepreneurship: A Theoretical Framework<br />

Kaveh Moghaddam, Old Dominion University<br />

Transnational Diaspora Entrepreneurship can be considered a new stream <strong>of</strong> research where migrant<br />

entrepreneurship and international business research fields intersect. This paper reviews the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

Transnational Diaspora Entrepreneurship over the past decade and suggests a theoretical framework to extend<br />

our understanding on how transnational diaspora entrepreneurs (TDEs) may develop their competitive<br />

advantages to succeed in a global market. This framework exhibits how the social embeddedness <strong>of</strong> TDEs<br />

affects their firm performance through the mediating effect <strong>of</strong> TDEs' global dynamic capabilities as a bundle <strong>of</strong><br />

two abilities (opportunity seeking and opportunity seizing) and the moderating effect <strong>of</strong> institutional distance<br />

between countries <strong>of</strong> origin and residence. Several propositions describing the mediating and moderating<br />

factors are developed for future empirical investigation. The managerial and policy implications as well as future<br />

research directions are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Kaveh Moghaddam, Old Dominion<br />

University, USA: kmoghadd@odu.edu)<br />

Session: 1.5.10 - Panel<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

Managing Course-Based Export/Import Projects<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Nicholas Robinson, North Island College<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 89


SUNDAY<br />

Panelists:<br />

Nicholas Robinson, North Island College<br />

Miroslaw Jarosinski, Warsaw School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Michel Librowicz, Université du Québec à Montréal<br />

In this presentation we discuss the use <strong>of</strong> course-based export/import projects as an instructional device. In<br />

such projects students investigate and report on export opportunities for real businesses as a major assignment<br />

in a course. We give suggestions for recruiting suitable businesses, minimizing free rider problems in student<br />

groups, and managing the relationship and communication among the project participants (businesses,<br />

educational institutions, and students). Our recommendations are based on our experience with the<br />

Interparse Project (<strong>International</strong> Trade Education in Partnership with Small and Medium Sized Enterprises) in<br />

which a consortium comprised <strong>of</strong> 3 European and 3 Canadian institutions exchanged 65 students and<br />

investigated export opportunities for 31 businesses between October 2007 and July 2011. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Nicholas Robinson, North Island College, Canada: nick.robinson@nic.bc.ca)<br />

Session: 1.5.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Subsidiary Innovation Strategies<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Florian Täube, EBS Business School<br />

Subsidiary Strategic Types and Functional Activities: The Importance <strong>of</strong> Knowledge in the Multinational's<br />

Differentiated Network<br />

Odile E. M. Janne, University <strong>of</strong> London-Birkbeck<br />

Paz Estrella Tolentino, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Pi-Chi Chen, Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

This paper explores the increasing significance <strong>of</strong> knowledge creation and exploitation in the differentiation <strong>of</strong><br />

strategic roles <strong>of</strong> foreign subsidiaries and functional units within the differentiated network <strong>of</strong> the multinational<br />

corporation (MNC). Developing a knowledge-augmented integration-responsiveness (IR) framework the paper<br />

argues for a more explicit recognition <strong>of</strong> organisational learning and innovation processes within the MNC as<br />

core to the analysis <strong>of</strong> differentiation, interdependencies and evolution <strong>of</strong> subsidiary types and functional units.<br />

Empirical results, in the context <strong>of</strong> foreign subsidiaries and functional units <strong>of</strong> leading American MNCs in<br />

Taiwan's IT industry, shows the increasing relevance and differentiation <strong>of</strong> knowledge transfers across foreign<br />

subsidiaries and different kinds <strong>of</strong> functional activities. However, the composition and knowledge characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> different functional activities in each subsidiary strategy type require a more specific and detailed analysis<br />

that may reflect the particular features <strong>of</strong> this empirical study. This then points to directions <strong>of</strong> research fruitful<br />

for reconciling organisational issues discussed in the international business literature with the resource-based<br />

literature on the creation and transfer <strong>of</strong> knowledge within the MNC. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Odile E. M. Janne, University <strong>of</strong> London-Birkbeck, United Kingdom: o.janne@bbk.ac.uk)<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> Innovation Networks across Geographical and Organizational Boundaries: A Study <strong>of</strong> Subsidiaries<br />

within Bangalore IT Cluster<br />

Amit Karna, EBS Business School<br />

Petra Sonderegger, Independent Researcher<br />

Florian Täube, EBS Business School<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 90


SUNDAY<br />

In this paper, we investigate the evolution <strong>of</strong> MNC subsidiaries through development <strong>of</strong> innovation networks.<br />

Literature on innovation networks has seen them to develop in several different settings. These networks,<br />

during their evolution, span firm boundaries and geographic proximity. However, the evolution <strong>of</strong> innovation<br />

networks within and outside MNC subsidiaries has not been investigated from the perspective <strong>of</strong> these two<br />

dimensions: geographical and organizational distance. In order to find out a pattern, we chose the Information<br />

Technology cluster in Bangalore, India, where we find there are MNC subsidiaries that operate and innovate<br />

within and outside organizations, and have strong links with firms within and outside <strong>of</strong> Bangalore cluster. The<br />

globalized nature <strong>of</strong> the cluster helps us infer the evolution <strong>of</strong> innovation networks that takes place across fourphases.<br />

We further find that the innovation networks <strong>of</strong> these MNC subsidiaries first develop as withinorganization<br />

networks and then extend across organizations. Within the first part, the networks start with a<br />

non-local nature (phase-1) and develop into local networks (phase-2). However, within the latter part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

evolution, networks develop from local (phase-3) towards a non-local nature (phase-4). (For more information,<br />

please contact: Amit Karna, EBS Business School, Germany: amit.karna@ebs.edu)<br />

A Study on the Key Factors for Successful Implementation <strong>of</strong> Knowledge Management Systems <strong>of</strong> Multinational<br />

Corporations<br />

Chia Chen Hsu, Ting Hisin <strong>International</strong> Group<br />

Ying Sheng Yao , National Chi Nan University<br />

Tsai Chiao Wang, National Chi Nan University<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to explore the current status and development trend <strong>of</strong> knowledge management<br />

system implementation in subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> multinational corporations in Taiwan and find out the key factors <strong>of</strong><br />

successful implementation by conducting factor analyses. In addition, important issues were prioritized, so that<br />

managers can, with limited resources, effectively arrange their resources and schedules to increase chances <strong>of</strong><br />

successfully implementing knowledge management systems. The findings <strong>of</strong> this study include: 1.Subsidiaries<br />

should be highly cooperative in knowledge management system transfers. 2.High-level managers should be<br />

involved personally and support implementation. 3.A good IT foundation is required. 4.A taskforce should be<br />

formed to step-by-step create all knowledge tools and define evaluation indexes. 5.The core <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

management is employees. 6.Parent companies <strong>of</strong> multinational corporations should pay more attention to<br />

accumulated knowledge resources in their subsidiaries. 7.Subsidiaries should speed up their processes <strong>of</strong><br />

implementing knowledge management systems. (For more information, please contact: Chia Chen Hsu, Ting<br />

Hisin <strong>International</strong> Group, Taiwan: michelle_hsu@weichuan.com.tw)<br />

A Behavioral View on Coopetition and Knowledge Sharing Dynamics in Multinational Corporations<br />

Barbara Brenner, WU Wien<br />

Shalini Rogbeer , WU Wien<br />

Building on the unique bridging position <strong>of</strong> the Multinational Corporation (MNC) in accessing, sharing and<br />

(re)combining globally scattered knowledge, we suggest that intra-organizational networks evolve in a dynamic<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> competition and cooperation depending on knowledge convergence. We use a case method to<br />

identify different drivers <strong>of</strong> intra-organizational knowledge flows. Drawing on behavioral theory we analyze<br />

under which conditions subsidiaries start and stop knowledge sharing and how convergence and coopetition<br />

affects network evolution in MNCs. Understanding these internal mechanisms is not only important for theory<br />

advancement but also has important practical managerial implications and allows us to gain novel insights into<br />

the dynamics <strong>of</strong> network evolution. Furthermore, our findings have concrete managerial implications for MNC<br />

managers acting on subsidiary coopetition and firm innovativeness. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Barbara Brenner, WU Wien, Austria: barbara.brenner@wu.ac.at)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 91


SUNDAY<br />

Technology Sourcing and a 'Creative Transition' in Subsidiaries: The Case <strong>of</strong> MNE Operations in China<br />

Marina Papanastassiou, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Robert Pearce, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Si Zhang, Tsinghua University<br />

The paper focuses on a ‘creative transition' (CT) as a crucial tipping point in the strategic evolution <strong>of</strong> MNE<br />

subsidiaries. Before a CT a subsidiary's operations will be based around application (in a market-seeking or<br />

efficiency-seeking strategy) <strong>of</strong> the successful established technologies and products <strong>of</strong> the MNE group. After<br />

the CT (as, for example, a Product Mandate) the subsidiary will be deriving new sources <strong>of</strong> technology, notably<br />

from its host country, and developing new products from these. Thus, we argue, the sources <strong>of</strong> technology<br />

accessed and/or generated by a subsidiary are crucial in defining its competitive status. Evidence cited from a<br />

study <strong>of</strong> MNE subsidiaries in China demonstrates the value <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> CT. Though pre-CT operations <strong>of</strong><br />

an ES, export-oriented, nature have played a role in China it is shown that, to an increasing degree, it is now<br />

post-CT innovation that provides the dominant imperative. But, contrary to traditional Product Mandates, a<br />

major strand <strong>of</strong> this innovation targets an embedded position in China's growth for MNEs. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Marina Papanastassiou, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: mpa.smg@cbs.dk)<br />

Session: 1.5.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 8 - Developing Country MNCs<br />

Competitive Dynamics and Developing Economy Multinationals<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Luis Alfonso Dau, Northeastern University<br />

The <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Private and State Firms under Reforms<br />

Luis Alfonso Dau, Northeastern University<br />

Building on the institution-based view <strong>of</strong> strategy, we study the impact <strong>of</strong> pro-market reforms on developingcountry<br />

firm multinationality. We propose that reforms increase multinationality by reducing institutional<br />

imperfections and increasing domestic competition, thus inducing firms to expand internationally. However, we<br />

argue that the effect is higher for private firms than state firms because the former are compelled to be more<br />

responsive to institutional changes and opportunities in order to survive. The three-level RCM Poisson analyses<br />

<strong>of</strong> a panel <strong>of</strong> the largest firms in Latin America for the period 1989-2009 provide robust support for the<br />

arguments. (For more information, please contact: Luis Alfonso Dau, Northeastern University, USA:<br />

l.dau@neu.edu)<br />

Innovation Blowback - How Competition between Advanced Economy MNEs Raises Competitors from Emerging<br />

Markets<br />

Martin Ihrig, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Philip Kappen, Uppsala University<br />

This paper provides an evolutionary explanation to the rise <strong>of</strong> the emerging market MNE. It does so by<br />

presenting the innovation blowback framework which describes how competition between traditional advanced<br />

economy MNEs raises tomorrow's new competitors from emerging markets. In particular, the paper provides a<br />

formal model <strong>of</strong> trade-<strong>of</strong>fs that the advanced economy MNE faces when organizing its R&D activities either<br />

concentrated at home or geographically dispersed. Using the SimIntReDe s<strong>of</strong>tware, the model is subsequently<br />

evaluated by simulation in the SimISpace environment. The initial simulations lend support for the innovation<br />

blowback framework and the findings provide insights into the evolution <strong>of</strong> new competition, firm performance<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 92


SUNDAY<br />

and general economic output. (For more information, please contact: Philip Kappen, Uppsala University,<br />

Sweden: philip.kappen@fek.uu.se)<br />

A Conceptual Positioning Matrix for Firms in Developing Countries - Case <strong>of</strong> India<br />

Ajay Kumar Singal, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, Lucknow<br />

Arun Kumar Jain, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, Lucknow<br />

Understanding and mapping global competitiveness <strong>of</strong> firms in emerging markets has been a burning issue for<br />

scholars and consultants in recent times. McKinsey suggested ‘strategic control map' (SCM) that looked at<br />

market capitalization - using two parameters <strong>of</strong> book equity (size) and price to book ratio (performance) – as<br />

key driver <strong>of</strong> competitiveness <strong>of</strong> firms. However, this mapping leaves important gaps. SCM, formulated with a<br />

developed market focus, is not suitable in emerging market context and does not consider internationalization<br />

as a key driver. In this paper, we suggest a fresh framework ‘Global Competitiveness Matrix' (GCM) to further<br />

augment the understanding about relative comparison <strong>of</strong> competitiveness <strong>of</strong> firms in emerging markets and<br />

developed contexts. Using the case <strong>of</strong> large cap firms based in India, we argue that ‘international intensity' and<br />

market capitalization can be important measures to map the relative paths <strong>of</strong> growth. The paper also provides<br />

important leads for further research. Keywords: Global Competitiveness Matrix (GCM), <strong>International</strong>ization,<br />

Vulnerability (For more information, please contact: Ajay Kumar Singal, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management,<br />

Lucknow, India: ajay.singal@iiml.ac.in)<br />

<strong>International</strong> Location Decisions <strong>of</strong> Companies from Emerging Countries: When and How Distance Matters<br />

Claudio Ramos Conti, EBAPE- Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Flávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos, EBAPE - Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Ronaldo Parente, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

We study the use <strong>of</strong> distance for international location decisions <strong>of</strong> companies from emerging countries, which<br />

have a growing importance for the world economy. In light <strong>of</strong> a call for scholars to study when and how<br />

distance matters, we investigate the circumstances under which distance matters the most, some <strong>of</strong> which<br />

atypical for companies from emerging economies. We propose that distance matters the most: (1) when the<br />

company is private-owned (as opposed to state-owned); (2) when its internationalization motive is marketseeking<br />

(rather than asset-seeking); (3) when it occurred in the first internationalization wave, in the 1970`s<br />

and 1980`s (instead <strong>of</strong> in the second internationalization wave, starting from the 1990`s); and (4) when it<br />

operates in services, low-technology industries (as opposed to manufacturing, high-technology, commodities<br />

and luxury industries). As most <strong>of</strong> these circumstances under which distance matters the most are typical <strong>of</strong> the<br />

internationalization <strong>of</strong> companies from developed countries, we also propose that: (5) distance is less important<br />

in the case <strong>of</strong> companies from emerging countries. With regard to how distance matters for international<br />

location decisions, we argue that it represents the disadvantages <strong>of</strong> the host countries and propose that: (6) it<br />

should be used in conjunction with factors that represent host country attractiveness. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Claudio Ramos Conti, EBAPE- Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil: claudio_conti@hotmail.com)<br />

Developing DMNCs' Learning Capabilities: From a Coopetition Perspective<br />

Fiona Xiaoying Ji, Kean University<br />

Manisha Singal, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University<br />

While the importance <strong>of</strong> international alliances has long been recognized in traditional multinational corporations<br />

(MNCs), its effects on MNCs from developing countries (DMNCs) learning and ultimately DMNCs growth remains<br />

undeveloped. In this paper, by building on the literature about coopetition, defined as simultaneously<br />

cooperation and competition as well as organizational learning, we identify and discuss factors influencing<br />

international learning decision and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> such learning for DMNCs' international growth. Our<br />

multi-level conceptual model incorporates dyadic coopetition with foreign partners and geographic coopetition<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 93


SUNDAY<br />

conditions as well as contextual factors. We stress the importance <strong>of</strong> examining a multitude <strong>of</strong> factors in<br />

understanding what predicts DMNCs' international learning and under what conditions the learning will facilitate<br />

international growth. (For more information, please contact: Fiona Xiaoying Ji, Kean University, USA:<br />

xji@kean.edu)<br />

Emerging Market Firms Competing in Other Emerging Markets: Beyond Institutional Voids<br />

Venkat Subramanian, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School<br />

Nikhil Celly, University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Academic research on emerging markets (EM), emerging market companies and their internationalization has<br />

increased in recent years. Much <strong>of</strong> the work though has been about the attractiveness <strong>of</strong> emerging markets to<br />

many developed market MNCs, and the threats to the established MNCs in their home markets. The focus <strong>of</strong><br />

this paper is exploring the factors that influence success in the market-seeking activities <strong>of</strong> emerging market<br />

firms into other emerging markets. We advance the concept <strong>of</strong> institutional arbitrage to explain emerging<br />

market firm competiveness in other EMs, introduce the concept <strong>of</strong> industry voids and propose that both<br />

institutional and industry conditions in home and host countries explain the potential likelihood <strong>of</strong> success <strong>of</strong><br />

EM firms in emerging markets. Further, we argue that this potential success is only realized through business<br />

model innovation. We draw on examples <strong>of</strong> firms from the Indian market across a range <strong>of</strong> industries to<br />

illustrate the validity <strong>of</strong> our propositions and conceptual model. We suggest that EM MNEs may need to<br />

develop or possess a dynamic capability that enables them to innovate upon their existing business models<br />

developed in their home countries to truly take advantage <strong>of</strong> similar institutional and industry conditions in other<br />

emerging markets. (For more information, please contact: Venkat Subramanian, Vlerick Leuven Gent<br />

Management School, Belgium: venkat@vlerick.com)<br />

Session: 1.5.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Culture at the National and Individual Level<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: William Stopford Harvey, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

National Culture versus Individual Culture: The Importance <strong>of</strong> the Ecological Fallacy<br />

Paul Brewer, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Sunil Venaik, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

This article challenges the understanding and use <strong>of</strong> the H<strong>of</strong>stede and GLOBE national culture dimensions in<br />

much extant culture theory development. Both the H<strong>of</strong>stede and GLOBE culture models are derived from<br />

individual survey data aggregated to, and analysed at, the national level. But culture scales that are correlated<br />

at the national (ecological) level will most likely not be at the individual level. To presume they are is known as<br />

the "ecological fallacy" in research literature. In spite <strong>of</strong> warnings, this fact has <strong>of</strong>ten been ignored by culture<br />

researchers. We analyse five research articles in top journals in general management, international business,<br />

marketing, accounting and operations and show that all five commit the ecological fallacy by projecting national<br />

level culture characteristics and associated scores onto individuals. The implications <strong>of</strong> this error are serious,<br />

and include the development <strong>of</strong> invalid culture theory and the persistence <strong>of</strong> false practitioner presumptions.<br />

We highlight the need for clarity and consistency in the interpretation and application <strong>of</strong> national culture<br />

constructs in future research. (For more information, please contact: Paul Brewer, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland,<br />

Australia: p.brewer@business.uq.edu.au)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 94


SUNDAY<br />

An Exploration <strong>of</strong> the Effects <strong>of</strong> National Context and Organizational Performance: An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Sectors in Two<br />

Countries<br />

G. Ronald Gilbert, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Donald Roomes, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

This paper examines the performance <strong>of</strong> organizations in two unique national contexts—Jamaica and the USA.<br />

Jamaica is a more economically challenged nation and is characterized as having different cultural values and<br />

inferior infrastructures (e.g., economic, political, public safety, and communications) than the USA. Based on<br />

samples from working adults in Jamaica (N=704) and the USA (N=884) and differentiating types <strong>of</strong><br />

organizations by sector (public, private, and not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it), we analyze the performance <strong>of</strong> organizations<br />

between and within the two nations. All three sectors in the USA perform more effectively than those in Jamaica<br />

based on criteria associated with the productivity systems-service quality chain and human resources support<br />

systems in the organizations. We find that NFP organizations in both countries perform more effectively on most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the criteria used to assess performance. Public organizations tend to be rated lower than the other sectors in<br />

both national contexts. It is suggested that its lower performance is attributable to the political nature <strong>of</strong> its<br />

design, lack <strong>of</strong> clear outcome objectives, labor management relations, and employee motivational structures.<br />

Differences in performance <strong>of</strong> the organizations embedded in the two nations may be attributed more to<br />

economic and infrastructure conditions than cultural values per se. (For more information, please contact: G.<br />

Ronald Gilbert, Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA: ron.gilbertems@gmail.com)<br />

A Psychological Perspective on Cultural Difference: Epistemological Heterogeneity and Individual Heterogeneity<br />

Across Cultures<br />

Kamal Fatehi, Kennesaw State University<br />

A Psychological Perspective on Cultural Difference: Epistemological Heterogeneity and Individual Heterogeneity<br />

Across Cultures Abstract Most cross-cultural studies <strong>of</strong> management have been sociological type. Conventional<br />

view <strong>of</strong> cultures and sociological perspective has resulted in the assumption that within each culture members<br />

are homogeneous in their psychological make-up, logic, and perspective. Although researchers have reminded<br />

us that people vary on pivotal psychological dimensions, both on a between-country and within-country basis,<br />

these reminders were not heeded. Maruyama's theories and research was exception. Although, other disciplines<br />

have creatively used Maruyama's epistemological heterogeneity, and heterogeneity across cultures, international<br />

management literature, for the most part, has ignored this line <strong>of</strong> inquiry. This paper elaborates on Maruyama's<br />

research and suggests that researchers in international management could use this line <strong>of</strong> inquiry to expand<br />

upon our understanding <strong>of</strong> effective managerial practices dealing with individuals and cultures. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Kamal Fatehi, Kennesaw State University, USA: kfatehi@kennesaw.edu)<br />

Intra-National Diversity and Regionalism within the Indian Diaspora: Effects on Reverse FDI<br />

Masud Chand, Wichita State University<br />

Majid Ghorbani, Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China<br />

Intra-national diversity and regionalism are becoming increasingly important in countries with multiple ethnic<br />

and national groups. In this paper, we look at intra-national diversity within the Indian diaspora to find<br />

explanations for regional patterns in reverse FDI. We tested the effect <strong>of</strong> intra-national diversity among the<br />

Indian diaspora in the U.S. and Canada in a two stage empirical study that used both qualitative and<br />

quantitative methods. Our results point to the importance <strong>of</strong> regionalism in the diasporic reverse FDI to India<br />

from both countries. The results also point to the importance <strong>of</strong> having social networks in the target FDI state in<br />

the diaspora's decision to invest in that particular state. (For more information, please contact: Masud Chand,<br />

Wichita State University, USA: masud.chand@wichita.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 95


SUNDAY<br />

Emergence <strong>of</strong> Cultural Intelligence and Global Mindset Capital: A Multilevel Model<br />

Jase Ramsey, University <strong>of</strong> Alabama<br />

Amine Abi Aad, University <strong>of</strong> Alabama<br />

Virginia Drummond Abdala, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

Livia Lopes Barakat, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

This article <strong>of</strong>fers an application <strong>of</strong> recent work in multilevel research by applying it to two key constructs within<br />

the international management literature: Cultural intelligence (CQ) and the global mindset (GM). Using<br />

transformative learning and the resource based view theories; we discuss how an individual level CQ and GM<br />

can emerge to the unit level. This unit level capital is further examined in order to demonstrate how sustainable<br />

desirable unit level outcomes can be obtained by international organizations. Suggestions <strong>of</strong> which<br />

circumstances are ideal for the use <strong>of</strong> CQ and GM are provided along with an explanation <strong>of</strong> how they can be<br />

enhanced within the firm. (For more information, please contact: Jase Ramsey, University <strong>of</strong> Alabama, USA:<br />

jase@cba.ua.edu)<br />

Emotional Intelligence, Role Stress and Performance <strong>of</strong> Customer Service Staffs in Outsourcing Call Center<br />

Chia-Ying Lu, National Taiwan University<br />

Many firms rely on international or local call centers to address customer concerns about problems with a<br />

product or service and provide product information. While the call center is increasingly known as a valuable<br />

resource for firms in managing customer relationships, it has also developed a stressful work environment. The<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to explore the mediating effect <strong>of</strong> role stress on the relationship between emotional<br />

intelligence and performance, and trying to understand how the customer service staff through the emotion<br />

regulation mechanism to change their perception <strong>of</strong> the role stress, thereby affecting the performance. 370<br />

questionnaires were used to survey customer service staffs <strong>of</strong> two call centers. One is an international call<br />

center and the other is a local call center in Taiwan. The results show that the emotional intelligence negatively<br />

influences role stress. While it positively influences service performance and doesn't significantly impact job<br />

performance. Furthermore, role stress negatively influences on service performance and doesn't significantly<br />

impact job performance. In lastly, emotional intelligence positively influences service performance through role<br />

stress. As a result, this study suggested that call centers emphasize on emotional intelligence and stress<br />

resistance <strong>of</strong> employees. (For more information, please contact: Chia-Ying Lu, National Taiwan University,<br />

Taiwan: d94724004@ntu.edu.tw)<br />

Session: 1.5.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />

Managing Alliance Partners and Portfolios<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: James Woodley, Ramapo College<br />

When Do Alliance Portfolio Resources Matter The Effect <strong>of</strong> a Firm's Market Experience<br />

Seong-Young Kim, EMLYON Business School<br />

Bernard Forgues, EMLYON Business School<br />

This study investigates how diversity <strong>of</strong> alliance portfolio resources and firm's characteristics influence firm<br />

performance. Although firms are expected to benefit from increasing diversity <strong>of</strong> alliance portfolio resources, the<br />

performance effects could vary with types <strong>of</strong> diversity <strong>of</strong> alliance portfolio resources. Further, performance<br />

effects may depend on a focal firm's characteristics. By analyzing a sample <strong>of</strong> multinational semiconductor<br />

firms, we show that diversity <strong>of</strong> alliance functions positively affects firm's market performance, while high<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> technological and positional resources has a negative effect on firm performance. However, this<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 96


SUNDAY<br />

negative effect depends on a focal firm's market experience. (For more information, please contact: Seong-<br />

Young Kim, EMLYON Business School, France: kim@em-lyon.com)<br />

How Do Alliance Partners Share the Value They Create Determinants <strong>of</strong> the Value Split in <strong>International</strong><br />

Technology Transfer Alliances<br />

Farok J. Contractor, Rutgers University<br />

James Woodley, Ramapo College<br />

This paper tests different determinants <strong>of</strong> partner shares <strong>of</strong> alliance returns, for a sample <strong>of</strong> cross-border<br />

technology transfer alliances. Findings suggest the importance <strong>of</strong> bargaining power as an influence on partner<br />

shares <strong>of</strong> alliance returns and suggest that firms with better absorptive capacity gain more from alliances. There<br />

is a positive correlation between risk and return in alliances; in other words, firms that want a greater share <strong>of</strong><br />

total returns from an alliance may be able to reach that objective by also agreeing to accept more risk or<br />

volatility. On a related point, shifting risk to a partner by insisting on minimum sales or minimum royalty<br />

requirements is typically accompanied by a smaller share <strong>of</strong> total alliance returns for the partner <strong>of</strong>floading risk.<br />

Finally, the findings suggest that return and risk are evaluated in a holistic manner by those negotiating and<br />

designing alliances. Implications for theory and practice are explored and further research about issues raised in<br />

this paper is recommended. (For more information, please contact: Farok J. Contractor, Rutgers University,<br />

USA: farok@andromeda.rutgers.edu)<br />

To Compete or to Cooperate: Contrasting Distance Determinants for Semiconductor Alliances<br />

Sonya H. Wen, Tamkang University<br />

How do competitive dynamics between partners impact alliance strategies To approach such inquiry, we<br />

devised a hypothesized governance model by applying the literature <strong>of</strong> competitive dynamics and knowledgebased<br />

view in the empirical context <strong>of</strong> technology intensive alliances. Two contrasting hypotheses driven by<br />

competitive tension versus cooperative incentives are developed and then tested on a sample <strong>of</strong> 1,696<br />

Semiconductor alliances during 1985 and 2008. These sampled alliances formed by actual and/or potential<br />

competitors are intentionally selected to magnify the hypothesized contrasting governance effects <strong>of</strong> multidimensional<br />

distance determinants. We posit that driven by cooperation that the higher cooperative barriers or<br />

higher distance, and contrastingly driven by competition, the higher resource similarity or lower distance<br />

between alliance partners, the higher propensity <strong>of</strong> equity-base mode to safeguard their comparative<br />

advantages against competitors. We found empirical support <strong>of</strong> both hypotheses on the direct or contingent<br />

governance effects <strong>of</strong> six distance determinants. In comparison, our research demonstrates that the governance<br />

driver <strong>of</strong> cooperative incentives stronger than competitive tension, as well as weaker governance effects <strong>of</strong><br />

cultural distance than the distance dimensions <strong>of</strong> power, coordination, knowledge, and experience. Such<br />

contrasting results support our call for more alliance research to analyze the strategic dynamics between<br />

competition and cooperation. (For more information, please contact: Sonya H. Wen, Tamkang University,<br />

Taiwan: sonya.wen@gmail.com)<br />

Exploring the Influence <strong>of</strong> Institutional Embeddedness <strong>of</strong> Partner Firms on Inter-Partner Dynamics in<br />

<strong>International</strong> Strategic Alliances<br />

Swetketu Patnaik, University <strong>of</strong> Kaiserslautern<br />

The article aims to demonstrate the influence <strong>of</strong> institutional embeddedness on the practices that organizations<br />

adopt in international strategic alliances and their implication on alliance dynamics. Whereas most studies, in<br />

international business, explore the dynamics <strong>of</strong> institutional arrangements in the context <strong>of</strong> issues relating to<br />

host country partner selection, little is known on how institutional embeddedness <strong>of</strong> partner firms have an<br />

influence on the dynamics <strong>of</strong> inter-organizational relations. Our paper, based on a longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> two cooccurring<br />

international strategic alliances <strong>of</strong> an Indian biopharmaceutical firm explores how institutional<br />

embeddedness <strong>of</strong> partner firms influence their alliance formation activities, the approaches they adopt to<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 97


SUNDAY<br />

undertake research and development activities as well as the approaches that the firms adopt in sharing <strong>of</strong><br />

information and conflict resolution. We find that institutional embeddedness <strong>of</strong> partner firms significantly<br />

influence inter-partner dynamics in international strategic alliances. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Swetketu Patnaik, University <strong>of</strong> Kaiserslautern, Germany: patnaik@wiwi.uni-kl.de)<br />

Coordination Modes and IORs Relational Outcomes: The Mechanisms in between<br />

Pei-Li Yu, National Cheng Kung University<br />

Effectively governed inter-organizational relationships (IORs) are characterized by high interfirm adaptation and<br />

low ex post opportunism. Promoting interfirm adaptation and attenuating ex post opportunism is increasingly an<br />

important coordination function in collaborations. However, evidence for the role <strong>of</strong> interfirm governance<br />

mechanisms in engendering such a managerial focus is scarce. To address this issue, I link transaction cost<br />

economics and social learning perspective, and propose an integrated model for specifying the link: coordination<br />

mechanisms, interfirm adaptation and ex post opportunism. This model involves the interorganizational learning<br />

process as a mediator and cultural differences as a moderator. The general thrust <strong>of</strong> our reasoning is that<br />

interfirm relationships perform better because the parties involved have developed a valuable knowledge<br />

transfer mechanism, which may facilitate better interfirm adaptation and mitigate ex post opportunism. While<br />

there seems to be little doubt about the positive impact <strong>of</strong> learning processes on interfirm relationships, I posit<br />

that the direct effect is mitigated by a variable specific to the interfirm context, namely cultural differences. I<br />

find empirical partial support for our developed theory in the context <strong>of</strong> Taiwanese high technology industry.<br />

The results shown that hierarchical mode <strong>of</strong> coordination mechanisms influences interfirm adaptation through<br />

knowledge exploration; feedback mode <strong>of</strong> coordination mechanisms influences ex post opportunism through<br />

knowledge exploitation when a lower cultural difference exists. (For more information, please contact: Pei-Li Yu,<br />

National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan: h4584933@ms24.hinet.net)<br />

Session: 1.5.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 14 - Methods in IB Research<br />

Novel Perspectives on Research Methods: Emerging Markets, Born Globals & Linguistics<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Ilan Alon, Rollins College<br />

Show, Don't Tell - The Combination <strong>of</strong> Qualitative In-Depth Interviews and Metaphor Analysis in <strong>International</strong><br />

Research Settings<br />

Stefanie Paluch, TU Dortmund University<br />

Modern information technologies alter not only the nature <strong>of</strong> services and their delivery process but also the<br />

interaction at the interface between service provider and customer. This research focuses on the exploration <strong>of</strong><br />

a new type <strong>of</strong> technology-mediated services, remote service in a B2B-context based on a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

qualitative in-depth interviews and metaphor analyses in three different countries. This study intends to<br />

contribute to literature by exploring how business customers perceive and evaluate remote services; revealing<br />

how transformation from close personal contact to technology-mediated interaction affects the relationship<br />

between provider and customer and by using qualitative techniques and metaphorical analysis to better<br />

understand customers attitude towards service technology in international research settings. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Stefanie Paluch, TU Dortmund University, Germany: stefanie.paluch@tudortmund.de)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 98


SUNDAY<br />

An Emic-Etic Research Approach for Under-Researched Countries: Lessons from the LEAD Project for the<br />

<strong>International</strong> Business Research Community<br />

Betty Jane Punnett, University <strong>of</strong> the West Indies<br />

Terri Lituchy, Concordia University<br />

This paper discusses the importance <strong>of</strong> understanding management issues in under-researched areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world, and the use <strong>of</strong> both emic and etic research to examine these issues. The paper uses a research project<br />

focusing on Africa and the African Diaspora, to illustrate the emic-etic combination. The project began with<br />

emic, culture specific, research the Lead project (Lituchy et al., 2011) and used this to develop an etic<br />

approach, a large scale survey, to be administered in a variety <strong>of</strong> African countries, as well as among the<br />

African Diaspora. Kamoche (2011) said "Africa remains relatively under-researched in the fields <strong>of</strong><br />

management…international business" (p.1) and "the scope for further research into the management <strong>of</strong> people<br />

in Africa is enormous" (p.4). This supports earlier calls for research on management in Africa (Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2009). Bolden and Kirks (2009) suggested that there is a need<br />

for grounded conceptualizations <strong>of</strong> leadership drawn from research within Africa, using a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

methodological approaches. The paper builds on these ideas and explains why it is critical to understand<br />

management outside <strong>of</strong> Western, developed countries, and why the emic-etic combination design provides<br />

insights that cannot be identified with only one approach. (For more information, please contact: Betty Jane<br />

Punnett, University <strong>of</strong> the West Indies, Barbados: eureka@caribsurf.com)<br />

Qualitative Insights into Concept Formation: The Case <strong>of</strong> the 'Born Global'<br />

Lisa Hewerdine, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Catherine Welch, The University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

This paper highlights the potential for qualitative research to contribute to what is one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> any field: the development, interrogation and reformulation <strong>of</strong> concepts. We draw on the born<br />

global literature as an illustrative example or case <strong>of</strong> concept formation but as the purpose <strong>of</strong> our paper is<br />

primarily methodological, our emphasis is placed on the central topic <strong>of</strong> concept formation, rather than a review<br />

<strong>of</strong> the BG literature per se. We present three vignettes and our empirical study showed us that qualitative case<br />

research can be extremely useful in demonstrating complexities associated with concepts that can otherwise be<br />

overlooked. To provide a framework for our analysis, we turned to the political scientists whose scholarship<br />

provided us with a vocabulary and framework for evaluating concepts. Using this literature, we argue that there<br />

are grounds for rethinking the born global concept as denoting a particular class <strong>of</strong> firm. We conclude by<br />

suggesting the term can be reconceptualised as an internationalisation pathway that firms may take, depending<br />

on contextual factors. (For more information, please contact: Lisa Hewerdine, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia:<br />

lisajane@bigpond.net.au)<br />

Assessing Group Variation: Methodological Considerations for Emerging Markets Research<br />

Alexander M. Settles, National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Valentina V. Kuskova, National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Liudmila V. Petrova, National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

While cross-cultural research is not new, available methodological recommendations are not always applicable<br />

for comparative studies in emerging markets. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to call more attention to comparative<br />

studies to expand our understanding <strong>of</strong> the differences between the emerging and developed markets, examine<br />

methodological trends in the field <strong>of</strong> emerging market research, and provide a comprehensive review <strong>of</strong><br />

methods <strong>of</strong> assessing group variation. (For more information, please contact: Alexander M. Settles, National<br />

Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Russia: asettles@hse.ru)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 99


SUNDAY<br />

Corpus Linguistics Tools and Qualitative and Quantitative <strong>International</strong> Business Research<br />

Brian Hilton, Nottingham University Business School<br />

John McKenny, English Studies Nottingham University<br />

This interdisciplinary paper sets out to explore the use <strong>of</strong> a Corpus Linguistic tool as a means either to<br />

quantitatively test hypothesis about the development <strong>of</strong> ideas in <strong>International</strong> Business or to qualitatively<br />

ground theory on developing perceptions within the genre. In illustration <strong>of</strong> the former it tests the hypothesis<br />

that the Integration Responsiveness framework has become paradigmaticly embodied in the genre. In<br />

illustration <strong>of</strong> the latter it shows how the descriptive material this tool lays out can be used to raise questions<br />

for qualitative exploration as potential new or developing ideas within the body <strong>of</strong> scholarship represented by<br />

articles in JIBS (For more information, please contact: Brian Hilton, Nottingham University Business School,<br />

China: brian.hilton@nottingham.edu.cn)<br />

By Eyesight - A Case <strong>of</strong> Mixing Methods in Qualitative Business Research<br />

Sabina Jaeger, AUT University<br />

Romuald Rudzki, New Zealand School <strong>of</strong> Export<br />

The paper tells the story <strong>of</strong> a research process, a project with the aim to investigate critical export barriers to<br />

growth. Starting <strong>of</strong>f with a quantitative method in the form <strong>of</strong> a mail survey the necessity for employing further<br />

investigative tools became quickly obvious. Ambiguous survey replies such as "by eyesight" demanded more indepth<br />

investigation in order to understand the meaning <strong>of</strong> the data collected. Applying different techniques <strong>of</strong><br />

data collection achieved the goal to comprehend what the respondents perceived as critical barriers and what<br />

made them decide to export in spite <strong>of</strong> sometimes adverse conditions. It appeared that the reality and extent <strong>of</strong><br />

the barriers were conditional on the respondents' perception <strong>of</strong>, and attitude towards, the barriers. In<br />

conclusion a mixed method research approach (triangulation) provided superior insights into the complexities <strong>of</strong><br />

making the decision for or against export activity than a survey alone. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Sabina Jaeger, AUT University, New Zealand: sabina.jaeger@aut.ac.nz)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 100


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.1.P - Panel<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

ABSTRACTS FOR MONDAY, JULY 2, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Showcase Panel on Institutional Change and Emerging Market Multinationals<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Elitsa R. Banalieva, Northeastern University<br />

Co-Chair: Laszlo Tihanyi, Texas A&M University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Michael Hitt, Texas A&M University<br />

Robert Hoskisson, Rice University<br />

Ruth Aguilera, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Northeastern University<br />

Our panel will focus on presenting some <strong>of</strong> the latest scholarly advances in the fields <strong>of</strong> institutional change and<br />

emerging market multinational enterprises (EM MNEs). In particular, our expert panelists—Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ruth Aguilera,<br />

Mike Hitt, Bob Hoskisson, and Pasha Mahmood—will present on three understudied issues: (1) comparative<br />

corporate governance and institutional change in EMs; (2) institutional polycentricity and its effect on EM MNEs'<br />

strategies and outcomes; and (3) new multinationals from former emerging economies. Our panel will present<br />

new ways to integrate and extend existing theories such as agency theory, institution-based view, and the<br />

resource-based view <strong>of</strong> the firm. (For more information, please contact: Elitsa R. Banalieva, Northeastern<br />

University, USA: e.banalieva@neu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.1.1 - Special Session<br />

UNCTAD WIR Panel II: TNCs, Global Value Chains and Development: the Investment and<br />

Trade Nexus<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: James Zhan, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD<br />

Co-Chair: Hafiz Mirza, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD<br />

Discussant: Jeremy Clegg, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Panelists:<br />

James Zhan, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD<br />

Hafiz Mirza, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD<br />

Susan Feinberg, Temple University<br />

Christos Pitelis, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

Aaron Brickman, SelectUSA, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce<br />

Ilan Alon, Rollins College<br />

The topic <strong>of</strong> this panel has been selected for World Investment Report 2013, so this panel is a basis for<br />

establishing a firm conceptual and empirical foundation for further work, as well as a platform for <strong>AIB</strong> members<br />

to collaborate in the effort. The Investment and Trade Nexus, is an important, but difficult topic; albeit<br />

ostensibly touched upon by many researchers and policymakers worldwide in recent years, it remains<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 101


MONDAY<br />

underexplored. In the new era <strong>of</strong> globalization, the rise <strong>of</strong> integrated international networks and the pivotal role<br />

TNCs in Global Value Chains, and the attendant policy challenges, the topic is ripe for thorough and sustained<br />

investigation. The issues to be raised in the panel include: • Given that increasingly the size, content, volume<br />

and direction <strong>of</strong> trade is under the common governance <strong>of</strong> TNCs and their decisions on where to locate foreign<br />

direct investment (FDI), or set up non-equity modes (NEM) operations with host-country entrepreneurs, what<br />

are the salient issues to be addressed and which data are required for the analysis • Value-chain based<br />

analyses is one way <strong>of</strong> doing this (what are the alternatives); and this approach require a "re-imagining" <strong>of</strong> the<br />

traditional interpretations <strong>of</strong> both trade and FDI patterns. What does a remapping <strong>of</strong> (a) global and (b) regional<br />

value chains reveal • What are the implications for theory How do we understand and differentiate between<br />

or reconfigure absolute, comparative and competitive advantage conceptually in the modern world – and<br />

integrate them into a common framework for FDI, NEMs and trade • Given the pivotal role <strong>of</strong> TNCs in GVCs<br />

and the investment and trade nexus, “responsible investment” also takes centre stage. How this issue is<br />

analysed in conceptual/theoretical and practical terms has huge implications for sustainable development. •<br />

Policymakers face the challenge <strong>of</strong> how to create synergies between investment and trade policies. How can<br />

this be achieved What are the main policy issues that matter in this context (For more information, please<br />

contact: Hafiz Mirza, Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD, Switzerland: Hafiz.Mirza@unctad.org)<br />

Session: 2.1.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Innovations in Leadership Development Learning from Outside Comfort Zones: Arts,<br />

Nature, History, Science, Community, Context<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Danica Purg, IEDC-Bled School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Panelists:<br />

Danica Purg, IEDC-Bled School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Nancy J. Adler, McGill University<br />

Jonathan Cook, Gordon Institute <strong>of</strong> Business Science<br />

Sergei Filonovich, National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Today's leaders are challenged by issues which are complex, interconnected and constantly changing. The<br />

challenges <strong>of</strong> today and tomorrow require innovative approaches, new visions – creative leadership. Traditional<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> leadership and management development <strong>of</strong>ten fall short in preparing leaders for these realities as<br />

they fail to cultivate reflective, holistic, socially responsible views and skills in leadership practice. As<br />

Woodward and Funk have recently written, leaders must re-imagine the complex realities they face and reenvision<br />

how to approach them. To achieve this requires innovative thinking – creativity – and the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> creative approaches to leadership development and practice. Processes <strong>of</strong> re-imagining and re-envisioning<br />

are driven by reflexive thinking. The panel will explore innovations which are aimed at learning from taking<br />

leaders out <strong>of</strong> their comfort zones and provoking reflection, inspiration, and responsible behavior. Particular<br />

emphasis will be given on learning from creative arts, science, history, nature, community, and context in<br />

general. Based on the presented experiences and lessons learned, the panel will also address the implications<br />

for leadership development, which should assume its own social responsibility for sustainable future and a<br />

better world. (For more information, please contact: Danica Purg, IEDC-Bled School <strong>of</strong> Management, Slovenia:<br />

danica.purg@iedc.si)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 102


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.1.3 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

A Global View on Sustainability and CSR<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Bodo B. Schlegelmilch, WU Vienna<br />

Panelists:<br />

Bodo B. Schlegelmilch, WU Vienna<br />

Timothy M. Devinney, University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sydney<br />

Michael R. Czinkota, Georgetown University<br />

Constantinos N. Leonidou, Leeds University<br />

Verena Gruber, WU Vienna<br />

Constantine S. Katsikeas, Leeds University<br />

Athina Zeriti, Leeds University<br />

In principle, there is broad agreement that governments and corporations should behave in a sustainable<br />

fashion and act socially responsible. However, when taking a more fine grained perspective on sustainability and<br />

CSR, differences abound. Not only is there little agreement on the definitions and dimensions <strong>of</strong> sustainability<br />

and CSR, there are also different views depending on economic- and social convictions, stages <strong>of</strong> market<br />

development and stakeholder roles. The sustainability and CSR debate is particularly relevant in an<br />

international context, as diverging opinions frequently relate to different vantage points in terms <strong>of</strong> geography,<br />

politics, and culture. The failure to strengthen the Kyoto Protocol at Durban in 2011 <strong>of</strong>fers a stark reminder <strong>of</strong><br />

the geopolitical nature <strong>of</strong> the disagreements. This panel aims to advance our thinking and perceptions about the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> sustainability and CSR from a theoretical, methodological and practical perspective. The unifying<br />

premise: taking a global view on these issues is imperative. (For more information, please contact: Bodo B.<br />

Schlegelmilch, WU Vienna, Austria: bodo.schlegelmilch@wu.ac.at)<br />

Session: 2.1.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Where is Knowledge in the Global Organization<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Shad Morris, Ohio State University<br />

Multi-Country Knowledge Generation: Evolving Parent-Subsidiary Relationships and Global Innovation within<br />

MNCs<br />

Heather K Berry, George Washington University<br />

I examine how more basic relationships associated with product integration can lead to higher level<br />

relationships that involve multi-country innovations within MNCs. I argue that product linkages provide<br />

communication channels, common knowledge and increased visibility that allow foreign subsidiaries to play<br />

increasingly important roles in innovation processes. Results from a dataset combining confidential data on the<br />

worldwide operations <strong>of</strong> US MNCs from the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic Analysis (BEA) with data on the patents <strong>of</strong><br />

these firms from the USPTO reveal that multi-country patenting is significantly related to higher product<br />

integration in MNCs. Overall, this paper emphasizes the importance <strong>of</strong> evolving parent-affiliate relations in the<br />

global innovation strategies <strong>of</strong> MNCs, and documents changing patterns in the international patenting <strong>of</strong> US<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 103


MONDAY<br />

MNCs. (For more information, please contact: Heather K Berry, George Washington University, USA:<br />

berryh@gwu.edu)<br />

Building Effective R&D Portfolios: Location Choices and Performance Consequences<br />

Mario Kafouros, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Niron Hashai, The Hebrew University<br />

Chengqi Wang, Nottingham University Business School<br />

Though R&D internationalization is central to organizational strategy, its consequences for firm performance<br />

remain less well understood, thus limiting scholarly theorizing about the forces shaping the success <strong>of</strong> overseas<br />

innovation. The current study is designed to address this lack <strong>of</strong> understanding. In contrast to single-location<br />

analyses, our conceptualization extends prior theorizing on the globalization <strong>of</strong> innovation by capturing firms'<br />

entire portfolios <strong>of</strong> R&D labs, their location choices in the global landscape, and differences in the resulting<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> R&D labs. Our contribution lies in explaining how, and the extent to which, R&D portfolios enable<br />

MNEs to exploit globally dispersed location bound resources. Our analysis generates implications for theory,<br />

indicating that the effects <strong>of</strong> R&D on performance not only depend on the degree <strong>of</strong> its internationalization, but<br />

also on how it is internationalized. (For more information, please contact: Mario Kafouros, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds,<br />

United Kingdom: mk@lubs.leeds.ac.uk)<br />

Superstar Inventors in Foreign Subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> the MNC<br />

Katarina Blomkvist, Uppsala University<br />

Philip Kappen, Uppsala University<br />

Ivo Zander, Uppsala University<br />

This paper develops a micro-perspective on the geographical dispersion <strong>of</strong> technological renewal in foreign<br />

subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> the multinational corporation (MNC). We draw upon an original data set comprising 371 foreign<br />

subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> 21 Swedish MNCs and follow their patenting activity to document the distribution <strong>of</strong> inventive<br />

activity both across and within individual subsidiaries. Findings at the subsidiary level show that the distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> technological activity and contribution to the overall multinational group is significantly skewed, and we<br />

proceed to empirically explore the assumption that a similar distribution applies also at the level <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

inventors. The results point to a pattern where most inventors make only occasional and limited technological<br />

contributions and more significant numbers <strong>of</strong> new technological discoveries are instead attributable to a select<br />

group <strong>of</strong> exceptionally inventive individuals. In the light <strong>of</strong> the results, we revisit the geographical distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

technological capabilities in the MNC, and suggest the fruitfulness <strong>of</strong> applying a people-centric perspective on<br />

the sources <strong>of</strong> sustained competitive advantage <strong>of</strong> the MNC, the management <strong>of</strong> geographically dispersed<br />

capabilities in the multinational network, and the geographical sources <strong>of</strong> invention in the MNC. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Katarina Blomkvist, Uppsala University, Sweden: katarina.blomkvist@fek.uu.se)<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> Global Innovation Network in MNEs<br />

Charles Dhanaraj, Indiana University<br />

Srivardhini K. Jha, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore<br />

Rishikesha T. Krishnan, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore<br />

Technological innovation is the cornerstone <strong>of</strong> competitive advantage –both for individual firms and for national<br />

economies. Advances in the institutional environment, and the changing dynamics <strong>of</strong> product and factor<br />

markets have systematically expanded the innovation networks <strong>of</strong> most multinational enterprises (MNEs) across<br />

the globe. As the innovation networks expand globally, achieving excellence or productivity in research and<br />

development (R&D) and ensuring appropriability <strong>of</strong> the innovation are the two major challenges for an MNE.<br />

While empirical research on MNE R&D has proliferated in recent years, theoretical development has been<br />

lagging significantly. Our paper fills this gap by addressing the central question in multinational R&D: How does<br />

an MNE's innovation network evolve Specifically, we draw on institutional and resource-dependence<br />

perspectives to extend the network model <strong>of</strong> MNE. We develop propositions to predict the onset <strong>of</strong> R&D<br />

mandate in a subsidiary, and the scope <strong>of</strong> the R&D function at a node, and the level <strong>of</strong> autonomy and<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 104


MONDAY<br />

coordination <strong>of</strong> the R&D organization. We discuss implications for theory and practice and outline some<br />

empirical methodologies to test these propositions. (For more information, please contact: Charles Dhanaraj,<br />

Indiana University, USA: dhanaraj@iupui.edu)<br />

Session: 2.1.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

New Perspectives on <strong>International</strong>ization<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Klaus Meyer, China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School<br />

Dispersion <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>ization and Firm Performance: A Contextualist Three-Stage Model<br />

Pham Hoanh Son Nguyen, ESC Clermont Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Tugrul Atamer, EMLYON Business School<br />

Alain Charles Martinet, University Jean Moulin Lyon 3<br />

The academic interest in the relationship between <strong>International</strong>ization and Performance (RIP) has grown<br />

steadily during the last four decades. Based on different theories and methodological approaches, researchers<br />

propose and confirm empirically RIP <strong>of</strong> various natures. Consequently, they have developed various alternative<br />

approaches to model RIP such as negative, positive and linear, U standard and U inverted. In this context, the<br />

three-stage model <strong>of</strong> Lu and Beamish (2004) and Contractor, Kundu and Hsu (2003), emerges as an integrator<br />

model capable <strong>of</strong> reconciling other efforts to model RIP. However, this integrator model has, in our point <strong>of</strong><br />

view, two limitations: (1) the absence <strong>of</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> internationalization, in particular, the cultural and<br />

institutional environment in the theoretical analysis and development; (2) the inability to show the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> dispersion <strong>of</strong> internationalization on performance. To overcome these limitations, we propose, in this<br />

work, to use the dispersion <strong>of</strong> internationalization as a vector by which the context <strong>of</strong> internationalization is<br />

incorporated into the analysis on the impact <strong>of</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization on performance. This research,<br />

based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 69 large international French enterprises over 7 years, 2001-2007, contributes to RIP<br />

research by providing the following new theoretical, empirical and methodological elements: (i) the three-stage<br />

model applies not only to the relationships between the breadth <strong>of</strong> internationalization and performance, or the<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> internationalization and performance, but also to the dispersion <strong>of</strong> internationalization and<br />

performance; (ii) it is not only the degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization itself that explains the firm's performance but<br />

also the context <strong>of</strong> internationalization. (For more information, please contact: Pham Hoanh Son Nguyen, ESC<br />

Clermont Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Management, France: pham.nguyen@esc-clermont.fr)<br />

Modeling the Speed <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>ization: Examining the Different Modes <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>ization According to<br />

their Timing and Speed<br />

Masahiro Kotosaka, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

This research adopted an exploratory, case-based theorising approach and empirically examined the model <strong>of</strong><br />

forces influencing the speed <strong>of</strong> internationalization developed by Oviatt and McDougall (2005). This study<br />

proposed a 4-by-4 matrix consisting <strong>of</strong> the time axis and the speed axis in order to compare the different modes<br />

<strong>of</strong> internationalization. By treating timing and speed differently, this study discussed potential refinements to the<br />

Oviatt and McDougall model, especially if it is to accommodate Born-again Global firms and <strong>International</strong> Small<br />

Firms. This study contributes to the understanding <strong>of</strong> the two distinguishing factors <strong>of</strong> internationalization: the<br />

timing and the speed. This paper argues the firm's competitive advantage, which is a result <strong>of</strong> access to the<br />

knowledge, networks, and resource, works as the moderating force determining the speed <strong>of</strong> expansion,<br />

together with the opportunity, enabling, motivating, and mitigating factors explained by Oviatt and McDougall's<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 105


MONDAY<br />

model. Further, it argues the timing decision is a decision variable that the firm can control, and is essentially a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> the boundary and location decision. Therefore, one might benefit from applying the traditional<br />

theories about multinational enterprises, whereby the younger and smaller the firm, the stronger the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the entrepreneurial actor's perceptions. (For more information, please contact: Masahiro Kotosaka, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Oxford, United Kingdom: masahiro.kotosaka@sbs.ox.ac.uk)<br />

Cross-Listings, Stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>ization and Firm Performance<br />

Xueji Jessie Liang, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

Jane Lu, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

The internationalization process (IP) model suggests that firms internationalize through incremental steps in<br />

global markets, with accumulated knowledge and enhanced commitment. This study extends the IP model by<br />

arguing that cross-listing in global equity markets is a stage <strong>of</strong> internationalization process. More specifically,<br />

firms gain international recognition and legitimacy through cross-listings in major stock exchanges, which affect<br />

their knowledge accumulation and perceived opportunities in the global markets. Greater knowledge and more<br />

opportunities enhance firm commitment and thus facilitate further internationalization process. Our empirical<br />

results, based on a panel data analysis <strong>of</strong> Chinese firms, suggest that for firms from emerging market, global<br />

IPO increases the degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization and leads to better firm performance. Moreover, empirical<br />

evidence indicates that the strategic value <strong>of</strong> cross-listings is contingent on firm corporate governance structure,<br />

in which the better the corporate governance, the greater the value <strong>of</strong> cross-listings. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Xueji Jessie Liang, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore: xuejiliang@nus.edu.sg)<br />

Understanding the Pre-<strong>International</strong>ization Phase Decision Heuristic <strong>of</strong> Australian SMEs<br />

Alvin Tan, Queensland University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Paul Brewer, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Peter W. Liesch, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Since the 1970s, the Uppsala stages model has been one <strong>of</strong> the dominant explanations <strong>of</strong> firm<br />

internationalization. The model's focus on internationalization as a firm's gradual and incremental process <strong>of</strong><br />

increasing international involvement has attracted much debate, with one criticism being that it is unclear in<br />

explaining how the internationalization process first originates within a firm. In this paper, the Uppsala model is<br />

extended through the incorporation <strong>of</strong> a pre-internationalization phase to explore the antecedents <strong>of</strong> firm<br />

internationalization. Adopting the Uppsala model's theoretical underpinnings, this paper develops and<br />

operationalizes a pre-internationalization phase decision heuristic in the form <strong>of</strong> an ‘export readiness index'.<br />

Four constructs are proposed that drive and inhibit export commencement decision-making during a firm's preinternationalization<br />

phase: export stimuli, attitudinal/psychological commitment, resources and lateral rigidity.<br />

Through a survey <strong>of</strong> Australian exporting and non-exporting small-medium sized enterprises (SMEs), the Export<br />

Readiness Index (ERI) is developed through factor analysis and tested using logistic regression. Results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study and their potential implications are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Alvin Tan,<br />

Queensland University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Australia: ac.tan@qut.edu.au)<br />

Session: 2.1.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

M&As and Entry Mode Choices<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Olivier Bertrand, SKEMA Business School<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 106


MONDAY<br />

Is There a Link Between Geography, Regional Integration and Governance A Study <strong>of</strong> MNEs' Entry Mode<br />

Decisions in Europe<br />

Roberto Ragozzino, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

Caterina Moschieri, IE Business School / Universidade Católica Portuguesa<br />

Brian C. Pinkham, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

This study uses an economic geography lens and it focuses on supra-national institutions as determinants <strong>of</strong><br />

entry mode. We examine the relationship between geographic distance and the choice <strong>of</strong> governance<br />

implemented by firms seeking cross-border corporate growth in Europe. We are also interested in determining<br />

whether the evolution <strong>of</strong> Europe as a business environment and membership <strong>of</strong> the host country in the<br />

European Union affect this outcome. The results strongly support our predictions. Namely, geographic distance,<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> Europe and EU membership directly shape the manner in which MNEs choose to<br />

expand internationally. (For more information, please contact: Brian C. Pinkham, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas,<br />

USA: brian.pinkham@utdallas.edu)<br />

Entry Mode Choice: Is MNEs' Behavior Space-Neutral<br />

Lucia Piscitello, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Sergio Mariotti, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Stefano Elia, Politecnico di Milano<br />

This paper assesses the role <strong>of</strong> spatial heterogeneity on the MNEs' entry mode choice, by analyzing foreign<br />

acquisitions <strong>of</strong> local manufacturing firms occurred in Italy in the period 2001-2010. We claim that the MNEs'<br />

behavior is not space-neutral, and that the degree <strong>of</strong> ownership in cross border acquisitions is influenced by<br />

sub-national subtleties. In particular, the country core, the border areas, and the industrial districts generate<br />

information and knowledge spillovers that partially substitute those embedded in local target firms. Hence, the<br />

need <strong>of</strong> relying on local partnership to overcome the liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness, and to access distinctive countryand<br />

business-specific competences, decreases accordingly. (For more information, please contact: Lucia<br />

Piscitello, Politecnico di Milano, Italy: lucia.piscitello@polimi.it)<br />

Environmental Munificence, Prior Experience, and the Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Cross-Border Mergers & Acquisitions<br />

Rimi Zakaria, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

W.G. Douglas Fernandez, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

William Schneper, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

This study examines the implications <strong>of</strong> organizational learning and the scarcity <strong>of</strong> economic resources on the<br />

types <strong>of</strong> merger & acquisitions (M&A) undertaken by large US firms. We explore whether companies are more<br />

likely to pursue foreign M&As over domestic M&A's during periods <strong>of</strong> low environmental munificence in the<br />

home country and low organizational slack at the firm level. We further evaluate the moderating effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

focal firm's prior relevant experience on the relationship between its environmental munificence and nature <strong>of</strong><br />

M&A attempt. Thus, drawing on the literature on environmental munificence, organizational search, and<br />

organizational learning perspectives, this study seeks to explain the resource-, learning-, and routine-based<br />

antecedents <strong>of</strong> cross-border M&A activities. Results analyzed from a sample <strong>of</strong> 8,410 cross-border M&A activity<br />

attempted by the S&P 500 companies during the period <strong>of</strong> 1994 to 2009 generally support our theoretical<br />

understanding that resources and learning significantly influence a firm's acquisition behavior. (For more<br />

information, please contact: W.G. Douglas Fernandez, Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA:<br />

wdoug002@fiu.edu)<br />

Asset-Seeking Acquisitions: Performance Consequences for Service Sector EMNCs<br />

Sathyajit Gubbi, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen<br />

Padma Rao Sahib, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 107


MONDAY<br />

This study examines the role <strong>of</strong> home market context and nature <strong>of</strong> business in cross-border acquisitions by<br />

service sector and non-service sector firms. Beginning with the assumption that international acquisitions by<br />

EMNCs are primarily strategic asset seeking investments, we propose that due to inherent differences in market<br />

conditions and nature <strong>of</strong> business, service sector acquisitions outperform those by non-service sector.<br />

Furthermore, though the decision to acquire management control in the target has desirable consequences, it<br />

has a differential impact on acquisition performance depending on whether the acquiring firm is located in a<br />

service or non-service sector. Acquiring control <strong>of</strong> resources post-acquisition is more beneficial to non-service<br />

sector EMNCs than to service sector EMNCs. Our findings are supported by analysis <strong>of</strong> 540 cross-border<br />

acquisitions by Indian firms over the period 2000-2007. (For more information, please contact: Sathyajit Gubbi,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Groningen, Netherlands: s.r.gubbi@rug.nl)<br />

Session: 2.1.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

Assessing and Enhancing Multicultural Perspectives in IB Students<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Vas Taras, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina Greensboro<br />

Student Perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>ization, Multiculturalism, and Diversity in the Business School<br />

Matthew C. Mitchell, Drake University<br />

Darcie Vandegrift, Drake University<br />

Over the last five decades business schools all over the world have adapted their strategies for introducing the<br />

theoretical and pedagogical consequences <strong>of</strong> globalization. Educational institutions have gone to great lengths<br />

to internationalize their curricula to stay current with the most recent trends in the globalizing economy. As this<br />

evolution takes place, the issues <strong>of</strong> multiculturalism and diversity are increasingly included in the<br />

internationalization dialogue. Important questions are being asked and answered: What is the relationship<br />

between internationalization, multiculturalism, and diversity How are they similar How are they different<br />

Can business schools successfully address all three Can they afford not to What is the role <strong>of</strong> the<br />

international business faculty in leading these initiatives These questions and many others are explored in this<br />

article. We use qualitative focus groups to examine student's personal experiences <strong>of</strong> internationalization,<br />

multiculturalism, and diversity in the business school. Next, we examine the institutional response to the<br />

mandate to integrate all three issues into a coherent and effective curriculum. Finally, we <strong>of</strong>fer brief concluding<br />

recommendations about how to balance these complementary educational goals. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Matthew C. Mitchell, Drake University, USA: matthew.mitchell@drake.edu)<br />

Changing Minds: <strong>International</strong> Business and Student Attitudes towards Globalization in Qatar and Hong Kong<br />

Amit Das, Qatar University<br />

Pamsy P. Hui, Hong Kong Polytechnic University<br />

Shobha Das, Qatar University<br />

This paper reports on how student attitudes towards globalization changed upon completing <strong>International</strong><br />

Business course in two mid-sized universities, one in the Middle East and the other in East Asia. We examined<br />

students' awareness <strong>of</strong> globalization – economic, political, and cultural – and their perception <strong>of</strong> its impacts<br />

through questionnaire surveys administered at the start and end <strong>of</strong> the IB course. Paired t-tests show that<br />

students' awareness <strong>of</strong> globalization and diversity, and their knowledge <strong>of</strong> international trade issues generally<br />

increased between the start and end <strong>of</strong> the course. On the other hand, their perceptions <strong>of</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong><br />

globalization, tolerance for diversity, support for free market policies, and attitudes towards inbound FDI<br />

showed little or no change. Our paper illustrates a systematic approach to collecting evidence <strong>of</strong> the efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 108


MONDAY<br />

IB teaching in terms <strong>of</strong> shaping student attitudes. Our results suggest that it might be easier to raise awareness<br />

and conceptual understanding <strong>of</strong> globalization than it is to change more deeply held values on diversity, free<br />

market economics, and inbound FDI. The collective wisdom <strong>of</strong> IB instructors can be brought to bear on the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> IB curriculum that not only inform students, but also shape positive attitudes towards the world<br />

around them. (For more information, please contact: Amit Das, Qatar University, Qatar: amit.das@qu.edu.qa)<br />

Preparing Students for Doing Business with the "Forgotten Majority":<br />

Activities for "Base <strong>of</strong> the Pyramid" Instruction<br />

Les Dlabay, Lake Forest College<br />

Curriculum Strategies and Research<br />

More than half <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong> the world live on $2 or less a day, and they are also doing business. To prepare<br />

to do business with all <strong>of</strong> the people in the world, students need an awareness <strong>of</strong> the varied cultural and<br />

business practices in these emerging market settings. This session will address curriculum topics, instructional<br />

strategies, and resources for doing business with the billions <strong>of</strong> people in low-income situations. Discussion will<br />

include coverage <strong>of</strong> the informal business environment, social entrepreneurship, microenterprise activities, and<br />

alternative financial services, including microloans, RoSCAs, and VSLAs. The topics for this session can be<br />

adapted to varied instructional settings to provide improved quality <strong>of</strong> life and expanded economic development<br />

through innovation among "base <strong>of</strong> the pyramid" businesses. During the session, participants will interact with<br />

others to determine where and how in their courses these concepts may be included. A curriculum framework<br />

will be used to plan and implement "base <strong>of</strong> the pyramid" topics, resources, and instructional strategies in<br />

various international business courses. (For more information, please contact: Les Dlabay, Lake Forest College,<br />

USA: dlabay@lakeforest.edu)<br />

Anatomy <strong>of</strong> an Undergraduate Business Study Tour revisited: An Integrated Approach<br />

Jolanta Aritz, University <strong>of</strong> Southern California<br />

The paper addresses the topic <strong>of</strong> undergraduate business study tours (Howard, Keller and MacEwan,(2010) and<br />

proposes an integrated model <strong>of</strong> a business study tour that is grounded in a refined set <strong>of</strong> learning outcomes<br />

that promote the development <strong>of</strong> intercultural competence. More specifically, I propose an integrated model <strong>of</strong><br />

a business study tour curriculum that positions a Business Study Tour as a learning process that has three<br />

distinct stages. Each stage contributes to the development <strong>of</strong> three sets <strong>of</strong> skills, knowledge, skills, and<br />

attributes, by incorporating academic, corporate and cultural aspect within each stage to fully address the<br />

learning outcomes <strong>of</strong> a business study tour. Whereas most business schools incorporate the first two<br />

components <strong>of</strong> a global model in their curriculum, I argue that the third stage – a post-trip debrief - is<br />

instrumental in achieving the learning outcomes <strong>of</strong> an undergraduate business study tour program. I will argue<br />

that such approach is better positioned to develop the intercultural communication competence that enables<br />

students to successfully translate the knowledge acquired during the study tour trip to a single country to future<br />

work assignments that may extend to other cultures. (For more information, please contact: Jolanta Aritz,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Southern California, USA: aritz@marshall.usc.edu)<br />

Session: 2.1.8 - Competitive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Blended Family: Rethinking Culture's Consequences on Organization<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Mary Margaret Maloney, University <strong>of</strong> St. Thomas<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 109


MONDAY<br />

Internal Communications, Shared Experience and Vicarious Learning: The Effects on Multinational Divisions'<br />

Strategy and Performance<br />

Michael David Lord, Wake Forest University<br />

Annette Ranft, University <strong>of</strong> Tennessee<br />

Paul Nagy, Florida State University<br />

This study explores how the strategic choice and performance <strong>of</strong> one division <strong>of</strong> a multinational enterprise might<br />

be influenced by the MNE's other divisions. Specifically, we examine whether a focal division's investment and<br />

performance during expansion into a new host country are influenced by other divisions' prior experience and<br />

learning. The richness <strong>of</strong> MNEs' internal communications is hypothesized to influence the interdivisional transfer<br />

<strong>of</strong> host country knowledge, which in turn should influence a division's strategy and performance. Using a broad<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> divisions within diversified MNEs, we find that knowledge transfer mediates the relationships between<br />

MNE experience and divisional investment and performance. Our results help explain mixed findings in the<br />

literature and further detail the heterogeneous dynamics and outcomes <strong>of</strong> MNEs' organizational learning<br />

processes. (For more information, please contact: Michael David Lord, Wake Forest University, USA:<br />

lordmd@wfu.edu)<br />

Psychic and Cultural Distance Effects on Corporate Performance: Re-evaluating an Ambiguous Relationship<br />

Fragkiskos Filippaios, University <strong>of</strong> Kent<br />

Ruth Rama, CCHS-CSIC (Spanish National Research Council)<br />

The main aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to shed light on the effects <strong>of</strong> psychic and cultural distance on the performance <strong>of</strong><br />

multinationals. Both types <strong>of</strong> distance present costs for the multinational and increase the liability <strong>of</strong><br />

foreignness. Although both measures <strong>of</strong> distance have been included in a number <strong>of</strong> studies and thoroughly<br />

explored in the literature, their effect still remains ambiguous from a conceptual and empirical perspective. On a<br />

theoretical level we develop a conceptual framework that explains the channels through which culture and<br />

psychic distance influence the performance <strong>of</strong> multinationals and from an empirical perspective we use a<br />

dataset that allows us to empirically investigate the main arguments developed. By using a sample <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world's 100 largest Food and Drink Multinational Enterprises (F&D MNEs) over three time periods (i.e. 1996,<br />

2000 and 2002) and their nearly 8,000 affiliates, per period, classified by line <strong>of</strong> business (e.g. food, retailing,<br />

etc.) we explore dynamic aspects in the MNEs' development. To the best <strong>of</strong> our knowledge this is the first<br />

study that sheds light to the effect <strong>of</strong> psychic and cultural distance on the performance <strong>of</strong> multinationals at the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> activity and by using a number <strong>of</strong> different distance measures rather than a combined distance<br />

measure. Our results show the significant need to understand further psychic and cultural distance and establish<br />

more detailed and better defined measures that could provide guidance for managers when making foreign<br />

direct investment decisions. (For more information, please contact: Fragkiskos Filippaios, University <strong>of</strong> Kent,<br />

United Kingdom: f.filippaios@kent.ac.uk)<br />

R&D Investment, Performance above Aspirations and National Culture: Evidence from the Paper Products<br />

Industry<br />

Krista Burrill Lewellyn, Old Dominion University<br />

Shuji Bao, Old Dominion University<br />

Investing in R&D to create knowledge and generate innovation is particularly relevant for MNCs competing in<br />

today's globalized knowledge-based economy. We theorize and demonstrate empirically with a sample <strong>of</strong> paper<br />

product industry firms from 11 countries that outperforming competitors in the past (performance above<br />

aspiration level) motivates R&D investment. We also generate theory and supportive empirical findings that<br />

show dimensions (power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and institutional collectivism) <strong>of</strong> a firm's home<br />

country national culture create a context that either encourages or discourages firm level R&D investment. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Krista Burrill Lewellyn, Old Dominion University, USA: klewelly@odu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 110


MONDAY<br />

A Cognitive-based View <strong>of</strong> the Impacts <strong>of</strong> Cultural Distance on New Product Development Performance in<br />

<strong>International</strong> Supply Chain Innovation Alliances<br />

Robin N. Pesch, University <strong>of</strong> Bayreuth<br />

Torben Bruder, University <strong>of</strong> Bayreuth<br />

Ricarda B. Bouncken, University <strong>of</strong> Bayreuth<br />

Being better and faster than competitors are major challenges in new product development. To meet these<br />

challenges, firms extensively use supply chain innovation alliances to gain access to complementary knowledge<br />

even beyond national borders. Such international innovation alliances are characterized by cultural distance.<br />

Concomitant with cultural distance, cognitive impacts such as divergent cognitive processes and mental models<br />

<strong>of</strong> alliance partners have so far been neglected in the academic literature about international supply chain<br />

innovation alliances. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is therefore to provide insights on the impact <strong>of</strong> cultural distance on<br />

new product development performance from a cognitive-based view. In this context, we will particularly<br />

consider how alliance intensity and alliance duration influence the cognitive effects. The results <strong>of</strong> this study –<br />

based on a survey <strong>of</strong> 397 companies operating in engineering or medical technology – shows that cultural<br />

distance improves firms' performances in terms <strong>of</strong> new product superiority. Concerning speed to market, the<br />

results indicate a significantly positive relationship between cultural distance and speed to market only in the<br />

medical technology industry. Our findings further expose that the combination <strong>of</strong> complementary knowledge<br />

mediates the relationship between cultural distance and new product superiority. Interestingly, this mediation is<br />

moderated by alliance intensity. (For more information, please contact: Robin N. Pesch, University <strong>of</strong> Bayreuth,<br />

Germany: robin.pesch@uni-bayreuth.de)<br />

Session: 2.1.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Learning and Knowledge in Entrepreneurial Firms<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Patricia Mcdougall , Indiana University<br />

Go Out There and Learn! The Mediating Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business Competence on the Relationship<br />

between <strong>International</strong>ization and Firm Performance<br />

Dinora Eliete Floriani, University <strong>of</strong> Vale do Itajaí<br />

Maria Tereza Fleury, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Afonso Carlos Correa Fleury, University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

Rodrigo Bandeira-de-Mello, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Existing literature on internationalization <strong>of</strong> Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) suggest that international<br />

business competences lead to superior international performance. We tested the hypothesis that the higher the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization the higher the level <strong>of</strong> international competence development. We developed<br />

several models using structured equation modeling and, using a sample <strong>of</strong> 114 Brazilian SMEs, found strong<br />

support for the hypothesis. Therefore, international competences mediate the relationship between the degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> internationalization and firm performance. SMEs need to go abroad in order to develop capabilities, and not<br />

the other way around. (For more information, please contact: Dinora Eliete Floriani, University <strong>of</strong> Vale do Itajaí,<br />

Brazil: dinora@univali.br)<br />

Small Firm <strong>International</strong>isation Competence: An Owner-Manager Perspective<br />

Peter William Lamb, La Trobe University<br />

Jörgen Sandberg, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 111


MONDAY<br />

We examine competence as a phenomenon from the perspective <strong>of</strong> task accomplishment and what makes<br />

performance possible for owner-managers <strong>of</strong> small internationalising firms and move beyond knowledge as a<br />

free floating term to knowledge in action. By doing so, we contribute to the emerging topic <strong>of</strong> small firm<br />

internationalisation competence by focusing on the owner-manager rather than that <strong>of</strong> the firm. We also<br />

contend that competence is not attribute-based but rather relational in nature. By using a relational approach<br />

and phenomenography we reveal not only what constitutes small firm internationalisation competence but the<br />

variation in the way owner-managers organise their knowledge and skills into sets <strong>of</strong> distinctive competence.<br />

Our findings demonstrate that owner-managed small firm internationalisation competence is not defined<br />

primarily as a set <strong>of</strong> attributes or owner-manager characteristics/traits. Rather internationalisation competence<br />

is defined by the way owner-managers understand firm internationalisation. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Peter William Lamb, La Trobe University, Australia: p.lamb@latrobe.edu.au)<br />

In Search <strong>of</strong> a Prince: An INV'S Quest for a Strong Tie with an MNE<br />

Shameen Prashantham, Nottingham University Business School<br />

Suresh Bhagavatula, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore<br />

K Kumar, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore<br />

Given the paucity <strong>of</strong> research on network outcomes (i.e. network ties as the dependent variable) and specific<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> social capital in studies on international new ventures (INVs), we ask: How does an<br />

internationalization-seeking new venture successfully forge a strong tie with a large MNE Specifically, we<br />

identify ties with large multinational enterprises (MNEs) as an important but under-researched source <strong>of</strong> social<br />

capital for internationalization-seeking start-ups – in other words, aspiring INVs. Based on an inductive<br />

longitudinal case-study in Bangalore, India, our central argument is that an aspiring INV could build and<br />

leverage valuable MNE links through the interplay between its network actions and uncertainty reduction, which<br />

are engendered by the clarity <strong>of</strong> its strategic intent. Specifically, we identify the combined effects <strong>of</strong> network<br />

broadening actions and egocentric uncertainty reduction as potentially leading to the formation <strong>of</strong> an optimal<br />

partnering relationship with an MNE subsidiary. The combined effects <strong>of</strong> network deepening actions and<br />

altercentric uncertainty reduction potentially lead to the transformation <strong>of</strong> this local relationship into a globally<br />

embedded one involving the wider MNE. This, in turn, could lead to the MNE becoming a conduit for the new<br />

venture's international expansion. Our theorizing contributes a fine-grained explanation <strong>of</strong> how the interaction<br />

between strategic intent clarity, network actions and uncertainty reduction influence the network dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

an INV pursuing a specific network strategy viz. partnering with an MNE as a basis for international expansion.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Shameen Prashantham, Nottingham University Business School, China:<br />

shameen.prashantham@nottingham.edu.cn)<br />

Session: 2.1.10 - Panel<br />

Track: 14 - Methods in IB Research<br />

How IB Journals Manage Qualitative Submissions: Best Practices and Future Directions<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Catherine Welch, The University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Co-Chair: Sylvie Chetty, Massey University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Catherine Welch, The University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Mary Yoko Brannen, INSEAD<br />

Sylvie Chetty, Massey University<br />

Pervez N. Ghauri, King's College London<br />

Klaus Macharzina, University <strong>of</strong> Hohenheim<br />

Peter W. Liesch, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 112


MONDAY<br />

This panel aims to discuss how IB journals currently handle qualitative submissions, how these practices may<br />

have changed in recent years, and possible best practices for the future. In 2011 JIBS signalled important<br />

changes to the way in which it regards qualitative submissions, making this panel particularly timely. Our<br />

panellists – editors from key IB journals (IBR, JIBS, JWB, MIR) – will address the following questions: What are<br />

best practices for managing the review process for qualitative manuscripts What institutional changes and<br />

trends have occurred at their journal What institutional barriers are still faced by qualitative researchers during<br />

the review process Does their journal attract the best qualitative researchers in the field as authors and<br />

reviewers What is the reputation <strong>of</strong> their journal as an outlet for qualitative articles What role should their<br />

journals play in the future to encourage the publication <strong>of</strong> high-quality qualitative articles The session will be<br />

run according to a roundtable format. As well as reflecting on the institutional practices at their journals, the<br />

editors will also respond to real-life scenarios reflecting the challenges that qualitative researchers face in<br />

having their work evaluated in the review process. (For more information, please contact: Rebecca Piekkari,<br />

Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland: rebecca.piekkari@aalto.fi)<br />

Session: 2.1.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

Institutional Environments, National Culture and Learning<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Julie Elston, Oregon State University<br />

A Cross-Cultural Study <strong>of</strong> the Ease <strong>of</strong> Doing Business and the Effect <strong>of</strong> Institutional Environment<br />

Rakesh Sambharya, Rutgers University - Camden<br />

Martina Musteen, San Diego State University<br />

Drawing on the institutional theory, we develop arguments linking the regulatory, normative and cognitive<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> local institutional environment to the level <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship. Using a sample <strong>of</strong> 44 countries, we<br />

find support for most <strong>of</strong> our hypotheses. It appears that regulatory dimension <strong>of</strong> the institutional environment –<br />

measured as the number <strong>of</strong> days it takes to legally start a new business and enforce a business contract –<br />

impacts both opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship while the normative dimension (assessed as the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> government intervention) is only related to total level <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial activity and opportunity-based<br />

entrepreneurship. We do not find any support for the link between the cognitive, culturally-based institutional<br />

dimension and entrepreneurship. (For more information, please contact: Rakesh Sambharya, Rutgers University<br />

- Camden, USA: sambhary@camden.rutgers.edu)<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> National Culture, Type <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurs on Outsourcing<br />

Shouming Chen, Tongji University<br />

Arpita Joardar, Clark University<br />

Sibin Wu, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American<br />

In this paper, we seek to answer two important questions. First, why does outsourcing go to countries with<br />

heavy entrepreneurial activities Second, how are entrepreneurs related to outsourcing success We argue that<br />

national cultures determine what type <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurs a country tends to produce. We contend that the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurs does not matter, but the type <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurs, promoters vs. trustees, does to<br />

outsourcing success. Specifically, we propose that promoters tend to outsource more. We also suggest that<br />

promoters are likely to select the wrong vendor, but they also find hidden cost quicker, find an exit strategy<br />

faster and tend to have more control <strong>of</strong> their outsourced activities. (For more information, please contact: Sibin<br />

Wu, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American, USA: sibinwu@utpa.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 113


MONDAY<br />

<strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurship and Legitimacy: A Study <strong>of</strong> Chinese <strong>International</strong> Firms<br />

Hairu Yang, Shanghai Finance University<br />

Zhiqiang Liu, Huazhong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

Daniel Ding, City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

This study tries to explore in the domestic market what the motivation <strong>of</strong> international entrepreneurship is and<br />

how international entrepreneurial firms survive in foreign markets. Based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 212 Chinese<br />

international firms, this study examines the level <strong>of</strong> internationalization <strong>of</strong> organizational field as an antecedent<br />

<strong>of</strong> international entrepreneurship from a neoinstitutional theory perspective. We also investigate exploitative<br />

and exploratory learning as consequences <strong>of</strong> international entrepreneurship, because firms seek to achieve<br />

legitimacy in a host country. We further test the nonlinear relationship between exploitative and exploratory<br />

learning and performance in foreign markets. Findings suggest that isomorphic pressure from the organizational<br />

field will cause firms to engage in international entrepreneurial activities. In order to gain legitimacy in a host<br />

country, international entrepreneurship, in turn, is positively associated with the above two learning processes.<br />

Results also support that although exploitative and exploratory learning are beneficial, they can weaken a firm's<br />

performance in foreign markets, after a certain point. (For more information, please contact: Hairu Yang,<br />

Shanghai Finance University, China: cherryyang97@hotmail.com)<br />

The Moderating Effect <strong>of</strong> Knowledge Transfer and Institutional Context on the Speed <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>ization - A<br />

Proposed Framework<br />

Niklas Akerman, Linnaeus University<br />

Leaning on theory related to speed <strong>of</strong> internationalization, knowledge transfer and institutional theory this study<br />

proposes that an understanding <strong>of</strong> country-specific institutional contexts need to be taken into account in order<br />

to understand the variance in the speed <strong>of</strong> internationalization <strong>of</strong> traditional small and medium-sized firms.<br />

Responding to a need <strong>of</strong> better understanding the moderating factors determining the pace <strong>of</strong><br />

internationalization processes this paper takes an integrative approach to suggest a number <strong>of</strong> propositions for<br />

future research. With the aim <strong>of</strong> contributing to internationalization process theory it is proposed that there are<br />

associations between successful intra-unit knowledge transfer across borders and a rapid internationalization<br />

process. It is further suggested that knowledge about how institutional contexts influence the transferring <strong>of</strong><br />

experiential internationalization knowledge will influence the speed <strong>of</strong> future internationalization positively. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Niklas Akerman, Linnaeus University, Sweden: niklas.akerman@lnu.se)<br />

The <strong>International</strong> Expansion <strong>of</strong> SMEs: High vs. Low Entrepreneurial Orientation<br />

Patricia Todd, Western Kentucky University<br />

Rajshekhar (Raj) Javalgi, Cleveland State University<br />

Robert Scherer, Cleveland State University<br />

The study presents a comparison <strong>of</strong> SMEs characterized as high in entrepreneurial orientation and those that<br />

are low. Surveys were sent to a cross section <strong>of</strong> exporting firms located in six states surrounding the Great<br />

Lakes region, including Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan. The final number <strong>of</strong><br />

useable surveys was 197, after dealing with outliers. The effective response rate was 14.1%. It was found that<br />

the best predictors for discriminating between firms with high or low entrepreneurial orientation are the<br />

satisfaction with the rate <strong>of</strong> new market entry and the perception <strong>of</strong> growth in total market share due to<br />

exporting. The significant economic contribution <strong>of</strong> SMEs is well understood but information concerning the<br />

differentiating characteristics between high and low entrepreneurial orientation are scarce. This study extends<br />

the literature by providing a preliminary investigation <strong>of</strong> these differentiating behaviors. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Patricia Todd, Western Kentucky University, USA: patricia.todd@wku.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 114


MONDAY<br />

Entrepreneurship, Competitiveness and Economic Growth <strong>of</strong> BRICS Countries: An Empirical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Data<br />

From GEM and GCI<br />

Raimundo Eduardo Silveira Fontenele, Universidade de Fortaleza<br />

Paulo Francisco Barbosa Sousa, Universidade Federal do Ceara<br />

Alexandre Oliveira Lima, Universidade de Fortaleza<br />

Entrepreneurship can help economic growth in some countries by the introduction <strong>of</strong> new products on the<br />

market or by the evolution <strong>of</strong> existing products, as much as by changes in the production process and increases<br />

in market competition. This study investigates the influence <strong>of</strong> per capita income, health care and primary<br />

education, higher education and training, and technology and sophistication <strong>of</strong> businesses, in the differences in<br />

the total rate <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship among BRICS countries, which refers to Brazil, Russia, India, China and South<br />

Africa. The survey was conducted with a multivariable statistical analysis. The regression was obtained in two<br />

models, <strong>of</strong> which the first used the overall value <strong>of</strong> the CGI (overall index) as a proxy for competitiveness, while<br />

the second model used the twelve indicators that make up the GCI each separately. The results reinforce the<br />

hypothesis that there is a positive relationship between the indices <strong>of</strong> competitiveness and the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurship. (For more information, please contact: Raimundo Eduardo Silveira Fontenele, Universidade de<br />

Fortaleza, Brazil: fontenele@unifor.br)<br />

Session: 2.1.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 12 - Value Creation and Work<br />

The Geography <strong>of</strong> Value Creation: Clusters, Networks, Ethnic Ties<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Gabriele Suder, SKEMA Business School and ANUCES Fellow<br />

<strong>International</strong> Input-Output Dynamics as a Measure <strong>of</strong> the Geography <strong>of</strong> Value-Distribution Across Asia and <strong>of</strong><br />

Market Integration<br />

Gabriele Suder, SKEMA Business School and ANUCES Fellow<br />

Satoshi Inomata , JTRO- IDE<br />

Irina Jormanainen, Aalto School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Bo Meng, JETRO- IDE<br />

Regional integration, the interdependence in regional trade and production networks, has important implications<br />

for economic development and the location <strong>of</strong> international business activity. This paper adopts a novel<br />

approach to analyze the evolution <strong>of</strong> such production networks in Asia over time. We study its impact on the<br />

location <strong>of</strong> production hubs, indicating a high density <strong>of</strong> cross-border interaction and geographic dynamics as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the interrelation <strong>of</strong> value addition and geographical location <strong>of</strong> cross-border production activity. We<br />

undertake a longitudinal study using empirical evidence about the period 1985-2000 and analyze interlinkages<br />

and underlying factors affecting the change in the geographic distribution <strong>of</strong> network hubs, with an emphasis on<br />

Country-specific advantages (CSAs). Our empirical methodology is based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> Input-Output data<br />

for nine Asian countries in three <strong>of</strong> the most integrated sectors <strong>of</strong> the manufacturing industry. We calculate<br />

their coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation and mapping, and assess countries' gain and give-out potential <strong>of</strong> value in the<br />

production process. We support our results with an assessment <strong>of</strong> inward and outward investment flow<br />

locations and the convergence <strong>of</strong> locations <strong>of</strong> production network hubs and FDI. The findings demonstrate that<br />

the distribution <strong>of</strong> production hubs changes significantly over time; the emergence <strong>of</strong> Asian economies is<br />

embedded in overall regional integration. Value-added hubs center on and evolved around China and Japan.<br />

This is confirmed by the evolution <strong>of</strong> FDI locations. We argue that changes in country-specific advantages and<br />

specialization in Asian countries explain this result <strong>of</strong> rapid internal regional development and the need to<br />

respond to the pressures <strong>of</strong> the global business environment. (For more information, please contact: Gabriele<br />

Suder, SKEMA Business School and ANUCES Fellow, France: gabriele.suder@skema.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 115


MONDAY<br />

The Rise <strong>of</strong> Global Service Delivery Networks: Network Conditions and Embedded Strategies<br />

Stephan Manning, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston<br />

Pratyush Bharati, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston<br />

<strong>International</strong> business scholars increasingly acknowledge the embeddedness <strong>of</strong> internationalization strategies<br />

within global networks <strong>of</strong> client and supplier relations. Following this paradigm, we investigate the role <strong>of</strong><br />

network conditions and embedded competitive strategies in driving the global distribution <strong>of</strong> service delivery in<br />

the global services industry. Based on comprehensive data from the Offshoring Research Network, we show<br />

that managing time differences through global delivery models is a major driver <strong>of</strong> internationalizing operations<br />

in this industry. Providers from developed countries thereby respond to increasing global competitive pressures<br />

as well as clients' interest in using qualified personnel from abroad. Providers from developing countries, in turn,<br />

internationalize to reduce time differences to clients and increase their overall global presence, which helps<br />

them stabilize client relationships, yet at the expense <strong>of</strong> margins. Our findings demonstrate the growing<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> global competitive dynamics, not least between developing and developed country firms, and the<br />

increasing role <strong>of</strong> global rather than domestic or regional client orientations in driving internationalization, in<br />

particular in business services. (For more information, please contact: Stephan Manning, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Massachusetts Boston, USA: stephan.manning@umb.edu)<br />

Information Processing Competency in Global Service Delivery: An Empirical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Knowledge Process<br />

Outsourcing in Service Supply Chains<br />

Vaidy Jayaraman, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

Stephanie Lu Wang, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

Yadong Luo, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

Antony Paulraj, University <strong>of</strong> North Florida<br />

We draw upon the information processing theory to develop a better understanding <strong>of</strong> how the fit between<br />

information processing (IP) needs and IP capabilities would influence firm performance. The model differs from<br />

previous studies by proposing a moderating effect <strong>of</strong> inter-organizational cultural friction and innovativeness<br />

orientation on the relationship between IP needs – IP capabilities alignment and firm performance. We also take<br />

a vendor's perspective and use survey data that we collected from 205 Indian KPO vendors and four different<br />

analytical techniques to rigorously analyze the hypothesized relationships. Our results provide strong support for<br />

the notion that the congruence between IP capabilities and IP needs will lead to superior firm performance –<br />

revenue growth, capacity enhancement and client satisfaction. We also find inter-organizational cultural friction<br />

and innovativeness orientation strategies to strengthen the association between IP needs – IP capabilities<br />

alignment and global service delivery performance. Implications for future research and practice within<br />

knowledge intensive service supply chains are <strong>of</strong>fered. (For more information, please contact: Stephanie Lu<br />

Wang, University <strong>of</strong> Miami, USA: slu@bus.miami.edu)<br />

Moving Along the Value Chain: The <strong>International</strong> Expansion <strong>of</strong> Thailand-listed Firms<br />

Pavida Pananond, Thammasat Business School<br />

This paper presents an overview <strong>of</strong> findings from the newly created firm-level database on Thai multinationals.<br />

It shows that Thai multinationals with substantial OFDI activities mostly hail from industries whose value chains<br />

are globalized across countries, either through a producer- or buyer-driven mechanism. With sufficient evidence<br />

suggesting that the international expansion <strong>of</strong> firms within these chains differ, we suggest that the international<br />

business literature on emerging multinationals should integrate the global value chain perspective in analyzing<br />

how the different mechanism and governance <strong>of</strong> the chains may influence the international expansion patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> developing-country firms that initially serve as suppliers to foreign MNEs but later became multinationals<br />

themselves. (For more information, please contact: Pavida Pananond, Thammasat Business School, Thailand:<br />

pavida@tbs.tu.ac.th)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 116


MONDAY<br />

Harnessing Business Services Sourcing Capabilities for Economic Development in Newly Industrialized<br />

Economies<br />

Xing Zhong, Duke University<br />

Arie Y. Lewin, Duke University<br />

The economic development potential <strong>of</strong> business services sourcing <strong>of</strong>fers a new lever for economic growth. But<br />

so far a systematic roadmap is missing for guiding and assessing how to harness the benefits <strong>of</strong> attracting<br />

sourcing <strong>of</strong> business process services at a time when global sourcing <strong>of</strong> such services is becoming a new<br />

business normal. The extent to which a country can realize a full spectrum <strong>of</strong> economic development potential<br />

from business sourcing, ranging from income shift to moving up the global value chain given the country<br />

specific development paths and national absorptive capacity is currently under explored, as well as the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> policy instruments a country can deploy to promote its attractiveness for business services<br />

sourcing. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive two-stage model involving a multi-level analysis, and<br />

provide fresh insights on the global organization and reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> value chain and work, and how global<br />

sourcing <strong>of</strong> business services can contribute to developing countries economic growth. The model also considers<br />

the mediating effect <strong>of</strong> complementarities necessary for addressing the question <strong>of</strong> how piecemeal policies and<br />

economic development instruments can be bridged successfully and sustainably. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Xing Zhong, Duke University, USA: xing.zhong@duke.edu)<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> the National Institutional Environment on the Entry <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Firms into Global Value<br />

Chains: A Comparative Case Study Investigation in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan<br />

Dilshod Makhmadshoev, University <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the recent research on global value chains (GVCs) has focused on how relations amongst different<br />

participants in chains are governed, and further, how global governance structures (i.e. behaviours <strong>of</strong> lead<br />

firms) affect the process <strong>of</strong> entry into chains. In fact, the literature asserts that entry barriers (and therefore<br />

access to chains) are predominantly determined and defined by governance structures. This paper argues that<br />

policies, regulations, practices, and norms <strong>of</strong> doing business at local and national levels (especially in transition<br />

economies) could be as important as global governance structures in shaping the opportunities for indigenous<br />

producers to enter GVCs. (For more information, please contact: Dilshod Makhmadshoev, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Strathclyde, United Kingdom: dilshod.makhmadshoev@strath.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 2.1.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

Studying Consumer and Employee Behavior in Emerging Markets<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Douglas Sanford, Towson University<br />

Consumer Responses and Cross-border Acquisitions: Evidence from China<br />

Cher-Min Fong, National Sun Yat-sen University<br />

Chun-Ling Lee, National Sun Yat-sen University<br />

Yunzhou Du , Anhui University <strong>of</strong> Finance & Economics<br />

This study investigates Chinese consumer responses toward acquisition <strong>of</strong> a local firm by foreign multinational<br />

corporations (MNCs) from different animosity-evoking countries (High: Japan vs. low: Netherland). This study<br />

designs an experiment by manipulating the animosity-evoking and corporate reputation to examine the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> consumer animosity and local target reputation on Chinese consumers' responses toward the post-acquisition<br />

target (foreign subsidiary). Results show that animosity against specific country does affect Chinese consumers'<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 117


MONDAY<br />

responses toward the post-acquisition target. Chinese consumers demonstrate more negative attitudes toward<br />

the post-acquisition target and lower intentions to repurchase products <strong>of</strong> the post-acquisition target when the<br />

foreign acquirer comes from a high animosity-evoking country (Japan) than when it comes from a low<br />

animosity-evoking country (Netherland). The reputation <strong>of</strong> local target has a negative effect on Chinese<br />

consumers' responses toward the post-acquisition target. Such negative effect <strong>of</strong> local target reputation,<br />

however, only emerges for the foreign acquirer from a high-animosity evoking country. Implications and<br />

limitation <strong>of</strong> the findings are also discussed. (For more information, please contact: Chun-Ling Lee, National Sun<br />

Yat-sen University, Taiwan: d934010005@student.nsysu.edu.tw)<br />

Compromising Brands: Western Hotel Chains and Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics<br />

Brian Hilton, Nottingham University Business School<br />

Beadle Frederick, Nottingham University Business School<br />

Wang Yi, Nottingham University Business School<br />

This study explores the impact <strong>of</strong> Chinese business culture on the performance <strong>of</strong> multinational hotel brands in<br />

China. This work is part <strong>of</strong> a larger research agenda and limits itself to producing grounded theory for later<br />

exploration. The focus is the relationship between the franchisor and franchisee in branded hotel chains in<br />

China. The research question posed was whether Western views on hotel management as specified in<br />

franchises were affected by the Chinese context. Interviews were conducted with Western Hotel staff employed<br />

in international hotels in a city <strong>of</strong> 7million. While each brand has a clear statement <strong>of</strong> its service standard this<br />

was compromised by a mutual lack <strong>of</strong> interest in maintaining it y either franchisor or franchisee. If not corrected<br />

longer term this could damage brands. An oversupply <strong>of</strong> rooms prompts owners to interfere in hotel<br />

management as low pr<strong>of</strong>itability lowers the brand's value to them.. This raises issues for hotel franchising at<br />

the margin in China. Global hotel brands cannot afford not to be there but our results suggest problems for<br />

brand integrity (For more information, please contact: Brian Hilton, Nottingham University Business School,<br />

China: brian.hilton@nottingham.edu.cn)<br />

Understanding Cognitive Moral Development <strong>of</strong> Chinese Purchasing Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

Yi-Hui Ho, Chang Jung Christian University<br />

Chieh-Yu Lin, Chang Jung Christian University<br />

While doing business in China, many foreign companies are usually confronted with the problem about ethical<br />

decision-making <strong>of</strong> Chinese purchasing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. Although considerable attention has been paid on<br />

purchasing ethics, little attempt has been made on examining moral development <strong>of</strong> purchasing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in<br />

emerging economies. This study applies a widely used instrument measuring moral development, the Defining<br />

Issues Test, to analyze moral development <strong>of</strong> purchasing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in China. This paper proposes that<br />

Chinese purchasing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals focus more on the conventional level than on the post-conventional level <strong>of</strong><br />

moral development because they are influenced by Chinese culture. The study also investigates the influences<br />

<strong>of</strong> age, gender, educational level, purchasing experiences, international experiences, management level,<br />

company size, industry type, and material category on purchasing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals' moral development. The<br />

research findings will be helpful for international businesses to understand Chinese purchasing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals'<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> ethics in business negotiation occasions. (For more information, please contact: Chieh-Yu Lin,<br />

Chang Jung Christian University, Taiwan: jylin@mail.cjcu.edu.tw)<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Relation-Specific Investments on Channel Relationship Performance - Focusing on Mediators<br />

Yi Zheng, Nanjing University<br />

Guocai Wang, NanJing University<br />

Yanhui Zhao, Michigan State University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 118


MONDAY<br />

This study attempts to investigate the mediating mechanisms through which relationship-specific investments<br />

(RSI) can contribute to channel relationship performance. We identify two types <strong>of</strong> relationship-specific<br />

investments in channel relationship, namely property-based RSI and knowledge-based RSI. We propose that the<br />

two types <strong>of</strong> relationship-specific investments rely on different governance mechanisms to impact channel<br />

performance. Specifically, property-based RSI prompts the drafting and utilization <strong>of</strong> formal contract which<br />

ensure the stability <strong>of</strong> channel relationship, whereas knowledge-based RSI enhance relationship communication<br />

and relational trust which can improve long-term orientation and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> channel relationship. We further<br />

propose that relationship communication mediate the impact <strong>of</strong> RSI on formal contract and relational trust. We<br />

also predict that the culture aspects <strong>of</strong> China can influence the relative importance <strong>of</strong> formal contract,<br />

relationship communication and relational trust to channel performance. Results from an empirical study<br />

conducted in the context <strong>of</strong> China’s marketing channel basically support the proposed model. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Yi Zheng, Nanjing University, China: zhengyi5828790@163.com)<br />

Antecedents <strong>of</strong> Service Climate in Emerging Markets: An Exploration <strong>of</strong> Local and Foreign Service Providers in<br />

Vietnam<br />

Hung Trong Hoang, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide<br />

Susan Freeman, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide<br />

Vinh Nhat Lu, Australian National University<br />

Sally Rao Hill, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide<br />

There exists limited knowledge about antecedents <strong>of</strong> service climate, especially from an emerging market<br />

context. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to obtain preliminary insights into how different internal and external<br />

factors foster a favorable service climate in local versus foreign-owned service firms. Three major theoretical<br />

underpinnings have been drawn upon, including the resource-based theory, the OLI paradigm, and social<br />

exchange theory to provide theoretical development. Data was collected through interviews with managers and<br />

service employees in 10 local and foreign service firms in Vietnam. Three groups <strong>of</strong> antecedents have emerged<br />

from the paper, namely firm-based, market-based and culture-based. Additionally, the paper provides evidence<br />

that foreign firms tend to perform better in several firm-based antecedents (eg. internal processes, serviceoriented<br />

human resource management), and employee's cultural orientation are different between local and<br />

foreign firms. Implications and directions for future research are provided. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Hung Trong Hoang, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia: hung.hoang@adelaide.edu.au)<br />

Cirque du Soleil's Venture in Macau: Chinese Tourists' Behavior within the Standardization-Adaptation Debate<br />

Joseph Adea Sy-Changco, University <strong>of</strong> Macau<br />

Alix Barasch, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Chi Hin Chim, Haas Business School<br />

Bernard Tan, University <strong>of</strong> St. Joseph<br />

With China's recent economic growth, Chinese tourists have become a major target market for Western<br />

companies. In reaching out to this new market, Western firms must consider how much to standardize or adapt<br />

their products and strategies across cultures. This paper uses the case <strong>of</strong> Cirque Du Soleil's Macau show to<br />

evaluate this challenging decision. Through interviews with audience members and with a Cirque du Soleil<br />

executive, the authors analyze the decisions <strong>of</strong> Cirque du Soleil's Macau operation and contribute to the growing<br />

literature on standardization and adaptation from the vantage point <strong>of</strong> Chinese culture and consumers. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Joseph Adea Sy-Changco, University <strong>of</strong> Macau, Macau: josephs@umac.mo)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 119


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.1.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />

Perspectives in Global Strategy<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Simon C. Collinson, Reading University<br />

Business Strategies <strong>of</strong> Foreign Subsidiaries: Performance Effects and Customer Access Moderations<br />

Anders Pehrsson, Linnaeus University<br />

The market context <strong>of</strong> the foreign subsidiary is essential in determining an appropriate headquarter-subsidiary<br />

relationship in global strategy making. The study aims to extend the understanding <strong>of</strong> linkages between<br />

business strategy and performance <strong>of</strong> foreign subsidiaries by focusing on customer access moderations.<br />

Hypotheses were tested on 263 subsidiaries in Europe and the USA. The subsidiaries belong to Swedish<br />

manufacturing firms. The study found that the customer scope <strong>of</strong> the subsidiary positively triggers its<br />

performance if it encounters many obstacles to accessing customers. The study also found that a subsidiary<br />

emphasis on differentiation <strong>of</strong> products from those <strong>of</strong> competitors negatively triggers performance regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

the number <strong>of</strong> obstacles, while customer responsiveness differentiation has positive effects where there are few<br />

obstacles. Contributions to global strategy literature are discussed. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Anders Pehrsson, Linnaeus University, Sweden: anders.pehrsson@lnu.se)<br />

Antecedents <strong>of</strong> Multinational Enterprise Performance: A Literature Review<br />

Lars Matysiak, Justus Liebig University Giessen<br />

Andreas Bausch, Justus Liebig University Giessen<br />

MNEs overarching goal is to maximize performance in the long run. Hence, research that focuses on explaining<br />

antecedents <strong>of</strong> MNE performance is particularly relevant to practitioners. Previous research in the fields <strong>of</strong><br />

strategic management and international business suggest that key antecedents <strong>of</strong> MNE performance should be<br />

found on the firm level, industry level, and country level. In this regard, our review <strong>of</strong> literature published in<br />

three top business and management journals <strong>of</strong> high relevance for the field <strong>of</strong> international business reveals<br />

three worrying facts. First <strong>of</strong> all, the majority <strong>of</strong> research on antecedents <strong>of</strong> MNE performance utilizes an<br />

omnium-gatherum <strong>of</strong> theoretical arguments instead <strong>of</strong> a consistent and carefully developed theoretical<br />

framework. Secondly, researchers utilize a wide variety <strong>of</strong> different performance measures without specifically<br />

addressing this issue. Thirdly, the vast majority <strong>of</strong> studies focus on some measure <strong>of</strong> multinationality as an<br />

explicatory variable. According to the dominating theory <strong>of</strong> the MNE, internalization theory, multinationality is<br />

not related to MNE performance per se. Based on the three insights from our literature review, we suggest that<br />

future research must abandon multinationality and concentrate on firm-specific and country-specific advantages<br />

as well as industries in order to improve our understanding <strong>of</strong> antecedents <strong>of</strong> MNE performance. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Lars Matysiak, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany: research@matysiak.com)<br />

Geographical Choice and Firm Strategy: Insights from the Oil and Gas Industry<br />

Simon C. Collinson, Reading University<br />

Colin Dale, Reading University<br />

Rugman and Verbeke (2004) suggest most firms favour local or regional rather than global internationalisation<br />

strategies. In contrast, our analysis <strong>of</strong> intra-firm data from the oil and gas firms, segmented by both line <strong>of</strong><br />

business and geography, finds these strategies are increasingly global. Longitudinal analysis on ten years <strong>of</strong><br />

data, using a new methodological approach supports this less normative strategic perspective. We identify ‘new'<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 120


MONDAY<br />

global oil and gas firms, highlight the variation in geographic focus across the value chain <strong>of</strong> the vertically<br />

integrated oil and gas MNEs and find trends including movement away from home location. We also find no<br />

significant correlation between multi-nationality and performance for this industry. We suggest the explanatory<br />

variables <strong>of</strong> MNE performance are more complex than just as degrees <strong>of</strong> multi-nationality and believe a review<br />

<strong>of</strong> prior endowments, intra-firm competition and industry specific factors must augment theories based on Firm-<br />

Specific Advantages. This study does, however, reveal a correlation between multi-nationality and revenue,<br />

suggesting that, in this industry at least, size does matter. (For more information, please contact: Simon C.<br />

Collinson, Reading University, United Kingdom: s.collinson@reading.ac.uk)<br />

Embeddedness for Global Innovation: An Investigation <strong>of</strong> Differentiated Ties at Overseas R&D Subsidiaries<br />

Kazuhiro Asakawa, Keio University<br />

Tina Claudia Ambos, Johannes Kepler University<br />

Björn Ambos, Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business<br />

This papers aims to shed light on the question how embeddedness impacts the potential <strong>of</strong> international R&D<br />

subsidiaries to create innovations for the global – rather than the local – market. We examine the kinds<br />

(external vs. internal) and the locus (local vs. global) <strong>of</strong> ties that international R&D subsidiaries maintain and<br />

test their relationship with the unit's global innovation potential drawing on a sample <strong>of</strong> 99 overseas R&D<br />

subsidiaries belonging to Japanese multinational corporations. Our results reveal that certain ties enable<br />

overseas R&D subsidiaries to pursue innovation for global markets more than others: Collaborating with<br />

overseas business organizations, with other intra-firm subsidiaries, and certain intervention by headquarters are<br />

positively related to subsidiary innovation for global markets; whereas ties with local business organizations<br />

turns out to be negatively associated with subsidiary innovation for global markets. Our findings partly reconfirm<br />

the established wisdom on subsidiary embeddedness and innovation but also challenge the value <strong>of</strong> host market<br />

embeddedness vis-à-vis other forms <strong>of</strong> ties. (For more information, please contact: Tina Claudia Ambos,<br />

Johannes Kepler University, Austria: tina.ambos@jku.at)<br />

Global Networks in the High-Tech Industry: Structural Holes and R&D Performance<br />

Susanne Johanna Scherer, WU Vienna<br />

Gregor Binder, WU Vienna<br />

Mario Glowik, Karol Adamiecki University <strong>of</strong> Economics in Katowice<br />

This paper examines the influence <strong>of</strong> structural holes and closed networks on the performance <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

firms' networks within the High-Tech Industry. Specifically, it argues that having closed networks is more<br />

favourable for participating firms. Moreover, the work intends to theoretically discuss this matter in order to<br />

allow gaining insights into the characteristics, emergence, and potential benefits <strong>of</strong> structural holes.<br />

Furthermore, the boundary conditions and contingencies are studied and the opposing network theory, viz.<br />

network closure, is presented. Despite ambiguous opinions in the available literature, we test the hypothesis<br />

that structural holes will hinder the performance <strong>of</strong> networking firms in the sample <strong>of</strong> R&D networks in the<br />

consumer electronics industry. The final sample <strong>of</strong> this longitudinal research setting included a period <strong>of</strong> more<br />

than ten years with 112 observations. Conducting random-effects generalized least squares (GLS) regressions,<br />

revealed that closed networks are increasing performance in R&D networks whereas structural holes are<br />

weakening performance. This outcome suggests that a dense network with many redundant ties is favourable<br />

and desirable. Interestingly, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> mainly collectivistic oriented players in the industry suggests that<br />

this specific cultural influence impacts the outcome accordingly. (For more information, please contact: Susanne<br />

Johanna Scherer, WU Vienna, Austria: susanne.scherer@wu.ac.at)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 121


MONDAY<br />

Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: Quadratic and Moderating Effect Under Differing Degree <strong>of</strong><br />

Market Orientation<br />

Yao-Ping Peng, National Chung Hsing University<br />

Ku-Ho Lin, National Chung Hsing University<br />

This study employs the dynamic capabilities view to investigate the direct effect <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> an<br />

organization's explorative and exploitative capabilities on organizational tensions. Two indicators are used to<br />

test ambidexterity; synchronizing the development <strong>of</strong> explorative and exploitative capabilities can reduce<br />

tensions. The research subjects consisted <strong>of</strong> electronics manufacturing firms in Taiwan developing new hightech<br />

products. A total <strong>of</strong> 154 valid questionnaires were recovered. A hierarchical multiple regression model was<br />

used for hypothesis testing. The findings <strong>of</strong> this study indicate that exploitative capabilities have a positive<br />

effect on organizational tensions. In addition, ambidexterity and interaction <strong>of</strong> ambidexterity and environmental<br />

dynamism have negative influences on organizational tensions. Finally, there are some conclusions, theoretical<br />

and practical implications, limitations and suggestions provided for future studies. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Yao-Ping Peng, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan: s91370001@mail2000.com.tw)<br />

Investigating Pr<strong>of</strong>itability Differences between Hotel MNEs and DMEs in South Mediterranean European<br />

Countries<br />

Ioanna Giannoukou, University <strong>of</strong> Patras<br />

George Anastassopoulos, University <strong>of</strong> Patras<br />

Christina Beneki, Technological Educational Institute <strong>of</strong> Ionian Islands<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the paper is to investigate the determinants <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> hotel multinational enterprises'<br />

subsidiaries and domestic firms in France, in Italy, in Spain, in Greece and in Portugal. The data permits a<br />

comparison between a group <strong>of</strong> MNEs subsidiaries and a group <strong>of</strong> DMEs for the period 2000 – 2009. An<br />

econometric model has been employed to find support for the ownership advantages model <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

production. Estimation results indicate that, multinationality has a positive impact on firms' performance. The<br />

analysis also reveals that the determinants <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> MNEs and DMEs partially differ. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Christina Beneki, Technological Educational Institute <strong>of</strong> Ionian Islands, Greece:<br />

christinabeneki@gmail.com)<br />

An Investigation into the Cultural and Religious Determinants <strong>of</strong> National Competitiveness<br />

Hamid Yeganeh, Winona State University<br />

Relying on data drawn from the World Economic Forum, Schwartz Value Types, and World Value Survey, this<br />

study aims at investigating the cultural and religious determinants <strong>of</strong> national competitiveness. The empirical<br />

analyses show that after controlling for the effects <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic development, culture and religiosity still<br />

have important implications for national competitiveness. More specifically, it is found that Autonomy, Hierarchy<br />

and Mastery cultural dimensions are likely to foster, but Conservatism, Egalitarianism and Harmony dimensions<br />

tend to impede national competitiveness. Furthermore, it is found that regardless <strong>of</strong> the religious denomination,<br />

religiosity by itself remains a serious hindrance to national competitiveness. By referring to the Modernization<br />

Theory, the implications are discussed, and some avenues for future research are pointed out. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Hamid Yeganeh, Winona State University, USA: hyeganeh@winona.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 122


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.1.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Politicians and Political Dynamics in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: George O. White III, Old Dominion University<br />

Why MNCs Should Invest in Foreign Countries During Political Elections<br />

Charles Harrison, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Raed Elaydi, Roosevelt University<br />

As foreign direct investment (FDI) by multinational corporations (MNC) has dispersed to desolate regions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

globe, the significance <strong>of</strong> acquiring idiosyncratic host-country information has increased (Javernick-will & Scott,<br />

2010). Embedding within and learning from the host-country institutional landscape has been shown to<br />

promote favorable outcomes related to foreign direct investment (FDI) strategy (Orr & Levitt, 2011, cited in<br />

Scott, Levitt, & Orr, 2011). However, this process is generally viewed as slow and incremental. This discussion<br />

presents a novel and practical, process-based narrative strategy for acquiring information pertaining to hostcountry<br />

investment climates. Pre-entry (prior to formal project proposal) via short-duration immersion and data<br />

gathering in contexts mired with political contestation such as presidential elections is presented as the<br />

alternative. (For more information, please contact: Charles Harrison, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA:<br />

harrison.charles.e@gmail.com)<br />

Contagion and Risk Management Strategy: Navigating Exogenous Shocks in the Global Business Environment<br />

J. Cameron Verhaal, University <strong>of</strong> Utah<br />

Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist, University <strong>of</strong> Utah<br />

We introduce a capabilities-based approach to managing the negative effects <strong>of</strong> contagion and international<br />

crisis. Ultimately, the investment pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> an MNC in both a host country and the region is affected by the<br />

firm's ability to respond to unstable economic, political and social contexts. The mechanisms used to manage<br />

these contexts represent firm-specific capabilities. We identify three: deliberate learning and cognitive search,<br />

firm-specific political resources, and redeployment <strong>of</strong> resources. Moreover, we argue that these capabilities are<br />

moderated by both the nature <strong>of</strong> the investment (i.e. location and asset-specific investments) and crossnational<br />

distance considerations. Ultimately, our conceptual framework <strong>of</strong> contagion management attempts to<br />

unpack the micro and meso-level mechanisms that surround what has been largely understood as a<br />

macroeconomic phenomenon. We also highlight the need to view both an MNC's actions and the multiple<br />

institutional environments that they operate in as highly interdependent. Finally, we argue that the implications<br />

<strong>of</strong> this research can help firms to identify potentially volatile and uncertain investment environments, ex ante,<br />

as well as manage environments that have already been struck by economic, political or social crises associated<br />

with contagion. (For more information, please contact: J. Cameron Verhaal, University <strong>of</strong> Utah, USA:<br />

cameron.verhaal@business.utah.edu)<br />

Political Economy and Financial Architecture<br />

Raj Aggarwal, University <strong>of</strong> Akron<br />

John W. Goodell, University <strong>of</strong> Akron<br />

While it is clear that some countries are bank oriented and others rely more on equity financing, there is little<br />

research on the degree to which national political economies determine the national architecture for financial<br />

intermediation. Using data for a recent fourteen-year period for thirty-six countries, we document that financial<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 123


MONDAY<br />

architecture is indeed influenced by the nature <strong>of</strong> the national political-economy. We find that a greater<br />

predilection for market financing over bank financing is associated with less fragmentary, more centralized<br />

polities, with more political checks and balances and less political entrenchment (all associated with strong high<br />

quality polities). We also <strong>of</strong>fer robust evidence that more economically left-leaning and social democratic<br />

governments are more market oriented while parliamentary systems are associated negatively with an<br />

orientation toward markets. We reconfirm that a predilection for markets is associated with greater<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> equity market capitalization, more globalization, less regulation, greater cultural emphasis on<br />

hierarchy and lower ambiguity aversion. Our results should be <strong>of</strong> great interest to scholars and policymakers<br />

interested in the impact <strong>of</strong> the political economy on financial architecture. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Raj Aggarwal, University <strong>of</strong> Akron, USA: aggarwa@uakron.edu)<br />

Corporate Political Actions, Nonmarket Positions and the Institutional Environment<br />

Seong-jin Choi, Peking University<br />

Nan Jia, University <strong>of</strong> Southern California<br />

Jiangyong Lu, Beijing University<br />

This study examines how a firm's nonmarket position – defined as how well the firm is positioned to handle<br />

political risks relative to all peer firms in the same institutional environment – influences the firm's use <strong>of</strong><br />

political strategies, and how this relationship is moderated by different institutional contexts. Using survey data<br />

from a random sample <strong>of</strong> over 16,000 firms in 37 countries over four years, we demonstrate that firms that are<br />

in a less advantageous position to shield themselves from the hazards <strong>of</strong> state predation and private<br />

expropriation than their peers in the same country are more likely to bribe government <strong>of</strong>ficials and engage in<br />

lobbying activities. We also find that the relationship between a firm's relative nonmarket position and its<br />

political strategies is strengthened in a country with lower-quality market-supporting institutions. These findings<br />

have important implications for research on corporate political activities. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Nan Jia, University <strong>of</strong> Southern California, USA: nan.jia@marshall.usc.edu)<br />

Antecedents and Performance Consequences <strong>of</strong> Subsidiaries' Political Activities in Emerging Markets: An<br />

Institutional Approach<br />

Stefan Heidenreich, WU Vienna<br />

Jonas F. Puck, WU Vienna<br />

Phillip C. Nell, Copenhagen Business School<br />

This paper analyzes antecedents <strong>of</strong> political activities deployed by MNC subsidiaries in emerging markets and<br />

subsequently examines their effect on subsidiary performance. Following institutional theory reasoning, we<br />

point towards institutional duality subsidiaries are confronted with, entailing isomorphic pressures stemming<br />

from their internal as well as their external environment. Our hypotheses are tested using a three-stage least<br />

squares method with data from 156 subsidiaries in emerging markets. Results contribute to theory by providing<br />

evidence on the effects stemming from internal vs. external isomorphic pressures on political activities, and<br />

delivering a deeper-level understanding <strong>of</strong> the latter relationship by differentiating the higher-level concept <strong>of</strong><br />

external isomorphic pressures into pressures from national public and national private stakeholders. Finally, we<br />

find significant support for a positive effect <strong>of</strong> political activities on subsidiary performance, revealing strong<br />

implications for practitioners. (For more information, please contact: Stefan Heidenreich, WU Vienna, Austria:<br />

stefan.heidenreich@wu.ac.at)<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> Voluntary Environmental Management Practices for MNE Subsidiaries in an Emerging Country<br />

Erkan Bayraktar, Bahcesehir University<br />

Ekrem Tatoglu, Bahcesehir University<br />

Sunil Sahadev, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield<br />

Mehmet Demirbag, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 124


MONDAY<br />

Empirical studies that have focused on the determinants <strong>of</strong> voluntary environmental management practices<br />

(VEMPs) <strong>of</strong> MNE subsidiaries operating in emerging countries have been rare. The present study explores the<br />

antecedent factors that drive MNE subsidiaries, located in a key emerging country – Turkey, to adopt voluntary<br />

environmental management practices. Drawing largely on the arguments <strong>of</strong> institutional theory and resource<br />

based view <strong>of</strong> organizations, a number <strong>of</strong> hypotheses are formulated to investigate the effects <strong>of</strong> stakeholder<br />

pressures, perceived polluting potential, customer focus and competitive intensity. With the exception <strong>of</strong><br />

competitive intensity, all three factors are noted to positively influence the adoption level <strong>of</strong> VEMPs by MNE<br />

subsidiaries. Some <strong>of</strong> the parent-level and subsidiary-level control variables are also found to have significant<br />

effects on MNE subsidiaries' extent <strong>of</strong> VEMPs adoption. (For more information, please contact: Erkan Bayraktar,<br />

Bahcesehir University, Turkey: erkan.bayraktar@bahcesehir.edu.tr)<br />

How Global Level Public Policy Impacts Domestic Clean Energy Technology Development<br />

Joel Malen, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Increasing levels <strong>of</strong> global integration suggest that foreign policy choices are relevant to firms operating outside<br />

<strong>of</strong> the national context. This paper examines the conditions and mechanisms underlying how the adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

policies supporting clean energy development by foreign governments influences the emergence <strong>of</strong> domestic<br />

industries focused on the development <strong>of</strong> clean energy technologies. We argue that foreign policies influence<br />

how favorable a domestic environment is for clean energy technology development in two ways. First, greater<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> supportive clean energy policies in the global environment directly supports domestic industry<br />

emergence by increasing the total market size as well number <strong>of</strong> markets for new clean energy technology<br />

products and services. Second, a greater level <strong>of</strong> global policy indirectly works to enhance the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic policies. Using a panel dataset on venture capital investing in solar energy firms and government<br />

policy adoption, We find empirical support for both effects. (For more information, please contact: Joel Malen,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, USA: male0110@umn.edu)<br />

Nonmarket Institutional Pressures and the Frequency <strong>of</strong> Nonmarket Actions: Evidence from Foreign Owned<br />

Firms<br />

Cosmina Lelia Voinea, Radboud University Nijmegen<br />

Hans van Kranenburg, Radboud University Nijmegen<br />

This paper explores the relation and sources <strong>of</strong> variation in the strength <strong>of</strong> institutional pressures and<br />

nonmarket actions. Based on institutional, international business and corporate political strategy literature, we<br />

explore institutional factors explaining pressures from six types <strong>of</strong> institutions: national regulators, political<br />

institutions, standards agencies, interest groups, the media supranational regulators, on the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

nonmarket actions undertaken by foreign owned firms to deal with these pressures in an open regionally<br />

integrated economy. Evidence is provided by a survey sample <strong>of</strong> 160 foreign owned firms operating in the<br />

Netherlands. Results show that four types <strong>of</strong> institutions have the highest explanatory value for an increase in<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> nonmarket actions are national regulators, standards agencies, interest groups, and the media<br />

along with the specific institutional factors elucidating these effects. Empirical outcome also indicates a strong<br />

dependency <strong>of</strong> national level institutions on the supranational echelon. This study further contributes to the<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> plausible explanations for why firms adopt nonmarket actions. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Cosmina Lelia Voinea, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands: c.voinea@fm.ru.nl)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 125


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.2.P - Panel<br />

Track: 12 - Value Creation and Work<br />

Showcase Panel on Global Organization and Reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> Value Creation and Work<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

Tarun Khanna, Harvard Business School<br />

Pankaj Ghemawat, IESE Business School<br />

Arie Y. Lewin, Duke University<br />

Bruce Kogut, Columbia University<br />

(For more information, please contact: Ram Mudambi, Temple University, USA: rmudambi@temple.edu)<br />

Session: 2.2.1 - Panel<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

Women Starting and Leading Businesses in Adverse Conditions<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Amanda Bullough, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

Co-Chair: Susan Forquer Gupta, Monmouth University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Amanda Bullough, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

Susan Forquer Gupta, Monmouth University<br />

Liesl Riddle, George Washington University<br />

Wynona Heim, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

Mary Boyden Teagarden, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

Margareta S. Schettler, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> State<br />

Maria Peña, Vital Voices Global Partnerships<br />

Nakiye Boyacigiller, Sabanc&#305; University<br />

Elizabeth Vazquez, WEConnect <strong>International</strong><br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this panel is to begin a high-level dialogue on the various adversities facing women in business<br />

around the world. The goal is stimulate more research and education in the area <strong>of</strong> women's entrepreneurship<br />

in places with adverse working and living conditions. This is important because most empirical research has<br />

been done in a Western context, and business education initiatives are based on that context and might not be<br />

the most effective in areas <strong>of</strong> adversity. Getting the public, education, and private sectors together on this panel<br />

would open more lines <strong>of</strong> contact for this type <strong>of</strong> work, which is important for program and policy making. With<br />

all the good work being done by each <strong>of</strong> these sectors, we have a lot to learn from each other. That learning<br />

can be translated into knowledge and best practices to better serve women's advancement worldwide. In<br />

addition, while educators and policy makers in places with comparatively less adversity have something to <strong>of</strong>fer,<br />

there is also a lot to be learned from women operating in places <strong>of</strong> more adversity. Another goal <strong>of</strong> this panel is<br />

instigate a discussion <strong>of</strong> how the level <strong>of</strong> adversity, or the different types <strong>of</strong> adverse conditions, might affect<br />

women differently and therefore require different strategies to promote women's advancement. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Amanda Bullough, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management, USA:<br />

amanda.bullough@thunderbird.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 126


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.2.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Exploring Responsible Global Leadership<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Schon Beechler, INSEAD<br />

Panelists:<br />

Allan Bird, Northeastern University<br />

Schon Beechler, INSEAD<br />

Mark Mendenhall, University <strong>of</strong> Tennessee<br />

Christ<strong>of</strong> Miska, WU Vienna<br />

Sheila M. Puffer, Northeastern University<br />

The emergence <strong>of</strong> two new strains <strong>of</strong> leadership research – global leadership and responsible leadership –<br />

reflects an effort to better comprehend the nature <strong>of</strong> leadership in the 21st century. This symposium brings<br />

together recognized experts on global leadership and responsible leadership. After introductory, stage-setting<br />

remarks, the panel will lay a foundation for considering the challenges <strong>of</strong> the global environment and how<br />

contextual factors may constrain or facilitate responsible global leadership behaviors. This will be followed by a<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the global leadership literature with a focus on the emerging emphasis on responsibility, particularly<br />

as it relates to the ethical dilemmas associated with leadership in a global context. The panel will then move on<br />

to consider how responsible global leadership relates to the larger context <strong>of</strong> corporate social responsibility in<br />

global organizations. The call for responsible global leadership begs the question <strong>of</strong> what are its antecedents,<br />

the next area <strong>of</strong> exploration by the panel. Finally, the focus shifts and narrows to the challenge <strong>of</strong> responsible<br />

global leadership in emerging markets, where an absence <strong>of</strong> well-established institutional norms, mingled with<br />

significant cultural variation give rise to considerations not found when operating in OECD countries. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Allan Bird, Northeastern University, USA: a.bird@neu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.2.3 - Panel<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Emerging Trends in Multinational R&D in Emerging Markets: Rethinking the Nexus<br />

between Institutions and Innovation<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Rishikesha T. Krishnan, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore<br />

Panelists:<br />

Rishikesha T. Krishnan, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore<br />

Srivardhini K. Jha, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore<br />

Anand Nandkumar, Indian School <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Kannan Srikanth, Indian School <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Krishnan Narayanan, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology Bombay<br />

Charles Dhanaraj, Indiana University<br />

This panel brings together leading researchers from India on multinational investment in R&D to provide a<br />

rigorous and contextual perspective to the changing nature <strong>of</strong> multinational R&D investment in India. There is a<br />

silent revolution that is going on in many emerging markets, more conspicuous in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia,<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 127


MONDAY<br />

India, China, and South Africa). Institutional regimes evolve rapidly to support such activities, and indigenous<br />

firms are re-engineering their search routines to enhance their R&D and shift it to riskier domains. Multinational<br />

R&D has broken <strong>of</strong>f their well-tested routines <strong>of</strong> restricting R&D to home or home-like markets and investing<br />

significantly in emerging markets. So much so, these markets are redefining MNE strategies and products. This<br />

panel will address questions such as the motivation and rationale for such investment; its geographical and<br />

sectoral spread; and its interaction with the local innovation system. All these questions will be answered in a<br />

dynamic context and the changes over time will be identified and placed in a strong theoretical context. This<br />

panel is expected to generate rich insights into the changing nature <strong>of</strong> multinational R&D in emerging markets<br />

by taking a focused look at India, with important implications for theory and practice. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Rishikesha T. Krishnan, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore, India: rishi@iimb.ac.in)<br />

Session: 2.2.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

The Nature <strong>of</strong> Innovation in Emerging Markets<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Masaaki Kotabe , Temple University<br />

Transcending Paradoxes: Managing Innovation and Growth in the Indian Biotech Industry<br />

Shaista E. Khilji, George Washington University<br />

Tomasz Mroczkowski, American University<br />

Rashmi Assudani, Xavier University<br />

Biotech companies in USA are generally faced with the paradoxes <strong>of</strong> simultaneously managing growth and<br />

innovation, as well as addressing explorative and exploitative aspects <strong>of</strong> innovation (Khilji, Mroczkowski &<br />

Bernstein, 2006). This has led to a high failure rate among them. Scholars have urged tem to re-evaluate their<br />

business model (Pisano, 2006). With the purpose <strong>of</strong> exploring how biotech companies in emerging economies<br />

address these paradoxes, we focus upon the nascent biotech industry in India in order to investigate their<br />

growth and innovation patterns, as well identify the challenges that they may be faced with. Data indicates that<br />

Indian biotech companies are ambidextrous and have managed to transcend the aforementioned paradoxes by<br />

developing and maintaining distinct organizational capabilities. They were found to pursue an integrated model<br />

<strong>of</strong> efficiency and innovation and utilize both exploitative and explorative aspects <strong>of</strong> innovation to fuel growth<br />

and innovation. We also find evidence <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the "India Way", proposed by Cappelli,<br />

Singh, Singh & Useem (2010a). We conclude that American biotech companies could glean some <strong>of</strong> the learning<br />

from their Indian counterparts in order to build new competencies and sustain innovation in today's competitive<br />

environment. (For more information, please contact: Shaista E. Khilji, George Washington University, USA:<br />

shaistakhilji@gmail.com)<br />

The Structure and Performance <strong>of</strong> Reverse-Innovating Subsidiaries in Emerging Markets<br />

Michael Sartor, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

This paper explores the structure and performance <strong>of</strong> foreign subsidiaries that employ a reverse innovation<br />

strategy – the process <strong>of</strong> entering into emerging markets for the purpose <strong>of</strong> engaging in research and<br />

development (R&D)-related activities. Given the well-documented risk <strong>of</strong> intellectual-property (IP) leakage in<br />

these markets, we investigate how normative institutions in the host country market shape the structure and<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> these unique investments. While institutional theory tends to predominate in research related to<br />

host market institutions, we build on conceptual advances in transaction cost economics (TCE) and the<br />

resource-based view (RBV) to develop a set <strong>of</strong> competing hypotheses with respect to the impact <strong>of</strong> two distinct<br />

types <strong>of</strong> normative institutional distance (governmental and technological) upon the ownership mode choice and<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 128


MONDAY<br />

expatriate staffing strategy <strong>of</strong> reverse-innovating MNEs. We tested our hypotheses against a sample <strong>of</strong> 514<br />

subsidiaries established in 15 emerging markets during the period between 1996-2006. The results support our<br />

development <strong>of</strong> an integrated TCE-RBV conceptualization <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> normative institutions on the<br />

strategy, structure and performance <strong>of</strong> foreign-investing MNEs. Within this framework, our results suggest that<br />

as governmental normative distance increases, reverse-innovating MNEs will prefer to employ more expatriates<br />

and to enter emerging markets via a wholly-owned governance structure. Conversely, under conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

heightened technological normative distance, these same MNEs will choose to enter through joint venture<br />

partnerships. To examine the efficacy <strong>of</strong> these risk-reduction strategies, we investigated the performance<br />

implications associated with these strategic endeavors. Reverse-innovating MNEs' preference for full ownership<br />

was found to predict enhanced financial performance. (For more information, please contact: Michael Sartor,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada: msartor.phd@ivey.ca)<br />

The Economic Impacts <strong>of</strong> Technological Capability, FDI and R&D in Emerging Economies<br />

Hyun Shin, Long Island University<br />

Steven Chang, Long Island University<br />

In this paper, we investigate the dynamic, interdependent relations among technological capability (embodied<br />

vs. disembodied technology position), FDI (inward vs. outward FDI), R&D, and a nation's economic progress<br />

(GDP). We choose four emerging countries in two clusters: 1) Brazil and Mexico (Catching-up) and 2) Korea and<br />

Taiwan (Pre-frontier). We use Vector Autoregressive (VAR) modeling to analyze quarterly time-series data<br />

(1998:1Q-2007:4Q) between two important global economic events, i.e., the Asian Financial Crisis <strong>of</strong> 1997 and<br />

the Subprime Mortgage Crisis <strong>of</strong> 2008. We find that 1) technological capability has a positive long-run impact on<br />

GDP <strong>of</strong> Korea and Taiwan; and 2) enhanced embodied position helps Mexico and Brazil attract more inward FDI<br />

while improved disembodied position facilitates Taiwan and Korea to increase outward FDI over time. In<br />

addition, we observe that the relationship among technological capability, FDI, and R&D varies across countries.<br />

These findings provide insightful policy implications for emerging economies at different development stages,<br />

helping them compete successfully in a globalized economy. (For more information, please contact: Hyun Shin,<br />

Long Island University, USA: hyun.shin@liu.edu)<br />

Export Intensity, Domestic Market Competition, and Product Innovation in an Emerging Economy<br />

Zhenzhen Xie, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

Jiatao Li, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

Recent empirical studies have consistently found a positive relationship between firm-level export and product<br />

innovation, attributing this as "learning by exporting". We argue that in a large emerging economy such as<br />

China, this relationship could be inverted-U shaped. Exporters in emerging economies are usually technology<br />

leaders in their domestic market, but technology laggards in international markets. When the export intensity is<br />

low, the exporters pay attention to the domestic market and tend to make product innovation by combining<br />

their domestic market knowledge with superior technological capabilities gained from exporting. When export<br />

intensity exceeds a threshold, the exporters may shift their focus to overseas markets, where their competitive<br />

advantage might lie in efficient and quality manufacturing rather than in superior technological or market<br />

knowledge. This may prevent highly intensive exporters from making product innovation. When domestic<br />

competition is high, less intensive exporters are more likely to make full use <strong>of</strong> the knowledge they gain through<br />

exporting and make product innovations to compete domestically. Meanwhile, intense domestic competition<br />

might push exporters to focus more on efficient and quality production and abandon product innovation. An<br />

analysis on 6,197 manufacturers in China's automobile industry during 2005-2007 supports the above<br />

argument. (For more information, please contact: Zhenzhen Xie, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC: xiezz@ust.hk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 129


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.2.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Balancing Exploration and Exploitation<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Kazuhiro Asakawa, Keio University<br />

<strong>International</strong> R&D Collaborations and Novelty <strong>of</strong> Product Innovation<br />

Annique Un, Northeastern University<br />

María Nieto, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid<br />

Lluis Santamaría, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid<br />

We analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> international research and development (R&D) collaborations on the novelty <strong>of</strong><br />

product innovation. Prior studies argue that access to diversity <strong>of</strong> knowledge external to the firm is important<br />

for generating innovations; however, we do not know how it influences their novelty. We introduce two types <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge distances, newness and diversity, <strong>of</strong> the firm's knowledge relative to its partners', and explain how<br />

these distances impact the novelty <strong>of</strong> product innovation. Specifically, we argue that international R&D<br />

collaborations have a higher positive impact on radical than incremental product innovations, because, in<br />

contrast to incremental innovation, it requires greater knowledge distances, and foreign partners can provide<br />

such knowledge. However, the cross-national variation in knowledge distances <strong>of</strong> the country <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

partners lead to another proposition that, the higher the knowledge distances <strong>of</strong> the country <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

partner, the higher is the impact on radical than incremental product innovations. The analysis <strong>of</strong> a panel <strong>of</strong><br />

firms operating in Spain for the period 2004-2007 supports the arguments. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Annique Un, Northeastern University, USA: a.un@neu.edu)<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Cross-National Knowledge on Organizational Ambidexterity: A Case <strong>of</strong> the Global Pharmaceutical<br />

Industry<br />

Denise Dunlap, Northeastern University<br />

Tucker Marion, Northeastern University<br />

John Friar, Northeastern University<br />

Using a sample <strong>of</strong> 70 global pharmaceutical firms, this study examined how cross-national knowledge affected<br />

the creation <strong>of</strong> exploitative (incremental) and explorative (breakthrough) types <strong>of</strong> technological innovations both<br />

<strong>of</strong> which are necessary for organizational ambidexterity. We found that there were significant differences for<br />

effectively using cross-national knowledge, which reinforces the need for organizational ambidexterity. The<br />

data used to study cross-national knowledge consisted <strong>of</strong> patent analyses <strong>of</strong> commercialized products, which is<br />

a step further than most studies that stop at just the patents themselves. Through the use <strong>of</strong> double-log<br />

regression analysis, the results suggested a notable conclusion: while the sourcing <strong>of</strong> intra-firm, cross-national<br />

knowledge enhanced explorative or breakthrough innovation, it did not enhance the development <strong>of</strong> exploitative<br />

or incremental innovation. The paper concludes with managerial implications for managing ambidexterity. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Denise Dunlap, Northeastern University, USA: d.dunlap@neu.edu)<br />

Proactive Knowledge Replication: The Choice and Performance Effects <strong>of</strong> Using Principles or Templates in<br />

Multinational Consulting Projects<br />

James Oldroyd, Sungkyunkwan University<br />

Shad Morris, Ohio State University<br />

We seek to identify the antecedents and consequences <strong>of</strong> using two different forms <strong>of</strong> knowledge replication:<br />

principles and templates. We predict that MNE consulting project leaders with strong local human capital or<br />

strong international human capital are likely to differentially use knowledge. Moreover, we hypothesize that the<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 130


MONDAY<br />

use <strong>of</strong> knowledge principles is likely to increase responsiveness; while templates are likely to increase project<br />

efficiency. Analyzing 267 globally dispersed consulting projects; we find support for our hypotheses. In general,<br />

this research highlights the importance <strong>of</strong> human capital in the proactive replication process and the<br />

performance effects <strong>of</strong> utilizing different knowledge replication forms. (For more information, please contact:<br />

James Oldroyd, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea, South: oldroyd@skku.edu)<br />

Session: 2.2.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />

M&A, IJV’S and <strong>International</strong> Alliances<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Yves Doz, Insead<br />

Exploring the Strategic Antecedents <strong>of</strong> Alliance Portfolio Configuration—An Empirical Study Based on A Two-<br />

Dimension Based Approach<br />

Wei He, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Sumit K. Kundu, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Jinlin Zhao, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Aiming at investigating the determinants <strong>of</strong> alliance portfolio configuration we develop a two-dimensional<br />

typology that incorporates both alliance attributes and partner attributes to demarcate different types <strong>of</strong> alliance<br />

portfolio. The resulting four types <strong>of</strong> alliance portfolio are employed for theory building. Drawing on resourcebased<br />

view and resource dependency theory, we develop a framework demarcating the determinants <strong>of</strong> alliance<br />

portfolio configuration. The resulting conceptual model explains how alliance management experience,<br />

organizational slack and brand image interacting with degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization and environmental<br />

munificence can affect the type <strong>of</strong> alliance portfolio configuration selected by a firm. The empirical results<br />

suggest that the type <strong>of</strong> alliance portfolio chosen by a firm depends on the level <strong>of</strong> the above factors as well as<br />

their interaction with the focal firm's degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization. Overall, this paper shed insights on how<br />

alliance portfolio configuration can be defined and predicted. (For more information, please contact: Wei He,<br />

Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA: whe001@fiu.edu)<br />

Cross Border Acquisition Choice in the Services Sector: Evidence from Emerging Economies<br />

Somnath Lahiri, Illinois State University<br />

B. Elango, Illinois State University<br />

Sumit K. Kundu, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Corporate acquisition <strong>of</strong> emerging economy firms by foreign MNEs have been increasing over the years. Yet our<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> such cross-border acquisitions (CBAs), particularly those in the services sector, remains limited. In<br />

this paper we examine how acquirer's country-<strong>of</strong>-origin, type <strong>of</strong> service, and cultural distance influence<br />

ownership choice decisions in CBA in emerging economies. Analysis <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> 609 CBAs undertaken in<br />

multiple emerging economies over a 11-year time period by MNEs from 45 nations provide evidence that the<br />

direct and combined effects <strong>of</strong> country-<strong>of</strong>-origin, service type, and cultural distance does impact choice <strong>of</strong><br />

partial versus full acquisition in significantly different ways. We conclude by discussing theoretical and<br />

managerial contributions <strong>of</strong> the study and highlighting limitations and directions for future research. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Somnath Lahiri, Illinois State University, USA: slahiri@ilstu.edu)<br />

Which Came First, The Chicken or the Egg Using Propensity Score Matching to Determine Causality<br />

Wenjie Chen, George Washington University<br />

Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Northeastern University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 131


MONDAY<br />

This paper explains the application <strong>of</strong> propensity score matching for analyzing causality relationships in<br />

international and strategic management. Unlike the controlled experiments available in natural sciences, it is<br />

extremely difficult in international and strategic management to establish causal treatment effects in firms. Most<br />

methods fall short in identifying proper control groups and, as a result, may generate misleading conclusions.<br />

We propose using a simple approach that allows researchers to preprocess data with propensity score matching<br />

and combine it with commonly used parametric techniques to identify an appropriate control group and<br />

evaluate the impact <strong>of</strong> treatment. We illustrate the power <strong>of</strong> this technique over others by analyzing differences<br />

in performance between firms acquired by foreign companies and those acquired by domestic ones. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Northeastern University, USA: a.cuervocazurra@neu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.2.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Enduring Distance<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: David A. Ralston, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Reconsidering the Concept <strong>of</strong> Distance in <strong>International</strong>ization Research<br />

Thomas Hutzschenreuter, WHU<br />

Ingo Kleindienst, WHU<br />

Sandra Lange, WHU<br />

In this study we <strong>of</strong>fer a new perspective on the distance concept by raising awareness to the fundamental role<br />

<strong>of</strong> the reference point in determining distance. We question the IB field's consistent use <strong>of</strong> the home country<br />

reference point and <strong>of</strong>fer theoretically inferred alternative reference points. Specifically, drawing on insights<br />

from the organizational learning and MNE knowledge transfer literatures, we reason that a focal unit entering a<br />

new context may actually rely on knowledge sources other than the home country in order to narrow the<br />

knowledge gap in the new context. We illustrate the differences in distances resulting from the use <strong>of</strong><br />

alternative reference points by means <strong>of</strong> several exemplary cases. Finally, the implications for distance-related<br />

research are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Thomas Hutzschenreuter, WHU, Germany:<br />

th@whu.edu)<br />

Multidimensional Distances and Location Choice: An Empirical Study <strong>of</strong> Chinese Outward Foreign Direct<br />

Investment<br />

Na Ma, Tsinghua University<br />

Dong Chen, Loyola Marymount University<br />

This study examines how multidimensional distances, including cultural, institutional, economic, and geographic<br />

distances, affect the location choice <strong>of</strong> Chinese outward foreign direct investment (OFDI). Ascribing to the<br />

potential benefits and costs <strong>of</strong> various distances, we suggest that Chinese OFDI flow into different countries has<br />

a sigmoid (S-shaped) relationship with cultural distance, a positive relationship with institutional distance, an<br />

inverted U-shaped relationship with economic distance, and a negative relationship with geographic distance.<br />

The hypotheses are tested using country-level Chinese OFDI data between 2003 and 2009. Our empirical<br />

results provide support for the hypothesized effects <strong>of</strong> cultural, institutional, and economic distances.<br />

Furthermore, the effects on institutional and economic distances are negatively moderated by geographic<br />

distance. The study <strong>of</strong>fers an integrative view <strong>of</strong> multidimensional distances between countries and provides<br />

important insights on the OFDI activities <strong>of</strong> Chinese companies. (For more information, please contact: Dong<br />

Chen, Loyola Marymount University, USA: dchen@lmu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 132


MONDAY<br />

Psychic Distance in 37 Years <strong>of</strong> IB Literature: Taking Stock and Setting the Course<br />

Anja Maria Schuster, Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business<br />

Björn Ambos, Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business<br />

Psychic distance has become a central concept in international business research. Despite its frequent use, its<br />

application to a variety <strong>of</strong> phenomena has produced inconsistent study results. We argue that part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

empirical ambiguity can be attributed to causal ambiguity and inconsistency. In order to better understand<br />

these issues, a systematic search and content analysis <strong>of</strong> published research on the psychic distance concept<br />

were performed. Covering major journals in the fields <strong>of</strong> international business, management, strategy and<br />

marketing, we identify 348 relevant academic contributions, outline the development <strong>of</strong> the concept and find<br />

evidence for its reification. Addressing the concept's controversial contribution to the literature so far, we <strong>of</strong>fer a<br />

theoretical advancement in regard to its conceptualization. We argue that future operationalizations will benefit<br />

from the inclusion <strong>of</strong> bilateral measurement which allows for the possibility <strong>of</strong> asymmetric psychic distances and<br />

its consequences. We propose a framework that captures the two dimensions <strong>of</strong> psychic distance asymmetry<br />

and highlight research areas that could benefit from its application. (For more information, please contact: Anja<br />

Maria Schuster, Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business, Austria: anja.schuster@wu.ac.at)<br />

Session: 2.2.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

<strong>International</strong> Resource Allocation<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Abigail S. Hornstein, Wesleyan University<br />

Do Multinational Firms Shift Pr<strong>of</strong>its Out <strong>of</strong> China: Subsidiary-level Evidence<br />

Sea-Jin Chang, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

Jaiho Chung, Korea University<br />

Jon Jungbien Moon, Korea University<br />

Using data on financial information for foreign subsidiaries operating in China from 2001 to 2007, this paper<br />

uses a novel approach to <strong>of</strong>fer evidence <strong>of</strong> income shifting at the subsidiary level and investigate how such<br />

income shifting is conditioned by three means at the subsidiary level: fixed asset investment, intangible asset<br />

investment, and capital structure. We find that multinational subsidiaries in China shifted pr<strong>of</strong>its to and from<br />

China depending on corporate tax rates and that the magnitudes <strong>of</strong> tax-motivated income shifting activities are<br />

larger among foreign subsidiaries possessing these three means. (For more information, please contact: Jon<br />

Jungbien Moon, Korea University, Korea, South: jonjmoon@korea.ac.kr)<br />

Geographic Scope under Conditions <strong>of</strong> Confined and Connected Change: The Case <strong>of</strong> Telefónica<br />

Rafael Lucea, George Washington University<br />

Luis Vives, ESADE Business School<br />

Traditional explanations <strong>of</strong> MNE geographic scope formation fit somewhat uncomfortably with recent empirical<br />

and theoretical work in IB that suggests (1) that wholesale (not just gradual) changes in MNE geographic scope<br />

may be more frequent than previously thought, and (2) that managers' responses to a world increasingly<br />

characterized by random, unpredictable change are more experimental and less optimizing in nature than<br />

assumed in most models <strong>of</strong> international expansion. In this paper we draw from studies portraying industries<br />

as dynamic networks, and from the literature on managerial cognition to provide a complementary explanation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> MNE geographic scope that reconciles the insights <strong>of</strong> traditional IB models with the questions<br />

raised by more recent studies in this field. We illustrate the proposed model through a detailed account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 133


MONDAY<br />

internationalization process <strong>of</strong> Telefonica, the Spanish telecommunications company. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Rafael Lucea, George Washington University, USA: rafel@gwu.edu)<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization and CEO Turnover<br />

Yu-Kai Wang, Soochow University<br />

Kun Yang, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Nathan Hiller, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

The requirements facing CEOs in modern organizations are generally challenging, yet also highly variable such<br />

that two CEOs may face entirely different degrees <strong>of</strong> complexity and challenge in their role. Using the concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> executive job demands (Hambrick cite), we posit that an MNE's degree <strong>of</strong> internationalization (measured as<br />

firm-level international diversification, political complexity, and cultural complexity) is related to CEO turnover.<br />

Data from an unbalanced panel dataset <strong>of</strong> 208 U.S.-based manufacturing MNEs with 813 observations from<br />

2004 to 2009 suggests that international diversification, firm-level cultural complexity, and firm-level political<br />

complexity are each positively associated with the likelihood <strong>of</strong> CEO turnover. These effects were not amplified<br />

by the dynamism <strong>of</strong> the industry and were present even when controlling for firm performance and other<br />

possible explanatory variables. Taken together, these results suggest that the demands faced by a high degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> firm internationalization are likely to present challenges that increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong> corporate disruption<br />

through CEO departure. (For more information, please contact: Yu-Kai Wang, Soochow University, Taiwan:<br />

ywang012@scu.edu.tw)<br />

Session: 2.2.10 - Competitive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Multicultural Teams & Managing Diversity<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Mary Elizabeth Zellmer-Bruhn, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Language Differences as Impediments to Shared Mental Model Formation in Multinational Teams<br />

Helene Tenzer, Tübingen University<br />

Markus Pudelko, Tübingen University<br />

Large corporations increasingly use multinational teams to integrate their global operations. To perform this<br />

complex task efficiently, team members need to develop shared mental models (SMMs), i.e. an organized<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the knowledge base they are sharing. In multinational teams, the heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> team<br />

members makes SMM formation especially challenging. While previous research has investigated the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> different diversity factors on SMMs, the impact <strong>of</strong> language differences has surprisingly been neglected so<br />

far. To address this important gap we investigate how different elements <strong>of</strong> the language barrier impede the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> SMMs. Based on 84 semi-structured interviews with team leaders, members and<br />

senior managers <strong>of</strong> 15 multinational teams in three German automotive corporations we develop a model<br />

showing how pragmatic and paraverbal barriers between team members obstruct SMMs about roles,<br />

responsibilities and interaction patterns and how shortcomings in lexical, syntactical and phonetic pr<strong>of</strong>iciency<br />

impede SMMs about team members' preferences, strengths, weaknesses as well as values and attitudes. These<br />

findings integrate linguistic and psychological theories with management studies and complement our<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the antecedents <strong>of</strong> SMMs in multinational teams. This is <strong>of</strong> crucial importance since SMMs<br />

have been established as important prerequisites for team performance. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Helene Tenzer, Tübingen University, Germany: helene.tenzer@uni-tuebingen.de)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 134


MONDAY<br />

A Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Effects <strong>of</strong> Different Forms <strong>of</strong> Team Diversity on Global Virtual Team Performance<br />

Vas Taras, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina Greensboro<br />

Pawel Bryla , University <strong>of</strong> Lodz<br />

Dan V. Caprar, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

Alfredo Jimenez, University <strong>of</strong> Burgos<br />

Peter Magnusson, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Riikka Sarala, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, Greensboro<br />

<strong>International</strong> on-line collaboration is an inherent feature <strong>of</strong> the modern workplace. Global virtual teams can<br />

enjoy benefits but can also experience challenges due to diversity <strong>of</strong> member backgrounds, values, and<br />

geographic dispersion. Advancing earlier research on the relationship between team diversity and performance,<br />

the novelty <strong>of</strong> the present study is that it <strong>of</strong>fers a simultaneous comparative evaluation <strong>of</strong> the strength and the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> various dimensions <strong>of</strong> diversity – demographic, geographic, time-zone, cultural,<br />

institutional, and perceived – on team performance. The data were collected as a part <strong>of</strong> a large academic<br />

experiential learning exercise that involved over a thousand undergraduate and MBA students from 26 countries<br />

working together in international teams <strong>of</strong> four-eight students for about eight weeks. The results confirmed a<br />

significant effect <strong>of</strong> diversity on team performance, but also revealed substantial differences <strong>of</strong> the effect<br />

strength and direction across diversity dimensions and measures. (For more information, please contact: Vas<br />

Taras, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina Greensboro, USA: v_taras@uncg.edu)<br />

Multinational Teams: Cultural Differences, Interactions, Organizational Context, and Performance<br />

Aida Hajro, Brunel University<br />

Markus Pudelko, Tübingen University<br />

Cristina Gibson, University <strong>of</strong> Western Australia<br />

This paper extents the literature on multinational teams (MNTs) in a series <strong>of</strong> ways: First, we demonstrate that<br />

the relationship between national cultural diversity and MNT performance is mediated by inter-cultural team<br />

interactions. Furthermore, we show that MNT interaction can lead to a process <strong>of</strong> hybridization in which<br />

cognitive convergence between team members takes place so that they can negotiate and manage successfully<br />

their cultural differences. Next, we re-veal how the macro-organizational context, in this study operationalized<br />

by corporate strategy, can either facilitate or impair the process <strong>of</strong> the inner-team negotiation <strong>of</strong> cultural<br />

differences, resulting in different degrees <strong>of</strong> team performance. Our study is based on 162 in-depth inter-views<br />

with team members and leaders across 89 different teams from eleven different companies plus extensive<br />

participant observations. (For more information, please contact: Aida Hajro, Brunel University, United Kingdom:<br />

aida.hajro@brunel.ac.uk)<br />

Getting the Best from Cultural Diversity: Psychological and Structural Elements in a Five T-model<br />

Geetha Garib, UCL<br />

Previous models <strong>of</strong> diversity effects have either sought to promote diversity by monitoring its performance (De<br />

Anca & Vazquez, 2007) or included task characteristics and psychological aspects (Knippenberg et. al., 2004) in<br />

order to manage diversity. However, diversity models have not yet combined both structural and psychological<br />

elements. The Five T model (Training, Time, Talk, Threat to the majority and Together) builds further on the<br />

CEM <strong>of</strong> Knippenberg et. al (2004) and combines structural and psychological elements to manage cultural<br />

diversity effectively, as it includes main elements to decrease negative effects and increase positive effects <strong>of</strong><br />

cultural diversity. (For more information, please contact: Geetha Garib, UCL, United Kingdom: y.r.garib@uvt.nl)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 135


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.2.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Multiple Entry Perspectives<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Deepak K Datta, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Arlington<br />

Where Experience Matters More: Effects <strong>of</strong> Learning on Value Creation in Cross-Border Acquisitions by U.S.<br />

Firms in the Service Industry<br />

Dynah A. Basuil, Asian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Deepak K Datta, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Arlington<br />

Based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 312 cross-border acquisitions by U.S. firms in the service sector, our study examines the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> industry knowledge and cross-border acquisition experience on shareholder value creation. We used<br />

the BHAR (buy and hold abnormal returns) methodology to assess the extent <strong>of</strong> value creation in the year<br />

following an acquisition. Our findings indicate that both industry knowledge and cross-border acquisition<br />

experience (number <strong>of</strong> cross-border acquisitions undertaken in the five years prior to the acquisition) are<br />

positively associated with shareholder value creation; however, the relationships are contingent on cultural<br />

distance. Our analyses indicate that the positive effects are more pronounced when cultural distance is low,<br />

than when it is high. Implications <strong>of</strong> our findings from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> researchers and practitioners are<br />

discussed. (For more information, please contact: Dynah A. Basuil, Asian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, Philippines:<br />

dbasuil@aim.edu)<br />

Entry Mode and Distance: An Experimental Investigation <strong>of</strong> a Contentious Relationship<br />

Douglas Dow, University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne<br />

Daniel Baack, University <strong>of</strong> Denver<br />

Ronaldo Parente, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

This paper adopts an experimental approach to explore the role <strong>of</strong> psychic distance in international entry mode<br />

choice. By directly measuring manager's a priori perceptions the psychic distance using best worst scaling, the<br />

results indicate that perceptions <strong>of</strong> psychic distance play a significant role as a source <strong>of</strong> external uncertainty<br />

during foreign investment decisions. In a similar fashion, the tacit nature <strong>of</strong> the knowledge transferred during<br />

the investment is a major source <strong>of</strong> internal uncertainty; however, psychic distance does not appear to influence<br />

the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the internal uncertainty. (For more information, please contact: Douglas Dow, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Melbourne, Australia: d.dow@mbs.edu)<br />

Choice <strong>of</strong> Foreign Market Entry Mode: The Moderating Effect <strong>of</strong> Cultural Distance on Separability and Foreign<br />

Expansion<br />

Maziar Raz, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

This paper investigates the moderating effect <strong>of</strong> cultural distance on the relationship between separability and<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> foreign entry mode. To that aim, it compares 11740 cases <strong>of</strong> Japanese foreign direct investment into<br />

manufacturing and service industries (retail trade, wholesale trade, and finance and insurance). The empirical<br />

model supports the hypothesis that in service firms, where separability <strong>of</strong> production and consumption is low,<br />

increase in cultural distance reduces the likelihood <strong>of</strong> entry by a wholly owned subsidiary. From these results,<br />

this paper draws implications for the literature on internationalization <strong>of</strong> service firms. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Maziar Raz, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada: mraz.phd@ivey.ca)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 136


MONDAY<br />

Success in Entry Mode Choice in a High Animosity Host Country Market<br />

Cher-Min Fong, National Sun Yat-sen University<br />

Chun-Ling Lee, National Sun Yat-sen University<br />

Yunzhou Du , Anhui University <strong>of</strong> Finance & Economics<br />

Drawn on the institutional perspective, this study investigates the effects <strong>of</strong> the choice <strong>of</strong> entry mode<br />

(greenfield vs. joint venture), the ownership arrangement <strong>of</strong> international joint venture (IJV) (majority vs.<br />

minority), and the selection <strong>of</strong> local partner (positive reputation vs. negative reputation) on gaining market<br />

legitimacy (acceptance by local consumers) in the host country by a multinational corporation (MNC) from an<br />

animosity-evoking home country. Specifically, this work investigates Chinese consumers' (with high animosity<br />

against Japan) responses toward the products <strong>of</strong> a Japanese wholly owned subsidiary and four Japanese-<br />

Chinese joint venture firms with different ownership structures and local partners. The results show that<br />

Chinese consumers have higher product purchase intentions if the Japanese MNC adopts a joint-venture entry<br />

mode than a greenfield entry mode. Furthermore, Chinese consumers exhibit higher product purchase<br />

intentions when the Japanese partner has minority equity as opposed to having majority equity in the IJV. With<br />

respect to local partner selection, Chinese consumers demonstrate higher product purchase intentions for an<br />

IJV in which the local partner is a positive reputation firm. Theoretical and practical implications <strong>of</strong> the findings<br />

are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Chun-Ling Lee, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan:<br />

d934010005@student.nsysu.edu.tw)<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) Ownership Mode Choice in China: Evidence from Nordic<br />

Manufacturing Investment<br />

Yi Wang, University <strong>of</strong> Vaasa<br />

Jorma Larimo, University <strong>of</strong> Vaasa<br />

This study analyzes factors influencing the choice <strong>of</strong> Nordic manufacturing firms (Denmark, Finland, Norway,<br />

and Sweden) between international joint venture (IJV) and wholly-owned subsidiary (WOS) <strong>of</strong> their subsidiaries<br />

in China. The sample consists <strong>of</strong> 254 manufacturing investments made by 115 Nordic firms in a period <strong>of</strong> 1982-<br />

2008. The empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> this study indicates that R&D intensity, internationally experienced firms, degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> diversification <strong>of</strong> the investing firm and subsidiaries operating in resource-intensive industry increased the<br />

propensity <strong>of</strong> Nordic firms to choose international joint ventures. Whereas business experience in China,<br />

subsidiary location (SEZs and open coastal cities), deregulated host government policy toward FDI and<br />

Greenfield investments positively associated with increased probability <strong>of</strong> Nordic firms to choose wholly-owned<br />

subsidiary. Further on, cultural distance, parent firm size and country <strong>of</strong> origin provide no marginal information<br />

for predicting ownership mode choice <strong>of</strong> Nordic MNEs entering China. This study also supports the view that<br />

host government investment polices interact with some transaction cost variables to influence ownership mode<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> MNEs entering to China. (For more information, please contact: Yi Wang, University <strong>of</strong> Vaasa, Finland:<br />

wyi@uwasa.fi)<br />

Service Characteristics as Moderators <strong>of</strong> the Entry Mode Choice: Empirical Evidence in the Hotel Industry<br />

Jose Pla-Barber, University <strong>of</strong> Valencia<br />

Cristina Villar, University <strong>of</strong> Valencia<br />

Fidel León-Darder, University <strong>of</strong> Valencia<br />

Although a considerable amount <strong>of</strong> research has explored the entry mode choice, results regarding the direct<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> some variables on the entry mode choice evince a lack <strong>of</strong> a clear consistency. By introducing the<br />

moderator effect <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the services being provided by the firm, we explain some <strong>of</strong> these inconclusive<br />

results. We use a comprehensive database on the Spanish hotel industry which covers practically all the<br />

operations carried out by the majority <strong>of</strong> Spanish hotel chains up to 2011. We found that both intangibility and<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> the services <strong>of</strong>fered by the hotel moderate the relationship between environmental uncertainties<br />

and entry mode choice by increasing the propensity to use greater commitment entry modes when faced with<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 137


MONDAY<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> country risk and cultural uncertainty. (For more information, please contact: Jose Pla-Barber,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Spain: jose.pla@uv.es)<br />

The Entry Mode Choice in Family-Owned Firms<br />

Yi-Chieh Chang, St. John's University<br />

Chih-Hao Tsai , National Sun Yat-Sen University<br />

Chih-Fang Chiu, National Taiwan University<br />

Our study is designed to shed further light on the foreign direct investment (FDI) decision by the family<br />

business, and address the question: Under what situation family-owned firms make the entry mode with high<br />

risk commitment. To explore this scenario, we import from knowledge-based view (KBV) to explain how the<br />

family business with local knowledge affect the FDI decision. (For more information, please contact: Chih-Fang<br />

Chiu, National Taiwan University, Taiwan: juju0802@gmail.com)<br />

Session: 2.2.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

Ownership Change<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Liu Wang, Providence College<br />

Corporate Cash Holdings and Global Financial Crisis: An Empirical Study <strong>of</strong> Chinese Companies<br />

Mohamad Sepehri, Jacksonville University<br />

Yujun Lian, Sun Yat-Sen University<br />

Maggie Foley, Jacksonville University<br />

This study investigates the determinants <strong>of</strong> cash holdings in the period 1999-2009 in China. The sample period<br />

covers the time <strong>of</strong> financial crisis. The focus in this study is on how firm characteristics, especially financial<br />

constraints and investment options, are associated with cash holdings. The findings show that: • Compared<br />

to "normal" times, Chinese firms tend to increase their cash holdings during the financial crisis. • In general,<br />

the firms with more financial constrains, and with more investment opportunities, tend to hold more cash. •<br />

Further, the firms with lower leverage, less net working capital (NWC), and lower capital expenditures, are more<br />

likely to increase their cash holdings as well. Likewise, those firms tend to save more cash from cash flow. •<br />

The evidence suggests that Chinese firms are precautious with their cash holdings. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Mohamad Sepehri, Jacksonville University, USA: msepehr@ju.edu)<br />

Gold for the Golden Years: Cross-Border Acquisitions and Inside Debt<br />

Krista Burrill Lewellyn, Old Dominion University<br />

In the wake <strong>of</strong> new SEC disclosure rules, the business media and academics have begun to highlight the<br />

substantial levels <strong>of</strong> "inside debt" e.g., defined pension benefits, many U.S. chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficers (CEOs) have<br />

garnered. This study draws from the accumulated body <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> executive compensation from multiple<br />

disciplines, to assess MNC firm level outcomes <strong>of</strong> this under-analyzed variable. Results indicate cross-border<br />

acquisition activity is positively related to CEO levels <strong>of</strong> inside debt, suggesting CEOs may use this corporate<br />

strategy as a means for diversifying their personal risk and increasing the firm's liquidation value, putting them<br />

in alignment with firm bondholders as opposed to equity holders. (For more information, please contact: Krista<br />

Burrill Lewellyn, Old Dominion University, USA: klewelly@odu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 138


MONDAY<br />

Ownership and Premium in Foreign Acquisitions: Impact <strong>of</strong> Geographic Distance and Payment Method<br />

Ajai Gaur, Rutgers University<br />

Shavin Malhotra, Ryerson University<br />

This paper examines the effect <strong>of</strong> geographic distance and payment method on equity participation and<br />

premium payment decisions in cross border acquisitions. Drawing on insights from information economics, we<br />

propose that firms seek flexible ownership arrangements by way <strong>of</strong> lower equity position, and make a premium<br />

payment when faced with a high level <strong>of</strong> information asymmetry. Further, stock-based payment method<br />

creates a bonding arrangement, minimizing the problems <strong>of</strong> adverse selection and moral hazard in high<br />

asymmetric information environments. There is, however, a significant cost <strong>of</strong> such bonding arrangements.<br />

The premium that firms pay in high asymmetric environment is significantly higher if firms use stock payments<br />

as compared to cash. (For more information, please contact: Ajai Gaur, Rutgers University, USA:<br />

ajai@business.rutgers.edu)<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> National Distances and Subsidiary Experience <strong>of</strong> Target Firm in Cross-border M&A<br />

Hyejin Cho, Korea University<br />

This paper investigates the effect <strong>of</strong> national distances (cultural, institutional, and economic) and subsidiary<br />

experience <strong>of</strong> target firm on shareholder value <strong>of</strong> acquiring firm. An analysis <strong>of</strong> 2374 cross-border M&A<br />

announcement transactions during 1995-2010 shows that acquiring firms experience abnormal stock returns<br />

when there are economic and institutional distances between target firms and acquiring firms and when target<br />

firm has a subsidiary experience. Moreover, the moderating role <strong>of</strong> subsidiary experience <strong>of</strong> target firm on the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> national distance and previous M&A experience <strong>of</strong> acquiring firms on shareholder value are discussed.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Hyejin Cho, Korea University, Korea, South: hyejinstory@korea.ac.kr)<br />

Privatization and Natural Advantage<br />

Jean-Claude Cosset, HEC Montreal<br />

Artyom Durnev, University <strong>of</strong> Iowa<br />

Igor Oliveira dos Santos, HEC Montreal<br />

This paper examines the role <strong>of</strong> natural advantage (e.g., substantial oil reserves or mineral deposits) in the<br />

shaping <strong>of</strong> privatization policies. First, we analyze the role <strong>of</strong> agglomeration economies stemming from a natural<br />

advantage in the government's reluctance in divesting from their natural advantage based state-owned firms.<br />

Then, we examine from the firm size perspective the ultimate State ownership pattern in the natural advantage<br />

based industries. In addition, we study the relation between the vulnerability to resource curse and the ultimate<br />

State ownership. Finally, we pay attention to the accessibility to sea and its implications in privatization policies.<br />

We find evidence that governments tend to retain higher ownership in natural advantage based when strong<br />

agglomeration occurs in the corresponding industries, irrespective <strong>of</strong> political orientation. Also, we confirm the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> the too-big-to-relinquish firms in the natural advantage based industries, particularly located in<br />

emerging economies. Finally, we conclude that accessibility to sea plays an important role in privatization<br />

policies, regardless <strong>of</strong> resource abundance, country size, or geographical blessing (For more information, please<br />

contact: Jean-Claude Cosset, HEC Montreal, Canada: jean-claude.cosset@hec.ca)<br />

Session: 2.2.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Organizational and Cultural Influences on Innovation<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Kalanit Efrat, Ruppin Academic Center<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 139


MONDAY<br />

Cultural Aspects <strong>of</strong> Innovation<br />

Kalanit Efrat, Ruppin Academic Center<br />

Innovation's centrality and importance in international operations undergo changes in scale and scope in the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> globalization. One such change concerns the effect <strong>of</strong> national culture on the ability to be innovative.<br />

Based on H<strong>of</strong>stede's (1980) cultural dimensions, possible changes that occur in their impact on nations'<br />

innovativeness are examined here, following Shane's (1992, 1993) research. While controlling for nations'<br />

investments in innovation, cultural dimensions are found still to impact all types <strong>of</strong> innovation examined, with<br />

even greater force. (For more information, please contact: Kalanit Efrat, Ruppin Academic Center, Israel:<br />

kalanite@ruppin.ac.il)<br />

Emigrants' Willingness to Share Knowledge with Compatriots Still Living in their Country <strong>of</strong> Origin<br />

Helena Barnard, GIBS, University <strong>of</strong> Pretoria<br />

Catherine Pendock, GIBS, University <strong>of</strong> Pretoria<br />

Migrants are increasingly recognized as "bridges" between their original and adopted countries, sources <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge and innovation for their country <strong>of</strong> origin. However, previous work focused on individuals with an<br />

ongoing commitment to their country <strong>of</strong> origin, rather than emigrants who choose to seek a new future in an<br />

adopted country. But migrants <strong>of</strong>ten experience strong and even contradictory emotions about their decision to<br />

emigrate, and knowledge sharing is known to be affected by attitudes, and it cannot be assumed that<br />

knowledge will be shared. This study on South African emigrants connects the literatures on emigration, country<br />

<strong>of</strong> origin attitudes and knowledge sharing, and finds that emigrants' willingness to share knowledge is affected<br />

by their attitudes towards their country <strong>of</strong> origin: The willingness to share knowledge increases when emigrants<br />

have a positive attitude to their country <strong>of</strong> origin, but decreases when they experience it negatively. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Helena Barnard, GIBS, University <strong>of</strong> Pretoria, South Africa: barnardh@gibs.co.za)<br />

Optimizing Cross-cultural Team Knowledge in Conceiving and Introducing Global Products<br />

Karina R. Jensen, ESCP Europe<br />

Globalization, time to market, and customer responsiveness present new challenges for achieving product<br />

innovation across cultures. Organizations need to leverage cross-cultural collaboration in order to facilitate idea<br />

generation and knowledge-sharing that produce successful market solutions. How can organizations facilitate<br />

collaboration for conceiving and delivering new products An exploratory study is used to examine this question<br />

through interviews with 45 executives and senior team managers responsible for global product introductions<br />

and cross-cultural teams in 35 multinational organizations based in Europe, Asia, and the US. By examining<br />

organizational processes and tools that influence knowledge-sharing between the project leader and the globally<br />

distributed team, this study contributes to the understanding <strong>of</strong> cross-cultural collaboration and knowledgesharing<br />

challenges for new product introductions while highlighting research needs for a topic that has<br />

significant impact on the MNEs international market performance. (For more information, please contact: Karina<br />

R. Jensen, ESCP Europe, France: karina.jensen@escpeurope.eu)<br />

Global Dissemination <strong>of</strong> the Toyota Way in Sales & Marketing<br />

Osamu Tsukada, Kagawa University<br />

Besides building a global organization capable <strong>of</strong> identifying new consumer trends in one country, it must link<br />

those trends through new technologies to other countries, innovate knowledge, and diffusing the knowledge<br />

rapidly around the world. How can a corporation facilitate the knowledge exchange required for this globally<br />

Toyota has been striving to disseminate its corporate philosophy and values, the so-called Toyota Way 2001<br />

and Toyota Way in Sales & Marketing (hereafter called TW/TWSM), among 170 distributors around the world.<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 140


MONDAY<br />

To disseminate these abstract concepts it applies a unique problem-solving approach called Kaizen. This<br />

approach has brought Toyota success in disseminating the TPS (Toyota Production System), a philosophy and<br />

set <strong>of</strong> values in Production. Toyota developed a new problem-solving method called the Toyota Business<br />

Practice (TBP) as a mechanism to disseminate the Toyota Way in its white collar universe. Can this problemsolving<br />

mechanism be effective in Sales & Marketing, an arena quite distinct from Production Do Toyota's 170<br />

distributors understand and practice the TW/TWSM across borders The results from the interviews and ninecountry<br />

survey conducted as components <strong>of</strong> the joint research project by Toyota and Hitotsubashi University<br />

provided interesting insights into these questions. (For more information, please contact: Osamu Tsukada,<br />

Kagawa University, Japan: otsukada0929@gmail.com)<br />

'Non-Verbatim' Transfer <strong>of</strong> Routines Across Borders: The Interplay <strong>of</strong> Institutional Context and Routine<br />

Complexity<br />

Majid Eghbali-Zarch, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

There is a dearth <strong>of</strong> research on the transfer <strong>of</strong> routines within multinational enterprises (MNEs). This study<br />

addresses this gap and investigates how routines get transferred across border within MNEs. Building on the<br />

literature on deinstitutionalization and diffusion <strong>of</strong> organizational practices, this study identifies technical,<br />

cultural, and political elements that impact the transfer <strong>of</strong> routines across borders. It also highlights the role <strong>of</strong><br />

routine per se, and its characteristics and interactions with the contextual elements. Attributes <strong>of</strong> routines are<br />

analysed to help future empirical measurements <strong>of</strong> routine and its complexity. Further, to clarify the levels <strong>of</strong><br />

analysis in this study, three types <strong>of</strong> routines in MNEs are introduces, namely micro-routines, meso-routies, and<br />

macro-routines for each <strong>of</strong> the individual, subsidiary, and MNE levels respectively. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Majid Eghbali-Zarch, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada: meghbali-zarch.phd@ivey.ca)<br />

Deep Sea versus Inshore Fishing - The Impact <strong>of</strong> Market Information <strong>International</strong>ization on New Product<br />

Development Performance<br />

Anna Dubiel, WHU<br />

Christoph Grimpe, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Our study examines market information processing in three different stages <strong>of</strong> the new product development<br />

(NPD) process (concept generation, development, and commercialization) and its impact on overall NPD<br />

performance. In particular, it zooms into the geographic location <strong>of</strong> the market information by distinguishing<br />

between domestic and international sources. It demonstrates that using domestic market information is<br />

important over the whole NPD process while international market information is beneficial only in the idea<br />

generation stage. Thus looking at faraway markets though a possible source <strong>of</strong> unique, ahead <strong>of</strong> the trend<br />

information may not always enhance NPD. As this information is <strong>of</strong>ten costly and difficult to decipher firms<br />

might be better <strong>of</strong>f by fishing for market information in familiar nearby ponds. We test our hypotheses using a<br />

panel sample <strong>of</strong> more than 1,500 German companies from both manufacturing and services. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Anna Dubiel, WHU, Germany: anna.dubiel@whu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.2.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

The Diffusion <strong>of</strong> Practices in Multinational Enterprises<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Paul W. Beamish, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 141


MONDAY<br />

Advantages <strong>of</strong> Foreignness: Benefits <strong>of</strong> Creative Institutional Deviance<br />

Wei Shi, Rice University<br />

Robert Hoskisson, Rice University<br />

The liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness has long been acknowledged as a key concept in international business research.<br />

Departing from the cost side <strong>of</strong> foreignness, this paper explores intangible benefits <strong>of</strong> foreignness exclusive to<br />

multinational enterprises in a host country in addition to tangible benefits such as preferential tax policies.<br />

Intangible benefits <strong>of</strong> foreignness are defined as advantages <strong>of</strong> foreignness so as to distinguish from assets <strong>of</strong><br />

foreignness—tangible benefits <strong>of</strong> foreignness. Drawing on institutional theory and social comparison theory, we<br />

propose that advantages <strong>of</strong> foreignness can lead to important firm specific performance-related outcomes,<br />

which have been generally underestimated in the international business literature. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Wei Shi, Rice University, USA: ws9@rice.edu)<br />

Dependence Change and the Divesture <strong>of</strong> Formerly Acquired Foreign Subsidiaries<br />

Jun Xia, West Virginia University<br />

Xufei Ma, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Why do firms divest their formerly acquired foreign subsidiaries Building around the core concept <strong>of</strong><br />

dependence change, we argue that increased environmental dependence and subsidiary power reduce the<br />

hazard rates <strong>of</strong> divestitures simultaneously. A sample <strong>of</strong> firms engaging in cross-border divestitures after<br />

acquisitions is collected to test the argument in a multiple country setting. The results show that the hazard<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> divestitures are lower if the mutual trade dependence between a firm's home and host countries<br />

increases. Moreover, subsidiary power, as measured by three dimensions -- subsidiary acquisition expansion,<br />

subsidiary network building, and reduced intrafirm competition -- also reduces the hazard rates. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Xufei Ma, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC:<br />

xufei@cuhk.edu.hk)<br />

HRM Issues and Practices <strong>of</strong> Emerging Market Multinationals: The Case <strong>of</strong> Brazilian Multinationals<br />

Kamel Mellahi, University <strong>of</strong> Warwick<br />

David Collings, National University <strong>of</strong> Ireland, Galway<br />

George Frynas, Middlesex University<br />

As emerging market multinational enterprises (EM-MNES) increase their activities across borders, a key research<br />

question is whether they are deploying host country or home country practices in their overseas subsidiaries.<br />

This study aims to contribute to this ongoing conversation. Specifically, we examine the extent to, and<br />

mechanisms by, which three major Brazilian MNEs adapt their HRM practices to local contexts. Four major<br />

findings emerge. First, Brazilian MNEs exhibit a high degree <strong>of</strong> standardization <strong>of</strong> home country HR practices<br />

and exhibit a considerable desire for global integration. Second, there are surprisingly few local, especially<br />

cultural, adaptations to HR practices and corporate level practices appear to meet little or no resistance in<br />

subsidiaries. Third, HR practices in Brazilian MNEs have evolved over time - in the early stage <strong>of</strong><br />

internationalisation, there was a considerably higher degree <strong>of</strong> local adaptation in all three cases. Fourth,<br />

contemporary HR practices themselves originate from Western countries and Brazilian MNEs tend to "re-export"<br />

Western practices rather than diffuse conventional local ones. These findings underscore the need for<br />

broadening the conventional narrow view <strong>of</strong> home and host country practices and call for further research on<br />

the supply-side <strong>of</strong> HRM practices in EM-MNEs. (For more information, please contact: Kamel Mellahi, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Warwick, United Kingdom: kamel.mellahi@wbs.ac.uk)<br />

Knowledge Inflows and Subsidiary's Global Initiative in MNCs: The Perspective <strong>of</strong> Human Capital Theory<br />

Wan-Ching Chen, Sun Yat-Sen University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 142


MONDAY<br />

This research investigates the determinants <strong>of</strong> subsidiary's global initiative by integrating human capital,<br />

knowledge management, and network theory. In the perspective <strong>of</strong> network theory, the knowledge-based<br />

resources within MNCs network are the basis <strong>of</strong> subsidiary initiative. Taken from knowledge management<br />

perspective, subsidiary's learning mechanism determine subsidiary's initiative. In the perspective <strong>of</strong> human<br />

capital theory, the practices <strong>of</strong> human capital investment can foster subsidiary's learning mechanism and than<br />

lead to subsidiary's global initiative. This research expects to do investigate research by using questionnaires<br />

during the period <strong>of</strong> research abroad in Asian area and hope to find out how subsidiary can use the plentiful<br />

knowledge-based resources within MNCs network and lead to subsidiary's global initiative. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Wan-Ching Chen, Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan: paospaos@gmail.com)<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Non-Proximity on Staffing in Foreign Investments<br />

Kevin K. Boeh, Pacific Lutheran University<br />

Paul W. Beamish, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

While evolving technologies are surely enabling better management across geographic distances, physical<br />

separation remains important in the choice <strong>of</strong> leadership and staffing <strong>of</strong> expatriates in foreign investments. The<br />

distance between parent firms and their foreign subsidiaries is measured by dyad travel time, the time required<br />

to transit the distance. Controlling for the effects <strong>of</strong> separation on governance choice, distal subsidiaries are<br />

staffed with fewer expatriates and more <strong>of</strong>ten have host country leadership. The results show that firm resource<br />

allocation decisions are affected by the (non-) proximity <strong>of</strong> investments, and an employee preference for<br />

proximate assignments. (For more information, please contact: Kevin K. Boeh, Pacific Lutheran University, USA:<br />

boehkk@plu.edu)<br />

The Influences <strong>of</strong> High Performance Human Resource Practices on Knowledge Capacity and Innovation<br />

Performance - An Example <strong>of</strong> Taiwanese MNCs<br />

Huei-Fang Chen, Soochow University<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> research limitations concerning the high performance human resource practice, I examined processes<br />

linking high performance human resource practices and innovation performance. This study conducted a survey<br />

<strong>of</strong> Taiwanese MNC subsidiaries in foreign environments. A LISREL model was used to test the research<br />

hypotheses. The major results <strong>of</strong> this research reveal that high performance human resource practices have a<br />

positive and significant influence on a foreign unit's knowledge capacity, knowledge management process, and<br />

innovation performance. Moreover, it confirms the mediating role <strong>of</strong> knowledge capacity between high<br />

performance human resource practices and innovation performance. Research implications are discussed and<br />

future study suggestions are recommended lastly. (For more information, please contact: Huei-Fang Chen,<br />

Soochow University, Taiwan: hfchen@scu.edu.tw)<br />

Session: 2.3.P - Special Session<br />

<strong>International</strong> Business-Government Relations: Quo Vadis (<strong>AIB</strong> Fellows Session in Honor<br />

<strong>of</strong> Jean Boddewyn)<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Robert Grosse, George Mason University<br />

Guest Speaker:<br />

Jean Boddewyn, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 143


MONDAY<br />

Discussants:<br />

Stephen Kobrin, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Ravi Ramamurti, Northeastern University<br />

Theodore Moran, Georgetown University<br />

(For more information, please contact: Robert Grosse, George Mason University, USA: rgrosse@gmu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.3.1 - Panel<br />

Track: 14 - Methods in IB Research<br />

Multinational Firm and Establishment Level Data: What's Hot in <strong>2012</strong><br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Heather K Berry, George Washington University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Heather K Berry, George Washington University<br />

Ray Mataloni, BEA<br />

Brad Jensen, Georgetown University<br />

Stefano Menghinello, ISTAT<br />

Jeremy Clegg, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

(For more information, please contact: Heather K Berry, George Washington University, USA: berryh@gwu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.3.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 12 - Value Creation and Work<br />

Diaspora Networks, Institutional Entrepreneurship and Innovation<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Florian Täube, EBS Business School<br />

Co-Chair: Liesl Riddle, George Washington University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Paul Vaaler, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Liesl Riddle, George Washington University<br />

Kate Gillespie, University <strong>of</strong> Texas, Austin<br />

Preeta Banerjee, Brandeis University<br />

Prithwiraj Choudhury, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Romi Bhatia, USAID<br />

Florian Täube, EBS Business School<br />

In November 2011, The Economist Magazine devoted a cover story to ‘The magic <strong>of</strong> diasporas' indicating the<br />

rising awareness <strong>of</strong> politicians about the relevance <strong>of</strong> diasporas to the world economy, both in emerging<br />

markets and industrialized economies. Diasporas are emigrants who "demonstrate a strong link with their<br />

migration history and a sense <strong>of</strong> co-ethnicity with others <strong>of</strong> a similar background" (Cohen 1997, p. IX). In the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> international business and especially in the case <strong>of</strong> emerging economies, an active diaspora can be<br />

an invaluable asset to a nation, acting as a source <strong>of</strong> developmental capital. In fact, as <strong>of</strong> 2011, remittances<br />

from migrants to developing countries totaled $351 billion dwarfing other forms <strong>of</strong> cross-border capital flow<br />

such as international lending, portfolio investment, and government to government aid (World Bank, 2011).<br />

Yet, an engaged diaspora is much more than a "cash-pot" for nations to tap for resources. The human and<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 144


MONDAY<br />

social capital that diaspora investors and entrepreneurs possess and their relative familiarity with home nation<br />

markets can help them overcome traditional liabilities <strong>of</strong> foreignness such as language, culture, and lack <strong>of</strong><br />

access to local networks. The typically informal nature <strong>of</strong> such "people and ethnic networks" is likely to be<br />

especially relevant and valuable when doing business in countries where the role <strong>of</strong> formal institutions (i.e. the<br />

rule-<strong>of</strong>-law) is weak or non-existent. This panel will focus on the ability <strong>of</strong> the diaspora to innovate in their<br />

home nations by engaging in acts <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship and institutional change. With their ability to "navigate<br />

both worlds" and harness their experiences from abroad, a nation's diaspora can be an important conduit for<br />

the flow <strong>of</strong> new ideas, the transmission <strong>of</strong> institutions, and the adoption <strong>of</strong> innovative entrepreneurial practices.<br />

The panel will bring together leading scholars and practitioners with a deep expertise in international business<br />

and public policy. The audience will gain an in-depth understanding <strong>of</strong> the literature on diaspora<br />

entrepreneurship, network with others with similar research interests, and identify new ideas for continued<br />

contributions in this areas <strong>of</strong> international business, entrepreneurship, technology and innovation management,<br />

and strategy. (For more information, please contact: Florian Täube, EBS Business School, Germany:<br />

florian.taeube@ebs.edu)<br />

Session: 2.3.3 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Opening Global Markets to U.S. Health Care Exports: A Cooperative Approach<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Jonathan P. Doh, Villanova University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Edward Gresser, Senior Advisor, Alliance for Healthcare Competitiveness<br />

Trevor Gunn, Senior Director, <strong>International</strong> Relations, Medtronic<br />

Jim Sherry, Director, Center for Global Health, George Washington University<br />

The Alliance for Healthcare Competitiveness (AHC) proposes to organize a panel session at the upcoming <strong>AIB</strong><br />

<strong>Conference</strong>, entitled "Opening Global Markets to U.S. Health Care Exports: A Cooperative Approach"<br />

Participants will discuss the American health ecosystem and its potential to spark long-term growth, high-wage<br />

employment and global health outcomes through rising exports. The panel, seeking to bridge the divide<br />

between practitioners and academics, will be composed <strong>of</strong>: Jonathan Doh, Herbert G. Ramrod Endowed Chair<br />

in <strong>International</strong> Business, founding Director <strong>of</strong> the Center for Global Leadership, and Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

and Operations, Villanova University (Moderator) Ed Gresser, Senior Advisor, Alliance for Healthcare<br />

Competitiveness Trevor Gunn, Senior Director, <strong>International</strong> Relations, Medtronic Jim Sherry, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong><br />

Global Health and <strong>International</strong> Affairs; Director, Center for Global Health, George Washington University The<br />

AHC is a coalition <strong>of</strong> leading businesses, industry associations, academics and other influential thought leaders<br />

who are working to support and promote the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the U.S. healthcare industry in international<br />

markets. (For more information, please contact: Jonathan P. Doh, Villanova University, USA:<br />

jonathan.doh@villanova.edu)<br />

Session: 2.3.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 2 - Marketing and Supply Chain<br />

Cultural Considerations in <strong>International</strong> Marketing<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Peter Magnusson, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 145


MONDAY<br />

The Relationship between Individual Cultural Values (ICV) and Nation Brand Personality (NBP) Traits<br />

José I. Rojas-Méndez, Carleton University<br />

Mohammed Alwan, Carleton University<br />

Nicolas Papadopoulos, Carleton University<br />

This is the first study exploring the relationship between Individual Cultural Values (ICV) and nation brand<br />

personality (NBP) traits. A survey was conducted among Saudi Arabia citizens, living in Saudi Arabia, regarding<br />

their perceptions <strong>of</strong> the personality projected by the U.S. brand. Results show a critical view by the Saudis<br />

because some negative brand personality traits (i.e. materialistic, egocentric, and authoritarian) rank at the top<br />

<strong>of</strong> their evaluations. Collectivism emerges as the most related ICV with NBP traits. This study confirms some<br />

relationships accepted in the personality psychology field between the Big-five and cultural dimensions, and at<br />

the same time proposes new such as masculinity with extraversion and conscientiousness, and collectivism with<br />

agreeableness and conscientiousness (all negative). Implications, limitations, and further research ideas are<br />

also presented. (For more information, please contact: José I. Rojas-Méndez, Carleton University, Canada:<br />

jose_rojas@carleton.ca)<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> National Culture on Organizational Culture: A Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Implementation <strong>of</strong> Market<br />

Orientation across Nations<br />

Ahmet H. Kirca, Michigan State University<br />

This study tests the effects <strong>of</strong> national cultural values on organizational cultures with a comparative metaanalysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the studies that investigate the implementation <strong>of</strong> market orientation across nations. The findings<br />

indicate that the <strong>of</strong>ten-cited effects <strong>of</strong> senior management factors (e.g., top management emphasis),<br />

interdepartmental dynamics (e.g., interdepartmental conflict), and organizational systems (e.g., centralization,<br />

formalization, reward systems) on market orientation are context dependent and the implementation <strong>of</strong> market<br />

orientation across nations is a function <strong>of</strong> the national cultural environment in which firms operate. As such, the<br />

present study provides useful insights for researchers and managers regarding the challenges that companies<br />

face when implementing market orientation in diverse country markets. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Ahmet H. Kirca, Michigan State University, USA: kirca@msu.edu)<br />

The Biasing Effects <strong>of</strong> Country-<strong>of</strong>-Origin: A cross-cultural Application <strong>of</strong> Preference Reversals<br />

Stephen Gould, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

Mike Chen-ho Chao, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

Andreas Grein, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

Rania Semaan, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

Country-<strong>of</strong>-origin (COO) effects on product evaluations have been widely applied in international marketing,<br />

albeit with mixed results and suggesting that how COO is framed is a factor in its relative impact. We apply one<br />

such framing perspective based on preference reversals and their biasing effects to a study <strong>of</strong> COO and<br />

willingness to pay (WTP) for a cellphone in the U.S., China and Taiwan. Similar results are mirrored across all<br />

three countries except for the separate condition in Taiwan where the U.S. COO image is relatively respected.<br />

When evaluated separately, consumers are willing to pay more for a domestic-made cellphone than a foreignmade<br />

one even though the former is not as good as the latter on an important attribute, amount <strong>of</strong> internal<br />

memory. However, when the domestic and foreign-made phones are presented in joint evaluations, the better<br />

foreign-made product is favored. Possible explanations and implications are <strong>of</strong>fered. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Mike Chen-ho Chao, Baruch College, CUNY, USA: chen-ho.chao@baruch.cuny.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 146


MONDAY<br />

Bundling Cultural Intelligence and Marketing Adaptations to Improve Export Performance<br />

Stanford Westjohn, University <strong>of</strong> Toledo<br />

Peter Magnusson, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Srdan Zdravkovic, Bryant University<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> expanding exports has been stressed by world leaders as a means to improve their<br />

economies, and is important for all firms wishing to expand their markets. In this study, we build a theoretical<br />

case and <strong>of</strong>fer evidence from a pilot study that cultural intelligence plays a role in crafting international<br />

marketing strategy and ultimately export performance. A key component <strong>of</strong> international marketing strategy is<br />

the degree that the marketing mix is standardized or adapted for international markets. While a standardized<br />

strategy implies the benefits <strong>of</strong> economies <strong>of</strong> scale, an adaptation strategy is designed to better appeal to the<br />

tastes and preferences <strong>of</strong> the culture. We propose that "culturally intelligent" export managers are better<br />

prepared to assess culturally diverse marketplaces and suggest more appropriate adaptations resulting in<br />

improved export performance. (For more information, please contact: Stanford Westjohn, University <strong>of</strong> Toledo,<br />

USA: stanford.westjohn@utoledo.edu)<br />

Session: 2.3.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Corporate Governance and <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Andrew Delios, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

Board Structure: An Empirical Study <strong>of</strong> Firms in Anglo-American Governance Environments<br />

Maureen I. Muller-Kahle, Penn State<br />

With boards <strong>of</strong> directors playing both monitoring and guidance roles, we examine the impact <strong>of</strong> board structure<br />

in large US and UK firms on firm performance using the lenses <strong>of</strong> agency and resource dependence theories.<br />

We find that distinct differences in the impact <strong>of</strong> board independence, board size and outside director busyness<br />

on firm value in UK firms. Specifically, we find that board independence has a significant positive impact on<br />

firm value in the UK, but no impact in the US. We also find larger boards are positively associated with firm<br />

value in the UK. However, in the UK, board busyness has a positive impact on firm value. Thus, we find<br />

support for resource dependence theory in UK firms. (For more information, please contact: Maureen I. Muller-<br />

Kahle, Penn State, USA: mim10@psu.edu)<br />

Corporate Governance in Context: Regulatory, Cognitive, and Normative Institutions <strong>of</strong> Investor Protection<br />

Anthony Paul Cannizzaro, George Washington University<br />

This paper introduces a framework <strong>of</strong> regulatory, cognitive and normative institutions specific to the domain <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance. Viewing the arche <strong>of</strong> good corporate governance as strong minority investor protection, I<br />

seek to understand how each <strong>of</strong> these pillars within a society might influence agency conflicts within the firm.<br />

Prior work approaching corporate governance from an agency theoretic perspective tends to operationalize<br />

institutions too simplistically, imposing the assumption that de jour (regulatory) and de facto (cognitive)<br />

institutions impact firm-level governance equally. Furthermore, work on corporate governance in the<br />

institutional theory literature has neglected the impact <strong>of</strong> institutional context on the principal-agent and<br />

principal-principal problems that shape corporate governance at the firm level. To address these gaps, I rejoin<br />

the divergent institutional and agency theoretic perspectives. Using data from 21 developed countries, this<br />

analysis shows that regulatory, cognitive and normative institutions uniquely impact a firm's corporate<br />

governance through both direct effects and by moderating the impact <strong>of</strong> firm-level characteristics on<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 147


MONDAY<br />

governance practices. (For more information, please contact: Anthony Paul Cannizzaro, George Washington<br />

University, USA: tony_c@gwmail.gwu.edu)<br />

A Contingency Perspective on the Effect <strong>of</strong> Board Capital on Organizational Learning: Cross-National Evidence<br />

from the UK & German Pharmaceutical Industry<br />

Mariano L.M. Heyden, Erasmus University<br />

Jana Oehmichen, Georg-August University Göttingen<br />

In this study we view directors as active participants in strategy making and examine the effect <strong>of</strong> board capital<br />

diversity on organizational learning orientation (exploration versus exploitation). We argue that the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

board capital on organizational learning orientation is contingent on how different governance models facilitate<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> director's knowledge resources in strategy-making. We propose a contingency model by<br />

highlighting the influence <strong>of</strong> different cross-national board structures on the relation between board capital and<br />

organizational learning. Drawing on the distinction between the Anglo-Saxon (one-tier) and Rhineland (two-tier)<br />

model in the UK and Germany respectively, we test hypotheses on a panel <strong>of</strong> firms in the pharmaceutical<br />

industry from 2005-2009. Our pattern <strong>of</strong> findings suggests that though board capital diversity matters more<br />

generally for firm-level organizational learning orientation, the crux for harnessing the value <strong>of</strong> board capital for<br />

different learning orientations may rest in how country-specific board structures enable or constrains the actual<br />

realization <strong>of</strong> value out <strong>of</strong> board capital. We discuss implications for theory and practice. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Mariano L.M. Heyden, Erasmus University, Netherlands: mheyden@rsm.nl)<br />

Remuneration Systems <strong>of</strong> the Management Board and Corporate Governance Reporting - Evidence from Austria<br />

Karina Sopp, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna<br />

Josef Baumueller, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna<br />

In this paper the interaction between financial reporting, especially based on national codes <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

governance, and management control systems is analyzed, with focus on the devel-opment <strong>of</strong> both disclosure<br />

and design <strong>of</strong> the compensation <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the management board. National corporate governance<br />

codes provide principles <strong>of</strong> remuneration systems <strong>of</strong> the management board. Variable remuneration<br />

components are <strong>of</strong> considerable importance for such designs <strong>of</strong> compensation systems. Regularly the calculation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the variable components is linked to corporate management target systems, and thus is based upon internal<br />

management control systems. Also, the reporting requirements are functional for the aims <strong>of</strong> management<br />

control systems. This interaction is analyzed based on the annual reports (for the financial years 2006-2010) <strong>of</strong><br />

the companies listed in the ATX on the Vienna Stock Exchange. We obtain the following results: disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />

management remuneration has considerably increased in scope, although most <strong>of</strong> the underlying rules are<br />

based on self-regulation. Also the quality <strong>of</strong> the applied designs <strong>of</strong> compensation systems has improved. Deficits<br />

are found regarding the chosen assessment bases for variable components. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Karina Sopp, University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria: karina.sopp@univie.ac.at)<br />

Session: 2.3.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Connections and Relationships in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Jaeyong Song, Seoul National University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 148


MONDAY<br />

The Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Business Entertainment in Facilitating Transactional Relationships: The Case <strong>of</strong> Chinese<br />

Sales Managers<br />

Francis Yonglin Sun, Woodbury School <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Shih-Fen S. Chen, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

We develop and test a theory that can predict the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> business entertainment in facilitating<br />

transactional relationships. Our analysis is based on a broader theoretical framework where exchange<br />

relationships are regulated through a transaction governance structure (TGS) featuring a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

market, social, and legal sanctions. Business entertainment serves to reinforce the power <strong>of</strong> social sanctions in<br />

regulating the behavior <strong>of</strong> economic agents, especially in cases where market and legal infrastructures are less<br />

developed. Survey data collected from a sample <strong>of</strong> Chinese sales managers indicate that the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

business entertainment in facilitating transactional relationships is associated with the intensity and format <strong>of</strong><br />

the focal entertainment practice. These findings support our transaction governance approach to business<br />

entertainment. (For more information, please contact: Francis Yonglin Sun, Woodbury School <strong>of</strong> Business, USA:<br />

francis.sun@aya.yale.edu)<br />

Social Capital and its Necessary Evolution for <strong>International</strong>ization<br />

Angelika Lindstrand, Stockholm School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Sara Hånell Melén, Stockholm School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

In this study we examine the continuous effects <strong>of</strong> social capital on SMEs' exploitation <strong>of</strong> international business<br />

opportunities during their international expansion. To do so, we test the effects <strong>of</strong> two forms <strong>of</strong> social capital,<br />

conceptualized as the preceding and the current social capital <strong>of</strong> the internationalizing SME. Based on<br />

internationalization process theory and social capital theory we argue for an evolutionary development <strong>of</strong> social<br />

capital during a firm's internationalization process. Three hypotheses are tested using structural equation<br />

modeling and linear regression on a data set covering 308 Swedish internationalizing SMEs. The results show no<br />

support for a direct positive effect <strong>of</strong> internationalizing SMEs' preceding social capital on their international<br />

opportunity exploitation. However, when the preceding social capital is mediated by the use <strong>of</strong> the firm's current<br />

social capital, the model demonstrates a positive effect. The overall results contribute to internationalization<br />

process theory by highlighting the necessity <strong>of</strong> internationalizing SMEs to be able to develop and extend their<br />

social capital during the international expansion. (For more information, please contact: Angelika Lindstrand,<br />

Stockholm School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Sweden: angelika.lindstrand@hhs.se)<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Formal and Informal HQ-Subsidiary Relationships for Knowledge Transfer in Multinationals<br />

B. Sebastian Reiche, IESE Business School<br />

Anne-Wil Harzing, University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne<br />

Markus Pudelko, Tübingen University<br />

This study draws on foreign entry mode, organization and social capital theories to investigate the role <strong>of</strong> formal<br />

and informal HQ-subsidiary relationships for knowledge transfer from the corporate headquarters to foreign<br />

subsidiaries. Building on a large-scale empirical study <strong>of</strong> 817 subsidiaries located in nine different<br />

countries/regions, we find support for our hypotheses that both formal and informal social structure are<br />

conducive to knowledge transfer from headquarters. We also identify two specific conditions – subsidiary type<br />

and language proximity – that moderate these relationships. Implications for research on MNC knowledge flows,<br />

social capital and international business are discussed. (For more information, please contact: B. Sebastian<br />

Reiche, IESE Business School, Spain: sreiche@iese.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 149


MONDAY<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Power-Dependence on Innovation Generation in <strong>International</strong> Customer-Supplier Relationship<br />

Ruey-Jer Bryan Jean, National Chengchi University<br />

Rudolf Sinkovics, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Daekwan Kim, Florida State University<br />

While innovations generated by supply channel relationships, as opposed to individual partners, are playing an<br />

increasingly important role in the success <strong>of</strong> all supply chain partners, there has been a dearth <strong>of</strong> research in<br />

the literature on how supply chain relationships cultivate the process <strong>of</strong> such innovation generation. This study<br />

explores supplier market intelligence generation, relationship learning, systems collaboration, and technological<br />

uncertainty, as antecedents <strong>of</strong> supplier innovation generation, which is, in turn, hypothesized to positively affect<br />

the relationship performance <strong>of</strong> the supplier. Furthermore, supplier dependence on the buyer is investigated as<br />

a moderator <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> such antecedents on supplier innovation generation. According to the empirical<br />

tests, which used a sample <strong>of</strong> 236 Taiwanese executives, most <strong>of</strong> the hypotheses in the study are supported.<br />

Some implications <strong>of</strong> the results are discussed at the end. (For more information, please contact: Ruey-Jer<br />

Bryan Jean, National Chengchi University, Taiwan: bryan@nccu.edu.tw)<br />

Session: 2.3.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Emerging-Market MNEs<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Lin Cui, Australian National University<br />

Macro Determinants <strong>of</strong> Chinese Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions in Developed Markets<br />

Monica Yang, Adelphi University<br />

This paper investigates the factors determining the level <strong>of</strong> cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBMA) by<br />

emerging market firms in developed markets. We draw on traditional economic and the organizational learning<br />

perspectives to develop several hypotheses. Using panel data <strong>of</strong> Chinese CBMA in nine developed markets from<br />

1996 to 2010, we found that economic factors (e.g., the wealth and strategic asset <strong>of</strong> host market) and<br />

financial factors (e.g., the size and liquidity <strong>of</strong> financial market) positively affected the number <strong>of</strong> CBMAs by<br />

China in developed markets. Other economic factors (e.g., the size <strong>of</strong> market and the level <strong>of</strong> openness to<br />

international trade) and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> government were negatively influenced the number <strong>of</strong> CBMAs in<br />

these developed markets. Finally, the growth <strong>of</strong> market and the "learning from others" factor had no significant<br />

impact. (For more information, please contact: Monica Yang, Adelphi University, USA: yang2@adelphi.edu)<br />

Sub-National Institutional Heterogeneity and Entry Ownership: Evidence <strong>of</strong> Investment from Mexico, India, and<br />

China into Developed Markets<br />

Victor Zitian Chen, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina; Columbia University<br />

Jing Li, Simon Fraser University<br />

Daniel M. Shapiro, Simon Fraser University<br />

This paper focuses on the decision <strong>of</strong> entry ownership <strong>of</strong> emerging-market (EM) MNEs into developed markets<br />

(DMs). First, I argue that, all else being equal, the direct effect on the choice <strong>of</strong> full-ownership entry is positive,<br />

because whereas MNEs from EMs with weaker market-based institutions must engage in joint ventures for<br />

adaption to local external legitimacy in DMs, institutional development at home will reduce uncertainty with<br />

respect to legitimacy, and the resulting need for joint ownership, and thus increase the likelihood that firms will<br />

choose full-ownership entry. Second, institutional development at home encourages EM MNEs to build FSAs<br />

such as technological capabilities, which in turn lead them to seek full ownership <strong>of</strong> their foreign subsidiaries.<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 150


MONDAY<br />

Using a cross-country (Mexico, India, and China) firm-level sample <strong>of</strong> 492 entries into triad DMs (North America<br />

(USA and Canada), Western Europe, and Japan), and adopting state-/province-level measures <strong>of</strong> institutional<br />

quality, I find results supporting both direct and indirect mediation effects. Conclusions, implications, and<br />

suggestions for future extensions are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Victor Zitian Chen,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina; Columbia University, USA: emgp.editor@gmail.com)<br />

Drivers and Motives for Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investments in Africa<br />

Katarina Blomkvist, Uppsala University<br />

Rian Drogendijk, Uppsala University<br />

The main part <strong>of</strong> Chinese OFDIs is located in neighboring countries in Asia, with China's Special Administrative<br />

Region, Hong Kong, as the foremost receiver <strong>of</strong> Chinese OFDI (Gugler and Fetscherin 2010). However, during<br />

recent years Chinese OFDI to Africa has seen an unprecedented increase and trade flows between China and<br />

Africa in 2008 totaled more than 106 billion US dollars. The introduction in 2006 <strong>of</strong> China's <strong>of</strong>ficial Africa policy<br />

by the Chinese government and its intensified diplomatic links with the African continent has opened up for a<br />

new era <strong>of</strong> bilateral trade and economic cooperation. The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper to systematically test the<br />

explanatory power <strong>of</strong> established theories and motivations for investments by Chinese firms in Africa. Our<br />

findings suggest that all else equal, African countries have a higher likelihood to receive investments from<br />

Chinese firms. Moreover, we find that Chinese firms perform both market seeking, natural resource seeking,<br />

and strategic asset seeking FDI in Africa. (For more information, please contact: Katarina Blomkvist, Uppsala<br />

University, Sweden: katarina.blomkvist@fek.uu.se)<br />

Accessing Country-specific Advantages: The Case <strong>of</strong> Chinese Enterprise Management S<strong>of</strong>tware Industry<br />

Feng Wan, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Peter Williamson, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Country-specific advantages (or location advantages) have long been studied in the literature. Contrary to the<br />

implicit assumption <strong>of</strong> OLI model and internalization theory, we argue national advantages are not always freely<br />

or fully accessible by all firms. Grounded on the case studies <strong>of</strong> four firms in Chinese enterprise management<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware industry, we develop a theoretical framework to explain how firms access country-specific advantages.<br />

Unexpectedly, we found the ability to access national advantages is not evenly distributed among firms. The<br />

accessing framework has important implications for multinationals to explore market in host countries, and for<br />

firms in general aiming to develop new firm-specific advantages. (For more information, please contact: Feng<br />

Wan, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, United Kingdom: fw269@cam.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 2.3.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Culture and Cognition: Identity, Attachment and Global Mindset<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: John Mezias, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

Dual Attachment in Multinational Enterprises: The Roles <strong>of</strong> Perceived Prestige, Positive Interaction, and<br />

Organization-Based Self-Esteem<br />

Davina Vora, SUNY New Paltz<br />

Tatiana Kostova, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 151


MONDAY<br />

Research has long considered the issue <strong>of</strong> control in multinational enterprises (MNEs), and suggests that<br />

informal control, or normative integration, may be vital. Psychological attachment to the MNE is one way to<br />

achieve such control. We study the antecedents <strong>of</strong> dual attachment <strong>of</strong> subsidiary managers in MNEs,<br />

hypothesizing that perceived prestige <strong>of</strong> and positive interaction with the MNE and subsidiary positively relate to<br />

organizational identification with and commitment to each entity. In addition, we examine the cross-level<br />

mediating role <strong>of</strong> organization-based self-esteem on these relationships. Results support the direct effects, but<br />

only partially support the mediating role <strong>of</strong> organization-based self-esteem. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Davina Vora, SUNY New Paltz, USA: vorad@newpaltz.edu)<br />

Demystifying the Myth about Marginals: Implications for Global Leadership<br />

Stacey Fitzsimmons, Western Michigan University<br />

Yih-teen Lee, IESE Business School<br />

Mary Yoko Brannen, INSEAD<br />

Marginalized biculturals are individuals who have internalized more than one culture, but do not identify strongly<br />

with either or any <strong>of</strong> them (Berry, 1980). Despite persistent assumptions to the contrary, marginalized<br />

biculturals sometimes excel at global leadership activities, even surpassing the performance <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong><br />

biculturals. In this paper, we propose a conceptual explanation for why marginalized biculturals may excel as<br />

global leaders, and propose implications for both practitioners and researchers. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Stacey Fitzsimmons, Western Michigan University, USA: stacey.fitzsimmons@wmich.edu)<br />

Tracking Global Mindset: Are Chinese Executives Poised to Become the New Global Leaders<br />

Schon Beechler, INSEAD<br />

Nandani Lynton, CEIBS<br />

Chinese investments in overseas companies, property or plants are expected to reach as much as $2 trillion<br />

over the coming decade. Managing those overseas investments and running international Chinese companies<br />

presents formidable challenges because globalization is a manifestation <strong>of</strong> complexity and the lack <strong>of</strong> global<br />

leaders able to manage the complexity has been named as a major factor in the poor performance <strong>of</strong> many<br />

Chinese firms operating globally. In order to understand the level <strong>of</strong> global leadership in Chinese managers, our<br />

data analysis focuses on the values indicative <strong>of</strong> two crucial components <strong>of</strong> global mindset associated with<br />

global leadership, cosmopolitanism and cognitive complexity, which can be inferred from the Schwartz Value<br />

Survey (SVS) and narrative interviews. The analysis suggests that Chinese executives show lower cosmopolitan<br />

values but high levels <strong>of</strong> competing values, an indication <strong>of</strong> the cognitive complexity underlying behavioral<br />

complexity and managerial effectiveness. The Chinese executives in our sample may not currently have the<br />

requisite knowledge and experience needed to be effective global leaders but they have a mindset that<br />

embraces contradictions and ambiguity, which may well be ultimately better attuned to the complex realities <strong>of</strong><br />

global business than that <strong>of</strong> many Western executives. (For more information, please contact: Schon Beechler,<br />

INSEAD, USA: schon.beechler@gmail.com)<br />

Session: 2.3.10 - Panel<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

Case Studies for <strong>International</strong> Business Teaching: The Opportunities and Challenges<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Sandra Draheim, William Davidson Institute at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 152


MONDAY<br />

Panelists:<br />

Robert Kennedy, William Davidson Institute at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan<br />

Marc Robinson, William Davidson Institute at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan<br />

Guy Pfeffermann, Founder & CEO, Global Business School Network<br />

Sandra Draheim, William Davidson Institute at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan<br />

Roberto Garcia, Indiana University<br />

The panel will <strong>of</strong>fer perspectives on the importance <strong>of</strong> international business education in the U.S., as well as in<br />

emerging and transitioning economies. Because education and training are key drivers <strong>of</strong> global economic<br />

growth, so the panel will provide insight into future global business education needs and the challenges in<br />

developing and delivering solutions for those needs. Robust, high-quality, international business teaching<br />

materials are critical to the successful education <strong>of</strong> the world’s future business leaders. The development and<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> case studies – which enable high-level, experiential learning – will be addressed by experts in the<br />

fields <strong>of</strong> academic educational design, marketing, and case method teaching. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Sandra Draheim, William Davidson Institute at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, USA: draheims@umich.edu)<br />

Session: 2.3.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

Competitive Dynamics and Firm Strategies in Emerging Economies<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist, University <strong>of</strong> Utah<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Context in the Globalization <strong>of</strong> Chinese Firms<br />

John Child, University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham<br />

Svetla Trifonova Marinova, Aalborg University<br />

The most important argument in this paper, and its main original contribution, is that in order to fully appreciate<br />

OFDI and its implementation, we require an analysis that is sensitive to both home and host country contexts,<br />

taking account <strong>of</strong> the ‘triangle' <strong>of</strong> resource, institutional and political factors that apply in those contexts. We<br />

have illustrated that it is a recognition <strong>of</strong> the different combinations <strong>of</strong> home and host country characteristics<br />

that permits an adequately nuanced understanding <strong>of</strong> the challenges facing Chinese overseas-investing firms<br />

and how they are likely to cope with them. An analysis <strong>of</strong> home-host country contextual similarities and<br />

differences opens the door both to more adequate theorizing as well as to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

options for ensuring that foreign investment is successful. (For more information, please contact: Svetla<br />

Trifonova Marinova, Aalborg University, Denmark: svetla@business.aau.dk)<br />

Unexpected Dynamics in Doing M&A in the Informal Economy: A Case <strong>of</strong> Acquiring a Chinese Firm<br />

Tian Wei, Fudan University<br />

This paper makes attempts to explore the dynamics <strong>of</strong> mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the informal<br />

economy, particularly in emerging countries. An idiographic case that a UK firm acquired a Chinese firm has<br />

been selected as sources <strong>of</strong> data for this nascent field. Data were collected through the M&A process with a<br />

focus on due diligence and integration. In the case analysis, six propositions are developed to present the<br />

emerging findings from the observations. Seven key constructs are identified from these propositions as major<br />

factors for successful M&A in the informal economy. These constructs are then categorized into two groups:<br />

people and standardization. The seven propositions and two types <strong>of</strong> key constructs are the major contributions<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study. (For more information, please contact: Tian Wei, Fudan University, China:<br />

weitian1983@gmail.com)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 153


MONDAY<br />

How Do Foreign MNCs and Local Firms Compete An Integrative View<br />

Wei Yang, China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School<br />

The resource-based view (RBV) and the competitive dynamics perspective are central to the strategy research.<br />

But their tight linkage and re-enforcing nature have been largely ignored. This paper integrates these two views<br />

into one theoretical framework and use survey data to test the interrelationships <strong>of</strong> the strategic resource<br />

endowment and competitive response, and their influence on firm competitive advantage. We deem that<br />

strategic resources have both direct and indirect impacts on firm competitive advantage. The indirect impact is<br />

realized through the mediating effects <strong>of</strong> competitive response speed on the relationships <strong>of</strong> strategic resources<br />

and firm competitive advantage. (For more information, please contact: Wei Yang, China Europe <strong>International</strong><br />

Business School, China: ywei@ceibs.edu)<br />

How Uncertainty Avoidance, Risk and Relatedness Matter in Emerging Economy Acquisitions<br />

Somnath Lahiri, Illinois State University<br />

Drawing on entry mode literature we examine in this study how three important factors: (a) cultural distance<br />

along the uncertainty avoidance dimension, (b) difference in country risk, and (c) relatedness between acquirer<br />

and target industry impact cross-border acquisition choice <strong>of</strong> foreign MNEs in emerging markets. Analysis <strong>of</strong> a<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> 1389 acquisitions undertaken in two emerging economies by MNEs from 33 nations over a 11-year<br />

time period generally support our hypothesized relationships on the direct and moderating influence <strong>of</strong><br />

uncertainty avoidance difference, country risk difference and relatedness on the choice <strong>of</strong> partial acquisition<br />

over full acquisition. In addition, our results suggest similar choice <strong>of</strong> acquisition when the aggregate measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> national cultural distance is used in place <strong>of</strong> uncertainty avoidance difference. We conclude by discussing<br />

various implications <strong>of</strong> the study and providing directions for future research. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Somnath Lahiri, Illinois State University, USA: slahiri@ilstu.edu)<br />

Strategic Alliances, Institutions and Performance in Emerging Markets<br />

Rand Gerges Yammine, EMLYON Business School<br />

This study tackles two research questions. First, how do institutional contexts impact the decision <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

firms to opt for strategic alliances as entry strategies in emerging markets Second, are strategic alliances<br />

linked to superior performance in specific institutional contexts Building on institutional theory and a network<br />

perspective, we investigate the relationships between strategic alliances as entry strategies, home and host<br />

countries' institutional contexts, and performance consequences. In particular, we argue that foreign firms are<br />

more likely to enter emerging markets with strategic alliances to counteract market inefficiencies through access<br />

to valuable inter-firm networks. However when the institutional context is similar, foreign firms prefer<br />

alternative entry strategies which allow greater control namely acquisition or greenfield. We also argue that in a<br />

weak institutional context, strategic alliances are associated with superior performance in comparison with other<br />

entry strategies. We opt for a multi-industry, cross country dataset comprising 300 FDI projects in 20 emerging<br />

markets from 1995 to 2005. (For more information, please contact: Rand Gerges Yammine, EMLYON Business<br />

School, France: gergesyammine@em-lyon.com)<br />

Barriers to Bilateral Business Relations: The Case <strong>of</strong> Australia and Ukraine<br />

Genrikh Salata, Australian National University<br />

Pierre van der Eng, Australian National University<br />

Vinh Nhat Lu, Australian National University<br />

Vesna Sedoglavich, Australian National University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 154


MONDAY<br />

Existing knowledge about the specific trade barriers that undermine firm performance in emerging markets,<br />

particularly those in the Central and Eastern European region, is fragmented. In this paper, we empirically<br />

investigate <strong>of</strong> the differences in the perceived business environments <strong>of</strong> two countries, namely Australia and<br />

Ukraine, and how they could undermine the potential for further business operations <strong>of</strong> internationalized firms.<br />

In depth interviews with executives <strong>of</strong> nine companies involved in business between Australia and Ukraine as<br />

well as industry experts. The findings suggest that the perceptions <strong>of</strong> environmental barriers by the Australian<br />

firms match the views expressed by Ukrainian businesses, in that Ukraine presents barriers to<br />

internationalization that are distinct to other emerging markets. Political instability remains the main obstacle<br />

and is considered above macroeconomic variations or other factors that undermine the relations with Australia.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Genrikh Salata, Australian National University, Australia:<br />

genrikh.salata@anu.edu.au)<br />

When Will <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures be Inflexible to Exit<br />

Sungjin J. Hong, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

Seung-Hyun Lee, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

This paper aims to identify boundary conditions <strong>of</strong> real options theory in the context <strong>of</strong> international joint<br />

ventures (IJVs). Drawing upon institutional perspective and experiential learning perspective, we argue that<br />

IJVs will provide high divestment flexibility when environmental uncertainty is high and legitimacy pressures are<br />

low. If normative and regulative legitimacy pressures are high, IJVs would not provide high divestment flexibility<br />

even if host country economic environments are volatile. In a similar vein, we argue that, even though prior<br />

country and partner specific experience would reduce perceived uncertainties in the host country, increased<br />

legitimacy gained through prior experience would also raise the expected level <strong>of</strong> local legitimacy and<br />

embeddedness for those foreign parents <strong>of</strong> IJVs. Therefore, reduced perceived uncertainties may not<br />

necessarily lead to higher IJV divestment flexibility. (For more information, please contact: Sungjin J. Hong,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA: sungjin@utdallas.edu)<br />

Session: 2.3.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

Corporate Governance<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Ursula F. Ott, Loughborough University<br />

An Exploratory Study on the Impact <strong>of</strong> Economic Development on the Relationship between Cultural Differences<br />

and Foreign Direct Investment<br />

Yener Kandogan, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan-Flint<br />

The literature has long analyzed the effects <strong>of</strong> national cultural distance on the volume <strong>of</strong> cross-border foreign<br />

direct investments (FDI). Considering the increase in significance <strong>of</strong> FDI originating from emerging countries,<br />

this study compares the effect <strong>of</strong> cultural differences on the stock <strong>of</strong> FDI from and to countries <strong>of</strong> various levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic development to explain how level <strong>of</strong> economic development affect the impact <strong>of</strong> cultural distance<br />

on FDI. Results suggest that the cultural differences tend to be bigger barriers for multinationals from emerging<br />

countries, but they also learn quickly how to deal with such differences. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Yener Kandogan, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan-Flint, USA: yener@umflint.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 155


MONDAY<br />

Structuring and Pricing <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Syndicated Corporate Loans<br />

Ha-Chin Yi, Texas State University<br />

Byung-uk Chong, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea<br />

This paper examines how syndicate structure affects the risk premium <strong>of</strong> internationally syndicated loans in<br />

both developed and developing countries. Syndicate structure is an organizational response to information<br />

asymmetry in syndicate composition. The lead bank assumes a risky position as a lender by retaining a fraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the loan, and also acts as the intermediary between the borrower and the syndicate participants by allocating<br />

loan shares to participants. Between the two competing hypotheses <strong>of</strong> syndicate structure – concentration<br />

hypothesis versus diversification hypothesis, most <strong>of</strong> the estimations support the diversification hypothesis. This<br />

paper finds that a portion <strong>of</strong> loan retained by lead arranger is negatively related to loan risk premium. As the<br />

riskiness <strong>of</strong> borrowing firm increases, lead arrangers and participating banks share the loan amounts since<br />

participating banks may possess information through which they can assess the riskiness <strong>of</strong> the borrowing firm<br />

as accurate as the lead arrangers do. Therefore, a lead arranger intends to provide appropriate risk premium to<br />

participating banks in order to seek for their syndicate participation; otherwise, the lead bank should be willing<br />

to retain more loan shares to credibly signal to participants to certify loan quality. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Ha-Chin Yi, Texas State University, USA: hy11@txstate.edu)<br />

Executives as Agents: Expatriate Managers in Subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> Multinational Banks<br />

Hein Bogaard, George Washington University<br />

Marketa Sonkova, Boston University<br />

The theoretical and empirical literature on (international) banking identified a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between the need for<br />

local "s<strong>of</strong>t" information on clients and the creation <strong>of</strong> information asymmetries between the principal (bank<br />

headquarters) and the agent (a foreign subsidiary). This paper investigates how multinational banks manage<br />

the trade-<strong>of</strong>f through executive staffing in their emerging market subsidiaries. In particular, we create a unique<br />

dataset to study how bank strategy and host country institutions affect the choice between home country and<br />

host country executives. We anticipate that (i) strategies that require local knowledge or s<strong>of</strong>t information create<br />

a preference for host country executives and that (ii) weak institutions that reduce transparency and amplify<br />

information asymmetries between principal and agent increase the preference for home country executives.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Hein Bogaard, George Washington University, USA: hbogaard@gwu.edu)<br />

Are Bank Dividends a Signal to Informed Depositors<br />

Cristiano Forti, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Rafael Felipe Schiozer, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

This study investigates whether the composition <strong>of</strong> bank debt affects payout policy. We exploit the features <strong>of</strong><br />

the Brazilian banking system, such as the existence <strong>of</strong> several closely held banks, owned and managed by a<br />

small group <strong>of</strong> shareholders, for which shareholder-targeted signaling is implausible, and find that banks that<br />

rely more on informed (institutional) depositors for funding pay larger dividends, controlling for other features.<br />

During the financial crisis, when the Brazilian banking system suffered the contagion <strong>of</strong> the liquidity freeze in<br />

international banking systems, this effect was even more pronounced, i.e. banks that relied on institutional<br />

investors paid even higher dividends. This relationship reinforces the role <strong>of</strong> dividends as a costly and credible<br />

signal about the quality <strong>of</strong> bank assets. (For more information, please contact: Rafael Felipe Schiozer, Fundação<br />

Getúlio Vargas, Brazil: rafael.schiozer@fgv.br)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 156


MONDAY<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Double Taxation Treaties on Cross Border Portfolio Equity Flows, Corporate Equity Valuations and<br />

Firms' Cost <strong>of</strong> Equity Capital<br />

Bhavik Parikh, University <strong>of</strong> Memphis<br />

Pankaj Jain, University <strong>of</strong> Memphis<br />

Ronald Spahr, University <strong>of</strong> Memphis<br />

Bilateral double taxation treaties (DTTs) have become very popular in recent years with over 2,289 treaties in<br />

place at the end <strong>of</strong> 2008. We find that inter country portfolio investment flows increase by 48.53% when<br />

countries sign DTTs. DTTs are also associated with an increase in corporate equity valuation, and appear to be<br />

a factor in lowering firms' cost <strong>of</strong> equity capital in the treaty countries by approximately 0.012% per annum.<br />

These positive effects <strong>of</strong> DTT are robust in multivariate regression models with country fixed effects, differences<br />

in corporate tax rates, and other control variables. (For more information, please contact: Bhavik Parikh,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Memphis, USA: brparikh@memphis.edu)<br />

Corporate Governance, Board Networks and Firm Performance<br />

Deeksha A. Singh, Temple University<br />

In this paper I use an integration <strong>of</strong> agency theory with resource dependence view to examine the performance<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> board structure, network centrality and ownership structure in case <strong>of</strong> emerging economy<br />

firms. I also investigate the contingency conditions which make board independence less or more valuable for<br />

emerging economy firms. Empirical findings based on the panel data analysis <strong>of</strong> 17,967 observations over a<br />

nine year period from 2001 to 2009 support all my hypotheses. I find that family ownership, presence <strong>of</strong><br />

independent directors and separation <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> CEO from board chair are positively related to firm<br />

performance. Additionally, directors also help firms become central in the network <strong>of</strong> other firms, and firms that<br />

are more central in a network outperform those that are less central. Board independence also interacts with<br />

family ownership and network centrality in affecting firm performance. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Deeksha A. Singh, Temple University, USA: deeksha@temple.edu)<br />

The Exchange Rate as a Determinant <strong>of</strong> Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions<br />

Wenjie Chen, George Washington University<br />

Theoretical and empirical studies have generated mixed support for a link between exchange rates and foreign<br />

direct investment. Most existing studies lack the detail and quality <strong>of</strong> data that satisfy the stringent assumptions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the theoretical models. Moreover, the majority <strong>of</strong> empirical works has been exclusively conducted on US<br />

data, although a large share <strong>of</strong> FDI occurs outside <strong>of</strong> the US. Using transaction-specific data on worldwide<br />

cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) between 1990 and 2009, this paper reexamines the relationship<br />

between bilateral exchange rate and FDI. The empirical analysis uses various econometric specifications and<br />

exploits the rich features <strong>of</strong> the M&A data that are closer to the underlying assumptions <strong>of</strong> theoretical models. I<br />

find strong evidence for a link between exchange rates and FDI. A depreciation in a home country's currency<br />

against a foreign country is accompanied by increased inflows <strong>of</strong> cross-border M&A from the foreign into the<br />

home country. This link between exchange rates and acquisition FDI is particularly strong in the case <strong>of</strong> target<br />

firms that are in the high-tech industry as well as for firms that are more prone to face credit constraints and<br />

asymmetric information; both features that have been predicted in the theoretical literature. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Wenjie Chen, George Washington University, USA: chenw@gwu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 157


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.3.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Trade, Investment and Innovation<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Christopher Williams, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

Can Innovation Rescue Exporters A Contingency Perspective<br />

Ziliang Deng, Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China<br />

Honglin Guo, Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China<br />

Chengqi Wang, Nottingham University Business School<br />

The massive collapse <strong>of</strong> exporters during the recent global financial crisis motivates researchers to explore what<br />

factors have helped exporters survive. Employing data for Chinese firms over the period 1998-2008, this paper<br />

examines the effects <strong>of</strong> technological innovation on exporter survival in foreign market. Departing from the<br />

conventional wisdom that innovation is always beneficial to exporting, this research shows that innovation at<br />

times can be detrimental to exporter survival due to the "double liability" <strong>of</strong> foreignness and innovativeness.<br />

However, we also find that innovation can enhance exporter survival when the firm is highly pr<strong>of</strong>itable and<br />

when the institutional environment in which the firm is embedded is highly business-friendly. By demonstrating<br />

the co-existence <strong>of</strong> the two opposing effects, we enhance understanding <strong>of</strong> how and under what conditions<br />

innovation promotes/impedes exports. (For more information, please contact: Ziliang Deng, Renmin University<br />

<strong>of</strong> China, China: ziliang.deng@ruc.edu.cn)<br />

The Effect <strong>of</strong> Past Experience on the Frequency <strong>of</strong> Future <strong>International</strong> Acquisitions<br />

Majid Eghbali-Zarch, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

Experiences <strong>of</strong> a firm in international acquisitions and joint ventures can be beneficial in terms <strong>of</strong> the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> its future international acquisitions. From their experience with foreign acquisitions, firms learn which part <strong>of</strong><br />

their existing knowledge is applicable to new and dissimilar settings. Learning effect <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong><br />

acquisitions (partial and full acquisitions) and their impact on later acquisitive initiatives are investigated. Highly<br />

experienced firms in acquisitions develop routines for search and selection <strong>of</strong> target firms for acquisition.<br />

Further, the level <strong>of</strong> experience matter in its effect on future acquisitions. The study finds that initial acquisitive<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> a firm have higher learning impact than its later instances <strong>of</strong> acquisition. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Majid Eghbali-Zarch, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada: meghbali-zarch.phd@ivey.ca)<br />

Experiential Learning and Innovation in Offshore Outsourcing Transitions<br />

Christopher Williams, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

Maya Kumar, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

We develop a conceptual model <strong>of</strong> the process by which firms engage in <strong>of</strong>fshore outsourcing for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

sourcing innovation. We argue that this process requires <strong>of</strong>fshore providers to become able to innovate on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> clients who are geographically and culturally distant. The model we develop is based on experiential<br />

learning theory applied at a functional team level. We develop an argument that there are different learning<br />

transitions (relationship-oriented and task-oriented) that enable <strong>of</strong>fshore providers to attain the capabilities<br />

needed to innovate on behalf <strong>of</strong> their clients. These transitions in turn are influenced by the cultural context in<br />

which client and provider teams are embedded. The model we develop has implications for theory <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore<br />

outsourcing as well as for practicing managers. (For more information, please contact: Maya Kumar, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada: mkumar@ivey.ca)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 158


MONDAY<br />

Exporting and Product Innovation <strong>of</strong> Chinese Firms:The Contingent Role <strong>of</strong> Institutional Development and<br />

Foreign Competitor Intensity<br />

Alex Xin Chen, University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Kevin Zheng Zhou, University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Drawing on organizational learning perspective, we examine the curvilinear relationship between exporting and<br />

product innovation. The results <strong>of</strong> a survey <strong>of</strong> 262 Chinese exporters show that exporting has an inverted U-<br />

shaped relationship with product innovation. That is, a moderate level <strong>of</strong> exporting has the strongest effect on<br />

innovation, whereas a high level <strong>of</strong> exporting is inhibitive to innovation. Moreover, the inverted U-shaped effect<br />

is more prominent when institution environment is better developed and foreign competitor intensity is high.<br />

Our findings provide a more nuanced understanding <strong>of</strong> exporting and suggest a contingent view <strong>of</strong> exporting on<br />

product innovation. (For more information, please contact: Alex Xin Chen, University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong,<br />

SAR-PRC: alexchen@hku.hk)<br />

Learning by Trading: Trade Vertical Specialization and <strong>International</strong> Technology Trade<br />

Szu-Wei Yen, WuFeng University<br />

Chun-Chen Huang, Asia University<br />

This paper examines the relationships between trade vertical specialization and the international technology<br />

trade. The OECD proposed using the technology balance <strong>of</strong> payments to measure relationships between the<br />

technology imports and exports <strong>of</strong> a nation. In order to address the problem <strong>of</strong> such an index underestimating<br />

the contribution <strong>of</strong> technology imports to technology exports, this study attempts to construct an empirical<br />

model that measures this by considering the effects <strong>of</strong> interindustry diffusion, in order to estimate more<br />

precisely the level <strong>of</strong> change in industrial technology under international technical trade. Another objective <strong>of</strong><br />

this paper is to measure vertical specialization levels and trends in the manufacturing industry, and to examine<br />

the relationship between international trade in vertical specialization and the contribution <strong>of</strong> technology imports<br />

to technology exports. Using longitudinal data and input–output tables from 1994 to 2002 for Taiwan's<br />

manufacturing industry, the empirical results reveal a strong relationship between international trade with<br />

vertical specialization and the contribution <strong>of</strong> technology imports to technology exports. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Szu-Wei Yen, WuFeng University, Taiwan: sword@wfu.edu.tw)<br />

Session: 2.3.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 2 - Marketing and Supply Chain<br />

Market Entry, Relationships and Ethics<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Hongzhi Gao, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington<br />

<strong>International</strong> Marketing Channels for Brazilian Beef: Comparison between Russia and the United Kingdom<br />

Karim Marini Thomé, University <strong>of</strong> Brasilia<br />

Luciana Marques Vieira, Unisinos<br />

Antonio Carlos dos Santos, Federal University <strong>of</strong> Lavras<br />

This paper compares international marketing channels for Brazilian beef in two different markets: Russia and<br />

the United Kingdom. The study is a multiple case study with qualitative variables where data were obtained<br />

through semi-structured interviews Brazilian meatpacking and the retailers and distribution agents in the<br />

Russian and British markets. The results show that the model hereby developed allowed to understand the<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 159


MONDAY<br />

relationships between different theoretical perspectives and was able to identify the differences and the reasons<br />

for the organizational form <strong>of</strong> the marketing channels. Findings also show that there is difference in the<br />

organization <strong>of</strong> the international marketing channel searching for the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the transaction and that<br />

institutional attributes are able to influence organizational dependence and efficiency <strong>of</strong> the deal and the<br />

distinction between channels on the efficient transaction. (For more information, please contact: Karim Marini<br />

Thomé, University <strong>of</strong> Brasilia, Brazil: thome@unb.br)<br />

Subsidiaries' Ability to Innovate in Marketing in Emerging Economies: A Case Study<br />

Thelma Valéria Rocha, ESPM<br />

Susana Costa E Silva, Universidade Católica Portuguesa<br />

This study analyses the ability <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries to innovate in marketing. It highlights the importance <strong>of</strong> GMS -<br />

global marketing strategies - in the ability to innovate in subsidiaries in emerging economies, as Brazil. The<br />

objective is to find out how the level <strong>of</strong> autonomy displayed by subsidiaries influences the adaptation vs.<br />

standardization dilemma, and, consequently, the marketing-mix program. The methodology followed is<br />

qualitative research using a case-study approach in an American multinational from the food sector. In this<br />

case, we found out that firm's brands are very important to this firm's success overseas, which sustains that<br />

brand policies should be defined carefully at both levels: subsidiaries and headquarters. This brand policy<br />

influences direct the autonomy to innovate in marketing at subsidiaries level. This study is useful for managers<br />

at subsidiaries who need to understand the importance <strong>of</strong> global marketing strategies, and also for managers at<br />

headquarters who need to verify in which circumstances autonomy pays <strong>of</strong>f. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Thelma Valéria Rocha, ESPM, Brazil: tvrocha@espm.br)<br />

Global Network Structure and <strong>International</strong> Manufacturing Joint-Venture Formations<br />

Steven Carnovale, Rutgers University<br />

Sengun Yeniyurt, Rutgers University<br />

This paper develops a network theory based framework <strong>of</strong> manufacturing equity-based partnership formations<br />

and provides an empirical test in the context <strong>of</strong> the global automotive industry. Specific theoretic hypotheses<br />

are formulated regarding the implications <strong>of</strong> the network structure for a firm's partner selection in global<br />

manufacturing Joint Ventures. The role <strong>of</strong> network theory constructs such as network centrality, tie length, and<br />

structural embededness are explored. A comprehensive dataset containing 1,158 automotive firms over the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> 19 years is utilized to test the hypotheses. Results provide empirical support for the role <strong>of</strong> network<br />

structure in mitigating the uncertainties <strong>of</strong> new equity based partnership decisions in global supply chain<br />

networks. (For more information, please contact: Steven Carnovale, Rutgers University, USA:<br />

scarnova@pegasus.rutgers.edu)<br />

A Three-Country Study <strong>of</strong> Unethical Sales Behaviors<br />

Ning Li, George Mason University<br />

William H. Murphy, University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan<br />

A major challenge in global sales research is helping managers understand sales ethics across countries.<br />

Addressing this challenge, our research investigates whether a few demographic variables and psychographic<br />

variables reduce unethical sales behaviors (USBs) in Canada, Mexico, and the USA. Further, using literatures<br />

associated with business ethics, national culture, and customer orientation advocacy, we hypothesize why sales<br />

managers should expect similarities and differences in USBs between countries. We tested hypotheses using a<br />

sales contest scenario and six USBs, examining survey responses from 948 business-to-business salespeople <strong>of</strong><br />

a multinational company's sales force in Canada, Mexico, and the USA. The results reveal that several<br />

psychographic variables (such as commitment, relationship to sales manager, and achievement need) affect<br />

salespeople's tendency to engage in USBs differently in each country. Additionally, business ethics,<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 160


MONDAY<br />

individualism, and customer orientation advocacy associated with each country can be used to anticipate<br />

similarities and differences in USBs between countries. This research <strong>of</strong>fers important theoretical contributions<br />

and implications for more effectively managing sales forces and reducing USBs across countries. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Ning Li, George Mason University, USA: nli@gmu.edu)<br />

Guanxi Gatekeeping in Chinese-Western Business Relationships<br />

Hongzhi Gao, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington<br />

John G. Knight, University <strong>of</strong> Otago<br />

David Ballantyne, University <strong>of</strong> Otago<br />

Culturally based relationship norms are collectively known as guanxi () in Chinese markets. A review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

international business and management literature reveals that coverage <strong>of</strong> intercultural guanxi dynamics is<br />

superficial despite the increasing recognition <strong>of</strong> guanxi in developing Chinese-Western business relations. The<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> this article is to explore how go-betweens (gatekeepers) facilitate the development <strong>of</strong> relationships<br />

between foreign outsiders and Chinese insiders in an intercultural environment, and to bring to the surface the<br />

cultural nuances <strong>of</strong> guanxi. Based on interviews with 58 managers in China and New Zealand, the workings <strong>of</strong><br />

Chinese-Western business relationships are explored. Empirical findings reveal two key gatekeeping roles,<br />

namely reciprocal and symbolic, used for enabling or constraining the development <strong>of</strong> intercultural business<br />

relationships. This paper concludes with strategic implications <strong>of</strong> guanxi gatekeeping for foreign outsiders and<br />

recommends practical approaches for reaching the decision makers and resource integrators in guanxi<br />

networks. (For more information, please contact: Hongzhi Gao, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington, New Zealand:<br />

hongzhi.gao@vuw.ac.nz)<br />

Eclectic Perspectives on Inter-Organizational Cooperation: A Case Analysis <strong>of</strong> Korean Car Company<br />

Taehoon Park, Osaka City University<br />

As the hybridization <strong>of</strong> the Japanese and US types <strong>of</strong> cooperation in the automobile industry advance, the<br />

eclectic theory proposes that transaction cost theory, resource-based theory and embeddedness theory should<br />

be combined to explain the present state <strong>of</strong> inter-organizational cooperation. In the eclectic theory, it is said<br />

that the formative factors in the product development and production processes are identical. However,<br />

through the case analysis <strong>of</strong> Hyundai motors company, we investigated that how the types <strong>of</strong> interorganizational<br />

cooperation between the product development and production processes are different and how<br />

we should combine formative factors which are relevant to establishing cooperation in product development and<br />

production processes. The results <strong>of</strong> our case analysis are as follows: Firstly, there is a degree <strong>of</strong> freedom in<br />

how different types <strong>of</strong> product development and production processes are combined. Secondly, it is necessary<br />

to explain eclectically by taking into account <strong>of</strong> the factors that affect the process <strong>of</strong> product development and<br />

the factors which influence production. While the acquisition <strong>of</strong> resources is the major factor that effects the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> a product development process, the reduction <strong>of</strong> production cost is the factor which leads to the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> inter-organizational production process. (For more information, please contact: Taehoon Park,<br />

Osaka City University, Japan: taehoon@gscc.osaka-cu.ac.jp)<br />

Creating Legitimacy for <strong>International</strong> New Ventures: The Role <strong>of</strong> Business Model Storytelling across Institutional<br />

Contexts<br />

Poul Houman Andersen, Aarhus University<br />

Morten Rask, Aarhus University<br />

Based upon a conceptual model <strong>of</strong> legitimizing the business model through storytelling reflecting the difference<br />

in institutional contexts across national borders we use the Better Place venture as our case with which to<br />

explore how the storytelling efforts <strong>of</strong> new business ventures interact with institutional contexts to create<br />

legitimacy. Better Place provides infrastructure services for combining electrical vehicles and power grid<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 161


MONDAY<br />

networks. Using content analysis to analyze the debate unfolding around Better Place's attempts to<br />

communicate their business model to constituents in Denmark, Israel, Canada, and Australia, we demonstrate<br />

that the narrative process for creating legitimacy for the business model varies across the diverse contexts <strong>of</strong><br />

these countries. This reflects different configurations <strong>of</strong> stakeholders and agendas in different institutional<br />

contexts and underlines the ongoing importance <strong>of</strong> institutional differences, even to very global issues such as<br />

sustainability. We contribute to the growing literature on institutions in international business research. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Morten Rask, Aarhus University, Denmark: mr@morten-rask.dk)<br />

Session: 2.3.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Corporate Social Responsibility in <strong>International</strong> Business II<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Dorothee Feils, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

A Comparative Study on Corporate Social Responsibility Communication between Chinese and German<br />

Companies<br />

Yiqin Wang, Harbin Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Boxia Shi, Harbin Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Yanfang Hao, Harbin Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

CSR communication is important for multinational corporations to convey a positive image and to gain<br />

legitimacy among stakeholders from different countries. This paper develops a comprehensive analysis<br />

framework to conduct the comparative study <strong>of</strong> CSR communication and to explore the reasons for the<br />

differences. Based on the framework, the paper compares the CSR communication in relation to the objects,<br />

contents and strategy <strong>of</strong> the communication by structuring CSR communication keywords index system between<br />

Chinese and German enterprises. Based on this empirical study, the paper argues that CSR communication is<br />

challenged by the global economy and the culture. (For more information, please contact: Yiqin Wang, Harbin<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, China: yqw@hit.edu.cn)<br />

Building <strong>International</strong> CSR on Solid Foundations: Location and Network Aspects <strong>of</strong> Nonmarket Environments<br />

Rafael Lucea, George Washington University<br />

Multinational companies' (MNCs) corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs frequently comprise a portfolio<br />

<strong>of</strong> disconnected country-level programs or, alternatively, consist <strong>of</strong> blanket corporate policies that apply in the<br />

same way across the geographies where the company operates. Yet, the international nonmarket environment<br />

in which CSR programs operate is neither a completely fragmented nor a perfectly homogeneous one.<br />

Building on the concept <strong>of</strong> stakeholder-issue-networks, we develop a model that explicitly takes into<br />

consideration the role <strong>of</strong> geography in the characterization <strong>of</strong> a firm's nonmarket environment. This allows us to<br />

develop a taxonomy <strong>of</strong> nonmarket environments on the basis <strong>of</strong> their geographic spread and their degree <strong>of</strong><br />

cross-border connectedness. We then explore the strategic and organizational implications that different ideal<br />

types <strong>of</strong> (cross-border) nonmarket environments have for the development <strong>of</strong> international CSR policies. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Rafael Lucea, George Washington University, USA: rafel@gwu.edu)<br />

Global Diffusion <strong>of</strong> CSR Standards: A Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Global Reporting Initiative and the Global Compact<br />

Stephen Chen, University <strong>of</strong> Newcastle<br />

Petra Bouvain, University <strong>of</strong> Canberra<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 162


MONDAY<br />

Despite their claims to be global standards, implementation <strong>of</strong> both the GRI and the Global Compact has been<br />

highly geographically uneven. This paper examines the factors that have influenced adoption <strong>of</strong> both standards<br />

worldwide. Drawing from recent theoretical and empirical literature on global industry and standards, we<br />

develop a series <strong>of</strong> hypotheses about the relationship between GRI reporting and Global Compact membership<br />

counts and various characteristics <strong>of</strong> the national institutional environment. Our results suggest that adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

the GRI has been influenced by certain features <strong>of</strong> the national institutional environment as well as foreign<br />

trade and investment. The reporting count by country is positively correlated with the level <strong>of</strong> exporting, the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment, and transparency <strong>of</strong> institutions in that country but negatively correlated<br />

with the strength <strong>of</strong> NGO's in the country. In the case <strong>of</strong> the Global Compact, however, we find that only<br />

economic factors (GDP, FDI and exports) are significant. (For more information, please contact: Stephen Chen,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Newcastle, Australia: stephen.chen@newcastle.edu.au)<br />

The Nature and Strategic Impact <strong>of</strong> Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets: The Case <strong>of</strong> Russia<br />

Olga Hawn, Duke University<br />

While most studies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) are conceptualized and conducted in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

developed countries, there is little understanding <strong>of</strong> what CSR means both in terms <strong>of</strong> the nature and strategic<br />

impact on firms in emerging markets, where most <strong>of</strong> the current commercial activity takes place. This inductive<br />

paper seeks to understand and explain the implications <strong>of</strong> CSR for Russian firms by asking what it means in that<br />

context, how it affects their international expansion efforts and performance back at home. The results suggest<br />

significant differences by the nature <strong>of</strong> the firm (i.e. large or small-and-medium sized) as well as by relations<br />

with the state (i.e. mutual benefit or barrier). Implications for scholars and managers are discussed as to the<br />

drivers <strong>of</strong> CSR heterogeneity, and its importance in overcoming liabilities in international expansion. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Olga Hawn, Duke University, USA: olga.hawn@duke.edu)<br />

Relationship Among Corporate Social Responsibility, Earning Management, and Audit Fee: An Event Historical<br />

Analysis<br />

Gunae Choi, Rutgers University<br />

Changhee Lee, Rutgers University<br />

Sangcheol Song, Bryant University<br />

Using the Kinder Lydenburg Domini (KLD) investment firm social ratings dataset from 2003-2010, this study<br />

examines the effects <strong>of</strong> CSR [ Technical CSR (TCSR) vs. Institutional CSR (ICSR)] on the probability <strong>of</strong> a firm'<br />

engagement in earning management (EM) and then investigates the effects <strong>of</strong> EM on the probability <strong>of</strong> paying<br />

positive or negative abnormal fees, considering the moderating effects <strong>of</strong> TCSR/ICSR. The results from a<br />

discrete time event history analysis with time-varying independent variables show that when a firm's TCSR- or<br />

ICSR strengths increases, the firm is likely to engage more in EM, but pay less audit fee. Likewise, when a firm's<br />

TCSR- or ICSR concerns increases, the firm is likely to engage more in EM; but only a firm with TCSR concerns<br />

tends to pay more audit fee. This indicates that a firm's increasing TCSR concerns can significantly affect the<br />

auditor's risk due to its relation to internal control, while a firm's increasing ICSR concerns tends not be<br />

connected to the auditor's risk. Such findings have implications for strategic philanthropy. A firm that focuses<br />

more on TCSR and tries to reduce TCSR concerns than ICSR concerns appears to gain a competitive advantage<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> the auditor's risk. (For more information, please contact: Gunae Choi, Rutgers University, USA:<br />

choigunae@hotmail.com)<br />

Developing a Legitimacy-based View <strong>of</strong> Political Risk: The case <strong>of</strong> Google in China<br />

Charles Edward Stevens, University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming<br />

Political risk remains one <strong>of</strong> the critical factors affecting firms' strategies and performance abroad. Yet, the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> business-government interactions in an era <strong>of</strong> increased economic competition and<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 163


MONDAY<br />

interconnectedness has changed. This has greatly reduced the explanatory and predictive power <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

theories <strong>of</strong> political risk based on factors such as bargaining power or structural attributes <strong>of</strong> political<br />

institutions. In this paper, we examine the political risk faced by Google in China through the lens <strong>of</strong> both the<br />

traditional bargaining power approach as well as an emergent, legitimacy-based view, and find the latter<br />

perspective to better explain Google's experience. Likewise, we find that Google's experience can be used to<br />

create testable propositions and further conceptual development <strong>of</strong> this legitimacy-based approach to political<br />

risk. (For more information, please contact: Charles Edward Stevens, University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming, USA:<br />

csteve10@uwyo.edu)<br />

Institutional Contexts and Diversification Patterns <strong>of</strong> Business Groups in Emerging Economies: The Case <strong>of</strong><br />

Turkish Family Holdings<br />

Bahattin Karademir, Cukurova University<br />

Huseyin Ozgen, Cukurova University<br />

Atilla Yaprak, Wayne State University<br />

The formation <strong>of</strong> business groups in emerging markets has inspired a growing body <strong>of</strong> literature. While this<br />

literature has addressed the potential motivators <strong>of</strong> these groups' diversification into unrelated industries, their<br />

strategic response to changes in their institutional and market contexts has not been adequately explored. In<br />

this paper, we explore this question through examining the diversification <strong>of</strong> Family Business Groups in Turkey.<br />

We examine the diversification levels <strong>of</strong> 77 business groups, and find slight variation in the diversification level<br />

<strong>of</strong> business groups established in different institutional time periods. We also find that the earlier cohort <strong>of</strong> BGs<br />

is more heterogeneous than the recent cohorts in terms <strong>of</strong> their diversification. We also find that bank-affiliated<br />

groups are more diversified. The diversification <strong>of</strong> business groups is significantly associated with their size and<br />

time <strong>of</strong> founding. The larger size and the earlier cohort <strong>of</strong> business groups are more diversified. In contrast to<br />

conventional wisdom, we find a slight variation in the diversification level <strong>of</strong> business groups established during<br />

the state-centered and the liberalization periods <strong>of</strong> Turkey. We suggest that the state's increasing share in the<br />

economy and slow development <strong>of</strong> market institutions in the post-1980 Liberalization Period explain this finding.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Bahattin Karademir, Cukurova University, Turkey: bdemir@cu.edu.tr)<br />

Session: 2.4.P - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Showcase Panel on Institutional Theory in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Timothy M. Devinney, University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sydney<br />

Co-Chair: Laszlo Tihanyi, Texas A&M University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Michael Hitt, Texas A&M University<br />

Robert Hoskisson, Rice University<br />

Stewart Miller, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at San Antonio<br />

Torben Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

This highly interactive panel focuses on the use <strong>of</strong> institutional theory in international business research. The<br />

goals <strong>of</strong> the session are to introduce new ideas and frameworks from the traditions <strong>of</strong> neoinstitutional<br />

economics and sociology and to provide answers to theoretical and methodological questions related to the<br />

design <strong>of</strong> empirical studies from the institutional perspective. The session is organized around ideas and papers<br />

in the forthcoming volume <strong>of</strong> the Advances in <strong>International</strong> Management series (Emerald) <strong>of</strong> the same title and<br />

presents a great opportunity for informed debate about the field. Using ""roundtables"" led by leading scholars,<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 164


MONDAY<br />

the session will be structured around five themes: (1) Institutional Theory Development, (2) Multinational<br />

Enterprises and Country Institutions, (3) Institutional Polycentrism and <strong>International</strong> Business, (4) Institutional<br />

Change in Emerging Markets, and (5) Designing Studies <strong>of</strong> Institutions. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Laszlo Tihanyi, Texas A&M University, USA: ltihanyi@tamu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.4.1 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Trading Places: The Evolving Role <strong>of</strong> Government, Business and Civil Society in the Global<br />

Business Environment<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Jonathan P. Doh, Villanova University<br />

Trading Places: The Evolving Role <strong>of</strong> Government, Business and Civil Society in the Global Business Environment<br />

Robert Hemphill, AES Solar<br />

Robert Kaplan, Inter-American Foundation<br />

Tarun Khanna, Harvard Business School<br />

Chris Jochnick, Oxfam America<br />

John Stoner, McKinsey & Co.<br />

This panel seeks to explore the implications for IB theory and practice <strong>of</strong> the changing roles <strong>of</strong> governments,<br />

private firms, and NGOs in the international business environment. In particular, we explore the increased<br />

private provision <strong>of</strong> public, collective goods, and the growing collaboration among all three sectors in the joint<br />

responses to social and institutional voids in developing and emerging markets. Panelists with extensive<br />

involvement studying or engaging in such efforts – including cross-sectoral collaborations – will reflect on their<br />

experience and what it means for international business theory and practice and the overall conference theme.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Jonathan P. Doh, Villanova University, USA:<br />

jonathan.doh@villanova.edu)<br />

Session: 2.4.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Bi/Multiculturals and their Roles in Organizations<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Davina Vora, SUNY New Paltz<br />

Panelists:<br />

Mary Yoko Brannen, INSEAD<br />

Stacey Fitzsimmons, Western Michigan University<br />

Fiona Moore, Royal Holloway, University <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Terry Mughan, Anglia Ruskin University<br />

Anne-Marie Søderberg, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Christopher Voisey, Nyenrode Business University<br />

Davina Vora, SUNY New Paltz<br />

Bi/multiculturals, people who have internalized two or more cultures, are becoming increasingly common in<br />

today's global environment. These individuals not only have skills and capabilities that monoculturals do not, but<br />

they also have the potential to help firms fulfill organizational goals. Despite this, research on the roles <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 165


MONDAY<br />

bi/multiculturals in organizations is relatively limited. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this panel is to highlight bi/multicultural<br />

employees and the roles they play in organizations. The four qualitative studies suggest that biculturals<br />

influence firms at the individual, team, and organizational levels, and that organizations may leverage the skills<br />

and capabilities, and also minimize the negative effects, <strong>of</strong> these individuals. An open-ended discussion<br />

regarding the roles <strong>of</strong> bi/multiculturals in organizations is expected to shed further light on this issue. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Davina Vora, SUNY New Paltz, USA: vorad@newpaltz.edu)<br />

Session: 2.4.3 - Panel<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

From Whether to How Regions Matter: Past, Present and Future <strong>of</strong> the Regionalization<br />

Perspective<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Ruth Aguilera, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Panelists:<br />

Jin Uk Kim, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Ruth Aguilera, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Elitsa R. Banalieva, Northeastern University<br />

Charles Dhanaraj, Indiana University<br />

Ricardo Gabriel Flores, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

Rafael Lucea, George Washington University<br />

Luis Vives, ESADE Business School<br />

Chang Hoon Oh, Simon Fraser University<br />

Alan M. Rugman, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Andre Sammartino, University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne<br />

Recent advances in international business research show that regional differences are powerful enabling and<br />

constraining forces that influence firm behavior in pr<strong>of</strong>ound ways. The objective <strong>of</strong> the current panel session is<br />

to establish a common platform for researchers engaged with the regionalization or semi-globalization<br />

perspective. The discussions will revolve around answering the following questions: 1) what has been our<br />

progress thus far; 2) what are the caveats in the extant literature; 3) what is the appropriate future direction<br />

The panel session is composed <strong>of</strong> five presentations that aim to provide a platform for answering the above<br />

questions. By doing so, we hope to enhance the rigor and relevance <strong>of</strong> international business research and keep<br />

the discussion on regionalization lively and productive for current and future scholars. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Jin Uk Kim, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA: jkim198@illinois.edu)<br />

Session: 2.4.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 8 - Developing Country MNCs<br />

Corporate Governance and the <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Firms from Developing Economies<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Vikas Kumar, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Corporate Governance, Board Networks and Growth Strategies<br />

Deeksha A. Singh, Temple University<br />

Andrew Delios, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 166


MONDAY<br />

This paper examines the relationship between board structure and risk taking behavior <strong>of</strong> emerging market<br />

firms by looking at firms' growth strategies. I investigate two types <strong>of</strong> growth strategies – growth through<br />

international expansion, and growth through new domestic ventures. More specifically, I study the individual<br />

and joint effects <strong>of</strong> board structure, network centrality through board interlocks and ownership structure on<br />

firm's growth strategies. Using longitudinal data on 2152 publicly listed Indian firms from 2002 to 2009, I find<br />

that boards that are structured keeping in view the resource dependence role are more helpful in pursuing<br />

growth strategies. (For more information, please contact: Deeksha A. Singh, Temple University, USA:<br />

deeksha@temple.edu)<br />

The Shareholder Value Creation Effects <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance on the <strong>International</strong>isation <strong>of</strong> Emerging Market<br />

Firms<br />

Lutao Ning, Durham University<br />

Roger Strange, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />

Jing-Ming Kou, Durham University<br />

The rapid international expansion <strong>of</strong> firms from emerging economies has caught media attention worldwide and<br />

attracted considerable academic interests over the last decade. Previous research has emphasised emerging<br />

market firms' motivations and strategies for internationalisation. Understanding <strong>of</strong> whether their<br />

internationalisation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CM&As) has created value for shareholders<br />

is still relatively limited. There is also little empirical evidence on the value implications <strong>of</strong> good corporate<br />

governance for emerging market CM&As. Using a unique and manually collected firm-level dataset, this paper<br />

examines the stock returns upon CM&A announcements made by Chinese multinationals listed in the Hong<br />

Kong Stock Exchange from 1991 to 2011, where firms are subjected to stricter international reporting rules and<br />

accounting standards. The empirical findings support our hypotheses that CM&As by EMNEs create shareholder<br />

value. We also found that the magnitude <strong>of</strong> created value is positively associated with the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance, which mainly stems from moderation <strong>of</strong> principal-principal rather than principal-agent<br />

conflicts as perceived by international investors. (For more information, please contact: Lutao Ning, Durham<br />

University, United Kingdom: lutao.ning@durham.ac.uk)<br />

Returnee Managers and <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Emerging Economy Firms: The Moderating Role <strong>of</strong> Corporate<br />

Govenance<br />

Lin Cui, Australian National University<br />

Yi Li, Australian National University<br />

Zijie Li, University <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business and Economics<br />

Emerging economy (EE) firms recruit returnee managers with international experience to support their growth<br />

into the global market. This study investigates the effect <strong>of</strong> returnee managers on EE firms' foreign direct<br />

investment (FDI) decisions. Drawing on upper-echelon perspective and the principal-principal conflict<br />

perspective in the corporate governance <strong>of</strong> EE firms, we argue that the returnee managers have a positive<br />

effect on EE firms' FDI propensity, while this effect is moderated in opposite manners by shareholders who have<br />

conflicts in interests, in particular, the dominant state owner and the influential foreign owner. Our empirical<br />

results from an event history analysis <strong>of</strong> 164 Chinese listed firms over an 8-year period supported the<br />

hypothesized main effect, and the negative moderating role <strong>of</strong> foreign ownership. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Lin Cui, Australian National University, Australia: lin.cui@anu.edu.au)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 167


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.4.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Institutional Environment and FDI<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Jongmoo Jay Choi, Temple University<br />

Substituting Local Institutions and Industry: How Status from Foreign Success Addresses Uncertainty Based on<br />

Host Country Context<br />

Markus David Taussig, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

This paper demonstrates that successful foreign experience helps firms overcome global market uncertainty<br />

caused by weak host country institutions. I provide evidence from private equity (PE) across 49 emerging<br />

economies that a track record <strong>of</strong> foreign success grows in value under conditions <strong>of</strong>: i.) weaker host country<br />

contracting institutions at the time investments are sold; ii.) less developed host country PE industry at the time<br />

investments are sold; and iii.) higher growth in excess global capital over the investment period. I reconcile<br />

these findings with previous research emphasizing local experience as a substitute for contracting institutions by<br />

introducing a model wherein: a.) local resources address PE firms' own internal context-dependent uncertainty<br />

when selecting and investing into emerging economy deals; and b.) foreign resources reduce the external<br />

market's uncertainty about host country context when PE firms sell <strong>of</strong>f these same investments. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Markus David Taussig, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore:<br />

markus@nus.edu.sg)<br />

Institutional Misalignment as a Driver <strong>of</strong> OFDI: An Exploratory <strong>of</strong> South American MNEs<br />

Jack Alan Clampit, University <strong>of</strong> Memphis<br />

Ben Kedia, University <strong>of</strong> Memphis<br />

Nolan Gaffney, University <strong>of</strong> Memphis<br />

The phenomenon <strong>of</strong> multinational enterprises (MNEs) moving parts <strong>of</strong> their value chain abroad for traditional<br />

market and/or resource seeking reasons, i.e., to exploit or augment organizational level assets, has been well<br />

studied in the international business literature. Decisions to invest abroad as an escape response to situations<br />

where institutional factors at home are perceived to be misaligned with MNE goals, however, have not been as<br />

fully explored. In this paper, we examine the types and consequences <strong>of</strong> institutional misalignment, before<br />

testing our hypotheses via an examination <strong>of</strong> South American MNEs during times <strong>of</strong> institutional change. In<br />

order to delineate traditional gain based motives versus the predominantly loss-avoidance based motive we<br />

suggest, we employ Prospect Theory as a lens. While initial findings are mixed, they do suggest that firms may,<br />

indeed, view OFDI as an escape response to deteriorating home-country institutions. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Jack Alan Clampit, University <strong>of</strong> Memphis, USA: jclampit@memphis.edu)<br />

Institutions sans Frontières: <strong>International</strong> Agreements and Foreign Investment<br />

Robert J Weiner, George Washington University<br />

Srividya Jandhyala, George Washington University<br />

Do international institutions – institutions that transcend country borders– reduce MNEs' political risk We<br />

examine whether the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Investment Agreements (IIAs), negotiated among countries for<br />

increased foreign investor protection, lowers political risk for MNEs by limiting the ability <strong>of</strong> host governments to<br />

make discriminatory policy changes adversely affecting the value <strong>of</strong> firms' investment. Using detailed<br />

transaction level data for sale <strong>of</strong> petroleum reserves in 50 countries, we find that MNEs pay significantly higher<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 168


MONDAY<br />

amounts for assets protected by IIAs than similar unprotected assets, an effect moderated by firm size. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Robert J Weiner, George Washington University, USA: rweiner@gwu.edu)<br />

Does the Origin <strong>of</strong> the Firm Matter Institutional Determinants <strong>of</strong> Acquisition Strategies in Russia<br />

Marie-Ann Betschinger, Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Olivier Bertrand, SKEMA Business School<br />

Tomi Laamanen, University <strong>of</strong> St.Gallen<br />

We aim at deepening the existing understanding <strong>of</strong> the antecedents <strong>of</strong> acquisitions by emerging market firms<br />

by providing a multi-layered analysis <strong>of</strong> the firm, industry, and region level determinants <strong>of</strong> acquisition behavior.<br />

We are interested in what causes firms to engage in a series <strong>of</strong> acquisitions and grow to become regionally,<br />

nationally, and eventually internationally influential firms. Based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 1500 <strong>of</strong> medium-sized and large<br />

firms in different regions <strong>of</strong> Russia, we examine what drives firms with little prior experience or capabilities to<br />

engage in acquisitions. Consistent with prior research, we find that firm size, slack, and low overall industry<br />

growth increase a firm's likelihood to engage in acquisitions. As a novel, to some extent counter-intuitive,<br />

finding we find that also the level <strong>of</strong> corruption in a region is a highly important determinant <strong>of</strong> acquisition<br />

behavior. Our paper contributes to an improved understanding <strong>of</strong> how informal institutions in emerging<br />

economies can affect firms' acquisition behavior. (For more information, please contact: Marie-Ann Betschinger,<br />

Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Russia: mbetschinger@hse.ru)<br />

Session: 2.4.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Politics and <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Bernard M. Wolf, York University<br />

Fortress Europe: ISO 9000 as a Device to Form an EU Standardization Union<br />

Joseph Clougherty, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and CEPR-London<br />

Michal Grajek, ESMT European School <strong>of</strong> Management and Technology<br />

Considering the trade-effects <strong>of</strong> one particular international standard (ISO 9000), we allow standardization to<br />

manifest via multiple (quality-signaling, information/compliance-cost, and common-language) channels, and use<br />

instrumental variable techniques to overcome endogeneity concerns. We find the quality-signaling and<br />

common-language effects to enhance country-pair trade, though host-nation standardization can impede trade<br />

flows. In particular, ISO-rich nations (most notably European) uniquely benefit from host-nation standardization,<br />

while the majority <strong>of</strong> nations (e.g., the US and all developing nations) actually find worldwide diffusion to<br />

represent a trade barrier due to compliance-cost effects. (For more information, please contact: Joseph<br />

Clougherty, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and CEPR-London, USA: jaclough@illinois.edu)<br />

Can the State be Trusted The Antecedents and Consequences <strong>of</strong> Institutional-Based Trust in the Russian<br />

Bank Deposit Market<br />

Andrew Spicer, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Ilya Okhmatovskiy, McGill University<br />

We extend research into the antecedents and consequences <strong>of</strong> institutional-based trust to the study <strong>of</strong> stateowned<br />

enterprises in emerging markets. We propose that if market participants trust the top political<br />

leadership in a country to oversee and monitor state-owned enterprises, then they may come to view state<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 169


MONDAY<br />

ownership as a signal <strong>of</strong> safety and security in an otherwise turbulent market environment. We test our<br />

argument about the positive, trust-producing functions <strong>of</strong> state-owned enterprises using a survey <strong>of</strong> over 2,400<br />

Russian individuals about their preferences <strong>of</strong> where to deposit their savings: in the Russian state bank, in a<br />

private bank or in no bank at all. We find that the antecedents and consequences <strong>of</strong> individual-level trust in<br />

state ownership differ from the antecedents and consequences <strong>of</strong> trust in state regulation, supporting the<br />

proposition that state ownership represents an independent mechanism by which institutional-based trust is<br />

produced. (For more information, please contact: Andrew Spicer, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA:<br />

aspicer@moore.sc.edu)<br />

Interaction between MNCs, Political Units and NGOs - The Case <strong>of</strong> Ericsson's CSR Strategy in Latin America<br />

Cecilia Pahlberg, Uppsala University<br />

Anna Ljung, Uppsala University<br />

Relationships between firms, governments and NGO's have in recent years attained increased interest. Not least<br />

when it comes to activities in emerging markets, interaction among these counterparts become vital. Applying a<br />

business network perspective, this paper will focus on how a multinational company (Eriksson) interact with<br />

political counterparts, NGOs and other firms when it comes to their CSR strategy. Given the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

emerging markets in the world economy today, and the lack <strong>of</strong> focus on Latin America in emerging economy<br />

studies, Ericsson's subsidiaries in the emerging economies Argentina and Brazil are chosen as study objects.<br />

Differences between the networks in the two countries are discussed and the cases point to the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

including relationships with both business and non-business actors in the analysis in order to understand the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the firm's CSR strategy. (For more information, please contact: Cecilia Pahlberg, Uppsala<br />

University, Sweden: cecilia.pahlberg@fek.uu.se)<br />

Session: 2.4.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

Exporting, Importing and Firm Strategy<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Jen Baggs, University <strong>of</strong> Victoria<br />

Exporting and Productivity: The Effects <strong>of</strong> Multi-market and Multi-product Export Entry<br />

Priit Vahter, University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham<br />

Jaan Masso, University <strong>of</strong> Tartu<br />

Empirical studies on the micro-level effects <strong>of</strong> exporting on productivity pay usually little attention to the<br />

potentially heterogeneous effects <strong>of</strong> the different modes <strong>of</strong> export market entry. We show that the early stage<br />

entry into several export markets or with several products leads to higher growth in productivity, compared with<br />

entry into only one foreign market or with only one product. This implies significant benefits from<br />

experimentation with different markets and different products. Our analysis is based on detailed export data<br />

from full population <strong>of</strong> firms in Estonia, disaggregated for each firm by export markets and individual products.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Priit Vahter, University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham, United Kingdom:<br />

p.vahter@bham.ac.uk)<br />

Does Finance Play a Role in Exporting for Indian Service Firms<br />

Sandra Lancheros, Aston Business School<br />

Pelin Demirel, Nottingham University Business School<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 170


MONDAY<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> finance for exporting goods is well understood in the literature. Yet, despite the growing<br />

magnitude and importance <strong>of</strong> services exports, the question whether service firms rely on external finance for<br />

exporting remains unanswered by the existing literature. In this paper we address this overlooked area by<br />

studying whether long and short term borrowing matters for the exporting decisions and the levels exported by<br />

Indian service firms. (For more information, please contact: Sandra Lancheros, Aston Business School, United<br />

Kingdom: spllancheros@hotmail.com)<br />

Import Competition and Business Strategies <strong>of</strong> Indian Firms<br />

B. Elango, Illinois State University<br />

Chinmay Pattnaik, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

This study seeks to empirically test the specific relationship between the various strategies employed by Indian<br />

firms and the impact on performance under import competition using a panel dataset <strong>of</strong> about 3800 Indian<br />

firms for the years 1996-2007. This study therefore will bring a greater understanding <strong>of</strong> how emerging market<br />

firms successfully adapt to import competition. Study findings will contribute to the literature on this topic at<br />

both the micro and macro levels. (For more information, please contact: B. Elango, Illinois State University,<br />

USA: elango@ilstu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.4.8 - Competitive<br />

Track: 14 - Methods in IB Research<br />

The Challenges <strong>of</strong> Mixed Methods in IB Research<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Catherine Welch, The University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in <strong>International</strong> Business: A Research Journey<br />

Vesna Sedoglavich, Australian National University<br />

Researchers <strong>of</strong>ten face challenging tasks and serious problems in conceptualization and evaluation <strong>of</strong> constructs<br />

that appear to be either vague and imprecise, or difficult to define. The absorptive capacity (AC) construct falls<br />

into this category. Problems come from hidden assumptions and one-dimensional methodological approaches,<br />

diminishing the validity <strong>of</strong> the construct and challenging its role and application in management. These<br />

methodological dilemmas, their implications and the solutions are the focus <strong>of</strong> the present paper. The paper<br />

discusses how solving the research problem may require thinking outside <strong>of</strong> the well-known methodological<br />

traditions. The paper demonstrates how mixed methods could be utilized to develop a deeper understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

ambiguous constructs such as AC. (For more information, please contact: Vesna Sedoglavich, Australian<br />

National University, Australia: vesna.sedoglavich@anu.edu.au)<br />

Managing Fieldwork Challenges within a Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Service Firm<br />

William Stopford Harvey, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

There has been a growth <strong>of</strong> work on qualitative methods in the last few decades, but one area that has been<br />

explored in less detail is the methodological challenges <strong>of</strong> firm-specific studies. This paper focuses on the<br />

difficulties faced when conducting a firm-specific study in multiple countries on a global pr<strong>of</strong>essional service<br />

firm. I begin by providing some context to the background and design <strong>of</strong> the research project. I then discuss<br />

the content <strong>of</strong> preliminary meetings with gatekeepers as well as the agreement <strong>of</strong> the non-disclosure<br />

agreement. I subsequently analyse some <strong>of</strong> the challenges I faced during the fieldwork, including feedback<br />

from meetings, gaining control <strong>of</strong> contacts, hierarchical difficulties as a junior researcher, and attempts with<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 171


MONDAY<br />

administering an online survey. I conclude by discussing feedback and provide some brief reflections on this<br />

particular fieldwork. The overall aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to provide a critical insight into the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />

conducting a firm study in order to help others who are conducting comparable studies. (For more information,<br />

please contact: William Stopford Harvey, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia: w.harvey@sydney.edu.au)<br />

Mixed Methods as a Research Strategy in <strong>International</strong> Business - From Simple Designs to Value Added<br />

Contribution<br />

Leila Hurmerinta, Turku University<br />

Niina Nummela, Turku University<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the research was to obtain a comprehensive picture <strong>of</strong> the empirical research design in IB studies<br />

having the focus on mixed methods studies. For that purpose we decided to conduct a systematic review<br />

process <strong>of</strong> recent studies in the field during ten years period. The objective <strong>of</strong> the review was threefold; first,<br />

we were interested in which research methods had been used, second, how they had been used and third,<br />

what was the value added that this research design had brought to the studies in question. The initial results<br />

confirmed our assumption <strong>of</strong> the increase in the use <strong>of</strong> mixed methods research design. Further, the correlation<br />

between the value added (facilitation, validity or knowledge) and the combination <strong>of</strong> mixed methods was not so<br />

simple. This required more in-depth analysis <strong>of</strong> the underlying factors determining the choice <strong>of</strong> the method.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Leila Hurmerinta, Turku University, Finland: lthupe@utu.fi)<br />

Identifying <strong>International</strong> Strategies through Content Analysis<br />

Birgitte Grogaard, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary<br />

Inger G. Stensaker, NHH<br />

Helene Loe Colman, Norwegian Business School<br />

In this study, we propose the use <strong>of</strong> content analysis <strong>of</strong> readily available secondary data to identify international<br />

strategies. This method has several benefits. First, access to multinationals and key informants can be both<br />

difficult and time consuming to achieve. Second, measures found in increasingly sophisticated quantitative<br />

methods do not necessarily capture important complexities <strong>of</strong> international strategies. We compare the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> our content analysis with in-depth interviews and internal strategy documents from three <strong>of</strong> the largest<br />

Norwegian MNEs. The findings support our use <strong>of</strong> content analysis <strong>of</strong> secondary data, showing significant<br />

alignment with the results from our analysis <strong>of</strong> in-depth interviews and internal strategy documents. Based on<br />

our findings, we argue that the proposed research method can provide valuable insights to identify international<br />

strategies when access is challenging as well as complement other methods by providing more information<br />

about combinations <strong>of</strong> different strategic elements. We also suggest that this method can be a useful tool for<br />

comparison across larger numbers <strong>of</strong> firms. (For more information, please contact: Birgitte Grogaard, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada: bgrogaar@ucalgary.ca)<br />

Session: 2.4.9 - Special Session<br />

Current Issues in Japanese Business Studies: Special Session <strong>of</strong> AJBS Best Papers<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Elizabeth L. Rose, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

The Effect <strong>of</strong> Two Staffing Decisions on Subsidiary Performance<br />

Naoki Ando, Hosei University<br />

No abstract available. (For more information, please contact: Naoki Ando, Hosei University, Japan:<br />

nando@hosei.ac.jp)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 172


MONDAY<br />

The Innovation System <strong>of</strong> Culture-Specific MNEs: the Effects <strong>of</strong> Diversified and Geographically Dispersed<br />

Knowledge Sourcing Mechanism<br />

Chie Iguchi, Keio University<br />

Takabumi Hayashi, Kokushikan University<br />

Atsuho Nakayama, Tokyo Metropolitan University<br />

No abstract available. (For more information, please contact: Chie Iguchi, Keio University, Japan:<br />

ciguchi@sfc.keio.ac.jp)<br />

Structural Empirical Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Job Search Behavior: Evidence from Japan and Korea<br />

Yuhee Jung, Meiji University<br />

Norihiko Takeuchi, Aoyama Gakuin University<br />

Tomokazu Takeuchi, Gakushuin University<br />

No abstract available. (For more information, please contact: Yuhee Jung, Meiji University, Japan:<br />

hopejung@kisc.meiji.ac.jp)<br />

Session: 2.4.10 - Competitive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Issues in Managing and Strategizing MNE's<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: William Newburry, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Employee Incentives and Boundary Conditions for Geographically Distant Knowledge within the MNE<br />

Shad Morris, Ohio State University<br />

Bi-Juan Zhong, Ohio State University<br />

Mona Makhija, Ohio State University<br />

While scholars regard MNEs as superior to markets due to their ability to effectively manage knowledge across<br />

geographical boundaries, how they accomplish this has not been examined. We develop and test a model that<br />

highlights the role <strong>of</strong> organizational incentives in influencing employees to search for and employ geographically<br />

distant knowledge. Data from 166 knowledge-based MNE projects indicate that outcome-related incentives<br />

motivate employees to search outside their geographical comfort zone, which in turn enhances project<br />

performance. Moreover, more codified distant knowledge, while easier to obtain and interpret, is seen to be<br />

much less effective in this regard than tacit knowledge. (For more information, please contact: Shad Morris,<br />

Ohio State University, USA: morris@fisher.osu.edu)<br />

Subsidiary Strategic Initiative: The Construct and its Antecedents<br />

Wan-Ching Chen, Sun Yat-Sen University<br />

Bih-Shiaw Jaw, Sun Yat-Sen University<br />

Christina Yu-Ping Wang, National Dong Hwa University<br />

This study focuses on multinational corporation's (MNC) foreign subsidiaries and aims to conceptualize the<br />

construct <strong>of</strong> subsidiary's strategic initiative through incorporating the theory <strong>of</strong> strategic entrepreneurship into<br />

MNC context. Additionally, this study extends our understandings on subsidiary initiative proposed by<br />

Birkinshaw by further explores the antecedents <strong>of</strong> subsidiary strategic initiative. Four enablers including TMT<br />

entrepreneurial leadership, entrepreneurial culture, subsidiary talent management, and absorptive capacity are<br />

proposed in our research model and the causal relationships between enablers are tested and supported by<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 173


MONDAY<br />

empirical evidences. A total <strong>of</strong> 202 valid questionnaires were collected from subsidiaries in Asian area. Using<br />

structure equitation modeling (SEM), this study testifies that: (1) subsidiary's strategic initiative is equipped with<br />

multilayers <strong>of</strong> initiative-taking, including subsidiary distinctive capability, subsidiary local market initiative, and<br />

outbound knowledge creation. (2) subsidiary's entrepreneurial culture is the most critical mediator that can lead<br />

to subsidiary's strategic initiative. (3) TMT entrepreneurial leadership is the core engine to activate the activities<br />

<strong>of</strong> strategic value creations at the subsidiary's level. (4) the international human resource management (IHRM)<br />

practices <strong>of</strong> talent management in the subsidiary level plays an mediating role on the development <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurial culture, absorptive capacity, and the enhancement <strong>of</strong> subsidiary strategic initiative. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Wan-Ching Chen, Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan: paospaos@gmail.com)<br />

Explicit Leader Behaviour Preferences: Turkish & Cross-National Sample Comparisons<br />

Romie Frederick Littrell, Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

E. Serra Yurtkoru, Marmara University<br />

Handan Kepir Sinangil, Marmara University<br />

Beril Durmus, Marmara University<br />

Alev Katrinli, Izmir University <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Gülem Atabay, Izmir University <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Gonca Günay, Izmir University <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Burcu Güneri-Çangarlı, Izmir University <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Dimensions <strong>of</strong> explicit managerial leader behaviour are assessed for samples <strong>of</strong> businesspeople in Turkey, and<br />

compared within Turkey and across samples from Europe and the USA. Past research in Turkey has indicated<br />

strong preferences for Paternal and Authoritarian leadership styles. We however find that Turkish<br />

businesspeople tend to prefer leaders who focus on managing the business system over other considerations<br />

such as relationships with subordinates. We found in the business environment there appears to be little or no<br />

difference in preferences relating to gender; men and women have nearly identical ideal leader preferences.<br />

Concerning Paternal and Authoritarian style behaviours, our samples neither received nor expected Paternal<br />

leader behaviour. They expected and did receive moderately Authoritarian leader behaviour. Compared to both<br />

USA and European businesspeople, Turkish businesspeople have greater concerns for Predictive Accuracy—<br />

good planning and forecasting. (For more information, please contact: Romie Frederick Littrell, Auckland<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Technology, New Zealand: romie.littrell@aut.ac.nz)<br />

Session: 2.4.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

A Little Bit About Everything You Want to Know About INVs and Born Globals<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Viveca Sasi, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

'Alternative Governance Structure': An Exploratory Study on Power in a Born Global Organization<br />

Lin Yan, Anglia Ruskin University<br />

In their seminal work, Oviatt and McDougall propsoed the notion <strong>of</strong> 'alternative governance structure' that<br />

enables Born Global organizations to sustain competitive advantages. Despite the proliferation <strong>of</strong> Born Global<br />

research, paucity remains on studies directly addressing the governance <strong>of</strong> Born Globals. Through a<br />

longitudinal case study, this paper explores the articulation and negotiation <strong>of</strong> power in a Born Global<br />

organization that spread across 18 countries. The findings suggest an emergent, negotiated and individualized<br />

form <strong>of</strong> power, different from the traditional notions <strong>of</strong> 'power over' and 'power to', which we termed as 'power<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 174


MONDAY<br />

with'. (For more information, please contact: Lin Yan, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom:<br />

lin.yan@anglia.ac.uk)<br />

Resource Differences between Born Global and Born Regional Firms: Evidence from Canadian Small and<br />

Medium-Sized Manufacturers 1997-2004<br />

Sui Sui, Ryerson University<br />

Zhihao Yu, Carleton University<br />

Matthias Baum, University <strong>of</strong> Giessen<br />

While <strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurship research has intensively observed the creation and management <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> New Ventures (INV), we only have a limited understanding on different types <strong>of</strong> INVs. More<br />

specifically, we do not know why some INVs pursue geographically restrained internationalization (so called<br />

Born Regional Firms), while others decide for a globally dispersed approach (so called Born Global firms). This<br />

study draws on resource-based theory and applies logistic regression on a longitudinal sample <strong>of</strong> 604 Canadian<br />

exporting manufactures to investigate how firm internal resources differentiate between Born Global and Born<br />

Regional firms. We find that, compared to Born Regionals, Born Globals have significantly greater global market<br />

knowledge, and have significantly higher initial performance. (For more information, please contact: Sui Sui,<br />

Ryerson University, Canada: sui.sui.66@gmail.com)<br />

Models <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Entrepreneurship<br />

Morten Rask, Aarhus University<br />

Per Servais, University <strong>of</strong> Southern Denmark<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this article is to provide a comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> models used to depict infant firms that operate<br />

internationally right from or close to inception, so-called international new ventures (INVs) or born global firms<br />

that emerged in the literature in the early 1990s up until today. The purpose with this article is to give a<br />

comprehensive overview <strong>of</strong> models used to describe and explain the establishment and development <strong>of</strong><br />

international new ventures. Based upon a diverse platform <strong>of</strong> types <strong>of</strong> research and types <strong>of</strong> models we have<br />

developed three meta-models <strong>of</strong> international entrepreneurship. The matrix model defines types <strong>of</strong> international<br />

entrepreneurial firms. The multi-stimuli model explains how the external environment factors and the internal<br />

organizational and managerial factors influence the international entrepreneurship strategies. The stimuliresponse<br />

model explains the antecedents/drivers <strong>of</strong> moderators in and performance by international<br />

entrepreneurship. These models reflect the merger <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship and international business into the field<br />

<strong>of</strong> international entrepreneurship. Managers in international entrepreneurial firms and students in international<br />

business and entrepreneurship can use the models as framework for understanding international<br />

entrepreneurship. A call for more research on cross-country comparative aspects together with more focus on<br />

products and business opportunities in relation to international entrepreneurship finalize the paper. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Morten Rask, Aarhus University, Denmark: mr@morten-rask.dk)<br />

Born Globals: Evolution and revolution as organisations grow<br />

Vítor Corado Simões, ISEG, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Lisbon<br />

Jacinto Antunes Celorico, ISEG, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Lisbon<br />

Luís Filipe Laranjeira, ISEG, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Lisbon<br />

This paper is intended to assess the relevance <strong>of</strong> the punctuated equilibrium model (Gould, 2002; Romanelli<br />

and Tushman, 1994) and Greiner's (1972) "evolution and revolution" models to explain how Born Global firms'<br />

(BGs) behaviors and structures change as they get older. Three main perspectives (Business model,<br />

Configuration <strong>of</strong> assets and responsibilities, and Top management logic) were used to enable the identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> "evolution and revolution" phases in two exploratory cases. The paper shows that BGs follow different<br />

stages, corresponding to new combinations <strong>of</strong> business models, configurations <strong>of</strong> assets and responsibilities,<br />

and top management logic. Changes are a result <strong>of</strong> internal perceptions, capabilities and tensions, and external<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 175


MONDAY<br />

opportunities and challenges as framed by top management mental models. The punctuated equilibrium model<br />

was not supported. Greiner's (1972) approach may, at the least in the first phases, contribute to explain BG<br />

development. BGs face transitions that entail significant changes in the way how business is understood and<br />

how the company is organized. However, the result from the transition is not fully congruent archetype as<br />

Ambos and Birkinshaw (2010) suggested. Another important contribution is the finding that some prefoundation<br />

features do persist for more than twelve years after company creation, namely the international<br />

commitment. (For more information, please contact: Vítor Corado Simões, ISEG, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Lisbon,<br />

Portugal: vcs@iseg.utl.pt)<br />

The New Argonauts, <strong>International</strong> New Ventures and Performance Implication<br />

Guohua Jiang, Temple University<br />

Masaaki Kotabe , Temple University<br />

<strong>International</strong> new venture (INV) is an important topic for scholarly inquiry in international entrepreneurship<br />

literature. A new venture with an ethnically diversified founding team could leverage international experience<br />

and network <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> its founders, thereby, influencing its recognition <strong>of</strong> opportunities and access to<br />

resources to pursue internationalization strategy. This study explores the effect <strong>of</strong> founding ethnic composition<br />

on a new venture's internationalization strategic choice. Then, we study the performance implication <strong>of</strong> new<br />

ventures. We test hypotheses using longitudinal data <strong>of</strong> 4,928 new ventures in Kauffman Firm Survey. It is<br />

found that more immigrant entrepreneurs are more likely to pursue INV strategy while more US citizen<br />

entrepreneurs will pursue domestic new venture (DNV) strategy. Furthermore, INV has higher revenues than<br />

DNV but there is no difference in pr<strong>of</strong>its between them. Finally, a new venture is established with the<br />

entrepreneur's initial knowledge; while it is required to acquire and develop additional organizational technology<br />

knowledge. Both are important for new venture performance. (For more information, please contact: Guohua<br />

Jiang, Temple University, USA: tua63885@temple.edu)<br />

An <strong>International</strong> Ambidexterity Model to Understand New Venture <strong>International</strong>ization and Growth<br />

Fiona Xiaoying Ji, Kean University<br />

Devi R. Gnyawali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University<br />

Donald E. Hatfield, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University<br />

Firms use international operations to access external resources to exploit existing competences or explore new<br />

market or technological knowledge; however after initial internationalization at a young age, international new<br />

ventures might choose to go to similar foreign markets to leverage and exploit existing knowledge for growth or<br />

they might continue experimenting with less related foreign markets. In this study, we propose that<br />

international new ventures benefit from using an ambidextrous strategy for long-term performance employing<br />

both exploitation and exploration. Using a sample <strong>of</strong> 311 international new ventures to test our hypotheses, we<br />

found that the benefits associated with international exploration through early internationalization are realized<br />

when a firm continues further commitment to exploitation capabilities so they can accomplish ambidexterity<br />

learning from narrower scope <strong>of</strong> international expansion. (For more information, please contact: Fiona Xiaoying<br />

Ji, Kean University, USA: xji@kean.edu)<br />

Session: 2.4.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

<strong>International</strong>izing and Enriching the Business Curriculum<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Vinod K Jain, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 176


MONDAY<br />

<strong>International</strong> Business Boot Camp (An Intensive IB Course with Field Visits)<br />

Vinod K Jain, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

The "Introduction to <strong>International</strong> Business Management" course at the Robert H. Smith School <strong>of</strong> Business,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, is a fairly standard, 3-credit IB survey course <strong>of</strong>fered in business schools. In 2008, I<br />

started <strong>of</strong>fering the course during the first summer session as an accelerated, intensive course, comprising both<br />

classroom learning and field visits; it is called the "<strong>International</strong> Business Boot Camp." The course is housed in<br />

our Washington D.C. location, and students participate in classroom activities in the mornings and visit<br />

international organizations, multilateral institutions, and foreign embassies in the afternoons. Students are<br />

required to have read almost half the textbook before starting the course and take a 30-minute exam on Day 1,<br />

and complete a team project after the course ends. The Boot Camp is open to students from throughout the UM<br />

campus, which creates interesting group dynamics and opportunities for business and non-business students to<br />

see the world through (each other's) interdisciplinary lenses. While Washington D.C. is a quintessentially<br />

international city and it is relatively easy to <strong>of</strong>fer such a course here, most major cities in the United States and<br />

other countries have enough international resources available where such a course would be viable. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Vinod K Jain, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park, USA: vjain@rhsmith.umd.edu)<br />

Assessing Study Abroad <strong>International</strong> Business Offerings<br />

Chad Smith, Clarion University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Miguel R. Olivas-Luján, Clarion University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Study Abroad programs is becoming a necessity for all stakeholders, in particular for<br />

<strong>International</strong> Business faculty members in accredited institutions. In this session, we will review pressures,<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer suggestions and suggest components <strong>of</strong> assessment initiatives that participants can use in their home<br />

institutions. Our goal is to describe a general research design that can be used for assessment purposes in<br />

multiple locations to advance our knowledge <strong>of</strong> and facilitate this increasingly important component <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> Business Education. Attendants to this session will take home references and a blueprint that they<br />

may modify to fit their pr<strong>of</strong>essional needs. Robust, built-in assessment strategies in international study<br />

programs is a major contribution that <strong>International</strong> Business faculty can make to the internationalization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

curriculum in Business schools as well as in higher education more generally. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Miguel R. Olivas-Luján, Clarion University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA: molivas@clarion.edu)<br />

Leveraging the IB Learning Experience with Study Tours: A Must for IB Curriculum<br />

Sri Beldona, University <strong>of</strong> Dallas<br />

Scott Wysong, University <strong>of</strong> Dallas<br />

With economic downturn in some <strong>of</strong> the advanced countries <strong>of</strong> the world, the economic turmoil <strong>of</strong> countries like<br />

Greece, Italy, Iceland, Ireland etc., the realization has sunk in that most sales for MNCs come from outside <strong>of</strong><br />

their country, especially from emerging economies. Not that this is a new phenomenon but something that has<br />

hit home very hard in the recent few years. Despite this fact very few schools that <strong>of</strong>fer IB curriculum have<br />

made it mandatory for their students to embark on a study tour to immerse them in the nuances <strong>of</strong> conducting<br />

business in emerging economies. This paper while arguing for making study tours a core requirement for IB<br />

curriculum also provides practical suggestions to improve and enhance study tours to have a lasting impact on<br />

the students. (For more information, please contact: Sri Beldona, University <strong>of</strong> Dallas, USA:<br />

sbeldona@udallas.edu)<br />

<strong>International</strong>izing the Business Curriculum at a Historically Black University: The Implementation Experience<br />

Jun Wu, Savannah State University<br />

Anshu Arora, Savannah State University<br />

Suman Niranjan, Savannah State University<br />

Reginald Leseane, Savannah State University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 177


MONDAY<br />

In response to the challenges <strong>of</strong> globalization, many universities have adopted the strategy <strong>of</strong> "internationalizing<br />

the curriculum". This research paper presents a case study about internationalization at a business school <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Historical Black College and University (HBCU) in the State <strong>of</strong> Georgia, United States. In order to provide<br />

students with capability for employment in the global economy, the business school introduced a new program -<br />

Global Logistics and <strong>International</strong> Business (G-LIB). In this study, we discuss the need to have an international<br />

business program at a HBCU, and the challenges and benefits <strong>of</strong> developing international collaborations with<br />

universities and companies that focus on international business. This paper provides practical implications for<br />

similar HBCU and other universities interested in internationalizing their curriculum. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Jun Wu, Savannah State University, USA: wuj@savannahstate.edu)<br />

Teaching Global Leadership<br />

Mansour Javidan, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

Jennie Walker, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management<br />

This paper provides a useful approach to teaching global leadership by identifying and defining the concepts<br />

and associated curriculum. It also identifies the critical learning outcomes <strong>of</strong> this curriculum. Perhaps most<br />

importantly, it highlights the dynamic learning methods required to create real and measurable impact in<br />

learning outcomes. (For more information, please contact: Mansour Javidan, Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global<br />

Management, USA: mansour.javidan@thunderbird.edu)<br />

Session: 2.4.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Global Talent Management<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Allan Bird, Northeastern University<br />

Returnees and MNE Staffing<br />

Huanglin Wang, Utica College<br />

Jean-Louis Schaan, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

Returnees, those who went overseas for higher education and then returned to their home countries, represent<br />

a unique group <strong>of</strong> employees for multinational enterprises (MNEs). However, they have been ignored in the<br />

MNE staffing literature which has developed a staffing typology based on nationality, specifically parent country<br />

nationals (PCNs), host country nationals (HCNs), and third country nationals (TCNs). However, the literature<br />

suggests that culture is a key element in overseas assignments. Ten top executives from multinational<br />

subsidiaries in China were interviewed in order to identify and delineate the unique characteristics <strong>of</strong> returnees.<br />

They suggested that returnees understand multiple cultures, possess cross-cultural communication skills, and a<br />

global perspective; and act as a "bridge" between expatriates and locals, between a subsidiary and the other<br />

units <strong>of</strong> the MNE (including headquarters and the other subsidiaries), as well as between the MNE and the local<br />

environment. The findings from the interviews strongly suggest that cultural understanding is a more<br />

appropriate criterion than nationality in categorizing staff in MNEs. Based on this criterion, we compare<br />

returnees with the existing categorizations <strong>of</strong> MNE staff from both headquarters' perspective and subsidiary's<br />

perspective; their contribution to the two staffing purposes including subsidiary control and organizational<br />

learning; as well as their positions in the two conflicting goals <strong>of</strong> global integration and local responsiveness.<br />

Returnees may be closer to the ‘balanced individuals' that MNEs need compared with either expatriates or<br />

locals. Therefore, they may be a good staffing choice for MNE subsidiaries in China. This study contributes to<br />

the literature by proposing a new criterion for staffing categorization in MNEs, by studying a new type <strong>of</strong> staff –<br />

returnees. It directs us to a promising direction in MNE staffing research and has the potential to help managers<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 178


MONDAY<br />

develop more effective overseas staffing strategies. (For more information, please contact: Huanglin Wang,<br />

Utica College, USA: huwang@utica.edu)<br />

Strategy and Global Talent Management the Chicken or the Egg: An Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Impact <strong>of</strong> Strategy <strong>of</strong> MNEs'<br />

Global Talent Management Systems<br />

Tomas Alexander Parks, Cleveland State University<br />

This article examines the relationship between a MNE's international marketing strategy and its GTM systems.<br />

The point <strong>of</strong> interest is to what extent a MNE's international marketing strategy impacts the GTM systems <strong>of</strong> its<br />

subsidiaries. Much literature in the strategy field proposes that strategy exerts a normative force on other<br />

systems in the MNE, contingency theory. This paper makes propositions about this relationship with regards to<br />

the way a MNE's subsidiaries' run their GTM systems. The propositions provide a few possible impacts and<br />

relationships <strong>of</strong> note. They also have some interesting implications for managers. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Tomas Alexander Parks, Cleveland State University, USA: t.a.parks@csuohio.edu)<br />

Country Institutional Constraints: Interjecting a New Option into the "Best Practice" Versus "Best Fit" Debate in<br />

HRM<br />

Nicholas R. Prince, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

J. Bruce Prince, Kansas State University<br />

Bradley R. Skousen, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br />

Ruediger Kabst, Justus-Liebig-Universitat<br />

We call into question the recently settled "best practice" versus "best fit" debate and propose a third option.<br />

We do so by integrating the comparative human resource management (HRM) and new institutional theory<br />

streams <strong>of</strong> research into the prior conversation on "best practice" versus "best fit". We provide a review <strong>of</strong> both<br />

literatures. Prior evidence suggests that "best fit" is the best answer based on multiple studies showing a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

convergence towards a global "best practice". However, evidence from comparative HRM studies suggests a<br />

convergence towards a country level "best practice". Using the theoretical lens provided by new institutional<br />

theory we propose that organizations embedded in each country will have a limited set <strong>of</strong> institutional logics to<br />

choose from. These logics can be considered a country constrained "best fit" approach. We test this theory by<br />

testing the convergence/divergence <strong>of</strong> calculative HRM practices in 8 countries in four regional clusters (Anglo,<br />

Nordic, Germanic, and Confucian Asia). Our results indicate the convergence towards a country constrained<br />

"best fit" and suggest convergence within each regional cluster with the exception <strong>of</strong> the Confucian Asian<br />

cluster. Japan and Taiwan break from previously established cluster delineations by reporting differences in<br />

their usage <strong>of</strong> calculative HRM. (For more information, please contact: Nicholas R. Prince, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at<br />

Urbana-Champaign, USA: prince4@illinois.edu)<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Global Orientation and Corporate Social Responsibility on Recruiting Success<br />

Soyeon Kim, Korea University<br />

Fabian Jintae Froese, Korea University<br />

Attracting qualified personnel is crucial in today's globalized and knowledge intensive world because human<br />

resources are a source for competitive advantage. This study investigates the determinants <strong>of</strong> applicant<br />

attraction at the organizational level in a transformational Asian economy, namely South Korea. Data analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

284 Korean companies, demonstrate that similar organizational factors as in the West, e.g. size and reputation,<br />

also predict the actual number <strong>of</strong> applicants in South Korea. Going beyond simple replication <strong>of</strong> prior studies,<br />

this study examines the direct and interactive effects <strong>of</strong> corporate social responsibility (CSR), global orientation,<br />

and regional location on applicant attraction. Results show that global orientation, CSR, and location, are<br />

directly associated with applicant attraction. More importantly, the findings elucidate that location disadvantages<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 179


MONDAY<br />

<strong>of</strong> companies can be overcome by improving social responsiveness and higher global orientation. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Fabian Jintae Froese, Korea University, Korea, South: fabian.froese@gmail.com)<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> Subsidiary Autonomy for Human Resources Management in Emerging Market Multinationals<br />

Sergio Nunes Muritiba, University Nove de Julho<br />

Patricia Morilha Muritiba, University Nove de Julho<br />

Lindolfo Galvão Albuquerque, University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim Vasconcellos, University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the key aspects on the study <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the headquarters is the level <strong>of</strong> control they exert over<br />

subsidiaries. This paper analyzes the level <strong>of</strong> control exerted by emerging market multinational headquarters<br />

over their international subsidiaries' human resources management policies, based on the case <strong>of</strong> Brazil. A<br />

theoretical framework was then applied to twelve cases <strong>of</strong> Brazilian multinationals, exploring the determinants<br />

<strong>of</strong> different control levels. Results lead to proposing that while the higher levels <strong>of</strong> HQ control relate to smaller<br />

subsidiary sizes and greenfield investments, lower control is tied to the age <strong>of</strong> the subsidiaries – more years <strong>of</strong><br />

international experience – and the strategic intention to promote flexibility and adjustment to local law. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Patricia Morilha Muritiba, University Nove de Julho, Brazil:<br />

pmorilha@gmail.com)<br />

Gender Implications in Balancing Work and Family Among Today's Global Managers<br />

Pamela Lirio, EDHEC Business School<br />

Recognizing new entrants to global careers highlights the importance <strong>of</strong> global experience in career<br />

development, as well as the growing prevalence <strong>of</strong> global aspects in many jobs within today's organizations<br />

(Cullen, 2007). Traditionally, women have been under represented in global careers when examined from the<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> expatriate assignments (Adler, 1984; Altman & Shortland, 2008; Thomas, Lazarova, & Inkson,<br />

2005). However, scholars are increasingly exploring alternative forms <strong>of</strong> global careers such as frequent<br />

international business travel and virtual global work. These are thought to enable employees to work globally<br />

and develop or maintain global skills in the workplace while not uprooting the family (Collings et al., 2007),<br />

which may in turn encourage more women to undertake global work and those seeking work-life balance. This<br />

has significant implications for organizations in terms <strong>of</strong> HR strategies to maintain a diverse workforce and<br />

develop senior leadership in the future. This paper presents exploratory research on a subset <strong>of</strong> young women<br />

and men global managers who are balancing global work with family. Understanding issues <strong>of</strong> diversity is<br />

essential to managing the necessary talent for achieving organizational success in today's competitive global<br />

business environment (Beutell & Wittig-Berman, 2008). (For more information, please contact: Pamela Lirio,<br />

EDHEC Business School, France: pamela.lirio@edhec.edu)<br />

Updating Cross Cultural Management: Exploring the Relationships between Cultural Values and Gender<br />

Inequality Practices<br />

Andy Bertsch, Minot State University<br />

Gillian Warner-Soderholm, Norwegian Business School<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to explore relationships between societal cultural values and observable gender<br />

equality indices including the Gender Inequality Index (GII), the Women's Economic Opportunity Index (WEO),<br />

and the Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI). Correlations are explored using secondary data from published<br />

GLOBE societal cultural values against the three societal behavior indices (GII, WEO, and GGGI). Data analysis<br />

includes Pearson correlation, tests for significance, step-wise regression analyses, and R-squared analyses to<br />

explore possible operational models. Statistical analyses <strong>of</strong>fer support for the development <strong>of</strong> two useable<br />

models whereby societal cultural value dimensions act as independent variables. This exploratory study<br />

identified two workable models: (i) the societal values <strong>of</strong> ‘Uncertainty Avoidance' and ‘Future Orientation' as<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 180


MONDAY<br />

determinants for a society's placement along the GII index, and (ii) societal values <strong>of</strong> ‘Gender Egalitarianism'<br />

and ‘Uncertainty Avoidance' as determinants for a society's placement along the WEO index. An interesting<br />

discovery, and one that warrants further study, is the presence <strong>of</strong> ‘Uncertainty Avoidance' as a determinant in<br />

both final models. We believe this adds to the debate on which cultural values and traditions may support or<br />

hinder the development <strong>of</strong> gender equality practices. (For more information, please contact: Andy Bertsch,<br />

Minot State University, USA: andy.bertsch@minotstateu.edu)<br />

Session: 2.4.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Corporate Governance Issues in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Robert Grosse, George Mason University<br />

Managerial Redeployment, Ownership Structure, and Family Ties<br />

Sharon Belenzon, Duke University<br />

Andrea Patacconi, Aberdeen University<br />

It is widely acknowledged that the ability to redeploy and recombine internal resources is an important source<br />

<strong>of</strong> competitive advantage. This paper deepens our understanding <strong>of</strong> the factors affecting internal redeployment<br />

by exploring how shared ownership and managers' family ties influence top managerial mobility in business<br />

groups. We find that managerial redeployment is more common in affiliates that are wholly-owned by the group<br />

controlling shareholder than in affiliates that are only partly-owned. Consistent with property rights view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

firm, the effect <strong>of</strong> minority shareholders in a destination affiliate is especially large when the source affiliate is<br />

wholly-owned. A distinctive pattern is observed for managers who are related to one <strong>of</strong> the group's dominant<br />

shareholders. We discuss the implications <strong>of</strong> our results for the theory <strong>of</strong> the firm and the role <strong>of</strong> family in<br />

business groups. (For more information, please contact: Sharon Belenzon, Duke University, USA:<br />

sb135@duke.edu)<br />

When is a Nexus <strong>of</strong> Contracts More Firm-Like Theory and Evidence from Business Groups<br />

Sharon Belenzon, Duke University<br />

Andrea Patacconi, Aberdeen University<br />

Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

When is a nexus <strong>of</strong> contracts more firm-like We theoretically and empirically address this question in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> business groups. We develop a model where assets can be diverted from one group affiliate to<br />

another and asset redeployment is more valuable when firms operate in related industries. The group<br />

ownership structure affects both the controlling shareholder's propensity to expropriate and the minority<br />

shareholders' incentives to monitor. We show that specialized groups choose more vertical structures and may<br />

well exhibit greater ownership concentration than diversified groups. We then confirm these predictions using<br />

novel and comprehensive data on business groups from 15 European countries. Interestingly, however, we also<br />

find substantial cross-country variation. (For more information, please contact: Sharon Belenzon, Duke<br />

University, USA: sb135@duke.edu)<br />

Multiple Paths to the Same Destination: The Role <strong>of</strong> Private, Public, and Civil Actors in Industry Emergence<br />

Jocelyn M. Leitzinger, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison<br />

Jennifer Spencer, George Washington University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 181


MONDAY<br />

Both social movements and national political institutional structures have been shown to influence or facilitate<br />

the emergence <strong>of</strong> new organizational forms. But, little research has examined the interactive role that civil<br />

society, the state, and incumbent industries play in the emergence <strong>of</strong> new markets. Building on institutional<br />

theory, this study builds a theoretical framework for categorizing the actions and reactions <strong>of</strong> social movements<br />

and incumbent industries as they interact with the institutional arrangements particular to each nation.<br />

Developing a 2x2 <strong>of</strong> state strength and the disruption to entrenched institutions, the framework depicts the<br />

typical path taken by social movements and incumbent firms in engaging the public and government in<br />

discourse on socially relevant issues. The varying paths to the successful emergence <strong>of</strong> new organizational<br />

forms through the iterative interactions <strong>of</strong> private, public, and civil actors are explored. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Jocelyn M. Leitzinger, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison, USA: jleitzinger@wisc.edu)<br />

Government-Business Relations and Financial Crises<br />

Robert Grosse, George Mason University<br />

Albert Wocke, GIBS University <strong>of</strong> Pretoria<br />

The global financial crisis <strong>of</strong> 2008-9 affected government-international business relations importantly, leading to<br />

adjustments <strong>of</strong> both government policies and company strategies. The crisis disrupted this relationship,<br />

affecting the relative resources <strong>of</strong> governments and companies, as well as what each had at stake in their<br />

relationships, and also the similarity <strong>of</strong> their interests during the difficult macroeconomic and financial times.<br />

This paper presents a dynamic conceptual framework for viewing the government-international business<br />

relationship, and uses four empirical bargaining contexts to demonstrate the usefulness <strong>of</strong> the model. In<br />

addition, evidence on government policy and financial crises is presented to show how in times <strong>of</strong> crisis the<br />

government side <strong>of</strong> the bargaining relationship has shifted. (For more information, please contact: Robert<br />

Grosse, George Mason University, USA: rgrosse@gmu.edu)<br />

Informal Institutions and Limits to <strong>International</strong> Convergence in Corporate Governance: The Reaction to Hedge<br />

Fund Activism in Japan<br />

John Buchanan, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Dominic Chai, Seoul National University<br />

Simon Deakin, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Using the example <strong>of</strong> the reaction to recent hedge fund activism in Japan, we observe how informal institutions,<br />

namely norms and conventions shaping the behaviour <strong>of</strong> managers and investors, mediate the effect <strong>of</strong> more<br />

formal ones based on laws and regulations. In our Japanese study, informal norms expressing the logic <strong>of</strong> the<br />

"community firm" are seen to subvert the impact <strong>of</strong> formal institutions potentially supportive <strong>of</strong> the principle <strong>of</strong><br />

"shareholder primacy". The effect we identify helps to explain why global convergence <strong>of</strong> corporate governance<br />

practices, despite growing similarity <strong>of</strong> formal laws and regulations, has yet to take place. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Dominic Chai, Seoul National University, Korea, South: dchai@snu.ac.kr)<br />

Culture and Corruption: A Concurrent Application <strong>of</strong> H<strong>of</strong>stede's, Schwartz's and Inglehart's Frameworks<br />

Hamid Yeganeh, Winona State University<br />

This study aims at investigating the effects <strong>of</strong> cultural values on corruption by integrating H<strong>of</strong>stede's,<br />

Schwartz's, and Inglehart's frameworks. The empirical analysis confirms that after controlling for the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

socio-economic development, cultural values have considerable influence on the level <strong>of</strong> perceived corruption.<br />

More specifically, it is found that H<strong>of</strong>stede's High Power Distance, High Uncertainty Avoidance, Masculinity and<br />

Collectivism, Schwartz's Conservatism and Harmony, and Inglehart's Survival and Traditional-religious<br />

dimensions are associated with the corrupt behavior. By contrast, the opposite values namely H<strong>of</strong>stede's Low<br />

Power Distance, Low Uncertainty Avoidance, Femininity, and Individualism, Schwartz's Autonomy and Mastery,<br />

and Inglehart's Self-Expression and Rational-secular dimensions tend to impede corruption. Building on a<br />

principal-agent perspective, the theoretical and practical implications are discussed and an integrative model is<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 182


MONDAY<br />

proposed. (For more information, please contact: Hamid Yeganeh, Winona State University, USA:<br />

hyeganeh@winona.edu)<br />

How Do Top Managers and Powerful External Actors Affect the Relationship between Resistance and Adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> Diffusing Practice An Integrating Framework<br />

Qian Lu, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

Jieyu Zhou, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

We provide a framework to examine how resistance impacts firm's adoption <strong>of</strong> new diffusing practice. In our<br />

framework, Firm's adoption toward the new practice is classified according to two dimensions: completeness <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation and fidelity <strong>of</strong> framing. We argue that the relationships among firm's resistance and the two<br />

ends <strong>of</strong> adoption are affected by different agents: Top manager's perception <strong>of</strong> the new practice moderates the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> resistance on completeness <strong>of</strong> implementation, while resistance's influence on fidelity <strong>of</strong> framing<br />

depends on powerful external actors' perception toward the new practice. The national system serves as the<br />

boundary condition for the framework. (For more information, please contact: Qian Lu, National University <strong>of</strong><br />

Singapore, Singapore: luqian@nus.edu.sg)<br />

Session: 2.4.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

MNEs from Emerging Markets, MNEs in Emerging Markets<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Jiawen Yang, George Washington University<br />

FDI Outflows and Domestic Investment in the BRIC Countries: An Empirical Exercise<br />

Nandita Dasgupta, UMBC<br />

The emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) are aggressively pursuing international<br />

investment practices through outbound foreign direct investment (OFDI) activities since the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

their outward looking development strategies. The increasing FDI outflows from these countries have naturally<br />

raised concerns relating to the repercussions on their domestic investment and capital formation from the<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> economic development and growth. The concern arises because OFDI activities could shift not<br />

only some <strong>of</strong> the production activities from home to foreign destinations but also could possibly threaten the<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> scarce financial resources at home by allocating resources abroad. All this have the potential to<br />

reduce domestic investment, thus lowering the long run domestic economic growth and employment. The<br />

central goal <strong>of</strong> this paper is to empirically investigate and evaluate the evidence <strong>of</strong> the macroeconomic<br />

relationship between OFDI and levels <strong>of</strong> domestic capital formation in the BRIC economies. This study is<br />

carried out in two broad steps. The first step is a time series data analysis where we have performed country<br />

level exercise to estimate the causal relationship between OFDI and domestic investment in each <strong>of</strong> the four<br />

BRIC countries. Given the limitations on data availability, we had to restrict ourselves to a bivariate analysis with<br />

gross capital formation (GCF: measure <strong>of</strong> domestic investment) and OFDI as the only two variables. In the next<br />

step, we have employed a balanced panel <strong>of</strong> four BRIC countries over the period <strong>of</strong> 19 years from 1992 through<br />

2010. The choice <strong>of</strong> our variables is basically from the Feldstein (1995) model, which includes FDI inflows and<br />

outflows, domestic savings as well as other variables that might jointly influence domestic investment. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Nandita Dasgupta, UMBC, USA: nandita@umbc.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 183


MONDAY<br />

Not for All: What Explains Cross-Border Acquisitions from Emerging Market Firms<br />

Larissa Rabbiosi, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Tamara Stucchi, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Drawing upon the resource-based view, we examine how the degree <strong>of</strong> geographic fungibility <strong>of</strong> firm-specific<br />

resources (upstream, downstream and relational assets) relates to the location choice <strong>of</strong> international<br />

acquisitions made by emerging market firms. We test our hypotheses on 14,330 observations <strong>of</strong> Indian firms<br />

observed in the period 2006-2010. The results suggest that upstream (technological) resources enhance<br />

acquisitions in developed markets while acquisitions in other developing countries are more likely when the<br />

emerging market firm owns greater advertising resources. Relational assets also contribute in explaining the<br />

destination <strong>of</strong> acquisitions by emerging market firms: local-based ties inhibit the probability <strong>of</strong> engaging in<br />

cross-border acquisitions, while co-ethnic-based ties enhance the probability <strong>of</strong> acquisitions in advanced<br />

markets. (For more information, please contact: Tamara Stucchi, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark:<br />

ts.smg@cbs.dk)<br />

Foreign Listing: An <strong>International</strong>ization Approach <strong>of</strong> Emerging Market Firms<br />

Yangwen Wang, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Xufei Ma, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Foreign listing is a surging phenomenon in global capital market. The financial motivations for listing abroad<br />

have been widely studied in finance and economics. However, explanations are lacking from strategic<br />

perspective. We argue that foreign listing is an important strategic decision to help with the emerging market<br />

firms' international expansion. Employing organizational learning theory, we suggest that foreign listing provides<br />

firms with fast and low cost learning experience, which helps EMFs to overcome their liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness and<br />

latecomer disadvantage. Furthermore, we investigate the special institutional environment EMFs facing. We<br />

suggest that served as institutional supports, business group affiliation, subnational institutional openness and<br />

industry popularity in the global market give the firm legitimacy in both the home country and the foreign stock<br />

market, and thus promote foreign listing. We further propose that these institutional supports facilitate learning<br />

process, and thus positively moderate the relationship between internationalization and foreign listing. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Yangwen Wang, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC:<br />

yangwen@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk)<br />

The Direct and Contingent Value <strong>of</strong> Subnational Institutions on Emerging Market Firms' <strong>International</strong>ization<br />

Zhujun Ding, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Xufei Ma, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

This study examines the relationship between subnational institutions and emerging market firms' (EMFs)<br />

internationalization and suggests that these relationships are related to firm's nonmarket and market<br />

capabilities. Using survey data <strong>of</strong> 727 Chinese private enterprises in 31 provinces, we find that EMFs homebased<br />

subnational institutions, in terms <strong>of</strong> government market orientation, product market development, and<br />

labor market development, have a positive effect on EMF's internationalization, while EMFs' nonmarket<br />

capabilities and market capabilities play the contingent role to influence the above relationship. Theoretically,<br />

the findings highlight the importance <strong>of</strong> considering subnational institutions and firm-specific capabilities<br />

simultaneously in understanding EMFs' international strategy. Empirically, this study adopts a multilevel<br />

modeling to demonstrate both the direct and contingent nature <strong>of</strong> the role that subnational institutions play on<br />

EMFs' internationalization. (For more information, please contact: Zhujun Ding, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong<br />

Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC: zhujun@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 184


MONDAY<br />

Do the Biggest Aisles Serve a Brighter Future Global Retail Chains and Their Implications for Romania<br />

Yue Li, World Bank<br />

Beata Javorcik, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford and CEPR<br />

During the past two decades many countries have opened their retail sector to foreign direct investment, yet<br />

little is known about the implications <strong>of</strong> such liberalization for the economies <strong>of</strong> host countries. Using a unique<br />

dataset combining outlet-specific information on global retail chains with a panel <strong>of</strong> Romanian manufacturing<br />

firms, this study sheds some light on this question. The results from the difference-in-difference analysis<br />

suggest that the expansion <strong>of</strong> global retail chains led to a significant increase in the total factor productivity in<br />

the supplying industries. Their presence in a region raised the total factor productivity <strong>of</strong> firms in the supplying<br />

industries by 3.8 to 4.7 percent, while doubling the number <strong>of</strong> chains led to an increase <strong>of</strong> 3.3 to 3.7 percent.<br />

The conclusions are robust to a variety <strong>of</strong> specifications and supported by the survey evidence. These findings<br />

suggest that the opening <strong>of</strong> the retail sector to foreign direct investment may stimulate productivity growth in<br />

manufacturing industries through backward linkages, and they provide another piece <strong>of</strong> evidence in favor <strong>of</strong><br />

services liberalization. (For more information, please contact: Yue Li, World Bank, USA: yli7@worldbank.org)<br />

Bi-Directional Technology Spillovers between Foreign and Local Firms: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging<br />

Economy<br />

Gerald Yong Gao, University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis<br />

Yao Amber Li, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

Min Ju, University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis<br />

We examine the bi-directional technology spillovers between foreign and local firms. Extending the literature <strong>of</strong><br />

FDI spillovers, we focus on new product development as the non-productivity spillovers outcome and further<br />

investigate the possible reverse spillovers effect from local to foreign firms. Moreover, we test whether the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> technology spillovers is contingent on firm geography. Based on a seven-year panel data <strong>of</strong><br />

manufacturing firms in China, we find strong evidence <strong>of</strong> the two-way technology spillovers. Interestingly,<br />

geographic proximity positively moderates the technology spillovers from foreign on local firms, but it has no<br />

effect on local firms' spillovers on foreign firms. (For more information, please contact: Gerald Yong Gao,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis, USA: gaogy@umsl.edu)<br />

A Non-Linear Model <strong>of</strong> Technological Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): A Comparison between<br />

Horizontal and Vertical Spillovers<br />

Yoo Jung Ha, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Axèle Giroud, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

This research investigates the non-linear form <strong>of</strong> backward and forward spillovers. To our knowledge, we<br />

present the first findings about the non-linear relationship <strong>of</strong> backward and forward spillovers with local firm<br />

performance. We demonstrate that the relationship <strong>of</strong> horizontal spillovers and backward spillovers with local<br />

firm performance occurs in an inverted-U shape, respectively. Forward spillovers are positive overall and marked<br />

by a constant marginal rate <strong>of</strong> incidence, and thus occurring almost proportionately with rising inward MNE<br />

investments. Based on empirical evidences, we propose a conceptual model where factors <strong>of</strong> curvilinear learning<br />

curve are fixed costs and marginal costs <strong>of</strong> learning. In other words, backward spillovers are underscored by<br />

low fixed costs and rising marginal costs <strong>of</strong> learning, while forward spillovers are underscored by relatively high<br />

fixed costs and constant marginal costs <strong>of</strong> learning. (For more information, please contact: Yoo Jung Ha,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom: y.j.ha@sant.oxon.org)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 185


MONDAY<br />

Session: 2.5.P - Plenary<br />

<strong>AIB</strong>/AOM Ambassadors Plenary on Good Governance<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

The <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business and the IM Division <strong>of</strong> AOM have coordinated to <strong>of</strong>fer matched sessions<br />

in each conference program that present practical perspectives on investment in emerging markets. In the<br />

Ambassador’s Plenary session at <strong>AIB</strong>, Washington DC based Ambassadors will discuss the perspectives <strong>of</strong> their<br />

governments on the need to build institutional capacity and strengthen reform to boost domestic and<br />

international investment. The AOM session <strong>of</strong>fers managers' perspectives on the challenges and opportunities <strong>of</strong><br />

investment into emerging markets.<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 186


TUESDAY<br />

ABSTRACTS FOR TUESDAY, JULY 3, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Session: 3.1.1 - Panel<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Global Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The Interface between Multinationals and New<br />

Ventures<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Shameen Prashantham, Nottingham University Business School<br />

Co-Chair: Charles Dhanaraj, Indiana University<br />

Discussant: Peter Buckley, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Panelists:<br />

Shameen Prashantham, Nottingham University Business School<br />

Charles Dhanaraj, Indiana University<br />

Julian Birkinshaw, London Business School<br />

Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

George S Yip, China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School<br />

Sam Palmisano, then Chairman <strong>of</strong> IBM made a prophetic statement in 2006, "The MNC <strong>of</strong> the late twentieth<br />

century had little in common with the international firms <strong>of</strong> a hundred years earlier, and those companies were<br />

very different from the great trading enterprises <strong>of</strong> the 1700s. The type <strong>of</strong> business organization that is now<br />

emerging -- the globally integrated enterprise -- marks just as big a leap." We are currently witnessing the<br />

confluence <strong>of</strong> two major research streams, international management and international entrepreneurship - that<br />

thus far have stood independent <strong>of</strong> each other; <strong>of</strong>ten for good reasons as their targets were two different<br />

ecosystems - multinational enterprises and international new ventures. There is gathering evidence that new<br />

ventures internationalize piggybacking on MNEs, and MNEs expand their geographic scope by leveraging<br />

externally the services <strong>of</strong> new ventures. However, scholarship is fragmented across ‘entrepreneurship' and<br />

‘international management' that one group hardly gets to think through the eyes <strong>of</strong> the other. This symposium<br />

will address the emerging research opportunities <strong>of</strong> this globally integrated enterprise, that links MNEs and<br />

INVs, and identify some practical ways to advance the field and the practice <strong>of</strong> international business. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Shameen Prashantham, Nottingham University Business School, China:<br />

shameen.prashantham@nottingham.edu.cn)<br />

Session: 3.1.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Asian Business Systems: Cultural and Institutional Variations<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Michael A. Witt, INSEAD<br />

Panelists:<br />

Christina Ahmadjian, Hitotsubashi University<br />

Michael Carney, Concordia University<br />

Shige Makino, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Gordon Redding, INSEAD<br />

Kyoung-Hee Yu, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

Daphne Yiu, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 187


TUESDAY<br />

Our panel will discuss cultural and institutional variations across the Asian business context. In doing so, it<br />

seeks to shed new light on empirical patterns in the emerging economic center <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong> the world economy<br />

with respect to important IB constructs such as liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness, cultural distance, and institutional<br />

distance. This panel will touch on topics such as the status and evolution <strong>of</strong> corporate governance in Asia<br />

(Ahmadjian); employment relations (Frenkel & Yu); cross-cultural differences and patterns (Javidan, Redding, &<br />

Witt); and the shape <strong>of</strong> social capital (Li). This panel has a sister panel exploring other aspects <strong>of</strong> the cultural<br />

and institutional context <strong>of</strong> Asia. (For more information, please contact: Michael A. Witt, INSEAD, Singapore:<br />

michael.witt@insead.edu)<br />

Session: 3.1.3 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Adaptation and Local Responsiveness<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Ajai Gaur, Rutgers University<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Mismatches between Local Practices and Values on Inward MNE Affiliate Activity: An Institutional<br />

Perspective<br />

Arjen Slangen, RSM Erasmus University<br />

Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, University <strong>of</strong> Groningen<br />

We draw on institutional theory to examine how intra-country mismatches between local business practices and<br />

local values influence inward multinational enterprise (MNE) affiliate activity. We argue that foreign MNE<br />

affiliates generally increase their local legitimacy by adopting local practices, but that this legitimacy increase is<br />

lower if there is a larger mismatch between local practices and values. We therefore hypothesize that this<br />

mismatch is negatively related to a country's inward MNE affiliate activity. We also hypothesize that this<br />

negative relationship will be stronger for developed countries and production-oriented affiliate activity than for<br />

developing countries and local sales-oriented affiliate activity. We find support for these hypotheses in a panel<br />

data analysis <strong>of</strong> U.S. foreign affiliate sales over the 1994-2007 period, using GLOBE data to measure a country's<br />

practices-values mismatch. Our study adds to institutional theory by shedding more light on the contribution <strong>of</strong><br />

local practice adoption to affiliate legitimacy and extending the concept <strong>of</strong> institutional duality. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Arjen Slangen, RSM Erasmus University, Netherlands: aslangen@rsm.nl)<br />

Institutional Perspective on MNE Adaptation: An Empirical Approach<br />

Andrei Kuznetsov, University <strong>of</strong> Central Lancashire<br />

Marcus Jacob, EBS European Business School<br />

This paper contributes to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> global corporate and industrial change dynamics triggered<br />

at the firm level. Our focus is on convergence vs. divergence <strong>of</strong> national institutional systems. Data are drawn<br />

from a large N survey <strong>of</strong> German firms in the UK and British firms in Germany. Our results for adaptation<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> British subsidiaries in Germany suggest that at the firm level the primacy <strong>of</strong> national institutions and<br />

institutional complementarity as determinants <strong>of</strong> the organizational behavior <strong>of</strong> MNEs could be overstated.<br />

Nonetheless, evidence that German MNEs in Britain strongly seek to opt for the strategic choices for which there<br />

is institutional support in the host country suggests that complementarity is functional enough to incite<br />

adjustment even in the absence <strong>of</strong> strong formal pressure. The evidence that both German and British firms<br />

seem to prefer practices characteristic <strong>of</strong> liberal market economies may pose a problem for institutional stability<br />

in Germany and generates implications for the likely pathways <strong>of</strong> institutional change. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Andrei Kuznetsov, University <strong>of</strong> Central Lancashire, United Kingdom: akuznetsov@uclan.ac.uk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 188


TUESDAY<br />

<strong>International</strong> Business Strategy in Emerging Economies: Insights from the Evolution <strong>of</strong> a Trading Company<br />

Karim Marini Thomé, University <strong>of</strong> Brasilia<br />

Janann Joslin Medeiros, University <strong>of</strong> Brasilia<br />

Cristina Lelis Leal Calegario, Federal University <strong>of</strong> Lavras<br />

This case study investigates from a longitudinal perspective the drivers <strong>of</strong> trading company strategy and the<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> trading company success in international business. The firm selected for study is a trading<br />

company that conducts the majority <strong>of</strong> its total transactions among emerging economies. The theoretical<br />

framework draws upon three approaches to international business strategy: industrial competitiveness, firm<br />

resources and capabilities, and institutional contexts and transitions. Data were collected using in-depth<br />

interviews, document analysis and non-participant observation. Rather than a single driver, we found that<br />

strategic choices were driven at times by the demands <strong>of</strong> industrial competitiveness, at times by firm resources<br />

and capabilities, and at times by institutional conditions. There was evidence neither <strong>of</strong> a linear chronological<br />

order for these drivers, nor <strong>of</strong> driver obsolescence. On the contrary, findings suggest that drivers are<br />

cumulative and interactive. Changes in organizational resources and capabilities or in competitive or institutional<br />

environments can force review and re-thinking <strong>of</strong> strategic objectives. The capabilities <strong>of</strong> managing the<br />

interfaces among internal resources and capabilities and the demands <strong>of</strong> the competitive and institutional<br />

environments and carrying out strategic redefinitions when necessary are identified as the determinants <strong>of</strong><br />

success for the trading company studied. (For more information, please contact: Karim Marini Thomé, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Brasilia, Brazil: thome@unb.br)<br />

Factors Affecting Local Responsiveness: The Case <strong>of</strong> Chinese Multinationals Operating in Australia<br />

Di Fan, Victoria University<br />

Cherrie Jiuhua Zhu, Monash University<br />

Chris Nyland , Monash University<br />

Utilising cross-level and in-depth interviews this paper extends empirical and conceptual studies that have<br />

clarified the underlying factors that determine how multinational enterprises (MNEs) respond to local<br />

contingencies. The study examines the applicability <strong>of</strong> these factors in the context <strong>of</strong> Chinese MNEs with<br />

operations in Australia. In so doing, it pioneers the use <strong>of</strong> qualitative methods to determine which factors affect<br />

emerging market MNEs' local responsiveness and how these elements function. The capturing <strong>of</strong> senior<br />

management perceptions at two levels <strong>of</strong> the firm enables intra-management comparison and notable<br />

perception gaps are discovered. Furthermore the study explores and discusses two new factors affecting<br />

Chinese MNEs' local responsiveness concerns, these being, national interest and social licence. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Di Fan, Victoria University, Australia: di.fan@vu.edu.au)<br />

Session: 3.1.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

The Geography <strong>of</strong> R&D<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Jennifer Spencer, George Washington University<br />

Do Technology Leaders Deter Inward R&D Investments Evidence from Regional R&D Location Decisions in<br />

Europe<br />

Dieter Somers, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven<br />

Rene Belderbos, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 189


TUESDAY<br />

Asymmetry in knowledge spillovers between technology leading and lagging firms provides incentives for<br />

technology leaders to discourage other firms from setting up new R&D establishments in their vicinity, in order<br />

to reduce the threat <strong>of</strong> knowledge dissipation. We examine whether the presence <strong>of</strong> local technology leaders<br />

discourages inward R&D investments, in an analysis <strong>of</strong> the location <strong>of</strong> 301 cross-border R&D investment<br />

projects in EU-15 countries at the NUTS-1 regional level, 2003-2008. We identify the strength <strong>of</strong> industry<br />

technology leaders as dominant players in regional R&D from the concentration <strong>of</strong> regional patenting activity<br />

among local firms and control for the size <strong>of</strong> the regional technology cluster. Our preliminary results clearly<br />

indicate that while the strength <strong>of</strong> local relevant technology clusters attracts cross-border R&D projects,<br />

investors are discouraged by concentration <strong>of</strong> technology activities by regional industry leaders. Distinguishing<br />

between firms with the largest patent portfolios and firms with smaller patent activity, we find that these effects<br />

are only significant for smaller firms, indicating substantial firm heterogeneity in the responses to technology<br />

clusters and technology concentration. (For more information, please contact: Dieter Somers, Katholieke<br />

Universiteit Leuven, Belgium: dieter.somers@econ.kuleuven.be)<br />

The Dual External Embeddedness <strong>of</strong> Geographically Distributed R&D<br />

Suma Athreye, Brunel University<br />

Georgios Batsakis, Brunel University<br />

Satwinder Singh, Brunel University<br />

We develop the conjecture that an R&D subsidiary can embed itself in the science base <strong>of</strong> the home country<br />

(more closely controlled by the parent) and/or the science base <strong>of</strong> the host country, depending upon the type <strong>of</strong><br />

R&D it is mandated to perform, the threat <strong>of</strong> R&D leakage, strategic considerations <strong>of</strong> rival firms, and the<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the host country's business environment and scientific endowments. We test these conjectures<br />

on data obtained from 76 R&D subsidiaries in 14 international locations. Both types <strong>of</strong> external embeddedness<br />

are important and complementary. Global competitors and location specific advantages have determine the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> host country embeddedness, but location specific disadvantages, geographical proximity to the parent<br />

and relative autonomy in subsidiary operations favour external embeddedness in the parent country networks.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Georgios Batsakis, Brunel University, United Kingdom:<br />

georgios.batsakis@brunel.ac.uk)<br />

Dynamic Capabilities and Subsidiary Innovation: Towards an Integrative Framework<br />

Zhan Wu, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Snejina Michailova, University <strong>of</strong> Auckland<br />

This conceptual paper borrows the concept <strong>of</strong> dynamic capabilities from the strategic management literature<br />

and applies it to the examination <strong>of</strong> subsidiary innovation in global context. The paper proposes an integrative<br />

framework which a) differentiates between generative, sourcing and integrative capabilities, b) relates these to<br />

the new proposed construct <strong>of</strong> dynamic knowledge capability and c) establishes a link between dynamic<br />

knowledge capability and subsidiary innovation. The framework addresses the levels <strong>of</strong> subsidiary, the<br />

multinational corporation and the host country. A set <strong>of</strong> theoretical propositions is developed and research and<br />

managerial implications as well as future research are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Zhan<br />

Wu, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia: w.zhan@econ.usyd.edu.au)<br />

Session: 3.1.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Knowledge Creation in the MNE<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Anupama Phene, George Washington University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 190


TUESDAY<br />

How Does Structural Position Impact Subsidiaries' Knowledge Development and Reverse Knowledge Transfer<br />

Zhaleh Najafi Tavani, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Rudolf Sinkovics, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Tamer Cavusgil, Georgia State University<br />

Employing the well established dimensions <strong>of</strong> external embeddedness and subsidiary-parent firm<br />

embeddedness, a four quadrant framework <strong>of</strong> subsidiary structural position, Partner, Fencesitter, Receptive, and<br />

Detached subsidiaries, was developed. Variation within the four groups <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries is then analysed in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge development and reverse knowledge transfer. Results from 184 subsidiaries operating in<br />

Knowledge Intensive Business Service (KIBS) sectors in the United Kingdom indicate significant inter-group<br />

differences in terms <strong>of</strong> knowledge development and reverse knowledge transfer. Moreover, the empirical data<br />

show that, while high degree <strong>of</strong> external embeddedness is the pivotal element <strong>of</strong> subsidiary knowledge<br />

development, high level <strong>of</strong> subsidiary-parent firm embeddedness is the main determinant <strong>of</strong> reverse knowledge<br />

transfer. (For more information, please contact: Zhaleh Najafi Tavani, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom:<br />

z.najafitavani@leeds.ac.uk)<br />

Knowledge Co-Creation across National Boundaries: Trends and Firms' Strategies<br />

Wan-Ting Su, National Tsing Hua University<br />

Bou-Wen Lin, National Tsing Hua University<br />

In the era <strong>of</strong> global knowledge economy, knowledge creation has noticeably thrived across the national<br />

boundaries; it plays an increasingly important role in the open innovation paradigm. What are patterns and<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> knowledge that is co-created across national boundaries How is it different from knowledge<br />

created within the border How is co-created knowledge used by companies How is internationalization related<br />

to firms' strategies <strong>of</strong> knowledge co-creation In spite <strong>of</strong> their central importance to the theory and practice <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge management, these questions have not been discussed. Our paper identifies a patent whose<br />

initiative owners are from different countries as an indicator <strong>of</strong> knowledge co-created across national boundaries<br />

and shows the trends <strong>of</strong> cross-border knowledge by using the longitudinal patent data analysis over 30 years.<br />

Our results show that knowledge co-created across borders displays higher value and there exists heterogeneity<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge co-creation patterns in Triad regions. In order to enter global markets, to discern trends in local<br />

markets, to tap into the local knowledge and to access further sources <strong>of</strong> new technology, firms can use<br />

mechanisms for co-creating knowledge with local firms. (For more information, please contact: Wan-Ting Su,<br />

National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan: szlin0831@gmail.com)<br />

TMT Identification, Knowledge Creation, and <strong>International</strong> Joint Venture Performance: Does National Diversity<br />

Matter<br />

Bi-Juan Zhong, Ohio State University<br />

Yaping Gong, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

Oded Shenkar, Ohio State University<br />

Yadong Luo, University <strong>of</strong> Miami<br />

The literature about the role <strong>of</strong> organizational identification on knowledge creation in teams has mixed findings.<br />

This study proposes that team national diversity constitutes an important condition to curtail the potential<br />

drawbacks <strong>of</strong> a team's superordinate identification. We proposed that knowledge creation potential in<br />

multinational teams will be best achieved when national diversity and superordinate identification are<br />

acknowledged and promoted simultaneously. Using data from 185 top management teams <strong>of</strong> international joint<br />

ventures (IJVs), we found our model supported. TMT IJV identification was positively related to IJV<br />

performance via increased knowledge creation and this benefit was realized only when TMT national diversity<br />

was high. (For more information, please contact: Bi-Juan Zhong, Ohio State University, USA:<br />

zhong_40@fisher.osu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 191


TUESDAY<br />

An Integrated Process Model <strong>of</strong> Knowledge Management in <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures<br />

Yong Suhk Pak, Yonsei University<br />

Wonchan Ra, Hankuk University <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies<br />

Jongmin Lee, Yonsei University<br />

This paper examines how knowledge evolves from the initial knowledge migration stage through adaptation and<br />

creation eventually to the reverse knowledge migration stage in an international joint venture (IJV). While the<br />

extant literature has focused on and analyzed each stage <strong>of</strong> knowledge management (e.g., mostly knowledge<br />

transfer), we tried to show the path-dependent nature <strong>of</strong> knowledge flow in IJVs. Accordingly, we present that<br />

the transferred knowledge from parents to IJVs needs to be adapted first before it reaches a creation stage and<br />

that also only created knowledge is expected to be reverse transferred back to parents. We used 136 survey<br />

responses from parent companies <strong>of</strong> IJVs to test the process model <strong>of</strong> knowledge management. The test results<br />

show a significant relationship among steps <strong>of</strong> knowledge process which are all combined to result in an<br />

integrated model <strong>of</strong> knowledge management in IJVs. Our study clearly demonstrates that the knowledge<br />

adaptation stage mediates between the knowledge migration and knowledge creation stage and that created<br />

knowledge is harvested back to the parents. Managerial implications and discussion are presented at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the paper. (For more information, please contact: Wonchan Ra, Hankuk University <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies, Korea,<br />

South: wonra@hufs.ac.kr)<br />

Session: 3.1.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

Country and Firm Competitiveness<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Joseph Clougherty, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and CEPR-London<br />

The Determinants <strong>of</strong> National Competitiveness<br />

Mercedes Delgado, Temple University<br />

Christian Ketels , Harvard Business School<br />

Michael E. Porter, Harvard Business School<br />

Scott Stern, MIT<br />

While competitiveness has become an increasingly important part <strong>of</strong> the economic policy debate, the academic<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> this concept has over the last twenty years suffered from terminological confusion. In this paper<br />

we define national competitiveness as the expected level <strong>of</strong> output per working-age individual given the overall<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> a country as a place to do business. The focus on output per potential worker, a broad measure <strong>of</strong><br />

national productivity, reflects the role <strong>of</strong> prosperity as the central goal <strong>of</strong> economic policy. Our framework<br />

highlights three interrelated drivers <strong>of</strong> national competitiveness: social infrastructure and political institutions,<br />

macroeconomic policy, and the microeconomic environment (including the business environment and the<br />

sophistication <strong>of</strong> company operations and strategy). The estimation <strong>of</strong> this framework is based on the<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> several data sets covering more than 130 countries during the 2001 and 2008 period. Our results<br />

establish the separate and distinct influence <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these three drivers in determining country-level<br />

differences in output per potential worker. Our approach <strong>of</strong>fers a novel methodology for the estimation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

theoretically grounded and empirically validated index <strong>of</strong> national competitiveness. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Mercedes Delgado, Temple University, USA: mdelgado@temple.edu)<br />

Country Relatedness and <strong>International</strong> Coherence<br />

Sokol Celo, Suffolk University<br />

Aya Chacar, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 192


TUESDAY<br />

The conventional approach in international business research is to consider and/or compute country distance as<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> individual and firm actions. Borrowing from Teece et. al. (1994), we propose in this paper an<br />

alternative approach that relies on ‘survivor' data culled from the very actions <strong>of</strong> these individuals and/or firms<br />

to compute ‘country relatedness', the inverse <strong>of</strong> distance. We then focus on country relatedness for investment<br />

decisions, defined as the degree to which there are economies to joint operations and/or ownership in these<br />

countries by a multinational enterprise (MNE). To test the predictive validity <strong>of</strong> country relatedness for<br />

investment decisions, we hypothesize that MNEs characterized by high levels <strong>of</strong> international coherence, the<br />

degree to which they operate in related countries, will have a superior performance. Our empirical test starts by<br />

computing country relatedness for 24,000 country pairs, using investment data for the full sample <strong>of</strong> 20,000<br />

public MNEs worldwide. We then measure international coherence for a sample <strong>of</strong> 1,000 U.S. MNEs and find<br />

support for our hypothesis and the validity <strong>of</strong> the measures proposed. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Sokol Celo, Suffolk University, USA: scelo@suffolk.edu)<br />

Making the Most <strong>of</strong> the Second Best: Synchronization <strong>of</strong> Reforms Rhythms, Slack, and Performance <strong>of</strong><br />

Transition Economy Firms<br />

Elitsa R. Banalieva, Northeastern University<br />

We analyze the understudied impact <strong>of</strong> synchronization <strong>of</strong> reforms rhythms on the performance <strong>of</strong> transition<br />

economy firms. We argue that higher synchronization <strong>of</strong> reforms rhythms improves the firms' performance due<br />

to timing synergies among the different reforms types. Additionally, we propose that excess high-discretion<br />

slack further strengthens the performance benefits from a higher synchronization <strong>of</strong> reforms rhythms because it<br />

allows the transition economy firms to more quickly adapt to their changing institutional environment. Thus, we<br />

extend the institution-based view <strong>of</strong> the firm by shifting its traditional focus on institutional differences across<br />

countries to a new research direction that accounts explicitly for the timing <strong>of</strong> implementation—concurrent or<br />

sequential—<strong>of</strong> the different types <strong>of</strong> reforms rhythms within a country over time. Our test on a sample <strong>of</strong> 430<br />

firms from 13 transition economies during 1991-2009 supports our arguments. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Elitsa R. Banalieva, Northeastern University, USA: e.banalieva@neu.edu)<br />

Session: 3.1.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Negotiation and Conflict Resolution Across Cultures<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Allan Bird, Northeastern University<br />

Business as Unusual: A Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Tactical Preferences <strong>of</strong> Chinese and Australian Negotiators<br />

Cheryl Rivers, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington<br />

Roger James Volkema, IAG/PUC-Rio<br />

How do Eastern and Western perceptions <strong>of</strong> questionable or unethical (tricky) negotiation tactics differ We<br />

address this question by comparing 161 Chinese and 146 Australian negotiators' ratings <strong>of</strong> appropriateness <strong>of</strong><br />

different types <strong>of</strong> negotiation tactics. We predict that their different cultural values and cultural differences in<br />

the implicit theories <strong>of</strong> how negotiation ought to be conducted will be salient in their perceptions <strong>of</strong> tactics.<br />

Rather than thinking about tricky tactics as a generic group, we explore differences in Chinese and Western<br />

negotiators' perspectives <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> negotiation tactics. Awareness <strong>of</strong> The Secret Art <strong>of</strong> War: The 36<br />

Stratagems means Chinese negotiators think very differently about some types <strong>of</strong> tactics compared to Western<br />

negotiators who have no equivalent <strong>of</strong> the 36 stratagems in their tactic repertoire. We found Chinese<br />

negotiators rated tactics that are related to the 36 stratagems as significantly more appropriate than did<br />

Australian negotiators. Also, Australians were significantly more approving <strong>of</strong> tactics that use negative emotions<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 193


TUESDAY<br />

than were Chinese negotiators, which we link to concern about face in China. Our findings suggest that<br />

Western thinking about negotiation has much to learn from Eastern negotiation thinking. How do Eastern and<br />

Western perceptions <strong>of</strong> questionable or unethical (tricky) negotiation tactics differ We address this question by<br />

comparing 161 Chinese and 146 Australian negotiators' ratings <strong>of</strong> appropriateness <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong><br />

negotiation tactics. We predict that their different cultural values and cultural differences in the implicit theories<br />

<strong>of</strong> how negotiation ought to be conducted will be salient in their perceptions <strong>of</strong> tactics. Rather than thinking<br />

about tricky tactics as a generic group, we explore differences in Chinese and Western negotiators' perspectives<br />

<strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> negotiation tactics. Awareness <strong>of</strong> The Secret Art <strong>of</strong> War: The 36 Stratagems means<br />

Chinese negotiators think very differently about some types <strong>of</strong> tactics compared to Western negotiators who<br />

have no equivalent <strong>of</strong> the 36 stratagems in their tactic repertoire. We found Chinese negotiators rated tactics<br />

that are related to the 36 stratagems as significantly more appropriate than did Australian negotiators. Also,<br />

Australians were significantly more approving <strong>of</strong> tactics that use negative emotions than were Chinese<br />

negotiators, which we link to concern about face in China. Our findings suggest that Western thinking about<br />

negotiation has much to learn from Eastern negotiation thinking. (For more information, please contact: Roger<br />

James Volkema, IAG/PUC-Rio, Brazil: volkema@american.edu)<br />

Attitudes towards Questionable Negotiation Tactics in Peru<br />

Abraham Stefanidis, St. John's University<br />

Moshe Banai, City University <strong>of</strong> New York<br />

Ulf Richter, Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Peru<br />

This research investigates the influence <strong>of</strong> three theoretically valid independent variables, horizontal and vertical<br />

individualism-collectivism, ethical idealism and trust propensity on employees' attitudes towards ethically<br />

questionable negotiation tactics in Peru. 233 usable responses were collected from participants employed in<br />

various industries in the capital area, Lima. The results empirically corroborated a classification <strong>of</strong> three groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> negotiation tactics, namely pretending, deceiving and lying tactics. Peruvian employees who scored high on<br />

vertical individualism tended to score high on the endorsement <strong>of</strong> pretending, deceiving and lying tactics; those<br />

who scored high on horizontal collectivism tended to score low on the endorsement <strong>of</strong> the deceiving and lying<br />

tactics; those who scored high on vertical collectivism tended to score high on the endorsement <strong>of</strong> the deceiving<br />

and lying tactics. Emphasizing the non-US and non-Western European nature <strong>of</strong> the empirical data collected,<br />

the originality <strong>of</strong> this research further stems from the development <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive research framework<br />

about the antecedents <strong>of</strong> employees' attitudes towards questionable negotiation tactics in Peru, a country<br />

where human resource management studies are limited. (For more information, please contact: Abraham<br />

Stefanidis, St. John's University, USA: stefania@stjohns.edu)<br />

Patience Is a Virtue: An Analysis <strong>of</strong> Reactive Bargaining Behavior in <strong>International</strong> Negotiations with or within<br />

Multinational Enterprises<br />

Ursula F. Ott, Loughborough University<br />

Yuko Kimura, University <strong>of</strong> Leicester<br />

This paper is based on the intercultural negotiation framework <strong>of</strong> activity-based bargaining types called linearactive<br />

(time-is-money approach), multi-active (negotiation-is-an-art approach) and reactive (building-up-trust<br />

approach) categories <strong>of</strong> culture. The complexities <strong>of</strong> international negotiations are analyzed and used in a onesided<br />

incomplete information game to show the uncertainty about the cultural adjustment process and its<br />

impact in international negotiations. The results <strong>of</strong> the games show the equilibrium concepts and a possibility to<br />

circumvent problems in international business negotiations which are related to different time perceptions and<br />

strategic behavior. We add to the theoretical analysis an empirical test conducted in a Japanese MNE as a<br />

representative for reactive cultures. This helped us to test the strategies, initial <strong>of</strong>fers, processes and the<br />

approach <strong>of</strong> reactive cultures in an international negotiation setting. The outcome is a surprise, since the<br />

patience and win-win strategy approach are a cognitive program which can be adjusted to, but will overall not<br />

be changed in light <strong>of</strong> a short-termist or haggling cultural approach. We can conclude that the cultural programs<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 194


TUESDAY<br />

are a strong cognitive program which only slightly changes with international experience, but seems to be good<br />

way to create cooperative outcome in an international setting. (For more information, please contact: Ursula F.<br />

Ott, Loughborough University, United Kingdom: u.f.ott@lboro.ac.uk)<br />

Combining Two Complementary Systems Approaches to Conflict in Multinational Mergers: A Japanese-<br />

American Merger as an Extreme Test Case<br />

Patricia (Tish) Robinson, Hitotsubashi University<br />

Mergers and acquisitions between multinational firms <strong>of</strong>ten entail conflict. Due to the organizational complexity<br />

involved, a systems perspective is useful in approaching the organizational change <strong>of</strong>ten necessary to address<br />

this conflict. This paper explores the nexus <strong>of</strong> two models <strong>of</strong> organizational systems set out by William Isaacs<br />

and Arnold Mindell. It applies these models jointly to assess and then implement organizational change around<br />

conflict in mergers and acquisitions between American and Japanese multinational firms operating in Japan.<br />

The paper proceeds on the premise that resolving organizational conflict at a deep level <strong>of</strong>ten involves deepseated<br />

change. These two models complement each other and enhance our ability to diagnose where<br />

organizational change needs to occur and how we might address conflict. Drawing on participant observation,<br />

this study develops and pilot tests an application for facilitating organizational dialog around conflict and<br />

organizational change, based on Arnold Mindell's Process Work model <strong>of</strong> group facilitation. The framework<br />

proposes several major concepts: 1) primary and secondary identities; 2) roles and polarities; and 3) how the<br />

marginalization <strong>of</strong> views can spawn conflict. (For more information, please contact: Patricia (Tish) Robinson,<br />

Hitotsubashi University, Japan: probinson@ics.hit-u.ac.jp)<br />

Session: 3.1.8 - Competitive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

Exchange Rates and <strong>International</strong> Finance<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Robert Grosse, George Mason University<br />

Exchange Trading Rules, Surveillance and Insider Trading<br />

Feng Zhan, York University<br />

Douglas Cumming, York University<br />

Michael Aitken, ASB, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

We examine the impact <strong>of</strong> stock exchange trading rules and surveillance on the frequency and severity <strong>of</strong><br />

suspected insider trading cases in 22 stock exchanges around the world over the period January 2003 – June<br />

2011. Using new indices for market manipulation, insider trading, and broker-agency conflict based on the<br />

specific provisions in the trading rules <strong>of</strong> each stock exchange, along with surveillance <strong>of</strong> such rules, we show<br />

that differences in exchange trading rules and surveillance over time and across markets significantly affect the<br />

frequency and severity <strong>of</strong> insider trading. Surveillance reduces the number <strong>of</strong> cases and pr<strong>of</strong>its per case.<br />

Exchange trading rules reduce the number <strong>of</strong> cases but increase the pr<strong>of</strong>its per case. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Feng Zhan, York University, Canada: fzhan09@schulich.yorku.ca)<br />

Exchange Rate Movements and Firm Dynamics in Retail Trade Industries<br />

Jen Baggs, University <strong>of</strong> Victoria<br />

Loretta Fung, National Tsing Hua University<br />

Beverley Lapham, Queen's University<br />

Eugene Beaulieu, University <strong>of</strong> Calgary<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 195


TUESDAY<br />

This paper analyzes firm-level data to estimate the effects <strong>of</strong> real exchange rate movements on Canadian retail<br />

firms. Using comprehensive firm-level data for Canadian retailers from 1986 to 1997, a period characterized by<br />

a large appreciation and subsequent depreciation <strong>of</strong> the Canadian dollar, we are able to examine the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

exchange rate changes on firm size, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and survival. Our results indicate significant adverse effects <strong>of</strong><br />

a real Canadian currency appreciation primarily along the intensive margin (firm size measured by sales and<br />

employment) and pr<strong>of</strong>its. We find that the effects diminish for firms located farther away from the border and<br />

the rate at which the effects decline differs across different retail trade industries and the measures <strong>of</strong> firm<br />

performance. (For more information, please contact: Jen Baggs, University <strong>of</strong> Victoria, Canada:<br />

jenbaggs@uvic.ca)<br />

Do Multinational Corporations Flexibly Respond to Exchange Rate Fluctuations : A Tale <strong>of</strong> Two Korean MNCs<br />

Young-Ryeol Park, Yonsei University<br />

Sangcheol Song, Bryant University<br />

Gunae Choi, Rutgers University<br />

We examine in this study whether Korean multinational corporations (MNCs) in electronics and steel industries<br />

shift their production across their foreign subsidiaries located in different countries as exchange rates fluctuate.<br />

From a case study <strong>of</strong> two Korean MNCs (LG Electronics and POSCO), we find that even facing heightened<br />

production costs associated with host -country currency appreciation, Korean MNCs do not shift their production<br />

to less costly locations due to industrial characteristics, limited capacity, and high tariff barriers. We also find<br />

that they reduce the production costs internally, and they also negotiate the costs with employees and suppliers<br />

to adjust the production costs associated with appreciated currency. Our findings imply that certain industrial<br />

and environmental constraints make it difficult for MNCs to take the flexible actions that multinational –<br />

operational- flexibility perspective predicts. (For more information, please contact: Gunae Choi, Rutgers<br />

University, USA: choigunae@hotmail.com)<br />

The Financial Crisis and Cross-Border Perceptions <strong>of</strong> "Too Big to Fail"<br />

Raquel Oliveira, Central Bank <strong>of</strong> Brazil<br />

Rafael Felipe Schiozer, Fundação Getúlio Vargas<br />

Lucas Ayres Barros, University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

We examine how the perception <strong>of</strong> an implicit too-big-to-fail policy affects depositor behavior, exploring the<br />

exogenous shock caused by the international turmoil <strong>of</strong> late 2008 to the Brazilian banking system. We<br />

document a run to the systemically important banks during the crisis, and provide evidence that this movement<br />

is better explained by the depositors' perception <strong>of</strong> an implicit too-big-to-fail policy than by bank fundamentals.<br />

Nonfinancial firms' decision to run has greater economic importance, but institutional investors run more<br />

heavily. We also find that the share <strong>of</strong> deposits held by institutional investors affects the decision to run by<br />

other depositors. (For more information, please contact: Rafael Felipe Schiozer, Fundação Getúlio Vargas,<br />

Brazil: rafael.schiozer@fgv.br)<br />

Session: 3.1.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Risky Business<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Stephen Kobrin, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 196


TUESDAY<br />

Legal System Uncertainty and FDI Attraction in Southeast Asia<br />

George O. White III, Old Dominion University<br />

Anne Canabal, University <strong>of</strong> Maine<br />

Amon Chizema, Loughborough University<br />

Mark J. Perry, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan-Flint<br />

Conventional wisdom suggests that legal system uncertainty will negatively affect foreign direct investment<br />

(FDI) attraction. However, to date, research on the effects <strong>of</strong> legal system uncertainty on FDI attraction in<br />

emerging markets has received very little attention. In this paper, we hypothesize that (1) the relationship<br />

between legal system uncertainty and FDI attraction is curvilinear in nature, such that FDI attraction decreases<br />

with legal system uncertainty down to an inflection point, but then increases beyond this point, and (2) that the<br />

relationship between legal system uncertainty and FDI attraction is moderated by government intervention in<br />

the host country economy, such that the strength <strong>of</strong> this relationship is greater when government intervention<br />

is high rather than when it is low. Moreover, we suggest that these relationships exist because uncertainty will<br />

provide opportunities for FDI that seek this form <strong>of</strong> operating environment, leveraging legal system uncertainty<br />

as a basis for competitive advantage. We test and find support for our hypotheses using FDI data from nine<br />

Southeast Asian countries for the years 1995 to 2005. Implications <strong>of</strong> our findings and suggestions for future<br />

inquiry are presented. (For more information, please contact: George O. White III, Old Dominion University,<br />

USA: gowhite@odu.edu)<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization Decisions and Political Hazards: Managerial Intent in a Risky Location<br />

Elizabeth Maitland, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

Andre Sammartino, University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne<br />

How decision-makers incorporate assessments <strong>of</strong> political risk into internationalization decisions is a ‘black box'<br />

in international business (IB). Research on the interplay between states and multinational enterprises (MNEs)<br />

almost exclusively utilizes data aggregated at the national, industry and firm levels. Yet, assessment <strong>of</strong> risks and<br />

locations is a task undertaken, at least initially, by individuals. We introduce and explore the cognitive aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

such decisions. Utilizing extensive evidence from a mining MNE's expansion into West Africa, we demonstrate<br />

the crucial role <strong>of</strong> individuals' decision heuristics and schemas, and argue for greater consideration <strong>of</strong> such<br />

elements in IB research. (For more information, please contact: Andre Sammartino, University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne,<br />

Australia: samma@unimelb.edu.au)<br />

Legal Legitimacy, Political Stability and MNE Entry into Developing Countries: The Role <strong>of</strong> BIT Design<br />

Christopher Williams, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

Candace A. Martinez, Saint Louis University<br />

Tatiana Vashchilko, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

We investigate the impact <strong>of</strong> bilateral investment treaty (BIT) design on the likelihood <strong>of</strong> choosing majoritycontrolled<br />

entry modes as political stability changes across host countries. We extend institutional and<br />

transaction choice theories by focusing on the joint impact <strong>of</strong> domestic and international political institutions as<br />

well as on the variations in their design. We argue that the stringency <strong>of</strong> BIT design, rather than the mere<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> BITs, has a significant effect on entry mode choices. However, this effect is conditional on the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> political stability in host countries. The sample includes 201 foreign expansions made by AEX-listed<br />

Dutch MNEs between 2004 and 2008 into 30 developing countries with which The Netherlands had ratified<br />

BITs. As hypothesized, we find that both political stability and BIT stringency have a positive impact on seeking<br />

majority control in the investment and that BIT stringency has a stronger impact on majority control decisions in<br />

less politically stable countries. We conclude with research and management implications. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Christopher Williams, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada:<br />

cwilliams@ivey.uwo.ca)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 197


TUESDAY<br />

Corruption, Strategy and Foreign Subsidiary Survival<br />

Michael Sartor, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

This study focuses on the multinational enterprise's (MNE) pursuit <strong>of</strong> external legitimacy and the survival<br />

implications associated with various strategic initiatives that are implemented at the subsidiary level to secure<br />

legitimacy in increasingly corrupt host market environments. In this context, the strategic insights pr<strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

resource dependence theory (RDT) and institutional theory (IT) are characterized by distinct spatial<br />

orientations. RDT predicts that subsidiaries will implement proximal localization strategies in which local (host<br />

country) partners and employees are hypothesized to be best-suited to efforts to enhance the subsidiary's<br />

legitimacy and reduce its likelihood <strong>of</strong> exit from the host country market. Conversely, IT suggests that distal<br />

localization strategies in which subsidiaries that prefer to engage home country partners and employees in the<br />

subsidiary investment are better-suited to reducing the likelihood <strong>of</strong> subsidiary exit from increasingly corrupt<br />

host country market environments. We develop a set <strong>of</strong> competing hypotheses based on RDT and IT to<br />

examine the relationship between host market corruption levels, MNE strategy and the likelihood <strong>of</strong> exit. The<br />

hypotheses were tested against a large sample <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries established between 1995 and 2006 in 44 host<br />

countries. Our results reveal the enhanced efficacy <strong>of</strong> distal localization strategies. Subsidiaries that prefer<br />

transnational joint venture partnership arrangements (constituted by home country partners only), employ a<br />

greater proportion <strong>of</strong> expatriates and engage fewer host country partners in subsidiary investments enjoy a<br />

diminished likelihood <strong>of</strong> exit under conditions <strong>of</strong> heightened corruption. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Michael Sartor, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada: msartor.phd@ivey.ca)<br />

Session: 3.1.10 - Panel<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

Large-Scale Multi-Country Experiential Learning Projects in IB/IM Education:<br />

Challenges and Best Practices for Enhancing Teaching and Research<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Vas Taras, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina Greensboro<br />

Panelists:<br />

Vas Taras, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina Greensboro<br />

Alexander Bode, Darmstadt University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Douglas Chun, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa<br />

Louise Curran, Toulouse Business School<br />

Susan Forquer Gupta, Monmouth University<br />

Josephine Igoe, National University <strong>of</strong> Ireland, Galway<br />

Peter Magnusson, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Riikka Sarala, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, Greensboro<br />

Anja Maria Schuster, Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business<br />

Alfredo Jimenez, University <strong>of</strong> Burgos<br />

José G. Vargas-Hernández, University <strong>of</strong> Guadalajara<br />

Norhayati Zakaria, University <strong>of</strong> Wollongong in Dubai<br />

Xavier Ordenana, ESPAE Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Betty Jane Punnett, University <strong>of</strong> the West Indies<br />

Using the X-Culture project as an example, the panel session will review challenges and best practices <strong>of</strong> using<br />

large-scale multi-country collaborative exercises and simulations to enhance learning in IB/IM courses and<br />

provide a platform for high-quality research. A total <strong>of</strong> over a thousand students from over two dozen countries<br />

participate in the project every semester. The project is administered by the instructors on a voluntary basis and<br />

participation in the project is complete free for the students and their institutions. The presentations will focus<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 198


TUESDAY<br />

on challenges and best practices <strong>of</strong> participant recruitment, effort coordination, learning and transfer <strong>of</strong> training<br />

to real-life settings, data collection, performance monitoring and evaluation, student feedback and course and<br />

instructor evaluations, and use <strong>of</strong> large-scale student collaboration projects for teaching, research, and interinstitutional<br />

and pr<strong>of</strong>essional networking. Of 30+ instructors who have participated in the project over the past<br />

two years, about 20 will be attending the session, although only 11 will be formally presenting on behalf <strong>of</strong> the<br />

group. (For more information, please contact: Vas Taras, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina Greensboro, USA:<br />

v_taras@uncg.edu)<br />

Session: 3.1.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

Developing Technological Capabilities in Emerging Markets<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Robert Pearce, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Search Behavior and Knowledge Creation <strong>of</strong> Firms in Emerging Markets<br />

Yuzhe Miao, Kyung Hee University<br />

Jaeyong Song, Seoul National University<br />

This study investigates how search behaviors influence knowledge creation <strong>of</strong> firms in emerging markets by<br />

classifying search behaviors <strong>of</strong> an organization into vertical search (time span) and horizontal search (field<br />

span). We suggest that that in order to innovate successfully, firms in emerging markets should adopt<br />

idiosyncratic search strategies different from those <strong>of</strong> established large firms in advanced countries. Based on<br />

an empirical test <strong>of</strong> 204 Chinese firms, we find that given high recombination potential <strong>of</strong> new knowledge, and<br />

insufficient organizational experience with past knowledge, firms in emerging economies should focus on<br />

emerging and new knowledge rather than mature, old knowledge in order to improve innovation performance.<br />

In addition, due to their underdeveloped absorptive capacity, firms in emerging markets should avoid searching<br />

in diverse knowledge fields, as established large firms in advanced countries are encouraged to do, in order to<br />

innovate successfully. This study provides new theoretical insights into and practical implications about<br />

knowledge creation for firms in emerging markets, by investigating two distinct search behaviors. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Yuzhe Miao, Kyung Hee University, Korea, South: yzmiao@gmail.com)<br />

National Innovation System and Globalization: The Implication for Technological Catching-up<br />

Feng Zhang, St. Mary's University<br />

Robert Pearce, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

This article reviews early literature about national innovation system (NIS) that was introduced to analyze<br />

postwar Japanese technology policy and economic growth. We initiated an application <strong>of</strong> NIS concept on China<br />

in the context <strong>of</strong> globalization. We adopted the broad definition <strong>of</strong> NIS to include foreign-owned firms operating<br />

in China as a part <strong>of</strong> China's NIS, and speculated that foreign-owned firms may not only draw upon China's NIS<br />

but also significantly contribute to the system. Some implications <strong>of</strong> early literature on the further development<br />

<strong>of</strong> China's NIS are also discussed. (For more information, please contact: Feng Zhang, St. Mary's University,<br />

USA: fzhang@stmarytx.edu)<br />

Balancing External and Internal Knowledge in Host Country Environment: Evolution <strong>of</strong> R&D focused MNE<br />

Subsidiaries in India<br />

Amit Karna, EBS Business School<br />

Petra Sonderegger, Independent Researcher<br />

Florian Täube, EBS Business School<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 199


TUESDAY<br />

We investigate subsidiary innovation <strong>of</strong> MNEs, which is influenced by both subsidiaries and headquarters.<br />

Through a qualitative study, we analyse trade<strong>of</strong>fs in knowledge flows faced by MNEs setting up R&D<br />

subsidiaries in India. Our findings indicate a slow inflow <strong>of</strong> external, i.e. local knowledge into the subsidiary.<br />

There is also decreasing and later increasing internal, i.e. non-local knowledge flow between headquarters and<br />

subsidiary. A framework <strong>of</strong> knowledge flows points at trade<strong>of</strong>fs between the two. This study contributes by<br />

strengthening linkages between subsidiary evolution and knowledge flows. It has implications for subsidiary<br />

management, in particular those aimed at innovation. (For more information, please contact: Amit Karna, EBS<br />

Business School, Germany: amit.karna@ebs.edu)<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Government-business Interdependence in Firm Growth: A Contingent Perspective<br />

Zheng Yan, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

Prior literature on business-government relations has mainly focused on the dependence <strong>of</strong> firms on<br />

government for resources. In this study, we advance this literature by investigating the governments'<br />

dependence on business and its effect on firm growth, using China's steel industry as the empirical context.<br />

Considering the divergent interests between governments at different levels, we propose that local governments<br />

depend on firms for tax revenue and foreign investment, while the central government favors firms with higher<br />

state ownership and technological capability. Furthermore, the performance effects <strong>of</strong> governments'<br />

dependence are moderated by firm size, central government's policies, and the province's significance in the<br />

national economy, leading to different levels <strong>of</strong> firm growth. Our results supported these propositions. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Zheng Yan, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore:<br />

zhengyan@nus.edu.sg)<br />

A Contextual Examination <strong>of</strong> the Strategic Investment Decision Making Process in Singapore<br />

Christine Soh, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh<br />

Chris Carr, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh<br />

Konstantinos Bozos, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

In today's internationalisation, the ASEAN countries have merged to develop a global identity for enhanced<br />

trade relations and increased competitiveness. The continuous institutional and governmental encouragement<br />

for more MNEs to enter the local economy <strong>of</strong> Singapore have contributed to its status as the only developed<br />

economy out <strong>of</strong> the 6 countries, with the highest GDP. The inputs <strong>of</strong> strategic investments by companies largely<br />

contribute to the success <strong>of</strong> the Singaporean economy. It is therefore important to understand the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

contextual factors shaping the strategic investment decision making process (SIDMP) in Singapore for further<br />

collaboration globally. We interviewed 18 decision makers from 9 companies using a detailed, semi-structured<br />

questionnaire. The mapping <strong>of</strong> the 9 companies in a 4-category contextual typology and the GLOBE framework<br />

suggests that Singaporean firms are more financially focused in comparison to their Asian counterparts.<br />

Decision making (DM) speed is higher in unpredictable environments <strong>of</strong> rapid change. Decision rationality is<br />

found to be independent <strong>of</strong> organisational type and decision topic. These divergences from the more <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

researched Asian examples <strong>of</strong> China and Japan and convergence to the Anglo-Saxon context give room for<br />

further cross-cultural research. (For more information, please contact: Christine Soh, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh,<br />

United Kingdom: christineclarissesoh@hotmail.com)<br />

Session: 3.1.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 12 - Value Creation and Work<br />

Sourcing, Outsourcing and Offshoring<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Barry Scholnick, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 200


TUESDAY<br />

Backsourcing: A Conceptual Framework<br />

Pooja Thakur, Virginia Tech<br />

Backsourcing is the full or partial re-internalization <strong>of</strong> previously outsourced activity. This emerging phenomenon<br />

occurs when the firm terminates its outsourcing contract before completion or does not renew the contract and<br />

chooses to bring the activity back in-house. In this research we propose a framework to understand the<br />

different types <strong>of</strong> backsourcing and its performance implications. Using the Transaction Cost Economics (TCE)<br />

and Resource Based View (RBV) as theoretical lenses, we posit that there are two dimensions involved in<br />

backsourcing and they are the cost to reinternalize the activity and the internal capabilities <strong>of</strong> the firm for reinternalization.<br />

Using these two dimensions we created a two-by-two matrix where backsourcing can be<br />

categorized into: failure backsourcing, operational backsourcing, strategic backsourcing and pr<strong>of</strong>itability<br />

backsourcing. Prior literature has viewed backsourcing as a failure <strong>of</strong> the outsourcing strategy however this<br />

paper suggests that it may be advantageous to bring the activity back in-house under certain circumstances.<br />

Our research proposes that backsourcing is the most beneficial when the firm has low costs for reinternalization<br />

and high internal capabilities. (For more information, please contact: Pooja Thakur, Virginia Tech,<br />

USA: pthakur@vt.edu)<br />

A Multilevel Analysis <strong>of</strong> Strategic Timing and Cost Savings in Offshoring<br />

Oli Mihalache, Free University Amsterdam<br />

Shiko Ben-Menahem, Erasmus University<br />

Despite the prevalence <strong>of</strong> cost reduction as reasoning behind <strong>of</strong>fshoring, the understanding <strong>of</strong> the factors<br />

influencing cost savings through <strong>of</strong>fshoring remains limited. To address this gap, we provide a multilevel<br />

contingency perspective proposing that the timing <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshoring activities affects the degree <strong>of</strong> cost savings and<br />

that the relationship is contingent on activity and firm-level factors. Using data on 639 <strong>of</strong>fshoring activities at<br />

214 firms, we find evidence <strong>of</strong> an early-mover cost advantage in <strong>of</strong>fshoring. In addition, we find that this<br />

relationship is stronger in the case <strong>of</strong> labor rather than knowledge-intensive functions. We further propose that<br />

firms‘ breadth and depth <strong>of</strong> geographical experience (i.e. international and host country experience) are<br />

important firm-level contingencies. Results indicate that the depth dimension <strong>of</strong> geographical knowledge affects<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> timing on cost savings, but not the breadth dimension. Thus, our study highlights that the<br />

multilevel dynamics between activity and firm-level factors influence the cost savings <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshored activities. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Oli Mihalache, Free University Amsterdam, Netherlands:<br />

oli.mihalache@gmail.com)<br />

The Value <strong>of</strong> Flexibility: Evidence from Outsourcing<br />

Jongmoo Jay Choi, Temple University<br />

Lenos Trigeorgis, University <strong>of</strong> Cyprus<br />

Xiaotian Tina Zhang, Saint Mary's College <strong>of</strong> California<br />

Although it is commonly believed that flexibility is valuable, there is little direct empirical evidence on whether<br />

flexibility actually enhances corporate performance. Viewing outsourcing as a switching real option, this paper<br />

presents evidence regarding the value <strong>of</strong> flexibility for US firms engaged in outsourcing activities. We construct<br />

a corporate flexibility index and examine how flexibility affects market valuation <strong>of</strong> corporate outsourcing<br />

decisions. The results show that market reaction to outsourcing announcements is positive and significant. After<br />

controlling for switching transaction costs related to outsourcing, flexibility gains are shown to be associated<br />

with a firm's strategic growth options. The likelihood <strong>of</strong> outsourcing is related to prior growth prospects.. These<br />

results are consistent with flexibility being a motive for outsourcing as suggested by real options theory. The<br />

results also confirm the importance <strong>of</strong> good internal corporate governance as a requisite for realizing potential<br />

flexibility gains from outsourcing. (For more information, please contact: Jongmoo Jay Choi, Temple University,<br />

USA: jjchoi@temple.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 201


TUESDAY<br />

How Offshore Outsourcing Affects Costs and Value Creation: A Process Perspective on Knowledge-Intensive<br />

Business Services<br />

Kristin Martina Brandl, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Michael J Mol, Warwick Business School<br />

Although academic and public interest in service <strong>of</strong>fshoring has increased in recent years, research remains<br />

focused mainly on antecedents and benefits <strong>of</strong> activities, overlooking process aspects. For that reason, we take<br />

a process perspective when conceptualizing around <strong>of</strong>fshore outsourcing <strong>of</strong> knowledge-intensive business<br />

services (KIBS) in this research. We characterize and dissect the production process <strong>of</strong> KIBS into five stages<br />

(problem-finding & acquisition, problem-solving, choice, execution, monitoring & evaluation) and consequently<br />

are able to analyze how <strong>of</strong>fshore outsourcing differentially affects costs and value creation in the respective<br />

stages. The reconceptualization enables us to provide a clearer and more fine-grained picture <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fshoring and outsourcing decisions, thus helping to further develop our understanding <strong>of</strong> the reasoning to<br />

relocate services geographical and organizational. (For more information, please contact: Kristin Martina Brandl,<br />

Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: kbr.int@cbs.dk)<br />

Face to Face Communication, Business Travel and the Outsourcing <strong>of</strong> Services<br />

Barry Scholnick, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

Runjuan Liu, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

Adam Finn, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

This paper develops and tests new hypotheses concerning the impact <strong>of</strong> face-to-face communication on the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fshore outsourcing <strong>of</strong> services. We use the existing literature on face-to-face interactions to develop new<br />

hypotheses for when face-to-face interactions will be most important for international service outsourcing. We<br />

argue that face-to-face interactions will be greater for: (a) services with greater complexly, (b) interactions<br />

involving individual's at higher levels within the organization, (c) interactions with individuals not from<br />

diasporas, (d) interactions not involving trade shows, (e) interactions where the costs <strong>of</strong> travel relative to<br />

electronic communication are relatively lower. We measure face-to-face interactions using data on international<br />

business travel. We test our hypotheses by matching data from the Survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Air Travelers (SIAT)<br />

conducted by the Office <strong>of</strong> Travel and Tourism Industries (OTTI) with data on the nominal dollar value <strong>of</strong> 11<br />

types <strong>of</strong> services outsourced by US firms to 29 countries, provided by the US Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic Analysis. Our<br />

service-level measure <strong>of</strong> complexity uses job task and occupation level data from the US Occupation<br />

Information Network (O*NET). In general our empirical results support our hypotheses. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Barry Scholnick, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Canada: barry.scholnick@ualberta.ca)<br />

Creating Value through Offshore Outsourcing: A Resource Management Perspective<br />

Debmalya Mukherjee, University <strong>of</strong> Akron<br />

In this paper we present an analytical framework explaining value creation through <strong>of</strong>fshore outsourcing.<br />

Specifically, we attempt to address the question: how do firms create value by outsourcing their business<br />

functions to foreign external providers Given the growing prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore outsourcing as a dominant<br />

business practice in the world <strong>of</strong> global business, this question merits further research attention. We propose<br />

that firms embarking on <strong>of</strong>fshore outsourcing create value by effectively managing their internal and external<br />

resources in the face <strong>of</strong> changing environment. The value creation framework discussed in this paper draws<br />

from the ‘strategic resource management' and disintegration-location-specific resourcing- externalization (DLE)<br />

perspectives. We discuss implications for theory and practice and <strong>of</strong>fer recommendations for future research.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Debmalya Mukherjee, University <strong>of</strong> Akron, USA: dmukher@uakron.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 202


TUESDAY<br />

Session: 3.1.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Cross-Cultural Communication, Negotiation and Leadership<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Davina Vora, SUNY New Paltz<br />

Does Culture Affect How People Receive and Resist Persuasive Messages Research Proposals about Resistance<br />

to Persuasion in Cultural Groups<br />

Renata Kolodziej-Smith, Wayne State University<br />

Daniel Friesen, Wayne State University<br />

Atilla Yaprak, Wayne State University<br />

Even though persuasion has been a widely researched topic in consumer behavior, the great majority <strong>of</strong> these<br />

studies have involved American consumers and focused on persuasion itself, with very few addressing<br />

resistance to persuasive attempts. None has addressed resistance to persuasion in a cross-cultural context. We<br />

aim to contribute to closing this gap in the literature with this paper. Specifically, we aim to expand knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> the persuasive process by applying the cultural dimensions <strong>of</strong> self-construal and identity negotiation theories<br />

to Gopinath and Nyer's (2009) work conducted on American consumers about the effect <strong>of</strong> public commitment<br />

on resistance to persuasion. Our research focus is on why people from different ethnic/cultural backgrounds will<br />

receive or resist persuasive messages differently. We anchor this notion in identity negotiation theory (Ting-<br />

Toomey, 2005). This perspective addresses different stages <strong>of</strong> an individual's cultural assimilation in a<br />

multicultural environment, thus shedding light on processes underlying persuasion and resistance to persuasion<br />

mechanisms as influenced by culture. Understanding the effects <strong>of</strong> cultural differences on a person's reception<br />

<strong>of</strong>, or resistance to, counter-attitudinal persuasion should be valuable to managers who make decisions about<br />

cultural adaptations and target audience changes. (For more information, please contact: Renata Kolodziej-<br />

Smith, Wayne State University, USA: rksmith@wayne.edu)<br />

Communication Style as Extensions <strong>of</strong> Internalized Cultural Values: Behavioral Consistency and Inconsistency in<br />

Intercultural Encounters<br />

Andre Pekerti, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Empirical evidence supported the notion that communication behaviors during intercultural encounter are<br />

effectively extensions <strong>of</strong> internalized cultural values. Study 1 established that communication behaviors <strong>of</strong><br />

Asians and New Zealanders (NZs) are consistent with vertical-collectivism and horizontal-individualism,<br />

respectively. In particular, argumentativeness is positively related to the independent self-construal and<br />

negatively related to the interdependent self-construal. This supports Markus and Kitayama's (1991)<br />

independent and interdependent self-construal theory. Study 2 showed that NZs exhibited more idiocentric and<br />

argumentative behavior while Asians displayed more sociocentric and less argumentative behavior during two<br />

actual interactions demonstrating that in intercultural interactions, participants diverged in their communication<br />

styles to be more consistent with their cultural values. Finally, analysis <strong>of</strong> decision outcomes showed that<br />

culture moderates cognitive consistency behaviors, such that NZs exhibited inconsistency-reduction behaviors,<br />

whereas Asians exhibited inconsistency-support behaviors. (For more information, please contact: Andre<br />

Pekerti, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Australia: a.pekerti@uq.edu.au)<br />

Cross-Cultural Voice: Effects <strong>of</strong> Manager/Subordinate Communication Styles<br />

Anna-Katherine Ward, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Elizabeth C. Ravlin, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Nancy R. Buchan, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Brian S. Klaas, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 203


TUESDAY<br />

While cultural diversity among employees can increase firm performance, its full benefits are <strong>of</strong>ten not attained,<br />

as managers can be (intentionally or unintentionally) deaf to the input <strong>of</strong> culturally-different subordinates. This<br />

paper presents a theoretical model <strong>of</strong> cross-cultural workplace voice that explores the effects <strong>of</strong> cultural<br />

communication style on subordinate influence. I draw on high-/low-context theory, leader-member exchange<br />

theory, and the affect-infusion model to demonstrate the role <strong>of</strong> emotions and manager/subordinate<br />

relationships in the link between cultural communication style and influence. The propositions presented here<br />

have theoretical implications for the employee voice and cross-cultural communication literatures and practical<br />

implications for managers in culturally-diverse organizations. (For more information, please contact: Anna-<br />

Katherine Ward, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA: annakward@hotmail.com)<br />

A Comparison <strong>of</strong> German, Sloven and Slovak Negotiation Styles: An Empirical Analysis<br />

Marko Kek, ESC Rennes Business School<br />

Mohammad Niamat Elahee, Quinnipiac University<br />

This paper compares the negotiation styles <strong>of</strong> German, Slovene, and Slovak people. The analysis <strong>of</strong> empirical<br />

data collected from these three countries shows that culture has a significant impact on negotiation style. The<br />

largest difference was found between German and Slovak negotiation style. Difference between German and<br />

Slovene styles was smaller than that between Germans and Slovaks while the Slovaks and Slovenes had the<br />

smallest difference. The analysis further shows that gender has moderate impact on negotiation style, while<br />

age, education, and length <strong>of</strong> experience do not seem to have much impact on negotiation style. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Mohammad Niamat Elahee, Quinnipiac University, USA:<br />

mohammad.elahee@quinnipiac.edu)<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Leadership Styles, Rank, and Seniority on Organizational Commitment: A Comparative Study <strong>of</strong><br />

American and Korean Employees<br />

Gahye Hong, Korea University<br />

Youngsam Cho, Korea University<br />

Fabian Jintae Froese, Korea University<br />

Man Soo Shin, Korea University<br />

This study developed a theoretical model based on the culturally endorsed implicit leadership theory to<br />

investigate differences in the relationships between leadership styles and organizational commitment in the U.S<br />

and South Korea. Survey results from 455 American and Korean employees show that the positive relationship<br />

between consideration leadership (i.e., people-oriented leadership) and organizational commitment was<br />

stronger among U.S. employees than Korean employees. Initiating structure leadership (i.e., task-oriented<br />

leadership) was negatively related to organizational commitment in the U.S., whereas this relationship was<br />

positive in South Korea. Further, these relationships were moderated by rank and seniority in Korea. That is, the<br />

positive relationship between consideration leadership and organizational commitment was stronger when<br />

employee's rank was higher, whereas the positive relationship was weaker when employee's seniority was<br />

longer. There were no moderating effects in the U.S. The findings provide important managerial<br />

recommendations how U.S. and Korean managers can lead local employees more successfully. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Fabian Jintae Froese, Korea University, Korea, South: fabian.froese@gmail.com)<br />

Culture Under Strain Leadership Challenges <strong>of</strong> Japanese Managers in the UK and China<br />

Hyun-Jung Lee, London School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Katsuhiko Yoshikawa, Institute for Organizational Behavior Research, Recruit Management Solutions<br />

Carol Reade, San Jose State University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 204


TUESDAY<br />

This study explores the leadership challenges <strong>of</strong> Japanese expatriate managers in the UK and China. Based on<br />

data from 18 in-depth interviews in two companies, we investigate the extent to which cultural differences<br />

explain such challenges. Findings from the UK mostly support predictions from the cross-cultural leadership<br />

literature, though indicate the importance <strong>of</strong> high-low context which has been largely ignored in the literature.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> China, we find that the economic and institutional environment substantially influences leadership<br />

challenges, while cultural differences appear to provide only a partial explanation. Implications for research and<br />

practice are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Carol Reade, San Jose State University, USA:<br />

carol.reade@sjsu.edu)<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Leader-Follower Ethnicity Differences on Followers' Perceptions <strong>of</strong> Authentic Leadership and Job<br />

Satisfaction<br />

Andrei A. Lux, Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Romie Frederick Littrell, Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

This study tests the effects <strong>of</strong> ethnicity as a moderating variable for the relationship between a follower's<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> a leader's authentic leadership behaviours and the employee's job satisfaction. Two measures<br />

were constructed and validated from parts <strong>of</strong> the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire and the Abridged Job<br />

Descriptive Index. These were administered as a survey to an opportunistic, though representative, sample <strong>of</strong><br />

New Zealand adults working in small to medium-sized businesses. The results confirm that followers'<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> authentic leadership are significantly and positively correlated with their job satisfaction. Ethnicity<br />

did not demonstrate a moderating effect on this relationship. Both <strong>of</strong> the scales developed for this study proved<br />

to be reliable measures <strong>of</strong> a follower's perceptions <strong>of</strong> authentic leadership and their job satisfaction respectively.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Romie Frederick Littrell, Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology, New<br />

Zealand: romie.littrell@aut.ac.nz)<br />

Innovative Culture and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills: The Moderating Role <strong>of</strong> Power Distance Orientation and Mediating<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> Supportive Leadership<br />

Pei-Li Yu, National Cheng Kung University<br />

Improving employees' development <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills is increasingly an important function <strong>of</strong> an innovative<br />

culture. However, the empirical evidence for the role <strong>of</strong> innovative culture in engendering development <strong>of</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills is scarce. To address this issue, the authors link positive and negative extrinsic motivators in<br />

an integrated model. In addition to identifying the influences <strong>of</strong> innovative culture on development <strong>of</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills, this study focuses in particular on the mediating effects <strong>of</strong> supportive leadership and the<br />

moderating effects <strong>of</strong> individual power distance orientation, which have largely been neglected in the previous<br />

literature. Results from a study <strong>of</strong> Information Technology (IT) 317 technical pr<strong>of</strong>essional workers confirmed<br />

that innovative culture works through supportive leadership, which in turn interacts with power distance<br />

orientation and enhances development <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional skills. This relationship was more positive when power<br />

distance orientation was lower, rather than higher. (For more information, please contact: Pei-Li Yu, National<br />

Cheng Kung University, Taiwan: h4584933@ms24.hinet.net)<br />

Session: 3.1.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Local Linkages, Foreign Interactions<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Anna Lamin, Northeastern University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 205


TUESDAY<br />

Corporate Reputation, Entry Mode Strategy, & Competitive Advantage: New Insights from an Integration <strong>of</strong><br />

Resource-based and Transaction Costs Logics<br />

Charles Edward Stevens, University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming<br />

Erin Elizabeth Makarius, Canisius College<br />

Choosing the correct entry strategy is critical to firms' global success and survival. Traditional studies using<br />

transaction cost economics (TCE) predict a firm's entry mode based on the degree <strong>of</strong> opportunistic behavior<br />

expected based on transaction attributes. However, this does not consider that firms can—and <strong>of</strong>ten do—<br />

engage in forbearance: choosing not to act opportunistically even when the ability to do so is present. To<br />

address this, this paper incorporates the resource based view (RBV) with TCE to explore how a key attribute <strong>of</strong><br />

transacting firms—corporate reputation—affects firms' likelihood <strong>of</strong> forbearance, and thus their foreign market<br />

entry strategy. (For more information, please contact: Charles Edward Stevens, University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming, USA:<br />

csteve10@uwyo.edu)<br />

Agglomeration, Entry and the Liability <strong>of</strong> Foreignness<br />

Anna Lamin, Northeastern University<br />

Grigorios Livanis, Northeastern University<br />

Foreign entrants suffer from a liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness, influencing their location choices and leading them to<br />

prefer clusters with other firms. However, prior research only examines foreign entrants, while the liability <strong>of</strong><br />

foreignness implies that these entrants would be more strongly attracted to clusters <strong>of</strong> firms than domestic<br />

firms. We compare the location choices <strong>of</strong> 437 foreign and domestic entrants in India during 2005-2009 and<br />

find that domestic firms exhibit a stronger preference than foreign ones for these city clusters. This suggests<br />

that foreign entrants may not suffer from a liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness, anymore so than domestic entrants. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Grigorios Livanis, Northeastern University, USA: g.livanis@neu.edu)<br />

BOT Outsourcing Contracts - Boon or Bane to Emerging Market Vendor Firms<br />

Peter D. Oerberg Jensen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Bent Petersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Build-operate-transfer (BOT) contracting has been widely usen in the engineering and construction industry, but<br />

has only recently been introduced in services industry domains. Notably, service provider firms from emerging<br />

markets have recently started <strong>of</strong>fering BOT outsourcing contracts. In this paper we investigate under which<br />

circumstances a BOT outsourcing contract (i.e. a contract where the client firm exercises its call option) is<br />

beneficial, or the opposite, to the emerging market vendor firm. We draw on various theoretical literatures<br />

(transaction cost economics, real options, inter-firm linkages) and develop three scenarios for the implications<br />

for vendor firms. We find that BOT contracts, under certain circumstances, may imply benefits <strong>of</strong> process and<br />

knowledge upgrading for the emerging market vendor firm. However, given different sets <strong>of</strong> circumstances,<br />

engaging in a BOT contract carries important competitive risks for the vendor firm, in terms <strong>of</strong> a gradual<br />

downgrading <strong>of</strong> the vendor firm's role in the collaboration with clients, and the ensuing hollowing out <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge competences. (For more information, please contact: Peter D. Oerberg Jensen, Copenhagen<br />

Business School, Denmark: poe.smg@cbs.dk)<br />

Does FDI Increase Market Concentration An Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Portuguese Manufacturing Industries<br />

Rosa Portela Forte, University <strong>of</strong> Porto<br />

Paula Sarmento, University <strong>of</strong> Porto<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment (FDI) on host country market concentration has been a controversial<br />

issue, both at the theoretical and the empirical levels. Most existing empirical studies point to a positive<br />

relationship, enhancing the negative effects <strong>of</strong> FDI on competition conditions, but there are also studies that<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 206


TUESDAY<br />

support the argument that FDI reinforces competition. In this paper we analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> FDI on market<br />

concentration considering the Portuguese manufacturing industries in the period 2006-2009. Using panel data<br />

estimation we found a significant negative impact <strong>of</strong> FDI on industry concentration, which is in line with the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> other studies for developed countries, and gives support to arguments that FDI has positive effects on<br />

domestic firms, eventually through positive externalities. (For more information, please contact: Rosa Portela<br />

Forte, University <strong>of</strong> Porto, Portugal: rforte@fep.up.pt)<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Institutional Actors on Investments in <strong>International</strong> Business Relationships<br />

Sara Jonsson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Kent Eriksson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Oystein Fjeldstad, Norwegian Business School<br />

This paper contributes to global strategy research by connecting institutional theory with relationship level<br />

international business research in the internationalization process <strong>of</strong> firms. The paper provides empirical<br />

evidence that one kind <strong>of</strong> institutional actor assumes different functions depending on whether it operates in<br />

host or home country and can have different effects on investments in international business relationships.<br />

These effects occur because different institutional actors contribute differently to the knowledge development in<br />

the internationalization process <strong>of</strong> firms. The findings suggest that management <strong>of</strong> institutional actors is a key<br />

strategic issue that should be included in the business plans <strong>of</strong> global firms. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Sara Jonsson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sweden: sara.jonsson@abe.kth.se)<br />

Confidence in Learning from Salient Failures: Why (not) Un-adopt the Failed Strategy in Other firms<br />

Jing Yu Yang, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Jiatao Li, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

Andrew Delios, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

We examine how other firms' failures <strong>of</strong> a strategy affect a focal firm's adoption <strong>of</strong> the strategy. Drawing on the<br />

outcome-based learning perspective, a firm generally responds to others' failures in a strategy by un-adopting<br />

the strategy. We argue the intensity <strong>of</strong> such response is affected by the salience <strong>of</strong> each failure and the<br />

observers' confidence in learning from the overall failures. Our analysis <strong>of</strong> 925 Japanese firms' entries into China<br />

from 1979 to 2000 largely supports the argument. We find that (1) a firm is in general less likely to launch new<br />

entries when observing more salient failure experiences <strong>of</strong> early entrants in the host market, reflected in the<br />

failures' timing, duration, and also their investors' status; whilst (2) such effects become weaker when the<br />

causes to the failures are perceived diverse or transient, making the firm less confident in learning from the<br />

failures. This study highlights important conditions why not firms always avoid adopting the failed strategy in<br />

other firms. (For more information, please contact: Jing Yu Yang, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia:<br />

gracy.yang@sydney.edu.au)<br />

The Decision <strong>of</strong> Entry Mode in <strong>International</strong> Cooperation Strategies: Cultural Distance or Relative Size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Host Country<br />

Francisco Figueira de Lemos, Uppsala University<br />

Miguel Matos Torres, University <strong>of</strong> Aveiro<br />

This paper proposes a decision model wherein <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures and <strong>International</strong> Alliances play as<br />

two possible entry strategies. The conceptual model, based on the risk management conceptualization <strong>of</strong><br />

Figueira de Lemos, Johanson and Vahlne (2011), was tested on a probabilistic model with a dataset <strong>of</strong> 9263<br />

alliances and joint ventures established in 65 different countries, being at least one partner from the United<br />

States. Having cultural distance and country economy size as dependent variables, the model's results show<br />

that US firms prefer to engage in alliances to enter more culturally distant countries, whereas the use <strong>of</strong> joint<br />

ventures more probable as larger the host country's economy. Important to notice at theoretical level is this<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 207


TUESDAY<br />

study's pioneer explanation <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Cooperation Strategies within the Uppsala Model's assumptions.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Francisco Figueira de Lemos, Uppsala University, Sweden:<br />

francisco.lemos@fek.uu.se)<br />

Session: 3.1.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Corporate Strategy and Structure in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 09:00-10:15<br />

Chair: Chang Hoon Oh, Simon Fraser University<br />

The Influence <strong>of</strong> Home Country Institutions on the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Firms' Geographic Diversification Strategies<br />

Brian R. Tan, Nanyang Technological University<br />

Asda Chintakananda, Nanyang Technological University<br />

This paper develops an institutional framework to explain and test how various institutional factors influence the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a firm's geographic diversification strategy. The results indicate that while firms operating from<br />

countries with politically stable environments have more effective geographic diversification strategies, an<br />

increase in regulatory effectiveness actually reduces the effectiveness. From a social institutional perspective,<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> in-group collectivism positively influences the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a firm's geographic diversification<br />

strategy, while the level <strong>of</strong> uncertainty avoidance reduces the effectiveness. These findings highlight the<br />

importance for researchers to develop specific theoretical grounding as to how different institutional constructs<br />

influence the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> firm strategy. (For more information, please contact: Asda Chintakananda,<br />

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore: asda@ntu.edu.sg)<br />

Japan's Orientation towards Foreign Investments: Inertia Effects and Driving Force <strong>of</strong> Institutional Changes<br />

Nir Kshetri, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina<br />

Ralf Bebenroth, Kobe University<br />

We use an institutional perspective to develop a framework for understanding the contexts, mechanisms and<br />

processes associated with institutions and institutional changes related to foreign investment in Japan. We<br />

examine power dynamics and relational boundaries between diverse actors and analyze why and how some<br />

components <strong>of</strong> institutions have changed and others have not. Also explored in this paper are the conflicting<br />

discourses that have been raised in regards to the participation <strong>of</strong> foreign investors. We also examine purposive<br />

efforts <strong>of</strong> various institutional entrepreneurs to change prevailing institutions in Japan. We assess structural<br />

factors working as sources <strong>of</strong> inertia in Japan's openness to FDI including the nature <strong>of</strong> capitalism, power <strong>of</strong><br />

bureaucracy and culture and analyze various internal and external sources associated with exogenous shocks<br />

and gradual changes in institutions. (For more information, please contact: Nir Kshetri, University <strong>of</strong> North<br />

Carolina, USA: nir.kshetri@gmail.com)<br />

National Culture and Takeover Activity<br />

Astrid Juliane Salzmann, RWTH Aachen University<br />

Wolfgang Breuer, RWTH Aachen University<br />

We investigate the influence <strong>of</strong> national culture on takeover activity in a cross-disciplinary study across nations.<br />

Cultural differences are measured with the individualism index developed by H<strong>of</strong>stede (2001), which is related<br />

to overconfidence. Overconfident managers overestimate their ability to create value through mergers and<br />

acquisitions. We argue that higher individualism induces more takeover activity as managers exhibit more<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 208


TUESDAY<br />

overconfidence bias. Our empirical evidence supports the positive relationship between the cultural dimension<br />

<strong>of</strong> individualism and the level <strong>of</strong> takeover activity in a cross-country empirical analysis with 47 countries. The<br />

results are robust to controlling for several institutional variables and corporate governance indicators as well as<br />

using other proxies <strong>of</strong> takeover activity, other time periods, and subsamples <strong>of</strong> countries. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Astrid Juliane Salzmann, RWTH Aachen University, Germany:<br />

astrid.salzmann@bfw.rwth-aachen.de)<br />

Exploiting Economic Distance: The Influence <strong>of</strong> Home Country Formal Institutions on <strong>International</strong> New Entrants<br />

Lin Cui, Australian National University<br />

Xiaoming He, Beijing Jiaotong University<br />

This paper examines the effect <strong>of</strong> home country formal institutions on international new entrants' decisions to<br />

exploit economic distance in their foreign direct investment. We advance an analytical framework that<br />

incorporates the governance quality and executive power dimensions <strong>of</strong> home country formal institutions. Using<br />

data from 366 international new entrants and their foreign market entry activities, we found empirical supports<br />

to our theoretical arguments. Specifically, our results suggest that the two home country institutional factors<br />

promote firms' decision to exploit economic distance, and that the factors reinforce the effect <strong>of</strong> each other.<br />

Moreover, we examine the moderating effects <strong>of</strong> firm characteristics. Specifically, we found that home-based<br />

international experience positively moderates the home country institutional effects, whereas the moderating<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> unabsorbed organizational slack was not supported. (For more information, please contact: Lin Cui,<br />

Australian National University, Australia: lin.cui@anu.edu.au)<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Institutional Norms on Knowledge Sharing: The Mediating Role <strong>of</strong> Trust<br />

Yu-Fang Yen, National Quemoy University<br />

Hsing-Kuo Wang, National Quemoy University<br />

Based on the Chinese schema, we propose that social capital can manifest itself in the form <strong>of</strong> guanxi, trust,<br />

and norms. We discuss the concept <strong>of</strong> interpersonal relationships within the context <strong>of</strong> Chinese culture<br />

embedding the concept <strong>of</strong> guanxi in the model to further investigate relationships among there three<br />

dimensions. We used a survey-based methodology to collect from 230 employees <strong>of</strong> the top 100 hightechnology<br />

firms in Taiwan and Structural equation modeling (SEM) with LISTERL 8.54 to examine the<br />

hypotheses model. Results revealed that at the individual level, guanxi is positively related to both trust and<br />

norms. In addition, trust and norms are positively related to knowledge sharing. The mediating effects <strong>of</strong> trust<br />

and norms were also found to be significant. Trust direct influences knowledge sharing, and plays a mediating<br />

role between guanxi and knowledge sharing. This suggests that knowledge sharing is likely to occur when trust<br />

exists among employees. Furthermore, the results indicate that norms mediate the relationship between guanxi<br />

and knowledge sharing. On the other hand, guanxi among members influences knowledge sharing, and<br />

organizations require a feasible solution through the mechanism <strong>of</strong> relational norms. Past studies have<br />

emphasized the direct influence <strong>of</strong> social capital or regarded all variables to be <strong>of</strong> similar importance with regard<br />

to knowledge sharing; however, no clear explanations have been provided explaining how it influences<br />

knowledge sharing. The present study advances our understanding regarding the reasons social capital<br />

enhances knowledge sharing among employees and means by which this occurs. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Yu-Fang Yen, National Quemoy University, Taiwan: yvonne@nqu.edu.tw)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 209


TUESDAY<br />

Session: 3.2.P - Special Session<br />

<strong>2012</strong> JIBS Decade Award<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: John Cantwell, Rutgers University<br />

Retrospective on his <strong>2012</strong> JIBS Decade Award winning article, 'Institutional, cultural and transaction cost<br />

influences on entry mode choice and performance', JIBS, 33(2):203-221.<br />

Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University<br />

Discussants and Commentators:<br />

Xavier Martin, Tilburg University<br />

Myles Shaver, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

(For more information, please contact: John Cantwell, Rutgers University, USA: cantwell@business.rutgers.edu)<br />

Session: 3.2.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 8 - Developing Country MNCs<br />

Foreign Market Entry Strategies <strong>of</strong> Developing Economy Multinationals<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Nikhil Celly, University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

The Motives and Performance <strong>of</strong> Cross-border Acquirers from Emerging Economies<br />

Rekha Rao Nicholson, University <strong>of</strong> Bath<br />

Julie Salaber, University <strong>of</strong> Bath<br />

During the recent decade, the world has witnessed the rapid growth <strong>of</strong> MNEs from emerging economies. Their<br />

increasing participation in cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) has raised great attention in the extant<br />

literature. This study evaluates the value creation from these cross-border transactions from two representative<br />

emerging countries, namely China and India, and determines factors that result in the different performance <strong>of</strong><br />

these international acquisition activities. Cross-border M&As conducted by these countries' companies indeed<br />

lead to significant shareholder wealth creation. Furthermore, Indian shareholders are more likely to benefit from<br />

deals in English-speaking countries, while Chinese investors gain favorable returns from the cross-border<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> manufacturing companies. Location also affects the performance <strong>of</strong> cross-border M&As, with<br />

acquisitions into developed countries generating higher returns to shareholders. These results are based on a<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> 203 Indian and 63 Chinese cross-border M&A deals over the period 2000-2010 and hold after<br />

controlling for various deal-level and firm-level characteristics. (For more information, please contact: Julie<br />

Salaber, University <strong>of</strong> Bath, United Kingdom: js509@management.bath.ac.uk)<br />

Queen Bee Colonization Strategy - Metaphor for Capturing Hyundai Motor's Entry into the India Automotive<br />

Market<br />

Hyeong-Deug Kim, Simon Fraser University<br />

Rosalie L. Tung, Simon Fraser University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 210


TUESDAY<br />

This paper examines how the Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) became a global automaker through its Foreign<br />

Direct Investment (FDI) experience in India. HMC outperformed its competition through its rapid and aggressive<br />

expansion into foreign markets to become a major global automaker in a short period <strong>of</strong> time despite its limited<br />

international experience. We study HMC's previous FDI strategies and practices and examine how the lessons<br />

learned from its failed investment in Canada enabled it to overcome the challenges <strong>of</strong> establishing its operations<br />

in India. This paper also analyzes the reasons for HMC's success in India and how its experience can be imitated<br />

by other companies whose home countries are at a similar stage <strong>of</strong> development as that <strong>of</strong> Korea's or at the<br />

emerging market status. HMC's approach to the Indian market can be dubbed as a "Queen Bee" colonization<br />

strategy. The practical implications <strong>of</strong> HMC's FDI strategy are also discussed. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Hyeong-Deug Kim, Simon Fraser University, Canada: hdkim@sfu.ca)<br />

Perspectives on Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Australia<br />

Robert Graham Jack, Macquarie University<br />

Lijun Qin, Macquarie University<br />

Monica Ren, Macquarie University<br />

The sheer size and scale <strong>of</strong> China's internationalisation, and its significance for Australia's future trade and<br />

investment relations, encourages analysis <strong>of</strong> its overseas investment modes and strategies. By employing an<br />

exploratory, multiple case study methodology, across a diverse range <strong>of</strong> Chinese manufacturers in the<br />

Australian market, we seek to contribute to the literature on firm internationalisation from emerging markets as<br />

well as enhancing our understanding <strong>of</strong> firm strategies from one <strong>of</strong> Australia's most important trading partners.<br />

Four key research questions, drawn from an overview <strong>of</strong> the relevant literature, are presented. These questions<br />

focus on the reasons why Chinese firms target the Australian market; their choice <strong>of</strong> entry mode, and the value<br />

creating activities they locate in Australia. Among the key findings from our research is the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Australian market by Chinese firms for new product testing and the ongoing challenges these firms face in<br />

building brand preference for their products. (For more information, please contact: Robert Graham Jack,<br />

Macquarie University, Australia: rob.jack@mq.edu.au)<br />

Are Mining Firms Just <strong>International</strong>izing for Natural Resources The Motives <strong>of</strong> Chinese Mining SOEs and POEs<br />

Monica Ren, Macquarie University<br />

Robert Graham Jack, Macquarie University<br />

We present six comparative case studies detailing the outward foreign direct investments (OFDI) <strong>of</strong> three<br />

Chinese mining state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and three private-owned enterprises (POEs) to examine their<br />

motives for internationalization. Case studies indicated that their motives fulfill multiple aims and are multidimensional.<br />

Both mining SOEs and POEs have unique ‘domestic comparative ownership advantages'. While the<br />

SOEs internationalize to exploit competitive advantages, the POEs move abroad to redress competitive<br />

disadvantages. This exploratory study suggests that POEs are not yet internationalizing to gain global<br />

competitiveness, but to sustain or improve their existing positions in the Chinese mining industry. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Robert Graham Jack, Macquarie University, Australia: rob.jack@mq.edu.au)<br />

Foreign Acquisitions by Emerging Country Multinationals: Asset Exploitation or Asset Augmentation<br />

Surender Munjal, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds and University <strong>of</strong> Delhi<br />

Peter Buckley, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Nicolas Forsans, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Peter Enderwick, Auckland Technical university<br />

Since the last decade, we witnessed a rise in the internationalisation <strong>of</strong> multinationals enterprises from the<br />

emerging markets (EMNEs). The traditional perspective <strong>of</strong> internationalisation puts forward asset exploitation as<br />

prime driver for internationalization. However, asset augmentation was further acknowledged as a determinant<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 211


TUESDAY<br />

<strong>of</strong> the EMNE's internationalization as the EMNE firm generally lacks firm specific ownership advantages (FSAs).<br />

In this respect, the extent literature has not addressed a gap that if the EMNE lacks FSAs and internationalize to<br />

augment assets, then what factors enables the EMNE to internationalise to augment assets. While examining<br />

asset augmentation activities <strong>of</strong> the EMNE undertaken through cross border merger and acquisitions, we find<br />

that the EMNE having absorptive capacity and financial capability internationalize to procure technological<br />

assets through acquisitions. (For more information, please contact: Surender Munjal, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds and<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Delhi, United Kingdom: smu@lubs.leeds.ac.uk)<br />

Which Factors Determine the Acquisition Price <strong>of</strong> Cross-border Acquisitions: Do Emerging Market Multinationals<br />

Pay More for their Targets in Advanced Economies<br />

Dieter Somers, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven<br />

Filip De Beule, KU Leuven<br />

This paper examines which factors have an impact on the acquisition price and investigates whether emerging<br />

market multinationals pay on average more for their takeovers in advanced economies than their counterparts<br />

from developed markets. This study also contributes to the literature by analyzing whether emerging market<br />

multinationals pay more for vertically related target firms or target firms that are active in high-tech industries.<br />

After a linear regression with robust standard errors, we obtain surprising results. The empirical analysis<br />

confirms that emerging market multinationals pay more for their targets in advanced economies. Our analysis<br />

however also shows that emerging market multinationals are paying a lower acquisition price when their targets<br />

are vertically related or are active in high-tech industries. These last two findings contradict our hypotheses.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Dieter Somers, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium:<br />

dieter.somers@econ.kuleuven.be)<br />

Sequential <strong>International</strong>ization, Heterogeneous Process and Subsidiary Roles: The Case <strong>of</strong> Hyundai Motor<br />

Company<br />

Chung-Sok Suh, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

Yue Wang, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

Myung Hyun Nahm, Hannam University<br />

This paper proposes a new two-phase conceptualization <strong>of</strong> firm internationalization, combining routes to foreign<br />

production as the first phase and subsidiary development as the second phase. Focusing on modeling the<br />

second phase, we theorize alternative routes <strong>of</strong> subsidiary development and establish conceptual links between<br />

firm internationalization and subsidiary roles in relation to patterns <strong>of</strong> knowledge flows. The model is<br />

illustrated through a comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong> a concrete empirical case. We demonstrate that the overall<br />

internationalization process <strong>of</strong> Hyundai Motor Company (HMC), especially the company's accelerated<br />

engagement in foreign production since the 1990s, shows both a sequential pattern from the headquarters'<br />

perspective and heterogeneous development at the subsidiary level. At the headquarters, the rationale <strong>of</strong><br />

capability-building through sequential investment links the company's strategies toward its overseas<br />

subsidiaries. Learning from its initial entry failure, HMC adapted its investment strategy to build production<br />

subsidiaries in countries where the company enjoyed firm-specific advantages (FSA) over local competitors and<br />

faced a low degree <strong>of</strong> liability <strong>of</strong> foreignness (LOF) before moving further into markets where HMC faced less<br />

FSA and a higher degree <strong>of</strong> LOF. At the subsidiary level, however, the HMC experience shows a<br />

heterogeneous development <strong>of</strong> overseas subsidiaries, which led to individual subsidiaries playing different roles<br />

and shaping the knowledge-flow patterns within the company's global operations. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Chung-Sok Suh, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia: c.suh@unsw.edu.au)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 212


TUESDAY<br />

Session: 3.2.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

Focusing on the Student Experience in IB Courses<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Anshu Arora, Savannah State University<br />

A Click, A Clip, and a World Apart: Cultural Influences on Multimedia Use in the Business Classroom<br />

Amanda E.K. Budde-Sung, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Anthony Fee, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Many studies have indicated that Generation Y is more multimedia oriented than were previous generations <strong>of</strong><br />

students, and it is generally agreed that students from Generation Y prefer multimedia tools in the classroom.<br />

However, culture can strongly influence learning styles, and the influence <strong>of</strong> culture on learning preference has<br />

not been tested with this cohort. This quantitative study therefore considers how culture impacts the<br />

preferences <strong>of</strong> students regarding multimedia use in the classroom. Culture emerges as a significant influence<br />

on students' perceptions <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> multimedia tools, with students from lower power distance and higher<br />

humane oriented cultures expressing greater preference for these types <strong>of</strong> tools. Implications <strong>of</strong> these findings<br />

are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Amanda E.K. Budde-Sung, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia:<br />

a.budde@econ.usyd.edu.au)<br />

Empowering Students through Self Directed Collaborative Learning (SDCL)<br />

Shankar Chelliah, Universiti Sains Malaysia<br />

When the faculty introduces a new subject called <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> New Ventures, the biggest challenge<br />

was finding the appropriate text book to teach the subject. In fact, the given subject has three major elements -<br />

entrepreneurship, new venture establishment, and internationalization <strong>of</strong> the new venture. Therefore, a new<br />

way <strong>of</strong> teaching the subject was mooted in 2009 using a self directed, collaborative and institutional learning<br />

modes. Lectures are delivered by the author <strong>of</strong> this paper. Whereas the tutorials are conducted by the students<br />

using the self directed collaborative learning (SDCL) mechanism. It is a pr<strong>of</strong>ound group learning process in a<br />

shared-membership mode. SDCL will emphasize on learning, usually in small, face-to-face groups, to use the<br />

different strengths and expertise <strong>of</strong> the students to accomplish the learning objectives <strong>of</strong> this subject. After the<br />

data collection and analysis completes, SDCL functions to schedule the groups to present during the tutorials.<br />

The writings are converted and archived into case study books and will be used in the subsequent semesters as<br />

references. The private sponsors usually select the best report based on some predetermined criteria on<br />

applicability to award the winners. (For more information, please contact: Shankar Chelliah, Universiti Sains<br />

Malaysia, Malaysia: shankar@usm.my)<br />

Developing Business Personality<br />

Anne Marie Zwerg-Villegas, Universidad EAFIT<br />

Pedagogical topic to be addressed: This proposed conference will cover how we, the pr<strong>of</strong>essors, can discuss<br />

with the students what their responsibilities are in their own personal-pr<strong>of</strong>essional development, why these<br />

responsibilities might be greater than what the student had expected, and how the student can assume these<br />

responsibilities creatively. Statement <strong>of</strong> impact and benefits: Students and faculty <strong>of</strong>ten have quite a<br />

dissimilar vision <strong>of</strong> what the university is all about. Many students expect much more "hand-holding" than most<br />

<strong>of</strong> us are willing or able to do. This session will discuss the changing role <strong>of</strong> business schools in the world today<br />

and will guide pr<strong>of</strong>essors through how to motivate students to change their own definition <strong>of</strong> what university<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 213


TUESDAY<br />

education is and how to take more personal responsibility for their own pr<strong>of</strong>essional development. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Anne Marie Zwerg-Villegas, Universidad EAFIT, Colombia: azwerg@eafit.edu.co)<br />

Building Bridges to "Knowhere": Arts-based Pedagogy in Management Education<br />

David Trott, I-Shou University<br />

In a Taiwan-based international business administration program, students from Haiti, Holland, Hong Kong,<br />

India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mongolia, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkmenistan, USA, and Vietnam created original<br />

artwork as metaphors for business management concepts. Students were able to widen their capacity to make<br />

sense, deepen their knowledge <strong>of</strong> core course content and engage in extemporaneous English speaking through<br />

their interpretation <strong>of</strong> original creations <strong>of</strong> 3D art work or 2D black-and-white photos. A comparison group <strong>of</strong><br />

19 USA non-traditional students also participated in the study. In total, responses by 105 students to a 22-item<br />

survey indicated that learning outcomes were met in a fulsome, creative, innovative and meaningful fashion<br />

with a level <strong>of</strong> engagement perceived as substantially deeper than traditional methods/assessments. Art-asmetaphor<br />

provides an enriching complementary approach to ways <strong>of</strong> knowing, making sense, and <strong>of</strong>fers an<br />

innovative way to facilitate verbal expression in a foreign language. This paper reviews the results <strong>of</strong> a twoyear<br />

study and further contributes to a growing rationale to include arts-based pedagogy in management<br />

education as a proven classroom teaching methodology (For more information, please contact: David Trott, I-<br />

Shou University, Taiwan: davidt@isu.edu.tw)<br />

The Aracruz Simulation: Developing Stakeholder Dialogue Skills for an Emerging Economy Context<br />

Joyce Osland, San Jose State University<br />

Asbjorn Osland, San Jose State University<br />

Carol Reade, San Jose State University<br />

Emerging economies present increasing opportunity for business expansion. <strong>International</strong> business (IB)<br />

students therefore need to become better aware <strong>of</strong> the socio-political challenges that may arise in emerging<br />

economy contexts such as poverty and civil unrest, and to gain capacity for fruitfully engaging in dialogue with<br />

diverse stakeholder groups. The Aracruz Simulation is an experiential learning exercise that can be used in the<br />

IB classroom. It is based on an actual case <strong>of</strong> the Brazilian pulp company, Aracruz Celulose, and involves a land<br />

rights controversy with indigenous and landless people, the community, a government agency that advocates<br />

for indigenous people, and NGOs protesting against the company. This pedagogical tool helps students to<br />

develop stakeholder dialogue skills that are critical for global managers and leaders. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Carol Reade, San Jose State University, USA: carol.reade@sjsu.edu)<br />

IT meet "IB": The Why and How <strong>of</strong> Injecting Culture into "IT" courses<br />

Mikelle A. Calhoun, Georgia Southern University<br />

Akhadian S. Harnowo, Georgia Southern University<br />

Toward the end <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, technological innovations fueled globalization, reshaped business<br />

practices and focused pedagogical and empirical attention on information technology ("IT"), and the emergent<br />

topic <strong>of</strong> global supply chain management ("GSCM"). While at first limited to one firm in one country, IT<br />

facilitated international expansion. IT systems soon spanned borders and not long thereafter, through<br />

incorporation in GSCM systems, spanned different firms from different host countries. The cultural contexts <strong>of</strong><br />

IT systems increased in complexity. IT systems could be developed in one country for use by one or more firms<br />

operating across a network <strong>of</strong> different countries. As academic work caught up to international firms' IT use,<br />

studies revealed that culture influenced a range <strong>of</strong> IT concerns – from development to outcome.<br />

Notwithstanding a growing literature highlighting the significance <strong>of</strong> culture and cultural differences for<br />

understanding IT issues, review <strong>of</strong> IT curricula evidences a lack <strong>of</strong> attention to culture, cultural literacy and<br />

related social issues. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to present the argument for expanding IB into IT programs <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 214


TUESDAY<br />

study and to provide samples <strong>of</strong> teaching tools and assignments intended to improve cultural literacy. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Mikelle A. Calhoun, Georgia Southern University, USA: pr<strong>of</strong>.calhoun@gmail.com)<br />

Session: 3.2.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 2 - Marketing and Supply Chain<br />

Export Performance, Branding, and Retailing<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Yupin Patara, Chulalongkorn University<br />

Export Diversification and Firm Performance: Why and How Does Export Intensity Matter<br />

Dirk Michael Boehe, Insper Institute <strong>of</strong> Education and Research<br />

This study develops a theory that seeks to explain the relationship between export diversification and firm<br />

performance under varying degrees <strong>of</strong> foreign over total sales (export intensity). By integrating conceptual<br />

building blocks from corporate diversification strategy, international marketing and the country-<strong>of</strong>-origin effect,<br />

we develop a three-stage theory that suggests a declining S-curve relationship between geographic export<br />

diversification and firm performance if exporters' export intensity is low and an inverted U-shape if export<br />

intensity is high. We examine our hypothesis using a panel <strong>of</strong> longitudinal archival data with roughly 2,000 firmyear<br />

observations, which cover all <strong>of</strong> the possible export destination countries served by large Brazil-based<br />

exporters from 2001 to 2009. Our results imply that the degree to which the country <strong>of</strong> origin's institutional,<br />

economic and market environments affect its exporters is paramount to understanding why the relationship<br />

between geographic diversification and performance varies. (For more information, please contact: Dirk Michael<br />

Boehe, Insper Institute <strong>of</strong> Education and Research, Brazil: dirkmb@insper.edu.br)<br />

Conflicts and Export Performance: The Role <strong>of</strong> Company Specific Factors<br />

Gregor Pfajfar, University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana<br />

Maja Makovec Brencic, University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana<br />

Aviv Shoham, University <strong>of</strong> Haifa<br />

While the relationships between conflict and export performance have been studied, the findings have been<br />

equivocal. We argue that conflicts have impact on objective performance measures (financial and strategic<br />

performance), which further impact subjective measures (satisfaction with export venture). The empirical<br />

results among 105 exporters show that conflicts have impact on export performance only when the company is<br />

large, operating on many markets and coming from a high-tech industry. Reasons for somehow surprising<br />

results we may find in the concept <strong>of</strong> organizational inertia and the fact that SMEs are much more flexible and<br />

changing faster than large companies, while conflicts need time to arise. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Gregor Pfajfar, University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Slovenia: gregor.pfajfar@ef.uni-lj.si)<br />

Market Orientation in Chinese Retailer-Supplier Relationship: The Reference Group Perspective<br />

Brenda Sternquist, Michigan State University<br />

Jing Zhao, Michigan State University<br />

Retailing evolves in developing economies as the nature <strong>of</strong> buyer-supplier relationships changes. At early stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> the development, manufacturers are given full range to determine what merchandise a retailer will <strong>of</strong>fer.<br />

Retailers serve essentially as manufacturer's showrooms. In such circumstance, market orientation will not<br />

occur. With economic development retailers begin to play a more important role in merchandise selection and<br />

strategic positioning <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fering. BRIC countries are at this stage. This study investigates market orientation<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 215


TUESDAY<br />

in retailer-supplier relationships in a BRIC market, China. Results suggest that supplier market orientation<br />

significantly impacts perceived role performance <strong>of</strong> the supplier, and that both supplier market orientation and<br />

supplier role performance significantly impact retailer market orientation (with the exception <strong>of</strong> supplier role<br />

performance on retailer intelligence generation). Partial mediation <strong>of</strong> supplier role performance suggests that<br />

supplier's market orientation must establish superior role performance from the retailer's perspective in order to<br />

create retailer market orientation. We adopt reference group theory as the theoretical foundation to explain the<br />

expected association between supplier market orientation/supplier role performance and retailer market<br />

orientation. We discussed the findings and implications <strong>of</strong> this study to provide managerial insights to suppliers<br />

in BRIC countries. (For more information, please contact: Brenda Sternquist, Michigan State University, USA:<br />

sternqui@msu.edu)<br />

When Do Foreign Owned Firms Use Fire-Fighting Actions to Deal with the Media A Resource Based View<br />

Cosmina Lelia Voinea, Radboud University Nijmegen<br />

Hans van Kranenburg, Radboud University Nijmegen<br />

This paper explores the types <strong>of</strong> actions chosen by foreign owned firms to manage the influences <strong>of</strong> the host<br />

media and to exploit the possible benefits that this media can convey to their business activities from a resource<br />

base perspective. As most comprehensive and inclusive types <strong>of</strong> actions dedicated to media, we explore two<br />

particular forms, namely fire-fighting and strategic actions. Evidence is provided by a survey sample <strong>of</strong> 160<br />

foreign owned firms operating in the Netherlands. Results show that young foreign owned firms with a broad<br />

market focus and with low perception <strong>of</strong> media power in the host society are more inclined to utilize fire-fighting<br />

actions; while older foreign owned firms with a market focus on the host economy are predisposed to employ<br />

strategic actions to manage the media effects. Empirical outcome also indicates that foreign owned firms from<br />

the service industries prefer to employ strategic actions to manage the influences <strong>of</strong> host media institutions and<br />

issues. (For more information, please contact: Cosmina Lelia Voinea, Radboud University Nijmegen,<br />

Netherlands: c.voinea@fm.ru.nl)<br />

The Global Impacts <strong>of</strong> World Event Sponsorships on Firm Market Performance: A Hierarchical Linear Modeling<br />

Approach<br />

Daekwan Kim, Florida State University<br />

While firms use sponsorships as a common promotional means to enhance its position in the market, the<br />

literature suggests that such promotional activities affect consumers' brand recall and recognition, enhancing<br />

overall brand image if used strategically. However, the literature is muted on whether or not such marketing<br />

activity is eventually leading to their market performance. This study addresses such gap by exploring how<br />

world event sponsorships affect sponsors' market growth rate, using data collected at three different levels: firm<br />

level, industry level, and country level with 2004 Olympic Games as its context. The results <strong>of</strong> Hierarchical<br />

Linear Modeling (HLM) indicate that world event sponsors accrue enhanced market share growth rate although<br />

such benefit gets stronger in industries with less competition and in countries with less trade barriers and high<br />

interest in the event. Furthermore, sponsors in an event related industry receive additional benefits in countries<br />

with less national income, closer geographic proximity, and less trade barriers. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Daekwan Kim, Florida State University, USA: dkim@cob.fsu.edu)<br />

Session: 3.2.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Location Decisions<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Andre Sammartino, University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 216


TUESDAY<br />

Do You Imitate Immediately An Examination <strong>of</strong> the Location Choices for Foreign Direct Investment<br />

HsienJui Chung, National Chung Cheng University<br />

Wei Wan Liao, National Chi Nan University<br />

This study applies recency effects on interfirm imitation studies. It investigates whether peer firms' recent<br />

location choices <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment (FDI) yield imitation pressure on a firm's FDI location choices. This<br />

study examines FDI data <strong>of</strong> Taiwan listed companies. Results confirm the existence <strong>of</strong> recency effects. This<br />

study further indicates that peer firms' remote experience and a firm's own experience have negative<br />

moderating effects on recency effects. These results illustrate why the Matthew effects would not occur nor<br />

firms' behavior would converge to highly homogeneous state even the imitation mechanism functions. The<br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> this study is to introduce time dimension in imitation studies and to propose new interpretation<br />

about the occurrence <strong>of</strong> imitation behavior from time aspect (For more information, please contact: HsienJui<br />

Chung, National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan: hjchung@ccu.edu.tw)<br />

MNE Bargaining Power Under Constrained Location Choices: Evidence from the Tourism Industry<br />

Nicholas James Bailey, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

This paper discusses the bargaining power <strong>of</strong> multinational enterprises (MNEs) when making investment<br />

decisions under constrained location choices. Building on the resource-based view, I argue that countries have<br />

competitive advantages in attracting industry-specific foreign direct investment (FDI) when they have<br />

heterogeneous and immobile resources desired by MNEs from certain industries. Under these conditions, the<br />

more powerful player in the firm-country relationship is the country because the MNE must invest where the<br />

limited resources they need are located. Therefore, investment will take place regardless <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong><br />

incentives used by the country to attract FDI. I test this argument by studying hospitality firms in 158 countries.<br />

Results indicate that countries with high levels <strong>of</strong> unique tourist resources attract hospitality FDI regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

the tax rate in those countries. (For more information, please contact: Nicholas James Bailey, University <strong>of</strong><br />

South Carolina, USA: nicholas.bailey@grad.moore.sc.edu)<br />

Does Knowledge Distance Matter : The Impact <strong>of</strong> Distance on the Formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> R&D Alliances in<br />

a Knowledge Intensive Industry<br />

Jeongho Choi, Rutgers University<br />

This study explores the impact <strong>of</strong> knowledge distance on the formation <strong>of</strong> international R&D alliances in a<br />

knowledge intensive industry. With a sample <strong>of</strong> 162 alliance deals from the year <strong>of</strong> 2000 to 2010, I found that<br />

distance in industrial knowledge intensity, industrial knowledge specialization and knowledge network<br />

connectedness increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong> international R&D alliance formation. In addition, the results support<br />

the view that firms in a competitive knowledge intensive industry and with knowledge-seeking motive are more<br />

likely to engage in regionalized international R&D alliances with foreign partner firms although there exists<br />

certain levels <strong>of</strong> institutional distance as well as knowledge distance between two nations <strong>of</strong> each partner firm.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Jeongho Choi, Rutgers University, USA: jhochoi@pegasus.rutgers.edu)<br />

Institutional Distance, Firm Capabilities, and Foreign Market Entry<br />

Nan Zhou, Moscow School <strong>of</strong> Management SKOLKOVO<br />

Mauro Guillen, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

This paper <strong>of</strong>fers the first systematic study <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the various dimensions <strong>of</strong> institutional distance on<br />

the location choice <strong>of</strong> three different types <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment (FDI): market-seeking, efficiencyseeking,<br />

and strategic asset-seeking. Building on the literature on location advantages, we propose that<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 217


TUESDAY<br />

different dimensions <strong>of</strong> institutional distance (administrative, cultural, demographic, economic, knowledge and<br />

political) have different kinds <strong>of</strong> effects on the three types <strong>of</strong> FDI. We also examine firm-specific moderator<br />

variables. We propose that ownership concentration, state ownership, intangible assets, and prior experience<br />

moderate the impact <strong>of</strong> institutional distance on FDI. We test these hypotheses in the context <strong>of</strong> Chinese listed<br />

firms investing abroad during the 1991-2007 period, finding support for most <strong>of</strong> the predictions concerning<br />

market-seeking FDI and some <strong>of</strong> those concerning efficiency and asset-seeking investments. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Nan Zhou, Moscow School <strong>of</strong> Management SKOLKOVO, China: nzhou@skolkovo.ru)<br />

Chinese Telecommunication MNEs in Africa: Effects <strong>of</strong> Host Countries Economic Environment on IMNEs'<br />

Location choice<br />

Yuxuan Tang, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Robert Pearce, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Christine Phillips, University <strong>of</strong> Reading<br />

Chinese infrastructure investment is always considered as the part <strong>of</strong> China's ODA to Africa. However, the<br />

entities <strong>of</strong> this investment—the IMNEs (Infrastructure Multinational Enterprises) also have to consider host<br />

countries environment because <strong>of</strong> firms' mixed motivation. This paper, based on two stream <strong>of</strong> IB theory:<br />

institution-based view and location choice on host country, explains the cross-country differences on<br />

macroeconomic and institutional environment affect strategic behaviour <strong>of</strong> Chinese Infrastructure MNEs in Africa<br />

and examines why macroeconomic and institutional environments still matter and how host countries<br />

environments differentiate individual Chinese firm's location choice. Owing to the particularity <strong>of</strong> IMNEs in<br />

telecommunication sector, the paper is going to pick two major Chinese players as cases (Huawei Technologies<br />

and ZTE). The empirical study <strong>of</strong> this argument is tested by Panel probit model, using data <strong>of</strong> two companies'<br />

location choice in 40 African countries over 8 years. (For more information, please contact: Yuxuan Tang,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom: yuxuan.tang@pgr.reading.ac.uk)<br />

Understanding Multinational's Location Choice Decisions: A Resource Based View Perspective<br />

Fragkiskos Filippaios, University <strong>of</strong> Kent<br />

Fatima Annan-Diab, Kingston University London<br />

Understanding the nature <strong>of</strong> multinational investment decisions, both from a company and country perspective,<br />

is an important issue for economic growth and development. The question <strong>of</strong> where to invest, and which<br />

resources and core competences to align with which location advantages, is crucial for the creation <strong>of</strong> a firm's<br />

sustainable competitive advantage and the country's wealth and prosperity. Based on the notion that the way a<br />

firm utilise its resources leads to the development <strong>of</strong> its core competences, these core competences in turn<br />

influence the choice <strong>of</strong> the firm's strategies and investment decisions. Firms must examine and understand the<br />

resources and capabilities that enable them to generate above-normal rates <strong>of</strong> return and thus compete in the<br />

best possible way in dynamic global markets. This research adopts the resource-based view, with relevant key<br />

insights being drawn from international business theory to capture multinational foreign direct investment<br />

motivations and explain multinationals' investment decisions. To achieve this multinational investment<br />

motivations and their underlying resources and core competences are presented in a set <strong>of</strong> propositions<br />

developed from both the strategic management and the international business literatures and embracing the<br />

firm and country perspective. An empirical application to Ireland then allows exploring the validity <strong>of</strong> our<br />

propositions and discussing effective recommendations for multinational enterprises and suitable policy<br />

implications for host countries. (For more information, please contact: Fragkiskos Filippaios, University <strong>of</strong> Kent,<br />

United Kingdom: f.filippaios@kent.ac.uk)<br />

Cause or Coincidence Market Entry among Foreign Banks in Tokyo, 1907-2005<br />

Joeri van Hugten, Tilburg University<br />

Jeroen G. Kuilman, Tilburg University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 218


TUESDAY<br />

Interarrival times between foreign entries into the Japanese banking industry are examined. We develop<br />

hypotheses on how the relationship between a prior entry and the likelihood <strong>of</strong> a subsequent entry varies over<br />

time. Piecewise-constant hazard models reveal a negative relationship, but with a spike in the pattern occurring<br />

after a number <strong>of</strong> months. It is theorized that the overall pattern is caused by coalescence, lagged imitation<br />

effects, and the weakening <strong>of</strong> these effects. These results allow scholars <strong>of</strong> (foreign) market entry to bridge the<br />

gap between interorganizational-level theories that do not consider the time dimension to their effects, and<br />

empirical models that require the specification <strong>of</strong> a time dimension <strong>of</strong> variables. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Joeri van Hugten, Tilburg University, Netherlands: j.g.w.j.vanhugten@tilburguniversity.edu)<br />

Policy Issues, Firm's Characteristics and Foreign Direct Investment<br />

Miguel Matos Torres, University <strong>of</strong> Aveiro<br />

Celeste Amorim Varum, University <strong>of</strong> Aveiro<br />

Firm's competencies may determine its actions. Firm may use its own competencies to establish or maintain<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment, or otherwise when internal competencies are not sufficient or the<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> investment too demanding it may cooperate with other firms through international joint ventures,<br />

international alliances, with locals, firms <strong>of</strong> home country and third countries or develop a strategy that includes<br />

an arrangement to apply for external support provided by governments. With a binary probit model applied on<br />

a recent survey, a Bayesian filter calculates the probability <strong>of</strong> a given characteristic's and the use <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

public support is related with the existence <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment. The results show that some<br />

characteristics like the size, labour productivity, age, and domestic ownership, have a noticeable effect on the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment. In terms <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> public support, there is evidence <strong>of</strong> measures that<br />

promote informational services, fiscal benefits, and protocols between governmental agencies and banks have<br />

positive effects on existence <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment. This study may add useful information to help<br />

scholars and policy makers to understand the role <strong>of</strong> competencies on the development <strong>of</strong> activities abroad.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Miguel Matos Torres, University <strong>of</strong> Aveiro, Portugal:<br />

miguel.torres@ua.pt)<br />

Session: 3.2.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Social Dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 10:45-12:00<br />

Chair: Michael Sartor, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

Social Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Brazilian and UK Firms in Light <strong>of</strong> Institutional Theory<br />

Marcelle Colares Oliveira, Universidade de Fortaleza<br />

Jonas Ferreira Araujo Junior, Universidade de Fortaleza<br />

Oderlene Vieira Oliveira, Universidade de Fortaleza<br />

Vera Maria Rodrigues Ponte, Universidade Federal do Ceara<br />

Maísa de Souza Ribeiro, University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the study was to identify the main characteristics <strong>of</strong> social information disclosure <strong>of</strong> the top 30<br />

Brazilian and top 30 UK public firms (Forbes Global 2000 ranking) compared against a set <strong>of</strong> 15 indicators<br />

recommended in the UN Guidance on Corporate Responsibility Indicators in Annual Reports, and to analyze<br />

disclosure patterns in light <strong>of</strong> Institutional Theory. The study was explorative and based on information<br />

retrieved from social reports and accounting statements. The frequency distribution <strong>of</strong> the data, mean values<br />

and equality <strong>of</strong> means were determined. The most frequently disclosed indicators were "total revenues",<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 219


TUESDAY<br />

"payments to government" (explained by the regulative pillar <strong>of</strong> Institutional Theory), "voluntary contributions<br />

to civil society" (explained by the cognitive pillar <strong>of</strong> Institutional Theory) and "new investments" (explained by<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> the stakeholders to whom this information is destined). The results <strong>of</strong> the statistical tests show<br />

that the level <strong>of</strong> disclosure was higher in Brazilian firms with regard to five UN indicators. The study represents<br />

a contribution to current research on social information disclosure by Brazilian firms, compared to firms in<br />

countries with more highly institutionalized CSR structures. (For more information, please contact: Marcelle<br />

Colares Oliveira, Universidade de Fortaleza, Brazil: marcellecolares@unifor.br)<br />

Industrial Evolution on the Second Round: Missing Pieces from MNEs Context<br />

Hye Sun Kang, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Against predictions from both industrial evolution and institutional perspective, why the MNEs in the same<br />

industry with same nationality show heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> technological trajectories during the second variation in<br />

the industrial life cycle To resolve this tension, we postulate that the evolutionary pattern <strong>of</strong> industry will be<br />

different in the second round <strong>of</strong> industrial evolution, especially if the firms are becoming MNEs as industry<br />

evolves. Based on case analysis <strong>of</strong> three Japanese automakers, we argue that the multinationality <strong>of</strong><br />

automakers will lead heterogeneity in technological trajectories they pursue. Also, we predict that MNEs will be<br />

heterogeneous in technological trajectories, a) when they are differently getting advantages from home<br />

institutions, b) when they are differently interact with host institutions because <strong>of</strong> different level <strong>of</strong> institutional<br />

advantages. (For more information, please contact: Hye Sun Kang, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA:<br />

hyesun.kang@grad.moore.sc.edu)<br />

Institutional Misalignment as a Cost <strong>of</strong> Doing Business Abroad: Varieties <strong>of</strong> Capitalism Approach<br />

Kim J. Clark, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at San Antonio<br />

Indu Ramachandran, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at San Antonio<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> Doing Business Abroad (CDBA) is an important construct in <strong>International</strong> Business. The variety <strong>of</strong> causes<br />

leading to the CDBA has been the subject <strong>of</strong> and many scholars' examinations. Extending CDBA to an<br />

institutional level, we develop a new perspective on the CDBA by incorporating institutional misalignment<br />

between the home and the host country as a cause <strong>of</strong> CDBA. We propose that institutional misalignment should<br />

be considered as a component <strong>of</strong> the CDBA. Using the theoretical lens <strong>of</strong> Varieties <strong>of</strong> Capitalism (VoC), we<br />

explain why and how institutional misalignment can create additional cost for MNEs operating in foreign<br />

countries. Specifically, we discuss how the differences between institutional configurations <strong>of</strong> the home and the<br />

host country create institutional misalignment. Furthermore, we explain why institutional misalignment is<br />

inevitable as MNEs cross national borders and how it incurs economic as well as social cost that MNEs may not<br />

be aware <strong>of</strong>. By doing so, we extend the CDBA research to a national level <strong>of</strong> analysis and showed that a set <strong>of</strong><br />

firms from a nation can lose its national comparative institutional advantage as they cross national borders.<br />

Finally, we assert that the larger the institutional distance between the two countries, the greater the<br />

institutional misalignment is. (For more information, please contact: Kim J. Clark, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at San<br />

Antonio, USA: kim.clark@utsa.edu)<br />

The Effect <strong>of</strong> Corruption on <strong>International</strong> Technology Transfer and Spillovers: Evidence from the Wind Turbine<br />

Industry<br />

Neli Kouneva Loewenthal, George Washington University<br />

The paper examines the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the United Nations climate change mandate on clean energy<br />

technology transfer from the developed to the emerging economies where corruption is perceived to be<br />

generally high. The MNCs as repositories <strong>of</strong> knowledge are the key mechanism <strong>of</strong> transfer <strong>of</strong> capabilities<br />

across borders. In the context <strong>of</strong> the wind turbine industry which is the focus <strong>of</strong> this study, foreign direct<br />

investment (FDI) is the key mechanism for technology transfer from developed countries to the emerging<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 220


TUESDAY<br />

economies. The paper <strong>of</strong>fers strong theoretical foundations and a detailed methodology that is expected to<br />

empirically indicate that in addition to the host-home country corruption distance, MNC's entry is influenced by<br />

host country natural resources, while the technology spillovers following that entry are largely influenced by<br />

host country corruption levels. Corruption is expected to be increasing the cost <strong>of</strong> FDI for the MNCs but<br />

decreasing the cost <strong>of</strong> imitation for the recipient <strong>of</strong> knowledge once the MNC has been located in the host<br />

country. By examining corruption, an informal institution, and its effect on FDI and the resulting knowledge<br />

spillovers, this paper extends the literature on the effect <strong>of</strong> institutions on international technology transfer. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Neli Kouneva Loewenthal, George Washington University, USA:<br />

nelik@gwmail.gwu.edu)<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> Corruption on MNEs' Reinvestment Decisions<br />

Martina McGuinness, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield<br />

Mehmet Demirbag, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield<br />

Nizamettin Bayyurt, Fatih University<br />

A range <strong>of</strong> studies have found that corruption has a significant impact upon FDI decisions, however to date<br />

there has been little investigation into longer term investments made by firms. Utilising 2005 World Bank<br />

Enterprise Survey data, this study explores the relationship between corruption and MNEs' strategic decision to<br />

reinvest pr<strong>of</strong>its. Drawing together institutional and transaction costs approaches, we find variation in the<br />

different dimensions <strong>of</strong> corruption and their impact upon relationship between corruption and reinvestment. We<br />

find that pervasive corruption impacts negatively upon reinvestment whilst bribery in not found to be significant.<br />

Perceived robust legal institutions have a positive correlation with reinvestment. Firm level attributes <strong>of</strong><br />

increased size and age are important factors in positive reinvestment decisions. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Mehmet Demirbag, University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, United Kingdom: m.demirbag@sheffield.ac.uk)<br />

Domestic Firms' Strategic Responses to Government Corruption: A Cross-Country Comparison<br />

Sungjin J. Hong, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

Seung-Hyun Lee, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

Mike Peng, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas<br />

How do domestic firms develop strategic alternatives other than simply complying with bribery requests from<br />

their home country's government <strong>of</strong>ficials Drawing on the property rights theory and institution-based view <strong>of</strong><br />

strategy, we propose two strategic alternatives determined by firms' incentives vis-à-vis those <strong>of</strong> government<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials: partial avoidance strategy and manipulation strategy. We predict that a partial avoidance strategy<br />

created via foreign market reliance will decrease a firm's perceived need to bribe, while a manipulation strategy<br />

constructed via government ties will increase a firm's perceived need to bribe. We also argue that the effect <strong>of</strong> a<br />

partial avoidance strategy will be weaker under a high level <strong>of</strong> policy discretion, while the effect <strong>of</strong> a<br />

manipulation strategy will be greater under a high level <strong>of</strong> policy discretion. We test our hypotheses using a<br />

multilevel modeling approach on the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey dataset, and our<br />

results overall support the predicted relationships. Our study provides an important implication for scholars and<br />

managers in that the benefits gained from domestic firms' manipulation and partial avoidance strategies would<br />

vary by the country where they are embedded. (For more information, please contact: Sungjin J. Hong,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA: sungjin@utdallas.edu)<br />

The Ethical Challenges <strong>of</strong> the UN's Clean Development Mechanism in the Solid Waste Management Sector<br />

Candace A. Martinez, Saint Louis University<br />

J.D. Bowen, Saint Louis University<br />

This paper examines the ethical implications <strong>of</strong> the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), the United Nation's<br />

climate change initiative that provides incentives to countries and firms in developed countries to motivate<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 221


TUESDAY<br />

investments in greenhouse gas reduction projects in developing countries. We argue that the current program<br />

is leading to unintentional but avoidable negative outcomes. Using the tenets <strong>of</strong> agency theory, we present a<br />

solid waste management project in El Salvador as an illustrative example <strong>of</strong> how the CDM can produce a<br />

disproportionately high social cost for the most marginalized populations in the developing world. We extend<br />

theory and suggest that the UN needs to reformulate the CDM so that it more effectively aligns the divergent<br />

goals <strong>of</strong> multiple actors and upholds the UN's principles. By providing incentives for environmental, economic,<br />

and social value creation, an industry specific CDM would be a more appropriate riposte to climate change. It<br />

would not only promote ethical behavior by pr<strong>of</strong>it-seeking firms that participate in the program but also<br />

reinforce the UN's twin pro-poor and environmental targets. (For more information, please contact: Candace A.<br />

Martinez, Saint Louis University, USA: cmarti58@slu.edu)<br />

Session: 3.3.1 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

New Directions in Nonmarket Strategy: An Integrative Approach to Value Creation in<br />

Diverse Settings<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

Panelists:<br />

Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

Jonathan P. Doh, Villanova University<br />

Thomas Lawton, EMLYON Business School<br />

Kamel Mellahi, University <strong>of</strong> Warwick<br />

Allison F. Kingsley, University <strong>of</strong> Vermont<br />

Nonmarket strategy has been the subject <strong>of</strong> renewed attention in recent years as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resurgent state following global financial crisis, as well as increasing incidence <strong>of</strong> Western multinationals<br />

operating in emerging market where governments play a prominent role in economics and business<br />

development. More recently, emerging multinationals – with complex and opaque state and private ownership<br />

structures – have been ntering and operating in developed countries, posing challenges for those firms'<br />

interactions with host governments and for competitors who seek to respond to the rise <strong>of</strong> developing country<br />

MNCs. Finally, the sustained interest in – and priority given to – social actors as a result <strong>of</strong> changes in<br />

consumer preferences, investor priorities, and media and popular interest, poses challenges for nonmarket<br />

strategists because it suggests different modes and mechanisms for developing and advancing strategies and a<br />

new set <strong>of</strong> influencers which firms must consider. Successful nonmarket strategies are therefore complex: they<br />

must target both private and public actors; they must align with overall commercial strategies; and they must<br />

be catered to diverse national business and political environments. This panel brings together leading scholars<br />

to discuss these challenges in a roundtable format. The moderator will ask each participant to make a brief set<br />

<strong>of</strong> opening remarks, followed by a moderated Q&A with the audience. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park, USA: bzelner@rhsmith.umd.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 222


TUESDAY<br />

Session: 3.3.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

Roundtable on Innovation and Global Value Chains<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Vinod K Jain, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

Panelists:<br />

Vinod K Jain, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />

Bahija Jallal, MedImmune, LLC<br />

R. Lemuel Lasher, CSC<br />

Carlo Pietrobelli, IADB and University <strong>of</strong> Roma Tre<br />

The dispersion <strong>of</strong> production networks or value chains between developed and developing countries is decades<br />

old. A more recent feature <strong>of</strong> the global economy is the emergence <strong>of</strong> global value chains (GVCs) in service<br />

industries over the last two decades. Seeking efficiencies and talent, multinational enterprises (MNEs) from<br />

developed countries began <strong>of</strong>fshoring a variety <strong>of</strong> corporate functions to developing countries, such as India<br />

and China. These included IT services, business process outsourcing, and pre-clinical and clinical trials for the<br />

biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, among others. A still more recent feature <strong>of</strong> the global<br />

economy is the development and utilization <strong>of</strong> intra-firm and inter-firm GVCs for R&D and innovation by MNEs.<br />

While MNEs have been performing R&D in foreign countries for a long time, what is new is that they are now<br />

performing R&D work in developing countries. The proposed roundtable panel will explore different facets <strong>of</strong><br />

these new developments related to innovation and global value chains, with a focus on emerging markets as<br />

key links in GVCs. The panelists include senior executives responsible for innovation and global R&D for<br />

pharmaceutical and IT industries, which have been at the forefront in developing and utilizing global value<br />

chains for innovation. (For more information, please contact: Vinod K Jain, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park,<br />

USA: vjain@rhsmith.umd.edu)<br />

Session: 3.3.3 - Panel<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

External Knowledge Sourcing in the Global Pharmaceutical Industry<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Felipe Monteiro, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Panelists:<br />

Felipe Monteiro, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Denise Dunlap, Northeastern University<br />

Ram Mudambi, Temple University<br />

TJ Hannigan, Temple University<br />

Minyuan Zhao, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan<br />

Jan Hohberger, University <strong>of</strong> Technology Sydney<br />

Paul Almeida, Georgetown University<br />

Thomas Klueter, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Research in international business has acknowledged that the search for knowledge around the globe is one <strong>of</strong><br />

the key drivers <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment and plays a very important role in increasing a multinational<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 223


TUESDAY<br />

corporation's innovation performance. Traditionally, research has focused on studying the implications<br />

associated with sourcing knowledge from established local subsidiaries through long-term FDI investments in<br />

particular host countries. Today, however, multinational corporations (MNCs) are increasingly investing in the<br />

sourcing <strong>of</strong> external knowledge via non-equity modes <strong>of</strong> international production (e.g., various types <strong>of</strong> research<br />

partnerships such as licensing, etc.) as it was highlighted in the most recent World Investment Report<br />

(UNCTAD, 2011). As much as this trend is affecting a multitude <strong>of</strong> industries, there is probably no better<br />

example <strong>of</strong> the importance and the prevalence <strong>of</strong> external knowledge sourcing than the global pharmaceutical<br />

industry. This panel will examine questions regarding the benefits, trade-<strong>of</strong>fs and challenges associated with<br />

the modes through and the locations where external knowledge is sourced. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Felipe Monteiro, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA: luizm@wharton.upenn.edu)<br />

Session: 3.3.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 2 - Marketing and Supply Chain<br />

<strong>International</strong> Marketing and Logistics Strategy<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Timothy M. Devinney, University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sydney<br />

To What Degree Should Firms Standardize or Adapt Their Product Mix Across Countries New Empirical Results<br />

Based on the Strategic-Fit Approach<br />

Stefan Schmid, ESCP Europe<br />

Thomas Kotulla, ESCP Europe<br />

The question <strong>of</strong> whether to standardize or adapt the international product mix has been one <strong>of</strong> the central<br />

research questions in the international business and international marketing literature. However, despite a long<br />

research tradition, the empirical results are inconclusive. A main reason for the contradictory findings lies in the<br />

fact that performance effects have been either neglected or conceptualized differently across studies.<br />

Furthermore, performance implications have <strong>of</strong>ten been derived without reference to the theory <strong>of</strong> strategic fit.<br />

Our study is intended to provide new insights into the field by using foreign product pr<strong>of</strong>it as a performance<br />

variable and by applying the fit approach, rooted in contingency theory. In particular, we show which subelements<br />

<strong>of</strong> the product mix have to be internationally standardized/adapted to what degree in order to<br />

enhance foreign product pr<strong>of</strong>it, depending on the situation. In addition, based on the fit-as-matching<br />

perspective, we are able to identify the effects <strong>of</strong> over-adaptation and over-standardization on performance.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Stefan Schmid, ESCP Europe, Germany: sschmid@escpeurope.eu)<br />

How and When Does Integrated Product Innovativeness Affect New Product Performance in Developed and<br />

Emerging Economies<br />

Nathaniel Boso, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

John W. Cadogan, Loughborough University<br />

Vicky M. Story, University <strong>of</strong> Nottingham<br />

Grace Abekah, Gracious Pearl <strong>Academy</strong><br />

Using primary data from 319 UK and 221 Ghanaian companies, this study shows that in both developed and<br />

emerging economies the basic form <strong>of</strong> the relationship between integrated product innovativeness and business<br />

success is inverted U-shape, but that the strength and/or form <strong>of</strong> this relationship changes under differing levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> access to financial resources, market orientation, environmental dynamism and environmental hostility.<br />

Importantly, there are substantial differences in the ways that integrated product innovativeness is related to<br />

new product performance across the UK and Ghanaian samples. In Ghana, access to financial resources<br />

enhances the impact <strong>of</strong> integrated product innovativeness, unlike in the UK, where access to financial resources<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 224


TUESDAY<br />

has no significant impact. Furthermore, environmental dynamism is a good thing for Ghanaian innovators –<br />

providing market development and exploitation opportunities – but dynamism poses a challenge for Ghanaian<br />

firms after a point, such that too much dynamism reduces the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Ghanaian firms' innovativeness.<br />

For UK businesses, on the other hand, integrated product innovation is increasingly beneficial as markets<br />

become more dynamic. Across both UK and Ghanaian samples, the results also indicate that integrated product<br />

innovation can leverage stronger new product success when firms are more market oriented and when<br />

competition is more hostile. (For more information, please contact: Nathaniel Boso, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United<br />

Kingdom: n.boso@leeds.ac.uk)<br />

Macro-Logistics Decision Factors and Information Measures for Scanning Global (Supply Chain) Environments in<br />

<strong>International</strong> Location Choice<br />

Aseem Kinra, Copenhagen Business School<br />

The spatial and placial scope <strong>of</strong> organisations has recently been reemphasised in the context <strong>of</strong> cross-border<br />

value chains and supply chain management. This scope is usually accompanied by uncertainty to organisations,<br />

especially for the cross-border value chain with geographically dispersed operations and activities, and poses<br />

environmental complexity in the form <strong>of</strong> risks and costs that organisations need to contend with. With this<br />

background, the purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to report on the most important macro logistics decision factors that<br />

describe environmental complexity for global/cross border logistics operations. The study applies a decisionmaking<br />

oriented approach in order to develop a set <strong>of</strong> macro-logistics factors that pose international uncertainty<br />

in cross-border flows <strong>of</strong> goods, information, payment and ownership. Similarly, a list <strong>of</strong> information measures<br />

that are relevant in scanning against this international uncertainty is also developed. For this purpose, the study<br />

deploys integrated literature reviews and content analyses. Finally, the study employs expert opinions in order<br />

to validate these factors and information measures and to present the findings in the form <strong>of</strong> a decision<br />

hierarchy. The findings suggest the importance <strong>of</strong> 17 generic decision factors at the macro-economic (country)<br />

level that pose constraints to international supply chain flows, and describe international uncertainty for firms. A<br />

catalogue <strong>of</strong> 187 information measures that aid in decisions on each relevant factor is also identified. The<br />

findings may be used by managers in different industry contexts for their scanning and strategic forecasting<br />

needs in relation to international risks. This may be done within the context <strong>of</strong> decision support systems that aid<br />

in global site location and other supply chain design problems. In contrast to solely utilizing widely-accepted<br />

environmental scanning indexes, managers may then prioritise macro economic factors with respect to their<br />

specific decision-making situations. (For more information, please contact: Aseem Kinra, Copenhagen Business<br />

School, Denmark: aki.om@cbs.dk)<br />

The Impacts <strong>of</strong> Product Innovativeness on Performance: An Empirical Investigation <strong>of</strong> Exporters in an Emerging<br />

Economy<br />

Nathaniel Boso, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

John W. Cadogan, Loughborough University<br />

Vicky M. Story, University <strong>of</strong> Nottingham<br />

In a longitudinal study <strong>of</strong> Ghanaian small business exporters, we develop a model <strong>of</strong> business success in which<br />

product innovativeness levels have curvilinear relationships with performance, and in which optimal levels <strong>of</strong><br />

product innovativeness are determined by financial resources and market turbulence. Results show that the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> product innovativeness on performance is U-shaped; novelty <strong>of</strong> product innovativeness<br />

has an inverted U-shape relationship with performance; and that the curvilinear relationship between novel<br />

product innovativeness and business success is stronger (and more positive) when there is greater access to<br />

financial resource and more negative when environment turbulence increases. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Nathaniel Boso, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom: n.boso@leeds.ac.uk)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 225


TUESDAY<br />

Session: 3.3.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

Network Effects in <strong>International</strong>izing SMEs<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Patricia Mcdougall , Indiana University<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Organizational and Personal Networks in Exploring and Exploiting Opportunities in <strong>International</strong><br />

Markets<br />

Manuel Eberhard, Bond University<br />

Justin B. Craig, Bond University<br />

In a study <strong>of</strong> 1304 Australian manufacturing industry SMEs, we investigate the relationships among networking<br />

(i.e., inter-personal and inter-organisational networks), international market venturing (i.e., export intensity),<br />

and family ownership. We find evidence that (1) inter-personal networking and inter-organisational networking<br />

positively influence SME international market venturing, but this relationship is contingent on a time lag effect,<br />

and (2) family ownership negatively moderates the effect <strong>of</strong> inter-organisational networking on international<br />

market venturing. Implications for managerial practice and public policy are discussed. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Manuel Eberhard, Bond University, Australia: meberhar@bond.edu.au)<br />

Effectuation and Networking <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>izing SMEs<br />

Tamara Galkina, Hanken School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Sylvie Chetty, Massey University<br />

We explore previously discarded phenomena in the internationalization process literature, namely non-predictive<br />

logic <strong>of</strong> foreign market entry. We use effectuation theory as a new lens to examine how small and medium size<br />

enterprises (SMEs) network during their international expansion. We develop a conceptual framework by<br />

contrasting how the network concept is used in the revisited Uppsala model from the <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

literature and in effectuation theory from the entrepreneurship literature. This comparison shows that the<br />

underlying assumptions <strong>of</strong> the network concept relating to trust, risk, uncertainty and coordination are<br />

essentially different in these two streams <strong>of</strong> literature. Consequently, we identify how effectuation theory can<br />

capture the unintentional aspect <strong>of</strong> networking by internationalizing SMEs. Our research design is a multiplecase<br />

study approach. Our findings show how entrepreneurs network with all interested partners instead <strong>of</strong><br />

carefully selecting international partners according to pre-defined network goals. Entrepreneurs who network<br />

effectually enter markets wherever an opportunity emerges to commit to a network relation which will increase<br />

their means. Hence, the network relations determine which foreign markets the firm enters rather than vice<br />

versa. An implication for entrepreneurs in internationalizing firms is that their networks need not necessarily be<br />

planned, structured and coordinated. (For more information, please contact: Tamara Galkina, Hanken School <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, Finland: tamara.galkina@hanken.fi)<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> SMEs into Emerging Market Business Networks - Antecedents <strong>of</strong> the Network Entry Node<br />

Choice<br />

Susanne Sandberg, Linnaeus University<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the third wave <strong>of</strong> internationalization, Western SMEs have established themselves on a big scale in<br />

the emerging markets <strong>of</strong> the world which <strong>of</strong>fers a highly dissimilar institutional context. This paper aims to<br />

determine antecedents <strong>of</strong> the emerging market entry node, being the establishment point into the foreign<br />

business network, <strong>of</strong> 203 SMEs in Southern Sweden that entered the emerging markets <strong>of</strong> the Baltic States,<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 226


TUESDAY<br />

Poland, Russia and China. The theoretical framework used to analyze these highly internationalized SMEs builds<br />

on a network approach to internationalization. Hypotheses are formulated regarding the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

usefulness <strong>of</strong> former internationalization knowledge, market knowledge and social linkages on the current<br />

network entry node choice <strong>of</strong> the firm; either a direct relationship in the form <strong>of</strong> a dyad, or an indirect<br />

relationship in the form <strong>of</strong> a triad. Through a logistic regression it was shown that market knowledge and social<br />

linkage favors a dyadic entry node into the emerging market business network, while general<br />

internationalization knowledge did not significantly affect the choice <strong>of</strong> entry node. In addition, moderations<br />

were found between the antecedents and the current network entry node <strong>of</strong> the sample SMEs. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Susanne Sandberg, Linnaeus University, Sweden: susanne.sandberg@lnu.se)<br />

Accelerated <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Small Firms: Adjusting and Activating Networks for Opportunities<br />

Anita Juho, University <strong>of</strong> Oulu<br />

Tuija Mainela, University <strong>of</strong> Oulu<br />

The present study examines the behaviors <strong>of</strong> small firm entrepreneurs in their intensified efforts to increase the<br />

international business activities <strong>of</strong> their firms. The study builds on previous research on the use <strong>of</strong> networks and<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> business opportunities in both gradual internationalization and new venture<br />

internationalization models. The study combines the two to suggest networking and learning as the actions that<br />

drive the international opportunity development by the entrepreneur in accelerated internationalization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

firm. It is that triad <strong>of</strong> behaviors that might be the key driver <strong>of</strong> the accelerated internationalization any firm.<br />

In the empirical study we compare the networking, learning and international opportunity development<br />

behaviors by an international late starter and an international new venture longitudinally over a three year<br />

period. As a result <strong>of</strong> the study we suggest two primary ways <strong>of</strong> behaving in networks in accelerated<br />

internationalization <strong>of</strong> firms. The international late starter depicts "adjusting" type <strong>of</strong> behaviors whereas the<br />

international new venture depicts "activating" type <strong>of</strong> behaviors. We suggest these behavioral logics to<br />

circumscribe the acting <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneurs and lead to either sequential or cyclical process <strong>of</strong> accelerated<br />

internationalization. (For more information, please contact: Anita Juho, University <strong>of</strong> Oulu, Finland:<br />

anita.juho@oulu.fi)<br />

Session: 3.3.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

The Many Functions <strong>of</strong> Networks in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Torben Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Local Embedding Activity by the Competence-seeking MNE Subsidiary<br />

Shameen Prashantham, Nottingham University Business School<br />

This exploratory study sheds light on how competence-seeking MNE subsidiaries build local embedded<br />

relationships. Drawing on over 50 semi-structured interviews spanning three technology alliances formed by a<br />

UK-based American MNE subsidiary, we argue that local actors' perceptions during interactions (e.g. meetings)<br />

with MNE subsidiaries powerfully affect how embedding unfolds. We contribute fine-grained, nuanced theorizing<br />

<strong>of</strong> perceptual barriers to embedding: negative process-related perceptions may derail trust-building while<br />

adverse content-related perceptions could impede information-sharing. Consequently, mutual commitment and<br />

therefore joint problem-solving are hindered. Embedding activity is thus no trivial matter and constitutes a<br />

make-or-break factor in MNE subsidiaries' competence-creation via external networks. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Shameen Prashantham, Nottingham University Business School, China:<br />

shameen.prashantham@nottingham.edu.cn)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 227


TUESDAY<br />

Cross-National Distance and Insidership in Networks:Japanese MNEs' Ownership Decisions on Their Overseas<br />

Subsidiaries<br />

Megan (Min) Zhang, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario<br />

Combining country specificity with network specificity, this study reinvestigates the controversial question <strong>of</strong><br />

MNEs' equity ownership decisions on their overseas subsidiaries. When studying ownership as a formal structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> overseas subsidiaries, most prior studies were only concerned with the influence <strong>of</strong> cross-national distance,<br />

but did not examine whether networks as informal structures <strong>of</strong> firms affect the decision-making. Moreover,<br />

most prior studies adopted aggregated constructs, time-invariant measures, and single level analyses, and<br />

thereby failed to capture the complexity <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon further. Some <strong>of</strong> them even resulted in mutually<br />

conflicting conclusions. To address these issues, the study first applies multidimensional and longitudinal<br />

measures to the investigation, and thereby captures the diverse influences <strong>of</strong> cross-national distance on MNE's<br />

ownership decisions. Moreover, the study takes inter-organizational collaborations into account, and thereby<br />

empirically addresses the insidership in business networks and their influences on ownership decisions. Finally,<br />

the study identifies that the insidership in networks alleviates cross-national distance's influences on ownership<br />

decisions. To capture this cross-level interaction, the study adopts Hierarchical Linear Modeling approach.<br />

Future research and implications for practice are also discussed. (For more information, please contact: Megan<br />

(Min) Zhang, University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada: mzhang.phd@ivey.ca)<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> MNEs' Competitive Network Positions on the Intensity <strong>of</strong> Competitors' Actions: The Moderating<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> Competitive Action Types<br />

Yu-Ching Chiao, National Chung Hsing University<br />

Keng-Hsiang Cheng, National Chung Hsing University<br />

There has been little empirical research discussing competitive dynamics by considering competitive networks<br />

and how firms' positions in a competitive network impact competitors' actions. Using the awarenessmotivation-capability<br />

(AMC) perspective, this study explores how a focal firm's structural hole and outward<br />

centrality in a competitive network affects its intensity <strong>of</strong> competitors' actions, and the moderate effect <strong>of</strong><br />

competitive action types between competitive network positions and the intensity <strong>of</strong> competitors' actions.<br />

Examining a sample <strong>of</strong> top 20 container shipping multinational enterprises (MNEs) by collecting 2,984<br />

competitive actions <strong>of</strong> 682 global competitive interactions news from Cyber Shipping Guide (CSG), we found<br />

that a firm with higher outward centrality <strong>of</strong> competition or higher structural hole in a competitive network is<br />

subject to less threat from its competitors' actions. The number <strong>of</strong> strategic actions taken by a focal firm will<br />

strengthen the negative relationship between structural hole <strong>of</strong> competition and intensity <strong>of</strong> competitors'<br />

actions. Moreover, the number <strong>of</strong> tactic actions <strong>of</strong> a focal firm will weaken the negative relationship between<br />

outward centrality <strong>of</strong> competition and intensity <strong>of</strong> competitors' actions. The implications <strong>of</strong> these findings for<br />

research and practice are also discussed. (For more information, please contact: Keng-Hsiang Cheng, National<br />

Chung Hsing University, Taiwan: kenghsiang.c@gmail.com)<br />

The Private and Common Benefits <strong>of</strong> Spanning Structural Holes within the MNE Network<br />

Lisa Katarina Gaerber, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Torben Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Shalini Rogbeer , WU Wien<br />

It is well established that spanning structural holes creates private benefits through innovation. However, the<br />

extent to which other network members pr<strong>of</strong>it from spanning structural holes remains unclear. This research<br />

considers how subunits that span structural holes within the MNE network reap private benefits in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

innovation, as well as contribute to the common network benefits through knowledge outflows. Acknowledging<br />

that a direct relationship between knowledge sharing and innovation exists, we use a 3SLS model to elucidate<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 228


TUESDAY<br />

the various individual and simultaneous links among brokerage, innovation and knowledge outflows. In this<br />

way, we decompose some <strong>of</strong> the ways in which brokerage simultaneously affects knowledge outflows and<br />

innovation to map out the private and common benefits <strong>of</strong> brokering within the MNE network. We find that<br />

brokerage is indeed positively related to innovation but negatively to knowledge outflows, given also that, as<br />

expected, innovation is positively related to outflows. The reason that existing literature has ignored the<br />

knowledge outflow patterns <strong>of</strong> the broker, and as such its value-added to the network, may be that the total<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> knowledge outflow is indeed positive, although the direct effect <strong>of</strong> brokerage on knowledge outflow is<br />

negative. (For more information, please contact: Lisa Katarina Gaerber, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark:<br />

lg.smg@cbs.dk)<br />

Session: 3.3.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Social Movements and <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Andrew Spicer, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

Torts and Tickers: The Impact <strong>of</strong> Human Rights Lawsuits on Multinational Stock Performance<br />

David Adam Wernick, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

William Schneper, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Activist groups have filed dozens <strong>of</strong> civil lawsuits in U.S. federal courts against multinational enterprises in<br />

recent years over alleged human rights abuses in developing countries, many in Latin America. Multinational<br />

business leaders complain that these lawsuits add to their cost <strong>of</strong> doing business and hamper their global<br />

competiveness. Anecdotal evidence suggests that their concerns may be justified. But does the empirical<br />

evidence bear this out To answer this question we conducted an event study <strong>of</strong> lawsuits filed against<br />

multinational enterprises between 1993 and 2010 under the U.S. Alien Tort Statute, a law that gives U.S.<br />

federal courts extraterritorial jurisdiction for cases involving allegations <strong>of</strong> serious <strong>of</strong>fenses committed against<br />

foreign citizens. Our analysis shows that target firms experienced a significant decline in share price upon filing<br />

and that both industry and nature <strong>of</strong> the lawsuit had a significant and negative relationship to shareholder<br />

wealth. We <strong>of</strong>fer conclusions and implications for practice. (For more information, please contact: David Adam<br />

Wernick, Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA: wernick@gmail.com)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>its and Prophets: The Religious Determination <strong>of</strong> Corporate Legitimacy<br />

Matthew C. Mitchell, Drake University<br />

The broad and complex relationship between religion and global businesses is investigated using the theoretical<br />

lens <strong>of</strong> institutional theory and qualitative methodological techniques <strong>of</strong> cultural analysis <strong>of</strong> discourse.<br />

Specifically, I examine the relationship between the corporation and the religio-institutional environments in<br />

which they transact by mapping the cognitive schematic elements <strong>of</strong> religious actors in three countries: Egypt<br />

(Islam), Israel (Judaism), and Sweden (Secular Humanism). Semi-structured participant interviews <strong>of</strong> 78<br />

religious clerics and business executives are used to generate and analyze a focused discursive corpus. The<br />

result <strong>of</strong> this analysis is (1) a thick description <strong>of</strong> the cognitive and discursive relationship between religion and<br />

business for each national environment, (2) an identification <strong>of</strong> critical constructs and themes in the religious<br />

cognition <strong>of</strong> corporate legitimacy, and (3) proposed maps for the normative evaluation <strong>of</strong> corporate legitimacy<br />

in each national context (the Egyptian case is highlighted in this paper). (For more information, please contact:<br />

Matthew C. Mitchell, Drake University, USA: matthew.mitchell@drake.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 229


TUESDAY<br />

Business under Adverse Home and <strong>International</strong> Institutions: The Case <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Sanctions against<br />

Myanmar<br />

Klaus Meyer, China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School<br />

Htwe Htwe Thein, Curtin University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

We expand the institutional perspective <strong>of</strong> international business by exploring the range <strong>of</strong> institutions outside<br />

the host country that influence international business. We use an extreme case, Myanmar, as case study to<br />

explore the dynamics <strong>of</strong> institutional constraints and the reaction <strong>of</strong> business to such constraints. Crucially, this<br />

includes adverse formal and informal institutions, namely economic sanctions, created in the home countries<br />

and on the international stage by a variety <strong>of</strong> institutional actors. The impact <strong>of</strong> institutional pressures varies<br />

with the characteristics <strong>of</strong> business activities undertaken in the sanctions country, in particular the market<br />

orientation and the capital intensity. We provide an in-depth analysis <strong>of</strong> four industries varying by these criteria<br />

between 1996/97, the height <strong>of</strong> the sanctions, and the late phase when access was eased in 2010/11. On the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> our case analysis, we propose a conceptual framework <strong>of</strong> institutional pressures influencing<br />

multinational enterprises on the international stage, and how the impact <strong>of</strong> such pressures varies across<br />

industries and firms. (For more information, please contact: Klaus Meyer, China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

School, China: kmeyer@ceibs.edu)<br />

Session: 3.3.8 - Competitive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

New Perspectives on Expatriate Staffing<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Hein Bogaard, George Washington University<br />

Host Country Relative Development Level and Expatriate Staffing: The Case <strong>of</strong> Korean Multinationals' Overseas<br />

Subsidiaries<br />

Khan-Pyo Lee, Sogang University<br />

Jong-Hun Park, Sogang University<br />

Myung Suk Kim, Sogang University<br />

This study examines how the development level <strong>of</strong> the host country relative to the home country affects the<br />

extent to which MNEs staff their overseas subsidiaries with home country expatriates. Building on the research<br />

on intergroup relations from social psychology, we hypothesize that the extent <strong>of</strong> expatriate staffing in a<br />

subsidiary is positively related to the host country's relative level <strong>of</strong> development. We further predict that host<br />

country relative development level also positively moderates the negative associations between the length <strong>of</strong><br />

subsidiary operation and subsidiary performance on the one hand, and the extent <strong>of</strong> expatriate staffing on the<br />

other. The findings from the analysis <strong>of</strong> expatriate staffing in 1,294 overseas subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> 727 Korean firms<br />

operating in 47 host countries provide support for the hypotheses. (For more information, please contact: Khan-<br />

Pyo Lee, Sogang University, Korea, South: khanplee@sogang.ac.kr)<br />

A Multilevel Framework <strong>of</strong> Expatriate Adjustment and Knowledge Stock on MNE Subsidiary Performance<br />

Subhajit Chakraborty, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American<br />

Jorge Gonzalez, University <strong>of</strong> Texas - Pan American<br />

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) <strong>of</strong>ten assign expatriate senior executives to manage their newly formed<br />

subsidiaries, especially those in emerging economies. A multilevel moderated mediation model is proposed<br />

wherein individual level expatriate senior executives' ability to adjust to a variety <strong>of</strong> foreign conditions moderate<br />

the relationship between organization level expatriate executives' utilization and subsidiary knowledge stock. It<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 230


TUESDAY<br />

is further proposed that subsidiary knowledge stock mediates the relationship between expatriate utilization and<br />

subsidiary operating performance. Research implications are discussed. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Subhajit Chakraborty, University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American, USA: schakraborty1@utpa.edu)<br />

Exploring City Attractiveness: Drivers to Work in a Southeast Asian City<br />

Michael Dickmann, Cranfield University<br />

Jean-Luc Cerdin, ESSEC Business School<br />

Within the boundaryless career framework, the decision to work in a particular location is under-researched.<br />

This paper explores the city attractiveness and career drivers <strong>of</strong> individual working domestic or foreign nationals<br />

in a prominent Southeast Asian capital. Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted to explore the attraction<br />

factors <strong>of</strong> living and working in the particular location. The data enabled us to distinguish the drivers <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic citizens from foreign expatriates. The findings give detail to what are the specific national and<br />

regional, location, career and development, family and friends, organizational and individual career<br />

considerations that individuals consider when deciding to work in this South East Asian city. In a global ‘war for<br />

talent' between cities, the Southeast Asian city had developed instruments to reduce barriers to entry (friendly<br />

immigration policies) or re-entry while attempting to bind people more closely to the city. While legal career<br />

barriers to work internationally may diminish, cities seem to work on increasing their attractiveness and,<br />

thereby, creating psychological, regulatory, network-based and cultural links that may serve as boundaries to<br />

careers. A number <strong>of</strong> managerial and theoretical implications are explored. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Michael Dickmann, Cranfield University, United Kingdom: m.dickmann@cranfield.ac.uk)<br />

Intent to Become an Expatriate: An Application Of Ajzen's Theory <strong>of</strong> Planned Behavior and the Role <strong>of</strong> Gender<br />

in the United States, Russia and Turkey<br />

Robert Louis Engle, Quinnipiac University<br />

Nikolay Dimitriadi, Rostov State Economic University<br />

Ekrem Tatoglu, Bahcesehir University<br />

Using a sample <strong>of</strong> 575 subjects in Russia, Turkey and the United States a model <strong>of</strong> expatriate intention was<br />

developed using Ajzen's theory <strong>of</strong> planned behavior. Model variables included attitude towards the behavior,<br />

social norms, and perceived self-efficacy, as well as a number <strong>of</strong> control variables including gender. The model<br />

was operationalized with an emphasis on cultural adaptability and results suggested that the model explained<br />

44% <strong>of</strong> the variance in job intention with 48% <strong>of</strong> the variance explained in the U.S., 41% explained in Turkey,<br />

and 25% explained in Russia. The social norms model element was constructed using three distinct social<br />

groups and this model antecedent on intention had the greatest overall impact across all countries, followed by<br />

attitude, and with gender explaining a small but significant percentage <strong>of</strong> the variance. The interaction between<br />

social groups, gender, and job intention was also explored with potentially important implications for both<br />

research and practice. (For more information, please contact: Robert Louis Engle, Quinnipiac University, USA:<br />

robert.engle@quinnipiac.edu)<br />

Session: 3.3.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

The Critical Role <strong>of</strong> Capabilities in Entrepreneurial Firms<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Peter W. Liesch, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 231


TUESDAY<br />

Capability Presence in the Newly <strong>International</strong>izing Firm<br />

Jay Weerawardena, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Gillian Sullivan Mort, La Trobe University<br />

Peter W. Liesch, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland<br />

Gary Knight, Florida State University<br />

Sandeep Salunke, Queensland University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

We investigate the enablers <strong>of</strong> early internationalization <strong>of</strong> the firm. We posit that for firms to internationalize<br />

early in their lifecycles, sets <strong>of</strong> capabilities must be present at the firm's formative stage and that these<br />

capabilities build upon routines that the founders bring into the new firm. These capabilities are aligned to<br />

establish a platform for internationalization unencumbered by the administrative heritage <strong>of</strong>ten observed in<br />

well-established firms. We model this phenomenon, testing it in a cross-national setting <strong>of</strong> early<br />

internationalizing firms in Australia and the United States. To do so, we draw upon a dynamic capabilities<br />

framing, conceptualizing and measuring the dynamic capabilities that founders apply in their early<br />

internationalization activities. We then present and discuss the results <strong>of</strong> our analyses. In sum, we uncover and<br />

confirm a collection <strong>of</strong> vital capabilities – primarily innovation, learning, networks, and marketing – that drive<br />

early internationalization <strong>of</strong> the firm. (For more information, please contact: Peter W. Liesch, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Queensland, Australia: p.liesch@business.uq.edu.au)<br />

SME Organisational Capabilities and Export Performance<br />

Serena Mascherpa, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia<br />

Antonella Zucchella, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia<br />

Roger Strange, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the increasing tendency towards a global economy, international business involvement is<br />

becoming particularly relevant for smaller companies. Exporting constitutes the most popular, quickest and<br />

easiest way for many small firms to internationalise. The aim <strong>of</strong> the paper is to provide a comprehensive picture<br />

<strong>of</strong> the export performance determinants <strong>of</strong> Italian small and medium sized companies (SMEs) by investigating<br />

the potential relationship between organisational capabilities and both objective and subjective measures <strong>of</strong><br />

performance. Based on the literature review and mainly embedded in the resource-based view <strong>of</strong> the firm, we<br />

uncover a collection <strong>of</strong> organisational capabilities that are especially salient to these firms and their growing<br />

international involvement. The suggested conceptual model is tested within a sample <strong>of</strong> Italian exporting SMEs<br />

using regression analysis. The results show that entrepreneurial and innovative capabilities are the most<br />

influential antecedents <strong>of</strong> both objective and subjective measures <strong>of</strong> international performance. Environmentallearning<br />

capabilities are positively and significant related to the subjective indicator, whilst marketing capabilities<br />

are insignificantly related to both the measures. Finally, we discuss the managerial implications <strong>of</strong> our findings.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Serena Mascherpa, University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy:<br />

serena.mascherpa@libero.it)<br />

How capabilities evolve in a knowledge intensive Born Global firm: Case <strong>of</strong> an Indian Born Global firm<br />

Nishant Kumar, Stockholm University<br />

In the recent studies on Born Global, emphasis has been on the question <strong>of</strong> where and how capabilities emerge<br />

in Born Global firms. The present paper is an attempt to address this question. On the basis <strong>of</strong> a longitudinal<br />

case study <strong>of</strong> knowledge intensive service firm from India, this study explores how global capabilities emerge<br />

and play an important role in the survival and international growth <strong>of</strong> the firm. The study shows that developing<br />

capabilities for global service delivery is crucial for the survival and growth <strong>of</strong> Born Global service firms; these<br />

capabilities are emerging through a mix <strong>of</strong> experiential and deliberate learning processes, and continuously<br />

evolving with the changes in the environment. Capability evolution follows different paths in the different<br />

phases <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> Born Global firm. (For more information, please contact: Nishant Kumar, Stockholm<br />

University, Sweden: nku@fek.su.se)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 232


TUESDAY<br />

Stakeholders and Marketing Capabilities in <strong>International</strong> New Ventures: Evidence from Ireland, Sweden and<br />

Denmark<br />

Natasha Evers, NUI Galway<br />

Svante Andersson, Halmstad University<br />

Martin Hannibal Knudsen, University <strong>of</strong> South Denmark<br />

This paper aims to extend the concept <strong>of</strong> dynamic capabilities in relation to the marketing function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organisation, with particular focus on the role <strong>of</strong> stakeholders in marketing capability-building processes to<br />

deliver unique marketing assets for competitive advantage in international new ventures. Using a cross-country<br />

case approach <strong>of</strong> firms in Ireland, Sweden and Denmark, we identify and empirically examine the role <strong>of</strong><br />

stakeholder groups in developing market-relating capabilities that enable firms to acquire and effectively<br />

respond to the dynamic international market environments. This study suggests that small internationalising<br />

firms must move beyond market orientation strategies for developing marketing capabilities to consider other<br />

stakeholder groups for driving firm performance. This study finds that various stakeholders play a critical role in<br />

influencing the nature <strong>of</strong> the firm's marketing capabilities. The nature <strong>of</strong> stakeholder groups can influence the<br />

learning processes <strong>of</strong> the firm and thus can determine the type <strong>of</strong> marketing capabilities and marketing assets<br />

the firm develops for competitive advantage. In particular, we find that managerial capabilities <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneur/manager stakeholder are central in managing and leveraging the relationships between the firm<br />

and stakeholder relationships for capturing and regenerating marketing resources and capabilities for<br />

generating rents. (For more information, please contact: Natasha Evers, NUI Galway, Ireland:<br />

natasha.evers@nuigalway.ie)<br />

Session: 3.3.10 - Panel<br />

Track: 13 – Teaching IB<br />

Teaching the Introduction to <strong>International</strong> Business Course in an Era <strong>of</strong> Black Swan<br />

Events:<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Tom W Roehl, Western Washington University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Tom W Roehl, Western Washington University<br />

Roberto Garcia, Indiana University<br />

Michael Geringer, Ohio University<br />

In a world where our students are less likely to find predictable outcomes (Black Swans) and opportunities in<br />

their international careers, what changes do we need to make in the way we introduce our students to<br />

international issues While we will continue to teach about the rules and the tools that are traditionally the core<br />

<strong>of</strong> a beginning international business course, how we teach the ideas and the mix <strong>of</strong> concepts we teach may<br />

need to be re-examined. This is especially important because many <strong>of</strong> us are required to teach both students<br />

with a commitment to international business and those for whom this course will be the majority <strong>of</strong> international<br />

exposure they will have in their business program. We think that we must let students struggle with a<br />

requirement to use combinations <strong>of</strong> tools, deal with a lot more uncertainty, and be able to adjust quickly to<br />

environments we cannot hope to fully prepare them for. Three pr<strong>of</strong>essors showcase their attempts to make<br />

the introductory course more appropriate for this new environment, providing specific ideas to they have used<br />

to improve the courses. (For more information, please contact: Tom W Roehl, Western Washington University,<br />

USA: tom.roehl@wwu.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 233


TUESDAY<br />

Session: 3.3.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 2 - Marketing and Supply Chain<br />

Consumer Ethnocentrism, Country Image, and Product Origin Effects<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Vinh Nhat Lu, Australian National University<br />

Consumer Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Developing Country Products: The Moderating Role <strong>of</strong> Product Ethnicity<br />

Terence Motsi, Cleveland State University<br />

Ji Eun Park, Cleveland State University<br />

This paper seeks to explore the role product ethnicity plays in moderating the relationship between consumer<br />

values and product evaluation <strong>of</strong> developing country products. Previous research has shown that products from<br />

developing country are generally rated as inferior to developed country products, however product category<br />

effects are likely to confound the findings <strong>of</strong> this research. The product ethnicity <strong>of</strong> a product is a likely signal <strong>of</strong><br />

its authenticity and quality to the consumer and reconciles previous research which has shown a negative<br />

relationship between consumer values and the general evaluation <strong>of</strong> developing country products. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Terence Motsi, Cleveland State University, USA: t.motsi@csuohio.edu)<br />

Consumer Ethnocentrism: A Re-Evaluation and Extension in the Context <strong>of</strong> Globalization<br />

Mohammad Niamat Elahee, Quinnipiac University<br />

Tilottama Ghosh-Chowdhury, Quinnipiac University<br />

Camelia Micu, Fairfield University<br />

This study seeks to examine and re-evaluate our understanding <strong>of</strong> consumer ethnocentrism in the light <strong>of</strong><br />

globalization that has resulted in the increase <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people with bi-national/bi-cultural identities as well<br />

as in the growth <strong>of</strong> products made in multiple countries. This study presents a newly developed and validated<br />

scale on ethnocentrism with three dimensions: normative thinking, products made in a single county, and<br />

products made in multiple countries. Based on data collected from three distinct groups <strong>of</strong> US citizens, the study<br />

also discusses the similarities and differences between mono-cultural and bi-cultural people in terms <strong>of</strong> their<br />

ethnocentric scores with respect to the three dimensions validated in the scale. The paper concludes with<br />

directions for future research that may strengthen our understanding <strong>of</strong> the complex phenomenon <strong>of</strong> consumer<br />

ethnocentrism in this constantly evolving global market place. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Mohammad Niamat Elahee, Quinnipiac University, USA: mohammad.elahee@quinnipiac.edu)<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Ethnocentrism and Cultural Aspects on Co-Branding Evaluations<br />

Yupin Patara, Chulalongkorn University<br />

Nicha Tanskul, Chulalongkorn University<br />

Co-branding strategy has been used in extending the brand into a new product category such as a product line<br />

extension and the new market entry. Several aspects <strong>of</strong> co-branding strategy have been explored in term <strong>of</strong> the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> co-branding strategy and important factors which will influence the consumers cobranded evaluations.<br />

The differences in degree <strong>of</strong> ethnocentrism, self-complexity and consumers' thinking style (or cultural aspects)<br />

have been perceived as key factors that determine the success <strong>of</strong> co-branding as market entry strategy. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Yupin Patara, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand: yupin.patara@sasin.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 234


TUESDAY<br />

Decomposing COO for <strong>International</strong> Services: Perceptions <strong>of</strong> People, Places and Skill<br />

Matt Stanton, South Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Business & Technology<br />

Roberta Veale, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide<br />

Pascale Quester, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> origin (COO) is a complex multidimensional construct, decomposed in many studies pertaining to<br />

tangible products but not thus far for services. This exploratory research tests quality perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

international education services, and, in additional to the already established country <strong>of</strong> brand, reveals<br />

important new COO dimensions <strong>of</strong> services, namely: country <strong>of</strong> service delivery, home country <strong>of</strong> person<br />

providing the service and where they were trained. Using a best-worst discrete choice experimental design, the<br />

study demonstrates that each dimension contributes to expectations <strong>of</strong> service quality, with county training<br />

image the most important dimension, at least in the international education context. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Matt Stanton, South Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Business & Technology, Australia:<br />

matt.stanton@unisa.edu.au)<br />

Antecedents <strong>of</strong> Home and Foreign Product Country Images in Developed and Developing Countries: A<br />

Comparative Study<br />

Zhongqi Jin, Middlesex University<br />

Richard Lynch, Middlesex University<br />

Samaa Attia, British University in Egypt<br />

Bal Chansarkar, Middlesex University<br />

Tanses Gulsoy, Beykent University<br />

Paul Lapoule, Novancia Business School<br />

Xueyuan Liu, Wuhan University<br />

William Newburry, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Mohamad Sheriff Nooraini, Universiti Teknolgi Mara<br />

Ronaldo Parente, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Keyoor Purani, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Kozhikode<br />

Marius Ungerer, Stellenbosch University<br />

Research into the comparison <strong>of</strong> consumer buying behavior between developing and developed countries has<br />

been growing rapidly in recent years. However, few research papers have explored the differences in the factors<br />

influencing product country image between developed and developing countries. This study proposes a new<br />

conceptual framework incorporating three life style variables, cosmopolitanism, ethnocentrism and materialism,<br />

and two types <strong>of</strong> product country image: home country and the most familiar foreign country. Twelve<br />

hypotheses are formulated regarding the relationship between these constructs particularly with regard to the<br />

possible differences between developing and developed countries. They are then tested with a sample <strong>of</strong> over<br />

2,715 respondents from eleven countries: three developed countries and eight developing countries. Our<br />

findings reveal a rather complicated picture <strong>of</strong> the differences in product country image between developed<br />

countries and developing countries. They find that some life style variables and images are more important than<br />

others in explaining such differences. The results therefore have significant managerial implications for<br />

international marketing management. (For more information, please contact: Zhongqi Jin, Middlesex University,<br />

United Kingdom: z.jin@mdx.ac.uk)<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> Export Destination Effects<br />

Shenyu Li, Shanghai University <strong>of</strong> Finance and Economics<br />

Rong Huang, Shanghai University <strong>of</strong> Finance and Economics<br />

Tuan A. Luong, Shanghai University <strong>of</strong> Finance and Economics<br />

This paper introduces a new international marketing concept: the country <strong>of</strong> export destination effect (COED) at<br />

a consumer level. The results <strong>of</strong> this study show that the COED influences domestic consumers' quality<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 235


TUESDAY<br />

evaluation, preference, and purchase intention regarding a product manufactured domestically, yet available<br />

both domestically and internationally. Specifically, consumers' product knowledge negatively moderates the<br />

COED effect on the quality evaluation <strong>of</strong> the car and mahogany furniture. This finding is similar to the halo<br />

effect in the country <strong>of</strong> origin (COO) literature. In addition, different export destinations have different effects<br />

on consumers' preference and purchase intention. In contrast to studies in the COO literature, this research<br />

demonstrates that nationalism and internationalism are positively related to the intention to purchase an<br />

exported product. Patriotism, however, is negatively related to the consumer's intention to purchase an<br />

exported product. (For more information, please contact: Shenyu Li, Shanghai University <strong>of</strong> Finance and<br />

Economics, China: li.shenyu@shufe.edu.cn)<br />

Competitive Brand Evaluation: Does Cultural and Linguistic Fit Dictate the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

Branding Strategy<br />

David W. Pan, Prince Sultan University<br />

Linda D. Clarke, University <strong>of</strong> Florida<br />

Berna Mutlu, University <strong>of</strong> Florida<br />

Alan Pan, Xiamen University<br />

Consumers worldwide base their product/brand selection decisions upon their own "ethno-linguistic" contexts.<br />

An ethno-linguistic fit is therefore proposed and partially confirmed as a principle factor overriding brand<br />

effectiveness in determining effective international marketing strategies. Domestic and imported brands are<br />

compared on product-brand fit, brand-perception consistency, and brand-product/cultural-linguistic consistency<br />

in two nations with the following results: (1) The host ethno-linguistic function indeed serves an overriding<br />

factor for a foreign brand; (2) as long as a product and its brand do not conflict with the host ethno-linguistic<br />

norms, the foreign brand would be minimally sufficient to enter a market <strong>of</strong> a new ethno-linguistic context other<br />

than its own; (3) a transliterated brand that fits with the host ethno-linguistic context has potential in its host<br />

market that surpasses its brand equity in its home market due to the independency <strong>of</strong> a brand <strong>of</strong> a given ethnolinguistic<br />

context; (4) just being a foreign brand in a host market has its limitations in improving the brand<br />

equity rapidly; (5) consumers are more savvy with their own domestic brands and products by taking their<br />

consistency with their own ethno-linguistic context for granted than with foreign brands and their embodied<br />

products. (For more information, please contact: Linda D. Clarke, University <strong>of</strong> Florida, USA: clarkel@ufl.edu)<br />

Session: 3.3.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

<strong>International</strong> Competitiveness<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Joseph Clougherty, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and CEPR-London<br />

How Does Export Price Competitiveness affect Geographic Diversification and Performance<br />

Dirk Michael Boehe, Insper Institute <strong>of</strong> Education and Research<br />

This paper tests a model that describes how export price competitiveness affects geographic export<br />

diversification and firm performance. The hypotheses were tested on a panel <strong>of</strong> Brazilian exporters covering the<br />

years from 2001-2010. Using a firm-specific real effective exchange rate index to operationalize export price<br />

competitiveness, we find an inverted U-shape relationship between export price competitiveness and geographic<br />

export diversification. We also find that export price competitiveness moderates the relationship between<br />

geographic export diversification and firm performance: diversification is positively (negatively) related to<br />

performance for less (highly) price competitive exporters. By introducing a firm-specific real effective exchange<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 236


TUESDAY<br />

rate index, this paper unravels an important antecedent <strong>of</strong> geographic export diversification and integrates<br />

arguments from international economics with those <strong>of</strong> international business strategies. Practitioners may gain<br />

relevant insights on the intricate performance impacts <strong>of</strong> exchange rates. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Dirk Michael Boehe, Insper Institute <strong>of</strong> Education and Research, Brazil: dirkmb@insper.edu.br)<br />

The Home Country Determinants <strong>of</strong> Outward Foreign Direct Investment from East Asia during Industrialisation<br />

Period<br />

Ling Liu, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh<br />

This article examines the home country macroeconomic determinants <strong>of</strong> outward foreign direct investment from<br />

Japan, Korea and China during their industrialization period. Error Correction Model is used to test relationships<br />

between OFDI and explanatory variables in the long run and short run. The results show that the three<br />

countries converge on the same macroeconomic variables GDP per capita, human capital and exports, indicating<br />

that firms are engaging in FDI as a response to export performance through economic development. The<br />

regression results show that the three countries exhibit different relationship with foreign exchange reserves,<br />

exchange rates and interest rates. Japan's OFDI is affected by interest rates in the long run, Korea by exchange<br />

rates and China by foreign exchange reserves in both the long and short run. This implies that limited<br />

differences do still exist across the three countries. (For more information, please contact: Ling Liu, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Edinburgh, United Kingdom: ling.liu@ed.ac.uk)<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> Origin and Behavior <strong>of</strong> Institutional Investors: Evidence from Japan<br />

Ralf Bebenroth, Kobe University<br />

Nir Kshetri, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina<br />

This paper investigates whether country <strong>of</strong> origin and behavior <strong>of</strong> institutional investors matter for acquisitions<br />

in Japan. We investigate how the post-acquisition performance <strong>of</strong> target firms differs across domestic versus<br />

foreign and friendly versus unfriendly institutional takeovers. In applying the arms-length principle and<br />

geographic proximity theory, our results partly confirm that Japanese target firms acquired in an unfriendly<br />

attempt performed better right after the deal. Subsequently, performances were significantly higher for target<br />

firms acquired by foreign institutional investors compared to domestic ones. The number <strong>of</strong> employees after the<br />

deal decreased strongly for Japanese and for friendly attempts but increased for foreign and unfriendly ones.<br />

Implications are discussed. (For more information, please contact: Ralf Bebenroth, Kobe University, Japan:<br />

rbeben@rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp)<br />

Drivers <strong>of</strong> Korean Exports: Testing the Influence <strong>of</strong> Governance Structure and Managerial Orientation<br />

Young Soo Yang, Yonsei University<br />

Yong Suhk Pak, Yonsei University<br />

Young-Ryeol Park, Yonsei University<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> internationalization through export have been perpetually examined for the Korean-context due<br />

to her export-driven economy. Despite the fact that prior literature focused on firm- or managerial-level<br />

analysis, a very distinctive ownership structure <strong>of</strong> Korean firms such as family- and chaebol-ownership has been<br />

barely examined and needs further clarification on its influence on exports. Also, little research attempted to<br />

examine whether outside directors have adequate knowledge and information to make meaningful contributions<br />

to exportation. As a result, this paper extends the study <strong>of</strong> export behavior <strong>of</strong> Korean firms by highlighting<br />

managerial experience <strong>of</strong> outside directors and governance structure <strong>of</strong> Korean firms. We tested the drivers <strong>of</strong><br />

Korean exports using the samples <strong>of</strong> 453 Korean manufacturing firms which are listed in the Korean Stock<br />

Exchange (KSE) from 2005 to 2008. The results showed that the international experience <strong>of</strong> top managers and<br />

the distinctive Korean governance structure, Chaebol, positively affected internationalization through export,<br />

while family-owned enterprises was negatively associated with exportation. The contribution <strong>of</strong> outside directors<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 237


TUESDAY<br />

on exports was shown insignificant unlike <strong>of</strong> the cases <strong>of</strong> developed economies. This finding shows the limited<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> outside directors in managing Korean enterprises. Further business implications are discussed at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the manuscript. (For more information, please contact: Young Soo Yang, Yonsei University, Korea,<br />

South: seoukore@yonsei.ac.kr)<br />

Employment Protection and Delocation with Firm Heterogeneity<br />

Yama Temouri, Aston University<br />

Gerda Dewit, NUI Maynooth<br />

Holger Gorg, Kiel University<br />

This paper examines the determinants <strong>of</strong> the decision to delocate activities abroad for MNEs that are located in<br />

32 OECD countries. Higher employment protection in the home country discourages firms' delocation activity.<br />

Larger firms or firms with higher labour intensities have, ceteris paribus, higher propensities to delocate. Firm<br />

heterogeneity also plays a role for the link between employment protection and delocation, as suggested by our<br />

theoretical model. Employment protection lowers the propensity to delocate more for firms that are large or<br />

labour intensive. We also find, as expected, an inverted U-shape relationship between delocation and<br />

productivity. Hence, firms with medium levels <strong>of</strong> productivity are most likely to locate affiliates abroad.<br />

Employment protection, however, also affects those firms most, as the interaction terms <strong>of</strong> productivity and<br />

employment protection indicate. The results are consistent for firms operating in the manufacturing sector as<br />

well as the services sector. (For more information, please contact: Yama Temouri, Aston University, United<br />

Kingdom: y.temouri1@aston.ac.uk)<br />

Managerial Status and <strong>International</strong> Diversification<br />

K. Skylar Powell, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan-Flint<br />

This research looks at the status, or reputation, <strong>of</strong> a firm's managerial ranks as a factor that may be related to<br />

the propensity towards international geographic diversification in contexts that meet certain boundary<br />

conditions. Using hand-collected longitudinal data in the empirical context <strong>of</strong> large US corporate law firms,<br />

results suggest that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship, where firms with managers at mid-to-high levels<br />

on the status hierarchy are more likely than firms with managers at the very highest or very lowest status levels<br />

to maintain greater numbers <strong>of</strong> foreign <strong>of</strong>fices. In addition, this inverted U-shape appears to be further<br />

enhanced when firms are from highly competitive home markets. (For more information, please contact: K.<br />

Skylar Powell, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan-Flint, USA: kristans@umflint.edu)<br />

Session: 3.3.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 6 - Innovation and Knowledge Mgmt.<br />

MNE Innovation and Knowledge Diffusion<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Ziliang Deng, Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China<br />

Global Collaboration in MNE Patenting from Emerging Economies: Does it Protect IP<br />

Suma Athreye, Brunel University<br />

Tufool Al-Nuaimi, Imperial College<br />

Phanish Puranam, London Business School<br />

Studies on MNE patenting from emerging economies have noted the larger than average shares <strong>of</strong> patents from<br />

these economies that feature global collaboration (i.e. where inventors that are resident outside these<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 238


TUESDAY<br />

economies are also listed as authors on the patents). We test the proposition that global collaboration reflects a<br />

task partitioning strategy to mitigate spillovers within weak IPR regimes in the emerging economies. For a<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> MNE subsidiaries in the telecom and semiconductor industries, our results indicate that whether it<br />

was intended to or not, global collaboration does not mitigate spillovers within the emerging economy and in<br />

fact increases aggregate spillovers outside the MNE. Rather, the high levels <strong>of</strong> global collaboration in MNE<br />

patents in emerging economies like India and China may simply reflect the fact that most <strong>of</strong> their R&D<br />

subsidiaries in these countries may still be relatively young. (For more information, please contact: Suma<br />

Athreye, Brunel University, United Kingdom: suma.athreye@brunel.ac.uk)<br />

The Depth and Breadth <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Innovation: The Roles <strong>of</strong> Technological Diversity and Degree <strong>of</strong><br />

Innovativeness<br />

Yung-Ching Ho, National Chung Cheng University<br />

Ying-Ying Hsieh, National Chung Cheng University<br />

When does international research and development (R&D) lead to superior performance In this study we<br />

examine the performance implication <strong>of</strong> R&D internationalization by taking into account the technological<br />

diversity and the degree <strong>of</strong> innovativeness. These two aspects cover the breadth and depth <strong>of</strong> innovation, and<br />

shall shed lights on the roles different types <strong>of</strong> innovation play in the overseas R&D-innovation outcome<br />

mechanism. Our hypotheses argue that technological diversity and degree <strong>of</strong> innovativeness negatively<br />

moderate the influence <strong>of</strong> R&D internationalization on innovation performance. They indirectly diminish the<br />

MNCs' ability to gain benefits from R&D internationalization. We analyze an 11-year data set from 2000 to 2010<br />

<strong>of</strong> over 66 Taiwanese publicly listed firms in the semiconductor industry. Although this is only a preliminary<br />

study with further analysis in progress, and the hypotheses not fully supported, we gain a better picture about<br />

the direction and where this work should be proceeding. (For more information, please contact: Ying-Ying<br />

Hsieh, National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan: yy.hsieh@gmail.com)<br />

Innovation and <strong>International</strong> Patenting trends in the Photographic Equipment Industry<br />

John W Clarry, Rutgers University<br />

Innovation is an essential form <strong>of</strong> competition in many industries. Normal innovation is focused on existing<br />

customers, but radical or disruptive innovation can create new customers and disrupt markets. This paper uses<br />

patents to track potentially disruptive changes from digital technologies in the photographic equipment industry.<br />

Patent counts indicate new knowledge is unevenly distributed internationally and amongst firms, which<br />

constrains disruption and fosters R&D rivalry. Discrete technological fields in the digital imaging industry<br />

indicate concentration <strong>of</strong> patents from a few nations and firms, especially from Japan. Patenting activities in<br />

the industry are increasing as international sales and production networks grow; but financial returns to patents<br />

and R&D efforts are uncertain due to rapid imitation and disruptive technologies from smartphones. (For more<br />

information, please contact: John W Clarry, Rutgers University, USA: jc1418@andromeda.rutgers.edu)<br />

Are Dynamic Capabilities Influenced by the Geographical Location <strong>of</strong> Company Headquarters<br />

Elzotbek Rustambekov, Old Dominion University<br />

This is a conceptual paper, which looks at dynamic capabilities as a specific type <strong>of</strong> knowledge that is<br />

geographically localized. Dynamic capabilities are knowledge-based processes that are developed over time by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> interactions among company's resource bundles and capabilities. Dynamic capabilities enhance a<br />

company's capacity to leverage resources and organizational processes to increase pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Corporate<br />

headquarters were selected as a unit <strong>of</strong> analysis because <strong>of</strong> their knowledge-intensive nature. Empirical<br />

evidence suggests that about six percent <strong>of</strong> headquarters relocate every year and reasons for relocations are<br />

different than just tax incentives (Voget, 2010). It is argued that geographical proximity <strong>of</strong> headquarters<br />

causes spillover <strong>of</strong> operational knowledge during interactions between managers. That operational knowledge<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 239


TUESDAY<br />

includes various routines and contains dynamic capabilities. This research work links studies on dynamic<br />

capabilities and studies on geography <strong>of</strong> knowledge and headquarter relocations. The information gathered<br />

might help to explain how relocations <strong>of</strong> corporate headquarters take place, and how companies may increase<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itability by moving their headquarters to locations favorable to building particular dynamic capabilities. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Elzotbek Rustambekov, Old Dominion University, USA: erustamb@odu.edu)<br />

A Classic Approach to Finding an Innovative Source: Discovering Disruption in MNEs<br />

Birton Cowden, Saint Louis University<br />

Hadi Alhorr, Saint Louis University<br />

Research has found that not all innovation can be treated the same. The most recent categorization <strong>of</strong><br />

innovation is Christensen's (1997) theory on disruptive innovation. Most papers have tried to explain this<br />

phenomenon and have applied it to different industries. This paper takes the theory a step further in its<br />

operationalization by setting it in an international context and by beginning to see where internally MNEs can<br />

find ideas for disruption. Specifically, the paper asks, where do disruptive innovations originate in a MNE, from a<br />

central R&D site or from a subsidiary Using the internalization theory and other seminal pieces in international<br />

business, it is proposed that disruptive ideas start in subsidiaries. It is further proposed that these subsidiaries<br />

require foreign direct investment and are collaborative in nature. This paper not only expands the boundary<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> disruptive innovation, but also expands on the "where" question for knowledge acquisition in<br />

MNEs. (For more information, please contact: Birton Cowden, Saint Louis University, USA: bcowden@slu.edu)<br />

The New Kid on the Block: Bringing the Visual to Knowledge Management Research<br />

Miikka J. Lehtonen, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this conceptual paper is to analyze the current state <strong>of</strong> knowledge-related research in eight<br />

journals relevant to IB in order to pave way for qualitatively oriented studies where knowledge is better<br />

grounded ontologically and epistemologically. Twenty pivotal articles were further analyzed and the results<br />

indicate that while scholars seem to agree that knowledge exists in both tacit and explicit form, further<br />

philosophical discussions are still lacking among IB and management scholars. This can be seen alarming given<br />

the current rise <strong>of</strong> qualitative studies in IB, as knowledge in qualitative settings cannot be understood as a static<br />

construction. Furthermore, according to the data scholars have tended to ignore visual communication means<br />

as relevant to knowledge management literature. To bridge these intellectual gaps, the author suggests we<br />

should incorporate visual communication to knowledge management research while drawing on the IB scholars'<br />

ability to theorize from research contexts. (For more information, please contact: Miikka J. Lehtonen, Aalto<br />

University School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland: miikka.j.lehtonen@aalto.fi)<br />

Session: 3.3.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 5 - MNC Management and Organization<br />

Addressing Current Strategic Challenges Facing MNEs<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Murali Chari, Lally School <strong>of</strong> Management & Technology<br />

Do Natural Disasters Facilitate Globalization<br />

Andres Ramirez, Bryant University<br />

Nezih Altay, DePaul University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 240


TUESDAY<br />

Natural disasters create damage not only to a country's people and infrastructure but also to their firm's assets.<br />

The aftermath <strong>of</strong> a disaster brings uncertainty and changes to markets near and far the epicenter <strong>of</strong> the event.<br />

We posit that firms will respond to this uncertainty via expanding their global footprint, in particular sales<br />

abroad. We test our hypothesis using a large sample <strong>of</strong> almost one hundred thousand firm year observations<br />

and more than two thousand five hundred natural disasters in fifty countries from 1990 – 2004. We find that<br />

disaster damage is positively correlated with foreign sales, furthermore we show that this effect is persistent<br />

over time. Even 3 years after a disaster firms continue to increase their level <strong>of</strong> foreign sales. More interestingly<br />

we show that this effect is more pronounce for smaller firms and those from poorer countries. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Andres Ramirez, Bryant University, USA: aramirez@bryant.edu)<br />

Model <strong>of</strong> Corporate Culture, Strategic Change and Corporate Performance: Evidence from the Chinese<br />

Construction Industry<br />

Mingming Liu, Dalian University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Susan Freeman, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide<br />

Md. Wahid Murad, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide<br />

The extent to which corporate culture, strategic change and corporate performance influence each other has<br />

not been studied methodically, leaving a critical gap in the international business and strategy literature.<br />

Drawing upon strategy and organizational theories, we build a hypothetical model <strong>of</strong> corporate culture, strategic<br />

change and corporate performance. We extend current conceptualizations <strong>of</strong> ‘corporate culture' (team spirit,<br />

science and technological innovation, customer orientation, organizational learning, and social responsibility)<br />

and ‘strategic change' (strategic change speed, magnitude and depth). We surveyed 244 Chinese firms in the<br />

construction sector, using structural equation analysis and reliability test. The path coefficients were measured<br />

and relationships <strong>of</strong> significance were identified using confirmatory factor analysis, full measurement model<br />

analysis and competitive model analysis. We contribute new understanding, showing that team spirit and social<br />

responsibility have a positive influence, while science and technological innovation and organizational learning<br />

have a negative influence on strategic change speed, magnitude and depth. Customer orientation did not meet<br />

the requirements <strong>of</strong> factor analysis. Finally, we identify that strategic change has no intervening influence on<br />

the relationship between corporate culture and corporate performance. We conclude by outlining our new<br />

model <strong>of</strong> strategic change, and include suggestions for future research and managerial implications. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Md. Wahid Murad, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia:<br />

wahid.murad@adelaide.edu.au)<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Structural Embeddedness on Innovative Capability and <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Business Group.<br />

Constrain or Opportunity<br />

Ying-Yu (Kerri) Chen, National Taiwan University<br />

Yi-Long Jaw, National Taiwan University<br />

This study successful links the research questions from sociological and economic aspects through investigating<br />

related economic effects under the context <strong>of</strong> group structural embeddedness. We test the research model by<br />

incorporating both business group and focal firm from different databases, which include 5,227 affiliated firms<br />

in 77 Taiwanese business groups and 77 corresponding focal firms, representing 16 industries in Taiwan. Using<br />

lagged cross-sectional regression models, this study extends prior business group research in effects <strong>of</strong> group,<br />

cross, and focal firm dimensions. In group dimension, we investigate previously untested role <strong>of</strong> group structure<br />

through using small world structure as proxy to verify its relationship with group diversification, and confirmed<br />

positively. Drawing upon social network theory and organizational theory, this study finds small world structure<br />

can facilitate group industrial diversification. Group diversification was also tested and found related to group's<br />

internationalization. In cross dimension effects, we found internationalization in group has positive effect on<br />

focal firm's internationalization. However, small world structure in group is not related to firm innovative<br />

capability. In focal firm dimension, the firm's innovative capability is positively related to its internationalization.<br />

Drawing on the results, embedded group structure creates both constrains and opportunities for focal firm. (For<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 241


TUESDAY<br />

more information, please contact: Ying-Yu (Kerri) Chen, National Taiwan University, Taiwan:<br />

ying1116@hotmail.com)<br />

Using the Joint Impact <strong>of</strong> 3Ds (Dispersion, Density, and Diversity) to unlock the M-P Puzzle<br />

Dina Abdelzaher, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Jose de la Torre, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Conclusive evidence <strong>of</strong> the multinationality to performance (M-P) has not been reached, with scholars calling for<br />

a revisit <strong>of</strong> underlying theory. This paper provides a network explanation for why and how multinationality can<br />

impact performance. We propose the examination <strong>of</strong> joint effects <strong>of</strong> three network dimensions (diversity,<br />

density, and diversification) using a contingency approach on financial performance while highlighting<br />

subsidiaries vs. headquarters perspectives. We analyze the subsidiary networks <strong>of</strong> 78 MNCs consisting <strong>of</strong> 3318<br />

foreign subsidiaries. Results from this proposed integration provides a network based theoretical foundation for<br />

M-P relationship and insights into a three dimensional measure <strong>of</strong> internationalization. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Dina Abdelzaher, Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA: dzahe001@fiu.edu)<br />

Session: 3.3.15 - Interactive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Technology and the Environmental Management in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Kun Liu, Wayne State University<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Institutional Forces on Adoption <strong>of</strong> Environmental Management Strategy: Moderating Effects <strong>of</strong><br />

Complementary Assets and Environmental Orientation<br />

Yuanfei Kang, Massey University<br />

Ximing He, University <strong>of</strong> New Castle<br />

It is well argued that factors both internal and external to firms contribute to adoption <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

management strategy. However, how these internal and external factors interact with each other is an understudied<br />

area. Building on institutional theory and resource-based view, we develop an interactive perspective to<br />

investigate how the influence <strong>of</strong> institutional forces on environmental management strategy is contingent on the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> firm resources/capabilities. Empirical findings based on survey data from manufacturing firms<br />

operating in China suggest that possession <strong>of</strong> complementary assets is crucial for firms to adopt environmental<br />

management strategy in effectively responding institutional forces. Our analysis also suggests that influence <strong>of</strong><br />

institutional force in terms <strong>of</strong> public constraint on environmental management strategy is moderated by<br />

environmental orientation embedded in a firm (For more information, please contact: Yuanfei Kang, Massey<br />

University, New Zealand: y.kang@massey.ac.nz)<br />

Environmental Regulation and Proactiveness: What Does the Jordanian Evidence Tell Us<br />

Yousef Eiadat, University College Dublin<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> environmental regulations in affecting the managerial decision to adopt different environmental<br />

responsiveness strategies is well discussed in the organizational literature. However, most <strong>of</strong> the empirical<br />

literature on the environmental regulation-environmental responsiveness strategies link have focused on<br />

analyzing linear relationships and neglected nonlinearity in empirical modelling. Hypothetically, there is a<br />

possibility that the relationship between environmental regulation and managerial decision to adopt<br />

environmental responsiveness strategies could be nonlinear. This paper considers the possibility <strong>of</strong> a nonlinear<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 242


TUESDAY<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> perceived environmental regulation on managerial decision to adopt environmental responsiveness<br />

strategy, using data from the chemical sector in Jordan. (For more information, please contact: Yousef Eiadat,<br />

University College Dublin, USA: yousef.husein@ucd.ie)<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Environmental Proactivity in the Relationship between Consumer Ethnocentrism and Foreign<br />

Company Identification<br />

Yung-Hwal Park, Saint Louis University<br />

Morris Kalliny, Saint Louis University<br />

A large body <strong>of</strong> research has explored the relationship between consumer ethnocentrism and local consumers'<br />

attitude toward foreign goods, but there has been little research examining how consumer ethnocentrism<br />

interacts with foreign company's eco-friendly practices. This study explores whether the foreign company's<br />

environmental proactivity can mitigate the severity <strong>of</strong> local consumers' bias against the company by appealing<br />

to their aspiration to enhance their self-image through identification with an environmentally responsible<br />

company. This study also examines the roles <strong>of</strong> three situational factors upon which the effect <strong>of</strong> the foreign<br />

company's environmental proactivity is contingent. (For more information, please contact: Yung-Hwal Park,<br />

Saint Louis University, USA: ypark9@slu.edu)<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Stakeholder Management and Sustainability Practices: Evidence <strong>of</strong> Domestic and <strong>International</strong><br />

Operations <strong>of</strong> Brazilian Multinationals<br />

Flavia M. Alvim, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

Livia Lopes Barakat, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

Heiko H. Spitzeck, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

Sherban Leonardo Cretoiu, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

Isabelle C. Neves, Fundação Dom Cabral<br />

This quantitative paper compares stakeholder management and sustainability practices <strong>of</strong> Brazilian<br />

multinationals applied at home and abroad. Valid responses have been collected from 49 firms, from a<br />

population <strong>of</strong> 78, by a questionnaire sent via e-mail. Results indicate that the surveyed firms take an<br />

instrumental stakeholder approach favoring primary over secondary stakeholders, and engage more intensively<br />

with stakeholders at home than abroad. On the other hand, stakeholder management may be considered an<br />

effective mechanism for increasing sustainability <strong>of</strong> multinationals abroad. Engagement with local communities,<br />

NGOs, and activists has fostered firms to adopt sustainability practices abroad, but not at home. Local<br />

communities were found to have a significant impact abroad on the formalization <strong>of</strong> practices and also on the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> environmental and social practices, while the effect <strong>of</strong> NGOs and activists was found only on the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> environmental practices. The study also finds probable evidence that companies associate<br />

sustainability with benefits related to risk minimization over opportunity identification, such as improved<br />

stakeholder relations and reputational gains. (For more information, please contact: Flavia M. Alvim, Fundação<br />

Dom Cabral, Brazil: flavia.alvim@fdc.org.br)<br />

Green Firm Specific Advantages for Enhancing Environmental and Economic Performance<br />

Nitish Singh, Saint Louis University<br />

Carri R. Tolmie, Saint Louis University<br />

Yung-Hwal Park, Saint Louis University<br />

Several studies have explored the link between environmental and economic performance but strategic insights<br />

into how firm capabilities and resources can drive both environmental and economic performance<br />

simultaneously are lacking. This study uses a combination <strong>of</strong> content analysis method and case study approach<br />

to analyze how firms can leverage their green firm-specific resources and capabilities to achieve both<br />

environmental and economic performance. The project is expected to yield rich cross-industry and cross-country<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 243


TUESDAY<br />

insights into corporate sustainability efforts <strong>of</strong> top 395 firms on Dow Jones Sustainability Index. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Carri R. Tolmie, Saint Louis University, USA: creisdor@slu.edu)<br />

Drivers <strong>of</strong> Investment in Corporate Sustainability Strategies <strong>of</strong> Retailers and Manufacturers in Developed and<br />

Developing Countries<br />

Kudzai Mukumbi, Michigan State University<br />

Brenda Sternquist, Michigan State University<br />

This study develops a conceptual model for corporate sustainability investment strategies using institutional<br />

theory, transaction cost theory, and the business case perspective. The study seeks to compare institutional<br />

and financial drivers <strong>of</strong> investment in corporate sustainability for (i) firms using standardized corporate<br />

sustainability reporting guidelines (i.e., the Global Reporting Initiative) versus those that do not and (ii)<br />

developed versus developing country firms. Differences in transaction cost levels and institutional pressures<br />

between firms in developed and developing countries can influence corporate sustainability investment.<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> standardized corporate sustainability reporting may strengthen the relationship between<br />

institutional pressures and investment in corporate sustainability strategy. This is because the adoption can be<br />

used as a tool to increase legitimacy, transparency and credibility <strong>of</strong> the firm as well as reducing transaction<br />

costs <strong>of</strong> searching and monitoring firm's corporate sustainability strategies. In addition, institutional pressures<br />

are likely to influence firms from developing rather than developed countries because the institutional drivers<br />

help to reduce the higher transaction costs, uncertainty, and corporate sustainability governance gaps faced by<br />

firms from developing countries. (For more information, please contact: Kudzai Mukumbi, Michigan State<br />

University, USA: mukumbik@msu.edu)<br />

Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy on the Development <strong>of</strong> Entrepreneurship across Countries<br />

Kun Liu, Wayne State University<br />

Kun Fu, Bocconi University<br />

Institutions, as the rules <strong>of</strong> the game, influence the emergence and development <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship in<br />

important ways. Most <strong>of</strong> the existing studies have investigated entrepreneurship within a given institutional<br />

environment without considering the variations <strong>of</strong> institutions in different national contexts. In this paper we<br />

study the impact <strong>of</strong> two economic institutions that are particularly relevant to entrepreneurship — the<br />

intellectual property rights (IPRs) and the enforcement <strong>of</strong> the competition policy, as well as their interaction<br />

effects on the development <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship especially those dealing with technological innovations. We<br />

propose that IPRs is positively associated with entrepreneurial activity and this effect is contingent upon the<br />

enforcement level <strong>of</strong> competition policy. The hypotheses are examined within a framework <strong>of</strong> pooling a crosssection<br />

<strong>of</strong> 60 countries during the periods between 2002 and 2007. The findings show surprisingly that<br />

strengthened IPR protection adversely affects the entry <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurs adopting new technology and this<br />

relationship is attenuated by the increasing enforcement <strong>of</strong> competition policy. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Kun Liu, Wayne State University, USA: k.liu@wayne.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 244


TUESDAY<br />

Session: 3.4.1 - Panel<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Poverty Alleviation at the Local Level: What Works Best<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: John Raymond Dilyard, St. Francis College<br />

Panelists:<br />

John Raymond Dilyard, St. Francis College<br />

Susan Mudambi, Temple University<br />

Bindu Vyas, King's College<br />

Masud Chand, Wichita State University<br />

Sow Hup Chan, University <strong>of</strong> Macau<br />

Chung-Leung Luk, City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Wendy W. N. Wan, Sun Yat-Sen University<br />

Poverty alleviation has long been a purported outcome <strong>of</strong> foreign direct investment yet it has a rather<br />

disappointing record in that regard. Thanks in large part to the work <strong>of</strong> Muhammad Yunus and the success <strong>of</strong><br />

the Grameen Bank, small scale lending or micr<strong>of</strong>inance, has been seen as the key to poverty alleviation, job<br />

creation and economic development in developing countries. Often they are aligned with government programs<br />

and/or non-governmental organization (NGO) partnerships. <strong>International</strong> business scholars are starting to<br />

examine these small-scale local financing activities to find out what really might be best for poverty alleviation.<br />

This panel will provide a cross-section <strong>of</strong> studies covering this topic from a variety <strong>of</strong> perspectives. (For more<br />

information, please contact: John Raymond Dilyard, St. Francis College, USA: jdilyard@gmail.com)<br />

Session: 3.4.2 - Panel<br />

Track: 7 - Emerging Economies<br />

Entrepreneurship in Islamic Societies<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Mehdi Farashahi, Concordia University<br />

Panelists:<br />

Mehdi Farashahi, Concordia University<br />

Abbas Ali, Indiana University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Soumaya Ben Letaifa, Universite du Quebec a Montreal<br />

Abdulrahman Chikhouni , Concordia University<br />

Claude Marcotte, Concordia University<br />

Recent uprisings in Islamic societies have created radical social changes and institutional upheavals in these<br />

countries. Fallen governments and the instability <strong>of</strong> political and economic systems in many Islamic societies<br />

have developed a new type <strong>of</strong> social entrepreneurship based on religious values in these countries. This is<br />

reflected in the recent elections in most Islamic societies, that brought parties with Islamic background in<br />

power. Fighting against corruption and seeking for justice and equality, as major Islamic values, have indeed<br />

become some <strong>of</strong> the main driving forces behind these social entrepreneurships. In the coming years we might<br />

experience the dominance <strong>of</strong> Islamic social norms and regulations in these countries with significant effects on<br />

economic and business activities. They can transform the missions, characters and strategic choices <strong>of</strong> business<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 245


TUESDAY<br />

firms both at home and in foreign markets. They can also influence their ability to innovate and take risks as<br />

well as foster entrepreneurship. The purpose <strong>of</strong> organizing this Panel Session is to identify and explore some <strong>of</strong><br />

the potential changes and opportunities that will be experienced in the uprising Islamic societies and exchange<br />

research ideas and insights <strong>of</strong> how the expected "Islamic institutional environments" might<br />

encourage/discourage entrepreneurial activities <strong>of</strong> individuals and organizations. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Mehdi Farashahi, Concordia University, Canada: mfarashahi@jmsb.concordia.ca)<br />

Session: 3.4.3 - Competitive<br />

Track: 8 - Developing Country MNCs<br />

<strong>International</strong> Strategies <strong>of</strong> Developing Economy Firms: Resources, Capabilities and Entry<br />

Modes<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Douglas Dow, University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne<br />

The Bargaining Model Revisited: Theory and Evidence from China's Natural Resource Investments in Africa<br />

Jing Li, Simon Fraser University<br />

Aloysius Newenham-Kahindi, University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan<br />

Daniel M. Shapiro, Simon Fraser University<br />

Victor Zitian Chen, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina; Columbia University<br />

Recent years have witnessed rapid growth <strong>of</strong> Chinese OFDI in natural resource industries. Given the strategic<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> the natural resource sectors to host country governments, MNE-host country government<br />

bargaining occurs <strong>of</strong>ten in these sectors. The traditional bargaining models suggest that MNEs largely rely on<br />

their FSAs to negotiate for investment deals. Chinese firms, however, typically have weak FSAs. Our study<br />

investigates the role <strong>of</strong> the Chinese government in facilitating Chinese natural resource investments in Africa.<br />

Using interview information with firms and government <strong>of</strong>ficials in Tanzania, our study enriches existing<br />

bargaining models. We find that the Chinese government/firms engage in a modified one-tier bargaining model<br />

in which the Chinese government represents the collective interests <strong>of</strong> the Chinese firms in negotiating with the<br />

host country government and the Chinese firms act as executers <strong>of</strong> negotiation outcomes. To increase its<br />

bargaining power, the Chinese government promises to provide aids with no political conditions, improve host<br />

country infrastructures, and modernize local communities via multiple purpose projects. We further propose<br />

boundary conditions for the Chinese bargaining model. Finally, we conclude that the Chinese OFDI model in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the role played by the Chinese government is not new, nor it is it unique. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Jing Li, Simon Fraser University, Canada: jingli@sfu.ca)<br />

Leverage or Develop How Emerging Market Multinationals Manage their Business Models in their<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization Processes<br />

Margarete Kalinowski, ESADE Business School<br />

Luis Vives, ESADE Business School<br />

The phenomenal surge in internationalization by emerging market multinationals (EMNEs) has gained<br />

momentum in academic research. The existing literature has focused on either exploitation <strong>of</strong> ownership<br />

advantages or exploration <strong>of</strong> new advantages through opportunity seeking as the drivers <strong>of</strong> EMNEs'<br />

internationalization. We contribute to the growing stream <strong>of</strong> research by exploring the questions <strong>of</strong> how EMNEs<br />

manage their business models as they internationalize. We propose a conceptual framework depicted by two<br />

key variables: (1) the level <strong>of</strong> institutional difference in terms <strong>of</strong> entry into emerging or developed markets, and<br />

(2) strategic initiatives in terms <strong>of</strong> leveraging their own business models or developing new business models.<br />

We obtain four possible strategies to manage business models EMNEs can follow in their expansion to other<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 246


TUESDAY<br />

emerging markets or developed economies. We illustrate the framework using case study examples <strong>of</strong> different<br />

emerging multinationals. The paper concludes with fruitful avenues for future research. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Margarete Kalinowski, ESADE Business School, Spain: margarete.kalinowski@esade.edu)<br />

Turning Lead into Gold: The Case <strong>of</strong> Chinese and Indian Multinationals' <strong>International</strong>ization<br />

Filip De Beule, KU Leuven<br />

This paper analyzes the internationalization pattern <strong>of</strong> Chinese and Indian multinationals by looking into the<br />

location determinants <strong>of</strong> their greenfield subsidiaries. On the basis <strong>of</strong> a conditional logit gravity model, it<br />

analyzes whether these determinants vary by the type <strong>of</strong> activity –such as extraction, manufacturing, sales <strong>of</strong><br />

products or services, and R&D- being internationalized. Given that these Emerging Market Firms (EMFs) have<br />

developed competitive advantages that fit their home country environment, the analysis shows that they<br />

predominantly go to similarly economic environments but not to similarly institutional environments. In fact, a<br />

greater positive institutional distance attracts more investments, while a greater economic distance deters<br />

investment. This result is robust for all types <strong>of</strong> investment, except extraction. This latter type <strong>of</strong> subsidiary is<br />

predominantly drawn to resource intensive countries. R&D subsidiaries are also shown to significantly locate in<br />

countries with similar market and better institutional environments, indicating that both Chinese and Indian<br />

firms largely carry out knowledge exploiting greenfield investments abroad. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Filip De Beule, KU Leuven, Belgium: filip.debeule@lessius.eu)<br />

Resources and Multinational Expansion <strong>of</strong> ASEAN Firms<br />

Nuruzzaman Arsyad, <strong>International</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Jakarta<br />

Peter Hwang, <strong>International</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Jakarta<br />

This study investigates the type <strong>of</strong> resources that firms draw upon to expand internationally in the ASEAN<br />

context. This paper seeks to understand the impact <strong>of</strong> technological, networking, and accumulated knowledge<br />

resources on ASEAN firms' multinationality, moderated by labor intensity, the type <strong>of</strong> ownership and the stage<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic development. We found that technology resource is positively associated with multinationality.<br />

Moreover, the high labor intensity firms will benefit more from the impact <strong>of</strong> technology resource on<br />

multinationality than low labor intensive firms. For manager industry experience, we found an inverted U-shape<br />

relationship and for manager education we found a positive relationship with multinationality. Lastly, while<br />

networking is important across firms in ASEAN, over-networking applies to foreign firms but not local firms. As<br />

such, over-networking appears to be situation specific rather than a generalized concept. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Nuruzzaman Arsyad, <strong>International</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Jakarta, Indonesia: nuruzzaman@ssb.ac.id)<br />

Session: 3.4.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />

Governance and Innovation in <strong>International</strong> Alliances<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Jean-Francois Hennart, Tilburg University; Queens University; Singapore Management University<br />

Non-Complementary Governance Mechanisms in <strong>International</strong> Technology Alliances and Innovation Capabilities<br />

Yong Kyu Lew, University <strong>of</strong> Hull<br />

This paper investigates governance mechanisms in international technology alliances (ITAs), firm-level<br />

innovation capabilities, and performance outcomes in the mobile computing market. This high-tech market is<br />

characterized by numerous cross-border strategic technology collaborations between s<strong>of</strong>tware and hardware<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 247


TUESDAY<br />

firms. Anchoring our work in interfirm governance theories and the resource-based view, we develop a model<br />

and empirically test relationships related to behavioral governance mechanisms, innovation capabilities and<br />

business performance. In the cross-industry and cross-border context, the empirical model explains to what<br />

extent complementary strategic resources, through a relational governance mechanism, contribute to the<br />

innovation capabilities <strong>of</strong> high-tech firms, providing a competitive advantage. The data, analyzed using partial<br />

least squares path modeling, indicates that technological commitment is a factor in expediting technology<br />

resource exchange in ITAs between heterogeneous firms. The results also show that firm-level performance is<br />

only influenced by market development capability, and not new product development capability, in product<br />

innovation. However, we did not find any significant moderating effects <strong>of</strong> firm size and industry type on the<br />

model. Furthermore, this paper <strong>of</strong>fers insights into how high-tech firms benefit from interfirm governance in<br />

international technology resource exchange arrangements. (For more information, please contact: Yong Kyu<br />

Lew, University <strong>of</strong> Hull, United Kingdom: Y.Lew@hull.ac.uk)<br />

Alliance or Going Alone: The Choice for <strong>International</strong>izing Small and Medium-Sized Technology Enterprises<br />

Gongming Qian, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong<br />

Lee Li, York University<br />

Small and medium-sized firms interested in entering international markets face a difficult decision with regard to<br />

the choice <strong>of</strong> governance modes. The options available to a firm include internalization and externalization.<br />

Existing theories contradict each other as to the strategic benefits <strong>of</strong> these options. This study compares these<br />

theories in the context <strong>of</strong> small and medium-sized technology-based enterprises (SMTEs). Findings from this<br />

study suggest that merits <strong>of</strong> internalization and externalization vary with market contexts and the resources<br />

under the firm's control. Under certain conditions, one theory can be more powerful than the other. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Gongming Qian, Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC:<br />

qian@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk)<br />

Control Decisions <strong>of</strong> Offshored Activities: Drivers <strong>of</strong> Non-Equity Alliances<br />

Gabriella Lojacono, Università Bocconi<br />

Nicola Misani, Università Bocconi<br />

Motivations <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong>fshoring and alliances have been intensively analysed in the international business field.<br />

However the interrelation between the two fields has not yet been investigated in depth. Given the<br />

commonalities in the drivers considered in the two streams <strong>of</strong> research, a combined theoretical framework is an<br />

interesting research field to investigate the motivations <strong>of</strong> the governance choice for delocalized collaborative<br />

agreements. Empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> 361 alliances realized on a global basis between 1986 and 2010 in the major<br />

appliances industry reveals that the activity content and the hosting location are strong drivers for deciding for a<br />

non-equity alliance. (For more information, please contact: Nicola Misani, Università Bocconi, Italy:<br />

nicola.misani@unibocconi.it)<br />

Session: 3.4.5 - Competitive<br />

Track: 12 - Value Creation and Work<br />

Activity Organization and Firm Boundaries<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Silvia Massini, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 248


TUESDAY<br />

The Changing Nature <strong>of</strong> Global Integration: Antecedents <strong>of</strong> Parent and Affiliate Product Transfers<br />

Heather K Berry, George Washington University<br />

Aseem Kaul, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

In this paper, we study the factors that drive the direction <strong>of</strong> resource transfers within MNCs. We argue that<br />

different benefits from global integration will drive different configurations <strong>of</strong> intra-firm transfers. More<br />

specifically, aggregation benefits from exploiting organizational endowments on a global scale will be associated<br />

with transfers from parents, while arbitrage benefits from accessing location-specific advantages will drive<br />

multilateral transfers from affiliates. Results from a unique panel <strong>of</strong> 33 US manufacturing industries between<br />

1989 and 2004 show support for these arguments, highlighting a significant increase in intra-firm product<br />

transfers from affiliates, driven by foreign knowledge-seeking activities and the threat <strong>of</strong> foreign rivals. This<br />

paper thus extends our theoretical understanding <strong>of</strong> global integration, while providing empirical insights into<br />

the changing nature <strong>of</strong> global product transfers. (For more information, please contact: Heather K Berry,<br />

George Washington University, USA: berryh@gwu.edu)<br />

Firms as Catalyst <strong>of</strong> Within Country Migration Evidence from a Randomized Intra-Firm Experiment in India<br />

Prithwiraj Choudhury, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Tarun Khanna, Harvard Business School<br />

In the face <strong>of</strong> rapid growth, technology firms in countries like India face severe labor shortages. Such firms also<br />

face physical and informational barriers in hiring talented individuals from remote locations and from<br />

disadvantaged social groups. However, investing in hiring such individuals might lead to higher pay<strong>of</strong>f in<br />

equilibrium. Our empirical setting is "INDTECH," one <strong>of</strong> India's largest information technology (IT) firms where<br />

we exploit the pre-existence <strong>of</strong> a randomization <strong>of</strong> entering talent across the available projects in the 10<br />

development centers INDTECH runs across India. This randomization helps us evade econometric problems that<br />

plague studies that measure employee productivity within firms. We use hand collected data on personal<br />

records and migration patterns for entry level employees recruited by INDTECH in 2007 from over 250<br />

educational institutions all across India. We find that employees from remote locations outperform talent<br />

sourced from mainstream locations provided the distance <strong>of</strong> migration is less than 500 miles. Further, the nonmainstream<br />

talent appears disproportionately to use the firm as a platform for further advanced education.<br />

Also, talent from underrepresented social strata outperforms that hired from mainstream social communities.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Prithwiraj Choudhury, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA:<br />

prithw@wharton.upenn.edu)<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Absorptive Capacity Routines and Attention Directing Mechanisms in Adoption <strong>of</strong> a Management<br />

Innovation<br />

Carine Peeters, Université libre de Bruxelles<br />

Silvia Massini, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Arie Y. Lewin, Duke University<br />

This paper studies how the organization level <strong>of</strong> directing attention (C-level or local) mediates the absorptive<br />

capacity (AC) <strong>of</strong> an organization in the adoption and implementation <strong>of</strong> a management innovation. Drawing on<br />

two in-depth case studies, it provides empirical evidence <strong>of</strong> organizational routines underlying AC capabilities<br />

and shows that two different configurations <strong>of</strong> AC practiced routines in different organizations can lead to<br />

successful implementation <strong>of</strong> the same management innovation, namely the reconfiguration <strong>of</strong> firms' value<br />

chains through sourcing <strong>of</strong> business services from low cost countries. However, the organizational level for<br />

directing attention and guiding adoption <strong>of</strong> the innovation affects the time to successfully implement the<br />

management innovation. Specifically, the cases suggest that the C-level ‘attention-directing' mechanism as it<br />

relates to legitimating and facilitating implementation <strong>of</strong> the new practice is more time efficient than<br />

problemistic search or local directing attention mechanisms. Moreover, the application <strong>of</strong> certain AC routines<br />

are more important in the early stages <strong>of</strong> articulating, developing and implementing the management<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 249


TUESDAY<br />

innovation while other routines become critical at a later stage. Differences in effectiveness <strong>of</strong> AC routines and<br />

underlying mechanisms in turn can be traced back to organizational antecedents and to individual actors<br />

involved in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the innovation. (For more information, please contact: Carine Peeters,<br />

Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium: carine.peeters@ulb.ac.be)<br />

The Global Co-Evolution <strong>of</strong> Firm Boundaries: Commoditization, Capabilities, and Paths Dependencies<br />

Stephan Manning, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston<br />

Silvia Massini, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Carine Peeters, Université libre de Bruxelles<br />

Arie Y. Lewin, Duke University<br />

This paper contributes to the discourse on the co-evolution <strong>of</strong> firm boundaries and capabilities by focusing on<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> process commoditization, changing external availability <strong>of</strong> capabilities and firm specific paths <strong>of</strong><br />

governance decisions on the configuration <strong>of</strong> firm boundaries, and their co-evolution over time. Our analysis<br />

further incorporates the role <strong>of</strong> firm strategic orientation in decisions to source business services internally<br />

(captive) vs. from third party providers. We test our hypotheses on a unique and comprehensive panel <strong>of</strong> 930<br />

discrete <strong>of</strong>fshore operations across various business functions and locations from early experiments in the late<br />

1980s through 2011. Our empirical findings suggest that the three mechanisms <strong>of</strong> process commoditization,<br />

changing availability <strong>of</strong> service suppliers, firm-level experiences and prior sourcing decisions, along with<br />

strategic orientations, affect choices <strong>of</strong> governance models for sourcing particular tasks and, hence, the coevolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> firm boundaries in the context <strong>of</strong> global services sourcing. Yet, these three mechanisms affect<br />

governance model choices in different ways over time, which can be explained by the interplay <strong>of</strong> external<br />

dynamics (e.g. growing maturity <strong>of</strong> sourcing practices and supplier relations across firms) and internal dynamics<br />

(e.g. growing firm-level experience with and development <strong>of</strong> specific capabilities for global sourcing). (For more<br />

information, please contact: Stephan Manning, University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston, USA:<br />

stephan.manning@umb.edu)<br />

Session: 3.4.6 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Spillovers: Here, There, Everywhere<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Ulf Andersson, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Inter-regional Determinants <strong>of</strong> Innovatory Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from China<br />

Yi (Elizabeth) Wang, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Jeremy Clegg, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Chengqi Wang, Nottingham University Business School<br />

This paper investigates the inter-regional impact <strong>of</strong> inward foreign direct investment (FDI) on the ability <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic Chinese firms to generate their own technologies. Research on FDI spillovers productivity effects<br />

argues that advanced technology employed by foreign-invested firms is adopted by domestically-owned firms,<br />

so raising their productivity. We know far less about the mechanisms through which FDI impacts upon the<br />

innovative capabilities <strong>of</strong> these domestic firms. We draw upon literatures on the multinational enterprises,<br />

knowledge diffusion (organisational learning), and economic geography to investigate empirically the<br />

relationship between inward FDI and domestic patent innovation (innovatory spillovers), and how and why this<br />

relationship varies spatially. We find that the baseline impact <strong>of</strong> innovatory spillovers is negative, in contrast<br />

with that generally found for productivity spillovers; patenting by foreign firms within the host economy<br />

perforce generates a near-perfect crowding out effect. We then identify an "inventing around" mechanism,<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 250


TUESDAY<br />

whereby indigenous firms patent around core technologies, moderated by a set <strong>of</strong> inter-regional factors.<br />

Beneficial inter-regional factors include short geographic distance between FDI-host regions (FHRs) and<br />

spillovers-recipient regions (SRRs), a high level <strong>of</strong> marketisation in FHRs, and a high degree <strong>of</strong> competition in<br />

FHRs. Policy recommendations are <strong>of</strong>fered to raise balanced and sustainable technological development. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Yi (Elizabeth) Wang, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom:<br />

y.e.wang@leeds.ac.uk)<br />

Making Room for Something New: Foreign Direct Investment and Host-Country Entrepreneurial Activity<br />

Phillip Kim, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Madison<br />

Mingxiang Li, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Madison<br />

This study presents new theory and evidence for how foreign direct investment (FDI) spurs entrepreneurial<br />

activity in host countries. Current theories provide limited guidance for why foreign investment and domestic<br />

societal conditions may jointly affect business creation. The findings from our panel analyses <strong>of</strong> 104 countries<br />

are consistent with our predictions that foreign direct investment positively relates to business creation and that<br />

this positive effect is strongest in countries with poor institutional support, weak political constraint, and low<br />

general human capital. Our work provides new insights into how cross-border investments and domestic<br />

societal conditions influence entrepreneurial activity especially in emerging economies. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Phillip Kim, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Madison, USA: pkim@bus.wisc.edu)<br />

Subsidiary Linkage Patterns: Learning Prospects and Spillover Risks<br />

Ulf Andersson, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Alessandra Perri, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid<br />

Phillip C. Nell, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Grazia D. Santangelo, University <strong>of</strong> Catania<br />

This paper investigates the pattern <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries' local vertical linkages under varying levels <strong>of</strong> competition and<br />

subsidiary capabilities. Contrary to most previous literature, we explicitly account for the double role <strong>of</strong> such<br />

linkages as conduits <strong>of</strong> learning prospects as well as potential channels for spillovers to competitors. We find a<br />

curvilinear relationship between the extent <strong>of</strong> competitive pressure and the quality <strong>of</strong> a subsidiary's set <strong>of</strong> local<br />

linkages. Furthermore, the extent to which a subsidiary possesses capabilities moderates this relationship: Very<br />

capable subsidiaries in strongly competitive environments tend to shy away from high quality linkages. We<br />

discuss our findings in light <strong>of</strong> the literature on spillovers and inter-organizational linkages. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Ulf Andersson, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: ua.smg@cbs.dk)<br />

Session: 3.4.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 10 - Economics, Finance and Accounting<br />

Capital Structure<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Grigorios Livanis, Northeastern University<br />

U.S. Listing and <strong>International</strong> Asset Pricing: The Absence <strong>of</strong> Cross-Listing Premiums<br />

Liu Wang, Providence College<br />

This paper explores the role <strong>of</strong> cross-listing in international asset pricing with a special focus on misvalued firms<br />

using a panel sample <strong>of</strong> Chinese firms with and without U.S. listings. In contrast with conventional theories that<br />

predict enormous cross-listing benefits, no significant premiums are found when Chinese firms cross-list in the<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 251


TUESDAY<br />

U.S. Further investigation indicates that in an environment with inherent stock overvaluation, the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

cross-listing premiums is mainly a result <strong>of</strong> a downward price correction (toward the fundamental values) once<br />

U.S. listing allows for an enhanced capitalization <strong>of</strong> firm-specific information. Consistent with the price<br />

correction hypothesis, cross-listed firms are found to be generally less overvalued, more informative, and exhibit<br />

a stronger price-earnings relationship. (For more information, please contact: Liu Wang, Providence College,<br />

USA: lwang@providence.edu)<br />

Relationship Lending versus Arm's Length Debt - A Cultural Perspective<br />

Astrid Juliane Salzmann, RWTH Aachen University<br />

Ron Christian Antonczyk, RWTH Aachen University<br />

Wolfgang Breuer, RWTH Aachen University<br />

We examine how cultural preferences impact the financing decision <strong>of</strong> firms. In particular, we hypothesize that<br />

firms in countries with a higher degree <strong>of</strong> long-term orientation tend to prefer bank finance, whereas firms in<br />

countries with a higher degree <strong>of</strong> short-term orientation tend to prefer bond finance. Based on a thorough<br />

theoretical investigation and an extensive empirical analysis using a large, worldwide dataset, we find strong<br />

support for our hypothesis on the role <strong>of</strong> culture in financial intermediation. The results are robust to controlling<br />

for other determinants <strong>of</strong> the choice <strong>of</strong> debt financing as well as alternative measures <strong>of</strong> culture. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Astrid Juliane Salzmann, RWTH Aachen University, Germany:<br />

astrid.salzmann@bfw.rwth-aachen.de)<br />

The Emperor's New Clothes: Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Chinese Stock Listing Diaspora<br />

Abigail S. Hornstein, Wesleyan University<br />

This paper provides two explanations for why Chinese firms are choosing to have only one listing on particular<br />

foreign stock exchanges. First, Chinese firms may present greater informational asymmetries to foreign<br />

investors as they are <strong>of</strong>ten parts <strong>of</strong> corporate pyramids or under state control. Second, there is substantial interprovincial<br />

and international variation in the regulatory and operating environment <strong>of</strong> the headquarters'<br />

locations. The empirical results show that firms that list on the U.S. and U.K. exchanges are more likely to be at<br />

the top <strong>of</strong> a corporate pyramid, come from the better regulated provinces <strong>of</strong> China, and are less likely to have<br />

foreign headquarters. (For more information, please contact: Abigail S. Hornstein, Wesleyan University, USA:<br />

ahornstein@wesleyan.edu)<br />

Session: 3.4.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

SME Exporting<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Shameen Prashantham, Nottingham University Business School<br />

Relationalism in the SMEs export channel<br />

Youngmi Baek, Sogang University<br />

This research identifies affecting factors <strong>of</strong> relationship commitment and relations to the financial performance<br />

in the export distribution channel. For the theoretical basis <strong>of</strong> research model, this research adapted RBV, TCE<br />

and social exchange theory. Resource based determinants (firm size, brand value, technological capability and<br />

fame) and transaction cost determinants (environmental uncertainty, industry and psychic distance) are<br />

considered as the significant factors to affect relationship commitment in the export distribution channel. In<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 252


TUESDAY<br />

addition, the relation between relationship commitment and financial performance is analyzed and adopts the<br />

social exchange variables (shared value, communication and dependence) as the moderating factors between<br />

relationship commitment and performance to specify the situational condition. For the empirical test, 455<br />

samples <strong>of</strong> Korean exporting manufacturing companies are used and divided into two groups based on the firm<br />

size (small-medium sized firms and large sized firms). The empirical test result showed the significant<br />

difference in the effect <strong>of</strong> moderators in the two groups. Only in the sample <strong>of</strong> small-medium sized firms, the<br />

share value, communication and dependence activated as the moderators. In addition, more resource-based<br />

variables are verified significantly on the small-medium sized firms. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Youngmi Baek, Sogang University, Korea, South: youngmibaek@hotmail.com)<br />

Export Orientation in the Economic Recession - An Empirical Investigation <strong>of</strong> New Zealand Wineries<br />

Yang Yu, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington<br />

Val Lindsay, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington<br />

Stacey Hynes, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington<br />

The study explores how firms' export orientations were affected in the recent economic recession. A conceptual<br />

model is developed from the extant literature and hypotheses are tested using data from 55 wine exporters in<br />

New Zealand. Results show that those wineries' export orientation in 2010 at the time <strong>of</strong> the research was<br />

related positively with their past export performance prior to the 2008 financial crisis (between 2005 and 2007),<br />

and negatively with their export performance deterioration soon after the crisis (from 2008 onwards). Equally<br />

important, these relationships between export orientation and performance variables appear to be contingent<br />

upon first, firms' managerial attitudes toward exporting and second, their perceived market uncertainty. Overall,<br />

the study enriches the literature on firms' strategic reactions in economic recession from small exporters'<br />

perspective; its findings in particular, help to understand the complexity <strong>of</strong> such reactions. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Yang Yu, Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington, New Zealand: yang.yu@vuw.ac.nz)<br />

Export Propensity, Export Intensity and Firm Performance: the Role <strong>of</strong> the Entrepreneurial Founding Team<br />

Panagiotis Ganotakis, Leeds University<br />

James Love, Aston University<br />

We investigate how the characteristics and experience <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneurial founding team (EFT) affect the<br />

export orientation and subsequent performance <strong>of</strong> the businesses they establish, while allowing for the<br />

mutually-reinforcing relationship between exporting and productivity. Using a sample <strong>of</strong> UK new technology<br />

based firms, we find that the set <strong>of</strong> EFT human capital needed for entering export markets is quite different<br />

from that required for succeeding in export markets. Commercial and managerial experience helps firms<br />

become exporters, but once over the exporting hurdle it is education, both general and specific, that has a<br />

substantially positive effect. The overall pattern <strong>of</strong> human capital effects on productivity are similar to those for<br />

export propensity. We also find evidence that productive firms are more likely both to enter export markets and<br />

to be export intensive, and that exporting boosts subsequent firm productivity. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Panagiotis Ganotakis, Leeds University, United Kingdom: p.ganotakis@leeds.ac.uk)<br />

Firms' Exporting and Importing Activities: Is There a Two-Way Relationship<br />

Davide Castellani, University <strong>of</strong> Perugia<br />

Chiara Franco, University <strong>of</strong> Bologna<br />

David Aristei, University <strong>of</strong> Perugia<br />

The literature on firm heterogeneity and trade has highlighted that most trading firms tend to engage in both<br />

importing and exporting activities. This may be due to some common sunk costs or to a true state dependence.<br />

This paper provides some evidence that helps sort this issue out. Using firm level data for a group <strong>of</strong> 27<br />

Eastern European and Central Asian countries from the World Bank Business Environment and Enter- prise<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 253


TUESDAY<br />

Performance Survey (BEEPS) over the period 2002-2008, we estimate a bivariate probit model <strong>of</strong> exporting and<br />

importing. The main finding is that there is a positive correlation between import and export at the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

firm, but after controlling for size (and other firm level character- istics) importing have a positive effect on<br />

exporting, but exporting to not increase the probability <strong>of</strong> importing. The evidence is thus consistent with the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> common sunk costs and with a one-way link between im- porting and exporting. The positive effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> import on export is mainly due to an increase in firm productivity and product innovation (For more<br />

information, please contact: Davide Castellani, University <strong>of</strong> Perugia, Italy: davide.castellani@unipg.it)<br />

Session: 3.4.10 - Competitive<br />

Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />

Micr<strong>of</strong>inance, Venture Investment and <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Raj Aggarwal, University <strong>of</strong> Akron<br />

National Institutional Configurations, Organizational Forms, and<br />

in Global Micr<strong>of</strong>inance<br />

Eric Yanfei Zhao, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

the Financial-Social Performance Relationship<br />

In this paper, I develop a configurational approach to the financial-social performance debate and apply it to a<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the global micr<strong>of</strong>inance organizations (MFOs) in 94 countries between 1995 and 2007. Based on their<br />

relative performance on both financial and social dimensions, MFOs are categorized into four ideal types: selfsustainable,<br />

mission-drifting, subsidized, and failing. According to the configurational approach, the specific<br />

ideal type an MFO falls into depends on both national institutional configurations and the MFO's organizational<br />

form. Results provide support for the configurational approach and have significant theoretical and policy<br />

implications. (For more information, please contact: Eric Yanfei Zhao, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Canada:<br />

eric.zhao@ualberta.ca)<br />

The Dividends <strong>of</strong> Diaspora: Migrants, Remittances, and Changes in Home-Country Rule <strong>of</strong> Law<br />

Michael Cummings, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Paul Vaaler, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />

Michael Barnett, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford<br />

How do we explain the cross-country transmission <strong>of</strong> institutional norms vital to international business ("IB")<br />

Since at least the 1970s, scholars have highlighted the role <strong>of</strong> governments, banks and business as means for<br />

transmitting institutional norms across countries. In the 2000s, migrants may constitute a new and increasingly<br />

important transmission source from developed to developing countries. We choose one such institutional norm,<br />

rule <strong>of</strong> law, and develop alternative theories to explain how rule-<strong>of</strong>-law norms might be transmitted to<br />

developing countries through migrants and their remittances. We then present evidence from regression<br />

analyses <strong>of</strong> migrants, migrant remittances and rule-<strong>of</strong>-law trends in 49 developing countries from 2001-2010.<br />

Results suggest that home-country rule <strong>of</strong> law strengthens as the host-country rule <strong>of</strong> law <strong>of</strong> remitting migrants<br />

strengthens. Migrants and their remittances matter, but their impact on institutional norms in the home country<br />

depends on where both reside abroad. (For more information, please contact: Michael Cummings, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Minnesota, USA: cummings@umn.edu)<br />

Business, the State, and Poverty Alleviation: Insights from the Backlash against Commercial Micr<strong>of</strong>inance in<br />

India<br />

Joshua K. Ault, University <strong>of</strong> Victoria<br />

Andrew Spicer, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 254


TUESDAY<br />

We conducted a grounded study <strong>of</strong> a recent micr<strong>of</strong>inance crisis in the Indian region <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh to<br />

generalize more broadly about the role <strong>of</strong> the state in the success <strong>of</strong> business-led efforts to alleviate poverty at<br />

the base <strong>of</strong> the pyramid (BOP). While the existing BOP literature <strong>of</strong>ten sees business as a solution to failures <strong>of</strong><br />

the state, our case analysis shows that market participants in Andhra Pradesh increasingly looked to the state<br />

as a solution to the perceived failure <strong>of</strong> the market. A comparison <strong>of</strong> the rapid rise and fall <strong>of</strong> the micr<strong>of</strong>inance<br />

industry in Andhra Pradesh to the slower but more stable evolution <strong>of</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>inance in Bangladesh further<br />

supports the argument that the state plays an important role in shaping the long-term success <strong>of</strong> BOP<br />

innovation. We discuss the implications <strong>of</strong> a more synergistic perspective on states and markets for future BOP<br />

research. (For more information, please contact: Joshua K. Ault, University <strong>of</strong> Victoria, Canada: jault@uvic.ca)<br />

Session: 3.4.11 - Interactive<br />

Track: 11 - SMEs and Entrepreneurship<br />

Strategic Issues in <strong>International</strong>izing Entrepreneurial Firms<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Kaveh Moghaddam, Old Dominion University<br />

Foreign Knowledge Acquisition Strategies and Start-Up Value to Venture Capital Investors<br />

Anupama Phene, George Washington University<br />

Jennifer Spencer, George Washington University<br />

Nidia Banuelos, University <strong>of</strong> Chicago<br />

Our study examines the relationship between a start-up's foreign knowledge acquisition strategies and the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> venture capital (VC) investment it is able to attract. We evaluate start-up strategy to acquire foreign<br />

knowledge through three mechanisms, foreign knowledge sourcing, collaborations with foreign partners and<br />

overseas innovation activity by the firm. We hypothesize that adoption <strong>of</strong> these strategies increases the value<br />

perceived by VC investors and has a positive influence on VC investment in the startup. We posit that the<br />

strategies differ in the extent to which the startup is embedded in the global innovation system and propose<br />

that more embedded strategies lead to more VC investment. We test our hypotheses in a sample <strong>of</strong> U.S.<br />

biotechnology startups and find support for the effects <strong>of</strong> foreign knowledge acquisition strategies on VC<br />

investment. Interestingly less embedded strategies have a greater effect on VC investment. An analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

foreign firm innovative presence in the location <strong>of</strong> the start-up, suggests that it operates as a complement to<br />

foreign knowledge acquisitions strategies. (For more information, please contact: Anupama Phene, George<br />

Washington University, USA: anuphene@gwu.edu)<br />

SME Adaptation for Survival in Economic Crisis: A Customer Relationship Orientation Viewpoint<br />

Melodena Stephens Balakrishnan, University <strong>of</strong> Wollongong in Dubai<br />

Abraham Koshy, IIM A<br />

This study looks at the adaptation strategies SMEs employ when faced with a financial crisis. The findings prove<br />

the current relevance <strong>of</strong> the Miles and Snow typology and provide a practical framework for organizations to<br />

monitor the impact <strong>of</strong> change. Through a detailed literature review it consolidates and classifies marketing<br />

strategies available to organizations during change. The study also highlights the importance <strong>of</strong> customer<br />

relationship orientation and its implication on adaptation to turbulent times. This exploratory study uses<br />

qualitative methodology to study the effect <strong>of</strong> turbulence on an organization looking specifically at their market<br />

strategy adoption. It is a cross-country study looking at 20 firms based in Taiwan and India. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Melodena Stephens Balakrishnan, University <strong>of</strong> Wollongong in Dubai, United Arab<br />

Emirates: melodenabalakrishnan@uowdubai.ac.ae)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 255


TUESDAY<br />

Not Too Small, Not Too Big: The Rise <strong>of</strong> Medium-Sized Firms in <strong>International</strong> Markets<br />

Alberto Pezzi, University <strong>of</strong> Roma Tre<br />

Ottorino Morresi, University <strong>of</strong> Roma Tre<br />

We study shareholder value creation in the form <strong>of</strong> stock market reaction to announcements <strong>of</strong><br />

internationalization strategies by medium-sized firms listed on European stock exchanges. Recent preliminary<br />

evidence shows these firms to be superior in terms <strong>of</strong> accounting-based performance, efficiency and<br />

internationalization propensity than small and large firms. We find that medium-sized listed firms in Europe are<br />

able to create value through their global diversification. These firms appear to successfully manage the issues<br />

related to internationalization. Value creation is present in all sample countries. British, Italian, Belgian and<br />

French firms show the best performance while Dutch, German and Spanish firms show the worst results.<br />

According to international literature, the value created is dependent on some firm-specific, deal-specific,<br />

industry-specific, and country-specific determinants. (For more information, please contact: Alberto Pezzi,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Roma Tre, Italy: pezzi@uniroma3.it)<br />

Step by Step: A Hierarchical Model <strong>of</strong> SME <strong>International</strong>ization<br />

David Pastoriza, HEC Montreal<br />

Hugo Zarco, University <strong>of</strong> Navarra<br />

Miguel Canela, IESE Business School<br />

We empirically investigate the internationalization decision making process <strong>of</strong> SMEs. In contrast to the dominant<br />

rational analytic model, we argue that the managers <strong>of</strong> SMEs simplify the structure <strong>of</strong> the internationalization<br />

decision by decomposing it into a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> two different stages: First, they decide on the foreign expansion<br />

decision; and second, they decide on the degree <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> the entry mode choice. Based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 436<br />

Spanish SMEs, our paper contributes to the literature <strong>of</strong> SME`s internationalization in two ways: First, it shows<br />

the explanatory capacity <strong>of</strong> the hierarchical model to split SME`s internationalization into two different stages;<br />

and second, it identifies distinguishes which factors impact each <strong>of</strong> the two stages respectively. (For more<br />

information, please contact: David Pastoriza, HEC Montreal, Canada: david.pastoriza@hec.ca)<br />

Entrepreneurial Orientation and <strong>International</strong> Performance<br />

George Nakos, Clayton State University<br />

Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University<br />

Pavlos Dimitratos, University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow<br />

Lance Eliot Brouthers, Kennesaw State University<br />

Entrepreneurial firms tend to expand abroad to improve performance. Yet because <strong>of</strong> liabilities <strong>of</strong> smallness<br />

and foreignness these ventures are <strong>of</strong>ten unsuccessful. To overcome these issues firms can engage in alliances.<br />

In this study we examine the moderating influence <strong>of</strong> alliances with non-competitors and competitors on the<br />

international performance <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial SMEs. Based on a sample <strong>of</strong> 162 British and US companies our<br />

results indicate that a firm's entrepreneurial orientation is significantly related to international performance. Our<br />

analysis also shows that alliances with non-competitors interact with entrepreneurial orientation to increase a<br />

company's performance but that alliances with competitors do not have a similar impact on international<br />

performance. (For more information, please contact: Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University, USA:<br />

keith_brouthers@ncsu.edu)<br />

One For All Transaction Cost Determinants and Entry Mode <strong>of</strong> SMEs vs. MNEs: A Meta-Analysis<br />

Alexander H. Wisgickl, WU Vienna<br />

Jonas F. Puck, WU Vienna<br />

Arne Floh, WU Vienna<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 256


TUESDAY<br />

Existing findings on determinants <strong>of</strong> entry mode remain inconclusive, especially when looking on transactioncost<br />

determinants. In this paper we argue that this inconclusiveness can at least partially be explained by<br />

missing out an important context factor: firm size. Based on meta-analytical evidence, specifically 130 effect<br />

sizes <strong>of</strong> 57 empirical studies, our findings strongly support this line <strong>of</strong> reasoning, as we find significantly<br />

different effect sizes and, in the case <strong>of</strong> internal and external uncertainty, even effect directions for SMEs and<br />

MNEs. We intensely discuss the implications <strong>of</strong> our findings following two directions. On the one hand,<br />

discussing how TCE and its measures could be better adjusted to the specific SME context. On the other hand,<br />

theorizing on how TCE could be supplemented by additional theories to improve its applicability to SMEs. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Alexander H. Wisgickl, WU Vienna, Austria: alexander.wisgickl@wu.ac.at)<br />

Session: 3.4.12 - Interactive<br />

Track: 8 - Developing Country MNCs<br />

<strong>International</strong> Diversification, Performance and Developing Economy Firms<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Elizabeth L. Rose, Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Diversification and Performance <strong>of</strong> Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Taiwan as Example<br />

Cheng-Wen Yao, Tzu-Chi College <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Angeline, Te-Yi Lin, National ChengChi University<br />

As a distinctive phenomenon <strong>of</strong> emerging countries, business groups receive much attention <strong>of</strong> practitioners and<br />

academics. Although many studies examine the relationship between diversification and business group<br />

performance, most <strong>of</strong> them focus on the relationship between diversification and an affiliated firm's<br />

performance. Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> business groups, and to explore a bigger picture <strong>of</strong> business group<br />

performance, this study proposed that the impacts <strong>of</strong> diversification on a business group were different from<br />

those on a single member firm. This study explored the impacts <strong>of</strong> different diversifications on the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the whole business group. An OLS multiple regression model was used to test the hypothesis.<br />

Results based on 101 high-tech business groups showed that diversification was beneficial to a business group.<br />

All three types <strong>of</strong> diversification, including related diversification, unrelated diversification, and international<br />

diversification, were positively related to business group performance. This finding indicated that a business<br />

group performed better when it diversified internationally and into different industries. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Cheng-Wen Yao, Tzu-Chi College <strong>of</strong> Technology, Taiwan: tomcwyao@gmail.com)<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> FDI Type on the Relationship between Institutional Distances and the Performance <strong>of</strong> Foreign<br />

Subsidiaries<br />

Hsiao-Wen Lin, ChenChi University<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> MNEs, there are different arguments about the relationship between institutional distance and<br />

foreign subsidiaries' performances. This paper tries to integrate the FDI type, up-stream and down-stream FDI,<br />

into the model and propose that the construct will have a moderating effect. Because <strong>of</strong> the different motive <strong>of</strong><br />

FDI, institutional development <strong>of</strong> the host country, and country <strong>of</strong> origin effect <strong>of</strong> the two FDI types, this paper<br />

provides propositions that under the situation <strong>of</strong> down-stream FDI, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship<br />

between institutional distance and the performance <strong>of</strong> LDCs MNEs foreign subsidiaries, while opposite U shaped<br />

relationship under up-stream FDI. (For more information, please contact: Hsiao-Wen Lin, ChenChi University,<br />

Taiwan: 96355506@nccu.edu.tw)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 257


TUESDAY<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Business Group Diversification on Emerging Market Multinationals: Evidence from Latin America<br />

Armando Borda, Universidad ESAN/ Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Diversified business groups represent the most efficient organizational form to conduct transactions in the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> large institutional voids because they reduce transaction cost by internalizing activities. However,<br />

Emerging economies are characterized by a reduction <strong>of</strong> government intervention and by the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

governance mechanisms. Under the adoption <strong>of</strong> market oriented institutions, the organizational costs <strong>of</strong><br />

diversified business groups may be higher than their benefits and hence; these business groups face pressures<br />

to refocus their operations. Nevertheless, given that the majority <strong>of</strong> business groups are old and large; they also<br />

face strong inertial processes that constrain their capability to adapt to these environmental changes In this<br />

article we explore this alternative avenue that diversified business groups have to distribute their large<br />

overhead: the internationalization <strong>of</strong> their affiliates. Considering that firm specific assets tend to be regionally<br />

bound and that the benefits <strong>of</strong> business group diversification are associated with the presence <strong>of</strong> institutional<br />

voids, we explore the capacity <strong>of</strong> business group diversification to generate value in the internationalization<br />

process <strong>of</strong> their affiliates and how this impacts varies depending on whether their affiliates expand to more or<br />

less developed countries and on whether their affiliates are regionally or globally oriented. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Armando Borda, Universidad ESAN/ Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA:<br />

abord001@fiu.edu)<br />

Firm Specific Advantages in Managing the Risks <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>isation in Frontier Markets: Exploring the Role <strong>of</strong><br />

Government Linkages<br />

Namukale M. Chintu, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

While there is a vast amount <strong>of</strong> research on firms' choice <strong>of</strong> ownership form when entering a foreign market, it<br />

has largely focussed on firms behaving in a reactive manner to host country circumstances. Little attention has<br />

been paid to how firms might overcome some <strong>of</strong> the root causes associated with the selection <strong>of</strong> joint ventures<br />

and internationalise using wholly owned subsidiaries in the first instance. Using an embedded case study<br />

developed in Zambia, we investigate the choice <strong>of</strong> ownership form among Chinese and Western firms. The<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> these cases leads to the development <strong>of</strong> 3 testable propositions focused on the behaviour <strong>of</strong> firms<br />

with government linkages in nascent frontier economies. Our study aims to lay a foundation for future research<br />

on government linkages and the internationalisation <strong>of</strong> firms, particularly in frontier market contexts. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Namukale M. Chintu, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, United Kingdom: nc350@cam.ac.uk)<br />

Innovation Process as a Mediator Linking Export Capabilities and Performance<br />

Badri Munir Sukoco, Airlangga University<br />

Muslich Anshori, Airlangga University<br />

Indrianawati Usman, Airlangga University<br />

Having export capabilities are necessary steps for exporters to be success in the international market. Based on<br />

learning-based view <strong>of</strong> internationalization, this study argues that the capability to acquire information from<br />

foreign market and being adaptive on foreign consumer needs need to go further through innovation process<br />

before having effects on export performance. The developed hypotheses are tested among Indonesian smalland-medium-size<br />

enterprises (SMEs) exporters. The results indicate that export capabilities contribute positively<br />

on innovation process and export performance, which is also apply on the effect <strong>of</strong> innovation process and<br />

export performance. Further findings indicate that innovation process partially mediates the effect <strong>of</strong> export<br />

capabilities on export performance. (For more information, please contact: Badri Munir Sukoco, Airlangga<br />

University, Indonesia: badri@feb.unair.ac.id)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 258


TUESDAY<br />

Session: 3.4.13 - Interactive<br />

Track: 9 - Cross-cultural Management and HRM<br />

Managing Overseas Assignments<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Naoki Ando, Hosei University<br />

The Influence <strong>of</strong> Terrorism on Expatriate Performance: a Conceptual Approach<br />

Benjamin Bader, University <strong>of</strong> Hamburg<br />

Nicola Berg, University <strong>of</strong> Hamburg<br />

This article presents a conceptual model <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> terrorism on expatriates' work attitudes and<br />

performance. After briefly discussing the challenges connected with terrorism and the expatriation <strong>of</strong> employees<br />

into high-risk countries, we develop a causal model based on the stress perspective. Several role and situational<br />

stressors contribute to an expatriate's individual stress level, which is then reflected in his or her work attitudes<br />

and performance. Then, propositions on the postulated relationships are derived and moderating influences are<br />

discussed. The paper ends with managerial implications and directions for future studies. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Benjamin Bader, University <strong>of</strong> Hamburg, Germany: benjamin.bader@uni-hamburg.de)<br />

The Effect <strong>of</strong> Absolute and Relative Numbers <strong>of</strong> Expatriates on Foreign Subsidiary Performance<br />

Naoki Ando, Hosei University<br />

This study examines the relationship between foreign subsidiary staffing and the performance <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

subsidiaries. In particular, this study emphasizes two practices <strong>of</strong> foreign subsidiary staffing, i.e., the ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

parent country nationals to foreign subsidiary employees and the number <strong>of</strong> parent country nationals assigned<br />

to the foreign subsidiary. Hypotheses are developed that predict curvilinear relationships between foreign<br />

subsidiary staffing and the performance <strong>of</strong> foreign subsidiaries. Using the data consisting <strong>of</strong> 2,228 foreign<br />

subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> Japanese firms, empirical analysis is conducted to test the hypotheses. The results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analysis show that the ratio <strong>of</strong> parent country nationals has an inverted U-shaped relationship with foreign<br />

subsidiary performance. The results also show that the number <strong>of</strong> parent country nationals assigned to the<br />

foreign subsidiary has a U-shaped relationship with foreign subsidiary performance. The results <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

suggest that the two distinctive but related staffing practices have different effects on foreign subsidiary<br />

performance. (For more information, please contact: Naoki Ando, Hosei University, Japan: nando@hosei.ac.jp)<br />

Cross-Cultural Adjustment <strong>of</strong> Expatriates: The Role <strong>of</strong> Emotional Intelligence, Sex, Cultural Similarity and<br />

Experience<br />

Alexei Koveshnikov, Hanken School <strong>of</strong> Economics<br />

Heidi Wechtler, Sorbonne Business School<br />

Cecile Dejoux, CNAM Paris<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> emotional intelligence (EI) in cross-cultural adjustment (CCA) <strong>of</strong> expatriates on international<br />

assignments remains under-researched in extant literature. In this paper, we test a model which shows that EI<br />

is an important positive predictor <strong>of</strong> expatriates' general living, interactional and work-related CCA. Additionally,<br />

we find that cultural similarity facilitates general living adjustment only and not the other two dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

CCA. Finally, the analysis yields an interesting interaction effect between sex and appraisal <strong>of</strong> emotions in the<br />

self and others, showing that emotionally intelligent (in that particular adaptive ability) females are likely to<br />

experience slower CCA on all three dimensions than males. The adaptive ability <strong>of</strong> appraisal <strong>of</strong> emotions in the<br />

self and others has a relatively faster diminishing utility for females than for males, i.e. the improvement in CCA<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 259


TUESDAY<br />

(on all three dimensions) tends to get smaller for females than for males as the level <strong>of</strong> the ability increases.<br />

Overall, the paper contributes to the literature by providing evidence that EI has an important explanatory<br />

power for expatriates' CCA. (For more information, please contact: Alexei Koveshnikov, Hanken School <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics, Finland: alexei.koveshnikov@hanken.fi)<br />

The U-Curve Hypothesis: A New Examination <strong>of</strong> the Adjustment process <strong>of</strong> Cross-Cultural Adjustment through a<br />

Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Expatriates<br />

Heidi Wechtler, Sorbonne Business School<br />

Olivier Wurtz, Ecole Hotelière de Lausanne<br />

This study examines the trajectory <strong>of</strong> expatriates adjustment. We focus on six personal factors (sex, age,<br />

initiation <strong>of</strong> expatriation, prior experience abroad, position level, and presence <strong>of</strong> family members on<br />

assignment) that affect international adjustment in order to build a taxonomy <strong>of</strong> expatriates. On the basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> 584 observations, we show that the adjustment <strong>of</strong> these different types <strong>of</strong> expatriates follows<br />

different curves. In some specific cases (the youngest expatriates) a U-shape <strong>of</strong> interactional adjustment is<br />

observed. (For more information, please contact: Heidi Wechtler, Sorbonne Business School, France:<br />

heidi_wechtler@yahoo.fr)<br />

Broadening our Understanding <strong>of</strong> Self-initiated Expatriates: A cross-discipline look at international volunteers'<br />

motivations<br />

Anthony Fee, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Eliane Karsaklian, Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle<br />

Self-initiated expatriation takes many forms and is likely instigated by an equally diverse breadth <strong>of</strong> motivational<br />

roots. In this paper, we argue that understanding the complex motivations to expatriate may benefit from a<br />

cross-disciplinary approach. To demonstrate this, we draw on literature into consumer behaviour, specifically<br />

ethical consumption, as a way to expand the understanding <strong>of</strong> the factors underpinning the motives <strong>of</strong> one<br />

group <strong>of</strong> self-initiating expatriates; international volunteers. By doing so, we develop a framework suggests that<br />

international volunteers may be more motivated by social factors than current research suggests. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Anthony Fee, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia: anthony.fee@sydney.edu.au)<br />

Willingness to Work in an <strong>International</strong> Context<br />

Anci Borozan, Eastern Illinois University<br />

David Boggs, Eastern Illinois University<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this study is to 1) develop the concept <strong>of</strong> international context, and 2) explain and predict<br />

willingness to work in an international context. Global firms require employees interested in, and capable <strong>of</strong>,<br />

working cross-nationally; even domestic employees are expected to possess basic international skills in order to<br />

function effectively. This paper reviews research on receptivity to working internationally, proposes a model,<br />

and reports the results <strong>of</strong> a survey <strong>of</strong> 392 undergraduate and graduate students at an AACSB-accredited<br />

Midwestern university. The survey was administered to examine factors that influence willingness to work in an<br />

international context. Empirical results show that perceptions, preparedness and socio-biographical background<br />

variables affect willingness to work in an international context. The findings have relevance for companies that<br />

select employees for their global operations. (For more information, please contact: David Boggs, Eastern<br />

Illinois University, USA: djboggs@eiu.edu)<br />

Foreign CEO Appointments in the Multinational Enterprise: Rational Motives and Homophilic Constraints<br />

Yannick Thams, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

Aya Chacar, Florida <strong>International</strong> University<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 260


TUESDAY<br />

In this paper, we examine the drivers <strong>of</strong> foreign-born Chief Executive Officers'(CEOs) appointment. We argue<br />

that rational or economic factors will drive these appointments albeit constrained by the homophilic tendencies<br />

<strong>of</strong> the firm's board <strong>of</strong> directors. More specifically, we argue that the greater the internationalization <strong>of</strong> a<br />

multinational enterprise (MNE) the greater the challenges it faces and the greater the need for a leader who<br />

understands numerous foreign markets. Such a requirement narrows the potential candidates' pool, increasing<br />

the likelihood <strong>of</strong> a foreign-born CEO appointment. Moreover, poor performance <strong>of</strong> international operations will<br />

bring to light the importance <strong>of</strong> a leader who can manage the foreign operations <strong>of</strong> an MNE, enhancing the<br />

likelihood <strong>of</strong> a foreign-born CEO appointment. Recruiting committees however are boundedly rational. As in all<br />

selection processes, homophilic tendencies, or the selection <strong>of</strong> individuals that are demographically similar to<br />

the recruiter(s), will be strong limiting the likelihood that foreign-born CEOs are appointed. This latter problem<br />

will ease as board members and top management teams become more international. As such, we propose that<br />

the link between firms' the economic drivers <strong>of</strong> selection and foreign-born CEO appointment will be moderated<br />

by the national diversity <strong>of</strong> board <strong>of</strong> directors and top management team members. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Yannick Thams, Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA: thamsy@fiu.edu)<br />

The Job Demands-Resources Model and <strong>International</strong> Business Travelers: A Qualitative Study<br />

Lucy Rattrie-Wilcox, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

Markus Kittler, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling<br />

This study explores the experiences <strong>of</strong> international business travelers. It highlights the job demands, job<br />

resources and personal resources that are most influential in determining well-being and performance related<br />

outcomes. It further points at the value <strong>of</strong> using the Job Demands-Resources Model (Bakker and colleagues) as<br />

a theoretical framework to classify such characteristics with individuals who operate in an international work<br />

context and discusses the potential for organizations to enhance the amount <strong>of</strong> resources available to<br />

employees in a cost-effective manner. Through twenty-five semi-structured interviews, the main job demands<br />

and resources identified were related to workload, infrastructure and administration, frequency and duration <strong>of</strong><br />

travel, recovery time, building relationships and knowledge transfer. The important personal resources were<br />

health, organizational skills and openness to experience. (For more information, please contact: Lucy Rattrie-<br />

Wilcox, University <strong>of</strong> Stirling, United Kingdom: lucy.wilcox@stir.ac.uk)<br />

Session: 3.4.14 - Interactive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization Processes<br />

Presented On: July 3, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Elizabeth Maitland, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

The Speed <strong>of</strong> Export Expansion and Firm Performance<br />

Dirk Michael Boehe, Insper Institute <strong>of</strong> Education and Research<br />

This study addresses the speed <strong>of</strong> export expansion, which refers to the number <strong>of</strong> new export destination<br />

countries a firm enters per period. This widely under-researched topic in international business is important to<br />

export management because there is a likely trade-<strong>of</strong>f between the economic incentives to rapidly expand to (or<br />

withdraw from) export markets on the one hand and the hazard <strong>of</strong> overstretching existing production and<br />

managerial capabilities on the other hand. Using a panel data base <strong>of</strong> Brazilian exporters, we test a model that<br />

simultaneously predicts firm performance as a function <strong>of</strong> export expansion speed and the latter as a function <strong>of</strong><br />

both export strategy variables and a firm-specific exchange rate competitiveness. We find that "better" firms,<br />

i.e. firms that have higher export intensity, geographic diversification, serve more distant target countries and<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 261


TUESDAY<br />

source inputs from abroad, tend to show higher expansion (but also retraction) speed. Although higher<br />

expansion speed negatively influences export performance, firms with higher export intensity can mitigate this<br />

negative influence. (For more information, please contact: Dirk Michael Boehe, Insper Institute <strong>of</strong> Education and<br />

Research, Brazil: dirkmb@insper.edu.br)<br />

<strong>International</strong>isation as Market-Making: An Overlooked Concept in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

Peter William Lamb, La Trobe University<br />

We contend market making as a concept and market making activities has been overlooked in IB and firm<br />

internationalisation enquiry. We explore the notion <strong>of</strong> market making by examining the process <strong>of</strong> small firm<br />

internationalisation and the internationalisation practices <strong>of</strong> their owner-managers. From our interpretive and<br />

phenomenographic study <strong>of</strong> small internationalising Australian wineries, we reveal an internationalisation<br />

activity cycle which represents and illustrates how they actually overcome obstacles to trade in establishing a<br />

footprint in international markets over time. We argue the internationalisation activity cycle to be a process <strong>of</strong><br />

market making. As a consequence, we provide a comprehensive and nuanced explanation <strong>of</strong> how ownermanagers<br />

<strong>of</strong> small firms practise firm internationalisation. (For more information, please contact: Peter William<br />

Lamb, La Trobe University, Australia: p.lamb@latrobe.edu.au)<br />

An Integrative Model <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong>ization Strategies: The Corporate Entrepreneurship - Institutional<br />

Environment - Regulatory Focus (EIR) Framework<br />

Xin Li, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Jens Gammelgaard, Copenhagen Business School<br />

This paper critically reviews the ownership, location, and internalization (OLI) model, and the Uppsala<br />

internationalization process (UIP) framework. Both the OLI model and the UIP model ignore to incorporate the<br />

insights <strong>of</strong> each other and fail to include corporate entrepreneurship in their analyses. We argue that regulatory<br />

focus theory can unify the managerial choice <strong>of</strong> internationalization between internalization and networking. In<br />

addition, host country institutions affect this managerial choice with regard to internationalization. Thus, we<br />

suggest that the inclusion <strong>of</strong> concepts such as corporate entrepreneurship, institutional environment, and<br />

regulatory focus in an integrated framework helps to explain firm internationalization. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Xin Li, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: xl.int@cbs.dk)<br />

<strong>International</strong>ization Speed, Firm Performance and the Moderating Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Diversity<br />

Kuei-Yang Cheng, National Taiwan University<br />

An appropriate internationalization strategy has been recognized as a determinant <strong>of</strong> firm success. A number <strong>of</strong><br />

studies have tested the relationships between internationalization and firm financial performance, yet studies <strong>of</strong><br />

internationalization speed are relatively few and our knowledge <strong>of</strong> its consequences is limited. Moreover, it<br />

largely overlooks the interaction effects <strong>of</strong> diversity and international expansion speed on firm pr<strong>of</strong>itability. This<br />

research distinguishes the direct and indirect impacts <strong>of</strong> international expansion speed on firm performance.<br />

Panel data on 656 publicly held firms in Taiwan confirms the differing influences <strong>of</strong> international expansion<br />

speed on firm pr<strong>of</strong>itability. Results indicate that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between<br />

internationalization speed and firms performance. In addition, multinational and product diversity negatively<br />

moderate the impacts <strong>of</strong> internationalization speed on firm performance. This study develops causal logic for<br />

internationalization process influence on firm pr<strong>of</strong>itability. A proposed theoretical framework analysis provides<br />

insights into the interaction relationships <strong>of</strong> diversity and international expansion speed in this research, <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

better understanding <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> internationalization speed in internationalization process. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Kuei-Yang Cheng, National Taiwan University, Taiwan: d94724015@ntu.edu.tw)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 262


TUESDAY<br />

What Matters More - Experience or Competitive Imitation A Longitudinal Study <strong>of</strong> R&D Location Decisions<br />

Pallavi Shukla, Rutgers University<br />

Drawing on the internationalization process model and the knowledge-based theory <strong>of</strong> the firm, I develop a<br />

theoretical framework to examine the effect <strong>of</strong> (skilled) immigrant concentration on the research and<br />

development (R&D) location decisions <strong>of</strong> multinational firms. I argue that firms are increasingly relying on its<br />

skilled immigrant workers for enriching their social knowledge and that this knowledge in conjunction with prior<br />

experience is used by firms in making decisions to site R&D activities in international locations. However, the<br />

recent phenomenon <strong>of</strong> dramatic growth in the number <strong>of</strong> R&D centers in developing countries can also be seen<br />

as a mimetic behavior <strong>of</strong> firms and can be explained by the neoinstitutional theory. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is<br />

to develop theoretical propositions that seek to examine the time-varying effects <strong>of</strong> experience, immigrant<br />

concentration and competitive imitation on the decision to locate R&D activities in an international location. (For<br />

more information, please contact: Pallavi Shukla, Rutgers University, USA: p.shukla.awasthi@gmail.com)<br />

Do Firm Specific Intangible Assets Compensate Weak Legal Institutions Empirical Evidence on the<br />

Relationship between Multinationality and Value from European Firms<br />

Stefan Eckert, <strong>International</strong> Graduate School Zittau<br />

Marcus Dittfeld, IHI-Zittau<br />

Florian Meinfelder, University <strong>of</strong> Bamberg<br />

We analyze the relationship between multinationality and firm value for a sample encompassing 42,866 firmyear-observations<br />

from different EU-countries for the period from 1990 to 2006. To obtain a deeper insight into<br />

the relationship we split our sample in four subgroups depending on the legal traditions mentioned in La Porta<br />

et al. (1998). Our findings document that corporate multinationality independent <strong>of</strong> other prerequisites only<br />

leads to value enhancement in the case <strong>of</strong> firms from countries belonging to the common law tradition, i.e.<br />

countries with a high degree <strong>of</strong> investor protection. On the other hand we find that, firms from countries<br />

belonging to the civil low tradition have to be in charge <strong>of</strong> certain firm-specific intangible assets if<br />

multinationality should have a positive impact on firm value. In this sense, firm-specific intangible assets seem<br />

to work as a kind <strong>of</strong> surrogate mechanism for legal institutions concerning investor protection. We further find<br />

that the lower the degree <strong>of</strong> investor protection, the higher the requirements concerning the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

intangible assets as a prerequisite for investors' preparedness to pay a premium on firm value for corporate<br />

multinationality. (For more information, please contact: Marcus Dittfeld, IHI-Zittau, Germany: dittfeld@ihizittau.de)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 263


(This page is intentionally blank)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 264


INDEX OF<br />

PROGRAM<br />

CONTRIBUTORS<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 265


(This page is intentionally blank)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 266


INDEX OF PROGRAM CONTRIBUTORS<br />

A<br />

Abdelzaher, Dina; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (dzahe001@fiu.edu): 3.3.14<br />

Abekah, Grace; Gracious Pearl <strong>Academy</strong>, Ghana (johnworktheworld@yahoo.co.uk): 3.3.4<br />

Abi Aad, Amine; University <strong>of</strong> Alabama, USA (aaabiaad@crimson.ua.edu): 1.5.13<br />

Ackrill, Robert; Nottingham Trent University , United Kingdom (robert.ackrill@ntu.ac.uk): 1.5.3<br />

Adler, Nancy J.; McGill University, Canada (nancy.adler@mcgill.ca): 2.1.2<br />

Aggarwal, Raj; University <strong>of</strong> Akron, USA (aggarwa@uakron.edu): 1.3.1, 1.4.15, 2.1.15, 3.4.10<br />

Aguilera, Ruth; University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (ruth-agu@uiuc.edu): 1.1.1, 1.3.3, 1.5.7, 2.1.P, 2.4.3<br />

Ahmadjian, Christina; Hitotsubashi University, Japan (cahmadjian@ics.hit-u.ac.jp): 1.1.1, 3.1.2<br />

Aitken, Michael; ASB, University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (m.aitken@cmcrc.com): 3.1.8<br />

Akerman, Niklas; Linnaeus University, Sweden (niklas.akerman@lnu.se): 2.1.11<br />

Alas, Ruth ; Estonia Business School, Estonia (ruth.alas@ebs.ee): 1.5.6<br />

Albuquerque, Lindolfo Galvão; University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, Brazil (lgdalbuq@usp.br): 2.4.13<br />

Alday, Sandra Seno; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (sandra.seno-alday@sydney.edu.au): 1.4.12<br />

Alfoldi, Eva Andrea; University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom (eva.alfoldi@mbs.ac.uk): 1.1.14<br />

Alhorr, Hadi ; Saint Louis University, USA (halhorr@slu.edu): 1.3.11, 3.3.13<br />

Ali, Abbas ; Indiana University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (aaali@iup.edu): 3.4.2<br />

Al-Laham, Andreas; University <strong>of</strong> Mannheim, Germany (ebomrich@mail.uni-mannheim.de): 1.1.9<br />

Almeida, Paul; Georgetown University, USA (almeidap@georgetown.edu): 3.3.3<br />

Al-Nuaimi, Tufool; Imperial College, United Kingdom (tufool.alnuaimi@gmail.com): 3.3.13<br />

Alon, Ilan; Rollins College, USA (ialon@rollins.edu): 1.5.15, 2.1.1<br />

Altay, Nezih; DePaul University, USA (naltay@depaul.edu): 3.3.14<br />

Alvim, Flavia M.; Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil (flavia.alvim@fdc.org.br): 3.3.15<br />

Alwan, Mohammed; Carleton University, Canada (malwan@connect.carleton.ca): 2.3.4<br />

Amann, Bruno; University <strong>of</strong> Toulouse III, France (publications@bruno-amann.fr): 1.1.14<br />

Ambos, Björn; Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business, Austria (bjoern.ambos@wu.ac.at): 2.1.14, 2.2.7<br />

Ambos, Tina Claudia; Johannes Kepler University, Austria (tina.ambos@jku.at): 2.1.14<br />

Amoros, Jose Ernesto ; GEM Chile Team Leader; Universidad del Desarollo, Chile: 1.4.1<br />

Anandalingam, G. "Anand"; Robert H. Smith School <strong>of</strong> Business, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland , USA: 0.5, 1.1.P<br />

Anastassopoulos, George; University <strong>of</strong> Patras, Greece (gan@upatras.gr): 2.1.14<br />

Andersen, Poul Houman; Aarhus University, Denmark (poa@asb.dk): 1.4.14, 2.3.14<br />

Andersson, Per; Stockholm School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Sweden (per.andersson@hhs.se): 1.1.7<br />

Andersson, Svante; Halmstad University, Sweden (svante.andersson@hh.se): 3.3.9<br />

Andersson, Ulf; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (ua.smg@cbs.dk): 1.1.8, 3.4.6<br />

Ando, Naoki; Hosei University, Japan (nando@hosei.ac.jp): 2.4.9, 3.4.13<br />

Ang, Siah H.; University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, New Zealand (s.ang@auckland.ac.nz): 1.3.4<br />

Annan-Diab, Fatima; Kingston University London, United Kingdom (f.diab@kingston.ac.uk): 3.2.14<br />

Ansari, Mahfooz ; University <strong>of</strong> Lethbridge, Canada (mahfooz.ansari@uleth.ca): 1.5.6<br />

Anshori, Muslich; Airlangga University, Indonesia (slich@unair.ac.id): 3.4.12<br />

Antonczyk, Ron Christian; RWTH Aachen University, Germany (ron.antonczyk@rwth-aachen.de): 3.4.7<br />

Araujo Junior, Jonas Ferreira; Universidade de Fortaleza, Brazil (jonas.soma@gmail.com): 3.2.15<br />

Aristei, David; University <strong>of</strong> Perugia, Italy (david.aristei@stat.unipg.it): 3.4.9<br />

Aritz, Jolanta; University <strong>of</strong> Southern California, USA (aritz@marshall.usc.edu): 2.1.7<br />

Arnold, Denis G.; University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, Charlotte, USA (denisarnold@uncc.edu): 1.3.15<br />

Arora, Anshu; Savannah State University, USA (aroraa@savannahstate.edu): 2.4.12, 3.2.12<br />

Arriaga-Muzquiz, Juan; Egade Business School, Mexico (juan.arriaga@itesm.mx): 1.1.11<br />

Arsyad, Nuruzzaman; <strong>International</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Jakarta, Indonesia (nuruzzaman@ssb.ac.id): 3.4.3<br />

Asakawa, Kazuhiro ; Keio University, Japan (asakawa@kbs.keio.ac.jp): 1.4.13, 2.1.14, 2.2.5<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 267


Ashby, Nathan; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at El Paso, USA (njashby@utep.edu): 1.4.9<br />

Asmussen, Christian Geisler; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (cga.smg@cbs.dk): 1.3.9, 1.5.4<br />

Assudani, Rashmi; Xavier University, USA (assudanir@xavier.edu): 2.2.4<br />

Atabay, Gülem; Izmir University <strong>of</strong> Economics , Turkey: 2.4.10<br />

Atamer, Tugrul; EMLYON Business School, France (atamer@em-lyon.com): 2.1.5<br />

Athanassiou, Nicholas; Northeastern University, USA (n.athanassiou@neu.edu): 1.4.10<br />

Athreye, Suma; Brunel University, United Kingdom (suma.athreye@brunel.ac.uk): 3.1.4, 3.3.13<br />

Attia, Samaa; British University in Egypt, Egypt (samaa.attia@bue.edu.eg): 3.3.11<br />

Aulakh, Preet ; York University, Canada (paulakh@schulich.yorku.ca): 1.3.14<br />

Ault, Joshua K.; University <strong>of</strong> Victoria, Canada (jault@uvic.ca): 3.4.10<br />

Autio, Erkko; Imperial College, United Kingdom (e.autio@imperial.ac.uk): 1.1.6<br />

Avrichir, Ilan; ESPM/SP, Brazil (iavrichir@espm.br): 1.1.11<br />

Aykol, Bilge; Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey (bilge.aykol@deu.edu.tr): 1.1.7<br />

B<br />

Baack, Daniel; University <strong>of</strong> Denver, USA (daniel.baack@du.edu): 2.2.11<br />

Bader, Benjamin; University <strong>of</strong> Hamburg, Germany (benjamin.bader@uni-hamburg.de): 3.4.13<br />

Baek, Youngmi; Sogang University, Korea, South (youngmibaek@hotmail.com): 3.4.9<br />

Baggs, Jen; University <strong>of</strong> Victoria, Canada (jenbaggs@uvic.ca): 2.4.7, 3.1.8<br />

Baik, Youjin; Yonsei University, Korea, South (youjin.baik@gmail.com): 1.1.15<br />

Bailey, Nicholas James; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (nicholas.bailey@grad.moore.sc.edu): 3.2.14<br />

Balakrishnan, Melodena Stephens; University <strong>of</strong> Wollongong in Dubai, United Arab Emirates<br />

(melodenabalakrishnan@uowdubai.ac.ae): 3.4.11<br />

Ballantyne, David; University <strong>of</strong> Otago, New Zealand (david.ballantyne@otago.ac.nz): 2.3.14<br />

Banai, Moshe; City University <strong>of</strong> New York, USA (moshe.banai@baruch.cuny.edu): 3.1.7<br />

Banalieva, Elitsa R.; Northeastern University, USA (e.banalieva@neu.edu): 2.1.P, 2.4.3, 3.1.6<br />

Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo; Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil (rodrigo.bandeira.demello@fgv.br): 1.4.8, 2.1.9<br />

Banerjee, Preeta; Brandeis University, USA (banerjee@brandeis.edu): 2.3.2<br />

Banuelos, Nidia; University <strong>of</strong> Chicago, USA (nbanuelos@uchicago.edu): 3.4.11<br />

Bao, Shuji; Old Dominion University, USA (sbao@odu.edu): 2.1.8<br />

Barakat, Livia Lopes; Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil (liviabarakat@fdc.org.br): 1.1.12, 1.5.13, 3.3.15<br />

Barasch, Alix; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (alix.barasch@gmail.com): 2.1.13<br />

Barbosa Sousa, Paulo Francisco; Universidade Federal do Ceara, Brazil (paulo@acep.org.br): 2.1.11<br />

Barnard, Helena; GIBS, University <strong>of</strong> Pretoria, South Africa (barnardh@gibs.co.za): 2.2.13<br />

Barnett, Michael; University <strong>of</strong> Oxford, United Kingdom (michael.barnett@sbs.ox.ac.uk): 3.4.10<br />

Barros, Lucas Ayres; University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, Brazil (lucasayres2002@gmail.com): 3.1.8<br />

Basuil, Dynah A.; Asian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, Philippines (dbasuil@aim.edu): 2.2.11<br />

Batsakis, Georgios; Brunel University, United Kingdom (georgios.batsakis@brunel.ac.uk): 3.1.4<br />

Baum, Matthias ; University <strong>of</strong> Giessen, Germany (matthias.baum@wirtschaft.uni-giessen.de): 2.4.11<br />

Baumueller, Josef; University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria (josef.baumueller@univie.ac.at): 2.3.5<br />

Bausch, Andreas; Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (andreas.bausch@wirtschaft.uni-giessen.de): 2.1.14<br />

Bayraktar, Erkan; Bahcesehir University, Turkey (erkan.bayraktar@bahcesehir.edu.tr): 2.1.15<br />

Bayyurt, Nizamettin; Fatih University, Turkey (bayyurt@fatih.edu.tr): 3.2.15<br />

Bazuchi, Karina Regina Vieira; Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP, Brazil (kari_bazuchi@yahoo.com.br): 1.4.8<br />

Beamish, Paul W.; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (pbeamish@ivey.uwo.ca): 0.1, 2.2.14<br />

Beaulieu, Eugene; University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada (beaulieu@ucalgary.ca): 3.1.8<br />

Bebenroth, Ralf; Kobe University, Japan (rbeben@rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp): 3.1.15, 3.3.12<br />

Beechler, Schon; INSEAD, USA (schon.beechler@gmail.com): 2.2.2, 2.3.9<br />

Belderbos, Rene; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (rene.belderbos@econ.kuleuven.be): 3.1.4<br />

Beldona, Sri; University <strong>of</strong> Dallas, USA (sbeldona@udallas.edu): 2.4.12<br />

Belenzon, Sharon; Duke University, USA (sb135@duke.edu): 2.4.14<br />

Beleska-Spasova, Elena; University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom (e.beleska-spasova@henley.reading.ac.uk): 1.1.6<br />

Ben Letaifa, Soumaya; Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada (soumayabenletaifa@gmail.com): 3.4.2<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 268


Bendickson, Josh; Louisiana State University, USA (jbendi2@lsu.edu): 1.3.10<br />

Beneki, Christina; Technological Educational Institute <strong>of</strong> Ionian Islands, Greece (christinabeneki@gmail.com): 2.1.14<br />

Benischke, Mirko H.; University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, New Zealand (m.benischke@auckland.ac.nz): 1.3.4<br />

Benito-Osorio, Diana; Rey Juan Carlos University, Spain (diana.benito@urjc.es): 1.5.5<br />

Ben-Menahem, Shiko; Erasmus University, Netherlands (sben-menahem@rsm.nl): 3.1.12<br />

Bensaou, Ben; INSEAD, France (ben.bensaou@insead.edu): 1.4.7<br />

Berg, Nicola; University <strong>of</strong> Hamburg, Germany (nicola.berg@uni-hamburg.de): 3.4.13<br />

Berry, Heather K; George Washington University, USA (berryh@gwu.edu): 2.1.4, 2.3.1, 3.4.5<br />

Bertrand, Olivier; SKEMA Business School, France (olivier.bertrand@skema.edu): 1.4.5, 2.1.6, 2.4.5<br />

Bertsch, Andy; Minot State University, USA (andy.bertsch@minotstateu.edu): 2.4.13<br />

Betschinger, Marie-Ann; Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Russia (mbetschinger@hse.ru): 1.4.5, 2.4.5<br />

Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd; University <strong>of</strong> Groningen, Netherlands (s.beugelsdijk@rug.nl): 3.1.3<br />

Bhagavatula, Suresh; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore, India (suresh.bhagavatula@iimb.ernet.in): 2.1.9<br />

Bharati, Pratyush; University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston, USA (pratyush.bharati@umb.edu): 2.1.12<br />

Bhatia, Romi; USAID, USA: 2.3.2<br />

Binder, Gregor; WU Vienna, Austria (gregor.binder@wu.ac.at): 2.1.14<br />

Bird, Allan; Northeastern University, USA (a.bird@neu.edu): 1.4.10, 2.2.2, 2.4.13, 3.1.7<br />

Birkinshaw, Julian; London Business School, United Kingdom (jbrikinshaw@london.edu): 1.2.P, 3.1.1<br />

Blanc-Brude, Fredéric ; EDHEC Risk Institute, Singapore: 1.1.3<br />

Blomkvist, Katarina; Uppsala University, Sweden (katarina.blomkvist@fek.uu.se): 2.1.4, 2.3.7<br />

Boddewyn, Jean; Baruch College, CUNY, USA (jean.boddewyn@baruch.cuny.edu): 1.1.4, 2.3.P<br />

Bode, Alexander; Darmstadt University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Germany (bode@bwl.tu-darmstadt.de): 3.1.10<br />

Boechat, Cláudio; Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil (boechat@fdc.org.br): 1.3.15<br />

Boeh, Kevin K.; Pacific Lutheran University, USA (boehkk@plu.edu): 2.2.14<br />

Boehe, Dirk Michael; Insper Institute <strong>of</strong> Education and Research, Brazil (dirkmb@insper.edu.br): 3.2.13, 3.3.12, 3.4.14<br />

Boehler, Dominik; Karlsruhe Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Germany (dominik-boehler@web.de): 1.5.7<br />

Bogaard, Hein; George Washington University, USA (hbogaard@gwu.edu): 2.3.12, 3.3.8<br />

Boggs, David; Eastern Illinois University, USA (djboggs@eiu.edu): 3.4.13<br />

Boos, Madeleine; Trier University, Germany (boos2101@uni-trier.de): 1.1.6<br />

Borda, Armando; Universidad ESAN/ Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (abord001@fiu.edu): 1.3.3, 3.4.12<br />

Borozan, Anci ; Eastern Illinois University, USA (aborozan@eiu.edu): 3.4.13<br />

Bort, Suleika; University <strong>of</strong> Mannheim, Germany (sbort@rumms.uni-mannheim.de): 1.1.9<br />

Boso, Nathaniel ; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (n.boso@leeds.ac.uk): 3.3.4<br />

Bouncken, Ricarda B.; University <strong>of</strong> Bayreuth, Germany (bouncken@uni-bayreuth.de): 2.1.8<br />

Bouvain, Petra; University <strong>of</strong> Canberra, Australia (petra.bouvain@canberra.edu.au): 2.3.15<br />

Bowen, J.D.; Saint Louis University, USA (jbowen5@slu.edu): 3.2.15<br />

Boyacigiller, Nakiye; Sabancı University, Turkey (nakiye@sabanciuniv.edu): 2.2.1<br />

Bozos, Konstantinos; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (k.bozos@lubs.leeds.ac.uk): 3.1.11<br />

Brandl, Kristin Martina; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (kbr.int@cbs.dk): 3.1.12<br />

Brannen, Mary Yoko; INSEAD, France (mary-yoko.brannen@insead.edu): 0.1, 2.1.10, 2.3.9, 2.4.2<br />

Brenner, Barbara ; WU Wien , Austria (barbara.brenner@wu.ac.at): 1.5.11<br />

Breuer, Wolfgang ; RWTH Aachen University, Germany (wolfgang.breuer@bfw.rwth-aachen.de): 3.1.15, 3.4.7<br />

Brewer, Paul; University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Australia (p.brewer@business.uq.edu.au): 1.5.6, 1.5.13, 2.1.5<br />

Brickman, Aaron; SelectUSA, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, USA (aaron.brickman@trade.gov): 2.1.1<br />

Britton, Patricia Ann; St. Mary's University, USA (pbritton1@stmarytx.edu): 1.3.10<br />

Brock, David M. ; Ben-Gurion University, Israel (dmb@som.bgu.ac.il): 1.5.6<br />

Broering, Laurent ; Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP, Brazil (laurent.broering@gmail.com): 1.4.8<br />

Brouthers, Keith D.; North Carolina State University, USA (keith_brouthers@ncsu.edu): 1.3.9, 3.2.P, 3.4.11<br />

Brouthers, Lance Eliot; Kennesaw State University, USA (lbrouthe@kennesaw.edu): 3.4.11<br />

Bruder, Torben ; University <strong>of</strong> Bayreuth, Germany (torben.bruder@uni-bayreuth.de): 2.1.8<br />

Bruneel, Johan; Imperial College, United Kingdom (j.bruneel@imperial.ac.uk): 1.1.6<br />

Bryant, Chuck; Cleveland State University, USA (c.e.bryant@csuohio.edu): 1.4.15<br />

Bryla , Pawel ; University <strong>of</strong> Lodz, Poland (pbryla@uni.lodz.pl): 2.2.10<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 269


Buchan, Nancy R.; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (nancy.buchan@moore.sc.edu): 3.1.13<br />

Buchanan, John; University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, United Kingdom: 2.4.14<br />

Buckley, Peter ; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (p.j.buckley@lubs.leeds.ac.uk): 1.3.1, 1.4.4, 3.1.1, 3.2.11<br />

Budde-Sung, Amanda E.K.; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (a.budde@econ.usyd.edu.au): 3.2.12<br />

Bullough, Amanda ; Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management, USA (amanda.bullough@thunderbird.edu): 2.2.1<br />

Butt, Arif ; Lahore University <strong>of</strong> Management Sciences, Pakistan (arifb@lums.edu.pk): 1.5.6<br />

C<br />

Cabral, Sandro; Universidade Federal da Bahia, USA (scabral@ufba.br): 1.4.P<br />

Cadogan, John W.; Loughborough University, United Kingdom (j.w.cadogan@lboro.ac.uk): 3.3.4<br />

Calegario, Cristina Lelis Leal; Federal University <strong>of</strong> Lavras, Brazil (ccalegario@dae.ufla.br): 3.1.3<br />

Calhoun, Mikelle A.; Georgia Southern University, USA (pr<strong>of</strong>.calhoun@gmail.com): 1.4.7, 3.2.12<br />

Caligiuri, Paula; Rutgers University, USA (caligiuri@smlr.rutgers.edu): 0.1<br />

Campa, Jose Manuel; IESE, Spain (jcampa@iese.edu): 1.4.5<br />

Canabal, Anne; University <strong>of</strong> Maine, USA (anne.canabal@maine.edu): 3.1.9<br />

Canela, Miguel; IESE Business School, Spain (canela.miguel@gmail.com): 3.4.11<br />

Caniato, Federico ; Politecnico di Milano, Italy (federico.caniato@polimi.it): 1.5.4<br />

Cannizzaro, Anthony Paul; George Washington University, USA (tony_c@gwmail.gwu.edu): 2.3.5<br />

Cantwell, John; Rutgers University, USA (cantwell@business.rutgers.edu): 0.3, 1.3.6, 3.2.P<br />

Caprar, Dan V. ; University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (dan.caprar@unsw.edu.au): 2.2.10<br />

Carney, Michael; Concordia University, Canada (mcarney@jmsb.concordia.ca): 3.1.2<br />

Carnovale, Steven; Rutgers University, USA (scarnova@pegasus.rutgers.edu): 2.3.14<br />

Carr, Chris ; University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, United Kingdom (chris.carr@ed.ac.uk): 3.1.11<br />

Casado, Tania ; University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, Brazil (tcasado@usp.br): 1.5.6<br />

Castellani, Davide; University <strong>of</strong> Perugia, Italy (davide.castellani@unipg.it): 1.1.3, 3.4.9<br />

Castro, Francisco B. ; CEMPRE-Universidade do Porto, Portugal (fcastro@fep.up.pt): 1.5.6<br />

Cavusgil, Tamer; Georgia State University, USA (cavusgil@gsu.edu): 3.1.5<br />

Celly, Nikhil ; University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (ncelly@hku.hk): 1.5.12, 3.2.11<br />

Celo, Sokol; Suffolk University, USA (scelo@suffolk.edu): 3.1.6<br />

Celorico, Jacinto Antunes; ISEG, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Lisbon, Russia (jacintojac@gmail.com): 2.4.11<br />

Cerdin, Jean-Luc; ESSEC Business School, France (cerdin@essec.fr): 3.3.8<br />

Chacar, Aya; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (chacara@fiu.edu): 1.4.8, 3.1.6, 3.4.13<br />

Chai, Dominic; Seoul National University, Korea, South (dchai@snu.ac.kr): 2.4.14<br />

Chai, Kah Hin; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (iseckh@nus.edu.sg): 1.3.6<br />

Chakraborty, Subhajit; University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American, USA (schakraborty1@utpa.edu): 3.3.8<br />

Chan, Sow Hup; University <strong>of</strong> Macau, Macau (joannec@umac.mo): 3.4.1<br />

Chand, Masud; Wichita State University, USA (masud.chand@wichita.edu): 1.5.13, 3.4.1<br />

Chang, Sea-Jin; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (schang@nus.edu.sg): 2.2.9<br />

Chang, Steven; Long Island University, USA (steven.chang@liu.edu): 2.2.4<br />

Chang, Yi-Chieh; St. John's University, Taiwan (lucas@mail.sju.edu.tw): 2.2.11<br />

Chansarkar, Bal; Middlesex University, United Kingdom (bal_chansarkar@yahoo.co.uk): 3.3.11<br />

Chao, Mike Chen-ho; Baruch College, CUNY, USA (chen-ho.chao@baruch.cuny.edu): 2.3.4<br />

Chari, Murali; Lally School <strong>of</strong> Management & Technology, USA (charim2@rpi.edu): 3.3.14<br />

Chatterjee, Suparna ; Xavier University , USA (chatterjees@xavier.edu): 1.3.15<br />

Chavan, Meena; Macquarie University, Australia (meena.chavan@mq.edu.au): 1.1.13<br />

Chavarria, Juan Angel; University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American, USA (jachavarria@utpa.edu): 1.1.13<br />

Chelliah, Shankar ; Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia (shankar@usm.my): 3.2.12<br />

Chen, Alex Xin; University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (alexchen@hku.hk): 2.3.13<br />

Chen, Dong; Loyola Marymount University, USA (dchen@lmu.edu): 2.2.7<br />

Chen, Huei-Fang; Soochow University, Taiwan (hfchen@scu.edu.tw): 2.2.14<br />

Chen, Jennifer H.; Nanhua University, Taiwan (chen.huiru@gmail.com): 1.3.13<br />

Chen, Pi-Chi; Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom (pi-chi.chen@bbk.ac.uk): 1.1.8, 1.5.11<br />

Chen, Shih-Fen S.; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (sfchen@ivey.uwo.ca): 2.3.6<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 270


Chen, Shouming; Tongji University , China (schen@tongji.edu.cn): 2.1.11<br />

Chen, Stephen; University <strong>of</strong> Newcastle, Australia (stephen.chen@newcastle.edu.au): 2.3.15<br />

Chen, Victor Zitian; University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina; Columbia University, USA (emgp.editor@gmail.com): 1.4.8, 2.3.7,<br />

3.4.3<br />

Chen, Wan-Ching ; Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan (paospaos@gmail.com): 2.2.14, 2.4.10<br />

Chen, Wenjie; George Washington University, USA (chenw@gwu.edu): 1.4.5, 2.2.6, 2.3.12<br />

Chen, Ying-Yu (Kerri); National Taiwan University, Taiwan (ying1116@hotmail.com): 3.3.14<br />

Cheng, Keng-Hsiang; National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan (kenghsiang.c@gmail.com): 3.3.6<br />

Cheng, Kuei-Yang; National Taiwan University, Taiwan (d94724015@ntu.edu.tw): 3.4.14<br />

Chetty, Sylvie; Massey University, New Zealand (s.chetty@massey.ac.nz): 2.1.10, 3.3.5<br />

Cheung , Yan-Leung ; Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (scheung@hkbu.edu.hk): 1.3.7<br />

Chia, Ho-Beng ; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (bizchb@nus.edu.sg): 1.5.6<br />

Chiao, Yu-Ching; National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan (chiaoy@dragon.nchu.edu.tw): 3.3.6<br />

Chikhouni , Abdulrahman ; Concordia University, Canada (a_chikho@jmsb.concordia.ca): 3.4.2<br />

Child, John ; University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham, United Kingdom (j.child@bham.ac.uk): 1.3.5, 2.3.11<br />

Chim, Chi Hin; Haas Business School, USA (chihinchim@gmail.com): 2.1.13<br />

Chintakananda, Asda; Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (asda@ntu.edu.sg): 3.1.15<br />

Chintu, Namukale M.; University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, United Kingdom (nc350@cam.ac.uk): 3.4.12<br />

Chiu, Chih-Chieh ; Rider University, USA (cchiu@rider.edu): 1.3.12<br />

Chiu, Chih-Fang; National Taiwan University, Taiwan (juju0802@gmail.com): 2.2.11<br />

Chizema, Amon ; Loughborough University, United Kingdom (a.chizema@lboro.ac.uk): 3.1.9<br />

Cho, Hyejin; Korea University, Korea, South (hyejinstory@korea.ac.kr): 2.2.12<br />

Cho, Youngsam; Korea University, Korea, South (zegal82@korea.ac.kr): 3.1.13<br />

Choi, Gunae; Rutgers University, USA (choigunae@hotmail.com): 2.3.15, 3.1.8<br />

Choi, Jeongho; Rutgers University, USA (jhochoi@pegasus.rutgers.edu): 3.2.14<br />

Choi, Jongmoo Jay ; Temple University, USA (jjchoi@temple.edu): 2.4.5, 3.1.12<br />

Choi, Seong-jin; Peking University, China (neostar018@gmail.com): 2.1.15<br />

Chong, Byung-uk; Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea, Korea, South (chongb@ewha.ac.kr): 2.3.12<br />

Choudhury, Prithwiraj; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (prithw@wharton.upenn.edu): 2.3.2, 3.4.5<br />

Christmann, Petra; Rutgers University, USA (christmann@business.rutgers.edu): 0.3<br />

Chrysostome, Elie Virgile; State University <strong>of</strong> New York - Plattsburgh, USA (elie.chrysostome@plattsburgh.edu):<br />

1.4.11<br />

Chun, Douglas; University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa, USA (chundoug@hawaii.edu): 3.1.10<br />

Chung, HsienJui; National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan (hjchung@ccu.edu.tw): 3.2.14<br />

Chung, Jaiho; Korea University, Korea, South (jhochung@korea.ac.kr): 2.2.9<br />

Clampit, Jack Alan; University <strong>of</strong> Memphis, USA (jclampit@memphis.edu): 2.4.5<br />

Clark, Kim J.; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at San Antonio, USA (kim.clark@utsa.edu): 3.2.15<br />

Clarke, Linda D.; University <strong>of</strong> Florida, USA (clarkel@ufl.edu): 3.3.11<br />

Clarke, Thomas; University <strong>of</strong> Technology Sydney, Australia (thomas.clarke@uts.edu.au): 1.1.1<br />

Clarry, John W; Rutgers University, USA (jc1418@andromeda.rutgers.edu): 1.3.13, 3.3.13<br />

Clegg, Jeremy ; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds , United Kingdom (l.j.clegg@lubs.leeds.ac.uk): 1.1.14, 2.1.1, 2.3.1, 3.4.6<br />

Clougherty, Joseph; University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and CEPR-London, USA (jaclough@illinois.edu):<br />

1.4.5, 2.4.6, 3.1.6, 3.3.12<br />

Cobas-Flores, Elisa; Egade Business School, Mexico (ecobas@itesm.mx): 1.1.11<br />

Coble, Kyle D.; Saint Louis University, USA (kcoble@slu.edu): 1.1.13<br />

Cohen, David G.; University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, USA (dcohen@som.umass.edu): 1.3.8<br />

Collings, David; National University <strong>of</strong> Ireland, Galway, Ireland (david.collings@nuigalway.ie): 2.2.14<br />

Collinson, Simon C.; Reading University, United Kingdom (s.collinson@reading.ac.uk): 1.3.13, 1.5.1, 2.1.14<br />

Colman, Helene Loe; Norwegian Business School, Norway (helene.l.colman@bi.no): 2.4.8<br />

Conti, Claudio Ramos; EBAPE- Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil (claudio_conti@hotmail.com): 1.5.12<br />

Contractor, Farok J.; Rutgers University, USA (farok@andromeda.rutgers.edu): 1.5.14<br />

Cook, Jonathan; Gordon Institute <strong>of</strong> Business Science, South Africa (cookj@gibs.co.za): 2.1.2<br />

Cookson, Graham; King's College London, United Kingdom (graham.cookson@kcl.ac.uk): 1.1.3<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 271


Corredor , Sandra ; University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (corredo2@illinois.edu): 1.4.13<br />

Cosset, Jean-Claude; HEC Montreal, Canada (jean-claude.cosset@hec.ca): 1.1.4, 2.2.12<br />

Cowden, Birton; Saint Louis University, USA (bcowden@slu.edu): 1.4.14, 3.3.13<br />

Craig, Justin B.; Bond University , Australia (jcraig@bond.edu.au): 3.3.5<br />

Crespi-Cladera, Rafel ; Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain (rafel.crespi@uib.es): 1.1.1, 1.3.3<br />

Cretoiu, Sherban Leonardo; Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil (sherban@fdc.org.br): 1.1.12, 3.3.15<br />

Cross, Adam R. ; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (arc@lubs.leeds.ac.uk): 1.1.10<br />

Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro; Northeastern University, USA (a.cuervocazurra@neu.edu): 0.1, 1.1.10, 1.3.3, 1.4.13, 2.1.P,<br />

2.2.6<br />

Cui, Lin; Australian National University, Australia (lin.cui@anu.edu.au): 1.1.5, 2.3.7, 2.4.4, 3.1.15<br />

Cumming, Douglas; York University, Canada (douglas.cumming@gmail.com): 1.5.7, 3.1.8<br />

Cummings, Michael; University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, USA (cummings@umn.edu): 3.4.10<br />

Curran, Louise; Toulouse Business School, France (l.curran@esc-toulouse.fr): 3.1.10<br />

Cuypers, Ilya; Singapore Management University, Singapore (ilyacuypers@smu.edu.sg): 1.4.7<br />

Czinkota, Michael R.; Georgetown University, USA (czinkotm@georgetown.edu): 1.5.2, 2.1.3<br />

D<br />

Dabic, Marina ; University <strong>of</strong> Zagreb, Croatia (mdabic@efzg.hr): 1.5.6<br />

D'Agostino, Lorena M.; University <strong>of</strong> Catania, Italy (ldagosti@unict.it): 1.5.4<br />

Dai, Li ; Loyola Marymount University, USA (li.dai@lmu.edu): 1.4.9, 1.5.P<br />

Dalbem, Mayara Ximenes; Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil (mayara.dalbem@fdc.org.br): 1.1.12<br />

Dale, Colin; Reading University, United Kingdom (colin_dale@hotmail.com): 2.1.14<br />

Dalgic, Tevfik ; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA (tdalgic@utdallas.edu): 1.5.6<br />

Dania, Akash; Alcorn State University, USA (adania@alcorn.edu): 1.3.12<br />

Daniels, John; University <strong>of</strong> Miami, USA (daniels@miami.edu): 0.1<br />

Danis, Wade ; University <strong>of</strong> Victoria, Canada (wdanis@uvic.ca): 1.5.6<br />

Das, Amit; Qatar University, Qatar (amit.das@qu.edu.qa): 2.1.7<br />

Das, Shobha; Qatar University, Qatar (shobha.das@qu.edu.qa): 2.1.7<br />

Dasgupta, Nandita; UMBC, USA (nandita@umbc.edu): 2.4.15<br />

Datta, Deepak K; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Arlington, USA (ddatta@uta.edu): 2.2.11<br />

Dau, Luis Alfonso; Northeastern University, USA (l.dau@neu.edu): 1.1.10, 1.5.12<br />

De Beule, Filip; KU Leuven, Belgium (filip.debeule@lessius.eu): 3.2.11, 3.4.3<br />

de la Garza Carranza, María Teresa; Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya, Mexico (teresa.garza@itcelaya.edu.mx): 1.5.6<br />

de la Torre, Jose; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (jose.delatorre@fiu.edu): 1.2.P, 3.3.14<br />

Deakin, Simon; University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, United Kingdom: 2.4.14<br />

Dejoux, Cecile; CNAM Paris, France (dejoux.cecile@gmail.com): 3.4.13<br />

Delgado, Mercedes; Temple University, USA (mdelgado@temple.edu): 3.1.6<br />

Delios, Andrew ; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (andrew@nus.edu.sg): 2.3.5, 2.4.4, 3.1.14<br />

Dellestrand, Henrik; Uppsala University, Sweden (henrik.dellestrand@fek.uu.se): 1.5.5<br />

Demirbag, Mehmet; University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, United Kingdom (m.demirbag@sheffield.ac.uk): 1.1.13, 2.1.15, 3.2.15<br />

Demirel, Pelin ; Nottingham University Business School, United Kingdom (pelin.demirel@nottingham.ac.uk): 2.4.7<br />

Deng, Ziliang; Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China, China (ziliang.deng@ruc.edu.cn): 2.3.13, 3.3.13<br />

Devinney, Timothy M.; University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sydney, Australia (timothy.devinney@gmail.com): 2.1.3, 2.4.P, 3.3.4<br />

Dewit, Gerda; NUI Maynooth, Ireland (gerda.dewit@nuim.ie): 3.3.12<br />

Dhanaraj, Charles; Indiana University, USA (dhanaraj@iupui.edu): 0.2, 2.1.4, 2.2.3, 2.4.3, 3.1.1<br />

Diaz-Pichardo, Rene; IPN-CIIDIR Unidad Oaxaca, Mexico (renediazp@hotmail.com): 1.1.11<br />

Dickmann, Michael ; Cranfield University, United Kingdom (m.dickmann@cranfield.ac.uk): 3.3.8<br />

Dilyard, John Raymond; St. Francis College, USA (jdilyard@gmail.com): 1.3.15, 3.4.1<br />

Dimitratos, Pavlos; University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow, United Kingdom (pavlos.dimitratos@glasgow.ac.uk): 3.4.11<br />

Dimitriadi, Nikolay; Rostov State Economic University, Russia (ndimitriadi@yandex.ru): 3.3.8<br />

Ding, Daniel; City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (mkding@cityu.edu.hk): 2.1.11<br />

Ding, Zhujun; Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (zhujun@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk): 2.4.15<br />

Dittfeld, Marcus; IHI-Zittau, Germany (dittfeld@ihi-zittau.de): 3.4.14<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 272


Dlabay, Les; Lake Forest College, USA (dlabay@lakeforest.edu): 2.1.7<br />

Doh, Jonathan P.; Villanova University, USA (jonathan.doh@villanova.edu): 1.3.4, 1.5.1, 2.3.3, 2.4.1, 3.3.1<br />

Dole, Claudia Patricia; University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American, USA (cpdole@utpa.edu): 1.1.13<br />

Dorobantu, Sinziana; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (sdor@wharton.upenn.edu): 1.3.7<br />

dos Santos, Antonio Carlos; Federal University <strong>of</strong> Lavras, Brazil (acsantos@dae.ufla.br): 2.3.14<br />

Douglas Fernandez, W.G.; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (wdoug002@fiu.edu): 2.1.6<br />

Dow, Douglas; University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne, Australia (d.dow@mbs.edu): 2.2.11, 3.4.3<br />

Doz, Yves; Insead, USA (Yves.DOZ@insead.edu): 2.2.6<br />

Draheim, Sandra; William Davidson Institute at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, USA (draheims@umich.edu): 2.3.10<br />

Driffield, Nigel; Aston University, United Kingdom (n.l.driffield@aston.ac.uk): 1.3.7<br />

Drogendijk, Rian ; Uppsala University, Sweden (rian.drogendijk@fek.uu.se): 2.3.7<br />

Drummond Abdala, Virginia; Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil (virginia.abdala@fdc.org.br): 1.5.13<br />

Du, Juana; Poly-technic Institute <strong>of</strong> New York University, USA (xunniedu@gmail.com): 1.1.14<br />

Du , Yunzhou ; Anhui University <strong>of</strong> Finance & Economics, China (duyunzhou_2000@sina.com): 2.1.13, 2.2.11<br />

Duanmu, Jing-Lin ; University <strong>of</strong> Surrey , United Kingdom (j.duanmu@surrey.ac.uk): 1.5.9<br />

Dubiel, Anna; WHU, Germany (anna.dubiel@whu.edu): 1.5.4, 2.2.13<br />

DuBois, Frank Latta; American University, USA (jetfrank@yahoo.com): 1.3.11<br />

Dunlap, Denise; Northeastern University, USA (d.dunlap@neu.edu): 1.1.9, 2.2.5, 3.3.3<br />

Durmus, Beril; Marmara University , Turkey: 2.4.10<br />

Durnev, Artyom; University <strong>of</strong> Iowa, USA (artem-durnev@uiowa.edu): 2.2.12<br />

Dussauge, Pierre; HEC Paris, France (dussauge@hec.fr): 1.4.8<br />

E<br />

Eapen, Alex; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (alex.eapen@sydney.edu.au): 1.4.12<br />

Eberhard, Manuel; Bond University, Australia (meberhar@bond.edu.au): 3.3.5<br />

Eckert, Stefan; <strong>International</strong> Graduate School Zittau, Germany (eckert@ihi-zittau.de): 3.4.14<br />

Efrat, Kalanit; Ruppin Academic Center, Israel (kalanite@ruppin.ac.il): 2.2.13<br />

Egelh<strong>of</strong>f, William G.; Fordham University, USA (egelh<strong>of</strong>f@fordham.edu): 1.4.14<br />

Eghbali-Zarch, Majid; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (meghbali-zarch.phd@ivey.ca): 2.2.13, 2.3.13<br />

Egri, Carolyn P. ; Simon Fraser University, Canada (egri@sfu.ca): 1.1.7, 1.5.6<br />

Eiadat, Yousef; University College Dublin, USA (yousef.husein@ucd.ie): 3.3.15<br />

Eisenbeis, Michael; Scuderi Group, USA (michael@scuderigroup.com): 1.1.2<br />

Elahee, Mohammad Niamat; Quinnipiac University, USA (mohammad.elahee@quinnipiac.edu): 3.1.13, 3.3.11<br />

Elango, B.; Illinois State University, USA (elango@ilstu.edu): 2.2.6, 2.4.7<br />

Elaydi, Raed; Roosevelt University, USA (relaydi@roosevelt.edu): 1.3.15, 2.1.15<br />

Elia, Stefano; Politecnico di Milano, Italy (stefano.elia@polimi.it): 1.5.4, 2.1.6<br />

Elston, Julie; Oregon State University, USA (julie.elston@osucascades.edu): 1.4.15, 2.1.11<br />

Enderwick, Peter ; Auckland Technical university, New Zealand (peter.enderwick@aut.ac.nz): 3.2.11<br />

Engle, Robert Louis; Quinnipiac University, USA (robert.engle@quinnipiac.edu): 3.3.8<br />

Eriksson, Kent; Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sweden (kent.eriksson@abe.kth.se): 3.1.14<br />

Ertug, Gokhan; Singapore Management University, Singapore (gokhanertug@smu.edu.sg): 1.4.7<br />

Evers, Natasha; NUI Galway, Ireland (natasha.evers@nuigalway.ie): 3.3.9<br />

F<br />

Fan, Di; Victoria University, Australia (di.fan@vu.edu.au): 1.5.8, 3.1.3<br />

Fang, Yongqing ; University <strong>of</strong> Canberra, Australia (yongqing.fang@canberra.edu.au): 1.5.6<br />

Farashahi, Mehdi ; Concordia University, Canada (mfarashahi@jmsb.concordia.ca): 3.4.2<br />

Farooq, Omer; Euromed Management-Marseille, France (muhammadomer.farooq@euromed-management.com):<br />

1.4.15<br />

Fastoso, Fernando; Bradford University , United Kingdom (f.fastoso@bradford.ac.uk): 1.5.3<br />

Fatehi, Kamal; Kennesaw State University, USA (kfatehi@kennesaw.edu): 1.5.13<br />

Fee, Anthony; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (anthony.fee@sydney.edu.au): 3.2.12, 3.4.13<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 273


Feils, Dorothee; University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Canada (dfeils@ualberta.ca): 1.1.15, 2.3.15<br />

Feinberg, Susan; Temple University, USA: 0.5, 2.1.1<br />

Fernanda Arreola, Maria; Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP, Brazil (fernanda.arreola@gmail.com): 1.4.8<br />

Figueira de Lemos, Francisco; Uppsala University, Sweden (francisco.lemos@fek.uu.se): 3.1.14<br />

Filatotchev, Igor ; WU Vienna, Austria (igor.filatotchev@wu.ac.at): 1.3.4, 1.3.9<br />

Filippaios, Fragkiskos; University <strong>of</strong> Kent , United Kingdom (f.filippaios@kent.ac.uk): 1.4.15, 2.1.8, 3.2.14<br />

Filonovich, Sergei; National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Russia (sfilon@dol.ru): 2.1.2<br />

Finn, Adam; University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Canada (adam.finn@ualberta.ca): 3.1.12<br />

Fitzsimmons, Stacey; Western Michigan University, USA (stacey.fitzsimmons@wmich.edu): 2.3.9, 2.4.2<br />

Fjeldstad, Oystein ; Norwegian Business School, Norway (oystein.fjeldstad@bi.no): 3.1.14<br />

Fladmoe-Lindquist, Karin; University <strong>of</strong> Utah, USA (karin.lindquist@business.utah.edu): 2.1.15, 2.3.11<br />

Fleury, Afonso Carlos Correa; University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, Brazil (acfleury@usp.br): 1.1.12, 2.1.9<br />

Fleury, Maria Tereza ; Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil (mtereza.fleury@fgv.br): 1.1.12, 2.1.9<br />

Floh, Arne; WU Vienna, Austria (arne.floh@wu.ac.at): 3.4.11<br />

Flores, Ricardo Gabriel; University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (r.flores@unsw.edu.au): 1.3.8, 2.4.3<br />

Floriani, Dinora Eliete; University <strong>of</strong> Vale do Itajaí, Brazil (dinora@univali.br): 2.1.9<br />

Flotow, Paschen; Sustainable Business Institute, Germany (flotow@instoec.de): 1.3.15<br />

Foley, Maggie; Jacksonville University, USA (mfoley3@ju.edu): 2.2.12<br />

Fong, Cher-Min; National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan (cmfong@bm.nsysu.edu.tw): 2.1.13, 2.2.11<br />

Forgues, Bernard ; EMLYON Business School, France (forgues@em-lyon.com): 1.5.14<br />

Forsans, Nicolas; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (nf@lubs.leeds.ac.uk): 3.2.11<br />

Fort, Tim; George Washington University, USA (timfort@gwu.edu): 1.4.9<br />

Forte, Rosa Portela; University <strong>of</strong> Porto, Portugal (rforte@fep.up.pt): 3.1.14<br />

Forti, Cristiano; Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil (crforti@gmail.com): 2.3.12<br />

Forza, Cipriano; University <strong>of</strong> Padova, Italy (cipriano.forza@unipd.it): 1.1.11<br />

Fotiadis, Thomas A.; University <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Greece (thomas.fotiadis@yahoo.gr): 1.1.7<br />

Franco, Chiara; University <strong>of</strong> Bologna, Italy (chiara.franco2@unibo.it): 3.4.9<br />

Frederick, Beadle; Nottingham University Business School, United Kingdom (beadlefred@gmail.com): 2.1.13<br />

Freeman, Susan; University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia (susan.freeman@adelaide.edu.au): 2.1.13, 3.3.14<br />

Freiling, Joerg; University <strong>of</strong> Bremen, Germany (freiling@uni-bremen.de): 1.4.11<br />

Friar, John; Northeastern University, USA (j.friar@neu.edu): 2.2.5<br />

Friebe, Christian; EBS Business School/ Sustainable Business Institute, Germany (christian.friebe@ebs-siie.de):<br />

1.3.15<br />

Friesen, Daniel; Wayne State University, USA (friesen@wayne.edu): 3.1.13<br />

Froese, Fabian Jintae; Korea University, Korea, South (fabian.froese@gmail.com): 1.1.13, 2.4.13, 3.1.13<br />

Frynas, George; Middlesex University, United Kingdom (g.frynas@mdx.ac.uk): 2.2.14<br />

Fu, Kun; Bocconi University, Italy (kun.fu.cn@gmail.com): 3.3.15<br />

Fu, Ping Ping ; Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (ppfu@cuhk.edu.hk): 1.5.6<br />

Fuchs, Manfred ; University <strong>of</strong> Graz, Austria (manfred.fuchs@uni-graz.at): 1.4.14<br />

Fung, Loretta; National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan (lorettafung17@gmail.com): 3.1.8<br />

Furrer, Olivier ; University <strong>of</strong> Nijmegen, Netherlands (o.furrer@fm.ru.nl): 1.5.6<br />

G<br />

Gaerber, Lisa Katarina ; Copenhagen Business School , Denmark (lg.smg@cbs.dk): 3.3.6<br />

Gaffney, Nolan; University <strong>of</strong> Memphis, USA (ntgffney@memphis.edu): 2.4.5<br />

Galkina, Tamara; Hanken School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland (tamara.galkina@hanken.fi): 3.3.5<br />

Gammelgaard, Jens; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (jg.int@cbs.dk): 3.4.14<br />

Ganotakis, Panagiotis; Leeds University, United Kingdom (p.ganotakis@leeds.ac.uk): 1.3.9, 3.4.9<br />

Gao, Gerald Yong; University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis, USA (gaogy@umsl.edu): 2.4.15<br />

Gao, Hongzhi; Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington, New Zealand (hongzhi.gao@vuw.ac.nz): 2.3.14<br />

Garcia, Roberto; Indiana University, USA (prgarcia@indiana.edu): 2.3.10, 3.3.10<br />

Garib, Geetha; UCL, United Kingdom (y.r.garib@uvt.nl): 2.2.10<br />

Gaur, Ajai; Rutgers University, USA (ajai@business.rutgers.edu): 1.1.1, 2.2.12, 3.1.3<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 274


Gerges Yammine, Rand; EMLYON Business School, France (gergesyammine@em-lyon.com): 2.3.11<br />

Geringer, Michael; Ohio University, USA (jmichaelgeringer@yahoo.com): 3.3.10<br />

Gerschewski, Stephan; Hankuk University <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies, Korea, South (stephange@hufs.ac.kr): 1.1.6<br />

Ghauri, Pervez N.; King's College London, United Kingdom (pervez.ghauri@kcl.ac.uk): 1.4.3, 2.1.10<br />

Ghemawat, Pankaj; IESE Business School, Spain (pghemawat@iese.edu): 2.2.P<br />

Ghorbani, Majid; Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China, China (majidghorbani@rbs.org.cn): 1.5.13<br />

Ghosh-Chowdhury, Tilottama ; Quinnipiac University, USA (tilottama.ghoshchowdhury@quinnipiac.edu): 3.3.11<br />

Giannoukou, Ioanna; University <strong>of</strong> Patras, Greece (igian@upatras.gr): 2.1.14<br />

Gibson, Cristina; University <strong>of</strong> Western Australia, Australia (cristina.gibson@uwa.edu.au): 2.2.10<br />

Gilbert, G. Ronald; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (ron.gilbertems@gmail.com): 1.5.13<br />

Gillespie, Kate; University <strong>of</strong> Texas, Austin, USA (kate.gillespie@mccombs.utexas.edu): 2.3.2<br />

Ginzberg, Michael J.; Kogod School <strong>of</strong> Business, American University, USA: 1.1.P<br />

Giroud, Axèle; University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom (axele.giroud@mbs.ac.uk): 1.1.8, 2.4.15<br />

Girson, Ilya ; University <strong>of</strong> Westminster, United Kingdom (girsoni@westminster.ac.uk): 1.5.6<br />

Glowik, Mario ; Karol Adamiecki University <strong>of</strong> Economics in Katowice, Poland (mario.glowik@ue.katowice.pl): 2.1.14<br />

Gnyawali, Devi R. ; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA (devi@vt.edu): 2.4.11<br />

Goedhuys, Micheline; Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Belgium<br />

(micheline.goedhuys@skynet.be): 1.5.9<br />

Goh, Roy Ee Jin; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (eejin.goh@nus.edu.sg): 1.4.15<br />

Gong, Yaping; Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology , China (mnygong@ust.hk): 3.1.5<br />

Gonzalez, Jorge; University <strong>of</strong> Texas - Pan American, USA (gonzalezja@utpa.edu): 3.3.8<br />

Goodell, John W. ; University <strong>of</strong> Akron, USA (johngoo@uakron.edu): 1.4.15, 2.1.15<br />

Gopinath, C.; Suffolk University, USA (cgopinath@suffolk.edu): 1.3.15<br />

Gorg, Holger; Kiel University, Germany (goerg@economics.uni-kiel.de): 3.3.12<br />

Gould, Stephen; Baruch College, CUNY, USA (stephen.gould@baruch.cuny.edu): 2.3.4<br />

Graham, Loren R.; Harvard University, USA (grahamloren@gmail.com): 1.4.13<br />

Grajek, Michal; ESMT European School <strong>of</strong> Management and Technology, Germany (grajek@esmt.org): 2.4.6<br />

Grein, Andreas; Baruch College, CUNY, USA (andreas.grein@baruch.cuny.edu): 2.3.4<br />

Gresser, Edward ; Senior Advisor, Alliance for Healthcare Competitiveness, USA (egresser@fontheim.com): 2.3.3<br />

Grimpe, Christoph; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (cg.ino@cbs.dk): 1.3.6, 2.2.13<br />

Grogaard, Birgitte; University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada (bgrogaar@ucalgary.ca): 1.1.8, 2.4.8<br />

Grosse, Christine; Thunderbird, USA (christine.grosse@thunderbird.edu): 1.4.2<br />

Grosse, Robert; George Mason University, USA (rgrosse@gmu.edu): 0.5, 1.1.P, 2.3.P, 2.4.14, 3.1.8<br />

Grosso, Laura; Kids Connection Haiti, USA: 1.3.2<br />

Groves, Kevin. S.; Pepperdine University, USA (kevin.groves@pepperdine.edu): 1.1.15<br />

Gruber, Verena; WU Vienna, Austria (verena.gruber@wu.ac.at): 2.1.3<br />

Gubbi, Sathyajit; University <strong>of</strong> Groningen , Netherlands (s.r.gubbi@rug.nl): 2.1.6<br />

Guermat, Cherif; University <strong>of</strong> the West <strong>of</strong> England, United Kingdom (cherif.guermat@uwe.ac.uk): 1.3.13<br />

Gugler, Klaus; Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business, Austria (klaus.gugler@wu.ac.at): 1.4.5<br />

Guillen, Mauro; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (guillen@wharton.upenn.edu): 3.2.14<br />

Gulsoy, Tanses; Beykent University, Turkey (tanses@hotmail.com): 3.3.11<br />

Günay, Gonca; Izmir University <strong>of</strong> Economics , Turkey: 2.4.10<br />

Güneri-Çangarlı, Burcu; Izmir University <strong>of</strong> Economics , Turkey: 2.4.10<br />

Guney, Yilmaz; University <strong>of</strong> Hull, United Kingdom (y.guney@hull.ac.uk): 1.5.9<br />

Gunn, Theresa ; Alfred University, USA (gunn@alfred.edu): 1.3.12<br />

Gunn, Trevor; Senior Director, <strong>International</strong> Relations, Medtronic, USA: 2.3.3<br />

Guo, Honglin ; Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China, China (honglin_guo@126.com): 2.3.13<br />

Gupta, Susan Forquer; Monmouth University, USA (sgupta@monmouth.edu): 1.5.2, 2.2.1, 3.1.10<br />

Gupta, Vijay Kumar; IIM Indore, India (vkgupta@iimidr.ac.in): 1.3.12<br />

Gutenberger, Jan; EBS Business School, Germany (gutenberger@gmail.com): 1.4.12<br />

Guthrie, Doug; George Washington University School <strong>of</strong> Business, USA: 1.1.P<br />

H<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 275


Ha, Yoo Jung; University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom (y.j.ha@sant.oxon.org): 2.4.15<br />

Haddock, Jorge; George Mason University School <strong>of</strong> Management, USA: 1.1.P<br />

Hagen, James M.; Hamline University, USA (jhagen05@hamline.edu): 1.3.10<br />

Hajro, Aida; Brunel University, United Kingdom (aida.hajro@brunel.ac.uk): 2.2.10<br />

Hallinger, Philip ; Hong Kong Institute <strong>of</strong> Education, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (hallinger@gmail.com): 1.5.6<br />

Hammes, Martin; WHU, Germany (martin.hammes@whu.edu): 1.4.6<br />

Han, Hannah Xia; University College Dublin, Ireland (xia.han@ucdconnect.ie): 1.4.12<br />

Hånell Melén, Sara; Stockholm School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Sweden (sara.melen@hhs.se): 2.3.6<br />

Hannibal Knudsen, Martin; University <strong>of</strong> South Denmark, Denmark (mhk@sam.sdu.dk): 3.3.9<br />

Hannigan, TJ; Temple University, USA (tuc70661@temple.edu): 3.3.3<br />

Hao, Yanfang; Harbin Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, China (haoyanfang0000@163.com): 2.3.15<br />

Harimaya, Kozo ; University <strong>of</strong> Ritsumeikan, Japan (harimaya@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp): 1.5.8<br />

Harnowo, Akhadian S.; Georgia Southern University, USA (akhadian_s_harnowo@georgiasouthern.edu): 1.4.7,<br />

3.2.12<br />

Harrison, Charles ; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania , USA (harrison.charles.e@gmail.com): 1.3.15, 2.1.15<br />

Harvey, William Stopford; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (w.harvey@sydney.edu.au): 1.5.13, 2.4.8<br />

Harzing, Anne-Wil; University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne, Australia (harzing@unimelb.edu.au): 2.3.6<br />

Hashai, Niron ; The Hebrew University, Israel (nironh@huji.ac.il): 1.4.4, 2.1.4<br />

Hatfield, Donald E. ; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA (hatfield@vt.edu): 2.4.11<br />

Hawn, Olga; Duke University, USA (olga.hawn@duke.edu): 2.3.15<br />

Haxhi, Ilir ; University <strong>of</strong> Amsterdam, Netherlands (i.haxhi@uva.nl): 1.1.1, 1.3.4<br />

Hayashi, Takabumi; Kokushikan University, Japan (thayashi@kokushikan.ac.jp): 2.4.9<br />

He, Chong; Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (hechong@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk): 1.3.14<br />

He, Wei; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (whe001@fiu.edu): 2.2.6<br />

He, Xiaoming; Beijing Jiaotong University, China (feifei.xiaoming@gmail.com): 3.1.15<br />

He, Ximing; University <strong>of</strong> New Castle, United Kingdom (xinming.he@newcastle.ac.uk): 3.3.15<br />

He, Xinming; Newcastle University, United Kingdom (xinming.he@ncl.ac.uk): 1.3.9<br />

Hearn, Bruce Allen; University <strong>of</strong> Sussex, United Kingdom (b.a.hearn@sussex.ac.uk): 1.3.4, 1.4.11<br />

Heidenreich, Stefan; WU Vienna, Austria (stefan.heidenreich@wu.ac.at): 2.1.15<br />

Heim, Wynona; Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management, USA (wynona.heim@thunderbird.edu): 2.2.1<br />

Heinrichs, John H.; Wayne State University, USA (ai2824@wayne.edu): 1.3.13<br />

Hemphill, Robert; AES Solar, USA (bob.hemphill@aes-solar.com): 2.4.1<br />

Henisz, Witold; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (henisz@wharton.upenn.edu): 1.3.7<br />

Hennart, Jean-Francois; Tilburg University; Queens University; Singapore Management University, Netherlands<br />

(j.f.hennart@uvt.nl): 1.4.4, 3.4.4<br />

Henneberg, Stephan; University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom (stephan.henneberg@mbs.ac.uk): 1.1.8<br />

Herrington, Mike; GEM South Africa Team Leader; University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, South Africa: 1.4.1<br />

Hewerdine, Lisa; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (lisajane@bigpond.net.au): 1.5.15<br />

Heyden, Mariano L.M.; Erasmus University, Netherlands (mheyden@rsm.nl): 2.3.5<br />

Hill, Sally Rao; University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia (sally.raohill@adelaide.edu.au): 2.1.13<br />

Hiller, Nathan; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (hillern@fiu.edu): 2.2.9<br />

Hilton, Brian; Nottingham University Business School, China (brian.hilton@nottingham.edu.cn): 1.4.12, 1.5.15, 2.1.13<br />

Hitt, Michael; Texas A&M University, USA (mhitt@mays.tamu.edu): 0.2, 2.1.P, 2.4.P<br />

Ho, Yi-Hui; Chang Jung Christian University, Taiwan (vicky@mail.cjcu.edu.tw): 2.1.13<br />

Ho, Yung-Ching; National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan (bmaych@ccu.edu.tw): 3.3.13<br />

Hoang, Hung Trong; University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia (hung.hoang@adelaide.edu.au): 2.1.13<br />

Hödl, Markus K.; WU Vienna, Austria (markus.hoedl@wu.ac.at): 1.3.4<br />

Hohberger, Jan; University <strong>of</strong> Technology Sydney, Australia (jan.hohberger@uts.edu.au): 3.3.3<br />

Holland, Jr., Benny; <strong>International</strong> Longshoremen's Association, USA: 1.5.2<br />

Hong, Eunsuk; SOAS, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom (e.hong@soas.ac.uk): 1.3.5<br />

Hong, Gahye ; Korea University, Korea, South (gahye.hong@gmail.com): 3.1.13<br />

Hong, Sungjin J.; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA (sungjin@utdallas.edu): 2.3.11, 3.2.15<br />

Hornstein, Abigail S.; Wesleyan University, USA (ahornstein@wesleyan.edu): 2.2.9, 3.4.7<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 276


Hoskisson, Robert; Rice University, USA (robert.hoskisson@rice.edu): 2.1.P, 2.2.14, 2.4.P<br />

Hsieh, Linda Hy; University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham, United Kingdom (h.hsieh@bham.ac.uk): 1.4.7<br />

Hsieh, Ying-Ying; National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan (yy.hsieh@gmail.com): 3.3.13<br />

Hsu, Chia Chen; Ting Hisin <strong>International</strong> Group, Taiwan (michelle_hsu@weichuan.com.tw): 1.5.11<br />

Hsu, Sean Tsuhsiang; University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, USA (thsu@katz.pitt.edu): 1.3.13<br />

Hu, Helen; University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne, Australia (hehu@unimelb.edu.au): 1.1.5<br />

Huang, Chun-Chen ; Asia University, Taiwan (cchuang1127@asia.edu.tw): 2.3.13<br />

Huang, Rong; Shanghai University <strong>of</strong> Finance and Economics, China (email.huangrong@gmail.com): 3.3.11<br />

Hui, Pamsy P.; Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (msphui@polyu.edu.hk): 2.1.7<br />

Hunoldt, Michael; Friedrich Schiller University <strong>of</strong> Jena, Germany (michael.hunoldt@uni-jena.de): 1.3.14<br />

Hurmerinta, Leila; Turku University, Finland (lthupe@utu.fi): 2.4.8<br />

Hutzschenreuter, Thomas; WHU, Germany (th@whu.edu): 1.3.9, 1.4.6, 2.2.7<br />

Hwang, Peter; <strong>International</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Jakarta, Indonesia (peter.hwang@ssb.ac.id): 3.4.3<br />

Hynes, Stacey; Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington, New Zealand: 3.4.9<br />

Hyun, Hea-Jung; Kyung-Hee University, Korea, South (hjhyun@khu.ac.kr): 1.1.8<br />

I<br />

Igoe, Josephine; National University <strong>of</strong> Ireland, Galway, Ireland (josephine.igoe@nuigalway.ie): 3.1.10<br />

Iguchi, Chie; Keio University, Japan (ciguchi@sfc.keio.ac.jp): 2.4.9<br />

Ihrig, Martin; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania , USA (ihrig@wharton.upenn.edu): 1.5.12<br />

Inomata , Satoshi; JTRO- IDE, Japan (satoshi_inomata@ide.go.jp): 2.1.12<br />

Iriyama, Akie; State University <strong>of</strong> New York at Buffalo, USA (airiyama@buffalo.edu): 1.3.13<br />

Ito, Kiyohiko; University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa, USA (k.ito@hawaii.edu): 1.4.10<br />

J<br />

Jack, Robert Graham; Macquarie University, Australia (rob.jack@mq.edu.au): 3.2.11<br />

Jacob, Marcus; EBS European Business School, Germany (marcus.jacob@ebs.edu): 3.1.3<br />

Jaeger, Sabina; AUT University, New Zealand (sabina.jaeger@aut.ac.nz): 1.5.15<br />

Jain, Arun Kumar; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, Lucknow, India (arunjain@iiml.ac.in): 1.5.12<br />

Jain, Pankaj; University <strong>of</strong> Memphis, USA (pjain@memphis.edu): 2.3.12<br />

Jain, Vinod K; University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park, USA (vjain@rhsmith.umd.edu): 2.4.12, 3.3.2<br />

Jallal, Bahija; MedImmune, LLC, USA (jallalb@medimmune.com): 3.3.2<br />

Jandhyala, Srividya; George Washington University, USA (srividya@gwu.edu): 2.4.5<br />

Janne, Odile E. M.; University <strong>of</strong> London-Birkbeck, United Kingdom (o.janne@bbk.ac.uk): 1.1.8, 1.5.11<br />

Jarosinski, Miroslaw; Warsaw School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Poland (mjaros@sgh.waw.pl): 1.5.10<br />

Jaussaud, Jacques; University <strong>of</strong> Pau, France (jacques.jaussaud@univ-pau.fr): 1.1.14<br />

Javalgi, Rajshekhar (Raj); Cleveland State University, USA (r.javalgi@csuohio.edu): 2.1.11<br />

Javidan, Mansour; Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management, USA (mansour.javidan@thunderbird.edu): 2.4.12<br />

Javorcik, Beata; University <strong>of</strong> Oxford and CEPR, United Kingdom (beata.javorcik@economics.ox.ac.uk): 2.4.15<br />

Jaw, Bih-Shiaw ; Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan (bsjaw510@mail.nsysu.edu.tw): 2.4.10<br />

Jaw, Yi-Long; National Taiwan University, Taiwan (yljaw@ntu.edu.tw): 3.3.14<br />

Jayaraman, Vaidy; University <strong>of</strong> Miami, USA (vaidy@miami.edu): 2.1.12<br />

Jean, Ruey-Jer Bryan; National Chengchi University, Taiwan (bryan@nccu.edu.tw): 2.3.6<br />

Jensen, Brad ; Georgetown University, USA (jbj24@georgetown.edu): 2.3.1<br />

Jensen, Karina R.; ESCP Europe, France (karina.jensen@escpeurope.eu): 2.2.13<br />

Jensen, Peter D. Oerberg; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (poe.smg@cbs.dk): 3.1.14<br />

Jesuino, Jorge C. ; Instituto Superior de Ciencias do Trabalho e da Empresa, Portugal (correia.jesuino@iscte.pt):<br />

1.5.6<br />

Jha, Srivardhini K.; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore, India (vardhini@gmail.com): 2.1.4, 2.2.3<br />

Ji, Fiona Xiaoying; Kean University, USA (xji@kean.edu): 1.5.12, 2.4.11<br />

Jia, Nan; University <strong>of</strong> Southern California, USA (nan.jia@marshall.usc.edu): 2.1.15<br />

Jiang, Crystal; Bryant University, USA (cjiang1@bryant.edu): 1.1.12<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 277


Jiang, Guohua; Temple University, USA (tua63885@temple.edu): 1.3.6, 2.4.11<br />

Jiang, Marshall Shibing; Brock University, Canada (mjiang@brocku.ca): 1.3.14<br />

Jimenez, Alfredo; University <strong>of</strong> Burgos, Spain (ajimenez@ubu.es): 1.5.5, 2.2.10, 3.1.10<br />

Jin, Zhongqi; Middlesex University, United Kingdom (z.jin@mdx.ac.uk): 3.3.11<br />

Jo, Crotty; Salford University, United Kingdom (j.crotty@salford.ac.uk): 1.3.7<br />

Joardar, Arpita; Clark University, USA (ajoardar@clarku.edu): 2.1.11<br />

Jöbstl, Beatrix; University <strong>of</strong> Graz, Austria (beatrix.joebstl@edu.uni-graz.at): 1.4.14<br />

Jochnick, Chris; Oxfam America, USA (cjochnick@oxfamamerica.org): 2.4.1<br />

Johansson, Johny; Georgetown University, USA (johanssj@georgetown.edu): 1.3.P<br />

Jones, Chris; Aston University, United Kingdom (c.jones2@aston.ac.uk): 1.3.7<br />

Jonsson, Sara; Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sweden (sara.jonsson@abe.kth.se): 3.1.14<br />

Jordan-Jones, Victoria; ASB/University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (v.jordanjones@gmail.com): 1.3.8<br />

Jormanainen, Irina; Aalto School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland (irina.jormanainen@aalto.fi): 2.1.12<br />

Joshi, Amol M.; University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa, USA (amol@hawaii.edu): 1.4.7<br />

Ju, Min; University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis, USA (jum@umsl.edu): 2.4.15<br />

Judge, William Q.; Old Dominion University, USA (wjudge@odu.edu): 1.1.1<br />

Juho, Anita; University <strong>of</strong> Oulu, Finland (anita.juho@oulu.fi): 3.3.5<br />

Jung, Jin-Sup; Chungbuk National University, Korea, South (jsjung@chungbuk.ac.kr): 1.4.13<br />

Jung, Yuhee; Meiji University, Japan (hopejung@kisc.meiji.ac.jp): 2.4.9<br />

K<br />

Kabbach de Castro, Luiz Ricardo; Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain (luisricardo.kabbach@uab.es): 1.3.3<br />

Kabbara, Diala; University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy (dkabbara@eco.unipv.it): 1.1.11<br />

Kabst, Ruediger ; Justus-Liebig-Universitat, Germany (ruediger.kabst@wirtschaft.uni-giessen.de): 2.4.13<br />

Kafouros, Mario; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (mk@lubs.leeds.ac.uk): 2.1.4<br />

Kalasin, Kiattichai; Mahidol University, Thailand (cmkiattichai@mahidol.ac.th): 1.4.8, 1.5.P<br />

Kalinic, Igor; University <strong>of</strong> Groningen, Netherlands (i.kalinic@rug.nl): 1.1.11, 1.4.11<br />

Kalinowski, Margarete; ESADE Business School, Spain (margarete.kalinowski@esade.edu): 3.4.3<br />

Kallenborn, Oliver; Daimler, Germany (oliver.kallenborn@daimler.com): 1.1.2<br />

Kalliny, Morris ; Saint Louis University, USA (kalliny@slu.edu): 3.3.15<br />

Kamal, Fariha; Center for Economic Studies, US Census Bureau, USA (fariha.kamal@census.gov): 1.5.7<br />

Kandogan, Yener; University <strong>of</strong> Michigan-Flint, USA (yener@umflint.edu): 2.3.12<br />

Kang, Hye Sun; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (hyesun.kang@grad.moore.sc.edu): 3.2.15<br />

Kang, Yuanfei; Massey University, New Zealand (y.kang@massey.ac.nz): 3.3.15<br />

Kano, Liena L.; University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada (liena.kano@haskayne.ucalgary.ca): 1.4.4<br />

Kaplan, Robert; Inter-American Foundation, USA (rcaplan@iaf.gov): 2.4.1<br />

Kappen, Philip ; Uppsala University, Sweden (philip.kappen@fek.uu.se): 1.5.12, 2.1.4<br />

Karademir, Bahattin ; Cukurova University , Turkey (bdemir@cu.edu.tr): 2.3.15<br />

Karam , Charlotte M. ; American University <strong>of</strong> Beirut, Lebanon (ck16@aub.edu.lb): 1.5.6<br />

Karna, Amit; EBS Business School, Germany (amit.karna@ebs.edu): 1.5.11, 3.1.11<br />

Karsaklian, Eliane; Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle, France (eliane.karsaklian@univ-paris3.fr): 3.4.13<br />

Katrinli, Alev; Izmir University <strong>of</strong> Economics , Turkey (alev.katrinli@izmirekonomi.edu.tr): 2.4.10<br />

Katsikeas, Constantine S. ; Leeds University, United Kingdom (buscsk@leeds.ac.uk): 2.1.3<br />

Kaul, Aseem; University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, USA (akaul@umn.edu): 3.4.5<br />

Kawai, Norifumi; University <strong>of</strong> Sussex, United Kingdom (n.kawai@sussex.ac.uk): 1.1.3<br />

Kay, Adrian; Australian National University, Australia (adrian.kay@anu.edu.au): 1.5.3<br />

Kedia, Ben; University <strong>of</strong> Memphis, USA (bkedia@memphis.edu): 1.1.11, 2.4.5<br />

Kek, Marko ; ESC Rennes Business School, France (kexon87@gmail.com): 3.1.13<br />

Kelley, Donna; GEM USA Team Leader; Babson College, USA (dkelley@babson.edu): 1.4.1<br />

Kelley, Keith; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (kkelley@fiu.edu): 1.4.12<br />

Kennedy, Robert; William Davidson Institute at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, USA (rekennedy@umich.edu): 2.3.10<br />

Ketels , Christian; Harvard Business School, USA (cketels@hbs.edu): 3.1.6<br />

Khanna, Tarun; Harvard Business School, USA (tkhanna@hbs.edu): 1.2.P, 2.2.P, 2.4.1, 3.4.5<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 278


Khilji, Shaista E. ; George Washington University, USA (shaistakhilji@gmail.com): 2.2.4<br />

Khoury, Theodore A.; Portland State University, USA (tedkhoury@pdx.edu): 1.1.10<br />

Kim, Bongsun; University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (bskim@illinois.edu): 1.4.13<br />

Kim, Daekwan; Florida State University, USA (dkim@cob.fsu.edu): 2.3.6, 3.2.13<br />

Kim, Hee Sun; Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom (elisavette0811@gmail.com): 1.4.13<br />

Kim, Hyeong-Deug; Simon Fraser University, Canada (hdkim@sfu.ca): 3.2.11<br />

Kim, Jin Uk; University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (jkim198@illinois.edu): 2.4.3<br />

Kim, Myung Suk; Sogang University, Korea, South (myungkim@sogang.ac.kr): 3.3.8<br />

Kim, Phillip; University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Madison, USA (pkim@bus.wisc.edu): 3.4.6<br />

Kim, Seong-Young; EMLYON Business School, France (kim@em-lyon.com): 1.5.14<br />

Kim, Seung H.; Saint Louis University, USA (kimsh@slu.edu): 1.1.13<br />

Kim, Soyeon; Korea University, Korea, South (ksy0430@gmail.com): 2.4.13<br />

Kimura, Yuko; University <strong>of</strong> Leicester, United Kingdom (yk27@leicester.ac.uk): 3.1.7<br />

Kimura, Yuko; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Japan: 1.4.2<br />

Kingsley, Allison F.; University <strong>of</strong> Vermont, USA (allison.kingsley@uvm.edu): 3.3.1<br />

Kinra, Aseem; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (aki.om@cbs.dk): 3.3.4<br />

Kirca, Ahmet H.; Michigan State University, USA (kirca@msu.edu): 2.3.4<br />

Kittler, Markus; University <strong>of</strong> Stirling, United Kingdom (markus.kittler@stir.ac.uk): 3.4.13<br />

Klaas, Brian S.; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (klaasb@moore.sc.edu): 3.1.13<br />

Kleindienst, Ingo; WHU, Germany (ingo.kleindienst@whu.edu): 1.3.9, 2.2.7<br />

Klueter, Thomas; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (klueter@wharton.upenn.edu): 3.3.3<br />

Knight, Gary; Florida State University, USA (garyalanknight@gmail.com): 1.1.6, 3.3.9<br />

Knight, John G.; University <strong>of</strong> Otago, New Zealand (john.knight@otago.ac.nz): 2.3.14<br />

Knill, April Michele; Florida State University, USA (aknill@cob.fsu.edu): 1.1.10, 1.5.7<br />

Kobrin, Stephen; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania , USA (kobrins@wharton.upenn.edu): 1.5.3, 2.3.P, 3.1.9<br />

Koestner, Mariella; University <strong>of</strong> Graz, Austria (mariella.koestner@uni-graz.at): 1.4.14<br />

Kogut, Bruce; Columbia University, USA (bruce.kogut@columbia.edu): 2.2.P<br />

Kolodziej-Smith, Renata; Wayne State University, USA (rksmith@wayne.edu): 3.1.13<br />

Koshy, Abraham; IIM A, India (akoshy@iimahd.ernet.in): 3.4.11<br />

Kostova, Tatiana; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (kostova@moore.sc.edu): 1.3.7, 2.3.9<br />

Kotabe , Masaaki; Temple University, USA (mkotabe@temple.edu): 1.1.12, 2.2.4, 2.4.11<br />

Kothari, Tanvi; University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Oshkosh, USA (kothari.t@gmail.com): 1.1.12, 1.4.11<br />

Kotosaka, Masahiro; University <strong>of</strong> Oxford, United Kingdom (masahiro.kotosaka@sbs.ox.ac.uk): 2.1.5<br />

Kotulla, Thomas; ESCP Europe, Germany (tkotulla@escpeurope.eu): 3.3.4<br />

Kou, Jing-Ming; Durham University, United Kingdom (jing-ming.kuo@durham.ac.uk): 2.4.4<br />

Koveshnikov, Alexei; Hanken School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland (alexei.koveshnikov@hanken.fi): 3.4.13<br />

Kragh, Hanne; Aarhus University, Denmark (hak@asb.dk): 1.4.14<br />

Krepp, K. Denise Rucker; Maritime Administration, USA: 1.5.2<br />

Krishnan, Rekha; Simon Fraser University, Canada (rekhak@sfu.ca): 1.4.12<br />

Krishnan, Rishikesha T.; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore, India (rishi@iimb.ac.in): 2.1.4, 2.2.3<br />

Kshetri, Nir ; University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, USA (nir.kshetri@gmail.com): 3.1.15, 3.3.12<br />

Kuilman, Jeroen G.; Tilburg University, Netherlands (j.g.kuilman@uvt.nl): 3.2.14<br />

Kumar, K; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Bangalore, India (kumark@iimb.ernet.in): 2.1.9<br />

Kumar, Maya; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (mkumar@ivey.ca): 2.3.13<br />

Kumar, Nishant; Stockholm University, Sweden (nku@fek.su.se): 3.3.9<br />

Kumar, Vikas ; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (vikas.kumar@sydney.edu.au): 0.2, 1.4.8, 2.4.4<br />

Kundu, Sumit K.; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (kundus@fiu.edu): 0.2, 1.4.8, 2.2.6<br />

Kunz, Werner; University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston, USA (werner.kunz@umb.edu): 1.4.12<br />

Kuo, Min-Hsun; National Central University, Taiwan (minhsunkuo@yahoo.com): 1.5.6<br />

Kuskova, Valentina V.; National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Russia (vkuskova@indiana.edu):<br />

1.5.15<br />

Kuznetsov, Andrei; University <strong>of</strong> Central Lancashire, United Kingdom (akuznetsov@uclan.ac.uk): 3.1.3<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 279


L<br />

Laamanen, Tomi ; University <strong>of</strong> St.Gallen, Switzerland (tomi.laamanen@unisg.ch): 2.4.5<br />

Lahiri, Nandini; University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA (nandini_lahiri@unc.edu): 1.4.7<br />

Lahiri, Somnath; Illinois State University, USA (slahiri@ilstu.edu): 2.2.6, 2.3.11<br />

Lamb, Peter William; La Trobe University, Australia (p.lamb@latrobe.edu.au): 2.1.9, 3.4.14<br />

Lamin, Anna; Northeastern University, USA (a.lamin@neu.edu): 1.1.4, 3.1.14<br />

Lancheros, Sandra; Aston Business School, United Kingdom (spllancheros@hotmail.com): 2.4.7<br />

Lange, Sandra; WHU, Germany (sandra.lange@whu.edu): 2.2.7<br />

Lapham, Beverley; Queen's University, Canada (laphamb@econ.queensu.ca): 3.1.8<br />

Lapoule, Paul; Novancia Business School, France (plapoule@novancia.fr): 3.3.11<br />

Laranjeira, Luís Filipe ; ISEG, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Lisbon, Portugal (luisfilipelaranjeira@gmail.com): 2.4.11<br />

Larimo, Jorma; University <strong>of</strong> Vaasa, Finland (jla@uwasa.fi): 2.2.11<br />

Larsen, Marcus Møller; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (mml.smg@cbs.dk): 1.4.14, 1.5.4<br />

Lasher, R. Lemuel; CSC, USA (llasher@csc.com): 3.3.2<br />

Lauring, Jakob ; Aarhus University, Denmark (jala@asb.dk): 1.4.14<br />

Lawrence, Martyn; Emerald Group Publishing, USA (mlawrence@emeraldinsight.com): 1.3.10<br />

Lawton, Thomas; EMLYON Business School, France (lawton@em-lyon.com): 1.5.3, 3.3.1<br />

Leartsurawat, Watcharaphong; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (wlear001@fiu.edu): 1.4.11<br />

Lee, Changhee ; Rutgers University , USA (chleeacct@gmail.com): 2.3.15<br />

Lee, Chay-Hoon ; Keppel Offshore & Marine, Singapore (chayhoon.lee@keppelom.com): 1.5.6<br />

Lee, Chun-Ling; National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan (d934010005@student.nsysu.edu.tw): 2.1.13, 2.2.11<br />

Lee, Hyun-Jung; London School <strong>of</strong> Economics, United Kingdom (h.lee@lse.ac.uk): 3.1.13<br />

Lee, In Hyeock; Western Kentucky University, USA (ian.lee@wku.edu): 1.3.5<br />

Lee, Jongmin; Yonsei University, Korea, South (jongmin.lee@yonsei.ac.kr): 3.1.5<br />

Lee, Khan-Pyo; Sogang University, Korea, South (khanplee@sogang.ac.kr): 3.3.8<br />

Lee, KyungMi; Hankuk Univesity <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies, Korea, South (lennalee77@gmail.com): 1.1.7<br />

Lee, Meng-Hsiu; National Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan (st873217@yahoo.com.tw): 1.1.13<br />

Lee, Seung-Hyun; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA (lee.1085@utdallas.edu): 2.3.11, 3.2.15<br />

Lee, Soo Hee; Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom (s.lee@bbk.ac.uk): 1.4.13<br />

Lee, Yih-teen; IESE Business School, Spain (ylee@iese.edu): 2.3.9<br />

Lehtonen, Miikka J.; Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland (miikka.j.lehtonen@aalto.fi): 3.3.13<br />

Leiter, Tara; Attorney, Blank Rome LLP, USA: 1.5.2<br />

Leitzinger, Jocelyn M.; University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison, USA (jleitzinger@wisc.edu): 2.4.14<br />

Lemanski, Michal; WU Wien / UE Wroclaw, Poland (leman@poczta.onet.pl): 1.5.8<br />

Lenartowicz, Tomasz ; Florida Atlantic University, USA (lenartow@fau.edu): 1.5.6<br />

León-Darder, Fidel ; University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Spain (fidel.leon@uv.es): 1.5.6, 2.2.11<br />

Leonidou, Constantinos N.; Leeds University, United Kingdom (c.leonidou@leeds.ac.uk): 1.1.7, 2.1.3<br />

Leonidou, Leonidas C.; University <strong>of</strong> Cyprus, Cyprus (leonidas@ucy.ac.cy): 1.1.7<br />

Leseane, Reginald; Savannah State University, USA (leseaner@savannahstate.edu): 2.4.12<br />

Lessard, Donald R.; MIT Sloan School <strong>of</strong> Management, USA (dlessard@mit.edu): 1.2.P<br />

Lew, Yong Kyu; University <strong>of</strong> Hull, United Kingdom (Y.Lew@hull.ac.uk): 3.4.4<br />

Lewellyn, Krista Burrill; Old Dominion University, USA (klewelly@odu.edu): 2.1.8, 2.2.12<br />

Lewin, Arie Y.; Duke University, USA (ayl3@duke.edu): 1.5.1, 2.1.12, 2.2.P, 3.4.5<br />

Li, Chin Pin; National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan (lcp.0926@yahoo.com.tw): 1.1.14<br />

Li, Jiatao; Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (mnjtli@ust.hk): 2.2.4, 3.1.14<br />

Li, Jing; Simon Fraser University, Canada (jingli@sfu.ca): 1.4.8, 2.3.7, 3.4.3<br />

Li, Lee; York University, Canada (leeli@yorku.ca): 3.4.4<br />

Li, Ming Hua ; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (mhl.int@cbs.dk): 1.1.12<br />

Li, Mingxiang; University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Madison, USA (mli@bus.wisc.edu): 3.4.6<br />

Li, Ning; George Mason University, USA (nli@gmu.edu): 2.3.14<br />

Li, Sali; University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA (li9@uwm.edu): 1.3.14<br />

Li, Shenyu; Shanghai University <strong>of</strong> Finance and Economics, China (li.shenyu@shufe.edu.cn): 3.3.11<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 280


Li, Xiaoying; Brunel University, United Kingdom (xiaoying.li@brunel.ac.uk): 1.3.5<br />

Li, Xin; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (xl.int@cbs.dk): 3.4.14<br />

Li, Yao Amber; Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (yaoli@ust.hk): 2.4.15<br />

Li, Yi; Australian National University, Australia (yi.li@anu.edu.au): 2.4.4<br />

Li, Ying; Technical University <strong>of</strong> Denmark, Denmark (ying@business.dtu.dk): 1.1.9<br />

Li, Yongjuan ; Chinese <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sciences, China (liyj@psych.ac.cn): 1.5.6<br />

Li, Yue; World Bank, USA (yli7@worldbank.org): 2.4.15<br />

Li, Zijie; University <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business and Economics, China (lizijie@126.com): 2.4.4<br />

Lian, Yujun ; Sun Yat-Sen University, China (lianyj@mail.sysu.edu.cn): 2.2.12<br />

Liang, Xueji Jessie; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (xuejiliang@nus.edu.sg): 2.1.5<br />

Liao, Wei Wan ; National Chi Nan University, Taiwan (cf002@ms49.hinet.net): 3.2.14<br />

Librowicz, Michel ; Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada (librowicz.michel@uqam.ca): 1.5.10<br />

Liesch, Peter W.; University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Australia (p.liesch@business.uq.edu.au): 1.4.6, 2.1.5, 2.1.10, 3.3.9<br />

Liguori, Eric W.; California State University, Fresno, USA (eliguori@csufresno.edu): 1.3.10<br />

Lim, Jeen-Su; University <strong>of</strong> Toledo, USA (jlim@utnet.utoledo.edu): 1.3.13<br />

Lin, Angeline, Te-Yi; National ChengChi University, Taiwan (linteli@nccu.edu.tw): 3.4.12<br />

Lin, Bou-Wen ; National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan (bwlin@mx.nthu.edu.tw): 3.1.5<br />

Lin, Chieh-Yu; Chang Jung Christian University, Taiwan (jylin@mail.cjcu.edu.tw): 2.1.13<br />

Lin, Hsiao-Wen; ChenChi University, Taiwan (96355506@nccu.edu.tw): 3.4.12<br />

Lin, Ku-Ho ; National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan (link@dragon.nchu.edu.tw): 2.1.14<br />

Lindeque, Johan; Amsterdam Business School, Netherlands (j.p.lindeque@uva.nl): 1.5.3<br />

Lindsay, Val; Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington, New Zealand (val.lindsay@vuw.ac.nz): 1.1.6, 3.4.9<br />

Lindstrand, Angelika; Stockholm School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Sweden (angelika.lindstrand@hhs.se): 2.3.6<br />

Lirio, Pamela; EDHEC Business School, France (pamela.lirio@edhec.edu): 2.4.13<br />

Littrell, Romie Frederick; Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology, New Zealand (romie.littrell@aut.ac.nz): 1.4.14, 1.5.6,<br />

2.4.10, 3.1.13<br />

Lituchy, Terri; Concordia University, Canada (terrilituchy@yahoo.com): 1.5.15<br />

Liu, Dong; Georgia Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, USA (dong.liu@mgt.gatech.edu): 1.5.P<br />

Liu, Kun ; Wayne State University, USA (k.liu@wayne.edu): 3.3.15<br />

Liu, Ling ; University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, United Kingdom (ling.liu@ed.ac.uk): 3.3.12<br />

Liu, Mingming; Dalian University <strong>of</strong> Technology, China (doubleming618@163.com): 3.3.14<br />

Liu, Runjuan; University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Canada (runjuan.liu@ualberta.ca): 3.1.12<br />

Liu, Xiyou; Audit Research Institute <strong>of</strong> China's National Audit Office, China (ruclxy@hotmail.com): 1.1.15<br />

Liu, Xueyuan; Wuhan University, China (egcuk@hotmail.com): 3.3.11<br />

Liu, Zhiqiang; Huazhong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, China (zqliu@mail.hust.edu.cn): 2.1.11<br />

Livanis, Grigorios; Northeastern University, USA (g.livanis@neu.edu): 3.1.14, 3.4.7<br />

Ljung, Anna; Uppsala University, Sweden (anna.ljung@fek.uu.se): 2.4.6<br />

Loewenthal, Neli Kouneva; George Washington University, USA (nelik@gwmail.gwu.edu): 3.2.15<br />

Lojacono, Gabriella; Università Bocconi, Italy (gabriella.lojacono@unibocconi.it): 3.4.4<br />

Lord, Michael David; Wake Forest University, USA (lordmd@wfu.edu): 2.1.8<br />

Love, James; Aston University, United Kingdom (j.h.love@bham.ac.uk): 3.4.9<br />

Lovely, Mary E.; Syracuse University, USA (melovely@maxwell.syr.edu): 1.5.7<br />

Lu, Chia-Ying; National Taiwan University, Taiwan (d94724004@ntu.edu.tw): 1.5.13<br />

Lu, Jane; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (janelu@nus.edu.sg): 2.1.5<br />

Lu, Jiangyong; Beijing University, China (lujiangyong@gsm.pku.edu.cn): 2.1.15<br />

Lu, Qian; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (luqian@nus.edu.sg): 2.4.14<br />

Lu, Vinh Nhat; Australian National University, Australia (vinh.lu@anu.edu.au): 2.1.13, 2.3.11, 3.3.11<br />

Lucea, Rafael; George Washington University, USA (rafel@gwu.edu): 1.3.7, 2.2.9, 2.3.15, 2.4.3<br />

Luiz, John Manuel; University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, South Africa (john.luiz@gsb.uct.ac.za): 1.3.11<br />

Luk, Chung-Leung; City University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, China (mkclluk@cityu.edu.hk): 3.4.1<br />

Luo, Yadong; University <strong>of</strong> Miami, China (yadong@miami.edu): 1.3.15, 2.1.12, 3.1.5<br />

Luong, Tuan A.; Shanghai University <strong>of</strong> Finance and Economics, China (luong.tuananh@shufe.edu.cn): 3.3.11<br />

Lux, Andrei A.; Auckland University <strong>of</strong> Technology, New Zealand (andrei.lux@hotmail.com): 3.1.13<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 281


Luzzini, Davide; Politecnico di Milano, Italy (davide.luzzini@polimi.it): 1.5.4<br />

Lynch, Richard; Middlesex University, United Kingdom (richardjilynch@hotmail.com): 3.3.11<br />

Lynton, Nandani; CEIBS, Germany (lyntonn@gmail.com): 2.3.9<br />

M<br />

Ma, Alyson C.; University <strong>of</strong> San Diego, USA (maa@sandiego.edu): 1.5.4<br />

Ma, Na; Tsinghua University, China (man.11@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn): 2.2.7<br />

Ma, Xufei; Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (xufei@cuhk.edu.hk): 2.2.14, 2.4.15<br />

MacDuffie, John Paul; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (macduffie@wharton.upenn.edu): 1.1.2<br />

Macharzina, Klaus; University <strong>of</strong> Hohenheim, Germany (macharzina@gmail.com): 2.1.10<br />

Magnusson, Peter; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (magnusson@niu.edu): 2.2.10, 2.3.4, 3.1.10<br />

Maignan, Isabelle ; VU University Amsterdam, Netherlands (n.nieuweboer@chello.nl): 1.5.6<br />

Mainela, Tuija; University <strong>of</strong> Oulu, Finland (tuija.mainela@oulu.fi): 3.3.5<br />

Maitland, Elizabeth; University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (e.maitland@unsw.edu.au): 3.1.9, 3.4.14<br />

Majid, Kashef A.; George Washington University, USA (kashef@gwmail.gwu.edu): 1.3.9<br />

Majocchi, Antonio; University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy (antonio.majocchi@unipv.it): 1.1.3<br />

Makarius, Erin Elizabeth; Canisius College, USA (makariue@canisius.edu): 3.1.14<br />

Makhija, Mona; Ohio State University, USA (makhija_2@fisher.osu.edu): 2.4.10<br />

Makhmadshoev, Dilshod ; University <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde, United Kingdom (dilshod.makhmadshoev@strath.ac.uk): 2.1.12<br />

Makino, Shige; Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (makino@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk): 0.2,<br />

1.3.5, 3.1.2<br />

Makovec Brencic, Maja ; University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Slovenia (maja.makovec@ef.uni-lj.si): 3.2.13<br />

Maksimov, Vladislav; University <strong>of</strong> Miami, USA (vmaksimov@bus.miami.edu): 1.3.15<br />

Malen, Joel; University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, USA (male0110@umn.edu): 2.1.15<br />

Malhotra, Shavin; Ryerson University, Canada (shavinm@ryerson.ca): 2.2.12<br />

Malik, Omar; , USA (malik@oakland.edu): 1.1.12<br />

Malik, Tariq; Dongbei University <strong>of</strong> Finance & Economics, China (tmalik@dufe.edu.cn): 1.4.13<br />

Maloney, Mary Margaret; University <strong>of</strong> St. Thomas, USA (mmmaloney@stthomas.edu): 1.3.2, 1.5.8, 2.1.8<br />

Manning, Stephan; University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts Boston, USA (stephan.manning@umb.edu): 1.4.12, 2.1.12, 3.4.5<br />

Marano, Valentina; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (valentina.marano@gmail.com): 1.3.7<br />

Marcotte, Claude; Concordia University, Canada (cmarcotte@jmsb.concordia.ca): 3.4.2<br />

Marinov, Marin; University <strong>of</strong> Gloucestershire, United Kingdom (mmarinov@glos.ac.uk): 1.3.5<br />

Marinova, Svetla Trifonova ; Aalborg University, Denmark (svetla@business.aau.dk): 1.1.11, 1.3.5, 2.3.11<br />

Marion, Tucker; Northeastern University, USA (t.marion@neu.edu): 2.2.5<br />

Mariotti, Sergio ; Politecnico di Milano, Italy (sergio.mariotti@polimi.it): 2.1.6<br />

Martin, Daniel E. ; California State University, East Bay, USA (dmartin@alineagroup.com): 1.1.15<br />

Martin, Xavier; Tilburg University, Netherlands (x.martin@uvt.nl): 0.2, 1.1.5, 1.4.6, 3.2.P<br />

Martinet, Alain Charles; University Jean Moulin Lyon 3, France (alain.martinet@univ-lyon3.fr): 2.1.5<br />

Martinez, Candace A. ; Saint Louis University, USA (cmarti58@slu.edu): 3.1.9, 3.2.15<br />

Martinez, Zaida L.; St. Mary's University, USA (zmartinez@stmarytx.edu): 1.3.10<br />

Masango, Shingairai Grace; Sheffield Hallam University, United Kingdom (s.masango@shu.ac.uk): 1.1.11<br />

Mascherpa, Serena; University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy (serena.mascherpa@libero.it): 3.3.9<br />

Massini, Silvia; University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom (silvia.massini@mbs.ac.uk): 1.5.1, 3.4.5<br />

Masso, Jaan; University <strong>of</strong> Tartu, Estonia (jaan.masso@mtk.ut.ee): 2.4.7<br />

Mataloni, Ray; BEA, USA (raymond.mataloni@bea.gov): 2.3.1<br />

Matysiak, Lars; Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany (research@matysiak.com): 2.1.14<br />

McCarthy, Daniel J. ; Northeastern University, USA (da.mccarthy@neu.edu): 1.4.13<br />

McDaniel, Dana; California State University, Long Beach, USA (dana.mcdaniel@csulb.edu): 1.3.2<br />

McDermott, Gerald; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (gerald.mcdermott@moore.sc.edu): 1.1.2<br />

Mcdougall , Patricia; Indiana University, USA (mcdougal@indiana.edu): 2.1.9, 3.3.5<br />

McGahan, Anita; University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Canada (amcgahan@rotman.utoronto.ca): 1.4.P<br />

McGaughey, Sara; University <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde, United Kingdom (s.mcgaughey@strath.ac.uk): 1.1.14<br />

McGuinness, Martina; University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, United Kingdom (m.mcguinness@sheffield.ac.uk): 3.2.15<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 282


McGuire, Matthew T.; U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Commerce, USA: 1.5.2<br />

McGuire, Steven; Aberystwyth University, United Kingdom (sbm@aber.ac.uk): 1.5.3<br />

McKenny, John; English Studies Nottingham University, China (john.mckenny@nottingham.edu.cn): 1.5.15<br />

Medeiros, Janann Joslin; University <strong>of</strong> Brasilia, Brazil (janann@unb.br): 3.1.3<br />

Meinfelder, Florian; University <strong>of</strong> Bamberg, Germany (florian.meinfelder@uni-bamberg.de): 3.4.14<br />

Mellahi, Kamel; University <strong>of</strong> Warwick, United Kingdom (kamel.mellahi@wbs.ac.uk): 1.3.13, 2.2.14, 3.3.1<br />

Mendenhall, Mark; University <strong>of</strong> Tennessee, USA (mark-mendenhall@utc.edu): 2.2.2<br />

Meng, Bo; JETRO- IDE, Japan (bo_meng@ide.go.jp): 2.1.12<br />

Menghinello, Stefano ; ISTAT, Italy: 2.3.1<br />

Merchant, Hemant; USF – St. Pete, USA (merchant@fau.edu): 0.2, 1.3.5, 1.4.3<br />

Meyer, Christopher R.; Fairleigh Dickinson University, USA (chrisrmeyer@mac.com): 1.3.8<br />

Meyer, Klaus; China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School, China (kmeyer@ceibs.edu): 1.1.5, 2.1.5, 3.3.7<br />

Mezias, John; University <strong>of</strong> Miami, USA (jmezias@bus.miami.edu): 0.1, 2.3.9<br />

Mezias, Stephen; INSEAD, United Arab Emirates (stephen.mezias@insead.edu): 0.1<br />

Miao, Yuzhe; Kyung Hee University, Korea, South (yzmiao@gmail.com): 1.1.5, 3.1.11<br />

Michailova, Snejina; University <strong>of</strong> Auckland, New Zealand (s.michailova@auckland.ac.nz): 3.1.4<br />

Micu, Camelia; Fairfield University, USA (cmicu@fairfield.edu): 3.3.11<br />

Midgley, David F.; INSEAD, France (david.midgley@insead.edu): 1.4.14<br />

Mihalache, Oli; Free University Amsterdam, Netherlands (oli.mihalache@gmail.com): 3.1.12<br />

Mileski, Joan; Texas A&M University at Galveston, USA (mileskij@tamug.edu): 1.5.2<br />

Miller, Stewart; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at San Antonio, USA (stewart.miller@utsa.edu): 2.4.P<br />

Milton, Laurie ; Universidad de los Andes and University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario , Canada<br />

(laurie.milton@haskayne.ucalgary.ca): 1.5.6<br />

Mirza, Hafiz; Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD, Switzerland (Hafiz.Mirza@unctad.org): 1.3.1, 2.1.1<br />

Misani, Nicola; Università Bocconi, Italy (nicola.misani@unibocconi.it): 3.4.4<br />

Miska, Christ<strong>of</strong>; WU Vienna, Austria (christ<strong>of</strong>.miska@wu.ac.at): 2.2.2<br />

Mitchell, Matthew C.; Drake University, USA (matthew.mitchell@drake.edu): 2.1.7, 3.3.7<br />

Mockaitis, Audra ; Mockaitis, Australia (audra.mockaitis@monash.edu): 1.5.6<br />

Moghaddam, Kaveh; Old Dominion University, USA (kmoghadd@odu.edu): 1.5.9, 3.4.11<br />

Mol, Michael J; Warwick Business School, United Kingdom (michael.mol@wbs.ac.uk): 3.1.12<br />

Molteni, Mario ; Catholic University <strong>of</strong> Milan, Italy (mario.molteni@unicatt.it): 1.5.6<br />

Monin, Philippe; EMLYON Business School, France (monin@em-lyon.com): 1.1.5<br />

Monteiro, Felipe; University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (luizm@wharton.upenn.edu): 3.3.3<br />

Moon, Jon Jungbien; Korea University, Korea, South (jonjmoon@korea.ac.kr): 2.2.9<br />

Moon, Yong-lin ; Seoul National University, Korea, South (moon@plaza.snu.ac.kr): 1.5.6<br />

Moore, Fiona; Royal Holloway, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom (fiona.moore@rhul.ac.uk): 2.4.2<br />

Moran, Theodore; Georgetown University, USA (morant@georgetown.edu): 0.5, 1.3.1, 2.3.P<br />

Moreira Filho, Omar Penna; Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil (opmf@terra.com.br): 1.3.11<br />

Mori, Patricio Raul; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (pmori001@fiu.edu): 1.3.6<br />

Morresi, Ottorino; University <strong>of</strong> Roma Tre, Italy (ottorino.morresi@uniroma3.it): 3.4.11<br />

Morris, Shad; Ohio State University, USA (morris@fisher.osu.edu): 2.1.4, 2.2.5, 2.4.10<br />

Morrison, Robert Dean; University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American, USA (morrisonrd@utpa.edu): 1.1.13<br />

Morschett, Dirk; University <strong>of</strong> Fribourg, Switzerland (dirk.morschett@unifr.ch): 1.1.6<br />

Moschieri, Caterina; IE Business School / Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Spain (caterina.moschieri@ie.edu):<br />

1.4.5, 2.1.6<br />

Motsi, Terence; Cleveland State University, USA (t.motsi@csuohio.edu): 3.3.11<br />

Mroczkowski, Tomasz; American University, USA (tmrocz2002@yahoo.com): 2.2.4<br />

Mudambi, Ram ; Temple University, USA (rmudambi@temple.edu): 1.1.2, 1.5.1, 2.1.1, 2.2.P, 3.1.1, 3.3.3<br />

Mudambi, Susan; Temple University, USA (susan.mudambi@temple.edu): 3.4.1<br />

Mughan, Terry; Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom (terry.mughan@anglia.ac.uk): 2.4.2<br />

Mukherjee, Debmalya; University <strong>of</strong> Akron, USA (dmukher@uakron.edu): 3.1.12<br />

Mukumbi, Kudzai ; Michigan State University, USA (mukumbik@msu.edu): 3.3.15<br />

Muller-Kahle, Maureen I.; Penn State, USA (mim10@psu.edu): 2.3.5<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 283


Munjal, Surender; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds and University <strong>of</strong> Delhi, United Kingdom (smu@lubs.leeds.ac.uk): 3.2.11<br />

Muñoz-Bullón, Fernando ; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain (fernando.munoz@uc3m.es): 1.1.9<br />

Murad, Md. Wahid; University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia (wahid.murad@adelaide.edu.au): 3.3.14<br />

Muritiba, Patricia Morilha; University Nove de Julho, Brazil (pmorilha@gmail.com): 2.4.13<br />

Muritiba, Sergio Nunes; University Nove de Julho, Brazil (smuritiba@gmail.com): 2.4.13<br />

Murphy, William H.; University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan, Canada (wmurphy@edwards.usask.ca): 2.3.14<br />

Murray, Janet Y.; University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis, USA (murrayjan@umsl.edu): 1.4.2<br />

Murray, Tom; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USA (murray.tom-hq@epa.gov): 1.1.2<br />

Musteen, Martina; San Diego State University, USA (mmusteen@mail.sdsu.edu): 2.1.11<br />

Mutlu, Berna; University <strong>of</strong> Florida, USA (berna.mutlu@warrington.ufl.edu): 3.3.11<br />

N<br />

Nagy, Paul; Florida State University, USA (pnagy@fsu.edu): 2.1.8<br />

Nahm, Myung Hyun; Hannam University, Korea, South (mhnahm@naver.com): 3.2.11<br />

Nair, Sudhir; University <strong>of</strong> Victoria, Canada (sudhirnair.rti@gmail.com): 1.3.8<br />

Najafi Tavani, Zhaleh; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (z.najafitavani@leeds.ac.uk): 1.1.8, 3.1.5<br />

Nakamura, Shiho ; University <strong>of</strong> Ritsumeikan, Japan (snakamu@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp): 1.5.8<br />

Nakayama, Atsuho; Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan: 2.4.9<br />

Nakos, George; Clayton State University, USA (georgenakos@clayton.edu): 3.4.11<br />

Nandkumar, Anand; Indian School <strong>of</strong> Business, India (anand_nandkumar@isb.edu): 2.2.3<br />

Naoumova, Irina ; University <strong>of</strong> Hartford, USA (naoumova@hartford.edu): 1.5.6<br />

Narayanan, Krishnan; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology Bombay, India (knn@iitb.ac.in): 2.2.3<br />

Nartey, Lite; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (lite.nartey@moore.sc.edu): 1.3.7<br />

Narula, Rajneesh; Reading University , United Kingdom (r.narula@henley.reading.ac.uk): 0.2, 1.3.1, 1.4.4<br />

Naude , Peter; University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom (peter.naude@mbs.ac.uk): 1.1.8<br />

Nebus, James; Suffolk University, USA (jnebus@suffolk.edu): 1.3.6<br />

Nell, Phillip C.; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (pcn.smg@cbs.dk): 1.4.14, 2.1.15, 3.4.6<br />

Neves, Isabelle C.; Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil (isbelle.neves@fdc.org.br): 3.3.15<br />

Newburry, William; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (newburry@fiu.edu): 1.3.3, 2.4.10, 3.3.11<br />

Newenham-Kahindi, Aloysius ; University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan, Canada (newenham-kahindi@edwards.usask.ca): 3.4.3<br />

Nguyen, Pham Hoanh Son ; ESC Clermont Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Management, France (pham.nguyen@escclermont.fr):<br />

2.1.5<br />

Nguyen, Quyen T.K; University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom (t.k.q.nguyen@pgr.reading.ac.uk): 1.5.5<br />

Nicholson, Joel ; San Francisco State University, USA (jnichols@sfsu.edu): 1.5.6<br />

Nielsen, Klaus; Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom (k.nielsen@bbk.ac.uk): 1.4.13<br />

Nieto, María; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain (mnieto@emp.uc3m.es): 2.2.5<br />

Ning, Lutao; Durham University, United Kingdom (lutao.ning@durham.ac.uk): 2.4.4<br />

Niranjan, Suman; Savannah State University, USA (niranjans@savannahstate.edu): 2.4.12<br />

Nkongolo, Jean Marie; University <strong>of</strong> Regina, Canada (jean-marie.nkongolo-bakenda@uregina.ca): 1.4.11<br />

Nonaka, Ikujiro; Hitotsubashi University, Japan: 1.3.P<br />

Nooraini, Mohamad Sheriff; Universiti Teknolgi Mara, Malaysia (nooraini@salam.uitm.edu.my): 3.3.11<br />

Noorderhaven, Niels; Tilburg University, Netherlands (n.g.noorderhaven@uvt.nl): 1.4.7<br />

Nummela, Niina; Turku University, Finland (niina.nummela@utu.fi): 2.4.8<br />

Nyland , Chris ; Monash University, Australia (chris.nyland@monash.edu): 3.1.3<br />

O<br />

Oehmichen, Jana; Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany (jana.oehmichen@wiwi.uni-goettingen.de): 1.5.7,<br />

2.3.5<br />

Oesterle, Michael-Jörg; University <strong>of</strong> Stuttgart, Germany (michael-joerg.oesterle@bwi.uni-stuttgart.de): 1.4.12<br />

Oetzel, Jennifer; American University, USA (oetzelj@american.edu): 0.1, 1.4.9<br />

Offenheiser, Ray; Oxfam America, USA: 0.5<br />

Oh, Chang Hoon; Simon Fraser University, Canada (coh@brocku.ca): 1.1.8, 1.4.9, 2.4.3, 3.1.15<br />

Okhmatovskiy, Ilya; McGill University, Canada (ilya.okhmatovskiy@mcgill.ca): 2.4.6<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 284


Oldroyd, James ; Sungkyunkwan University, Korea, South (oldroyd@skku.edu): 2.2.5<br />

Olejnik, Edith; Trier University, Germany (e.olejnik@uni-trier.de): 1.1.6<br />

Olivas-Luján, Miguel R.; Clarion University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (molivas@clarion.edu): 2.4.12<br />

Oliveira, Marcelle Colares; Universidade de Fortaleza, Brazil (marcellecolares@unifor.br): 3.2.15<br />

Oliveira, Oderlene Vieira; Universidade de Fortaleza, Brazil (oderlene@hotmail.com): 3.2.15<br />

Oliveira, Raquel; Central Bank <strong>of</strong> Brazil, Brazil (raquel.oliveira@bcb.gov.br): 3.1.8<br />

Oliveira dos Santos, Igor; HEC Montreal, Canada (igor.oliveira-dos-santos@hec.ca): 2.2.12<br />

Oliveira Lima, Alexandre; Universidade de Fortaleza, Brazil (alexandre@acep.org.br): 2.1.11<br />

Ordenana, Xavier; ESPAE Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Management, Ecuador (xordenan@espol.edu.ec): 3.1.10<br />

Osland, Asbjorn; San Jose State University, USA (asbjorn.osland@sjsu.edu): 3.2.12<br />

Osland, Joyce; San Jose State University, USA (joyce.osland@sjsu.edu): 3.2.12<br />

Ott, Ursula F.; Loughborough University, United Kingdom (u.f.ott@lboro.ac.uk): 2.3.12, 3.1.7<br />

Ozaki, Toshiya; Rikkyo University, Japan (ozakit@rikkyo.ac.jp): 1.5.3<br />

Ozgen, Huseyin ; Cukurova University , Turkey (husozgen@gmail.com): 2.3.15<br />

P<br />

Pahlberg, Cecilia ; Uppsala University, Sweden (cecilia.pahlberg@fek.uu.se): 2.4.6<br />

Paik, Yongsun ; Loyola Marymount University, USA (yspaik@lmu.edu): 1.1.15<br />

Pak, Yong Suhk ; Yonsei University, Korea, South (yspak@yonsei.ac.kr): 3.1.5, 3.3.12<br />

Palmer, Ian ; Royal Melbourne Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Australia (ian.palmer@rmit.edu.au): 1.5.6<br />

Paluch, Stefanie; TU Dortmund University, Germany (stefanie.paluch@tu-dortmund.de): 1.5.15<br />

Pan, Alan; Xiamen University, China (apan@indiana.edu): 3.3.11<br />

Pan, David W.; Prince Sultan University, Saudi Arabia (david.pan@ufl.edu): 3.3.11<br />

Pananond, Pavida; Thammasat Business School, Thailand (pavida@tbs.tu.ac.th): 1.3.1, 2.1.12<br />

Papadopoulos, Nicolas; Carleton University, Canada (nicolas_papadopoulos@carleton.ca): 2.3.4<br />

Papageorgiadis, Nikolaos P. ; Bradford University School <strong>of</strong> Management , United Kingdom<br />

(n.papageorgiadis1@bradford.ac.uk): 1.1.10<br />

Papanastassiou, Marina; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (mpa.smg@cbs.dk): 1.5.11<br />

Parente, Ronaldo; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (rcparent@fiu.edu): 1.1.2, 1.5.12, 2.2.11, 3.3.11<br />

Parikh, Bhavik; University <strong>of</strong> Memphis, USA (brparikh@memphis.edu): 2.3.12<br />

Park, Ji Eun; Cleveland State University, USA (jepark03@gmail.com): 3.3.11<br />

Park, Jong-Hun; Sogang University, Korea, South (johnpark@sogang.ac.kr): 3.3.8<br />

Park, Sam; SKOLKOVO Institute for Emerging Market Studies, China (spark@skolkovo.org): 0.1<br />

Park, Taehoon; Osaka City University, Japan (taehoon@gscc.osaka-cu.ac.jp): 2.3.14<br />

Park, Young-Ryeol ; Yonsei University, Korea, South (yrpark@yonsei.ac.kr): 1.1.15, 3.1.8, 3.3.12<br />

Park, Yung-Hwal; Saint Louis University, USA (ypark9@slu.edu): 3.3.15<br />

Parker, Lee D.; University <strong>of</strong> South Australia, Australia (lee.parker@unisa.edu.au): 1.3.12<br />

Parks, Tomas Alexander; Cleveland State University, USA (t.a.parks@csuohio.edu): 2.4.13<br />

Pastoriza, David; HEC Montreal, Canada (david.pastoriza@hec.ca): 3.4.11<br />

Pasupuleti, Venkata Vijay Kumar; IIM Indore, India (f07venkatav@iimidr.ac.in): 1.3.12<br />

Patacconi, Andrea ; Aberdeen University , United Kingdom (a.patacconi@abdn.ac.uk): 2.4.14<br />

Patara, Yupin; Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (yupin.patara@sasin.edu): 3.2.13, 3.3.11<br />

Pater, Maximiliaan Johannes; University <strong>of</strong> Groningen, Netherlands (m.j.pater@student.rug.nl): 1.4.11<br />

Patnaik, Swetketu; University <strong>of</strong> Kaiserslautern, Germany (patnaik@wiwi.uni-kl.de): 1.5.14<br />

Pattnaik, Chinmay; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney , Australia (chinmay.pattnaik@sydney.edu.au): 2.4.7<br />

Paulraj, Antony; University <strong>of</strong> North Florida, USA (apaulraj@unf.edu): 2.1.12<br />

Pearce, Robert; University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom (r.d.pearce@reading.ac.uk): 1.5.11, 3.1.11, 3.2.14<br />

Pedersen, Torben; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (tp.smg@cbs.dk): 0.2, 1.3.9, 1.5.4, 2.4.P, 3.3.6<br />

Peeters, Carine; Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium (carine.peeters@ulb.ac.be): 3.4.5<br />

Pehrsson, Anders; Linnaeus University, Sweden (anders.pehrsson@lnu.se): 2.1.14<br />

Pekerti, Andre ; University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Australia (a.pekerti@uq.edu.au): 1.5.6, 3.1.13<br />

Peña, Maria; Vital Voices Global Partnerships , USA: 2.2.1<br />

Pendock, Catherine; GIBS, University <strong>of</strong> Pretoria, South Africa (cpendock@za.go2uti.com): 2.2.13<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 285


Peng, Mike; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA (mikepeng@utdallas.edu): 1.3.7, 1.5.P, 3.2.15<br />

Peng, Yao-Ping; National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan (s91370001@mail2000.com.tw): 2.1.14<br />

Peot, Chris; District <strong>of</strong> Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, USA: 1.3.2<br />

Perkins, Susan; Northwestern University, USA (s-perkins@kellogg.northwestern.edu): 1.3.3<br />

Perri, Alessandra; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain (aperri@emp.uc3m.es): 3.4.6<br />

Perry, Mark J. ; University <strong>of</strong> Michigan-Flint, USA (mjperry@umich.edu): 3.1.9<br />

Pesch, Robin N.; University <strong>of</strong> Bayreuth, Germany (robin.pesch@uni-bayreuth.de): 2.1.8<br />

Petersen, Bent; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (bp.smg@cbs.dk): 3.1.14<br />

Petrova, Liudmila V.; National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Russia (kuzmicheva@list.ru): 1.5.15<br />

Pezzi, Alberto; University <strong>of</strong> Roma Tre, Italy (pezzi@uniroma3.it): 3.4.11<br />

Pfajfar, Gregor; University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Slovenia (gregor.pfajfar@ef.uni-lj.si): 3.2.13<br />

Pfeffermann, Guy; Founder & CEO, Global Business School Network, USA (gpfeffermann@gmail.com): 2.3.10<br />

Phene, Anupama; George Washington University, USA (anuphene@gwu.edu): 0.1, 3.1.5, 3.4.11<br />

Phillips, Christine; University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom (c.b.phillips@henley.reading.ac.uk): 3.2.14<br />

Piaskowska, Dorota; University College Dublin, Ireland (dorota.piaskowska@ucd.ie): 1.4.12<br />

Piesse, Jenifer; Kings College London and University <strong>of</strong> Bournemouth, United Kingdom (jenifer.piesse@kcl.ac.uk):<br />

1.1.3, 1.4.11<br />

Pietrobelli, Carlo; IADB and University <strong>of</strong> Roma Tre, Italy (carlop@iadb.org): 3.3.2<br />

Pinkham, Brian C.; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA (brian.pinkham@utdallas.edu): 2.1.6<br />

Pino, Carol; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., USA: 1.4.2<br />

Piscitello, Lucia; Politecnico di Milano, Italy (lucia.piscitello@polimi.it): 1.5.4, 2.1.6<br />

Pitelis, Christos; University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, United Kingdom (c.pitelis@jbs.cam.ac.uk): 1.4.P, 2.1.1<br />

Pla-Barber, Jose ; University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Spain (jose.pla@uv.es): 1.5.6, 2.2.11<br />

Poirier, Diane; American Red Cross, USA: 1.4.2<br />

Ponte, Vera Maria Rodrigues ; Universidade Federal do Ceara, Brazil (vponte@fortalnet.com.br): 3.2.15<br />

Porter, Michael E.; Harvard Business School, USA (mporter@hbs.edu): 3.1.6<br />

Potocan, Vojko V. ; University <strong>of</strong> Maribor, Slovenia (vojko.potocan@uni-mb.si): 1.5.6<br />

Powell, K. Skylar; University <strong>of</strong> Michigan-Flint, USA (kristans@umflint.edu): 3.3.12<br />

Prashantham, Shameen; Nottingham University Business School, China<br />

(shameen.prashantham@nottingham.edu.cn): 2.1.9, 3.1.1, 3.3.6, 3.4.9<br />

Primo, Marcos Andre; Federal University <strong>of</strong> Pernambuco, Brazil (marcos.primo@ufpe.br): 1.3.11<br />

Prince, J. Bruce; Kansas State University, USA (jbprince@ksu.edu): 2.4.13<br />

Prince, Nicholas R.; University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (prince4@illinois.edu): 2.4.13<br />

Puck, Jonas F.; WU Vienna, Austria (jonas.puck@wu.ac.at): 1.3.4, 2.1.15, 3.4.11<br />

Pudelko, Markus; Tübingen University, Germany (markus.pudelko@uni-tuebingen.de): 2.2.10, 2.3.6<br />

Puffer, Sheila M.; Northeastern University, USA (s.puffer@neu.edu): 1.4.13, 2.2.2<br />

Punnett, Betty Jane; University <strong>of</strong> the West Indies, Barbados (eureka@caribsurf.com): 1.5.15, 3.1.10<br />

Puranam, Phanish; London Business School, United Kingdom (ppuranam@london.edu): 3.3.13<br />

Purani, Keyoor; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management Kozhikode, India (kpurani@iimk.ac.in): 3.3.11<br />

Purg, Danica; IEDC-Bled School <strong>of</strong> Management, Slovenia (danica.purg@iedc.si): 2.1.2<br />

Q<br />

Qian, Gongming; Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (qian@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk): 1.3.14,<br />

3.4.4<br />

Qin, Lijun; Macquarie University, Australia (lijun.qin@mq.edu.au): 3.2.11<br />

Qiu, Ranfeng; California State University San Bernardino, USA (rqiu@csusb.edu): 1.1.9<br />

Quester, Pascale; University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia (pascale.quester@adelaide.edu.au): 3.3.11<br />

R<br />

Ra, Wonchan; Hankuk University <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies, Korea, South (wonra@hufs.ac.kr): 3.1.5<br />

Rabbiosi, Larissa; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (lr.smg@cbs.dk): 2.4.15<br />

Radebe, Busi; Wits Business School, South Africa (johnluiz@telkomsa.net): 1.3.11<br />

Rademaker, Linda ; Tilburg University, Netherlands (c.h.a.rademaker@uvt.nl): 1.4.6<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 286


Raghunath, S ; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management in Bangalore, India (srnath@iimb.ernet.in): 0.2<br />

Ragozzino, Roberto; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA (rragozzino@utdallas.edu): 1.4.5, 2.1.6<br />

Rahman, Manzur; University <strong>of</strong> San Diego, USA (rahman@sandiego.edu): 1.1.15<br />

Rajwani, Tazeeb; Cranfield University , United Kingdom (tazeeb.rajwani@cranfield.ac.uk): 1.5.3<br />

Ralston, David A.; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (ralstond@fiu.edu): 1.5.6, 2.2.7<br />

Rama, Ruth; CCHS-CSIC (Spanish National Research Council), Spain (ruth.rama@cchs.csic.es): 2.1.8<br />

Ramachandran, Indu; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at San Antonio, USA (indu.ramachandran@utsa.edu): 3.2.15<br />

Ramamurti, Ravi; Northeastern University, USA (r.ramamurti@neu.edu): 2.3.P<br />

Ramburuth, Prem ; University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (p.ramburuth@unsw.edu.au): 1.5.6<br />

Ramirez, Andres; Bryant University, USA (aramirez@bryant.edu): 3.3.14<br />

Rammal, Hussain G.; University <strong>of</strong> South Australia, Australia (hussain.rammal@unisa.edu.au): 1.3.12, 1.4.3<br />

Ramos, Miguel; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at El Paso, USA (maramosgonzalez@utep.edu): 1.4.9<br />

Ramsey, Jase; University <strong>of</strong> Alabama, USA (jase@cba.ua.edu): 1.5.13<br />

Ranft, Annette; University <strong>of</strong> Tennessee, USA (aranft@utk.edu): 2.1.8<br />

Rao Nicholson, Rekha; University <strong>of</strong> Bath, United Kingdom (r.rao@bath.ac.uk): 3.2.11<br />

Rao Sahib, Padma; University <strong>of</strong> Groningen , Netherlands (p.rao.sahib@rug.nl): 1.5.8, 2.1.6<br />

Rapp, Marc Steffen; Philipps-University Marburg, Germany (mail@m-s-rapp.de): 1.5.7<br />

Rask, Morten; Aarhus University, Denmark (mr@morten-rask.dk): 2.3.14, 2.4.11<br />

Ratner, Mitchell; Rider University, USA (ratner@rider.edu): 1.3.12<br />

Rattrie-Wilcox, Lucy; University <strong>of</strong> Stirling, United Kingdom (lucy.wilcox@stir.ac.uk): 3.4.13<br />

Ravlin, Elizabeth C.; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (ravlin@moore.sc.edu): 3.1.13<br />

Raz, Maziar; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (mraz.phd@ivey.ca): 2.2.11<br />

Reade, Carol; San Jose State University, USA (carol.reade@sjsu.edu): 3.1.13, 3.2.12<br />

Redding, Gordon; INSEAD, Singapore (gordon.redding@gmail.com): 3.1.2<br />

Reiche, B. Sebastian; IESE Business School, Spain (sreiche@iese.edu): 2.3.6<br />

Reis, Germano Glufke ; FGV/EAESP, Brazil (germanoglufkereis@yahoo.com.br): 1.1.12<br />

Ren, Monica; Macquarie University, Australia (monica.ren@mq.edu.au): 3.2.11<br />

Reynaud, Emmanuelle ; IAE d'Aix-en-Provence, France (emmanuelle.reynaud@iae-aix.com): 1.5.6<br />

Ribeiro, Maísa de Souza; University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, Brazil (maisorib@usp.br): 3.2.15<br />

Richards, Malika ; Pennsylvania State University, USA (mur12@psu.edu): 1.5.6<br />

Richardson, Nela Thomas; Bloomberg, USA (nrichardso11@bloomberg.net): 1.5.7<br />

Richta, Hannah Noriko; University <strong>of</strong> Mainz, Germany (hannahrichta@web.de): 1.4.12<br />

Richter, Ulf; Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru (urichter@pucp.edu.pe): 3.1.7<br />

Riddle, Liesl; George Washington University, USA (lriddle@gwu.edu): 0.5, 2.2.1, 2.3.2<br />

Ritvala, Tiina Anna-Maria; Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland (tiina.ritvala@aalto.fi): 1.1.7<br />

Rivers, Cheryl; Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington, New Zealand (cheryl.rivers@vuw.ac.nz): 3.1.7<br />

Robinson, Marc ; William Davidson Institute at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, USA (marcrob@umich.edu): 2.3.10<br />

Robinson, Nicholas; North Island College, Canada (nick.robinson@nic.bc.ca): 1.5.10<br />

Robinson, Patricia (Tish) ; Hitotsubashi University, Japan (probinson@ics.hit-u.ac.jp): 3.1.7<br />

Robles, Fernando; George Washington University, USA (roblesf@gwu.edu): 1.3.11, 1.4.10<br />

Rocha, Thelma Valéria; ESPM, Brazil (tvrocha@espm.br): 2.3.14<br />

Rodrigues, Suzana Braga; Erasmus University, Netherlands (srodrigues@rsm.nl): 1.4.7<br />

Roehl, Tom W; Western Washington University, USA (tom.roehl@wwu.edu): 3.3.10<br />

Rogbeer , Shalini ; WU Wien , Austria (shalini.rogbeer@wu.ac.at): 1.5.11, 3.3.6<br />

Rojas-Méndez, José I.; Carleton University, Canada (jose_rojas@carleton.ca): 2.3.4<br />

Ronchi, Stefano; Politecnico di Milano, Italy (stefano.ronchi@polimi.it): 1.5.4<br />

Roomes, Donald; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (roomesd@fiu.edu): 1.5.13<br />

Rose, Elizabeth L.; Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland (elizabeth.rose@aalto.fi): 1.1.6, 1.4.3, 1.5.5, 2.4.9,<br />

3.4.12<br />

Rose, Jerman; Washington State University, USA (rosej@wsu.edu): 1.4.10<br />

Rossi, Ana Maria ; Clinica De Stress E Bi<strong>of</strong>eedback, Brazil (stress@anamrossi.com.br): 1.5.6<br />

Rottig, Daniel; Florida Gulf Coast University, USA (drottig@fgcu.edu): 1.1.14, 1.3.14<br />

Rowney, Julie; University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada (julie.rowney@haskayne.ucalgary.ca): 1.1.15<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 287


Rudzki, Romuald; New Zealand School <strong>of</strong> Export , New Zealand (rom@export.ac.nz): 1.5.15<br />

Rugman, Alan M.; University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom (a.rugman@henley.reading.ac.uk): 0.2, 0.5, 1.2.P, 1.3.P,<br />

1.4.4, 1.5.5, 2.4.3<br />

Ruiz Gutiérrez, Jaime; Universidad de los Andes, Colombia (jar@adm.uniandes.edu.co): 1.5.6<br />

Rustambekov, Elzotbek; Old Dominion University, USA (erustamb@odu.edu): 3.3.13<br />

S<br />

Sabac, Florin; University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Canada (fsabac@ualberta.ca): 1.1.15<br />

Sahadev, Sunil; University <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, United Kingdom (s.sahadev@sheffield.ac.uk): 2.1.15<br />

Saito, Richard; Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil (rsaito@finenge.com): 1.3.11<br />

Saito, Yasuhiro; Tokyo <strong>International</strong> University, Japan (saitoy@tiu.ac.jp): 1.3.11<br />

Salaber, Julie; University <strong>of</strong> Bath, United Kingdom (js509@management.bath.ac.uk): 3.2.11<br />

Salata, Genrikh; Australian National University, Australia (genrikh.salata@anu.edu.au): 2.3.11<br />

Saleem, Farida ; FUIEMS, Foundation University, Pakistan (farida-saleem@hotmail.com): 1.3.15<br />

Salmi, Asta; Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland (asta.salmi@aalto.fi): 1.1.7<br />

Salunke, Sandeep; Queensland University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Australia (sandeep.salunke@qut.edu.au): 3.3.9<br />

Salzmann, Astrid Juliane; RWTH Aachen University, Germany (astrid.salzmann@bfw.rwth-aachen.de): 3.1.15, 3.4.7<br />

Sambharya, Rakesh; Rutgers University - Camden, USA (sambhary@camden.rutgers.edu): 2.1.11<br />

Sammartino, Andre; University <strong>of</strong> Melbourne, Australia (samma@unimelb.edu.au): 2.4.3, 3.1.9, 3.2.14<br />

Sánchez-Bueno, Maria ; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain (mjsanche@ing.uc3m.es): 1.1.9<br />

Sandberg, Jörgen; University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Australia (j.sandberg@business.uq.edu.au): 2.1.9<br />

Sandberg, Susanne; Linnaeus University, Sweden (susanne.sandberg@lnu.se): 3.3.5<br />

Sanford, Douglas; Towson University, USA (dsanford@towson.edu): 2.1.13<br />

Santamaría, Lluis ; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain (lsantama@emp.uc3m.es): 2.2.5<br />

Santangelo, Grazia D.; University <strong>of</strong> Catania, Italy (grsanta@unict.it): 1.5.4, 3.4.6<br />

Sarala, Riikka ; University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, Greensboro, USA (rmsarala@uncg.edu): 2.2.10, 3.1.10<br />

Sarmento, Paula; University <strong>of</strong> Porto, Portugal (sarmento@fep.up.pt): 3.1.14<br />

Sartor, Michael; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (msartor.phd@ivey.ca): 2.2.4, 3.1.9, 3.2.15<br />

Sasi, Viveca; Aalto University School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Finland (viveca.sasi@aalto.fi): 1.4.3, 2.4.11<br />

Satinsky, Daniel M.; Russia Innovation Collaborative, USA (dsatinsky@russiainnovation.com): 1.4.13<br />

Schaan, Jean-Louis; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (jlschaan@ivey.uwo.ca): 2.4.13<br />

Schaaper, Johannes; Bordeaux Management School, France (jan.schaaper@bem.edu): 1.1.14<br />

Scherer, Robert; Cleveland State University, USA (r.scherer@csuohio.edu): 2.1.11<br />

Scherer, Susanne Johanna; WU Vienna, Austria (susanne.scherer@wu.ac.at): 2.1.14<br />

Schettler, Margareta S.; U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> State, USA: 1.5.2, 2.2.1<br />

Schiozer, Rafael Felipe; Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil (rafael.schiozer@fgv.br): 2.3.12, 3.1.8<br />

Schlegelmilch, Bodo B.; WU Vienna, Austria (bodo.schlegelmilch@wu.ac.at): 2.1.3<br />

Schmid, Stefan; ESCP Europe, Germany (sschmid@escpeurope.eu): 3.3.4<br />

Schmidt, Mareike; University <strong>of</strong> Bremen, Germany (mareike.schmidt@uni-bremen.de): 1.4.11<br />

Schneper, William ; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (wschneper@gmail.com): 2.1.6, 3.3.7<br />

Scholnick, Barry; University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Canada (barry.scholnick@ualberta.ca): 3.1.12<br />

Schomaker, Margaret Spring; Université Laval, Canada (margaret.schomaker@mng.ulaval.ca): 1.1.4<br />

Schotter, Andreas ; Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management, USA (andreas.schotter@thunderbird.edu): 1.3.6,<br />

1.4.14<br />

Schulze, Anja; swiss Center for Automotive Research (swiss CAR), Switzerland (aschulze@ethz.ch): 1.1.2<br />

Schuster, Anja Maria; Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Economics and Business, Austria (anja.schuster@wu.ac.at): 2.2.7, 3.1.10<br />

Sedoglavich, Vesna; Australian National University, Australia (vesna.sedoglavich@anu.edu.au): 2.3.11, 2.4.8<br />

Sekhar, Sashi C.; University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA (scsekhar@uwm.edu): 1.1.15<br />

Selleck, Lauren; University <strong>of</strong> Akron, USA (ellejay86@hotmail.com): 1.4.15<br />

Semaan, Rania; Baruch College, CUNY, USA (rania.semaan@baruch.cuny.edu): 2.3.4<br />

Semenov, Alexey V.; Saint Louis University, USA (asemenov@slu.edu): 1.3.11<br />

Sepehri, Mohamad; Jacksonville University, USA (msepehr@ju.edu): 2.2.12<br />

Servais, Per; University <strong>of</strong> Southern Denmark, Denmark (per@sam.sdu.dk): 2.4.11<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 288


Settles, Alexander M.; National Research University Higher School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Russia (asettles@hse.ru): 1.4.5,<br />

1.5.15<br />

Shackman, Joshua; Trident University, USA (jshackman@tuiu.edu): 1.3.12<br />

Shapiro, Daniel M.; Simon Fraser University, Canada (dshapiro@sfu.ca): 1.4.8, 2.3.7, 3.4.3<br />

Shaver, Myles; University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, USA (mshaver@umn.edu): 3.2.P<br />

Shenkar, Oded; Ohio State University, USA (shenkar_1@fisher.osu.edu): 3.1.5<br />

Sherry, Jim; Director, Center for Global Health, George Washington University, USA: 2.3.3<br />

Shi, Boxia; Harbin Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, China (shiboxia310@126.com): 2.3.15<br />

Shi, Wei; Rice University, USA (ws9@rice.edu): 2.2.14<br />

Shin, Hyun; Long Island University, USA (hyun.shin@liu.edu): 2.2.4<br />

Shin, Man Soo ; Korea University, Korea, South (shinms@korea.ac.kr): 3.1.13<br />

Shoham, Amir; Temple, USA (tud20698@temple.edu): 1.3.12<br />

Shoham, Aviv; University <strong>of</strong> Haifa, Israel (ashoham@univ.haifa.ac.il): 3.2.13<br />

Shukla, Abhishek; Charles Darwin University, Australia (abhishek.shukla@cdu.edu.au): 1.5.5<br />

Shukla, Pallavi; Rutgers University, USA (p.shukla.awasthi@gmail.com): 3.4.14<br />

Silva, Susana Costa E; Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal (ssilva@porto.ucp.pt): 2.3.14<br />

Silveira Fontenele, Raimundo Eduardo; Universidade de Fortaleza, Brazil (fontenele@unifor.br): 2.1.11<br />

Simões, Vítor Corado; ISEG, Technical University <strong>of</strong> Lisbon, Portugal (vcs@iseg.utl.pt): 2.4.11<br />

Sinangil, Handan Kepir; Marmara University , Turkey (hsinangil@gmail.com): 2.4.10<br />

Singal, Ajay Kumar; Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, Lucknow, India (ajay.singal@iiml.ac.in): 1.5.12<br />

Singal, Manisha; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA (msingal@vt.edu): 1.5.12<br />

Singer, Slavica; GEM Croatia Team Leader; J.J. Strossmayer University, Croatia: 1.4.1<br />

Singh, Deeksha A. ; Temple University, USA (deeksha@temple.edu): 2.3.12, 2.4.4<br />

Singh, Nitish; Saint Louis University, USA (singhn2@slu.edu): 3.3.15<br />

Singh, Satwinder; Brunel University, United Kingdom (satwinder.singh@brunel.ac.uk): 3.1.4<br />

Sinkovics, Rudolf; University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United Kingdom (rudolf.sinkovics@manchester.ac.uk): 2.3.6, 3.1.5<br />

Skaggs, Bruce C.; University <strong>of</strong> Massachusetts, USA (bskaggs@isenberg.umass.edu): 1.3.8<br />

Skousen, Bradley R.; University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (bradleyskousen@gmail.com): 1.3.14, 2.4.13<br />

Slangen, Arjen; RSM Erasmus University, Netherlands (aslangen@rsm.nl): 3.1.3<br />

Sleuwaegen, Leo; Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and University <strong>of</strong> Leuven, Belgium<br />

(leo.sleuwaegen@econ.kuleuven.be): 1.5.9<br />

Smeets, Roger; Amsterdam Business School, Netherlands (r.smeets@uva.nl): 1.1.10<br />

Smith, Chad; Clarion University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, USA (csmith@clarion.edu): 2.4.12<br />

Smith, Matthew Grady; Rutgers Business School, USA (matthewgradysmith@gmail.com): 1.1.4, 1.5.7<br />

Smith, Natalya; University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool, United Kingdom (natalya.smith@liv.ac.uk): 1.4.13<br />

Søderberg, Anne-Marie; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (ams.ikl@cbs.dk): 2.4.2<br />

S<strong>of</strong>ka, Wolfgang; Tilburg University, Netherlands (w.e.j.s<strong>of</strong>ka@uvt.nl): 1.3.6<br />

Soh, Christine ; University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, United Kingdom (christineclarissesoh@hotmail.com): 3.1.11<br />

Somaya, Deepak; University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA (dsomaya@illinois.edu): 1.4.13<br />

Somers, Dieter; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (dieter.somers@econ.kuleuven.be): 3.1.4, 3.2.11<br />

Sonderegger, Petra; Independent Researcher, India (petras@gmail.com): 1.5.11, 3.1.11<br />

Søndergaard, Mikael; University <strong>of</strong> Aarhus, Denmark (msoendergaard@econ.au.dk): 1.3.2<br />

Song, Chang; Renmin University <strong>of</strong> China, China (changsong22@sina.com): 1.1.15<br />

Song, Jaeyong ; Seoul National University, Korea, South (jsong@snu.ac.kr): 1.1.5, 2.3.6, 3.1.11<br />

Song, Sangcheol ; Bryant University, USA (mailsong2@hanmail.net): 1.1.15, 2.3.15, 3.1.8<br />

Sonkova, Marketa; Boston University, USA (marketa.sonkova@gmail.com): 2.3.12<br />

Sopp, Karina; University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, Austria (karina.sopp@univie.ac.at): 2.3.5<br />

Sørgard, Lars; Norwegian School <strong>of</strong> Economics, Norway (lars.sorgard@nhh.no): 1.4.5<br />

Spahr, Ronald; University <strong>of</strong> Memphis, USA (rspahr@memphis.edu): 2.3.12<br />

Spencer, Jennifer; George Washington University, USA (jspencer@gwu.edu): 0.1, 2.4.14, 3.1.4, 3.4.11<br />

Spicer, Andrew; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (aspicer@moore.sc.edu): 1.4.P, 2.4.6, 3.3.7, 3.4.10<br />

Spillan, John E. ; University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Pembroke, USA (john.spillan@uncp.edu): 1.3.12<br />

Spitzeck, Heiko H.; Fundação Dom Cabral, Brazil (heiko@fdc.org.br): 3.3.15<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 289


Srikanth, Kannan; Indian School <strong>of</strong> Business, India (kannan_srikanth@isb.edu): 2.2.3<br />

Srinivasan, Narasimhan ; University <strong>of</strong> Connecticut, USA (han.srinivasan@business.uconn.edu): 1.5.6<br />

Stanton, Matt; South Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Business & Technology, Australia (matt.stanton@unisa.edu.au): 3.3.11<br />

Staples, Andrew ; Doshisha Business School, Japan (astaples@mail.doshisha.ac.jp): 1.5.8<br />

Starkus, Arunas ; CIBER-Vilnius, Lithuania (arunas.starkus@ciber.lt): 1.5.6<br />

Stefanidis, Abraham; St. John's University, USA (stefania@stjohns.edu): 3.1.7<br />

Stensaker, Inger G.; NHH, Norway (inger.stensaker@nhh.no): 2.4.8<br />

Stern, Scott; MIT, USA (sstern@mit.edu): 3.1.6<br />

Sternquist, Brenda; Michigan State University, USA (sternqui@msu.edu): 3.2.13, 3.3.15<br />

Stevens, Charles Edward; University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming, USA (csteve10@uwyo.edu): 2.3.15, 3.1.14<br />

Stoian, Carmen Raluca; University <strong>of</strong> Kent , United Kingdom (c.r.stoian@kent.ac.uk): 1.4.15<br />

Stone, Zita; University <strong>of</strong> Kent , United Kingdom (z.stone@kent.ac.uk): 1.4.15<br />

Stoner, John; McKinsey & Co., USA (john_stoner@mckinsey.com): 2.4.1<br />

Storgaard, Marianne; Kolding School <strong>of</strong> Design, Denmark (ms@dskd.dk): 1.4.14<br />

Story, Vicky M.; University <strong>of</strong> Nottingham, United Kingdom (vicky.story@nottingham.ac.uk): 3.3.4<br />

Strange, Roger ; University <strong>of</strong> Sussex, United Kingdom (r.n.strange@sussex.ac.uk): 1.1.3, 2.4.4, 3.3.9<br />

Stucchi, Tamara; Copenhagen Business School, Denmark (ts.smg@cbs.dk): 1.4.8, 2.4.15<br />

Su, Wan-Ting; National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan (szlin0831@gmail.com): 3.1.5<br />

Su, Weichieh; University <strong>of</strong> Texas at Dallas, USA (weichieh.su@gmail.com): 1.3.7<br />

Subramanian, Venkat ; Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Belgium (venkat@vlerick.com): 1.5.12<br />

Suder, Gabriele; SKEMA Business School and ANUCES Fellow, France (gabriele.suder@skema.edu): 1.3.1, 1.4.2,<br />

2.1.12<br />

Suh, Chung-Sok; University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (c.suh@unsw.edu.au): 3.2.11<br />

Sui, Sui; Ryerson University, Canada (sui.sui.66@gmail.com): 2.4.11<br />

Sukoco, Badri Munir; Airlangga University, Indonesia (badri@feb.unair.ac.id): 1.1.7, 3.4.12<br />

Sullivan Mort, Gillian; La Trobe University, Australia (g.sullivan-mort@latrobe.edu.au): 3.3.9<br />

Sun, Francis Yonglin; Woodbury School <strong>of</strong> Business, USA (francis.sun@aya.yale.edu): 2.3.6<br />

Sun, Laixiang; SOAS, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom (ls28@soas.ac.uk): 1.3.5<br />

Swoboda, Bernhard; University <strong>of</strong> Trier, Germany (b.swoboda@uni-trier.de): 1.1.6<br />

Sy-Changco, Joseph Adea; University <strong>of</strong> Macau, Macau (josephs@umac.mo): 2.1.13<br />

Symeonidou, Theoni-Eirini; Imperial College, United Kingdom (t.symeonidou09@imperial.ac.uk): 1.1.6<br />

Szabo, Erna ; Johannes Kepler University, Austria (erna.szabo@jku.at): 1.5.6<br />

T<br />

Takahashi, Ichiro; Jissen Women's University, Japan (takahashi-ichiro@jissen.ac.jp): 1.3.11<br />

Takenouchi, Hideyuki ; Sophia University, Japan (takeno-h@sophia.ac.jp): 1.3.11<br />

Takeuchi, Norihiko; Aoyama Gakuin University, Japan (ntake@busi.aoyama.ac.jp): 2.4.9<br />

Takeuchi, Tomokazu; Gakushuin University, Japan (tomo-t@mte.biglobe.ne.jp): 2.4.9<br />

Tallman, Steve; University <strong>of</strong> Richmond, USA (stallman@richmond.edu): 0.2<br />

Tan, Alvin; Queensland University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Australia (ac.tan@qut.edu.au): 2.1.5<br />

Tan, Bernard; University <strong>of</strong> St. Joseph, Singapore (bernardcstan@gmail.com): 2.1.13<br />

Tan, Brian R.; Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (abrtan@ntu.edu.sg): 3.1.15<br />

Tan, Weiqiang; Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (wqtan@hkbu.edu.hk): 1.3.7<br />

Tang, Jing'an; Sacred Heart University, USA (tangj3@sacredheart.edu): 1.4.6<br />

Tang, Yinuo; University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh, USA (tangyn04@gmail.com): 1.4.5<br />

Tang, Yuxuan; University <strong>of</strong> Reading, United Kingdom (yuxuan.tang@pgr.reading.ac.uk): 3.2.14<br />

Tanskul, Nicha; Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (nicha.tanskul@sasin.edu): 3.3.11<br />

Taras, Vas; University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina Greensboro , USA (v_taras@uncg.edu): 2.1.7, 2.2.10, 3.1.10<br />

Tatoglu, Ekrem; Bahcesehir University, Turkey (ekremt@bahcesehir.edu.tr): 1.1.13, 2.1.15, 3.3.8<br />

Täube, Florian; EBS Business School, Germany (florian.taeube@ebs.edu): 1.1.2, 1.3.15, 1.5.11, 2.3.2, 3.1.11<br />

Taussig, Markus David; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (markus@nus.edu.sg): 1.3.8, 2.4.5<br />

Teagarden, Mary Boyden; Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management, USA (mary.teagarden@thunderbird.edu):<br />

1.4.14, 2.2.1<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 290


Teegen, Hildy; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (teegen@moore.sc.edu): 0.1<br />

Temouri, Yama; Aston University, United Kingdom (y.temouri1@aston.ac.uk): 3.3.12<br />

Tenzer, Helene; Tübingen University, Germany (helene.tenzer@uni-tuebingen.de): 2.2.10<br />

Terpstra-Tong, Jane ; Monash University, Malaysia (jane.tong@buseco.monash.edu.my): 1.5.6<br />

Thaijongrak, Ornjira; University <strong>of</strong> Bath, Thailand (t.ornjira@gmail.com): 1.1.5<br />

Thakur, Pooja; Virginia Tech, USA (pthakur@vt.edu): 3.1.12<br />

Thams, Yannick; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (thamsy@fiu.edu): 3.4.13<br />

Thanh, Hung Vu ; National Economics University, Vietnam (vuthanhhung@hotmail.com): 1.5.6<br />

Thavikulwat, Precha; Towson University, USA (pthavikulwat@towson.edu): 1.3.10<br />

Thein, Htwe Htwe; Curtin University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Australia (vicki.thein@cbs.curtin.edu.au): 3.3.7<br />

Thomas, Ekaterina; Staffordshire University, United Kingdom (katerina.thomas@staffs.ac.uk): 1.4.13<br />

Thomé, Karim Marini; University <strong>of</strong> Brasilia, Brazil (thome@unb.br): 2.3.14, 3.1.3<br />

Thompson, Edmund R.; University <strong>of</strong> Bath, United Kingdom (e.r.thompson@bath.ac.uk): 1.4.6<br />

Tihanyi, Laszlo; Texas A&M University, USA (ltihanyi@tamu.edu): 2.1.P, 2.4.P<br />

Todd, Patricia; Western Kentucky University, USA (patricia.todd@wku.edu): 2.1.11<br />

Tolentino, Paz Estrella ; Birkbeck, University <strong>of</strong> London, United Kingdom (p.tolentino@bbk.ac.uk): 1.1.8, 1.5.11<br />

Tolmie, Carri R.; Saint Louis University, USA (creisdor@slu.edu): 1.1.15, 3.3.15<br />

Torres, Miguel Matos ; University <strong>of</strong> Aveiro, Portugal (miguel.torres@ua.pt): 3.1.14, 3.2.14<br />

Torres Baumgarten, Gladys; Ramapo College <strong>of</strong> NJ, USA (torresbaumgarten@gmail.com): 1.3.11<br />

Torres Carbonell, Silvia; GEM Argentina Team Leader; IAE Business School, Argentina: 1.4.1<br />

Totskaya, Natalya; Concordia University, Canada (n_totska@jmsb.concordia.ca): 1.4.15<br />

Trigeorgis, Lenos; University <strong>of</strong> Cyprus, Cyprus (lenos@ucy.ac.cy): 3.1.12<br />

Trott, David; I-Shou University, Taiwan (davidt@isu.edu.tw): 3.2.12<br />

Tsai , Chih-Hao ; National Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan (billy.tsai88@gmail.com): 2.2.11<br />

Tsui, Audrey Heung Heung; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (bizathh@nus.edu.sg): 1.4.15<br />

Tsukada, Osamu; Kagawa University, Japan (otsukada0929@gmail.com): 2.2.13<br />

Tung, Rosalie L.; Simon Fraser University, Canada (tung@sfu.ca): 3.2.11<br />

U<br />

Un, Annique; Northeastern University, USA (a.un@neu.edu): 1.1.9, 2.2.5<br />

Ungerer, Marius; Stellenbosch University , South Africa (marius.ungerer@usb.ac.za): 3.3.11<br />

Usman, Indrianawati; Airlangga University, Indonesia (indrianawati@gmail.com): 3.4.12<br />

V<br />

Vaaler, Paul; University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, USA (vaal0001@umn.edu): 0.1, 1.4.P, 1.5.9, 2.3.2, 3.4.10<br />

Vahter, Priit; University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham, United Kingdom (p.vahter@bham.ac.uk): 2.4.7<br />

Valentin, Andrew ; University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina, Charlotte, USA (andy.valentin@gmail.com): 1.3.15<br />

Van Assche, Ari; HEC Montreal, Canada (ari.van-assche@hec.ca): 1.5.4<br />

van der Eng, Pierre; Australian National University, Australia (pierre.vandereng@anu.edu.au): 2.3.11<br />

van Essen, Marc; Utrecht University, Netherlands (m.vanessen@uu.nl): 1.5.P<br />

van Hugten, Joeri; Tilburg University, Netherlands (j.g.w.j.vanhugten@tilburguniversity.edu): 3.2.14<br />

van Kranenburg, Hans; Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands (h.vankranenburg@fm.ru.nl): 2.1.15, 3.2.13<br />

van Veen , Kees; University <strong>of</strong> Groningen , Netherlands (k.van.veen@rug.nl): 1.5.8<br />

Vance, Charles M.; Loyola Marymount University, USA (cvance@lmu.edu): 1.1.15<br />

Vandegrift, Darcie; Drake University, USA (darcie.vandegrift@drake.edu): 2.1.7<br />

Vargas-Hernández, José G. ; University <strong>of</strong> Guadalajara, Mexico (jvargas2006@gmail.com): 3.1.10<br />

Varum, Celeste Amorim; University <strong>of</strong> Aveiro, Portugal (camorim@ua.pt): 3.2.14<br />

Vasconcellos, Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim; University <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, Brazil (epgdvasc@gmail.com): 2.4.13<br />

Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de; EBAPE - Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil (flavio.vasconcelos@fgv.br): 1.5.12<br />

Vashchilko, Tatiana ; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (tvashchi@uwo.ca): 3.1.9<br />

Vazquez, Elizabeth; WEConnect <strong>International</strong> , USA: 2.2.1<br />

Veale, Roberta; University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia (roberta.veale@adelaide.edu.au): 3.3.11<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 291


Veiga, Leonardo ; GEM Uruguay Team Leader; Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay: 1.4.1<br />

Venaik, Sunil; University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Australia (s.venaik@business.uq.edu.au): 1.4.14, 1.5.13<br />

Verbeke, Alain; University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada (alain.verbeke@haskayne.ucalgary.ca): 1.4.4<br />

Verhaal, J. Cameron; University <strong>of</strong> Utah, USA (cameron.verhaal@business.utah.edu): 2.1.15<br />

Vieira, Luciana Marques; Unisinos, Brazil (lmvieira@unisinos.br): 2.3.14<br />

Villar, Cristina; University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Spain (cristina.villar@uv.es): 2.2.11<br />

Vives, Luis ; ESADE Business School, Spain (luis.vives@esade.edu): 0.2, 2.2.9, 2.4.3, 3.4.3<br />

Voinea, Cosmina Lelia; Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands (c.voinea@fm.ru.nl): 2.1.15, 3.2.13<br />

Voisey, Christopher; Nyenrode Business University, Netherlands (c.voisey@nyenrode.nl): 2.4.2<br />

Volkema, Roger James; IAG/PUC-Rio, Brazil (volkema@american.edu): 3.1.7<br />

von Glinow, Mary Ann; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (vonglino@fiu.edu): 0.5<br />

von Wangenheim, Florian ; Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany (florian.wangenheim@wi.tu-muenchen.de):<br />

1.5.6<br />

Vora, Davina; SUNY New Paltz, USA (vorad@newpaltz.edu): 1.3.2, 2.3.9, 2.4.2, 3.1.13<br />

Vouga Chueke, Gabriel; ESPM/SP, Brazil (gabrielbrasil@gmail.com): 1.1.11<br />

Vural, Metin Onal; IE Business School, Spain (onalv@yahoo.com): 1.3.13<br />

Vyas, Bindu; King's College, USA (binduvyas@kings.edu): 3.4.1<br />

W<br />

Walker, Jennie; Thunderbird School <strong>of</strong> Global Management, USA (Jennie.Walker@thunderbird.edu): 2.4.12<br />

Wan, Feng; University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, United Kingdom (fw269@cam.ac.uk): 2.3.7<br />

Wan, Wendy W. N.; Sun Yat-Sen University, China (wendywan@live.com): 3.4.1<br />

Wang, Chengang; Bradford University , United Kingdom (c.wang9@bradford.ac.uk): 1.5.3<br />

Wang, Chengqi ; Nottingham University Business School, United Kingdom (chengqi.wang@nottingham.ac.uk): 2.1.4,<br />

2.3.13, 3.4.6<br />

Wang, Christina Yu-Ping ; National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan (cywang@mail.ndhu.edu.tw): 2.4.10<br />

Wang, Chung-Jen; National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan (wchungzen@gmail.com): 1.1.14<br />

Wang, Guocai; NanJing University, China (wgcxfeng@nju.edu.cn): 2.1.13<br />

Wang, Hsing-Kuo ; National Quemoy University, Taiwan (andywang@nqu.edu.tw): 3.1.15<br />

Wang, Huanglin; Utica College, USA (huwang@utica.edu): 2.4.13<br />

Wang, Liu; Providence College, USA (lwang@providence.edu): 2.2.12, 3.4.7<br />

Wang, Stephanie Lu; University <strong>of</strong> Miami, USA (slu@bus.miami.edu): 1.3.15, 2.1.12<br />

Wang, Tsai Chiao; National Chi Nan University, Taiwan: 1.5.11<br />

Wang, Yangwen; Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (yangwen@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk):<br />

2.4.15<br />

Wang, Yi ; University <strong>of</strong> Vaasa, Finland (wyi@uwasa.fi): 2.2.11<br />

Wang, Yi (Elizabeth); University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (y.e.wang@leeds.ac.uk): 3.4.6<br />

Wang, Yiqin; Harbin Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, China (yqw@hit.edu.cn): 2.3.15<br />

Wang, Yuandi; Technical University <strong>of</strong> Denmark, China (yuwan@business.dtu.dk): 1.1.9<br />

Wang, Yue; University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (yue.w@unsw.edu.au): 3.2.11<br />

Wang, Yu-Kai; Soochow University, Taiwan (ywang012@scu.edu.tw): 2.2.9<br />

Ward, Anna-Katherine; University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina, USA (annakward@hotmail.com): 3.1.13<br />

Warner-Soderholm, Gillian; Norwegian Business School, Norway (gillian.warner.soderholm@bi.no): 2.4.13<br />

Weber, Mark ; Argosy University-Twin Cities, USA (markjweber@aol.com): 1.5.6<br />

Weber, Thomas ; Old Dominion University , USA (tweber@odu.edu): 1.3.4<br />

Wechtler, Heidi; Sorbonne Business School, France (heidi_wechtler@yahoo.fr): 3.4.13<br />

Weerawardena, Jay; University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Australia (J.Weerawardena@business.uq.edu.au): 3.3.9<br />

Wei, Tian; Fudan University, China (weitian1983@gmail.com): 2.3.11<br />

Weiner, Robert J; George Washington University, USA (rweiner@gwu.edu): 2.4.5<br />

Welch, Catherine; The University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (catherine.welch@sydney.edu.au): 1.5.15, 2.1.10, 2.4.8<br />

Wells, Louis T.; Harvard Business School, USA (lwells@hbs.edu): 1.2.P<br />

Wen, Sonya H.; Tamkang University, Taiwan (sonya.wen@gmail.com): 1.3.13, 1.5.14<br />

Wernick, David Adam; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (wernick@gmail.com): 3.3.7<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 292


Westermann-Behaylo, Michelle; American University, USA (westerma@american.edu): 1.4.9<br />

Westjohn, Stanford; University <strong>of</strong> Toledo, USA (stanford.westjohn@utoledo.edu): 2.3.4<br />

Westney, D. Eleanor; York University, Canada (ewestney@schulich.yorku.ca): 1.2.P, 1.3.P, 1.4.3<br />

White III, George O. ; Old Dominion University , USA (gowhite@odu.edu): 1.3.4, 1.5.3, 2.1.15, 3.1.9<br />

Wilkinson, Adrian; Griffith University, Australia (adrian.wilkinson@griffith.edu.au): 1.1.13<br />

Wilks, Leighton Robert; University <strong>of</strong> Calgary, Canada (lrwilks@ucalgary.ca): 1.1.15<br />

Williams, Christopher; University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (cwilliams@ivey.uwo.ca): 2.3.13, 3.1.9<br />

Williamson, Peter; University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, United Kingdom (p.williamson@jbs.cam.ac.uk): 2.3.7<br />

Wisgickl, Alexander H.; WU Vienna, Austria (alexander.wisgickl@wu.ac.at): 3.4.11<br />

Witt, Michael A.; INSEAD, Singapore (michael.witt@insead.edu): 3.1.2<br />

Wocke, Albert; GIBS University <strong>of</strong> Pretoria, South Africa (wockea@gibs.co.za): 2.4.14<br />

Wolf, Bernard M.; York University, Canada (bwolf@yorku.ca): 2.4.6<br />

Wolf, Joachim; University <strong>of</strong> Kiel, Germany (wolf@bwl.uni-kiel.de): 1.4.14<br />

Wolff, Hans-Georg ; University <strong>of</strong> Erlangen-Nuremburg, Germany (hans-georg.wolff@wiso.uni-erlangen.de): 1.3.4<br />

Wolff, Michael; Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany (michael.wolff@wiwi.uni-goettingen.de): 1.5.7<br />

Woodley, James; Ramapo College, USA (jwoodley@ramapo.edu): 1.5.14<br />

Wu, Jun; Savannah State University, USA (wuj@savannahstate.edu): 2.4.12<br />

Wu, Sibin; University <strong>of</strong> Texas-Pan American, USA (sibinwu@utpa.edu): 2.1.11<br />

Wu, Zhan ; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (w.zhan@econ.usyd.edu.au): 3.1.4<br />

Wurtz, Olivier; Ecole Hotelière de Lausanne, Switzerland (olivier.wurtz@ehl.ch): 3.4.13<br />

Wysong, Scott; University <strong>of</strong> Dallas, USA (swysong@udallas.edu): 2.4.12<br />

X<br />

Xavier, Roland; GEM Malaysia Team Leader; Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia: 1.4.1<br />

Xia, Jun; West Virginia University, USA (jun.xia@mail.wvu.edu): 1.3.14, 2.2.14<br />

Xie, Zhenzhen; Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (xiezz@ust.hk): 1.3.5, 2.2.4<br />

Xiong, Jie; EMLYON Business School, France (jie@em-lyon.com): 1.1.5<br />

Y<br />

Yan, Lin; Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom (lin.yan@anglia.ac.uk): 2.4.11<br />

Yan, Zheng; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (zhengyan@nus.edu.sg): 3.1.11<br />

Yang, Hairu; Shanghai Finance University, China (cherryyang97@hotmail.com): 2.1.11<br />

Yang, Jiawen; George Washington University, USA (jwyang@gwu.edu): 1.1.15, 2.4.15<br />

Yang, Jing Yu; University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia (gracy.yang@sydney.edu.au): 3.1.14<br />

Yang, Kun; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (kyang001@fiu.edu): 2.2.9<br />

Yang, Monica; Adelphi University, USA (yang2@adelphi.edu): 2.3.7<br />

Yang, Wei; China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School, China (ywei@ceibs.edu): 2.3.11<br />

Yang, Young Soo; Yonsei University, Korea, South (seoukore@yonsei.ac.kr): 3.3.12<br />

Yao, Cheng-Wen; Tzu-Chi College <strong>of</strong> Technology, Taiwan (tomcwyao@gmail.com): 3.4.12<br />

Yao , Ying Sheng; National Chi Nan University, Taiwan: 1.5.11<br />

Yaprak, Atilla ; Wayne State University, USA (attila.yaprak@wayne.edu): 2.3.15, 3.1.13<br />

Yeganeh, Hamid; Winona State University, USA (hyeganeh@winona.edu): 2.1.14, 2.4.14<br />

Yen, Szu-Wei ; WuFeng University, Taiwan (sword@wfu.edu.tw): 2.3.13<br />

Yen, Yu-Fang; National Quemoy University, Taiwan (yvonne@nqu.edu.tw): 3.1.15<br />

Yeniyurt, Sengun; Rutgers University, USA (yeniyurt@business.rutgers.edu): 2.3.14<br />

Yi, Ha-Chin; Texas State University, USA (hy11@txstate.edu): 2.3.12<br />

Yi, Wang; Nottingham University Business School , China (yi.wang@nottingham.edu.cn): 2.1.13<br />

Yip, George S; China Europe <strong>International</strong> Business School, China (gyip@ceibs.edu): 3.1.1<br />

Yiu, Daphne; Chinese University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (dyiu@baf.msmail.cuhk.edu.hk): 3.1.2<br />

Yoo, TaeYoung; Hankuk Univesity <strong>of</strong> Foreign Studies, Korea, South (taeyoungyoo@hufs.ac.kr): 1.1.7<br />

Yoshikawa, Katsuhiko; Institute for Organizational Behavior Research, Recruit Management Solutions, Japan<br />

(katsuhiko_yoshikawa@recruit-ms.co.jp): 3.1.13<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 293


Yu, Kyoung-Hee; University <strong>of</strong> New South Wales, Australia (khyu@unsw.edu.au): 3.1.2<br />

Yu, Ming-Chu; National University <strong>of</strong> Tainan, Taiwan (yuminchu@mail.nutn.edu.tw): 1.1.13<br />

Yu, Pei-Li; National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan (h4584933@ms24.hinet.net): 1.5.14, 3.1.13<br />

Yu, Shu; National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore, Singapore (yushu@nus.edu.sg): 1.1.4<br />

Yu, Yang; Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Wellington, New Zealand (yang.yu@vuw.ac.nz): 3.4.9<br />

Yu, Zhihao ; Carleton University, Canada (zhihao.yu@gmail.com): 2.4.11<br />

Yurtkoru, E. Serra; Marmara University , Turkey: 2.4.10<br />

Z<br />

Zacharias, Suelen; Fundação Getúlio Vargas/FGV-EAESP, Brazil (suelen.zacharias@gmail.com): 1.4.8<br />

Zaefarian, Ghasem; University <strong>of</strong> Leeds, United Kingdom (g.zaefarian@leeds.ac.uk): 1.1.8<br />

Zaidi, Mahmood; University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, USA (mzaidi@csom.umn.edu): 1.4.15<br />

Zakaria, Norhayati ; University <strong>of</strong> Wollongong in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (yatizakaria11@gmail.com): 3.1.10<br />

Zakaria, Rimi; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (rimi_zakaria@yahoo.com): 2.1.6<br />

Zander, Ivo; Uppsala University, Sweden (ivo.zander@fek.uu.se): 2.1.4<br />

Zanfei, Antonello; University <strong>of</strong> Urbino, Italy (antonello.zanfei@uniurb.it): 1.1.3<br />

Zarco, Hugo; University <strong>of</strong> Navarra, Spain (hugo.zarco.jasso@gmail.com): 3.4.11<br />

Zdravkovic, Srdan; Bryant University, USA (szdravko@bryant.edu): 2.3.4<br />

Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary Elizabeth; University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, USA (zellm002@umn.edu): 1.3.2, 2.2.10<br />

Zelner, Bennet A.; University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park, USA (bzelner@rhsmith.umd.edu): 1.4.P, 2.4.14, 3.3.1<br />

Zeriti, Athina; Leeds University, United Kingdom (bnaz@leeds.ac.uk): 2.1.3<br />

Zhan, Feng; York University, Canada (fzhan09@schulich.yorku.ca): 3.1.8<br />

Zhan, James; Division on Investment and Enterprise, UNCTAD , Switzerland (James.Zhan@unctad.org): 1.3.1, 2.1.1<br />

Zhang, Feng; St. Mary's University, USA (fzhang@stmarytx.edu): 1.3.6, 3.1.11<br />

Zhang, Jie; China HuaRong Asset Management Corporation; Peking University, China (jacqueline35@sina.com):<br />

1.1.15<br />

Zhang, Junhou ; Old Dominion University, USA (jzhan012@odu.edu): 1.3.4<br />

Zhang, Megan (Min); University <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, Canada (mzhang.phd@ivey.ca): 3.3.6<br />

Zhang , Mike Mingqiong ; La Trobe University, Australia (m.zhang@latrobe.edu.au): 1.5.8<br />

Zhang, Si; Tsinghua University, China (si.si.zhn@gmail.com): 1.5.11<br />

Zhang, Xiaotian Tina; Saint Mary's College <strong>of</strong> California, USA (xz4@stmarys-ca.edu): 3.1.12<br />

Zhao, Eric Yanfei; University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Canada (eric.zhao@ualberta.ca): 3.4.10<br />

Zhao, Jing; Michigan State University, USA (zhaojin3@msu.edu): 3.2.13<br />

Zhao, Jinlin; Florida <strong>International</strong> University, USA (zhaoj@fiu.edu): 2.2.6<br />

Zhao, Minyuan; University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, USA (myzhao@umich.edu): 3.3.3<br />

Zhao, Yanhui; Michigan State University, USA (zhaoy@bus.msu.edu): 2.1.13<br />

Zheng, Yi; Nanjing University, China (zhengyi5828790@163.com): 2.1.13<br />

Zhong, Bi-Juan; Ohio State University, USA (zhong_40@fisher.osu.edu): 2.4.10, 3.1.5<br />

Zhong, Xing; Duke University, USA (xing.zhong@duke.edu): 1.5.1, 2.1.12<br />

Zhou, Jieyu; Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, China (jyzhouaa@ust.hk): 2.4.14<br />

Zhou, Kevin Zheng; University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR-PRC (kevinzhou@business.hku.hk): 2.3.13<br />

Zhou, Nan; Moscow School <strong>of</strong> Management SKOLKOVO, China (nzhou@skolkovo.ru): 3.2.14<br />

Zhu, Cherrie Jiuhua ; Monash University, Australia (cherrie.zhu@monash.edu): 1.5.8, 3.1.3<br />

Zimmermann, Joerg; European Comission, JRC - IPTS, Spain (jzi@gmx.de): 1.3.8<br />

Zock, Florian; University <strong>of</strong> Mannheim, Germany (fzock@mail.uni-mannheim.de): 1.1.9<br />

Zucchella, Antonella; University <strong>of</strong> Pavia, Italy (antonella.zucchella@unipv.it): 1.1.11, 3.3.9<br />

Zwerg-Villegas, Anne Marie; Universidad EAFIT, Colombia (azwerg@eafit.edu.co): 3.2.12<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 294


<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

54 th Annual Meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

"Rethinking the Roles <strong>of</strong> Business, Government and NGOs in the Global Economy"<br />

Washington, DC, USA<br />

June 30-July 3, <strong>2012</strong><br />

ISSN: 2078-0435<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business<br />

For more information, please contact:<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> Executive Secretariat<br />

G. Tomas M. Hult, Executive Director, or<br />

Tunga Kiyak, Managing Director<br />

Eppley Center<br />

465 N. Shaw Ln Rm 7<br />

Michigan State University<br />

East Lansing, MI 48824, USA<br />

Phone: +1 (517) 432-1452 • Fax: +1 (517) 432-1009<br />

E-mail: aib@aib.msu.edu • Web: http://aib.msu.edu/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!